alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting; Sunshine Act

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10 a.m. on 
Tuesday, February 20, 2001, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 
552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of Title 5, 
United States Code, to consider matters relating to the Corporation's 
supervisory and resolution activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4175 Filed 2-14-01; 4:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
#### Vincent McKinley BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER; Warden Harris L. Diggs, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-7210.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 23, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 24, 2011.

Vincent McKinley Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

*774Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent McKinley Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2860, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on February 12, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on August 2, 2010.* Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                        2,022
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,022
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         839,634
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   501,700
<COMMON>                      300,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (1,639,312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  (837,612)
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (189,067)
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (189,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (189,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (189,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of Hudson Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-150432) of our report dated June 25, 2009 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Hudson Holding Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hudson Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2009.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Marcum LLP    
|                  
|                  
|New York, New York
|June 25, 2009
CONFIDENTIAL 

Freddie Mac Board of Directors 

Committee Composition 

Audit Committee

Nominating and 

Governance Committee 

Aleem Gillani, Chair Kathleen L. Casey, Chair 

Kathleen L. Casey Aleem Gillani 

Kevin G. Chavers Mark B. Grier 

Allan P. Merrill Allan P. Merrill 

Roy Swan 

 

Compensation and 

Human Capital Committee 

Operations and 

Technology Committee 

Kevin G. Chavers, Chair Mark H. Bloom, Chair 

Mark H. Bloom Luke S. Hayden 

Christopher E. Herbert Grace A. Huebscher 

Grace A. Huebscher Roy Swan 

Roy Swan 

 

Executive Committee Risk Committee

Lance F. Drummond, Chair Grace A. Huebscher, Chair 

Mark H. Bloom Mark H. Bloom

Kathleen L. Casey Mark B. Grier 

Kevin G. Chavers Luke S. Hayden 

Aleem Gillani Christopher E. Herbert 

Christopher E. Herbert 

Grace A. Huebscher 

Michael T. Hutchins 

 

Mission and Housing 

Sustainability Committee

Christopher E. Herbert, Chair 

Kathleen L. Casey 

Kevin G. Chavers 

Allan P. Merrill
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Patrick Eugene ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-1222.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 5, 2014.

Filed: Aug. 7, 2014.

Edward O. Walker, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Patrick Eugene Allen, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Justin Eisele, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants Appellant.

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Allen directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Allen’s below-Guidelines-range sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. *See United States v. Lazarski,*560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir.2009) (substantive reasonableness of sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion; where district court varied downward from Guidelines range, it was “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its discretion in not varying downward further). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.

As for counsel’s motion to withdraw, we conclude that allowing counsel to withdraw at this time would not be consistent with the Eighth Circuit’s 1994 Amendment to Part V of the Plan to Implement the Criminal Justice Act of 1964. We therefore deny counsel’s motion to withdraw as premature, without prejudice to counsel refiling the motion upon fulfilling the duties set forth in the Amendment.

1

. The Honorable James Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
5754 Department of the Treasury—Internal Revenue Service
Form

Statement by Person(s) Receiving Gambling Winnings

(Rev. January 1980)

Date won Type of winnings Game number Machine number Race number
Person to Whom Winnings are Paid

Name Address
Taxpayer identifying number ‘Other ILD. ‘Amount received Federal income tax withheld

QGZTMIME Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable

iting hur ‘Amount
Name identifying number Address moult

Under penalties of perjury, | declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the names, addresses, and taxpayer identifying numbers which | have furnished correctly
identify me as the recipient of this payment and correctly identify each person entitled to any portion of this payment.

Date > _.

Signature >...

313-333-1


Form 5754 (Rev. 1-80)

Page 2

Part Il Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable (Continued)

Taxpayer

Name identifying number

Amount

Address mour

In the event that any person other than the person receiving
gambling winnings which are subject to withholding or reporting
requirements (‘‘recipient”’) is entitled to a portion of the winnings,
this form must be completed by the recipient. If the recipient is
not one of the winners, that person must fill in his or her name,
address and taxpayer identifying number in Part | and then list the
names, addresses, taxpayer identifying numbers and the amount
of the winnings which each of the other persons is entitled to re-
ceive. If the recipient is one of the winners, that person’s name
and the amount of the winnings should also appear in Part Il.
The taxpayer identifying number for an individual is the social

‘4r US, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1980-O-313-333

security number; for all others it is the employer identification
number. The statement must then be signed (if Federal income
tax is withheld) and returned to the payer of the winnings. The
payer will file a Form W-2G for each of the winners from whom
withholding tax has been withheld. The payer may issue the Form
W-2G at the time of the payment or no later than January 31st
of the year following the year of the winnings.

This form should be retained by the payer for a period of four
years from the date of the payment of the winnings and must be
made available to Internal Revenue upon request during that
period.

313-333-1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Eugene BRAME, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-1375.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 13, 2014.

Mark J. Barrett, Stephanie Natsuko Gaddy, Office of the United States Attorney, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Veronica S. Rossman, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The court was recently informed that the appellant in this matter, Paul Eugene Brame, passed away on June 8, 2014. *See*Notice of Appellant’s Death, No. 13-1375 (10th Cir., filed June 10, 2014). Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal as moot, *see, e.g., United States v. Judd,*42 Fed.Appx. 140, 141 n. 1 (10th Cir.2002) (noting that a party’s appeal was “rendered moot by his death”), and REMAND the case to the district court with instructions to vacate that portion of the judgment imposing the challenged condition of supervised release. *See United States v. DeMichael,*461 F.3d 414, 417 (3d Cir.2006) (remanding to the district court with instructions to effectively vacate (i.e., “abate”) only that element of the deceased defendant’s sentence challenged on appeal); *United States v. Butler,*48 FedAppx. 630, 631 (9th Cir. 2002) (vacating sentence but not conviction where the deceased defendant had appealed only his sentence). A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.
---



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 1O-QSB/A

(Amendment No. 1)



---



(Mark One)

x  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003



 ̈TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT



For the transition period from  to



Commission file number: 000-17510



MEGA GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of
small business issuer as specified in its charter)



|NEW YORK                                                       |  | 14-1653446                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (IRS Employer Identification No.)



1730 Rhode Island
Ave., N.W., Suite 415, Washington, DC 20036

(Address of principal executive offices)



(202) 296-9594

(Issuers telephone number)



N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requires for the past 90 days.
Yes    x        No ̈



State the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 9,359,303 shares of common stock (including 75,302 shares held of record by our wholly-owned subsidiary), as of August 1, 2003.



Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):
Yes ̈No    x



---



---

EXPLANATORY NOTE:



This Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) is being filed to reflect accurately on the cover page that the issuer has (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requires for the past 90 days.



1



---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|Date: September 3, 2003 |  |  |  | MEGA GROUP, INC.
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------
|                        |  |  |  |                 
|                        |  |  |  |                 
|                        |  |  |  |                 



|                        |  |  |  |    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: September 3, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                        |  |  |  |
SEVENTH AMENDMENT

                      TO THE BYLAWS OF WINTER SPORTS, INC.




     Article XII is hereby amended to read as follows:


ARTICLE XII

A.    To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the corporation shall
indemnify any director, officer, or employee who is made a party to any legal,
regulatory or other proceeding because he or she is or was a director, officer
or employee of the corporation.

B.   No director shall be liable to the corporation or its shareholders for any
actions taken or any failure to take any action, as a director, except liability
for:

     (1)  the amount of a financial benefit received by a director to which the
     director is not entitled;

     (2)  an intentional infliction of harm on the corporation or the
     shareholders;

     (3)  a violation of MCA 35-1-713; and

     (4)  an intentional violation of criminal law.

C.   No officer shall be liable to the corporation or its shareholders if the
officer acts:

     (1)  in good faith;

     (2)  with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a similar position would
          exercise under similar circumstance; and

     (3)  in a manner the officer reasonably believes to be in the best
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 10 88

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Jo aq ui n Ir win Fo y
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Aug us t 3 , 20 17 Fi le d: Aug us t 1 0, 2 01 7 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Jo aq ui n Fo y was ci vi ll y co m m it te d un de r 1 8 U

. S .C. § 42 46 in 20 07 , an d he ap pe al s fro m th e jud gm en t of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t, en te red aft er a he ari ng , de nyin g hi s 1

The Hon or ab le Dou gl as Harp oo l, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da ti on s of th e Hon or a b le Dav id P. Ru sh , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri.m ot io n fo r co nd it io na l d is ch arg e u nd er 1 8 U.S.C. § 42 47 (h ). We co nc lu de th at th e

Dis tri ct Co ur t di d no t cl earl y err in de nyin g th e m ot io n. See Uni te d St at es v. LeCl ai r, 33 8 F.3 d 88 2, 88 5 (8 th Ci r.) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w), cert

. de ni ed , 54 0 U.S. 10 25 (2 00 3)

. The m en ta l he al th ex pe rts as so ci at ed wit h th e Fed eral Med ic al Cen te r in Ro ch es te r, Mi nn es ot a, whe re Fo y is cu rren tl y co nf in ed , t e s t i f

ie d th at Fo y ’s un co nd it io na l di sc ha rg e wou ld be da ng ero us in li gh t of hi s lo ng st an di ng , se ve re m en ta l il ln es s an d hi s la ck of in si gh t; hi s rece nt hi st or y of th reat en in g vi ol en ce; an d hi s st at em en ts th at h e d i d n o t wis h to be rel eas ed wit h co nd it io ns an d wou ld no t ta ke pr es cri be d

m ed ic at io n i f rel eas ed wit ho ut co nd it io ns

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t o f th e Dis tri ct Co ur t, an d we g ran t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Glas-Aire  Industries  Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the
"Report") I, Craig Grossman,  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,  President, and
Secretary  of the  Company,  and Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2005


\s\ Craig Grossman
---------------------------------------------------
Craig Grossman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Secretary


/s/ Linda Kwan
---------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer****Exhibit 31.1**
I, Douglas D. Burkett, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October31, 2004 of Zila, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report for the quarter ended October 31,2004 does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: December 8, 2004
/s/ Douglas D. Burkett,Ph. D.