alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11



                        SHOWPOWER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months                           Six Months
                                                                   Ended June 30,                        Ended June 30,
                                                         ------------------------------------     ----------------------------------
                                                               1998                 1997                 1998             1997
                                                         ----------------    ----------------     ----------------  ----------------

<S>                                                        <C>                  <C>                 <C>                  <C>        
Net income (loss)                                          $  (689,967)         $   304,952         $  (604,586)         $   265,700

Weighted average
    shares outstanding                                       2,113,074            1,913,080           2,013,074            1,536,080

Dilutive effect after application
    of treasury stock method

    Restricted shares                                               --               96,154                  --               48,077
    Employee stock options                                          --                   --                  --                   --

Shares used in calculating
    diluted income per share                                 2,113,074            2,009,234           2,013,074            1,584,157

Basic net income per share                                 $     (0.33)         $      0.16         $     (0.30)         $      0.17

Diluted net income per share                               $     (0.33)         $      0.15         $     (0.30)         $      0.17


PRO FORMA:

Pro forma net income                                       $   148,285          $   189,673         $   128,955          $   147,965

Weighted average
    shares outstanding                                       2,113,074            1,913,080           2,013,074            1,536,080

Dilutive effect after application
    of treasury stock method

    Restricted shares                                          106,251               96,154             104,634               48,077
    Employee stock options                                      18,445                   --               9,222                   --

Shares used in calculating
    diluted income per share                                 2,237,770            2,009,234           2,126,930            1,584,157

Basic net income per share                                 $      0.07          $      0.10         $      0.06          $      0.10

Diluted net income per share                               $      0.07          $      0.09         $      0.06          $      0.09
</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce

multicandidate political committee contributions to congressional candidates, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

reduce multicandidate political committee contributions

to congressional candidates, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens Election Cam5 paign Reform Act’’.
2

•HR 2048 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN THE CEILING ON MULTICANDIDATE

2 POLITICAL COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS TO

3 CANDIDATES.

4 Section 315(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Election Cam5 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)(A)) is amended

6 by striking out ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

7 ‘‘$2,000’’.

8 SEC. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITA9 TION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS

10 OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS.

11 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

12 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

13 the following new subsection:

14 ‘‘(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in,

15 or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

16 may not, with respect to an election, accept contributions

17 from—

18 ‘‘(1) persons other than individual residents of

19 the State in which the election is held; and

20 ‘‘(2) outside the congressional district involved

21 that are in excess of the contributions accepted from

22 inside that district.’’.
3

•HR 2048 IH

1 SEC. 4. POSTAGE FOR TWO MASS MAILINGS BY

2 NONINCUMBENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTA3 TIVES CANDIDATES TO BE PAID FROM THE

4 OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE OF THE HOUSE

5 OF REPRESENTATIVES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—In a general, special, or runoff

7 election for the office of Representative in, or Delegate or

8 Resident Commissioner to, the Congress, in which an in9 cumbent is a candidate, each candidate (other than the

10 incumbent) shall be entitled to free bulk rate postage for

11 2 mass mailings to residents of the congressional district

12 involved. Such mass mailings shall—

13 (1) consist only of biographical and platform

14 statements of the candidate;

15 (2) be sent with postage paid from the Official

16 Mail Allowance of the House of Representatives; and

17 (3) be mailed and delivered in the same cal18 endar year as the general election, but in no event

19 later than 60 days prior to the date of such general,

20 special, or runoff election.

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section the term

22 ‘‘candidate’’ has the meaning given in section 301 of the

23 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2092

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include chiropractic care as

an authorized health care benefit under the Civilian Health and Medical

Program of the Uniformed Services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1993

Mr. EVANS (for himself and Mr. PICKETT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include chiropractic care as an authorized health care benefit under the

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed

Services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHIROPRACTIC CARE COVERAGE UNDER

4 CHAMPUS.

5 (a) COVERAGE.—Section 1079(a) of title 10, United

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (16);
2

•HR 2092 IH

1 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

2 paragraph (17) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

3 and

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new

5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(18) chiropractic care (including appropriate

7 diagnostic activities and histories, examinations, ap8 propriate diagnostic imaging procedures (such as X9 rays), adjustment and manipulation of the spine and

10 its articulations and extremities, and appropriate fol11 low-up procedures) shall be provided by a licensed

12 doctor of chiropractic.’’.

13 (b) REGULATIONS.—The administering Secretaries

14 shall issue rules to implement this section, and the amend15 ments made by this section, not later than 180 days after

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. In order to foster

17 a smooth integration of any rule change affecting the pro18 vision of chiropractic care available under sections 1079

19 and 1086 of title 10, United States Code, the rules issued

20 under this subsection may be changed not more than once

21 per year. Any such change should be made on or about

22 the anniversary of the publication of the original rules.

