alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        24927348
<SECURITIES>                                  39094615
<RECEIVABLES>                                 27266991
<ALLOWANCES>                                    787175
<INVENTORY>                                     218622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              96307487
<PP&E>                                        23324174
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9599982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               121288661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10559553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        160377
<OTHER-SE>                                   109600197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 121288661
<SALES>                                       10000000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              81326935
<CGS>                                          9400000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 63406619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              11351402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                787175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              694922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2831085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (873242)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1957843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1957843)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF Tl-iE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATlORNEI GMER*L 

AUSTIN 
llfmorabla But ,gord, Pa60 2 

Ii thr ooaree OS par lotoar of raquwt mu 

. *(u).~ ‘BopMr*at 8ny pornon who t 

oath&sod to 8Ol1 l& LOr OthOr 8h WI l 

ntallar; 

"4 pIrg# a.atw a8 l @ M t,~O8? a lO8- 

1111 iOr th. 8*1r O? Or iOr takb& Or 8OliOitlq orbarr for tha ula oi any 4uor lrroaprO$iW Ot Whether 8UOh Mlr %m t0 b made 

within or witheat thr Stat@ la nqulmd to 

pmoen as qpnt’8 partit. It lr aot intoad- 

. . 
ad Wmt this oh&l 

o? a potrit holdor 

who rsm1?&8 on the 

& nrr l wh l olo.' 

apply to ths amp10J'** 

vho oollo liquor and 

liaonood prorioss La 

Your lottot fprflulclz disolosor Ebt t&so ore 

IlO dfOt~lo~iO8 in #SO Stot$, u&d iwli&n dlstlllors 

Mkiog sslso do 80 thX'Oq&h S&Sat8 Or rS~SOOntStiTO8 

heldlngcr pordt, rolloltlng btulasso lnthlo8tsts. 

auah dIstillArm sra not trquimd to &TO a 

Ii 

smlt, slnoo they sro not rkinQ the l olro or doing 

tWinSO fn thi8 8tSt0,thS bU8hOSS bOingintOrStStO btWuirrr88. &lkdhVitS VO. as18 8hOO %., 5 

2 :: II 

2 559; John A. Dlokwn Pub, 40, vs. Bryan, 5 

(2) 

2 9601 Rokrts ta. J,, P. 001) Ce,, 31 8. 1. 

196 Aszwt~81~ Oerporstlon of X8uQs vs. Oosutt, 17 ia. w. (2) 693, 

Thai, Dho holder ef an a&et'8 

PI 

aslo ma$ 

OOliOit l E& taka OtiSTO iOr th. 8Oh Oi 1 @Or trar say 

of the80 PIMP panrib iWldon, Tha &or ir $0 WZit*Xt, 

sad wo have lb0 autborlt~ to oeastmlo it dirforsntly, 

own to weld ?&o~erlU p&Mod twt bf JI~W in %to sb8sWllOS @Ed SjP&IliOOtitt& The fmsdy, it on8 io noodod, -1s with the I44181atur0, and notwlththls dopsrtmaze, nor with pur do ]Ptmont, Tour Beard, or wuroo, 

r na el t dopt s rsplat r on, hew~vsr dooinbls that 

would be la HoLstlon of tlm statatsa, but within the 

l tstuts8 the Bead’s pmoro SM bmaod. 
xoaombls Bert PYord, Pam 4 

Tmstlq that the above will,hs+s ostlofootorfiy answered ,yOpr qUO@tiOIi8, W EM 

Vorr tmly yours 

_’ , 

.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3736 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3736

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the fee for 
   installment agreements paid by electronic payment through a debit 
                              instrument.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

   Mr. Vela introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the fee for 
   installment agreements paid by electronic payment through a debit 
                              instrument.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Installation Agreement Affordability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INSTALLMENT FEE WAIVED FOR CERTAIN ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6159(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Waiver or reimbursement.--
                    ``(A) In the case of a taxpayer who has agreed to 
                make payments under the installment agreement by 
                electronic payment through a debit instrument, no fee 
                shall be imposed on an installment agreement under this 
                section.
                    ``(B) In the case of a taxpayer with an adjusted 
                gross income, as determined for the most recent year 
                for which such information is available, which does not 
                exceed 250 percent of the applicable poverty level (as 
                determined by the Secretary), if the taxpayer is unable 
                to make payments under the installment agreement by 
                electronic payment through a debit instrument, the 
                Secretary shall, upon completion of the installment 
                agreement, pay the taxpayer an amount equal to any such 
                fees imposed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to installment agreements entered into after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CANNON et al. v. CANNON et al.

