10490 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc.01–3860 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001–05–U

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–81–000]

Chandeleur Gas Pipe Line Company;

Notice of Application

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on February 5, 2001,

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company

(Chandeleur), P.O. Box 4879, Houston,

Texas 77210–4879, filed in Docket No.

CP01–81–000 an application pursuant

to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for

a certificate of public convenience and

necessity authorizing an increase in

total system capacity, all as more fully

set forth in the application on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection. This filing may be viewed

on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

Chandeleur proposes to increase the

maximum capacity of its system from

280,000 Mcf of natural gas per day to

321,000 Mcf per day. It is stated that the

proposed increase is needed to more

closely match current production

profiles with delivery point capacities

and to reflect a planned interconnection

with Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.

(Destin). It is asserted that the

interconnection is being installed on the

refinery grounds of Chandeleur’s

affiliate, Chevron Products Company, a

division of Chevron USA Inc., in

Pascagoula, Mississippi, by Chandeleur

and Destin under their respective

blanket certificates. It is further asserted

that the increase in capacity can be

accomplished without an increase in

operating pressure. It is explained that

Chandeleur has conducted an open

season for the new capacity and is in the

process of completing precedent

agreements with shippers for the new

capacity.

Any questions regarding the

application should be directed to Ruth

A. Bosek, Bosek Law Firm, at (202) 326–

5256, 1090 Vermont Ave., NW., Suite

800, Washington, DC 20005.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make protest with reference to said

application should on or before

February 20, 2001, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

a motion to intervene or a protest in

accordance with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 175.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules. Comments and protests may be

filed electronically in lieu of paper. See

18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s

website at http://ferc.fed.us/efi/

doorbell.htm.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate is required by the public

convenience and necessity. If a motion

for leave to intervene is timely filed, or

if the Commission on its own motion

believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for Chandeleur to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–3808 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–80–000]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Application

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on February 2, 2001,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), Post Office Box 1642,

Houston, Texas, 77251–1642, filed in

Docket No. CP01–80–000 an application

pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural

Gas Act for authorization to construct,

own, and operate additional pipeline

and compression facilities in Tennessee

and Georgia and to extend its Line 3500

in Tennessee and Georgia to provide

transportation to new customers in

Georgia, all as more fully set forth in the

application on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection. This

filing may be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

East Tennessee proposes to construct

and operate approximately 27 miles of

20-inch pipeline as an extension of its

Line 3500 in Hamilton County, TN, and

Catoosa, Whitfield, and Murray

Counties, GA (the Murray Lateral); to

construct four 20-inch pipeline loops

adjacent to the existing East Tennessee

system in Bedford, Moore, Franklin,

Marion, and Hamilton Counties, TN;

and to hydrostatically test four pipeline

sections of approximately 30 miles of

12-inch pipeline and to increase the

maximum allowable operating pressures

(MAOP) of six pipeline sections on the

East Tennessee system in Marshall,

Bedford, Moore, Franklin, Marion,

Sequatchie, McMinn, and Grundy

Counties, TN. East Tennessee also

proposes to install an additional 10,950

horsepower (hp) at two existing

compressor stations by increasing

horsepower at Stations 3210 and 3214

and to install a 1590 hp compressor unit

at the new Station 3216 in McMinn

County, TN, by moving the existing

compressor unit from Station 3210. In

addition, East Tennessee would

construct two gas meter stations and

regulators: one in Whitfield County and

one in Murray County, GA.

East Tennessee states that the

proposed construction would allow it to

provide 5,000 dekatherms per day (Dth/

d) for Dalton Utilities (Dalton), and the

City of Cartersville (Cartersville), GA;

and it would provide increasing

volumes up to 165,000 Dth/d of firm

transportation service to Duke Energy

Murray, LLC (DENA Murray), jointly

referred to as the Murray customers.

