alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                             INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
                  SCHEDULE REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                              (000's EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                  Twelve Weeks Ended          Twenty-Four Weeks Ended
                                               --------------------------    --------------------------
                                               November 16,  November 18,    November 16,  November 18,
                                                  1996          1995            1996          1995
                                               ------------  ------------    ------------  ------------

<S>                                             <C>           <C>             <C>           <C>
Net income                                      $ 26,242      $   6,095       $ 44,909      $  11,821
                                                =========     ==========      =========     ==========

Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                      37,440         36,784         37,382         31,637
Dilutive stock options                               589            443            525            348
                                                ---------     ----------      ---------     ---------- 
Weighted average common and common 
 equivalent shares outstanding                    38,029         37,227         37,907         31,985
                                                =========     ==========      =========     ==========

Earnings per share                              $    .69      $     .16       $   1.18      $     .37
                                                =========     ==========      =========     ========== 

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Torres MOYA, also known as Francisco Torres-Moya, also known as Francisco Moya Torres, also known as Franciso Torres Moya, also known as Jose Quebedo, also known as Francisco Torres, also known as Francisco Torrez Moya, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20156

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Torres Moya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Moya has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
#### James Howard SCHROPP, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-1832.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

James Howard Schropp, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Curtis Clarence Pett, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

*801Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Howard Schropp appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s issuance of a notice of federal tax lien as to his 2005 income tax deficiency and upholding the determination that his Offer in Compromise was insufficient. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. *Schropp v. Comm’r of IRS,*No. 24031-07L, 99 T.C.M. (CCH) 1298 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 10.74


BILL OF SALE


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:  SF Leasing L.L.C.
("Seller") for and in consideration of the sum of Fifteen Million
Three Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Five and
75/100 Dollars ($15,336,865.75) plus sales taxes in the amount of
$0 Dollars (exempt) (if exemption from sales tax is claimed, an
exemption certificate must be furnished herewith), paid by Stella
Foods, Inc. (together with its successors and assigns, the
"Buyer") receipt of which is acknowledged, hereby grants, sells,
assigns, transfers and delivers to Buyer the equipment (the
"Equipment") described in Schedules No. 1 and No. 2 and Annex A
to Schedules No. 1 and No. 2, dated November 14, 1996, to the
Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 14, 1996, among
Seller, as lessor, and Buyer and Metz Baking Company,
collectively as lessees (said Schedules and related Master Lease
Agreement, as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, being
collectively referred to herein as the "Lease"), to have and to
hold the Equipment unto Buyer and its successors with permitted
assigns, to and for its and their proper use and benefit,
forever, along with whatever claims and rights Seller may have
against the manufacturer and/or supplier of the Equipment (the
"Supplier"), including but not limited to all warranties and
representations.

     Buyer is purchasing the Equipment in its AS IS WHERE IS
CONDITION in accordance with the exercise of its early purchase
option under Section XXII of the Lease.  Seller represents and
warrants to Buyer that Buyer will acquire by the terms of this
Bill of Sale all of Seller's right, title and interest in the
Equipment free and clear of any lien or encumbrance created by,
through or under Seller.

     Seller hereby covenants with Buyer and its successors and
permitted assigns that, from time to time after the date hereof,
Seller will execute and deliver to Buyer such instruments of
transfer, conveyance, assignment and delivery as may reasonably
be requested by Buyer in order to vest in Buyer all of Seller's
right, title or interest in or to, any of the Equipment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has executed this Bill of Sale
this 5th day of December, 1997.

                                   SELLER:

                                   SF Leasing L.L.C.


