alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 178 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 178

  To prohibit the use of Federal funds for abortions except where the 
                life of the mother would be endangered.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Emerson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of Federal funds for abortions except where the 
                life of the mother would be endangered.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the Congress finds that--
            (1) scientific evidence demonstrates that abortion takes 
        the life of an unborn child who is a living human being;
            (2) a right to abortion is not secured by the Constitution 
        of the United States; and
            (3) in Roe versus Wade (410 U.S. 113) and Doe versus Bolton 
        (410 U.S. 179), the Supreme Court erred in not recognizing the 
        humanity of the unborn child and the compelling interest of the 
        several States to protect the life of each person before birth.
    Sec. 2. No funds appropriated by Congress shall be used to perform 
abortions except where the life of the mother would be endangered if 
the fetus were carried to term.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, I, Paul
H.  Metzinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies,
Inc.,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     a)   such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
          for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2003, fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     b)   the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2003,
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.


                                      /s/Paul  H.  Metzinger
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Paul H. Metzinger, Chief Executive Officer
                                      &  President


Date:  April 13, 2004


               A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section
               906  has  been provided to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and will
               be retained by NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
               Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.9    
    


AMENDMENT #2 TO LEASE AGREEMENT  


        WHEREAS, UNITED STATES PROFESSIONAL TENNIS ASSOCIATION,
hereinafter called "Landlord," and GLOBAL GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES, INC., hereinafter called "Tenant," entered into a Lease Agreement dated the 4th
day of November, 2004 for approximately 4,500 square feet of rentable area located in the 3535 Briarpark Office Building, 3535 Briarpark, Suite 200, Houston, Texas, said Lease Agreement commencing
November 5, 2004 and expiring February 28, 2005; and, 


        WHEREAS, on February 17, 2005 that lease agreement was amended in a First Amendment to Lease Agreement for the purpose of extending
the Lease Agreement through July 31, 2005; and, 


        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, Landlord and Tenant agree to further amend said
Lease Agreement, as follows: 



	1.
	Lease Expansion: Effective July 1, 2005, Tenant expanded in size the Leased Premises by 2,461 rentable square feet for space
located in Suite 201. The Lease Premises will consist of 8,473 rentable square feet.



	2.
	Lease Expiration: Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to extend the expiration date of said Lease Agreement for an additional six
(6) months with a lease expirtion date of January 31, 2006.



	3.
	Base Rent: Monthly rent calculated on basis of $9.00 psf annual rents. 







	Suite
 
	 	Months
	 	Monthly Rent
	 	Total Rents

	Suite 200	 	6	 	$	4,509.00	 	$	27,054.00
	Suite 201	 	7	 	$	1,845.75	 	$	12,920.25






	4.
	Parking: Tenant is authorized to park 20 (twenty) vehicles in the general surface
parking area of which 2 (two) of the twenty spaces will be located in the covered reserved parking area all of which will be free of charge.



	5.
	Expansion Options: Landlord will lease any vacant space, subject to prior leasing, on a month-to-month basis for
Tenant's short term projects with terms mutually agreeable between all parties. 




        EXCEPT as hereby amended, Landlord and Tenant do hereby ratify and affirm the terms, conditions and covenants of said Lease Agreement and
Amendments. 



 Dated this the            day
of                        , 2005.  



	LANDLORD:	 	TENANT:
	
UNITED STATES PROFESSIONAL TENNIS ASSOCIATION	
 	
GLOBAL GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES, INC.
	

By:	
 	

    
	
 	

By:	
 	

    

	Title:	 	    
	 	Title:	 	    














QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.9
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

|   | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

     

 

| Date: March 31, 2006 |   |   | By:    |   |   | /s/ MATTHEW H. KNIGHT                                          |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   |   |   |        |                                                           |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   | **Matthew H. Knight****President and Chief Executive Officer** |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cadus  Corporation  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Blitz,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus  Corporation  and will be retained  by Cadus  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ David Blitz
----------------------------------------------
David Blitz
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
March 30, 2006

The foregoing  certification is furnished  solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 12, 2004By:
    
    /s/ Ron D. Kessinger
Ron D. Kessinger
President and Chief Executive Officer
 The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with AmendmentNo.1 to the Quarterly Report of MCF Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, D. Jonathan Merrimanand John D. Hiestand, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 15, 2005 |       |                                      |
|----------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                 |       |                                      |
|                 |       |                                      |
|                 | By:        | /s/  D.  JONATHAN MERRIMAN      |   |
|                 |       | **D.  Jonathan Merriman**                 |
| ** **           | ** ** | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
| ** **           | ** ** | ** **                                |
| ** **           | ** ** | ** **                                |
|                 | By:        | /s/ JOHN D.  HIESTAND                |   |
|                 |       | **John  D. Hiestand**                     |
| ** **           | ** ** | **Chief  Financial Officer**              |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant to Ocean Test Equipment, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable nonexclusive license in the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 09/391,605 entitled “Differential Pressure Flow Sensor.” 

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than April 16, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code OC4, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division, Code 05T, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone (301) 744-6111. 

      ( print page 10278)    
Dated: February 5, 2001. 

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liason Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-3718 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LAWRENCE RUSCOE

*Alice Osedach,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Timothy J. Sugrue,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 834 (AC 29198), is denied.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT

TO THE

UNOVA, INC. RESTORATION PLAN


The UNOVA, Inc.
Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended in the following manner, in
accordance with Section 11.1 of the Plan, and effective as of June 30, 2006,
except where another date is provided herein.


