alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1773

To reauthorize the rural health care transition grant program established

under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, to direct the

Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference in making

grants under such program to hospitals that establish consortia with

other providers in the communities in which the hospitals are located,

and to revise the frequency of the Secretary’s reports on the program

to Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. EMERSON (for himself, Mr. GUNDERSON, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. STENHOLM,

Mr. LANCASTER, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. SLATTERY, Mr.

DURBIN, and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To reauthorize the rural health care transition grant program

established under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

Act of 1987, to direct the Secretary of Health and

Human Services to give preference in making grants

under such program to hospitals that establish consortia

with other providers in the communities in which the

hospitals are located, and to revise the frequency of

the Secretary’s reports on the program to Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1773 IH

1 SECTION 1. REVISIONS TO RURAL HEALTH CARE TRANSI2 TION GRANT PROGRAM.

3 (a) REAUTHORIZATION THROUGH FISCAL YEAR

4 1997.—Section 4005(e)(9) of the Omnibus Budget Rec5 onciliation Act of 1987 is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘1989 and’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘1989,’’; and

8 (2) by striking ‘‘1992’’ and inserting ‘‘1992

9 and $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1993

10 through 1997’’.

11 (b) PREFERENCE IN AWARDING GRANTS FOR HOS12 PITALS ESTABLISHING CONSORTIA OF COMMUNITY PRO13 VIDERS.—Section 4005(e)(5) of such Act is amended in

14 the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting after

15 ‘‘the Administrator’’ the following: ‘‘shall give preference

16 to a hospital whose proposed project is to establish a con17 sortium with other providers of health care services in the

18 community in which the hospital is located to integrate

19 the delivery of such services to individuals in the commu20 nity, and’’.

21 (c) REVISION OF FREQUENCY OF SECRETARY’S RE22 PORTS TO CONGRESS.—Section 4005(e)(8)(B) of such Act

23 is amended by striking ‘‘6 months’’ and inserting ‘‘12

24 months’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                 0<F1>
<SECURITIES>                           0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                          0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                           0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                            0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0<F1>
<PP&E>                                 0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                         0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         0<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0<F1>
<BONDS>                                0<F1>
<COMMON>                               0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                            0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                             0<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           0<F1>
<SALES>                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0<F2>
<CGS>                                  0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                           0<F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                         0<F2>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0<F2>
<CHANGES>                              0<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                           0<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0<F2>
        

<FN>
<F1>See September 30, 1997 Statement of Net Assets in Liquidation.
<F2>See September 30, 1997 Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation.
</FN>



</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1922

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent appropriation

for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. EVERETT)

introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees

on Appropriations and Rules

A BILL

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent

appropriation for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Pay For

4 Performance Act’’.

5 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PERMANENT APPROPRIA6 TION FOR MEMBERS’ PAY.

7 Subsection (c) of section 130 of the joint resolution

8 entitled ‘‘Joint resolution making continuing appropria9 tions for the fiscal year 1982, and for other purposes’’
2

•HR 1922 IH

1 (Public Law 97–51; 2 U.S.C. 31 note) is amended by

2 striking out ‘‘Effective’’ and by inserting ‘‘(1) Except to

3 the extent provided by paragraph (2), effective’’ and by

4 inserting at the end the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(2) If Congress has not passed all general appro6 priation bills before the beginning of a fiscal year, then

7 the appropriation contained in paragraph (1) shall not be

8 effective with respect to such fiscal year.’’.

9 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AP10 PROPRIATION.

11 It shall not be in order in either the House of Rep12 resentatives or the Senate to consider the general appro13 priation bill making appropriations for the legislative

14 branch for any fiscal year unless and until other general

15 appropriation bills for such fiscal year have been presented

16 to the President for signature under section 7 of Article

17 I of the Constitution.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1857 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1857

 To repeal the Helium Act, to require the Secretary of the Interior to 
    sell Federal real and personal property held in connection with 
  activities carried out under the Helium Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Helium Act, to require the Secretary of the Interior to 
    sell Federal real and personal property held in connection with 
  activities carried out under the Helium Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    The Helium Act (50 U.S.C. 161 et seq.) is repealed.

