alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on February 28, 2001, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, February 28, 2001--10 a.m. Until the Conclusion of 
Business

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EST). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: February 8, 2001.
James E. Lyons,
Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 01-3948 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
| (1) | The Quarterly Report containing financial statements to which this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report to which this certificate is an exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 9, 2012 | /s/ Wallace D. Ruiz                                                 |   |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           | Wallace D. Ruiz                                                     |   |
|           | Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer |   |
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRED JAY OTTO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; et

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-56438

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-06014-MMMCW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 9, 2013 ** 

Before: TASHIMA, M.SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Fred Otto appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for

preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 10 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-56438

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying

preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)

(listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press

Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           10515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    63050
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     799787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1014887
<PP&E>                                          109993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1085957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           916298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9991
<OTHER-SE>                                      137300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1085957
<SALES>                                        4693051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4693051
<CGS>                                          4185404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4185404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                660150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (153981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (153981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (153981)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.015)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3210 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3210

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1905 15th Street in Boulder, Colorado, as the ``Officer Eric H. 
                     Talley Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER ERIC H. TALLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1905 15th Street in Boulder, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Officer Eric H. Talley Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Eric H. Talley Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3210

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1905 15th Street in Boulder, Colorado, as the ``Officer Eric H. 
                     Talley Post Office Building''.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tyrone Luvoid HUTCHERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10078.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2010.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Bonita L. Gunden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, GARWOOD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

*ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING*

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing are DENIED. We appreciate that the government’s Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal was filed with and granted by this court and not the district court as our November 29, 2010 opinion states. However, our reasoning in our opinion did not rely on the notion that the district court had viewed these supplemental documents prior to sentencing. On further consideration, we conclude that it would not have been error for the district court to consider the “Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Journal Entry of Judgment” in designating Hutcherson as a career offender. Therefore, Hutcherson’s contention that his sentence should be vacated still fails under plain error review. It would not have been error — plain or otherwise — ‘for the district court to consider these documents if they had been submitted to it prior to sentencing. We further conclude that there is not a reasonable probability that the district court would fail to apply the career offender *865enhancement were we to remand for re-sentencing. Hutcherson cannot show that the district court’s error in relying only on the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) affected his substantial rights, and thus there is no plain error. Nor do we conclude that failure to remand for resentencing would seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.

As the government noted in its Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal, we have previously approved supplementation of the record on appeal in situations such as this one where the defendant claims for the first time on appeal that a prior conviction does not qualify him for an enhanced sentence. *See e.g., United States v. Fambro,*526 F.3d 836, 849-50 (5th Cir.2008); *United States v. Fernandez-Cusco,*447 F.3d 382, 384-86 (5th Cir.2006). Our previous approval of such motions indicates that we will consider additional documents in situations where the district court erred by relying solely on the PSR. Furthermore, the appellant never contended in his reply brief or at oral argument that the documents attached to the government’s motion to supplement were irrelevant to this appeal.

Based on the foregoing as well as the reasoning in our opinion, the motions for rehearing are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for GSI Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”). I, Jordan M. Copland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

|   | By:    | /s/ JORDAN M. COPLAND                         |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                               |   |
|   |   | **Jordan M. Copland Chief Financial Officer** |   |

May 9, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF EAT AT JOE'S LTD.  AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30,  2000 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         19
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    31
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65
<PP&E>                                         762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1947
<BONDS>                                        1346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   878
<SALES>                                        1540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1540
<CGS>                                          606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2417)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2417)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 8, 2017

NO. 03

- 17

- 00386

- CV

Pejman Dargahi; Kamran Dargahi; and Yekk C onstruction Services, LLC d/b/a

Lakeway Custom Homes and Renovation, Appellant s

v.

Dhiraj Handa and R itu Handa, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FI ELD, AND BOURLAND

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on May 30, 2017. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds tha t there was reversible error

in the order . Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s interlocutory order and renders

judgment granting appellants’ motion to compel arbitration and stay the proceedings. Appellees

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Cou rt and the court below.
Certification

I, Frank Jiang, certify that: 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great China International Holdings, Inc. for the periodended September 30, 2007; 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WALTER A. BETANCOURT

, Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA EDWARDS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1518

[ February 6, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; John Joseph Murphy, III , Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE

18

- 00 3088

.

Walter A. Betancourt, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of the Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Fort

Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a ).

L EVINE

, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT32.0**

 

# **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

#  

The undersigned hereby certify that this report complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   April 29,  2008 | By:                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                         | Roger E. Gower                        |
|                                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| Dated:   April 29,  2008 | By:                     | /s/ Bruce R. Ficks |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|
|                                         | Bruce R. Ficks          |
|                                         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Order entered November 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00201-CV

RICHARD RALEY, RALEY HOLDINGS, LLC, AND MATTHEW W. BOBO, 

Appellants

V.

DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P.C. AND FITZPATRICK HAGOOD SMITH & UHL, LLP,

Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00390-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 18, 2019 unopposed motion for a fourteen-day

extension of time to file their opening brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants’ 

opening brief be filed no later than December 6, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1364-1365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Request to Amend Endangered Species Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicant requests a permit amendment to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.):

Applicant: Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts

Permit No.: TE-697823

    This applicant requests to amend their current permit for take 
activities for all listed species in the states of Connecticut, 
Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New

[[Page 1365]]

Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, 
Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia for the purpose 
of scientific research and enhancement of survival of the species, to 
include the recently listed Gulf of Maine distinct population segment 
of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

DATES: Written comments on this request for a permit amendment must be 
received on or before February 7, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Endangered Species Permits Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035; facsimile: 413-
253-8482.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents and other information 
submitted with this request for an amendment are available for review, 
subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of 
Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy 
of such documents within 20 days of the date of publication of this 
notice to the address above; telephone: 413-253-8628.

    Dated: December 19, 2000.
Dr. Mamie A. Parker,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-403 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M