Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices 10487

SUMMARY: The Panel will conduct two

open meetings. On March 9, 2001 the

Panel will receive information from the

general public regarding the V–22

aircraft. On April 13, 2001 the Panel

will conduct deliberations. The

meetings will begin at 1 p.m. and end

no later than 5 p.m.

DATES: March 9, 2001 and April 13,

2001.

ADDRESSES: Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1489

Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington

Ballroom, Mezzanine Level, Arlington,

VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Mr. Gary J. Gray, the Executive

Secretary, 1235 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Suite 940, Arlington, VA

22202–3283, phone (703) 602–1515, fax

(703) 602–1532. Requests to present oral

comments regarding of the V–22 aircraft

must include a brief summary of the

material to be presented and be received

by letter or email (V22panel@OSD.mil)

no later than noon Thursday, March 1,

2001. Written comments must be

received no later than noon, March 5,

2001 to ensure their availability to panel

members prior to the hearing. Request

that a copy of written comments be

emailed to the Panel or provided on a

floppy disk in Microsoft Word format.

Copies of the draft meeting agenda can

be obtained by contacting Mrs. Carolyn

Duke or Mr. Doug Pang by phone (703)

602–1515 or by fax (703) 602–1532.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Seating

spaces will be reserved only for

scheduled speakers. The remaining

seats will be available on a first-come,

first-served basis beginning at 12:30

p.m. No teleconference lines will be

available. In general, each individual or

group making an oral presentation will

be limited to a total time of 10 minutes.

Written comments will be provided to

panel members if they are received in

the Office of the Review Panel no later

than noon March 5, 2001. Written

comments received after that date will

be sent to panel members after the

adjournment of the March 9th meeting

and will also be included in the official

records.

Dated: February 9, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01–3789 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Air Force A–76 Initiatives Cost

Comparisons and Direct Conversions

(As of Dec. 31, 2000)

The Air Force is in the process of

conducting the following A–76

initiatives. Cost comparisons are publicprivate competitions. Direct conversions

are functions that may result in a

conversion to contract without public

competition. These initiatives were

announced and in-progress as of Dec 31,

2000, include the installation and state

where the cost comparison or direct

conversion is being performed, the total

authorizations under study, public

announcement date and actual or

anticipated solicitation date. The

following initiatives are in various

stages of completion.

COST COMPARISONS

Installation State Function(s)

Total

authorizations

Public

announcement

date

Solicitation

issued or

scheduled

date

ANDERSEN ....................... GUAM ...... COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.24 15–Sep–00 30–May–01

ANDREWS ......................... MD ........... AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY ................ 815 25–Jul–97 26–May–99

ANDREWS ......................... MD ........... COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 181 04–Oct–99 26–Sep–01

ANDREWS ......................... MD ........... HEATING SYSTEMS ................................................... 22 17–Dec–98 18–Feb–00

AVON PARK ...................... FL ............ RANGE OPERATIONS ................................................ 38 22–Dec–99 15–Sep–01

BEALE ............................... CA ........... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 372 08–Sep–99 07–Mar–01

BOLLING ........................... DC ........... SUPPLY AND TRANSPORTATION ............................ 138 01–Dec–98 12–Sep–00

CARSWELL ....................... TX ............ BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 69 03–Feb–00 05–Jun–01

DAVIS MONTHAN ............. AZ ............ BASE SUPPLY ............................................................. 35 04–Jan–00 29–Jan–01

EDWARDS ......................... CA ........... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 553 09–Dec–98 04–May–00

EGLIN ................................ FL ............ ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ..................................... 49 22–Sep–99 26–Sep–00

EGLIN ................................ FL ............ AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY ................ 319 15–Sep–00 01–Jun–01

EIELSON ........................... AK ............ COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.63 29–Oct–99 05–Jan–01

ELMENDORF .................... AK ............ BASE SUPPLY ............................................................. 208 26–Mar–99 21–Apr–00

ELMENDORF .................... AK ............ COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.66 05–Jan–00 08–Nov–00

HANSCOM AFB ................ MA ........... CIVIL ENGINEERING .................................................. 201 09–Dec–98 25–Feb–00

HANSCOM AFB ................ MA ........... EDUCATION/TRAINING AND PERSONNEL .............. 17 25–Nov–98 20–Apr–00 ‘’

HILL AFB ........................... UT ............ BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 577 30–Sep–98 15–Mar–01

HOLLOMAN AFB ............... NM ........... TEST TRACK ............................................................... 125 18–Nov–99 08–Jan–01

HURLBURT COM FL ........ FL ............ ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ..................................... 33 28–Apr–99 09–Mar–01

