alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 12, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, February 25, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Leeco, Inc., Docket No. KENT 

2012-166. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling that the 

mine operator was negligent where a continuous miner operator 

placed himself in an unsafe location.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Acker,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Kevin J.  Acker                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin J. Acker                        |   |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |   |
| March 12,  2010                  |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toWest Suburban Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2003

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require any major or

minor party general election candidate who receives amounts from the

Presidential Election Campaign Fund to participate in debates with

other such candidates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require

any major or minor party general election candidate who

receives amounts from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund to participate in debates with other such

candidates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Presidential

5 Debates Act of 1993’’.
2

HR 2003 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEBATES BY GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES

2 WHO RECEIVE AMOUNTS FROM THE PRESI3 DENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FUND.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of the Internal Reve5 nue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.) is amended

6 by inserting after section 9003 the following new section:

7 ‘‘SEC. 9003A. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATES.

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the requirements

9 specified in section 9003, in order to be eligible to receive

10 any payments under section 9006, the candidates of a

11 major or minor political party for the offices of President

12 and Vice President shall agree in writing—

13 ‘‘(1) that the candidate for the office of Presi14 dent will participate in at least 3 debates, sponsored

15 by a nonpartisan organization, with all other can16 didates for that office who are eligible under such

17 section 9006; and

18 ‘‘(2) that the major or minor party candidate

19 for the office of Vice President will participate in at

20 least 1 debate, sponsored by a nonpartisan or bipar21 tisan organization, with all other candidates for that

22 office who are eligible under such section 9006.

23 ‘‘(b) INELIGIBILITY.—If the Commission determines

24 that a major or minor party candidate failed to participate

25 in a debate under subsection (a) and was responsible at
3

HR 2003 IH

1 least in part for such failure, the candidates of the party

2 involved shall—

3 ‘‘(1) be ineligible to receive payments under sec4 tion 9006; and

5 ‘‘(2) pay to the Secretary of the Treasury an

6 amount equal to the amount of the payments made

7 to such candidates under such section.’’.

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

9 for chapter 95 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is

10 amended by inserting after the item relating to section

11 9003 the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 9003A. Presidential election debates.’’.

12 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

13 Section 9007(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of

14 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9007(b)(5)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or

15 section 9003A(b)’’ after ‘‘this subsection’’ each place it

16 appears.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.12


                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT
                                    BETWEEN
                     DALLAS LYNDON CORPORATION, AS LANDLORD
                                      AND
                       NATIONAL TECHTEAM, INC. AS TENANT

WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement dated August 17, 1995 by and between Dallas Lyndon
Corporation ("Landlord"), and National Techteam ("Tenant") as amended by
Amendment No. 1 dated December 11, 1996 does lease from Landlord 34,061 square
feet of rentable area ("Leased Premises") in the Building commonly known as
Lyndon Plaza East, located at 10945 Estate Lane, Dallas, Texas. It is now
agreed by the undersigned principal parties as follows:

EXPANSION SPACE:
Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord the
17,951 rentable square feet of space on the second floor in the Building
commonly known as Lyndon Plaza South and shown on Exhibit A to Amendment 2
attached hereto. This 17,951 of rentable square feet shall be known as
Expansion Space.

The Primary Term on the Expansion Space shall commence on February 1, 1998 and
expire on September 30, 2003.

The Basic Rent rate on the Expansion Space shall be as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Rate per          Amount per
                               RSF               month
<S>                          <C>                <C>

February, 1998               $10.12             $15,146
03/01/98 to 01/31/00         $13.50             $20,195
02/01/00 to 09/30/03         $14.00             $20,942
</TABLE>

There shall be no security deposit on the Expansion Space.

Landlord will pay $89,755 ($5.00 per rentable square foot) for Leasehold
Improvements to the Expansion Space. This obligation shall be known as
Expansion Finish Allowance. The determination of specific improvements within
the Expansion Finish Allowance shall be the sole discretion of Tenant.

The Landlord will provide 24 hour heating, air-conditioning and electricity for
the Expansion Space at no extra cost to Tenant.

