alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Danny Ryan SASS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jeff E. THOMAS, Warden Federal Prison Camp Sheridan, Oregon, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 09-35830.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 2010.

Filed Dec. 8, 2010.

Stephen R. Sady, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant U.S. Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: TASHIMA, PAEZ, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*203MEMORANDUM *

Danny Ryan Sass appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a), and we affirm.

1. Sass contends that the Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP”) policies interpreting the Second Chance Act (“SCA”) are substantively and procedurally invalid. The SCA, however, had not yet become effective, and the BOP’s memoranda and regulations that are at issue on appeal had not yet been implemented when the BOP denied Sass’ only request for a transfer to a Residential Re-Entry Center (“RRC”) that is documented in the record. Accordingly, Sass’ claims challenging the BOP’s SCA-based policies are not ripe for review. *See Bova v. City of Medford,*564 F.3d 1093, 1096 (9th Cir.2009).

2. Sass also argues that the BOP, in denying his particular request for transfer to an RRC, violated 18 U.S.C. § 3621 by failing to consider the factors enumerated in that statute. We conclude that the record does not support this contention. We further note that, in any event, the BOP will evaluate any future RRC applications by Sass under its SCA-based policies, which we recently approved in the related case of *Sacora v. Thomas,*628 F.3d 1059, 1061 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 16, 2014

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

SELECTS A MANAGER FOR THE S FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced today that it has selected Blackrock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. as the 

investment manager for its Small Cap Stock Index Investment Fund (S Fund). The 

S Fund invests in a stock index fund that tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Completion Total 

Stock Market Index. The earnings consist of dividend income and gains or losses in the 

price of stocks. As of June 2014, the S Fund held $49.8 billion in assets. The contract 

will be for a one-year term, with four one-year options. 

The S Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Fixed Income Index Investment Fund, the 

Common Stock Investment Fund, and the International Stock Index Investment Fund –

are currently managed by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (BlackRock). 

 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is

similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. 

As of June 2014, TSP assets totaled approximately $417.8 billion, 

and retirement savings accounts were being maintained for more 

than 4.6 million TSP participants. Participants include Federal 

civilian employees in all branches of Government, employees of 

the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. 

Additional information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
#### TDM AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5138.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 9, 2010.

Gary J. Campbell, McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendanb-Appel-lee.

David W. Denenberg, Davidoff Malito & Hutcher LLP, New York, NY, Erica A. Franklin, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

*875ON MOTION

ORDER

TDM America, LLC (TDM) moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule in this appeal pending reexamination of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,542,614 and 5,794,862 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to stay the briefing schedule is granted. TDM is directed to inform the court within 21 days of a final decision concerning reexamination how it believes this appeal should proceed. The United States may also respond within that time.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is moot.

(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.
7 FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

*

atte

THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 6, 2013

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD AWARDS
BENCHMARKING CONTRACT TO DELOITTE CONSULTING, INC.

Washington, D.C. - In Fiscal Year 2014, the Federal
Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) has undertaken a
new strategic initiative to enhance the FRTIB’s business
intelligence. This effort starts by benchmarking our key
operational processes against other administrators and
financial institutions.

The insight gained as a result of the benchmarking work
performed under this contract will then be used by the
FRTIB to identify and track the metrics that will drive our
success in improving and delivering the services TSP
participants want.

The FRTIB awarded a contract with a potential of 18-month
period of performance and value of $2,901,517 to Deloitte
Consulting Inc.. There is no incumbent performing this
work currently.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees;
it is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private
employers. As of September 2013, TSP assets totaled
approximately $375 billion, and retirement savings accounts
were being maintained for more than 4.6 million TSP
Participants. Participants include Federal civilian
employees in all branches of Government, employees of the
U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services.
Additional information can be found at www.tsp.gov.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Kim Weaver
202-942-1640
(end)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2139 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for 
      the National Historical Publications and Records Commission.
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for 
      the National Historical Publications and Records Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2504(f) of 
title 44, United States Code is amended by striking ``(f)(1)'' and all 
that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(f)(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to the National 
Historical Publications and Records Commission such amounts as may be 
necessary to carry out this chapter for each of fiscal years 1994, 
1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### CARTER OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et al.

No. 24372.

Feb. 12, 1935.

Jas. A. Yeasey, L. G. Owen, and Forrest M. Darrough, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al, cause No. 24271, this day decided (170 Okla. 517, 41 P. [2d] 453), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2100 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2100

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the use of certain 
              agricultural byproducts in wine production.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the use of certain 
              agricultural byproducts in wine production.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF OTHER AGRICULTURAL BYPRODUCTS IN WINE PRODUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 5373 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to wine spirits) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 
        (3) and (4), respectively,
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(2) as determined by the Secretary, other agricultural 
        products or their residues,'', and
            (3) by adding at the end thereof the following: ``Wine 
        spirits derived from other than standard wines may not be used 
        to fortify a natural wine.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The following certification accompanies the issuers Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos.
33-8238, 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003.

