alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3637 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to fund prize 

competitions to accelerate innovation in the prevention, diagnosis, and 

treatment of Lyme disease, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to fund prize competitions to accelerate innovation in 

the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LymeX Authorization 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POLICY. 

7 It is the policy of the United States to— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3637 IH

1 (1) engage stakeholders, including academia, 

2 nonprofits, industry, small business, entrepreneurs, 

3 and government to facilitate patient-centered innova4 tions in Lyme disease care; 

5 (2) foster breakthroughs in health education 

6 and public awareness initiatives focused on Lyme 

7 disease patients; and 

8 (3) accelerate development of next-gen 

9 diagnostics that are rapid and patient focused. 

10 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

11 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec12 retary of Health and Human Services $5,000,000 to carry 

13 out prize competitions (as defined in section 24 of the Ste14 venson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 

15 U.S.C. 3719)) to accelerate innovation in the prevention, 

16 diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1682

To repeal the Truth in Savings Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. ORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To repeal the Truth in Savings Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TRUTH IN SAVINGS ACT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle F of title II of the Fed5 eral Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of

6 1991 is hereby repealed.

7 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

8 The table of contents of the Federal Deposit Insurance

9 Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 is amended by

10 striking the item relating to subtitle F of title II of such

11 Act and all that follows through the item relating to

12 section 274.
2

•HR 1682 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF LIABILITY FOR ANY PRIOR VIOLATION.

2 Notwithstanding any provision of the Truth in Sav3 ings Act, no person shall be liable for any violation of such

4 Act, or any regulation prescribed under such Act, which

5 occurred before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 12/17/2001 66 FR 
64969.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: December 19, 2001 10:00 
a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Nos. and Company have been 
added to Item E-70 of the Commission Meeting of December 19, 2001.
    Item No.: E-70.
    Docket No. and Company: ER00-2998-001, ER00-2999-001, ER00-3000-
001, and ER00-3001-001, Southern Company Services, Inc.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-32143 Filed 12-26-01; 4:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW

SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004

December 10, 2012

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 20, 2012

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following 

in open session: Prairie State Generating Co., LLC v. Secretary of 

Labor, Docket Nos. LAKE 2009-711-R, et al. (Issues include 

whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding the 

District Manager’s disapproval of roof control and ventilation 

plans submitted by the operator.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

I, E. Michael Thoben, III, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics,Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2007
#### Magdaline Iyabo BANYONG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1391.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 22, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 9, 2010.

*746Kim-Bun Thomas Li, Li, Latsey & Guiterman, PLLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jem C. Sponzo, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Magdaline Iyabo Banyong, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Banyong’s motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Banyong*(B.I.A. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### Leonard F. RUHL, Appellant, v. Samuel LUPER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee.

No. 12961.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1957.

Gene A. Jones, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the husband of a bankrupt from the judgment of the district court holding that a certain lot in Upper Arlington, Franklin County, Ohio, be subjected to a lien of $5,075, for the benefit of the bankrupt estate of the wife;

And it appearing from a consideration of the briefs and arguments of attorneys and from the record in the case that there was ample substantial evidence to *958support the findings of fact of District Judge Cecil (which were certainly not clearly erroneous) embraced in his opinion, D.C., 148 F.Supp. 888, and that his conclusions of law upon which his decision was based were correctly drawn;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135272 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135272 

 COA: 280100 

Kent CC: 04-005983-FH 

STEVEN MARK HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Kent County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order. The prosecutor shall address the following issues: (1) whether the Michigan 

Department of Corrections (MDOC) has the authority to “cancel” defendant’s discharge 

from parole; and (2) whether the trial court erred by sua sponte amending a judgment of 

sentence, which was valid when entered, based on the MDOC’s “cancellation” of 

defendant’s parole discharge. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

s0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 23, 2008 

 Clerk
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 335 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons 

as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty 

as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. SMITH of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven 

years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 335 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINT2 MENT OF PERSONS AS SECRETARY OF DE3 FENSE WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF RELIEF 

4 FROM ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR COMMIS5 SIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the second sen7 tence of section 113(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

8 the first person appointed, by and with the advice and con9 sent of the Senate, as Secretary of Defense in an appoint10 ment made on or after January 20, 2021, may be a person 

11 who is, on the date of appointment, within seven years 

12 after relief, but not within four years after relief, from 

13 active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular compo14 nent of the Armed Forces. 

15 (b) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—This section applies only 

16 to the first person nominated after 12 p.m. (Eastern 

17 Standard Time) on January 20, 2021, and appointed as 

18 Secretary of Defense as described in subsection (a), and 

19 to no other person. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828186
<NAME> 88A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         208,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,263
<PP&E>                                      10,107,832
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,479,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,002,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,967,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,002,916
<SALES>                                        638,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,472
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            292,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   292,517
<EPS-BASIC>                                      22.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Joel M. HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis G. CHENAIL; et al., Defendants-Appellees, and James Warren Baird, MD, ADC Medical Program Manager; et al., Defendants.

No. 12-16522.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 14, 2014.

Filed April 2, 2014.

