alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 10.24

                         NON-NEGOTIABLE PROMISSORY NOTE


$50,000.00                                                Dated: June 26, 1996


                  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned ("Maker") hereby promises
to pay to the order of Jan Wernick ("Lender"), at 524 Longacre Avenue, Woodmere,
NY 11598, upon the earlier of December 31, 1997 or the completion of a public
offering of its common stock, the principal sum of FIFTY THOUSAND ($50,000.00)
DOLLARS AND 00/100. Interest shall accrue from the date hereof at the rate of
twelve percent per annum (or at the highest rate permitted by law, if lower) on
the unpaid principal balance from time to time outstanding.

                  Payment of the principal of, and interest on, this Note shall
be payable at the aforesaid address in the lawful money of the United States of
America, or at such other place as the holder of this Note shall have designated
to the Maker in writing.

                  Maker waives presentment, protest, demand, and notice of
protest, of demand and of dishonor and of nonpayment of this Note and expressly
agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to
time by Lender without in any way affecting the liability of Maker hereof.

                  This note is not negotiable or assignable by the Lender.

                  This Note will in all respects be governed by and construed in
accordance with the New York Uniform Commercial Code.



                                            ROYAL CANADIAN FOODS CORP.


                                            By: 
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Sheldon Golumbia, President
##### 



(THERMA-WAVE LOGO)

Exhibit 10.45

[Therma-Wave Letterhead]

March 12, 2003

Mr. Papken S. Der Torossian

Dear Papken:

As you are aware, the Board of Directors (the Board) of Therma-Wave, Inc.
(the Company) has nominated you to serve as a director of the Company and has
further nominated you to serve as Chairman of the Board.

If you consent to serve as a director of the Company and as Chairman of the
Board, you will receive director fees in the amount of $10,000 per month. [You
will not receive any additional fees for your attendance at Board or Board
committee meetings.]Since you are not an employee of the Company, you will
not be eligible to receive employee benefits. However, the Company will
reimburse you for all out-of-pocket expenses you incur in your service as a
director and as Chairman of the Board. You will also receive an option to
purchase 400,000 shares of the Companys common stock under the Companys 2000
Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $0.42 per share. Your option
will vest automatically upon a merger or sale of all the assets of the Company.

Sincerely,

/s/ Boris Lipkin
Boris Lipkin
President and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 69**  **48**

CARMELO P. MARTINEZ ,
P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

NORA HUNT , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5 :1 2

- hc

- 0 2150

- BO )

Submitted : August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Carmelo P. Martinez , Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis , Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Carmelo P. Martinez seeks to appeal the district

court’s ord er dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not
issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner

must demonstrate both that t he dispositive procedural ruling is
debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the
denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S.
473, 484

- 85 (2000)

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Martinez h as not made the requisite showing. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in th e materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
2014-0604.

#### State v. Wilson.

Ross App. No. 12CA3354, 2014-Ohio-293. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Lanzinger and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                          MICROFINANCIAL, INCORPORATED
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                REGARDING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
                        QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

      James R. Jackson Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
MicroFinancial, Incorporated, (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Covered Report") and, excepts as
corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

-     the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-     the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of this
November 14, 2003.

                                      /s/JAMES R. JACKSON JR.
                                      -----------------------
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### IN RE JUSTIN F. IN RE HAILEE L.

The petition by the respondent parents for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 31728) is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*908
      *Kimberly L.,*pro se, and *Anthony L.,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 29, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 168 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 168

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building to be constructed between Gay and 
    Market Streets and Cumberland and Church Avenues in Knoxville, 
  Tennessee, as the ``Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building to be constructed between Gay and Market 
Streets and Cumberland and Church Avenues in Knoxville, Tennessee, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Howard H. Baker, Jr. United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard H. Baker, 
Jr. United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 29 (legislative 
      day, June 28), 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00284-CV

IWR Operating, LLC

v.

Sunbreaker Services, LLC

On appeal from the

135th District Court of Jackson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-7-14933

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 6, 2016.
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period  ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George
Wm. Erikson, the Chairman of the Company,  certify, pursuant to and for purposes
of  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.


