alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC., App Pharmaceuticals LLC, Pliva Hrvatska D.O.O., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 2014-1455.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 25, 2014.

Adam Lawrence Perlman, Bruce Gen-derson, Dov Philip Grossman, David M. Krinsky, Andrew V. Trask, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daryl L. Wiesen, Attorney, Elaine Blais, Attorney, Michael B. Cottier, Brian Joseph Prew, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, Emily L. Rapalino, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before REYNA, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

The parties jointly move to remand this appeal so that they can litigate the issue of infringement in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in *Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.,*— U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2111, 189 L.Ed.2d 52 (2014). In the district court, the parties jointly stipulated to induced infringement and proceeded to trial only on validity. As part of that stipulation, however, appellants reserved the right to litigate infringement if the Supreme Court granted the then-pending petition for writ of certiorari in *Akamai*and reversed or vacated this court’s decision.

Accordingly,

It Is ORdered That:

(1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1832(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2001. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Maria Villanueva, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                 

*1. Centennial First Financial Services, Inc.,*                     Redlands, California; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Palomar Community Bank, Escondido, California.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 13, 2001. 

Robert DeV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-4038 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 6 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box) Name of establishment

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (see instructions) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than

evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(see instructions)

Employer’s name (same name as on Form 941)

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable)

City, state, and ZIP code (if a foreign address, see instructions)

Does this establishment accept credit Check if: Amended Return

cards, debit cards, or other charges?

1 Total charged tips for calendar year 2005 1

2 Total charge receipts showing charged tips (see instructions) 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (add lines 4a and 4b) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (not less than line 2—see instructions) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here  granted by the

IRS. (Attach a copy of the IRS determination letter to this return.) 

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

 This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (see instructions for restriction)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach a copy of the agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature  Title  Date 

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (2005)

Note: If you marked the checkbox in line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours

worked per business day during the payroll period. (see instructions)

Apt. or suite no.

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), mark an “X” on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your

records on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 2005 

Note: Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 5

of the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

 See separate instructions.

Yes (lines 1 and 2 must be completed)

No Final Return

2005
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2028

To make appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for a community adjustment

and economic diversification program in connection with Homestead Air

Force Base, Florida.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1993

Mrs. MEEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Appropriations

A BILL

To make appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for a community

adjustment and economic diversification program in connection with Homestead Air Force Base, Florida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homestead, Florida,

5 Community Adjustment and Economic Diversification Ap6 propriations Act for Fiscal Year 1994’’.
2

•HR 2028 IH

1 SEC. 2. FISCAL YEAR 1994 APPROPRIATIONS.

2 The following sums are appropriated, out of any

3 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to pro4 vide appropriations for fiscal year 1994:

5 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—MILITARY

6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

7 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE AGENCIES

8 For assistance under section 2391(b) of title 10,

9 United States Code, to the State of Florida and local gov10 ernments in Dade County, Florida, for the purpose of

11 planning and carrying out a community adjustment and

12 economic diversification program in connection with

13 Homestead Air Force Base, Florida, $10,000,000, to re14 main available until expended.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

137392(58) 

DONNA NOE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137392 

 COA: 278727 

Wayne CC: 06-612135-NO 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 18, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant 

leave to appeal.
#### DOMINION RESOURCES, INC., Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., and Virginia Electric and Power Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 2009-5081, 2009-5032.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 27, 2010.

Brad Fagg, David M. Kerr, Morgan, Lewis & Boekius LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Lisa L. Donahue, Harold D. Lester Jr., Andrew P. Averbach, Christopher J. Carney, Scott D. Slater, Department of Justice, Jane K. Taylor, Department of En-

ergy, Washington, DC, for Defendanb-Appellant.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves for a 15-day extension of time, until September 14, 2010, to file its reply brief,

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The motion is granted.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 6, 2001.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 23, 2001 
to be assured of consideration.

U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE (CUS)

    OMB Number: 1515-0217.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Land Border Carrier Initiative Program.
    Description: The Land Border Carrier Initiative Program is designed 
to prevent smugglers of illicit drugs from utilizing commercial 
conveyances for their commodities, and to make participation in this 
program at certain, high-risk locations a condition for use of the Line 
Release method of processing repetitive entries of merchandise.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.050.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 5 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 5,250 hours.
    Clearance Officer: J. Edgar Nichols (202) 927-1426 or, Tracey 
Denning (202) 927-1429, U.S. Customs Service, Information Services 
Branch, Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 
3.2.C, Washington, DC 20229.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4178 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                      29,228,186
<SECURITIES>                                 9,343,280
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,487,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                10,869,082
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,284,252
<PP&E>                                       4,106,659
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,295,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,360,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,374,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,857
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,209,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,360,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,268,173
<CGS>                                        9,022,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,186,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               538,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,908,914
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (991,126)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,477,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                   806,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,159,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      592,689
<NET-INCOME>                                   566,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
35%

65%

Purchase Refinance

June 2017

$35 $190

Billion Billion

YTD 2017

0.85%

$284

June 2017 Highlights

SF delinquency rate is 90+ days; MF rate is 60+ days 

0.01%
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 7, 2010 

d0331 

Order 

 

April 7, 2010 

139832 

JESUBEN ENGELHARDT and LORI 

ENGELHARDT, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 139832 

 COA: 292143 

Macomb CC: 2007-004652-NM 

ST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM-DETROITMACOMB CAMPUS, d/b/a ST. JOHN 

MACOMB HOSPITAL, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D. and 

RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D., P.C., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 9, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
#### Fredy Antonio ESPINOZA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73101.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

Frank P. Sprouls, Esquire, Law Office of Ricci and Sprouls, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Kelly J. Walls, *104Esquire, Trial, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fredy Antonio Espinoza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Espinoza’s motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to demonstrate the evidence he submitted was material and previously unavailable. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Espinoza’s challenge to the adverse credibility finding contained in the agency’s prior orders because this petition for review is not timely as to those orders. *See Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
----

|   |    (i)   | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 26, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Francis M. DiNuzzo                |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Francis M. DiNuzzo                    |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911167
<NAME> ARIEL CORPORATION
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       7,088,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,111,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,019,731
<INVENTORY>                                  3,303,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,642,469
<PP&E>                                       5,443,637
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,056,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,817,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,814,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,832,597
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,986,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,817,072
<SALES>                                     11,626,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,626,546
<CGS>                                        5,096,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,096,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,004,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             527,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,499,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,499,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,499,815)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice of Friday, July 7, 2000, in Part III “Availability of Funds Announced in the HRSA Preview” of FR Doc. 00-16874, on page 42217, the grant category beginning in the first column under the heading “Partnership for Information and Communication (PIC) MCH Cooperative Agreements, CFDA# 93.110G,” is withdrawn from competition because no competition is needed to fund all potential eligibles for this fiscal year. Prospective applicants have been notified directly of this withdrawal.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sue Martone, Division of Child, Adolescent and Family Health, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Room 18A-30, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone 1-301-443-2250. 

Dated: February 14, 2001. 

James J. Corrigan, 

Associate Administrator for Management and Program Support. 

[FR Doc. 01-4232 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-U