No. 25731.

Jan. 22, 1935.

Sasseen & Foth, for plaintiffs in error.

Carder & Carder, for defendants in error.

PER CURTAM.

On the 22nd day of November, 3932, there was filed in the district court of Washita county, a transcript of the proceedings from the county court in the matter of the last will and testament of Elijah B. Cannon, deceased, and at the proceedings in the district court the matter was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. At the rendition of the judgment notice of intention to appeal was given, and it was • not until thereafter, on December 28, 3933, that a motion for new trial was filed, which was overruled on the 18th day of January, 3934.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal was not perfected within six months from the date of the rendition of the. judgment, to wit, the 27th day of December, 1933. It was the early holding of this court and has been the consistent rule since that where a case, is tried upon the. pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, no motion for new trial is necessary, and if no notice of appeal was given at the time of the rendition of the judgment, or within 10 days thereafter, or if the case is not filed within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the alleged errors contained in the petition in error and case-made attached. Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285, 27 P. (2d) 631; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654, 154 P. 676; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 P. 152; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70, 22 P. (2d) 998; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192, 253 P. 105.

In the case of Showalter v. Hampton, supra, this court said:

> “Where a cause is tried upon an agreed statement of all the ultimate facts, leaving for the court the sole question of the application of the law to such ultimate facts, a motion for a new trial is unnecessary and unauthorized by statute and does not extend the time within which an appeal must be perfected in the Supreme Court, and the time for perfecting such appeal runs from the date judgment is rendered, and not from the date of the overruling of such unnecessary and unauthorized motion.”

It appearing, therefore, that no notice of intention to appeal to this court was given at. the, date of the trial or within ten days thereafter as by law provided, and it appearing, further, that the appeal was not taken within six months from the date of said judgment, this court acquired no jurisdiction of said appeal, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that, to our knowledge:
 
 (a)           such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (b)           the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 By:
/s/ Ralph Larry Lyons

Date:  April 15, 2010Ralph Larry LyonsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ Charles F. Catlett, III

Date:  April 15, 2010Charles F. Catlett, IIISenior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-12-464 CV

In the Interest of A.K.M., J.D.M. and D.M.M.

Appealed from the 252nd District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas

Cause No. F-201,904-H

ORDER

The court reporter for the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas is to 

forward the following original in camera exhibits to the Clerk of this Court for filing on 

or before July 5, 2013:

Photographs (6) offered as in camera exhibits at the October 27, 2011 hearing and 

Bates Stamped 0016, 0017, 0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.

The original exhibits will be returned to the court reporter for the 252nd District 

Court of Jefferson County when the appeal is final in this Court.

Entered this 20th day of June, 2013.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-359]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-440]


FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, 
Unit 1; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility 
Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee) 
to withdraw its June 5, 2000, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. NPF-58 for the Perry Nuclear Power 
Plant, Unit 1, located in Lake County, Ohio.
    The proposed amendment would have changed the Perry Nuclear Power 
Plant, Unit 1, as described in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. The 
proposed modification would have installed a time delay to the main 
turbine and feedwater pump turbine trip signal associated with a 
reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system automatic initiation.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on August 9, 
2000 (65 FR 48747). However, by letter dated December 14, 2000, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated June 5, 2000, and the licensee's letter 
dated December 14, 2000, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible 
electronically through the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at 
the NRC Web site (http://www.nrc.gov).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of December, 2000.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Douglas V. Pickett,
Senior Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate III, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-359 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Aaron Ferer and Robin Monsky, appellants, v. Erickson & Sederstrom, P.C., a limited liability organization, a Nebraska corporation, appellee.

759 N.W.2d 75

Filed October 27, 2006.

