alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Andrew CHIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LECLAIRRYAN; William K. Grogan & Associates; William K. Grogan, Defendants-Appellees, and Chesterfield County, Defendant.

No. 13-8017.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Andrew Chien, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Rainsbury, Leelair Ryan, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Chien appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the claims against Le-Clair Ryan and William K. Grogan & Associates for the reasons stated by the district court. *Chien v. Chesterfield Cty.,*No. 1:13-cv-00993-LO-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 6, entered Nov. 7, 2013). We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the claims against William Grogan in his capacity as a Commissioner in Chancery on alternative grounds. *See MM ex rel. DM v. School Dist. of Greenville Cnty.,*303 F.3d 523, 536 (4th Cir.2002). While Grogan was a state actor, he is entitled to judicial immunity for actions taken within the scope of his official duties. *See Stump v. Sparkman,*435 U.S. 349, 362, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978) (defining factors used to determine whether an action is a judicial act). We deny Chien’s motion to expedite this decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TONY BANKS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 381 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James T. Sartain, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FirstCityFinancial Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ James T. Sartain
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-026)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announce a forthcoming meeting of the                               ( print page 10750)                            NASA Advisory Council, Minority Business Resource Advisory Committee.                     

# DATES:

Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Wednesday, March 21, 2001, 9 a.m. to 12 noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058-3696. Meeting held on Tuesday, March 20, 2001, will be in Building 111, Room 108 and the meeting held on Wednesday, March 21, 2001, will be in Building 1, Room 966. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ralph C. Thomas III, Code K, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 9K70, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546-0001, (202) 358-2088. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

—Overview of NASA 

—Small Disadvantaged Business Participation in Major NASA Contracts 

—Report on JPL/NASA High-Tech Small Business Conference 

—Action Items 

—NASA Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Program Update 

—Report of Chair 

—Public Comment 

—Report from MBRAC Sub Panels 

—Review of NASA's Top 10 Small Business Stories for 2000 

—Status of Open Committee Recommendations

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: February 13, 2001. 

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-3968 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               NAVARRE CORPORATION

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-80218, No. 33-86762, No. 333-31017 and No. 333-87143 as
amended) pertaining to the Navarre Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, and the
Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-58149 and No. 333-111733, pertaining
to the registration of Navarre Corporation common stock of our report dated May
13, 2004, except for footnote 5, as to which the date is June 21, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Navarre Corporation for
the year ended March 31, 2004.

/s/  Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young

Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 29, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 23, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00495

- CV

IN RE Alicia P. WILLEFORD

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

Proceeding

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Real party in interest

, Jimmy Willeford’s response was originally due on October 22,

2020. One extension of time has been granted to November 12, 2020. On November 20, 2020,

Willeford filed a motion requesting a twenty

- one day

- extension to file a response.

The motion is GRANTED and the response is due no later than December 11, 2020

. Counsel for Mr. Willeford is cautioned that further delays in filing the response are disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on November 23, 2020

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 11792 , styled in the Matter of the Marriage of Alicia P.

Willeford and Jimmy D. Willeford , pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas . T he

Honorable Richard Price issued the order at issue in this original proceeding

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          43,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,424)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,151
<PP&E>                                          88,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,566
<BONDS>                                         44,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           179  
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,046
<SALES>                                        209,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,372
<CGS>                                          159,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,646
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,646
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Rand Enterprises, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912BU-10-C-0039 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59801 

Terence Murphy, Esq. 

Karla J. Soloria, Esq. 

Christopher T. Page, Esq. 

Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 

Norfolk, VA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Jam es D. Mirynowski, Esq. 

Amanda G. Phily, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Philadelphia 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STEMPLER 

The parties have settled their dispute and requested that the Board enter 

judgment in favor of appellant. 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of 

$804,000.00. Interest shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from 

1June2015 until date of payment. 

