alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                       225
<INVENTORY>                                      1,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,411
<PP&E>                                          27,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,069
<BONDS>                                         10,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           167
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,307
<SALES>                                        132,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,805
<CGS>                                          109,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,510
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William F. Coyro, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of TechTeam
Global, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
         December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
         on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ William F. Coyro, Jr.
-------------------------
William F. Coyro, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


March 24, 2004








                                      158
exv10w2



 








Exhibit 10.2









June 27,2006




WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION

3601 East University Drive

Phoenix, Arizona 85034




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Loan by JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (successor by merger to
Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago)) (“Lender”) to WHITE
ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION (“Borrower”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:




                    Lender has extended to Borrower credit pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement,
dated January 7, 2000 (as amended from time to time, “Loan Agreement”) in the principal
amount of $12,000,000.00 (the “Loan”) and evidenced by the Promissory Note, dated June 30,
2000 (“Note”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings given them in the Loan Agreement.



                    Lender and Borrower agree to amend the Loan Documents as follows:



                    1. The definition of “Termination Date” in the Loan Agreement is hereby amended
to mean September 28,2006.



                    2. The definition of “Maturity Date” in the Note is hereby amended to mean
September 28,2006.



                    All other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. All property or rights to or interest in
property granted as security for the Loan, shall remain as security for the Loan and the
obligations of Borrower in the Loan Documents.



 









 






     Please acknowledge your receipt and acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions by
signing and returning a copy of this letter. In addition, please obtain the consent and
agreement of the Guarantors by having them sign the copy of this letter to be returned by you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., (successor by
	 	 	merger to BANK ONE, NA, (Main Office Chicago)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ R. Mark Chambers
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	R. Mark Chambers
	 

	 	Title:
	 	 Sr. Vice President






Consented and agreed to

this 28th day of June, 2006.




WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS

CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Hamid R. Shokrgozar	 	 
	Name:

	 	 

Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 	 
	Title:

	 	President & CEO	 	 






 









 






CONSENT AND AGREEMENT




     The foregoing amendments are hereby consented and agreed to this 28th day of
June, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PANELVIEW, INCORPORATED, an Oregon
	 	 	corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President & CEO
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	INTERFACE DATA SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona
	 	 	corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President & CEO
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	IDS ACQUISITION CORPORATION, an Arizona
	 	 	corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Hamid R. Shokrgozar
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President & CEO






GUARANTORS
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1856

To prohibit the expenditure of appropriated funds on the Space Station

Freedom Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1993

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of appropriated funds on the

Space Station Freedom Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Space Station Freedom

5 Termination Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF THE SPACE STATION PROGRAM.

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Effective thirty days after the

8 date of enactment of this section, no appropriated funds

9 shall be available to carry out the provisions of section
2

HR 1856 IH

1 106 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administra2 tion Act of 1998 (42 U.S.C. 241 note).

3 (b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding the provisions of

4 subsection (a), not to exceed $50,000,000 of such funds

5 referred to in subsection (c) may be used in terminating

6 the United States International Space Station Freedom

7 Program.

8 (c) UNEXPENDED FUNDS.—Subject to the provisions

9 of subsection (b), any funds appropriated for use on the

10 United States International Space Station Freedom Pro11 gram that remain unexpended and unobligated thirty days

12 after the date of enactment of this section shall be credited

13 to the general revenues of the United States Treasury.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
NanoPierce  Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Paul
H.  Metzinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies,
Inc.,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

          a)   such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NanoPierce Technologies,
               Inc.  for  the  quarter  ended September 30, 2005, fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

          b)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               of  NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended September
               30,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the
               financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of NanoPierce
               Technologies, Inc.



