alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID PAUL NAVARRO,

 Appellant, 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

No. 08-20-00204-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D03126)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until June 4, 2021. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ordered that the Hon. Felix Valenzuela, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s Brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 4, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19

th day of April, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                     44,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,583
<PP&E>                                         102,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,362
<BONDS>                                        153,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,194)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,091
<SALES>                                        179,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,613
<CGS>                                          127,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,963)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,318
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
942 A.2d 892

#### Anthony OLIVER, Sr., Administrator of the Estate of Anthony Daniel Oliver, Jr., Deceased, and Anthony Oliver, Sr., and Sherree Goode, in their Own Right, Respondents v. LOU’S OF UPPER DARBY, INC. and Phoenix Arms Petition of Lou’s of Upper Darby, Inc.

No. 148 EM 2006.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 13, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Application for Relief

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2008, the Application for Relief is DENIED.

Mr. Justice McCAFFERY dissents.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1077** 

THEODORE JUSTICE, for Son , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent; MARY WATSON, Director Exceptional Children; AUGUSTUS B. ELKINS, Administrative Law Judge; HONORABLE JULIAN MANN, III, Administrative Law Judge; AMY MILLER, Program Director Exceptional Children; MICHAEL ALLEN, Director Exceptional Children; KATHY TWISDALE, Principal Stovall Sha w Elementary; ROBYNN WILLIAMS, Special Education Teacher; JAMES E. CROSS, JR., Attorney Granville County Schools; DALE W. HENSLEY, Attorney Granville County Schools; KATE NEALE, Consultant for Dispute Resolution Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division; JULIE RICHARDS, Clerk of Court ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:13

- cv
- 00343

- D )

Submitted : April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se. John Graham Corriher, Kenneth Alexander Soo, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Laura Ellen Crumpler, Susannah Porter Holloway, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Tiffany Y. Lucas, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice appeals the district court ’ s order
dismissing his complaint raising claims under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(2) (2012) and the

United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Justice v. Farley , No.

5:13

- cv
- 003 43

- D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014)

. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional proce ss.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10968-10969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4223]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

49 CFR Part 37

[OST Docket 98-3648]


Transportation for Individuals With Disabilities--Accessibility 
of Over-the-Road Buses (OTRBs)

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule makes an editorial correction to the preamble of the 
recently published interim final rule amending the Department of 
Transportation's regulations concerning accessibility of over-the-road 
buses (OTRBs). The interim final rule was published in the Federal 
Register on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9048)

[[Page 10969]]

and becomes effective on March 8, 2001. Written comments on the interim 
final rule must be submitted on or before March 8, 2001. The interim 
final rule may be changed in light of the comments received.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 21, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blane A. Workie, Office of the General 
Counsel, C-50, (202) 366-4723, Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The interim final rule amending 49 CFR part 
37, erroneously asks whether the Department should ``propose requiring 
acquisition of accessible buses in some situations where on-call 
service is not permitted''? Instead, the question should have been 
whether the Department should ``propose requiring acquisition of 
accessible buses in some situations where on-call service is now 
permitted''? This correction notice is to rectify this typographical 
mistake.

    Issued in Washington, DC, this 9th day of February, 2001 under 
authority delegated to me by 49 CFR 1.57(l).
Rosalind A. Knapp,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-4223 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANACIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 8, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FORTY WEEKS ENDED MARCH 8, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-08-1997
<CASH>                                          10,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,954
<INVENTORY>                                     61,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,131
<PP&E>                                       1,039,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 250,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,437,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          328,321
<BONDS>                                        239,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           391
<OTHER-SE>                                     513,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,437,891
<SALES>                                      2,457,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,457,261
<CGS>                                        1,205,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,205,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of A.L.H.

, a child, * From the County Court at Law

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1411455

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 003

- CV * April 9 , 20 20

* Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here is

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the order of th e trial court is in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3574] 

# AGENCY:

United States Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Kandinsky and Abstraction in Russia,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museo de Arte de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, from on or about March 3, 2001 to on or about May 14, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001. 

Dated: February 8, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-3861 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

***I, Roger E. Gower, certify that:***

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: April 28,  2005 | By:                                    | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                        | Roger E. Gower                         |
|                        | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                               0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<INVENTORY>                                 0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                      0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                              0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                     0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<COMMON>                                    0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<PREFERRED>                                 0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                  0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                0 <F1>            0 <F1>
<SALES>                                     0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<CGS>                                       0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                              0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<CHANGES>                                   0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<EPS-BASIC>                               0 <F2>            0 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0 <F2>            0 <F2>

<FN>
<F1> SEE JUNE 30, 1999 STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION.
<F2> SEE JUNE 30, 1999 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION.
</FN>

</TABLE>
# FILED

April 18, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON
ROBERT RAYFORD, ) ) C.C.A. No. 02 C01-9701-CC-00011 PETITIONER, ) ) LAUDERDALE COUNTY VS ) ) ROBERT CONLEY, WARDEN, ) ) RESPONDENT. )

ORD ER D ENY ING PET ITI ON T O RE HEAR
Upon consideration of the petiti on to rehear, the Court finds the same to be without merit. The petition to rehear is respectfully DENIED. So ordered.

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUD GE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEPTEMBER-30-1995
<CASH>				716,630
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   000
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                000
<PP&E>				000
<DEPRECIATION>			000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			14,182,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		311,957
<BONDS>				000
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      13,870,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	14,182,609
<SALES>				000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (97,181)
<CGS>				000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                73,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		000
<INCOME-PRETAX>			(170,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		(170,972)
<DISCONTINUED>			000
<EXTRAORDINARY>			000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    (170,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   000
        		

</TABLE>
946 A.2d 103

#### Robert EDWARDS, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 30, 2008.

*492
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2008, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.