alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1634

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost share assistance

for projects designed to improve the supply of water in rural areas

that are experiencing severe problems with the quality or quantity of

water.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. ROGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost

share assistance for projects designed to improve the

supply of water in rural areas that are experiencing

severe problems with the quality or quantity of water.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

4 SUPPLY.

5 The Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act

6 is amended by inserting after section 3A (16 U.S.C.

7 1003a) the following:
2

•HR 1634 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 3B. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

2 SUPPLY.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the

4 Secretary shall provide 100 percent of the cost of con5 structing reservoirs and other surface facilities for the

6 storage of water, to increase the supply of water in rural

7 areas.

8 ‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—In order to qualify for assistance

9 under this section, a project must be designed to increase

10 the supply of water in a community in a rural area that

11 is experiencing a severe problem with the quality or quan12 tity of water.

13 ‘‘(c) RURAL AREA DEFINED.—As used in this sec14 tion, the term ‘rural area’ means any territory of a State

15 that is not within the outer boundary of any city having

16 a population of 10,000 or more, according to the latest

17 decennial census of the United States.’’.

Æ
1

Filed 8/26/13 P. v. Belton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JUVOUNE RAY BELTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

C073073

(Super. Ct. No. CRF122221)

Appointed counsel for defendant Juvoune Ray Belton has asked this court to 

review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We shall affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

In April 2012, defendant entered the victim’s unoccupied apartment with the intent 

to commit a theft and took property valued at approximately $1,200.
2

A felony complaint charged defendant with first degree burglary (Pen. Code, 

§ 459)1 and receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)) in Yolo County. The complaint 

further alleged that defendant’s prior conviction rendered him eligible for sentencing to 

state prison. Defendant pleaded no contest to the first degree burglary and the remaining 

count was dismissed. In an unrelated incident, defendant was convicted of committing a 

robbery (§ 211) in May 2012 in Sacramento County. The plea agreement included the 

provision that the Yolo County burglary would become the principal term, for which 

defendant would receive a two-year term, and the court would resentence defendant on 

the Sacramento County robbery to one-third the midterm, or one year. The trial court 

sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea to an aggregate term of three years in 

prison. Defendant was held in Yolo County on an order to produce from the Department 

of Corrections and Rehabilitation in the Sacramento County case. Accordingly, he did 

not earn presentence custody credits while held in custody in Yolo County. The trial 

court awarded defendant 92 days of actual custody credit, and ordered defendant to pay a 

$240 restitution fund fine (§ 1202.4), a $30 criminal conviction assessment (Gov. Code, 

§ 70373) and a $40 court security fee (§ 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)). Defendant did not obtain a 

certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this 

court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of the right to file a 

supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 

days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having 

 

1

 Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
3

undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would 

result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. 

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 DUARTE , J.

We concur:

 MAURO , Acting P. J.

 MURRAY , J.
#### LIFANG CHEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70186.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Albert S. Chow, Esq., Lin & Chow, Monterey Park, CA, for Petitioner.

District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See.*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lifang Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) *133decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ found Chen not credible for a number of reasons, including Chen’s unclear testimony regarding how school authorities punished her, her evasiveness during parts of her testimony, the omission of her parents’ arrest from her asylum application, and the inconsistency between her testimony and the record of her credible fear interview regarding who involved her in distributing Falun Gong pamphlets. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. *See id.*at 1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the Real ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances”); *Malkandi v. Holder, 576*F.3d 906, 917-19 (9th Cir.2009). In the absence of credible testimony, Chen’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Chen’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not credible, and Chen does not point to any other evidence that shows it is more likely than not she would be tortured if returned to China, her CAT claim fails. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Shareholders and Board of Directors 

SizelerProperty Investors, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-107043 and No. 333-103380) on Form S-3, and (No. 333-16073, No. 333-85212, and No. 333-99541) on Form S-8 of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. of our reports dated February 24, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,and all related financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

March 17, 2005
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.01 --- LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


SUBSIDIARY                               ADDRESS

FRANCE
Radius France S.A.                      BP422 World Trade Center
                                        CNIT-2 Place De La Defense
                                        92053 La Defense, France

Radius S.A.R.L.

ASIA
Radius KK                               Yanada Bld. 5F
                                        6-7-10 Roppongi
                                        Minato-ku, Tokyo
                                        Japan

Nihon SuperMac K.K.                     Japan

SuperMac Asia Pacific                   Hong Kong

UNITED KINGDOM
Radius UK Ltd.                          13 Westminster Court
                                        Hipley Street
                                        Old Woking,
                                        Surrey GU22 9LQ
                                        United Kingdom

SuperMac Technology Europe

GERMANY
Radius GmbH                             Grosse Bleichen 35
                                        20354 Hamburg
                                        Germany

OTHERS
Radius FSC Inc.                         Bay Street 
                                        Bridgetown
                                        Barbados

Radius (Australia) Pty. Ltd.            Level 5, 18-20 Orion Road
                                        Lane Cove, NSW 2066
                                        Australia

Radius Canada                           Canada


All subsidiaries are either inactive or in dissolution or preparation therefor.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Description of System To Rank and Approve Requests for Assistance 
for Rehabilitation of Aging Watershed Dams

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14 (f) of the Watershed Protection and 
Flood Prevention Act (Pub. L. 83-566), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1012); The 
Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
gives notice that a system to rank and approve requests for 
rehabilitation of watershed dams has been prepared for use in 
implementation of a rehabilitation program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry W. Caldwell, National Policy 
Coordinator for Aging Watershed Infrastructure, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, 100 USDA Suite 206, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074-
2655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 83-566 was amended by Section 313 
of Public Law 106-472. One provision of this amendment directed the 
Secretary of Agriculture to establish a system of ranking and approving 
requests for rehabilitation of watershed dams. A description of the 
system that will be implemented in FY 2002 to establish a priority 
ranking of all applications for assistance received in a state has been 
developed. Copies of the description of this ranking and approval 
system are available upon request at the above address.

Roger L. Bensey,
Director, Watersheds and Wetlands Division.
[FR Doc. 01-31745 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX International, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,686
<SECURITIES>                                   11,133,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,173,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    4,333,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,044,164
<PP&E>                                         6,019,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,231,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,861,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,605,563
<BONDS>                                        1,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,301
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,328,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,861,762
<SALES>                                        7,633,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,633,207
<CGS>                                          4,898,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,898,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,085,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             72,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            42,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3717 

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish a program to provide grants 

to improve power lines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2021 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish a program 

to provide grants to improve power lines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Power Line Resiliency 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POWER LINE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after 

8 the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of En9 ergy shall establish a program to provide grants to electric 

10 utilities to carry out eligible activities. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3717 IH

1 (b) GRANTS.— 

2 (1) APPLICATION.—To apply for a grant pro3 vided under this section, an electric utility shall sub4 mit to the Secretary of Energy an application at 

5 such time, in such manner, and containing such in6 formation as the Secretary of Energy may require. 

7 (2) SELECTION.—The Secretary of Energy 

8 shall provide grants under this section— 

9 (A) on a competitive basis; and 

10 (B) to geographically diverse electric utili11 ties. 

12 (3) PRIORITY.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

13 prioritize providing a grant under this section to any 

14 electric utility that sells electricity in an area that 

15 has a history of extreme weather events. 

16 (c) SUNSET.—The program established under sub17 section (a) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after 

18 the date of enactment of this section. 

19 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

20 (1) ELECTRIC UTILITY.—The term ‘‘electric 

21 utility’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

22 3(22) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

23 796(22)). 

24 (2) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY.— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3717 IH

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘eligible ac2 tivity’’ means an activity that— 

3 (i) is designed to improve the per4 formance or efficiency of a power line; 

5 (ii) makes a power line more resilient 

6 to an extreme weather event; or 

7 (iii) otherwise ensures that an end8 user has access to electricity during an ex9 treme weather event. 

10 (B) INCLUDES.—The term ‘‘eligible activ11 ity’’ includes— 

12 (i) burying a power line; 

13 (ii) hardening a power line; and 

14 (iii) if burying a power line is not fea15 sible, providing a generator to a household 

16 that is located in a remote area. 

17 (3) EXTREME WEATHER EVENT.—The term 

18 ‘‘extreme weather event’’ means an historically rare 

19 or severe natural disaster, including a heat wave, 

20 drought, flood, tornado, and hurricane. 

21 (4) POWER LINE.—The term ‘‘power line’’ in22 cludes distribution lines and transmission lines. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.2


    Exhibit
      10.2

    


    


    FORM
      OF

    STOCK
      OPTION CERTIFICATE

    


    


    This
      Stock
      Option Certificate certifies that, pursuant to the ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), the Board of Directors of ARIAD
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) has granted an option (the “Option”) to
      purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par value per share
      (“Shares”), as follows:

    


    Name
      of Participant: 

    Number
      of Option Shares:  

    Type
      of Stock Option Grant: 

    Exercise
      Price: 

    Date
      of Grant: 

    


    This
      Option is subject to all the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in
      the
      2006 Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, and to the following
      additional terms specified by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Option
      shall be exercisable as follows:

    


    


    [terms]

    


    


    


    


    The
      Option
      shall terminate ten years from the Date of Grant or such shorter period as
      set
      forth in the 2006 Plan in the event of the Optionee’s termination of service,
      Death or Disability. The Option is not assignable or transferable, other than
      as
      provided in the 2006 Plan. No partial exercise of the Option may be for less
      than 100 full shares. In no event shall the Company be required to issue
      fractional shares.

    


    This
      Stock
      Option Certificate, together with the 2006 Plan and any other written agreement
      between the Company and the Participant relevant to the subject matter hereof
      and executed contemporaneously herewith or hereafter, embodies the entire
      agreement and understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the
      subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements and
      understandings relating to the subject matter hereof and no other statement,
      representation, warranty, covenant or agreement shall affect or be used to
      interpret, change or restrict, the express terms and provisions of this Stock
      Option Grant, provided, however, in any event, this Stock Option Certificate
      shall be subject to and governed by the 2006 Plan.

    


    In
      witness
      whereof, the Company has caused this Option Certificate to be executed by its
      duly authorized officers.

    


    Dated:
      

    


    


     

    
      	 	 	 	 
	Edward
              M. Fitzgerald	 	Harvey
              J. Berger, M.D.	 
	Senior
              Vice President	 	Chairman
              and Chief Executive Officer	 
	Finance
              and Corporate Operations	 	 	 
	Chief
              Financial Officer
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Reports & Budget Submissions              

#   Reports & Budget Submissions

Strategic Plan

Budget and Annual Performance Reports

Buy American Reports

Performance Accountability Reports

Sustainability Report

Reports to Congress

Reports to the President 

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 21.  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Percent    State or other jurisdiction of
                       Name                             Owned     incorporation or organization
---------------------------------------------------    -------    ------------------------------

<S>                                                     <C>       <C>
Beijing Antai Communication Equipment Company, Ltd.      50%      Peoples Republic of China

GlobalFONE of Romania (1)                               100%      Romania

Farmstead Asset Management Services, LLC                 98%      Delaware

FTG Venture Corporation (2)                             100%      Delaware

TeleSolutions, Inc.                                      40%      Republic of the Philippines

<FN>
--------------------
<F1> (1)   Inactive

<F2> (2)   Holds a 2% interest in Farmstead Asset Management Services, LLC.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 39