alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of   Environmental   Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending
December 31, 2006 (the "Report") we, Edward Torres, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer  of the  Company,  and  Michael  Fell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 17, 2007


\s\ Edward Torres
---------------------------------------------------
Edward Torres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


\s\ Michael Fell
---------------------------------------------------
Michael Fell, Chief Financial Officer


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Form 3903 2021

Moving Expenses 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service (99) 

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form3903 for instructions and the latest information.

▶ Attach to Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR. 

OMB No. 1545-0074 

Attachment 

Sequence No. 170 

Name(s) shown on return Your social security number 

Before you begin: You can deduct moving expenses only if you are a Member of the Armed Forces on active duty and, due to a 

military order, you, your spouse, or your dependents move because of a permanent change of station. 

Check here to certify that you meet these requirements. See the instructions . . . . . . . . . ▶

1 Transportation and storage of household goods and personal effects (see instructions) . . . . . 1 

2 Travel (including lodging) from your old home to your new home (see instructions). Do not include the

cost of meals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 Add lines 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Enter the total amount the government paid you for the expenses listed on lines 1 and 2 that is not 

included in box 1 of your Form W-2 (wages). This amount should be shown in box 12 of your Form

W-2 with code P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 Is line 3 more than line 4? 

No. You cannot deduct your moving expenses. If line 3 is less than line 4, subtract line 3 from

line 4 and include the result on Form 1040 or 1040-SR, line 1; or Form 1040-NR, line 1a. 

Yes. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the result here and on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 14. 

This is your moving expense deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 12490K Form 3903 (2021)
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-4003

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Eric Daniel Anderson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2005 Filed: December 14, 2005

___________ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eric Daniel Anderson appeals the sent ence imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Anderson argues th e district court’s imposition of a U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) enhancem ent to his sentence violated his Sixth Amendment rights as recognized in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because Anderson properl y preserved a Booker objection and was erroneously sentenced under a mandatory Guidelines scheme, his sentence violated Booker . See United States v. Thomas , 422 F.3d 665, 669 (8th Cir. 2005) (district court committed error both in basing sentence on enhancemen ts found by court at sentencing, and in failing to treat Guidelines as advisory). We conclude the error was not harmless, because the government failed to show the e rror did not affect Anderson’s substantial-2- rights. SeeUnited States v. Haidley , 400 F.3d 642, 644-45 (8th Cir. 2005). Anderson was sentenced at the bottom of the Guidelines range and we disagree with the government contention that the district c ourt’s statements indicate the court would have given the same sentence under an advi sory system. To the contrary, taken in context, the court’s statements reflect an intent to be lenient within its perceived discretion. Seeid . (holding not harmless district court’s error in imposing sentence under mandatory Guidelines regime wher e court “made conscious decision” to sentence defendant to bottom of Guidelines range and defendant had raised several mitigating facts). Accordingly, we vacat e the sentence and remand for resentencing.

______________________________
SECOND DI VI SI ON

BA RNES, P. J.

, M I LLER, and RA

Y, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a ls .us /r ule s /

A ugust 10, 2015



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 3 A2 10 0 . PARKER v . THE STATE.

B A R N E S , Pres i d i n g J ud g e.

In Pa r ker v. St a t e , 2 9 6 Ga. 5 8 6 (7 6 9 SE2 d 3 2 9 ) (2 0 1 5 ), t he Su p rem e Co u rt o f

Geo rg i a rev ers ed Di v i s i o n 1 o f t h e ju d g m en t o f t h i s Co u rt i n Pa rker v. S t a t e , 3 2 6 Ga.

Ap p

. 2 1 7 (7 5 6 SE2 d 3 00 ) (2 0 1 4 ). 1 W e vacat e o u r earl i er o p i n i o n an d ad o p t t h e

o p i n i o n o f t h e Su p rem e Co u rt as ou r o wn

. Acco rd in gl y , we v acat e P a r k er’ s

co n vi ct i o n s an d t h e o rd er d en y i n g h i s m o t io n fo r m at eri al wi t n es s cert i fi cat es , rev ers e

t h e tri al co u rt ’ s ex cl u s io n o f Park er’ s p ro ffered d o cu m en t s , an d rem an d t h e cas e “ to

t h e t ri al co u rt wi t h d i rect i o n t o i s s u e a n ew ord er o n Park er’ s m o ti o n aft er co n s i d eri n g

h i s p ro ffers

, al o ng wi t h an y ot h er u n p ri v il eg ed ev i den ce su b m it t ed b y Park er an d t h e

St at e o n rem an d .” Pa r

ker , 2 9 6 Ga. at 5 9 6 (4 ).

1 Th i s Co u rt ’s r u l i n g s o n wh i ch t h e Su p rem e Co u rt d i d no t g ran t cert i o rari

rem ai n t h e l aw o f t he cas e. Pa rker , 2 9 6 Ga. at 5 9 7 , n . 1 4.If t h e t ri al co u rt o n rem an d g ran t s Park er’ s m o t i on fo r m at eri al wi t n es s

cert i fi cat es i n wh o l e o r i n p a r t

, an d Park er t h en s u cceed s in o bt ai n i n g

s u m m o n s es fo r th e wi t n es s es fro m t he Ken t uck y co u rt

, t h en a new t ri al

wi l l b e neces sary

. If, o n t h e o t h er h an d

, t h e t ri al co u rt d en i es t h e m o t i o n

ag ai n, t hen t he co urt s h o ul d reen t er t he ju dg m en t s o f co nv i ct i o n ag ai n s t

Park e r , w h o co u l d t h en t ak e an o th er ap p eal ch al l en g i n g t h e s eco n d

ru l i n g o n h i s m o t i o n an d an y rel at ed i ss u es

.