Dated: 13 January 2016 

(Signatures continued) 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

Administrative udge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59801, Appeal of Rand 

Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3395]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration, Commerce


Export Trade Certificate of Review

ACTION: Notice of issuance of an amended export trade certificate of 
review, Application No. 96-A0005.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce has issued an amendment to the 
Export Trade Certificate of Review granted originally to Spirit Index, 
Ltd. on November 15, 1996. Notice of issuance of the Certificate was 
published in the Federal Register on November 21, 1996 (61 FR 59217).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa M. Bachman, Acting Director, 
Office of Export Trading Company Affairs, International Trade 
Administration, (202) 482-5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or at 
E-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5bab0a1b6b495bca1b4fbb1bab6fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6369786f6d4c65786d2268636f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act 
of 1982 (15 U.S.C. sections 4001-21) authorizes the Secretary of 
Commerce to issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. The regulations 
implementing Title III are found at 15 CFR Part 325 (2000).
    The Office of Export Trading Company Affairs (``OETCA'') is issuing 
this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), which requires the Department 
of Commerce to publish a summary of the certification in the Federal 
Register. Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any 
person aggrieved by the Secretary's determination may, within 30 days 
of the date of this notice, bring an action in any appropriate district 
court of the United States to set aside the determination on the ground 
that the determination is erroneous.

Description of Amended Certificate

    Export Trade Certificate of Review No. 96-00005, was issued to 
Spirit Index, Ltd. on November 15, 1996 (61 FR 59217, November 21, 
1996). Spirit Index, Ltd.'s Certificate of Review has been amended to 
change the name of the Certificate holder from Spirit Index, Ltd. 
originally located at 342 White Horse Pike, Clementon, New Jersey 
08021-4345, to Thomas P. Kaczur at 259 Rockaway Street, Islip Terrace, 
New York 11752-1104.
    A copy of the amended certificate will be kept in the International 
Trade Administration's Freedom of Information Records Inspection 
Facility, Room 4102, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: February 5, 2001.
David C. Bowie,
Acting Deputy, Assistant Secretary for Service Industries and Finance.
[FR Doc. 01-3395 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Form 8864

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Fuels Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8864 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-1924

2017

Attachment 

Sequence No. 141

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

Caution: You cannot claim any amounts on Form 8864 that you claimed (or will claim) on Form 720 (Schedule C), Form 

8849, or Form 4136. 

Claimant has a certificate from the producer or importer of biodiesel or renewable diesel reported on lines 1 through 6 

below and, if applicable, claimant also has a statement from the reseller. Claimant has no reason to believe that the 

information in the certificate or statement is false. Claimant may need to attach a copy of the certificate and statement. 

See Certification in the instructions.

Type of Fuel

(a) 

Number of Gallons 

Sold or Used

(b) 

Rate

(c) 

Column (a) x Column (b) 

1 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) . . . . . . . . . 1 

2 Agri-biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Renewable diesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) included in a biodiesel 

mixture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Agri-biodiesel included in a biodiesel mixture . . . . . . 5

6 Renewable diesel included in a renewable diesel mixture . . 6

7 Qualified agri-biodiesel production . . . . . . . . . 7 

8 Add lines 1 through 7. Include this amount in your income for 2017 (see instructions) . . . . . 8

9 Biodiesel and renewable diesel fuels credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, 

estates, and trusts (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

10 Add lines 8 and 9. Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, go to line 11. Partnerships and 

S corporations, stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, stop here and report 

this amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

11 Amount allocated to patrons of the cooperative or beneficiaries of the estate or trust (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

12 Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, subtract line 11 from line 10. Report this amount on Form 3800, 

Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 25778F Form 8864 (2017)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 07, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 07, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0182. THE COASTAL BANK v. LARRY RAWLINS, ET, AL.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV1301299
**Exhibit 31.2  —  Certification of Chief Financial Officer  —  Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302**
I, Ron D. Kessinger, certify that:
6. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Triad Guaranty Inc.; 7. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 8. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 9. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:   d) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;   e) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and   f) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
10. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors:   c) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and   d) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   March 12, 2004       /s/ Ron D. Kessinger
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00544-CR

TERESA FLORES FERNANDEZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-CR-8690-DC

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 25, 2024