alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Announcing the Fourth Quarterly Meeting of the Crash Injury 
Research and Engineering Network

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Meeting announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Fourth Quarterly Meeting of members 
of the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network. CIREN is a 
collaborative effort to conduct research on crashes and injuries at 
nine Level 1 Trauma Centers which are linked by a computer network. 
Researchers can review data and share expertise, which could lead to a 
better understanding of crash injury mechanisms and the design of safer 
vehicles.

DATE AND TIME: The meeting is scheduled from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on March 
16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Room 6200-04 of the U.S. 
Department of Transportation Building, which is located at 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CIREN System has been established and 
crash cases have been entered into the database by each Center. NHTSA 
has held three Annual Conferences where CIREN research results were 
presented. Further information about the three previous CIREN 
conferences is available through the NHTSA website at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/include/bio_and_trauma/ciren-final.htm. NHTSA held 
the first quarterly meeting on May 5, 2000, with a topic of lower 
extremity injuries in motor vehicle crashes, the second quarterly 
meeting on July 21, 2000, with a topic of side impact crashes, and the 
third quarterly meeting on November 30, 2000, with a topic of thoracic 
injuries in crashes. Information from the May 5, July 21, and November 
30, 2000, meetings are also available through the NHTSA website.
    NHTSA plans to continue holding quarterly meetings on a regular 
basis to disseminate CIREN information to interested parties. This is 
the fourth such meeting. The topic for this meeting is offset frontal 
collisions. Subsequent meetings have tentatively been scheduled for 
June, September, and December 2001. These quarterly meetings will be in 
lieu of an annual CIREN conference.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Donna Stemski, Office of Human-
Centered Research, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 6206, Washington, DC 
20590, telephone: (202) 366-5662.

    Issued on: February 8, 2001.
Raymond P. Owings,
Associate Administrator for Research and Development, National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3831 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
EX-10.5



 







Exhibit 10.5




SCHEDULE A

TO

EXHIBIT 10.4




     Rurban Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) has entered into First Amendments to Change in
Control Agreements with the executive officers of the Registrant identified below, which First
Amendments to Change in Control Agreements are substantially identical to the First Amendment to
Change in Control Agreement, executed May 17, 2006 and effective as of March 1, 2006, by and
between the Registrant and Duane L. Sinn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the “June 30, 2006 Form 10-Q”).



     In accordance with Rule 12b-31 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Item
601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K, the following table identifies those executive officers of the
Registrant with whom the Registrant has entered into First Amendments to Change in Control
Agreements similar to that included as Exhibit 10.4 to the June 30, 2006 Form 10-Q:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Current Offices Held with	 	Effective Date	 	Execution Date
	Name	 	the Registrant and its Subsidiaries	 	of Agreement	 	of Agreement
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Henry R. Thiemann

	 	President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of Exchange Bank;
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of RFCBC, Inc.
	 	March 1, 2006*
	 	May 19, 2006
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mark A. Klein

	 	President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of The State Bank and
Trust Company
	 	March 1, 2006
	 	May 30, 2006








 




			
	*	 	Remains subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC.
Order filed January 6, 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00654

- CR

____________ CHAD SMALL , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1383973



### ORDER
Appellant is not represented by counsel on appeal. This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to appointment of counsel and to proceed without the payment of costs.

In addition, t he certification of the defendant’s right of appeal appears to be incorrect. The certification states this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal.” The judgment reflects that this is not a plea bargain case.2

Accordingly, we enter the following order.
We ORDER the judge o f the 263rd District Court to immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant and counsel for the State shall be present to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to appoin ted counsel. The judge shall appoint appellate counsel for appellant, if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the
trial clerk to forward a record of the hea ring and a supplemental clerk = s record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk
of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

In addition , we ask that the trial court review the record, and, if necessar y, correct the certification of the defendant’s right of appeal, request the trial court clerk to prepare and certify a supplemental clerk’s record containing the corrected certification, and file the supplemental clerk’s record with this court within 30 d ays of the date of this notice.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from t he trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
944 A.2d 752

#### Denise ELBERSON v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ELWYN, INC.). Petition of Elwyn, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 18, 2008.

*464
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Petition for Supersedeas/Stay on Appeal are DENIED.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   August 9, 2004               /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                    A signed original of this written  statement
                                    required by Section 906 has been provided to
                                    CNL  Income  Fund  IV,  Ltd.   and  will  be
                                    retained  by CNL Income  Fund IV,  Ltd.  and
                                    furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
                                    Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00215-CR

Jamie Jerome Wingwood, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-05-204312, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Jamie Jerome Wingwood guilty of aggravated assault. See

Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2006). The jury assessed punishment at ten years’

imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant also filed a pro se brief.
2

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing

in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: October 24, 2006

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-11998, 333-107242, 333-129762, 333-157585, 333-161207, 333-163445 and 333-163446 on Form S-8, and in Registration Statements Nos. 333-124713, 333-133573 and
333-158531 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 1, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of PartnerRe Ltd. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of PartnerRe Ltd.s internal control
over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PartnerRe Ltd. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                        
|------------------------
|/S/    DELOITTE &
TOUCHE
|Deloitte & Touche       
|                        
|Hamilton, Bermuda       
|March 1, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Alberto RAMIREZ-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50358

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2014.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mara Asya Blatt, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Alberto Ramirez-Miranda (“Ramirez”) appeals his sentence of seventy months following a conviction on a guilty plea to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Ramirez’s sole argument is that the district court improperly calculated his guidelines range when it concluded that his prior conviction for violation of an Arizona burglary statute (Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 13-1507) was a crime of violence. The Government contends that we need not reach this issue because any error is harmless. *See United States v. Valdez,*726 F.3d 684, 697 (5th Cir.2013)(evaluating harmlessness by looking at whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence for the same reasons); *United States v. Richardson,*676 F.3d 491, 511-12 (5th Cir.2012). We agree.

The district court engaged in a lengthy colloquy with counsel regarding Ramirez’s extensive prior (mostly uncounted) criminal convictions and his history of prior deportations followed by unlawful reentry. It was aware of the two potential guidelines ranges (with or without the enhancement). It considered Ramirez’s particular characteristics in light of his allocution, the parties’ arguments, and the information presented before engaging in a lengthy analysis of the reasons that the particular sentence was appropriate “with or without the guidelines,” including: “you’ve had a lot of chances” (several deportations without convictions); and, despite the fact that most of his convictions came when Ramirez was “a younger man,” “you still have those criminal convictions and a lot of them didn’t count.” It noted that “you’re not willing to abide by [the law regarding illegal reentry].” It then reiterated: “that’s why I think a sentence within this range is appropriate, with or without the guidelines.” Considering the totality of the record, we conclude that the same sentence would have been imposed even •without the enhancement.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                             AVONDALE INCORPORATED
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Fiscal Years Ended
                                                1994          1995         1996          1997          1998
                                              --------      --------     --------      --------     --------
<S>                                           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Fixed Charges:

   Interest expense                               $6.5         $14.3        $18.5         $26.2         23.3

   Discount and expenses on sale of
      accounts receivable                           --            --          3.7           6.6          7.3
   Amortization of debt issuance costs              --            --           .9           1.1          1.1
     Fixed Charges                                ----         -----        -----         -----        -----
                                                  $6.5         $14.3        $23.1         $33.9        $31.7
                                                  ====         =====        =====         =====        =====

Earnings
   Pretax income before
      extraordinary item                         $22.6         $34.0        $22.7         $37.9        $55.4
   Fixed charges                                   6.5          14.3         23.1          33.9         31.7
                                                 -----         -----        -----         -----        -----
      Earnings                                   $29.1         $48.3        $45.8          71.8         87.1
                                                 =====         =====        =====         =====        =====
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 4.5x          3.4x         2.0x          2.1x         2.8x
</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062

To amend chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, to provide that veterans

who are former prisoners of war shall be deemed to have a serviceconnected disability rated as total for the purposes of determining the

benefits due to such veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1993

Mr. FISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, to

provide that veterans who are former prisoners of war

shall be deemed to have a service-connected disability

rated as total for the purposes of determining the benefits due to such veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISABILITY RATING FOR FORMER PRISONERS

