alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
8813 Partnership Withholding Tax Payment (Section 1446) Form

© See separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. OMB No. 1545-1119

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service For calendar year 19 , or tax year beginning , 19 , and ending , 19

1 PARTNERSHIP’S name, address (number, street, and room or suite no.), city, state,

and ZIP code. If a P.O. box or foreign address, see page 4 of the instructions.

2 Partnership’s U.S. employer

identification number

3 Amount of this payment. Attach a check or money order payable to the “Internal

Revenue Service.” Write the partnership’s employer identification number, tax year,

and “Form 8813” on it 3

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. Cat. No. 10681H Form 8813 (Rev. 11-96)

(Rev. November 1996)
SCHEDULE N Return of Officers, Directors, and 10% or More

Shareholders of a Foreign Personal Holding Company (Form 5471)

(Rev. December 2004) OMB No. 1545-0704

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach to Form 5471. See Instructions for Form 5471.

Name of person filing Form 5471 Identifying number

Name of foreign corporation

Enter the relevant functional currency and the exchange rate(s) used throughout this schedule 

Shareholder Information

Section A—Outstanding Securities Convertible Into Stock of the Corporation or Options Granted by the Corporation

Interest Face value

rate (%) Description of securities (attach a complete, detailed statement of conversion privileges) Beginning of year End of year

Section B—List of Holders of Convertible Securities or Options Granted by the Corporation

Securities held Class

of

securities

Name and address of each holder

of convertible securities or options

(designate nonresident aliens)

Explanation and date of 

any change in holdings of

securities during the year

Beginning of year End of year

Number Face value Face value Number

Income Information

Section A—Undistributed Foreign Personal Holding Company Income

1 Gross income as defined in section 555 (attach schedule) 1

2 Deductions allowable under section 161 (attach schedule) 2

3 Taxable income or (loss) (subtract line 2 from line 1) 3

4 Adjustments to taxable income or (loss) (see page 12 of instructions):

a Taxes (see instructions) 4a

b Charitable contributions 4b

c Special deductions disallowed 4c

d Net operating loss 4d

e Expenses and depreciation applicable to property of the taxpayer

4f f Taxes and contributions to pension trusts

g Total adjustments (combine lines 4a through 4f) 4g

5 5

6 6

Combine line 3 and line 4g

7 Subtract line 6 from line 5 7

8 Deduction allowed under section 563(c) for dividends paid after close of tax year (see

instructions). Attach designation required by Rev. Proc. 90-26, 1990-1 C.B. 512 8

9 Undistributed foreign personal holding company income (subtract line 8 from line 7) 9

Section B—Deduction for Dividends Paid During Tax Year (see instructions)

Date paid Amount 10 Taxable dividends paid during tax year:

a Cash 

b Property other than cash or the corporation’s own securities

(indicate nature of property) 10b

c Obligations of the corporation (bonds, notes, scrip, etc.)

11 Consent dividends (attach schedule)

12 12

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 5471. Schedule N (Form 5471) (Rev. 12-2004)

10a

11

10c

4e

Part II

Part I

Deduction for dividends paid during tax year (add lines 10a through 11). Enter here and on line 6 above

Deduction for dividends paid during tax year. Enter the amount from Section B, line 12, below

Cat. No. 61925Q

Important: All amounts must be stated in U.S. dollars translated from functional currency. See page 11 of the instructions for the

relevant exchange rate.
- frtib.gov
Benchmark Evaluation Report Thrift Savings Plan
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 07, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 07, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0182. THE COASTAL BANK v. LARRY RAWLINS, ET, AL.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV1301299
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   46,056,645
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       7,722,702
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     4,525,322
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,304,669
<COMMON>                                        15,932
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   19,256,710
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          3,971,719
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              22,343,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         9,268,450
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           2,179,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                    5,549,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                3,157,516
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                  2,711,874
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                83,947
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              13,010,900
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               58,304,669
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   28,648,048
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         1,029,700
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  24,045,098
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  25,074,798
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      3,573,250
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              67,228
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               3,625,722
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,238,476
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,387,246
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                2,387,246
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       879,347
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      759,270
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       4,226,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Statements of Comprehensive Inc

# Balance Sheets

# Statements of Equity (Deficit)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40008 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESAR DIAZ TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-31-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cesar Diaz Trevino appeals the 45-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Trevino acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue forNo. 01-40008 -2- Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90 ; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Trevino’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service © For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8027.

Use IRS label. Make Employer’s name Employer identification number

any necessary changes.

Otherwise, type or print

employer’s name,

address, and employer

identification number as

shown on Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File this form along with accompanying Forms 8027

with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Andover,

MA 05501, by February 29, 1996.

