alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE OF EAT AT JOE'S LTD. AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED  STATEMENTS  OF
OPERATIONS  AND CASH  FLOWS FOR THE YEAR  THEN  ENDED  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         430
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    9
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               478
<PP&E>                                         4081
<DEPRECIATION>                                 66
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2708
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     1926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4636
<SALES>                                        464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464
<CGS>                                          331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (85)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                      8,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,115
<PP&E>                                           4,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,153
<SALES>                                        146,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,508
<CGS>                                          110,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    92
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE FIGURES PRESENTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128
AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY
DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78J11

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OFTEXAS £%

PENALTY FOR g '

PRIVATE USE

12/10/2014 — ..__...„,_ ..

THOMAS, KEITH DOUGLAS AKA WILLIAMSJA/ES AKA THOMPSON

DOUGLAS Tr. Ct. No.^*tf»PA...T C#^ WR-82,462-01

This is to advise that the Court jrt has^erriedjL has Periled wittiout writt^n-Or .^

writ of habeas corpus. <tt^^tO"* **' ^ °

3 ^&y '"shssscsep' pitney bowes

02 1R $ 00.26s 0006557458 'DEC10 2014

MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701

ifder the application for

Abel Acosta, Clerk

T-43B .77002 j7Jij7]ijiJh]ijjii;)jn]iiii7jp)|)niri]J}nj)jijHj}.ii.ip»'j.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certifications



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    MATTHEW H.
KNIGHT             
|                     |  |     |  | Matthew H. Knight                    
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of   Environmental   Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10KSB/A  for the period  ending
December 31, 2007 (the  "Report") I, Edward L.  Torres,  Acting Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 22, 2008


/s/Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: February 9, 2001.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-3785 Filed 2-9-01; 3:55 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-U
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41701 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS DIAZ-MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1164-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos Diaz-Marquez (Diaz) appeals his 58-month sentence for having entered the United States illegally after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Diaz contends that his sentence must be vacated and his case remanded for resentencing because the district court committed reversible error by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime, in light of United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005).No. 04-41701 - 2 - The district court’s sentence pursuant to a mandatory guideline scheme constitutes Fanfan error. See United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). The Government thus bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the Guidelines been advisory only. See id. at 464-65. If the Government cannot show that the error was harmless, we ordinarily will vacate and remand for resentencing. Id. at 463. The sentencing transcript does not reveal whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the Guidelines been advisory. Because the Government cannot meet its burden , we vacate Diaz’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing. See id. at 464-66. Diaz also challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated-felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury, on authority of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Diaz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Diaz contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),No. 04-41701 - 3 - cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Diaz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Diaz’s conviction is affirmed. CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,746,897
<SECURITIES>                                 4,715,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,573,934
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,594,134
<PP&E>                                       8,241,953
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,370,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,750,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,269,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,342
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,750,946
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,195,536
<CGS>                                        2,373,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,372,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,841,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,841,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,841,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 20, 2010 

d1013 

Order 

 

October 20, 2010 

140840 

KATHY KAY NEVILLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140840 

 COA: 294461 

Wayne CC: 94-402973-DM 

MARK T. NEVILLE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration, as on leave granted, of whether the trial court correctly held that the 

parties’ November 14, 1994 divorce judgment limited the plaintiff’s survivorship benefit 

to a proportionate interest based on years of marriage, that the divorce judgment 

conflicted with the 1995 Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) agreed upon by 

the parties, that the terms of the divorce judgment should control over the terms of the 

QDRO, and that the defendant’s motion to have the QDRO amended was not timebarred. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction.
PUBLIC February 28, 2022 © Freddie Mac

1

Replacement Index Transition Timing for Single-Family Loans and MBS Disclosure

11th District COFI Transition:

COFI Loans: The transition for applicable loans will depend on the next rate adjustment date and lookback period, as described below. All rate adjustments after May 1, 2022, will use 

the replacement index. 

Freddie Mac ARM PC Disclosures (Level 1/Level 2): Beginning with the monthly disclosure files published on March 4, 2022, Freddie Mac will update the description of the disclosed

Index Code 21 from “COFI_1MO_11THDIST” to “Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index”. The description update will be reflected in the Single-Family Disclosure Guide and 

on the user-interface when viewing specific CUSIPs. 

Next Interest Rate Adjustment Date Lookback Period Index Publication Date Index Month Index Used

2/1/2022

0 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

1 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

15 12/30/2021 November 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

30 12/30/2021 November 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

45 11/30/2021 October 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

60 11/30/2021 October 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

3/1/2022

0 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

1 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

15 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

30 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

45 12/30/2021 November 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

60 12/30/2021 November 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

4/1/2022

0 3/31/2022 February 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

1 3/31/2022 February 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

15 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

30 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

45 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

60 1/31/2022 December 2021 COFI_1MO_11THDIST

5/1/2022 and all subsequent 

adjustments

0 4/29/2022 March 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

1 4/29/2022 March 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

15 3/31/2022 February 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

30 3/31/2022 February 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

45 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index

60 2/28/2022 January 2022 Enterprise 11th District COFI Replacement Index
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John W. Casella,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Transition Report on Form 10-KT of Casella Waste Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2015



By:

/s/ John W. CasellaJohn W. CasellaChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, J. Bryan Baker, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FirstCityFinancial Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ J. Bryan Baker