alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1601

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs with protection against certain unfair employment practices.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide employees

of the Department of Veterans Affairs with protection

against certain unfair employment practices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following new section:

5 ‘‘§ 712. Protection against reprisals

6 ‘‘(a) No officer or employee of the Department shall,

7 by reason of the fact that an employee of the Department

8 has filed, instituted, or caused to be filed or instituted any

9 proceeding alleging that the employee has been subject to
2

•HR 1601 IH

1 unlawful employment discrimination or a prohibited per2 sonnel practice, or has testified or is about to testify in

3 any proceeding resulting from the administration or en4 forcement of any law respecting unlawful employment dis5 crimination or a prohibited personnel practice—

6 ‘‘(1) discharge the employee;

7 ‘‘(2) in any other way discriminate against the

8 employee; or

9 ‘‘(3) cause another person to take an action de10 scribed in paragraph (1) or (2).

11 ‘‘(b) Any employee who believes that the employee

12 has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by

13 an officer or employee of the Department in violation of

14 subsection (a) may file a complaint in accordance with

15 provisions of law protecting the employee against prohib16 ited personnel practices.’’.

17 (b) The table of sections at the beginning of such

18 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following

19 new item:

‘‘712. Protection against reprisals.’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

November 27, 2013

147883-7(48)

MENARD, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 147883

v COA: 310399

Ct of Claims: 10-000082-MT

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

STATE TREASURER and STATE OF 

MICHIGAN,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 147884

v COA: 311053

Ct of Claims: 09-000068-MT

STATE TREASURER, STATE OF 

MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________/

MENARD, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 147885

v COA: 311261

Ct of Claims: 09-000057-MT

STATE TREASURER, STATE OF 

MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________/
2

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2013

ART VAN FURNITURE-CONNER, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 147886

v COA: 311294

Ct of Claims: 09-000059-MT

STATE TREASURER, STATE OF 

MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________/

ART VAN FURNITURE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 147887

v COA: 312168

Ct of Claims: 09-000058-MT

STATE TREASURER, STATE OF 

MICHIGAN, and DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Retailers Association to 

participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The brief submitted by the Michigan 

Retailers Association on November 19, 2013, on the application for leave to appeal is 

accepted for filing. 

Clerk
----

|   | a) | such Quarterly      Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended December      31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vyta      Corp for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all      material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vyta      Corp. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    | /s/ Paul H. Metzinger                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Paul H. Metzinger,      President & CEO & Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Date:        May 7,      2008 |                                                                                                                                                          |

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for

health insurance costs of self-employed individuals for an indefinite period, and to increase the amount of such deduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. GRANDY (for himself and Mr. BREWSTER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

the deduction for health insurance costs of self-employed

individuals for an indefinite period, and to increase the

amount of such deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health

5 insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended

6 by striking ‘‘25 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘the applicable

7 percentage’’.
2

•HR 162 IH

1 (b) Paragraph (6) of section 162(l) of such Code is

2 amended to read as follows:

3 ‘‘(6) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—For purposes

4 of paragraph (1)—

In the case of taxable

years beginning in The applicable

calendar year: percentage is:

1992 or 1993 ............................................. 25 percent

1994 or 1995 ............................................. 50 percent

1996 or thereafter ..................................... 100 percent.’’

5 (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply

6 to taxable years beginning after June 30, 1992.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Douglas D. Burkett, Chief Executive Officer of Zila, Inc., (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/
Douglas D. Burkett, Ph.D.Douglas D. Burkett, Ph.D.Chief Executive OfficerMarch 9, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Zila, Inc. and will be retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3276]

[[Page 9595]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that an agreed order amending the consent 
decree in United States v. A&D Recycling, Inc., et al., Civil Action 
No. 1:CV-99-1332 (M.D. Pa.) was lodged with the court on January 22, 
2001.
    The original consent decree resolves claims of the United States 
against 120 defendants under sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended ( 
``CERCLA'' ), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, for response costs and actions 
at the Jack's Creek Superfund Site in Mifflin County, PA. The proposed 
amendment reduces the amount one de minimis party, United Holdings Co., 
Inc., is required to pay from $58,526.44 to $33,600. This reduction is 
made based on a mutual mistake of fact in the original decree as to the 
amount of material United sent to the site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed amendment. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. A&D Recycling, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:CV-99-
1332 (M.D. Pa.), DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-911.
    The proposed amendment may be examined and copied at the Office of 
the United States Attorney, Room 1162, Federal Building, 228 Walnut 
Street, Harrisburg, PA 17108; or at the Region III Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, c/o Daniel Isales, Assistant Regional 
Counsel, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. A copy of the 
proposed amendment may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box No. 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $2.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library. Exhibits to the amendment may be obtained for an 
additional fee.

