alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1969

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the deduction

for advertising or other promotion expenses with respect to sales of

tobacco products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow

the deduction for advertising or other promotion expenses

with respect to sales of tobacco products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tobacco Advertising

5 Reform and Revenue Enhancement Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR TOBACCO

7 PRODUCT SALES PROMOTION EXPENSES.

8 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Part IX of subchapter B of

9 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•HR 1969 IH

1 to items not deductible) is amended by adding at the end

2 thereof the following new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 280I. TOBACCO PRODUCT SALES PROMOTION EX4 PENSES.

5 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—No deduction shall be allowed

6 under this chapter for any tobacco product sale promotion

7 expense.

8 ‘‘(b) TOBACCO PRODUCT SALE PROMOTION EX9 PENSE.—For purposes of this section—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘or tobacco prod11 uct sale promotion expense’ means any amount oth12 erwise allowable as a deduction under this chapter

13 with respect to—

14 ‘‘(A) any advertisement primarily for pur15 poses of promoting the sale of tobacco products,

16 or

17 ‘‘(B) any of the following incurred or pro18 vided primarily for purposes described in sub19 paragraph (A)—

20 ‘‘(i) travel expenses (including meals

21 and lodging),

22 ‘‘(ii) any amount attributable to goods

23 or services of a type generally considered

24 to constitute entertainment, amusement, or

25 recreation or to the use of a facility in con-
3

•HR 1969 IH

1 nection with the providing of such goods or

2 services,

3 ‘‘(iii) gifts, or

4 ‘‘(iv) other promotion expenses.

5 ‘‘(2) TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—The term ‘tobacco

6 products’ has the meaning given to such term by

7 section 5702(c).

8 ‘‘(c) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe

9 such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the pur10 pose of this section.’’.

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

12 for part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

13 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

14 item:

‘‘Sec. 280I. Tobacco product sales promotion expenses.’’

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

17 the date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years end18 ing after such date.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-23]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, 
March 21, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Thursday, March 22, 2001, 
8:30 a.m. to Noon.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., Conference Room 5H46, 
Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Code SB, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
4452.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following:

--Associate Administrator's Program Status Report
--Science Theme Status Reports
--Subcommittee Reports
--Outer Planets
--NGST Reformulation
--Technology Program Status
--Research Program Review Status
--Sounding Rocket and Balloons Program
--Activities and Schedule for 2003 Strategic Plan
--Mars Scout

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.
    Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: February 7, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3479 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay or Parcellena P. Fielding, Contact Representatives, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room 303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Director of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-3495  Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative

Adjustment Request (AAR) 8082 OMB No. 1545-0790 Form

(Rev. January 2000)

(For use by partners, S corporation shareholders, estate and domestic trust beneficiaries,

foreign trust owners and beneficiaries, REMIC residual interest holders, and TMPs) Attachment

Department of the Treasury Sequence No. 84 Internal Revenue Service  See separate instructions.

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

General Information

1 Check boxes that apply:

2 If you are a TMP filing an AAR on behalf of the pass-through entity, are you requesting substituted return

treatment? (see instructions)

3 Check applicable box to identify type of pass-through entity:

4 Identifying number of pass-through entity 6 Tax shelter registration number (if applicable) of pass-through entity

5 Name, address, and ZIP code of pass-through entity 7 Internal Revenue Service Center where pass-through entity filed its return

8 Tax year of pass-through entity / / to / /

9 Your tax year / / to / /

Inconsistent or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR) Items

(b) Inconsistency is in,

or AAR is to correct

(check boxes that

apply)

(c) Amount as shown on

Schedule K-1, Schedule Q,

or similar statement, a

foreign trust statement, or

your return, whichever

applies (see instructions)

(a) Description of inconsistent or

administrative adjustment request (AAR) items

(see instructions)

(e) Difference between

(c) and (d) (d) Amount you are reporting

Amount of

item

Treatment

of item

10

11

12

13

Explanations—Enter the Part II item number before each explanation. If more space is needed, continue

your explanations on the back.

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8082 (Rev. 1-2000)

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 49975G

Yes No

(a) Partnership (c) S corporation (d) Estate Trust (e) (f) REMIC

(a) Notice of inconsistent treatment (b) Administrative adjustment request (AAR)

(b) Electing large partnership
Form 8082 (Rev. 1-2000) Page 2

Part III Explanations (continued)

Form 8082 (Rev. 1-2000)
# PC & Giant

# CMO

# CRT

# MF PC

# MF Securities

# T-Deal & WLR

# SLST & SCRT

# Preferred Stock
Converted by EDGARwiz





EXHIBIT 10.3







AMENDMENT NO. 2

to the

SPONSORED PROJECT AGREEMENT

between

MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (Sponsor)

and the

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ISU)







WHEREAS the Sponsor and ISU mutually agree to amend the research program under the Sponsored Project Agreement with an effective date of May 1, 2005;




NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following changes:




Section 1.0  Project Period




Section 1.0 Shall be modified as underlined:




Project Period. The (“Project Period”) of this Agreement is September 1, 2005 through June 1, 2007.




ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties agree to execute this Amendment based upon their written approval.




IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF

MICROCHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION




By: /s/ Matthew Bailey

By: /s/ Terri DuMoulin

Matthew Bailey, Ph.D.

Terri DuMoulin

Title:  Associate Director

Title:  President




Date: February 8, 2007

Date: February 7, 2007







   IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION







By: /s/ Kenneth Kirkland

Date: February 8, 2007

Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D.

Executive Director
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Collegiate Pacific Inc.
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eat at Joe's,  Ltd., on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph
Fiore, Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2006


/s/ Joseph Fiore
Joseph Fiore
CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       28
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Date: March 8, 2006         By:  /s/ Eric B. Dana    Eric B. Dana    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





Form S-8 No. 33-75668, pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan;





Form S-8 No. 333-16613, pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan;





Form S-8 No. 333-73548, pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan;





Form S-8 No. 33-96550, pertaining to the Triad Guaranty Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan;





Form S-8 No. 333-69967, pertaining to the Triad Guaranty Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan;





Form S-8 No. 333-134884, pertaining to the Triad Guaranty Inc. 2006 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan; and





Form S-8 No. 333-161980, pertaining to the Triad Guaranty Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan;








of our report dated March 18, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Triad Guaranty Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP








Atlanta, Georgia


March 18, 2011
#### Kristian E. GRUBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security,* Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-15446.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 2014.

Filed March 28, 2014.

Eric G. Slepian, Esquire, Slepian Law Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before: TALLMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and GARBIS, Senior District Judge.**

*

 Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, is substituted for her predecessor, Michael J. Astrue, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The Honorable Marvin J. Garbis, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Kristian E. Grube (Grube) seeks judicial review of the district court’s affirmance of the final determination of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Grube’s claim for disability benefits.

“Even when the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation, we must uphold the ALJ’s [Administrative Law Judge’s] findings if they are supported by inferences reasonably drawn from the record.... [W]e may not reverse an ALJ’s decision on account of an error that is harmless.... ” *Molina v. Astrue,*674 F.3d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir.2012) (citations omitted).

The ALJ’s decision was sufficiently articulated. *See Burch v. Barnhart,*400 F.3d 676, 684 (9th Cir.2005) (affirming district court’s affirmance of the ALJ’s denial of benefits where “the ALJ provided legally sufficient reasons” for his decision). Any error in using the exertional category of “sedentary” to perform the residual functioning capacity analysis was harmless because the ALJ subsequently elaborated *563on the specific limitations experienced by Grube. *See Kennedy v. Colvin,*738 F.3d 1172, 1175 (9th Cir.2013) (discussing the use of residual functioning capacity with the goal of “determining whether the claimant can still do past relevant work or make an adjustment to other work”) (citation omitted).

The ALJ sufficiently detailed his reasons for discrediting Grube’s testimony when he explained that Grube’s reported symptoms of pain and fatigue were not supported by the medical evidence and the record. *See Stubbs-Danielson v. Astrue,*539 F.3d 1169, 1175 (9th Cir.2008). Finally, the ALJ did not err in giving less weight to Dr. Sachdeva’s opinion. The ALJ’s conclusion that the record as a whole refuted Dr. Sachdeva’s opinion was a “specific and legitimate reason[ ] ... supported by substantial evidence in the record.” *Lester v. Chater,*81 F.3d 821, 830-31 (9th Cir.1995) (citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,712
<PP&E>                                         333,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,753
<BONDS>                                         34,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,241
<SALES>                                         33,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,367
<CGS>                                            5,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,049
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act

    In accordance with 28 CFR 50.7, the Department of Justice gives 
notice that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Mobil Oil 
Corporation, No. CV-96-1432 (E.D.N.Y), was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on December 
13, 2001, pertaining to the payment of a civil penalty, compliance and 
other injunctive relief, and implementation of a supplemental 
environmental project in connection with the Mobil Oil Corporation's 
(``Mobil'') violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 
42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq., at the Port Mobil facility in Staten Island, 
New York City, New York.
    Under the proposed consent decree, Mobil will pay a civil penalty 
of $8.2 million, will agree to comply with RCRA at the Port Mobil 
facility and implement corrective action as directed by the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, will agree to refrain from making 
certain legal arguments under specified circumstances, and will agree 
to implement a supplemental environmental project--purchasing land for 
preservation in the Staten Island or New York city harbor area--at a 
cost of at least $3 million. The Consent Decree includes a release of 
claims alleged in the complaint.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comment should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resource Division, United 
States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Mobil Oil Corporation, No. CV-96-1432 (E.D.N.Y.), and 
DOJ Reference No. 90-7-1-794. Commenters may request an opportunity for 
a public meeting in the affected area, in accordance with RCRA Section 
7003(d), 42 U.S.C. 6973(d).
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at: (1) the Office of 
the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, One 
Pierrepoint Plaza, Brooklyn, New York 11201, (718) 254-7000; and (2) 
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Region 2), 290 
Broadway, New York 10007 (contact Stuart Keith in the office of 
Regional Counsel). A copy of the proposed consent decree may be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please refer to the 
referenced case and DOJ Reference Number and enclose a check in the 
amount of $6.00 (24 pages at 25 cents per page reproduction costs), may 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Ronald G. Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-32221 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M