Use this form to send Forms 8027 to the Internal

Revenue Service Center if you have more than one

establishment for which you have to file Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (1995)

Apt. or suite no.

Printed on recycled paper
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 21, 2018

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

SELECTS A MANAGER FOR THE F FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced that it has selected Blackrock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. as the fund 

manager for its Fixed Income Index Investment Fund (F Fund). The F Fund invests in a 

portfolio of bonds that tracks the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. This 

broad index includes U.S. Government, Agency, mortgage-backed, asset-backed, 

corporate, and foreign government (issued in the U.S.) sectors of the U.S. bond market. 

As of April 2018, the F Fund held $27.4 billion in assets. The contract will be for a oneyear term, with four one-year options. 

The F Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Common Stock Investment Fund, the 

Small Cap Stock Index Investment Fund, and the International Stock Index Investment 

Fund – are currently managed by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 

(BlackRock). 

 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees

and members of the uniformed services; it is similar to the 

401(k) plans offered by many private employers. As of 

April 2018, TSP assets totaled approximately $545.5

billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for more than 5.2 million TSP participants. 

Participants include Federal civilian employees in all 

branches of Government, employees of the U.S. Postal 

Service, and members of the uniformed services. Additional 

information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1934

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the

Federal Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Maritime

5 Commission Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Federal

8 Maritime Commission $19,450,000 for fiscal year 1994.
2

•HR 1934 RFS

1 SEC. 3. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NONPERFORM2 ANCE OF VOYAGES.

3 Section 3(b) of Public Law 89–777 (46 App. U.S.C.

4 817e(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘and such bond or other

5 security shall be in an amount paid equal to the estimated

6 total revenue for the particular transportation.’’, and

7 inserting a period.

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Form 843

OMB No. 1545-0024

Expires 1-31-97

Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement (Rev. January 1994)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service © See separate instructions.

Use Form 843 only if your claim involves one of the taxes shown on line 3a or a refund or abatement of interest, penalties, or

additions to tax on line 4a.

Daytime telephone number

Name of claimant

( )

Address (number, street, and room or suite no.)

City or town, state, and ZIP code

Please type or print

Spouse’s social security number

Your social security number

Employer identification number

Name and address shown on return if different from above

1 Period—prepare a separate Form 843 for each tax period 2 Amount to be refunded or abated

From , 19 , to , 19 $

b Dates of payment ©

3a Type of tax, penalty, or addition to tax:

Employment

Penalty IRC section ©

Estate Gift

4a Request for abatement or refund of:

Interest caused by IRS errors and delays (under Rev. Proc. 87-42—see instructions).

A penalty or addition to tax as a result of erroneous advice from the IRS.

Type of return filed (see instructions):

706 709 990-PF 4720 940 941

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 10180R Form 843 (Rev. 1-94)

b

5 Explanations and additional claims. Explain why you believe this claim should be allowed, and show computation of tax

refund or abatement of interest, penalty, or addition to tax.

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this claim, including accompanying schedules and statements,

and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Director’s Stamp

(Date received)

Signature (Title, if applicable. Claims by corporations must be signed by an officer.) Date

Signature Date

Signature. If you are filing Form 843 to request a refund or abatement relating to a joint return, both you and your spouse must

sign the claim. Claims filed by corporations must be signed by a corporate officer authorized to sign, and the signature must be

accompanied by the officer’s title.

Note: Do not use Form 843 if your claim is for—

● An overpayment of income taxes;

● A refund of fuel taxes; or

● An overpayment of excise taxes reported on Form 720, 730, or 2290.

Excise (other than excise taxes reported on Form 720, 730, or 2290)

Other (specify)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF HOTELWORKS.COM, INC.



The Leonard Parker Company
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation: Florida

         Leonard Parker Company
         9 Temasek Blvd.
         27-03 Suntec Tower Two
         Singapore 038989
         Incorporation:  Singapore

         Leonard Parker Company (Africa) (Proprietary) Limited
         3 Sandown Valley Crescent
         PO Box 786598
         Sandton 2146 South Africa
         Incorporation:  South Africa

         Leonard Parker Company Europe B.V.
         Hessenbergweg 77
         1101 CX Amsterdam
         The Netherlands
         Incorporation:  Netherlands

Parker Reorder Online, Inc.
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  Florida

Bekins Distribution Services Co., Inc.
9362 Dielman Industrial Drive
St. Louis, MO  63132
State of Incorporation:  Delaware

Hospitality Restoration and Builders, Inc.
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  New York

Hospitality Construction Corporation
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  Georgia

Hospitality Development Services Corporation
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  New York



<PAGE>   2
HWS Real Estate Advisory Group, Inc.
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  New York

Hospitality Software Systems, Inc.
201 Alhambra Circle
Coral Gables, FL  33134
State of Incorporation:  New York


                                      -2-
941 A.2d 1262

#### Lucy AWA-MADEZIA v. NEMATI CAB COMPANY and David R. Adenyi and Jamal Sadir Greene and Emanuel Uso d/b/a/ Budget Auto Repair v. Kenneth Amissah, an Incompetent Through His Legal Guardian, Milady Simpson Petition of Lucy Awa-Madezia.

