alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 2, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. David Allan King, Ernestine Ritter King, David Anderson King, 
Susan Morrison King, all of Philadelphia, Mississippi, Herbert Allan 
King and Nancy Higdon King, both of Starkville, Mississippi, and James 
Howard Briscoe and Carolyn King Briscoe, both of Jackson, Mississippi, 
to collectively retain 16.78 percent of the voting shares of Citizens 
Holding Company and its subsidiary bank, The Citizens Bank of 
Philadelphia, both of Philadelphia, Mississippi.
    2. Donald Howard Kay, Jr., Martha Andrews Kay, Kyle Andrews Kay, 
and Rance Howard Kay, all of Ocala, Florida, to collectively retain 
79.47 percent of the voting shares of ONB Financial Services, Inc., and 
its subsidiary bank, Ocala National Bank, both of Ocala, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Harry Pike Schaller, Storm Lake, Iowa, to acquire 19.0 percent, 
totaling 39.8 percent, of the voting shares of FNC, Inc., Storm Lake, 
Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire The First National Company, 
Citizens First National Bank, and The First Leasing Company, all of 
Storm Lake, Iowa, and FNT, San Antonio, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 9, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3792 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TechTeam Global, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc J.
Lichtman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    /s/ Marc J. Lichtman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Marc J. Lichtman
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                        and Treasurer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1838

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for a study of El

Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (The Royal Road of the Interior Lands),

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 22, 1993

Mr. RICHARDSON (for himself and Mr. COLEMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for

a study of El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (The

Royal Road of the Interior Lands), and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘El Camino Real de

5 Tierra Adentro Study Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds that—
2

•HR 1838 IH

1 (1) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro was the

2 primary route for nearly 300 years that was used by

3 clergy, colonists, soldiers, Indians, officials and trade

4 caravans between Mexico and New Mexico;

5 (2) from the Spanish colonial period (1598–

6 1821), through the Mexican national period (1821–

7 1848), and through part of the United States Terri8 torial period (1848–1912), El Camino Real de Tier9 ra Adentro extended 1,800 miles from Mexico City

10 through Chihuahua City, El Paso del Norte, and on

11 to Santa Fe in northern New Mexico;

12 (3) the road was the first to be developed by

13 Europeans in what is now the United States and for

14 a time was one of the longest roads in North Amer15 ica; and

16 (4) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, until

17 the arrival of the railroad in the 1880s, witnessed

18 and stimulated great multicultural exchanges and

19 the evolution of nations, peoples, and cultures.

20 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF El CAMINO REAL DE TIERRA

21 ADENTRO IN THE UNITED STATES.

22 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16

23 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding the following new

24 paragraph at the end thereof:
3

•HR 1838 IH

1 ‘‘( ) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, the ap2 proximately 350 mile route extending from the inter3 national border at El Paso, Texas, across to Santa

4 Fe, New Mexico. The study shall (A) examine

5 changing routes within the general corridor, (B) ex6 amine major connecting branch routes, and (C) give

7 due consideration to alternative name designations.’’.

Æ
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7811

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LIONEL HOLLOWAY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr
- 00363

- ELH

- 1 ; 1:19

- cv
- 02243

- ELH )

Submitted : February 20 , 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, RUSHING , Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lionel Holloway , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lionel Holloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.
See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v.
McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holloway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

* Holloway’s § 2255 motion sought to challenge his September 2010 criminal judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rehaif v. United States , 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). Holloway may seek authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion based on Rehaif

. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2).3 contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit
10.2


FORM
OF OPTION COMMITMENT


Notice is hereby given
that, effective this ▼ day of ▼, 200▼ (the “Effective Date”)
Storm Cat Energy Corporation (the “Company”) has granted to ▼ (the “Service
Provider”), an Option to acquire ▼ Common Shares (“Optioned’ Shares”) up
to 5:00 p.m. Vancouver Time on the ▼ day of ▼, 200▼ (the “Expiry
Date”) at an Exercise Price of CDN$▼ per share.


At the date of grant of
the Option, the [Company’s Common Shares are listed for
trading on the TSX  Venture and the
Company is classified as a Tier ▼ Issuer / Company’s Common Shares are
listed for trading on the TSX].


Optioned Shares will vest
and may be exercised as follows:


▼ in accordance
with the vesting provisions set out in Schedule B of the Plan


or


▼ as follows:  ▼


The grant of the Option
evidenced hereby is made subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s
Amended & Restated Share Option Plan (the “Plan”) dated for reference June
27, 2006, the terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated
herein.  The Company will provide you
with a copy of the Plan upon your request.


