alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          79,934                 168,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,769,311               2,515,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,861,188               2,692,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,503                   5,820
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,611,685               2,686,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,861,188               2,692,772
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   407                   1,932
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,608                  13,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,201)                (11,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,201)                (11,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,201)                (11,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1995

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an exception where

a noncustodial parent provides over half of the support of the child

for a calendar year to claim such child as a dependent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mr. VOLKMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an

exception where a noncustodial parent provides over half

of the support of the child for a calendar year to claim

such child as a dependent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION WHERE A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT

4 PROVIDES OVER HALF OF THE SUPPORT OF

5 THE CHILD FOR A CALENDAR YEAR TO CLAIM

6 SUCH CHILD AS A DEPENDENT.

7 Section 152(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

8 is amended by adding a new paragraph ‘‘3’’ following
2

HR 1995 IH

1 paragraph ‘‘2’’ and redesignating following paragraphs in

2 section accordingly.

3 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION WHERE A NONCUSTODIAL

4 PARENT PROVIDES OVER HALF OF THE SUPPORT OF

5 THE CHILD FOR A CALENDAR YEAR.—A child of par6 ents described in paragraph (1) shall be treated as

7 having received over half of his support during a cal8 endar year from the noncustodial parent if—

9 ‘‘(A) the custodial parent refuses to release

10 claim to exemption under paragraph (2) and

11 ‘‘(B) the custodial parent does not contrib12 ute to support of the child and

13 ‘‘(C) the noncustodial parent does provide

14 over half of the support of the child, then

15 ‘‘(D) the noncustodial parent shall be enti16 tled to claim such child as a dependent.’’

Æ
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-15-00280-CV 

________________________

IN RE CODY ALLEN JOHNSON, RELATOR 

 

 

Original Proceeding 

Arising from Proceedings Before the 31st District Court 

Gray County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 4447; Honorable Steve Emmert, Presiding 

 

August 5, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Relator, Cody Allen Johnson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a 

writ of mandamus to compel the Clerk of the Seventh Court of Appeals and a Deputy 

Clerk to provide him with a copy of all documents pertaining to a “plea of October 21, 

2009,” in cause number 4447, in the 31st District Court, Gray County, Texas. He 

acknowledges that no appeal was taken from that cause number and “no appeal 

records are requested.” For the reasons expressed herein, Relator’s request for 

mandamus relief is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
2

This court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a 

district or county court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. 

TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b)(1) (West 2004). Not only does the clerk of this 

court not maintain any of the requested records, appellate court clerks are not 

enumerated as persons against whom a writ of mandamus may be issued by this court. 

Additionally, Relator has not complied with the applicable rules of procedure for 

filing an original proceeding in this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. The fact that 

Relator is proceeding pro se does not excuse his compliance with procedural rules. 

Pena v. McDowell, 201 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. 2006).

Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

 Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3555]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting; Agenda Addition

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: February 5, 2001, 
66 FR 8959.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: February 7, 10 a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Item No. has been added to the 
February 7, 2001 Commission meeting.
    Item No.: CAC-7.
    Docket No. and Company: CP01-28-000, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3555 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

December 16, 2016

 

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Thursday, January19,2017

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillconsiderandactuponthefollowinginopen

session:*Secretary****ofLaborv.ConsolidationCoalCompany,*DocketNos.VA2012-42etal.(IssuesincludewhethertheJudgeerredbyrulingthatadeepcutinviolationoftheoperator’sroofcontrolplanwas not “significant and substantial.”)

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

Passcode:129-339

 

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6820

RODERICK DENNIS FOLKS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Commissioner ofOperations, South Carolina Department of Corrections; C. J. CEPAK, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carol ina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-594-2-20AJ) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Dennis Folks, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant claims that he was denied due process when he was placed in maximum security followinga prison riot, and that his placement in maximum security constituted cruel and unusual punishment. We find that Appellant failedto establish a liberty interest in remaining in the general population because he did not show that the conditions in maximum security are atypical and significant in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. See Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472, 484- 86 (1995); Beverati v. Smith , 120 F.3d 500, 504 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, he was not entitled to a hearing or other processprior to his placement in maximum security. Furthermore, Appellant's second claim fails because the mere fact of segregated confinement, without more, does not amount to cruel and unusual punishment. See Sweet v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections , 529 F.2d 854, 861 (4th Cir. 1975). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO

. 4 of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 17th day of September, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

THE STATE OF TEXA S, Appellant,

v.

