alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, I, Andrew J. Mako,  President of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby certify that the accompanying  Quarterly
Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2003,  containing  the
financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property
Account (a separate  account of Pruco Life Insurance  Company of New Jersey) and
The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Report"), fully
complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable  Contract Real Property  Account
and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.


Date: May 15, 2003


 /s/ Andrew J. Mako
------------------------------
Name: Andrew J. Mako
Title: President

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.


                                        25
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of
my knowledge:



/s/ Dennis M. Hanson Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


April 29,
2013

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7171

ANTHONY RAY HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R.L. FOY, Deputy; RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT; WAKE COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:09-ct-03124-FL)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Ray Harris, Appellant Pro Se. John Albert Maxfield, 

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina; Hunt Kang Choi, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Ray Harris seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing the Raleigh Police Department from his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Harris seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Harris’ 

motion for release and dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### Jose Tiodoro AMAYA, also known as Jose Teodoro Amaya, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-60304

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2011.

*862Gino Mario Mesa, Esq., Law Office of Gino M. Mesa, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Tangerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Julie Marie Iversen, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWTCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Tiodoro Amaya, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. He claims that he will be persecuted by a gang, a member of which is related to a family that Amaya holds responsible for the murder of his foster-father. According to Amaya, his foster-father was murdered, and he and his family were threatened by the gang member’s family, following the breakup of a marriage between Amaya’s foster-sister and the gang member’s brother.

We review the BIA’s determination that an alien is not entitled to withholding of removal for substantial evidence and will not reverse the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Chen v. Gonzales,*470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir.2006). To qualify for withholding of removal, the alien “must demonstrate a ‘clear probability’ of persecution upon return.” *Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d*132, 138 (5th Cir.2004) (citation omitted). At a minimum, there must be some particularized connection between the feared persecution and the alien’s race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. *Faddoul v. INS,*37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir.1994).

The BIA determined that Amaya had not shown any such particularized connection, and Amaya does not assert such a connection in his petition for review. The BIA’s conclusion that Amaya was threatened due to a personal dispute between his family and that of the gang member rather than due to any connection with a statutorily-protected ground is supported by substantial evidence. Put differently, the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to that reached by the BIA. *See Chen,*470 F.3d at 1134.

The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Form 8845

(Rev. January 2020)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Indian Employment Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8845 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0123

Attachment 

Sequence No. 113

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

1 Total of qualified wages and qualified employee health insurance costs paid or incurred during the

tax year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Calendar year 1993 qualified wages and qualified employee health insurance costs (see instructions). 

If none, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Incremental increase. Subtract line 2 from line 1. If zero or less, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . . 3

 4 Multiply line 3 by 20% (0.20). See instructions for the adjustment you must make to salaries 

and wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Indian employment credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, estates, and trusts . . . 5

6 Add lines 4 and 5. Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, go to line 7. Partnerships and S corporations, 

stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, stop here and report this amount on Form

3800, Part III, line 1g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

7 Amount allocated to patrons of the cooperative or beneficiaries of the estate or trust (see instructions) 7

8 Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, subtract line 7 from line 6. Report this amount on Form 3800, Part 

III, line 1g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 16146D Form 8845 (Rev. 1-2020)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The Deputy Director of the National Science Foundation has determined that the establishment of the Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 USC 1861*et seq.*                     This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.                

*Name of Committee:*                     Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure.                

*Nature/Purpose:*                     The Advisory Committee will be strictly advisory and will prepare a report to the National Science Foundation concerning the broad topic of advanced cyberinfrastructure and the existing Partnerships for Advanced Computational Infrastructure.                

*Responsible NSF Official:*                     Dr. Ruzena Bajcsy, Assistant Director, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1105, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8900.                

Dated: February 14, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-4159 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41591

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BERNARDO FLORENTINO SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-264-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bernardo Florentino Sanchez appeals the sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for a 2003 charge of possession with intent to distribute over 100

kilograms of marijuana. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for

the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed: United States of America v.