HURLBURT COM FL ........ FL ............ COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 50 31–Jul–98 15–Apr–01

HURLBURT COM FL ........ FL ............ ENVIRONMENTAL ....................................................... 7 22–Jun–00 15–Mar–01

HURLBURT COM FL ........ FL ............ HOUSING MANAGEMENT .......................................... 12 08–Jun–00 01–May–01

KEESLER .......................... MS ........... MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 741 21–Sep–99 19–Dec–00

LACKLAND ........................ TX ............ MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 1439 26–Jan–99 09–Aug–99

MAXWELL ......................... AL ............ EDUCATION SERVICES ............................................. 35 24–Jul–00 29–Sep–00

MAXWELL ......................... AL ............ MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 814 28–Apr–98 22–Mar–99

MCCHORD ........................ WA ........... GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ........................................ 10 14–Jun–99 22–Sep–00

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. COMMUNICATIONFUNCTIONS .................................. 208 03–Aug–99 01–Nov–00

LANGLEY .......................... VA

HILL AFB ........................... UT

10488 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices

COST COMPARISONS—Continued

Installation State Function(s)

Total

authorizations

Public

announcement

date

Solicitation

issued or

scheduled

date

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 141 11–Mar–99 14–Apr–00

GENERAL MITCHELL ....... WI

WESTOVER ...................... MA

MINN–ST PAUL ................. MN

YOUNGSTOWN ................ OH

WILLOW GROVE .............. PA

GRISSOM .......................... IN

PITTSBURG ...................... PA

MARCH .............................. CA

HOMESTEAD .................... FL

CARSWELL ....................... TX

NEW ORLEANS ................ LA

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. EDUCATION SERVICES ............................................. 73 17–Aug–00 25–Jan–01

ANDERSEN ....................... GUAM

EIELSON ........................... AK

ELMENDORF .................... AK

HICKAM ............................. HI

KADENA ............................ JA

KUNSAN ............................ KR

MISAWA ............................ JA

OSAN ................................. KR

YOKOTA ............................ JA

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 65 14–Jul–99 28–Jun–01

CROUGHTON ................... UK

MOLESWORTH ................. UK

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. PERSONNEL SERVICES ............................................ 223 16–Jun–00 15–Mar–01

BARKSDALE ..................... LA

CANNON ........................... NM

DAVIS MONTHAN ............. AZ .

DYESS ............................... TX

ELLSWORTH ..................... SD

HOLLOMAN ....................... NM

KEFLAVIK .......................... ICELD

LAJES ................................ AZORE

LANGLEY .......................... VA

MINOT ............................... ND

MOODY ............................. GA

MOUNTAIN HOME ............ ID

NELLIS ............................... NV

SEYMOUR JOHNSON ...... NC

SHAW ................................ SC

WHITEMAN ....................... MO

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ................... 15 07–Jul–99 29–May–00

LAKENHEATH ................... UK

MILDENHALL .................... UK

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ................... 24 07–Jul–99 13–Feb–01

RAMSTEIN ........................ GERMY

SPANGDAHLEM ............... GERMY

NEW BOSTON .................. NH ........... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 48 03–Dec–97 31–Jan–01

NEW ORLEANS NAS ........ LA ............ BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 45 03–Feb–00 01–Mar–01

OFFUTT ............................. NE ........... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................... 1568 30–Sep–98 16–Feb–01

PATRICK ........................... FL ............ SUPPLY AND TRANSPORTATION ............................ 43 14–May–98 18–Sep–00

PETERSON ....................... CO ........... PERSONNEL SERVICES ............................................ 90 05–Jan–00 10–Feb–01

RANDOLPH ....................... TX ............ MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 1224 14–Sep–00 10–Oct–01

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... BASE SUPPLY ............................................................. 131 01–Apr–99 19–Dec–00

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... EDUCATION SERVICES ............................................. 67 07–Jan–99 17–Aug–00

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... ENVIRONMENTAL ....................................................... 49 07–Jun–00 20–Apr–01

SCOTT ............................... IL ............. PERSONNEL SERVICES ............................................ 236 25–Jun–99 19–Feb–01

SEMBACH ......................... GERMY ... COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 48 18–Dec–98 28–Feb–01

SHEPPARD ....................... TX ............ MULTIPLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS ........................... 549 21–Sep–99 29–Jun–00

TRAVIS .............................. CA ........... VEHICLE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ......... 131 15–Jul–98 24–Aug–00

USAF ACADEMY .............. CO ........... CIVIL ENGINEERING .................................................. 496 01–Dec–98 24–Mar–00

USAF ACADEMY .............. CO ........... COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 114 20–May–99 09–Jan–01

USAF ACADEMY .............. CO ........... SUPPLY AND TRANSPORTATION ............................ 117 08–May–98 09–May–00

