10684 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2001 / Notices

EPA ICR No. 1214.05; Pesticide

Product Registration Maintenance Fee;

was approved 01/23/2001; OMB No.

2070–0100; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 0616.07; Compliance

Requirements for Child Resistant

Packaging; in 40 CFR part 157; was

approved 01/23/2001; OMB No. 2070–

0052; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1790.02; NESHAP for

Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and

Phosphate Fertilizers Production, in 40

CFR part 63, subparts AA and BB; was

approved 01/24/2001; OMB No. 2060–

0361; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1066.03; NSPS for

Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing

Plants; in 40 CFR part 60, subpart PP;

was approved 01/24/2001; OMB No.

2060–0032; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1797.02; NSPS for

Petroleum Liquids for which

Construction, Reconstruction, or

Modification Commenced after June 11;

in 40 CFR part 60, subpart K; was

approved 01/24/2001; expires 01/31/

2004.

EPA ICR No. 1056.07; NSPS for Nitric

Acid Plants, in 40 CFR part 60, subpart

G; was approved 01/24/2001; OMB No.

2060–0019; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1678.04; NESHAP for

Magnetic Tape Manufacturing

Operations; in 40 CFR part 63, subpart

EE; was approved 01/24/2001; OMB No.

2060–0326; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1783.02; MACT—

Flexible Polyurethane Form Product; in

40 CFR part 63, subpart III; was

approved 01/24/2001; OMB No. 2060–

0357; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1664.04; The National

Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution

Contingency Plan; in 40 CFR part

300.900, subpart J; was approved 01/24/

2001; OMB No. 2050–0141; expires 01/

31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1799.02; NESHAP/

MACT Mineral Wool Production; in 40

CFR part 63, subpart DDD; was

approved 01/24/2001; OMB No. 2060–

0362; expires 01/31/2004.

EPA ICR No. 1717.03; NESHAP for

Site Waste and Recovery Operations; in

40 CFR part 63, subpart DD; was

approved 01/24/2001; OMB No. 2060–

0313; expires 01/31/2004.

Short Term Extensions

EPA ICR No. 1056.06; NSPS FOR

Nitric Acid Plants; in 40 CFR part 60,

subpart G; OMB No. 2060–0019; on 10/

26/2000 OMB extended the expiration

date through 01/31/2001.

EPA ICR No. 1012.06; Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs) Disposal Permitting

Regulation; in 40 CFR part 761; OMB

No. 2070–0011; on 11/22/2000 OMB

extended the expiration date through

03/31/2001.

EPA ICR No. 1503.03; Data

Acquisition for Registration; in 40 CFR

part 158; OMB No. 2070–0122; on 12/

22/2000 OMB extended the expiration

date through 03/31/2001.

EPA ICR No. 0586.08; Preliminary

Assessment Information Rule (PAIR)—

TSCA Section 8(a); in 40 CFR part 712;

OMB No. 2070–0054; on 12/22/2000

OMB extended the expiration date

through 03/31/2001.

Comments Filed

EPA ICR No. 1968.01; Hazardous

Waste Listings for Wastes from the

Production of Inorganic Chemicals; in

40 CFR part 261; on 01/18/2001 OMB

filed a comment under comment No.

2050–0174. Note, this is not an OMB

approval number.

EPA ICR No. 1974.01; NESHAP for

Cellulose Products Manufacturing; in 40

CFR part 63, subpart A, G, and H; on 01/

24/2001 OMB file a comment under

comment No. 2060–0444. Note, this is

not an OMB approval number.

EPA ICR No. 1964.01; Reporting and

Recordkeeping Requirements of the

NESHAP from Wet-formed Fiberglass;

on 01/24/2001 OMB file a comment

under comment No. 2060–0440. Note,

this is not an OMB approval number.

Comment Filed and Continue

EPA ICR No. 1189.08; Requirements

for Zinc Fertilizers Made from Recycled

Hazardous Secondary Materials

(Proposed Rule); in 40 CFR part 261.4;

OMB No. 2050–0052; on 01/18/2001

OMB filed a comment/continue action

pending review of the final rule.

Withdrawal/Continue

EPA ICR No. 1363.09; Toxic Chemical

Release Reporting, Recordkeeping,

Supplier Notification and Petitions

under Section 313 of the Emergency

Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act (EPRA); in 40 CFR part 372;

on 01/18/2001 OMB’s action reads: This

ICR is withdrawn because there is

already an approved ICR for this

collection that authorizes the collection

through 01/31/2003.

