alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Lou Fatica, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 of
Associated Estates Realty Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:March 5, 2004			/s/ Lou Fatica

Lou Fatica, Chief Financial Officer

G:\2003K\lf302cer.wpd
House Calendar No. 55

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 168

[Report No. 103–139]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building to be constructed

States Courthouse’’.nessee, as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. Unitedberland and Church Avenues in Knoxville, Tenbetween Gay and Market Streets and CumJUNE 17, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 55

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 168

[Report No. 103–139]

To designate the Federal building to be constructed between Gay and Market

Streets and Cumberland and Church Avenues in Knoxville, Tennessee,

as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

JUNE 17, 1993

Additional sponsor: Mr. TRAFICANT

JUNE 17, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building to be constructed between

Gay and Market Streets and Cumberland and Church

Avenues in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard H.

Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 168 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building to be constructed between Gay

3 and Market Streets and Cumberland and Church Avenues

4 in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated

5 as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States

11 Courthouse’’.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20637 Summary Calendar

ROBERT LEE HARTFIELD,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1842

April 18, 2001

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Lee Hartfie ld, Texas prisoner # 598534, seeks a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 applicatio n for writ of habeas

corpus as successive. In the alternative, Hartfield moves for

authorization to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application,

asserting that his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness is based

on newly discovered evidence.2

Hartfield fails to brief the issue whether the district court

erred in dismissing his petition as successive and, therefore, has

waived the only cognizable issue in his appeal. S ee Hughes v.

Johnson

, 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999) (claims not argued in

the COA application are waived), cert. denied

, 120 S. Ct. 1003

(2000); see also Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993) (issues must be properly briefed to be preserved for appeal).

Because Hartfield has failed to show that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the district court erred in dismissing

his petition as successive, his request for a COA is DENIED. See

Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

T o obtain authorization to file a successive habeas corpus

application, Hartfi eld must make a prima facie showing that his

claims are based on a new rule of constitutional law, made

retroactive on collateral revi ew by the Supreme Court, that was

previously unavailable, or are based on newly discovered evidence

that could not have been discovered earlier with the exercise of

due diligence and would be sufficient to establish by clear and

convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no

reasonable fact finder would have found him guilty. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b)(2), (3). Hartfield has not made such a showing. His

alternative motion for authorization to file a successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 application therefore is

D E N I E D.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard Paul Richman
 Richard Paul Richman
 Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
 Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant
 September 13, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

WHOLLY-OWNED CORPORATE SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY:
        BPP/Crenshaw-Imperial, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Golden State Acquisitions, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Mountaingate, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Northwest Acquisitions, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Puente Hills, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Riley, Inc. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Simi Valley, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Valley Central, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        Burnham Pacific L.P., Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Arrowhead, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Sunset, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Zimel, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPAC Texas, Inc. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH THE COMPANY HOLDS INTERESTS:
        BPP/Cameron Park L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Crenshaw-Imperial, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/East Palo Alto L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Hilltop L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Marin L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Mission Viejo, L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Mountaingate, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Pleasant Hill L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Richmond L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Riley L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Simi Valley, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Valley Central L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Van Ness L.P. (California) (Consolidated)
        Burnham Pacific Operating Partnership, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Powell, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Arrowhead, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Sunset, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Zimel, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPAC Texas, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Van Ness Operating Company, L.P. (Delaware) (Consolidated)

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES IN WHICH THE COMPANY HOLDS AN INTEREST:
        BPP/Golden State Acquisitions, L.L.C. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Northwest Acquisitions, L.L.C. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        BPP/Puente Hills, L.L.C. (Delaware) (Consolidated)
        Ladera Center Associates, LLC (Delaware) (Unconsolidated)
        Margarita Plaza Associates, LLC (Delaware) (Unconsolidated)
        Historic Van Ness, LLC (Delaware) (Unconsolidated)
        BPP Retail, LLC (Delaware) (Unconsolidated)
        BPAC Texas GP, LLC. (Delaware) (Unconsolidated)
        BPP/Van Ness Operating Company, LLC (California) (Consolidated)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1084-1085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-427-001]


Sorbitol From France; Time Limits

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of 
antidumping duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the preliminary results of the 1999-2000 administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on sorbitol from France. This 
review covers one exporter of the subject merchandise to the United 
States, Amylum France and Amylum SPI Europe (collectively, Amylum). The 
period of review is April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker at (202) 482-2924 or Robert 
James at (202) 482-0649, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Enforcement Group III, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department initiated this administrative 
review on June 2, 2000 (65 FR 35320). Under section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act), the Department may 
extend the deadline for completion of an administrative review if it 
determines that it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
statutory time limit of 365 days. Because of the complexity of 
researching whether or not Amylum entries during the period of review 
(POR), and the need to allow parties the opportunity to comment on the 
results of our research prior to issuing preliminary results of review, 
we are extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary 
results until April 30, 2001. See Memorandum from Richard Weible to 
Joseph Spetrini, titled, ``Extension of Time Limit for the April 1999 
through March 2000 Administrative Review,'' dated the same date as the 
publication of this notice, on file in room B-099 of the main Commerce 
building. The deadline for the final results will continue to be 120 
days after the publication of the preliminary results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act and section 351.213(h)(2) of the Department's regulations.


