alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         81,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,891
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,639
<SALES>                                         11,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,270
<CGS>                                            9,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,924
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    833
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,315)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.07)


</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | a) | such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended                September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of                Vyta Corp                for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vyta                Corp. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Paul H. Metzinger              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul                H. Metzinger, Chief           |
|   | Executive                Officer, President       |
|   | &                Principal Accounting Officer |

----
Hon. Robert S. Calvert 

Comptroller of Public Accounts 

opinion No. ww-338 

Capitol Station Re: Whether the Hotor Vehicle 

Austin, Texas Sales Tax levied by 

Article 7047K, V.C.S., 

applies where an automobile dealer secures 

a motor vehicle from a 

manufacturer to be used 

by a salesman for demonstration purposes when 

no consideration Is 

Dear Mr. Calvert: involved? 

question: 

In your letter request you submit to us the following 

"Where an automobile dealer has secured 

a vehicle from the manufacturer and has the 

manufacturer's certificate and wishes to let 

a salesman have the vehicle to use for demonstration purposes, and no consideration was 

Involved, would the tax be due?" 

Section 3 (b) of Article 7047K, V.C.S., provides: 

"The term 'retail sale' or 'retail sales' 

as herein used shall Include all sales of motor 

vehicles except those whereby the purchaser 

acquires a motor vehicle for the exclusive 

purpose of resale and not for use." 

Article 7OJ+7K only levies the tax upon a "sale" of 

a motor vehicle. If the transfer of the motor vehicle to the 

automobile dealer constitutes a "sale" the tax will apply as 

,you state the motor vehicle Is to be used for "demonstration 

purposes." The dealer did not acquire same for the exclusive 

purpose of resale, but acquired It-for use, that Is for use 

as a demonstrator. Attorney General's Opinion O-3742. However, you state that "no consideration was involved." This 

being true there was not a "sale" involved. Even if the 

transaction could be ,termed a sale, no tax would be due for 
Hon. Robert S. Calvert,, page 2 (~~-338) 

the simple reason that 1.1s of the sale price--which Is 

nothing--amounts to a tax of .OOOO. 

SUMMARY 

The motor vehicle sales tax levied by 

Artlole 7047K, V.C.S., does not apply 

to transactions where an automobile 

dealer, without a consideration, acquires 

a motor vehicle from a manufacturer to 

be used as a demonstrator. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney Qeneral of Texas 

W. V. GCeppert 

Assistant 

wvff:gs 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Qeo. P. Blackburn, Chairman 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

Milton Richardson 

Leonard Passmore 

REVIEWEDBOR THE ATTORNEYGENF3AL 

BY 

James N. Ludlum
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20916

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABDELHADY ABDELHADY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CR-59

- - - - - - - - - -

August 14, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abdelhady Abdelhady appeals his conviction for possession of

a machinegun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He argues for

the first time on appeal that his conviction is invalid because 

§ 922(o) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to his

case. We conclude that no plain error has occurred. See United

States v. Knutson, 113 F.3d 27, 30-31 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM and DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellant s ,

v.

E.H., the Mother, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 404

[ October 13, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19000006DPAXMX

.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellant Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Andrew Feigenbaum, Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellant Department of Children and Families.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regiona l Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* *

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November                14, 2007 | /s/                Stephen J. Benedetti        |
|                                              | Stephen                J. Benedetti            |
|                                              | Principal                Executive Officer and |
|                                              | Principal                Financial Officer     |
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Duane G. Debs, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/   Duane G. Debs                     |   |
| Duane   G. Debs                         |   |
| President   and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 14,   2011                   |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Regulations Governing Payments by the Automated Clearing House method 
on Account of United States Securities.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 10, 2001, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Vicki S. Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 
Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Regulations Governing Payments by the Automated Clearing 
House Method on Account of United States Securities.
    OMB Number: 1535-0094.
    Abstract: The regulations authorize payment to investors in United 
States securities by the Automated Clearing House (ACH Method).
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit, and 
state or local governments.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: February 2, 2001.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 01-3242 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,750
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,657
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,750
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,009,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        626,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           241
<OTHER-SE>                                     350,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,009,599
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,726
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,293)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
CCASE:

SOL (MSHA) V. SUNSHINE MINING

DDATE:

19790327

TTEXT:
~1

 Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)

 Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, Civil Penalty Proceeding

 MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

 ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. DENV 78-569-PM(A)

 PETITIONER A.O. No. 10-00089-05002

 v. Sunshine Mine

SUNSHINE MINING COMPANY,

 RESPONDENT

 DECISION AND ORDER

Appearances: Joseph Walsh, Trial Attorney, Department of Labor,

 Office of the Solicitor, Arlington, Virginia, for

 the petitioner;

 Piatt Hull, Esquire, Wallace, Idaho, for the

 respondent.

Before: Judge Kennedy

 On March 21, 1979, the captioned matter came on for an

evidentiary hearing in Spokane, Washington. After carefully

reviewing and considering the testimony and documentary evidence,

the Presiding Judge found that the Secretary had failed to

establish by a preponderance of the evidence that:

 1. On the night shift on April 11 or the day shift on

 April 10, the operator endangered the safety of the

 miners by any lack of diligence or due care in the

 furnishing of ground support on the hanging wall of the

 5215 Stope.

 2. That the violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.3-22 charged

 did not, therefore, occur.

Accordingly, it was ordered that the petition for assessment of a

civil penalty be dismissed with prejudice.
~2

The premises considered, it is ORDERED that the bench decision

and order of March 21, 1979, be, and hereby are, CONFIRMED and

that the imminent danger closure order 347008 issued April 12,

1978 be, and hereby is, VACATED.

 Joseph B. Kennedy

 Administrative Law Judge
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. EASTERN METAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

No. 15783.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 15, 1957.

Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Bethell & Pearce, Ft. Smith, Ark., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and stipulation filed with Board.
<i IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### OF TEXAS NOS. PD-1121-14 & PD-1122-14 

### MARCUS LEEJEFFERSON, AppeUant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### MAY 13 2015 

### Abel Acosta, Clerk>4


### Motion to appeal the refusal of Appellant's Discretionary Review 

### Appellant's Discretionary Review was refused. 

### Appellant, Marcus Lee Jefferson, has Motion to appeal the decision of the refusal ofhis Discretionary Review. 

### As Appellant has justcause for this appeal. This motion is not made for the purpose ofdelay, WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, 

### Appellant prays that this Honorable Court grants the extension oftime to complete the order ofthe Criminal Court ofAppeals.


### *Prayerfully, Marcus Lee Jefferson 19822 River Breeze Dr. Tomball, Texas 77375 PH. 281.773.1448 

### May 12, 2015
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| Date: July  31, 2007 |   | /s/ J. Bryan Baker        |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | J. Bryan Baker            |
| * *             |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----