alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LI LIE NG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-73089.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 9, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Norman Anthony Lewin, Esquire, Law Offices of Norman Lewin, Woodland Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

OIL, Shahrzad Baghai, Micheline K. Hershey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*555Before: FERNANDEZ, N.R. SMITH, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ng, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying her application for asylum.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that the incidents Ng experienced (the burning of her family home and suffering a burn to her leg) in Indonesia during the May 1998 riots, even considered cumulatively, did not rise to the level of past persecution. *See Halim v. Holder,*590 F.3d 971, 976 (9th Cir.2009) (harassment, threats, and one beating did not compel finding of past persecution). Further, the record does not compel a conclusion different from the BIA’s determination that Ng’s sister’s rape, while deplorable, was not based on a pattern of persecution related to Ng herself. *See Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th Cir.2009).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Ng failed to present evidence of an individualized risk of future persecution based on a disfavored group analysis, and thus that she did not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1180-81 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc) (holding that petitioner was ineligible for asylum in part because she presented no evidence of individualized risk of future persecution). Ng did not present any evidence that she or members of her family were individually targeted. The only incident of persecution was based on the civil unrest that targeted all ethnic Chinese, which occurred during the May 1998 riots.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Ng failed to raise her claims for withholding of removal and protection under CAT in her opening brief. Therefore, she waived those issues. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.1996).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,331
<INVENTORY>                                     15,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,754
<PP&E>                                         103,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,547
<SALES>                                        214,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,875
<CGS>                                          129,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.2 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
of
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
of
EQUITY MARKETING, INC.
Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware   Equity Marketing, Inc. (the Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: FIRST. At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly called and held on
February 24, 2004, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring such amendment to be advisable and
directing that such amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for approval at
its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 20, 2004. Such resolutions recommended that
the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
amended and restated in its entirety as follows: FOURTH: A. Authorized Capital Stock. The total number of shares of all
classes of stock which this Corporation shall have authority to issue is twenty-six million
(26,000,000) shares, consisting of one million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par
value $.001 per share (hereinafter, the Preferred Stock), and twenty-five million
(25,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (hereinafter, the Common
Stock). SECOND. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation duly called and held on May
20, 2004, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes permitted to be cast by the holders of
the outstanding shares of the Corporations common stock, par value $.001 per share, and the
Corporations Series A Senior Cumulative Participating Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.001
per share, was obtained in favor of such amendment with respect to Article FOURTH. THIRD. Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by
Teresa L. Tormey, its authorized officer, this 16th day of July, 2004. By:
    /s/ TERESA L. TORMEYTeresa L. Tormey,Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
#### Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

No. 10-7158.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2011.

*384Antonio Colbert, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered October 28, 2010, 2010 WL 4285744, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appellant’s complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), which requires “a short and plain statement of the claim” showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. *See Ciralsky v. CIA,*355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3480]



[[Page 9883]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-24]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Structure and Evolution of the Universe Subcommittee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science 
Advisory Committee, Structure and Evolution of the Universe 
Subcommittee.

DATES: Monday, March 5, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Tuesday, 
March 6, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference 
Room 5H 46, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Alan Bunner, Code S, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-
2150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Associate Administrator's Program Status Report
--Report from the Theme Director
--Recent Space Science Advisory Committee
--Report of the Research and Analysis Task Group
--Progress on Energetic X-Ray Imagery Survey Telescope
--Ultra Long Duration Balloon

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: February 7, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3480 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1838 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1838

 To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for a study of El 
 Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (The Royal Road of the Interior Lands), 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1993

 Mr. Richardson (for himself and Mr. Coleman) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for a study of El 
 Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (The Royal Road of the Interior Lands), 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro 
Study Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro was the primary route 
        for nearly 300 years that was used by clergy, colonists, 
        soldiers, Indians, officials and trade caravans between Mexico 
        and New Mexico;
            (2) from the Spanish colonial period (1598-1821), through 
        the Mexican national period (1821-1848), and through part of 
        the United States Territorial period (1848-1912), El Camino 
        Real de Tierra Adentro extended 1,800 miles from Mexico City 
        through Chihuahua City, El Paso del Norte, and on to Santa Fe 
        in northern New Mexico;
            (3) the road was the first to be developed by Europeans in 
        what is now the United States and for a time was one of the 
        longest roads in North America; and
            (4) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, until the arrival of 
        the railroad in the 1880s, witnessed and stimulated great 
        multicultural exchanges and the evolution of nations, peoples, 
        and cultures.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF El CAMINO REAL DE TIERRA ADENTRO IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:
            ``( ) El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, the approximately 
        350 mile route extending from the international border at El 
        Paso, Texas, across to Santa Fe, New Mexico. The study shall 
        (A) examine changing routes within the general corridor, (B) 
        examine major connecting branch routes, and (C) give due 
        consideration to alternative name designations.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Edward J. DEEGAN, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-602.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOUND ON F3 AND F4 OF THE COMPANY'S 10K
FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      29,912,553
<SECURITIES>                                 8,970,638
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,397,853
<PP&E>                                      52,834,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,478,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,198,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,512,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,000,451
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,685,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,686,226
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            47,631,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (44,182,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (44,188,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (44,188,443)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Burke Priest, Chief Financial Officer of Smartdata Corp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:   (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  June 29, 2011   /s/ Burke Priest Burke Priest Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Smartdata Corp. and will be retained by Smartdata Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1839

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on powerdriven weaving machines for weaving fabrics more than 4.9 meters in width.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 22, 1993

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension

of duty on power-driven weaving machines for weaving

fabrics more than 4.9 meters in width.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON POWER-DRIVEN WEAVING MA5 CHINES FOR WEAVING FABRICS MORE THAN

6 4.9 METERS.

7 Heading 9902.84.46 of the Harmonized Tariff

8 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

9 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.
2

•HR 1839 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 180th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1990; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

16 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

18 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

19 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, BachThuy T. Vo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Dated: | April 30, 2007 | By:                             | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |   |
|--------|----------------|---------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   |           | BachThuy T. Vo                  |
|   |           | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
DiSMISS: Opinion Issued October 31. 2012.

7 7

In The

ntirt øf pia1i

FiftI! Jitrirt nf axa at Ja11ai

No. 05-12-01022-CV

MICHELLE EDDINS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATiVE OF

THE ESTATE OF RONALD CARY EDDINS, Appellant

V.

JAN DEBEUCKELAER, INDIVII)UALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF KAAT DEBEUCKELAER, CLIRISTIANE I)AEMS, MAUR1TA LARK,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTAFE OF KENNEF11

JOSEPIl LARK, DECEASED, AND KENNETH LARK, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02 149-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang

Opinion By Justice Lang

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties inform the

Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss

the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

/ /

3

/I

OUGLAS. LANG

JUSTIC/’

121 022F.P05
(I(

(!Itnirt of Apprala

fift1i Jitrirt of t!xaa at Oatlaa

JUDGMENT

MICHELLE EDDINS, AS PERSONAL Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

REPRF:SENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-12-

RONAL[) CARY EDDiNS, Appellant 02149-B).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices

No. 05-12-01022-CV V. Bridges and Richter, participating.

JAN DEBEUCKELAER, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF KAAT DEBEUCKELAER,

CHRISTIANE DAEMS, MAU RITA LARK,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

KENNETH JOSEPH LARK, DECEASED,

AND KENNETH LARK, INDIVIDUALLY,

Appel lees

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered October 31, 2012.

/

1/g/ 14

DOUfGLAS .LANG

JUSTICE/