                                   /s/Paul H. Metzinger
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Paul H. Metzinger, Chief Executive
                                   Officer & President


Date: November 18, 2005


               A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section
               906  has  been provided to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and will
               be retained by NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
               Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of MCF Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, D. Jonathan Merriman and Gregory S.
Curhan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



September 23, 2003



/s/ D. Jonathan MerrimanD. Jonathan Merriman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Gregory S. CurhanGregory S. Curhan Chief Financial Officer




32
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Duane G. Debs,President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Duane G. Debs                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Duane G. Debs                          |   |
| President and Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| March 11, 2008                    |   |

 

 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to West SuburbanBancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Peer Review Plan 

Title of Review: WIC Infant and Toddler 

Feeding Practices Study II 

[X ] Influential Scientific Information 

 

Agency: FNS [ ] Highly Influential Scientific Assessment 

 

Agency Contact: Melissa Abelev 

 

Subject of Review: WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study II 

 

Purpose of Review: FNS will seek scientific peer review for the subject study. 

 

Type of Review: [ ] Panel Review [] Individual Reviewers 

 

[ X ] Alternative Process (Briefly Explain): 

 Individual manuscripts based on analysis of study data are 

submitted to scientific journals and receive peer review 

through the journal peer review process. 

 

Timing of Review (Est.): Start: 2017 End: 2023 Completed: 2023 

 

Number of Reviewers: [ ] 3 or 

fewer

[ ] 4 to 10 [X ] More than 10 

 

Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise Needed for Review: 

There are three areas of expertise needed: (1) research methodology and statistical analysis; (2) knowledge 

of subject FNS programs; and (3) expertise in breastfeeding, infant and toddler feeding, and nutrition for 

young children. 

Reviewers selected by: [ ] Agency [ X ] Designated Outside 

Organization 

 Organization’s Name: The scientific journals to 

which the manuscripts are 

submitted

Opportunities for Public Comment? [ ] Yes [ X] No 

 If yes, briefly state how and when these opportunities will be provided: 

 How: 

 When: 

 

Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

Other: 
 

The reviewers will be charged with two tasks as follows: 

1. Reviewers will be requested to determine if (i) the data collection as implemented was 

appropriate, (ii) whether the analyses as carried out reflect the original plans and (iii) 

whether the analyses are appropriate given the actual implementation of sampling and data 

collection. 

2. Reviewers will be charged with evaluating the clarity of hypotheses, the robustness of 

the methods employed to address the hypotheses, the appropriateness of the methods for 

the hypotheses being tested, the extent to which the conclusions follow from the analysis, 

and the strengths and limitations of the overall conclusions. The peer reviewers will be 

requested, as appropriate, to suggest ways to clarify assumptions, findings, and 

conclusions; identify oversights, omissions, and inconsistencies; and, if needed, encourage 

authors to more fully acknowledge limitations and uncertainties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                5

<CIK>                                                     0000828530
<NAME>                                                    ADMIRAL FINANCIAL CORP
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     23,890
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                                (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              0
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finanical information extracted from Registrant's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Janet L. Holt, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Continucare
Corporation.

|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 25, 2003 |  | By: /s/ Janet L. Holt                
|                         |  |                                      
|                         |  | JANET L. HOLT
Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JINBEI XUE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73492

Agency No. A087-848-870

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jinbei Xue, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

MAY 23 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039 (9th Cir. 2010), and review de novo claims of due process violations in

immigration proceedings, Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir. 2010). 

We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s reliance on Xue’s inability

to recall the days of the week on which specific events occurred. See Ren v.

Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1085-86 (9th Cir. 2011) (inconsistency regarding day

incident occurred was “manifestly trivial” and could “not form a basis for an

adverse credibility determination”). Substantial evidence also does not support the

BIA’s reliance on Xue’s omission of being taken to a court because, contrary to the

BIA’s finding, Xue was never asked about this omission. See Soto-Olarte v.

Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 2009) (IJ must provide opportunity to

explain any inconsistencies that form basis for denying claim). Finally, the

inconsistency regarding whether the six signatories on a witness statement were

arrested with Xue does not support the adverse credibility finding. See Ren, 648

F.3d at 1087 (finding “initial error” was “a quickly-corrected innocent mistake”). 

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand Xue’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims on an open record for further proceedings

2 12-73492
consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002)

(per curiam); Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1095-96.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

3 12-73492