Id . at 5 9 7 (4 ).

Ju d g men t va ca t ed a nd ca s e r ema nd ed wi t h d i r e c t i o n

. Mi ll er an d Ra y, JJ.,

co n cu r

.

2
Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deng Zhi Ren, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Date: June 15, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Deng Zhi RenDeng Zhi RenChief
Executive Officer   Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Great China International Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cheng Shui San, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Date: June 15, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Cheng Shui San LawrenceCheng Shui San LawrenceChief
Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great China International Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by Great China International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 31.4

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

     I, N. Gregory Petrick, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of
Uni-Marts, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:  May 28, 2004
       --------------------------


                                       /S/ N. GREGORY PETRICK
                                       --------------------------
                                       N. Gregory Petrick
                                       Chief Financial Officer
## 666

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Ioaormblr Ooorgo Ii.8h+ppwd **0clr~tro~l.r of**  **Publir** 

### ArrouPtr Autla, Tour BoarBitt

ortr the opinion thu u 

### u~ouat Ar#hltooturil 8hlp ‘Of

### that Baird l br th. h&l&UFO br the La&lirlaturr for o St&a Boar6 of 

### Arohior the pn?~omr **of** a.- 

## l rrr4ull~,laaurrod

bf l

### rblairtrrtloa of the noat bf the kgirlature. r uttum. rhloh 

### l



### oatributb inno 

## thr l drialitration of rooh lam lro
whatsoever **to** the rnforoonwnt **of** thr **law8 intrusted**  to that Board ror adminlatration. You are therororcr adrlaed that t4o aooount for this purpose may n?t be paid from the lppropriationr mad8 to ths Board of Arohitrotural Exlainerr, Yourr rrrr trul7 - -..v “T --I!? ATTORRISY 5- 01 TEXAS
Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Optical Sensors Incorporated d.b.a. väsamed 
 Named Executive Officers’ Compensation
Summary 
 Optical Sensors Incorporated’s (the “Company’s) “named executive officers” (defined in Regulation S-B
Item 402(a)(2)) are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in their current positions: 
  

					
	 Name of Executive Officer:
	  	Base Salary	 
	 Paulita L. LaPlante
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	200,000	(1)
	 Roberta L. Dircks
 Vice President of Finance and Administration and
 Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	120,000	 
	 Jeffrey Skillicorn
 Vice President of Sales
	  	$	160,000	 
	 Kent R. Winger
 Vice President, Strategic Planning and Product Development
	  	$	108,160	 



	(1)	Subject to the Company meeting certain sales goals in 2006. 

 Stock
Options 
 On May 24, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted Jeffrey Skillicorn, the Company’s Vice
President of Sales, a non-statutory stock option under the Company’s 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock in connection with his recent employment by the Company. The option has an exercise
price of $2.15 per share, vests, on a cumulative basis, in four installments of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the option grant date, and has a term of ten years. The option is subject to the terms of the Plan. 
 On June 21, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted Roberta L. Dircks, the Company’s Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer, a non-statutory stock option under the Plan to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock in connection with her recent employment by the Company. The option has an exercise price of $2.15 per share, vests, on
a cumulative basis, in four installments of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the option grant date, and has a term of ten years. The option is subject to the terms of the Plan. 
 On June 22, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted the Company’s the following executive officers non-statutory
stock options under the Plan in the share amounts provided below. 
  

			
	 Name of Executive Officer:
	  	Shares Underlying
Award
	 Paulita L. LaPlante
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	40,000
	 Kent R. Winger
 Vice President, Strategic Planning and Product Development
	  	20,000

 Each option has an exercise price of $2.15 per share, vests, on a cumulative basis, in four installments of 25% on
each of the first four anniversaries of the option grant date, has a term of ten years and is subject to the terms of the Plan.
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       ANDRX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994




                                                1996           1995           1994
                                            ------------   ------------   ------------  
<S>                                         <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss                                    $(4,027,700)   $(5,187,000)   $(3,104,500)
                                            ===========    ===========    ===========

Actual weighted average shares
 of common stock outstanding                 12,148,000      9,297,900      8,548,800

Impact of shares issued within
 12 months of initial public offering,
 after application of the treasury method          --           92,000        103,000

Impact of warrants exercised within
 12 months of initial public offering,
 after application of the treasury method          --           40,400         90,100

Impact of options granted within
 12 months of initial public offering,
 after application of the treasury method          --           16,500         16,500
                                            -----------    -----------    -----------
Weighted average shares of 
 common stock outstanding                    12,148,000      9,446,800      8,758,400
                                            ===========    ===========    ===========

 Net loss per share                         $     (0.33)   $     (0.55)   $     (0.35)    
                                            ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,214
<PP&E>                                         255,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,923
<BONDS>                                         56,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,026
<SALES>                                         22,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,164
<CGS>                                            5,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                       531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                985
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS REQUIRED BY  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ Dana D. Messina President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


March 10,
2010

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's financial  statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         77
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               93
<PP&E>                                         652
<DEPRECIATION>                                 90
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,322
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,299)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   684
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.28)

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 701**  **7**

CHRISTOPHER LEE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. VICTOR LORANTH, M.D. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 4:12

- cv - 02547

- DCN )

Submitted : October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher Lee , Appellant Pro Se
. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Lee appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error
. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lee v. Loranth , No. 4:12

- cv - 02547

- DCN (D.S.C. June 12, 2013)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001943

31-MAR-2014

10:21 AM