alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                             INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
                  SCHEDULE REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                              (000's EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Sixteen Weeks Ended        Forty Weeks Ended
                                                ---------------------     ---------------------
                                                 March 6,    March 7,      March 6,    March 7,
                                                   1999        1998          1999        1998
                                                ---------   ---------     ---------   ---------

<S>                                             <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>
Net income                                      $ 29,583    $ 29,871      $ 96,181    $ 93,998
                                                ========    ========      ========    ========

Basic weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                      71,468      73,349        72,002      73,665
Effect of dilutive stock compensation                703       1,418           933       1,389
                                                --------    --------      --------    -------- 
Diluted weighted average common 
 shares outstanding                               72,171      74,767        72,935      75,054
                                                ========    ========      ========    ========

Earnings per share:
  Basic                                         $    .41    $    .41      $   1.34    $   1.28
                                                ========    ========      ========    ======== 
  Diluted                                       $    .41    $    .40      $   1.32    $   1.25
                                                ========    ========      ========    ========

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40382

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAY GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-1388-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ray Green appeals the within-guidelines sentence of 210 months of 

imprisonment imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiring to 

possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine and 

possessing a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime. He contends that 

the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 6, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40382 Document: 00515373518 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2020
No. 19-40382

2

Because he did not raise this alleged procedural error in the district 

court, we review for plain error only. United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 

564 F.3d 357, 361-62 (5th Cir. 2009). As Green’s sentence falls within the 

applicable guidelines range, we infer that the district court considered the 

§ 3553(a) factors. United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Moreover, Green does not even attempt, and thus fails, to show plain error. 

See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-40382 Document: 00515373518 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2020
1 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0320 

THOMAS ALVARADO, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 v. 

CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA, et al., 

Defendants and Appellees. 

ORDER 

 Appellee, CoreCivic, Inc. (f/k/a Corrections Corporation of America), 

moved this Court pursuant to Mont. R. App. P. 26(1) for an order granting an 

extension of time up to and including October 27, 2021 for Appellee to file its 

answer brief; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee’s motion for an extension is 

GRANTED. Appellee CoreCivic, Inc. shall have up to and including October 27, 

2021 to file its answer brief. 

 Dated this day of _________________, 2021. 

 

 

Supreme Court Justice 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2021

09/13/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0320
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1752 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1752

  For the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired), and Roger 
                                 Sands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1993

   Mr. Hyde introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired), and Roger 
                                 Sands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, to Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired) and Roger 
Sands, an amount of money in compensation for any damages (including 
legal costs, as well as other economic and noneconomic losses incurred) 
arising out of the unlawful confinement and detention of Ernest Sands 
in Saudi Arabia from August, 1991 until January, 1992. Such confinement 
and detention occurred as a result of negligence, misrepresentation and 
other unlawful actions taken by officials of the United States State 
Department and other United States government officials. Such damages 
shall be awarded to the claimants notwithstanding the defense of 
sovereign immunity or any defense available to the United States under 
sections 2671-2680 of title 28, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2125

To make an exception to the United States embargo on trade with Cuba

for the export of medicines or medical supplies, instruments, or equipment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1993

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To make an exception to the United States embargo on

trade with Cuba for the export of medicines or medical

supplies, instruments, or equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO EMBARGO AUTHORITY IN THE

4 FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.

5 Section 620(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

6 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2370(a)(1)) is amended by inserting be7 fore the period at the end of the second sentence the fol8 lowing: ‘‘, except that any such embargo shall not apply

9 with respect to the export of any medicines or medical sup10 plies, instruments, or equipment’’.
2

•HR 2125 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXISTING RESTRICTIONS ON

2 TRADE WITH CUBA.

3 Upon the enactment of this Act, any regulation, proc4 lamation, or provision of law, including Presidential Proc5 lamation 3447 of February 3, 1962, the Export Adminis6 tration Regulations (15 CFR 368–399), and Cuban Assets

7 Control Regulations (31 CFR 515), that prohibits exports

8 to Cuba or transactions involving exports to Cuba and that

9 is in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, shall

10 not apply with respect to the export to Cuba of medicines

11 or medical supplies, instruments, or equipment.

12 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON THE FUTURE EXERCISE OF

13 AUTHORITY.

14 (a) EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 1979.—After

15 the enactment of this Act, the President may not exercise

16 the authorities contained in the Export Administration

17 Act of 1979 to restrict the exportation to Cuba of medi18 cines or medical supplies, instruments, or equipment, ex19 cept to the extent such restrictions would be permitted

20 under section 5 of that Act for goods containing parts or

21 components subject to export controls under such section.