Dated: February 9, 2001.

Oscar Morales,

Director, Collection Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 01–3985 Filed 2–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6615–5]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency

Office of Federal Activities, General

Information (202) 564–7167 or

www.epa.gov/oeca/ofa

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements Filed February 05, 2001

Through February 09, 2001 Pursuant

to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 010039, Draft EIS, FAA, FL, Fort

Lauderdale—Hollywood International

Airport, Proposed Expansion of

Runway 9R–2FL and other Associated

Improvements, Funding, Broward

County, FL, Comment Period Ends:

April 20, 2001, Contact: Bart Vernace

(407) 812–6331.

EIS No. 010040, Final EIS, BOP, ID,

Terre Haute United States

Penitentiary (USP), Proposal to

Construct and Operate 960 Beds

Facilities along with a Special

Confinement Unit of 100–120 Beds to

Alleviating Overcrowding, Vigo

County, Terra Haute, ID, Wait Period

Ends: March 19, 2001, Contact: David

J. Dorworth (202) 514–6470.

EIS No. 010041, Draft EIS, FHW, MI, I–

94/Rehabilitation Project,

Transportation Improvements to a 6.7

miles portion of I–94 from east I–96

west end to Conner Avenue on the

east end, Funding and NPDES Permit,

City of Detroit, Wayne County, MI,

Comment Period Ends: April 02,

2001, Contact: James Kirschensteiner

(517) 377–1880.

EIS No. 010042, Final EIS, FHW, MI,

Boardman River Crossing Mobility

Study, Improve the East-West

Mobility across the Boardman River,

COE Permit, Traverse City and Grand

Traverse County, MI , Wait Period

Ends: March 19, 2001, Contact: James

A. Kirschensteiner (517) 377–1880.

EIS No. 010043, Final EIS, TVA,

Adoption—Disposition of Surplus

Highly Enriched Uranium, TVA

proposes to obtain 33 Metric Tons of

Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to

blend down to Low Enriched

Uranium (LEU) and Fabricated to Fuel

for use in Nuclear Reactors at Browns

Ferry Nuclear Plant, Wait Period

Ends: March 19, 2001, Contact: Bruce

L. Yeager (423) 632–8051. Tennessee

Valley Authority (TVA) has adopted a

portion of the Department of Energy’s

FEIS #960298 filed 06–21–96. TVA

was not a Cooperating Agency for the

above final EIS. Recirculation of the

document is necessary under

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2001 / Notices 10685

§ 1506.3(b) of the Council on

Environmental Quality Regulations.

EIS No. 010044, Final Supplement,

NPS, MS, Natchez Trace Parkway,

Update Information on the

Construction of Section 3P13 (Old

Agency Road), City of Ridgeland,

Madison County, MS, Wait Period

Ends: March 19, 2001, Contact:

Wendell A. Simpson (662) 680–4004.

EIS No. 010045, Draft EIS, EPA,

Proposed Rule on Environmental

Impact Assessment of

Nongovernmental Activities in

Antarctica, To implement the Protocol

on Environmental Protection to the

Antarctic Treaty of 1959, Comment

Period Ends: April 02, 2001, Contact:

B. Katherine Biggs (202) 564–7144.

Dated: February 13, 2001.

Joseph C. Montgomery,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 01–3999 Filed 2–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6615–6]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under section

309 of the Clean Air Act and section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities aT

(202) 564–7167.

An explanation of the ratings assigned

to draft environmental impact

statements (EISs) was published in

Federal Register dated April 14, 2000

(65 FR 20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–J65327–CO Rating

EC2, Baylor Park Blowdown Project,

Salvage and Treat Down and Damaged

Timber, To Reduce Impact of Spruce

Beetles, Implementation, White River

National Forest, Sopris and Rifle Ranger

Districts, Garfield, Mesa, and Pitkin

Counties, CO.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns about potential

impacts from road construction on

water quality, watershed health and

wetlands.

ERP No. D–AFS–K39064–CA Rating

LO, Mammoth Creek Revised Instream

Flow Requirements, Implementation for

Point of Measurement and Place of Use,

Mammoth Lakes, Mono County, CA.

Summary: EPA has no objections to

the proposed project.

ERP No. D–EPA–E90016–NC Rating

NA, New Wilmington Ocean Dredged

Material Disposal Site, Designation,

Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina

State Port and the Military Ocean

Terminal (Sunny Point (MOTSU), NC.

