alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JAMES PERRY TURNAGE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4298

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

James Perry Turnage, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1773 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1773

     To reauthorize the rural health care transition grant program 
  established under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, to 
direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference in 
making grants under such program to hospitals that establish consortia 
  with other providers in the communities in which the hospitals are 
located, and to revise the frequency of the Secretary's reports on the 
                          program to Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

Mr. Emerson (for himself, Mr. Gunderson, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. 
Lancaster, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Slattery, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. 
Kyl) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the rural health care transition grant program 
  established under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, to 
direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference in 
making grants under such program to hospitals that establish consortia 
  with other providers in the communities in which the hospitals are 
located, and to revise the frequency of the Secretary's reports on the 
                          program to Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISIONS TO RURAL HEALTH CARE TRANSITION GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Reauthorization Through Fiscal Year 1997.--Section 4005(e)(9) 
of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1989 and'' and inserting ``1989,''; and
            (2) by striking ``1992'' and inserting ``1992 and 
        $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1993 through 1997''.
    (b) Preference in Awarding Grants for Hospitals Establishing 
Consortia of Community Providers.--Section 4005(e)(5) of such Act is 
amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting after 
``the Administrator'' the following: ``shall give preference to a 
hospital whose proposed project is to establish a consortium with other 
providers of health care services in the community in which the 
hospital is located to integrate the delivery of such services to 
individuals in the community, and''.
    (c) Revision of Frequency of Secretary's Reports to Congress.--
Section 4005(e)(8)(B) of such Act is amended by striking ``6 months'' 
and inserting ``12 months''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3743 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3743

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To increase funding for the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and 
Drug Administration and for the Foundation for the National Institutes 
                               of Health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting the Foundation for the 
National Institutes of Health and the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the 
Food and Drug Administration Act''.

SEC. 2. REAGAN-UDALL FOUNDATION AND FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL 
              INSTITUTES OF HEALTH.

    (a) Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and Drug Administration.--
Section 770(n) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
379dd(n)) is amended by striking ``$500,000 and not more than 
$1,250,000'' and inserting ``$1,250,000 and not more than $5,000,000''.
    (b) Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.--Section 
499(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290b(l)) is amended 
by striking ``$500,000 and not more than $1,250,000'' and inserting 
``$1,250,000 and not more than $5,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3743

