alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1




                 Exhibit 23 - Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the use of our report dated January 21, 1997, included in the 1996
Annual Report to  Shareholders  of Triad Guaranty Inc.,  included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Triad Guaranty Inc.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of Triad Guaranty Inc.
listed in Item 14(a).  These schedules are the  responsibility  of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our  opinion,   the  financial  statement  schedules  referred  to  above,  when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-75668) pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of
Triad  Guaranty  Inc. and the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  33-96550)
pertaining to the Triad  Guaranty Inc.  401(k) Profit Sharing Plan of our report
dated January 21, 1997, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
included  in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) of Triad  Guaranty  Inc.,  and our
report  included  in the  preceding  paragraph  with  respect  to the  financial
statement schedules.



/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
--------------------
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 20, 1997
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIS DOMINGUEZ, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 143

- CR

Appeal from the

243 rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20080D03880 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s out of time motion for extension of time to file the

brief until October 23 , 2013

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Joseph D. Vasquez

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney

,

prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 23 , 201 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 1st day of October

, 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2223 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2223

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in 
       Dallas, Texas, as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas, 
Texas, is designated as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 is 
deemed to be a reference to the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.14

ULTIMATE ELECTRONICS, INC.  BONUS PLAN  FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED  JANUARY 31, 2005

Under our 2005 bonus plan, 60% of the annual incentive bonuses to be awarded to executive officers and vice presidents is based on a matrix that ties to the
Company's budgeted comparable store sales and pre-tax, pre-bonus operating income, with a 100% payout upon obtaining the Company's comparable store sales goal of 3.5% to 5.0%
and a pre-tax, pre-bonus operating income goal of $9.0 million to $10.49 million.

2005 BONUS PLAN MATRIX(1)

|Pre-bonus Operating Income |  |    |   |    |   |    |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |  
|-------------------------- |  | -- | - | -- | - | -- | - | --- | - | --- | - | --- | - | --- | - | --- | - | --- | -
|
|
|
|0% to < 1.0%               |  | 30 | % | 40 | % | 50 | % | 55  | % | 65  | % | 75  | % | 85  | % | 100 | % | 110 | %
|1.0% to < 2.0%             |  | 35 | % | 45 | % | 55 | % | 60  | % | 70  | % | 80  | % | 90  | % | 110 | % | 120 | %
|2.0% to < 3.5%             |  | 40 | % | 60 | % | 60 | % | 70  | % | 75  | % | 90  | % | 100 | % | 120 | % | 130 | %
|3.5% to < 5.0%             |  | 45 | % | 60 | % | 70 | % | 75  | % | 80  | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | 130 | % | 140 | %
|5.0% to < 7.5%             |  | 50 | % | 60 | % | 75 | % | 80  | % | 90  | % | 110 | % | 120 | % | 140 | % | 150 | %
|7.5% to < 10%              |  | 50 | % | 60 | % | 75 | % | 90  | % | 100 | % | 120 | % | 130 | % | 150 | % | 160 | %
|> 10%                      |  | 50 | % | 60 | % | 75 | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | 130 | % | 140 | % | 160 | % | 170 | %

---

The
remaining 40% of the annual incentive bonuses to be awarded to executive officers and vice presidents is a fixed dollar bonus based on the attainment of certain individual
performance objectives by each executive officer or vice president, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2 (302 Cert)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Chieffo, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-Q of Pruco  Life of New
Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/ John Chieffo
-------------

John Chieffo
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2115 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2115

               For the relief of Gorsha Michaelovich Sur.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Gorsha Michaelovich Sur.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN NATURALIZATION REQUIREMENTS FOR GORSHA 
              MICHAELOVICH SUR.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the inability of Gorsha 
Michaelovich Sur to meet the requirements of section 316 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act that relate to residence and physical 
presence in the United States, he shall be deemed eligible for 
naturalization upon the filing of the appropriate application if 
otherwise qualified for naturalization under such Act.
    (b) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) 
shall apply only if the application for naturalization is filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-10-000]

Take notice that on February 5, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing a Refund Report for interruptible transportation revenue credits on its Coyote Springs Extension.

