alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of   Environmental   Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10KSB/A  for the period  ending
December 31, 2006 (the  "Report") I, Edward L.  Torres,  Acting Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 6, 2007

\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, N.A. *v.*ROBERT WALPUCK ET AL.

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 31823) is denied.

*911
      *Robert Walpuck,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided May 5, 2010

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1791

___________

Robert Wilson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Nancy H. Evans, Public Safety *

Commissioner of the City of Cedar *

Rapids, individually and in her official * Appeal from the United States

capacity; Cedar Rapids Police * District Court for the

Department, sued as The Cedar Rapids * Northern District of Iowa.

City Police Department; City of Cedar *

Rapids; Brian Bean, police officer of * [UNPUBLISHED]

the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; *

Graham Campshure, police officer of *

the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; *

Four Unidentified and Unnamed *

Officers, Cedar Rapids Police *

Department, individually, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: August 30, 2001

 Filed: September 4, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________
1The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of Iowa.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Robert Wilson appeals the District Court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment

in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth

Amendments. He alleges that because he is African American, he was twice stopped

and detained by City of Cedar Rapids (City) police officers for no legitimate purpose,

and on one occasion they required him to provide his personal identifying information

when he tried to report a crime. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Smith v.

Watkins, 159 F.3d 1137, 1138 (8th Cir. 1998) (de novo standard of review), we affirm.

Although the city ordinance infractions upon which the challenged stops were

based appear minor, Wilson fails to establish that the stops were unconstitutional or

that the scope of the stops was excessive. Cf. United States v. Beck, 140 F.3d 1129,

1133-34 (8th Cir. 1998) (affirming that even minor traffic violation creates probable

cause to stop vehicle; during investigative traffic stops, officers may ask for

identification, request explanation for presence in area, and conduct computer checks).

Further, Wilson’s evidence falls short of showing that City police officers targeted

African Americans or engaged in racial profiling, or that City police officers treated

similarly situated whites differently.

We also conclude that Wilson cannot seek reversal in this civil matter on a claim

of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th

Cir. 1988) (holding that defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to effective

assistance of counsel in a civil case). Finally, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in awarding costs to defendants. See Firefighters’ Inst. for Racial Equal. v.

City of St. Louis, 220 F.3d 898, 905 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied,

121 S. Ct. 1359 (2001).
-3-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

d0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140696

ROBERT ADKINS, JA CQUELINE ADKINS, WILLIAM BACON, RICHARD DEMING, AUDREY DEMING, GARY DENSLOW, PATRICIA DENSLO W, WALTER H. FORSBERG, GREGORY E. THOMPSON, BONNIE L. THOMPSON, and ALGONQUIN LAKE WATERFRONT OWNERS ALLIANCE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 140696 COA: 286888 Barry CC: 07-000210-AA RUTLAND CHARTER TW P ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, RUTLAND CHARTER TWP, and RUTLAND CHARTER TWP ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                February 29, 2001


1.       G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.       G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.       G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.       G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.       G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited
         partnership
6.       G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.       G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.       G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.       G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.      G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.      GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.      GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.      Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.      Valley Convalescent, LLC, a California limited liability company
15.      435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
16.      G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
17.      G&L Burbank, LLC
18.      G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
19.      G&L Holy Cross, LLC
20.      G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
21.      G&L Tustin, LLC
22.      G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
23.      G&L Valencia, LLC
24.      G&L Penasquitos, LLC
25.      G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
26.      GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
27.      GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
28.      G&L Hoquiam, LLC
29.      G&L Lyons, LLC
30.      G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
31.      G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
32.      G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
33.      Lakeview Associates, LLC
34.      Tustin Heritage Park, LLC
35.      G&L Heritage Care, LLC
36.      G&L Heritage Care, Inc.
37.      G&L Massachusetts, LLC
38.      G&L Aspen, LLC
Petitions for Writs of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Majority and 

Concurring Opinions filed September 15, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-20-00383-CR

NO. 14-20-00384-CR

IN RE DMITRY KRUGLOV, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Court No. 3

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MD-0368264 & MD-0368265

MEMORANDUM CONCURRING OPINION

I write separately to briefly point out that the majority does not follow this 

court’s binding precedent. Relator is required to show he filed his notice of appeal 

in the trial court. To meet this requirement relator must provide this court with a 

file-stamped copy of his notice of appeal or other proof that the notice was filed in 

the trial court. See In re Gomez, 602 S.W.3d 71, 74 (Tex. App.―Houston [14th
2

Dist.] 2020, orig. proceeding); In re Flanigan, 578 S.W.3d 634, 626 (Tex. 

App.―Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, orig. proceeding); see also In re Henry, 525 

S.W.3d 381, 382 (Tex. App.―[14th Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding) (holding that 

relator had not established that his motion was pending in trial court in absence of 

providing file-stamped copy of motion). 

I would follow this court’s binding precedent in denying relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus.

/s/ Ken Wise

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain. (Spain, J., majority).

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 4 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (mark

only one checkbox) Name of establishment

Use IRS label.

Make any 

necessary

changes. 

Otherwise,

please type or

print.

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (see instructions) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than

evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(see instructions)

Employer’s name (same name as on Form 941)

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable)

City, state, and ZIP code (if a foreign address, see instructions)

Does this establishment accept Mark if: Amended Return

credit cards or other charges?

1 Total charged tips for calendar year 2001 1

2 Total charge receipts showing charged tips (see instructions) 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (add lines 4a and 4b) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (see instructions) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here  granted by the

IRS. (Attach a copy of the IRS determination letter to this return.) 

