alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.5
 EXECUTED
ORIGINAL
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE
 th
  st rd th th
    1. Capitalized Terms.
 2. Extension of Term.




---



##### 



3. Rent.
 3.1
Base Rent.
 MonthlyMonthly
    
    Rental RatePeriod During
    
    
    
    Installment
    
    per RentableExtended Term
    
    Annual Rent
    
    of Base Rent
    
    Square FootJanuary 1, 2003 
    
    $1,199,688.00
    
    $99,974.00
    
    $1.75December 31, 2003January 1, 2004 
    
    $1,357,361.28
    
    $113,113.44
    
    $1.98December 31, 2004January 1, 2005 
    
    $1,384,782.72
    
    $115,398.56
    
    $2.02December 31, 2005January 1, 2006 
    
    $1,419,059.52
    
    $118,254.96
    
    $2.07December 31, 2006January 1, 2007 
    
    $1,453,336.32
    
    $121,111.36
    
    $2.12December 31, 2007January 1, 2008 
    
    $1,487,613.12
    
    $123,967.76
    
    $2.17December 31, 2008January 1, 2009 
    
    $1,528,745.28
    
    $127,395.44
    
    $2.23December 31, 2009
 3.2
Tenants Share of Direct Expenses.
 4.
Improvements in the Premises.
 4.1
Improvement Allowance. st th
 4.2
HVAC Work Allowance.
 -2-
    6330 SAN VICENTE
BOULEVARD[Equity Marketing, Inc.]




---



##### 



4.3
Disbursement of Improvement Allowance and HVAC Work
Allowance.
 5. Parking Charges.
 5.1
Unreserved Passes. st
 5.2
Reserved Passes. st
 6. Storage
Space.
 -3-
    6330 SAN VICENTE
BOULEVARD[Equity Marketing, Inc.]




---



##### 



7. Deletions.
 8. Brokers. Section 8
 9. No Further Modification.
 -4-
    6330 SAN VICENTE
BOULEVARD[Equity Marketing, Inc.]




---



##### 



Landlord:LEXINGTON SAN VICENTE ASSOCIATES,LLC, a California limited liability companyBy:
    
    Its ManagerLexington Commercial Holdings, Inc.,a California Corporation/s/ Alisa J. FreundlichAlisa J. FreundlichChief Operating Officer
 Tenant:EQUITY MARKETING, INC., a DelawarecorporationBy:
    
    Larry MaddenIts:
    
    CFOBy:
    
    /s/ Larry MaddenIts:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 -5-
    6330 SAN VICENTE
BOULEVARD[Equity Marketing, Inc.]
# Stakeholder Notifications

## Breadcrumb

-  Newsroom 
-                       Notice to Stakeholders                  

Stakeholder Notifications

### By Date (1)

                      - 2019(1)

### By Program/Office (16)

                      - (-)The Emergency Food Assistance Program(1)
                      - Child and Adult Care Food Program(4)
                      - Commodity Supplemental Food Program(1)
                      - Food Distribution & Emergency Assistance(1)
                      - Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations(2)
                      - Meals for Schools and Childcare(2)
                      - National School Lunch Program(6)
                      - School Breakfast Program(5)
                      - Special Milk Program(2)
                      - Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)(6)
                      - Summer EBT(1)
                      - Summer Food Service Program(5)
                      - Summer Nutrition Programs(1)
                      - Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)(7)
                      - Team Nutrition(1)
                      - The Patrick Leahy Farm to School Program(1)

### By Initiatives (0)

### By Region (0)

### By Language (1)

                      - English(1)

Reset

New Rule to Enhance Customer Service and Link Farms to Food Banks in TEFAP 

The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) is a federal program that helps supplement the diets of low-income Americans by providing them with emergency food assistance at no cost through food banks and pantries. In recent years, a number of states have recognized the value of supporting donations from local farmers to their food bank networks – commonly known as Farm to Food Bank Projects.  

Page updated: February 25, 2021
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDREW THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

THE MANORS OF INVERRARY CONDO XI ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-525

[May 6, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Florence Taylor Barner, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE20-

6440 and COCE18-12072

Andrew Thompson, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
rom 1310 Statement of Claimant to Refund Due—Deceased Taxpayer

(Rev. Aug. 1973) For calendar yeat , or other taxable year beginning

Department of the Tressuty and ending 19.
Name of decedent Name of claimant

Please| Date of death | Social security number Number and street

type i i

or | Number and street (Permanent residence or domicile on the date of death)

print |__ _ _
City or town, State, and ZIP code City or town, State, and ZIP code

1 am filing this statement as (check only one box):
A. (J Surviving spouse, claiming a refund based on a joint return.
B. [J Administrator or executor. Attach a court certificate showing your appointment.

