alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT **

|   | (1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | The                information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                issuer                for the fiscal quarter then ended. |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                       |                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      | MEGA                GROUP, INC.            |
|                                 |                                  |                                                                      |
| Date: November              17, 2006 | By:                              | /s/ JOHN              H.              BROWN      |
|                                      | **John              H. Brown**             |
|                                      | **Chief                Executive Officer** |

|                                      |                                       |                                                |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November              17, 2006 | By:                              | /s/  JOYCE              BROWN   |
|                                      | **Joyce              Brown**               |
|                                      | **Chief                Financial Officer** |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         March 13, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         One Washington Circle Hotel, Presidential Board Room, One Washington Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lillian M. Publos, Ph.D, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Nueroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223, lp28e@nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neuroscience, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4088  Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF WETUMKA v. HALE-HALSELL CO.

No. 26047.

Jan. 22, 1935.

C. H. Baskin, for plaintiff in error.

Wilkinson *&*Hudson, for defendant in error.

*367PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced in the district court of Hughes county by the filing of a petition by HaleHalsell Company against the American National Bank on a certificate of deposit for $2,080. On the 6th day of April, 1934, a demurrer was filed to the petition, and on the 4th day of June, 1934, the court tried the cause, overruling the demurrer, and there was introduced in evidence the certificate of deposit, and judgment was rendered for tlie plaintiff. No notice of intention to appeal was given at this time, or within ten days thereafter. A motion for new trial was filed on the 4th day of June, 1934, and an order overruling the same was made on the 18th day of June, 1934.

A motion to dismiss has been filed in which movant states that since no notice of appeal was given at the date of the rendition of the judgment or within ten days thereafter, the cause should be dismissed. The appeal is by transcript.

In the case of Chase v. Brynes, 147 Okla. 118, 294 P. 786, the court held that where the appeal is by transcript, the motion for new trial and, the order overruling the same are no part of the record, and that where no notice of appeal was given at the date of the rendition of the judgment or within ten days thereafter, the appeal should be dismissed. See, also, Richardson v. Beidleman, 33 Okla. 463, 126 P. 818; Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk, 35 Okla. 439, 130 P. 138; Brigham v. Davis, 126 Okla. 90, 258 P. 740; In re Welfelt’s Estate, 142 Okla. 110, 285 P. 843.

The respondent states that the appeal is from the order of the court entered June 4, 1934, overruling the demurrer. The statement is made that the minutes of the clerk show that notice of appeal was given at that time. This court held in the following cases that a mere recital of the clerk’s minutes is no part of the record or proceedings. Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228, 240 P. 1067; Nelson v. Pittsburg Mort. Inv. Co., 43 Okla. 208, 141 P. 1197; Waggoner v. Mounts, 44 Okla. 128, 143 P. 1196; Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gish, 23 Okla. 824, 102 P. 708; Ellis v. Carr, 25 Okla. 874, 108 P. 1101; Casner v. Smith, 28 Okla. 303, 114 P. 255; Fife v. Cornelous, 35 Okla. 402, 124 P. 957; Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 44 Okla. 788, 145 P. 321; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; In re Garland, 52 Okla. 585, 153 P. 153; Courtney v. Moore, 51 Okla. 628, 151 P. 1178.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
.webform-required { display: none; }
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of FirstCity
Financial Corporation (the Company).

I, J. Bryan Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to
my knowledge,:

(i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

|    |                                                            
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|By: | /s/ J. BRYAN BAKERJ. Bryan BakerPrincipal Financial Officer

Dated: August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilder Richman Historic Properties
II, L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, the general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Richard Paul Richman
--------------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of Registrant
October 20, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Appellate Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: April 11-12, 2001.

TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hotel Inter-Continental, 444 St. Charles Avenue, New 
Orleans, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: February 8, 2001.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 01-3705 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
#### ALLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Monster Government Solutions, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5131.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 16, 2010.

Frederick W. Claybrook Jr., Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jacob B. Pankowski, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Michael N. O’Connell Jr., Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Monster Government Solutions, LLC moves without opposition for leave to intervene.

The court notes that Monster intervened in the trial court on the side of the defen*975dant. Thus, Monster should be listed in the court’s caption as a defendant-appellee, and the motion to intervene in this court is unnecessary.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is OrdeRed That:

The motion is denied as moot. The revised official caption is reflected above.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors
Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-11465, No. 333-97261, and No. 333-144632) on form S-8 of
Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 14, 2011

---



QuickLinks
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2018

To require that States receiving State Legalization Impact Assistance Grants

(SLIAG) cooperate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service

and the Border Patrol in the apprehension, detention, and transfer

of illegal immigrants.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1993

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require that States receiving State Legalization Impact

Assistance Grants (SLIAG) cooperate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol

in the apprehension, detention, and transfer of illegal

immigrants.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SLIAG REQUIREMENT.

