alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1644

For the relief of Vladimir Epschtein and Cilia Epschtein.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. LANTOS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Vladimir Epschtein and Cilia Epschtein.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR VLADIMIR

4 EPSCHTEIN AND CILIA EPSCHTEIN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Vladimir Epschtein and Cilia Epschtein shall be eligi8 ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment

9 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of

11 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for

12 adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 1644 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Vladimir

2 Epschtein or Cilia Epschtein enters the United States be3 fore the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or

4 she shall be considered to have entered and remained law5 fully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjust6 ment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and

7 Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this

8 Act.

9 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

10 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap11 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica12 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

13 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Vladimir Epschtein and Cilia Epschtein, the Sec17 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

18 by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

19 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

20 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

21 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli22 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

23 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

24 under section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,160
<SECURITIES>                                    53,817
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        231,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,249
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,611
<SALES>                                          6,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,123
<CGS>                                            5,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,835
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,391)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.44)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           28657
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             383
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     416695
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         520145
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (7880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1021641
<DEPOSITS>                                      856773
<SHORT-TERM>                                     25781
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6247
<LONG-TERM>                                      28750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         23491
<OTHER-SE>                                       80599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1021641
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  21564
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                12748
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    46
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 34358
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               16002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17891
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            16467
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                2566
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  13670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9356
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6183
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.60
<LOANS-NON>                                       6574
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1388
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  1278
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2111
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  8364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      574
<RECOVERIES>                                        90
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 7880
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3092
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           4788
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1722

Making appropriations to begin a phase-in toward full funding of the special

supplemental food program for women, infants, and children (WIC) and

of Head Start programs, and to expand the Job Corps program for

the year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. KILDEE (for himself and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

Making appropriations to begin a phase-in toward full funding of the special supplemental food program for women,

infants, and children (WIC) and of Head Start programs, and to expand the Job Corps program for the

year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Every Fifth Child Ap5 propriations Act’’.
2

•HR 1722 IH

1 SEC. 2. WIC PROGRAM.

2 Out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap3 propriated, for the Department of Agriculture for the fis4 cal year ending September 30, 1994, there is appropriated

5 to carry out the special supplemental food program for

6 women, infants, and children (WIC) authorized in section

7 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786),

8 $3,287,000,000. In addition, in order to achieve full fund9 ing for such program by the end of the fiscal year 1996,

10 there should be appropriated $3,564,000,000 for the fiscal

11 year 1995, and $3,914,000,000 for the fiscal year 1996.

12 SEC. 3. HEAD START PROGRAMS.

13 Out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap14 propriated, for the Department of Health and Human

15 Services for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994,

16 there is appropriated to carry out the Head Start pro17 grams established under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C.

18 9831 et seq.), $4,150,000,000. In addition, in order to

19 achieve full funding for such programs by the fiscal year

20 1999, there should be appropriated $4,970,000,000 for

21 the fiscal year 1995, $5,810,000,000 for the fiscal year

22 1996, $6,740,000,000 for the fiscal year 1997, and

23 $7,660,000,000 for the fiscal year 1998.

24 SEC. 4. JOB CORPS PROGRAM.

25 Out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap26 propriated, for the Department of Labor for the fiscal year
3

•HR 1722 IH

1 ending September 30, 1994, there is appropriated to carry

2 out the Job Corps program established under subtitle B

3 of title IV of the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C.

4 1691 et seq.), $1,153,000,000. In addition, in order to es5 tablish 50 additional Job Corps centers and by the year

6 2001 serve at least 50 percent more disadvantaged youths

7 than were served in the year 1992, there should be appro8 priated $1,250,000,000 for the fiscal year 1995,

9 $1,400,000,000 for the fiscal year 1996, $1,490,000,000

10 for the fiscal year 1997, $1,550,000,000 for the fiscal year

11 1998, $1,709,000,000 for the fiscal year 1999, and

12 $1,821,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2000 and

13 2001.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1711

Relating to customs fees charged with respect to certain commercial truck

arrivals in Whatcom County, Washington.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 7, 1993

Mr. SWIFT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

Relating to customs fees charged with respect to certain

commercial truck arrivals in Whatcom County, Washington.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM FEE.

4 Section 13031(b)(2) of the Consolidated Omnibus

5 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(2))

6 is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(B) No fee may be charged under subsection (a)(2)

10 for the arrival of a commercial truck in any port of entry
2

HR 1711 IH

1 in Whatcom County, Washington, in the course of a

2 round-trip journey between Point Roberts, Washington,

3 and any other place in the State of Washington if—

4 ‘‘(i) Point Roberts, Washington, is either the

5 place from which the journey originates or the re6 turn trip starts; and

7 ‘‘(ii) no stops are made for commercial pur8 poses during each Canadian segment of the jour9 ney.’’.

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by section 1 apply with re12 spect to arrivals that are made in the course of journeys

13 described in section 1 and that occur on or after the 15th

14 day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6700

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICKY PAGE REYNOLDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:00-cr-00006-SGW; 7:06-cv-00082-SGW)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 19, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Page Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Page Reynolds seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his

motion for reconsideration. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the

district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive

procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record

and conclude that Reynolds has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 2, 2019

a0624

Order 

Clerk

July 2, 2019

158527

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158527

COA: 344498

Shiawassee CC: 2017-009737-FH

DANIEL PATRICK McCONNELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA)

[Docket No. RSPA-00-7666; Notice 1 and RSPA-00-7408; Notice 1]


Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Integrity Management in High 
Consequence Areas (Natural Gas Pipelines) and Communications (Natural 
Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines)

AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs 
Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting and request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: RSPA published a document in the Federal Register on January 
4, 2001, (66 FR 848) regarding a public meeting to be held February 12-
14, 2001 on Pipeline Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas 
(Natural Gas Pipelines) and Communications (Natural Gas and Hazardous 
Liquid Pipelines). The document contained errors in reference to the 
ending times of the meeting on February 12, 2001 and on February 13, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Callsen, OPS, (202) 366-
4572.

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of January 4, 2001, 66 FR 848, in the 
second column, correct the second full paragraph to read: DATES: The 
public meeting will be on February 12, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., 
February 13, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and February 14, 2001, from 9 
a.m. to 12 noon, at the Crystal City Marriott.

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 5, 2001.
Stacey L. Gerard,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 01-3398 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 112-113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-40,307]


Universal Furniture Limited, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was

[[Page 113]]

initiated on October 29, 2001 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Universal Furniture Limited, 
Goldsboro, North Carolina.
    As active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-38,811A, as amended). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of December, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-32211 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-
72000 and 33-93014 of Leasing Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8, of
our reports dated January 22, 1997 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Leasing Solutions, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Leasing Solutions, Inc.,
listed in Item 14(a)2. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP

San Jose, California
March 28, 1997
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Form10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2006 | /s/ James T. Sartain |                      |
|--------------------|----------------------|---------------------------|
|               |                 | James T. Sartain          |
|               |                 | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    |                      |                           |  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to theForm 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
102 A.3d 1201

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW K. MURRAY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 030461995).

December 5, 2014.

ORDER

This matter have been duly presented to the Court pursuant to *Rule*l:20-10(b), following the granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 14-298 of ANDREW K. MURRAY of POMP-TON PLAINS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of *Rule*1:21-6);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*1.15(d), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XIV-201S-0178E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *Rule*l:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW K. MURRAY of POMPTON PLAINS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *48expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.