alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN THE  COMPANY'S  10-K FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1996  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIREY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         $77,342,947
<SECURITIES>                                     5,176,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,696,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,263,683)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,406,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,548,268
<PP&E>                                         134,714,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,139,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,701,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,465,548
<BONDS>                                        199,979,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        72,647,099
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,453,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,701,198
<SALES>                                         41,299,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,299,486
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,342,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,188,654)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,224,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,632,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,632,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,378,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           85
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                      80
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,766
<PP&E>                                        4,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         6,166
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         34
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 13,332
<SALES>                                      14,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             14,782
<CGS>                                         9,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
#### Douglas A. PANNELL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric WILSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7945.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Douglas A. Pannell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas A. Pannell, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Pannell v. Wilson,*No. 3:13-cv-00413-JAG, 2013 WL 6092190 (E.D.Va. Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Form 56 

(Rev. December 2011)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Notice Concerning Fiduciary Relationship

(Internal Revenue Code sections 6036 and 6903)

OMB No. 1545-0013

Part I Identification 

Name of person for whom you are acting (as shown on the tax return) Identifying number Decedent’s social security no. 

Address of person for whom you are acting (number, street, and room or suite no.) 

City or town, state, and ZIP code (If a foreign address, see instructions.) 

Fiduciary’s name 

Address of fiduciary (number, street, and room or suite no.) 

City or town, state, and ZIP code Telephone number (optional) 

( )

Section A. Authority

1 Authority for fiduciary relationship. Check applicable box: 

a Court appointment of testate estate (valid will exists) 

b Court appointment of intestate estate (no valid will exists)

c Court appointment as guardian or conservator

d Valid trust instrument and amendments 

e Bankruptcy or assignment for the benefit or creditors 

f Other. Describe ▶

2 a If box 1a or 1b is checked, enter the date of death ▶

2 b If box 1c—1f is checked, enter the date of appointment, taking office, or assignment or transfer of assets ▶

Section B. Nature of Liability and Tax Notices 

3 Type of taxes (check all that apply): Income Gift Estate Generation-skipping transfer Employment 

Excise Other (describe) ▶

4 Federal tax form number (check all that apply): a 706 series b 709 c 940 d 941, 943, 944 

e 1040, 1040-A, or 1040-EZ f 1041 g 1120 h Other (list) ▶

5 If your authority as a fiduciary does not cover all years or tax periods, check here . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

and list the specific years or periods ▶

6 If the fiduciary listed wants a copy of notices or other written communications (see the instructions) check this box . . . . ▶

and enter the year(s) or period(s) for the corresponding line 4 item checked. If more than 1 form entered on line 4h, enter the

form number. 

Complete only if the line 6 box is checked.

If this item 

is checked: Enter year(s) or period(s) If this item is checked: Enter year(s) or period(s) 

4a 4b 

4c 4d

4e 4f

4g 4h:

4h: 4h:

For Paperwork Reduction Act and Privacy Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Cat. No. 16375I Form 56 (Rev. 12-2011) 
Form 56 (Rev. 12-2011) Page 2 

Part II Court and Administrative Proceedings 

Name of court (if other than a court proceeding, identify the type of proceeding and name of agency) Date proceeding initiated 

Address of court Docket number of proceeding 

City or town, state, and ZIP code Date Time a.m. 

p.m. 

Place of other proceedings 

Part III Signature 

Please 

Sign 

Here 

I certify that I have the authority to execute this notice concerning fiduciary relationship on behalf of the taxpayer. 

▲

Fiduciary’s signature Title, if applicable Date 

Form 56 (Rev. 12-2011)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,159
<SECURITIES>                                     5,972
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       196
<INVENTORY>                                      3,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,571
<PP&E>                                          32,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,515
<BONDS>                                         26,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,860
<SALES>                                          2,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,306
<CGS>                                            3,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (556)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial Officer

| | Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  September 13, 2005 | /s/ Stephen T. WillsStephen T. WillsExecutive Vice President
     and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

|   | a) | such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended      September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vyta      Corp for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Vyta Corp. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Paul H. Metzinger                                                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul H. Metzinger,       President      & CEO & Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer)                              |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-34] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Algona, IA.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, March 22, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2525.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69662). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on March 22, 2001. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on January 22, 2001.

Richard L. Day,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 01-3650  Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, in his
capacity as the acting Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition at the end of such quarter and the Companys results of operations for such quarter.





