alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1




                 Exhibit 23 - Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the use of our report  dated  January  22,  1998,  in this  Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Triad Guaranty Inc.

Our audit also included the  financial  statement  schedules of Triad  Guaranty,
Inc.  listed  in Item  14(a).  These  schedules  are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion,  the financial  statement  schedules  referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-75668) pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of
Triad  Guaranty  Inc. and the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  33-96550)
pertaining to the Triad  Guaranty Inc.  401(k) Profit Sharing Plan of our report
dated January 22, 1998, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
included  in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) of Triad  Guaranty  Inc.,  and our
report  included  in the  preceding  paragraph  with  respect  to the  financial
statement schedules.



/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
--------------------
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 23, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 221 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 221

   To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene ceph v 
                            sulfoxide ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on exomethylene ceph v 
                            sulfoxide ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXOMETHYLENE CEPH V SULFOXIDE ESTER.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  Exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide ester (provided for in                        No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 2934.90.40)..................................  Free                                                31/95           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Tucker I. Marr, Chief Financial Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby
certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property
Partnership.

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Tucker I.
MarrTucker I. MarrChief Financial OfficerPruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT
31.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer





I, Man
Ha, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Forestry, Inc.





2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)* for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
*;





c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information (all of which do not apply); and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





*  Indicates
material omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986.







Date:  May
      13, 2008
              
              /s/Man
      Ha
              -----------------------------
              Man
      Ha
              Principal
      Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

STUART LAWRENCE SOBERMAN

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 172 DB 2017 (No. 10 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 60207

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of March, 2018, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 15, 2018, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Stuart Lawrence Soberman, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never 

been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Matthew Allen EATON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-50162.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 5, 2011.

Harold W. Chun, Assistant U.S., Nicole Acton Jones, Assistant U.S. Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Leila Wylie Morgan, Esquire, Trial, Federal Defenders Of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Matthew Allen Eaton appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate and foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2314. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Eaton contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4 for using a minor to commit a crime. The record reflects that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Eaton affirmatively used his children in the conspiracy. *See United States v. Castro-Hernandez,*258 F.3d 1057, 1060-61 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Ann R. BALDUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-1444-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2011.

*518Christopher N. Parlato, DeSanto and Parlato, Watertown, CT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Elizabeth M. Bergen, Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges, RICHARD K. EATON, Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Richard K. Eaton, of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

On May 15, 2006, plaintiff-appellant Ann R. Balducci was involved in a two-car motor vehicle accident during which the air bag system in her 2000 Hyundai Elantra failed to deploy. Alleging that this failure was the result of a manufacturing defect, Balducci brought a product liability action against the manufacturer, Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (“Hyundai”), pursuant to Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-572m, *et seq.,*seeking damages for injuries sustained during the accident. After the District Court granted summary judgment to Hyundai, *see Balducci v. Hyundai Motor Am. Inc.,*No. 08 CV 356 (D.Conn. Mar. 11, 2010), Balducci brought this appeal. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment *de novo,*drawing all factual inferences in favor of the non-moving party. *See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.,*321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). Undertaking that review, we affirm the grant of summary judgment to Hyundai for substantially the reasons set forth by the District Court in its ruling of March 11, 2010. Specifically, we agree with the District Court that because Balducci failed to rebut the evidence offered by Hyundai in support of the proposition that the air bag system did not malfunction by failing to deploy, Balducci failed to satisfy the first prong of Connecticut’s “malfunction doctrine,” which “requires the plaintiff to provide at least circumstantial evidence that the product malfunctioned.” *Balducci,*No. 08 CV 356, at *7. Although Balducci raised issues of fact regarding the impact’s location and the degree of damage, she offered no evidence demonstrating an “absence of other identifiable causes” when defendant’s evidence shows that the air bag’s non-deployment was caused by the low speed of Balducci’s car and the type of crash, not a malfunction. *See Potter v. Chi. Pneumatic Tool Co.,*241 Conn. 199, 218, 694 A.2d 1319 (1997); *see also Fallon v. Matworks,*50 Conn. Supp. 207, 218, 918 A.2d 1067*519(Conn.Super.Ct.2007) (noting “crucial additional showing” in malfunction case of negating other “causes for the malfunction other than a product defect” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

*CONCLUSION*

We have considered each of Balducci’s arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
June 30

LIBOR cessation

under LIBOR Act**

December 31

ICE ceased publication 

of 1W and 2M USD 

LIBOR tenors

December 16

Pursuant to the LIBOR 

Act, the Federal 

Reserve Board of 

Governors (FRB) 

published the final 

rule related to LIBOR 

replacement rates

October 6

ARRC released SpreadAdjustment Fallback 

Recommendations 

March 15

LIBOR Federal 

Legislation signed 

into law

December 22

Freddie Mac announced

legacy fallback rates for 

Single-Family (SF) Loans 

and Securities, 

Multifamily (MF) Loans 

and Securities, CMOs, 

and CRTs

May 19

ARRC endorsed CME 

12M Term SOFR 

*Information received through DTCC LENS is for informational purposes only. The official source of Freddie Mac fallback information is the Consolidated CUSIP List on the Freddie Mac Reference Rates Transition webpage.

