alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1871 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1871

 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report to Congress on 
the long-term needs of veterans in the State of New Jersey for nursing 
home care and on the feasibility of providing a State home construction 
grant to that State to assist in the construction of a new nursing home 
   in central New Jersey to meet the nursing home needs of veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1993

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report to Congress on 
the long-term needs of veterans in the State of New Jersey for nursing 
home care and on the feasibility of providing a State home construction 
grant to that State to assist in the construction of a new nursing home 
   in central New Jersey to meet the nursing home needs of veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON STATE HOME CONSTRUCTION GRANT FOR AN ADDITIONAL 
              STATE NURSING HOME IN NEW JERSEY.

    (a) Report.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the 
Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of 
Representatives a report on the feasibility and desirability of making 
a grant to the State of New Jersey under the State home grants program 
for the construction in central New Jersey of a new State nursing home 
for veterans in that State.
    (b) Study of Long-Term Needs.--Before submitting the report 
required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall conduct a study of 
the long-term needs of veterans in the State of New Jersey for nursing 
home care and the adequacy of existing facilities in the State to meet 
those needs.
    (c) Deadline.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be 
submitted not later than six months after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term ``State 
home grants program'' means the Department of Veterans Affairs program 
carried out under subchapter III of chapter 81 of title 38, United 
States Code.

                                 <all>
```
#### William SCHELL, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-193.

Oct. 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9597-9598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act

    Notice is hereby given that on January 19, 2001 a proposed Consent 
Decree (``Decree'') in United States and State of Colorado v. William 
Field Services Co. et al., Civil Action No. 01-S-0113 was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The 
United States filed this action pursuant to section 113(b) of the Clean 
Air Act (the ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b), for noncompliance with 
Section 165 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7475 pertaining to increased 
emissions of volatile organic compounds from major modifications at the 
settling defendant's so-called Ignacio Plant, a natural gas processing 
facility situated within the exterior boundaries of the Southern Ute 
Indian Reservation near Durango, Colorado.
    Under the terms of the Decree Williams Field Services Company and 
Williams Gas Processing Company, Inc., will pay the United States a 
civil penalty in the amount of $850,000, and meet emission standards 
and other terms and conditions set forth in the Decree regarding 
emissions of volatile organic compounds until such time that a PSD 
permit has been issued to the companies by EPA or other duly authorized 
State or Tribal agency or commission to which EPA has delegated PSD 
permitting authority.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. 
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Williams Field Services Co., et al., D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-
1-06938.
    The Decree may be examined at the offices of the U.S. EPA Region 
VIII, 999

[[Page 9598]]

18th Street, Suite 500 South Tower, Denver, Colorado. A copy of the 
Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 
either with or without the multiple signature pages and attachments. In 
requesting a copy of the Decree, please enclose a check payable to the 
Consent Decree Library for $6.75 for a complete copy of the decree (25 
cents per page reproduction cost).

Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-3274 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

May 22, 2012

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 31, 2012

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Shamokin Filler Co., Docket Nos. 

PENN 2009-775, et al. (Issues include whether the Mine Safety 

and Health Administration has regulatory jurisdiction over the 

company’s facility.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-42605)  of Asset  Investors  Corporation  of our  reports  (a) dated
February 9, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Asset
Investors  Corporation  for the year  ended  December  31,  1995  and (b)  dated
February 9, 1996 with respect to the financial  statements of Commercial Assets,
Inc.,  both of which are included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1995.





Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 1996
Order entered October 27 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01206
- CV ANITA KANE, Appellant

V. KATHY BRADY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 17
- 04125
- E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 26, 2017 motion requesting an exemption from payment of this Court’s filing fee. We GRANT the motion. Appella nt may proceed without payment of the appellate filing fee.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11

                          NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                             December 31                   December 31
                                         ------------------             ----------------
                                         2000           1999           2000           1999
                                         ----           ----           ----           ----

<S>                                <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>

Net loss                           $( 1,133,628)   (   841,198)   ( 1,823,187)   ( 1,102,559)
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding          46,812,076     31,518,037     41,314,355     30,949,261

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  options and warrants                      -              -              -              -
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

                                     46,812,076     31,518,037     41,314,355     30,949,261
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Basic and diluted loss per
  share:

    Loss from continuing
      operations                    $(      .01)   (       .03)   (       .03)   (       .04)

    Extraordinary loss               (      .01)   (       .00)   (       .01)   (       .00)
                                      ---------     ----------     ----------     ----------

      Net loss                      $(      .02)   (       .03)   (       .04)   (       .04)
                                      =========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Stock options and warrants are not considered in the calculations as the impact of the
potential common shares (15,578,426 shares at December 31, 2000 and 16,737,500 shares
at December 31, 1999) would be to decrease net loss per share.

