alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1661 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1661

      To suspend temporarily the duty on C.I. Pigment Yellow 138.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on C.I. Pigment Yellow 138.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C.I. PIGMENT YELLOW 138.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.32.32   C.I. Pigment Yellow 138 (CAS             No change      No change      On or before     
                         No. 30125-47-4) (provided                                              12/31/97      ''
                         for in subheading                                                                     .
                         3204.17.10).................  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by this section applies 
        with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.32.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
# Webinar Archives - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

- Mediation Skills – August 2024 This course takes place over 6 DAYS: (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday) August 20-22 and 27-29, 2024 Time: 11am - 5pm Eastern Standard Time Instructors: experienced FMCS Mediators Cost: $1600.00  - Early bird $1500.00 if registered by July 20, 2024   Location: This course will be conducted entirely online using Zoom for Government.  Please contact the [...]The post Mediation Skills &#8211; August 2024 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
- Becoming a Labor Arbitrator – Fall 2024 – Online! Instructors:  Arbitrator Sheila Mayberry, Arbitrator Martin Malin, and FMCS Director of Arbitration Arthur Pearlstein Dates: For this virtual course, please note all times referenced are EASTERN time. August 12,  3:00- 4:30pm: Online Orientation Meeting August 19- September 20, 2024: Weekly Reading, Videos, &amp; Discussion Board Assignments September 23-27 11am – 5:00pm EST: Live Webinar Please [...]The post Becoming a Labor Arbitrator &#8211; Fall 2024 &#8211; Online! appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Future Value Ventures, Inc., 2745 N. Martin L. King Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212, has surrendered their license to operate as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the Act). Future Value Ventures, Inc. was licensed by Small Business Administration on November 9, 1984. 

Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the Regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender was accepted on this date, and accordingly, all rights, privileges, and franchises derived therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.11, Small Business Investment Companies)

Dated: January 30, 2001. 

Harry Haskins, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment. 

[FR Doc. 01-3405 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULE S 531 AND 536 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE : : : : : : : NO. 488

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**DISSENTING STA** 

**TEMENT JUSTICE**  **DONOHUE** Pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, I would suspend portions of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5747.1 (a) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 5747.1(b)(1), which the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee identified as procedural in nature. To the extent the amendment to Rule 536 in corporates those provisions, I respectfully dissent.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50680 

USDC No. W-94-CV-176 

__________________

LEON ANTHONY BENJAMIN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. ADAMS ET AL.,

 Defendants,

RICHARD L. ADAMS, CO III Officer;

JAMES AMENT, Officer,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

December 14, 1995

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leon Anthony Benjamin requests leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court's dismissal

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) of this civil rights action alleging

retaliation by prison officials and the denial of due process

regarding prison classification and disciplinary hearings. 
No. 95-50680

-2-

This appeal presents no issue of arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. Therefore, IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Benjamin previously has been warned by this court that he

may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. 

Accordingly, Benjamin is barred from filing any pro se, in forma

pauperis, civil appeals in this court or any pro se, in forma

pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to

this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission

of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this

court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this

circuit are directed to return to Benjamin, unfiled, any

attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-71711) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan and the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan of Centaur
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated February 21, 2000, with respect to
the financial statements of Centaur Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 29, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6398

In Re: WAYMARE BILLUPS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waymare Billups, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Waymare Billups has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking review of his sentences. Mandamus relief is available only

when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In

re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United

Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Further, mandamus

relief is only available when there are no other means by which the

relief sought could be granted. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826

(4th Cir. 1987).

The relief sought by Billups is not available by way of

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Billups’ motion to proceed

in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

May 11, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 26, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Hecla Limited, et al., Docket Nos. 

WEST 2012-760-M, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred 

in ruling that the operator did not violate the standard requiring that 

ground conditions be examined and tested.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statement Number
33-47593  on Form S-8  dated  May 1,  1992,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-61896 on Form S-8 dated April 29,  1993,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-78258 on Form S-8 dated April 28,  1994,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-91294 on Form S-8 dated April 17,  1995,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-02531 on Form S-8 dated April 16,  1996,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-50275 on Form S-8 dated April 16,  1998,  in  Registration  Statement  Number
33-75099 on Form S-8 dated March 26, 1999, and in Registration  Statement Number
333-33524  on Form S-8 dated March 29,  2000 of our report  dated  February  12,
2001, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Mid
Atlantic Medical Services,  Inc. and subsidiaries  included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.




                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                  ---------------------
                                                   Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 2001



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1. Equity Marketing Hong Kong, Ltd., a Delaware corporation ("EMHK")

2. Corinthian Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation

3. Logistix Limited, a United Kingdom corporation ("Logistix")

4. Johnson Grossfield, Inc., a Delaware corporation

5. Equity Marketing Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK)

6. Equity Marketing China, Limited., a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK)

7. Virtual Video Company Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of
   Logistix)
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.22

                                Sheldon Golumbia
                                 815 Park Avenue
                               New York, NY 10021


Board of Directors
Royal Canadian Foods, Corp.
1004 Second Avenue
New York, NY 10022

To the Board of Directors:

                  I have made various loans to Royal Canadian Foods Corp. (the
"Company") and its subsidiaries, which as of the date of this letter total
$316,380, including accrued interest thereon. I have made several extensions of
the due date of a portion of these loans. I now agree to extend the due date for
$250,000 of such loans to June 30, 1998, subject to mandatory prepayment in the
event the Company completes a second public offering of its securities prior
thereto.

