alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3-5 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          97,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,097,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,047,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,203,930
<PP&E>                                       1,958,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,854,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,844,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,277
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       741,681
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,194,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,854,705
<SALES>                                     13,137,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,137,407
<CGS>                                        9,345,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,345,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,275,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                517,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                   196,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   320,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1858

To terminate new water projects of the Bureau of Reclamation, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1993

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To terminate new water projects of the Bureau of

Reclamation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NEW WATER PROJECTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—After the date of enactment of

5 this Act, the Secretary of the Interior may not design, con6 struct, or acquire interests in land for any unit of a rec7 lamation project for which funds have not been appro8 priated and obligated before the date of enactment of this

9 Act.
2

•HR 1858 IH

1 (b) AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND PROJECTS.—The Sec2 retary shall suspend design and construction activities and

3 the acquisition of interests in land for any unit of a rec4 lamation project with respect to which the Secretary deter5 mines that continuing the unit of the project would result

6 in a net loss to the United States, taking into account

7 the benefits of the project as well as the costs (including

8 the costs (if any) of suspending the project), determined

9 on a dollar basis. The Secretary shall review each reclama10 tion project to determine if the project should be termi11 nated under this subsection.

12 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND RE13 PLACEMENT RESPONSIBILITY.

14 The Secretary of the Interior shall seek to transfer

15 the responsibility for operating, maintaining, and replac16 ing reclamation projects to the water districts which bene17 fit from the projects. Any such transfer may include the

18 transfer of all right, title, and interest of the United States

19 in and to the reclamation project or a portion thereof. The

20 Secretary shall adjust the obligation to repay the United

21 States to reflect each such transfer.

22 SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT OF RECLAMATION PROJECTS RE23 MAINING UNDER FEDERAL CONTROL.

24 The Secretary of the Interior shall seek to enter into

25 contracts for the management of any reclamation project
3

•HR 1858 IH

1 or portion thereof not transferred under section 2. Each

2 such contract shall contain such terms and conditions as

3 the Secretary determines will carry out this Act and pro4 tect the interests of the United States.

5 SEC. 4. COST OF WATER PROVIDED FROM RECLAMATION

6 PROJECTS.

7 Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment

8 of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a

9 study and submit a report to the Congress on the true

10 value of water provided from water reclamation projects.

11 The study shall take into account alternate sources of

12 water and the value of the water to the user. The Sec13 retary shall include in the report recommendations for

14 charging the recipient of water from a water reclamation

15 project the true value of the water received.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:

| | (i)  | the accompanying Annual Report
       on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report)
       fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
       as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                  

The foregoing
      certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
      before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

|Date:February 22, 2006 | By: | /s/ MATTHEW H.
       KNIGHT             
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                          
|                       |     | Matthew H. Knight                        
|                       |     | President and Chief Executive
    Officer



---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2014

No. 04-14-00355-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.S, B.R.S., AND R.C.S.,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. Fl-13-117

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on July 6, 2014. Because this is an accelerated appeal from an order 

terminating appellant’s parental rights, no further extensions of time will be granted.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2203

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human

Resources

AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of grants regarding the prevention and control

of sexually transmitted diseases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sexually Transmitted

5 Diseases Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2203 RFS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF GRANTS REGARDING

2 PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF SEXUALLY

3 TRANSMITTED DISEASES.

4 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 318(d)(1) of

5 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c(d)(1)) is

6 amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘there are au7 thorized’’ and all that follows and inserting the following:

8 ‘‘there are authorized to be appropriated $80,000,000 for

9 fiscal year 1994, and such sums as may be necessary for

10 each of the fiscal years 1995 through 1998.’’.

11 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Section 318 of the

12 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c) is amended—

13 (1) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘, and’’

14 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

15 (2) in subsection (d)(5)—

16 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking

17 ‘‘form, or’’ and inserting ‘‘form, or;’’ and

18 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘pur19 poses,’’ and inserting ‘‘purposes;’’.

20 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM REGARDING PREVENT21 ABLE CASES OF INFERTILITY ARISING AS RE22 SULT OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES.

23 (a) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—

24 (1) AMENDATORY INSTRUCTIONS.—Section 304

25 of Public Law 102–531 (106 Stat. 3490) is amend26 ed—
3

•HR 2203 RFS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Part A of title III’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘Part B of title III’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘241 et seq.’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘243 et seq.’’.

5 (2) CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 318A of the

6 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c–1), as

7 added by section 304 of Public Law 102–531 (106

8 Stat. 3490), is amended in subsection (o)(2) by

9 striking ‘‘subsection (s)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection

10 (q)’’.

11 (b) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 318A of the

12 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c–1), as added

13 by section 304 of Public Law 102–531 (106 Stat. 3490),

14 is amended—

15 (1) in subsection (q), by striking ‘‘and 1995’’

16 and inserting ‘‘through 1998’’; and

17 (2) in subsection (r)(2), by striking ‘‘through

18 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘through 1998’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 16, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16189

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-60229-CR-WJZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDWARD JEREMAINE WHITFIELD,

a.k.a. Main

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(August 16, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Jeremaine Whitfield appeals his conviction and 216-month sentence
for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 50 grams of crack cocaine

and 500 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(A)(iii), and (b)(1)(B)(ii). On appeal, Whitfield argues that his guilty plea

was not knowing and voluntary because the district court did not ensure that he

understood the nature of the charge against him and failed to make a finding as to

the factual basis of the plea.

