alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2128 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2128
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act

  
 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 
appropriations for

           refugee assistance for fiscal years 1993 and 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR REFUGEE ASSISTANCE FOR 
FISCAL YEARS 1993 AND 1994.
    Section 414(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1524(a)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 1992'' and inserting 
``fiscal year 1993 and fiscal year 1994''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50238 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GONZALO ZAVALZA-PLANTILLAS, also known as Gonzalo Plantillas, also known as Gonzalo Zavala-Plantillas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1750-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Gonzalo Zavalza-Plantillas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,154,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 240,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,056,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,847,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,373
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,354,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,056,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            159,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
<FN>
<F1>For purpose of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 208

To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using campaign contributions

for inherently personal purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Administration

A BILL

To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using

campaign contributions for inherently personal purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FOR

4 INHERENTLY PERSONAL PURPOSES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Federal Election

6 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended

7 by adding at the end of the following new section:
2

•HR 208 IH

1 ‘‘PROHIBITION OF USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FOR

2 INHERENTLY PERSONAL PURPOSES

3 ‘‘SEC. 324. (a) An individual who receives contribu4 tions as a candidate for Federal office—

5 ‘‘(1) may use such contributions only for legiti6 mate and verifiable campaign expenses; and

7 ‘‘(2) may not use such contributions for any in8 herently personal purpose.

9 ‘‘(b) As used in this subsection—

10 ‘‘(1) the term ‘campaign expenses’ means ex11 penses attributable solely to bona fide campaign pur12 poses; and

13 ‘‘(2) the term ‘inherently personal purpose’

14 means a purpose that, by its nature, is for personal

15 benefit, and such term includes a home mortgage

16 payment, clothing purchase, noncampaign auto17 mobile expense, and any other inherently personal

18 living expense.’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 subsection (a) shall apply to contributions received after

21 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Glas-Aire  Industries  Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") I, Craig Grossman,  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,  President, and
Secretary  of the  Company,  and Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 11, 2006


\s\ Craig Grossman
---------------------------------------------------
Craig Grossman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Secretary


/s/ Linda Kwan
---------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas D.
Burkett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                          |  | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Douglas D. Burkett Ph. D.             |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002 |  | 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT32.0**

# **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

Theundersigned hereby certify that this report complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | Dated: | April 30, 2007                        | By:    | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|
|   |   | Roger E. Gower                        |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   | Dated: | April 30, 2007                        | By:    | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |   |
|   |   | BachThuy T. Vo                        |
|   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000829321
<NAME> METLIFE TEXAS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           345,891
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           49,630
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       4,235
<MORTGAGE>                                      29,530
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 477,781
<CASH>                                          13,647
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               5,478
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          52,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,144
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                416,271
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  7,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,144
<PREMIUMS>                                      10,660
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             25,404
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 274
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  13,851
<BENEFITS>                                      32,901
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,984
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                       811
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1799 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1799

  Making accession to the Treaty for the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear 
Weapons a condition for designation as a beneficiary developing country 
              under the Generalized System of Preferences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Making accession to the Treaty for the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear 
Weapons a condition for designation as a beneficiary developing country 
              under the Generalized System of Preferences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY DESIGNATION.

    Section 502(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6);
            (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (7) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
            ``(8) if such country has not acceded to the Treaty for the 
        Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Derek N. JARVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee. Derek N. Jarvis, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Enterprise Fleet Services and Leasing Company, Defendant—Appellee.

Nos. 10-1425, 10-1573.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 17, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle Bodley Radcliffe, Isler, Dare, Ray, Radcliffe & Connolly, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action and ruling on related matters, and the later order denying his motions to reconsider, *669for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co.,*No. 8:07-cv-03385-DKC, 2010 WL 1068146 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2010) & 2010 WL 1929845 (May 11, 2010).

We also deny Jarvis’ petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to recuse the magistrate judge and district judge who ruled on his claims below. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Jarvis has failed to establish the grounds needed for relief. *See Shaw v. Martin,*733 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir.1984) (providing grounds needed for recusal). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,471
<PP&E>                                         179,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,288
<BONDS>                                        124,978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,121
<OTHER-SE>                                    (100,030)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,357
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.34
 Summary of Director Compensation Plan
Effective as of January 1, 2006
  Directors
 
    
    Each non-employee director shall receive an annual retainer of $95,000, comprised of
$30,000 in cash paid in four quarterly installments and $65,000 paid in restricted stock
following Triads annual meeting of stockholders. The restricted stock shall vest as
follows: 60% upon the first anniversary of issuance, 20% upon the second anniversary of
issuance and 20% upon the third anniversary of issuance.
    
    Restricted stock issued to directors shall continue to vest in accordance with the terms
of the grant upon a directors departure from the Board unless the departure is for cause,
in which case all unvested stock shall be forfeited.
 Non-executive Chairman of the Board
 
    
    A non-executive Chairman of the Board shall receive an annual retainer of $225,000,
comprised of $112,500 in cash paid in four quarterly installments and $112,500 paid in
restricted stock following Triads annual meeting of stockholders. The restricted stock
shall vest as follows: 60% upon the first anniversary of issuance, 20% upon the second
anniversary of issuance and 20% upon the third anniversary of issuance.
    
    The Compensation Committee reserves the right to recommend a discretionary payment in
the event that the non-executive Chairman of the Board performs services beyond those
traditionally performed by others serving in the same capacity.
    
    Restricted stock issued to directors shall continue to vest in accordance with the terms
of the grant upon a directors departure from the Board unless the departure is for cause,
in which case all unvested stock shall be forfeited.
 Chairpersons and Members of Committees of the Board
 
    
    The Audit Committee Chairperson shall receive $15,000 per year for his/her service in
such capacity. Chairpersons of other Standing Committees shall receive $7,500 per year for
their service in such capacities.
    
    Audit Committee members shall receive $2,500 per meeting attended up to a maximum of
eight meetings per year. Other Standing Committee members shall receive $1,500 per meeting
attended up to a maximum of four meetings per year. The Compensation Committee reserves the
right to recommend the payment of additional fees per meeting in the event that additional
attendance is required.
 Reimbursement of Expenses
 
    
    All reasonable expenses incurred by non-employee directors or Committee members in their
capacity as such shall be reimbursed by Triad.
Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jiang Fang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Date: May 16, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Deng ZhirenDeng ZhirenChief
Executive Officer   Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wang Li Rong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Date: May 16, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Wang Li RongWang Li RongChief
Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great China International Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by Great China International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.