alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Jiang Peng, Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  Date: May 15, 2009
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Jiang PengJiang PengChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)   Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Sun Dongqing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 15, 2009
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Sun DongqingSun Dongqing, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great China
International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Great China International Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50897

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ANGEL GUZMAN-MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-338-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Angel GuzmanMartinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,946
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,985
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    171,470
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          92,955
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            94,507
<LOANS>                                        631,371
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,007,349
<DEPOSITS>                                     645,549
<SHORT-TERM>                                   144,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,466
<LONG-TERM>                                     99,348
<COMMON>                                            56
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,007,349
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 53,773
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,687
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   338
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                70,798
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,087
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,244
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           31,544
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  89
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,326
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,923
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,049
<LOANS-PAST>                                       775
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   370
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,907
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,228
<RECOVERIES>                                       100
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,079
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,079
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            564




</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN


The Amended and
Restated Investment Technology Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”) is amended, effective as of March 19, 2003, by adding the
following sentence at the end of Section 6(c) thereof:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors
of the Company may provide in an applicable Option agreement that the Option
will become exercisable on a date (or dates) later than the date set forth
above.”
CAPITAL RE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
           Exhibit 11 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                                                       September 30,               September 30,
                                                                                  ---------------------       ----------------------
                                                                                     1999          1998           1999          1998
                                                                                  ---------------------       ----------------------
<S>                                                                                <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Net Income from Continuing Operations                                              13,070        14,335        (57,145)       54,292
Net Income                                                                        (39,161)       14,470       (133,041)       54,450

Basic weighted average shares outstanding during the period                        36,523        31,912         33,792        31,871
Potentially dilutive employee stock options                                           147           820            266           859
                                                                                  ---------------------       ----------------------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the period                      36,670        32,732         34,058        32,730
                                                                                  =====================       ======================

Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations                          $0.36         $0.45         ($1.69)        $1.70
                                                                                  =====================       ======================
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations                        $0.36         $0.44         ($1.68)        $1.66
                                                                                  =====================       ======================

Basic earnings per common share                                                    ($1.07)        $0.45         ($3.94)        $1.71
                                                                                  =====================       ======================
Diluted earnings per common share                                                  ($1.07)        $0.44         ($3.91)        $1.66
                                                                                  =====================       ======================
</TABLE>

                                       35
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harold DAMPER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-60620

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2011.

Gaines H. Cleveland, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gulfport, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*785Harold Damper, Stafford, AZ, pro se.

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Harold Damper, federal prisoner # 14313-112, moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration that was filed in a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. The district court denied Damper’s § 3582(c)(2) motion because the crack cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines would not have changed Damper’s guidelines range. While Damper’s appeal of the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion was pending before this court, Damper filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(a). The district court denied Damper’s Rule 60(a) motion and the motion to reconsider he subsequently filed. The district court further denied Damper’s motion to proceed IFP, certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith because Damper filed his motion to reconsider while the appeal of his § 3582(c)(2) was pending before this court.

Damper has failed to brief any argument with respect to the district court’s determination that his appeal was not taken in good faith. Rather, he argues the merits of his motions which challenged the district court’s denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. Failure to identify any error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the judgment. *Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). Although pro se briefs are liberally construed, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them. *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993).

Given the forgoing, Damper has failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their merits.” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 & n. 24 (5th Cir.1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999, AS RESTATED, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AS RESTATED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,729,514<F1>
<PP&E>                                       6,185,981
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,916,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,231,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,947,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,457
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,035,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,231,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,048,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,205,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,220,878)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,984,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (5,082,320)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,066,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES NET ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS OF $37,594,624.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.69                                                            
                              
                              
       [FORM OF AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED BONUS AGREEMENT]
                              
                              
                              
                              
                              
                                    ___________________, 1999
                              
                              
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
                              
Dear _______________:
                              

          In recognition of your significant contributions,
[Metz Baking Company ("Metz")] [Mother's Cake and Cookie Co.
("Mother's")] [Specialty Foods Corporation ("SFC")] (the
"Company") is pleased to inform you that you will receive
60% of your total Deferred Bonus in 1999 under the deferred
bonus agreement entered into by yourself and the Company on
__________ (the "Agreement") as described below.

