[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19-21]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 252-312a; FRL-7118-1]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave 
Desert Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the 
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) portion of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 
Oxides of Nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>) emissions from cement kilns. We are 
approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the 
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on March 4, 2002 without further notice, 
unless EPA receives adverse comments by February 1, 2002. If we receive 
such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal 
Register to notify the public that this rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions and EPA's 
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal 
business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revisions 
at the following locations:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Rulemaking Office 
(AIR-4), Air Division, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule

[[Page 20]]

Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
Mojave Desert AQMD, 14306 Park Avenue, Victorville, CA 92392-2310.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charnjit Bhullar, Rulemaking Office 
(AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-
3960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
    C. What Is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action.
    A. How is EPA evaluating this rule?
    B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public comment and final action.
III. Background information.
    Why was this rule submitted?
IV. Administrative Requirements

I. The State's Submittal

A. What Rule Did the State Submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule we are approving with the dates that it was 
adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air 
Resources Board (CARB).

                        Table 1.--Submitted Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Local agency      Rule No.      Rule title       Adopted    Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDAQMD............        1161  Portland Cement     10/22/01     11/8/01
                                 Kilns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 21, 2001, this rule submittal was found to meet the 
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met 
before formal EPA review.

B. Are There Other Versions of This Rule?

    We approved a version of Rule 1161 into the SIP on May 11, 2000. 
The MDAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on October 22, 
2001 and CARB submitted them to us on November 8, 2001.

C. What Is the Purpose of the Submitted Rule Revisions?

    Rule 1161 applies to cement manufacturing operation within the 
Federal Ozone non-attainment area regulated by the MDAQMD. This rule 
controls emission of oxides of nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>) from Portland 
cement kilns.
    On May 11, 2000, the EPA published a limited approval and limited 
disapproval of this rule, because some rule provisions conflicted with 
section 110 and part D of the Clean air Act. Those provisions included 
the following:
    1. Alternative Compliance strategy in section (D).
    2. Exemption during start-up and shutdown in section (G)(1)(a).
    3. Referring to a rule not approved in the SIP in section 
(G)(1)(c).
    The revisions are designed primarily to correct these deficiencies. 
The TSD has more information about this rule.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How Is EPA Evaluating This Rule?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for 
major sources in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2)(A) and 
182(f)), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) 
and 193). The MDAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR 
part 81), so Rule 1161 must fulfill RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we used to define specific 
enforceability and RACT requirements include the following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the 
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of 
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NO<INF>X</INF> Supplement), 57 FR 55620, 
November 25, 1992.
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 
Deviations; Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal 
Register Notice,'' (Blue Book), notice of availability published in the 
May 25, 1988 Federal Register.
    3. Nitrogen Oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>) reasonably Available Control 
Technology (RACT) for the repowering of Utility Boilers, U.S. EPA 
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, March 9, 1994.

B. Does This Rule Meet the Evaluation Criteria?

    We believe this rule corrects the deficiencies identified in our 
May 11, 2000 action and is consistent with the relevant policy and 
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSD 
has more information on our evaluation.

C. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully 
approving the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all 
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this 
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. 
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are 
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we 
receive adverse comments by February 1, 2002, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct 
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in 
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive 
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective 
without further notice on March 4, 2002. This will incorporate this 
rule into the federally enforceable SIP.

III. Background Information

Why Was This Rule Submitted?

    NO<INF>X</INF> helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and 
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment. 
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that 
control NO<INF>X</INF> emissions. Table 2 lists some of the national 
milestones leading to the submittal of this local agency NO<INF>X</INF> 
rule.

                Table 2.--Ozone Nonattainment Milestones
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Date                                Event
------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 3, 1978..........................  EPA promulgated a list of ozone
                                          nonattainment areas under the
                                          Clean Air Act as amended in
                                          1977. 43 FR 8964; 40 CFR
                                          81.305.
May 26, 1988...........................  EPA notified Governors that
                                          parts of their SIPs were
                                          inadequate to attain and
                                          maintain the ozone standard
                                          and requested that they
                                          correct the deficiencies
                                          (EPA's SIP- Call). See section
                                          110(a)(2)(H) of the pre-
                                          amended Act.
November 15, 1990......................  Clean Air Act Amendments of
                                          1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-
                                           549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified
                                          at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

[[Page 21]]

 
May 15, 1991...........................  Section 182(a)(2)(A) requires
                                          that ozone nonattainment areas
                                          correct deficient RACT rules
                                          by this date.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 32111, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically 
significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 4, 2002. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 29, 2001.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(286) and 
(c)(287) to read as follows:


Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (286) [Reserved].
    (287) New and amended regulations for the following APCD were 
submitted on November 8, 2001 by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1161 adopted on October 22, 2001.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 01-32099 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P