1.                                       Section
3.27 is hereby amended by adding the following new definition with all
subsequent sections renumbered accordingly:


3.27         Rule of 70 Employee


The term Rule of 70 Employee shall have the same meaning as under
Section 3.35 of the Intermec Pension Plan, except that, for purposes of this
Plan, such individual must also be an Affected Employee.


2.                                       Section
4.1 is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:


Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any Affected Employee who, on
or after July 1, 2006, commences employment with, or is re-hired by, the Company
shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan.


3.                                       Section
6.4 is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:


Notwithstanding the above, effective June 30, 2006, each Affected
Employee who is actively employed on such date who is not a Rule of 70 Employee
will be 100% vested in his annual retirement benefit under the Plan.  


4.                                   Section
6 is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection at the end thereof:


6.6                                 Benefit
Freeze for Affected Employees other than Rule of 70 Employees 


Notwithstanding the above, effective July 1, 2006, no
further benefits shall accrue under Section 6.1, 6.2 or 6.3 of the Plan with
regard to any Affected Employee who is not a Rule of 70 Employee.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
INTERMEC, Inc., by its duly authorized representative, has caused this
Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf on this 29th day of June,
2006.


	
   

  	
  INTERMEC, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/ Larry D.
  Brady

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Larry D. Brady

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and
  Chief Executive Officer
// Custom scripts file

(function ($, Drupal) {

  'use strict';

  $(document).ready(function() {
    var owl = $('.owl-carousel');
    owl.owlCarousel({
      center: true,
      dots: false,
      loop: true,
      margin: 10,
      nav: true,
      responsive:{
        0:{
            items:1
        },
        600:{
            items:3
        },
        1300:{
            items: 5
        }
      }
    });

     // Custom Navigation Events
     $(".button--next").click(function(){
      owl.trigger('next.owl.carousel');
      $(".owl-item.active.center a").focus();
    })
    $(".button--prev").click(function(){
      owl.trigger('prev.owl.carousel');
      $(".owl-item.active.center a").focus();
    })

    $(".button--next").keypress(function(){
     owl.trigger('next.owl.carousel');
     $(".owl-item.active.center a").focus();
    })
    $(".button--prev").keypress(function(){
     owl.trigger('prev.owl.carousel');
     $(".owl-item.active.center a").focus();
    })
  });

  // Generic function that runs on window resize.
  function resizeStuff() {

  }

  // Runs function once on window resize.
  var TO = false;
  $(window).resize(function () {
    if (TO !== false) {
      clearTimeout(TO);
    }

    // 200 is time in miliseconds.
    TO = setTimeout(resizeStuff, 200);
  }).resize();

})(jQuery, Drupal);
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3543 

To establish an office within the Department of Commerce to coordinate 

all non-defense related deployment and activities related to blockchain 

technology within the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. SOTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To establish an office within the Department of Commerce 

to coordinate all non-defense related deployment and activities related to blockchain technology within the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blockchain Technology 

5 Coordination Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3543 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL BLOCKCHAIN TECH2 NOLOGY COORDINATION OFFICE. 

3 There is established within the Department of Com4 merce a National Blockchain Technology Coordination Of5 fice (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Office’’) which shall 

6 be organized and led by a Director, who shall be appointed 

7 by the Secretary not later than 60 days after the date 

8 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
CCASE:

MSHA V. REPUBLIC STEEL

DDATE:

19781127

TTEXT:

~1

 FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 WASHINGTON, D.C.

 November 27, 1978

SECRETARY OF LABOR, Civil Penalty Proceedings

 MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

 ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) Docket Nos. PITT 78-156-P

 v. PITT 78-396-P

 PITT 78-397-P

REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION, PITT 78-406-P

 PITT 78-407-P

PITT 78-408-P

 PITT 78-409-P

 PITT 78-410-P

 Banning Mine

 Russelton Mine

 Clyde Mine

 Newfield Mine

 DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER

 The decisions of the Administrative Law Judge, approving a

proposed settlement, is directed for review. It is found that the

Judge's decisions may be contrary to law or Commission policy, and

that a novel question of policy has been presented. The issue is:

 What reasons and facts support the Judge's determination

 that the proposed settlements should be approved?

 The Commission cannot answer this question until the record

reveals the Judge's reasons for, and the facts supporting his approval

of the settlement. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the Judge for

him to make a statement of reasons for approving the settlement and a

statement of the facts of record that supported his determination.

The Judge shall also offer the settlement agreement into the record.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1205-000]


Portland General Electric Company; Notice of Filing

February 13, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 8, 2001, Portland General Electric 
Company (PGE), tendered for filing pursuant to section 205 of the 
Federal Power Act its FERC Electric Tariff--Fifth Revised Volume 11. 
Volume 11 provides for PGE to make sales at market-based rates, and the 
changes being implemented permit PGE to make sales under the EEI Master 
Power Purchase & Sale Agreement. PGE states that it requires the use of 
this agreement to sell power to the California Department of Water 
Resources (CDWR) and that it wishes to be able to use the agreement to 
sell to other parties as well.
    PGE requests that the Fifth Revised Volume 11 be made effective as 
of February 7, 2001 so that sales to CDWR could commence immediately.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before March 1, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4068 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M