alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 01-021] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a NASA Advisory Council, Aero-Space Technology Advisory Committee, Rotorcraft Subcommittee meeting. 

# DATES:

Thursday, April 26, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, April 27, 2001, 8 a.m. to 12 Noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Administration Building, Room 215, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. Mattie P. Thomas, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135, 216/433-3702. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. Agenda topics for the meeting are as follows: 

—Status, Technical Accomplishments, and Plans for the NASA Rotorcraft Research and Technology Base Program 

—Review of Rotorcraft-Related Research Activities at Glenn Research Center 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitors register. 

Dated: February 6, 2001. 

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-3477 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10679-10680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-226-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

February 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 7, 2001 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 28, 
effective February 1, 2001.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is track rate 
changes attributable to storage service purchased from Texas Eastern 
Transmission Corporation under its Rate Schedule X-28 the costs of 
which are included in

[[Page 10680]]

the rates and charges payable under Transco's Rate Schedule S-2. The 
filing is being made pursuant to tracking provisions under Section 26 
of the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's Third Revised Volume 
No. 1 Tariff. Transco states that included in Appendix B attached to 
the filing is the explanation and details regarding the computation of 
the Rate Schedule S-2 rate changes.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its S-2 customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc/fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3909 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

 

I, Michael G. Rubin, President and Chief Executive Officer of GSI Commerce, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of GSI Commerce, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Intentionally Omitted.] 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

November 7, 2003
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.38

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$48,220.00                                          Dated: April 18, 1997


                  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned ("Maker") hereby promises
to pay to the order of Fernando Schechter ("Lender"), at an address in Israel
provided by the Lender, upon June 18, 1997, the principal sum of FORTY EIGHT
THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY ($48,220.00) DOLLARS AND 00/100. Interest shall
accrue from the date hereof at the rate of twelve percent per annum (or at the
highest rate permitted by law, if lower) on the unpaid principal balance from
time to time outstanding.

                  Payment of the principal of, and interest on, this Note shall
be payable at the aforesaid address in the lawful money of the United States of
America, or at such other place as the holder of this Note shall have designated
to the Maker in writing.

                  Maker and endorsers severally waive presentment, protest,
demand, and notice of protest, of demand and of dishonor and of nonpayment of
this Note and expressly agree that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be
extended from time to time by Lender without in any way affecting the liability
of Maker and endorsers hereof.

                  This Note will in all respects be governed by and construed in
accordance with the New York Uniform Commercial Code.

                  This Note and its provisions shall inure to the benefit of and
be binding upon, the respective heirs, successors and assigns of the Maker and
the Lender.


                                                 ROYAL CANADIAN FOODS CORP.


                                                 By:
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Sheldon Golumbia, President



<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Danilo ALDUBLIN-ROBLETO, a/k/a Danilo Albudin, a/k/a Danilo Anthony, a/k/a Danila A. Robletto, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-4324.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 5, 2011.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Joanna Silver, Staff Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, George J. Hazel, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

*824Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danilo Aldublin-Robleto appeals the fifty-seven-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to reentry of an alien deported after an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) (2006). On appeal, Aldublin-Robleto contends that the sentence was procedurally unreasonable because, essentially, the district court refused to make an individual assessment of the facts. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In reviewing a sentence, we must ensure that the district court did not commit any “significant procedural error,” such as failing to properly calculate the applicable Guidelines range, failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors, or failing to adequately explain the sentence. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The district court is not required to “robotically tick through § 3553(a)’s every subsection.” *United States v. Johnson,*445 F.3d 339, 345 (4th Cir.2006). However, the district court “must place on the record an ‘individualized assessment’ based on the particular facts of the case before it. This individualized assessment need not be elaborate or lengthy, but it must provide a rationale tailored to the particular case at hand and adequate to permit ‘meaningful appellate review.’ ” *United States v. Carter,*564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.2009) (quoting *Gall,*552 U.S. at 50, 128 S.Ct. 586) (internal footnote omitted). Upon review, we conclude that the district court provided an adequate individualized assessment, taking into account counsel’s arguments for a below-Guidelines sentence, and did not abuse its discretion in imposing AIdublin-Robleto’s fifty-seven-month sentence. *See United States v. Lynn,*592 F.3d 572, 576, 578 (4th Cir.2010) (providing standard of review for properly preserved procedural sentencing error); *see also Gall,*552 U.S. at 46, 128 S.Ct. 586.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, Kristi J. Kampmann, Chief Financial
Officer  of  Vyta  Corp  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to my
knowledge,  that:

     a)   such Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of Vyta Corp for the quarter
          ended  September  30,  2006,  fully  complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   the information  contained  in  such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
          of  Vyta  Corp  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2006, fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
          results  of  operations  of  Vyta  Corp.