C. [ Claimant, for the estate of the decedent, other than above. Complete Schedule A and attach a copy of the death certificate or proof
of death.*
Please attach requested information, compléte Schedule A, if applicable, and sign below.

Schedule A. (To be completed only if C above is checked.) Yes | No

1 Did the deceased leave a will? . . . - _-
2(a) Has an administrator or executor been appointed for the estate of the decedent? «
(b) If "No," will one be appointed? . . . Lee tee
If 2(a) or (b) is checked “Yes,"" do not file this form. The administrator or executor should file forthe retund. TW,
3 Will you, as the claimant for the estate of the decedent, disburse the refund according to the law of the State in which the
decedent was domiciled or maintained a permanent residence? . . . La

If “No,” payment of this claim will be withheld pending submission of proof of your appointment as administrator or executor “Yj
or other evidence showing that you are authorized under state law to receive payment.

4_Name of widow or widower Address

|
yy,

Address

5 Names of surviving chil

6 Name of person supporting the children Address

7_Names of decedent's living father and mother Address

8 Names of decedent's living brothers and sisters Address

9 Names of the living children of the decedent's deceased children Address

Signature and Verification

| hereby make request for refund of taxes overpaid by or in behalf of the decedent and declare under penalties of perjury, that | have
examined this claim and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct and complete.

> Signature of claimant .. Date .

May be the original or an authentic copy of a telegram or letter from the Department of Defense notifying the next of kin of his death while in active
service, or a death certificate issued by an appropriate officer of the Department of Defense,

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1974-644-181/N.P.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138034(82) 

PATRICK MCCARTHY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138034 

 COA: 284129 

Oakland CC: 2006-079432-NO 

ALISON SCOFIELD, DEPARTMENT OF 

HUMAN SERVICES, ANDREA DEAN, 

OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR, AMY 

ALLEN, CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT HOUSE/ 

OAKLAND COUNTY CARE HOUSE, CAROLE 

BOYD, OAKLAND COUNTY FRIEND OF THE 

COURT, THOMAS CALLAHAN, and 

MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 23, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Order entered November 26, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01184

- CV

RODNEY DRAUGHON, Appellant

V.

JOYCIE JOHNSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Cour t At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 99751

- CC



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 20, 2018 motion to substitute counsel. We

GRANT the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Bruce N. Patton as

counsel for ap pellant and substitute Daniel D. McGuire and LaToya J. Alexander of Polsinelli,

PC in Mr. Patton’s place.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk March 9 , 2018

155498 (53)

NORTH AMERICAN BROKERS, LLC,

and MARK RATLIFF,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 155498

v COA: 330126

Livingston CC: 15

- 028669

- CH

HOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Realtors to file a brief

amicus curiae is G RANTED

. The amicus brief submitted on March 7, 2018, is accepted

for filing.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 Under section 8521(a)(2) of title 5 of the United States Code, the Secretary of Labor is required to issue from time to time a Schedule of Remuneration specifying the pay and allowances for each pay grade of members of the military services. The schedules are used to calculate the base period wages and benefits payable under the program of Unemployment Compensation for Ex-servicemembers (UCX Program). The revised schedule published with this Notice reflects increases in military pay and allowances which were effective in January 2001. Accordingly, the following new Schedule of Remuneration, issued pursuant to 20 CFR 614.12, applies to “First Claims” for UCX which are effective beginning with the first day of the first week which begins after March 31, 2001. Pay grade
Monthly rate(1) Commissioned Officers:0-10
$13,9230-9
13,1230-8
12,1070-7
10,9920-6
9,2490-5
7,7540-4
6,4070-3
5,0910-2
4,0300-1
3,080(2) Commissioned Officers With Over 4 Years Active Duty As An Enlisted Member Or Warrant Officer:0-3E
5,9880-2E
4,8940-1E
4,116(3) Warrant Officers:W-5
6,771W-4
5,833W-3
4,856W-2
4,155W-1
3,551(4) Enlisted Personnel:E-9
5,419E-8
4,546E-7
3,970E-6
3,487E-5
2,952E-4
2,493E-3
2,202E-2
2,109E-1
1,927
 The publication of this new Schedule of Remuneration does not revoke any prior schedule or change the period of time any prior schedule was in effect. Signed at Washington, D.C., on January 18, 2001. Raymond L. Bramucci, Assistant Secretary of Labor.


[FR Doc. 01-3610 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 14, 2009 

# Order

October 14, 2009

139632(94)

SHIRLEY B. AKERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 139632 v CoA: 283771 Gr Traverse CC: 07-026056-CZ BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and SHANNON NELSON, Defendants-Appellees, and

JOHN DOE, Defendant.

________________ __________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion for temporary admission to practice of David A. James is considered and it is GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the annual
report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 of Palatin Technologies,
Inc. (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: September 13, 2004                   /s/ Stephen T. Wills
                                            --------------------
                                            Stephen T. Wills
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1339 CA 12-01101**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

HEATHER MOUSAW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
CITY OF OLEAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

FRANCIS M. LETRO, BUFFALO (RONALD J. WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (NORMAN E.S. GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered September 9, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000827164
<NAME> EXHIBITRONIX, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               83
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,428
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       85
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (85)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (85)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (85)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32









CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)









Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Green Builders, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify that:




1.           The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Clark WilsonClark WilsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2009












/s/ Cindy HammesCindy HammesVice President of FinancePrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2009







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                             EXHIBIT 3.2.1

                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS
                                       OF
                              ROCKFORD CORPORATION

            The Bylaws of Rockford Corporation are amended as follows:

         1. Article II, Section 2.11 of the Bylaws is amended by replacing
current Section 2.11 with the following replacement Section 2.11:

            2.11 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

                  Annual Meeting. A shareholder who wishes to submit a proposal
for inclusion in the company's proxy statement for an annual meeting of the
shareholders must submit the proposal to the company, at its principal office,
prior to the deadline identified in the proxy statement for the prior year's
annual meeting. The company will set the deadline to require that the proposal
be received at the company's principal office either:

            (a)         not less than 120 calendar days before the date of the
                        company's proxy statement in connection with the prior
                        year's annual meeting; or

            (b)         within a reasonable time before the company plans to
                        begin to print and mail its proxy materials for the
                        current year's annual meeting, if either (1) the company
                        did not hold an annual meeting the previous year or (2)
                        the date of the current year's annual meeting is more
                        than 30 days different from the date of the previous
                        year's annual meeting.

                  Special Meeting. A shareholder who wishes to submit a proposal
for inclusion in the company's proxy statement for a meeting of shareholders
other than for a regularly scheduled annual meeting must submit the proposal to
the company, at its principal office, within a reasonable time before the
company begins to print and mail its proxy materials.

                  DATED:  July 27, 2000



                                       /s/ W. Gary Suttle
                                      -------------------
                                           W. Gary Suttle
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:


/s/ James M. Thomson
--------------------
    James M. Thomson
    Secretary
SCHEDULE G-1 

(Form 5471)

(Rev. December 2023)

Cost Sharing Arrangement

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Attach to Form 5471. 

Go to www.irs.gov/Form5471 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0123

Name of person filing Form 5471 Identifying number

Name of foreign corporation EIN (if any) Reference ID number (see instructions)

Important. Complete a separate Schedule G-1 for each cost sharing arrangement (CSA) in which the foreign corporation was a 

participant during the tax year. Report all amounts in U.S. dollars. See instructions.

1 Provide a brief description of the CSA with respect to which this Schedule G-1 is being completed.

2 During the course of the tax year, did the foreign corporation become a participant in the CSA? . . . . . .

Yes No

3 Was the CSA in effect before January 5, 2009? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4 What was the foreign corporation’s share of reasonably anticipated benefits for the CSA during 

the tax year? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %

5 a Did a U.S. taxpayer make any platform contributions (as defined in Regulations section 1.482-7(c)) to the CSA 

during the tax year? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b If the answer to question 5a is “Yes,” enter the present value of the platform contributions in

U.S. dollars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

c If the answer to question 5a is “Yes,” check the box for the method under Regulations section 1.482-7(g) used to 

determine the price of the platform contribution transaction(s).

Comparable uncontrolled transaction method Income method Acquisition price method

Market capitalization method Residual profit split method Unspecified method

6 a Enter the total amount of stock-based compensation deductions claimed by the filer for the tax 

year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

b Enter the total amount of deductions for the tax year for stock-based compensation that was 

granted during the term of the CSA and is directly identified with, or reasonably allocable to, the

intangible development activity under the CSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

c Was there any stock-based compensation granted during the term of the CSA to individuals who performed 

functions in business activities that generate cost shared intangibles that was not treated as directly identified 

with, or reasonably allocable to, the intangible development activity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7a For the tax year, enter the total amount of intangible development costs for the CSA . . . . $

b For the tax year, enter the amount of intangible development costs allocable to the foreign

corporation based on the foreign corporation’s reasonably anticipated benefits share . . . . $

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 5471. Cat. No. 33569U Schedule G-1 (Form 5471) (Rev. 12-2023)