alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1769

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require that, in considering

the application of a hospital to change its geographic classification for

purposes of determining the amount of payment to the hospital for

the operating costs of inpatient hospital services under part A of the

medicare program, the Secretary of Health and Human Services find

the hospital’s wages to be comparable to the wages of hospitals in

the geographic area in which the hospital is applying to be classified

if the average hourly wage of the hospital is at least 85 percent of

the average hourly wage of hospitals paid in such area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming (for himself, Mr. GUNDERSON, Mr. SLATTERY, Mr.

ROBERTS, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. LANCASTER, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, and Mr. STRICKLAND) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

that, in considering the application of a hospital to

change its geographic classification for purposes of determining the amount of payment to the hospital for the

operating costs of inpatient hospital services under part

A of the medicare program, the Secretary of Health

and Human Services find the hospital’s wages to be

comparable to the wages of hospitals in the geographic

area in which the hospital is applying to be classified

if the average hourly wage of the hospital is at least
2

•HR 1769 IH

85 percent of the average hourly wage of hospitals paid

in such area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Hospital

5 Payment Equity Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. WAGE COMPARABILITY REQUIREMENT MET IF HOS7 PITAL WAGE IS 85 PERCENT OR MORE OF

8 WAGES IN AREA IN WHICH HOSPITAL AP9 PLIES TO BE CLASSIFIED.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(10)(D) of the

11 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)) is

12 amended—

13 (1) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii);

14 and

15 (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following

16 new clause:

17 ‘‘(ii) The Board shall find that a hospital meets any

18 guidelines published under clause (i)(I) for comparing hos19 pital wages if the average hourly wage of the hospital is

20 at least 85 percent of the average hourly wage of hospitals

21 paid in the area in which the hospital is applying to be

22 classified.’’.

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

24 subsection (a) shall apply to geographic classifications and
3

•HR 1769 IH

1 reclassifications for hospitals under section

2 1886(d)(10)(C) of the Social Security Act for fiscal years

3 beginning on or after October 1, 1993.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners IV, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Limited, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of
and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:  August 27, 2004  By:     /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Limited

Technology Funding Partners IV, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40383 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO BEST, also known as Armando Donato Best Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-231-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Best has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Best has not filed a response. Our independent reviewofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilder Richman Historic Properties
II, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Richard Paul Richman
---------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Company
January 14, 2003
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Acker,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ Kevin J. Acker                   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Kevin J. Acker                       |   |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

March 14, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WestSuburban Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-PA-00704, styled In the Interest of S.L.L., A Child, in the

131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel presiding. However, the order

complained of was signed by the Honorable Associate Judge Richard Garcia, presiding judge of the Children’s Court,

Bexar County, Texas. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00334-CV

IN RE S.L., A Child

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 2, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED 

On April 30, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Based on the record before

us, we conclude relator has not established the trial court clearly abused its discretion. See In re

Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 273 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Tex. 2009) (providing mandamus relief

is proper to correct a clear abuse of discretion); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124,

135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREM E COURT OF THE STATE OF M ONTANA Sup rem e Co u rtNo
. DA 2 0 -0 4 8 0 KYLE R. BABCOCK, Pl ai n t i ff an d Ap p el lan t , v . CASEY'S M A

NAGEM ENT, LLC, Defen d an tan dAp p el l ee,

ORDER GRANTI

NG 3 0 -DAY

EXTENSI

ON Up o n m o t i o no f Rei dJ . Perk i ns , at t o rn ey fo r Cas ey 's M an ag em en t , LLC (" Cas ey ' s " ), an dg o odcau s e ap p eari n g an d n o o b ject i o n b y

Op p o s i n g Co u n s el , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thatth e Ap p el l ee i s g ran t edanex t en si on t o M arch 5 , 2 0 2 1 , i nwh i ch t o p rep are, s erv e an d fi l e i t s Res p o n s e t o Ap p el lan t s ' Op en i n g Bri ef. Dat edth i s _

_ _ d ay o f Feb ru ary , 2 0 21
.

_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ Bo wen Green wo o d Cl erko f M o n tan a Sup rem e Co u rt
cc: Rei dJ . Perk i ns , Es q . Qu en t i nM . Rh o ad es , Es q .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 1 2021

02/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0480
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sean Acrey and Susan H. Acrey, * From the 236th District

Court of Tarrant County,

 Trial Court No. 236-246292-10.

Vs. No. 11-14-00025-CV * April 29, 2016

Langston Land Partners, LP; * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

Langston Mineral Partners, LP; (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Cynthia Langston Schmiediche; and Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

Carol Langston Mathis, 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed ninety percent against Sean Acrey and 

Susan H. Acrey, and ten percent against Langston Land Partners, LP; Langston 

Mineral Partners, LP; Cynthia Langston Schmiediche; and Carol Langston 

Mathis.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1763

To amend the Public Health Service Act and title XVIII of the Social

Security Act with respect to health professional shortage areas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming, Mr. SLATTERY, Mr.

LANCASTER, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. GUNDERSON, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on

Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act and title XVIII

of the Social Security Act with respect to health professional shortage areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Professional

5 Shortage Area Amendments of 1993’’.
2

HR 1763 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION IN CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION AS

2 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREA.

3 (a) NUMBER OF ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS.—Section

4 332(b)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.

5 245e(b)(2)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (C);

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (D) and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following subpara11 graph:

12 ‘‘(E) 20 percent or more of the population

13 being 65 years of age or older.’’.

