alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43930; File No. 265-22]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information. 

# SUMMARY:

The third meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information (“Committee”) will be held on March 1, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room, at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public, and the public is invited to submit written comments to the Committee.

      ( print page 10043)    

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and should refer to File No. 265-22. Comments should be submitted to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anitra Cassas, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, at 202-942-0089; Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-1001.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, and the regulations thereunder, the Designated Federal Official of the Committee, David S. Shillman, has ordered publication of this notice that the Committee will conduct a meeting on March 1, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public. This will be the third meeting of the Committee. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss possible ways to improve the existing model for consolidating and disseminating market information in the equities markets, and other issues relating to the public availability of market information in the equities and options markets.

Dated: February 6, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-3625 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                           SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                             AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   18,814
<SECURITIES>                                             11,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                            69,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (48,866)
<INVENTORY>                                              8,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         131,469
<PP&E>                                                   60,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (18,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           239,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    141,508
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,001
<OTHER-SE>                                               92,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             239,651
<SALES>                                                  376,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         161,945
<CGS>                                                    180,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            256,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         (274,476)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       2,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (268,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (46,393)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (221,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (221,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (4.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (4.48)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
 LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios (Unaudited)
  2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Net (loss) income
    
    $
    (10,155
    )
    
    $
    (48,418
    )
    
    $
    (65,172
    )
    
    $
    1,841
    
    
    $
    (6,959
    )Add:Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    
    
    763
    
    
    
    849
    
    
    
    (683
    )
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    450Fixed charges (see below)
    
    
    43,435
    
    
    
    45,215
    
    
    
    43,531
    
    
    
    27,470
    
    
    
    31,241Earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    34,043
    
    
    $
    (2,354
    )
    
    $
    (22,324
    )
    
    $
    29,610
    
    
    $
    24,732Fixed charges (1):Interest
    
    $
    38,092
    
    
    $
    42,551
    
    
    $
    40,950
    
    
    $
    25,730
    
    
    $
    29,351Amortization of debt costs
    
    
    1,575
    
    
    
    1,810
    
    
    
    1,731
    
    
    
    1,495
    
    
    
    1,636Interest portion of rentals
    
    
    654
    
    
    
    854
    
    
    
    850
    
    
    
    245
    
    
    
    25440,321
    
    
    
    45,215
    
    
    
    43,531
    
    
    
    27,470
    
    
    
    31,241Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    3,114
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    43,435
    
    
    $
    45,215
    
    
    $
    43,531
    
    
    $
    27,470
    
    
    $
    31,241(Deficiency) earnings in the coverage of fixed charges
    
    $
    (6,278
    )
    
    $
    (47,569
    )
    
    $
    (65,855
    )
    
    $
    2,140
    
    
    $
    (6,509
    )(Deficiency)
earnings in the coverage of fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    (9,392
    )
    
    $
    (47,569
    )
    
    $
    (65,855
    )
    
    $
    2,140
    
    
    $
    (6,509
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.08
    
    
    
    Ratio of
earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.08
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    Fixed charges consist of interest expensed, amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized
expenses related to indebtedness and an estimate of the interest within rental expense. The
Company believes that it is reasonable to estimate one-third of rental expense is interest
expense.
Exhibit 99.1
                                  TENERA, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of TENERA, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C. McKay, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert C. McKay
--------------------------
Robert C. McKay
Chief Executive Officer and
President
April 14, 2003
#### Verne A. HODGE, Appellant v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the VIRGIN ISLANDS.

No. 09-4359.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) Dec. 17, 2010.

Filed: Dec. 20, 2010.

Verne A. Hodge, St. Thomas, VI, pro se.

Simone R.D. Francis, Esq., Micol L. Morgan, Esq., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak *&*Stewart, St. Thomas, VI, for Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.

Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

In May of 2007, Verne A. Hodge filed a lawsuit against his employer, the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands (hereafter referred to as the Superior Court), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112, and the Virgin Islands Whistleblowers Protection Act, 10 V.I.C. § 122.1 Thereafter, the District Court granted Hodge’s motion to dismiss his ADA claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the Whistleblowers Protection Act claim. After the close of discovery, the Superior Court filed a motion for summary judgment. In a thorough memorandum, the District Court granted the motion and dismissed Hodge’s amended complaint with prejudice. Hodge responded by filing motions for, *inter alia,*summary judgment in his favor, and for default judgment, both of which were denied by the District Court. Hodge unsuccessfully sought reconsideration of each of these orders. This timely appeal followed.2

We conduct plenary review of a District Court’s grant of summary judgment. *642*Hutchins v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer,*253 F.3d 176, 181 (3d Cir.2001). In granting the Superior Court’s motion for summary judgment, the District Court concluded that Hodge failed to adduce proof of any of the elements of a prima facie case under the Whistleblowers Protection Act. Hodge contends that the District Court erred in applying the case law relevant to whistleblower actions. We disagree. For substantially the reasons given by the District Court, we will affirm the order granting summary judgment in favor of the Superior Court on Hodge’s whistleblower claim.

Furthermore, because the District Court had already granted summary judgment in favor of the Superior Court on Hodge’s sole claim, we find no error in the District Court’s denial of Hodge’s subsequent motion for default judgment or for summary judgment in his favor.3 Inasmuch as we have concluded that the District Court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the Superior Court, we will affirm the District Court’s order denying Hodge’s motion for reconsideration.4

1

. The District Court exercised jurisdiction under 48 U.S.C. § 1612(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367.

2

. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

3

. We review *the*District Court’s refusal to enter a default judgment for an abuse of discretion. *Chamberlain v. Giampapa,*210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir.2000).

4

. The abuse of discretion standard also applies to our review of the denial of a motion for reconsideration. *Budget Blinds, Inc. v. White,*536 F.3d 244, 251 (3d Cir.2008).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33985]


LB Railco, Inc.--Lease and Operation Exemption--San Francisco 
Port Commission

    LB Railco, Inc. (LB Railco) has filed a verified notice of 
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate lines leased from the San 
Francisco Port Commission between a junction with Union Pacific 
Services, near Amador Street and Cargo Way, and the Intermodal 
Container Transfer Facility, and thence beyond to Piers 92, 94, and 96, 
a total distance of approximately one-half mile in San Francisco, CA.
    LB Railco indicates that it intends to commence operations by 
December 30, 2000. The earliest the transaction can be consummated is 
December 29, 2000 (7 days after the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33985, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on John F. McHugh, McHugh & Barnes, P.C., 20 Exchange Place, New 
York, NY 10005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: December 29, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-331 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LAR R Y GENE HEGGEM , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. ANDREA HOLM ES, M a ide n na m e “ M athe rn” ; JOHN DOE, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-36014 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-01997-R SM M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington R ic ardo S. M artine z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. W a shington sta

te prisone r Larry

Ge ne He gge m

a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t de fe nda nt Holm e s viola

te d his c onstitutiona

l rights in c onne c tion with the 

# FIL ED JAN 02 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re voc ation of his Drug Offende r Se nte nc ing Alte rnative (“ DOSA” ) pla c e m e nt a nd his re turn to prison. We hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a distric t c ourt’ s a

pplic ation of thedoc trine s of c la im pre c l usion a

nd issue pre c lusion. Little

john v . Unite d

State s , 321 F.3d 915, 919 (9th C i r. 2003). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d He gge m ’ s c la i m s tha t did not ne c e ssa rily involvethe re v oc ation of He gge m ’ s DOSA se nte nc e a s ba rre d by the doc trine of c la im

pre c lusion be c a

use those c la i m

we re ra ise d or c o uld ha

ve be e n ra ise d in the prior fe de ra l a c tion tha t He gge m brought a ga inst Holme s in 2007. Se e Ow e ns v . K

aise r Found. He ath Plan, Inc ., 244 F.3d 708, 713 (9th C ir. 2001) (se tting forth e le m e nts of c la im pre c lusion under fe de ra l la w ). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d He gge m ’ s c la i m s tha t im plic ate d the va lidity of the re voc ation of He gge m ’ s DOSA se nte n c e a s ba rre d by the doc trine of issue pre c lusion be c a

use the issue of the va lidity of the re voc ation of He gge m ’ s DOSA se nte nc e wa s pre viously de c ide d by

the W a shington Suprem e C o urt whe n it de nie d He gge m ’ s pe rsona l re s tra int pe tition. Se eC hriste nse n v . Grant C

nty . Hosp. Dist. N o. 1 , 96 P.3d 957, 960-61 (Wa sh. 2004) (se tting forth e le m e nts of issue pre c lusion under W a s hington la w).

1 2 - 3 6 0 1 4

2W e re je c t He gge m ’ s c onte ntions c onc e rning his a tte m pt to a m e n d the c om pla i nt in his prior fe de ra l a c tion a nd the m e rits of his c la im s . AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 3 6 0 1 4 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, 
March 19, 2001, 1 p.m. to March 19, 2001, 3 p.m., NIEHS, 79 T. 
Alexander Drive, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, Research Triangle 
Park, NC, 27709 which was published in the Federal Register on January 
22, 2001, 66 FR 6641.
    The telephone conference call meeting will be held on February 20, 
2001, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the same location, instead of March 19, 
2000, as previously advertised. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-3460 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137088 & (53)(54) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137088 

 COA: 277878 

Wayne CC: 06-010995-01

MICHAEL BRUCE CURB, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for correction of sentence is DENIED. 

d1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
rom 4962

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

Depreciation and Amortization

P See separate instructions.

DP Attach this form to your return.

OMB No. 1545-0172

1984

Name(s) as shown on return

Identifying number

Business or activity to which this form relates

Depreciation

For transportation equipment (,
after June 18, 1984, and used 50% or less in a trade or business, the section 179 deduction is not allowed and depreciation must be
taken only online 2(h).

autos), amusement recreation property, and computer/peripheral equipment placed in service

Section A.—Election to expense recovery property (Section 179)

AA. Class of property B. Cost C. Expense deduction
1 Total (not more than $5,000). (Partnerships or S corporations—see the Schedule K and Schedule K-1
Instructions of Form 1065 or 1120S) .
Section B. —Depreciation of recovery property
B. Dati E. Method
A. Class of property placed in GiSestor. 9. recog” figaring F. Deduction
service depreciation
2 Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS) (see instructions):
For assets placed in service ONLY during taxable year beginning in 1984
(a) 3-year property
(b) 5-year property
(c) 10-year property
(d) 15-year public utility
property
(e) 15-year real property—
low-income housing
(f) 15-year real property other
than low-income housing
(g) 18-year real property
(h) Other recovery property + i

3 __ACRS deduction for assets placed in service prior to 1984 (see instructions) .

Section C.—Depreciation of nonrecovery property

4 Property subject to section 168(e)(2) election (see instructions)

Class Life Asset Depreciation Range (CLADR) System Depreciation (see instructions)

alan

Other depreciation (see instructions)

Section D.— Summary

7 Total (Add deductions on lines 1 through 6). Enter here and on the Depreciation line of f yourr return (Partner-

ships and S corporations—DO NOT include any amounts entered on line 1.)

{ Part 11 Amortization

E. Amortiza-
C. Cost or D. Code F. Amortization
A. Description of property B. Date acquired other basis, section oe eerie for this year

Total. Enter here and on Other Deductions or Other Expenses line of your return .

‘See Paperwork Reduction Act Notice on page 1 of the separate instructions.

Form 4562 (1984)
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 14, 2014*

[Cite as *07/14/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3066.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2013- 0539.

#### Jainco Invests., L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2012-A-2196. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement a settlement agreement, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to and filed with the Board of Tax Appeals.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HENRY RICKY LANZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 270 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.