alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilder Richman Historic Properties
II, L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ Richard Paul Richman
--------------------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant
July 15, 2003
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 6 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box)

Name of establishment

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

2

Number and street (see instructions)

Meals other than

evening meals

3

City or town, state, and ZIP code

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(see instructions)

Employer’s name (same name as on Form 941)

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable)

City, state, and ZIP code (if a foreign address, see instructions)

Does this establishment accept credit Check if: Amended Return

cards, debit cards, or other charges?

1 Total charged tips for calendar year 2009 1

2 Total charge receipts showing charged tips (see instructions) 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (add lines 4a and 4b) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (not less than line 2—see instructions) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here © granted by the IRS.

(Attach a copy of the IRS determination letter to this return.) 

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

© This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (see instructions for restriction)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach a copy of the agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature © Title © Date ©

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (2009)

Note. If you marked the checkbox in line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours

worked per business day during the payroll period. (see instructions)

Apt. or suite no.

Note. If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly, 

quarterly, etc.), mark an “X” on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your

records on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 2009 ©

Note. Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 6

of the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

© See separate instructions.

Yes (lines 1 and 2 must be completed)

No Final Return

2009

Employer identification number

Attributed Tip Income Program (ATIP). See Revenue Procedure 2006-30
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Claude Wendell BELLAMY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.

Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his motion for a certificate of appealability as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 *763S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bellamy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Burke Priest, Chief Financial Officer of Smartdata Corp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  April 16, 2010  /s/ Burke Priest Burke Priest Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Smartdata Corp. and will be retained by Smartdata Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, William R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer of Collegiate Pacific Inc.
certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of
Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; (c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by this Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer
----

----

|          (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|          (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

| /s/ Richard Paul Richman                                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard Paul Richman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| September 13, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

----
50%

50%

Purchase Refinance

June 2016

$37 $190

Billion Billion

YTD 2016

1.08%

3,713

June 2016 Highlights

SF delinquency rate is 90+ days; MF rate is 60+ days 

0.02%
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

h0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144576

____________________________________

In Re JERRY SIMS,

____________________________________

JERRY SIMS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144576

COA: 304023

Genesee CC: 90

- 042911

- FC

GENESEE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.2


                                                   [LOGO]  BLICK
                                                           ROTHENBERG
                                                           Chartered Accountants

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-86466, 33-88034, 333-01578, 333-06098,
333-9134, 333-11530, 333-91330 and 333- 109915) pertaining to the Aladdin
Knowledge Systems Ltd.("the Company") Share Option Plans, of our report dated 29
March, 2004 with respect to the Financial Statements of Aladdin Western Europe
Ltd., included in the Company's Annual Report (Form 20-F/A )for the year ended
December 31, 2003.


                                                           /s/ BLICK ROTHENBERG
London, UK                                                 BLICK ROTHENBERG
March 16, 2005                                             Chartered Accountants
4 

1lY6 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonorablr Roy 8. Loventhal 

ahairman, Llvostook Sanitary aomthfbi0n 

W. T. Waggoner Building 

Fort Worth, Tozao 

Dear Sir: 

thni* $1 the Aotr of the 

SS, p. 1SS (Vernon~a 

rov~sloae or ArtidLe 686, Ravised airi1 

QSS, as mended, the State Board of Qonrcmponolb/lity at aotlng au oustodt6n 

wonal property of the State. 

Artids 006, Rsrlsed Clvll Statutsr; 1925, reada ae 

follows: 
Honorable Roy 3. Lorenthel, Pa&e Ei 

ated . _ 

"All property belonging to tha State, eltuin the olty of Austin, in any department, 

poam or offios of the State, *hen it ehall belane unfit for owe or shall be no longer Maded, 

shall be plsosd in the haude of the Board of Control, end thr Boar& shall sell euoh property at 

publla au&ion after adtartlelng it for not lees 

than five says In two wwepapere, published in 

the aity of Austin. Th&q@!wy rroa tha Salk of 

l uah property, lees the qmxer of adrsrtlelng 

end l elllng, shall be deposited in the Stat0 

Trsaaury to the orsdlt of the gennaral ravanuo 

mud. The Soar& shall make a wrltten report to 

the Coqtmllar after eaah sale, showing the 

artloles receirsd, each artlole sold* to who&j 

sol& end the 2rias reeeivml.~ 

On AU@St 10, 1939, our Opinion Ipo. 0-LL6S *IS approved and furnished Ronormble f. I¶. Raeeo, Exxsautlve Head 

of the Livestook Sanitary Comnies~oa, an& In that opinion 

wa held that there was no authority, orpreee DC lm@llrd, autborlelnp: the a06d8810n to es11 eurglus dip. We saeloeo a 

oopy et the o?lnlon for your oonelderatloa. 

Xe therefore respaotfally edrlee that year dqmrtmtmt does not have autborlty to turnteh eur ltu dip to the 

State Ikpsrlmsnt Station, 02 to otherwlrs d f) epcue of it other 

than in ompllanoe with hrtfole 666, aupn whloh umld raqulre that it be returna& to the Board of hontnrl. 

Yours wry tm1.y
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829549
<NAME>                        ADVANCED TISSUE SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             17,878
<SECURITIES>                                        4,992
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                           183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   31,163
<PP&E>                                             33,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (17,851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     49,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              20,196
<BONDS>                                             7,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              598
<OTHER-SE>                                         20,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       49,504
<SALES>                                             6,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   13,673
<CGS>                                               6,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      22,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (7,255)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (924)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (15,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (15,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (15,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.27)




</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

STEPHENS, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Joshua J. SMITH

Captain (O-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201900300

Decided: 20 July 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges: 

Emily A. Jackson Hall (arraignment)

Glen R. Hines (trial)

K. Scott Woodard (Entry of Judgment)1

Sentence adjudged 23 July 2019 by a general court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a 

military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:

confinement for 35 years2 and a dismissal.

 

1 Due to the departure of the presiding trial judge from active service, Circuit 

Judge Woodard was detailed for the purpose of the Entry of Judgment by the Chief 

Trial Judge, Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

2 The convening authority suspended confinement in excess of 25 years pursuant 

to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Smith, NMCCA No. 201900300

Opinion of the Court

2

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Articles 59, 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-mos                
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           1,132,336
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,132,336   
<CASH>                                         9,324
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             7,305
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         136,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,473,621
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                43,679
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            393,742
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                99,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          324
<PREFERRED>                                    75,000
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     631,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,473,621
<PREMIUMS>                                     157,037
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            48,465
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             4,309
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,259
<BENEFITS>                                     33,677
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    39,037
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           12,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                73,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            54,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                 158
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   54,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.66
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 22,555
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            18,548
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              7,388
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             293
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               9,176
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                39,022
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0<F1>
<FN>

Not Applicable for mortgage guaranty and specialty reinsurer
</FN>

        


</TABLE>