VANDENBERG AFB .......... CA ........... MISSILE STORAGE & MAINTENANCE ...................... 66 25–Oct–00 27–Apr–01

WHITEMAN ....................... MO ........... UTILITIES PLANT ........................................................ 11 18–Aug–99 01–Jun–00

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices 10489

DIRECT CONVERSIONS

Installation State Function(s)

Total

authorizations

Public

announcement

date

Solicitation

issued or

scheduled

date

BOLLING ........................... DC ........... EDUCATION/TRAINING AND PERSONNEL .............. 12 01–May–00 08–Jan–01

COLUMBUS ....................... MS ........... SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT ............................................. 29 18–Apr–00 15–Apr–01

F E WARREN .................... WY ........... BASE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................... 105 30–Oct–97 19–Jul–00

GRAND FORKS ................ ND ........... MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE ...................................... 5 17–May–99 08–Dec–00

HICKAM ............................. HI ............. COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.48 07–Nov–00 30–Apr–01

HICKAM ............................. HI ............. FURNISHINGS MANAGEMENT .................................. 11 27–Jun–00 15–Jan–02

HOLLOMAN AFB ............... NM ........... MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING MAINTENANCE .......... 66 12–May–97 09–Nov–00

KIRTLAND ......................... NM ........... GENERAL LIBRARY .................................................... 6 12–Jan–99 05–Jan–01

KIRTLAND ......................... NM ........... RECREATIONAL SUPPORT ....................................... 9 12–Jan–99 05–Jan–01

LANGLEY .......................... VA ............ AIRCRAFT FLEET SERVICES .................................... 11 29–Jun–99 25–Sep–00

LANGLEY .......................... VA ............ COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 8 23–Mar–99 12–Jan–01

LANGLEY .......................... VA ............ COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION FUNCTION.13 31–Jan–00 28–Feb–01

LANGLEY .......................... VA ............ DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS .... 15 04–Nov–99 09–Feb–01

MALMSTROM .................... MT ........... BASE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................... 85 06–Oct–97 15–Aug–00

MCGUIRE .......................... NJ ............ FURNISHINGS MANAGEMENT .................................. 2 14–May–99 13–Oct–00

MCGUIRE .......................... NJ ............ HEATING SYSTEMS ................................................... 6 04–May–99 18–Oct–00

MINOT ............................... ND ........... GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ........................................ 9 18–May–99 07–Aug–00

MT HOME .......................... ID ............. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ........................................ 6 20–Jul–99 20–Jul–00

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... ............. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ..................................... 67 08–Aug–00 25–Jan–01

ANDERSEN ....................... GUAM

EIELSON ........................... AK

ELMENDORF .................... AK

HICKAM ............................. HI

KADENA ............................ JA

KUNSAN ............................ KR

MISAWA ............................ JA

OSAN ................................. KR

YOKOTA ............................ JA

MULTIPLE INSTLNS ......... .................. ENVIRONMENTAL ....................................................... 49 27–Sep–00 TBD

BARKSDALE ..................... LA

CANNON ........................... NM

DAVIS–MONTHAN ............ AZ

ELLSWORTH ..................... SD

HOLLOMAN ....................... NM

LANGLEY .......................... VA

MINOT ............................... ND

MOODY ............................. GA

MOUNTAIN HOME ............ ID

NELLIS ............................... NV

SEYMOUR JOHNSON ...... NC

WHITEMAN ....................... MO

OFFUTT ............................. NE ........... COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 13 17–Nov–00 28–Feb–01

OFFUTT ............................. NE ........... COMPUTER OPERATIONS ........................................ 76 17–Feb–99 21–Jul–00

RANDOLPH ....................... TX ............ COURSEWARE DEVELOPMENT ............................... 38 30–Sep–99 30–Jun–00

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... AIRFIELD MANAGEMENT ........................................... 10 06–Jun–00 24–May–01

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... GENERAL LIBRARY .................................................... 6 23–Nov–99 30–Apr–01

ROBINS ............................. GA ........... PROTECTIVE COATING ............................................. 8 18–Jan–00 15–May–01

SCHRIEVER ...................... CO ........... FOOD SERVICES ........................................................ 18 02–99 15–Feb–01

SCOTT ............................... IL ............. ADMINISTRATIVE SWITCHBOARD ........................... 85 05–Aug–99 05–Feb–01

SCOTT ............................... IL ............. FURNISHINGS MANAGEMENT .................................. 3 18–Sep–00 TBD

SHAW ................................ SC ............ COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ................................ 3 18–May–99 02–Apr–01

SHAW ................................ SC ............ ENVIRONMENTAL ....................................................... 2 22–Mar–00 10–Aug–00

SHAW ................................ SC ............ RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES .............. 2 02–Oct–00 22–Jan–01

TINKER .............................. OK ........... SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING .................................... 67 08–May–00 01–Jun–01

10490 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc.01–3860 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001–05–U

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–81–000]

Chandeleur Gas Pipe Line Company;

Notice of Application

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on February 5, 2001,

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company

(Chandeleur), P.O. Box 4879, Houston,

Texas 77210–4879, filed in Docket No.

