alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Date: March 8, 2006         By:  /s/ Mark K. Tonnesen    Mark K. Tonnesen    President and Chief Executive Officer   The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-72508, 333-95765,333-37641, 033-85766 and 333-117407 of Micro Component Technology, Inc.(the Company) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-124762,333-104590, 333-108072 and 333-115125 on Form S-2 of our report dated February 3,2006, (except for Note 12, as to which the date is February 17, 2006),which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micro Component Technology, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ Virchow,  Krause & Company, LLP. |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

March 30,2006

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TONI D. LEVINGSTON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-15566

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00589-AWISKO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Toni D. Levingston, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

FILED

JUL 12 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15566

exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act,

42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Levingston’s action because

Levingston did not properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing his

complaint, and failed to show that administrative remedies were effectively

unavailable to him. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (explaining that

“proper exhaustion” requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); Sapp v.

Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 826 (9th Cir. 2010) (administrative remedies are

“available” where administrative appeals are screened for proper reasons). We

construe the dismissal of these claims to be without prejudice. See Wyatt, 315 F.3d

at 1120.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Levingston’s

motions for reconsideration because Levingston provided no basis for

reconsideration. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5

F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and

requirements for reconsideration). 

Levingston’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

June 6, 2016

BAC 6735-01

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

FEDERAL REGISTER 

CITATION OF PREVIOUS 

ANNOUNCEMENT: Document 2016-12966, June 1, 2016

PREVIOUSLY

ANNOUNCED

TIME AND DATE

OF MEETING: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 8, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

CHANGES IN MEETING: The Commission has cancelled the meeting previously scheduled 

in Secretary of Labor v. American Coal Company, Docket No.

LAKE 2011-13.

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD 

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
September 30, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SPRING BRANCH TOWING, INC D/B/A SB TOW AND NICHOLAS GARZA, 

Appellants

NO. 14-14-00131-CV V.

ANGELA GUERRA-MANICA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

NORA CRUZ, MINOR CHILD, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to vacate and remand the 

judgment signed by the court below on August 26, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal VACATED and REMAND 

to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’

agreement.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.6

April 15, 2003

To: Talat Hasan

From: Boris Lipkin

Re: Employment  Contract

CC: Ray Christie, Noel Simmons

 

The following is a summary of the closure of your employment contract. Pleasesignify your agreement by signing below.

- You will be resigning as an employee on Friday, April 25.
- You will remain on the Board of Directors.
- You will receive regular benefits until the end of April 2003.
- You will receive Severance Pay in the amount of $225,000, 1/2 of which will bepaid to you in July, and the remaining 1/2 will be paid to you on regular payrollintervals from April 26 through October 31, 2003.
- Upon your application for benefits under COBRA, Therma-Wave will pay yourCOBRA payments from May 1, 2003 through April 30, 2004. (Our medical plansrequire that you be an active employee to remain on the employee rolls).
- Your stock options will continue to vest until April 30, 2004.

 

/s/	Boris Lipkin	      /s/	Talat Hasan	
Boris Lipkin         Talat Hasan

 	4/15/03	         	4/15/03	
Date          Date
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1791

