alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



Certification of Principal Accounting Officer



I, Wm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Admiral Financial Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: May 12, 2010



/s/ Wm. Lee PophamWm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1620 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1620

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits 
 for illegal aliens and to end Federal mandates for States to provide 
                      benefits for illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

  Mr. Dreier introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits 
 for illegal aliens and to end Federal mandates for States to provide 
                      benefits for illegal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF DIRECT FEDERAL FINANCIAL BENEFITS AND 
              UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS; ELIMINATION OF 
              FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FOR PROVISION OF ANY STATE BENEFITS 
              TO ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--On and after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, notwithstanding any other provision of law--
            (1) no direct Federal financial benefit or social insurance 
        benefit may be paid or otherwise given to any person not 
        lawfully present in the United States, except pursuant to a 
        provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
            (2) no State is required, under title XIX of the Social 
        Security Act, to provide for medical assistance for any person 
        not lawfully within the United States; and
            (3) no State (or locality in a State) is required under any 
        Federal law to provide any form of aid or assistance (including 
        the provision of educational services) to any person not 
        lawfully within the United States.
    (b) Unemployment Benefits.--No alien who has not been granted 
employment authorization pursuant to Federal law shall be eligible for 
unemployment benefits.
    (c) Construction.--This section--
            (1) shall not apply to the provision of foreign aid to 
        aliens abroad, and
            (2) shall not be construed as affecting the rights of 
        States to provide with State funds for any form of assistance 
        for a person not lawfully within the United States.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``person 
not lawfully within the United States'' means any person who at the 
time the person applies for, receives, or attempts to receive a 
benefit, aid, or assistance is not a United States citizen, a permanent 
resident alien, an asylee, a refugee, a parolee, or a non-immigrant in 
status.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**1. Equity Marketing Hong Kong, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“EMHK”)2. Corinthian Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation3. Logistix Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“Logistix”) (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe)4. Johnson Grossfield, Inc., a Delaware corporation5. Equity Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation6. Upshot, Inc., a Delaware corporation7. SCI Promotion, Inc., a Delaware corporation8. Logistix, Inc., a Delaware corporation9. Pop Rocket, Inc., a Delaware corporation10. EMAK Worldwide Service Corp., a Delaware corporation11. EMAK Europe Holdings Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“EMAK Europe”)12. EMAK Europe Services Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe)13. EMAK Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK)14. EMAK China Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK)15. Virtual Video Company Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of Logistix)16. EMAK Asia Holding Company Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK)17. Megaprint Group Limited, a United Kingdom company (“MGL”)(a subsidiary of EMAK Europe)18. Megaprint Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of MGL)19. Megapromotions (U.K.) Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of MGL)20. Megapromotions Beheer BV, a Dutch company (“MBBV”)(a subsidiary of MGL)21. Megapromotions BV, a Dutch company (a subsidiary of MBBV)22. Mint Holland BV, a Dutch company (a subsidiary of MBBV)23. Megapromotions GmbH, a German company (a subsidiary of MBBV)24. Promomega EURL, a French company (a subsidiary of MBBV)25. Megapromotions Asia, Ltd., a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of MGL)26. Prodesign Marketing Limited, a Northern Ireland company (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe)
67
exv10w2



 







Exhibit 10.2

 




Amendment to Employment Agreement

 




     This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is entered into as of August 1, 2006 by Tweeter
Home Entertainment Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer” or “Tweeter”), and Gregory W.
Hunt (“Employee”).



