alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



ZILA, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company  Grantee  Date of Grant
 RECITALS
 Plan
   AGREEMENT
 1. GRANT OF RESTRICTED SHARES  Restricted Shares Stock
 2. RIGHTS OF GRANTEE
 3. RESTRICTIONS ON RESTRICTED SHARES
 A. Limitations on Transfer
 B. Permitted Transfers
 4. LAPSE OF RESTRICTIONS
 A. Schedule
 [INSERT SCHEDULE HERE]
  B. Condition That Must be Satisfied Before Restrictions Lapse
 C. Issuance of Certificates




---



##### 



5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND REPRESENTATION OF GRANTEE
 A. Further Limitations on Disposition
 B. Section 83(b) Election Code
 THE GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS THE GRANTEES SOLE RESPONSIBILITY,
AND NOT THE COMPANYS, TO FILE TIMELY THE ELECTION UNDER SECTION 83(b)
OF THE CODE, EVEN IF THE GRANTEE REQUESTS THE COMPANY OR ITS
REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE THIS FILING ON THE GRANTEES BEHALF.
 6. FEDERAL AND STATE TAXES
 7. ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES
 8. AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT
 9. GOVERNING LAW
 10. SEVERABILITY
 11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  ZILA, INC.By:Its:GRANTEE:
 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-177-005]


Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Negotiated Rate 
Filing

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2001, Maritimes & Northeast 
Pipeline, L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing to become part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheet, to become effective on February 1, 2001:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 9

    Maritimes states that it is filing the above tariff sheet to 
implement a new negotiated rate agreement pursuant to Rate Schedule 
MN365 and section 24 of the General Terms and Conditions of Maritimes' 
FERC Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3425 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## THE ATJXBRNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN.TEXAR 78711 April 14, 1976

The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison Opinion No.'H-907 Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept. Re: Whether redfish of .JohnIi.Reagan Building Austin,,Te%as 78701~ less than fourteen inches may.be lawfullypossessed on board a licensed commercial shrimpboats. Deer Mr. Garrison: You have requested our opinionregarding whether redfish of less than 14 inchesmay be lawfullypossessed aboard a licensed commercial shrimpboat. Section 66.201of the new Parks and Wildlife Code provides: (a) No personmay take frompublic water and retain, or place in a boat, creel, live-box, or other container or on a stringer, a redfish less than 14 inches long. (b) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is punishableby a fine of not less than $25 nor more than $200. Prior to its inclusion in the Parks and Wildlife Code, this provision appeared in the Penal Code as article 931a. The minimum lengthof redfish is also declared to be 14 inches in anotherportion of the Parks and Wildlife Code, section 47.034(c),which dealswith maximum andminimum length of a number of varieties of fish. In 1975, the Legislature added the followingproviso to that section:

p.3405The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison - page 2 (H-807)

The possession of saltwater speciesof fish of greater or lesser length than set out in Subsection (c)of this section on board a licensed commercial shrimp boat engaged in the taking of shrimp or returning to port after taking shrimp is not a violation of this section. Parks and Wildlife Code S 47.034(e). Thus, for purposes of section 47.034,a licensed commercial shrimp boatmay lawfullypossess redfish of less than 14 inches. Since seation 66.201of the Code prescribes the sameminimum length as to redfish, it is our opinion that the exception of section 47.034 is equally applicable to section 66.201. Accordingly( redfish of less than 14 inchesmay be lawfullypossessed aboard a licensed commercial shrimpboat. SUMMARY Redfish of less than 14 inchesmay be lawfullypossessed aboard a licensed commercial shrimpboat. ry trulyyours,

of Texas &PROVED:



## jwb p.3406
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: February 7-9, 2001.
    Open: February 7, 2001, 9 a.m. to 10 a.m..
    Agenda: Reports from various Institute staff.
    Place: Holiday Inn Georgetown, Mirage II, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20007.
    Closed: February 7, 2001, 10 a.m. to adjournment on February 9, 
2001.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Georgetown, Mirage II, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 22, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-335 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9595-9596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 
RCRA, CERCLA, and EPCRA

    Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on January 18, 2001, 
a Consent Decree in United States v. BP

[[Page 9596]]

Exploration & Co., et al., Civil Action No. 2:96 CV 095, was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the Northern District of 
Indiana, Hammond Division.
    In the Second Amended Complaint the United States sought civil 
penalties and injunctive relief against BP Exploration & Co., Amoco Oil 
Company, and Atlantic Richfield Company (hereinafter, ``BP''), pursuant 
to Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act (``CAA''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b) 
(1983), amended by, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7413(b) (Supp. 1991), the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act, (``RCRA''), 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.; the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9603(a) and the Emergency Planning and 
Community Right to Know Act (``EPCRA''), 42 U.S.C. 11004(a) for alleged 
violations at BP's eight refineries located in Whiting, Indiana; 
Toledo, Ohio; Mandan, North Dakota; Salt Lake City, Utah; Texas City, 
Texas; Yorktown, Virginia; Cherry Point, Washington; and Carson, 
California.
    Under the settlement, BP will implement innovative pollution 
control technologies to greatly reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides 
(``NO<INF>X</INF>'') and sulfur dioxide (``SO<INF>2</INF>'') from 
refinery process units and adopt facility-wide enhanced monitoring and 
fugitive emission control programs. In addition, BP will pay a civil 
penalty of $10 million. The States of Indiana, Ohio, Utah, and the 
Northwest Air Pollution Authority, will join in this settlement as 
signatories to the Consent Decree.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. BP Exploration & Co., et al., D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-
07109.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, 1001 Main Street, Suite A, Dyer, Indiana 46311 and at 
U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604. A 
copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
in the amount of $41.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable 
to the Consent Decree Library.

Walker Smith,
Principal Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-3270 Filed 2-07-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         512,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        199,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,212
<SALES>                                         91,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,356
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (607)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.73
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 108-109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under Clean Air Act

    Notice is hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. 
Kenneth McDonald and Nicholas Menegatos, C.A. No. 3:CV-01-0510, was 
lodged on September 11, 2001, with the United States District Court for 
the Middle District of Pennsylvania. This notice was previously 
published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2001 and the public was 
given 30 days to comment. No comments were received. However, because 
of severe disruption in the mail service, the United States is unable 
to conclude with certainty that any comments mailed in response to that 
notice would have been received. As a result, the United States is 
providing this opportunity for any prior persons who previously 
submitted comments to resubmit their comments as directed below.
    The consent decree resolves the United States' claims against 
Defendant Nicholas Menegatos for violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 
U.S.C. 7401-7671q, and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous 
Air Pollutants for asbestos (``asbestos NESHAP''), 40 CFR part 61, with 
respect to the partial demolition of a facility, located in 
Tannersville, Pennsylvania.
    Under the consent decree, Defendant Menegatos, based upon his 
ability-to-pay, has agreed to pay a civil penalty in the amount of 
$2700 and has agreed to take a training course that will familiarize 
him with the Clean Air Act and the asbestos NESHAP regulations.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of twenty (20) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments previously submitted by mail should 
be resubmitted to the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United States v. Kenneth 
McDonald and Nicholas Menegatos, C.A. No. 3:CV-01-0510, DOJ Reference 
No. 90-5-2-1-2217. The comments should be faxed to the Acting Assistant 
Attorney General at 202/616-6583.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 228 Walnut Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
17108; and the Region III Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. A copy of 
the proposed consent decree may be obtained by mail from the

[[Page 109]]

Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please refer to the 
referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $5.75 (.25 cents 
per page production costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert D. Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-32218 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9659-9660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3375]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-01-013]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Chelsea River, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations governing 
the operation of the Chelsea Street Bridge, at mile 1.2, across the 
Chelsea River between East Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts. This 
deviation allows the bridge owner to keep the bridge in the closed 
position from 6 a.m. on February 7, 2001 through 6 a.m. on February 8, 
2001 and from 6 a.m. on February 21, 2001 through 6 a.m. on February 
22, 2001. This action is necessary to facilitate emergency maintenance 
at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from February 7, 2001 through 
February 8, 2001 and from February 21, 2001 through February 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John W. McDonald, Project Officer, 
First Coast Guard District, at (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chelsea Street Bridge, at mile 1.2, 
across the Chelsea River, has a vertical clearance of 9 feet at mean 
high water, and 19 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The 
existing drawbridge operating regulations require the bridge to open on 
signal at all times.
    The bridge owner, the City of Boston, requested a temporary 
deviation from the drawbridge operating regulations to facilitate 
emergency structural maintenance and repairs to the alternate operating 
system at the bridge.
    This deviation from the operating regulations allows the bridge 
owner to

[[Page 9660]]

keep the bridge in the closed position from 6 a.m. on February 7, 2001 
through 6 a.m. on February 8, 2001 and from 6 a.m. on February 21, 2001 
through 6 a.m. on February 22, 2001.
    Thirty days notice to the Cost Guard for approval of this 
maintenance repair was not given by the bridge owner and was not 
required because this work involves vital, unscheduled maintenance that 
must be performed without undue delay.
    Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so 
at all times during the closed period.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is 
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: January 30, 2001.
G.N. Naccara,
U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-3375 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
```
<PAGE>

                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick G. Duffy, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commercial National
Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986)

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 5, 2004

/s/ Patrick G. Duffy
_______________________
Patrick G. Duffy
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
LUIS RODOLFO LOPEZ, § APPELLANT § § VS § APPEAL NO. 05-13-01137-CR 

## § FILEDIN 

# stateoftexas, ^^ | „OURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 232315 motion for an extension of time „ , n 

### ADe/Acosta,Clerk COMES NOW, Luis Rodolfo Lopez, the Appellant herein, and 

### timely request a 45 day extension of time to prepare and tile a Petition for Discretionary Review. In support thereof, Appellant would show:

I On February 12, 2015, Appellant received a copy of the February 2, 2015, Court Opinion delivered by the Dallas Court of appeals at the prison mail room.

II Appellant is proceeding pro se and will require all tne time he can muster in preparing his Petition in the Prison Law Library. Appellant prays the Court will grant.him at least 45 days preparation and filing time

## RPPPlUPflIII Luis Rodolfo Lop ^..Jr^"'"^*"' *•» Polunsky Unit 

## COURTOFGRffJJINALAPPEALS 3872 Fm 350 south 

# FEB192015 iuis RodolfoLopez, ft1874821 

### Livingston, Texas 77351