22 (b) INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY ECONOMIC POW23 ERS ACT.—After the enactment of this Act, the President

24 may not exercise the authorities contained in section 203

25 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to

26 restrict the export to Cuba of medicines or medical sup-
3

•HR 2125 IH

1 plies, instruments, or equipment, to the extent such au2 thorities are exercised to deal with a threat to the foreign

3 policy or economy of the United States.

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarter ended 1995 Form 10-Q Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated 
Statements of Operations as of November 30, 1995 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000827830
<NAME>                        Neal Ludeke
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 MAR-01-1995         
<PERIOD-END>                   NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                            29,141
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,824,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,694,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,824,962
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  31,985
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  29,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (778,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (778,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (963.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the 
              United States for the vessel IMPATIENT LADY.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1993

 Mr. Deutsch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the 
              United States for the vessel IMPATIENT LADY.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the 
department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
IMPATIENT LADY (official number 553952).

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 333-72508, 333-95765, 333-37641, and033-85766 of Micro Component Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form S-8 andRegistration Statement Nos. 333-104590 and 333-108072 on Form S-2 of our reportdated February 6, 2004 (March 9, 2004 as to Note 12), which expresses anunqualified opinion appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MicroComponent Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
| /s/  Virchow,  Krause & Company, LLP. |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota                         |
| March 15,  2004                                |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ES01-16-000]


Ogden Energy Group, Inc.; Notice of Issuance or Order

February 12, 2001.
    On January 8, 2001, Ogden Energy Group, Inc. (Ogden) submitted for 
filing an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act. 
In its application, Ogden also requested waiver of various Commission 
regulations. In particular, Ogden requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liability by Ogden.
    On February 2, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Application, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuance of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Ogden should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Ogden is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Ogden's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 5, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3913 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
      Stephen C. RichterStephen
      C. RichterExecutive
      Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerAugust
      8, 2008
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Alcoa World Alumina, LLC              

#   Alcoa World Alumina, LLC

On May 2, 2018, the Commission issued its decision in *Alcoa World Alumina, LLC*, Docket Nos. CENT 2015-128 et al.  

Commission-Decision(Alcoa World Alumina LLC)CENT 2015-128 et al.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

MILITARY ROAD REVITALIZATION 

COMPANY, LLC 

VERSUS 

ST. TAMMANY PARISH 

GOVERNMENT 

NO. 2023 CW 1221 

MARCH 15, 2024 

In Re: Military Road Revitalization Company, LLC, applying for 

supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of 

St. Tammany, No. 202313320. 

BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, J J. 

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the district court's 

November 8, 2023 judgment which granted, in part, the exception of no 

right of action filed by defendant is reversed. Defendant, St. Tammany 

Parish Government, failed to carry its burden of proving that 

plaintiff, Military Road Revitalization Company, LLC, has no right of 

action to challenge the moratorium ordinance. Under the facts of this 

case, plaintiff has a "real and actual personal stake" in challenging 

the moratorium. Jenkins v. City of Baton Rouge, 2014-1235 (La. App. 1st 

Cir. 3/9/15), 166 So.3d 1032, 1036; La. Code Civ. P. art. 681. 

Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the district court's judgment 

granting, in part, defendant's exception of no right of action to the 

claims based upon allegations of violation of the Code of Ordinances 

and deny the exception. 

The portion of the district court's November 8, 2023 judgment, 

which denied the preliminary injunction is a final, appealable judgment 

pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 3612. Therefore, 

the writ is granted for the limited purpose of remanding this matter to 

the district court with instructions to grant an appeal to plaintiff, 

Military Road Revitalization Company, LLC, pursuant to the pleading 

that notified the district court of plaintiff's intention to seek 

writs. See In re Howard, 541 So.2d 195, 197 (La. 1989) (per curiam). 

In the event plaintiff, Military Road Revitalization Company, LLC, 

seeks to appeal the district court's judgment, plaintiff shall submit 

an order for appeal to the district court on or before fifteen days 

from the date of this court's order. Additionally, a copy of this 

court's order is to be included in the appellate record. 

EW 

TPS 

Welch, J., concurs. The portion of the district court's November 8, 

2023 judgment which granted, in part, defendant's peremptory exception 

of no right of action, did not dismiss all of plaintiff's claims, and 

therefore, the judgment constitutes an impermissible partial judgment. 

See State, by and through Caldwell v. AstraZeneca AB, 2016-1073 (La. 

App. 1st Cir. 4/11/18), 249 So.3d 38, 43, (en bane), writs denied, 

2018-00766, 2018-0758 (La. 9/21/18), 252 So.3d 899, 904. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

11.s..O 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for
the periods indicated.
  /s/  Robert L. ButchofskyRobert L. ButchofskyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
QLT Inc.