/s/    ANDREW J.
BUCKLANDAndrew J Buckland Acting Chief
Financial Officer





Dated: November 18, 2002
Supply Agreement



 

 
 Exhibit 10.ii.z 
 SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES 
 MEXICO 
  

			
	DATE:	  	MAY 16, 2006
		
	SELLER:	  	FERTILIZANTES MOSAIC S. de RL de CV
		  	__________________________________________
		  	__________________________________________
		  	__________________________________________
		
	BUYER:	  	NUTRIMENTOS AGROPECUARIOS PURINA S.A. DE C.V.
		  	__________________________________________
		  	__________________________________________
		  	__________________________________________
		
	PRODUCT:	  	BIOFOS
		
	SPECIFICATIONS:	  	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	MARKET:	  	MEXICO
		
	PERIOD:	  	MARCH 2006 – FEBRUARY 2007
		
	PRICING:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	QUANTITY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	DELIVERY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	PAYMENT:	  	30 DAYS
		
	TERMS:	  	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY. (ATTACHED)

  

									
			
	N.A.P.S.A.	 		  	MOSAIC MEXICO S. de RL de CV
					
	 By:
	 	  
	 		  	 By:
	 	  

	 Name:
	 	  
	 		  	 Name:
	 	  

	 Its:
	 	  
	 		  	 Its:
EXHIBIT 23.1


                     CONSENT OF CHANG G. PARK, CPA, PH. D.,
                 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         As independent registered public accountants,  we hereby consent to the
use of our report  dated  February  27, 2007 (except with respect to the matters
discussed  in Notes 12 and 17,  as to  which  the date is June 19,  2007) on the
consolidated financial statements of Environmental Service  Professionals,  Inc.
as of December 31, 2006 included in or made a part of this Form 10KSB/A.



/s/Chang G. Park, CPA
------------------------------------
Chang G. Park, CPA.

Chula Vista, California

May 21, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20473 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODNEY DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-867-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rodney Davis, also known as Arthur Carl Davis, pleaded guilty without a written plea agreement to possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, and he was sentenced to 90 months’ imprisonment, five years’ supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. At rearraignment, before the district court accepted his guilty plea, Davis asserted that he did not actually haveNo. 03-20473 -2- possession of the drugs, although he admitted that he arranged the meeting at which the drugs were sold and that he was present at the meeting. The district court then asked him whether he “knew what it was they were doing,” and Davis responded affirmatively. Davis argues on appeal that his denial at rearraignment of having possessed the drugs indicates that his guilty plea was not made knowingly and voluntarily. However, aiding and abetting “is an alternative charge in every count, whether explicit or implicit, and the rule is well-established, both in this circuit and others, that one who has been indicted as a principal may be convicted on evidence showing that he merely aided and abetted the commission of the offense.” United States v. Bullock , 451 F.2d 884, 888 (5th Cir. 1971). Davis admitted facts sufficient to support a conviction as an aider an abettor. See 18 U.S.C. § 2(a); United States v. Sorrells , 145 F.3d 744, 753 (5th Cir. 1998). Although the trial court did not inform Davis of the elements of aiding and abetting, his substantial rights were not violated because it is unlikely that his knowledge of the elements of aiding and abetting would have affected his willingness to plead guilty. See United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Therefore, the district court did not commit plain error and its decision is

AFFIRMED.
#### Nathaniel Howard THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-10744

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 2014.

Nathaniel Howard Thomas, Venus, TX, pro se.

Dale Gordon Bryant, Jr., Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

*349Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Nathanial Howard Thomas, former federal prisoner # 07052-078 and now Texas prisoner # 1886945, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a medical malpractice suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671*et seq.*He alleged that the federal prison’s medical staff failed to diagnose or treat his glaucoma, which resulted in blindness in one eye and partial blindness in the other. State law controls the liability for medical malpractice under the FTCA. *Ayers v. United States,*750 F.2d 449, 452 n. 1 (5th Cir.1985). Under Texas law, a medical-malpractice plaintiff must prove: (1) the physician’s duty to act according to an applicable standard of care, (2) a breach of that standard of care, (3) injury, and (4) causation. *Quijano v. United States,*325 F.3d 564, 567 (5th Cir.2003). Expert testimony is generally required to prove the applicable standard of care. *Id.*An expert is not necessary where “the mode or form of treatment is a matter of common knowledge or is within the experience of the layman.” *Hood v. Phillips,*554 S.W.2d 160, 165-66 (Tex.1977).

The district court granted summary judgment against Thomas on the malpractice claim based on his failure to designate an expert witness. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment. *Nickell v. Beau View of Biloxi, L.L.C.,*636 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir.2011). Contrary to his argument that the diagnosis and treatment for glaucoma is common knowledge, Thomas was required to present expert testimony to establish the applicable standard of care. *See Hood,*554 S.W.2d at 165-66. As it is uncontested that Thomas did not designate an expert witness to testify on his behalf, summary judgment was appropriate. *See Quijano,*325 F.3d at 567.

Thomas moved for appointment of counsel, asserting that he was unable to proceed pro se because he was incarcerated. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the district court denied the motion, and it later denied a renewed request when summary judgment was granted. On appeal, Thomas has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his requests for the appointment of counsel. *See Cupit v. Jones,*835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir.1987).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.