alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 55-22136-SP; ASLBP No. 01-788-01-SP]

                    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission,                     *see*                     37 Reg. 28,710 (Dec. 29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see*10 CFR 2.1201, 2.1207, notice is hereby given that a single member of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel is designated as Presiding Officer to conduct further proceedings in accordance with 10 CFR 2.1209 in the following case:                

## Michael L. Piasecki

## (Denial of Reactor Operator's License)

The hearing will be conducted pursuant to 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart L, of the Commission's Regulations, “Informal Hearing Procedures for Adjudications In Materials and Operator Licensing Proceedings.” This proceeding concerns Mr. Piasecki's January 11, 2001 request for a hearing to challenge the NRC staff's denial of his reactor operator's license application as reflected in the staff's December 27, 2000 letter to Mr. Piasecki. 

The Presiding Officer in this proceeding is Administrative Judge Ivan W. Smith. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.722, 2.1209, Administrative Judge Charles N. Kelber has been appointed to assist the Presiding Officer in taking evidence and in preparing a suitable record for review.

All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed with Judge Smith and Judge Kelber in accordance with 10 CFR 2.1203. Their addresses are:

Administrative Judge Ivan W. Smith, Presiding Officer, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dr. Charles N. Kelber, Special Assistant, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of February 2001. 

G. Paul Bollwerk III, 

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel. 

[FR Doc. 01-3367 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### LOWDEN et al. v. EXCISE BOARD OF COTTON COUNTY.

No. 25552.

Jan. 8, 1935.

W. R. Bleakmore, W. L. Farmer, John Barry, and Robert E. Lee, for plaintiffs in error.

Floyd L. Jackson, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the opinion in cause No. 25479, Lowden et al. v. Excise Board of Pittsburg County, this day decided, 170 Okla. 181, 40 P. (2d) 16, this - cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the Court of Tax Review to enter judgment in accordance with the stipulation as follows:

> “Whereas, this court in cause No. 25203, entitled School District No. 33, Choctaw County, Oklahoma, v. A. W. Trice et al., opinion filed February 16, 1934, and petition for rehearing later denied (168 Okla. 334, 32 P. [2d] 906), has decided the questions of law involved in this appeal in favor of the plaintiffs in error herein,

> “It is stipulated and agreed that the said cause be reversed by this court upon the authority of said cause No. 25203, above referred to, and that the trial court upon such authority be directed to render judgment sustaining each of the items of protest referred to in assignments of error numbered 1, 2, and 3, respectively, herein.”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-221-000]

Take notice that on January 31, 2001, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) as required under Section 4.3 of Rage Schedules FT and IT of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, tendered for filing its supporting calculations underlying Great Lakes' Transporter's Use percentages applicable during the six-month period from July 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. 

Great Lakes states that copies of the filing are being served upon each of Great Lakes' firm customers and the Public Service Commission of the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 305.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before February 14, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18  CFR 308.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm. 

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-3581  Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| Dated:      May 11, 2009 | /s/      Matthew Boyle       |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                     | Matthew      Boyle           |
|                     | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                     |                         |
|                     |                         |
|                     |                         |
| Dated:      May 11, 2009 | /s/      Paul N. Farquhar    |
|                     | Paul      N. Farquhar        |
|                     | Chief      Financial Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Albert FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-16376.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

Jeffery C. Duffey, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

*464Sandra J. Stewart, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Susan Redmond, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, HILL and ALARCON,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant John Albert Flores (“Flores”) entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of knowing and willfully possessing with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of a controlled substance, in this case cocaine hydrochloride, a Schedule II Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to the plea agreement, Flores reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his tractor trailer performed after a routine traffic stop. He now appeals the denial of his motion to suppress.

Flores filed his motion to suppress on March 17, 2009. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, and, on April 7, 2009, an evidentiary hearing was held. Following that hearing, on May 14, 2009, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied. Flores objected to that Report and Recommendation on May 28, 2009. The district court conducted a *de novo*review of the evidence and adopted the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Our review of the record of the suppression hearing convinces us that the finding of the magistrate judge and the district court that Flores consented to a search of his tractor trailer is not clearly erroneous and that the court properly applied the Fourth Amendment to that finding. The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                       508
<INVENTORY>                                     62,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,752
<PP&E>                                         172,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,139
<SALES>                                        373,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,768
<CGS>                                          318,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DERRICK KIRKSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3083

[May 7, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cheryl Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-

MM006459-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-42605)  of Asset  Investors  Corporation  of our  reports  (a) dated
January 21, 2000, except for Note I, as to which the date is March 7, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements and schedules of Asset Investors Corporation
and (b) dated January 21, 2000, except for Note O, as to which the date is March
7, 2000,  with respect to the financial  statements  and schedules of Commercial
Assets,  Inc.,  both of which are included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.

