alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8924]
RIN 1545-AY63


Liabilities Assumed in Certain Corporate Transactions; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to temporary and final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to temporary and final 
regulations that were published in the Federal Register on January 4, 
2001 (66 FR 723). This document relates to the assumption of 
liabilities in certain corporate transactions under section 301 of the 
Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: This correction is effective January 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Dean (202) 622-7550 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The temporary and final regulations that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 301 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, these temporary and final regulations (TD 8924) 
contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the temporary and final regulations 
(TD 8924), which were the subject of FR Doc. 01-200, is corrected as 
follows:
    On page 723, column 3, in the preamble under the paragraph heading 
``A. State of the Law Before the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical 
Corrections Act of 1999'', line 6, the language ``distribution shall be 
reduced (but now'' is corrected to read ``distribution shall be reduced 
(but not''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and 
Strategic Planning).
[FR Doc. 01-3775 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Farm to School Supports Small Farmers

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Patrick Leahy Farm to School Grant Program supports small farmers and their families. Meet one of the Farm to School beneficiaries, Anna Nakamura Knight, a fifth-generation farmer.

Old Grove Orange is the name of Anna’s family farm, where her father Bob Knight is the senior partner and she is the junior partner. Old Grove Orange is also the name of their farmer-led food hub of over 25 farmers, most of whom sell exclusively to local public schools in San Bernardino County, California. It is the oldest food hub in the area and a 2022 Farm to School Grant awardee.

With the award, Old Grove Orange is piloting farm field trips for its local school districts’ child nutrition departments and 2,000 elementary school students. The goal of this project is to increase access to local produce and increase procurement from local producers by stimulating student demand and helping child nutrition directors generate buy-in from parents, administrators, and teachers. The project will also increase access to agriculture education by providing students with an experiential learning opportunity that will increase their exposure to local farms.

According to Farmer Anna, Old Grove Orange is a pioneer of Farm to School in California. With more than 17 years of experience, they have found a model that truly works -- Farmer-Active Farm to School.

“This farmer-centered approach is powered by very active lead farmers and receptive, engaged child nutrition departments,” said Anna. “Our farmers proactively approach school districts and innovate new products in response to school district needs.”

Anna stressed that Farm to School is not possible without farmers, supportive child nutrition services partners, and deep, meaningful relationships. Farm to School and child nutrition programs are the right approach to sustainable and economical farming.

Old Grove Orange’s original client was Yucaipa Calimesa Joint Unified School District (YCJUSD), located about 10 miles east of the farm.

"The truth is, school meals and local farmers are made for each other,” said YCJUSD’s Child Nutrition Director Ann Van Damme. “We want the freshest, most nutritious produce for our students. These are supplied by our local farmers, making us a large one-stop-shop customer for their organization."

Page updated: March 18, 2024
Filed 1/27/22 P. v. Martinez CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MAURICIO MARTINEZ,

Defendant and Appellant. D0 79004

(Super. Ct. No. SCD272693 )

APPEAL from a n order of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Joseph P. Brannigan, Judge. Affirmed.

Jay Temple

, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss under Penal

Code 1 section 1203.42. The trial court found Mauricio Martinez ineligible for

relief under the statute and denied the motion. We will find the record on

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

appeal does not present any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. ( People v

.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende )

. )

In 2017, Martinez pleaded guilty to as sault with force likely to produce

great bodily injury ( § 245

, subd. (a)(4) ) . The court sentenced Martinez to

three years on probation.

In 2019, the court revoked probation and sentenced Martinez to a two

year term in prison.

In 2021, Martinez filed a petition for dismissal of his conviction under

section 1203.42. Following a hearing with Martinez present, the court found

Martinez was not eligible for relief and denied the petition.

Martinez filed a notice of appeal.

Appellate counsel has file d a brief pursuant to Wende

, supra , 25

Cal.3d 436, indicating counsel he has not been able to identify any arguable

issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the record for

error as mandated by Wende . We offered Martinez the opportu nity to file his

own brief on appeal, but he has not responded

.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks

the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review

, and

in compliance with Anders v

. California (1967) 386 U.S. 7 38 ( Anders ), counsel

has identified the following possible issues that were considered i n evaluating

the potential merits of this appeal.

1. Whether the trial court analyzed the petition under section 1203. 4

rather than sect ion 1203.42.

2. Whether the trial court erred in denying Martinez’s petition for

dismissal under section 1203.4.3

We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders

.

We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal.

Com petent counsel has represented Martinez on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Martinez ’ s petition to dismiss under section 1203. 4 2

is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

AARON, J.

DATO, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF EAT AT JOE'S,  LTD. AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                               494
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                           88
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     739
<PP&E>                              5611
<DEPRECIATION>                       141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      6347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               3019
<BONDS>                             1343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               1
<OTHER-SE>                          1984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        6347
<SALES>                             1281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1281
<CGS>                                866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    1186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (864)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                            (85)
<NET-INCOME>                        (948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 --  Shareholder Agreement

                           Doreen Zimmerman
                        3415 Ocatillo Mesa Way
                     North Las Vegas, Nevada  89031

July 18, 2006

DEZ, Inc.
3415 Ocatillo Mesa Way
North Las Vegas, Nevada 89031

Re:  Shareholder Agreement with DEZ, Inc.

