alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,515
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,250
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,288
<LOANS>                                        127,060
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,631
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,855
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,724
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,319
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 174,631
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,593
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  902
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   202
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,697
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,432
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,010
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,687
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,629
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,629
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,064
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      120
<RECOVERIES>                                        40
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,164
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,142
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,022
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.1



 







Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

GOLDLEAF FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC

2005 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




     First Amendment to the Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) 2005 Long-Term
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 8,
2006.



     FIRST, because the name of the Company has been changed from Private Business, Inc., to
Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc., Sections 1.1, 2.8 and 2.21 of the Plan are hereby amended to
reflect such name change.



     SECOND, effective retroactively as of January 23, 2006, Section 5.2(d) of the Plan is deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:



“(d) No
one Participant may be granted any Award covering an aggregate number of shares of Stock in excess of Nine Hundred Thousand (900,000) shares of Stock in any
calendar year.”



     THIRD, Section 5.2(e) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



“(e) In the event of a corporate transaction involving the Company (including,
without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend,
recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off,
combination or exchange of shares), the Committee shall adjust Awards to preserve
the benefits or potential benefits of the Awards. Action by the Committee shall
include, as appropriate: (i) adjustment of the number and kind of shares which may
be delivered under the Plan; (ii) adjustment of the number and kind of shares
subject to outstanding Awards; (iii) adjustment of the Exercise Price of outstanding
Awards; and (iv) any other adjustments that the Committee determines to be
equitable; provided, however, that that the limitations of sections 422 and 424 of
the Code shall apply with respect to adjustments made to ISOs so as not to cause any
ISO to cease to qualify as an ISO under section 422 of the Code or to cause any
“modification” to an ISO, as that term is defined by the Code and Regulations. All
determinations made by the Committee pursuant to this Paragraph 5.2(e) shall be
final and binding on the Participants.”



     FOURTH, in order to correct a scrivener’s error, the reference in Plan Section 8 made to
“Paragraph 5.2(d)” is hereby amended so that the reference is to “Paragraph 5.2(e).”



     FIFTH, except as amended hereby, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.



-End of Amendment-
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2060

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the moving expense

deduction for moving expenses associated with the sale of a residence

eligible to receive benefits under an approved airport noise compatibility

program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1993

Mr. CLEMENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

moving expense deduction for moving expenses associated

with the sale of a residence eligible to receive benefits

under an approved airport noise compatibility program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Displaced-by-Airport

5 Noise Homeowner Equity Act’’.
2

HR 2060 IH

1 SEC. 2. MOVING EXPENSE DEDUCTION TO APPLY TO

2 MOVES FROM RESIDENCES ELIGIBLE TO RE3 CEIVE BENEFITS UNDER AN APPROVED AIR4 PORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 217 of the Internal Reve6 nue Code of 1986 (relating to moving expenses) is amend7 ed by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k) and

8 by inserting after subsection (i) the following new sub9 section:

10 ‘‘(j) SPECIAL RULES FOR MOVES FROM RESIDENCES

11 ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE BENEFITS UNDER AN APPROVED

12 AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM.—

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of noise com14 patibility program moving expenses—

15 ‘‘(A) this section shall be applied with re16 spect to such expenses as if they were incurred

17 in connection with the commencement of work

18 by the taxpayer as an employee at a new prin19 cipal place of work,

20 ‘‘(B) the limitations of subsection (c) shall

21 not apply.

22 ‘‘(2) NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM MOVING

23 EXPENSES.—For the purposes of this subsection, the

24 term ‘noise compatibility program moving expenses’

25 means any moving expenses incurred by an individ-
3

HR 2060 IH

1 ual whose former residence was eligible for benefits

2 under a noise compatibility program—

3 ‘‘(A) undertaken by an airport operator

4 pursuant to title I of the Aviation Safety and

5 Noise Abatement Act of 1979, and

6 ‘‘(B) approved by the Secretary of Trans7 portation.’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

10 December 31, 1991.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

 

I, Jordan M. Copland, Chief Financial Officer of GSI Commerce, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of GSI Commerce,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Intentionally Omitted.] 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

May 12, 2004
Exhibit 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),Michael Posner, President of the Company, and Barbara L. Tolley,
Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Posner
------------------
Michael Posner, President
(principal executive officer)


May _____, 2004


/s/ Barbara L. Tolley
---------------------
Barbara L. Tolley, Chairman
(principal financial officer)

May ___, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-027)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Light Bullet Networks, Inc. of 
San Jose, CA, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the 
inventions disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,651,079 and 5,963,683 both 
entitled ``Photonic Switching Devices Using Light Bullets,'' which are 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent 
to the Ames Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by April 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Padilla, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 202A-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, 
telephone (650) 604-5104.

    Dated: February 12, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-4102 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
944 A.2d 78

#### In re the Nomination Petitions of Caleem JABBOUR a/k/a C.L. Jabbour (Democratic) Candidate for Representative in the General Assembly for District No. 38. Appeal of Angelo Norelli.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs April 3, 2008.