Gerald F. Giordano, Jr., Dorris *&*Gior-dano PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Catherine M. Stewart, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Former Arizona state prisoner Joel Hughes appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Drs. Macabuhay and Hegmann in Hughes’ action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging deliberate indifference in the treatment of his Hepatitis B and C. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, *Oswalt v. Resolute Indus., Inc.,*642 F.3d 856, 859 (9th Cir.2011), and we affirm.

Hughes failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Drs. Maca-buhay and Hegmann knew of and disregarded ah excessive risk to Hughes’ health and safety. *See Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1057 (9th Cir.2004). At most, the evidence that Hughes presented demonstrates that the failure of Drs. Macabu-hay and Hegmann to immediately refer Hughes to a liver specialist amounted to negligence. However, “[mjere negligence in diagnosing or treating a medical condition, without more, does not violate a prisoner’s Eighth Amendment rights.” *Id.*(quoting *McGuckin v. Smith,*974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, the district court properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID A. BLUM, M.D., P.A., a/a/o VANESSA MORENO,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4311

[March 14, 2018]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John D. Fry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-12198(70).

Douglas H. Stein of Association Law Group, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Marlene S. Reiss, Miami, and Thomas J. Wenzel of Cindy A. Goldstein, 

P.A., Coral Springs, for appellee.

KUNTZ, J.

We are presented with the following question, certified by the county 

court to be of great public importance: 

PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. § 627.739, IS AN INSURER 

REQUIRED TO APPLY THE DEDUCTIBLE TO 100% OF AN 

INSURED’S EXPENSES AND LOSSES PRIOR TO APPLYING 

ANY PERMISSIVE FEE SCHEDULE PAYMENT LIMITATION 

FOUND IN § 627.736(5)(A)(1), FLA. STAT. (2013)?

We rephrase the certified question as follows:

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 627.736 AND 627.739, FLORIDA 

STATUTES (2013), IS AN INSURER REQUIRED TO APPLY A 

POLICY DEDUCTIBLE TO THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF A 

PROVIDER’S INVOICES TO AN INSURED PRIOR TO 

APPLYING ANY FEE SCHEDULE FOUND IN § 627.736, FLA. 

STAT.?
2

For the reasons explained in our opinion in State Farm Mutual 

Automobile Insurance Co. v. Care Wellness Center, LLC a/a/o Bardon-Diaz, 

No. 4D16-2254 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 14, 2018), also issued today, we answer 

the rephrased certified question in the negative, reverse the county court’s 

summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with 

our opinion in case number 4D16-2254. We also certify conflict with 

Progressive Select Insurance Co. v. Florida Hospital Medical Center a/a/o 

Jonathan Parent, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D318 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 9, 2018).

Reversed and remanded; conflict certified.

FORST, J., concurs.

GROSS, J., dissents with opinion.

GROSS, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissent to the Court’s opinion 

in USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. Gogan a/a/o Tara Ricks, No. 4D16-3313 (Mar.

14, 2018).

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3601 

To authorize physicians and other health care providers of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs to provide information regarding State-approved 

marijuana programs to veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. LAMB (for himself and Mr. MEIJER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to 

the Committees on the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize physicians and other health care providers of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide information regarding State-approved marijuana programs to 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fully Informed Vet5 eran Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3601 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED PROVISION OF INFORMATION ON 

2 STATE-APPROVED MARIJUANA PROGRAMS 

3 TO VETERANS. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZED PROVISION OF INFORMATION.— 

5 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Controlled Sub6 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) or any other Federal, 

7 State, or local law regulating or prohibiting the provision 

8 of information on marijuana, the Secretary of Veterans 

9 Affairs shall authorize physicians and other health care 

10 providers of the Veterans Health Administration of the 

11 Department of Veterans Affairs to provide to veterans who 

12 are residents of States with State-approved marijuana 

13 programs information regarding the participation of such 

14 veterans in such programs. 

15 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) The term ‘‘information’’ includes details 

17 such as informational materials, internet websites, 

18 and relevant contact information for State-approved 

19 marijuana programs. 

20 (2) The term ‘‘marijuana’’ has the meaning 

21 given the term ‘‘marihuana’’ in section 102 of the 

22 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802). 

23 (3) The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 

24 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth 

25 of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3601 IH

1 United States, and each federally recognized Indian 

2 Tribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

October 11, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, October 21, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open

session: Secretary of Labor v. Northshore Mining Company,

Docket No. LAKE 2014-219-M (Issues include whether the Judge

erred in interpreting a regulation that addresses the reporting of eye

injuries.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart Deputy

General Counsel
# I5t7-W ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 02-13-00016-CR OFFENSE: 1.01 Josey Wales Parks v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIALCOURT: County Criminal Court No. 9 DATE: 09/08/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1263051



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Josey Wales Parksv. The St STYLE: Texas :ate of Petition 

# ccA. ISM'M
FORDISCRETIONARYREVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: 

# KZfVSp) JUDGE: 

# date: e>Hl/S'/*Pir JUDGE: fj>^ U*sU*i^ SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD