alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132947 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132947 

 COA: 263090 

Calhoun CC: 2004-003661-FH 

DAVE HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

| Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. |
|-----------------------------------|

Powhatan, Virginia 

 

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  

 

We were not engaged to examine management's assertion about the effectiveness of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 included in the accompanying *Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting* and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon. 

 

 

Winchester, Virginia 

March 31, 2008
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

September 18, 2007 

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Thursday, September 27, 2007 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Austin Powder Company, Docket Nos. 

CENT 2006-128-M and CENT 2006-159-M. (Issues include whether 

the Administrative Law Judge erred in finding that the company 

committed a violation when it stored detonators in a magazine that 

did not comply with the construction criteria in 30 C.F.R. 56.6132.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

December 29, 2016

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Friday,February3, 2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillconsiderandactuponthefollowinginopen

session:*Secretary****ofLaboronbehalfofGreathouse,etal.v.MonongaliaCountyCoalCompany,etal.,*DocketNos.WEVA2015-904-D,etal.(Issuesincludewhetherthe Judge erredin rulingthatcertainbonusplansinstitutedbytheoperatorsinterferedwithminers’rightsunder theMine Act.)

 

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

ARGUMENT:1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode:129-339

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Raian ROCCA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-12141

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 28, 2010.

*436A. Brian Albritton, Colleen D. Murphy-Davis, David Paul Rhodes, Susan H. Roth-stein-Youakim, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Patrick D. Doherty, Patrick D. Doherty, Brown & Doherty, P.A., St. Petersburg, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Raian Rocca appeals his 90-month sentence, which the district court imposed after Rocca pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C), possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Rocca argues that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider both his substantial assistance to authorities and his extraordinary family circumstances. After thorough review, we affirm.

We review a final sentence imposed by the district court for reasonableness. *United States v. Winingear,*422 F.3d 1241, 1245 (11th Cir.2005). Reasonableness review is akin to the deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 591, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), and we will reverse only if the district court’s error constitutes a clear error of judgment. *United States v. Frazier,*387 F.3d 1244, 1259 (11th Cir.2004) (en banc). The party who challenges the sentence must establish that the sentence is unreasonable in light of both the record and the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *United States v. Talley,*431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005).

Rocca first argues that the district court erred by failing to consider the substantial assistance he provided to federal authorities after he was apprehended. Although the court did not engage in an extensive discussion of Rocca’s assistance, we conclude that the court gave adequate consideration to whether that assistance warranted a lesser sentence. Furthermore, the district court explained that it had considered the advisory guidelines and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553. Under the circumstances of this case, this explanation was sufficient. *See United States v. Scott, 426*F.3d 1324, 1329 (11th Cir.2005).

We also reject Rocca’s contention that the district court failed to consider his family circumstances when imposing his sentence. Before imposing his sentence, the district court listened to testimony from Rocca’s defense counsel and his fiancée. Both asked the court to impose a lenient sentence because Rocca was the primary income-earner for his family. The district court listened to those arguments, but concluded that a within guidelines sentence was nonetheless warranted. There was no error in this conclusion. As a result, under these circumstances Rocca’s sentence was reasonable.

For these reasons, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
2014-0509.

#### In re Application of Grimsley.

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness. On May 19, 2014, applicant filed a notice of acceptance and motion for expedited consideration.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
----

----

Lithium Technology Corporation 10-K/A

|   | 1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated: December 19, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Martin Koster                                                 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |   | Martin KosterChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000805020
<NAME> UNI-MARTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,881,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,332,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,200
<INVENTORY>                                 16,235,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,947,640
<PP&E>                                     154,383,159
<DEPRECIATION>                              53,681,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             144,237,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,447,340
<BONDS>                                     75,005,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       736,112
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,343,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               144,237,514
<SALES>                                    346,795,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           348,704,141
<CGS>                                      272,753,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              347,251,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,621,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,452,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                   572,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            880,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   880,139
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1745

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on certain chemicals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself and Mr. VOLKMER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on certain

chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHEMICALS.

4 (a) CHAPTER 29 CHEMICALS.—Subchapter II of

5 chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unit6 ed States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence

7 the following new subheadings:
2

HR 1745 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 (R)-α-Amino1,4-

cyclohexadiene1-acetic acid

(CAS No.

26774–88–9)

(provided for in

HTS subheading

2922.49.50)

(commonly

called DDihydrophenyl

glycine) ............. Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.13 (R)-α-Amino-4-

hydroxybenzeneacetic

acid (CAS No.

22818–40–2)

(provided for in

HTS subheading

2922.50.30)

(commonly

called D(-)-4-

hydroxyphenyl

glycine) ............. Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.14 (R)-α-Aminobenzeneacetic

acid (CAS No.

875–74–1) (provided for in

HTS subheading

2922.49.35)

(commonly

called D(-)-

alphaphenyl glycine) .................. Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.15 N,N′-Bis(trimethylsilyl)urea

(CAS No.

18297–63–7)

(provided for in

HTS subheading

2931.00.50)

(commonly

called BisTrimethylsilurea) ........ Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.18 Penicillin V potassium (CAS

No. 132–98–9)

(provided for in

HTS subheading

2941.10.50) ...... Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.19 Penicillin G potassium (CAS

No. 113–98–4)

(provided for in

HTS subheading

2941.10.20) ...... Free No Change No Change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section apply with respect to articles entered, or with-
3

HR 1745 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55-56]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32235]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meeting

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has scheduled its regular business meetings to take 
place

[[Page 56]]

in Washington, DC on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, January 7-9, 2002, 
at the times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, January 7, 2002

11 a.m.-Noon. Ad Hoc Committee--Public Rights-of-Way (Closed Meeting).
1:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee--Public Rights-of-Way (Closed 
Meeting).

Tuesday, January 8, 2002

9:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Committee of the Whole--Recreation Facilities 
Final Rule (Closed Meeting).
10:30 a.m.-Noon. Technical Programs Committee.
1:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee--Passenger Vessels (Closed Meeting).

Wednesday, January 9, 2002

9 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Planning and Budget Committee.
10:30 a.m.-Noon. Executive Committee.
1:30 p.m.-3 p.m. Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Marriott at Metro Center 
Hotel, 775 12th Street, NW, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director, (202) 
272-5434, extension 113 (voice) and (202) 272-5449 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items.

Open Meeting

    <bullet> Executive Director's Report.
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the March 7, and May 9, 2001 
Board Meetings.
    <bullet> Technical Programs Committee: Construction tolerances, and 
on-going research and technical assistance projects.
    <bullet> Planning and Budget Committee: Budget spending plan for 
fiscal year 2002; fiscal year 2003; and out-of-town meetings.
    <bullet> Executive Committee: Executive Director's report; and 
nominating committee.

Closed Meeting

    <bullet> Ad Hoc Committee on Public Rights-of-Way.
    <bullet> Committee of the Whole; Recreation Facilities.
    <bullet> Ad Hoc Committee on Passenger Vessels.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. Sign 
language interpreters and an assistive listening system are available 
at all meetings. Persons attending Board meetings are requested to 
refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the 
comfort of other participants.

David M. Capozzi,
Director, Office of Technical and Information Services.
[FR Doc. 01-32235 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6680

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN FITZGERALD PRESCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR95-323-PJM)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Fitzgerald Prescott, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,

United States Attorney, Andrew Clayton White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Steven Michael Dettelbach,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for a new trial based on his allegations of newly discovered

evidence, the prosecutor's knowing use of perjured testimony, and

the government's violation of the disclosure requirements of Brady

v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3500 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Prescott, No. CR95-323-PJM (D. Md. Apr. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 19, 2020.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted through a videoconference involving all Commissioners. 

Any person wishing to listen to the proceeding may call the number listed below.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in 

open session: Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc., Docket No. WEVA 2019-0458 (Issues include 

whether the Judge erred in ruling that two trucks were subject to Mine Act jurisdiction.)

 Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary 

aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson, (202) 434-9935 / 

(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Phone Number for Listening to Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.

Passcode: 678-100.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Dated: November 3, 2020.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

BILLING CODE 6735-01
<PAGE> 
EXHIBIT (11)

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS:

  (A)  Computation of the weighted average number of shares of common stock     
 outstanding for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              WEIGHTED
                             SHARES OF    NUMBER OF DAYS                   NUMBER OF SHARES
                            COMMON STOCK   OUTSTANDING       SHARE DAYS       OUTSTANDING   
                            ------------  --------------  ---------------  ----------------
<S>                         <C>           <C>             <C>              <C>  
1996
----
October 1 - September 30     6,345,465         366         2,322,440,346
Treasury Stock Purchases    (   94,075)      Various      (    8,164,523)
Shares Issued                  407,097       Various          68,185,760
                             ---------                     -------------
                             6,658,487                     2,382,461,583     6,509,458
                             =========                     =============     =========


1995
----
October 1 - September 30     6,274,260         365         2,290,105,018
Shares Issued                   71,205       Various           8,432,227
                             ---------                     -------------
                             6,345,465                     2,298,537,245     6,297,362  
                             =========                     =============     =========



1994
----
October 1 - September 30     6,881,449         365         2,511,728,756
Treasury Stock Purchases    (  661,670)      Various      (   36,167,603)
Shares Issued                   54,481       Various          11,332,906
                             ---------                     -------------
                             6,274,260                     2,486,894,059     6,813,408
                             =========                     =============     =========

</TABLE>
  (B)  Computation of Earnings Per Share:

       Computation of earnings per share is net earnings divided by the
      weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the
      years ended September 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             1996             1995              1994   
                          ----------       ----------        ----------
<S>                       <C>              <C>               <C>
Net Earnings              $2,971,044       $4,153,761        $3,665,123

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding                6,509,458        6,297,362         6,813,408

Earnings Per Share           $.46             $.66              $.54
                             ====             ====              ====

</TABLE>
                                       53
2014-0056.

#### O’Malley v. O’Malley.

Cuyahoga App. No. 98708, 2013-Ohio-5238. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2014-Ohio-1674, 6 N.E.3d 1205. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

French, J.,

dissents and would grant the motion for reconsideration as to Proposition of Law No. II.

O’Neill, J., dissents.