alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7811

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

LIONEL HOLLOWAY, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00363-ELH-1; 1:19-cv-02243-ELH) 

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lionel Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Lionel Holloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holloway has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

 * Holloway’s § 2255 motion sought to challenge his September 2010 criminal 

judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 

2191 (2019). Holloway may seek authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 

motion based on Rehaif. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2). 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1895

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on ioxilan, and to extend

until January 1, 1996, the existing suspensions of duty on iohexol,

iopamidol, and ioxaglic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on ioxilan,

and to extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspensions of duty on iohexol, iopamidol, and ioxaglic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IOXILAN.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:
2

•HR 1895 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 N-(2,3-

Dihydroxypropyl)-5-[N-

(2,3-

dihydroxypropyl)acetamido]-

N′-(2-

hydroxyethyl)-

2,4,6-triiodoisophthalamide,

known as ioxilan

(CAS No.

107793–72–6)

(provided for in

subheading

2924.29.44) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSIONS OF DUTY

2 ON IOHEXOL, IOPAMIDOL, AND IOXAGLIC

3 ACID.

4 Headings 9902.30.64, 9902.30.65, and 9902.30.66

5 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

6 are each amended by striking ‘‘9/30/91’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘12/31/95’’.

8 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by sec10 tions 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day after the

11 date of the enactment of this Act.

12 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec13 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

14 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro15 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

16 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

17 warehouse for consumption of goods to which any amend18 ment made by section 1 or section 2 applies and that was

19 made—
3

•HR 1895 IH

1 (1) after September 30, 1991; and

2 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en3 actment of this Act;

4 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

5 or a lower duty if any amendment made by section 1 or

6 section 2 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall

7 be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or with8 drawal had occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,022
<SECURITIES>                                    64,585
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,028,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,511,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,286,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,319
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,511,068
<SALES>                                          5,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,309
<CGS>                                            3,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,672)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          835
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,144)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### Steven M. HUNTER, Appellant v. Edward F. REILLY, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, Appellee.

No. 10-5089.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 12, 2011.

Steven M. Hunter, Lewisburg, PA, pro se.

Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, PA, for Appellant.

Kenneth A. Adebonojo, Assistant U.S., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: GINSBURG, ROGERS, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary reversal; the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary *515action. *See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley,*819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam). Because appellant obtained all the relief to which he was entitled when the United States Parole Commission conducted a new parole hearing applying the D.C. Board of Parole’s 1987 and 1991 guidelines, the district court properly dismissed his case as moot. *See McBryde v. Comm. to Review Circuit Council Conduct,*264 F.3d 52, 55 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“If events outrun the controversy such that the court can grant no meaningful relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). The district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant leave to amend his complaint. *See Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd.,*863 F.2d 59, 69 (D.C.Cir.1988) (“[W]hen the amendments would not serve any purpose, the court is on solid ground in denying a motion for leave to amend.”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

September 13, 2024 SC-2024-0508 Ex parte A.N.M. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: R.C.W. v. A.N.M.) (Marshall Juvenile Court: CS-17-900134.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2024-0309).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on September 13, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Stewart, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10693-10694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Partially Open Meeting, Board of Visitors for the National Fire 
Academy

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of partially open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, FEMA announces the following committee 
meeting:
    Name: Board of Visitors for the National Fire Academy.
    Dates of Meeting: March 22-24, 2001.
    Place: Building H, Room 300, National Emergency Training Center, 
Emmitsburg, Maryland.

[[Page 10694]]

    Time: March 22, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. (Closed Meeting); March 
22, 2001, 10:30 a.m.-5 p.m. (Open Meeting); March 23, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-9 
p.m. (Open Meeting); March 24, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-12 noon (Open Meeting).
    Proposed Agenda: March 22, (Closed Meeting from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 
a.m., to review budget and procurement information.) March 23-24, 
Review National Fire Academy Program Activities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public 
(except as noted above) with seating available on a first-come, first-
served basis. Members of the general public who plan to attend the 
meeting should contact the Office of the Superintendent, National Fire 
Academy, U.S. Fire Administration, 16825 South Seton Avenue, 
Emmitsburg, MD 21727, (301) 447-1117, on or before March 16, 2001.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available for 
public viewing in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Fire 
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emmitsburg, 
Maryland 21727. Copies of the minutes will be available upon request 
within 60 days after the meeting.

    Dated: February 5, 2001.
Kenneth O. Burris, Jr.,
Acting U.S. Fire Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-3923 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-U
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00335-CR

Anthony Gordon Momentoff

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 10

of Tarrant County (1272125)

November 7, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
#### IN RE JUSTIN F. IN RE HAILEE L.

*Kimberly L.,*pro se, and *Anthony L.,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 29, 2010

The petition by the respondent parents for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 31728) is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3867]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Reflections of Sea and Light: Paintings and Watercolors by J.M.W. Turner from Tate,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Baltimore Museum of Art, Baltimore, MD from on or about February 11, 2002 to on or about May 26, 2002, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, (telephone: 202/619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

      ( print page 120)    
Dated: December 13, 2001.

Patricia S. Harrison,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-32227 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service © For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8027.

Use IRS label. Make Employer’s name Employer identification number

any necessary changes.

Otherwise, type or print

employer’s name,

address, and employer

identification number as

shown on Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File this form along with accompanying Forms 8027

with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Andover,

MA 05501, by February 28, 1997.

Use this form to send Forms 8027 to the Internal

Revenue Service Center if you have more than one

establishment for which you have to file Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (1996)

Apt. or suite no.

96
<PAGE>

Exhibit (23)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Uni-Marts, Inc.
State College, Pennsylvania


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-
69136, No. 333-07697, No. 333-75107 and No. 333-24903 of Uni-Marts, Inc. on Form
S-8 of our report dated November 5, 2001 (except for Note G as to which the date
is December 5, 2001), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uni-Marts,
Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2001.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Uni-Marts, Inc., listed in
Item 14(a)(2).  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Uni-
Marts, Inc.'s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly,
in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 5, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999, AS RESTATED, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AS RESTATED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         965,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,909,833<F1>
<PP&E>                                       4,509,305
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,514,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,145,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,347,872
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       131,093
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,518,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,145,102
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,215,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,272,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (508,858)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (763,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,157,175
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   393,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES NET ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS OF $45,000,068.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1356-DR]


Texas; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Texas, (FEMA-1356-DR), dated January 8, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
January 8, 2001:

    Briscoe, Crosby, Floyd, Nacogdoches, San Augustine, and Shelby 
Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-3936 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 23  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-144885,333-116799, 333-105398,
333-105397, 333-103556, 333-65332, 333-59433, and 333-161771 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-57301 on Form S-3 and Registration No. 333-161770
on Form S-1 of
our reports dated March 11, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Georgia Gulf
Corporation, and the effectiveness of Georgia Gulf Corporations internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Georgia Gulf Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.  /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP  Atlanta,
Georgia  March 11,
2010
July 20, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF W.D .H.
NO. 14

- 17

- 00164

- CV

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment A FFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.