alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Patrick O. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department; James Townsend, Property Manager, Monroe Hall; FNU Nipper, Cat’s Safety Manager; Sarah Parker, North Carolina Chief Justice, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-7292.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Christian v. Moore,*No. 3:10-cv-00302-FDW-DSC, 2010 WL 3418390 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  1994
Home/Timeline 1990-2013/1994 Previous			Next
1994										Director Wells appoints The Mediator Task Force on the Future of FMCS to prepare the Service for the next century.
FMCS forms its own labor-management partnership council and enters into a Partnership Agreement a year later with its National Office employees’ union, the National Association of Government Employees (NAGE) Local R3-118.
D2015-06-18T12:46:38-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Accessibility |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1921

To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to repeal the market promotion

program of the Department of Agriculture.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. ARMEY (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs.

SCHROEDER, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. COX, Mr.

ZIMMER, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. FAWELL, and Mr. GOSS),

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to repeal

the market promotion program of the Department of

Agriculture.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1921 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MARKET PROMOTION PROGRAM.

2 (a) REPEAL.—Section 203 of the Agricultural Trade

3 Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5623) is repealed.

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Agricultural

5 Trade Act of 1978 is amended—

6 (1) in section 211 (7 U.S.C. 5641), by striking

7 subsection (c); and

8 (2) in section 402(a)(1) (7 U.S.C. 5662(a)(1)),

9 by striking ‘‘203,’’.

10 (c) EFFECT OF REPEAL ON EXISTING AGREE11 MENTS.—The repeal by subsection (a) of the market pro12 motion program established pursuant to section 203 of the

13 Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 shall not affect the validity

14 or continued operation of an agreement entered into be15 fore the date of the enactment of this Act to provide as16 sistance under such section.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                        January 15-16, 2002.                    

*Time:*                        1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Aftab A. Ansari, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Natcher Building, MSC 6500, 45 Center Drive, 5AS-25S, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4952.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-32161  Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roylan ROMERO-CORONADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10320

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

Susan Cowger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Charles M. Bleil, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Roylan Romero-Coronado (Romero) appeals the 72-month sentence imposed in connection with his guilty plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States following his prior deportation.

Romero’s sole argument on appeal is that in imposing his sentence (an upward variance from the guidelines range), the district court procedurally erred by failing to acknowledge or explain its disagreement with the United States Sentencing Commission’s policy decision that the severity of a reentry offense should be measured by the defendant’s most serious pre-deportation conviction, not by the defendant’s number of deportations. In support, Romero relies in large part on *United States v. Simmons,*568 F.3d 564 (5th Cir. 2009), wherein we stated that when a district court disagrees with the Guidelines’ policy considerations, “what is necessary is that a court explain its reasons for disagreeing with [same].” *Id.*at 570. Romero’s claim of procedural error is premised on his assertion that the Sentencing Commission has made the policy decision that courts should not consider an illegal reentry defendant’s prior deportations in assessing the severity of the defendant’s offense conduct. Romero, however, points to no provision, policy statement, or commentary within the Guidelines that supports his assertion. Accordingly, *Simmons*is not applicable to the instant case, and Romero has not shown that the district court committed any procedural error. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. at September  30, 2000,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund IV, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,777,569
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                   272,118
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         16,976,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,934,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,754,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,051,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,754,362
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,494,462
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  629,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               12,685
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,809,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,809,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,809,079
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  IV,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.</FN>



</TABLE>
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 08536

Attention:  Ms. Bonnie Huff / Ms. Janet Boyer

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Huff and Ms. Boyer:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:
     /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED
WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1995 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1995

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an exception where 
 a noncustodial parent provides over half of the support of the child 
        for a calendar year to claim such child as a dependent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1993

 Mr. Volkmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an exception where 
 a noncustodial parent provides over half of the support of the child 
        for a calendar year to claim such child as a dependent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION WHERE A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT PROVIDES OVER HALF OF 
              THE SUPPORT OF THE CHILD FOR A CALENDAR YEAR TO CLAIM 
              SUCH CHILD AS A DEPENDENT.