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To increase funding for the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and 
Drug Administration and for the Foundation for the National Institutes 
                               of Health.
```
exv10w5



 







Exhibit 10.5




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Amendment (A)




     Larry Brittain (“Executive”) and Stratex Networks, Inc., formerly DMC Stratex Networks, Inc.
(the “Company”), are parties to an Employment Agreement of April 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”).
Executive and the Company now wish to amend the Agreement, and thus they agree as set forth below.



     1. The following is added to Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the Agreement: “provided, however, that if
you are 60 years of age or older on the date of your termination without cause, and if you have
been employed by the Company for not less than three years as of the date of your termination
without cause, the Company will pay the premiums necessary to continue your Company group health
insurance coverage under COBRA (or to provide you with comparable health insurance coverage) until
you reach the age of 65 or until you are eligible to participate in another employer’s group health
insurance plan, whichever comes first;”.



     2. In Paragraph 5(e) of the Agreement, the phase “(ii to a maximum of 18 months, unless you
are 60 years of age or older on the date of your termination/resignation and you have been employed
by the Company for not less than three years as of the date of your termination/resignation, in
which case the last clause of subparagraph 5(c)(ii) shall apply)” shall be inserted following the
phrase “subparagraph 5(c)(i),”.



     3. In Paragraph 11 of the Agreement, the last sentence (“Provided, however . . .”) is hereby
deleted and replaced with the following sentence: “Any arbitration conducted under this Paragraph
will be pursuant to the American Arbitration Association’s (“AAA”) National Rules for the
Resolution of Employment Disputes, a copy of which can be found on the AAA’s website at
www.adr.org.”



     Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: April 14, 2006	 	/S/ Larry Brittain
	 	 	 
	 	 	Larry Brittain
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: April 14, 2006	 	Stratex Networks, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/S/ Charles D. Kissner
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mountasia Management Company
Mountasia Development Co.
Mountasia Partners I, Inc.
Mountasia Properties, Inc.
Mountasia Family Entertainment Centers, Inc.
Amusement Co. Inc.
Amusement Co. Partners, Inc.
Malibu Grand Prix Corporation
Miami Castle MGPC, Inc.
Tempe MGPC, Inc.
Tucson MGPC, Inc.
Fresno MGPC, Inc.
North Hollywood Castle MGPC, Inc.
Puente Hills MGPC, Inc.
Puente Hills Showboat MGPC, Inc.
Redondo Beach Castle MGPC, Inc.
Redwood City Castle MGPC, Inc.
Redwood City MGPC, Inc.
San Diego MGPC, Inc.
Denver MGPC, Inc.
Orlando Castle MGPC, Inc.
Orlando MGPC, Inc.
Tampa Castle MGPC, Inc.
Tampa MGPC, Inc.
Lenexa MGPC, Inc.
Mount Laurel MGPC, Inc.
Columbus MGPC, Inc.
Cincinnati MGPC, Inc.
Portland MGPC, Inc.
Austin MGPC, Inc.
Dallas Castle MGPC, Inc.
Dallas MGPC, Inc.
Houston Castle MGPC, Inc.
Houston II MGPC, Inc.
San Antonio Castle MGPC, Inc.
San Antonio MGPC, Inc.
MGP Financial Services, Inc.
Off Track Management, Inc.
MGP Special, Inc.
Amusement Management Florida., Inc.
MGP Consulting, Inc.
MGP Design & Manufacturing Inc.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- PC

- 409 | October 9 , 2018 Page 1 of 2



### MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLANT Jeffrey A. Baldwin Tyler D. Helmond Voyles Vaiana Lukemeyer Baldwin & Webb Indianapolis, Indiana A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLEE Stephen R. Creason Chief Counsel for Appeals and Deputy Attorney General F. Aaron Negangard Chief Deputy Attorney General Justin F. Roebel Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E 

# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Obed Nyarenchi , Appellant

- Petitioner ,
v. 

### State of Indiana , Appellee

- Respondent October 9 , 2018 Court of Appeals Ca se No. 18A

- PC

- 409 Appeal from the Marion Superior Court The Honorable Lisa Borges, Judge Trial Co urt Cause No. 49G04

- 1501

- PC

- 2906

Vaidik , Chief Judge . [1] Obed Nyarenchi appeals the denial of the petition for post

- conviction relief that he filed after a jury found him guilty of attempted murder and burglary forCourt of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- PC

- 409 | October 9 , 2018 Page 2 of 2

breaking into a house in Speedway and attacking another man with a hatchet and a hammer. His trial attorneys as serted but then withdrew a defense of mental disease or defect. See Ind. Code § 35

- 41

- 3

- 6(a) (“A person is not responsible for having engaged in prohibited conduct if, as a result of mental disease or defect, he was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness o f the conduct at the time of the offense.”). Nyarenchi contends that the attorneys should have done more to develop that defense and then presented i t at trial, and he asserts that their failure to do so c onstitutes ineffective assistance of counsel

. To prevail on his ineffective

- assistance claim, Nyarenchi had to show not only that the failure to develop and present a mental

- disease

- or - defect defense amounted to “deficient performance” but also that he was prejudiced by that failure, i.e., that there is a reasonable probability that the jury would have found him not guilty if his attorneys had developed and presented the defense

. See Woods v. State , 701 N.E.2d 1208 (Ind. 1998), reh’g denied . On appeal, Nyarenchi states that he “has met this burden.” Ap pellant’s Br. p. 12. But that is the extent of his argument. He does not direct us to a single piece of evidence that would have supported a mental

- disease

- or - defect defense. In fact, his three

- sentence argument on this issue does not include any citati ons to the record, in violation of Indiana Appellate Rule 46(A)(8)(a) (“Each contention must be supported by citations to . . . the Appendix or parts of the Record on Appeal relied on[.]”). As such, he has not shown that the trial court erred by denying h is petition.

[2] Affirmed. Riley, J., and Kirsch, J., concur

.
##### 



Exhibit 10.47
 Summary of Director Compensation Plan
Effective as of May 17, 2007
  Directors
 
    
    Each non-employee director shall receive an annual retainer of $95,000, comprised of
$30,000 in cash paid in four quarterly installments and $65,000 paid in restricted stock
following Triads annual meeting of stockholders. The restricted stock shall vest 100% on
May 16, 2008.
    
    Restricted stock issued to directors shall continue to vest in accordance with the terms
of the grant upon a directors departure from the Board unless the departure is for cause,
in which case all unvested stock shall be forfeited.
 Non-executive Chairman of the Board
 
    
    A non-executive Chairman of the Board shall receive an annual retainer of $225,000,
comprised of $112,500 in cash paid in four quarterly installments and $112,500 paid in
restricted stock following Triads annual meeting of stockholders. The restricted stock
