alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

September 2, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 18, 2014

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. State of Alaska, Department of Transportation*, Docket No. WEST 2008-1490-M.(Issues include whether MSHA has regulatory jurisdiction over certain equipmentbecause the process in question constitutes “milling.”)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FORMORE INFO:                Sarah Stewart (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

                                                

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wilder Richman Historic Properties
II, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Wilder Richman Historic
Corporation, general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
--------------------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Company
January 14, 2003
Ex-10.1



 







Exhibit 10.1




Executive Officer Compensation Summary



In comparison to the Executive Officer Compensation Summary attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s 10-Q filed on August 9, 2005, the 2006 base salaries for executive officers have been
amended as represented below:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	Change in	 
	Name	 	Title	 	 	Base Salary	 	 	Base Salary	 	 	Base Salary	 
	Patrick J. Balthrop
	 	Chief Executive Officer and President	 	$	400,000	 	 	$	400,000	 	 	 	N/A	 
	Harriss T. Currie
	 	Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Office	 	$	228,800	 	 	$	228,800	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	and Treasurer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Randel S. Marfin
	 	Vice President, Luminex Bioscience Group	 	$	225,500	 	 	$	225,500	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	James W. Jacobson
	 	Vice President, Research and Development	 	$	225,500	 	 	$	225,500	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Oliver H. Meek
	 	Vice President, Manufacturing	 	$	192,850	 	 	$	192,850	 	 	 	N/A	 
	David S. Reiter
	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	 	$	214,200	 	 	$	214,200	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gregory J. Gosch
	 	Vice President, Marketing and Sales	 	$	187,775	 	 	$	200,000	 	 	$	12,225	 
	 
	 		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Russell W. Bradley
	 	Vice President, Business Development and Strategic	 	$	185,000	 	 	$	185,000	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	Planning
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Broyles, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Broyles,*118 Ohio St.3d 192, 2008-Ohio-2216.]

(No. 2007-0509

Submitted May 6, 2008

Decided May 14, 2008.)

John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Spiert, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Simpkins,*117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 8

|                                                                          |                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                                                                          | JURISDICTION OF  
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARIES                                                      | INCORPORATION    
|Aladdin Knowledge Systems Inc.                                            | New York         
|Aladdin Japan & Co. Inc.                                                  | Japan            
|Aladdin Western Europe Ltd. (formerly Aladdin
  Knowledge Systems UK Ltd) | England and Wales
|Hafalad BV                                                                | The Netherlands  
|Aladdin Western Europe BV                                                 | The Netherlands  
|Aladdin Western Europe S.A.R.L. (formerly Aladdin
  France S.A.)          | France           
|Aladdin Knowledge Systems Deutschland GmbH                                | Germany          
|Aladdin Asia Limited                                                      | Hong Kong        
|Aladdin Knowledge Espana S.L.                                             | Spain            
|Aladdin ITALY SRL                                                         | Italy            

---
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David W. Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ David W. Hempstead


David W. Hempstead


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


August 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00122

- CV

Isaac Sagredo v. Johnathan Ball

On Appeal from the 389th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 3976

- 20

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decis ion certified below for observance.
Fe bruary 8, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000826773
<NAME> ADINA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996             OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             470                     470
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   470                     470
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     470                     470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           651                     651
<OTHER-SE>                                        (181)                    (181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       470                     470
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7683
LARKIE LYNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNNY H. WILLIAMS; JOYCE WILLIAMS; RICHARD E. HUNTER, JR., Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-549-5-F) Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larkie Lynch, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larkie Lynch appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We havereviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lynch v. Williams , No. CA-00-549-5-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
109 A.3d 216

#### IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 039712002).

February 27, 2015.

ORDER

This matter have been duly presented to the Court pursuant to *Rule*1:20—10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 15-001 of CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON, formerly of SEA GIRT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since November 15, 2013;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*1.5(b) (failure to set forth in writing the basis or rate of the fee);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*1.5(b), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XIV-2012-0611E

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *Rule*l:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON, formerly of SEA GIRT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from the practice of law and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

*582ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                   NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                    (Unaudited)

                                    Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                       December 31,              December 31,
                                -------------------------  ------------------------

                                    2002         2001         2002         2001
                                ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

<S>                             <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss                        $  (855,505)  (1,344,801)  (1,874,230)  (2,341,121)
                                ============  ===========  ===========  ===========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding      60,593,585   55,710,198   59,117,467   55,714,507

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  options and warrants                    -            -            -            -
                                ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                 60,593,585   55,710,198   59,117,467   55,714,507
                                ============  ===========  ===========  ===========

Net loss per share,
  basic and diluted             $      (.01)        (.02)        (.03)        (.04)
                                ============  ===========  ===========  ===========
</TABLE>




Stock  options,  warrants  and convertible preferred stock are not considered in
the  calculations  for  those  periods  with  net  losses  as  the impact of the
potential  common  shares  (approximately  14,003,852  at  December 31, 2002 and
9,642,661  shares at December 31, 2001) would be to decrease net loss per share.


<PAGE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1328** 

HEYDI LORENA RECINOS

- ECHEVERRIA; D.A.D. , Petitioner s ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : October 28, 2016 Decided: November 8, 2016

Before SHEDD and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Timothy W. Davis, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY W. DAVIS, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland , for Petitioner s . Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Andrew M. O’Malley, Senior Litigation Counsel, Surell Brady , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washin gton, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Heydi Lorena Recinos

- Echeverria and her minor child , natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigratio n Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of Recinos

- Echeverria’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal , and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Recinos

- Echeverria’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision , s ee INS v.
Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Recinos

- Echeverria (B.I.A. Mar. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIE D
Order entered February 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00935-CR

No. 05-22-00936-CR

TROY ADAM LEWIS, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 33841CR, 33842CR

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief in cause number 

05-22-00936-CR is GRANTED, and we ORDER the brief received with the 

motion filed as of the date of this order. The State’s brief in cause number 05-22-

00936-CR is due March 20, 2023. 

Appellant’s brief in cause number 05-22-00935-CR was filed January 31, 

2023, and the State’s brief in that appeal is due March 2, 2023.
/s/ NANCY KENNEDY

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of UniTek Global Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011 (the “ Periodic Report ”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. Scott HiseyC. Scott Hisey

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Ronald J. LejmanRonald J. Lejman

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)





May 17, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UniTek Global Services, Inc. and will be retained by UniTek Global Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 120701A]


Marine Mammals; File No. 779-1633-00

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Southeast Fisheries Science 
Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, 
Miami, FL 33149 (Principal Investigator: Dr. Keith D. Mullin) has been 
issued a permit to take marine mammals for purposes of scientific 
research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 
phone (301) 713-2289; fax (301) 713-0376;
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298; phone (978) 281-9200; fax (978) 281-9371;
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive North, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432; phone (727) 570-5301; fax (727) 570-5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson or Tammy Adams, (301 
)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 16, 2001, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (66 FR 42997) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take marine mammals had been submitted by the above-
named organization. The requested permit has been issued under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the 
regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting of 
endangered and threatened species (50 CFR parts 222-226).
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: December 19, 2001.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 01-31834 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Exxon 

Mobil Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-19-00852-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-22667

Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County

Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation, has filed an objection to this 

Court’s November 21, 2019 Order of Referral to Mediation. The Court’s Order of Referral to 

mediation is hereby withdrawn.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __________/s/ Julie Countiss___________

Acting individually 

Date: December 10, 2019