4 A State which is otherwise eligible to receive State

5 Legalization Impact Assistance Grants (SLIAG) may not

6 receive such payments until the Immigration and Natu7 ralization Service and the United States Border Patrol
2

•HR 2018 IH

1 certify to the Attorney General that law enforcement offi2 cials of such State cooperate with Federal officials in the

3 apprehension, detention, and transfer of illegal immi4 grants.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 Section 1 shall take effect October 1, 1993.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, I, William J. Eckert,  IV, Chief Accounting
Officer of Pruco Life Insurance  Company of New Jersey,  hereby certify that the
accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,
containing  the  financial  statements  of  Pruco  Life of New  Jersey  Variable
Contract  Real  Property  Account (a  separate  account of Pruco Life  Insurance
Company of New  Jersey)  and The  Prudential  Variable  Contract  Real  Property
Partnership  (the "Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of Pruco  Life of New  Jersey  Variable
Contract  Real  Property  Account  and The  Prudential  Variable  Contract  Real
Property Partnership.


Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ William J. Eckert, IV
-------------------------------
Name: William J. Eckert, IV
Title: Chief Accounting Officer

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.


                                       30
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

October 19, 2007 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 1, 2007 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP, Docket 

No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal 

Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E. (Issues include 

whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding the 

Secretary’s decision to require that the operators’ Emergency 

Response Plans (ERPs) contain provisions mandating that the 

operators provide purchase orders for rescue chambers.) 

The Commission heard oral argument in these matters on October 23, 

2007. 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
----

|   | (i)    | the      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period      ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (ii)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                             |

| Date:      March 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Stanley Fronczkowski                                  |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Stanley      Fronczkowski                                      |
|                      |   | Vice      President—Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1726

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Internal Revenue

Service to pay interest on late refunds of certain required payments

made by entities electing not to have a required taxable year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. BACHUS of Alabama (for himself and Mr. BEVILL) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require

the Internal Revenue Service to pay interest on late

refunds of certain required payments made by entities

electing not to have a required taxable year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INTEREST PAYABLE ON LATE REFUNDS OF

4 CERTAIN REQUIRED PAYMENTS BY ENTITIES

5 ELECTING NOT TO HAVE REQUIRED TAXABLE

6 YEAR.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 7519(f)

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to required
2

•HR 1726 IH

1 payments for entities electing not to have required taxable

2 year) is amended by inserting before the period ‘‘if such

3 refund is made on or before the date the refund is payable

4 under subsection (c)(3)’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the

7 amendments made by section 10206 of the Revenue Act

8 of 1987.

Æ
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B HA DU RS I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71355 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 659- 981 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , H A W K I N S , an dG O U L D , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . B hadu r S i ng h, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n. W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a lof 

# FI LED JU L 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71355 2 am o tio n to r e o p e n . N

aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 5 9 7 F .3 d9 8 3 , 9 8 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g S in g h ’s u n tim e lym o tio n to re o p en w h er e th e m o ti o n w as filedo v erfiv e a n da h alf y ea rs af ter th e a g en cy ’s f in a l o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and S i ng h fai l ed t o est abl i sh changed c ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d iato qu a lif yf o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim ita tio n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; N a jm a b a di, 597 F . 3d a t987- 90. A ddi t i ona l l y , w e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rS i ngh’ s c ha l l e nge t o the i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g b e c au s e th is c o u rt a lr e a d yd e c id e dth e is s u e in Sin gh v . Mu ka s e

y, 3 0 5 F e d . A p p x . 4 0 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . See Merri tt v. M acke y , 932 F . 2 d1 3 1 7 , 1 3 2 0 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 1 ) (ex p l ai n i n g th atu n d er th e “ l aw o f th e case do ctri ne, ” one panel of an appel l at e c ou rtw i l lno tre consi der quest i on s w hi ch another panelhas dec i ded o n a pri or appeali n the sam e c as e) . I n l i ghtof

the s e c onc l us i ons , w e ne e d nota ddr e s s S i ngh’ s r e m a i ni ng c o n te n tio n s . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NICHOLAS THOMPSON,

Petitioner

v.

ERIE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS AND 

COURT STENOGRAPHER,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 80 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
February 25 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00138

- CV V.

FREEDMEN'S TOWN PRES ERVATION COALITION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on February 12, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DI SMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, The City of Houston.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.