**LIBOR cessation under the LIBOR Act only. Continued publication of synthetic LIBOR will occur for 15 months following cessation on June 30, 2023. This will not be a representative rate and we do not anticipate any impact to Freddie Mac.

4

th Quarter

Freddie Mac issued all new 

products referencing SOFR

Freddie Mac Legacy LIBOR Timeline

2020 2021 2022 2023

March 15

ARRC updated its 

recommended cash 

fallbacks to align with 

the FRB’s final rule 

for the LIBOR Act

April 13

Freddie Mac 

posted

CUSIP-level fallback 

rate details for SF 

ARM PCs, CMOs, SF 

CRT, and MF PCs 

May 16

Freddie Mac 

uploaded LIBOR 

replacement rate 

selections to the 

DTCC Enhanced LENS 

tool to facilitate 

communication of the 

rate changes to 

subscribers to the 

tool*

January 25

Freddie Mac provided SF 

and MF Servicers with 

guidance for transitioning 

LIBOR adjustable rate 

mortgages (ARMs) and 

floating rate loans (FRLs) 

to the FRB-selected 

replacement rates 

May 11

Freddie Mac posted

CUSIP-level fallback 

rate details for all 

remaining LIBORindexed products
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2184

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on chromotropic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. RAVENEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on chromotropic

acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHROMOTROPIC ACID.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 1,8-Dihydroxynapthalene-3, 6-

disulfonic acid,

also known as

Chromotropic

Acid (CAS No.

129–96–4) (provided for in subheading

2908.20.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.
2

•HR 2184 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for
the periods indicated.
  /s/ Cameron R. NelsonCameron NelsonVice President, Finance &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2087

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-[1-((4-Chloro-2-

(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl)imino)-2-propoxyethyl]-1-H-imidazole, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (by request) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-[1-((4-

Chloro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl)imino)-2-propoxyethyl]-

1-H-imidazole, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON 1-[1-((4-CHLORO-2-(TRIFLUORO5 METHYL)-PHENYL)IMINO)-2-PROPOXYETHYL]-

6 1-H-IMIDAZOLE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.31.07 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended

9 by—
2

•HR 2087 IH

1 (1) inserting ‘‘(triflumizole)’’ after ‘‘1-[1-((4-

2 Chloro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl)imino)-2-propoxy3 ethyl]-1-H-imidazole’’; and

4 (2) striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/

5 98’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered,

9 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

10 or after the 15th day after the date of the enact11 ment of this Act.

12 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN

13 ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tar14 iff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provi15 sion of law, upon proper request filed with the ap16 propriate customs officer before the 90th day after

17 the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or

18 withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

19 goods described in heading 9902.31.07 (as amended

20 by subsection (a)(1)) of the Harmonized Tariff

21 Schedule of the United States that was made—

22 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

23 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

24 the enactment of this Act;
3

•HR 2087 IH

1 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

2 entry or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, Clements and Haley 

RONALD WAYNE AHERRON 

v. Record No. 1493-05-3 

TIMES FIBER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND 

 ST. PAUL TRAVELERS MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

TIMES FIBER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND OCTOBER 25, 2005 

 ST. PAUL TRAVELERS 

v. Record No. 1704-05-3 

RONALD WAYNE AHERRON 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (James B. Feinman; James B. Feinman & Associates, on briefs), for 

Ronald Wayne Aherron. 

 (James A.L. Daniel; M. Brent Saunders; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley & 

Smitherman, P.C., on briefs), for Times Fiber Communications, Inc. 

and St. Paul Travelers. 

 Ronald Wayne Aherron (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding he failed to prove he made reasonable efforts to market his residual work 

capacity as of January 20, 2004 and continuing.1

 On cross-appeal, Times Fiber 

Communications, Inc. and its insurer contend the commission erred in finding claimant proved 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 In his opening brief, claimant contends the commission erred in not awarding him 

temporary total disability benefits from August 1, 2003 and continuing. However, the 

commission’s opinion indicates that claimant received permanent partial disability benefits from 

August 21, 2003, through January 9, 2004. The record supports that finding. Therefore, the 

period sought for temporary total disability benefits included July 18, 2003 through August 20, 

2003, and January 10, 2004, and continuing. 
- 2 -

he was entitled to an award of temporary total disability benefits from July 18, 2003 through 

August 20, 2003. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that these 

appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in 

its final opinion. See Aherron v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., VWC File No. 209-43-39 

(June 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.


DATE & TIME: Thursday, January 11, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2000-27: United Citizens Party of South Carolina 
by Michael Avey, Vice Chairman.
    Final Audit Report on Schumer '98.
    Administrative Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-394 Filed 1-2-01; 3:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M