1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13 -4 05 V

Filed: March 2 5, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED A.S., a minor, by her natural mother, *

NANCY SKOW, *

*

* Special Master Dorsey Petitioner, *

*

v. *

* Joint Stipulation on Damages;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Varicella vaccine ; Prevnar vaccine;
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Lipodystrophy.

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et. a l.

, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner

. Julia W. McInerny, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION 1

On June 1 7 , 2013 , Nancy Skow (“petitioner”) filed a petition on behalf of her minor child, A.S., pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving Varicella and Prevnar vaccines on April

5 , 2011, A.S. suffered from lipodystrophy and other adverse injuries. Stipulation at ¶¶ 2, 4, 6.

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion o f privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.2

Further, petitioner alleged that A .S. experienced residual effects of t hese injuries for more than six

months. Id. at ¶ 4.

On M arch 24 , 2015 , the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensati on. Res pondent denies that the V aricella and Prevnar vaccine s caused A .S. to suffer lip o dystrophy or any other injury

. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the par ties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A

.

The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $ 3 5 ,000 .00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, N ancy Skow, as guardian/conservator of A.S. ’ s estate

. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a)

.

Id. at ¶ 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amo unt for petitioner ’ s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.