               The Agreement provides for payment to you of
     a Deferred Bonus (as defined in the Agreement) payable
     in two installments, one in the year 1999 and one in
     the year 2000.  Section 1(c) of the Agreement currently
     provides for payment of forty percent (40%) of the
     Deferred Bonus in 1999 and for payment of sixty percent
     (60%) of the Deferred Bonus in 2000.  The Company has
     decided to amend this provision to instead provide for
     payment of sixty percent (60%) of the Deferred Bonus in
     1999 and for payment of forty percent (40%) of the
     Deferred Bonus in 2000.  Pursuant to this amendment,
     your Deferred Bonus will now be paid as follows:

     (i)  Sixty percent (60%) of the Deferred Bonus shall be
          paid on March 31, 1999; and

    (ii)  The remaining forty percent (40%) of the Deferred
          Bonus shall be paid on the earliest of (x) the date
          occurring ninety (90) days after a Change in Control
          (as defined in the Agreement) and (y) January 15,
          2000, provided that you remain employed by the
          Company through such date.




                              Very truly yours,

                              [METZ BAKING COMPANY]
                              [MOTHER'S CAKE AND COOKIE CO.]
                              [SPECIALTY FOODS CORPORATION]



                         By:______________________________

                       Name:____________________________

                      Title:_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9826-9827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-389-019]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate 
Filing

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 30, 2001, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing with the Commission the 
following Amendment Agreement to a recently filed negotiated rate 
transaction:

Amendment Agreement to ITS-2 Service Agreement No. 70052 between 
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company and Amoco Energy Trading 
Corporation Dated November 30, 2000, as Amended January 26, 2001

    Columbia Gulf states that this transportation service was scheduled 
to commence December 1, 2000 and terminate December 31, 2000. On 
January 16, 2001, FERC approved an amendment to extend the term through 
January 31, 2001 (Docket No. RP96-389-017). The parties have executed 
an Amendment Agreement extending the term through February 28, 2001. 
All other terms and provisions remain unchanged an in full force and 
effect.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of the filing have been served on 
all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 9827]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 
sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. 
All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3444 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3431 

To require the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator 

of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to establish 

a website providing information about grants available to assist State, 

Tribal, and local governments with climate resiliency, adaptation and 

mitigation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself and Mr. WEBSTER of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the 

Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration, to establish a website providing information about grants available to assist State, Tribal, and 

local governments with climate resiliency, adaptation and 

mitigation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Increasing Com5 munity Access to Resiliency Grants Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3431 IH

1 SEC. 2. CENTRALIZED WEBSITE FOR RESILIENCY GRANTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

3 date of enactment of this subsection, the Administrator 

4 shall establish and regularly update a publicly available 

5 website that includes— 

6 (1) hyperlinks to all grants administered by the 

7 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

8 and hyperlinks to other Federal agencies that offer 

9 similar grants to assist State, Tribal, and local gov10 ernments with resiliency, adaptation, and mitigation 

11 of climate change and sea level rise; and 

12 (2) with respect to each such grant, the contact 

13 information for an individual who can offer assist14 ance to State, Tribal, and local governments. 

15 (b) OUTREACH.—The Administrator shall conduct 

16 outreach activities to inform State, Tribal, and local gov17 ernments of the resiliency, adaptation, and mitigation 

18 grants. 

19 (c) ADMINISTRATOR.—In this section, the term ‘‘Ad20 ministrator’’ means the Secretary of Commerce acting 

21 through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and 

22 Atmospheric Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396




February 23, 2001


Bridgewater  Associates, Inc.
1 Glendinning Place
Westport, CT  06880

Attention:        Ms. Giselle Wagner,
                  Chief  Operating Officer

Re:      SB DIVERSIFIED 2000 FUTURES FUND L.P.
         SB DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND LP.

Dear  Ms. Wagner:

As I discussed with Joe Quinn yesterday, the Board of Directors has decided to
terminate the accounts traded by Bridgewater Associates. As such, please
liquidate all of your positions in the above referenced funds in an orderly
fashion immediately. We would like to be flat by Wednesday, February 28, 2001.

Please acknowledge receipt and acceptance by signing a copy and returning it to
me by fax at 212-723-8985.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212- 723-5416. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC.



Daniel R. McAuliffe
Director


DAD/sr


By:                                    Date:
         Signature

By:      Title:
         Print