alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for

fees for sewer and water services to the extent such fees exceed 1

percent of adjusted gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. STUDDS (for himself, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

MOAKLEY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. OLVER, Mr.

BLUTE, and Mr. MEEHAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

deduction for fees for sewer and water services to the

extent such fees exceed 1 percent of adjusted gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sewer and Water Fee

5 Deductibility Act of 1993’’.
2

HR 1973 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR LOCAL SEWER AND WATER FEES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (b) of section 164 of

3 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesig4 nating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5),

5 respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol6 lowing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(3) DEDUCTION ALLOWED FOR LOCAL SEWER

8 AND WATER FEES.—

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—To the extent that the

10 amount of local sewer and water fees paid or

11 accrued during any taxable year exceeds 1 per12 cent of adjusted gross income, such fees shall

13 be allowed as a deduction under subsection (a)

14 in the same manner as local real property taxes.

15 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION.—The term ‘local sewer

16 and water fees’ means any amount imposed by

17 a local government, State government (or any

18 agency or instrumentality thereof), or by the

19 District of Columbia as a charge for sewer or

20 water service. Such term shall not include any

21 amount allowable as a deduction without regard

22 to this paragraph.’’.

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

24 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

25 December 31, 1993.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1963 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1963

          To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on DMAS.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1993

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on DMAS.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DMAS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  DMAS (Dimethyl acetyl succinate) (provided for in                           No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 2918.30.50)..................................  Free                                                31/95           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         802,223
<SECURITIES>                                   203,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                  830,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,429,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,274,804
<PP&E>                                       4,540,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                 857,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,958,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          745,462
<BONDS>                                      1,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,829
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,154,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,958,649
<SALES>                                      1,603,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,603,260
<CGS>                                          768,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  768,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               807,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,268)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .029
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .022
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,535]


Melpack, Inc., Mullins, SC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on January 16, 2001, in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Melpack, Inc., Mullins, South 
Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 16th day of January, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-3305 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 189 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 189

To include the Territory of American Samoa in the Supplemental Security 
                            Income Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To include the Territory of American Samoa in the Supplemental Security 
                            Income Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS PROGRAM 
              TO AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) In General.--The 7th sentence of section 1101(a)(1) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended by inserting 
``and title XVI (as in effect pursuant to the amendment made by section 
301 of the Social Security Amendments of 1972)'' before ``also''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is 
        amended by inserting ``, American Samoa,'' before ``and''.
            (2) Section 1614(a)(1)(B)(ii) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1382c(a)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``or national'' 
        after ``citizen''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on October 1, 
1993.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1944

SALIH M. ZAMZAM; MARIAM ZAMZAM; SALIH M.

ZAMZAM, M.D., INCORPORATED,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 97-2984,

97-3004)

Submitted: December 21, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Salih M. Zamzam, Mariam Zamzam, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven

Rothenberg, Joel L. McElvain, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Salih M. Zamzam, Mariam Zamzam, and Salih M. Zamzam M.D.,

Inc., appeal from the tax court’s order determining deficiencies

and penalties with respect to their 1990 through 1994 federal

income tax liabilities. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue has

moved to dismiss the appeal by Salih M. Zamzam M.D., Inc., because

the corporation is not represented by counsel. Salih and Mariam

Zamzam have moved for appointment of counsel for the corporation.

We deny this motion. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506

U.S. 194, 197-98 (1993) (only natural person may be granted in

forma pauperis status). A corporation cannot appear in federal

court except through its attorney. Id. at 201-02. Accordingly, we

grant the Commissioner’s motion and dismiss the corporation’s

appeal.

With respect to the Zamzams’ appeal, we have reviewed the

record and the tax court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Zamzam

v. Comm’r., Nos. 97-2984, 97-3004 (U.S. Tax Ct. Dec. 7, 2000 & May

18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Exhibit
32
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Blitz, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ David BlitzDavid
      BlitzPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (ChiefExecutive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer)March
      31, 2009
 The
foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 15.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-86466, 33-88034, 333-01578, 333-06098,
333-9134, 333-11530, 333-91330 and 333- 109915) pertaining to the Aladdin
Knowledge Systems Ltd. Share Option Plans, of our independent auditors' report
dated January 22, 2004 with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of
Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd., included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A
for the year ended December 31, 2003.











Tel - Aviv, Israel                            /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
March 16, 2005                                A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - ITonis Inc.  - Exhibit 10.9






EXHIBIT 10.9


ITONIS INC.
Klimentska 10, 110
00 Prague 1, Czech Republic
+420 296578180
Fax +420
296578199


August 8, 2006


Nordic IPTV Company ApS
Asgaardsvej 10
DK 1811,
Frederiksberg C, Denmark

Attention: John Marienhof


This letter is to confirm our agreement to modify the terms of
the Reseller and Consulting Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) made effective
February 7, 2006 between ITonis Inc. (“ITonis”) and Nordic IPTV Company ApS
(“Agent”).

We confirm that ITonis and Agent have agreed that the Agreement
shall be amended to delete section 9 of the Agreement entitled “Agent to provide
Commercial Director for ITonis” in its entirety.

We further confirm that ITonis and Agent acknowledge and agree
that, as of the date hereof, the only obligations of ITonis outstanding pursuant
to section 9 of the original Agreement is US$120,000 in payment for the services
of John Marienhof acting as commercial director of ITonis from January 1, 2006
through April 30, 2006 and that, as contemplated in the original Agreement, such
amount has been and will continue to be accrued as a liability of ITonis in the
form of a non-interest bearing account payable to be repaid at such time as
ITonis has sufficient cash flow to repay this amount. Sufficient cash flow is
expected with the first round of financing after ITonis is listed on the
OTCBB.

