alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Chieffo, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-Q of Pruco  Life of New
Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s John Chieffo
-------------------

John Chieffo
Chief Accounting Officer



                                       28
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of receipt.

                    The following applicant requests a permit amendment to conduct certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531*et seq.*):                

*Applicant:*                         Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts                    

## Permit No.: TE-697823

                    This applicant requests to amend their current permit for take activities for all listed species in the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New                           ( print page 1365)                        Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia for the purpose of scientific research and enhancement of survival of the species, to include the recently listed Gulf of Maine distinct population segment of Atlantic salmon (                    *Salmo salar*).                

# DATES:

Written comments on this request for a permit amendment must be received on or before February 7, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional Endangered Species Permits Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035; facsimile: 413-253-8482.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Documents and other information submitted with this request for an amendment are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents within 20 days of the date of publication of this notice to the address above; telephone: 413-253-8628.

Dated: December 19, 2000.

Dr. Mamie A. Parker,

Acting Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 01-403  Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
# Content start

## Press Releases

11/17/2020    FRTIB Awards Recordkeeping Contract [PDF]

10/27/2020    FRTIB Awards the Second of Two Fund Manager Contracts [PDF]

06/05/2020    FRTIB Announces the Resignation of Chairman Michael Kennedy [PDF]

05/13/2020    FRTIB Defers Action on I FUND Transition [PDF]

02/24/2020    FRTIB Awards First of Two Fund Manager Contracts [PDF]

01/31/2020    FRTIB Awards Annuity Contract [PDF]
#### Robert LARK v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; The District Attorney Philadelphia County; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Appellants.

No. 12-9003.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued April 17, 2014.

Filed May 6, 2014.

Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq. (Argued), Ronald Eisenberg, Esq., Edward F. McCann, Jr., Esq., R. Seth Williams, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Appellants.

Leigh M. Skipper, Esq., Stuart Lev, Esq. (Argued), Federal Community Defender Office, Philadelphia, PA, for Appel-lee.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the order of the District Court granting Robert Lark’s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This is the second time this case has come before us. We previously held that the District Court had not proceeded to the third step of the inquiry required under *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and remanded for the court to conduct that analysis. *See Lark v. Sec’y Pa. Dep’t of Corr.,*645 F.3d 596, 628 (3d Cir.2011) *(“Lark I*”). On remand, the District Court concluded that Lark had established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Commonwealth had struck five Black potential jurors because of their race. We must now determine if the District Court’s findings were clearly erroneous. *Holloway v. Horn,*355 F.3d 707, 713 (3d Cir.2004); *Lark I,*645 F.3d at 606.

We have explained that, “relief must be granted under *Batson*when even one black person is excluded [from the jury] for racially motivated reasons.” *Holloway,*355 F.3d at 720 (internal quotation marks omitted). We have carefully considered the findings the District Court made on remand pursuant to its Third Step *Batson*analysis. We cannot conclude *162that the court’s conclusion that at least one of the Commonwealth’s peremptory strikes was racially motivated is clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, we will affirm the conditional grant of Lark’s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
663 S.E.2d 496

#### In the Matter of Michael David WOOD, Respondent.

No. 26513.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted June 3, 2008.

Decided June 30, 2008.

Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Michael David Wood, of Charleston, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a confidential admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the Agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows.

*Facts*

Respondent represented a client in a domestic matter. The client, who was living in the marital home, gave respondent an unopened package addressed to the client’s spouse that had been delivered to the marital home. Respondent, without the knowledge or consent of the addressee, opened the package *633and removed its contents. Immediately thereafter, respondent informed opposing counsel, who was present for an emergency hearing in the case, of his actions and allowed him to inspect the contents of the package. During the emergency hearing, respondent informed the court that he had opened the package and he presented the contents of the package to the court.

*Law*

Respondent admits that, by his misconduct, he has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 4.4 (a lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer’s client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender) and Rule 8.4 (it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, to engage in conduct involving dishonesty or to engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). Respondent further admits his misconduct constitutes grounds for discipline under Rule 7(a)(l)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct) and Rule 7(a)(5)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to engage in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute or conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR.

*Conclusion*

We find respondents misconduct warrants a public reprimand. Accordingly, we accept the Agreement and publicly reprimand respondent for his misconduct.

PUBLIC REPRIMAND.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Canyon Fuel Company, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Canyon Fuel Company, LLC

Canyon WEST 2015-635 Argument Notice 2-15-17.pdf

Canyon WEST 2015-635 Argument Notice 2-15-17.htm

Secretary of Labor v Canyon Fuel Company Docket WEST2015-635 etal_2-15-17.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
M. Alexander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
      Andrew M. AlexanderAndrew
      M. AlexanderPresident/Chief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      8, 2008
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Posner, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                                    /s/ Michael Posner
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Michael Posner, President
                                                    May 15, 2003
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


     We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc.
and of references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and the inclusion of and 
references to our report dated February 19, 1999, prepared for Torch Energy 
Royalty Trust in the Torch Energy Royalty Trust Annual Report on Form 10-K for 
the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                  H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                  By: /s/ H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc.
                                      ----------------------------------

Houston, Texas
March 26, 1999
Amendment No. 4 to OEM Distribution and License Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.24 
 FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO THE 
 OEM DISTRIBUTION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

 AMONG 
 ADOBE SYSTEMS
INCORPORATED 
 AND 
 ADOBE SYSTEMS
SOFTWARE IRELAND LIMITED 
 AND 
 ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. 
 EFFECTIVE AS OF January 1, 2006 (“Effective Date”) 
 This Amendment No. 4 (“Amendment No. 4”) to the OEM Distribution and License Agreement, dated September 19, 2005 (“Agreement”), is
made by and among Adobe Systems Incorporated, a Delaware corporation having a place of business at 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110-2704 (“Adobe Systems”), Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, a company incorporated in Ireland and
having a place of business at Unit 3100, Lake Drive, Citywest Business Campus, Saggart D24, Dublin, Ireland (“Adobe Ireland”), (both individually in their countries and collectively referred to as “Adobe”), and Electronics for
Imaging, Inc., a company incorporated in Delaware and having a place of business at 303 Velocity Way, Foster City, CA 94404 (“Licensee”). 
 NOW
THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 8.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

 * 
  

	2.	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. This Amendment No. 4 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 


 *
Indicates that certain information contained herein has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 








 FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested 
  

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 4 as of the Effective Date. 
  

					
	 ADOBE SYSTEMS:
 ADOBE SYSTEMS
 INCORPORATED
	  	 ADOBE IRELAND:
 ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE
 IRELAND LIMITED
	  	 LICENSEE:
 ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING,
 INC.

			
	 /s/ Michael L. Fancher
 Authorized Signature
	  	 /s/ David Liddy
 Authorized Signature
	  	 /s/ John Ritchie
 Authorized Signature

			
	 Michael L. Fancher
 Printed Name
	  	 David Liddy
 Printed Name
	  	 John Ritchie
 Printed Name

			
	 Director Revenue Assurance
 Title
	  	 Authorised Signatory
 Title
	  	 CFO
 Title

			
	 05/31/2006
 Date
	  	 06/02/2006
 Date
	  	 05/31/06
 Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,243
<PP&E>                                       4,196,749
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,992,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,323,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,323,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,323,558
<SALES>                                        441,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               127,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                315,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            315,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   315,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.35
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Tucker I. Marr, Chief Financial Officer of Pruco Life InsuranceCompany of New Jersey, hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2007, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New JerseyVariable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company of NewJersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract RealProperty Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.       Date: May 11, 2007     /s/ Tucker I. Marr     Tucker I. Marr
1 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 21-0512

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), 

the Appellant is given an extension of time until February 24, 2023 to 

prepare, file and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2023

01/25/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0512
2014-0309.

#### Mast v. Holmes Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-1771. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand to the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals to implement a settlement agreement, it is ordered by the court that the cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to and filed with the Board of Tax Appeals.