[[Page 1085]]


    Dated: December 29, 2000.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 01-384 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1945

To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of Members

of the House of Representatives to the Treasury for deficit reduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. ROEMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of Members of the House of Representatives to

the Treasury for deficit reduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETURN OF EXCESS AMOUNTS FROM OFFICIAL

4 ALLOWANCES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE

5 OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE TREASURY

6 FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.

7 Notwithstanding any other law, or any rule or other

8 authority, any amount remaining in an official allowance

9 of a Member of the House of Representatives at the end

10 of the session of Congress or other period for which the
2

•HR 1945 IH

1 allowance is made available shall be returned to the Treas2 ury, to be used for deficit reduction.

3 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

4 As used in this Act—

5 (1) the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep6 resentatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele7 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;

8 and

9 (2) the term ‘‘official allowance’’ means, with

10 respect to a Member of the House of Representa11 tives, the Clerk Hire Allowance, the Official Ex12 penses Allowance, or the Official Mail Allowance.

Æ
Form J 310 Statement of Person Claiming owe we, 1845-0073

Department of the Treasury Refund Due a Deceased Taxpayer Expires 8-31-84

Internal Revenue Service

Tax year decedent was due a refund:

Calendar year , or other tax year beginning 19 and ending 19 .
Date of death Social security number of decedent

‘Name of decedent

Paperwork Reduction Act Notice
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 says
we must tell you why we are collecting this
information, how we will use it, and whether

Address (number and street) you have to give it to us, We ask for the in-
formation to

Name of person claiming refund

Please type or print

that you are complying with the
City or town, State and ZIP code allow us to figure and collect the right amount

of tax. You are required to give us this infor-
mation.

1am filing this statement as (check only one box):
A [J Surviving spouse, claiming a refund based on a joint return. (See Death of Taxpayer in Instructions for Form 1040.)

B [] Decedent's personal representative.' Attach a court certificate showing your appointment.

C [| Person, other than A or B, claiming refund for the decedent's estate. Complete Schedule A and attach a copy of the death certifi-
cate or proof of death.”

Please attach requested information and sign below. If you checked box C, also complete Schedule A.

COIEE MGM (To be completed only if you checked box C above.) Yes | No
1 Did the decedent leave a will? . . . . + ee
2 a Has a personal representative been appointed for the estate of the decedent?. . . 2 6. 2 ee we we we
b If “No,” will one be appointed?. . . . . ey son eee :
It 2 a or b is answered “Yes,” do not file this form. The personal representative should file for the refund. AWA
3 As the person claiming the refund for the decedent's estate, will you pay out the refund according to the laws of the WAV
State where the decedent was a legal resident?. 2. . 2 6 1 6 ee ew ee ee ee ee ee

If “No," a refund cannot be made until you submit a court certificate showing your appointment as ‘personal representative or other
evidence that you are entitled, under State law, to receive the refund.
Signature and Verification

1 request a refund of taxes overpaid by or on behalf of the decedent. Under penalties of perjury, 1 declare that | have examined this claim and to the best of my knowledg
it is true, correct and complete.

Signature of person claiming refund > Date >

For purposes of this form, personal representative means the executor, trix, administrator or administratrix of the decedent's estate; if no ex-
ecutor, executrix, administrator or administratrix is appointed, qualified atid acting within the United States, personal representative means any person
in actual or constructive possession of any property of the decedent.

2 May be the original or an authentic copy of a telegram or letter from the Department of Defense notifying the next of kin of the decedent’s death while
in active service, or a death certificate issued by the Department of Defense.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3715 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3715

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include the credit of certain 
      tolls as an eligible use of revenue, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to include the credit of certain 
      tolls as an eligible use of revenue, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection Against Double Tolling 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF REVENUE.

    Section 129(a)(3)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking clause (v) and inserting the following:
                            ``(v) if the public authority certifies 
                        annually that the tolled facility is being 
                        adequately maintained, a toll rebate toward a 
                        congestion pricing fee for individuals residing 
                        on either side of a tolled bridge required to 
                        pay a toll to connect to the central business 
                        district in the city in which the vehicle of 
                        the individual is registered.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Donald A. Kurz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


                                            /s/ Donald A. Kurz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Donald A. Kurz
                                            Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                            Executive Officer


Dated: March 30, 2004