Landlord will provide parking to accommodate no less than one car park per 150
rentable square feet of lease space (120 car parks). Landlord will also provide
no less than 10 additional parking spaces in the adjacent covered parking
garage reserved for Tenant's exclusive use.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy [FE Docket No. 01-01-NG, 01-02-NG]
 AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.
 ACTION: Notice of orders.
 SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy gives notice that during January 2001, it issued Orders granting authority to import and export natural gas. These Orders are summarized in the attached appendix and may be found on the FE website at http://www.fe.doe.gov, or on the electronic bulletin board at (202) 586-7853. They are also available for inspection and copying in the Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum Import & Export Activities, Docket Room 3E-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Issued in Washington, DC on February 12, 2001. Clifford P. Tomaszewski, Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum Import & Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
 Appendix—Orders Granting Import/Export Authorizations
[DOE/FE Authority]
Order No.
Date Issued
Importer/Exporter 
                             FE Docket No.
Import Volume
Export Volume
Comments1665
1/22/01
Transco Energy Marketing Company 01-01-NG
730 Bcf

Import from Canada beginning on February 7, 2001, and extending through February 6, 20031664
1/26/01
Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. 01-02-NG
57 Bcf
Import and export a combined total from and to Canada, beginning on January 29, 2001, and extending through January 28, 2003


[FR Doc. 01-4005 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

 For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see

the Instructions for Form 8027.

Use IRS label. Make any Employer’s name Employer identification number

necessary changes.

Otherwise, type or print

employer’s name,

address, and employer

identification number as

shown on Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File Form 8027-T along with accompanying Forms

8027 with the Internal Revenue Service Center,

Andover, MA 05501, by March 1, 2004.

Use Form 8027-T to send Forms 8027 to the

Internal Revenue Service Center if you have more

than one establishment for which you have to file

Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (2003)

Apt. or suite no.

2003
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3706 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3706

 To provide that funding for Gaza shall be made available instead for 
            the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

 Mr. Guest (for himself, Mr. Norman, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Mast, Mr. 
  Garcia of California, Mr. DesJarlais, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Johnson of 
Ohio, Mr. Steube, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Posey, Mr. Perry, Mr. Roy, Mr. Mann, 
 Mr. Budd, Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Harris, 
   Mr. McClintock, Mrs. Hinson, Mr. Good of Virginia, and Mr. Clyde) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that funding for Gaza shall be made available instead for 
            the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Resupply for IRON DOME Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 1649 
of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and sections 482(b) and 
531(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291a(b) and 
2346(e)), the President shall transfer all unexpended balances of 
appropriations made available for assistance to Gaza--
            (1) to the Department of Defense, to be available for 
        grants to Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense 
        system; or
            (2) to the Foreign Military Financing Program authorized 
        under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2763), to be available for grants to Israel for the Iron Dome 
        short-range rocket defense system.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00360-CR

Ramon De Los Santos, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-06-301255, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Ramon De Los Santos seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated

assault. Sentence was imposed on March 2, 2007, and there was a timely motion for new trial. The

deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore May 31. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice of

appeal was filed on June 11, 2007. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. We are advised that the notice of appeal was hand delivered and therefore

the mailbox rule does not apply. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack

jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want

of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 20, 2007

Do Not Publish
exv10w2



 







Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Amendment (A)




     Paul Kennard (“Executive”) and Stratex Networks, Inc., (the “Company”), are parties to an
Employment Agreement of May 14, 2002 (the “Agreement”). Executive and the Company now wish to
amend the Agreement, and thus they agree as set forth below. This Amendment shall also be deemed
effective as of April 1, 2006.



     1. The following is added to Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the Agreement: “provided, however, that if
you are 60 years of age or older on the date of your termination without cause, and if you have
been employed by the Company for not less than three years as of the date of your termination
without cause, the Company will pay the premiums necessary to continue your Company group health
insurance coverage under COBRA (or to provide you with comparable health insurance coverage) until
you reach the age of 65 or until you are eligible to participate in another employer’s group health
insurance plan, whichever comes first;”.



     2. In Paragraph 5(e) of the Agreement, the phase “(ii to a maximum of 18 months, unless you
are 60 years of age or older on the date of your termination/resignation and you have been employed
by the Company for not less than three years as of the date of your termination/resignation, in
which case the last clause of subparagraph 5(c)(ii) shall apply)” shall be inserted following the
phrase “subparagraph 5(c)(i),”.



     3. In Paragraph 11 of the Agreement, the last sentence (“Provided, however . . .”) is hereby
deleted and replaced with the following sentence: “Any arbitration conducted under this Paragraph
will be pursuant to the American Arbitration Association’s (“AAA”) National Rules for the
Resolution of Employment Disputes, a copy of which can be found on the AAA’s website at
www.adr.org.”