Bruce Gelber,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-3276 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-01-009]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Brorein Street Bridge, Across 
the Hillsborough River, Tampa, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Brorein Street Bridge across the Hillsborough River, mile 0.16, Tampa, 
Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge to remain closed to 
navigation for five days, from 7 a.m. on February 26, 2001 until 12 
p.m. on March 2, 2001. This temporary deviation is required to allow 
the bridge owner to safety complete removal of asbestos from the 
tender's control room and from the electrical wiring of the bridge 
operating system.

DATES: This deviation is effective from February 26, 2001 to March 2, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Brorein Street Bridge across the 
Hillsborough River at Tampa, has a vertical clearance of 15 feet above 
mean high water (MHW) measured at the fenders in the closed position 
with a horizontal clearance of 80 feet. On January 31, 2001, Acutec, 
Inc., acting as an agent for the drawbridge owner, requested a 
deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.291(a) 
which requires the drawbridge to open on signal if at least two hours 
notice is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow 
necessary repairs to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive 
manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.291(a) for the purpose of 
repair completion of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Brorein 
Street Bridge need not open from 7 a.m. February 26, 2001 until 12 p.m. 
March 2, 2001. The deviation is effective for five days.

    Dated: February 1, 2001.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-3374 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            7574
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      19843
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            8812
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              8899
<LOANS>                                         157525
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  198385
<DEPOSITS>                                      152787
<SHORT-TERM>                                      6197
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1597
<LONG-TERM>                                      18500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20080
<OTHER-SE>                                       (776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  198385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3322
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  400
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    50
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  3772
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1552
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2220
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    974
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         974
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       690
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.98
<LOANS-NON>                                        932
<LOANS-PAST>                                        15
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    932
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2792
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2881
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1773
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1108


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 15, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-774 Lower Tribunal No. F09-16709B

________________ 

### Johnny Jackson, Jr. , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge. Johnny Jackson, Jr., in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1779

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe,

Missouri, as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post

Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Mis6 souri, is designated as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States

7 Post Office Building’’.
2

HR 1779 RFS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-331-016]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2001, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Sub. Fourth Revised Sheet No. 12, 
with a proposed effective date of February 3, 2001.
    National Fuel states that the filing is made to correct the 
termination date of two negotiated rate agreements between National 
Fuel and TXU Energy Trading Company, accepted by the Commission by 
letter order dated January 26, 2001, in Docket No. RP96-331-015.
    National Fuel states that copies of the filing were served upon its 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.200(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3443 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 26 ,

2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 1 2

- 00 005

- C V

____________

IN RE DAVID CARL WORMINGTON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 247 th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2004

- 20973



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On January 5

, 2012 , relator David Carl Wormington filed a petition for writ of

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, r elator complains that respondent, the p residing judge of the 247 th District

Court in Harris County, has not ruled on motions and pleading that were properly filed.

Specifically, relator complains that there has been no ruling on a motion for
contempt filed August 19, 2011, or a bill of review filed September 28, 2011

. He also

asserts that he filed motio ns requesting hearings on both the contempt motion and the bill

of review. O n October 25, 2011, relator filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis in2

response to a notice from the Harris County District Clerk that filing fees were owed

. Relator complai ns that he has received no further notification concerning his pending
pleadings , and h e asks this court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to
timely adjudicate his contempt motion and bill of review.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only if (1) the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and (2) the party requesting mandamus relief has no adequate
remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004).

It is relator’ s burden to provide a record sufficient to establish h is right to mandamus relief.

See Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 19 92).

Those seeking the extraordinary remedy of mandamus must follow the applicable
procedural rules. In re Le, 335 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011,
orig. proceeding). Chief among the requirements in seeking mandamus relief is the
critical obligation to provide the reviewing court with a complete and adequate record.

Id. ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a ).

Relator has not provided this court with copies of the motions and pleadings about
which he complains . Therefore, relator has not met his burden to establish his entitlement

to relief.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally

.