alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aura Systems, Inc.
                                   Term Sheet



Instrument

                    Convertible Note

Amount

                    $125,000

Use of Proceeds

                    Working capital

Closing

                    October 8, 2002

Interest

                    8% simple interest due in arrears.

                    Term 180 days

Conversion Price

                    $0.071 per share

Registration Rights

                    To be included in Registration  Statement to be filed within
                    ninety   days   following    issuance   of   common   stock.

Documentation

                    Company will provide  complete  documentation  subsequent to
                    Closing.

Other Conditions

                    If Aura Systems,  Inc.  ("Aura") receives equity funding for
                    an  amount  of  at  least  $2  million   (unrelated  to  the
                    contemplated  sale-leaseback of the building) between August
                    1,  2002 and the time of the final  payment  of the loan and
                    accrued  interest,  the loan will  convert into common stock
                    either  at a  conversion  rate of  $0.071  per  share or the
                    average of the new equity sale rate, whichever is lower.

                    Should,  at any  time  prior  either  to the  conversion  or
                    payment in full of the note, Aura grant a security  interest
                    in the patents to one or more  entities as part of an equity
                    funding,  Aura will  grant the  participant  note  holders a
                    security interest pari passu. This provision is inapplicable
                    to strategic  transactions involving technology licensing or
                    transfers.


On behalf of Aura Systems, Inc.

         __________________________on this date_________________
         Neal F. Meehan, Chairman



On behalf of Investors:

                                    Amount of participation $125,000

         __________________________on this date_________________
         The Prudent Bear Fund
#### Richard Price TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chaplain Russell HELBIG, sued in his personal-individual capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-7981.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 2014.

Decided: April 18, 2014.

Richard Price Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Price Tucker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Tucker v. Helbig,*No. 8:13-cv-00401-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
## **EXHIBIT31.1**

## **CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

## ***I, Roger E. Gower, certify that:***

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofMicro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
| Dated: April 2, 2007 | By:                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                 | Roger E. Gower                        |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMETRIO FELIX ZARATE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73783

Agency No. A073-717-843

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Demetrio Felix Zarate, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due

FILED

MAY 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
process violations in immigration proceedings. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Zarate’s motion to reopen

because he failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See Najmabadi v.

Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency may deny a motion to reopen

based on a failure to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought);

Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740-41 (9th Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act

“requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum

applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

We reject Zarate’s contentions that the BIA violated his right to due process

because the BIA considered his evidence and arguments. See Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 11-73783
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION



                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                                       OF
                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Commercial National Financial Corporation (the "Registrant"). This
Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.

We certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

This Certification is executed as of August 14, 2002.

                                           /s/JEFFREY S. BARKER
                                           --------------------
                                           Jeffrey S. Barker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ PATRICK G. DUFFY
                                           --------------------
                                           Patrick G. Duffy
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

CAREY JAMES BURTON JUNIOR, §

 Appellant §

vs. § CASE NO. 14-14-00745-CR

TRIAL COURT NO. 14CR0096

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

 Appellee §

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES, Cary James Burton Junior, the Appellant herein, and moves the Court for 

an extension of time to file Appellant's Brief in this cause, pursuant to Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, and in support thereof would show the Court as follows:

I.

The Appellant in this cause was convicted in the 405th District Court of Galveston County, 

Texas in cause number 14CR0096 of the felony offense of Failing to Register as Sex Offender and 

his punishment was assessed at 4 years TDC.

II.

Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 30, 2015. The undersigned counsel received a 

letter from Appellant on January 27, 2015 stating that he longer desires to pursue this appeal.

III.

The Appellant hereby requests an extension of time so that the undersigned counsel can 

send a copy of the Motion to Dismiss Appeal to appellant in TDC (Holliday Unit) for his signature 

ACCEPTED

14-14-00745-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/30/2015 4:50:46 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/30/2015 4:50:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
as required by Rule 42.2 TRAP, and would show unto the Court that 45 additional days should be 

sufficient to allow for the completion of this.

IV.

Due to the above-referenced, Appellant’s counsel respectfully requests a 45 day extension to 

obtain appellant’s signature on the Motion to Dismiss, as required by Rule 42.2, TRAP.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of 

Appellant, respectfully prays that this Honorable Court extend the time for filing Appellant's Brief 

in this cause.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Greg Russell

Greg Russell

Attorney for Appellant

711 59th Street

Galveston, Texas 77551

(409) 497-4743

(409) 497-4721 Fax

SBN: 17411550 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 As Attorney of Record for Appellant, I do hereby Certify that a true and correct 

copy of the above and foregoing document was this date provided to the Attorney for 

Appellee, Mr. Jack Roady, District Attorney of Galveston County at the offices of the 
District Attorney of Galveston County, Texas, 600 59th Street, Galveston, Tx. 77551, 

on the 30th day of January 2015, via certified electronic service provider.