CP01–81–000 an application pursuant

to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for

a certificate of public convenience and

necessity authorizing an increase in

total system capacity, all as more fully

set forth in the application on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection. This filing may be viewed

on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

Chandeleur proposes to increase the

maximum capacity of its system from

280,000 Mcf of natural gas per day to

321,000 Mcf per day. It is stated that the

proposed increase is needed to more

closely match current production

profiles with delivery point capacities

and to reflect a planned interconnection

with Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.

(Destin). It is asserted that the

interconnection is being installed on the

refinery grounds of Chandeleur’s

affiliate, Chevron Products Company, a

division of Chevron USA Inc., in

Pascagoula, Mississippi, by Chandeleur

and Destin under their respective

blanket certificates. It is further asserted

that the increase in capacity can be

accomplished without an increase in

operating pressure. It is explained that

Chandeleur has conducted an open

season for the new capacity and is in the

process of completing precedent

agreements with shippers for the new

capacity.

Any questions regarding the

application should be directed to Ruth

A. Bosek, Bosek Law Firm, at (202) 326–

5256, 1090 Vermont Ave., NW., Suite

800, Washington, DC 20005.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make protest with reference to said

application should on or before

February 20, 2001, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

a motion to intervene or a protest in

accordance with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 175.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules. Comments and protests may be

filed electronically in lieu of paper. See

18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s

website at http://ferc.fed.us/efi/

doorbell.htm.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate is required by the public

convenience and necessity. If a motion

for leave to intervene is timely filed, or

if the Commission on its own motion

believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for Chandeleur to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–3808 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–80–000]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Application

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on February 2, 2001,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), Post Office Box 1642,

Houston, Texas, 77251–1642, filed in

Docket No. CP01–80–000 an application

pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural

Gas Act for authorization to construct,

own, and operate additional pipeline

and compression facilities in Tennessee

and Georgia and to extend its Line 3500

in Tennessee and Georgia to provide

transportation to new customers in

Georgia, all as more fully set forth in the

application on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection. This

filing may be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

East Tennessee proposes to construct

and operate approximately 27 miles of

20-inch pipeline as an extension of its

Line 3500 in Hamilton County, TN, and

Catoosa, Whitfield, and Murray

Counties, GA (the Murray Lateral); to

construct four 20-inch pipeline loops

adjacent to the existing East Tennessee

system in Bedford, Moore, Franklin,

Marion, and Hamilton Counties, TN;

and to hydrostatically test four pipeline

sections of approximately 30 miles of

12-inch pipeline and to increase the

maximum allowable operating pressures

(MAOP) of six pipeline sections on the

East Tennessee system in Marshall,

Bedford, Moore, Franklin, Marion,

Sequatchie, McMinn, and Grundy

Counties, TN. East Tennessee also

proposes to install an additional 10,950

horsepower (hp) at two existing

compressor stations by increasing

horsepower at Stations 3210 and 3214

and to install a 1590 hp compressor unit

at the new Station 3216 in McMinn

County, TN, by moving the existing

compressor unit from Station 3210. In

addition, East Tennessee would

construct two gas meter stations and

regulators: one in Whitfield County and

one in Murray County, GA.

East Tennessee states that the

proposed construction would allow it to

provide 5,000 dekatherms per day (Dth/

d) for Dalton Utilities (Dalton), and the

City of Cartersville (Cartersville), GA;

and it would provide increasing

volumes up to 165,000 Dth/d of firm

transportation service to Duke Energy

Murray, LLC (DENA Murray), jointly

referred to as the Murray customers.

This transportation service will allow

Dalton and Cartersville to meet the

anticipated growth in their existing

markets in the Georgia area. In addition,

this firm transportation will deliver gas

supply to the Murray electric generating

plant (Murray Energy facility), a 1240-

megawatt (MW) gas-fired power plant

being developed by and to be owned by

DENA Murray in Murray County, GA.

East Tenn estimates the cost of the

proposed facilities to be $69,390,000.

East Tenn proposes to provide service

pursuant to firm transportation service

agreements entered into pursuant to its

Rate Schedule FT–A. However, service

to its Murray customers would be

provided at an incremental rate.