10-1343-cv(L) Moultrie v. Stationary Engineers Local 670 AFL-CIO, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTERJANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION“SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 4 thday of March, two thousand eleven.
Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, ROBERT D. SACK, ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges ,

________________________________________________ GLORIA MOULTRIE, Plaintiff-Appellant , v. Nos. 10-1343-cv(L), 10-1403-cv(CON) STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 670 AFL-CIO, DALLAS LUCAS, President, Stationary Engineers Local 670 AFL-CIO, VIP HEALTHCARE SERVICES, CINDY ROSEN, Manager, Defendants-Appellees

.

________________________________________________ For Plaintiff-Appellant: A NDREW S CHATKIN , Law Offices of Andrew J. Schatkin, Jericho, N.Y.2 For Defendants-Appellees Stationary Engi neers Richard M. Greenspan, Law Offices Local 670 AFL-CIO and Dallas Lucas: of Richard M. Greenspan, P.C., Ardsley, N.Y. For Defendants-Appellees VIP Healthcare J ASON A. Z OLDESSY (John A. Snyder, on Services and Cindy Rosen, Manager: the brief), Jackson Lewis LLP, New York, N.Y.
Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J. ). ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF , it is hereby ORDERED , ADJUDGED , and DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED

. Plaintiff-Appellant Gloria Moultrie appeal s from the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint in its entirety. On appeal, Moultrie argues that the district court erred in concluding that (1) the complaint did not state prima facie claims of race or national origin discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq. (“Title VII”), or disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq. , and (2) Moultrie failed to exhaust her administrative remedies in connection with her Title VII claims. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case. We have considered Moultrie’s arguments and find them to be without merit. For the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinions granting Defendants-Appellees VIP Healthcare Services and Cindy Rosen’s motion to dismiss the complaint, Moultrie v. VIP Health
Care Servs. , No. 08-CV-0457 (DLI)(RML), 2009 WL 750219 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2009), and granting Defendants-Appellees Stationary E ngineers Local 670 AFL-CIO and Dallas Lucas’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, Moultrie v. VIP Health Care Servs. , No. 08-CV-04573 (DLI)(RML), 2010 WL 1037693 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2010) , the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK