alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2











Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015 of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K as amended by Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.








Dated: August 1, 2016





/s/ Stephen T. Wills


Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the " Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned,
constituting the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Mega
Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their
knowledge:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the issuer for the fiscal quarter then ended.


Date: July 21, 2006                                     MEGA GROUP, INC.

                                                 By:    /s/ JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                                       14
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-60760

Summary Calendar

RANDY RAY SHOEMAKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(1:94-CV-495-RR)

May 14, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shoemake filed suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart")

in the Circuit Court of Pearl River County, Mississippi, seeking to

recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Shoemake when he

slipped and fell on the premises of a Wal-Mart Store in Picayune,

Mississippi. Wal-Mart removed the action to the United States
2

District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi on the

basis of diversity of citizenship and after completion of discovery

moved for summary judgment. The United States district judge

granted Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment. We have carefully

reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by

the district judge in his memorandum order filed November 6, 1995,

we affirm the final judgment filed under date of November 21, 1995,

in Wal-Mart's favor.

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00355

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.S, B.R.S., AND R.C.S.,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. Fl

- 13

- 117

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of T ime to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on July 6, 2014. Because this is an accelerated appeal from an order

terminating appellant’s parental rights, no further extensions of time will be granted.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2113 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2113

      To require approval by law of agency rules and regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

 Mr. Taylor of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Coble, Mr. Ballenger, 
Mr. Nussle, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Klug, and Mr. 
   Hefley) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require approval by law of agency rules and regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Regulatory Relief and Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. AGENCY RULES REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY LAW.

    (a) Approval Requirement.--Section 553 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``except to the extent'' and inserting 
        ``except that subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) do not apply 
        to the extent''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) A rule or regulation shall not be effective unless it is 
approved by law.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to--
            (1) a rule or regulation issued in final form after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) a rule or regulation issued in final form before the 
        date of the enactment of this Act, if the first effective date 
        of the rule or regulation occurs after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

December 4, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 17, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.,*Docket No. KENT 2011-434.**(Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling that a mine operator wasnot strictly liable for violations of a standard requiring that seat belts beworn by miners under prescribed conditions.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2180 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2180

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing suspension of 
                         duty on Paramine Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

 Mr. Ravenel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing suspension of 
                         duty on Paramine Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARAMINE ACID.

    Heading 9902.30.44 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829092
<NAME>                        MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-16-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         7,865
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,863
<PP&E>                                         206,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (68,289)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,268
<BONDS>                                        101,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,661
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               31,225
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,560
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         231,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,112
<PP&E>                                             184
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     230,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the first quarter 10-Q
                              and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
                              such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 79,601
<ALLOWANCES>                  (1,692)
<INVENTORY>                   49,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              156,238
<PP&E>                        805,822
<DEPRECIATION>                (25,756)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                969,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         70,400
<BONDS>                       174,882
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    164,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  969,281
<SALES>                       100,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              100,360
<CGS>                         93,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 93,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              5,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            7,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (6,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (2,548)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (4,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (4,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
Rel: December 8, 2023

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2023-0155 Renasant Bank v. Jack Donovan, Michele Donovan, and JMJAC Restaurant, Inc. (Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court: CV-18-84). STEWART, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Mendheim, JJ., concur. Cook, J., recuses himself.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 248

EX PA R TE M I C H A EL A N SH U N W A LK ER , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 3 0 , 5 9 7 - CR I N T HE 1 3 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM NAV ARR O CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u a n t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d

82 4, 82 6 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). Ap pli c a nt w a s c on vic te d o f po sse ssi on wi th intent to deliver a c ontrolled substance and sente nced to six ty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. Ap pli c a nt c on te nd s th a t his c ou ns e l f a ile d to tim e ly

fi le a no tic e of a pp e a l. We re mand e d th is
a pp lic a tio n to the tr ia l c ou rt to a llo w c ou ns e l an o pp or tun ity to r e sp on d to thi s c la im. Counsel has filed an a ffidavit in re sponse to the claim, and the tr ial court ha s determined tha t a timely notice of a

ppeal wa s not filed thoroug h no fault of Applica nt. We find, there fore , that2

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judg ment of convic tion in C a us e No
. 30 ,5 97 -C R

fr om t he 13 Judic ia l D istri c t Co ur t of Na va rr o County . App lic a nt i s th order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf u l appeal. All time lim its shall be calcula ted as if the
se n t e n c e h a d b e e n i m p o s e d o n t h e d a t e o n w h i c h t h e m a n d a t e o f t h i s C o u rt i s s u e s . We h old tha t, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a w ritten notice of a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ou rt

wi thi n 3 0 d a y s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 28, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00478-CR

In re W. Paul Parash

Ex parte Theodoro Quinones

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-12-0101-HC, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to Theodoro Quinones’s appeal. The subject

of this proceeding is W. Paul Parash, appellant’s retained attorney.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal stating he wished to appeal from the trial court’s

interlocutory orders related to his Motion to Reduce Bond. The clerk’s record was filed on July 12,

2012, and the reporter’s record was filed on October 8, 2012. In November 2012, Mr. Parash made

several attempts to file a brief electronically, but the briefs were rejected because theywere untimely,

lacked a correct motion for extension of time, and had various errors of form.

On December 4, two weeks after Mr. Parash’s last unsuccessful attempt to file the

brief and a motion for extension of time, we sent him notice that the brief was overdue, requesting

a response by December 4. On April 23, 2013, after Mr. Parash failed to respond or file a corrected
brief, we issued an order directing him to file the brief and motion for extension of time by May 3.

To date, Mr. Parash still has not responded to our communications or filed a brief.

We hereby order Mr. Parash to appear in person on June 5, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., in the

courtroom of this Court, located in the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th St., City of Austin,

Travis County, Texas, to show why he should not be held in contempt and sanctions imposed for his

failure to obey the April 23 order of this Court.

It is ordered May 17, 2013.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Do Not Publish

2
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 201

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide a limited

exemption from child labor provisions of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide

a limited exemption from child labor provisions of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION.

4 Section 13 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

5 (29 U.S.C. 213) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(k)(1) The provisions of section 12 shall not apply

8 to any minor who is under the age of 14 and who—

9 ‘‘(A) is enrolled in a school accredited by the

10 education agency of the State in which it is located,
2

•HR 201 IH

1 ‘‘(B) has completed the 6th grade, and

2 ‘‘(C) is participating in a work study program

3 that fully conforms with criteria specified by the

4 Secretary acting through the Administrator of the

5 Wage and Hour Division.

6 ‘‘(2) The employment of minors in a work study pro7 gram described in paragraph (1)(C) shall be limited—

8 ‘‘(A) to no more than 4 hours per week and no

9 more than 16 weeks in a school year, and

10 ‘‘(B) to such periods and conditions of employ11 ment as may be prescribed by the Secretary by regu12 lation.’’.

Æ
<i

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-1121-14 & PD-1122-14

MARCUS LEEJEFFERSON, AppeUant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM

THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MAY 13 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
>4

Motion to appeal the refusal ofAppellant's Discretionary Review

Appellant's Discretionary Review was refused.

Appellant, Marcus Lee Jefferson, has Motion to appeal the decision of the

refusal of his Discretionary Review.

As Appellant has just cause for this appeal.

This motion is not made for the purpose of delay,

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED,

Appellant prays that this Honorable Court grants the extension oftime to complete

the order ofthe Criminal Court ofAppeals.

*Prayerfully,

Marcus Lee Jefferson

19822 River Breeze Dr.

Tomball, Texas 77375

PH. 281.773.1448

May 12, 2015