We further confirm that ITonis and Agent acknowledge and agree
that the remaining provisions of the Agreement, including section 8 relating to
any commission payable to the Agent in connection with its promotion and resale
of the products and services specified in the Agreement, remain in full force
and effect and are not modified in any respect by this letter.

Please acknowledge your acceptance and agreement to the terms
of this letter by signing below, where indicated.

Best regards,

ITonis Inc.


  /s/ Nicolas Lavaud

  


	By: 	 	 
	                   	Nicolas Lavaud, President
  


Acknowledged and accepted this 9th day of August,
2006:

Nordic IPTV Company ApS


  /s/ John Marienhof




	By: 	 	 
	                   	John Marienhof, Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


(i)    Holophane Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation.

(ii)   Luxfab Limited, a United Kingdom corporation and the holding company for
       Holophane Europe Limited and Holophane Lichttechnik.

(iii)  Holophane Lichttechnik, a German GmbH.

(iv)   Holophane Europe Limited, a United Kingdom corporation.

(v)    MetalOptics, Inc., a Texas corporation.

(vi)   Antique Street Lamps, Inc., a Texas corporation, and the holding company
       for Castlight.

(vii)  Castlight, a Mexican corporation.

(viii) Holophane International, Inc., a Barbados company.

(ix)   Holophane Australia Corporation Pty. Limited, holding company for 50.2%
       of Unique Lighting Solutions Pty. Limited and 50.2% of The Austphane
       Trust.

(x)    Unique Lighting Solutions Pty. Limited, an Australian corporation,
       Trustee of The Austphane Trust.

(xi)   The Austphane Trust, an Australian unit trust.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Dean SNIDER, Jr., Appellant.

No. 10-2970.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 27, 2010.

Filed: Dec. 29, 2010.

John H. Lammers, Sioux City, IA, for Appellee.

Michael David Nelson, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.

*100David Dean Snider, Jr., Cedar Rapids, IA, pro se.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Snider, Jr., challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pled guilty to a drug offense. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Snider’s 240-month prison sentence is unreasonable.

We review the imposition of a sentence under an abuse-of-discretion standard considering the substantive reasonableness of the sentence under the totality of the circumstances. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc). We find no abuse of discretion. The sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See *United States v. Berni,*439 F.3d 990, 992-93 (8th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (reviewing sentence involving § 5K1.1 downward departure for reasonableness using abuse-of-discretion standard).

We reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We affirm the judgment of the district court, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Snider about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 99.2
                              C.F.O. Certification




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eat at Joe's, Ltd. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending  September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph Fiore,  Chief Executive
Officer (acting Chief Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Joseph Fiore
Chief Executive Officer
(Acting Chief Financial Officer)
November 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Horizon Group, Inc. (the "Company") of our report dated February 26, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Horizon Group, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Horizon Group,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-95174, No. 333-09315 and No. 33-95730 and Form S-4
No. 33-91236) of Horizon Group, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Horizon Group, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-79784) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan, the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Bonus
Arrangement; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-89152) pertaining to
the Profit Sharing/401(K) Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-95308) pertaining to the McArthur/Glen Realty Corp. 1993 Long-Term Incentive
Plan of Horizon Group, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report (From 10-K) of Horizon Group, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 1997
Severance Agreement between BankUnited and Hunting Deutsch


 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 SEVERANCE ARRANGEMENT WITH 
 Hunting Deutsch 
  
 On or about
May 30, 2006 BankUnited entered into a severance arrangement with Hunting Deutsch, Executive Vice President Wealth Management. Under the arrangement Mr. Deutsch will be entitled to twelve months salary plus the amount of the prior
year’s bonus (less applicable deductions and withholdings) if BankUnited eliminates the Wealth Management Division while Mr. Deutsch is employed in that division and does not offer him a position comparable in salary within BankUnited.
This severance payment will only be made should this situation occur on or before June 5, 2011. If Mr. Deutsch’s position is eliminated due to a merger or acquisition during or after this time, Mr. Deutsch will receive only the
payment indicated in the Change of Control Agreement between BankUnited Financial Corporation and Hunting Deutsch dated June 5, 2006, and not the additional severance payment referred to in the Severance Arrangement.
Order entered October 26, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00517-CR

ERBIE BOWSER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-00688-CR

ORDER

Before the Court is the October 23, 2017 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before December 20, 

2017. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Authorization and Consent of Subsidiary Corporation

to be Included in a Consolidated Income Tax Return

Form 1122

(Rev. December 1983)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service (Please type or print)

© For the first year a consolidated return is filed, this form must be attached for each subsidiary.

For the calendar year 19 , or other tax year beginning , 19 and ending , 19

Name Employer identification number

Number and street

City or town, State, and ZIP code

Name of common parent corporation Employer identification number

the subsidiary, the subsidiary authorizes the Commissioner or

District Director of Internal Revenue to do so.

The subsidiary corporation named above authorizes its common

parent corporation to include it in a consolidated return for the

tax year indicated and for each later year the group must make

a consolidated return under the regulations. If the parent

corporation does not make a consolidated return on behalf of

The subsidiary consents to be bound by the provisions of the

consolidated return regulations.

Signature

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that the subsidiary named above has authorized me to sign this form on its behalf, that I have examined this form, and the

information contained herein, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature of officer Date Title

Form 1122 (Rev. 12-83)

© ©