alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1328

HEYDI LORENA RECINOS-ECHEVERRIA; D.A.D.,

Petitioners,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: November 8, 2016

Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy W. Davis, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY W. DAVIS, LLC, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy

Assistant Attorney General, Andrew M. O’Malley, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Surell Brady, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Heydi Lorena Recinos-Echeverria and her minor child, natives 

and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal 

from the immigration judge’s denial of Recinos-Echeverria’s 

requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under 

the Convention Against Torture. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the 

transcript of Recinos-Echeverria’s merits hearing and all 

supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does 

not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual 

findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that 

substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. 

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. See In re Recinos-Echeverria (B.I.A. Mar. 

15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Paul D. Meyer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  |                                      
|                     |  | /s/ Thomas V. Brown                  
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Form 1122—UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

INFORMATION RETURN OF SUBSIDIARY OR AFFILIATED CORPORATION

WHOSE NET INCOME AND INVESTED CAPITAL ARE INCLUDED IN RETURN OF A PARENT OR PRINCIPAL
REPORTING CORPORATION FCR PURPOSES OF INCOME AND PROFITS TAXES

FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1922

If return is for calendar |
year 1922, file it on or be-
fore March 15, 1923, with
the Collector of Internal
Revenue fer the District in
which the Subsidiary or
Affiliated Corporation has
its principal office.

Ti for a period other than
a calender year, the return
‘should be filed on or before
the 15th day of the third
month following the close
of such period.

(Date Received)

Or for period begun _ _-.-.-..-9 1921, and ended 1922

1. Date incorporated______._----------------------------------2---ee Under laws of what State #22
2. Kind of business_____ nnn ween
3. Par value of capital stock outstanding at beginning of taxable period:
(a) Common, $-._.........----.----------------; (b) preferred, $_.._.------___--------—

4, Name of parent corporation —_____-_--_--_- n-ne nnn en
5. Address of parent corporation a2 2222-2 nnee nee nnn eee
6. Internal revenue district in which consolidated return has been filed. penenneennnee eee
district, or city and State)

7. The department prefers that the entire tax shown on a consolidated return be paid by the parent or principal
reporting corporation, instead of being apportioned among the corporations composing the affiliated group.

If apportionment is made, state the amount of income and profits taxes for the taxable period to be assessed

against the subsidiary or affiliated corporation making this return _____--.------.--- 8 enna nena

We, the undersigned, president and treasurer of the above-named subsidiary or affiliated corporation, being
severally duly sworn, each for himself deposes and says that the foregoing return, including the accompanying
list (Gif any), has been examined by. him and is to the best of his knowledge and belief a true and complete return
of information made in good faith pursuant to the Revenue Act of 1921 and the Regulations issued thereunder.

Swokrn to and subscribed before me this

onan day of 1928, nn nnn nnn ee
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10497

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEOBARDO CASTRO-CHAVEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-190-ALL

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leobardo Castro-Chavez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedStates, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 3, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10280

2

Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

                                CERTIFICATION

I, George J. Taylor, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President, certify
that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Farmstead
Telephone Group, Inc. ("registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  January 25, 2005

/s/ GEORGE J. TAYLOR, JR.
----------------------------------
George J. Taylor, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer, President
(until October 1, 2004)


<PAGE>
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 8, 2020

 

PLACE:                                  Thismeeting will be conducted through a videoconference involving allCommissioners. Any person wishing to listen to the proceeding may call the numberlisted below.

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                      TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co., LLC,*Docket No. PENN 2018-0169. (Issuesinclude whether the Judge erred in ruling that a citation was “significant andsubstantial” and in finding that two other citations should be upheld.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                 EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)236-7472

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

 

Dated: October 3, 2019

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel

 

 

BillingCode 6735-01
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

November 17, 2008 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 4, 2008 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor on behalf of Lawrence L. Pendley v. 

Highland Mining Company, LLC, Docket Nos. KENT 2007-383-D 

and KENT 2007-506-D. (Issues include whether the Administrative 

Law Judge properly concluded that the operator did not discriminate 

against the miner in question under section 105(c) of the Federal 

Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c).) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3715 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include the credit of certain 

tolls as an eligible use of revenue, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2021 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include the credit 

of certain tolls as an eligible use of revenue, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection Against 

5 Double Tolling Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF REVENUE. 

7 Section 129(a)(3)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

8 is amended by striking clause (v) and inserting the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3715 IH

1 ‘‘(v) if the public authority certifies 

2 annually that the tolled facility is being 

3 adequately maintained, a toll rebate to4 ward a congestion pricing fee for individ5 uals residing on either side of a tolled 

6 bridge required to pay a toll to connect to 

7 the central business district in the city in 

8 which the vehicle of the individual is reg9 istered.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          73,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,576
<INVENTORY>                                      4,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,140
<PP&E>                                         305,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 683,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,810
<BONDS>                                        235,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           337
<OTHER-SE>                                     437,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   683,851
<SALES>                                        534,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,088
<CGS>                                          205,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1737 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1737

 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
       buses that do not have seat belts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1993

Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
      the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
       buses that do not have seat belts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    No person shall manufacture, sell, deliver, or import any school 
bus, constructed after the effective date of this Act, for use by a 
person described in section 2 to provide transportation service, unless 
such school bus is equipped with a seat belt, with particular emphasis 
on the use of an Aaron Gordon type flight attendant double shoulder 
harness mechanism or other appropriate safety restraint device 
providing equal or greater passenger safety, for each passenger riding 
in such school bus.

SEC. 2. PERSONS TO WHICH PROHIBITION APPLIES.

    The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall apply to--
            (1) any school bus, as such term is defined in section 
        4221(d)(7)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
            (2) any Federal, State, or local government entity, school 
        district, or other public or private entity providing 
        transportation to passengers by school bus.

SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES; SECRETARY'S AUTHORITY TO COMPROMISE.

    (a) Amount of Penalties.--Whoever violates any provision of this 
Act, or any regulation issued thereunder, shall be subject to a civil 
penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each such violation. A violation with 
respect to each school bus shall constitute a separate violation, 
except that the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed $800,000 for any 
related series of violations.
    (b) Compromise of Penalties.--Any such civil penalty may be 
compromised by the Secretary of Transportation. In determining the 
amount of such penalty, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, the 
appropriateness of such penalty to the size of the business of the 
person charged and the gravity of the violation shall be considered. 
The amount of such penalty, when finally determined, or the amount 
agreed upon in compromise, may be deducted from any sums owing by the 
United States to the person charged.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of its enactment.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1711 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1711

  Relating to customs fees charged with respect to certain commercial 
             truck arrivals in Whatcom County, Washington.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 1993

  Mr. Swift introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Relating to customs fees charged with respect to certain commercial 
             truck arrivals in Whatcom County, Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM FEE.

    Section 13031(b)(2) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) No fee may be charged under subsection (a)(2) for the arrival 
of a commercial truck in any port of entry in Whatcom County, 
Washington, in the course of a round-trip journey between Point 
Roberts, Washington, and any other place in the State of Washington 
if--
            ``(i) Point Roberts, Washington, is either the place from 
        which the journey originates or the return trip starts; and
            ``(ii) no stops are made for commercial purposes during 
        each Canadian segment of the journey.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 apply with respect to arrivals 
that are made in the course of journeys described in section 1 and that 
occur on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```