Dated as of May 31, 1997

                                                         Very truly yours,



                                                         Sheldon Golumbia
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY — INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Form 4852
(Rev. Nov. 1974) | EMPLOYEE'S SUBSTITUTE WAGE AND TAX STATEMENT

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

NAME

ADDRESS (Number, street, crty, State ZIP code)

| have been unable to obtain a Form W-2 from my employer, named below, and have so
notified the Internal Revenue Service. The amounts shown below are my best estimates
of the gross wages paid to me and the Federal taxes withheld by this employer

during 19__.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER : GROSS WAGES | FEDERAL | SOCIAL
INCOME TAX | SECURITY
WITHHELD TAX
| WITHHELD

|
|

i
How did you estimate the above gross wages, Federal income tax withheld, and social security tax withheld?

Give reason Form W-2 was not furnished by employer, if known, and explain your efforts to obtain it.

Under penalties of perjury, | declare that | have examined this statement and, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
it is true, correct, and complete.

Your signature Date

Form 4852 (Rev. 11-74)
EXHIBIT
32.2








Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





I,
Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Operating Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby
certify, to my knowledge, that this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K
as amended by Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Palatin Technologies, Inc.








Dated:
April 13, 2018








/s/ Stephen T. Wills


Stephen
T. Wills, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
June 1, 1999



Rabar Market Research
10 Bank St. - Suite 830
White Plain, N.Y. 10606

Attention:  Mr. John Dreyer &
                    Mr. Paul Rabar

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund

Dear Mr. Dreyer & Mr. Rabar:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 2000
and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.


By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

RABAR MARKET RESEARCH

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
Exhibit 23.2

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-84592, 33-84594, 33-15493, 33-15499, 33-48539, 333-48541, 333-58773, 333-58777, 333-45414 and 333-89070 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payments*) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of EMAK Worldwide, Inc for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 30, 2007
Exhibit 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


(i)  Holophane Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation.

(ii) Luxfab  Limited,  a United Kingdom  corporation and the holding company for
     Holophane Europe Limited and Holophane Lichttechnik.

(iii) Holophane Lichttechnik, a German GmbH.

(iv) Holophane Europe Limited, a United Kingdom corporation.

(v)  MetalOptics, Inc., a Texas corporation.

(vi) Antique Street Lamps,  Inc., a Texas  corporation,  and the holding company
     for Castlight.

(vii) Castlight, a Mexican corporation.

(viii) Holophane International, Inc., a Barbados company.

(ix) Holophane Australia Corporation Pty. Limited,  holding company for 50.2% of
     Unique Lighting Solutions Pty. Limited and 50.2% of The Austphane Trust.

(x)  Unique Lighting Solutions Pty. Limited, an Australian corporation,  Trustee
     of The Austphane Trust.

(xi) The Austphane Trust, an Australian unit trust.
#### Jorge GEVARA, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alvin W. KELLER, Jr.; Robert C. Lewis; Richard Neely; Lawrence Parsons; Jeffrey T. Smith; Judy Atwater; Dennis E. Marshall; Betty Inpold; D. House; J. Hyatt; E. Coleman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.

Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Appellee Betty Inpold.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its previous order denying Gevara’s motion to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*
      *762337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Vilia Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date:    November 9, 2007
|   | /s/ Vilia Valentine     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Vilia Valentine         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Petitioner, Misc. Docket AG No. 110 v. September Term, 2016 KELLY GARNER KILROY

Respondent. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Kelly Gamer Kilroy, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that she violated Rules 1.15(a) & (c) and 8.4(c) & (d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 18th d a y o f May , 2017, ORDERED, that Respondent, Kelly Garner Kilroy, be and she hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective June 19, 2017; and it is further ORDERED, that, effective June 19, 2017, the Clerk of the Court shall remove the name Kelly Gamer Kilroy from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify the Respondent in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742 (a)(1), and comply with Maryland Rule 19-761.



### /s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
#### In re Derrick JOHNSON, Petitioner.

No. 14-1181.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. May 8, 2014.

Opinion Filed: May 15, 2014.

Derrick Johnson, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Johnson, proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to rule on a motion to compel discovery and motions for reconsideration. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the mandamus petition.

In 2007, Johnson was convicted of bank robbery in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. He was sentenced to 115 months of imprisonment. Thereafter, Johnson unsuccessfully sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and through applications to file successive § 2255 motions.

In August 2013, Johnson filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where he is currently incarcerated. By order entered *69September 24, 2013, the District Court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction, concluding that § 2255 was not inadequate or ineffective to test his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Over the next three months, Johnson filed several motions in the District Court, including a motion to compel discovery and motions for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e).

While those motions were pending, Johnson filed the present mandamus petition in this Court, seeking “to mandate the legal disposition of his motion[s] under Rule 59(e) and the motion to compel.” By order entered April 15, 2014, the District Court denied Johnson’s outstanding motions. Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.