alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RP01-200-000 and RP00-325-001 (Not Consolidated]

                    On December 29, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG) filed revised tariff sheets in Docket No. RP01-200-000 to implement a new daily Scheduled Imbalance Penalty and a new interruptible Automatic Parking and Lending service (APAL). On January 2, 2001, CIG filed revised                     *pro forma*                     tariff sheets in Docket No. RP00-325-001 to comply with Order No. 637. Protests were filed in both dockets. On January 31, 2001 the Commission issued an order accepting and suspending the tariff sheets field in Docket No. RP01-200-000 to be effective July 1, 2001, subject to refund and subject to the outcome of a technical conference. The conference discussion was to address the proposal APAL service and daily penalty, as well as their relationship to issues raised in CIG's Order No. 637 proceeding.                

Take notice that a technical conference to discuss various issues raised by CIG's filings will be held on Wednesday, February 28, 2001, at 9 a.m., in a room to be designed at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

                    Participants should be prepared to address, consistent with the January 31 order, (1) whether existing data support an operational need for the proposed                           ( print page 10016)                        service and penalty, (2) how the proposals in Docket No. RP01-200 relate to CIG's Order No. 637 compliance filing, (3) how GISB nomination processes are used to balance scheduled receipts and deliveries on CIG's system, (3) how CIG uses line pack and storage inventory to accommodate imbalances, and (4) any other concerns raised by CIG's filings.                

All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-3580  Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

CATHY LOVELL 

v. Record No. 1754-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

BASSETT-WALKER, INC. MARCH 12, 1996 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Barbara Hudson, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Richard D. Lucas; Woods, Rogers & 

Hazlegrove, on brief), for appellee. 

 Cathy Lovell appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation 

Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an 

occupational disease. The commission held that Lovell failed to 

prove that her bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was a disease 

within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation 

Act ("the Act"). Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the 

parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in 

The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, 

___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from 

cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or 

however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under 

the present provisions of the Act"). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication.
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Gary Suttle, Rockfords Chief Executive
Officer, and Murray Cohen, Rockfords Chief Financial Officer, each
certifies with respect to Rockford Corporations Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, that;  
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    Information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, Rockfords financial condition and results of
operations. Dated: August 10, 2004
    /s/ W. Gary SuttleW. Gary SuttleChief Executive Officer Dated: August 10, 2004
    /s/ Murray CohenMurray CohenChief Financial Officer 24
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Alvaranga Stewart, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.) rendered November 10, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree and sentencing him to three years' probation.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Ethan Greenberg, J.), rendered November 10, 2016, affirmed. </p><p>Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, we find no basis to reduce the agreed-upon probationary sentence. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with his bargained for plea and should not now "be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (<i>People v Fair</i>, 33 AD3d 558 [2006], <i>lv denied </i>8 NY3d 945 [2007], quoting <i>People v Chambers</i>, 123 AD2d 270</p><br>[1986]).<p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: September 10, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3814]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System.
    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, February 20, 2001.
    Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and 
C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.
    Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: February 9, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3814 Filed 2-9-01; 4:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 4 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box) Name of establishment

Use IRS label.

Make any

necessary

changes.

Otherwise,

please type or

print.

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (See instructions.) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than

evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(See instructions.)

Employer’s name

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable.)

City, state, and ZIP code (If a foreign address, see instructions.)

Check the box if applicable: Final Return Amended Return

1 Total charged tips for calendar year 1999 1

2 Total charged receipts (other than nonallocable receipts) showing charged tips 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (Add lines 4a and 4b.) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (other than nonallocable receipts) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here  granted by the

district director. Attach a copy of the district director’s determination letter to this return

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (See instructions for restriction.)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach copy of agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature  Title  Date 

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (1999)

Note: If you checked line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours worked

per business day during the payroll period. (See instructions. )

Apt. or suite no.

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), put an “X” on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your records

on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 1999 

Note: Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 4 of

the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

 See separate instructions.