___________ Robert Wilson, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Nancy H. Evans, Public Safety * Commissioner of the City of Cedar * Rapids, individually and in her official * Appeal from the United States capacity; Cedar Rapids Police * District Court for the Department, sued as The Cedar Rapids * Northern District of Iowa. City Police Department; City of Cedar * Rapids; Brian Bean, police officer of * [UNPUBLISHED] the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; * Graham Campshure, police officer of * the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; * Four Unidentified and Unnamed * Officers, Cedar Rapids Police * Department, individually, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 30, 2001 Filed: September 4, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of Iowa. -2- PER CURIAM. Robert Wilson appeals the District Court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. He alleges that because he is African American, he was twice stopped anddetained by City of Cedar Rapids (City) police officers for no legitimate purpose, andon one occasion they required him to provide his personal identifying information when he tried to report a crime. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Smith v. Watkins , 159 F.3d 1137, 1138 (8th Cir. 1998) (de novo standard of review), we affirm. Although the city ordinance infractions upon which the challenged stops were based appear minor, Wilson fails to establish that the stops were unconstitutional or that the scope of the stops was excessive. Cf. UnitedStates v. Beck , 140 F.3d 1129, 1133-34 (8th Cir. 1998) (affirming that even minor traffic violation creates probable cause to stop vehicle; during investigative traffic stops, officers may ask for identification, request explanation for presence in area, and conduct computer checks). Further, Wilson’s evidence falls short of showing that City police officers targeted African Americans or engaged in racial profiling, or that City police officers treated similarly situated whites differently.
We also conclude that Wilson cannot seek reversal in this civil matter on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988) (holding that defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel in a civil case). Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding costs to defendants. See Firefighters’ Inst. for Racial Equal. v. City of St. Louis , 220 F.3d 898, 905 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1359 (2001).-3-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1929

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to treatment

of certain equipment under the heavy truck tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself and Ms. SHEPHERD) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to treatment of certain equipment under the heavy truck

tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPLOSIVES HANDLING EQUIPMENT EXEMPT

4 FROM HEAVY TRUCK TAX.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4053 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to exemptions) is amended

7 by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(8) EXPLOSIVES HANDLING EQUIPMENT.—

9 Any article primarily designed—
2

•HR 1929 IH

1 ‘‘(A) to be placed or mounted on an auto2 mobile truck chassis, truck trailer, or semi-trail3 er chassis, and

4 ‘‘(B) to be used to process, prepare, or

5 load explosive products or the components

6 thereof.

7 (including in each case bins, tanks, or other contain8 ers mounted on the same chassis for transporting

9 components of the explosive products).’’

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the

12 amendment made by section 512(b) of the Surface Trans13 portation Assistance Act of 1982.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 10.43
 TRIAD GUARANTY INC.
EXECUTIVE/KEY EMPLOYEE RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
    Grant of Restricted Stock.
 Vesting.
 Date
    
    Vested Percentage____________
    
    ___%____________
    
    ___%____________
    
    100%
     i.e.
 1




---



##### 



Tax Remittance/Repurchase of Shares.
 Stock Certificates.
 Transferability.
 2




---



##### 



Effect of Termination of Employment.
     Rights as Shareholder.
 Determinations.
 Controlling Documents.
    No Guarantee of Employment.
 Assignment.
 Governing Law.
 3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 PARTICIPANT:
    
    COMPANY:TRIAD GUARANTY INC.By:Name:Title:
 4
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2163

To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl butoxide (PBO).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. GRANDY (for himself and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl

butoxide (PBO).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON PIPERONYL

4 BUTOXIDE (PBO).

5 Subchapter VI of chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 after subheading 2932.90.20 the following new sub8 heading, with the article description having the same de9 gree of indentation as the article description for sub10 heading 2932.90.30:

‘‘ 2932.90.28 Piperonyl butoxide ......................... 6.3% Free (CA, E,

IL)

15.4¢/kg +

52% ’’.
2

•HR 2163 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 210 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 210

   To prohibit candidates for Congress from accepting multicandidate 
                   political committee contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit candidates for Congress from accepting multicandidate 
                   political committee contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. ACCEPTANCE OF MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEE 
              CONTRIBUTIONS BY CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS AS UNLAWFUL.

    Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

  ``acceptance of multicandidate political committee contributions by 
                  candidates for congress as unlawful

    ``Sec. 324. It shall be unlawful for any candidate for the office 
of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner 
to, the Congress to accept contributions from multicandidate political 
committees.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1693 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1693

    To reduce until January 1, 1997, the duty on certain chemicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1993

Mr. Andrews of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reduce until January 1, 1997, the duty on certain chemicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MYCLOBUTANIL.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  <greek-a>-n-Butyl-<greek-a>-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-                      No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        triazole-1-propanenitrile (myclobutanil) (CAS No. 88671-                                                      31/96           ''
                        89-0) (provided for in subheading 2933.90.20)...........  11.1%                                                                .

SEC. 2. FENBUCONAZOLE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.13  <greek-a>[2-(-Chlorophenyl)-ethyl]-<greek-a>-phenyl-1H-                     No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        1,2,4-triazole-1-propanenitrile (fenbuconazole) (CAS No.                                                      31/96           ''
                        114369-43-6) (provided for in subheading 2933.90.20)....  11.1%                                                               . 

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 221

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide

ester.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene

ceph v sulfoxide ester.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXOMETHYLENE CEPH V SULFOXIDE ESTER.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 Exomethylene

ceph v sulfoxide

ester (provided

for in subheading

2934.90.40) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.
2

•HR 221 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
April 20.Z0IS 9:3opi^

A^*.AWlAcosW4CVerV<

v-OuA c& Grvv^nal AppoAs ot- Te*<iS

P.O.&ov 12.208

Cc\pv\o\ S\oV*oh

11.07.

\&SO£C\ AvAV* SuS«^A\ed'J \

1

T)cAUACj^4- °

j1750 FM 9££

^UATx.^?02Z

COUBTOFCWMINAl APPEALS

21 2015

^©lAcosta,Clerk
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

December 1, 2015

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 10, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: 

 

*Secretary of Labor v. AK Coal Resources, Inc*., Docket No. PENN 2014-159

 

*Secretary of Labor v. Pinnacle Mining Co., LLC*, Docket No. WEVA 2014-963

 

*Secretary of Labor v. James L. Deck*, Docket No. SE 2014-322-M

 

*Secretary of Labor v. BCJ Sand & Rock, Inc*., Docket No. WEST 2015-7-M

 

*Secretary of Labor v. E & G Masonry Stone #2*, Docket No. CENT 2015-21-M

 

*Secretary of Labor v. U.S. Silver – Idaho, Inc*., Docket No. WEST 2015-717-M

 

*Secretary of Labor v. Apogee Coal Co., LLC*, Docket No. WEVA 2014-632

 

*Secretary of Labor v. Campbell Redi-Mix, Inc*., Docket Nos. WEST 2014-917-M and WEST 2014-918-M

 

(Issues include whether motions to reopen the casesshould be granted by the Commission.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41591 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BERNARDO FLORENTINO SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-264-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bernardo Florentino Sanchez appeals the sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for a 2003 charge ofpossession with intent todistribute over 100 kilograms of marijuana. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed: U nited States of America v. Bernardo Sanchez, No. 06-41602. AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
# United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted December 6, 2007 Decided December 19, 2007 Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 07-2495 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,
v . EDWARD WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 89 CR 908 James B. Zagel, Judge

.

ORDER 

### The appellant was convicted on drug and related charges and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1992. The conviction an d sentence were eventually affirmed bythis court in 1997 in an unpublished opinion 1997 WL 303359. He later filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 to vacate the judgment. It was dismissed as being an unauthorized second section 2255 motion after an earlier motion of his under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 was recharacterized as a section 2255 motion. In 2006 he filed a third collateral attack, this one denominated as a request for relief under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. section 1651. The district court denied relief, and this appeal followed. We affirm. Like the earlier Rule 33 motion, the motion under section 1651is functionally a section 2255 motion. Nomenclature is irrelevant. A convicted defendant cannot evade the limitation on successive such motions by calling a motion by a different name. E.g., United States v. Scott , 414 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-11465 of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. on form S-8 of our reports dated March 30, 2005,relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule ofSteinway Musical Instruments, Inc., and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated March 30,2005 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
| /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Boston,  Massachusetts         |
| March 30,  2005           |

 

----