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, I, Paul H.
Metzinger,  President  and  Chief Executive Officer of Vyta Corp, hereby certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     a)   such Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of Vyta Corp for the quarter
          ended  March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     b)   the information  contained  in  such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
          of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations  of  Vyta  Corp.


                                        /s/ Paul H. Metzinger
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Paul H. Metzinger,
                                        Chief Executive Officer & President


Date:  May  22,  2006

          A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required by Section
          906  has  been provided to Vyta Corp and will be retained by Vyta Corp
          and  furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
          upon  request.
#### Michael MUEHL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Belinda SCHRUBBE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1872.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 2011.

Decided Jan. 20, 2011.

Michael Muehl, Green Bay, WI, pro se.

J.B. Van Hollen, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for DefendantsAppellees.

*62Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Wisconsin state prisoner Michael Muehl appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel during his unsuccessful lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, in which he claimed that prison nurse Gail Waltz and other defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care. We affirm.

Muehl was imprisoned at Waupun Correctional Institution on December 12, 2007, when he cut his left wrist in a suicide attempt. Dr. Paul Sumnicht treated and closed the wound, but it opened again that night. Muehl alleged that Waltz — who observed him on December 13 — refused to treat his wound. His complaint, which named 12 defendants and covered several alleged incidents of inadequate medical care, was severed into three cases, and in this case only his claim against Waltz survived summary judgment. Muehl subsequently moved for appointment of counsel, but the district court denied his motion.

After Muehl, proceeding pro se, presented his case at trial, the district court granted Waltz judgment as a matter of law. Testimony at trial from Sumnicht and Waltz established that the wound was only superficial, and thus the court concluded that even if Waltz ignored the reopened wound on December 13, Muehl had not shown that he had a serious medical need as required for his Eighth Amendment claim.

Muehl argues on appeal that the district court should have appointed counsel to represent him at trial; counsel, he contends, would have found an expert to assess his treatment in a way that would have led to a different outcome. A court weighing a motion to appoint counsel must consider whether the difficulty of the case exceeds the plaintiffs capacity to litigate his claims and present his case coherently. *See Pruitt v. Mote,*503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir.2007) (en banc). Muehl argued in his motion that he did not know how to prepare for a jury trial, that he was not as qualified as a “seasoned litigator” to cross-examine witnesses, and that he needed counsel to procure expert testimony to counter Waltz’s experts. But the district coui’t properly applied *Pruitt*and denied his request, explaining that the case was not complex, that Muehl appeared capable of litigating it (his filings had “generally been reasoned and easy to understand”), and that all pro se litigants are similarly handicapped by a lack of legal expertise and trial experience. *See Pruitt,*503 F.3d at 655-56; *Johnson v. Doughty,*433 F.3d 1001, 1006 (7th Cir.2006).

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20916 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ABDELHADY ABDELHADY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CR-59
- - - - - - - - - - August 14, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Abdelhady Abdelhady appeals his conviction for possession of a machinegun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He argues for the first time on appeal that his conviction is invalid because § 922(o) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to his case. We conclude that no plain error has occurred. See United States v. Knutson , 113 F.3d 27, 30-31 (5th Cir. 1997). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Health


National Institutes on Deafness and Other Communication 
Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 522b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 13, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Virginian Suites, 1500 Arlington Blvd., Arlington, VA 
22209.
    Contact Person: Stanley C. Oaks, Jr., PhD, Scientific Review 
Branch, Division of Extramural Research, Executive Plaza South, Room 
400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: February 6, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-3596 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**1331PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N**

**WASHINGTON,DC 20004-1710**

** **

 
| SECRETARY  OF LABOR,

  MINE  SAFETY AND HEALTH     

  ADMINISTRATION  (MSHA)          

 

                        v.

 

CONSOL  MINING COMPANY LLC                                        | :

 :

 :

 :

 :

 :

 :       |  

Docket  No. WEVA 2023-0141

 

  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

BEFORE:  Jordan,Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, and Baker, Commissioners

**ORDER**

 

BY THE COMMISSION:

            Thiscase arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On July 7, 2023, the Administrative Law Judgeassigned to this matter issued an order granting certification of questions forinterlocutory review. 

 

Pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 76,29 C.F.R. § 2700.76, the Commission may review a Judge’s ruling, prior to theJudge’s final decision in the case, if certain conditions are met. Thisincludes a Judge certifying that his interlocutory ruling involves a controllingquestion of law and that immediate review will materially advance the finaldisposition of the proceeding. 

 

We find that the qualifications containedin Procedural Rule 76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76, have been met, and hereby GRANTinterlocutory review. 

 

 

 

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

MaryLu Jordan, Chair

 

 

 

/s/William I. Althen

WilliamI. Althen, Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

MarcoM. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/Timothy J. Baker

TimothyJ. Baker, Commissioner

 

 

 

Distribution:

 

Emily Toler Scott

Counsel forAppellate Litigation

U.S. Department ofLabor

Office of theSolicitor

Division of MineSafety & Health

201 12th StreetSouth, Suite 401

Arlington,VA 22202

scott.emily.t@dol.gov

 

Robert S. Wilson

Office of theSolicitor

U.S. Department ofLabor, MSHA

201 12thStreet, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202

wilson.robert.s@dol.gov

 

D. Cass Trent, CLR

U.S. Department ofLabor, MSHA

4499 AppalachianHwy

Pineville, WV 24874

trent.david@dol.gov

 

Jim McHugh 

Hardy Pence LLC

10 Hale Street, 4thFloor

P.O. Box 2548

Charleston, WV 25329

jmchugh@hardypence.com

 

Craig Aaron 

CONSOL Energy Inc.

275 TechnolgyDrive, Suite 101

Canonsburg, PA  15317

craigaaron@consolenergy.com

 

Michael G. Young

Administrative LawJudge

Federal MineSafety and Health Review Commission

Office of theChief Administrative Law Judge

1331 PennsylvaniaAve, NW, Suite 520N

Washington, DC  20004

myoung@fmshrc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3216]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Council of Disability (NCD).

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule of the forthcoming 
meeting, in teleconference format, for NCD's Youth Advisory Committee. 
Notice of this meeting is required under section 10(a)(1)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).
    Youth Advisory Committee: The purpose of NCD's Youth Advisory 
Committee is to provide input into NCD activities consistent with the 
values and goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DATES: March 14, 2001, 4 p.m.-5 p.m. EST.
    Location: 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 1050, Washington, DC.
    For Youth Advisory Committee Information, Contact: Gerrie Drake 
Hawkins, Ph.D., Program Specialist, National Council on Disability, 
1331 F Street NW., Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 
(voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-727-2022 (fax), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e79767f697577706d5e707d7a30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5b2bdb4a2bebcbba695bbb6b1fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a> (e-
mail).
    Agency Mission: The National Council on Disability is an 
independent federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the 
President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its 
overall purpose is to promote policies, programs, practices, and 
procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with 
disabilities, regardless of the nature of severity of the disability; 
and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-
sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all 
aspects of society.
    This committee is necessary to provide advice and recommendations 
to NCD on disability issues.
    We currently have a membership reflecting our nation's diversity 
and representing a variety of disabling conditions from across the 
United States.
    Open Meeting: This advisory committee meeting, in teleconference 
format, of the National Council of Disability will be open to the 
public. However, due to fiscal constraints and staff limitations, a 
limited number of additional lines will be available. Those interested 
to joining the meeting should contact the appropriate staff member 
listed above. Space is limited.
    Records will be kept of all Youth Advisory Committee meetings calls 
and will be available after the meeting for public inspection at the 
National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on February 2, 2001.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 01-3216 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>