    Section 152(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
adding a new paragraph ``3'' following paragraph ``2'' and 
redesignating following paragraphs in section accordingly.
            ``(3) Exception where a noncustodial parent provides over 
        half of the support of the child for a calendar year.--A child 
        of parents described in paragraph (1) shall be treated as 
        having received over half of his support during a calendar year 
        from the noncustodial parent if--
                    ``(A) the custodial parent refuses to release claim 
                to exemption under paragraph (2) and
                    ``(B) the custodial parent does not contribute to 
                support of the child and
                    ``(C) the noncustodial parent does provide over 
                half of the support of the child, then
                    ``(D) the noncustodial parent shall be entitled to 
                claim such child as a dependent.''

                                 <all>
```
Form 8288

(Rev. February 2016)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

U.S. Withholding Tax Return for Dispositions by Foreign 

Persons of U.S. Real Property Interests

▶ Information about Form 8288 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8288.

OMB No. 1545-0902

Complete Part I or Part II. Also complete and attach Copies A and B of Form(s) 8288-A. 

(Attach additional sheets if you need more space.)

Part I To Be Completed by the Buyer or Other Transferee Required To Withhold Under Section 1445(a)

1 Name of buyer or other transferee responsible for withholding (see instructions) Identifying number

Street address, apt. or suite no., or rural route. Do not use a P.O. box.

City or town, province or state, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Phone number (optional)

2 Description and location of property acquired

3 Date of transfer 4 Number of Forms 8288-A attached 5 Amount realized on the transfer

6 Check applicable box.

a For dispositions after February 16, 2016, withholding is at 15% . . . . . . .

b For dispositions prior to February 17, 2016 and certain post-February 16, 2016 

dispositions (see instructions), withholding is at 10% . . . . . . . . . .

c Withholding is of a reduced amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7 Amount withheld

Part II To Be Completed by an Entity Subject to the Provisions of Section 1445(e)

1 Name of entity or fiduciary responsible for withholding (see instructions) Identifying number

Street address, apt. or suite no., or rural route. Do not use a P.O. box.

City or town, province or state, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Phone number (optional)

2 Description of U.S. real property interest transferred or distributed

3 Date of transfer 4 Number of Forms 8288-A attached

5 Complete all items that apply.

a Amount subject to withholding at 35% . . . . . . . .

b Amount subject to withholding at 15% . . . . . . . .

c Amount subject to withholding at 10% . . . . . . . .

d Amount subject to withholding at reduced rate . . . . . .

e Large trust election to withhold at distribution . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 Total amount withheld

Sign 

Here

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge 

and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than taxpayer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge.

▲

Signature of withholding agent, partner, fiduciary, or corporate officer Title (if applicable) Date

Paid 

Preparer 

Use Only 

Print/Type preparer’s name Preparer’s signature Date Check if 

self-employed

 PTIN

Firm’s name ▶

Firm’s address ▶

Firm's EIN ▶

Phone no. 

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the instructions. Cat. No. 62260A Form 8288 (Rev. 2-2016)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3574]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis in Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: February 22-24, 2001; 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joseph P. Brennan, Program Director, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 292-4876.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposal submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Algebra 
and Number Theory, and Combinatorics Program, as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 6, 2001.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3574 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit21.1**

 

**STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

 

Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

The Selmer Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

Vincent Bach International, a corporation organizedunder the laws of the United Kingdom

 

The Steinway Piano Company, Inc., a Delawarecorporation

 

Steinway, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

The O.S. Kelly Corporation, a Delaware corporation

 

The O.S. Kelly Company, an Ohio corporation

 

Steinway & Sons, a New York corporation

 

Boston Piano Company, a Massachusetts corporation

 

Boston Piano GmbH, a corporation organized under thelaws of Germany

 

Hermann KlugeBeteiligungs-GmbH, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany

 

Hermann Kluge GmbH &Co. KG, a limited partnership organized under the laws of Germany

 

Bohn Claviaturen GmbH& Co. KG, a limited partnership organized under the laws of Germany

 

Bona Sp. Z O.O., alimited liability company organized under the laws of Poland

 

Pianohaus Karl Lang GmbH, a corporation organizedunder the laws of Germany

 

S & B Retail, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

Steinway & Sons Japan, Ltd., a corporationorganized under the laws of Japan

 

United Musical Instruments Holdings, Inc., a Delawarecorporation

 

United Musical Instruments USA, Inc., an Indianacorporation

 

UMI Austria GmbH, a corporation organized under thelaws of Austria

 

The SMI Trust, a Massachusetts business trust

 

Emerson MusicalInstruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

----