alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael A. MCNEIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-1082.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Michael A. McNeil, Appellant pro se. Menachem Lanner, John Edward McCann, Jr., Jessica Anna-Christina du-Hoffmann, Miles & Stockbridge, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

*209Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1673 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *McNeil v. Federal Network Sys., LLC,*No. 1:13-cv-01501-WDQ, 2014 WL 269430 (D.Md. Jan. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service; Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent to Publish a Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment/Feasibility Study. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming scoping meeting/open house for the Crossroads of the American Revolution and the intent to publish a Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment and Feasibility Study in association with the Crossroads of the American Revolution.

Appropriation Bill H.R. 3194 directs the Crossroads of the American Revolution study. Open houses will be held as part of the scoping process. Further notice will be published in local newspapers when dates are set. Local newspapers will include the Trenton Times and Star Ledger among others.

We encourage all who have an interest to contact us by letter or telephone. Further information about the Crossroads of the American Revolution and the open houses can be obtained by contacting Linda Mead, Crossroads Project Leader, at 609-924-4646.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Linda Mead, Project Leader, Crossroads of the American Revolution, 570 Mercer Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, 609-924-4646.

Dated: January 23, 2001.

Michael D. Henderson,

Superintendent, Morristown National Historic Park.

[FR Doc. 01-3354  Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

p1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143691 

IN RE REINSTATEMENT PETITION OF SC: 143691 

ROBERT L. WIGGINS, JR., ADB: 10-26-RP 

 Petitioner-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1751

To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on graphite.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension

of duty on graphite.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRAPHITE.

4 Heading 9902.25.04 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States (relating to graphite) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/

7 96’’.

8 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

10 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

11 enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 1751 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

12 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

13 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

14 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

15 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Hospitality Worldwide Services, Inc.
New York, New York

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectuses
constituting a part of the Registration  Statements on Forms S-8, Nos. 333-22671
and 333.21689  and Forms S-3,  Nos.  333-39511 and 333-05101 of our report dated
March 21, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Hospitality
Worldwide  Services,  Inc. and  subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 1996
and 1995,  appearing in the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

We also  consent  to the  reference  to us under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Prospectuses.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
--------------------
BDO Seidman, LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828191
<NAME> 88B.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         159,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,651
<PP&E>                                       7,108,417
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,531,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,855,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,813,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,855,957
<SALES>                                        734,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               740,273
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                254,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            254,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   254,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    28.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
	EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS
				PER SHARE

                                        						   Three Months Ended
			                                         			March 31        March 31
						                                           1997             1996
					                                         (Unaudited)


<S>                                            <C>             <C>
Net Earnings                                   $  233,307      $  197,724


Primary earnings per share:


Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding                       5,891,911        5,769,589


Add:  Shares arising from the assumed
      exercise of stock options (as determined 
      under the Treasury Stock Method)                    
                                                  							0                0



Weighted average of common and
 equivalent shares                                            
                                           						5,891,911        5,769,589
   
Primary earnings per share                            $.04             $.03


Fully diluted earnings per share:

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding (as determined for the Primary
 earnings per share calculation above)          5,891,911        5,769,589

Add:  Additional shares arising from the assumed 
 exercise of stock options (as determined 
 under the Treasury Stock Method)                  78,576          114,247  

Weighted average of common and equivalent
 shares                                                      
                                          						5,970,487        5,883,836

Fully diluted earnings per share                     $.04             $.03

</TABLE>
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1975

For the relief of Afsar Khanom Tajbakhsh.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. GLICKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Afsar Khanom Tajbakhsh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR AFSAR

4 KHANOM TAJBAKHSH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Afsar Khanom Tajbakhsh shall be eligible for issu8 ance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to

9 that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of

12 status to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 1975 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Afsar Khanom

2 Tajbakhsh enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date

7 of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Afsar Khanom Tajbakhsh, the Secretary of State

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

23 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
#### Roxanne Gernhardt, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[612 NYS2d 831]

