alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1894

To expand the boundary of the Modoc National Forest to include lands

presently owned by the Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, to facilitate

a land exchange with the Forest Service, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundary of the Modoc National Forest to

include lands presently owned by the Bank of California,

N.A. Trustee, to facilitate a land exchange with the

Forest Service, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modoc National Forest

5 Boundary Adjustment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 1894 IH

1 (1) Certain private lands presently owned by

2 the Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, are adjacent

3 to the Modoc National Forest and are logical exten4 sions of the forest.

5 (2) A boundary adjustment will facilitate a land

6 exchange which involves approximately 4,240 acres

7 of National Forest land and 11,804 acres of private

8 land, of which only 760 acres are outside the present

9 Modoc National Forest boundary.

10 (3) Bank of California, N.A. Trustee, and the

11 Forest Service are prepared to exchange these lands

12 under existing authority of the Secretary of Agri13 culture which will benefit both the private land14 owners and the United States by consolidating their

15 respective landownership patterns, providing reduced

16 costs for each party in implementing their land man17 agement objectives, providing increased recreation

18 opportunities and fishery habitat for the American

19 public, and providing commercial timber lands to the

20 private landowners.

21 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Modoc Na23 tional Forest is hereby modified to include and encompass

24 760 acres, more or less, on the following described lands:

25 Mount Diablo Meridian, Lassen County, California, T. 38
3

•HR 1894 IH

N., R. 10 E., sec. 5, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1 1 ⁄4; sec. 8,

E1⁄2NE1⁄4, NE1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SE1⁄4; sec. 16, W1 2 ⁄2; sec.

25, Lots 13, 14 and 15 (S1⁄2SW1⁄4, SW1⁄4SE1 3 ⁄4); T. 37

N., R. 11 E., sec. 20, NW1⁄4SE1 4 ⁄4.

5 (b) RULE FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

6 FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and

7 Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–

8 9), the boundary of the Modoc National Forest, as modi9 fied by this Act, shall be considered to be the boundary

10 of that National Forest as of January 1, 1965.

Æ
Exhibit 10.6


                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                SCHOLASTIC CORPORATION 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         WHEREAS, Scholastic Corporation (the "Company") maintains the
Scholastic Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Article X of the Plan, the Company reserved the
right, by action of its Board of Directors or its Human Resources and
Compensation Committee (the "Committee"), to amend the Plan from time to time;
and

         WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, effective May 25, 2006, the Plan is amended as follows:

                  1.       Paragraph (c) of Section 6.3 of the Plan is amended
by deleting the last sentence appearing therein.

                  2.       Except as otherwise provided herein, the Plan is
ratified and confirmed and shall continue in full force and effect.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3693 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3693

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the reimbursement of 
      continuing professional education expenses for health care 
          professionals of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

    Ms. Brownley (for herself and Mrs. Miller-Meeks) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the reimbursement of 
      continuing professional education expenses for health care 
          professionals of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Continuing Professional Education Modernization Act'' or the ``VA CPE 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL 
              EDUCATION EXPENSES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Reimbursement.--Section 7411 of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7411. Reimbursement of continuing professional education 
              expenses
    ``(a) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse a full-time 
health care professional of the Department for expenses incurred for 
continuing professional education in amounts as follows:
            ``(1) With respect to a physician or dentist appointed 
        under section 7401(1) of this title, not more than $4,000 per 
        year.
            ``(2) With respect to an individual appointed to a position 
        listed in section 7401(1) that is not covered by paragraph (1), 
        not more than $2,000 per year.
            ``(3) With respect to an individual appointed to a position 
        listed in section 7401(3), not more than $2,000 per year.
    ``(b) Adjustment.--The Secretary may from time to time adjust the 
dollar amounts specified in subsection (a) based upon inflation.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 74 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 7411 and inserting the following new item:

``7411. Reimbursement of continuing professional education expenses.''.
                                 <all>
```
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

June 17, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 17, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., Docket No. 

VA 2013-291. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling 

that a particular location in a preheat tower was a “working place” 

for purposes of an examination requirement.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
(1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-156453) of Mobile Mini, Inc.,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41495) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86495) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan;(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43954) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan;(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-65566) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan,(6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-107333) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Options Plan,(7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-2868) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, and(8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136595) pertaining to the
Mobile Mini, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan;
TONY M. MIMS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 2208

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed September 7, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Tony M. Mims, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief

Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED

.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              7
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  information  extracted  from Form 10-K for the
twelve  months  ended  December  31,  1996,  and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>               87,229,855
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         0
<EQUITIES>                          7,494,817
<MORTGAGE>                                  0
<REAL-ESTATE>                               0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                     98,026,797
<CASH>                                360,586
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                     25,319
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>             10,198,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    112,402,523
<POLICY-LOSSES>                     6,305,397
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                 8,216,478
<POLICY-OTHER>                              0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               66,453
<OTHER-SE>                         91,613,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      112,402,523
<PREMIUMS>                         24,727,741
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                 5,446,672
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                   (162,385)
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<BENEFITS>                          3,279,130
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>         3,234,876
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                7,259,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    16,238,751
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,041,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                11,196,966
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       11,196,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.63
<RESERVE-OPEN>                      3,703,251
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                 4,673,130
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                  (1,394,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                    166,717
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                      841,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                     5,974,664
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                     0
        


</TABLE>
4 

### 1lY6

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

BonorablrRoy 8. Loventhal ahairman,

LlvostookSanitary **aomthfbi0n** W. T. WaggonerBuilding Fort Worth, Tozao Dear Sir:

thni* $1 the Aotr of the SS, p. 1SS (Vernon~a

rov~sloaeor ArtidLe 686, Ravised **airi1** QSS, as mended, the State Board of Qonrcmponolb/lity

at aotlng au oustodt6n wonal propertyof the State. Artids 006, Rsrlsed Clvll Statutsr; 1925, reada ae follows:Honorable Roy 3. Lorenthel,Pa&e Ei

ated

. _"All propertybelonging to tha State, eltuin the olty of Austin, in any department, poam or offios of the State, *hen it ehall **be** lane unfit for owe or shall be no longer Maded, shall be plsosd in the haude of the Board of Control, end thr Boar& shall sell euoh propertyat publla au&ion after adtartlelngit for not lees than five says In two wwepapere, published in the **aity** of Austin. Th&q@!wy rroa tha Salk of l uah property, lees the qmxer of adrsrtlelng end 

### l elllng,shall be deposited in the Stat0 Trsaauryto the orsdlt of the gennaral ravanuo mud. The Soar& shall make a wrltten report to the Coqtmllar after eaah sale, showing the artlolesreceirsd,each artlole sold* to who&j sol& end the 2rias reeeivml.~ On AU@St 10, 1939, our OpinionIpo. 0-LL6S *IS approvedand furnishedRonormblef. I¶. Raeeo, Exxsautlve Head of the LivestookSanitary Comnies~oa, an& In that opinion wa held that therewas no authority,orpreeeDC lm@llrd,autborlelnp: the a06d8810n to es11 eurglusdip. **We** saeloeo a oopy et the 

### o?lnlonfor your oonelderatloa.

Xe therefore respaotfally edrlee that year dqmrtmtmt does not have autborlty to turnteh eur ltu dip to the State Ikpsrlmsnt Station, 02 to otherwlrs **d**f) epcue of it other than in ompllanoe with **hrtfole 666,**  **aupn** whloh umld raqulre that it be returna& to the Board of hontnrl. Yours wry tm1.y
No. 98-40633

-1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40633

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ERI OCHOA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-387-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 20, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Eri Ochoa appeals his sentence for conspiracy to export

defense articles without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 371; 22 U.S.C. § 2778; and 22 C.F.R. §§ 121.1, 123.1, 127.1, and

127.3. Ochoa contends that the district court erred in denying him

a downward departure based on the nature of his prior convictions

and/or on U.S.S.G. § 2M5.2, comment (n.5).

This court lacks jurisdiction to review a defendant’s

challenge to his sentence based upon mere dissatisfaction with the

district court’s refusal to grant a downward departure. U nitedNo. 98-40633

-2-

States v. DiMarco

, 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). Jurisdiction

will lie only if the sentencing court’s refusal to depart downward

was the result of a violation of law or a misapplication of the

sen tencing guidelines. I d. A refusal to depart downward is a

violation of law only if the court mistakenly assumed that it

lacked the authority to depart. U nited States v. Burleson

, 22 F.3d

93, 94-95 (5th Ci r. 1994). A refusal to grant a departure is an

incorrect application of the se ntencing guidelines only if the

court committed an error that resulted in the selection of a

sentence from the wrong guideline range. S ee United States v.

Williams , 503 U.S. 193, 202-203 (1992).

Following a careful review of the record and the arguments on

appeal, we hold that the district court neither misapprehended its

authority to depart from the guidelines nor selected a sentence

from the wrong guideline range. Accordingly, this court lacks

jurisdiction to review the district court’s refusal to grant Ochoa

a downward departure. DiMarco , 46 F.3d at 477.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,686
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,262
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,147
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            26,252
<LOANS>                                        125,804
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,946)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,506
<DEPOSITS>                                     126,302
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,089
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,321
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           890
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 163,506
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,504
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  754
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   154
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,412
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 478
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,632
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      215
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    534
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.65
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       857
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,824
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      162
<RECOVERIES>                                        69
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,946
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,205
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            741
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent To File an Application for a New License

December 18, 2001.
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File an Application for a 
New License.
    b. Project No.: 618.
    c. Date filed: November 19, 2001.
    d. Submitted by: Alabama Power Company--current licensee.
    e. Name of project: Jordan Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Coosa River in Chilton, Coosa, and Elmore 
Counties, Alabama. The project does not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act.
    h. Licensee contact: Jim Crew, JFCREW@southernco,com, (205) 257-
4265, or Barry Lovett, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8bab3b4b7aebdacacb88b978d8c909d8a969b97d69b9795"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1939a9d9e8794858591a2bea4a5b9b4a3bfb2beffb2bebc">[email protected]</span></a>, (205) 257-1268.
    i. FERC contact: Ron McKitrick, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b2934353a373f75363830322f293238301b3d3e2938753d3e3f752e28"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f3d20212e232b61222c24263b3d262c240f292a3d2c61292a2b613a3c">[email protected]</span></a>, (770) 
452-3778.
    j. Effective date of current license: October 1, 1980.
    k. Expiration date of current license: July 31, 2007.
    l. Description of the project: The project consists of the 
following existing facilities: (1) The Jordan Dam consisting of: (a) A 
75-foot-long concrete bulkhead; (b) a 246-foot-long concrete intake 
structure; (c) a 1,330-foot-long concrete spillway section equipped 
with eighteen 34-foot-wide by 8-foot-high radial gates and seventeen 
30-foot-wide by 19-foot-high vertical lift gates; (d) a 177-foot-long 
concrete bulkhead; (2) the 5,880-acre Jordan Lake with a normal water 
surface elevation of 252 feet msl; (3) a powerhouse containing four 
generating units with a total installed capacity of 100 MW; (4) seven 
115-kV transmission lines; and (5) other appurtenances.
    m. Each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by July 31, 2005.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31594 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT GIROD TITLING TRUST VERSUS MARCUS L. PITTMAN, III NO. 2023 CW 0604 AUGUST 14, 2023 In Re: Marcus L. Pittman, III, applying for supervisory

writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2022-15610. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT PMc CHH SMM
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

March 21, 2007 Session

JOHN WAYNE WEBB v. BRANDON O. CANADA & DOUGLAS P.

TOWNSEND

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County

No. 2-740-04 Hon. Harold Wimberly, Circuit Judge

No. E2006-01701-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 25, 2007

CONCURRING OPINION

The majority holds that the Judgment denominated “Final Judgment” reducing the

previous Judgment from $723,426.27 to $598,426.27 was a “juristic act” of acceptance of the

remittitur under protest. I do not agree.

“A judgment is final from which an appeal lies as a matter of right when it decides

and disposes of the whole merits of the case leaving nothing for the further judgment of the court.”

Saunders v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County, 383 S.W.2d 28, 31 (Tenn. 1964), quoted

in Richardson v. Tenn. Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446, 460 (Tenn. 1995). 

While the Circuit Court’s order is styled a “Final Judgment,” it is at most a

provisional order because it did not, as such, deny Canada’s Motion for New Trial. Because the

Record before the Court contains no order denying Canada’s Motion for a New Trial, I would hold

the appeal is premature.

However, since the majority has found that the “Final Judgment” as entered

constituted a “juristic act” accepting the remittitur under protest, the majority’s decision becomes

the law of the case unless overturned, and the plaintiff cannot later claim that his Motion for a New

Trial is still viable.

The statute and cases prescribe the procedure for dealing with suggestions of

remittitur which the plaintiff failed to follow in this case. However, for the stated reason, I concur
-2-

with the result ofthe majority’s Opinion on this issue. I concur with the majority on the other issues.

______________________________

HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, P.J.