alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2023

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance). 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                      TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Thomas v. CalPortland Co.*,**Docket Nos. WEST 2018-0402-DM and WEST 2019-0205. (Issues include whetherthe Judge erred in ruling that the miner had established that the operator haddiscriminated against him under section 105(c)(3) of the Mine Act.)

 

                                                Anyperson attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility featuresand/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform theCommission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and§ 2706.160(d).

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)236-7472

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

 

Dated: September 22, 2023

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel

 

BillingCode 6735-01
#### Ronald E. BYERS, Appellant v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 13-2917.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 5, 2014.

Filed: Aug. 8, 2014.

Ronald E. Byers, argued, Wayzata, MN, pro se.

Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Deputy, U.S. Department of Justice, William Wilkins, Internal Revenue Service, argued, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following remand to the Tax Court,1 Ronald Byers challenges an order determining deficiencies owed by Byers for tax year 2004 and an order denying Byers’s subsequent motion to vacate the tax-deficiency order. This matter was on remand to the Tax Court upon a mandate from this Court to conduct further proceedings consistent with our conclusion that Byers was entitled to a business-expense tax deduction for his 2004 truck-lease payments.

After careful review, *see Blodgett v. C.I.R.,*394 F.3d 1030, 1034-35 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review), we conclude that the Tax Court (1) fully complied with our mandate by conducting its proceedings on the record developed by the court on remand, (2) did not clearly err in calculating the tax deficiency at issue after taking into account the business-expense deduction for Byers’s 2004 truck-lease payments, and (3) did not abuse its discretion in declining to set aside its decision. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

###### [Public Notice #3520] 

The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Secretary of State's Advisory Committee on Private International Law (ACPIL). The Under Secretary for Management has determined that ACPIL is necessary and in the public interest. 

ACPIL will continue to assist the Department to coordinate effective United States participation in international efforts to unify private law between nations. ACPIL enables the Department to obtain the expert and considered views of private sector interests most knowledgeable of, as well as most affected by, international activities in this field. 

ACPIL consists of members of private sector organizations, bar associations, national legal organizations, and federal and state government agency and judicial interests concerned with private international law. ACPIL will follow the procedures prescribed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463). Meetings will be open to the public unless a determination is made in accordance with Section 10(d) of the FACA, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and (4), that a meeting or a portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. 

For more information, please contact Harold Burman, Executive Director ACPIL, Office of the Legal Adviser, 2430 E Street, NW, South Bldg., Suite 203, Washington, DC 20037-2851, phone 202 776-8420. 

Jeffrey D. Kovar, 

Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-353 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*FRANCIS J. KURZATKOWSKI, JR.

*Michael Zariphes,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Leon F. Dalbec, Jr.,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 14, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Com. App. 556 (AC 29610), is denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Foster Agers, Appellant

No. 06-12-00175-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10-

0176X). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Foster Agers, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 21, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

     The following entities are subsidiaries of Horizon Group, Inc., a Michigan
     corporation:

            Horizon/Glen Outlet Centers Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
            partnership

            First Horizon Group Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
            partnership

            First HGI, Inc., a Delaware corporation

            Second HGI, Inc., a Delaware corporation

            H/G Perryville Limited Partnership, a Maryland limited partnership

            HGI Perryville, Inc., a Maryland corporation

            MG Third Party Services Corp., a Delaware corporation

            HGI Management Corp., a Michigan corporation

            MG Long Island Limited Partnership, a Virginia limited partnership

            MG Patchogue Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited
            partnership

            MG Patchogue Limited Partnership II, a Virginia limited partnership

            MG Medford Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited
            partnership

            HGL Outlet Associates, a Delaware general partnership

            Second Horizon Group Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
            partnership

            Finger Lakes Outlet Center, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
            company
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 203 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 203

   To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal 
   economic development assistance if the State or locality provides 
improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within 
                         the State or locality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
 the Committees on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs and Public Works 
                           and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal 
   economic development assistance if the State or locality provides 
improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within 
                         the State or locality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE.

    No State or political subdivision of a State may be provided 
assistance under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 
of 1974 or the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 if 
such State or political subdivision (or any instrumentality thereof) 
offers, permits, or grants any tax abatement, money payment, or payment 
of property (real or chattel) to any commercial or nonprofit 
organization or governmental entity in order to induce the location, 
retention, or expansion of such organization or entity within the State 
or political subdivision.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR ENTERPRISE ZONES.

    The prohibition under section 1 shall not apply to any abatement or 
payment offered, permitted, or granted under State law in connection 
with any tax enterprise zone established under State law.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1673 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1673

  To limit to $1,500,000,000 the amount expended by the Department of 
  Defense during any fiscal year for the Strategic Defense Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit to $1,500,000,000 the amount expended by the Department of 
  Defense during any fiscal year for the Strategic Defense Initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNUAL LIMITATION ON STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--The total amount expended by the Department of 
Defense during any fiscal year for the Strategic Defense Initiative may 
not exceed $1,500,000,000.
    (b) Coverage of Limitation.--For purposes of this section--
            (1) the Strategic Defense Initiative consists of those 
        programs, projects, and activities of the Department of Defense 
        constituting the Strategic Defense Initiative as of the date of 
        the enactment of this Act and any program, project, or activity 
        added to the Strategic Defense Initiative by the Department of 
        Defense after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) the Theater Missile Defense Initiative consists of 
        those programs, projects, and activities of the Department of 
        Defense constituting the Theater Missile Defense Initiative as 
        of the date of the enactment of this Act and any program, 
        project, or activity added to the Theater Missile Defense 
        Initiative by the Department of Defense after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
    (c) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) applies to fiscal years after 
fiscal year 1993.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

 

I, Michael G. Rubin, President and Chief Executive Officer of GSI Commerce, Inc., certifythat: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of GSICommerce, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) [Intentionally Omitted.] 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

May 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Bakeries Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended August 23, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James R. Elsesser, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ James R. Elsesser                                                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|James R. Elsesser                                                              
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



October 3, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Interstate Bakeries Corporation and will be retained by Interstate Bakeries Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
13.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aladdin Knowledge Systems
Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I,
Efrat Makov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

Dated: June 27, 2006

| |                         |                
| | ----------------------- | ---------------
| | By:                     | /s/ Efrat Makov
| |                         |                
| | Efrat Makov            
| | Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,311
<SECURITIES>                                    11,312
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,200
<PP&E>                                          18,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,748
<BONDS>                                         10,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           375
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,952
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,649
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (5)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0370

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including December 14, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 5 2020

11/05/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0370