alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-305-002]

Take notice that on February 1, 2001, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No.1, the following tariff sheet to be effective February 1, 2001: 

Original Sheet No. 10

MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the implementation of a new negotiated rate contract.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-3426  Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,448
<SECURITIES>                                        11
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                       909
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,788
<PP&E>                                           1,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           443
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,213
<SALES>                                         14,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,532
<CGS>                                            1,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Bakeries Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 6, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James R. Elsesser, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James R. Elsesser                                                          
|James R. Elsesser                                                              
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



April
19, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Interstate Bakeries Corporation and will be retained by Interstate Bakeries Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

   To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2,4-Dinitro aniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1993

Mr. Ballenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2,4-Dinitro aniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,4-DINITRO ANILINE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  2,4-Dinitroaniline (CAS No. 97-02-9) (provided for in                       No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 2921.42.75)..................................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry


Community and Tribal Subcommittee of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry (ATSDR) announces the following subcommittee meetings.

    Name: Community and Tribal Subcommittee.
    Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., February 26, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-
5 p.m., February 27, 2001.
    Place: Radisson Inn at Executive Park, 2061 North Druid Hills 
Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Status: Open to the public, limited by the available space. The 
meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: This subcommittee brings to the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, ATSDR, advice, citizen input, and recommendations on 
community and tribal programs, practices, and policies of the 
Agency.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items include an update on 
Action Items and Recommendations from previous meeting; CTS Special 
Consultant will update on attendance to the Environmental Protection 
Agency's National Environmental Justice Advisory Committee meeting; 
review of ATSDR's Research Agenda activities and new proposals; a 
presentation of the Strategic Planning current plan, mission and 
goal; viewing of the cultural sensitivity training issues video 
tape; CTS will give an update on the Task Group progress report and 
interactive session, and discuss the future activities of the Task 
Group.
    Written comments are welcomed and should be received by the 
contact person listed below prior to the opening of the meeting.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person For More Information: Robert Spengler, ScD, 
Executive Secretary, BSC, ATSDR contact, ATSDR, M/S E-28, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-0708.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


    Dated: February 5, 2001.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 01-3486 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-70-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Keith SWINT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10046.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 11, 2014.

Filed April 1, 2014.

Tracy Van Buskirk, Assistant U.S., Jennifer Elaine Green, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James Sun Park, Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: THOMAS, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Anthony Keith Swint appeals his conviction for two counts of assault on a federal *619officer under 18 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 111(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we need not recount it here.

I

The district court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense because Swint failed to make out a prima facie case of self-defense. Both Officers JC and DR testified that all of the force exerted upon Swint during his arrest and booking in the Grand Canyon was necessary to meet Swint’s resistance. Officer JC testified that he never placed his fingers in Swint’s mouth. There was no credible testimony to the contrary, by Swint or anyone else. The videotape of the booking episode does not demonstrate excessive force.

II

The district court did not commit reversible error in its evidentiary rulings. Assuming, without deciding, that the district court erred in admitting the evidence tendered under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), *see United States v. Bettencourt,*614 F.2d 214, 217-18 (9th Cir.1980), the error was harmless. An erroneous decision to admit evidence — even if it amounted to an abuse of discretion — will be reversed only if it is “more likely than not that there is a fair ■ assurance that the error did not substantially sway the verdict.” *United States v. Jimenez,*214 F.3d 1095, 1099 (9th Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). Given the strength of the government’s case, and the implausibility of Swint’s self-defense claim, we cannot conclude that admission of the 404(b) evidence affected the verdict.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

© For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see

the Instructions for Form 8027.

Use IRS label. Make Employer’s name Employer identification number

any necessary changes.

Otherwise, type or print

employer’s name,

address, and employer

identification number as

shown on Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File Form 8027-T along with accompanying Forms

8027 with the Internal Revenue Service Center,

Andover, MA 05501, by March 1, 1999.

Use Form 8027-T to send Forms 8027 to the

Internal Revenue Service Center if you have more

than one establishment for which you have to file

Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (1998)

Apt. or suite no.