—Order, Supreme Court, Kings County (Gloria Cohen Aronin, J.), entered November 24, 1991, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon review of the record, we find sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of negligence against defendant *(see, Elam v New York City Tr. Auth.,*183 AD2d 599, *lv denied*80 NY2d 760), and no basis to exercise our discretionary power to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. Inconsistent testimony concerning the nature and condition of the subject stairway metal tread plate on the date that plaintiff slipped on it and fell was properly left to the jury *(see, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134-137). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Nassau 
Metals Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:96-CV-562 (M.D. Pa.), was lodged on 
December 20, 2000, with the United States District Court for the Middle 
District of Pennsylvania. The consent decree resolves the United 
States' claims against the Estate of Joseph Brenner and the personal 
representative of the Estate with respect to past costs, pursuant to 
Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607, in connection with the cleanup of 
the C&D Recycling, Inc., Site, located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. 
Under the consent decree, the personal representative of the Estate, 
based upon an ability-to-pay settlement, will pay the United States 
$77,000 in reimbursement of past response costs within forty-five days 
after entry of the consent decree by the Court. The personal 
representative of the Estate has also agreed to sell the Site property, 
in cooperation with a co-owner of the property, and to pay the United 
States the proceeds from said sale as provided under the terms of the 
consent decree.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Nassau Metals Corp., et al., DOJ Reference No. 90-11-
3-1057-A.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, Suite 309, Federal Building, Washington and 
Linden Streets, Scanton, Pennsylvania 18501; and the Region III Office 
of the Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19103-2029. A copy of the proposed decree may be obtained 
by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 
7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please refer to the 
referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $8.00 (.25 cents 
per page production costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert D. Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-3268 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Acker, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Kevin J. Acker              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin J.  Acker                       |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
| March 12,  2004                       |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to West SuburbanBancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1752

For the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired), and Roger Sands.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. HYDE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired),

and Roger Sands.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Ser5 geant Major Earnest Sands (Retired) and Roger Sands,

6 an amount of money in compensation for any damages (in7 cluding legal costs, as well as other economic and non8 economic losses incurred) arising out of the unlawful con9 finement and detention of Ernest Sands in Saudi Arabia

10 from August, 1991 until January, 1992. Such confine11 ment and detention occurred as a result of negligence,
2

HR 1752 IH

1 misrepresentation and other unlawful actions taken by of2 ficials of the United States State Department and other

3 United States government officials. Such damages shall

4 be awarded to the claimants notwithstanding the defense

5 of sovereign immunity or any defense available to the

6 United States under sections 2671–2680 of title 28, Unit7 ed States Code.

Æ
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 

EPC Corporation 

Incorporated in Delaware on August 21, 1986 

 

Buzzard Power Corporation 

Incorporated in Delaware on December 12, 1990 

 

Coal Dynamics Corporation 

Incorporated in Pennsylvania on March 21, 1986 

 

Kaiser Power of Sunnyside, Inc. 

Incorporated in Delaware on March 26, 1986 

 

Kaiser Systems, Inc. 

Incorporated in Delaware on March 26, 1986 

 

Microgy Cogeneration Systems, Inc. 

Incorporated in Colorado on March 25, 1999 

 

Milesburg Energy, Inc. 

Incorporated in Pennsylvania on September 30, 1986 

 

Sunnyside Power Corporation 

Incorporated in Utah on September 21, 1987
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1695 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1695

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1993

   Mr. Carr introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR THE HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS INCREASED AND MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) Deduction Increased.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health 
insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking 
``25 percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''.
    (b) Deduction Made Permanent.--Subsection (l) of section 162 of 
such Code is amended by striking paragraph (6).
    (c) Repeal of Transition Rule.--Subsection (a) of section 110 of 
the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (d) Effective Dates.--
            (1) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to 
        taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.
            (2) The amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) shall 
        apply to taxable years ending after June 30, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1225

FRED HENDERSON MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHARLESTON, and its agents and servants,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-02148-DCN)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Henderson Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Rae Fargnoli, 

CLAWSON & STAUBES, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fred Henderson Moore seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and 

remanding his case to state court. We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on February 3, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on March 

10, 2011. Because Moore failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED