alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this report of the Company on Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Musial, Vice President - Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, based on my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 28, 2003                   By:   /s/  Stanley J. Musial
                                                -------------------------------
                                               Stanley J. Musial
                                               Vice President - Finance
                                               And Chief Financial Officer
OMB No. 1545-0239
Department of the Treasury—Internal Revenue Service Expires 9-30-84
rorm 9794

(Rev, Nov. 1981) Statement by Person(s) Receiving Gambling Winnings

Date won Type of winnings Game number Machine number Race number

Person to Whom Winnings are Paid

Name Address

Taxpayer identifying number Other 1.0. ‘Amount received Federal income tax withheld

Part Il Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable

Taxpayer
Name identifying number Address Amount won

Under penalties of perjury, | declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the names, addresses, and taxpayer identifying numbers which 1 have furnished correctly

identify me as the recipient of this payment and correctly identify each person entitled to any portion of this payment.

Signature > Date >
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of form. 343-539-1



Form 5754 (Rev. 11-81)

Page 2

Part Il Persons to Whom Winning Payments are Taxable (Continued)

‘Taxpayer
Name identifying number

Address Amount won

Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.—We ask for this information
to carry out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. We
need it to ensure that you are complying with these laws and to
allow us to figure and collect the right amount of tax. You are
required to give us this information.

In the event that any person other than the person receiving
gambling winnings which are subject to withholding or reporting
requirements (‘recipient’) is entitled to a portion of the winnings,
this form must be completed by the recipient. If the recipient is
not one of the winners, that person must fill in his or her name,
address and taxpayer identifying number in Part | and then list the
names, addresses, taxpayer identifying numbers and the amount
of the winnings which each of the other persons is entitled to re-
ceive. If the recipient is one of the winners, that person's name

¢ U.S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1981—O-343-539

and the amount of the winnings should also appear in Part Il.
The taxpayer identifying number for an individual is the social
security number; for all others it is the employer identification
number. The statement must then be signed (if Federal income
tax is withheld) and returned to the payer of the winnings. The
payer will file a Form W-2G for each of the winners from whom
withholding tax has been withheld. The payer may issue the Form
W-2G at the time of the payment or no later than January 31st
of the year following the year of the winnings.

This form should be retained by the payer for a period of four
years from the date of the payment of the winnings and must be
made available to Internal Revenue upon request during that
period.

343-539-1
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.
6330 San Vicente Blvd.
Los Angeles, California 90048

March 27, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

|    |  |                                                                                  
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Annual Report on Form 10-K of Equity
Marketing, Inc. (Commission File No. 2-3346)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Equity Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation, received a letter from
Arthur Andersen LLP, dated March 27, 2002, representing that the audit was subject
to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen LLP personnel working on the audit, availability of national office
consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen
to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Please contact me at 323-932-4315 if you have any questions regarding the
above.

Very truly yours,

|                                                                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                            |  | 
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|/s/ Lawrence J. Madden
Lawrence J. Madden
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  |
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001121 15-MAY-2017 11:44 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998, and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,658,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,319,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,118
<INVENTORY>                                    589,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,653,997
<PP&E>                                         315,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,441,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,083,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,170,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,441,646
<SALES>                                      2,563,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,204,331
<CGS>                                        1,635,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,915,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,108,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                    75,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            113,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   113,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

               STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                    YEAR   ENDED
                                                       JULY 31
                                                 1997          1996
                                             ----------   -----------

Average common shares outstanding             3,623,990     3,545,147

Net effect of dilutive common stock
  equivalents-based on treasury stock method        -0-           -0-
                                             ----------   -----------
Total weighted average common and 
common equivalent shares outstanding          3,623,990     3,545,147
                                             ==========   ===========
Loss before cumulative effect of 
  accounting change                          $ (760,580)  $(2,171,280)

Cumulative effect on prior years of
  change in accounting for new
  account allowances                         $            $(1,406,050)
                                             ----------   -----------
Net loss                                     $ (760,580)  $(3,577,330)
                                             ==========   ===========
Per share:
  Loss before cumulative effect of 
    accounting change                        $    (0.21)  $     (0.61)

  Cumulative effect of accounting change     $       --   $     (0.40)

  Net loss                                   $    (0.21)  $     (1.01)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN DEWAYNE SANDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-179)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Dewayne Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for a reduction of his sentence based on substantial

assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sanders, No. CR95-179 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee Meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Army Science Board (ASB).                    

*Date of Meeting:*                         13 February 2001.                    

Time of Meeting: 0830-1700.

*Place:*                         11th floor Conf. Room, Presidential Towers, Crystal City, Virginia.                    

*Agenda:*                         The Army Science Board's (ASB) Ad Hoc Study on “Adapting Future Wireless Technologies” will have their kickoff meeting to outline study goals, breakout into specific panels, and schedule meetings. There will be NO outside briefings at this kickoff meeting. If you require additional information or have any questions, please call Mr. Jeff Ozimek, the Study Staff Assistant on (732) 532-5496.                    

Wayne Joyner,

Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 01-3327  Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### Harry SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2010.

Harry Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harry Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,011,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,486,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    484,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,860,353
<PP&E>                                       7,133,852
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,226,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,636,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,454
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,675,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,226,424
<SALES>                                     40,693,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,754,905
<CGS>                                       16,975,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,663,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,182,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (447,984)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (734,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (734,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
<FN>
<F1>Income Tax is Shown as a Benefit
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Exhibit 32.1]


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to  Section 906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that this Quarterly  Report  on
Form 10-Q for  the quarter  ended  December 31, 2007   fully
complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of
operations of the Company.


Date:  May 14, 2008


/S/Wm. Lee Popham
----------------------------------
Wm. Lee Popham
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,365
<PP&E>                                         219,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,972
<BONDS>                                         37,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,997
<SALES>                                         10,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,256
<CGS>                                            2,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    368
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

CATHY LOVELL

v. Record No. 1754-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION *

PER CURIAM BASSETT-WALKER, INC. MARCH 12, 1996

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Barbara Hudson, on brief), for appellant.

(Richard D. Lucas; Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, on brief), for appellee.

Cathy Lovell appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an occupational disease. The commission held that Lovell failed to prove that her bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was a disease within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed

.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.