alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Women's Business Council

# AGENCY: 

National Women's business council.

# ACTION: 

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY: 

In accordance with the Women's Business Ownership Act, Public Law 105-135 as amended, the National Women's Business Council (NWBC) announces a forthcoming Council meeting and joint meeting of the NWBC and Interagency Committee on Women's Business Enterprise. The meetings will cover action items worked on by the National Women's Business Council and the Interagency Committee on Women's Business Enterprise included by not limited to procurement, access to capital and training.

# DATES:

February 14, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

*Council Meeting*. The Monarch Hotel, 2401 M Street, NW (24th & M Streets), Washington, DC, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# CONTACT:

National Women's Business Council, 409 Third Street, SW, Suite 210, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 205-3850—Gilda Presley.

# Note:

Please call by February  12, 2001.

Gilda Presley,

Administrative Officer, National Women's Business Council.

[FR Doc. 01-3343  Filed 2-5-01; 4:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-AB-M
#### KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC., Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC, First Quality Products, Inc., First Quality Retail Services, LLC, and First Quality Hygienic, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 957.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Kenneth P. George, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Respondents.

Constantine L. Trela Jr., Sidley Austin LLP, Marc S. Cooperman, Janice V. Mitrius, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, *432Rachel H. Townsend, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Petitioner.

Before GAJARSA, FRIEDMAN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. (Kimberly-Clark) petitions for permission to appeal orders certified by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania as ones involving a controlling issue of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. First Quality Baby Products, LLC et al. (First Quality) opposes. Kimberly-Clark replies.

This petition stems from a patent infringement suit brought by Kimberly-Clark against First Quality that remains pending before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. First Quality sought discovery of certain documents produced by Kimberly-Clark during several alternative dispute resolution proceedings between Kimberly-Clark and a third party. Kimberly-Clark objected, asserting that the documents were privileged under the “federal mediation privilege.” First Quality sought an order compelling discovery of those documents.

The District Court recognized the federal mediation privilege, but held that although documents arising from “mediation” proceedings were privileged, other documents arising from “arbitration” proceedings were discoverable. In a separate order, the District Court certified its discovery ruling for permissive appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether it will grant permission to appeal interlocutory orders certified by a trial court. *See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation,*903 F.2d 822 (Fed.Cir.1990); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). We determine that granting the petition in these circumstances is warranted.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for permission to appeal is granted.
Exhibit
10.4


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as this
“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 29th day of June, 2006, between
WAGNER FOREST MANAGEMENT, LTD., a New Hampshire corporation (hereinafter
referred to as “Purchaser”), and NEENAH PAPER COMPANY OF CANADA (hereinafter
referred to as “Seller”);


W
I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:


WHEREAS,
Seller and Purchaser previously have entered into that certain Purchase and
Sale Agreement, dated May 5, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”);
and


WHEREAS,
Seller and Purchaser now desire to modify the terms of the Agreement in certain
respects;


NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, the mutual agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable considerations, the parties
hereto do hereby covenant and agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as
follows:


1.             Amendment to Section 7.  The words “at Closing” in the sixth line of
Section 7 are deleted.


2.             Amendment to Section 9.  The fourth line of Section 9 is hereby
revised to read as follows:  “shall equal
the fair market value of the parcel or portion of the parcel of the Real
Property.”


3.             Amendment to Section 13(a).  The word “either” in the second line of
subparagraph (iii) is deleted.


4.             Amendment to
Section 14.1(a).  “Schedule 8(c)”
in subparagraph (iii) is deleted and replaced with “Schedule 5 (c).”


5.             Amendment to Schedule 10.3.  Schedule 10.3 is deleted, and replaced with
the new Schedule 10.3 attached hereto.


6.             Capitalized Terms.  All capitalized terms herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


7.             Reaffirmation of Agreement.  This Amendment shall be deemed a part of the
Agreement for all purposes, and the Agreement remains in full force and effect
in accordance with its terms and as modified herein.


8.             Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.











IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed by authorized representatives as of the day and year first above
written.


	
  

  	
   

  	
  SELLER:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Neenah Paper Company of Canada

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  s/s Sean T. Erwin

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Sean T. Erwin

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  President

  



 



 2
 








 


	
  

  	
   

  	
  PURCHASER:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Wagner Forest Management, Ltd.,

  a New Hampshire corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  s/s Thomas J. Colgan

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Thomas J. Colgan

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  



 


 



 3
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0458-10 & PD-0459-10

LYNN TAYLOR, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON REHEARING OF APPELLANT’S 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and unlawful possession of a

firearm and was sentenced to confinement for twenty-five years and twelve years,

respectively. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Taylor v. State, (Tex. App.

