alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant to CG Industries, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable nonexclusive license in the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 09/437,727 entitled “Automated Contact Gage System Using Three-Axis Contact Contour Comparator.” 

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than April 16, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code OC4, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, Code 05T, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone (301) 744-6111. 

Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404. 

Dated: February 5, 2001. 

J. L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-3716 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
exv10w6



 







EXHIBIT 10.6




NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO

STOCK OPTION CERTIFICATE / AGREEMENT

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.



March 20, 2006




     THIS NOTICE OF AMENDMENT (this Notice) hereby amends, effective as of March 20, 2006, the
terms of those Stock Options listed on Exhibit A to this Notice (the Amended
Options) previously granted by American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), to                                          (the Participant) under the Company’s 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan (the Plan). Capitalized terms used in this Notice that are not otherwise defined
herein have the meaning given in the Plan.



     1. Termination of Employment. From and after the effective date of this Notice, as
first set forth above, the terms of the Amended Options pertaining to termination of employment or
other service will be modified to provide that, except as provided in the Plan and/or the
applicable award agreements or certificates with respect to a change in control of the Company or
termination of the Participant’s employment by reason of death, disability, retirement or cause,
upon termination of the Participant’s employment or other service with the Company and all
Subsidiaries, the Amended Options that are exercisable as of the effective date of such termination
shall remain exercisable until the earlier of:




     (a) the expiration of such Amended Option; or




     (b) the date that is (i) nine-months after such termination date, for any Amended
Option that was vested as of December 31, 2004; or (ii) for any Amended Option that was not
vested as of December 31, 2004, the earlier of (A) such nine-month anniversary; or (B) March
15th of the year following the calendar year in which the termination occurred,
unless the appropriate officers of the Company, in their sole discretion determine that this
earlier potential expiration date does not apply, or that some other earlier potential
expiration date should apply, based upon subsequent regulations or other guidance issues
with respect to Section 409A of the Code.



     2. Effect of Amendment. Except to the extent expressly amended by this Notice, the
Amended Options shall otherwise remain in full force and effect, subject to the terms of the
applicable award agreement(s) and/or certificate(s) evidencing such Options and the Plan. This
Notice shall supersede and replace all prior notices, communications or understandings regarding
the amendment of post-employment exercise period of stock options granted under the Plan, and the
Participant acknowledges that any Incentive Stock Options held be the Participant are not amended.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:	 	 	 	 	 	AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	HOLDINGS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





50
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 15 - 00280 - CV

________________________ IN RE CODY ALLEN JOHNSON, REL A TOR O riginal Proceeding Arising from Proceedings Before the 31st District Court

Gray County, Texas Tri a l Court No. 4447; Honorable Steve Emmert , Presiding August 5 , 201 5 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator, Cody Allen Johnson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis , seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Clerk of the Seventh Court of Appeals and a Deputy Clerk to p rovide him with a copy of all documents pertaining to a “plea of October 21, 2009,” in cause number 4447 , in the 31st District Court, Gray County, Texas . He ackn owledges that no appeal was taken from that cause number and “no appeal records are requested . ” For the reasons expressed herein, Relator’s request for mandamus relief is d ismissed for want of jurisdiction .2

T his c ourt has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (a), (b) (1) (West 2004 ). Not only does the clerk of thi s c ourt not maintain any of the requested records, a ppellate court clerks are not enumerated as persons against whom a writ of mandamus may be issued by this court. Additionally, Relator has not complied with the applicable rules of procedure for filing an original proceeding in this c ourt. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3. The fact that Relator is proceeding pro se does not excuse his compliance with procedural rules. Pena v. McDowell , 201 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. 2006). Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9622-9623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc. Special Committee 198; Next Generation Communications 
(NEXCOM)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for an 
RTCA NEXCOM Special Committee 198 meeting to be held February 22-23, 
2001, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at the RTCA Inc., 
1140 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20536.
    At the request of the Federal Aviation Administration, RTCA 
established a new Special Committee (SC-198) to develop recommendations 
for the Next Generation Communications (NEXCOM) program. The FAA will 
implement an integrated system for digital air/ground voice and data 
communications in the National Airspace System. Special Committee 198 
will undertake a multiphase work program that will initially focus on 
operational considerations and identify, then characterize, basic 
operational issues. this results of the first phase effort will be 
published in a Principles of Operation document as well as a report on 
responses to recommendation of the RTCA Chairman's Committee on NEXCOM. 
In subsequent phases, Special Committee 198 will address detailed 
demonstration and transition planning.
    The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) 
Review Terms of Reference, discuss multi-phase work program; (3) 
Organize work groups, determine leadership, establish interim 
milestones to deliver two products for Phase 1: (a) Report on Responses 
to Recommendations to the RTCA Chairman's Committee on NEXCOM 
(Delivery: August 2001); (b) RTCA DO NEXCOM Principles (Delivery: 
September 2001); (4) Working Group meetings. Plenary Session: (5) 
Review Work Group reports; (6) Review Proposed schedule for subsequent 
meetings to include Plenary meetings in February, April, June, and 
August, as well as Plenary in September 2001 to approve phase 1 
documents; (c) Plenary

[[Page 9623]]

in November 2001 to review other committee work; (d) and Editorial 
meetings; (7) Other Business; (8) Date and Location of Next Meting; (9) 
Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the Co-chairmen, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to 
present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA, Inc., 
at (202) 833-9339 (phone), (202) 833-9434 (facsimile).