May 14, 2003                        /s/George Wm. Erikson
                                    George Wm. Erikson
                                    Chairman
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 of EarthShell Corporation (the "Company")
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Simon K. Hodson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/SIMON K. HODSONSimon K. Hodson
Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 29, 2003
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 of EarthShell Corporation (the "Company")
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Scott Houston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/D. SCOTT HOUSTOND. Scott Houston
Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 29, 2003
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7172

RICARDO EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. VANARDALE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-1880-AM) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 28, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricardo Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ricardo Evans, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on thereasoning of the district court, and deny Evans’ motion for appointment of counsel. Evans v. Vanardale , No. CA-97-1880-AM (E.D. Va. June 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,083, TA-W-38,083A]


Allegheny Ludlum Corporation; Washington and Houston, PA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
December 19, 2000, applicable to workers of Allegheny Ludlum 
Corporation, Jessop Plate Mill, Jessop O&T, Washington Flat Roll 
(formerly Washington Steel Corporation), Washington, Pennsylvania and 
Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Houston, Texas. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on January 11, 2001 (66 FR 2451).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
stainless steel, including slab, coil and plate as well as tool steel. 
New findings show that there was a previous certification, TA-W-34,026 
and TA-W-34,026A, issued on January 14, 1998, for workers of the 
subject firm who were engaged in employment related to the production 
of stainless steel products. That certification expired January 14, 
2000. To avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the certification 
is being amended to change the impact date from August 30, 1999 to 
January 15, 2000, for workers of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,083 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Jessop Plant Mill, 
Jessop O&T and Washington Flat Roll (formerly Washington Steel 
Corporation), Washington, Pennsylvania and Houston, Pennsylvania who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
January 15, 2000 through December 19, 2002 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of January, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-3294 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
2014-0799.

#### In re Complaint of Corrigan v. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 09-492-EL-CSS. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

Upon consideration of the motion of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company for leave to intervene as appellee, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 29, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 10, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. ICG Illinois, LLC, Docket No. 

LAKE 2013-160 (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling 

that a violation of the requirement to maintain a refuge alternative 

was “significant and substantial.”)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp
for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, I, Paul H. Metzinger, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Vyta Corp, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





a)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended
      December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





b)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp
      for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vyta
      Corp.











/s/ Paul H. MetzingerPaul
      H. Metzinger, Chief ExecutiveOfficer,
      President & PrincipalAccounting
      Officer








Date:  February
14, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Vyta Corp and will be retained by Vyta Corp and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such sonsolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1296
<ALLOWANCES>                                       163
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9030
<PP&E>                                           27524
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   34534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8345
<BONDS>                                          33393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     34534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20027
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1716

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To amend the Act of January 26, 1915, establishing Rocky

Mountain National Park, to provide for the protection

of certain lands in Rocky Mountain National Park and

along North St. Vrain Creek and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NORTH ST. VRAIN CREEK AND ADJACENT

4 LANDS.

5 The Act of January 26, 1915, establishing Rocky

6 Mountain National Park (38 Stat. 798; 16 U.S.C. 191

7 and following), is amended by adding the following new

8 section at the end thereof:
2

•HR 1716 RFS

1 ‘‘SEC. 5. NORTH ST. VRAIN CREEK AND ADJACENT LANDS.

2 ‘‘Neither the Secretary of the Interior nor any other

3 Federal agency or officer may approve or issue any permit

4 for, or provide any assistance for, the construction of any

5 new dam, reservoir, or impoundment on any segment of

6 North St. Vrain Creek or its tributaries within the bound7 aries of Rocky Mountain National Park or on the main

8 stem of North St. Vrain Creek downstream to the point

9 at which the creek crosses the elevation 6,550 feet above

10 mean sea level. Nothing in this subsection shall be con11 strued to prevent the issuance of any permit for the con12 struction of a new water gaging station on North St. Vrain

13 Creek at the point of its confluence with Coulson Gulch.’’.

14 SEC. 2. ENCOURAGEMENT OF EXCHANGES.

15 (a) LANDS INSIDE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL

16 PARK.—Promptly following enactment of this Act, the

17 Secretary of the Interior shall seek to acquire by donation

18 or exchange those lands within the boundaries of Rocky

19 Mountain National Park owned by the city of Longmont,

20 Colorado, that are referred to in section 111(d) of the Act

21 commonly referred to as the ‘‘Colorado Wilderness Act of

22 1980’’ (Public Law 96–560; 94 Stat. 3272; 16 U.S.C.

23 192b–9(d)).

24 (b) OTHER LANDS.—The Secretary of Agriculture

25 shall immediately and actively pursue negotiations with

26 the city of Longmont, Colorado, concerning the city’s pro-
3

•HR 1716 RFS

1 posed exchange of lands owned by the city and located

2 in and near Coulson Gulch for other lands owned by the

3 United States. The Secretary shall report to Congress 2

4 calendar years after the date of enactment of this Act,

5 and every 2 years thereafter on the progress of such nego6 tiations until negotiations are complete.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.