BONNIE DOWNS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 13

- 00358

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 13

- 714

- 4)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

.

We furth er order this decision certified below for observance.

September 17, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Co urt of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edi nburg, Texas this 1st day of December, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel Small Grants Program for Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer 
Prevention Research.
    Date: March 6-7, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Gaithersburg, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 
20877.
    Contact Person: Mary Jane Slesinski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8045, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301/594-1566.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-3458 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The undersigned officers of Wilson Holdings,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), do hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge: 1.    The Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. /s/ Clark WilsonClark Wilson
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2006/s/ Daniel AllenDaniel Allen
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD ALLEN MINGST , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2061

[ December 6, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2009

- CF

- 008245

- AXXX

- MB

.
Richard Allen Mingst, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , C IKLIN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1861 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1861

 To extend indefinitely the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
    to collect a commercial operation fee in the Delaware Water Gap 
                       National Recreation Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 1993

  Mr. McDade introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend indefinitely the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
    to collect a commercial operation fee in the Delaware Water Gap 
                       National Recreation Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO COLLECT FEE.

    The third undesignated paragraph under the heading ``ADMINISTRATIVE 
PROVISIONS'' in chapter VII of title I of Public Law 98-63 (97 Stat. 
329) is amended by striking subsection (3).

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP99-600-000]


National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation; Notice of Pre-Filing 
Conference

February 8, 2001.
    Take notice that a pre-filing conference will be held on Thursday, 
February 15, 2001, at 2:00 p.m., at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The 
purpose of the pre-filing conference is to discuss Norse Pipeline, 
L.L.C.'s and Nornew Energy, Inc.'s compliance with the Commission's 
December 14, 2000, Order Addressing Petition for Declaratory Order and 
Directing Compliance Filing (93 FERC para. 61,276 (2000)).
    All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend. For 
additional information, please contact Robert Christin (202) 208-1022.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3686 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1715 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1715

             For the relief of the estate of Irwin Rutman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 1993

 Ms. Molinari introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of the estate of Irwin Rutman.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DESIGNATION.

    For purposes of part L of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.), relating to benefits 
for survivors of public safety officers, Irwin Rutman of Staten Island, 
New York, shall be deemed to have been a public safety officer on 
October 29, 1990, and his family shall be entitled to death benefits 
under such part.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made under section 1 
may be paid to or received by any attorney or agent for services 
rendered in connection with the payment. Any person who violates the 
provisions of this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall 
be subject to a fine in the amount provided under title 18, United 
States Code.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of section 1 shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box) Name of establishment

Use IRS label.

Make any

necessary

changes.

Otherwise,

please type or

print.

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (See instructions.) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(See instructions.)

Employer’s name

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable.)

City, town or post office, state, and ZIP code (If a foreign address, enter city, province or state, postal code, and country.)

Check the applicable box: Final Return Amended Return

1 Total charged tips for 1994 1

2 Total charged receipts (other than nonallocable receipts) showing charged tips 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (Add lines 4a and 4b.) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (other than nonallocable receipts) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here © granted by the

district director. Attach a copy of the district director’s determination letter to this return

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (See instructions for restriction.)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good faith agreement (Attach copy of agreement.)

8 Total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 1994 ©

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature © Title © Date ©

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (1994)

Note: If you checked line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours worked

per business day during the payroll period. (See instructions. )

Apt. or suite no.

Printed on recycled paper

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), put an X on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your records

on line 7.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-84592, 33-84594, 33-15493, 33-15499, 33-48539,
333-48541, 333-58773, 333-58777, 333-45414 and 333-89070) of Equity Marketing,
Inc. of our reports dated February 20, 2004 relating to the financial statements
and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2004