— Amarillo, Nos. 07-08-00205-CR & 07-08-00206-CR, delivered March 22, 2010). 

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was dismissed as untimely filed on August
Taylor - 2

25, 2010. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing requesting reinstatement of his

petition so that it will be considered by this Court. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is

granted. His petition filed on August 23, 2010, is reinstated as of October 13, 2010 and

will be considered in accord with Tex.R.App.P. 68. 

Delivered October 13, 2010

Do not publish
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

February 2, 2009 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 12, 2009 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. SCP Investments, LLC, Docket Nos. 

SE 2006-148-M and SE 2006-163-M. (Issues include whether the 

Administrative Law Judge properly concluded that certain citations 

and orders issued to the operator should be vacated because the 

MSHA inspector did not allow the operator to exercise any 

walkaround rights during the inspection in question.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
#### Deanna GANGSTEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jordan Chambers, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-15287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 2, 2013.

Filed April 7, 2014.

Stewart Katz, Law Offices of Stewart Katz, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*501Amanda Lynn Butts, Esquire, Jeri Lynn Pappone, John A. Lavra, Esquire, Lon-gyear O’Dea and Lavra, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Deanna Gangstee and Jordan Chambers appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the County of Sacramento, Sheriff John McGinness, and Deputy Stephen LeCouve on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fourth Amendment unreasonable, seizure and related federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court determined that, upon intentional deployment of a canine, the canine’s handler is constitutionally responsible for *any*unreasonable seizure the canine makes. We do not agree with the district court’s reasoning. A violation of the Fourth Amendment on the basis of an unreasonable seizure “requires an intentional acquisition of physical control.” *Brower v. Cnty. of Inyo,*489 U.S. 593, 596, 109 S.Ct. 1378, 103 L.Ed.2d 628 (1989). The victim must be the “object of the detention.” *Id.*Here, there is no evidence, nor contention, that LeCouve intentionally deployed his canine in an effort to seize Gangstee. We are therefore bound by *Brower,*and affirm on that basis. In light of this determination, we need not reach the district court’s ruling that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether LeCouve intentionally released the canine.

2. Our decision on Gangstee’s Fourth Amendment unreasonable seizure claim is fatal to Gangstee’s additional § 1983 claims for *Monell*liability.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<MULTIPLIER>           1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>          JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>            SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<CASH>                          479
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1161
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               2265
<PP&E>                         1079
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                21072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         14872
<BONDS>                        1748
<COMMON>                         14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          2166
<PREFERRED>                    1600
<OTHER-SE>                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  21072
<SALES>                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2011
<CGS>                          3874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  3874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              130
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2029)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2029)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0
        

</TABLE>
SCHEDULE P List of Foreign Partner Interests in Partnerships OMB No. 1545-0126

(Form 1120-F)

© Attach to Form 1120-F.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Name of corporation (foreign partner) Employer identification number (EIN)

Part I—List of Foreign Partner Interests in Partnerships

© See separate instructions. 2007

1

2

12

4

3

5

6

8

13

14a

7

9

10

11

A

B

C

D

Name of partnership

Note: If corporation has more than 4 partnership interests, continue on separate page. See instructions.

Address EIN

Total

Part II—Foreign Partner Income and Expenses: Reconciliation to Schedule K-1 (Form 1065)

A B C D

Net income (loss) reported on lines 1

through 3, Schedule K-1

Gross income included on lines 1

through 3, Schedule K-1

Interest expense on lines 1 through 3,

Schedule K-1

Other non-interest expenses on lines 1 

through 3, Schedule K-1

Gross effectively connected income (ECI) 

on lines 1 through 3, Schedule K-1

Non-interest expenses on lines 1 through

3, Schedule K-1, allocated to gross ECI

Other gross income reported on

Schedule K-1

Other non-interest expenses reported

on Schedule K-1

Other interest expense reported on

Schedule K-1, lines 13 and 18

Total interest expense. Add lines 12

and 13

Other gross ECI reported on

Schedule K-1

Other non-interest expenses reported

on Schedule K-1 allocated to ECI

Total gross income. Add lines 2

and 6

Total gross effectively connected

income. Add lines 3 and 7

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 1120-F. Cat. No. 49677Z Schedule P (Form 1120-F) 2007