                                   By:  /s/ Douglas D. Wheat
                                   Name:     Douglas D. Wheat
                                   Title:    President
663 S.E.2d 37

#### In the Matter of Anderson County Magistrate Michael F. SMITH, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a) and Rule 17(b) of the Rules for Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 502, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is placed on interim suspension. Anderson County is under no obligation to pay respondent his salary during the suspension. *See In the Matter of Ferguson,*304 S.C. 216, 403 S.E.2d 628 (1991). Respondent is directed to immediately deliver all books, records, funds, property, and documents relating to his judicial office to the Chief Magistrate of Anderson County. He is enjoined from access to any monies, bank accounts, and records related to his judicial office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is prohibited from entering the premises of the magistrate court unless escorted by a law enforcement officer after authorization from *413the Chief Magistrate of Anderson County. Finally, respondent is prohibited from having access to, destroying, or canceling any public records and he is prohibited from access to any judicial databases or case management systems.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining any judicial accounts of respondent, shall serve as notice to the institution that respondent is enjoined from making withdrawals from the accounts.

II IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Date:April 1, 2008         By:       /s/ Kenneth W. Jones    Kenneth W. Jones    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### BATEMAN v. RINER et al.

No. 25563.

Dec. 11, 1934.

G. Earl Shaffer-, fox- plaintiff in error.

John P. Pendleton, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding in error was begun by the filing of the petition in error with case-made attached on May 11, 1934.

It appears by motion filed herein under date of October 12, 1934, that on the 10th. day of October, 1934, there was filed in the office of the court clerk of Nowata county, Okla., from which court this appeal is taken, a written satisfaction of the judgment. There is ixo contest filed against this motion, and it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the same is true. The appeal is therefore dismissed as moot.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EG01-126-000]

Take notice that the above-referenced notice (66 FR 10278, February 14, 2001) was inadvertently issued under Docket No. EG01-40-000. Since then, it has been reassigned a new docket number as captioned above.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4192  Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Sport Supply
Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Adam BlumenfeldAdam Blumenfeld,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2006 regarding vesting of management investment



 EXHIBIT 10.7 
 Southern Graphics Inc. 
 626 West Main Street, Suite 500 
 Louisville, Kentucky 40202 
 (502) 637-5443

 August 9, 2006 
 Henry R. Baughman 
 626 West Main Street 
 Suite 500 
 Louisville, Kentucky 40202 
 Dear Mr. Baughman, 
 Please refer to the Southern Graphics Inc. Stockholders Agreement dated as of December 30, 2006 (the “Stockholders Agreement”), your Joinder Agreement to the Stockholders Agreement dated
February 1, 2006 (the “Joinder Agreement”) and the Stock Subscription Agreement dated as of February 2, 2006 between Southern Graphics Inc. and yourself (the “Subscription Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this
letter and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meaning given to them in the Stockholders Agreement. 
 This will confirm that, provisions of
the Stockholders Agreement, the Joinder Agreement and the Subscription Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if you retire from active employment with SGS International, Inc. and its subsidiaries after December 30, 2008, any Unvested
Incentive Securities held by you at the time of your retirement will become Vested Incentive Securities effective upon your retirement. All other provisions of the Stockholders Agreement, the Joinder Agreement and the Subscription Agreement remain
in effect in accordance with their terms. 
 Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and return a copy of this letter to the
undersigned. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	SOUTHERN GRAPHICS INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Benjamin F. Harmon, IV

		 	Benjamin F. Harmon, IV
		 	Vice President and Secretary


  

	
	Agreed to and accepted:
	
	 /s/ Henry R. Baughman

	Henry R. Baughman
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anastasios N. Kyriakides
--------------------------------------------------
Anastasios N. Kyriakides,
Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Bill Rodriguez
--------------------------------------------------
Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer

November 21, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000911935
<NAME> GREENPOINT FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              91
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              13
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,049
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    25
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,008
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               4
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 4
<LOANS>                                          8,910
<ALLOWANCE>                                      (109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,084
<DEPOSITS>                                      10,973
<SHORT-TERM>                                       106
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                335
<LONG-TERM>                                        400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  13,084
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    731
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  235
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   973
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 498
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              475
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (19)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    242
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         148
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                        355
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 (105)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (16)
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                (109)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             (109)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JASON MANN

*Neal Cone,*senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Denise B. Smoker,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 8, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 626 (AC 27779), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.