alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828747
<NAME> DRUG SCREENING SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995             JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          77,331                  77,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,421                 234,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)               (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    484,863                 484,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               732,147                 732,147
<PP&E>                                       1,100,400               1,100,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               (579,271)               (579,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,288,690               1,288,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          681,478                 681,478
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        24,460                  24,460
<OTHER-SE>                                     482,752                 482,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,288,690               1,288,690
<SALES>                                        469,060               1,000,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,603               1,001,918
<CGS>                                          222,383                 394,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  388,149                 771,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (140,929)               (164,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,929)               (164,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)                  (0.07)

</TABLE>
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 20, 2013

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

ISSUES INTERIM FINAL RULE DEFINING SPOUSE

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board (FRTIB), the agency responsible for administering the 

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), announced today that it has 

promulgated an interim final rule revising its regulations to 

provide that the FRTIB will look to the jurisdiction of 

celebration to determine a participant’s marital status. The 

FRTIB will adopt a final rule after consideration of public 

comments on this interim rule. The rule can be found at:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/pdf/2013-22898.pdf

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in United States v. Windsor

that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, defining 

“marriage”, is unconstitutional. Windsor requires the FRTIB to 

defer to state law in determining the marital status of TSP 

participants. The FRTIB anticipates conflicting state laws. 

Existing FRTIB regulations have only one choice-of-law provision 

pertaining to marriage. It requires the FRTIB to look to the 

state of domicile of the participant for the purposes of paying 

benefits upon the death of the participant and establishing a 

beneficiary participant account. 

The FRTIB is required by statute to administer the Thrift 

Savings Plan solely in the interest of its participants and 

beneficiaries and for the exclusive purposes of (1) providing 

benefits to participants and their beneficiaries, and (2) 

defraying the reasonable expenses of administering the Thrift 

Savings Fund. 
The existing choice-of-law provision precludes the FRTIB from 

offering certain TSP benefits to the same-sex spouses of 

participants who are domiciled in states that do not recognize 

same-sex marriages performed in other states or foreign 

countries. The current choice-of-law is detrimental to a 

population of TSP participants and does not serve to defray the 

expenses of administering the Thrift Savings Fund. As a result, 

the FRTIB is revising its regulations to provide that FRTIB will 

look to the state of celebration of a marriage to determine a 

participant’s marital status. 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is similar to 

the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. As of August 2013, TSP 

assets totaled approximately $366.7 billion, and retirement savings accounts 

were being maintained for roughly 4.6 million TSP participants. Participants 

include Federal civilian employees in all branches of Government, employees 

of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. Additional 

information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
#### Christopher LEVERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jean SULLIVAN; Mitchell Solomon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-51034

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 29, 2014.

Christopher Leverson, Austin, TX, pro se.

Meitra Farhadi, Senior Attorney, City of Austin Law Department, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

*290PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE A. VILLANUEVA-ZALDANA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72840

Agency No. A014-145-167

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose A. Villanueva-Zaldana, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) deportation order and denying his motion to

remand based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

MAR 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72840

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of ineffective assistance of counsel,

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part

and grant in part the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The BIA did not err in finding that Villanueva-Zaldana’s former counsel had

not acted ineffectively by failing to submit the plea hearing transcript to the IJ. See

id. at 793 (a petitioner must demonstrate that counsel failed to perform with

sufficient competence to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim).

Because the BIA failed to address Villanueva-Zaldana’s contentions, raised

in his brief on appeal to the BIA, that the IJ’s bias violated due process and that the

IJ erred in failing to adjudicate his adjustment of status application, we grant the

petition for review and remand to the agency to consider these contentions in the

first instance. See Brezilien v. Holder, 569 F.3d 403, 412 (9th Cir. 2009) (BIA is

not free to ignore arguments raised by a petitioner). 

Each party shall bear its own costs in this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Merritt C. Brown, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mega Group, Inc; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c.)Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a.) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

December 4, 2012 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

SELECTS A MANAGER FOR THE F FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board (FRTIB) announced today that it has selected BlackRock 

Institutional Trust Company as the investment manager for its

Fixed Income Index Investment Fund (F Fund) after completing a 

source selection using full and open competitive procedures. 

The F Fund invests in a bond portfolio that tracks the Barclays 

Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. This broad index includes 

U.S. Government, mortgage-backed, corporate, and foreign 

government (issued in the U.S.) sectors of the U.S. bond market. 

