alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1953

To prohibit any type of class III gaming on Indian lands within a State

except for the type of class III gaming specifically allowed by that State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 1993

Mr. MACHTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To prohibit any type of class III gaming on Indian lands

within a State except for the type of class III gaming

specifically allowed by that State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLASS III GAMING.

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

6 11(d) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25

7 U.S.C. 2710(d)) is amended in the matter preceding

8 subparagraph (A) by striking out ‘‘Class III gaming

9 activities shall be lawful on Indian lands only if such

10 activities are—’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘All
2

•HR 1953 IH

1 types of class III gaming activity on Indian lands

2 are prohibited unless a particular type of class III

3 gaming activity is—’’.

4 (2) REFERENDA AND CHARITABLE ENTITIES.—

5 Section 11(d)(1)(B) of the Indian Gaming Regu6 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(1)(B)) is amended to

7 read as follows:

8 ‘‘(B) located in a State that permits (other

9 than by State or local referendum) such type of

10 gaming activity for a purpose other than a chari11 table purpose by any person, organization, or entity,

12 other than a charitable organization or entity, and’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

14 (1) RETROACTIVITY.—The amendment made by

15 subsection (a) shall apply at the end of the 180-day

16 period beginning on the date of enactment of this

17 Act to any class III gaming activity occurring on In18 dian lands on or before the date of enactment of this

19 Act.

20 (2) TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT NEGOTIATIONS.—

21 A Tribal-State compact under section 11(d)(3) of

22 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act not in effect on

23 or before the date of enactment of this Act shall be

24 subject to the amendment made by subsection (a).
3

•HR 1953 IH

1 (3) DEFINITION.—For the purposes of this Act,

2 the term ‘‘class III gaming’’ has the same meaning

3 given such term by section 4 of the Indian Gaming

4 Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703).

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Texas Department of Public Safety v. Anita Johnson & Tameki

Taylor

Appel la te case number: 01

- 20

- 00 397

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 76040

Trial court: 113 th District Court of Harris County

Appell ees

, Anita Johnson and Tameki Taylor , ha ve filed a motion to abate th is

appeal in light of the death of their counsel, Jeffrey W. Gillespie . Appellees have requested

that this Court abate the appeal for a period of 180 days to allow them to retain substitute

counsel and permit substitute counsel to obtain and evaluate the case file

. Appellant did

not file a response in opposition to the motio n. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, we abate t he appeal

. No later than 180 days from the date of this

order, appellees shall file a motion to reinstate or a report advising the Court of the status

of the proceedings. If appellees do not respond as directed

, the court may reinstate the

appeal on its own motion or consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by

appellant.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerr a

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3 , 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. at September  30, 1998,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,298,378<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                   258,741
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         19,231,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,643,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,331,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,428,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,331,281
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,777,815
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  550,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,310,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,310,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,310,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  IV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Includes $533,019 in restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 208

- CR

______________________________

BRIAN CHADWICK MARTIN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1122184

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brian Chadwick Martin has filed a notice of appeal. We have now received the

certification of Martin’s right of appeal as required by T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2. That certification

states that Martin waived his right of appeal.

Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we

must dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court’s certification

affirmatively shows that Martin has waived his right of appeal, and because the record before us

does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

Martin has also filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Martin and

by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.2.

We dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submi tted: January 4, 2012

Date Decided: January 5, 2012

Do Not Publish
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

BAC 6735-01

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE: CANCELLATION OF MEETING NOTICE

 

January 28, 2015

 

            The followingCommission meeting has been cancelled.  No earlier announcement of thecancellation was possible.

 

TIMEAND DATE:                2:00 p.m., Thursday, January 29, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from    F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Closed

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     It wasdetermined by a unanimous vote of the Commissioners that the Commission considerand act upon the following in closed session: *Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretaryof Labor,* Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-82-R, et al. (Issues include whether togrant the Secretary of Labor’s Emergency Motion for Stay of ALJ’s OrderDismissing Pattern-of-Violations Notice.)  

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.  Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1934 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1934

   To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the Federal 
              Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

  Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Studds, Mr. Fields of Texas, and Mr. 
   Bateman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the Federal 
              Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Maritime Commission 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Federal Maritime 
Commission $19,450,000 for fiscal year 1994.

SEC. 3. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NONPERFORMANCE OF VOYAGES.

