alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of   Environmental   Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10KSB/A  for the period  ending
December 31, 2007 (the  "Report") I, Edward L.  Torres,  Acting Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 21, 2008



/s/Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
exv10w8



 







EXHIBIT 10.8




REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE




	 	 	
	$7,500,000
	 	June 30, 2006






     On the Revolving Credit Maturity Date, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, North Pointe Holdings Corporation,
a Michigan corporation (“Company”) promises to pay to the order of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
(“Bank”) care of Comerica Bank, as Agent, at 500 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, in lawful
money of the United States of America, the sum of Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($7,500,000), or so much of said sum as may from time to time have been advanced and then be
outstanding hereunder pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June
30, 2006, made by and among the Company, certain banks, including the Bank, and Comerica Bank as
Agent for such banks, as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), together with
interest thereon as hereinafter set forth.



     Each of the Advances made hereunder shall bear interest at the Applicable Interest Rate from
time to time applicable thereto under the Agreement or as otherwise determined thereunder, and
interest shall be computed, assessed and payable as set forth in the Agreement.



     This Note is a note under which advances (including refundings and conversions), repayments
and readvances may be made from time to time, but only in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the Agreement. This Note evidences borrowings under, is subject to, is secured in accordance
with, and may be accelerated or matured under, the terms of the Agreement, to which reference is
hereby made. Definitions and terms of the Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference herein.



     This Note shall be interpreted and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be determined
under the laws of, and enforceable in, the State of Michigan.



     Company hereby waives presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonor and
nonpayment of this Note and agrees that no obligation hereunder shall be discharged by reason of
any extension, indulgence, release, or forbearance granted by any holder of this Note to any party
now or hereafter liable hereon or any present or subsequent owner of any property, real or
personal, which is now or hereafter security for this Note.



i









 






     Nothing herein shall limit any right granted Bank by any other instrument or by law.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS
 CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Its:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 

	 	 







ii
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9682-9683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-193; MM Docket No. 00-155; RM-9924]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Las Vegas and Rowe, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; denial.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission denies the request of Meadows Media, LLC, 
permittee of Station KTRL, Las Vegas, New Mexico, to substitute Channel 
275C3 for Channel 275C2 at Las Vegas, the reallotment of Channel 275C3 
to Rowe, as its first local aural service, and the modification of 
Station KTRL's construction permit accordingly. The Commission found 
that petitioner did not show that Rowe has sufficient community indicia 
to find that it is a community for allotment purposes. In addition, 
even if it were found to be a community for allotment purposes, the 
Commission found that the reallotment would not result in a 
preferential

[[Page 9683]]

arrangement of allotments because it would result in a substantially 
larger number of people remaining underserved with only one fulltime 
reception service than would receive a first local aural service but 
already receive at least two fulltime aural services. See 65 FR 54192, 
September 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-155, adopted January 17, 2001, and 
released January 26, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-3412 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828191
<NAME> 88B
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         107,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,166
<PP&E>                                       7,125,996
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,023,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,265,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,284,961
<SALES>                                        107,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,863
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|                                  |  |                           
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Information Analysis Incorporated |  | 2004 Report on Form 10-KSB



Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Form SB-2 No. 333-95775 dated September 4, 2000 and Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-26249 and No. 33-305136) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option Plan and 1996 Stock Option Plan of Information Analysis Incorporated and in the related prospectus of our report dated February 11, 2005 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Information Analysis Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered
|                                
|Bethesda, Maryland              
|March 24, 2005                  





15
##### 



Exhibit 32
Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Gary Suttle, Rockfords Chief Executive Officer
and James M. Thomson, Rockfords Chief Financial Officer, each certifies with
respect to Rockford Corporations Quarterly Report 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, that:



| |  |  | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, Rockfords financial condition and results of
operations.

|                         |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  | /s/ W. Gary Suttle  
|                         |  |                      |  |                        
|                         |  |                      |  | W. Gary Suttle         
|                         |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |                      |  |                        
|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  | /s/ James M. Thomson
|                         |  |                      |  |                        
|                         |  |                      |  | James M. Thomson       
|                         |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1962

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on 6-

Hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium, and ammonium salts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. KLECZKA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension

of duty on 6-Hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, and

its sodium, potassium, and ammonium salts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON 6-HYDROXY-2-NAPHTHALENE5 SULFONIC ACID, AND ITS SODIUM, POTAS6 SIUM, AND AMMONIUM SALTS.