     Except as modified by this or other Amendment, the Agreement will remain in full force and
effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: 4/26/06                    	 	           /S/
Paul Kennard
	 	 	 
	 	 	           Paul Kennard
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: 4/14/06                    	 	Stratex Networks, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	                    
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/S/ Chuck Kissner
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Peer Review Plan 

Title of Review: Food Security Status and Well-Being of Nutrition Assistance Program Participants in Puerto Rico 

[ X] Influential Scientific Information 

Agency: FNS [ ] Highly Influential Scientific Assessment 

Agency Contact: Melissa Abelev 

Subject of Review: Food Security Status and Well-Being of Nutrition Assistance Program Participants in Puerto Rico 

Purpose of Review: Subject the information to formal, independent, external peer review to ensure its

 objectivity. 

Type of Review: [ X ] Panel Review [] Individual Reviewers 

[ ] Alternative Process (Briefly Explain): 

Timing of Review (Est.): Start: 3/2021 End: 9/2025 Completed: 

Number of Reviewers: [] 3 or [ X ] 4 to 10 [ ] More than 10 

fewer 

Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise Needed for Review: 

The technical working group members have recognized subject matter and research methodology 

expertise on selected issues related to study design, system mapping, and Puerto Rican food and 

nutrition system 

Reviewers selected by: [ ] Agency [ X ] Designated Outside 

Organization 

Organization’s Name: Insight Policy

 Research 

Opportunities for Public Comment? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

If yes, briefly state how and when these opportunities will be provided: 

How: 

When: 

Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments? [ ] Yes [ X] No 

Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel? [ ] Yes [ X] No 

Other: 
 

The technical working group (TWG) will be charged with two tasks as follows: 

1. Reviewers will be requested to determine if (i) the data collection as implemented was 

appropriate, (ii) whether the analyses as carried out reflect the original plans and (iii) 

whether the analyses are appropriate given the actual implementation of sampling and data 

collection. 

2. Reviewers will be charged with evaluating the clarity of hypotheses, the robustness of 

the methods employed to address the hypotheses, the appropriateness of the methods for 

the hypotheses being tested, the extent to which the conclusions follow from the analysis, 

and the strengths and limitations of the overall conclusions. The peer reviewers will be 

requested, as appropriate, to suggest ways to clarify assumptions, findings, and 

conclusions; identify oversights, omissions, and inconsistencies; and, if needed, encourage 

authors to more fully acknowledge limitations and uncertainties. 

There will be three meetings of the TWG. A written summary of each meeting will be produced. 

Because this study is considered influential scientific information, reviewers will be informed that 

the Agency will make available to the public the summaries of technical working group.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN THE  COMPANY'S  10-K FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1996  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIREY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         $77,342,947
<SECURITIES>                                     5,176,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,696,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,263,683)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,406,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,548,268
<PP&E>                                         134,714,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,139,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,701,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,465,548
<BONDS>                                        199,979,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        72,647,099
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,453,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,701,198
<SALES>                                         41,299,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,299,486
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,342,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,188,654)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,224,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,632,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,632,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,378,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued August 22, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00560-CV

———————————

IN RE AXIS ENERGY MARKETING, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 3, 2023, relator Axis Energy Marketing, LLC filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus challenging an order signed on August 1, 2023 by the 

Honorable Robert Schaffer, who was sitting for the Honorable Beau Miller. In this 

order, the motion to expedite discovery filed by real party in interest Apricus 

Enterprises, LLC was granted and authorized the deposition of a corporate 
2

representative of relator Axis Energy.

1

 On the same day, Axis Energy filed its 

petition and a motion for emergency relief. Real party Apricus Enterprises filed a 

response to the motion for emergency relief.

On August 3, 2023, this Court issued an order granting the motion for 

emergency relief, staying the challenged August 1, 2023 order to permit the 

Honorable Beau Miller to reconsider the order signed by the Honorable Robert 

Schaffer. On August 4, 2023, relator Axis Energy filed a motion to dismiss the 

original proceeding because the parties had reached an agreement regarding the 

expedited discovery order and resolved the issues raised in the petition for writ of 

mandamus. The certificate of conference to this motion to dismiss indicates that 

real party Apricus Enterprises is unopposed to the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the petition. The stay of the 

trial court’s August 3, 2023 order is lifted. Any other pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

1 The underlying case is Apricus Enterprises, LLC v. Axis Energy Marketing, LLC, 

cause number 2023-47355, pending in the 190th District Court of Harris County, 

Texas, the Honorable Beau Miller presiding.