alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter
      Agreement

    


    


    


    
      	
              To
                the Board of Directors of 

            	
              As
                of August 2, 2006

            
	
              East
                India Company Acquisition Corp.

            	 


    

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    The
      undersigned hereby agrees that he/she will not transfer a portion of their
      beneficial interest in East India Company Acquisition Corp. by transferring
      interests in 25th
      Street
      LLC to other individuals or entities. 

    


    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    


    /s/
      Kary Shankar

    Kary
      Shankar

    


    


    


    /s/
      Reena Nandi

    Reena
      Nandi
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

SYNERGY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDIC

SURGERY CENTER, LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

SILVER PINE IMAGING, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellee

, UNPUBLISHED

July 15, 2021

v No. 350549

Washtenaw Circuit Court

AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE

COMPANY, LC No. 17

- 001041

- NF

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: R IORDAN

, P .J., and M. J. K ELLY and S HAPIRO , JJ.

M. J. K ELLY

, J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Michael J. Kelly
# Comment Request - SNAP Requirements for National Directory of New Hires for Employment Verification

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) 

Thursday, March 14, 2024

Federal Register link

Print version

Monday, May 13, 2024

SNAP regulations at 7 CFR 272.16 require that each state agency must compare identifiable information about each adult household member against data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) National Directory of New Hires (NDNH). This comparison will be used to determine the eligibility status of the household and determine the correct benefit amount the household should receive.

Following OMB approval of this collection, FNS intends to merge this collection with OMB control number 0584–0064.

Written comments must be received on or before May 13, 2024.

Page updated: March 14, 2024
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 18, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136951 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136951 

 COA: 284764 

Wayne CC: 87-001671-FY

DANIEL LEROY SANDERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

 KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

p1211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 18, 2008 

 Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. 2004 CHEVROLET MONTE CARLO, VIN# 2G1WW12E349209700, Defendant Joey Antwan Smith, Claimant-Appellant.

No. 13-2701.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 25, 2014.

Filed: July 1, 2014.

Maureen McGuire, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Joey Antwan Smith, Herlong, CA, pro se.

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this civil forfeiture action, Joey Smith appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion for relief from the judgment. *476Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that Smith did not present a valid basis for post-judgment relief, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his post-judgment motion. *See Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr.,*506 F.3d 1111, 1117 (8th Cir.2007) (district court’s denial of Rule 60(b)(6) motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion); *see also Arnold v. Wood,*238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.2001) (because Rule 60(b) motion cannot substitute for appeal, appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) motion does not present underlying judgment for appellate review; Rule 60(b) is not vehicle for simple reargument on merits); *Ivy v. Kimbrough,*115 F.3d 550, 552 (8th Cir.1997) (attorney’s ignorance or carelessness does not constitute excusable neglect).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,186
<SECURITIES>                                    12,945
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       196
<INVENTORY>                                      3,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,571
<PP&E>                                          32,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,515
<BONDS>                                         26,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,860
<SALES>                                          2,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,306
<CGS>                                            3,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (556)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
Form 8082

(Rev. September 2017) 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative 

Adjustment Request (AAR) 

(For use by partners, S corporation shareholders, estate and domestic trust beneficiaries, foreign 

trust owners and beneficiaries, REMIC residual interest holders, and TMPs.) 

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8082 for instructions and the latest information. 

OMB No. 1545-0790 

Attachment 

Sequence No. 84 

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number 

Part I General Information 

1 Check boxes that apply: (a) Notice of inconsistent treatment (b) Administrative adjustment request (AAR) 

2 Identify type of pass-through entity: 

(a) Partnership (b) S corporation (c) Estate (d) Trust (e) REMIC 

3 Employer identification number of pass-through entity 

4 Name, address, and ZIP code of pass-through entity 

5 Internal Revenue Service Center where pass-through entity filed its return 

6 Tax year of pass-through entity 

/ / to / / 

7 Your tax year 

/ / to / / 

Part II Inconsistent or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR) Items 

(a) Description of inconsistent or 

administrative adjustment request (AAR) items 

(see instructions) 

(b) Inconsistency is in, 

or AAR is to correct 

(check boxes that apply) 

Amount of 

item 

Treatment 

of item 

(c) Amount as shown on 

Schedule K-1, Schedule Q, or 

similar statement, a foreign

trust statement, or your return, 

whichever applies (see 

instructions) 

(d) Amount you are reporting (e) Difference between

(c) and (d) 

 

8

9

10 

11 

Part III Explanations—Enter the Part II item number before each explanation. If more space is needed, 

continue your explanations on the back. 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 49975G Form 8082 (Rev. 9-2017) 
Form 8082 (Rev. 9-2017) Page 2 

Part III Explanations (continued)

Form 8082 (Rev. 9-2017)
[Exhibit 32.1]

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that  this  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q   for
the quarter  ended March 31, 2005 fully complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information  contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


This 13th day of May, 2005


/S/Wm. Lee Popham
-------------------------------------
Wm. Lee Popham
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Samir T. Badawi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /S/ Samir T. Badawi 
 
 Date March 12, 2004 
 A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1125-1126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6614-4]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings 
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published 
in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157).