shall vest 100% on May 16, 2008.
    
    The Compensation Committee reserves the right to recommend a discretionary payment in
the event that the non-executive Chairman of the Board performs services beyond those
traditionally performed by others serving in the same capacity.
    
    Restricted stock issued to directors shall continue to vest in accordance with the terms
of the grant upon a directors departure from the Board unless the departure is for cause,
in which case all unvested stock shall be forfeited.
 Chairpersons and Members of Committees of the Board
 
    
    The Audit Committee Chairperson shall receive $15,000 per year for his/her service in
such capacity. Chairpersons of other Standing Committees shall receive $7,500 per year for
their service in such capacities.
    
    Audit Committee members shall receive $2,500 per meeting attended up to a maximum of
eight meetings per year. Other Standing Committee members shall receive $1,500 per meeting
attended up to a maximum of four meetings per year. The Compensation Committee reserves the
right to recommend the payment of additional fees per meeting in the event that additional
attendance is required.
 Reimbursement of Expenses
 
    
    All reasonable expenses incurred by non-employee directors or Committee members in their
capacity as such shall be reimbursed by Triad.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Education Goals Panel

# AGENCY:

National Education Goals Panel.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date and location of a forthcoming meeting of the National Education Goals Panel (NEGP). This notice also describes the functions of the Panel.

# DATE AND TIME:

Saturday, February 24, 2001 from 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Press Club, 529 14th Street, NW., Holeman Lounge, 13th Floor, Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Emily Wurtz, Acting Executive Director, 1255 22nd Street, NW., Suite 502, Washington, DC 20037, Telephone: (202) 724-0015.

# SUMMARY:

The National Education Goals Panel was established to monitor, measure and report state and national progress toward achieving the eight National Education Goals, and report to the states and the Nation on the progress.

*Agenda Items:*                        The agenda items will focus upon recommendations made by NEGP's Measuring Success Task Force. Governor John R. McKernan, Task Force Chair, will report recommendations of new data in student academic achievement, adult literacy, teacher education and professional development, and early childhood education. In addition, the incoming NEGP Chair, Governor Frank O'Bannon, will announce upcoming Panel initiatives for 2001.                    

Dated: February 9, 2001.

Emily Wurtz,

Acting Executive Director, National Education Goals Panel.

[FR Doc. 01-3798  Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4010-01-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,858-01

EX PARTE CEDRIC FRIEL WOODS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1379808-A IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., concurred.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of delivery of cocaine and sentenced to one year in the State Jail. 

Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he did not know of the bad acts of

the police officer who implicated him in this alleged offense. The State and the trial court agree that

Applicant’s plea was involuntary. Ex parte Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022); Ex

parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The State and the trial court both recommend

granting relief. We agree. Applicant is entitled to relief. 
2

Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 137980801010 in the 339th District Court

of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictment. 

The trial court shall issue any necessaryorders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: August 23, 2023

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828191
<NAME> 88B.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         148,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,733
<PP&E>                                       7,114,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,712,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,638,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,605,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,638,122
<SALES>                                        602,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  458,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $2,280.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant, and John Harvey Goddard, Sr., Claimant-Appellant.

No. 13-2434.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

John Harvey Goddard, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Harvey Goddard, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a forfeiture judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. $2,280.00 in U.S. Currency,*No. 5:13-cv-00017-JPB (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 5, 2013). We grant Goddard’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
exv10w1



 








Exhibit 10.1



Summary
of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Incentive Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year
2007




     On August 9, 2006, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of
Directors approved the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Incentive Compensation Plan for
Fiscal Year 2007 (the “CFO Incentive Plan”). The CFO Incentive Plan, which covers the Company’s
fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007, consists of three components: (i) a Specific Objectives Based
Bonus, (ii) an Earnings Growth Incentive Bonus, and (iii) a Restricted Stock Award. The amount of
the Specific Objectives Based Bonus, which ranges between $60,000 and $80,000, will be determined
at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, with a minimum payment of $60,000. The Earnings
Growth Incentive Bonus is payable based upon achievement of certain specified increases in the
income of the Company from continuing operations during fiscal year 2007. Mr. Urness also received
a Restricted Stock Award of 923 shares under the Cavco Industries, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.
The restricted shares shall vest in twenty percent increments over the next five years on the
anniversaries of the Grant Date.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                           [CROWE CHIZEK LETTERHEAD]

                         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Commercial National Financial Corporation
Ithaca, Michigan



We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Commercial National
Financial Corporation as of March 31, 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the
quarters ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Corporation's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which
is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                           /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                           Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


South Bend, Indiana
April 27, 2000