Summary: EPA EISs are not subject to

309 review.

ERP No. D–FHW–C40152–NJ Rating

EC2, NJ–52(1) Causeway (known as

MacArthur Boulevard) Construction

Project, between NJ–9 in Somers Point,

Atlantic County to Bay Avenue in

Ocean City City, Cape May County,

Funding, COE Section 404 and 10

Permits, USCGD Permit, Atlantic and

Cape May Counties, NJ.

Summary: EPA raised concerns with

the project based on purpose and need

and alternatives, wetlands, water

quality, coastal zone, and cumulative

impacts.

ERP No. D–FHW–C40153–NY Rating

EC2, NY–22 Transportation

Improvement, from I–684 to north of

County Road 65, Doansburg Road,

Construction, COE Section 404 Permit,

Town of Southeast, Putnam County, NY.

Summary: EPA raised concerns with

the project based on direct and growth

induced impacts to water quality and

the New York City Watershed.

ERP No. D–FHW–F40784–OH Rating

EC2, OH–7 (LAW–7) Relocation, OH–7

and OH–527 to a point Northeast of

Rome Township and OH–607 from East

Huntington Bridge to an Interchange

with proposed OH–7 and OH–775,

Funding, Lawrence County, OH.

Summary: EPA expressed concern

due to potential wetland impacts.

ERP No. D–FTA–F40390–MN Rating

EC2, Northstar Transportation Corridor

Project, Improvements from downtown

Minneapolis to the St. Cloud area along

Trunk Highway (TH) 10/47 and the

Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)

Railroad Transcontinental Route,

Connecting the Hiawatha Light Rail

Transit (LRT) Line at a Multi-Modal

Station, Minneapolis/St. Paul (MSP)

International.

Summary: EPA expressed concern for

and requested additional information

regarding; storm water management;

wetland mitigation; air quality; and

cumulative impact analysis.

ERP No. D–HUD–C85043–NY Rating

EC2, 1105–1135 Warburton Avenue,

River Club Apartment Complex

Development and Operation, Funding,

City of Yonkers, Westchester County,

NY.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding the draft EIS’s lack of an

Environmental Justice analysis as

required by Executive Order 12898. EPA

requested that the final EIS include an

EJ analysis in order to ensure that EJ

issues if identified would be addressed

or mitigated.

ERP No. D–HUD–K89062–CA Rating

EC2, North Hollywood Arts and

Entertainment District Project,

Construction and Operation, North

Hollywood Redevelopment Project, City

of Los Angeles, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding the information supporting

the air quality conformity determination

and requested that this information be

provided in the final EIS.

ERP No. D–NOA–K91008–00 Rating

EC2, Pelagic Fisheries of the Western

Pacific Region, Fishery Management

Plan, To Analyze Longline Fisheries,

Commercial Troll and Recreational Troll

Fisheries, Commercial Pelagic

Handliner and Commercial Pole and

Line Skipjack Fishery, Hawaii,

American Samoa, Guam and

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana

Island.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding proposed changes to the plan

and requested additional information on

the Biological Opinion for sea turtles

and the Hawaii longline fishery and the

relationship between this

comprehensive planning effort and

similar ongoing or planned revisions to

related fishery management plans in the

Western Pacific Region and Pacific

Coast.

ERP No. D–SFW–K64020–CA Rating

EC2, Metro Air Park Habitat

Conservation Plan, Issuance of an

Incidental Take Permit, To Protect,

Conserve and Enhance Fish, Wildlife

and Plants and their Habitat, Natomas

Basin, Sacramento County, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding cumulative impacts,

compliance with Section 404 Wetland

requirements, conformity with regional

air quality plans, adequate and sound

science, and species population

viability. EPA recommended better

integration with the Natomas Basin

Habitat Conservation Planning and a

commitment to planned growth which

is town-centered, transit and pedestrian

oriented, and has a greater mix of

housing, commercial and retail uses that

could significantly enhance the benefits

of the Metro Air Park and Natomas

Basin habitat conservation planning

efforts.

ERP No. DB–NOA–B91017–00 Rating

EC2, Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery

Management Plan (FMP), Updated

Information, Framework Adjustment 14

to adjust the annual Amendment 7 dayat-sea allocation for 2001 and 2002 and

to re-open portions of the Hudson