1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45129/45242

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JAMES HARVEY ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 338

Filed: January 26, 2018
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge . A ppeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Bradly S. Ford
, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen year s, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for aggravated battery (Canyon County case), affirmed ; judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentence of fourteen years with four years determinate for grand theft and a concurrent six

month jail term for misdemeanor domestic battery (Ada County case), affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford
, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney Gen eral, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM This consolidated appeal involves two cases arising from the same course of conduct in two separate counties. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Christophe r James Harvey pled guilty to aggravated battery (Canyon County case), Idaho Code §§ 18

- 903(a), 18

- 907(a) ; Harvey also pled guilty to grand theft, I.C. §§ 18

- 2407(1), 18

- 2407(1)(b), and 18

- 2409, and misdemeanor domestic battery, I.C. §§ 18

- 903(11), 18

- 918( 3)(b) (Ada County case). In the Canyon County2 case, the district court imposed a unified sentence of fifteen years with four years determinate for aggravated battery . In the Ada County case
, the district court imposed a concurrent unified
sentence of fou rteen years with four years determinate for grand theft and a concurrent six

- month jail term for misdemeanor domestic battery. Harvey appeals, asserting that the district courts abused their discretion by imposing excessive sentences in each case.
Sentenc ing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the def endant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and ha ving reviewed the record
in these case s , we cannot say that the district court s abused their discretion. Therefore, Harvey ’s judgment s of conviction and sentence s in Canyon County and Ada County are affirmed.