14 (b) RELEVANCE OF TRAVEL TIMES WITHIN FRON15 TIER AREAS.—Section 332(a) of the Public Health Service

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 245e(a)) is amended by adding at the end

17 the following new paragraph:

18 ‘‘(4) With respect to meeting the criteria under

19 paragraph (1)(A) for an area to be designated as a

20 health professional shortage area, the Secretary

21 shall, in the case of a frontier area, make the deter22 mination of whether the frontier area is a rational

23 area for the delivery of health services without re24 gard to—

25 ‘‘(A) the travel time between population

26 centers in the frontier area; or
3

HR 1763 IH

1 ‘‘(B) the travel time to contiguous area re2 sources in the frontier area.’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall take effect on October 1, 1993, or upon

5 the date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs

6 later.

7 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF ADDITIONAL PAYMENT UNDER MED8 ICARE FOR PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES FUR9 NISHED IN FORMER SHORTAGE AREAS.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(m) of the Social Se11 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(m)) is amended by striking

12 ‘‘area,’’ and inserting ‘‘area (or, in the case of an area

13 for which the designation as a health professional shortage

14 area under such section is withdrawn, in the case of physi15 cians’ services furnished to such an individual during the

16 3-year period beginning on the effective date of the with17 drawal of such designation),’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to physicians’ services furnished

20 in an area for which the designation as a health profes21 sional shortage area under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the

22 Public Health Service Act is withdrawn on or after

23 January 1, 1994.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-99216, 333-62207 and 333-63224) and
Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-88670, 33-93812, 333-42543, 333-46684 and 333-110566) of
Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (formerly Chelsea GCA Realty, Inc.) and Forms S-3
(Nos. 333-36487, 333-39324 and 333-100142) of Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and
CPG Partners, L.P. (formerly Chelsea GCA Realty Partnership, L.P.) and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated February 24, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Chelsea Property Group, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2003.

Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
February 24, 2004
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in  Registration  Statement
     Number in Registration  Statement  Number 33-47593 on Form S-8 dated May 1,
     1992, in Registration Statement Number 33-61896 on Form S-8 dated April 29,
     1993, in Registration Statement Number 33-78258 on Form S-8 dated April 28,
     1994, in Registration Statement Number 33-91294 on Form S-8 dated April 17,
     1995,  Registration  Statement  Number 33-02531 on Form S-8 dated April 16,
     1996,  Registration  Statement  Number 33-50275 on Form S-8 dated April 16,
     1998, and in Registration Statement Number 33-75099 on Form S-8 dated March
     26,  1999 of our  report  dated  February  14,  2000,  with  respect to the
     consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of Mid  Atlantic  Medical
     Services,  Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
     for the year ended December 31, 1999.






                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virgina                                   ---------------------
March 28, 2000                                      Ernst & Young LLP
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1983

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify the availability

of Medicaid payment for childhood vaccine replacement programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Ms. BYRNE (for herself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. HASTINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify

the availability of Medicaid payment for childhood vaccine replacement programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF MEDICAID PAYMENTS FOR

4 CHILDHOOD VACCINE REPLACEMENT PRO5 GRAMS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(32) of the Social

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(32)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (B),
2

HR 1983 IH

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(D) in the case of payment for a child6 hood vaccine administered to individuals enti7 tled to medical assistance under the State plan,

8 the State plan may make payment directly to

9 the manufacturer of the vaccine under a vol10 untary replacement program agreed to by the

11 State pursuant to which the manufacturer (i)

12 supplies doses of the vaccine to providers ad13 ministering the vaccine, (ii) periodically replaces

14 the supply of the vaccine, and (iii) charges the

15 State the manufacturer’s bid price to the Cen16 ters for Disease Control for the vaccine so ad17 ministered plus a reasonable premium to cover

18 shipping and the handling of returns;’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact21 ment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0633

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

NICHOLAS RYAN MCGUIRE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Dan Wilson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2024

04/10/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0633
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50238

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GONZALO ZAVALZA-PLANTILLAS, also known 

as Gonzalo Plantillas, also known as Gonzalo

Zavala-Plantillas,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1750-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Gonzalo

Zavalza-Plantillas raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Company and Kenneth W. Lowe



 Exhibit 10.63B 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 DATED JUNE 16, 2003 
 This Amendment No. 2 is made to that certain Employment Agreement between The E. W. Scripps Company, an Ohio corporation (together with its
successors and assigns, the “Company”), and Kenneth W. Lowe (“Executive”), which was entered into on June 16, 2003 and was amended by Amendment No. 1 dated September 30, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”).

 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the stipulated term thereof two
(2) years; 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company granted to Executive on February 23, 2006, 50,000 restricted
Class A Common Shares of the Company (the “Restricted Shares”) and an option for 125,000 Class A Common Shares of the Company (the “Option”); 
 WHEREAS, the Restricted Shares are evidenced by that certain Restricted Share Award Agreement dated February 23, 2006 (the “Restricted
Share Award Agreement”), and the Option is evidenced by that certain Option Agreement dated February 23, 2006 (the “Option Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to clarify that Section 6 of the Restricted Share Award Agreement and Section 5 of the Option Agreement supersede any
provision in the Employment Agreement that might be interpreted to the contrary; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing
and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree that from and after the date hereof: 
 1. The date “December 31,
2006” appearing in paragraph 2(a) shall be deleted in its entirety and the date “December 31, 2008” shall be substituted in its place. 
 2. No provision of the Employment Agreement shall override Section 6 of the Restricted Share Award Agreement or Section 5 of the Option Agreement, and accordingly any provision in the Employment Agreement
relating to grants of restricted shares or options that otherwise would provide for an acceleration of vesting of the Restricted Shares or the Option upon Early Retirement of Executive will be deemed not to include the Restricted Shares or the
Option. 
 This Amendment No. 2 is executed on May 10, 2006. 
  

			
	THE COMPANY:
	
	THE E. W. SCRIPPS COMPANY
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  

	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	  
 Kenneth W.
Lowe