T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSEP H TRI BB LE , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J I M G I B B O N S , G o v e rn o r ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 17810 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 2 1 6 - ECRV PC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da E dw a r d C . R e e d, J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose ph T ribb l e, a N evada s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tthe c ondi t i ons of

hi s pa r ol e he a r i ng vi ol a t e d hi s E i ghth a nd F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e nt r i ght s a nd the E x P os tF a c t o C l aus e of the U . S . C ons t i tut i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED FEB 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17810 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . N e ls o n v . H

e is s , 271 F . 3d 891, 893 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( d is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im ) ; Y an ezv. U

ni ted States , 63 F .3 d8 7 0 , 8 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 5 ) ( ju d g m e n t o n th e p le a d in g s ) . W e a f f irm . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dT r ib b le ’s E ig h th A m e n d m e n t c la im because the procedures use d athi s par ol e heari ng do no toffe nd “ cont em po rary st andards of dece ncy. ” H ell i ngv. McKi nn ey , 5 0 9 U .S . 2 5 , 3 6 ( 1 9 9 3 ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d T r i bbl e ’ s F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e ntdue p r o c e s s c la im b e c au s e N e v a d alaw d o e s n o t c r e a te alib e rtyin te r e s t in p a r o le . See Moo r v . P alm er , 6 0 3 F .3 d6 5 8 , 6 6 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ; s e e al s o W i lki ns on v . D ot

s on , 5 4 4 U .S . 7 4 , 8 1 - 8 2 ( 2 0 0 5 ) ( p r is o n e rm a yc h a lle n g e p r o c e du r e s u s e din p a r o le hear i ng un der s ec t i on 19 83 , prov i ded h e does notse ek “ i m m edi at e or s peedi er r e le a s e ” ) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssedT ri b b l e’ s E x P o stF act o cl ai m b ecau se he di d nota l l e ge r e tr oa c t i ve appl i c a t i on of al a w tha ts i gni f

i c a nt l yr i s ke d i nc r e a s i ng h is p u n is h m e n t. Se e i d. at66 3 (i n the parol e c on t ext , the ex po stfa ct o i nq ui ry f oc us e s on w he the rthe a m e nde d rul e c r e a t e s as i gni f i c a ntr i s k of

pr ol ongi ng a p r is o n e r ’s in c a r c e r a tio n ) .09- 17810 3 T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d en yi n g T ri b b l e’ s req u est fo r ap p o i n tm en to f co u n sel b ecau se h e fai l edt o sh o w ex cep t i o n al ci rcu m st an ces. Se e A ldabe v . A ldabe , 6 1 6 F .2 d1 0 8 9 , 1 0 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 0 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . T r ib b le ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . A F F I R M E D .