1998
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                          OF
                        ASSOCIATED ESTATES REALTY CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              State of 
                             Subsidiary                     Incorporation

          <S>                                                <C> 
          AERC of Florida, Inc.                                  Ohio
          AERC of Georgia, Inc.                                  Ohio
          AERC of Indiana, LLC                                 Indiana
          AERC of Michigan, LLC                                  Ohio
          AERC of Texas, Inc.                                    Ohio
          Aspen Lakes - AERC, Inc.                             Michigan
          Associated Estates Realty Corporation of
              Missouri, Inc.                                     Ohio
          Associated Estates Realty Corporation of North
              Carolina Limited Liability Company                 Ohio
          Associated Estates Realty Corporation 
             of Pennsylvania, Inc.                               Ohio
          Country Place, Inc.                                  Michigan
          Ellet Apartments, Inc.                                 Ohio
          FHM Corporation                                      Michigan
          Gables Indiana, Inc.                                   Ohio
          Gates Mills Club Housing, Inc.                         Ohio
          Hillwood I Apartments, Inc.                            Ohio
          Jennings Commons Apartments, Inc.                      Ohio
          MIG II Realty Advisors, Inc.                           Ohio
          PatCon, Inc.                                           Ohio
          Puritas Place Apartments, Inc.                         Ohio
          Rainbow Terrace Apartments, Inc.                       Ohio
          Riverview Towers Apartments, Inc.                      Ohio
          Shaker Park Gardens II, Inc.                           Ohio
          Somerset West Apartments, Inc.                         Ohio
          Spring Valley Apartments LLC                         Michigan
          State Road Apartments, Inc.                            Ohio
          Statesman II Apartments, Inc.                          Ohio
          Sutliff Apartments, Inc.                               Ohio
          Tallmadge Acres Apartments, Inc.                       Ohio
          The Oaks at the Woods Company, Inc.                    Ohio
          Twinsburg Apartments, Inc.                             Ohio
          Village Tower Apartments, Inc.                         Ohio
          West High Apartments, Inc.                             Ohio
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2058 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2058

    To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect to the 
distribution of securities under a plan under chapter 11 of such title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1993

  Mr. Berman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect to the 
distribution of securities under a plan under chapter 11 of such title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 1143 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``If'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Notwithstanding any nonbankruptcy law, if a plan requires the 
distribution of a security with respect to an allowed claim, then the 
fair market value of such security shall be conclusively presumed to be 
equal to the amount of such claim for purposes of any law (other than 
sections 1124 and 1129) applicable to the debtor or the estate.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by section 1 
shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code before the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul D. Meyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Paul D. Meyer
-----------------------
Paul D. Meyer
Chief Financial Officer
August 14th, 2002
2014-0055.

#### In re C.O.

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 99334 and 99335, 2013-Ohio-5239. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2014-Ohio-1674, 6 N.E.3d 1205. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### Clessie MEADOR, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOUCHENS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-5782.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 29, 2008.

Before: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant Clessie Meador sustained injuries in a grocery store when soft drinks fell on top of him. He and his wife, Sondra Meador, sued defendant-appellee *386Indiana Insurance Company, the grocery store’s insurance provider. He argues that the insurance company violated the Kentucky Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act by failing to pay his claim in good faith.

Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and the applicable law and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that a panel opinion further addressing the issues raised would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Therefore, on the grounds identified by the district court, we affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of Indiana Insurance Company.
947 A.2d 713

#### In re DAUPHIN COUNTY FOURTH INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY. Petition of Joseph F. Sica.

No. 13 MM 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 2, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2008, Petitioner’s request for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 is granted limited to the question of alleged violations of grand jury secrecy. See also *In re Dauphin County Investigating Grand Jury (Petition of Louis Denaples and Mount Airy # 1, L.L.C.),*596 Pa. 584, 947 A.2d 712, 2008 WL 1915158 (2008).

The matter is remanded to Supervising Judge Todd A. Hoover for the purpose of conducting an expedited evidentiary hearing relating to allegations of violations of the secrecy provisions of the Investigating Grand Jury Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 4541 et seq. At the conclusion of the hearing, Supervising Judge Hoover is directed to consider whether a special prosecutor should be appointed to pursue the allegations and to forward an opinion setting forth his findings and recommendations to this Court within ninety days of the date of this order.

The remaining claims presented in the Petition for Review are denied.

The Motion to Seal Exhibits “T” and “U” is granted.

Jurisdiction is retained.
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K/A (“Amendment No. 1”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:      March 21, 2006           By: /s/ Eric B. Dana