alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31961]



[[Page 67325]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 01-157]


Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This information collection is 
used by NASA contracting officers to ensure that projected contract 
cost savings are being realized.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by January 28, 
2002.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Office of Management and 
Budget; Room 10236; New Executive Office Building; Washington, DC, 
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nancy Kaplan, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1372.
    Title: Cost Reduction Proposals under the NASA FAR Supplement 
Shared Savings Clause.
    OMB Number: 2700-0094.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: This program provides an incentive for contractors 
to propose and implement, with NASA approval, significant cost 
reduction initiatives on current and follow-on contracts.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions; Federal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 9.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.25.
    Annual Responses: 11.25.
    Hours Per Request: 45.
    Annual Burden Hours: 506.
    Frequency of Report: On occasion.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-31961 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH TRIBBLE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JIM GIBBONS, Governor; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-17810

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00216-ECRVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Edward C. Reed, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Tribble, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the

conditions of his parole hearing violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment

rights and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution. We have jurisdiction

FILED

FEB 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-17810

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 893

(9th Cir. 2001) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Yanez v. United States, 63

F.3d 870, 872 (9th Cir. 1995) (judgment on the pleadings). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Tribble’s Eighth Amendment claim

because the procedures used at his parole hearing do not offend “contemporary

standards of decency.” Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 36 (1993). 

The district court properly dismissed Tribble’s Fourteenth Amendment due

process claim because Nevada law does not create a liberty interest in parole. See

Moor v. Palmer, 603 F.3d 658, 662 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Wilkinson v. Dotson,

544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005) (prisoner may challenge procedures used in parole

hearing under section 1983, provided he does not seek “immediate or speedier

release”). 

The district court properly dismissed Tribble’s Ex Post Facto claim because

he did not allege retroactive application of a law that significantly risked increasing

his punishment. See id. at 663 (in the parole context, the ex post facto inquiry

focuses on whether the amended rule creates a significant risk of prolonging a

prisoner’s incarceration). 
3 09-17810

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Tribble’s request

for appointment of counsel because he failed to show exceptional circumstances.

See Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 1980) (per curiam). 

Tribble’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Concession Contract Negotiations; Acadia National Park, ME

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a temporary concession contract authorizing the 
operation of carriage rides, horse camp, day use parking, facilities 
and services for the public at Acadia National Park, Maine for a term 
not to exceed October 31, 2001.

DATES: March 22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: National Park Service, Concession Management Program, Boston 
Support Office, 15 State Street, Boston MA 02109-3572, Telephone (617) 
223-5209.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This temporary concession contract is being 
awarded to Mr. Edward Winterberg, Seal Harbor, Maine. It is necessary 
to award the contract in order to avoid interruption of visitor 
services.
    This action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR 51.24(a). This is not a 
request for proposals and no prospectus is being issued at this time. 
The Secretary intends to issue a competitive solicitation of offers for 
a long-term operator to begin in 2002. You may be placed on a mailing 
list for receiving information regarding the competitive solicitation 
by sending a written request to the above address.

    Dated: December 22, 2000.
Chrysandra L. Walter,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 01-4082 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
rom S754

(Rev. November 1985)

Statement by Person(s) Receiving Gambling Winnings OMB No. 1545-0239

Department of the Treasu > For instructions for Form 5754, see Instructions for Expires 12-31-86
Interal Revenue Service Forms 1099, 1098, 5498, 1096, and W-26.

Date won Type of winnings Game number Machine number Race number
(GaAs Person to Whom Winnings are Paid

Name Address
Taxpayer identifying number Other. ‘Amount received | Federal income tax withheld
GG) Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable
Name ryanpayer Address ‘Amount won Winnings from

identifying number

identical wagers

Under penalties of perjury, | declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the names, addresses, and taxpayer identifying numbers which | have furnished correctly identify me as the
fecipient of this payment and correctly identify each person entitled to any portion of this payment and any payments from identical wagers.

Signature >

Date >

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of form.

Form 5754 (Rev. 11-85)


Form 5754 (Rev. 11-85) Page 2
[ztaaig Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable (Continued)
Name Taxpayer Address ‘Amount won Winnings from

identifying number

identical wagers

Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.—We ask for this information to
carry out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. We need it
to ensure that taxpayers are complying with these laws and to allow
us to figure and collect the right amount of tax. You are required to
give us this information.

