alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul D. Carrico, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ PAUL D. CARRICO Paul D. Carrico President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


November 19,
2010

---



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory C. Thompson, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ GREGORY C. THOMPSON Gregory C. Thompson Chief Financial Officer


November 19,
2010

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3444 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3444

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to disregard certain 
contributions to ABLE accounts when determining an individual's ability 
   to engage in substantial gainful activity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to disregard certain 
contributions to ABLE accounts when determining an individual's ability 
   to engage in substantial gainful activity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ABLE Accounts for Veterans Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ABLE ACCOUNTS DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL GAINFUL ACTIVITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(d)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(D) In determining when earnings derived from services 
demonstrate an individual's ability to engage in substantial gainful 
activity, in the case of earnings earned in a month by an individual 
who receives compensation for a service-connected disability for such 
month under chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, the 
Commissioner of Social Security shall disregard an amount of such 
earnings equal to the amount of any contribution made by the individual 
in such month to a qualified ABLE program (as defined in section 529A 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) established for the benefit of 
such individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to earnings earned for months beginning after the 
date that is 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE:

PLACE:

STATUS:

MATTERS TO BE
CONSIDERED:

CONTACT PERSON
FOR MORE INFO:

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW
‘SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004

October 25, 2013

2:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 13, 2013

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from
F Street entrance)

Open

The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open
session: Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., Docket Nos.
WEST 2008-788-R, et al. (Issues include whether the
Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that violations
involving accumulations of coal dust and an inadequate pre-shift
examination were “significant and substantial.”)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

Jean Ellen —_ (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay /
1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Edmond R. Coletta,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Transition Report on Form 10-KT of Casella Waste Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2015



By:

/s/ Edmond R. ColettaEdmond R. ColettaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00222

- CR

JARROD MICHAEL TAYLOR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court Cass County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017F00166

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a jury convicted Jarrod Michael Taylor of indecency with a child by contact, the trial court sentenced him to twenty years ’ imprisonment , and Taylor appealed . Taylor also appeals from his convictions for (1) sexual assault of a child in companion case num ber 06

- 17

- 00215

- CR , (2) six counts of online solicitation of a minor in com panion cause numbers 06

- 17

- 00216

- CR through 06

- 17

- 00221

- CR , and (3) another count of indecency with a child by co ntact in companion cause number 06

- 17

- 00223

- CR . Taylor has filed a single brief in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals. Specifically, Taylor argues, in a conclusory manner, that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury ’ s verdict of guilt. He also argues that the trial court erred in fail ing to excuse a juror who knew the victim and in denying his request for an instruction on the affirmative defense of insanity. We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Taylor ’ s appeal in cause number 06

- 17

- 00215

- CR. For the rea sons stated therein, we likewise conclude that Taylor failed to adequately brief his first point of error, cannot demonstrate error in the trial court ’ s decision to retain the juror, and raised no evidence entitling him to an instruction on the defense of insanity. We aff irm the trial court’s judgment.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice Date Submitted: July 23, 2018 Date Decided: July 31 , 2018 Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AK-910-1410-PG]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Alaska Resource Advisory Council meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The BLM Alaska Resource Advisory Council will conduct an open meeting Thursday, January 31, 2002, from 9:30 a.m. until 4 p.m. and Friday, February 1, 2002, from 8:30 a.m. until noon. The meeting will be held at the Campbell Creek Science Center, 6881 Abbott Loop Road, Anchorage.

Primary agenda items for the meeting include land use planning starts in Alaska and scoping for the northwest National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska and Colville River multiple use activity plans. The council will hear public comments Thursday, January 31, from 1-2 p.m. Written comments may be mailed to BLM at the address below.

# ADDRESSES:

Inquiries or comments should be sent to BLM External Affairs, 222 W. 7th Avenue, #13, Anchorage, AK 99513-7599.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Teresa McPherson, 907-271-3322, or via E-mail to                         *teresa_mcpherson@ak.blm.gov.*

Linda S.C. Rundell,

Associate State Director.

[FR Doc. 01-32130  Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2007 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2007

          To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 4,4'-
           (hexafluoroisopropylidene)bis(phthalic anhydride).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1993

Mr. Ballenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 4,4'-
           (hexafluoroisopropylidene)bis(phthalic anhydride).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-(HEXAFLUOROISOPROPYLIDENE)-BIS(PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE).

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  4,4'-(hexafluoro-isopropyl-idene)bis-(phthalic anhydride)                   No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        (provided for in subheading 2917.39.20).................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon Morton WELCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-5799.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 28, 2008.

*377BEFORE: BATCHELDER, SUTTON, and FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judges.*

*

 The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Leon Morton Welch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

An undercover police officer and a confidential informant (“Cl”) drove into a gas station, intending to conduct a controlled drug buy. "When a woman approached, the Cl told her he wanted crack cocaine and gave her $40. She went around the building and got into the back seat of a Cadillac. A man got out of the driver’s seat of the Cadillac, went into the gas station, returned to the Cadillac, and got back into the driver’s seat. The woman then got out of the back seat of the Cadillac, returned to the officer’s car, and gave the crack to the Cl. The officer signaled other police officers who had been watching both the Cadillac and the undercover officer’s car; they seized the Cadillac and the driver, who turned out to be defendant Welch. A search of the Cadillac yielded crack cocaine and, under the driver’s seat, a firearm.

Welch was indicted on charges of possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. He moved to suppress the evidence obtained through the search of the Cadillac, and, when his motion to suppress was denied, entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a firearm as a convicted felon. Welch now argues that the police had no probable cause to seize the Cadillac because the officers had no reason to think there were any more drugs inside.

“[A] warrantless search of a vehicle lawfully stopped by the police does not violate the fourth amendment if the officers have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband.” *United States v. Paulino,*935 F.2d 739, 747 (6th Cir.1991). Probable cause is based on a “totality of the circumstances” and “requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” *Illinois v. Gates,*462 U.S. 213, 244 n. 13, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). “This totality of the circumstances analysis includes a realistic assessment of the situation from a law enforcement officer’s perspective.” *United States v. Barrett,*890 F.2d 855, 861 (6th Cir.1989).

*378The activities that these officers observed involving the Cadillac certainly gave them probable cause to believe that they likely would find crack cocaine in the vehicle. Indeed, after watching the activities of Welch and the woman who actually delivered the $40 worth of crack to the Cl, the officers had little reason to think that they would *not*find contraband in that vehicle. The district court did not err by denying defendant’s motion to suppress.

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
ACCEPTED

12-13-00346-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

2/17/2015 4:49:46 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/17/2015 4:49:46 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,592,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,252,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (339,160)
<INVENTORY>                                 10,125,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,496,624
<PP&E>                                       9,659,210
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,020,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,447,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,039,536
<BONDS>                                      5,333,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          610,001
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,138
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,421,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,447,468
<SALES>                                     39,326,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,388,390
<CGS>                                       19,743,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,856,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,426,810
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,513,940)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,912,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,912,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
    We  consent to the incorporation by  reference in Registration Statement No.
33-87066  and  Registration  Statement   No.  33-58987  of  Mid-America   Realty
Investments,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 1, 1996 appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mid-America Realty Investments, Inc. for  the
year ended December 31, 1995.
 
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
February 1, 1996
Omaha, Nebraska
 
                                       53
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,021
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,313
<PP&E>                                         325,334
<DEPRECIATION>                               (106,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,645
<BONDS>                                        182,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   260,294
<SALES>                                        135,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,710
<CGS>                                           58,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          210
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Randy MCRAE, Board Member, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CENTRAL PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, CDC; Terry Speigner; Arthur Turner, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-1807.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

Randy McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, Meyers, Rodbell & Rosenbaum, PA, River-dale, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy McRae appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to remand and imposing sanctions against McRae. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *McRae v. Central Prince Georges County CDC,*No. 8:10-cv-00239-PJM, 2010 WL 2651634 (D. Md. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         GUNDLE/SLT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              JURISDICTION OF          EFFECTIVE
                        ENTITY NAME                            INCORPORATION           OWNERSHIP
                        -----------                           ---------------          ---------
<S>                                                           <C>                      <C>      
GSE Lining Technology, Inc. ................................  Delaware                   100%   
GSE Lining Technology GmbH..................................  Germany                    100%   
Gundle GmbH.................................................  Germany                    100%   
Geoplastics GmbH............................................  Germany                    100%   
GSE Lining Technology Pty. Ltd. ............................  Australia                  100%   
GSE Lining Technology Pte. Ltd. ............................  Singapore                  100%   
GSE Lining Technology Ltd. .................................  United Kingdom             100%   
GSE U.K. Ltd. ..............................................  United Kingdom             100%   
Gundle Environment Ltd. ....................................  United Kingdom             100%   
SGS Geosystems Limited......................................  United Kingdom             100%   
SGS Holdings Limited........................................  United Kingdom             100%   
GSE Clay Lining Technology Co. .............................  South Dakota               100%   
GSE International, Inc. ....................................  Delaware                   100%   
GSE Foreign Sales, Ltd. ....................................  Barbados                   100%   
GSE Gulf Offshore Limited ..................................  British Virgin Islands      41%   
Hyma/GSE Lining Technology Co. .............................  Arab Republic of Egypt   50.01%   
Hyma/GSE Manufacturing Co. .................................  Arab Republic of Egypt   50.01%   
</TABLE>