alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JT / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSE L UI S C ORRE A ROD RI GU EZ ; FI DELA M ARI A M ARTINEZ, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72652 A ge nc yN os . A 097- 361- 223

A 097- 361- 224 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e L ui s C orr e aR odr i gue z and F i de l aM ar i aM art i ne z , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED DE C 30 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ T / Res ea r ch 06- 72652 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , S i n gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 02 ), and revi ew de no vo cl ai m s of c on st i tut i on al v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s , Ra m v . I NS , 24 3 F . 3d 51 0, 51 6 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 1 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA ac t ed w i thi n i t s broad di sc re t i on i n d et erm i ni ng thatthe evi dence p r e s e n te dw ith th e m o tio n to r e o p e n w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w arr an t r e o p e n in g . See Si ngh , 2 9 5 F .3 da t 1 0 3 9 ( B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n s h a ll b e r e v e r s e do n ly i f i ti s “ arbi tr ary , i rr a t i ona l , orc ontr aryt o l aw ” ) . I tf ol l ow s tha tpe t i t i one r s ’ due p r o c e s s c la im f

a ils . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) (r equi ri ng error f

or a pet i t i on ert o p re vai l on a due process cl ai m ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
Motion Granted; Order filed November 13, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00225-CR

____________

SAMUEL ALEJANDRO GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1270337

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed a motion for access to review 

the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous 

v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 338th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before December 1, 2014; that 
the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days 

of that date.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2029

JAMES H. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BERKELEY COUNTY; JAMES H. ROZIER, JR., supervisor and individual; ROBERT W. METTS, tax

collector and individual; CAROLYN M. UMPHLETT,

treasurer and individual; JOHN DOES; JANE

DOES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-96-2336-2-23)

Submitted: January 27, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Patrick Corrigan, III,

GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on May 2, 1997; Appellant

did not file a notice of appeal within the thirty-day appeal

period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an

extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
55%

45%

Purchase Refinance

February 2017

$29 $68

Billion Billion

YTD 2017

0.98%

2,925

February 2017 Highlights

SF delinquency rate is 90+ days; MF rate is 60+ days 

0.03%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,516,936
<SECURITIES>                                16,829,291
<RECEIVABLES>                                  947,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    937,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,482,621
<PP&E>                                       7,568,435
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,886,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,460,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,294,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,678
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,641,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,460,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,185,443
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,739,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,406,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,407,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,407,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,407,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 19, 1994.

Resolved, That the House agree to the amendments of

the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1779) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located

at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as

the ‘Jerry Litton United States Post Office Building’ ’’, with

the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æ Page 3, lines 3 and 4, strike out øproceeding¿, and

2 insert: preceding

3 Ω2æ Page 4, line 3, strike out øsection 1¿, and insert:

4 section 4

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1779

AMENDMENTS

TO

SENATE AMENDMENTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                        5,320,317
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              204,867
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                5,546,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         180,192
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    4,011,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  5,546,726
<SALES>                       8,232,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,577,053
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,118,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,527,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               931,054
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           931,054
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               11,839,814
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  12,770,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                 2.58


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

 

(a)    such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)          the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Ralph Larry Lyons                 |   | Date:  March 31, 2009 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Ralph Larry Lyons                     |   |                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |                  |
|   |                                  |   |                  |
|   |                                  |   |                  |
|   |                                  |   |                  |
| By:    | /s/ Charles F. Catlett, III           |   | Date:  March 31, 2009 |
|   | Charles F. Catlett, III               |   |                  |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief       |   |                  |
|   | Financial Officer                     |   |                  |
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                  /s/Jenny Netzer
                                  Jenny Netzer
                                  Executive Vice President
                                  MMA Financial, LLC

                                  Date:  June 30, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William A. HAWKINS, by his next friend, Ida HAWKINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED (USA); Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein & Blatt, PA, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-2320.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 19, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 21, 2010.

Jason Ostendorf, Law Office of Jason Ostendorf, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Julia B. Strickland, Marcos D. Sasso, Stroock & Stroock *&*Lavan, LLP, Los Angeles, California; J. Preston Turner, Baltimore, Maryland; Jeffrey N. Pritzker, Randolph Baker, Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein *&*Blatt, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), his civil action asserting claims under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as well as the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hawkins v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.,*665 F.Supp.2d 518 (D.Md.2009) & (entered Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 12



                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES*



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               FISCAL YEAR
                                           -------------------------------------------------
                                            1992      1993      1994      1995       1996
                                           -------  --------  --------  ---------  ---------
                                                        (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                        <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes
   and extraordinary items                 $21,457   $11,135   $ 2,158   $(25,443)  $(16,778)
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                          9,580     9,919    13,895     16,599     14,843
Amortization of debt expense                   524       639       535        575        582
Interest component of rent expense             397       397       148         --         --
                                           -------  --------  --------  ---------  ---------
      Total fixed charges                  $10,501   $10,955   $14,578   $ 17,174   $ 15,425
                                           =======  ========  ========  =========  =========
Income before income taxes, extraordinary
   items and fixed charges                 $31,958   $22,090   $16,736   $ (8,269)  $ (1,353)
                                           =======  ========  ========  =========  =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            3.04x     2.02x     1.15x     (0.48)x    (0.09)x
                                           =======  ========  ========  =========  =========
</TABLE>


*For purposes of calculation of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of
income before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges.  Fixed
charges consist of interest on all indebtedness, amortization of debt expenses
and the estimated interest component of rent expense.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 12, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 25, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Oak Grove Resources, LLC, Docket 

Nos. SE 2010-1236, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred 

in concluding that a safeguard notice was valid.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc., Docket No. KENT 2008-712.              

#   Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc., Docket No. KENT 2008-712.

meeting_042511.pdf

meeting042511.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles THUNEHORST, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-8065.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 1, 2011.

Stephanie Irene Sprecher, Office of the United States Attorney, Casper, WY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas B. Jubin, Jubin & Zerga, LLC, Cheyenne, WY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KELLY, HARTZ, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Charles Thunehorst’s sole issue on appeal is a challenge to his sentence. His opening brief, submitted on November 1 and filed on November 19, 2010, argues that the district court improperly construed 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).

On November 15, however, the United States Supreme Court rejected the same argument in *Abbott v. United States,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 18, 178 L.Ed.2d 348 (2010). Mr. Thunehorst concedes in his reply brief that *Abbott*“squarely rejected claims identical to those made by Thune*208horst in this case.” Aplee. Reply Br. at 1.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below.

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Order entered May 26 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 01562

- CV
QUICK CHANGE ARTIST, LLC, Appellant

V.
IRIS T. ACCESSORIES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 14118



### O RDER
Before the Court is appellant’s May 24, 2015 second motion to extend the time to file a brief. Appellant timely tendered a brief on May 22, 2015. The Court notified appellant by post

card that the brief has not been filed because appellant’s counsel has not been admitted pro hac
vice with this Court. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’ s motion as follows: W e ORDER counsel for appellant to file, by JUNE 15, 2015 , a motion for admission pro hac vice that complies with
Ru le XIX of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar. Once the Court receives and rules on the motion for admission pro hac vice, the Court will make further orders regarding appellant’s
brief.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Hollinger Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, The Lord Black of Crossharbour PC(C), OC, KCSG, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     By:  /s/ Conrad M. Black
          -----------------------------
          Name: The Lord Black of Crossharbour PC(C), OC, KCSG
          Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director
          Hollinger Inc.

September 15, 2003