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 1, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 01-3310 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3009

___________________________ William Leroy Sanders lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner - Appellant

v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Respondent - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________ Submitted: September 25, 2020 Filed: October 5, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. William Leroy Sanders appeals after the district court 1 denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, and granted a certificate of appealability on his claim that his sentence

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is invalid in light

of Johnson v. United States , 576 U.S. 591, 606 (2015) (invalidating residual clause of ACCA as unconstitutionally vague). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. This court concludes Sanders did not meet his burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the residual clause led the sentencing court to apply the ACCA enhancement. See Dembry v. United States , 914 F.3d 1185, 1187 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review); Golinveaux v. United States , 915 F.3d 564, 567- 68 (8th Cir. 2019) (movant bringing Johnson claim must show by preponderance of evidence that residual clause led sentencing court to apply ACCA enhancement). The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TONY P. FINNO , Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , as trustee for THE C

- BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET

- BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- RP2, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3218

[ August 8, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 12

- 003687

.
Tony P. Finno, Margate, pro se.

Kimberly S. Mello and Joseph H. Picone of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tam pa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , F ORST and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1920 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1920

  To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on 
                        trifluoromethylaniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

 Mr. McMillan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on 
                        trifluoromethylaniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 
              TRIFLUOROMETHYLANILINE.

    Heading 9902.30.33 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/96''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard F. Latour, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MicroFinancial Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     /s/ RICHARD F. LATOUR     Richard F. Latour  President and Chief Executive Officer   Date: August 12, 2005
U. 8, TREASURY DEPARTMENT—INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

5 RETURN OF INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION AND
rorm 1122 CONSENT OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION INCLUDED INA | LOGE
UNITED STATES CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAX RETURN |e na witew sixs odor

FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1961

If return is for calendar | °F 2th taxable year beginning , 1961
year 1961, file on or before | ond ending 19
March 15, 1962. If return PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT PLAINLY

is for a year other than a
calendar year, file on or | NAME
before 15th day of third
month following close of |~yanier and wrest
such taxable year.

Employer Identification No. City or town, postal zone number, State

1. Date incorporated

2. Place incorporated

3. Capital stock outstanding at beginning of taxable year | (©) Common (b) Preferred

4. Kind of business
O Active (J Inactive

5. Name of ‘common parent corporation (Give name of corporation which filed the consolidated income tax return for the entire affiliated
group)

6. Address of common parent corporation

1. District Director's Office in which consolidated return is filed

The above-named subsidiary corporation hereby (1) authorizes the above-named common parent corporation to make
@ consolidated income tax return on its behalf for the taxable year for which this form is filed and (2) authorizes such
common parent corporation (or, in the event of its failure, the Commissioner or the District Director of Internal Revenue)
to make a consolidated income tax return on its behalf for each taxable year thereafter for which a consolidated return
must be made by the affiliated group under the provisions of the consolidated return regulations.

The above-named subsidiary corporation, in consideration of the privilege of joining in the making of a consolidated
return with the above-named common parent corporation, hereby consents to and agrees to be bound by the provisions of
the above-mentioned regulations.

SIGNATURE AND VERIFICATION
I declare under the penalties of perjury that the above-named subsidiary has authorized me to sign this form on its behalf, and that
this form has been examined by me and the information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, correct, and
complete.

Corporate
Seal

Date Signature Title

INSTRUCTIONS

Duplicate originals of this form must be prepared by each subsidiary corporation for each taxable year for which a consolidated return
is made by the affiliated group. One of these forms must be attached to the consolidated income tax return as part thereof; the other must
be filed (at or before the time the consolidated ‘income tax return is filed) in the office of the district director for the district prescribed for the
filing of a separate return by the subsidiary.

‘Yr U.S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1961—-O-601170
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cadus  Corporation  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Michele A. Paige,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus  Corporation  and will be retained  by Cadus  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 /s/ Michele A. Paige
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Michele A. Paige
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
March 29, 2004

The foregoing  certification is furnished  solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the 1986 Stock Options Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-44306) the 1991
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of Gundle/STL Environmental, Inc., (Form S-8 No.
33-44531) the Gundle/STL Environmental, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive
Stock Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-01759) the Gundle/STL Environmental, Inc. 1996
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Form S-8 No.
333-23299) and the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-62947 and No.
333-27735) of Gundle/STL Environmental, Inc., and in the related Prospectuses of
our report dated January 28, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Gundle/STL Environmental, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                       /s/ ERNEST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 13, 2000