alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/01-0275] 

                    Notice is hereby given that Northeast SBIC                     *(“Northeast”), 212 Tosca Drive, Stoughton, Massachusetts 02072,*                     has surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”).                     *Northeast*                     was licensed by the Small Business Administration on                     *May 7, 1974.*

                    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender of the license was accepted on                     *January 17, 2000*                     and accordingly, all rights, privileges, and franchises derived therefrom have been terminated.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small Business Investment Companies) 

Harry E. Haskins,

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 01-3977 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,381
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,428
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Pack , 2019-Ohio-4396.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

MADISON COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, Appellee,

- vs -

ROGER C. PACK, Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. 2018-08-026

D E C I S I O N 10/28/2019

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM MADISON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CRI20180051

Honorable Stephen J. Pronai, Madison County Prosecuting Attorney, 59 North Main Street, London, Ohio 43140, for appellee Engel & Martin, LLC, Joshua A. Engel, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, Ohio 45040, for appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Roger Pack, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Madison County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Cary L. Deacon

Cary L. Deacon
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ J. Reid Porter

J. Reid Porter
    
    Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and
accounting officer)
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Eric H. Paulson

Eric H. Paulson
    
    Chairman of the Board
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Keith A. Benson

Keith A. Benson
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ David F. Dalvey

David F. Dalvey
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Timothy R. Gentz

Timothy R. Gentz
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Frederick C. Green IV

Frederick C. Green IV
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Deborah L. Hopp

Deborah L. Hopp
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Kathleen P. Iverson

Kathleen P. Iverson
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010/s/ Tom F. Weyl

Tom F. Weyl
    
    Director
    
    June 11, 2010
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

Strategic Diagnostics Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-20421, 333-21211, 333-68107, 333-68484 and 333-118297) on Form S-8 of
Strategic Diagnostics Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Strategic Diagnostics Inc.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    KPMG LLP           
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|March 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eat at Joe's,  Ltd., on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Joseph Fiore,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2006


/s/ Joseph Fiore
Joseph Fiore
CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       29

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-74160, 33-81114, 33-81126, 33-80385, 33-80387,
and 33-80395 of Vesta Insurance Group, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
March 1, 2001 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 29, 2001
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

May29, 2017

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Thursday,July13,2017. (Thismeetinghadoriginally

beenscheduledfor June15, 2017.)

 

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillconsiderandactuponthefollowinginopen

session:*Secretary****ofLaborv.PocahontasCoalCompany,LLC,*DocketNos.WEVA2014-395-R,etal.(Issuesincludewhether theJudgeerredinconcludingthatMSHAhadestablishedthatapatternofviolationsexistedat the operator’smine.)

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

MEETING:                             1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode:678-100

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Terry J. Tuttle, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Speed Commerce, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: December 1, 2015



| | By | /s/ Terry J. Tuttle     | 
| | -- | ----------------------- | 
| |    | Terry J. Tuttle         | 
| |    | Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 REGARDING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005

      Richard F. Latour, President and Chief Executive Officer of MicroFinancial
Incorporated (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Covered Report") and, except as corrected or
supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

-     the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-     the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of this
16th of May, 2005.

                                       /s/ Richard F. Latour
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard F. Latour
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. JICARILLA APACHE NATION.

No. 10-382.

Jan. 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Darius T. HICKS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Tracy S. RAY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.

No. 10-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2011.

Darius T. Hicks, Appellant pro se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.*

*

 This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darius T. Hicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hicks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *822and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04

- 11

- 00348

- CR & 04

- 11

- 00349

- CR Norman Gary PICKENS , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR2384 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 3, 2011
DISMISSED In each of the trial court’s certifications in these appeals, the certification states that the case is “plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of ap peal has not been made part of the record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).04

- 11

- 00348

- CR & 04

- 11

- 00349

- CR

- 2

- In each case, Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that appellant has the right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the records presented, we agree with Appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
PER CURIAM

D O NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Cox,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |         |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |        
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ Douglas L. Cox                                  
|                     |  | Name:   |  | Douglas L. Cox                                      
|                     |  | Title:  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          36,945
<SECURITIES>                                    11,708
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,798
<PP&E>                                          14,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,491
<BONDS>                                             16
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           374
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,711
<SALES>                                            892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,182
<CGS>                                            1,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
        

</TABLE>
#### Lester O’Neil WOODRUFF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7944.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 14, 2014.

Decided: April 16, 2014.

Lester O’Neil Woodruff, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*256PER CURIAM:

Lester O’Neil Woodruff seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2860, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 28, 2013. The notice of appeal was filed on November 25, 2013.* Because Woodruff failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny Woodruffs motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).