General Information.—In the event that any person other than the
person receiving gambling winnings which are subject to withholding
or reporting re juirements (‘‘recipient’') is entitled to a portion of the
winnings, this form must be completed by the recipient. If the
recipient is not one of the winners, that person must fill in his or her
name, address and taxpayer identifying number in Part | and then list
in Part ll the names, addresses, taxpayer identifying numbers, the
amount of the winnings, and the amount of any additional winnings

from identical wagers which each of the other persons is entitled to
receive. If the recipient is one of the winners, that person's name, the
amount of the winnings, and the amount of any additional winnings
from identical wagers should also appear in Part II. The taxpayer
identifying number for an individual is the social security number; for
all others it is the employer identification number. The statement
must then be signed (if Federal income tax is withheld) and returned
to the payer of the winnings. The payer will file a Form W-2G at the
time of the payment or no later than January 31st of the year
following the year of the winnings.

This form should be retained by the payer for a period of four
years from the date of the payment of the winnings and must be
made available to Internal Revenue upon request during that period.

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1987—201-993/60093
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial informatino extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income FUnd IV, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of income
for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. for the three months ended March 31,
1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,966,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  353,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                   304,086
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      20,376,953
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,642,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,996,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,895,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,996,043
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               606,391
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                577,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            577,060
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   577,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas D. Burkett, Chief
Executive Officer of Zila, Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence J. BatinaLawrence J. Batina
Chief Financial Officer
December 15 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Zila, Inc. and will be
retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-63485) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Opinion
Research Corporation, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45412) pertaining
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Opinion Research Corporation,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-46530) pertaining to the Stock Purchase
Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Designated Employees and Consultants of
Opinion Research Corporation of our report dated February 7, 2002, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Opinion Research
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7546

FERNANDO M. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-1926-AW)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United

States, No. CA-97-1926-AW (D. Md. Aug. 27, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
July 20, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF W.D.H.

NO. 14-17-00164-CV 

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record. Having considered the 

record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders 

the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6352
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-371-HM, CA-03-3178-L) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Maxwell , Nos. CR-87-371-HM, CA-03-3178-L (D. Md. filed Feb. 4, 2004; entered Feb. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
|        |   | /s/ DENNIS M.  HANSON               |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                |
|   |   | Senior Executive Vice President and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer             |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)       |

 

March 16, 2007

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Research Evaluation and Communication; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Research Evaluation and Communication (1210).
    Date/Time: March 26--Rooms 565, 585, 595 (Stafford II) 8:30 
a.m.-5 p.m., March 27--Rooms 565, 585, 595 (Stafford II) 8:30 a.m.-5 
p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Finbarr Sloane, Program Director, Research 
Evaluation and Communication Division, National Science Foundation, 
Room 855, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-
8650.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate IERI Proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3981 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

January 13, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 28, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F 

Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Knife River Construction, Docket 

Nos. WEST 2013-827-RM, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge 

erred in upholding an imminent danger order.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Exhibit 10.2





7900  69th Avenue ~ Greenfield, Minnesota   55373 ~ Phone:  (763) 477-4774 ~ Fax:  (763) 477-5174


	
  PROJECT:

  	
   

  	
  Little Sioux Corn Processors

  	
   

  	
  CHANGE ORDER NO:

  	
   

  	
  1-1

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  4808 “F” Ave.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Marcus, IA. 50126

  	
   

  	
  DATE:

  	
   

  	
  July 17, 2006

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  PROJECT NO:

  	
   

  	
  03-06 IA

  
	
  ATTN:

  	
   

  	
  Steve Roe

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  ORIGINAL COMPLETION
  DATE;

  	
   

  	
  September 1, 2007

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  CONTRACT FOR:

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


The
contract is changed as follows:


	
  #

  	
   

  	
  COST

  	
   

  	
  DESCRIPTION

  	
   

  
	
  1

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  936,000.00

  	
   

  	
  DDG
  Storage Building Expansion, 125’ x 100’ by 39’ eave.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Per
  our proposal #06038-1 dated 7/17/2006

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  936,000.00

  	
   

  	
  TOTAL

  	
   

  



 


	
  Original Contract Sum

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,673,025.00

  	
   

  
	
  Net change by
  previously authorized Change Order(s)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  17,200.00

  	
   

  
	
  Contract Sum
  prior to this Change Order

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,690,225.00

  	
   

  
	
  Contract Sum
  will be increased by this Change Order in the amount of

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  936,000.00

  	
   

  
	
  New Contract Sum
  including this Change Order

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  6,626,225.00

  	
   

  
	
  Contract Time to
  be increased by (working days)

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
   

  
	
  Revised date of Substantial Completion

  	
   

  	
  September 1, 2007

  	
   

  



 


	
  Accepted By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  McC Inc.

  	
   

  	
  Little Sioux Corn Processors

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  CONTRACTOR

  	
   

  	
  OWNER

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Stephen G. Roe

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By: Rick Holthaus, Project Manager

  	
   

  	
  By: Steve Roe

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  7/21/06

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date: 7/17/2006

  	
   

  	
  Date: