9696 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2001 / Notices

25. Respondent denies that it

knowingly violated either the

Flammable Fabrics Act or the Consumer

Product Safety Act. 26. On its own initiative, Respondent

reported the incident that is the basis of

these proceedings, and, beginning on

December 8, 1999, voluntarily

undertook a recall of Ladies’ Fleece

Robes, style numbers 6314 and 6315.

Beginning on January 7, 2000,

Respondent voluntarily initiated a recall

of Ladies’ Fleece Robes, style numbers

6812, 6813, and 6814. Respondent

voluntarily offered a substantial gift

certificate to consumers to encourage

returns, voluntarily undertook a second

round of retailer notices when the initial

term of the recalls expired, voluntarily

extended the term of its recalls and

consumer incentives through December

31, 2000, and voluntarily destroyed or

identified for destruction virtually all

the robes returned under the recall.

IV. Agreement of the Parties

27. The Commission has jurisdiction

over Respondent and the subject matter

of this Settlement Agreement and Order

under the Consumer Product Safety Act

(CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.; the

Flammable Fabrics Act (FFA), 15 U.S.C.

1191 et seq.; and the Federal Trade

Commission Act (FTCA), 15 U.S.C. 41 et

seq. 28. This Agreement is entered into for

settlement purposes only and does not

constitute an admission by Respondent

or a determination by the Commission

that Respondent knowingly violated the

FFA’s Clothing Standard and/or the

CPSA’s Reporting Requirement. 29. Upon provisional acceptance of

this Settlement Agreement and Order by

the Commission, this Settlement

Agreement and Order shall be placed on

the public record and shall be published

in the Federal Register in accordance

with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR

1118.20(f). If the Commission does not

receive any written request not to accept

the Settlement Agreement and Order

within 15 days, the Settlement

Agreement and Order will be deemed to

be finally accepted on the 16th day after

the date it is published in the Federal

Register. 30. Upon final acceptance of this

Settlement Agreement by the

Commission and issuance of the Final

Order, Respondent knowingly,

voluntarily, and completely waives any

rights it may have in this matter (1) to

an administrative or judicial hearing, (2)

to judicial review or other challenges or

contest of the validity of the

Commission’s actions, (3) to a

determination by the Commission as to

whether Respondent failed to comply

with the FFA, as alleged, or the CPSA,

as alleged, (4) to a statement of findings

of facts and conclusions of law, and (5)

to any claims under the Equal Access to

Justice Act. 31. In settlement of the staff’s

allegations, Respondent agrees to pay a

$150,000.00 civil penalty as set forth in

the attached Order incorporated herein

by reference. 32. The Commission may publicize

the terms of this Settlement Agreement

and Order.

33. Upon final acceptance by the

Commission of this Settlement

Agreement and Order, the Commission

shall issue the attached Order.

34. A violation of the attached Order

shall subject Respondent to appropriate

legal action. 35. Agreements, understandings,

representations, or interpretations made

outside this Settlement Agreement and

Order may not be used to vary or

contradict its terms.

36. The provisions of this Settlement

Agreement and Order shall apply to,

and be binding upon, Respondent and

each of its shareholders, officers,

directors, employees, agents, successors,

assigns, and representatives, directly or

through any corporation, subsidiary,

division, or other business entity, or

through any agency, device, or

instrumentality.

Respondent Hanro USA, Inc.

Dated: December 26, 2000.

Niki Sachs,

President and Chief Executive Officer, Hanro

USA, Inc., 40 East 34th Street, New York,

NY 10016.

Commission Staff

Alan H. Schoem,

Assistant Executive Director, Consumer

Product Safety Commission, Office of

Compliance, Washington, DC 20207–0001.

Eric L. Stone,

Director, Legal Division, Office of

Compliance.

Dated: January 3, 2001.

Dennis C. Kacoyanis,

Trial Attorney, Legal Division, Office of

Compliance.

Order

Upon consideration of the Settlement

Agreement entered into between

Respondent Hanro USA, Inc.

(hereinafter, ‘‘Respondent’’), a

corporation, and the staff of the

Consumer Product Safety Commission

(‘‘Commission’’); and the Commission

having jurisdiction over the subject

matter and Respondent; and it

appearing that the Settlement

Agreement and Order is in the public

interest, IT IS

Ordered, that the Settlement

Agreement be and hereby is accepted,

and it is

Further Ordered, that upon final

acceptance of the Settlement Agreement

and Order, Respondent Hanro USA, Inc.

shall pay to the United States Treasury

a civil penalty in the amount of ONE

HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND

00/100 DOLLARS ($150,000.00) in three

(3) payments of FIFTY THOUSAND

AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($50,000.00)

each. The first payment of FIFTY

THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS

($50,000.00) shall be paid within twenty

(20) days after service of the Final Order

of the Commission (hereinafter, ‘‘the

anniversary date’’). The second payment

of FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00/100

DOLLARS ($50,000.00) shall be paid

within nine (9) months of the

anniversary date. The third payment

shall be paid within eighteen (18)

months of the anniversary date. Upon

the failure of Respondent Hanro USA,

Inc. to make a payment or upon the

making of a late payment by Respondent

Hanro USA, Inc. (a) the entire amount

of the civil penalty shall be due and

payable, and (b) interest on the

outstanding balance shall accrue and be

paid at the federal legal rate of interest

under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1961(a) and (b).

Provisionally accepted and

provisional Order issued on the 6th day

of February, 2001.

By Order of the Commission.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 01–3408 Filed 2–8–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Proposed Collection; Common

Request

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force,

DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

In compliance with Section

3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995, the Department

of the Air Force announces the

proposed reinstatement of a public

information collection and seeks public

comment on the provisions thereof.

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2001 / Notices 9697

proposed information collection; and (c)

ways to minimize the burden of the

information collection on respondents,

including through the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all

comments received by April 10, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to

AFSPC CSS/SCFB, 150 Vandenberg St,

Suite 1105, ATTN: SMSgt Jack

Kretchek, Peterson AFB, CO 80914–

4730.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To

request more information on this

proposed information collection or to

obtain a copy of the proposal and

associated collection instruments,

please write to the above address, or call

AFSPC CSS Force Application and

Sustainment, (719) 554–4057.

Title, Associated Form, and OMB

Number: Intercontinental Ballistic

Missile Hardened Intersite Cable Rightof-Way Landowner/Tenant

Questionnaire, AF Form 3951, OMB

Number 0701–0141.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirement is used to report

changes in ownership/lease

information, conditions of missile cable

route and associated appurtenances, and

projected building/excavation projects.

The information collected is used to

ensure system integrity and to maintain

a close contact public relations program

with involved personnel and agencies.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; Farms.

Number of Respondents: 4,000.

Responses per Respondent: 1.

Average Burden per Response: 15

Minutes.

Frequency: Biennially.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary of Information Collection

Respondents are landowners/tenants.

This form collects updated landowner/

tenant information as well as data on

local property conditions which could

adversely affect the Hardened Intersite

Cable System (HICS) such as soil

erosion, projected/building projects,

excavation plans, etc. This information

also aids in notifying landowners/

tenants when HICS preventive or

corrective maintenance becomes

necessary to ensure uninterrupted

Intercontinental Ballistic Missile

command and control capability.

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–3376 Filed 2–8–01; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001–05–U

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Record of Decision (ROD) of the Final

Environmental Impact Statement

(FEIS) on the Disposal and Reuse of

the Stratford Army Engine Plant

(SAEP), Stratford, CT

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army

announced the availability of the ROD

of the FEIS on the Disposal and Reuse

of the Stratford Army Engine Plant, in

accordance with the Defense Base

Closure and Realignment Act of 1990,

Public Law 101–510, as amended.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the ROD may be

obtained by writing to Mrs. Shirley

Vance, U.S. Army Materiel Command,

ATTN: AMCQMA, 5001 Eisenhower

Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22333–0001.

Copies of the FEIS may be obtained by

writing to Mr. Joe Hand, Corps of

Engineers, Mobile District, ATTN: PD–

EC, P.O. Box 2288, Mobile, AL 36628–

0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.

Shirley Vance by facsimile at (703) 617–

6447.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

ROD, the Army concludes that the FEIS

adequately addresses the impacts of

property disposal and documents its

decision to transfer the property as

encumbered. The ROD concludes that

approximately 71 of the 75-acre SAEP

property will be conveyed subject to

restrictions, identified in the FEIS, that

relate to the following: asbestoscontaining material, an easement for

avigation, an easement for public access,

other easements and rights-of-way,

floodplains, a groundwater use

prohibition, historic resources, land use

restrictions, lead-based paint, remedial

actions, and wetlands. The Army’s

intent under the ROD is to transfer

approximately 71 acres to the SAEP

Local Reuse Authority (LRA). The Army

may subsequently decide to transfer

approximately 4 acres of the SAEP

property to the City of Bridgeport for

airport purposes. If the City of

Bridgeport is unable to acquire the

necessary permits and approvals for

their proposed activity on the

approximately 4-acre parcel within a

reasonable period of time after the

conveyance of the property to the SAEP

LRA, the Army will, consistent with its

disposal authorities, convey the 4-acre

parcel to the SAEP LRA. Approximately

5 acres of the total acreage being

transferred to the LRA will have

avigation restrictions for height and

electromagnetic, smoke and light

emissions. The Army will impose deed

restrictions or other requirements to

ensure safety and protection of human

health and the environment.

The Army has taken all practicable

measures to avoid or minimize

environmental harm associated with its

preferred alternative of encumbered

property disposal. Mitigation measures

for reuse activities are identified in the

FEIS.

Dated: February 5, 2001.

Raymond J. Fatz,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army

(Environment, Safety and Occupational

Health) OASA(I&E).

[FR Doc. 01–3330 Filed 2–8–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Army Science Board; Notice of Open

Meeting

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(P.L. 92–463), announcement is made of

the following Committee Meeting:

Name of Committee: Army Science Board

(ASB).

Date of Meeting: 13 February 2001.

Time of Meeting: 0830–1700.

Place: 11th floor Conf. Room, Presidential

Towers, Crystal City, Virginia.

Agenda: The Army Science Board’s (ASB)

Ad Hoc Study on ‘‘Adapting Future Wireless

Technologies’’ will have their kickoff

meeting to outline study goals, breakout into

specific panels, and schedule meetings.

There will be NO outside briefings at this

kickoff meeting. If you require additional

information or have any questions, please

call Mr. Jeff Ozimek, the Study Staff

Assistant on (732) 532–5496.

Wayne Joyner,

Program Support Specialist, Army Science

Board.

[FR Doc. 01–3327 Filed 2–8–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. CP01–76–000, CP01–77–000,

and RP01–217–000]

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership;

Notice of Application and Notice of

Rate Settlement

February 5, 2001.

Take notice that on January 30, 2001,

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership

(Cove Point), P.O. Box 1396, Houston,