alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-93030) pertaining to the Timber Lodge Steakhouse, Inc. 1993
Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 13, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of Timber Lodge Steakhouse, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB/A-2) for the year ended December 31, 1997.
 
                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    Ernst & Young LLP
 
Minneapolis, Minnesota
July 10, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                         240,767
<SECURITIES>                                   739,295
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,027,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    382,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,575,634
<PP&E>                                       1,224,350
<DEPRECIATION>                               (342,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,464,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          679,444
<BONDS>                                        407,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,577
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,352,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,464,415
<SALES>                                      3,046,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,153,812
<CGS>                                          433,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,861,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (135,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (135,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (135,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Daniel M. Gottlieb, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of G&L Realty Corp.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of our annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005**
EXHIBIT 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                            CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

                       CSXT TRADE RECEIVABLES MASTER TRUST

          Issuer in respect of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust
        5.05% Trade Receivables Participation Certificates, Series 1993-1
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

          The   undersigned,   a   duly   authorized   representative   of   CSX
Transportation, Inc., as Servicer ("CSXT"), pursuant to the Amended and Restated
Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of October 27, 1993,  as amended and
supplemented,  (the  "Agreement")  among CSX Trade Receivables  Corporation,  as
Seller,  CSX  Transportation,  Inc., as Servicer,  and The Chase  Manhattan Bank
(formerly known as Chemical Bank), as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

          1.   CSXT is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
               Capitalized  terms used in this Certificate have their respective
               meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

          2.   The  undersigned  is a Servicer  Officer  who is duly  authorized
               pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate
               to the Trustee.

          3.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year
               ended  December  25,  1998,  and of  its  performance  under  the
               Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

          4.   Based  on  such  review,  the  Servicer  has,  to the  best of my
               knowledge,  performed  in all material  respects its  obligations
               under the Agreement  throughout  such year, and no default in the
               performance  of such  obligations  has occurred or is  continuing
               except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

          5.   The following is a description of each default in the performance
               of  the  Servicer's  obligations  under  the  provisions  of  the
               Agreement  known to me to have been made by the  Servicer  during
               the fiscal  year ended  December  25,  1998,  which sets forth in
               detail (i) the nature of such  default,  (ii) the action taken by
               the  Servicer,  if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the
               current status of each such default: None.

          In WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
          this 5th day of March, 1999.


                                          CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Servicer


                                      By: /s/ JAMES M. TILLEY
                                          -------------------
                                          James M. Tilley
                                           Assistant Treasurer

                                       -1-
CERTIFICATION


I, Mario Bonaccorso, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of PartnerRe Ltd.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: March 16, 2018


By:  / S / MARIO BONACCORSO


Name:  Mario Bonaccorso


Title:  Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Loflin, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that: |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: November 21, 2005. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|---------------------------|------------------|--------|

|   | David LoflinPresident |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
CASUAL DRESS CODE—QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

What is a casual dress code? 

A casual dress code means that employees are permitted to dress in comfortable, informal 

clothing. Although the employees' comfort is a priority, certain standards are required—clothing 

must be appropriate and still professional. We expect that your business attire, although casual, 

will exhibit common sense and professionalism. In general, clothing should be pressed and never 

wrinkled. Torn, dirty, or frayed clothing is unacceptable. Any clothing that has words, terms, or 

pictures that may be offensive to other employees is unacceptable.

Can I dress casually every day? 

Generally, yes. However, you must also consider each day’s activities when determining what to 

wear. For example, if you have a meeting with the Board, or an outside party, appropriate 

business attire should be worn. We need to continue to present a professional image toward our 

external stakeholders and the public.

Do I have to dress casually? 

No. Employees who prefer to dress more formally on a daily basis should feel free to do so. 

What tops/shirts are acceptable to wear under the casual dress code?

Tops and shirts should be clean and neatly pressed. Sweatshirts and sports jerseys that are neat 

and pressed are acceptable. Tank tops are generally not acceptable unless such garments are 

covered by another article of clothing (e.g., a sweater or jacket). Sheer or mesh clothing that 

exposes undergarments or midriffs are not acceptable.

What pants/bottoms are acceptable to wear under the casual dress code?

Jeans are acceptable under a casual dress code. However, jeans that are ripped or disheveled in 

appearance are not appropriate. Sweatpants, mini-skirts, shorts or exercise pants are not 

appropriate. Capri pants are acceptable. 

What footwear is acceptable to wear under the casual dress code?

Conservative athletic or walking shoes, loafers, sneakers, boots, and flats are acceptable for 

work. Flip-flops are not acceptable.

Who can I contact if I have questions or concerns about the casual dress code?

Please contact Employee Relations Specialist, April Lane, if you have questions or concerns 

about the casual dress code. 
CASUAL DRESS CODE EXAMPLES

ACCEPTABLE CASUAL DRESS

UNACCEPTABLE CASUAL 

DRESS
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-194-CV

PATRICIA HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLANT

AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE 

OF THE ESTATE OF HARVEY HARRIS, 

DECEASED

V.

ARLINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J. 

DELIVERED: August 6, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ David E. Hamer

                                       David E. Hamer
                                       Chief Accounting Officer
                                       March 31, 2003
#### Jack Hubert HUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, Director, ADOC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-16266.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 22, 2010.

*113Jack Hubert Hummer, Buckeye, AZ, pro se.

Paul Edward Carter, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Jack Hubert Hummer appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials’ failure to approve recommended cataract surgery amounted to deliberate indifference. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment ruling, *Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc), and for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of appointed counsel, *Wilborn v. Escalderon,*789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Hummer failed to present evidence showing that the defendants’ denial of cataract surgery in his right eye has caused or will cause further injury, or that the defendants knew of other serious pain or medical problems caused by Hummer’s cataract. *See Clem v. Lomeli,*566 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2009) (defendant must have knowledge of a substantial risk of serious harm to show deliberate indifference); *Shapley v. Nev. Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs,*766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam) (a delay in medical treatment must lead to further injury to support a claim of deliberate indifference).

*114The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Hummer’s request for counsel because this case does not present “exceptional circumstances.” *See Wilborn,*789 F.2d at 1331 (district court may designate counsel to represent an indigent civil litigant in “exceptional circumstances,” a standard that requires an evaluation of the likelihood of success on the merits and the complexity of the issue involved).

We do not consider Hummer’s contentions raised for the first time on appeal. *See Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Conocophillips Co.,*546 F.3d 1142, 1146 (9th Cir.2008).

We deny as moot the defendants’ motion to strike portions of Hummer’s reply brief.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(Report), the undersigned, constituting the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Mega Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that, to the best of their knowledge:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the
fiscal quarter then ended.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







By:

/s/     JOHN H.
BROWNJohn H. Brown Chief Executive
Officer of Mega Group, Inc.





Date: December 27, 2002





By:

/s/     MERRITT C.
BROWNMerritt C. Brown Chief
Financial Officer of Mega Group, Inc.





|Date: |  | December 27, 2002
|----- |  | -----------------
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 23 8 . SI FUR RAHAMAN v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 8

, Si fu r Rah am an was co n v i ct ed of ag g rav at ed b at t ery

. He fi l ed a t i m el y

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al

, wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed in No v em b er 20 2 0. Th e fo l l o wi n g

y ear, Rah am an fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r an o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

, as s ert in g th at h e h ad n ot

r ecei ved n o t i ce o f t h e d en i al o f h i s m o ti o n fo r n ew tri al u n t i l J ul y 2 0 21

. Th e t r i a l

co u rt g ran t ed Rah am an an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal , an d h e fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

. Th e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt recen t l y el i m in at ed t h e j u d ici al l y creat ed o u t -o ft i m e-ap p eal p ro ced u r e i n t ri al co u rt s

. Co o k v. S t a t e ,

__ _ Ga.

_ _ _ (5 ) (Cas e No

. S2 1 A1 27 0

, d e c i d e d M a r c h 1 5

, 2 0 2 2 ) (ap p l y i n g th e h o l d i n g “ t o al l cas es t h at are

cu rren t l y o n d i rect rev i ew or ot herwi se n o t y et fi n al ”). In l i g h t o f Co ok

, Rah am an h as
fi led a m o ti o n t o rem an d t h i s c a s e t o th e s u p eri o r co u rt t o d et erm i n e wh et h er h e
recei v ed t i m el y n o t i ce of t he d en i al o f hi s m o t i on fo r n ew t ri al an d

, i f n o t
, to al l o w t h e

t ri al co u rt to re-en t er t h e o rd er d en y i n g hi s m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al

. See, e.g ., McCu r l ey
v. S t a t e , 3 4 5 Ga. Ap p . 8 5 6, 8 57 (8 1 5 SE2 d 1 88 ) (2 0 1 8 ).

Th e t ri al co u rt ’ s ord er g ran t i n g t h e m o ti o n f o r o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal is h ereb y VACATED, Rah am an ’ s m o ti o n t o rem an d i s h ereb y GRANTED, an d t h i s cas e i s
REM ANDED t o t h e tri al co u rt t o d et erm i ne i f Rah am an recei v ed t im el y n o t ice o f t h e
d en ial o f h i s m o ti on fo r new t ri al

. On rem an d

, t h e t ri al co u rt i s DIRECTED t o en t er May 02, 2022an o rd er d i sm i ss i n g th e m o t i o n fo r an ou t -o f-t i m e ap peal

. See Ru t l ed g e v. S t a t e ,

_

_ _ Ga. _

_ _ (Cas e No . S2 1 A1 0 3 6 , d eci d ed M arch 1 5 , 2 0 2 2 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/02/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Mental Retardation Research Subcommittee, March 12, 2001, 8 a.m. to March 14, 2001, 5 p.m., Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd., Wisconsin at Western Ave., Washington, DC 20015 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 31, 2001, 66 FR 8418.                

The meeting will be held on March 12-13, 2001. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 9, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4091 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M