This transportation service will allow

Dalton and Cartersville to meet the

anticipated growth in their existing

markets in the Georgia area. In addition,

this firm transportation will deliver gas

supply to the Murray electric generating

plant (Murray Energy facility), a 1240-

megawatt (MW) gas-fired power plant

being developed by and to be owned by

DENA Murray in Murray County, GA.

East Tenn estimates the cost of the

proposed facilities to be $69,390,000.

East Tenn proposes to provide service

pursuant to firm transportation service

agreements entered into pursuant to its

Rate Schedule FT–A. However, service

to its Murray customers would be

provided at an incremental rate.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2001 / Notices 10491

East Tenn states that the Murray

Energy Facility has commenced

construction and has made significant

capacity commitments for long leadtime items, including a contractual

commitment with General Electric for

four electric turbines. Therefore, East

Tenn requests that a certificate be issued

by August 15, 2001.

Any questions regarding the

application should be directed to Steven

E. Tillman, Director, Regulatory Affairs,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company,

P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas, 77251,

(713) 627–5044.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before

February March 2, 2001, file with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules. Comments and protests may be

filed electronically in lieu of paper. See

18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s

website at http://ferc.fed.us/efl/

doorbell.htm.

A person obtaining intervenor status

will be placed on the service list

maintained by the Secretary of the

Commission and will receive copies of

all documents filed by the applicant and

by ever one of the intervenors. An

intervenor can file for rehearing of any

Commission order and can petition for

court review of any such order.

However, an intervenor must submit

copies of comments or any other filing

it makes with the Commission to every

other intervenor in the proceeding, as

well as 14 copies with the Commission.

A person does not have to intervene,

however, in order to have comments

considered. A person, instead, may

submit two copies of comments to the

Secretary of the Commission.

Commenters will be placed on the

Commission’s environmental mailing

list, will receive copies of

environmental documents and will be

able to participate in meetings

associated with the Commission’s

environmental review process.

Commenters will not be required to

serve copies of filed documents on all

other parties. However, commenters

will not receive copies of all documents

filed by other parties or issued by the

Commission and will not have the right

to seek rehearing or appeal the

Commission’s final order to a federal

court.

The Commission will consider all

comments and concerns equally,

whether filed by commenters or those

requesting intervenor status.

Take further notice that pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate is required by the public

convenience and necessity. If a motion

for leave to intervene is timely filed, or

if the Commission on its own motion

believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

necessary for East Tennessee to appear

or to be represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–3807 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–30–001]

OkTex Pipeline Company; Notice of

Compliance Filing

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on January 15, 2001,

OkTex Pipeline Company (OkTex) filed

tariff sheets to comply with the

Commission’s Order Approving

Abandonments and Issuing Certificate

issued on December 1, 2000 in Docket

NO. CP01–30–000.

OkTex states that the tariff sheets

reflect the adoption of the rates related

to the facilities abandoned by ONEOK

Midstream Pipeline, Inc. (Midstream) to

service over the facilities by OkTex as

authorized in Docket No. CP01–30–000.

Pursuant to the above-mentioned order,

OkTex will assure that there is no rate

impact on the existing interruptible

customers by including all discount

arrangements previously negotiated by

Midstream and its shippers.

OkTex states that copies of the filing

have been mailed to all affected

customers and state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a petition

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Section 385.211 of

the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such petitions or

protests must be filed in accordance

with Section 154.210 of the

Commission’s Regulations. Protests will

be considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room. This filing may be viewed on the

web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/

rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments and protests may

be filed electronically via the internet in

lieu of paper. See 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–3806 Filed 2–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. GT01–10–000]

PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest

Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

February 9, 2001.

Take notice that on February 5, 2001,

PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest

Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing a

Refund Report for interruptible

transportation revenue credits on its

Coyote Springs Extension.

GTN states that it refunded $844.19 to

Portland General Electric Company, the

sole eligible firm shipper on the Coyote

Springs Extension, by credit billing

adjustment on January 5, 2001.

GTN further states that a copy of this

filing has been served on all affected

customers and interested state

regulatory agencies.