alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396






June 11, 2001



Campbell & Company, Inc.
Court Tower Building, Towson
210 West Pennsylvania Avenue
Suite 770
Baltimore, MD 212104


Attn: Mrs. Theresa D. Becks

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mrs. Becks:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

        Smith Barney Potomac Futures  Fund L.P.
        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
        Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund
        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
        Smith Barney Campbell F.M. and Energy Fund plc
        Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
        Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.



Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:      /s/Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         ---------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED
CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.


By:


Print Name:



DRMcA/sr
(2)

 (2)

	NO. 07-12-0022-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	MARCH 22, 2012

	______________________________

	GRADY R. MITCHELL,

		Appellant

	v.

	POPAT PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, A/K/A PAUL PATEL,

KAMU PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, SUNIL PATEL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A SUPER 8 MOTEL AND ANAND, INC.,

		Appellees

________________________________

	FROM THE 237th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2009-547,914; HON. LESLIE HATCH, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Grady R. Mitchell appeals from the trial court’s judgment that appellant take nothing by his suit.  The clerk’s record was filed with this Court on March 16, 2012.  An affidavit of indigence was filed by appellant on February 6, 2012.  Appellees have filed a response to the affidavit contesting Mitchell’s request to proceed without the payment of costs.  

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 237th District Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

    	2.  whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3.  whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental records and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before April 23, 2012.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before April 23, 2012.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 15, 2004



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO

















































24
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.      Section 1350**

**as      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| By:   | /s/ D.                JONATHAN MERRIMAN                                                  |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            | **D.                Jonathan Merriman****Chief                Executive Officer**   |
|            |                                                                                          |
| By:   | /s/ PETER                V. COLEMAN                                                      |
|            | **Peter                V. Coleman****Chief                Financial Officer**            |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00690-CV

Thomas ROSAS, Jaime Rosas, and all Occupants,

Appellants

v.

21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CV-00771

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is 

ORDERED that costs shall be assessed against appellant.

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1832 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1832

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide protection 
against reductions in Medicare payment amounts to rural hospitals as a 
   result of reductions in wage indices applicable to such hospitals 
    because of census designations of formerly rural areas as urban.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1993

  Mr. Neal of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide protection 
against reductions in Medicare payment amounts to rural hospitals as a 
   result of reductions in wage indices applicable to such hospitals 
    because of census designations of formerly rural areas as urban.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOLD-HARMLESS PROTECTION FOR RURAL HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1886(d)(8)(C)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(8)(C)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``of subparagraph (B)'' and inserting ``(I) 
        of subparagraph (B),'';
            (2) by striking ``or a decision'' and inserting ``(II) a 
        decision''; and
            (3) by striking ``under paragraph (10)'' and inserting 
        ``under paragraph (10), or (III) new census designations''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

����������������������������������������������������������������������������� ����������������������������� March25, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:��������������� 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 10, 2014

 

�������� PLACE:������������ ����������� TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from F Street entrance)

 

�������STATUS:����������������������� Open 

 

MATTERSTO BE 

� CONSIDERED:������������������ TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co.,*Docket Nos. WEVA 2006-853, *et al*. (Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that aviolation of a lightning arrester standard was not �significant and substantial.�)

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. � 2706.150(a)(3) and � 2706.160(d).

 

CONTACTPERSON 

� �OR MORE INFO:�������������� JeanEllen������� (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

����������������������������������������������� 1-800-877-8339for toll free.
Form 3903 2020

Moving Expenses 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service (99) 

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form3903 for instructions and the latest information.

▶ Attach to Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR. 

OMB No. 1545-0074 

Attachment 

Sequence No. 170 

Name(s) shown on return Your social security number 

Before you begin: You can deduct moving expenses only if you are a Member of the Armed Forces on active duty and, due to a 

military order, you, your spouse, or your dependents move because of a permanent change of station. 

Check here to certify that you meet these requirements. See the instructions . . . . . . . . . ▶

1 Transportation and storage of household goods and personal effects (see instructions) . . . . . 1 

2 Travel (including lodging) from your old home to your new home (see instructions). Do not include the

cost of meals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 Add lines 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Enter the total amount the government paid you for the expenses listed on lines 1 and 2 that is not 

included in box 1 of your Form W-2 (wages). This amount should be shown in box 12 of your Form

W-2 with code P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 Is line 3 more than line 4? 

No. You cannot deduct your moving expenses. If line 3 is less than line 4, subtract line 3 from

line 4 and include the result on Form 1040 or 1040-SR, line 1; or Form 1040-NR, line 1a. 

Yes. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the result here and on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 13. 

This is your moving expense deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 12490K Form 3903 (2020)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 1, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 11, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Premier Elkhorn Coal Company,

Docket No. KENT 2011-827, and Secretary of Labor v. Trivette 

Trucking, Docket No. KENT 2011-1223. (Issues include whether

the Judge erred in vacating a citation alleging that a truck driver 

had failed to maintain control of his truck and in excluding certain 

evidence from the record.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGDEV RAM,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71978

Agency No. A078-638-384

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jagdev Ram, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying Ram’s motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

APR 16 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-71978

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th

Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ram’s motion to reopen

because Ram’s motion was untimely, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Ram failed

to establish changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception

to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Malty

v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The critical question is . . .

whether circumstances have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously

did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future

persecution.”).

Furthermore, we decline to reconsider Ram’s challenge to the agency denial

of his claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture because his

contentions have already been considered and rejected by this court. See Ram v.

Ashcroft, No. 03-74495 (9th Cir. Jan. 10, 2005); see also Merritt v. Mackey, 932

F.2d 1317, 1320 (9th Cir. 1991) (one panel of an appellate court will not reconsider

questions which another panel has decided on a prior appeal in the same case). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### JZ, INC., DUNKIN DONUTS *v.*PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST HARTFORD

*Ryan C. McKeen,*in support of the petition.

*Scott R. Chadwick,*corporation counsel, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2010

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 243 (AC 30591), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (136)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,384
<PP&E>                                           4,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,224)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,998
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,324
<SALES>                                         11,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,356
<CGS>                                            5,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (5)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    121
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       121
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         March 14, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Andrew P Mariani, PhD., Chief, Scientific Review Branch, 6120 Executive Blvd, Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892, 301/496-5561.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-3469  Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Name Change--Signet 
Star Reinsurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 10 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000, at 40868.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Signet Star Reinsurance Company, has 
formally changed its name to Berkley Insurance Company, effective 
December 31, 2000. The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety 
on Federal bonds at 65 FR 40899, June 30, 2000.
    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds, dated today, is hereby issued under Sections 9304 to 9308 of 
Title 31 of the United States Code, to Berkley Insurance Company, 
Wilmington, Delaware. The new Certificate replaces the Certificate of 
Authority issued to the Company under its former name. The underwriting 
limitation of $22,118,000 established for the Company as of July 1, 
2000, remains unchanged until June 30, 2001.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30, each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the Company remains qualified (31 CFR Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1, 
in the Department Circular 570, which outlines details as to 
underwriting limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety 
business and other information. Federal bond-approving officers should 
annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2000 
Revision, at page 40874 to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html. A hard copy may be purchased 
from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, 
Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular 
from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: January 26, 2001.
Wanda J. Rogers,
Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-3668 Filed 2-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M