No. S-05-619.

James D. Sherrets and Jason M. Bruno, of Sherrets & Boecker, L.L.C., for appellants.

Michael F. Kinney, David A. Blagg, and Daniel J. Epstein, of Cassem, Tierney, Adams, Gotch & Douglas, for appellee.

Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This matter is before the court on motions for rehearing filed by the parties to this appeal regarding our opinion reported at *Ferer v. Erickson, Sederstrom, ante*p. 113, 718 N.W.2d 501 (2006).

The motion for rehearing filed by the appellants, Aaron Ferer and Robin Monsky, is overruled. The motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, Erickson & Sederstrom, PC., is overruled, but we modify the opinion as follows:

In that portion of the opinion designated “Analysis,” under the subheading “Individual Claim,” the last paragraph, *id.*at 119, 718 N.W.2d at 507, is withdrawn. In its place, the following is inserted:

> Aaron has alleged in his operative complaint that E&S transferred his shares of AFSC to Harvey Ferer and then to Matthew Ferer and Whitney Ferer, despite his failure to endorse the stock certificate or authorize the transfer. If Aaron’s allegations are true, which we must assume for purposes of a motion to dismiss, see *Carruth v. State,*271 Neb. 433, 712 N.W.2d 575 (2006), E&S may be liable *471under § 8-407 because of the alleged ineffective endorsement. We therefore conclude that Aaron has stated a claim for wrongful registration, and the district court erred in concluding otherwise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motions for rehearing overruled.

Hendry, C J., not participating.
Order entered January 13, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-00996-CR No. 05-14-00997-CR No. 05-14-00998-CR

MICHAEL JERARD RICHARDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 416-82939-2012, 416-82940-2012, 416-82942-2012



### ORDER Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandates in

these appeals INSTANTER

.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 25 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Correcting amendment. 

# SUMMARY:

This document contains a correction to the final regulations redesignated and amended at 62 FR 5928, 5929, February 10, 1997. The regulations related to applications for special temporary authorizations contained in § 25.120(a). 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 13, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Terry D. Johnson, (202) 418-0445 (not a toll-free call). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations that are the subject of this correction prescribed the procedures one must follow to apply for special temporary authorization to install and/or operate new or modified equipment for earth stations. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, § 25.120(a) contains an incomplete mailing address which could delay receipt and processing of requests for special temporary authorizations. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25

      - Administrative practice and procedure
      - Communications common carriers
      - Radio
      - Telecommunications
      - Television

# PART 25—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

Accordingly, 47 CFR part 25 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: 

1. The authority citation for part 25 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 303(r), 309 and 325(e). 

§ 25.120 Application for special temporary authorization. 

2. In § 25.120 revise the last sentence in paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

(a) * * * A copy of the request for special temporary authority also shall be forwarded to the Commission's Columbia Operations Center, 9200 Farm House Lane, Columbia, MD 21046-1609. 

* * * * *

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-3636 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.




Dated: September 27, 2010










/ s/ Carl SpanaCarl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IV District Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Georgia District Office 
Advisory Council, will hold a public meeting on Friday, March 9, 2001 
at 9 a.m., at the Columbus Hilton, 800 Front Avenue, Columbus, Georgia 
31901; to discuss matters as may be presented by members, staff of the 
U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information write or call Mr. Charles E. Anderson, 
District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 233 Peachtree 
Street, NE, Suite 1900, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; telephone (404) 331-
0266.

Nancyellen Gentile,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3404 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9K67] 

Berkshire County and the contiguous counties of Franklin, Hampden, and Hampshire in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Litchfield in Connecticut; Columbia and Rensselaer in New York; and Bennington in Vermont constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a result of a fire that occurred on January 17, 2001 in the Town of Great Barrington. Eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic injury assistance as a result of this disaster until the close of business on November 2, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd, South 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303. 

The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. The numbers assigned for economic injury for this disaster are 9K6700 for Massachusetts; 9K6800 for Connecticut; 9K6900 for New York; and 9K7000 for Vermont. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

Date: February 2, 2001. 

Kristine Marcy, 

Acting Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 01-3403 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P