    Section 3(b) of Public Law 89-777 (46 App. U.S.C. 817e(b)) is 
amended by striking ``and such bond or other security shall be in an 
amount paid equal to the estimated total revenue for the particular 
transportation.'' and inserting a period.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 11, 2005



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
Certification

I, Wang Li Rong, certify that: 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Great China International Holdings, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007; 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiariesof the Trust**

 

(Wholly-Owned Corporate Subsidiaries of the Trust:

BPP/Arrowhead, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Crenshaw-Imperial, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Riley, Inc. (California) (Consolidated)

BPP/Simi Valley, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Valley Central, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

Burnham Pacific L.P., Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

 

Partnerships in which the Trust holds interests:

BPP/Arrowhead, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Cameron Park, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)

BPP/Crenshaw-Imperial, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Marin, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)

BPP/Richmond, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)

BPP/Riley, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)

BPP/Simi Valley, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

BPP/Van Ness, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)

Burnham Pacific Operating Partnership, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 2516 and 2517]

Allegheny Energy Supply, licensee for the Dam No. 4 Project No. 2516 and the Dam No. 5 Project No. 2517, currently is consulting with state and federal agencies concerning the relicensing of those projects. In this regard, Commission staff intends to participate with representatives of the licensee, resource agencies, and concerned non-governmental entities at a meeting to be held at the Rockwood Manor, 11001 MacArthur Boulevard, Potomac, Maryland, at 1 p.m., Wednesday, February 28, 2001. All interested persons are welcome to attend.

For further information, please contact Suzie Boltz, of Allegheny Energy Supply, at (410) 628-4359. Rockwood Manor's telephone is (301) 299-5206.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4070  Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
RICARDO DUNCAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2120

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 8, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. David P. Kreider , Judge

.

Stephen N. Bernstein, Gainesville , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Robert Charles Lee and Matthew Pavese

, Assistant Attorney s General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, WINOKUR

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### Miroslaw GORTAT, Henryk Bienkow-ski, Grzegorz Drelich, Miroslaw Filip-kowski, Artur Lapinski, Jan Swaltek, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, Artur Kosiorek, Henryk Stoklosa, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAPALA BROTHERS, INC., Pawel Ca-pala, Robert Capala, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants, Felipe (Phillip) E. Orner, Appellant.

No. 13-2731-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 10, 2014.

Robert Wisniewski, Esq., New York, NY, for Appellees.

Felipe (Phillip) E. Orner, Esq., Flushing, NY, for Appellants and pro se.

Present: BARRINGTON D. PARKER, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Following six years of litigation over unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201*et seq.,*and New York law, Appellees prevailed following a two-week jury trial on each of their claims, as well as counterclaims asserted against them. Appellants Capala Brothers, Inc., Pawel Capala, and Robert Capala now appeal a host of orders and decisions issued before, during, and after trial, as well as the judgment entered by *79the District Court. For substantially the same reasons as the District Court below, we affirm the District Court’s orders and judgment on appeal. Appellant Felipe Or-ner also appeals an order of the district court imposing sanctions upon him. Again, for substantially the same reasons as the District Court below, we affirm the District Court’s order as to Orner. We have considered all of Appellants’ remaining arguments—including their challenge to the district court’s impartiality—and have found them to be waived or without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court and the order as to Orner are AFFIRMED.
SECOND DIVISION

BARNES, P. J.,

MILLER, and RAY, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

August 10, 2015

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A13A2100. PARKER v. THE STATE.

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

In Parker v. State, 296 Ga. 586 (769 SE2d 329) (2015), the Supreme Court of

Georgia reversed Division 1 of the judgment of this Court in Parker v. State, 326 Ga.

App. 217 (756 SE2d 300) (2014).1 We vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the

opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. Accordingly, we vacate Parker’s

convictions and the order denying hismotion for material witness certificates, reverse

the trial court’s exclusion of Parker’s proffered documents, and remand the case “to

the trial court with direction to issue a new order on Parker’s motion after considering

his proffers, along with any other unprivileged evidence submitted by Parker and the

State on remand.” Parker, 296 Ga. at 596 (4).

1This Court’s rulings on which the Supreme Court did not grant certiorari

remain the law of the case. Parker, 296 Ga. at 597, n. 14. 
If the trial court on remand grants Parker’s motion for material witness

certificates in whole or in part, and Parker then succeeds in obtaining

summonses for the witnesses from the Kentucky court, then a new trial

will be necessary. If, on the other hand, the trial court denies the motion

again, then the courtshould reenter the judgments of conviction against

Parker, who could then take another appeal challenging the second

ruling on his motion and any related issues.

Id. at 597 (4).

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. Miller and Ray, JJ.,

concur.

2
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2074 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2074

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the American Folklife Center for fiscal 
                          years 1994 and 1995.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2074

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To authorize appropriations for the American Folklife Center for fiscal 
                          years 1994 and 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE AMERICAN FOLKLIFE 
              CENTER.

    Section 8 of the American Folklife Preservation Act (20 U.S.C. 
2107) is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' after ``September 30, 1992,''; 
        and
            (2) by inserting after ``September 30, 1993'' the 
        following: ``, $1,120,000 for the fiscal year ending September 
        30, 1994, and $1,120,000 for the fiscal year ending September 
        30, 1995''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`