1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,114                   4,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,985                  10,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,139                     894
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       4,385,549               4,154,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,240                 240,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,268,485               4,056,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,996,843               1,847,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,373                 368,373
<COMMON>                                             6                       6
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,425,066               1,355,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,268,485               4,056,870
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,829                 561,097
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,746                 167,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,841                 113,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,726                 116,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,516                 163,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            220,151                 159,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,322                 130,431
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.93                    2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89                    2.07


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Roy Dar, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                              /s/ Roy Dar   Roy Dar   Vice President, Controller(Principal Accounting Officer)   Dated:August 22, 2006
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief to families

with young children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1993

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

tax relief to families with young children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (d) of section 151 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption amount) is

5 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

6 paragraphs:

7 ‘‘(5) INCREASE IN EXEMPTION AMOUNT FOR

8 CERTAIN YOUNG CHILDREN.—

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a de10 pendent of the taxpayer who is a qualified child,
2

•HR 1862 IH

1 the exemption amount shall be twice the

2 amount which would otherwise have been deter3 mined under this subsection.

4 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED CHILD.—For purposes of

5 this paragraph, the term ‘qualified child’ means

6 any child (as defined in subsection (c)(3)) of

7 the taxpayer if—

8 ‘‘(i) such child has not attained age 7

9 before the close of the taxable year, and

10 ‘‘(ii) the taxpayer elects to treat such

11 child as a qualified child under this para12 graph for such taxable year.

13 ‘‘(6) RECAPTURE RULES.—

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the taxpayer made

15 an election under paragraph (5)(B) with respect

16 to any child for 1 or more taxable years, the tax

17 imposed by this chapter on such taxpayer for

18 each taxable year in the recapture period for

19 such child shall be increased by an amount

20 equal to—

21 ‘‘(i) the recapture amount with re22 spect to such child, divided by

23 ‘‘(ii) the number of taxable years in

24 the recapture period.
3

•HR 1862 IH

1 ‘‘(B) RECAPTURE PERIOD.—For purposes

2 of this paragraph, the recapture period for any

3 child is the period of consecutive taxable

4 years—

5 ‘‘(i) which begins with the taxable

6 year in which the child attains age 7, and

7 ‘‘(ii) which consists of a number of

8 taxable years equal to two times the num9 ber of taxable years for which the child

10 was treated as a qualified child under

11 paragraph (5).

12 ‘‘(C) RECAPTURE AMOUNT.—For purposes

13 of this paragraph, the recapture amount with

14 respect to any child is the aggregate decrease in

15 the taxpayer’s tax under this chapter for prior

16 taxable years by reason of treating such child

17 as a qualified child under paragraph (5).

18 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE.—Any increase in tax

19 under this paragraph shall not be treated as a

20 tax imposed by this chapter for purposes of—

21 ‘‘(i) determining the amount of any

22 credit allowable under this chapter, and

23 ‘‘(ii) determining the amount of the

24 minimum tax imposed by section 55.’’
4

•HR 1862 IH

1 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

2 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2006 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2006

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on diazo-2,1,4-sulfonic acid 
                             and its salts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1993

Mr. Ballenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on diazo-2,1,4-sulfonic acid 
                             and its salts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIAZO-2,1,4-SULFONIC ACID AND ITS SALTS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  Naphth[2,1-d]-1,2,3-oxadiazole-5-sulfonic acid and its                      No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        sodium salt (CAS No. 63182-22-9) (provided for in                                                             31/94           ''
                        subheading 2934.90.45)..................................  Free                                                                 .

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Board of Directors
Strategic Diagnostics Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-20421, 333-21211 and 333-68107) on Form S-8 of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. of
our report dated February 19, 2002, except as to the eighth paragraph of note 7,
which is as of March 28, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Strategic Diagnostics Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001
annual report on Form 10-K of Strategic Diagnostics Inc.

Our report dated February 19, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that
describes the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations, and certain provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as required
for goodwill and intangible assets resulting from business combinations
consummated after June 30, 2001.



KPMG LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2002