23 (c) REVIEW BOARD.—The administering Secretaries

24 shall establish a chiropractic review board to assist the

25 Secretaries in the preparation of the rules required by this
3

•HR 2092 IH

1 section, to review subsequent proposed changes in the

2 rules, to assist in the administration of the chiropractic

3 care program under sections 1079 and 1086 of title 10,

4 United States Code, and to serve in a utilization review

5 capacity. The board shall consist of seven doctors of chiro6 practic from National and State chiropractic organiza7 tions, chiropractic colleges, or commissioned officers of the

8 uniformed services who are doctors of chiropractic.

9 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

10 term ‘‘administering Secretaries’’ has the meaning given

11 that term in section 1072(3) of title 10, United States

12 Code.

Æ
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00227

- CV

JOSE LUIS GARCIA

v. JOANNA ANAYA
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. F

- 1377

- 11

- 7

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 16, 2014

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10749-10750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-026)]


NASA Advisory Council, Minority Business Resource Advisory 
Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announce a forthcoming meeting of the

[[Page 10750]]

NASA Advisory Council, Minority Business Resource Advisory Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Wednesday, March 
21, 2001, 9 a.m. to 12 noon.

ADDRESSES: Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058-3696. Meeting held 
on Tuesday, March 20, 2001, will be in Building 111, Room 108 and the 
meeting held on Wednesday, March 21, 2001, will be in Building 1, Room 
966.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ralph C. Thomas III, Code K, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 9K70, 300 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20546-0001, (202) 358-2088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Overview of NASA
--Small Disadvantaged Business Participation in Major NASA Contracts
--Report on JPL/NASA High-Tech Small Business Conference
--Action Items
--NASA Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Program Update
--Report of Chair
--Public Comment
--Report from MBRAC Sub Panels
--Review of NASA's Top 10 Small Business Stories for 2000
--Status of Open Committee Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3968 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, BachThuy T. Vo, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
| Dated: April 2, 2007 | By:                             | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|--------------------|
|                 | BachThuy T. Vo                  |
|                 | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Jasbir Singh MANN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72883.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Jasbir Singh Mann, Simi Valley, CA, pro se.

*100Katharine Clark, Esquire, OIL, Barry J. Pettinato, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jasbir Singh Mann, native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Even if Mann’s asylum application was timely filed, his asylum and withholding of removal claims fail because substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Mann can reasonably relocate to Bombay. *See Melkonian v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 1061, 1069 (9th Cir.2003).

Similarly, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Mann failed to establish his eligibility for CAT relief because he can safely relocate. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*351 F.3d 435, 443 (9th Cir.2003).

The government’s motion to strike the evidence submitted by Mann that is not already contained in the administrative record is granted. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                            RENEX CORP. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                  STATE OF           YEAR OF INCORPORATION
                          NAME                                  INCORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>                               <C>
Renex Dialysis Clinic of University City, Inc.             Missouri                          1993
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Pittsburgh, Inc.                  Pennsylvania                      1993
Renex Corp.                                                Texas                             1993
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Tampa, Inc.                       Florida                           1994
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Creve Couer, Inc.                 Missouri                          1994
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Miami, Inc.                       Florida                           1994
Renex Dialysis Homecare of Greater St. Louis, Inc.         Missouri                          1994
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Amesbury, Inc.                    Massachusetts                     1994
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Bridgeton, Inc.                   Missouri                          1995
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Philadelphia, Inc.                Pennsylvania                      1995
Renex Dialysis Homecare of Tampa, Inc.                     Florida                           1995
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Woodbury, Inc.                    New Jersey                        1995
Renex Dialysis Facilities, Inc.                            Mississippi                       1990
Renex Dialysis Homecare of Greater Pittsburgh, Inc.        Pennsylvania                      1996
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Orange, Inc.                      New Jersey                        1996
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Bloomfield, Inc.                  New Jersey                        1996
Renex Dialysis Homecare of Greater Philadelphia, Inc.      Pennsylvania                      1996
Renex Dialysis Clinic of North Andover, Inc.               Massachusetts                     1996
Renex National Homecare, Inc.                              Florida                           1997
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Union, Inc.                       Missouri                          1997
Dialysis Services of Atlanta, Inc.                         Georgia                           1997
Renex Management Services, Inc.                            Florida                           1997
Renex Dialysis Clinic of Maplewood, Inc.                   Missouri                          1997
Renex Dialysis Clinic of South Georgia, Inc.               Georgia                           1998
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, John F. Short, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Opinion Research Corporation, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Opinion Research Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: March 31, 2005      Signed:  /s/ John F. Short   Name:  John F. Short    Title:  Chairman and CEO
941 A.2d 1260

#### Michael TURNER, Petitioner, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Petitioner.

No. 174 EM 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 7, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Application Seeking Leave to File Original Process is granted. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief and/or Kings Bench Relief is denied, without prejudice to file a petition for expedited disposition of Petitioner’s pending motion with the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court.