     Reference is made to an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of August 1, 2006, by
and between Tweeter and Employee. The Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of August 1, 2006,
to provide that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, the effective
date for Employee’s assumption of the title and duties of Chief Financial Officer will be September
1, 2006. Employee will be employed during the transition period of August 1, 2006 to August 31,
2006 as a Senior Vice President of Employer. Effective September 1, 2006, Employee’s title will be
“Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.” In all other respects, the Agreement will
remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into as of the date and
year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Joseph McGuire
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Joseph McGuire 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President/Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	 	EMPLOYEE

 	 
	 	/s/ Gregory W. Hunt
 	 
	 	Gregory W. Hunt
### In The



## Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09

- 1 2

- 464 C V



### In the Interest of A.K.M., J.D.M. and D.M.M.

Appealed from the 252 nd District Court

of Jefferson County , Texas

Cause No. F

- 201,904

- H



### ORDER

The cou rt reporter for the 252 nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas is to

forwar d the following original in camera exhibit s to the Clerk of t his Court for filing on

or before July 5 , 201 3 :

Photo graphs (6) offered as in camera exhibits at the October 27, 2011 hearing and

Bates Stamped 0016, 0017, 0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021

.

The original exhibi t s will be r eturned to the court r eporter for the 252 nd D istrict

Court of Jefferson County when t he appeal is final in this Court.

Entered this 20 th day of June , 20 13

.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-SJFO-01-0001EIS]


Draft Environmental Impact Statement Oil and Gas Development on 
the Southern Ute Indian Reservation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of comment period and notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published a Notice of 
Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Oil and Gas 
Development on the Southern Ute Indian Reservation on January 5, 2001, 
(FR Vol. 66, No. 4, page 1152). Included in the notice was that 
comments would be received until March 6, 2001. This notice extends the 
comment period from March 6, 2001, until March 20, 2001. This notice 
also serves as notice of a public meeting to be held on the DEIS on 
February 27, 2001.

DATES: Written comments will be accepted on the Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement until March 20, 2001. The public meeting on the DEIS 
will be held on February 27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at Rolling Thunder Hall, 
14826 Hwy 172, Ignacio, Colorado, from 6-8 pm (MST). Please address 
questions, comments, or request for copies of the DEIS to the Bureau of 
Land Management, San Juan Field Office, Attn: Donald Englishman, 15 
Burnett Court, Durango, CO 81310.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Englishman at the above address 
or phone: 970-385-1346.

    Dated: January 30, 2001.
Calvin N. Joyner,
San Juan Field Office Manager, Colorado, Bureau of Land Management, 
USDI.
[FR Doc. 01-3513 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-021]


NASA Advisory Council, Aero-Space Technology Advisory Committee 
(ASTAC); Rotorcraft Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a NASA Advisory Council, Aero-Space Technology Advisory 
Committee, Rotorcraft Subcommittee meeting.

DATES: Thursday, April 26, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, April 27, 
2001, 8 a.m. to 12 Noon.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn 
Research Center at Lewis Field, Administration Building, Room 215, 
21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Mattie P. Thomas, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center at 
Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135, 216/433-3702.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. Agenda topics for the meeting are as 
follows:

--Status, Technical Accomplishments, and Plans for the NASA Rotorcraft 
Research and Technology Base Program
--Review of Rotorcraft-Related Research Activities at Glenn Research 
Center

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitors register.

    Dated: February 6, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3477 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
Exhibit 12.1
 LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios (Unaudited)
 Computation of Coverage of Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Net (loss) income
    
    $
    (11,685
    )
    
    $
    (10,155
    )
    
    $
    (48,418
    )
    
    $
    (65,172
    )
    
    $
    1,841Add:Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    
    
    834
    
    
    
    763
    
    
    
    849
    
    
    
    (683
    )
    
    
    299Fixed charges (see below)
    
    
    41,235
    
    
    
    43,435
    
    
    
    45,215
    
    
    
    43,531
    
    
    
    27,470Earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    30,384
    
    
    $
    34,043
    
    
    $
    (2,354
    )
    
    $
    (22,324
    )
    
    $
    29,610Fixed charges (1):Interest
    
    $
    33,537
    
    
    $
    38,092
    
    
    $
    42,551
    
    
    $
    40,950
    
    
    $
    25,730Amortization of debt costs
    
    
    1,275
    
    
    
    1,575
    
    
    
    1,810
    
    
    
    1,731
    
    
    
    1,495Interest portion of rentals
    
    
    673
    
    
    
    654
    
    
    
    854
    
    
    
    850
    
    
    
    24535,485
    
    
    
    40,321
    
    
    
    45,215
    
    
    
    43,531
    
    
    
    27,470Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    5,750
    
    
    
    3,114
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    41,235
    
    
    $
    43,435
    
    
    $
    45,215
    
    
    $
    43,531
    
    
    $
    27,470(Deficiency) earnings in the coverage of fixed charges
    
    $
    (5,101
    )
    
    $
    (6,278
    )
    
    $
    (47,569
    )
    
    $
    (65,855
    )
    
    $
    2,140(Deficiency) earnings in the coverage of fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    (10,851
    )
    
    $
    (9,392
    )
    
    $
    (47,569
    )
    
    $
    (65,855
    )
    
    $
    2,140Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.08Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.08
 
 (1)
    
    Fixed charges consist of interest expensed, amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to
indebtedness and an estimate of the interest within rental expense.  The Company believes that it is reasonable to
estimate one-third of rental expense is interest expense.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             917
<SECURITIES>                                     5,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       180
<INVENTORY>                                      1,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,028
<PP&E>                                           1,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                     538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         22
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,581
<SALES>                                          3,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,837
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-07-0445-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 4, 2008

______________________________

TROY LOCKE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. B17260-0706; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is Troy Locke’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which he

represents he wishes to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. As required

by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is signed by

Appellant and his attorney. No decision of this Court having been delivered, the motion
2

is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and

our mandate will issue forthwith.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
#### Raymond TORRES, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Alphonso JAMES; David A. Turrubiate; Michell Thomas; Nathaniel Wade; Stacy Michens; et. al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-40479

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2010.

Raymond Torres, Rosharon, TX, pro se.

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Raymond Torres, Texas prisoner # 860248, appeals the .district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. He also appeals the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 motion to alter or amend the judgment.

On appeal, Torres primarily argues that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint with prejudice and without giving him notice and an opportunity to amend his complaint. However, Torres provided an explanation of his claims and extensive supporting evidence in his initial complaint. He also was given the opportunity to further detail his claims through the use of a questionnaire and an order for a more definite statement. Because it appears that Torres was able to present his “best case,” the district court did not reversibly err by dismissing his complaint with prejudice and without a specific opportunity to amend. *See Eason v. Thaler,*14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir.1994); *Jones v. Greninger,*188 F.3d 322, 327 (5th Cir.1999). Regarding the district court’s conclusions that his specific claims were frivolous, Torres’s appellate brief merely repeats each claim and argues that it establishes a constitutional violation. He has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his claims as frivolous. *See Black v. Warren,*134 F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir.1998).1

*872After filing a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, Torres filed a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Although Torres has addressed the denial of this motion in his appellate brief, he failed to actually file a notice of appeal from its denial. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii); *see also Williams v. Chater,*87 F.3d 702, 704-06 (5th Cir.1996); *InterFirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. F.D.I.C.,*808 F.2d 1105, 1108 (5th Cir.1987). As Torres has not filed a notice of appeal regarding this motion, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. *See Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

. The district court in its thorough and detailed 26 page opinion gave full and careful consideration to each of Torres’s claims and allegations, and to the relevant authorities, including, among several others, *Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*- U.S. -, ---, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1951-54, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); *Sandlin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 2297-2302, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); *Black v.*
        *872
        *Warren, supra; Woods v. Smith,*60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir.1995); and *Murphy v. Collins,*26 F.3d 541 (5th Cir.1994).
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Effective on the date hereof, the Agreement is amended as follows:
      Additional Payments Specified Employee Interest




---



##### 



Delayed Payment Date
 2.
    
    In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.3.
    
    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and
all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 TechTeam Global, Inc.By:
    /s/ Michael A. SosinTitle: Vice President, General Counsel/s/ Kamran SokhanvariKamran Sokhanvari 2