Gentlemen:

     In consideration of the sale of the shares of Common Stock of DEZ, Inc.
(the "Company") to the undersigned (the "Holder"), the Holder hereby
represents, warrants, covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the Company and
any holders of record (the "third party beneficiaries") of the Company's
outstanding securities, including the Company's Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(the "Stock") at the date hereof and during the pendency of this letter
agreement, that the Holder will not transfer, sell, contract to sell, devise,
gift, assign, pledge, hypothecate, distribute or grant any option to purchase
or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, her 400,000 shares of Stock of
the Company owned beneficially or otherwise by the Holder except in connection
with or following completion of a merger, acquisition or other transaction of
or by the Company meeting the definition of a business combination as defined
in the Company's registration statement on Form 10-SB or otherwise complying
with the purposes of the Company as set out in the registration statement.

     Any attempted sale, transfer or other disposition in violation of this
letter agreement shall be null and void.

     The Holder further agrees that the Company (i) may instruct its transfer
agent not to transfer such securities (ii) may provide a copy of this letter
agreement to the Company's transfer agent for the purpose of instructing the
Company's transfer agent to place a legend on the certificate(s) evidencing
the securities subject hereto and disclosing that any transfer, sale, contract
for sale, devise, gift, assignment, pledge or hypothecation of such securities
is subject to the terms of this letter agreement and (iii) may issue stop-
transfer instructions to its transfer agent for the period contemplated by
this letter agreement for such securities.

     This letter agreement shall be binding upon the Holder, its agents,
heirs, successors, assigns and beneficiaries.

     Any waiver by the Company of any of the terms and conditions of this
letter agreement in any instance shall be in writing and shall be duly
executed by the Company and the Holder and shall not be deemed or construed
to be a waiver of such term or condition for the future, or of any subsequent
breach thereof.

     Agreed and accepted this 18th day of July 2006.


                                           THE HOLDER


                                      By: /s/ Doreen Zimmerman
                                          --------------------
                                              Doreen Zimmerman
                                              President

<PAGE>
Summary of Change to Chief Executive Officer Compensation



 Exhibit 10.11 
 Summary of Change to Chief Executive Officer Compensation 
 On June 1, 2006 our compensation
committee increased the salary of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Michael R. Minogue, to $345,000. In addition, the committee set Mr. Minogue’s target bonus for our fiscal year ended fiscal March 31, 2007 at $345,000.
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| BY:                             | /s/                Andrew M. Alexander           |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Andrew                M. Alexander               |
|                            | President/Chief                Executive Officer |
|                            |
|                            |
| November                9, 2007 |

----

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 7347** 

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

TIMOTHY JOSEPH SULLIVAN; LIAM O ’ GRADY, U.S. District Court Judge; ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv
- 00500

- FPS )

Submitted : January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews appeals the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his complaint and amended complaint filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U .S. 388 (1971)
and denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Matthews v. Sullivan , No. 8:14

- cv
- 00500

- FPS (D. Md. May 23 &

A ug. 13, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* In his motion for reconsideration and on appeal, Matthews asserts that the court should have considered some of his claims as common law professional malpractice, negligence, and gross negligence claims.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1655

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(4-aminophenyl)-6-methylbenzothiazole7-sulfonic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(4-aminophenyl)-6-

methylbenzothiazole-7-sulfonic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-(4-AMINOPHENYL)-6-METHYLBENZO4 THIAZOLE-7-SULFONIC ACID.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 2-(4-aminophenyl)-6-

methylbenzothiazole-7-sulfonic acid (CAS No. 130-

17-6) (provided for in subheading 2934.20.60) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97 ’’.
2

•HR 1655 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

3 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered,

4 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

5 or after the 15th day after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act.

7 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN

8 ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tar9 iff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provi10 sion of law, upon proper request filed with the ap11 propriate customs officer before the 90th day after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or

13 withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

14 goods described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Har15 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (as

16 added by subsection (a)) that was made—

17 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

18 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

19 the enactment of this Act;

20 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

21 entry or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after

22 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
GSI Commerce, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 (the Report) that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|            |  |     |  |                        
|----------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|            |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Rubin   
|            |  |     |  | Michael G. Rubin       
|            |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|            |  |    
|May 9, 2006 |  |     |  |                        
|            |  |    
|            |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael R. Conn    
|            |  |     |  | Michael R. Conn        
|            |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### In re: Jimmy PEARSON; Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille Carlson, Debtors. Mark R. Stewart, Trustee, Appellant, v. Jimmy Pearson; Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille Calrson, Appellees. United States of America, Amicus Curiae.

No. 08-8060.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2009.

Mark R. Stewart, Cheyenne, WY, pro se.

Ken McCartney, Cheyenne, WY, for Ap-pellee.

Robert J. Schneider, United States Department of Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, Newark, NJ, P. Matthew Sutko, Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, Washington, DC, Amicus Curiae.

Before KELLY, MURPHY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Appellees’ Status Report and Suggestion of Mootness,” and the responses filed by the appellant Trustee and amicus United States, the court orders this appeal DISMISSED as moot.

It is further ordered that the opinion of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (BAP), issued on July 28, 2008, 390 B.R. 706, is VACATED. The matter is remanded to the BAP with instructions to vacate the bankruptcy court’s ruling as to the vehicle-ownership-deduction issue and dismiss the BAP appeal.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1355-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Oklahoma, (FEMA-1355-DR), dated January 5, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 8, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of January 5, 2001: 

All counties in the State of Oklahoma are eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 01-3932  Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-04731, Form S-8 No. 333-04733, Form S-8 No. 333-52565, Form S-8 No. 333-118694, Form S-8 No.333-145248) of our reports dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of TechTeam Global, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of TechTeam Global, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2007.              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         Detroit, Michigan