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

 This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Mark the checkbox below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion,

if any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (see instructions for restriction)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach a copy of the agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature  Title  Date 

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (2001)

Note: If you marked the checkbox in line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours worked

per business day during the payroll period. (see instructions)

Apt. or suite no.

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), mark an “X” on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your

records on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 2001 

Note: Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 4 of

the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

 See separate instructions.

2001

Yes (lines 1 and 2 must be completed)

No Final Return
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 7, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FORTY WEEKS ENDED MARCH 7, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-07-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  196,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,012
<INVENTORY>                                     64,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               333,308
<PP&E>                                       1,157,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,538,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,939
<BONDS>                                        249,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           790
<OTHER-SE>                                     556,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,538,939
<SALES>                                      2,482,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,482,664
<CGS>                                        1,171,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,171,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 174 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 174

 To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify certain aspects of 
 its coverage and to provide for the recovery of additional litigation 
                         expenses by litigants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Edwards of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify certain aspects of 
 its coverage and to provide for the recovery of additional litigation 
                         expenses by litigants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voting Rights Extension Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEFINITIONS.

    Section 14(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(4) As used in section 5, the term `procedure with respect to 
voting' includes any change of procedural rules, voting practices, or 
transfers of decision making authority that affect the powers of an 
elected official or position.
    ``(5) As used in section 2, the term, ``standard, practice, or 
procedure'' includes any procedural rule, voting practice, or transfer 
of decision making authority that impairs the powers of an elected 
official or position.''.

SEC. 3. EXPERT EXPENSES.

    Section 14(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amended by 
inserting ``, reasonable expert expenses, and other reasonable 
litigation expenses'' before ``as part of the costs''.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2114

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure equitable treatment for

members of the Armed Forces from outside the continental United States

in the provision of excess leave and permissive temporary duty in connection with the separation of the members from the Armed Services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1993

Mr. UNDERWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure equitable

treatment for members of the Armed Forces from outside

the continental United States in the provision of excess

leave and permissive temporary duty in connection with

the separation of the members from the Armed Services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCESS LEAVE AND PERMISSIVE TEMPORARY

4 DUTY.

5 (a) EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF MEMBERS FROM

6 OUTSIDE THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES.—Section

7 1149 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 2114 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) PROVISION AS PART OF

2 SEPARATION.—’’ before ‘‘Under regulations’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section:

5 ‘‘(b) MEMBERS FROM OUTSIDE THE CONTINENTAL

6 UNITED STATES.—(1) In prescribing regulations under

7 subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that

8 a member whose home of record is outside the continental

9 United States and who is stationed inside the continental

10 United States at the time of the separation of the member

11 will be eligible to receive the same amount of excess leave

12 or permissive temporary duty under this section as a mem13 ber who is stationed overseas.

14 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘continental United

15 States’ means the 48 contiguous States and the District

16 of Columbia.’’.

17 (b) REPORT ON OTHER AREAS OF INEQUITABLE

18 TREATMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of

19 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall

20 submit a report to Congress—

21 (1) describing all provisions of law concerning

22 pay and allowances for members of the Armed

23 Forces in which members whose homes of record are

24 outside the continental United States and who are

25 stationed inside the continental United States re-
3

•HR 2114 IH

1 ceive different treatment than members who are sta2 tioned outside the United States; and

3 (2) containing recommendations to equalize

4 such treatment.

Æ
Exhibit 10.39
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE DATED 4-1-98
 th
     A.
    
    The LANDLORDS WAIVER AND CONSENT provided for in the FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE DATED
9-27-01 is null and void.B.
    
    The letter of credit from General Electric Capital Corporation provided for in the
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE DATED 9-27-01 is no longer effective.C.
    
    The security and damage deposit in the amount of $100,000.00 previously furnished
contemporaneously with the execution of the FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE DATED 9-27-01 will
continue to be held by lessor under the SECURITY AND DAMAGE DEPOSIT previously executed
(Exhibit 2 attached).All other terms and provisions of lease shall remain in full force and effect.
  Lessee: Navarre Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
    
    
    
    Lessor: Cambridge Apartments, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ J. Reid Porter
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ John R. PaulsonIts: Executive Vice President and CFO
    
    
    
    
    
    Its: President
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.15.3     Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and
                    Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Hank
                    H. Kadowaki dated July 1, 2000.


                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:              Hank H. Kadowaki
                    -------------------------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with
the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June
30, 2002.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______2000_______.



                                        QUAKER CITY BANK


/s/ Hank H. Kadowaki                    By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
------------------------                   --------------------------
Participant                             President
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 13, 2014

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD RELEASES A 

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR A MANAGER FOR THE S FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced today that it has released a request for proposal for a fund manager for its

Small Cap Stock Index Investment Fund (S Fund). The S Fund invests in a stock index 

fund that tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Completion Total Stock Market Index. The earnings 

consist of dividend income and gains or losses in the price of stocks. As of December 

2013, the S Fund held $46.6 billion in assets. The contract will be for a one-year term, 

with four one-year options. The FRTIB expects to award the contract by the second half 

of the year. 

The S Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Fixed Income Index Investment Fund, the 

Common Stock Investment Fund, and the International Stock Index Investment Fund –

are currently managed by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (BlackRock). 

 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is

similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. 

As of December 2013, TSP assets totaled approximately $397

billion, and retirement savings accounts were being maintained 

for more than 4.6 million TSP participants. Participants include 

Federal civilian employees in all branches of Government, 

employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the 

uniformed services. Additional information can be found at 

www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)