In connection with the Annual Report of Torch Energy Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Vanaskey, Vice President, of Wilmington Trust Company, the trustee of the Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Torch Energy Royalty Trust and will be
retained by the Torch Energy Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: February 3,
2014



/s/ David A. VanaskeyDavid A. Vanaskey, Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                                       /s/ Stephen J. Boyle
                                                       -------------------------
                                                 Name: Stephen J. Boyle
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       52
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 26, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13704

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-60368-CV-PAS

CARLOS URQUILLA DIAZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KAPLAN UNIVERSITY,

a.k.a. Kaplan College,

a.k.a. Iowa College

Acquisition Corp.,

KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORP.,

WASHINGTON POST CO.,

ANDY ROSEN,

BEN WILCOX, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(August 26, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Urquilla Diaz appeals following entry of summary judgment in favor

of the defendants on his employment discrimination and retaliation claims under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a) and 3(a), and 42

U.S.C. § 1981. On the discriminatory termination claim, because the actions and

statements of the decision-makers did not demonstrate race discrimination without

inference, they did not constitute direct evidence. Diaz also failed to establish a

prima facie case of race discrimination with circumstantial evidence: he did not

show he was qualified for the jobs he held, and he did not identify a similarly

situated comparator who was treated more favorably. Moreover, even if he had

established a prima facie case, he did not show that the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons his employer proffered for terminating him were pretextual.

As for his retaliation claim, even if Plaintiff showed a prima facie case, Diaz still

failed to show that the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for terminating him

were pretextual and that the true purpose was retaliatory. Accordingly, the district

court did not err in granting the employer summary judgment on Diaz’s claims.

AFFIRMED.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 194 meeting to be held March 12-15, 2001, starting at 1 p.m. on March 12. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: March 12: 1 p.m. Plenary Session: (1) Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Proposed Revision 3 to Committee Terms of Reference; (5) Status of the Free Flight Select Committee Update; (6) Status of Working Group (WG)-2's document, “DO-XXX Implementation Requirements for Service Integrated Flight Operations and Air Traffic Management Using Addressed Data Link” (DO-INTEGRATION); (7) Working Group Reports; March 13: 8:30 a.m. (8) WG—2, Flight Operations and ATM Integration; (9) WG-1, Data Link Ops Concept & Implementation Plan; March 14: 8:30 a.m. (10) WG-2 and WG-1 meetings continue; 1 p.m. (11) WG-4, Service Provider Interface; March 15: 9 a.m. Plenary Session: (12) Review Meeting Agenda; (13) Review Status of WG-2 document, DO-INTEGRATION; (14) Working Group Reports; (15) Other Business; (16) Data and Location of Next Meeting; (17) Closing.

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or                     *http://www.rtca.org*                     (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 12, 2001.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 01-4152  Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
exv10w1



 







Exhibit 10.1




Remote Knowledge, Inc.




Summary of Director Compensation




At the present time, all of our outside, non-employee, directors are granted 10,000 options per
quarter for the three-year terms for which they are elected. At each annual meeting, the newly
elected Class A, B, or C directors will receive the new grant upon their election with an exercise
price based on the market price for our common shares on the date of election. The chairman of our
audit committee receives an additional 5,000 options per quarter as additional compensation for the
services in that position. All of the options vest at the rate of 10,000 options per quarter served
(in arrears). Should a director resign during his term of office, all unvested options expire. The
chairman of our audit committee’s additional options also vest at the rate of 5,000 per quarter in
arrears, also commencing on the date of his election.



August 11, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0178

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHAWN WAYNE MALATARE, 

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until September 27, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 22 2023

08/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0178
Exhibit 10.4


    EXHIBIT
      10.4

    


    Schedule
      Prepared in Accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation
      S-K

    


    The
      Senior Convertible Notes dated May 25, 2006 are substantially identical in
      all
      material respects except as to the noteholder and the principal
      amount.

    


    
      	
              Holder

            	 	 	
              Principal
                Amount

            	 
	
              Dolphin
                Offshore Partners, L.P.

            	 	
              $

            	
              300,000

            	 
	
              Radcliffe
                SPC, Ltd. for and on behalf of the Class A Convertible Crossover
                Segregated Portfolio

            	 	
              $

            	
              7,000,000

            	 
	
              LBI
                Group, Inc.

            	 	
              $

            	
              5,000,000

            	 
	
              Kamunting
                Street Master Fund, Ltd.

            	 	
              $

            	
              3,500,000

            	 
	
              Tribeca
                Global Convertible Investments Limited

            	 	
              $

            	
              2,500,000

            	 
	
              Capital
                Ventures International

            	 	
              $

            	
              3,000,000

            	 
	
              Evolution
                Master Fund Ltd. SPC, Segregated Portfolio M

            	 	
              $

            	
              3,500,000

            	 
	
              Highbridge
                International, LLC

            	 	
              $

            	
              3,750,000

            	 


    

    


    


    The
      text
      of the Senior Convertible Notes is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1
      to Nestor’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 26, 2006 (at Exhibit A thereto)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive Patent License; CG 
Industries, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant 
to CG Industries, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable nonexclusive license 
in the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. 
Patent Application Serial Number 09/437,727 entitled ``Automated 
Contact Gage System Using Three-Axis Contact Contour Comparator.''

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than April 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with Indian Head 
Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code OC4, 101 Strauss Avenue, 
Indian Head, MD 20640-5035.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology 
Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, 
Code 05T, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone 
(301) 744-6111.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.

    Dated: February 5, 2001.
J. L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3716 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ David E. HamerDavid E. HamerChief Accounting OfficerMarch 31, 2006