SEC. 2. SALE OF PROPERTY.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall sell or otherwise dispose of, 
at the best possible terms available to the United States, all 
facilities, equipment, and other real or personal property, or rights 
thereto, held by the United States in connection with activities 
carried out under the Helium Act, unless such facilities, equipment, or 
other real or personal property, or rights thereto, are required for 
other Federal purposes.

SEC. 3. SALE OF HELIUM RESERVE.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall sell or otherwise dispose of, 
at the best possible terms available to the United States, all helium 
reserves held by the United States other than amounts required for the 
specific immediate needs of the Federal Government. Such sale shall be 
conducted in a manner consistent with the orderly conduct of commercial 
helium markets.

SEC. 4. REDUCTION OF FEDERAL DEBT.

    All funds received pursuant to sections 3 and 4, and all amounts 
remaining in the helium production fund established under section 6(f) 
of the Helium Act, shall be considered full repayment of loans made 
under section 12 of the Helium Act. Such funds shall be applied, 
subject to appropriations, solely to the retirement of outstanding 
United States Government debt, and may not be obligated or expended for 
any other purpose, notwithstanding any other provision of law that does 
not specifically reference this section.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Navarre
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2005 (the "Annual
Report"), I, Eric H. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.       The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


June 14, 2005
                                By /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                       Eric H. Paulson
                                       Chairman of the Board, President
                                       and Chief Executive Officer
Am. No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated 2004 Non-Employee Director Incentive Pl



 Exhibit 10.8 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION 
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The first sentence in Section V of the Petrohawk Energy Corporation Second Amended and Restated 2004
Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “The aggregate number of shares of Restricted Stock, shares of Incentive Stock and Shares which may be issued under Stock Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 600,000.” 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Plan effective this 12th day of July, 2006. 
  

			
	Petrohawk Energy Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/  Floyd C. Wilson
	Name:	 	       Floyd C. Wilson
	Title:	 	        President, Chief Executive Officer
        and Chairman of the Board
#### Tania Raquel MOLINA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72104.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Dave Linn, Esquire Thorp, WA, pro se.

OIL, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tania Raquel Molina, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In her opening brief, Molina fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s reasons for denying her December 2010 motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of status. *See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder,*706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir.2013) (a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening brief).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Molina’s sole contention that she suffered ineffective assistance of counsel, where she did not raise this issue before the BIA in her December 2010 motion to reopen and therefore failed to exhaust her administrative remedies in this petition for review. *See Tijani v. Holder,*628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir.2010).

*559We also lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s October 24, 2011, order denying Molina’s motion to reconsider and reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel because she failed to timely petition this court for review of that decision. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *Singh v. INS,*815 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

In light of our disposition, we need not consider Molina’s contention that the rationale of *Mezo v. Holder,*615 F.3d 616 (6th Cir.2010), applies to her case, because this concerns her ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which is not properly before us.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2186

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on dimethyl succinyl succinate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. RAVENEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on dimethyl

succinyl succinate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYL SUCCINYL SUCCINATE.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.12 Dimethyl succinyl succinate

(provided for in

subheading

2917.19.40) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95

’’.
2

•HR 2186 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS****ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Interstate Bakeries Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended August 21, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:October 6, 2006       /s/ Antonio C. Alvarez II     Antonio C. Alvarez II    Chief Executive Officer       Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, thiscertification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in anyregistration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**§ 302 CERTIFICATION**
          I, Steven L. Brink, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quiksilver, Inc.;
          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: January 27, 2004 /s/ Steven L. Brink    Steven L. Brink  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Anthony MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5144.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 27, 2011.

Anthony Moore, Bismark, ND, pro se.

Jeffrey A. Regner, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Anthony Moore moves for a remand and moves for the trial court to forward the record. The United States opposes. Moore replies.

Moore may include in his brief any request for remand or other relief. Moore has not established that remand is appropriate at this time. Concerning the record, it is not necessary for the trial court to forward the record at this time. The *357parties may include in an appendix to their brief any relevant documents that were before the trial court.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motions are denied. The United States’ brief is due within 40 days of the date of filing of this order.

(2) Moore must either pay the $455 docketing fee within 14 days of the date of filing of this order or file a completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (forms enclosed).