 /s/ Greg Russell

 Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I do hereby certify that this brief is in compliance with rule 9.4(i) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is computer generated, and its 

relevant portions contain 426 words.

/s/ Greg Russell

 Attorney for Appellant
2014-0416.

#### State ex rel. Irbey v. Sheldon.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Chad Irbey Sr. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

SYNERGY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC 

SURGERY CENTER, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

SILVER PINE IMAGING, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

July 15, 2021

v No. 350549

Washtenaw Circuit Court

AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

LC No. 17-001041-NF

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RIORDAN, P.J., and M. J. KELLY and SHAPIRO, JJ.

M. J. KELLY, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result only. 

/s/ Michael J. Kelly
Moving Expenses OMB No. 1545-0062

Form 3903

© Attach to Form 1040.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Attachment

Sequence No. 62

Name(s) shown on Form 1040 Your social security number

1 Enter the number of miles from your old home to your new workplace 1

2 Enter the number of miles from your old home to your old workplace 2

3 Subtract line 2 from line 1. Enter the result but not less than zero © 3

If line 3 is 35 or more miles, complete the rest of this form. If line 3 is less than 35 miles, you may not deduct your moving

expenses. This rule does not apply to members of the armed forces. 

Moving Expenses

Section A—Transportation of Household Goods

4 4

Section B—Expenses of Moving From Old To New Home

5 Travel and lodging not including meals 5

6 Total meals 6

7 Multiply line 6 by 80% (.80) 7

8 Add lines 5 and 7 8

Section C—Pre-move Househunting Expenses and Temporary Quarters

(for any 30 days in a row after getting your job)

9 9

10 10

11

11

Add lines 9, 10, and 12

12 12

13 13

14

15

Section D—Qualified Real Estate Expenses

Expenses of (check one): a selling or exchanging your old home, or

b if renting, settling an unexpired lease.

Expenses of (check one): a buying your new home, or

b if renting, getting a new lease.

Dollar Limits and Moving Expense Deduction

16 Enter the smaller of:

17

16

17

18

Add lines 14, 15, and 16

19

18

Add lines 4, 8, and 18. Enter the total here and on Schedule A, line 18. This is your moving expense

deduction ©

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 3903 (1992)

Pre-move travel and lodging not including meals

Temporary quarters expenses not including meals

Total meal expenses for both pre-move househunting

and temporary quarters

Multiply line 11 by 80% (.80)

14

Transportation and storage for household goods and personal effects

© See separate instructions.

● The amount on line 13, or

● $3,000 ($1,500 if married filing a separate return and at the end

of 1992 you lived with your spouse who also started work in 1992).

● $1,500 ($750 if married filing a separate return and at the end of

1992 you lived with your spouse who also started work in 1992).

Enter the smaller of:

● The amount on line 17, or

Cat. No. 12490K

Note: Any payments your employer made for any part of your move (including the value of any services furnished in kind) should

be included on your W-2 form. Report that amount on Form 1040, line 7. See Reimbursements in the instructions.

19

Part II

Part I

%

%

%

%

15

Caution: If you are a member of the armed forces, see the instructions before continuing.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Burnham
Pacific Properties, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-58347 and 333-86419 on Form S-8 and 33-56555,
333-31591 and 333-69957 on Form S-3 of Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

//Deloitte &
Touche LLP//

March 28,
2002
San Diego, California

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 20, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 20, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0371. BRINK'S ATLANTA et al. v. SHIRLEY GLINTON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV285529
Order entered July 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01540-CV

STEVEN V. TIPPS, Appellant

V.

PURPLE TREE, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-04540-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 15, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file his 

brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to July 30, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                   268,095
<INVENTORY>                                     30,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,116
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          949,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,159,865
<OTHER-SE>                                   (483,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,904
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               833,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (824,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (824,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (824,902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Wilder Richman  Historic  Properties
II, L.P. (the  "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Richard Paul Richman,  Chief Executive  Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  (S) 1350, as adopted  pursuant to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/ Richard Paul Richman
-------------------------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant
June 9, 2006