alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 31, 2020

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

AWARDS ANNUITY CONTRACT

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board (FRTIB) announced today that it has awarded its life 

annuity contract to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 

(MetLife). 

The Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act describes the 

annuity methods that are required to be made available to 

eligible Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) participants and spousal 

beneficiaries. There are eighteen annuity options and two 

annuity methods (single life and joint life). TSP participants 

may elect to use all or a portion of the proceeds of their TSP 

account to purchase an annuity. Account balances may consist of 

traditional contributions and earnings and Roth contributions 

and earnings. Separate Annuities are purchased for the

traditional and Roth balances.

The annuity contract is for a performance period comprised of a 

three-year base period and two 1-year option period. 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is similar to 

the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. As of December 2019, TSP 

assets totaled approximately $628 billion, and retirement savings accounts 

were being maintained for more than 5.8 million TSP participants. 

Participants include Federal civilian employees in all branches of 

Government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the 

uniformed services. Additional information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
----

----

| (Mark      One) |                                                                                              |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  x         |  QUARTERLY      REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF      1934 |

| o | TRANSITION REPORT      UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGEACT |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Safe      Technologies International, Inc.                             |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Exact name of small      business issuer as specified in its charter) |   |

|   | Delaware                                    |   | 22-2824492               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | (State or other      jurisdiction of   |   | (IRS    Employer         |   |
|   | incorporation or      organization)    |   | Identification      No.) |   |

|   | 1200      N Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33432 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Address of      principal executive offices)                |   |

|   |                                                                                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (866)      297-5070                                                                         |   |
|   | (Issuer's      telephone number)                                                            |   |
|   |  __________________________________(Former      address, if changed since last report) |   |

----

|                               | Safe      Technologies International, Inc. (Registrant) |                                |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |
| Date:      November 23, 2009  | By:                                                          | /s/Christopher      L. Kolb         |   |
|                               |                                                         | Christopher      L. Kolb, President |   |
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |

----
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this o pinion should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt exc ept under the limite d circumstances set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40510 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. H EC TO R FE LI X G AR ZA- G O N ZAL EZ, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U S D C N o . 7 :09 -C R -2 2 -1 B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * A pp eal i n g t h e j u dg m en tin a cri m i n alcase, H ect or Fel i x G arza- G on zal ez pre se nt s ar gum ent s t hat he c onc ede s ar e f or ec l os ed by Uni t e d S t at e s v . Ce pe daR i os , 530 F . 3d 333 , 335 - 36 (5t h C i r. 200 8) , w h i ch h el d that even aft er Lopezv. G on zal es , 549 U . S . 47 ( 200 6) , a sec on d st ate c on vi ct i on f or s i m pl e possess i on of a c o nt r o l l e d s ubs t anc e q ual i f i e s a s an a gg r av at e d f e l o ny t hats upp o r t s t he i m po s i t i o n o f

a n e i ght - l e ve le nhan c e m e nt unde r U . S. S. G . § 2L1 . 2(b) ( 1) ( C) . The G o ve r nm e nt ’ s m o t i o n fo rs um m ar y af f i r m anc e i s G RA N TE D , a nd t he j udg m e nt o f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
#### VAN METER v. WALLACE.

No. 23936.

March 5, 1935.

Harlan Deupree, Municipal Counselor, for plaintiff in error.

Dudley, Hyde, Duvall & Dudley, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the rec*639ord herein, it appears that applicant for a drilling permit, Robert A. Wallace, was not in possession of the lands on which he sought such permit, and that said lands were held adversely to him. The action of the court in granting said permit was therefore erroneous.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to dismiss said proceeding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Balance Sheet, and Income Statement
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                        5,082,212
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,460,197
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               26,698,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           167,987
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        132,106
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,333,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 26,698,776
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              6,027,544
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                12,758,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,808,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (8,540,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (16,359)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (8,523,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (8,523,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Special Diversified Opportunities Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Date: April 30, 2014

By:

/s/ PHILIP T. BLAZEK Philip T. Blazek President and Principal Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                        527
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13,471
<PP&E>                                          179,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                   35,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  157,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14,288
<BONDS>                                         124,978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        118,121
<OTHER-SE>                                     (100,030)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    157,357
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37,640
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .18
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 4659

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DARRELL TYKWAN ATKINSON, a/k/a Da Da , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 7:16

- cr - 00120

- D

- 5 )

Submitted : April 30, 2019 Decided: August 7, 2019

Before KING, THACKER , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. G. Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defender, Eric Joseph Brignac, Chief Appellate Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robe rt J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darrell Tykwan Atkinson sold heroin while serving a term of supervised release, resulting in a 24

- month sentence for distributing a controlled substance, plus a consecutive 24

- month revocation sentence for violating his supervision. On appeal from his revocation judgme nt , Atkinson contends that the revocation sentence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
We rev i ew double jeopardy challenges de novo

. United State s v. Schnittker , 807 F.3d 77, 81 (4th Cir. 2015) . Nevertheless, on settled issues of law, i t is well established “that one panel [of this c ourt] cannot overrule a decision issued by another panel” unless “the [prior panel] decision rests on authority that subsequently proves untenable.” United States v. Williams , 808 F.3d 253, 261 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In United States v. Woodrup , 86 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. 1996) , we held that “the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit the government from criminally prosecuting and punishing an offense which has formed the basis for revocation of a term of supervised release.” Id. at 363. In urging us to depart from Woodrup , Atkinson highli ghts changes to the Sentencing Guidelines and statutory sentencing factors that have occurred since 1996. These changes, however, simply provide no basis for us to conclude that the reasoning in Woodrup is no longer sound. Likewise, the Supreme
Court’s r ecent decision in United States v. Haymond , 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019) , does not undermine Woodrup

. Thus, we reject Atkinson’s assertion that his revocation sentence runs afoul of the Double Jeopardy Clause.3 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 1, 2017

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

ANNOUNCES A RELAXATION OF HARDSHIP WITHDRAWAL 

RULES TO HELP VICTIMS OF HURRICANE HARVEY

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) announced today 

that it has made a temporary change to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) hardship withdrawal rules 

to help victims of Hurricane Harvey pursuant to the guidance issued by the Internal Revenue 

Service on August 30. 

