alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), the undersigned, constituting the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer of Mega Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the issuer for the fiscal quarter then
ended.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  | MEGA GROUP, INC.
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 22, 2003 |  |  |  | By:             
|                      |  |  |  |                 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 22, 2003 |  |  |  | By:             
|                      |  |  |  |
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2139

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and

Records Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2504(f) of title 44, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘(f)(1)’’ and all that follows through

5 the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(f)(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to

7 the National Historical Publications and Records Commis8 sion such amounts as may be necessary to carry out this
2

HR 2139 RFS

1 chapter for each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,

2 and 1998.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6083.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 8, 2014.

Decided: April 16, 2014.

Lorenzo Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. *25860(b) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert L. ButchofskyRobert L. ButchofskyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerQLT Inc.
 45
rom 8813 Partnership Withholding Tax Payment (Section 1446)

(September 1989) > See separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813.
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service For calendar year 19 or other tax year beginning 19 ending

OMB No 1545-1119
Expires 7-31-92

19

1 PARTNERSHIP'S name, address, and ZIP code (|If a foreign address, see the Instructions.) 2 Partnership's U.S. employer
identification number

3_ Amount of this payment. - - ------------------------------------- 3

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813.

Form 8813 (9-89)

# U.S. GRO: 1989-262-151/00026
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew M. Alexander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








BY:
/s/ Andrew M. AlexanderAndrew M. AlexanderPresident/Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2010
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1940

To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing suspension of duty

on cyclosporine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing

suspension of duty on cyclosporine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY EXISTING SUSPEN4 SION OF DUTY ON CYLCLOSPORINE.

5 Heading 9902.29.88 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

7 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/96’’.
2

•HR 1940 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

16 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

18 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

19 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for GSI Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”). I, Michael G. Rubin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, solely for the purpose of satisfying therequirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

|   | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL G. RUBIN                                       |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                            |   |
|   |   | **Michael G. Rubin President and Chief Executive Officer** |   |

May 9, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,075
<SECURITIES>                                       690
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,577
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         973,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 966,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        800,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,102
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   966,509
<SALES>                                         14,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,865
<CGS>                                           12,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,027
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.87)


</TABLE>
#### Reginald Donnell RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Carrie WRIGHT; Karl Heinrich; Lauren Osteen; Johanna Heinrich; John Seal; Traci Seal; John Does 1-10; Melissa Knighten, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-40977

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 2010.

Reginald Donell Rice, Amarillo, TX pro se.

Mishell B. Kneeland, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, Joseph A. Barbknecht, Barbknecht Firm, Plano, TX, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

*889PER CURIAM: *

Reginald Donell Rice, Texas prisoner # 1436278, filed a civil rights complaint seeking damages, unrelated to the conditions of his incarceration, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Rice was represented by counsel and paid the filing fee. The complaint was related to Idalesyia Nicole Knighten, a child born on Januaryl6, 2007, and who died on March 29, 2007, of sudden infant death syndrome while in foster care at the direction of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. In his amended complaint, Rice alleged that Knighten was his daughter and that Wright and Osteen, in violation of the Constitution, had deprived him of his right to have a relationship with Knighten through their actions. Rice also brought state law wrongful death and survival actions against all of the defendants. The defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because Rice failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted as he failed to allege sufficiently that he was Knighten’s father. The district court granted the motions to dismiss because Rice’s allegations of paternity were merely speculative.

A district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) is subject to de novo review. *In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation,*495 F.3d 191, 205 (5th Cir.2007). A plaintiff fails to state a claim when the complaint does not contain “ ‘enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ ” *Id.*(quoting *Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,*550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)). “Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact).” *Twombly,*550 U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (quotation marks, citations, and footnote omitted). Rice has failed to brief whether the district court’s dismissal of his action for failure to state a claim was error. *See Grant v. Cuellar,*59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir.1995). Accordingly, Rice has not shown error in the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his claims. Rice’s motion to supplement his brief is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
June 22, 1998



Rabar Market Research
10 Bank St. - Suite 830
White Plain, N.Y. 10606

Attention:  Mr. John Dreyer &
                    Mr. Paul Rabar

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund

Dear Mr. Dreyer & Mr. Rabar:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 1999
and make the attached  modification  on Rider 1. The  incentive  fee will now be
paid annually  instead of  quarterly.  All other  provisions  of the  Management
Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.


By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

RABAR MARKET RESEARCH

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
Exhibit 32.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in
     this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
     condition and results of operations of the Company.

-------------------------
Anastasios N. Kyriakides,
Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer

-------------------------
Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2007
Exhibit 32.1
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
  /s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. RitondaroChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                         EXHIBIT 10.51



                        EARTHSHELL CONTAINER CORPORATION


                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                      TO
                           1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                      OF
                        EARTHSHELL CONTAINER CORPORATION

     The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") of EarthShell Container 
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is hereby amended by 
adding to Section 4(e) of the Plan the following sentence:

     "Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Director Option granted for the 
1996 fiscal year shall have an exercise price equal to 80% of the price per 
share at which the Company's Common Shares are first sold to the public 
pursuant to the initial public offering of the Company."
     
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be 
duly executed as of this 1st day of May, 1997 and is effective as of January 
8, 1997.

                                     EARTHSHELL CONTAINER CORPORATION, a 
                                     Delaware corporation

                                     By:  /s/ SIMON K. HODSON
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Simon K. Hodson,
                                          Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF VESTA INSURANCE GROUP, INC.



Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)



| |  | Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc. conducts non-standard automobile agency operations through approximately 31 subsidiaries operating within the United States.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



J. Gordon Gaines, Inc. (Delaware)



| |  | Florida Select Insurance Agency, Inc. (Florida)
| | - | -----------------------------------------------



| |  | Select Insurance Services, Inc. (Florida) d/b/a California Select Insurance Agency
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Vesta Fire Insurance Corporation (Illinois)



| |  | American Founders Financial Corporation (Arizona)
| | - | -------------------------------------------------



| |  | Laurel Life Insurance Company (Texas)
| | - | -------------------------------------



| |  | American Founders Life Insurance Company (Texas)
| | - | ------------------------------------------------



| |  | Bradford Investments, LC (Louisiana)
| | - | ------------------------------------



| |  | Florida Select Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Florida)
| | - | -------------------------------------------------



| |  | Florida Select Insurance Company (Florida)
| | - | ------------------------------------------



| |  | Shelby Casualty Insurance Company (Illinois)
| | - | --------------------------------------------



| |  | The Shelby Insurance Company (Illinois)
| | - | ---------------------------------------



| |  | Texas Select Lloyds Insurance Company (Texas)
| | - | ---------------------------------------------



| |  | Texas Select Lloyds, Inc. (Texas)
| | - | ---------------------------------



| |  | Vesta Capital Insurance Syndicate, Inc. (Illinois)
| | - | --------------------------------------------------



| |  | The Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Company, Ltd. (Hawaii)
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Vesta Insurance Corporation (Illinois)
| | - | --------------------------------------



Vesta Timber Co., LLC (Alabama)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           95972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   108098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     557377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                880597
<PP&E>                                          326651
<DEPRECIATION>                                   89582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1389163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           962782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10693
<OTHER-SE>                                      379069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1389163
<SALES>                                        2468343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2468343
<CGS>                                          2042838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2042838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                714967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (301976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (301976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (301976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)


</TABLE>