To exercise your Option,
deliver a written notice specifying the number of Optioned Shares you wish to
acquire, together with cash or a certified cheque payable to the Company for
the aggregate Exercise Price, to the Company. 
A certificate for the Optioned Shares so acquired will be issued by the
Company’s transfer agent as soon as practicable thereafter and will bear a
minimum four month non-transferability legend from the date of this Option Commitment.  [Tier 1 Issuers on the TSX
Venture and companies listed on the TSX may grant stock options without a hold
period, provided the exercise price of the options has been set at or above the
market price of the Company’s shares on such stock exchange rather than below.]


The Company and the
Service Provider represent that the Service Provider under the terms and
conditions of the Plan is a bona fide [EMPLOYEE/ CONSULTANT/MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EMPLOYEE] ▼ of the Company, entitled to receive Options under Exchange
Policies (as such term is defined in the Plan).


	
  STORM CAT ENERGY CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Authorized Signatory
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.14    
    


 
 

TERM LOAN NOTE    
    



	$60,000,000.00	 	May 18, 2006





        FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Global Geophysical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby promise to pay to the order of Orpheus Holdings, LLC (the
"Lender"), at the principal office of Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC (as administrative agent for such Lenders
"Administrative Agent"), at 135 East 57th Street, New York, New York 10022, the principal sum of SIXTY MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($60,000,000.00) or such lesser amount equal to the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Term Loans made by the Lender to the Borrower under the Term Loan Agreement, dated the date hereof among
Borrower, Lender, the other financial institutions from time to time party thereto ("Term Loan Agreement"), in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, on the dates and in the principal amounts provided in the Term Loan Agreement, and to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each such Term Loan, at
such office, in like money and funds, for the period commencing on the date of such Term Loan until such Term Loan is paid in full, at the rates per annum and on the dates provided in the Term Loan
Agreement. 


        The
date, amount and maturity of each Term Loan made by the Lender to the Borrower, and each payment made on account of the principal thereof, will be recorded by the Lender on its books
and, prior to any transfer of this Term Loan Note, endorsed by the Lender on the schedules attached hereto, if any, or any continuation thereof. Capitalized terms used in this Term Loan Note have the
respective meanings assigned to them in the Term Loan Agreement. 


        This
Term Loan Note is issued pursuant to the Term Loan Agreement, is entitled to the benefits provided for in the Term Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents. The Term Loan
Agreement provides for the acceleration of the maturity of this Term Loan Note upon the occurrence of certain events, for prepayments of loans upon the terms and conditions specified therein and other
provisions relevant to this Term Loan Note. 


        THIS TERM LOAN NOTE WILL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.


[SEE
ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE] 









	

 	
 	
GLOBAL GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

    

	 	 	Name: Craig Lindberg

Title: Senior Vice President













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.14


TERM LOAN NOTE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                           <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                              7,987
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      32,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (914)
<INVENTORY>                                        19,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   60,640
<PP&E>                                             59,893
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (32,034)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    130,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              24,397
<BONDS>                                           105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                9
<OTHER-SE>                                         (8,593)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      130,508
<SALES>                                           192,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  192,577
<CGS>                                             161,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     171,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  112,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  8,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    12,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                        5,194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 7,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        7,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0

        

</TABLE>
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00045-CV

COX VENTURES, INC. D/B/A MEDIA INK, Appellant

V.

KNG, L.L.C. D/B/A TEXAS DIRECT BINDERY & LETTERPRESS, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1,002,161).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 

30, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Cox Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Media Ink, pay all 

appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 30, 2014.
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Sharp.y
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133097 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DAVID HOLUBOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133097 COA: 270992 Jackson CC: 05-004698-CD JACKSON COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WALTER A. BETANCOURT,

Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA EDWARDS,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1518

[February 6, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John Joseph Murphy, III, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE 

18-003088.

Walter A. Betancourt, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of the Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

|   |                                                                                                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                  |

| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           |

|                   |                                                                                    |               |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                   |                                                                                    |
|                   |                                                                                    |               |
| Date: October 20, 2010 | By:                                                                           | /s/Melvin Gagerman |
|                   |                                                                                    |
|                   | Melvin GagermanChief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          86,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  662,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,533
<INVENTORY>                                  2,412,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,413,758
<PP&E>                                         264,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,464,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,684
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,436,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,464,504
<SALES>                                      1,500,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,500,418
<CGS>                                          973,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  973,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               744,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (217,890)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (261,508)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (261,508)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (261,508)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Speed Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Form 10-K/A”), I, Terry J. Tuttle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 1, 2015



| | By | /s/ Terry J. Tuttle     | 
| | -- | ----------------------- | 
| |    | Terry J. Tuttle         | 
| |    | Chief Financial Officer |