Schedules K-1

b Interest expense directly allocable

under Temporary Regulations section

1.882-5T(a)(1)(ii)(B). (Note: Include the

line 14b total on Schedule I, line 22.)

c Subtract line 14b from line 14a. (Note:

Enter the line 14c total on Schedule I,

line 9, column (b).)
15

16a

18

19

20

17

Total

Schedule P (Form 1120-F) 2007

A B C D

Partner’s liabilities included in outside

basis under section 752 that give rise

to directly allocable interest expense

under Temporary Regulations section

1.882-5T(a)(1)(ii)(B)

Partner’s liabilities under Regulations

section 1.884-1(d)(3)(vi). (Note: Enter

the line 17 total on Schedule I, line 8,

column (b).)

Partner’s outside basis under

Regulations section 1.884-1(d)(3)(vi).

Add lines 16d and 17

Partner’s outside basis allocable to ECI

under Regulations section 1.884-1(d)(3)(i). 

(Note: Enter the line 19 total on Schedule

I, line 5, column (b).)

Section 705 outside basis

Enter “income” or “asset” to indicate

the allocation method used on line 19

(see instructions)

Schedule P (Form 1120-F) 2007

Part III—Foreign Partner’s Average Outside Basis Under Regulations sections 1.882-5(b) and 1.884-1(d)(3)

Schedules K-1

b All other liabilities included in partner’s 

outside basis under section 752

c Add lines 16a and 16b

d Subtract line 16c from line 15

Page 2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN 

May 24,2007 

The Honorable Russell D. Feingold 

United States Senate 

506 Hart Senate Office Building 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Feingold: 

Pursuant to your request concerning Buy American Reports to Congress for fiscal year 

2006 under section 837 of the Departments ofTransportation, Housing, and Urban Development 

Appropriations Act of2006, Pub. L. No. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2396,2504 (Nov. 30, 2005), the 

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC) provides the following 

information for fiscal year 2006. Also included is infonnation for fiscal year 2005. 

1. The dollar value of any articles, materials, or supplies purchased that were 

manufactured outside of the United States. 

For both fiscal years 2005 and 2006, FMSHRC made no purchases ofany articles, 

materials, or supplies that were manufactured outside of the United States and that were above 

the micro-purchase threshold of$2500.00. 

2. An itemized list of all waivers granted with respect to such articles, materials, or 

supplies under the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. lOa et seq.). 

For both fiscal years 2005 and 2006, no waivers were requested or granted related to this 

requirement. 

3. A summary of the total procurement funds spent on goods manufactured in the United 

States versus funds spent on goods manufactured outside of the United States. 

For both fiscal years 2005 and 2006, FMSHRC spent 100% of its procurement funds on 

goods manufactured in the United States. 

601 NEW JERSE\' AVE, N'\\.,. • SUITE 9500 • WASHINGTON, I>C 20001 ·2021 

TELEPHONE: 202-4 :-14-UHOO 
'

. .. 

Pursuant to the requirements ofsubsection (c) of section 837, supra, to "make the [Buy 

American] report publicly available to the maximum extent practicable," this report shall be 

posted on the FMSHRC website, www.fmshrc.gov. 

Sincerely, 

' r'"'· \ \ 

\- ~~·~~~~~~~·-----,. 

M~chael?Duffy ....~ Chairman 

cc: 	 Senate Committee on Appropriations 

Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies 

Subcommittee 

The Capitol, S-131 

Washington, D.C.2051 0 

Rep. John W. Olver, Chainnan 

House Committee on Appropriations 

Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies 

Subcommittee 

Room H-218, The Capitol 

Washington, DC 20515 

2
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v.McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corp. & Jason Robinson              

#   Secretary of Labor v.McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corp. & Jason Robinson

April 24, 2014- Meeting Notice.pdf

McCoy Elkhorn KENT 2008-260 Meeting Notice 4-23-14.htm

secretary-labor-v.mccoy-elkhorn-and-jason-docket-kent2008-260-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE:

PLACE:

STATUS:

MATTERS TO BE
CONSIDERED:

CONTACT PERSON
FOR MORE INFO:

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW
SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004

October 25, 2013

2:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 13, 2013

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from
F Street entrance)

Open

The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open
session: Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., Docket Nos.
WEST 2008-778, et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative
Law Judge erred in concluding that violations involving
accumulations of coal dust and an inadequate pre-shift examination
were “significant and substantial.”)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

Jean Ellen —_ (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay /
1-800-877-8339 for toll free.