As of September 30, 2012, the F Fund held $25.4 billion in 

assets. The contract will be for a one-year term, with four 

one-year options for renewal. 

The F Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Common Stock 

Investment Fund, the Small Cap Stock Index Investment Fund, and 

the International Stock Index Investment Fund – are currently 

managed by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 

(BlackRock). 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is similar to 

the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. As of October 2012, TSP 

assets totaled approximately $324.1 billion, and retirement savings accounts 

were being maintained for roughly 4.6 million TSP participants. Participants 

include Federal civilian employees in all branches of Government, employees 

of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. Additional 

information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT: 

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641 
2

(end)
-------------------
   EXHIBIT 32.1
-------------------


         --------------------------------------------------------------
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
         --------------------------------------------------------------



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Air-Q  Wi-Fi  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Loflin,  President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code), that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Dated: August 19, 2003                       /s/ DAVID LOFLIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David Loflin
                                             President
55%

45%

Purchase Refinance July 2015

$41 $247

Billion Billion

YTD 2015

1.48% 4,347

July 2015 Highlights

YTD: seven months ended July 31, 2015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30594

Summary Calendar

 

RONALD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana

State Penitentiary,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-3864-D

--------------------

November 24, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronald Williams, Louisiana prisoner # 100849, seeks a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Williams contends that the

district court erred by dismissing his § 2254 petition as timebarred. A COA is GRANTED with regard to the issue whether his

§ 2254 petition was time-barred. 

Williams’ second state habeas application, even if dismissed
No. 98-30594 

-2-

by the state courts as repetitive of his first habeas

application, was properly filed and thus tolled the applicable

limitation period. See Villegas v. Johnson, 184 F.3d 467, 472-73

(5th Cir. 1999). With the benefit of the resulting tolling,

Williams’ federal habeas petition was filed within the

limitations period established by the AEDPA. See Flanagan v.

Johnson, 154 F.3d 196, 199-200 (5th Cir. 1998)(state prisoners

seeking to challenge convictions which became final prior to

April 24, 1996, have a one-year “grace period” within which to

file); Fields v. Johnson, 159 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1998)

(tolling provision of § 2244(d)(2) applies to “grace period”). 

Williams’ second state habeas application was filed on March 18,

1996, and remained pending until the Louisiana Supreme Court

denied Williams a supervisory writ on September 5, 1997. 

Therefore the limitations period was tolled until September 5,

1997, when the one-year statute of limitations began to run.

Williams’ petition, filed December 11, 1997, was thus within the

applicable one-year period. Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the

judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is

REMANDED for further proceedings.

COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
M. Gottlieb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Daniel M. Gottlieb

                                        Daniel M. Gottlieb
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 31, 2003
Exhibit 4.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.

Euronet Worldwide,  Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Corporation") hereby certifies as follows:

FIRST:  That on March 8,  2006,  the  directors  of the  Corporation  adopted  a
resolution   setting  forth  a  proposed   amendment  to  the   Certificate   of
Incorporation of the Corporation declaring the advisability thereof, and calling
for consideration of the proposed  amendment by the Corporation's  stockholders.
The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

     NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Article FOURTH (a) of the Certificate of
     Incorporation, as amended, shall be amended to read as follows:

     FOURTH:  (a) The total  number of shares of all  classes of  capital  stock
     which the Corporation  shall have authority to issue is One Hundred Million
     (100,000,000) shares, consisting of:

          1.   Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value two
               cents ($0.02) per share ("Preferred Stock");

          2.   Ninety Million (90,000,000) shares of common stock, par value two
               cents ($0.02) per share ("Common Stock").

SECOND:  That  thereafter,   at  the  Annual  Meeting  of  stockholders  of  the
Corporation  held  on May  18,  2006,  the  stockholders  adopted  a  resolution
approving the foregoing amendment.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Corporation  has caused this  certificate  to be
signed by its authorized officer this 29th day of June, 2006.

                                    EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Newman
                                        -------------------------
                                    Jeffrey B. Newman
                                    Executive Vice President,
                                    General Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The National Bank of Indianapolis
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Morris L. Maurer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Morris L. Maurer
-----------------------------------
Morris L. Maurer
Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and not for any other purpose, and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a two-day meeting.  The meeting will be open to  public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

June 7-8, 2001.

      ( print page 10320)    

# TIME:

8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

University of Pennsylvania Law School, 3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: February 8, 2001.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 01-3709  Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M