Beginning today, the TSP will treat any Financial Hardship In-Service Withdrawal Request

(Form TSP-76) received until January 24, 2018 as qualifying for a hardship withdrawal if the 

participant writes “Hurricane Harvey” at the top of the form and checks the block on the form for 

personal casualty on page 2, Item 18 of the form. The distributions must occur before January 31, 

2018 to qualify for this treatment. 

The participant should write “Hurricane Harvey” at the top of the form and check the “personal 

casualty” box on the TSP-76. The TSP will then waive the rule that prohibits a participant from 

making employee contributions for 6 months after taking a hardship withdrawal. This will allow 

an employee to continue to make contributions to the TSP and receive the employer match (if 

eligible). This temporary change will not be effective retroactively. For more information, please 

go to https://www.tsp.gov/whatsnew/plan/planNews.shtml.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for federal employees; it 

is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of July 2017, TSP assets totaled approximately 

$511 billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for over 5 million TSP participants. Participants 

include federal civilian employees in all branches of 

government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of 

the uniformed services. Additional information can be found at 

www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver

202-942-1641 

(end)
Order entered June 5, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01329
- CR PAUL HENRI WAGNER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. MA11
- 14870
- L



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the State’s June 3, 2014 second motion for extension of time to file
the State brief

. We ORDER the State to file its brief within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order. No further extensions will be gr anted.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2214 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2214

  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require that 
 candidates for the House of Representatives receive at least half of 
             their campaign contributions from individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 1993

  Mr. Franks of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require that 
 candidates for the House of Representatives receive at least half of 
             their campaign contributions from individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITATION ON 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate 
or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not, with respect to a 
reporting period for an election, accept contributions from persons 
other than individuals totaling in excess of 50 percent of all 
contributions accepted by the candidate with respect to the reporting 
period.''.

                                 <all>
```
Form 7004

(Rev. December 2017) 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Application for Automatic Extension of Time To File Certain 

Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns

▶ File a separate application for each return.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form7004 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0233 

Print 

or 

Type 

Name Identifying number 

Number, street, and room or suite no. (If P.O. box, see instructions.) 

City, town, state, and ZIP code (If a foreign address, enter city, province or state, and country (follow the country’s practice for entering postal code)).

Note: File request for extension by the due date of the return. See instructions before completing this form.

Part I Automatic Extension for Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns. See instructions.

1 Enter the form code for the return listed below that this application is for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Application 

Is For: 

Form 

Code 

Form 706-GS(D) 01

Form 706-GS(T) 02

Form 1041 (bankruptcy estate only) 03

Form 1041 (estate other than a bankruptcy estate) 04

Form 1041 (trust) 05

Form 1041-N 06

Form 1041-QFT 07

Form 1042 08

Form 1065 09

Form 1065-B 10

Form 1066 11

Form 1120 12

Form 1120-C 34

Form 1120-F 15

Form 1120-FSC 16

Form 1120-H 17

Form 1120-L 18

Application 

Is For: 

Form 

Code 

Form 1120-ND 19

Form 1120-ND (section 4951 taxes) 20

Form 1120-PC 21

Form 1120-POL 22

Form 1120-REIT 23

Form 1120-RIC 24

Form 1120S 25

Form 1120-SF 26

Form 3520-A 27

Form 8612 28

Form 8613 29

Form 8725 30

Form 8804 31

Form 8831 32

Form 8876 33

Form 8924 35

Form 8928 36

Part II All Filers Must Complete This Part 

2 If the organization is a foreign corporation that does not have an office or place of business in the United States, 

check here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

3 If the organization is a corporation and is the common parent of a group that intends to file a consolidated return, 

check here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

If checked, attach a statement listing the name, address, and employer identification number (EIN) for each member 

covered by this application. 

4 If the organization is a corporation or partnership that qualifies under Regulations section 1.6081-5, check here . ▶

5a The application is for calendar year 20 , or tax year beginning , 20 , and ending , 20 

b Short tax year. If this tax year is less than 12 months, check the reason: Initial return Final return 

Change in accounting period Consolidated return to be filed Other (see instructions—attach explanation)

6 Tentative total tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7 Total payments and credits (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

8 Balance due. Subtract line 7 from line 6 (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 13804A Form 7004 (Rev. 12-2017)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1604

To eliminate the price support program for wool and mohair.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Agriculture and Government Operations

A BILL

To eliminate the price support program for wool and mohair.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wool and Mohair Fed5 eral Support Program Elimination and Deficit Reduction

6 Act of 1993’’.

7 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WOOL AND MOHAIR PRICE SUP8 PORT PROGRAM.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The National Wool Act of 1954

10 (7 U.S.C. 1781 et seq.) is repealed.
2

•HR 1604 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 256(a) of

2 the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act

3 of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 906(a)) is amended—

4 (1) by striking paragraph (1); and

5 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as

6 paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.

7 SEC. 3. TRANSITION PROVISIONS.

8 The amendments made by this Act shall not affect

9 the liability of any person under any provision of law as

10 in effect before the application of the amendments in ac11 cordance with section 4.

12 SEC. 4. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

13 The amendments made by this Act shall apply begin14 ning with the marketing year beginning on or after Janu15 ary 1, 1994.

Æ