alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         3,613,777
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,810,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,024,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,151,302
<PP&E>                                         117,689,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,683,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,103,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,966,610
<BONDS>                                        20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43,355,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,825,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,103,769
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,401,922
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,100,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,746,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,627,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,327,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,930,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,930,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.531
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


June 29, 2006


 


Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated


675 West Kendall Street


Cambridge, MA 02142


Attn:  Alfred Vaz


 


Re:                               Sublease
dated September 14, 2004 between Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, as
sublandlord (“Vertex”), and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Momenta”), as
subtenant, with respect to premises located at 675 West Kendall Street,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, as amended (the “Sublease”)


 


Dear Al:


 


In connection with Momenta’s relocation from the third floor premises
to the fifth floor premises, this letter will confirm our agreement that,
notwithstanding anything in the Sublease to the contrary, (i) Momenta may continue
to access the third floor premises through July 9, 2006 to complete
decommissioning activities in third floor premises, and (ii) Momenta may continue
to submit to Vertex, and Vertex will continue to honor, Momenta’s draw requests
for the unused portion of the Fifth Floor Improvement Allowance (as defined in
the Second Amendment to Sublease) received through September 30, 2006.


 


Kindly acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing, by countersigning
this letter in the space provided below, and returning a copy to me.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very truly
  yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Momenta
  Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /S/ Richard
  P. Shea

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Richard P. Shea

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vertex
  Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /S/ Kenneth
  S. Boger

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Kenneth S.
  Boger

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Senior Vice
  President & General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the report of INUVO, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wallace D. Ruiz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 3, 2010/s/ Wallace D. Ruiz,Wallace D. Ruiz,Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 160

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require that the President submit

to Congress a balanced budget for each fiscal year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require that

the President submit to Congress a balanced budget

for each fiscal year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF BALANCED BUDGET.

4 Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is

5 amended by inserting at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(g)(1) Except as provided by paragraph (2), any

8 budget submitted to Congress pursuant to subsection (a)

9 for the ensuing fiscal year shall not be in deficit.
2

•HR 160 IH

1 ‘‘(2) For any fiscal year for which the President de2 termines that, for reasons of national security or economic

3 necessity, it is infeasible to submit a budget in compliance

4 with paragraph (1) and submits written reasons to Con5 gress in support of that determination, the President shall

6 submit 2 budgets only 1 of which is in compliance with

7 paragraph (1).’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

10 beginning with fiscal year 1994 and shall be fully reflected

11 in the fiscal year 1994 budget submitted by the President

12 as required by section 1105(a) of title 31, United States

13 Code.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH ARUANNO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2990

[ January 30, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Colbath , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 501994CF004033AXXXMB

.

Joseph Aruanno, Avenel, NJ , pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 10.45
 TRIAD GUARANTY INC.
OUTSIDE DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
    Grant of Restricted Stock.
 Vesting.
 Date
    
    Vested Percentage____________
    
    ___%____________
    
    ___%____________
    
    100%
     1




---



##### 



Stock Certificates.
 Transferability.
 Effect of Termination as a Director.
     Rights as Shareholder.
 Determinations.
 Controlling Documents.
  2




---



##### 



No Guarantee of Employment.
 Assignment.
 Governing Law.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 PARTICIPANT:
    
    COMPANY:TRIAD GUARANTY INC.By:Name:Title:
 3
44%

56%

Purchase Refinance

April 2017

$28 $127

Billion Billion

YTD 2017

0.92%

$290

April 2017 Highlights

SF delinquency rate is 90+ days; MF rate is 60+ days 

0.03%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED AUGUST 29, 1997 AND
AUGUST 28, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         AUG-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-29-1997
<CASH>                                          8,517
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,518
<INVENTORY>                                   120,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              208,636
<PP&E>                                        459,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                230,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                461,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          94,868
<BONDS>                                       248,075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          133
<OTHER-SE>                                     86,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  461,222
<SALES>                                     1,049,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,049,474
<CGS>                                         882,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 970,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                3,473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             26,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                37,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            22,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   22,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.70
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40673

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIE TATE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-115-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Willie Tate Jr., has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental letter brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tate has filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief, supplemental letter brief, and the relevant portions of

the record reflected therein, as well as Tate’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40673 Document: 00511571774 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
No. 10-40673

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Tate’s motion to remand is DENIED.

2

Case: 10-40673 Document: 00511571774 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
ET&T HOST PROCESSING AGREEMENT

This Agreement states that Betting, Inc., a Missouri
corporation, does hereby agree that Electronic Transactions &
Technologies ("ET&T") shall be the sole provider of bank host
processing for all Betting, Inc. transactions that are sent by
terminals that read credit cards, ATM cards, or smart cards.

That ET&T shall charge Betting, Inc. a fee of $0.25 per
transaction or 2.5% of the wager being sent by Betting, Inc. to
gaming operators.

That these transactions shall originate from globally placed
Betting, Inc. equipment and/or Betting, Inc. licensed operators.

This exclusive ET&T host service contract for Betting, Inc.
expires on January 1, 2006.

				Electronic Transactions & Technologies


Dated: April 28, 1997		By:_/s/  Thomas S. Hughes__
					Thomas S, Hughes, Chairman & CEO


					Betting, Inc.


Dated: April 28, 1997		By:_/s/_Thomas S. Hughes__
					Thomas S. Hughes, Chairman & CEO
#### Anthony D. SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-7276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Anthony D. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Sanders appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his action filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sanders v. DOJ,*No. 1:09-cv-01425-CMC, 2010 WL 3447262 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2010). We deny Sanders’ motions for appointment of counsel, transcripts at Government expense, production of documents, and to compel discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the " Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned,
constituting the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Mega
Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their
knowledge:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the issuer for the fiscal quarter then ended.


Date: July 21, 2006                                     MEGA GROUP, INC.

                                                 By:    /s/ JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                                       13
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10016-10017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-340-001]


Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; Notice of Pro Forma Tariff

February 7, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2001, Gulf South Pipeline Company, 
LP (Gulf South) tendered for filing pro forma tariff sheets listed on 
the attachment to the filing, in compliance with Order No. 637 issued 
in Docket Nos. RM98-10 and RM98-12 on February 9, 2000.
    On June 15, 2000 Gulf South filed the pro forma tariff sheets 
necessary to implement Order No. 637 on its system Since June Gulf 
South has participated in two technical conferences and has convened 
three customer meetings to discuss its implementation of Order No. 637. 
Through the course of these discussions, certain aspects of Gulf 
South's original filing have been modified or eliminated and new 
provisions have been added. While there is agreement on certain aspects 
of these proposed tariff sheets, there is not universal agreement on 
every aspect of this filing. The pro forma tariff sheets Gulf South has 
submitted replace the previously filed pro forma tariff sheets and 
represent a just and reasonable approach to implementing Order No. 637 
on this pipeline. Pursuant to the parties' agreement during these 
discussions, comments on this filing must be filed on or before 
February 15, 2001. Reply Comments must be filed on or before February 
23, 2001.
    Gulf South states that copies of the filing have been served upon 
Gulf South's customers, state commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before February 15, 2001. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are

[[Page 10017]]

on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3579 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 BY:
/s/ Stephen C. RichterStephen C. RichterExecutive Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2009
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Joyce Brown, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mega Group, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                       12