GTN states that it refunded $844.19 to Portland General Electric Company, the sole eligible firm shipper on the Coyote Springs Extension, by credit billing adjustment on January 5, 2001.

                    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on all affected customers and interested state regulatory agencies.                          ( print page 10492)    

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before February 15, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-3809  Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# **Exhibit 21.1**

** **

**STEINWAYMUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

Steinway &Sons Far East, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation

 

Conn-Selmer, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

 

Noblet, LLC, aWisconsin limited liability corporation

 

Normandie, LLC, aWisconsin limited liability corporation

 

G. Leblanc SNC, a partnership organized under the lawsof France

 

Vincent BachInternational, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the UnitedKingdom

 

Steinway &Sons, a New York corporation

 

Steinway Piano (Shanghai)Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of China

 

Steinway, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

 

The O.S. KellyCompany, an Ohio corporation

 

Boston Piano GmbH,a corporation organized under the laws of Germany

 

Kluge Klaviaturen GmbH, a corporation organized underthe laws of Germany

 

Kluge Klawiatury,Sp.z.o.o. Wilkow, Poland,a limited liability company organized under the laws of Poland

 

Steinway Haus Munchen GmbH, a corporation organizedunder the laws of Germany

 

Steinway &Sons Japan, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Japan

 

----
# United States Court **of Appeals** 
**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 20394 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Samuel David Cortez,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 559

- 1

Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Samuel David Cortez pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to a superseding criminal information charging him with three counts of interference with commerce by robbery and one count of attempted interference with commerce by robbery. The district court sentenced Cort ez

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except und er the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 11, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-20394 Document: 00515857895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2021No. 20

- 20394

2 to concurrent terms of 121 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Cortez argues that the Government plainly breached the plea agreement by failing to request dismissal of the original indictment at sentencing.

“The Government m ust strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of its promises in a plea agreement.” United States v. Harper , 643 F.3d 135, 139 (5th Cir. 2011). Based on our review of the record and the briefs, including
the Government’s concession of reversible error, we agree that Cortez is
entitled to relief. See id. Accordingly, the case is **REMANDED** to the district court for the limited purpose of entering a corrected judgment reflecting dismissal of the original indictment. The judgment is

**AFFIRMED** in all other respects. Case: 20-20394 Document: 00515857895 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2086 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2086

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (by request) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,6-
              DICHLOROBENZONITRILE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.69 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and 
inserting ``12/31/98''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.30.69 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States that was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 15, 2004



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO























































23
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                              AVONDALE INCORPORATED
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                               -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                2001               2002              2003               2004             2005
                                               ------             ------            -------           -------           ------
<S>                                            <C>                <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Fixed Charges:
 Interest expense                              $ 20.4             $ 17.7            $  18.2           $  16.9           $ 14.9
 Amortization of debt issuance costs              1.0                0.7                0.9               0.9              0.4
                                               ------             ------            -------           -------           ------
  Fixed Charges                                $ 21.4             $ 18.4            $  19.1           $  17.8           $ 15.3
                                               ======             ======            =======           =======           ======

Earnings
 Pretax income (loss) before extraordinary
  item                                         $  1.8             $ (0.4)           $ (12.2)          $ (11.1)          $ (4.3)
Fixed charges                                    21.4               18.4               19.1              17.8             15.3
                                               ------             ------            -------           -------           ------
   Earnings                                    $ 23.2             $ 18.0            $   6.9           $   6.7           $ 11.0
                                               ======             ======            =======           =======           ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                1.1x                --                 --                --               --
</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

141531

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141531 COA: 298214 Kent CC: 09-002511-FH AARON ALEXANDER ST. CLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 6, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.