alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         January 4, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 am to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6120 Executive Blvd. Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Andrew P Mariani, PhD, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, 6120 Executive Blvd, Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892, 301/496-5561.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.
      ( print page 1146)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 22, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-336  Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


    Acclaim Cable Holdings, Inc.                       Delaware
    Acclaim Coin-Operated Entertainment, Inc.          Delaware
    Acclaim Comics, Inc.                               Delaware
    Acclaim Distribution, Inc.                         Delaware
    Arena Entertainment, Inc.                          Delaware
    Acclaim Corporate Center I, Inc.                   New York
    LJN Toys, Ltd.                                     New York
    Oyster Bay Warehouse Corp.                         New York
    Lazer-Tron Corporation                             California
    Iguana Entertainment, Inc.                         Texas
    Sculptured Software, Inc.                          Utah
    Acclaim Japan, Ltd.                                Japan
    Acclaim Entertainment Canada, Ltd.                 Canada
    Acclaim Entertainment Espana SA                    Spain
    Acclaim Entertainment G.m.b.h.                     Germany
    Acclaim Entertainment, SA                          France
    Acclaim Entertainment, Ltd.                        United Kingdom
    Iguana Entertainment Ltd.                          United Kingdom
    Probe Entertainment Limited                        United Kingdom
    Lazer-Tron Limited                                 U.S. Virgin Islands
    ACTC, L.P.                                         Delaware
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3598 

To expand the Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019 and require 

the reinstatement of sanctions waived with respect to Nord Stream 

2 AG and corporate officers of Nord Stream 2 AG. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. KELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To expand the Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 

2019 and require the reinstatement of sanctions waived 

with respect to Nord Stream 2 AG and corporate officers 

of Nord Stream 2 AG. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our 

5 Wellbeing by Expanding Russian Sanctions Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘POWERS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3598 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PROTECTING EUROPE’S ENERGY SE2 CURITY ACT OF 2019. 

3 Section 7503(a)(1)(B) of the Protecting Europe’s 

4 Energy Security Act of 2019 (title LXXV of Public Law 

5 116–92; 22 U.S.C. 9526 note) is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and insert7 ing a semicolon; 

8 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(vi) engaged in any transaction with 

12 any foreign person described in any of 

13 clauses (i) through (v); and’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REINSTATEMENT OF WAIVED SANCTIONS. 

15 Any sanctions under section 7503 of the Protecting 

16 Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019 (title LXXV of 

17 Public Law 116–92; 22 U.S.C. 9526 note) or any other 

18 provision of law waived with respect to Nord Stream 2 

19 AG or any corporate officer of Nord Stream 2 AG before 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act— 

21 (1) shall be reinstated; and 

22 (2) notwithstanding subsection (f) of that sec23 tion, may not be waived except pursuant to an Act 

24 of Congress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3464 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3464

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2021

 Mr. Gohmert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zero-Baseline Budget Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CHANGES IN THE BASELINE.

    Section 257(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        everything that follows ``current year,'' and inserting 
        ``excluding resources designated as an emergency requirement 
        and any resources provided in supplemental appropriation 
        laws.'';
            (2) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5);
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (2); and
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) No adjustment for inflation.--No adjustment shall be 
        made for inflation or for any other factor.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1631 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1631

 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on the District of Columbia

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Justice Reform 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY PERMITTED FOR CASES 
              UNDER JURISDICTION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION 
              BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    (a) In General.--Section 11-1321, D.C. Code, is amended by striking 
``$2,000'' and inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to cases filed with the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Microgy, Inc., a Colorado corporation 

Microgy Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

MicrogyO&M, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

MST Production, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership 

MST GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company 

MST Estates, LLC, a Texaslimited liability company 

Hereford Biogas, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company 

Mission Biogas, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company 

Rio Leche Estates, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company

Microgy Grand Island LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company 

Microgy Riverdale, LLC, a California limited liability company 

Microgy Hanford, LLC, a California limited liability company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,150,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,252,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   423,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     329,390,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              55,964,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             285,886,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,835,000
<BONDS>                                    152,747,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,127,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               285,886,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,759,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,481,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,554,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,756,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Namond Earl WILLIAMS, a/k/a Namond Brewington, a/k/a Tony Smith, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6795.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 3, 2011.

Namond Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Namond Earl Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners IV, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Limited, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of
and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:  November 14, 2005    By:     /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Limited

Technology Funding Partners IV, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 13505

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus KELVIN LARON HOWARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:20

- cr

- 00026

- JRH

- BKE

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13505 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/07/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13505

Before W ILSON , J ORDAN , and N EWSOM , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. On October 23, 2023, Kelvin Laron Howard
, pro se , filed a notice of appeal designat ing “the order” denying his motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution against h im for lack of jurisdiction

. However, the district court had not resolved, or even addressed, that motion at that time. On November 30, 2023, the district court entered an oral order denying the motion.
Howard ’s notice of appeal wa s premature, as he ca nnot appeal a n expected or contemplated order. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B); Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs , 162 F.3d 653, 661 (11th Cir. 1998) (“ Rule 3(c) requires that a notice of appeal designate an existent judgment or order, not one tha t is merely expected or that is, or should be, within the appellant ’ s contemplation when the notice of appeal is filed. ”). Because t he district courthad not resolved Howard’s motion to dismiss, or otherwise entered any appealable order, when Howard filed his notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal

. See Bogle , 162 F.3d at 661 (dismissing premature appeal of sanctions order because “the notice of appeal in this case does not confer jurisdiction over a sanctions order that was entered almost two months after the notice of appeal was filed”); McDougald v. Jenson , 786 F.2d 1465, 1474 (11th Cir. 1986) (“[W] e cannot find the [appellant] to hav e intended hernotice of appeal to constitute an appeal from the order of permanent injunction, as that order had not yet been entered when her USCA11 Case: 23-13505 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/07/2023 Page: 2 of 323

- 13505 Opinion of the Court 3
notice of appeal was filed .”); s ee also United States v. Gulledge , 739 F.2d 582, 584 (11th Cir. 1984) (noting th at the general rule that anappeal may be taken from only a final judgment “has been stringently applied in criminal prosecutions”) ; United States v. Curry , 760 F.2d 1079, 1079 (11th Cir. 1985) (“In a criminal case the final judgment means the sentence.”)

. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-13505 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/07/2023 Page: 3 of 3
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

April 2, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 18, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. M-Class Mining, LLC, Docket No. 

LAKE 2012-519. (Issues include whether the Judge erred by ruling 

that a miner was not required to wear gloves while troubleshooting

an energized continuous mining machine.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
~ Name (Please type or print)

Social security number, if any
, f
' i
H

2. U.S, address (Number and street or rural route) (City) (State) (ZIP Code)

3. Complete foreign address

“4. Taxable year 5. Occupation

6. Passport or alien registration card number | 7. Date of departure 8. Place of departure | 9. Country of destination

10, Name of carrier [* Of what country are you a:

(a) citizen or subject _..
12. Are you a CO Yes
resident alien? [] No

---+-- (b) resident __..

Date on which you last
arrived in the US.

Original date of
entry into U.S.

U.S. DEPARTING ALIEN INCOME TAX STATEMENT
For a Resident Alien Whose Taxable Period Has Not Been Terminated or
For a Nonresident Alien Having No Taxable Income from United States Sources

U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FORM 2063

(REV. 1-67)

ANNUAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
This certifies that:

has satisfied all United States of America income tax obliga-
tions with respect to income received or to be received for
= 19.

the taxable year ended -...

determined to the extent practicable based on all information
available to me at this date.

(District Director of Internal Revenue)

(Name and title)

District Director's Stamp


13. Ifa nonresident alien, state purpose of entry into the U.S.

ath
att! Miityy,
, - , - - WR Bey,
14. Did you receive (or do you expect to receive) any income subject to United States income tax D Yes 0 No QO Dey
for the year stated in item 4 on the other side? : aN LZ
If "yes:"' (a) will U.S. income tax be withheld? OO Yes C1 No ae
__(b) will you file a Declaration of Estimated Income Tax? O Yes C1 Wo
15. (a) Did you receive any income subject to United States income tax during the past taxable year? CO Yes C] No z x oe =
(b) If "Yes,’” furnish the following information: Gor SN
yy, Some, S
U.S. address shown on return Up ERICA
Aging WW
Year Taxable Income Tax Paid Balance Due District in Which Return Was Filed
19 |

16, Are you liable for the filing of any tax returns or the payment of any taxes to the United 1 Yes J No IMPORTANT
States for any prior year, other than shown in 15 (b) above?

DECLARATION—Under the penalies of peniury, I declare thatthe above statements have been examined by me and tothe best of my knowledge and belief are true Please keep this certificate
with your passport
Signature of departing alien .... .- Date -..

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1966-—-O-241-266
exv10w16xby



 





Exhibit
10.16(b)




CHARTER PARTY

SECOND AMENDMENT



St. Louis Riverboat Entertainment, Inc. (fka Caruthersville Riverboat Entertainment, Inc.), a
Missouri corporation (“Owner”) and Greenville Riverboat, LLC, a Mississippi limited liability
company (“Charterer”) wish to amend the Charter Party agreement originally dated January 20, 1995
and as previously amended by the First Amendment dated January 19, 2004, as follows:





Whereas the amended Charter Party agreement is currently scheduled to expire on January 19,
2009.




The parties to the agreement wish to add two five year renewal options to extend the
agreement at the option of the Charterer. The first option to commence on January 19, 2009
and end on January 19, 2014 and the second option to commence on January 19, 2014 and end
on January 19, 2019. The Charterer must notify the Owner in writing at least thirty (30)
days in advance of the current expiration date of the agreement and the Charterer cannot be
in default under the agreement in order to exercise its option.


All other terms and provisions of the agreement, as amended, are to remain in full force and
effect.



The parties have executed this amendment on this 23rd day of May, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Owner:

St. Louis Riverboat Entertainment, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	by
	 	/s/ William J. Yung
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	William J. Yung, President
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Charterer:

Greenville Riverboat, LLC
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	by
	 	Wimar Tahoe Corporation
	 

	 	 	 	Managing Member
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	by
	 	/s/ William J. Yung
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	William J. Yung, President