Bernardo Sanchez, No. 06-41602. AFFIRMED. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 29, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before March 23, 2001 to be assured of consideration. 

## U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE (CUS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1515-0217.                 

*Form Number:*                     None.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Land Border Carrier Initiative Program.                 

*Description:*                     The Land Border Carrier Initiative Program is designed to prevent smugglers of illicit drugs from utilizing commercial conveyances for their commodities, and to make participation in this program at certain, high-risk locations a condition for use of the Line Release method of processing repetitive entries of merchandise.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit, Individuals or households, Not-for-profit institutions.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     1.050.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     5 hours.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     On occasion.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     5,250 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     J. Edgar Nichols (202) 927-1426 or,  Tracey Denning (202) 927-1429, U.S. Customs Service, Information Services Branch, Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3.2.C, Washington, DC 20229.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports, Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-4178 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-U
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Tucker  I. Marr, Chief Financial Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.

 

|   |   |   | Date:  August 11, 2006                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/  Tucker  I. Marr                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   |   |   |  

 

 

Name:  Tucker  I. MarrTitle:  Chief Financial OfficerPruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

32 |
#### POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY v. UNION TANK CAR CO.

No. 22828.

Jan. 8, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1935.

Clarence Tankersley, Co. Atty., J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and W. C. Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error.

Keaton, Wells, Johnston & Barnes. David L. Krebs, Jr., Harry B. Bogg, Jr., and Arthur E. Bristol, for defendant in error.

ANDREWS, J.

This is a companion case to cause numbered 22827, Pottawatomie County, Okla., v. Armour & Company, a Corporation, this day decided by this court (170 Okla. 534, 40 P. [2d] 1096). The. syllabus in that case is adopted as the syllabus in this ease.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to determine the proper assessed value of the property in accordance with the rule stated in cause numbered 22827, supra.

RILEY, O. J., and McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JJ„ concur. CUD LISON, Y. C. J„ and SWINDALL and BUSBY, JJ., absent.
#### Avtar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-72358.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 8, 2014.

Decided April 14, 2014.

Inna Lipkin, Esquire, Counsel, Law Offices of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.

R. Alexander Goring, Esquire, Trial, Nairi Simonian Gruzenski, Esquire, Oil, Michelle Gorden Latour, Esquire, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: NOONAN, NGUYEN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

1. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) did not abuse its discretion in affirming the Immigration Judge’s discretionary denial of asylum. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that Avtar Singh had engaged in marriage fraud. Immigration fraud is a proper consideration in a discretionary denial of asylum. *Hosseini v. Gonzales,*471 F.3d 953, 957 (9th Cir.2006). The BIA properly weighed this adverse factor alongside all other relevant considerations, including favorable factors such as family reunification. *See Kalubi v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1134, 1139 (9th Cir.2004). The denial is thus neither “manifestly contrary to the law [nor] an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D).

2. Singh’s Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim is moot. The BIA granted Singh withholding of removal, the broadest relief that would be available to him under CAT. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(4).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John W. Casella,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Casella Waste Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2016



By:

/s/ John W. CasellaJohn W. CasellaChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Blumenfeld, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Michael J. BlumenfeldMichael J. Blumenfeld,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 I, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Collegiate Pacific Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Collegiate Pacific Inc. Date: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD ALLEN MINGST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2061

[December 6, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2009-CF-008245-AXXX-MB.

Richard Allen Mingst, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2139

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received

AN ACT

To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and

Records Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2504(f) of title 44, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘(f)(1)’’ and all that follows through

5 the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(f)(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to

7 the National Historical Publications and Records Commis8 sion such amounts as may be necessary to carry out this
2

HR 2139 RDS

1 chapter for each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,

2 and 1998.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6834

ROBERT J. BARKLEY, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM DUNCIL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-108)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Barkley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Barkley v. Duncil, No. CA-95-108 (N.D.W. Va.

Apr. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED