alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00219-CV

GUARDIANSHIP OF JOHN DAVID 

HARRIS, AN INCAPACITATED 

PERSON

----------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On June 20, 2011, we received Appellant’s “Notice of Restricted Appeal” 

appealing the trial court’s December 29, 2010 order appointing a temporary 

guardian ad litem for Appellant’s father. Appellant’s father passed away, and on 

February 20, 2011, the trial court dismissed the guardianship investigation. We 

sent Appellant a letter on June 28, 2011, notifying Appellant of our concern that 

we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared that he was 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

attempting to appeal an unappealable order. Specifically, the order appointing 

the guardian ad litem did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable 

interlocutory order.

On July 11, 2011, we received a response from Appellant. That same day, 

we sent another letter to Appellant expressing our concern that any complaint 

regarding the temporary guardian is now moot because the case has been 

dismissed. See, e.g., Hamilton County v. Cooper, No. 05-07-00307-CV, 2007 

WL 2774166, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 25, 2007, no pet.) (dismissing an 

appeal from a temporary injunction as moot after trial court rendered a final 

judgment in the case). We notified Appellant that we would dismiss this case for 

want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal 

filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal.

On July 22, 2011, we received a response from Appellant. However, 

Appellant’s response does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. 

Appellant complains of various acts by the temporary guardian ad litem regarding 

the estate of Appellant’s father, and he argues that these acts constitute a 

continuing controversy between the parties. Any such controversy between the 

parties does not, however, flow from the propriety of the temporary guardian’s 

appointment. Further, Appellant does not explain how a judgment from this court 

could remedy what harm Appellant claims to suffer. See In re Smith, No. 05-09-

00913-CV, 2010 WL 4324434, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 3, 2010, orig. 
3

proceeding) (mem. op.). We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: August 18, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3725 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3725

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the qualified 
 business income deduction for taxpayers whose taxable income does not 
                exceed $100,000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

  Ms. Newman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the qualified 
 business income deduction for taxpayers whose taxable income does not 
                exceed $100,000, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Relief and Equity for Small 
businesses through Tax Act'' or the ``REST Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
              TAXPAYERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) 
and (j), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (g) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(h) Increased Deduction for Certain Individuals.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a taxpayer whose taxable 
        income does not exceed $100,000, subsections (a)(2) and (b) 
        shall be applied by substituting `25 percent' for `20 percent' 
        each place it appears.
            ``(2) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning after 2022, the dollar amount in paragraph (1) 
        shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2021' for `calendar year 2016' in 
                subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
        If any increase determined under this paragraph is not a 
        multiple of $1,000, such increase shall be rounded to the 
        nearest multiple of $1,000.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1
 LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries of the Company
 Company Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationLodgeNet StayOnline, Inc.
    
    DelawareLodgeNet Interactive Canada Corporation
    
    Ontario, CALodgeNet International, Inc.
    
    DelawareHotel Digital Network, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaOn Command Corporation
    
    DelawareOn Command Video Corporation
    
    DelawarePuerto Rico VEC
    
    DelawareSpectradyne International, Inc.
    
    DelawareThe Hotel Networks, Inc.
    
    DelawareVirgin Islands VEC
    
    Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10503-10504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.)

[[Page 10504]]

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable 
statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to 
acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to 
vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and 
nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the 
companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 12, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. First National Bank of Moose Lake Profit Sharing and ESOP, Moose 
Lake, Minnesota; to become a bank holding company by acquiring up to 
42.6 percent of the voting shares of First Financial Services of Moose 
Lake, Inc., Moose Lake, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire The 
First National Bank of Moose Lake, Moose Lake, Minnesota.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
acquire The First National Agency of Moose Lake, Moose Lake, Minnesota, 
and thereby engage in insurance in small towns pursuant to 
Sec. 225.28(b)(11)(iii)(A) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 9, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3791 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to
        18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
  knowledge, that:

| | (i)  | the accompanying Annual Report
       on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report)
       fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
    as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                               

The foregoing
      certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
      before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

|Date: March 15, 2006 | By: | /s/   ANTHONY
       J. SIMONETTA                                  
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                                    
|                     |     | Anthony J. Simonetta                                               
|                     |     | Vice
             PresidentFinance
    and Chief Financial Officer



---
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas P. Maun, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in this reportany changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:  March 15, 2004 | By:                       | /s/ Thomas  P. Maun |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                        | Thomas P.  Maun           |
|                        | Chief  Financial Officer  |
|                        | Chief  Accounting Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1651 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1651

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3, 5-Trimethylhydroquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3, 5-Trimethylhydroquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,3, 5-TRIMETHYLHYDROQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12   2,3, 5-Trimethylhydroquinone             No change      No change      On or before     
                         (CAS No. 700-13-0) (provided                                           12/31/97      ''
                         for in subheading                                                                     .
                         2907.29.50).................  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0563

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 29, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0563
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,James T. Sartain, President and Chief Executive Officer of FirstCity FinancialCorporation (“registrant”), certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

 

(1)                the Quarterly Report of theregistrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (“Form 10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                the information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:  August 16, 2010 | /s/  James T. Sartain                     |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                        | James  T. Sartain                         |
|                        | *President  and**Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I, E. Michael Thoben, III, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 14, 2004