4 OF WAR.

5 (a) RATING OF DISABILITY.—Chapter 11 of title 38,

6 United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking subsection (b) of section 1112;
2

HR 2062 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) of section

2 1112 as subsection (b); and

3 (3) by inserting after section 1116 the following

4 new section:

5 ‘‘§ 1117. Disability rating for former prisoners of war

6 ‘‘A veteran who is a former prisoner of war shall be

7 deemed to have a service-connected disability rated as

8 total for the purpose of determining the benefits due such

9 veteran under this title.’’.

10 (b) AMENDMENTS TO TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The

11 table of sections at the beginning of chapter 11 of title

12 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the

13 item relating to section 1116 the following new item:

‘‘1117. Disability rating for former prisoners of war.’’.

Æ
PNC Bank, National Association
                               South Tryon Square
                            201 South College Street
                                    Suite 900
                         Charlotte, North Carolina 28202


                                 August 14, 2006


TeamStaff, Inc.
TeamStaff Rx, Inc.
RS Staffing Services, Inc.
300 Atrium Drive
Somerset, New Jersey 08873


Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to that certain Revolving Credit and Security Agreement
dated as of June 8, 2005, as amended, by and among TeamStaff, Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, TeamStaff Rx, Inc., a Texas corporation, and RS Staffing Services,
Inc., a Georgia corporation (collectively, the "Borrowers"), the financial
institutions party thereto (the "Lenders") and PNC Bank, National Association, a
national banking association, as agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the
"Agent") (the "Credit Agreement"). The purpose of this letter is to amend
Section 6.5(a) of the Credit Agreement to read as followes:

         "(a) Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.

         Cause to be maintained a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less than
(i) 1.0 to 1.0 for the twelve month period ending as of June 30, 2006 and (ii)
1.05 to 1.0 for the twelve month period ending as of September 30, 2006 and as
of each fiscal quarter thereafter."

Please acknowledge your agreement to the terms set forth herein by signed below.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   PNC Bank, National Association, as Agent
                                   and Lender




                                   By
                                     ---------------------------------

                                   Title
                                        ------------------------------







Agreed to acknowledged by:

TeamStaff, Inc.

By
  ----------------------------------

Title
     -------------------------------



TeamStaff Rx, Inc.

By
  ----------------------------------

Title
     -------------------------------



RS Staffing Services, Inc.

By
  ----------------------------------

Title
     -------------------------------
- 
      - 
      - 
      - ☰
      - About Us
      - Topographic Maps
      - Our Maps

**Forest Visitor Maps**			for each national forest and grassland provide forest-wide information 			on attractions, facilities, services, and opportunities.

**Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM)** identify roads, trails, and 			areas designated for motor vehicle use.

**Wilderness Maps** are topographic maps that show natural 			features such as mountains, valleys, plains, lakes, rivers, and 			vegetation using contour lines depicting elevation gain or loss. 			Each map covers all or part of one wilderness area and the scale is 			generally 1 inch per mile (1:63,360).

For more information please visit **Forest Service Standard Map Products**.

Select Maps...
---Forest Visitor---
---MVUM---
---Wilderness---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Interlink  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, E. Michael Thoben,  III, Chairman,  President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/S/   E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III
-----------------------------------------------
E. Michael Thoben, III
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

July 24, 2006
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to require

that testimony before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission be given under oath.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 1993

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act

of 1990 to require that testimony before the Defense

Base Closure and Realignment Commission be given

under oath.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TESTIMONY BEFORE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE

4 AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION.

5 (a) OATHS REQUIRED.—Section 2903(d)(1) of the

6 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part

7 A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687

8 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new
2

•HR 2131 IH

1 sentence: ‘‘All testimony before the Commission at a pub2 lic hearing conducted under this paragraph shall be pre3 sented under oath.’’.

4 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

5 made by this section shall apply with respect to all public

6 hearings conducted by the Defense Base Closure and Re7 alignment Commission after the date of the enactment of

8 this Act.

Æ