No. 90 EM 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 7, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Application for Relief is hereby DENIED.

Justice TODD did not participate in this matter.
942 A.2d 897

#### Judith R. BUGOSH, Administratrix of the Estate of Edward J. Bugosh, deceased and Judith R. Bugosh, in her own right v. I.U. NORTH AMERICA, INC., as Successor by Merger to the Garp Company, formerly known as The Gage Company, formerly known as Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company, E.W. Bowman, Inc., Emhart Glass Inc., formerly known as Emhart Manufacturing Company, formerly known as Hartford Empire, F.B. Wright Company, Surface Combustion, Inc., Taylored Industries, Inc. Petition of I.U. North America, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 27, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

> Whether this Court should apply § 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts in place of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00401-CR

DWIGHT LESLIE CLIFFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 2

of Denton County (CR-2016-10477-B)

December 13, 2018

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Amendment No. 3 To Employment Contract


    Exhibit
      10.6.3

    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

    


    AGREED,
      as of the 1st day of June 2006, between the Federal Agricultural Mortgage
      Corporation (FAMC) and Timothy L. Buzby (you), that the existing employment
      contract between the parties hereto, dated as of June 5, 2003, as amended
      through Amendment No 2. dated as of June 16, 2005 (the Agreement), be and hereby
      is amended as follows:

    


    Sections
      1, 3 (a), 7 (a) (3) and 11 of the Agreement are replaced in their entirety
      with
      the following new sections: 

    


    1.  Term.
      The
      Term of this Agreement shall continue until July 1, 2010 or any earlier
      effective date of termination pursuant to Paragraph 7 hereof (the
“Term”).

    


    3
      (a). Base
      Salary. As of July 1, 2006, you will be paid a base salary (the Base Salary)
      during the Term of Two Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Eight Hundred and
      Eighty-Eight Dollars ($237,888) per year, payable in arrears on a bi-weekly
      basis.

    


    7
      (a)
      (3). Farmer
      Mac may terminate your employment without “cause” at any time. Such termination
      shall become effective on the earlier of July 1, 2010, or two years from the
      date of notice of such termination.

    


    11. Notices.
      Any notice given under this Agreement will be sufficient if in writing and
      either: (a) mailed postage prepaid by registered or certified mail, return
      receipt requested; or (b) delivered by hand to, in the case of Farmer Mac,
      1133
      Twenty-First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, attention President or,
      in
      the case of the Employee, 2707 Davis Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22302 (or to such
      other addresses as may be from time to time designated by notice from the
      recipient party to the other). Any such notice will be effective upon actual
      receipt or refusal thereof.

    


    As
      amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

    


        Federal
      Agricultural Mortgage Corporation       Employee

    


    


        By:  /s/
      Henry D. Edelman      /s/
      Timothy L. Buzby 

      
      President
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 BY:
/s/ Stephen C. RichterStephen C. RichterExecutive Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2010
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TARA MIKENAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00958 (UNA) 

v. )

 )

TONY LUNA, JR., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s application for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and pro se complaint, ECF No. 1. The Court will grant 

the application and dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), by which the 

Court is required to dismiss a case “at any time” if it determines that the action is frivolous. 

In disjointed fashion, and not even in complete sentences, plaintiff accuses defendant of 

stalking, financial exploitation, making death threats, and in conjunction with others, conducting 

illegal surveillance. See Compl. at 1. Plaintiff is “suing for mental harm + torture of [herself] 

and [her] children.” Id. 

“A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to 

relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell 

Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis 

either in law or in fact” is frivolous, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), and the Court 

cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint, Hagans v. Lavine, 415 

U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts 

are without power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated 
2

and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v. 

Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 

2009) (examining cases dismissed “for patent insubstantiality,” including where plaintiff 

allegedly “was subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment deriving from uncertain 

origins.”). Consequently, a Court is obligated to dismiss a complaint as frivolous “when the 

facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible,” Denton v. Hernandez, 

504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992), or “postulat[e] events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,” 

Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981). The instant complaint satisfies this 

standard and, therefore, it will be dismissed without prejudice. An Order is issued separately. 

/s/

TANYA S. CHUTKAN

DATE: April 19, 2023 United States District Judge