alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1631 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1631

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1631

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Justice Reform 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY PERMITTED FOR CASES 
              UNDER JURISDICTION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION 
              BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    (a) In General.--Section 11-1321, D.C. Code, is amended by striking 
``$2,000'' and inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to cases filed with the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-288-010]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2001, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets, proposed to become effective on February 2, 2001:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 5B.05
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5B.07

    Transwestern states that the above sheets are being filed to 
describe a negotiated rate agreement with Richardson Products Company 
in accordance with the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to 
Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines.
    Transwestern further states that copies of the filing have been 
mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3447 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911167
<NAME> ARIEL
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,626,533
<SECURITIES>                                 5,999,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,602,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                   212,678
<INVENTORY>                                  3,528,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,699,782
<PP&E>                                       3,579,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,542,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,103,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,904,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,950
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,189,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,103,064
<SALES>                                     13,030,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,030,637
<CGS>                                        6,753,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,753,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,823,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,801,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,801,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,801,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.97)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Roy Dar, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ Roy Dar                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Roy Dar

Senior Vice President, Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

 

Dated: April 2, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9832-9833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-218-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Annual Cash-Out 
Report

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 31, 2001, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing a report that compares its 
cash-out revenues with cash-out costs for the annual billing period 
November 1, 1999 through October 31, 2000.
    Texas Gas states that the filing is being made in accordance with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's December 16, 1993, ``Order 
on Third Compliance filing and Second Order on Rehearing'' in Docket 
Nos. RS92-24, et al. There is no rate impact to customers as a result 
of this filing.
    Texas Gas states that copies of this filing have been served upon 
all of Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before

[[Page 9833]]

February 13, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filling may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3432 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsPalatin
Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-57079 and 333-83876) and
registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-33569, 333-56605, 333-64951, 333-72873,
333-84421, 333-52024, 333-54918, 333-74990, 333-100469, 333-101764, 333-104370 and
333-112908) of Palatin Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated September 13, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Palatin Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as
of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows and stockholders equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
June 30, 2005, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, which reports appear in the June 30, 2005 annual
report on Form 10-K of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaSeptember
13, 2005
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4040

___________________________

John E. Peet

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: October 5, 2017

Filed: October 11, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

John E. Peet appeals the order of the district court affirming a partially 1

favorable determination on his application for supplemental security income. Peet’s

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E.

Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
pro se brief raises several arguments beyond the scope of this court’s review of the

December 18, 2014 decision before it, including claims that relate to prior disability

proceedings. As to those claims that arguably relate to the appealed decision, this

court concludes that (1) the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly limited his

consideration to the period within the scope of a remand order of the Appeals

Council, see 20 C.F.R. § 416.1477 (upon remand from Appeals Council, ALJ shall

take any action ordered by Appeals Council, and may take any additional action that

is not inconsistent with remand order); and (2) the ALJ did not err in proceeding with

Peet’s hearing despite his unrepresented status, as the record shows that Peet had

been provided several notices of his right to be accompanied by representation,

together with lists of organizationsto contactfor information regarding attorneys, see

42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(D) (Commissioner shall notify claimant in writing, together

with notice of adverse determination, of options for obtaining attorney

representatives, and shall advise of availability of legal service organizations

providing free legal services); Wingert v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 296, 298 (8th Cir. 1990)

(concluding claimant was advised of right to counsel through Social Security

Administration’s notice of his hearing, which explained his right to counsel, and

claimant’s response to notice). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9829-9830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-219-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Cashout Report

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 31, 2001, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern) tendered for filing its annual cashout report for 
the September 1999 through August 2000 period.
    Midwestern states that the cashout report reflects a net cashout 
gain during this period of $97,700. Midwestern will refund this gain to 
its firm shippers within forty-five days of the Commission's acceptance 
of this cashout report.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before

[[Page 9830]]

February 13, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3431 Filed 2-09-01; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1066

AHMAD A.N. DAHMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CVS PHARMACY IN MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-96-1025-AW)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad A.N. Dahmas, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Ann Khan, JACKSON,

LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ahmad A.N. Dahmas appeals the district court's order granting

summary judgment for CVS Pharmacy in Maryland on his employment

discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dahmas v. CVS Pharmacy, No. CA-96-1025-AW (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1997). Dahmas' expressions

of dissatisfaction with his counsel's performance merit no relief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   14538
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                             4781
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                  708933
<DEPRECIATION>                          (80244)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          688029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                                 284424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                 10
<COMMON>                                   154
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            688029
<SALES>                                  35309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         35309
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            23083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        4104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          10149
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      10149
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (204)
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                               9945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .58


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN REVERDES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-57 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 22, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge. Steven Reverdes, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                         839,125
<SECURITIES>                   000
<RECEIVABLES>                  96
<ALLOWANCES>                   000
<INVENTORY>                    000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               839,221
<PP&E>                         000
<DEPRECIATION>                 000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 839,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          51,040
<BONDS>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          000
<PREFERRED>                    000
<COMMON>                       000
<OTHER-SE>                     788,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   839,221
<SALES>                        000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               49,460
<CGS>                          000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               257,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>               000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (208,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                   000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (208,442)
<DISCONTINUED>                 000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                000
<CHANGES>                      000
<NET-INCOME>                   (208,442)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.04)


</TABLE>