alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1962 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1962

 To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on 6-
  Hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium, and 
                            ammonium salts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1993

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on 6-
  Hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium, and 
                            ammonium salts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 6-HYDROXY-2-
              NAPHTHALENE-SULFONIC ACID, AND ITS SODIUM, POTASSIUM, AND 
              AMMONIUM SALTS.

    Heading 9902.29.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        89,090
<DEPRECIATION>                (43,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                88,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,299,555
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   501,700
<COMMON>                      300,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (5,212,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  (4,410,623)
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,047,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,047,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,047,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,047,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2047

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for employment

in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1993

Mrs. BENTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel

for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of

the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and sections 12106,

5 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, as ap6 plicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for the vessel Top Duck, Maryland,

9 State registration number MD 8867 V.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley McCRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-14767

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 2014.

Andrea G. Hoffman, Kathleen Mary Sal-yer, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, William H. Beckerleg, Jr., Joanne Fine, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Stanley McCray, Miami, FL, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley McCray appeals *pro se*the denial of his postjudgment motion to amend and correct his presentence investigation report. McCray argues that the presen-tencing investigation report erroneously stated that he had been convicted of aggravated assault when he instead had pleaded guilty to a lesser-included charge and that his sentence should not have been *860enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act. McCray filed his motion nearly seven years after his criminal conviction became final. We vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

We review *de novo*jurisdictional issues. *United States v. Lopez,*562 F.3d 1309, 1311 (11th Cir.2009).

The district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain McCray’s motion several years after his sentence was imposed. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 governs the preparation of presentencing reports, but it provides no jurisdiction for correcting a report after a judgment of conviction and sentence has been entered. Fed.R.Crim.P. 32; *United States v. Fischer,*821 F.2d 557, 558 (11th Cir.1987). An error in the report may instead be challenged on direct appeal. *United States v. Peloso,*824 F.2d 914, 915 (11th Cir.1987). Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 permits a district court to correct a sentence for an arithmetical, technical, or other clear error, but only within 14 days of sentencing. Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). And Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 permits a district court, at any time, to correct a clerical error or an error in the record arising from oversight or omission. Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. But a motion under Rule 36 may not be used to make substantive alterations to a sentence. *United States v. Portillo,*363 F.3d 1161, 1164 (11th Cir.2004). And a defendant cannot challenge the accuracy of his presentencing investigation report for the first time in a collateral attack. *Simmons v. United States,*777 F.2d 660, 661-62 (11th Cir.1985). Moreover, a collateral attack by McCray would be barred as successive unless he first obtained permission from this Court to file his motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain McCray’s motion, we vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Threat Reduction Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics).

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on Thursday April 5, 2001, at the Pentagon.
    The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of 
Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) on technology 
security, counterproliferation, chemical and biological defense, 
sustainment of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related 
to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II, (1994)), it 
has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly the meeting will be 
closed to the public.

DATE: Thursday April 5, 2001, (8 a.m. to 6 p.m.).

ADDRESS: Room 3E869, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colonel Rick Baker, Defense Threat 
Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, 
VA 22060-6201. Phone: (703) 767-4759.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-4046 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
NUMBER 13-12-00107-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

DANIEL COSTILLA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 28th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Daniel Costilla, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated sexual 

assault in trial court cause number 10-CR-1597-A. The trial court has certified that this 

Ais a plea-bargain case, and the Defendant has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(a)(2).
2

On February 8, 2012, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On June 12, 2009, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response 

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that 

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be 

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this 

appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

24th day of May, 2012.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 
Council will meet on Wednesday, March 7th, 2001. The meeting will 
convene at 6 pm at the Children's Museum, 300 Congress Street, 
Auditorium, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational/cultural, community and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and 
Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and 
make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with 
respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and 
the operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Approval of minutes from December 6, 2000.
    2. Nomination and Election Process.
    3. Annual Report.
    4. Speaker series.
    5. Guest Speaker.
    6. Other business.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-
8667.

    Dated: January 26, 2001.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 01-4006 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1350-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Montana, (FEMA-1350-DR), dated December 6, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 30, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Montana is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 6, 2000: 

McCone County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-4137 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Corporate Passive Activity Loss and Credit Limitations OMB No. 1545-1091

Form 8810

 Attach to the corporation’s tax return (personal service

corporations and closely held corporations only). Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Name Employer identification number

2004 Passive Activity Loss

1a Current year income (from Worksheet 2, column (a)) 1a

1b

b Current year deductions and losses (from Worksheet 2,

column (b))

c 1c

1d

d

2

2

3

3

4

4

6 6

7

7

8

8

9

9

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8810 (2004)

 See separate instructions.

Prior year unallowed losses (from Worksheet 2, column (c))

Combine lines 1a, 1b, and 1c. If the result is net income or zero, see page 7 of the

instructions

Closely held corporations enter net active income and see page 7 of the instructions.

Personal service corporations enter -0- on this line

Unallowed passive activity deductions and losses. Combine lines 1d and 2. If the

result is net income or zero, see the instructions for lines 1d and 3 on page 7. Otherwise,

go to line 4

Total deductions and losses allowed. Add the income, if any, on lines 1a and 2

and enter the result (see page 7 of the instructions)

Prior year unallowed credits (from Worksheet 5, column (b))

Add lines 5a and 5b

Enter the tax attributable to net passive income and net active income (see page 9 of

the instructions)

Unallowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 7 from line 6. If the result is zero or

less, enter -0-

Allowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 8 from line 6 (see page 11 of the

instructions)

2004 Passive Activity Credits

b

5a 5a

5b

Current year credits (from Worksheet 5, column (a))

( )

( )

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 10356T

Part III Election To Increase Basis of Credit Property

10 If the corporation disposed of its entire interest in a passive activity or former passive activity in a fully taxable

transaction, and the corporation elects to increase the basis of credit property used in that activity by the unallowed

credit that reduced the property’s basis, check this box (see page 11 of the instructions) 

Name of passive activity disposed of 

Description of the credit property for which the election is being made 

Amount of unallowed credit that reduced the property’s basis  $

11

12

13

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheets 1 and 2 on page 6 before completing Part I.

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheet 5 on page 10 before completing Part II.

2004
#### Charles GILLENWATER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank L. CIKUTOVICH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-7783.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Charles Gillenwater, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Gillenwater appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gillenwater v. Cikutovich,*No. 5:13—ct—03135-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET  OF EAT AT  JOE'S  LTD.  AS OF MARCH  31,  1999  AND THE  RELATED
STATEMENTS OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         189
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692
<PP&E>                                         6590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2635
<BONDS>                                        1343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     3648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7628
<SALES>                                        847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               847
<CGS>                                          258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-63485) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Opinion
Research Corporation, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45412) pertaining
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Opinion Research Corporation,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-46530) pertaining to the Stock Purchase
Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Designated Employees and Consultants and
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50732) and related Prospectus
pertaining to shares of common stock of Opinion Research Corporation of our
report dated February 9, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Opinion Research Corporation included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
March 23, 2001