alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

thor 7), Injured Spouse Allocation

Note: To qualify as an Injured Spouse, you must have had income (i.e. wages, interest, etc.), prepaid credits (i.e. estimated tax
payments, withholding), and/or refundable credits which must have been reported on the joint return. All or a portion
of the joint overpayment must have been applied against a past due child support or Federal debt owed by the
other spouse.

Name

Information as
Shown on
Joint Return

Social security number of spouse Social security number of injured spouse

Instructions

This form must be filed with Form 1040X.

Item 1 Actual income must be claimed by the taxpayer earning the income. Joint income may be allocated as you determine, Examples
of joint income: interest, state and local tax refunds, Schedule D sales of joint assets. Gross unemployment compensation must
be included for computation purposes.

Item 2; In allocating adjustments to income, do not include the deduction for a married couple when both work.

Item 3: | Each taxpayer should claim his or her own itemized deductions (or 1/2 the standard deduction as shown on the 1987 joint return).

Item 4; Exemptions may not be prorated. Each taxpayer must claim the exemptions he or she would be entitled to claim had separate
returns been filed.

Item 5: Credits which are earned from a business must be claimed by the taxpayer who claimed income from the business—i.e, invest-
ment credit. Joint credits could be political contributions or energy credit. Child care credit should be claimed by the taxpayer
who would have claimed the exemption for the child/children or the other dependent for whom the credit is claimed

Item 6: Additional taxes are usually not joint except for alternative minimum tax, which may be allocated under certain circumstances.

Item 7° Each taxpayer must claim his or her own tax withholding as shown on Form W-2 and his or her own excess social security or
RRTA tax.

Item 8: Joint payments will be allocated based on each taxpayer’s percentage of the joint tax. (/RS will compute.)

Item 9: List social security numbers of spouses on the Form 1040X in the same order as shown on the Form 1040.

Allocation of Joint Refund Based on Married Taxpayers Separate Data

Items Necessary for

Allocation Joint Injured Spouse Other Spouse

1 Total income

2, Adjustments to income

3. Itemized deductions/Standard deduction

4. Exemptions

5. Credits against tax

6. Other taxes owed

7 Tax withholding and any excess
social security or RRTA tax

8. Joint payments

sr US.G.P.O, 1987-516-665/61619 Form 8379 (Rev. 1-88)
# Origination Data File

# Monthly Performance Data File
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The undersigned officers of Wilson Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to their knowledge: 1.the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Clark WilsonClark WilsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 21, 2005/s/ Daniel AllenDaniel AllenVice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 21, 2005
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00045

- CV
COX VENTURES, INC. D /B/A MEDIA INK , Appellant

V.
KNG, L.L.C. D/B/A TE XAS DIRECT BINDERY & LETTERPRESS , Appellee
Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1,002,161 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 30, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Cox Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Media Ink, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 30, 2014.Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice

Sharp.

y
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                                          7,780
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  30,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      860
<INVENTORY>                                                    19,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               59,060
<PP&E>                                                         58,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 30,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                127,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          27,407
<BONDS>                                                       105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (14,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  127,158
<SALES>                                                        63,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               63,818
<CGS>                                                          53,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  57,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              2,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 3,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    1,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             2,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    2,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1875

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the treatment

of certain domestic services under the unemployment tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the treatment of certain domestic services under the

unemployment tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DOMESTIC SERVICES

4 UNDER UNEMPLOYMENT TAX.

5 (a) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONAL CARE

6 SERVICES.—Subsection (c) of section 3306 of such Code

7 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (19),

8 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (20) and

9 inserting ‘‘; or’’, and by adding at the end thereof the fol10 lowing new paragraph:
2

•HR 1875 IH

1 ‘‘(21) services performed by an individual dur2 ing any period in providing personal attendance,

3 companionship, or household care services for any

4 individual if—

5 ‘‘(A) such services are performed in the

6 residence of such individual,

7 ‘‘(B) during such period, the individual

8 performing such services normally performs

9 such services for at least 5 individuals in their

10 residences, and

11 ‘‘(C) such services are not performed by

12 such individual while in the employ of another

13 person engaged in the trade or business of pro14 viding such services.’’

