alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 ... SeeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 19 4- CV P AT R I CI A H AR R I S , I NDI VI DUA L L Y AP P E L L ANT A N D A S PERSO N A L REPRESEN TA TI V E O FT H E E S T A T E O FH A R V E YH A R R IS , D ECEA SED V . A RLI N G TO N M EM O RI A L HO SPI TA L A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 4 8TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s id e re d “ A p p e ll a n t’ sA g re e d M o tio n T o D is m is s A p p e a l.”It i s t he court ’ s opi ni on t hat t he m ot i on s hou l d be gr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e di sm i ss th e a p p e a l . SeeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f). C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l bepa i d byt he part y i ncu r r i ng t he sa m e, f or w h i c h l e t e x e c u ti o n i s s u e . SeeTe x. R. App . P. 43. 4. P E RCU R I AM P A N E L : M C C O Y , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d L IV IN G S T O N , J . DEL I VERE D: Aug us t6, 2009
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Dana D. Messina, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March  12, 2004 |                           |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                  | /s/ Dana D.  Messina           |   |
|                  |                           |
|                  | Dana D.  Messina               |
|                  |                           |
|                  | Director,  President and Chief |
|                  | Executive  Officer             |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 88]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Adviser Council for Nursing Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Nursing 
Research.
    Date: January 16-17, 2002.
    Open: January 16, 2001, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: For discussion of program policies and issues.
    Place: 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 10, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: January 17, 2002, 9:30 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 10, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Mary Leveck, PhD, Deputy Director, NINR, NIH, 
Building 31, Room 5B05, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5963.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's 
homepage: www.nih.gov/ninr/a_advisory.html, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health.

    Dated: December 20, 2001
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-32166 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
-------------------
   EXHIBIT 32.2
-------------------


         --------------------------------------------------------------
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
         --------------------------------------------------------------



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Air-Q  Wi-Fi  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Loflin,  Acting Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  (subsections  (a)  and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Dated: August 19, 2003                       /s/ DAVID LOFLIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David Loflin

                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
               (In millions, except share and per share amounts)

                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                     1998       1997       1996
                                                   -------    -------    -------

Net income                                         $ 149.5    $ 147.6    $ 132.5

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year - basic*                 75.2       75.3       85.1

Weighted average number of common shares
and common stock equivalents outstanding during
each year -  diluted *                                77.8       79.3       87.8
                                                   -------    -------    -------

Basic earnings per  share *                        $  1.99    $  1.96    $  1.56
                                                   =======    =======    =======

Diluted earnings per share *                       $  1.92    $  1.86    $  1.51
                                                   =======    =======    =======

*     Share and per share data have been restated to reflect the impact of a
      2-for-1 split of the Company's stock on March 4, 1998.
Key LIBOR Transition Milestones

Freddie Mac

Product Offer SOFR products No longer offer LIBOR 

products

SF ARMs and 

securities Nov. 9, 2020

Last Funding Date when sold 

for cash: Dec. 31, 2020

Last WAC ARM PC issuance 

date: Dec. 1, 2020

SF CRT 

transactions Q4 2020 End of Q4 2020

CMOs June 2020 October 20201

Freddie Mac MF 

Floating Rate 

loans and 

securities

Floating Rate loans: 

Sep. 1, 2020

Securities:

o K-deals: Dec. 20, 2019

o Other securitization 

structures: Q4 2020

Floating Rate loans: 

End of Q4 2020

Securities: End of Q2 2021

MF CRT 

transactions Q4 2020 End of Q4 2020

1

The GSEs will continue to issue new resecuritizations of LIBOR-indexed CMOs (also known as “ReREMICs”), 

provided that such resecuritizations do not increase the total unpaid principal balance of the LIBOR-indexed 

CMOs outstanding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF AVONDALE, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
AUGUST 27, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-27-1999
<CASH>                                           8,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,615
<INVENTORY>                                    106,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,122
<PP&E>                                         562,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 306,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,178
<BONDS>                                        216,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,732
<SALES>                                        880,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               880,855
<CGS>                                          748,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  835,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,464
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,023
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829324
<NAME>                        National Equities Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1.000
<CASH>                                                 63,476
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           8,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                              720
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       72,265
<PP&E>                                              2,292,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (57,576)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4,878,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 525,912
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               37,875
<OTHER-SE>                                          4,314,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        4,878,224
<SALES>                                                 9,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       18,670
<CGS>                                                  14,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      192,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (191,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (191,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (191,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.005)
        


</TABLE>
946 A.2d 636

#### Sandra BASILE, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent v. H & R BLOCK, INC. and H & R Block Eastern Tax Services, Inc., Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 25, 2008.

*494*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

> (1) Whether the Superior Court misapplied the aggrieved party doctrine by requiring petitioners to cross-appeal from an earlier class certification order even though summary judgment was entered in petitioners’ favor.

> (2) Whether the Superior Court erred in rejecting the trial court’s determination petitioners’ claims could be properly tried on a class-wide basis.

Justice TODD and Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### AMI LACHOWICZ *v.*MATTHEW RUGENS

*Laura Ondrush,*in support of the petition.

*Peter D. Clark,*in opposition.

Decided May 20, 2010

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 866 (AC 30574), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Exhibit 23.1

                  Exhibit 23 - Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-75668) pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of Triad
Guaranty Inc., the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-96550) pertaining to
the Triad  Guaranty  Inc.  401(k)  Profit  Sharing  Plan,  and the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-69967) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
of Triad Guaranty Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Triad Guaranty Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000, and our report included
in the following paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedules.

Our audits also included the  financial  statement  schedules of Triad  Guaranty
Inc.  listed  in Item  14(a).  These  schedules  are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion,  the financial  statement  schedules  referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
-----------------------------
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
March 23, 2001
Peer Review Plan 

Title of Review: Final Evaluation Report [ X] Influential Scientific Information 

Agency: FNS [ ] Highly Influential Scientific Assessment 

Agency Contact: Melissa Abelev 

Subject of Review: Evaluation of SNAP Employment and Training (E &T) Pilots 

Purpose of Review: Subject the information to formal, independent, external peer review to ensure its 

 objectivity. 

Type of Review: [ X ] Panel Review [] Individual Reviewers 

[ ] Alternative Process (Briefly Explain): 

Timing of Review (Est.): Start: 8/2021 End: 8/2021 Completed: 9/2021 

Number of Reviewers: [] 3 or 

fewer 

[ X ] 4 to 10 [ ] More than 10 

Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise Needed for Review: 

The areas of expertise needed: (1) program evaluation, evaluation design and outcome measurement; (2) 

practitioners with expertise in E &T programs and workforce systems; and (3) experts in SNAP and SNAP 

 E and T policy. 

Reviewers selected by: [ ] Agency [ X ] Designated Outside 

Organization 

Organization’s Name: Mathematica Policy 

 Research 

Opportunities for Public Comment? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

If yes, briefly state how and when these opportunities will be provided: 

How: 

When: 

Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments? [ ] Yes [ X] No 

Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel? [ ] Yes [ X] No 

Other: 
The technical working group (TWG) reviewed the draft report and participated in a 2-day meeting to 

provide feedback to the contractor. The TWG was tasked as follows: 

1. Reviewers were requested to determine whether the analyses were appropriate for the 

longitudinal data collected for the final report. 

2. Reviewers were charged with evaluating the appropriateness of the methods for the 

hypotheses being tested, the extent to which the conclusions follow from the analysis, and 

the strengths and limitations of the overall conclusions. They were requested to suggest 

ways to clarify assumptions, findings, and conclusions; and to identify any oversights, 

omissions, and inconsistencies in the analyses and interpretation of findings. 

The contractor prepared a memo detailing how the TWG’s feedback was addressed in the revised 

final report.
1

 Because appellant filed the notice of appeal more than fifteen days late, the instrument itself

cannot serve as an implied motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615,

617 (Tex. 1997).

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00085-CV

Mary Moran, Appellant

v.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 98-14145, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The judgment in this case was signed October 28, 2003. A motion for new trial was

timely filed; accordingly, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before January 26, 2004. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). The notice of appeal was not filed until February 11, 2004, sixteen days

late. No timely motion for extension of time was filed.1 The clerk’s office notified appellant of this

problem and requested proof of timely mailing or an affidavit swearing that the filing was timely

mailed. See id. 9.2(b), (c). In response, appellant stated that the filing deadline was mistakenly
 

2

 We note that the date of service (by telefacsimile) shown in the certificate of service is February

11, as well.

2

calculated and the notice of appeal had not been filed until February 11, 2004.2 Because a late-filed

notice of appeal does not confer jurisdiction on this court, we must dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 (court may not alter time for perfecting appeal); Verburgt, 959

S.W.2d at 617.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 6, 2004
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00165

- CV

IN RE COREY EDAN FIS HER RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DELIVERED: June 30 , 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.