Final EISs

ERP No. F-AFS-J65293-MT

    Taylor Fork Timber Sale and Road Restoration, Implementation, Buck 
Creek, Taylor Fork Creek and Eldridge Creek, Gallatin National Forest, 
Madison Ranger, Hebgen Lake Ranger District, Yellow Stone, Gallatin 
County, MT.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the potential 
for delivery of sediment to Taylor Creek a 303(d) listed stream, but 
also indicated that project modifications should substantially mitigate 
effects. EPA recommended that aquatic effects on the Taylor Fork should 
be monitored to identify the actual impacts from the implementation 
activities. EPA believes additional information is needed to fully 
assess and mitigate all potential impacts of the management actions.

ERP No. F-SFW-K64017-CA

    Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration, To Restore and Maintain 
the Natural Production of Anadromous Fish, Trinity and Humboldt 
Counties, CA.
    Summary: EPA urged approval, funding, and implementation of the 
Preferred Alternative as soon as possible and the amendment of BOR's 
existing SWRCB water permit to be consistent with the minimum instream 
flows, minimum reservoir storage, and TRD operational requirements of 
this alternative.

ERP No. FB-NPS-K61029-CA

    Yosemite Valley Plan, Resource Preservation and Restoration, 
Visitor Enjoyment, Transportation and Employee Housing, Implementation, 
Yosemite National Park, Mariposa County, CA.

[[Page 1126]]

    Summary: EPA reviewed the FSEIS and found that the document 
adequately addresses the issues raised in our comment letter. 
Therefore, EPA has no objection to the action as proposed.

    Dated: January 2, 2001.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 01-379 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,956
<PP&E>                                       1,081,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,082,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,177
<BONDS>                                        310,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         88
<COMMON>                                           334
<OTHER-SE>                                     737,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,082,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,356
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
  This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from the
  balance sheet of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. at June 30, 2000,  and its statement
  of income for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
  reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL  Income  Fund IV,  ltd.  for the six months
  ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,782,300
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  268,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                   212,069
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         18,187,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,172,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,560,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,486,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,560,323
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,081,341
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  452,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,955
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                918,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            918,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   918,667
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>  Due to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund IV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DON BOGARD, AKA Michael R. Staten,

AKA Larry Donnell Bogard, Jr.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50015

D.C. No. 2:91-cr-00777-WDK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Don Bogard appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a

sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Bogard contends that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence

based upon Amendment 709 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The

district court did not err by concluding that such a reduction would be inconsistent

with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission. See

United States v. Paulk, 569 F.3d 1094, 1095 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam);

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(A), (c); see also United States v. Marler, 527 F.3d 874,

878 n.1 (9th Cir. 2008) (noting that Amendment 709 does not apply retroactively).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1

                           American Land Lease, Inc.

                        Subsidiaries as of March 19, 2001


AIC Home Sales Corp.                      CAX Savanna, L.L.C.
AIC Management Corporation                CAX White Sands, L.L.C.
AIC Management Holdings, L.L.C.           Commercial Assets Finance, Inc.
AIC Property Management Company, L.L.C.   Fiesta MHP Investors, L.L.C.
AIOP Brentwood West, L.L.C.               Fiesta SPE, L.L.C.
AIOP Florida Properties I, L.L.C.         Fiesta/Encanta MHP, L.L.C.
AIOP Florida Properties II, L.L.C.        Lakeshore Utilities, Inc.
AIOP Gulfstream Harbor, L.L.C.            Lakeshore Utilities, L.L.C.
AIOP Gulfstream Outlot I, L.L.C.          Riverside Golf Course and Marina,
                                          L.L.C.
AIOP Gulfstream Outlot II, L.L.C.         Riverside Utilities, L.L.C.
AIOP Gulfstream Outlot III, L.L.C.        Royal Palm Village, L.L.C.
AIOP Lost Dutchman Notes, L.L.C.          Southern Palms MHP, L.L.C.
AIOP Mullica, L.L.C.                      ALL TRS Holding Company, Inc.
AIOP Serendipity, L.L.C.                  Marina Dunes at Montery, L.L.C.
Asset Investors Acceptance, Inc.
CAX Saddlebrook, LLC
Asset Investors Finance Corporation
Asset Investors Funding Corporation
Asset Investors Mortgage Funding
Corporation
Asset Investors Operating Partnership,
L.P.
Asset Investors Secured Finance
Corporation
Prime Forest Partners
Casa Encanta Commercial, L.L.C.
CAX Acquisition Corp.
CAX Cannery, L.L.C.
CAX Cypress Greens II, L.L.C.
CAX Cypress Greens, L.L.C.
CAX DTR Securitization Corp.
CAX La Casa Blanca East, L.L.C.
CAX La Casa Blanca Mini-Storage, L.L.C.
CAX La Casa Blanca, L.L.C.
CAX Lakeshore, L.L.C.
CAX New Era Homes, L.L.C.
CAX Rancho Mirage, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside II, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside III, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside Maintenance, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside, L.L.C.
CAX Saddlebrook, L.L.C.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Admiral Financial Corp., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wm. Lee Popham, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 13, 2009





/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham President

Admiral Financial Corp.





/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham Principal Accounting Officer

Admiral Financial Corp.