Denver, Colorado

March 24, 2000                                              /s/Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit
10.1


 


                                                                                                                October
17, 2007


 


Dear Paula:


 


This letter confirms our
agreement regarding the reinstatement of certain relocation benefits under
Qwest’s Tier 1 Relocation Policy (the “Policy”).  In August 2004, the
Company agreed to pay the reasonable and customary closing costs associated
with the purchase of a home in Denver, as set forth on page 27 of the
Policy.  In addition, the Company has now agreed to provide the
following benefits:


 


1.  Shipping
of household goods as set forth in Section IV of the Policy.


2.  Participation
in the Qwest Home Sale Plan as set forth in Section VI of the Policy.


 


The benefits set forth in
this letter are the only additional relocation benefits the Company will
provide. The Company will not provide the other benefits described in the
Policy.  We look forward to having you and your family in the Denver area.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Teresa A. Taylor

  
	
   

  	
  Teresa A. Taylor

  
	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President
  and

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Administrative
  Officer
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

May 24, 2019

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 4, 2019

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *McNary v. Alcoa WorldAlumina, LLC,*Docket No. CENT 2015-279-DM. (Issues include whether the Judgeerred by determining that the complainant had failed to establish interferencewith his rights under the Mine Act.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1


                 LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios (Unaudited)
                          (Dollar amounts in thousands)

Computation of Coverage of Fixed Charges
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           1993          1994           1995           1996           1997
                                                       ----------     -----------    ----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>
Net loss                                               $  (2,057)     $  (4,650)     $  (7,026)    $  (16,610)    $  (25,619)

Add:
   Extraordinary loss (1)                                     --          1,324             --          3,253             --
   Cumulative effect of change
      in accounting principle (2)                             --             --             --             --            210
   Provision for income taxes                                 --             --             66             28            344
Add fixed charges (3):
   Interest                                                2,096            966          4,522          8,243         17,895
   Interest portion of rentals                                27             74            106            159            210
                                                       ---------      ----------     ----------    -----------     ----------
Earnings available to cover
   fixed charges                                              66         (2,286)        (2,332)        (4,927)        (6,960)
Less fixed charges                                         2,123          1,040          4,628          8,402         18,105
                                                       ----------     ----------     ----------    -----------      ---------

Deficiency in the coverage of
   fixed charges                                       $  (2,057)     $  (3,326)     $  (6,960)    $  (13,329)      $(25,065)
                                                       ----------     ----------     ----------    -----------      ---------
                                                       ----------     ----------     ----------    -----------      ---------
</TABLE>

---------------------------------

(1)  In 1994 -- loss on early termination of the Company's then bank credit
     facility.  In 1996 -- loss on early redemption of the Company's 9.95% and
     10.35% Senior Notes.
     
(2)  In 1997 -- charge for the effect of adopting EITF Issue 97-13 related to
     accounting for certain business reengineering costs.

(3)  Fixed charges consist of interest on all indebtedness, including
     amortization of debt issuance expense and capitalized interest, and 
     one-third of rental expense (which is estimated to represent the interest 
     portion thereof).
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>                             
<CAPTION>
                             Six Months Ended         Three Months Ended
                            June 30    June 30       June 30      June 30
                              1997      1996          1997          1996
<S>                          <C>        <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Earnings                 $342,188   $351,164     $108,881     $153,440

Primary earnings per share:

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding  5,791,911  5,773,037    5,791,911    5,773,037


Add: Shares arising from the
     assumed  exercise of stock 
     options (as determined  under 
     the Treasury Stock Method)     0          0            0            0


Weighted average of common 
  and equivalent shares     5,791,911  5,773,037    5,791,911    5,773,037          

  
  Primary earnings per share     $.06       $.06         $.02         $.03


Fully diluted earnings per share:


Weighted average number of 
 common shares  outstanding 
 (as determined for the 
 Primary  earnings per share 
 calculation above)         5,791,911  5,773,037    5,791,911    5,773,037


Add:  Additional shares 
 arising from the assumed  
 exercise of stock options (as 
 determined under the Treasury
 Stock Method)                 83,096    117,340       93,532      115,380 


Weighted average of common 
 and equivalent shares      5,875,007  5,890,377    5,885,443    5,888,417


Fully diluted earnings 
 per share                       $.06       $.06         $.02         $.03
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Duane G. Debs,President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Duane G. Debs                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Duane G. Debs                          |
| President and Chief  Financial Officer |
| March 14, 2005                    |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WestSuburban Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2078
NIKOLAY GLINCHUK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-925-979) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nikolay Glinchuk, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Anthony Couvillon, Linda Susan Wendtland, John Clifford Cunningham, Jr., Brenda Elaine Ellison, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant Nikolay Glinchuk seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' opinion and order dismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the recorddiscloses that the Board's decision is based on substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Glinchuk v. INS , No. A29-925-979 (B.I.A. Apr. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED