alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer** **EXHIBIT 31.1**
     I, Douglas D. Burkett, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October31, 2003 of Zila, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report for the quarter ended October 31,2003 does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: December 15, 2003
/s/ Douglas D. Burkett, Ph. D.
#### Connie BERRY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Eric W. Berry; J.W. Berry, Co-administrator of the estate of Eric Berry, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Brandon DAVIS, an individual; The City of Fort Smith, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 13-3610.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 13, 2014.

Filed: Aug. 18, 2014.

David Ray Blades, Blades & Gee, Tulsa, OK, Chris W. Blankenship, Stigler, OK, David Brent Sterling, Sterling & Fausett, Fayetteville, AR, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Colby T. Roe, Wyman Rice Wade, Jr., Daily & Woods, Fort Smith, AR, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action involving a Fourth Amendment claim of excessive *551use of force, Brandon Davis and the City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, appeal the district court’s1 interlocutory order denying their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Upon careful de novo review, we agree with the district court that the existence of a genuine issue of material fact precluded qualified immunity. *See Nance v. Sammis,*586 F.3d 604, 609 (8th Cir.2009) (denial of qualified immunity is reviewed de novo; denial of qualified immunity will be affirmed if genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether reasonable officer could have believed his actions were lawful); *see also Plumhoff v. Rickard,*— U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2019-20, 188. L.Ed.2d 1056 (2014) (court of appeals had interlocutory jurisdiction where officers contended their conduct did not violate Fourth Amendment and, in any event, did not violate clearly established law). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1394

GAIL EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAMSBURG TECHNICAL COLLEGE; CLIFTON

ELLIOTT, a/k/a Rusty Elliott, individually and

in his official capacity as agent and Dean of

Instruction of Williamsburg Technical College;

RONALD HAMPTON, in his official position as

acting President of Williamsburg Technical

College,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(4:03-cv-03939-TLW)

Submitted: January 10, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Bell, THE BELL LAW FIRM, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellant. Charles J. Boykin, Karla McLawhorn Hawkins, BOYKIN,

DAVIS & HAWKINS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gail Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary

judgment in favor of her former employer on her claims of

discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment brought

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42

U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), her claim under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000), and her state law claim of intentional infliction of

emotional distress. This court reviews a district court’s grant of

summary judgment de novo. Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,

863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). Summary judgment may only be

granted when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and

. . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of

law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). With this standard in mind, we have

reviewed the materials before us on appeal and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Evans v. Williamsburg Tech. Coll., No.

4:03-cv-03939-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.2

                        Summary of Executive Compensation

The following is a summary of the compensation of Joachim Melis for fiscal 2008.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Payment Plan
                                                                            Target
                                                   Annual                Compensation              Other Annual
Current Executive Officers                      Base Salary           (aggregated basis)           Compensation
-----------------------------------------      -------------       -----------------------   -------------------------
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>                      <C>
Joachim Melis                                  $(1)  195,000        0.10-0.27 of revenue     Group term life insurance
  Vice President of Worldwide Sales                                   Up to $111,300(2)      excess premiums
</TABLE>


(1)  To be paid in Euros.

(2)  As a sales executive officer, Melis may earn commission payments based on
     individual performance against specific revenue targets.


Mr. Melis is also eligible for options grants as determined by the Compensation
Committee or Board of Adept.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Nicholas Marsh, Also Known as Nicholas V. Marsh, Deceased. Adrienne M. Lefkowitz, Appellant; Bank of New York, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

[610 NYS2d 6]

—Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about December 7, 1992, which waived the filing of a formal judicial accounting by the former temporary administrator and permitted the filing of a narrative account, and denied petitioner’s motion to vacate, on the grounds of fraud and newly-discovered evidence (CPLR 5015 [a] [2], [3]), orders of said court (Marie Lambert, S.), entered March 21, 1990 and April 19, 1990, which, respectively, first suspended petitioner’s preliminary testamentary letters and expanded the powers of the temporary administrator, then revoked petitioner’s letters and barred her from serving as permanent executrix or trustee, directed an accounting of her acts as preliminary executrix, and appointed the Bank of New York as permanent executor and trustee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Even if the preliminary executrix had presented her purportedly newly discovered evidence at the revocation hearing, the outcome would not have been different since, in addition to the alleged acts of improvidence that she sought to rebut by *368such evidence *(see,*173 AD2d 336, *appeal dismissed*78 NY2d 990, *lv denied*79 NY2d 751), the order of removal was premised upon numerous other aspects of her conduct. Among these were petitioner’s failure to timely file estate taxes, her failure to file any income tax returns commencing in 1988 for decedent’s companies, her refusal to amend decedent’s 1986 income tax returns in order to obtain a substantial loss carry back refund, her challenge to the disposition of decedent’s Hong Kong pension monies thereby potentially subjecting the estate to a greater tax liability, her failure to marshall and administer estate assets in not submitting an estate asset list to allow ancillary probate proceedings to commence in Hong Kong, her failure to report on the status of such proceedings, her attempt to become sole trustee of the pension fund in order to distribute the assets to herself, and her intransigence in refusing to sign a document resolving numerous issues, which petitioner herself had voluntarily drafted, after the other parties indicated their agreement.

We have considered petitioner’s contentions with regard to the format of the accounting and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.
{"agency":"FMSHRC","generated":"2020-01-28 17:49:59","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FMSHRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["16"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["12"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["3"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q1"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flo ws and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,664
<PP&E>                                             677
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,422)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.23)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Maritime Administration 

On December 12, 2001, President George W. Bush approved the provision of vessel war risk insurance by memorandum for the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Transportation. The text of this memorandum reads:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including 3 U.S.C. 301 and section 1202 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (the “Act”), 46 U.S.C. App. 1282, I hereby: 

                        Approve the provision by the Secretary of Transportation of insurance or reinsurance of vessels (including cargoes and crew) entering the Middle East region against loss or damage by war risks in the manner and to the extent approved in title XII of the Act, 46 U.S.C. App. 1281,                         *et seq.*, for purposes of responding to the recent terrorist attacks, whenever, after consultation with the Department of State, it appears to the Secretary of Transportation that such insurance adequate for the needs of the waterborne commerce of the United States cannot be obtained on reasonable terms and conditions from companies authorized to do an insurance business in a State of the United States. The approval is effective for 6 months.                    

I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the authority vested in me by section 1202 of the Act, to approve the provision of insurance or reinsurance for these purposes after the expiration of 6 months.

                    The Secretary of Transportation is directed to bring this approval to the immediate attention of all operators and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

By Order of the Maritime Administrator. 

Dated: December 21, 2001. 

Murray A. Bloom, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-32019 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

BAC 6735-01

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

October 10, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 22, 2014

 

                  PLACE:                TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from    F Street entrance)

 

              STATUS:                 Open 

 

MATTERSTO BE 

    CONSIDERED:                 TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion Consultants,* Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-952-R,et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in rulingthat the violation of the order in question was the result of high negligence.) 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.  Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

CONTACTPERSON 

   FOR MORE INFO:             EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                ______________________________

                                                EmogeneJohnson

                                                AdministrativeAssistant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0028 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TIMOTHY JOHN STRYKER ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9, 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 1 2021

07/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0028
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-72508, 333-95765, 333-37641, 033-85766 and 333-117407 of Micro ComponentTechnology, Inc. (the Company) on Form S-8 and Registration Nos. 333-104590,333-108072 and 333-115125 on Form S-2 of our report dated February 17,2003 (March 26, 2003 as to the first paragraph of  Note 4), which expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s abilityto continue as a going concern, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofMicro Component Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|

 

Minneapolis,MinnesotaMarch 14, 2005

 

----