                                        /s/Kristi J. Kampmann
                                        ---------------------
                                        Kristi J. Kampmann,
                                        Chief Financial Officer


Date:     November  20,  2006


               A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by
               Section  906  has been provided to Vyta Corp and will be retained
               by  Vyta  Corp  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and Exchange
               Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
Form 8379

(March 1985)

Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

Injured Spouse Allocation

Note: To qualify as an injured spouse, you must have had income which was reported on the joint return and all or a
portion of the joint overpayment was applied against a past-due child support obligation or a Federal debt owed

by the other spouse.

Information as

Name

Shown on
Joint Return

Social security number of injured spouse Social security number of other spouse

Instructions

This form must be filed with Form 1040X and only after the original return has been filed.

Item 1:

Item 2:
Item 3:

Item 4:

Item 5:

Item 6:

Item 7:

Item 8:

Actual income must be claimed by the taxpayer earning the income. Joint income may be allocated as you determine, Examples
of joint income: interest, state and local tax refunds, Schedule D sales of joint assets, Gross unemployment compensation must
be included for computation purposes.

In allocating adjustments to income, do not include the deduction for a married couple when both work.

Each taxpayer should claim his or her own itemized deductions.

Exemptions may not be prorated. Each taxpayer must claim the exemptions he or she would be entitled to claim had separate
returns been filed.

Credits which are earned from a business must be claimed by the taxpayer who claimed income from the business—i.e., invest-
ment credit. Joint credits could be political contributions or energy credit. Child care credit should be claimed by the taxpayer
who would have claimed the exemption for the child/children or the other dependent for whom the credit is claimed.

Additional taxes are usually not joint except for alternative minimum tax, which may be allocated under certain circumstances.

Each taxpayer must claim his or her own tax withholding as shown on Form W-2 and his or her own excess social security or
RRTA tax.

Joint payments will be allocated based on each taxpayer's percentage of the joint tax. (/RS will compute.)

Allocation of Joint Refund Based on Married Taxpayers Separate Data

Items Necessary for

i Injured S; Other S|
Allocation Joint njured Spouse ther Spouse

1. Total income

2. Adjustments to income

3. Excess itemized deductions

4. Exemptions

5. Credits against tax

6. Other taxes owed

7, Tax withholding and any excess
social security or RRTA tax

8. Joint payments

# USGP.O: 1986-622-742/00237

Form 8379 (3-85)
Description of Mosaic Synergy Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.iii.i. 
  
 Description of Mosaic Synergy Incentive Plan 
  
 Prior to the business combination (the “Combination”) between IMC Global Inc. and Cargill Crop Nutrition, The Mosaic Company
(“Mosaic”) established a goal of achieving pre-tax operating synergies from the Combination of $145.0 million on an annual run-rate basis by the end of the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007. We surpassed that goal by the end of fiscal
2006, and expect to continue to achieve additional benefits from our synergy efforts in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007. Synergy benefits include, but are not limited to, benefits from cost reduction and cost avoidance initiatives,
production volume enhancement efforts, opportunity savings, capital spending avoidance and other classifications. The majority of these benefits have an impact on operating costs which assists in offsetting higher operating costs facing Mosaic
(particularly in the Phosphates business) such as energy and other production input costs, wage and benefit costs, water treatment costs, raw material costs, general inflation and the costs required to achieve the synergy benefits. In order to
motivate key employees, including executive officers, to achieve or exceed the expected levels of synergies, in addition to the Mosaic Incentive Plan, Mosaic established a Synergy Incentive Plan for each of its first three fiscal years (ending
May 31, 2007) pursuant to which key managers, including executive officers, are eligible for additional annual cash incentive compensation. The Synergy Incentive Plan is designed to incent key employees to achieve synergies from the
Combination. Under the Synergy Incentive Plan, a bonus pool is established for each fiscal year based upon attainment of levels of annual pre-tax synergies from the Combination that have been pre-established by Mosaic’s Board of Directors, upon
the recommendation of its Compensation Committee. Individual bonuses are payable from the pool based upon the assessment, by the Compensation Committee, in the case of executive officers, and by the Company’s Senior Leadership Team, in the case
of other participants, of business unit and individual contributions towards achieving Mosaic’s synergy goals.
# Federal COFI

Source:  Freddie Mac.  See www.freddiemac.com/news/finance/ for monthly updates.		Page &P

Although Freddie Mac attempts to provide reliable, useful information in this document, Freddie Mac does not guarantee that the information is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Estimates contained in this document are those of Freddie Mac currently and are subject to change without notice.  Information from this document may be used with proper attribution. Alteration of this document is strictly prohibited. © 2022 by Freddie Mac. 

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,052,266
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,052,266
<CASH>                                          18,122
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 737
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         145,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,452,158
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 45,041
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            436,702
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 99,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                     585,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,452,158
<PREMIUMS>                                      52,743
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             16,130
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,180
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     679
<BENEFITS>                                      15,658
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,406
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  30,644
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              1,436
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               14,222
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 7,587
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 38,715
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not Applicable for mortgage guaranty and specialty reinsurer
</FN>
        

</TABLE>