alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL
QUARTER ENDING AUGUST 2, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.6817
<CASH>                                         428,868
<SECURITIES>                                    80,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,151
<INVENTORY>                                    181,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,216,449
<PP&E>                                         958,676
<DEPRECIATION>                                 464,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,040,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       476,559
<OTHER-SE>                                     836,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,040,903
<SALES>                                        426,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          176,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,978
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3380]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 31 and 35

[FRL-6943-5]
RIN 2030 AA56


Environmental Program Grants for Tribes, Final Rule: Delay of 
Effective Date

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2001, from 
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 
``Regulatory Review Plan,'' published in the Federal Register on 
January 24, 2001, this action temporarily delays for 60 days the 
effective date of the rule entitled Environmental Program Grants for 
Tribes, published in the Federal Register on January 16, 2001, 66 FR 
3781. This rule concerns several Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
grant programs for Indian Tribes and Intertribal Consortia. It creates 
a new Tribal-specific subpart which contains only the provisions for 
environmental program grants that apply to Tribes and addresses the 
Performance Partnership Grant program for Tribes.

DATES: The effective date of the Environmental Program Grants for 
Tribes regulation amending 40 CFR parts 31 and 35 published in the 
Federal Register on January 16, 2001, at 66 FR 3781, is delayed for 60 
days, from February 15, 2001, to a new effective date of April 17, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: W. Scott McMoran, Grants 
Administration Division (3903R), United States Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 
(202) 564-5376, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aae7c9e7c5d8cbc484f9c9c5dedeeacfdacb84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b76587654495a55156858544f4f7b5e4b5a155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The temporary 60-day delay in effective date 
is necessary to give Agency officials the opportunity for further 
review and consideration of new regulations, consistent with the 
Assistant to the President's memorandum of January 20, 2001. This 
action involves matters relating to grants and under 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) 
is thus exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the 
Administrative Procedure Act.

    Dated: January 29, 2001.
David J. O'Connor,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Administration and Resources 
Management.
[FR Doc. 01-3380 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.








Dated: September 21, 2011





/s/ Carl SpanaCarl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

, Justices 

# Order

November 2 7 , 2013

147883

- 7 ( 48 )

MENARD, INC.

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant , SC: 147883

v COA: 310399 Ct of C laims : 10

- 000082

- MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendant

- Appell ee, and

STATE TREASURER and STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendants.

________________________________ __ _ /

SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant , SC: 147884

v COA: 311053 Ct of Claims: 09

- 000068

- MT STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendants

- Appell ees

.

_________________________________ _ _ /

MENARD, INC.

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant , SC: 147885

v COA: 311261 Ct of Claims: 09

- 000057

- MT STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendants

- Appell ees

.

___________________________ _____ ___ /2

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2 7 , 2013 ART VAN FURNITURE

- CONNER

, INC

. , Plaintiff

- Appell ant , SC: 147886

v COA: 311294 Ct of Claims: 09

- 000059

- MT STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendants

- Appell ees

.

___________________________ _____ __ _

/

ART VAN FURNITURE

, INC

. , Plaintiff

- Appell ant , SC: 147887

v COA: 312168 Ct of Claims: 09

- 000058

- MT STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendants

- Appell ees

.

____________________________ ____ __ _ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Retailers Association to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The brief submitted by the Michigan Retailers Association on November 19, 2013, on the application for leave to appeal is accepted for filing.

Clerk
#### Richard Lee FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. VERKOUTEREN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-56396.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 23, 2010.

Richard Lee Foster, Lancaster, CA, pro se.

*103Terrence F. Sheehy, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *103*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Richard Lee Foster, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that a prison official used excessive force under the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *White v. Roper,*901 F.2d 1501, 1503 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Foster’s excessive force claim because Foster failed to raise a triable issue as to whether Verkouteren used physical force “maliciously and sadistically to harm him” rather than “in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline.” *Hudson v. McMillian,*503 U.S. 1, 7, 112 S.Ct. 995, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992) (core judicial inquiry in excessive force claim is whether force was malicious and sadistic or a good-faith disciplinary effort); *see also White,*901 F.2d at 1507 (use of force not excessive where inmate resisted entering cell and only suffered a minor cut and some bruises).

Foster’s allegation of an ex parte meeting between the district judge and Verkouteren does not warrant reversal because Foster provides no evidence of the alleged meeting and he cannot show that he was unfairly prejudiced. *See Alexander Shokai, Inc. v. Comm’r,*34 F.3d 1480, 1484-85 (9th Cir.1994) (no due process violation where ex parte communications did not unfairly prejudice party).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
942 A.2d 895

#### Glue WILKINS, Appellant v. Zygmont A. PINES, Esq., Court Administrator of Pennsylvania, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 19, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2008, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1998      
<CASH>                                      9631      
<SECURITIES>                                   0      
<RECEIVABLES>                               4500      
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0      
<INVENTORY>                                    0      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0      
<PP&E>                                   792,726
<DEPRECIATION>                          (102,851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           773,352      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0      
<BONDS>                                  224,536      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0      
<PREFERRED>                                   10      
<COMMON>                                     156      
<OTHER-SE>                               280,225      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             773,352      
<SALES>                                        0      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          43,820      
<CGS>                                          0      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             40,961      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             533      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          10,819      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         6,048      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,594      
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,594      
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (283)     
<CHANGES>                                      0      
<NET-INCOME>                               2,311     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.08       
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           5,360
<SECURITIES>                                     1,169
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (109)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,448
<PP&E>                                           4,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,500
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,792
<SALES>                                         16,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,129
<CGS>                                            6,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (329)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Patriot Investment Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), I,
Bradley  S. Shepherd, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                         /s/Bradley  S.  Shepherd
                         -------------------------
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         Chief  Financial  Officer
                         March19,  2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                THERMA-WAVE, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, L. Ray Christie, in my capacity as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Therma-Wave, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Therma-Wave"),
and in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by Therma-Wave
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005 (the "Report"),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Therma-Wave.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Therma-Wave and
will be retained by Therma-Wave and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 4th day of February 2005.

                                        /s/ L. Ray Christie
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        L. Ray Christie
                                        Senior Vice President,
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed by Therma-Wave as part of
the report or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 or
any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,583,655
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,962,780
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,881,480
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,853,190
<LOANS>                                     81,135,997
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,718,227
<DEPOSITS>                                  83,340,583
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,249,552
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,349,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,094,338
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,990,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             106,718,227
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,282,597
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              266,709
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,549,306
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             990,720
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,354,261
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,195,045
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (1,033)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,591,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,948
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     145,948
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .025
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .025
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.9
<LOANS-NON>                                    435,881
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,716,608
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   90,598
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,225
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,706,834
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,284,437
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        422,397
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,195-01

EX PARTE JAVIER DUARTE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20160D02433 IN THE 120 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted

of the manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. 

He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by telling him that

if motions were filed or if the defense challenged the charges, the State would allege the punishment

range as a habitual offender and he would receive a mandatory life sentence. He also alleges that

counsel failed to investigate and learn that the person police named as the person who gave them
2

authorization to search the residence did not have the authority to grant such permission and that the

amount of drugs he possessed was not sufficient to sustain a first degree felony charge.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 
3

Filed: August 21, 2019

Do not publish