Decided April 11, 2008.

J. Deron Gabriel, Brimmeier & Associates, for Angelo Norelli, appellant.

Gary Kalmeyer, Kalmeyer *&*Kalmeyer, for Caleem Jabbour, Pittsburgh, appellee.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD and McCAFFERY, JJ.

*459*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for proceedings to address the merits of the Petition to Set Aside the Nominating Petitions.

The Commonwealth Court, sitting as the fact-finder, held that the Objector had not presented sufficient evidence to prove timely service upon the Secretary of the Commonwealth of the petition to set aside the nomination papers. The court reached this conclusion because 1) the Objector did not present a sworn affidavit or certifícate of service affirming service upon the Secretary; and 2) the time-stamped copy of the petition offered by the Objector indicated that the Secretary had received a copy of the petition 24 minutes before it was filed with the court. The court also struck a page of the petition to set aside because the page had not been included in the copy of the petition originally served upon the candidate’s wife.

We conclude that the court abused its discretion in rejecting the reasonable inference that service upon the Secretary of the Commonwealth had been effectuated based upon the timestamped copy of the cover sheet for the petition to set aside. Because authenticity of the cover sheet was not at issue, and in the absence of statutory or decisional authority to the contrary, we hold that the court’s ruling constituted an abuse of discretion in imposing an unnecessary item of evidentiary proof, *ie.,*an affidavit or certificate of service, where Objector had already proffered the time-stamped cover sheet of his petition. In addition, because 25 P.S. § 2937 does not address the matter of the precise order of filing and simply requires that service be accomplished within a set period of time, the court engaged in an abuse of discretion in concluding that it had no jurisdiction over the petition to set aside.

We conclude that the court further abused its discretion in striking a page of the petition to set aside based upon its absence from the copy served upon the candidate’s wife. The *460candidate concedes that his attorney learned of the missing page on March 6th, and he does not dispute Objector’s representation that the page was then provided to the candidate’s counsel via fax. Because the candidate had a complete copy of the petition to set aside eleven days prior to the scheduled hearing, sufficient time to prepare a response, we hold that the court abused its discretion in striking the page containing paragraphs 15 through 20.

The order is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

Motion to Quash is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                   7,893,465
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           43,707,086
<ALLOWANCES>                             2,106,863
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        61,388,084
<PP&E>                                   9,466,239
<DEPRECIATION>                           4,440,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         119,829,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   29,243,030
<BONDS>                                 43,371,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    78,054
<OTHER-SE>                              47,787,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           119,829,264 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        66,096,867
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           40,774,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        19,307,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           774,384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,261,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          4,009,355
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,585,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,424,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             2,242,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .28 
                               

</TABLE>
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 12, 2015

FRTIB RELEASES A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR A 

MANAGER FOR THE C FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced today that it has released a request for proposal (RFP) for a fund manager for 

its Common Stock Index Investment Fund (C Fund). The C Fund invests in a stock index 

fund that tracks the performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) Index. The 

earnings consist of dividend income and gains or losses in the prices of stocks. As of 

December 2014, the C Fund held $140.7 billion in assets. The contract will be for a oneyear term, with four one-year options. The FRTIB expects to award the contract in the 

second quarter of the year. 

Over the past two years, the FRTIB has issued RFPs for the other two stock and bond 

funds offered by the TSP. The C Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Fixed Income 

Index Investment Fund, the Small Cap Stock Index Common Stock Investment Fund, and 

the International Stock Index Investment Fund – are currently managed by BlackRock 

Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (BlackRock). 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is

similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. 

As of December 2014, TSP assets totaled approximately $439.7

billion, and retirement savings accounts were being maintained 

for 4.7 million TSP participants. Participants include Federal 

civilian employees in all branches of Government, employees of 

the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. 

Additional information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
Exhibit 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randi Swatt, acting Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Randi Swatt                                 |  | 
|Randi Swatt, acting Chief Executive Officer and
|Acting Chief Financial Officer                 
|May 14, 2009                                    |  |
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 203

To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal economic

development assistance if the State or locality provides improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within the State or

locality.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs and Public Works

and Transportation

A BILL

To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal economic development assistance if the State or locality provides improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within the State or locality.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE.

4 No State or political subdivision of a State may be

5 provided assistance under title I of the Housing and Com6 munity Development Act of 1974 or the Public Works and

7 Economic Development Act of 1965 if such State or politi-
2

•HR 203 IH

1 cal subdivision (or any instrumentality thereof) offers, per2 mits, or grants any tax abatement, money payment, or

3 payment of property (real or chattel) to any commercial

4 or nonprofit organization or governmental entity in order

5 to induce the location, retention, or expansion of such or6 ganization or entity within the State or political subdivi7 sion.

8 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR ENTERPRISE ZONES.

9 The prohibition under section 1 shall not apply to any

10 abatement or payment offered, permitted, or granted

11 under State law in connection with any tax enterprise zone

12 established under State law.

Æ