alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
GST Telecommunications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-94072, 333-07237 and 333-53981) on Form S-8, (Nos. 33-95324, 33-94096,
333-1538 and 333-76405) on Form F-3, and (Nos. 333-15699, 333-16141, 333-32137,
333-21729, 333-19339, 333-45013 and 333-52437) on Form S-3 of GST
Telecommunications, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 1999 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of GST Telecommunications, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' (deficit) equity, and cash flows and related schedule
for the year ended December 31, 1998, the three-month period ended December 31,
1997 and each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 1997,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1998 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10K of
GST Telecommunications, Inc.

                            /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
June 29, 1999

<PAGE>   2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
GST Telecommunications, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GST
Telecommunications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' (deficit)
equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1998, the three-month
period ended December 31, 1997, and for each of the years in the two-year period
ended September 30, 1997. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GST
Telecommunications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the results of its operations, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1998, the three-month period ended December 31, 1997, and for each of the years
in the two-year period ended September 30, 1997 in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States.

                            /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 1, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Steven W. Caple, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “QuarterlyReport”) of Novo Networks, Inc. (“Novo Networks”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis Quarterly Report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of Novo Networks as of, and for, the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report. 4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Novo Networks and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to NovoNetworks, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of Novo Networks’ disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this QuarterlyReport, based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any changes in NovoNetworks’ internal controls over financial reporting that occurredduring Novo Networks’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NovoNetworks’ internal control over financial reporting.
5. The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to NovoNetworks’ auditor and the audit committee of Novo Networks’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingthat are reasonably likely to adversely affect Novo Networks’ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Novo Networks’internal controls over financial reporting. Date: May 17**,**2004 /s/ Steven W. CapleSteven W. CaplePresident(Principal Executive Officer)
25
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10505-10506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN FOCUS

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 3, 2001.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 10506]]

    Place: Natcher Building, Room 5As.25, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: John R. Lymangrover, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 8, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-3816 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Navarre Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Annual Report), I, J. Reid Porter, Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 9, 2011



By

/s/ J. Reid PorterJ. Reid PorterInterim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20877

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE CARMEN RESENDIZ PICHARDO, also known as Jose Carmen

Resendiz-Pichardo, also known as Orlando Alaniz-Mungia, also known as

Orlando Alaniz, also known as J. Carmen Resendiz, also known as Sergio Reyes,

Jr., also known as Orlando Roberto Alaniz-Muniga, also known as Jose C.

Resendiz-Pichards, also known as Orlando R. Alaniz, also known as Orlando

Alanizmunguia, also known as Orlando Alaniz-Muniga,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-330-1

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Carmen Resendiz Pichardo has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-20877 Document: 00512085675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
No. 11-20877

Cir. 2011). Resendiz Pichardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 11-20877 Document: 00512085675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Tucker I. Marr, Chief Financial Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby
certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property
Partnership.

Date: May 13, 2009



| |  |                                           
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Tucker I. Marr                        
| |  | Tucker I. Marr                            
| |  | Chief Financial Officer                   
| |  | Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc., as


General Partner of


Arch Street VIII Limited Partnership, as


General Partner of


Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,


A Limited Partnership








Date:   April 6, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **NAME                OF SUBSIDIARIES**                                                                 | **JURISDICTION                OF INCORPORATION** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Aladdin                Knowledge Systems Inc.                                                           | New                York                          |
| Aladdin                Japan Co. Ltd.                                                                   | Japan                                            |
| Aladdin                Europe Ltd. (formerly Aladdin Westem Europe Ltd)                                 | England                and Wales                 |
| Hafalad                BV                                                                               | The                Netherlands                   |
| Aladdin                Europe BV (formerly Aladdin Western Europe BV)                                   | The                Netherlands                   |
| Aladdin                Europe S.A.R.L. (fonnerly Aladdin Western Europe S.A.R.L.)                       | France                                           |
| Aladdin                Europe S-L                                                                       | Spain                                            |
| Aladdin                Europe GmbH (formerly Aladdin Knowledge Systems Deutschland                GmbH) | Germany                                          |
| Aladdin                Knowledge Systems India Private Limited                                          | India                                            |
| Aladdin                Knowledge System Italy SRL                                                       | Italy                                            |
LAMONT OLASANDE

,
Appellant,

v.

STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM and TISA ABDULLAH MCMILLAN

,
Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FO R REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3364

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 18, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Department of Revenue

.
LaMont Olasande, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY

, KELSEY

, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ

. , CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 186 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 186

To amend section 325 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 
  that residence within the outlying possessions of the United States 
shall be counted as residence within a State or district of Service for 
       purposes of the residency requirement for naturalization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 325 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 
  that residence within the outlying possessions of the United States 
shall be counted as residence within a State or district of Service for 
       purposes of the residency requirement for naturalization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESIDENCE WITHIN AN OUTLYING POSSESSION AS RESIDENCE WITHIN 
              A STATE OR DISTRICT OF THE SERVICE.

    Section 325 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1436) 
is amended by inserting ``, and within a State or district of the 
Service in the United States,'' after ``presence within the United 
States''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4073]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Change in Subject of Meeting

    The National Credit Union Administration Board determined that its 
business requires the deletion of the following item from the 
previously announced closed meeting (Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 29, 
page 9884, February 12, 2001) scheduled for Thursday, February 15, 
2001.
    2. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to exemption (2).
    The Board voted unanimously that agency business requires that this 
item be removed from the closed agenda. Earlier announcement of this 
change was not possible.
    The previously announced items are:
    1. Special Assistance Program. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    2. Four (4) Personnel Matters. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) 
and (6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.

Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-4073 Filed 2-13-01; 4:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
#### WILLIAM K. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HVM, L.L.C., d/b/a Extended Stay America, Defendant—Appellee, and Travelocity.Com, L.P.; Sabre, Incorporated, Defendants.

No. 09-2038.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 5, 2011.

Gerald Glenn Poindexter, Poindexter & Poindexter, Surry, Virginia, for Appellant. William B. Tiller, Kelly B. Martin, Tiller Law Group, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*643PER CURIAM:

William K. Stone appeals the district court’s dismissal of his personal injury action against HVM, L.L.C., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to file his complaint within the applicable statute of limitations. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In Virginia, “every action for personal injuries, whatever the theory of recovery, ... shall be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues.” Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-243(A) (2007 & Supp.2010). The following elements must be present before a cause of action accrues: “(1) a legal obligation of a defendant to the plaintiff, (2) a violation or breach of that duty or right, and (3) harm or damage to the plaintiff as a proximate consequence of the violation or breach.” *Locke v. Johns-Manville Corp.,*221 Va. 951, 275 S.E.2d 900, 904 (1981). Additionally, a cause of action accrues “from the date the injury is sustained ... and not when the resulting damage is discovered,” Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-230 (2007), even if the initial injury is slight or additional damage occurs later. *McHenry v. Adams,*248 Va. 238, 448 S.E.2d 390, 393 (1994); *see Brown v. Am. Broadcasting Co., Inc.,*704 F.2d 1296, 1300 (4th Cir.1983) (“Once a cause of action is complete and the statute of limitations begins to run, it runs against all damages resulting from the wrongful act, even damages which may not arise until a future date.”). Upon review, we conclude that Stone’s cause of action against HVM accrued more than two years prior to the filing of his personal injury action. See *Giarratano v. Johnson,*521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th Cir.2008) (stating standard of review for Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal); *Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.,*494 F.3d 458, 464 (4th Cir.2007) (en bane) (stating that Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of complaint as time-barred proper where “all facts necessary to the affirmative defense clearly appearf ] *on the face of the complaint”).*Therefore, the district court correctly found that Stone’s complaint was time-barred.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   /s/ Dana D.
  MessinaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
  Executive Officer)March 13,
  2009