Having reviewed the record, we find no error. Based on admissions and

statements Whitfield made, there was a factual basis for his guilty plea. Further,

Whitfield failed to demonstrate that any alleged error resulted in his lack of

understanding the charge against him, and thus, his substantial rights were not

prejudiced. Finally, even if there was error, Whitfield has failed to demonstrate a

reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered his guilty

plea. Accordingly, we affirm Whitfield’s conviction.

With reference to his sentence, we conclude that Whitfield’s challenges are

barred by his valid appeal waiver. Whitfield’s sentence appeal waiver is valid and

none of its exceptions apply to permit him to challenge his sentence on appeal.

Because the district court specifically questioned Whitfield about the sentence

appeal waiver at his change-of-plea hearing, and Whitfield indicated that he

understood the waiver, Whitfield entered into the waiver knowingly and

2
voluntarily, and thus, the waiver is valid and enforceable. Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal as to the sentencing issues Whitfield attempts to raise.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-3160-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of Michigan, (FEMA-3160-EM), dated January 10, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 2, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency for the State of Michigan is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of January 10, 2001: 

Branch, Berrien, Gladwin, Hillsdale, Huron, Ingham, Ionia, Jackson, Mecosta, Osceola, Sanilac, and Shiawassee Counties for emergency protective measures under the Public Assistance program for a period of 48 hours. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-4129 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Sept-30-1997
<CASH>                        368,311
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,316,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         52,725
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,316,014
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              377,262
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              155,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               221,340
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           221,340
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  221,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                          NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three months ended September 30,
                                                  1999                    1998
                                                  ----                    ----
<S>                                         <C>                       <C>
Net loss                                    $(  261,361)              ( 553,985)

Dividends on Series A and B
  preferred stock                                   -                 (  45,313)
                                              ---------                --------

Net loss applicable to common shareholders  $(  261,361)              ( 599,298)
                                              =========                ========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                         30,380,483              12,385,392

Common equivalent shares representing
  shares issuable upon exercise of
  outstanding options and warrants                  -                       -
                                             ----------              ----------

                                             30,380,483              12,385,392
                                             ==========              ==========

Basic and diluted loss per share
  applicable to common shareholders         $(      .01)              (     .05)
                                              =========                ========

Stock options and warrants are not considered in the calculations as the impact
of the potential common shares would be to decrease net loss per share.

</TABLE>





















<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141531 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141531 

 COA: 298214 

Kent CC: 09-002511-FH 

AARON ALEXANDER ST. CLAIR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 6, 2010 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Form 843

(Rev. November 2002) Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement OMB No. 1545-0024

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  See separate instructions.

Use Form 843 only if your claim involves (a) one of the taxes shown on line 3a or (b) a refund or abatement of interest, penalties,

or additions to tax on line 4a.

Daytime telephone number

Name of claimant

( )

Address (number, street, and room or suite no.)

Type or print

City or town, state, and ZIP code

Spouse’s SSN or ITIN

Your SSN or ITIN

Employer identification number (EIN)

Name and address shown on return if different from above

1 Period. Prepare a separate Form 843 for each tax period 2 Amount to be refunded or abated

From / / to / / $

b Dates of payment 

3a Type of tax, penalty, or addition to tax:

Employment

Penalty—IRC section 

Estate Gift

4a Request for abatement or refund of:

Interest as a result of IRS errors or delays.

A penalty or addition to tax as a result of erroneous advice from the IRS.

Type of return filed (see instructions):

706 709 990-PF 4720 940 945

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 10180R Form 843 (Rev. 11-2002)

b

5 Explanation and additional claims. Explain why you believe this claim should be allowed, and show computation of tax

refund or abatement of interest, penalty, or addition to tax. If you need more space, attach additional sheets.

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this claim, including accompanying schedules and statements, and, to the best of my knowledge and

belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature (Title, if applicable. Claims by corporations must be signed by an officer.) Date

Signature Date

Signature. If you are filing Form 843 to request a refund or abatement relating to a joint return, both you and your spouse must

sign the claim. Claims filed by corporations must be signed by a corporate officer authorized to sign, and the signature must be

accompanied by the officer’s title.

Do not use Form 843 if your claim is for—

● An overpayment of income taxes;

● An overpayment of excise taxes reported on Form(s) 11-C, 720, 730, or 2290.

Excise (see instructions)

941 943 Other (specify)

● A refund for nontaxable use (or sales) of fuel; or
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            LETTER TO THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T



                  ENSTAR INCOME/GROWTH PROGRAM Five-A, L.P.
                           12405 Powerscourt Drive
                          St. Louis, Missouri 63131







                                March 29, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        Pursuant to temporary note 3T, Enstar Income/Growth Program Five-A,
L.P. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen stating that
the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit,
and availability of national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to the audit.

                                Very truly yours,


                                ENSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
                                  CORPORATION, General Partner of
                                  Enstar Income/Growth Program Five-A,
                                  L.P.


                                By: /s/  Paul E. Martin
                                   -------------------------------------
                                 Name:   Paul E. Martin
                                 Title:  Vice President and Corporate
                                         Controller (Principal Financial
                                         Officer and Principal Accounting
                                         Officer)