T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T I GR AN HO VH AN NI S YA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71404 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 308- 867 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T i gran H ov hann i sy an, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f A rm eni a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew o f th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) A p r il 2 9 , 2 0 1 1 o r d e rr e a f f irm in g its Jul y22, 2004 or de rdi s m i s s i ng H ovha nni s y an’ s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. 

# FI LED JU L 31 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71404 2 O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e vi de nc e the a ge nc y ’ s de c i s i on tha tape t i t i one rha s note s t abl i s he d e l i gi bi l i tyf or a s y lu m o rw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. H

u v. H older , 65 2 F . 3d10 11 , 10 16 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 1 ) . We d e n yi n p arta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s f in d in g th a t H o v h an n is y an f a ile dto e s tab lis h th e h arm h e s u f f e r e do rf e ar s is o n a c c o u n t o f

ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . See I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 50 2 U . S . 47 8, 48 1 n . 1 (19 92 ) ( no t i ng that , t o revers e aB IA de c i s i on unde rthe s ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s t anda r d of r e vi e w , “ w e m us tf

i nd tha tthe ev i d en ce n o to n l y s u

p p o r ts . . . b u t c o m

p e ls ” ac o n tr aryc o n c lu s io n ) ( e m p h a s is in or i gi na l ) . C ontr aryt o hi s c ont e nt i on, the e vi de nc e doe s notc om pe l the c onc l us i on th a t H o v h an n is y an ’s a c tio n s “w e r e d ir e c te dto w ar dag o v e rn in g in s titu tio n , . . . [and no t ] on l y a gai nsti nd i vi du al s w ho se corrup t i on w as aberrat i on al . ” G rava v. I NS , 2 0 5 F .3 d1 1 7 7 , 1 1 8 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ; cf . B ag hdasaryan v. H

older , 592 F . 3d 1 0 1 8 , 1 0 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( p e titio n e re x p o s e ds y s te m ic g o v e rn m e n t c o rrup tio n ) . A c c o r d in g ly , H o v h an n is y an ’s a s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See O choa v. G on zales , 40 6 F . 3d 11 66 , 11 72 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e l a c kj u r i s d i c t i o n t o r e v i e w H o v h an n i s y an ’ s h u man i t ar i an a s y l u m c l a i m, b e c au s e h e d idn o t r a is e th is c la im to th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ).11- 71404 3 W e a l so l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef , b e c au s e th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w is n o t tim e lya s to th a t o r d e r . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; Si n gh v . I NS , 31 5 F . 3d 11 86 , 11 88 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). F i nal l y, w e l ac k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w H ovhanni s y an’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a ge nc yvi ol a t e d hi s due p r o c e s s r ig h ts b yd e n y in g h is C A T c la im a n dh is s ub s e q u e n t m o tio n to r e o p e n . Se e i d. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.