7 Heading 9902.29.10 of the Harmonized Tariff

8 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

9 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.
2

•HR 1962 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

16 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

17 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

18 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc19 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                          <C>
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT:
  Buzzard Power Corporation
  Incorporated in Delaware December 12, 1990................................
  Sunnyside Power Corporation
  Incorporated in Utah September 21, 1987...................................
  Kaiser Power of Sunnyside, Inc.
  Incorporated in Delaware March 26, 1986...................................
  Kaiser Systems, Inc.
  Incorporated in Delaware March 26, 1986...................................
  Milesburg Energy, Inc.
  Incorporated in Pennsylvania September 30, 1986...........................
  Coal Dynamics Corporation
  Incorporated in Pennsylvania March 21, 1986...............................
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-84592, 33-84594, 33-15493, 33-15499, 33-48539, 333-48541, 333-58773, 333-58777, 333-45414 and 333-89070) of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006, except for the restatement discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (not presented herein), as to which date is August 31, 2006 and except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the effects of the change in segments discussed in Note 11, as to which the date is March 26, 2007 relating to the financial statements and our report dated March 30, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

April 2, 2007
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted for the
quarter  ended  August  31,  1996  form 10-Q  consolidated  Balance  Sheets  and
Consolidated Statements of Operations as of May 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000827830
<NAME>                        WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>               MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         616,125
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  88,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,433,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,701
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,291,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,433,260
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,543
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  21,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               448,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (445,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (550.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 Summary of Director Compensation 
  

													
	 Type of Fee

	  	Fee (Other
Than for
Meetings)

	  	Meeting Fees


	  	  	In-person
Attendance at
Meetings Held in
Conjunction With
a Regular Board
Meeting

	  	In-Person
Meetings Not
Held in
Conjunction
With a
Regular
Board
Meeting

	  	Telephonic
Participation in
Meetings


	 Annual Board Retainer (Cash)
	  	$	50,000	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Annual Board Retainer (Stock)
	  	$	75,000	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Board Meeting Fees
	  	 	 	  	$	2,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Annual Lead Director Retainer
	  	$	20,000	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$	20,000	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Annual Chair Retainer (Other Committees)
	  	$	8,500	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Audit Committee Meeting Fees
	  	 	 	  	$	3,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Nuclear Oversight Committee Meeting Fees
	  	 	 	  	$	4,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Other Committee Meeting Fees
	  	 	 	  	$	2,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 189

To include the Territory of American Samoa in the Supplemental Security

Income Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To include the Territory of American Samoa in the

Supplemental Security Income Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY IN4 COME BENEFITS PROGRAM TO AMERICAN

5 SAMOA.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 7th sentence of section

7 1101(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

8 1301(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and title XVI (as

9 in effect pursuant to the amendment made by section 301
2

•HR 189 IH

1 of the Social Security Amendments of 1972)’’ before

2 ‘‘also’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

4 (1) Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

5 1382c(e)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, American

6 Samoa,’’ before ‘‘and’’.

7 (2) Section 1614(a)(1)(B)(ii) of such Act (42

8 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by inserting

9 ‘‘or national’’ after ‘‘citizen’’.

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

12 on October 1, 1993.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           66795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   262746
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      33888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                403833
<PP&E>                                          170168
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2670340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           472575
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          5360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2192405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2670340
<SALES>                                         738703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                738703
<CGS>                                           539253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   327686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (128236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (128192)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### SHELL OIL COMPANY and Atlantic Richfield Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2010-5161.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2011.

*431Michael W. Kirk, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Kyle E. Chadwick, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves to summarily vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims and remand or, in the alternative, for a stay of proceedings. Shell Oil Company and Atlantic Richfield Company oppose. The United States replies.

We deem the better course is to deny the United States’ motions without prejudice to the United States raising its issues in its briefs.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motions are denied.

(2) The United States’ brief is due within 40 days from the date of filing of this order.