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

16 section 3306(c) of such Code is amended by inserting

17 ‘‘(not described in paragraph (21))’’ after ‘‘domestic serv18 ice’’ the first place it appears.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to remuneration paid in calendar

21 quarters ending after the date of the enactment of this

22 Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1929 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1929

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to treatment of 
              certain equipment under the heavy truck tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

 Mr. Goodlatte (for himself and Ms. Shepherd) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to treatment of 
              certain equipment under the heavy truck tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPLOSIVES HANDLING EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM HEAVY TRUCK TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 4053 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to exemptions) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(8) Explosives handling equipment.--Any article primarily 
        designed--
                    ``(A) to be placed or mounted on an automobile 
                truck chassis, truck trailer, or semi-trailer chassis, 
                and
                    ``(B) to be used to process, prepare, or load 
                explosive products or the components thereof.
        (including in each case bins, tanks, or other containers 
        mounted on the same chassis for transporting components of the 
        explosive products).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the amendment made by section 512(b) of 
the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.92


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE

WORLDSPAN TECHNOLOGIES INC.

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


This SECOND AMENDMENT TO
THE WORLDSPAN TECHNOLOGIES INC. STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (“Plan”), is adopted by
Worldspan Technologies Inc. with the consent of the Chief Executive Officer of
Worldspan, L.P. effective as of June 15, 2006:


1.             Second 5.1 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:


5.1         Number.  Subject to the provisions of Section 5.3, the
number of shares of Common Stock subject to Incentive Awards under the Plan may
not exceed 13,250,000.  The shares of
Common Stock to be delivered under the Plan may consist, in whole or in part,
of shares held in treasury or authorized but unissued shares not reserved for
any other purpose.


2.             Except as expressly amended herein, the Plan shall
continue in full force and effect.


	
  WORLDSPAN TECHNOLOGIES INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Margaret K. Cassidy

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Margaret K. Cassidy

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Consented to this 15th day of June 2006

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
     /s/ Rakesh Gangwal

  	
   

  
	
  Rakesh Gangwal

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer of Worldspan, L.P.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ira St. Anthony HUGGINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6187.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.

Ira St. Anthony Huggins, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ira St. Anthony Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 *712U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Huggins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Huggins’ motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          20,629
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    113,443
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          68,322
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            68,319
<LOANS>                                        470,647
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 694,443
<DEPOSITS>                                     594,256
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,252
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 694,443
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,652
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,489
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                39,141
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,511
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,311
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,830
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 264
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,301
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,301
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,710
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,453
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   800
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,168
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,729
<RECOVERIES>                                       799
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,544
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,544
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0028

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY JOHN STRYKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 9, 2021 within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 1 2021

07/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0028
#### John DOE # 11, et al., petitioners, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

No. 10-350.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF RESTRUCTURING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, in his
capacity as the Chief Restructuring Officer of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition at the end of such quarter and the Companys results of operations for such quarter.





/s/    MARK J GERGENMark J Gergen Chief Restructuring Officer





Dated: November 18, 2002
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1977

To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to remove the

limitation on appropriations for land acquisition in the Santa Monica

Mountains National Recreation Area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mr. BEILENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978

to remove the limitation on appropriations for land acquisition in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the first sentence of section 507(r) of the National

4 Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 460kk(r))

5 is amended to read as follows: ‘‘There are authorized to

6 be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for acqui7 sition of lands and interests therein within the boundaries
2

•HR 1977 IH

1 of the recreation area established under this section, to

2 remain available until expended.’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133948 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133948 COA: 272582 Genesee CC: 04-014983-FC MARIO DARREL COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
**Exhibit3C**

** **

**MICRO COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.**

** **

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

 

The undersigned, duly elected and acting ChiefFinancial Officer of Micro Component Technology, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,hereby certifies that the shareholders of the corporation, by majority vote ata meeting held on March 14, 2002, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,Section 302A.135, approved an amendment to the corporation’s Articles ofIncorporation to revise Article 4 to state as follows:

 

4.             Common Stock. The total number of shares of the corporation’s common stock authorizedfor issuance is forty million (40,000,000) shares with a par value of $.01 pershare.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto sethis hand this 14th day of March 2002.

 
|   |   |                                                      |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | **/**s**/**Jeffrey S. Mathiesen,  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        |        |                                                           |        |  |