alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**I, Patrick G. Mackey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Berliner Communications, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report, isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.    Date: November 14, 2005            /s/ Patrick G. Mackey     Patrick G. Mackey  Senior Vice President  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Cite as: Opinion No. 96-011 (February 29, 1996)

(unpublished)

OPEN MEETINGS ACT ) “PUBLIC BODY” ) MARYLAND SCHOOL

FOR THE BLIND NOT SUBJECT TO THE ACT

February 29, 1996

The Honorable John J. Hafer

State Senate

You have requested our opinion whether the Maryland School for the Blind is subject to the

State’s Open Meetings Act. 

In a recent letter of advice, a copy of which is attached, Assistant Attorney General Robert

A. Zarnoch concluded that the Maryland School for the Blind is a private entity and not a “public

body” subject to the Open Meetings Act. In his letter, Mr. Zarnoch laid proper emphasis on the

historical circumstances in which the School’s statutory charter was issued, the absence of

government involvement in the School’s management, and the official recognition accorded the

School’s private character.

We have carefully reviewed the matter and agree with Mr. Zarnoch’s analysis and conclusion.

J. Joseph Curran, Jr.

Attorney General

Jack Schwartz

Chief Counsel

Opinions & Advice

Letter to Senator John J. Hafer from Assistant Attorney General Robert A. Zarnoch.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.46

                         NON-NEGOTIABLE PROMISSORY NOTE


$100,000.00                                          Dated: February 23, 1998


                  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned ("Maker") hereby promises
to pay to the order of Yeshiva Tomchai Tmimim ("Lender"), at 35 Balfour Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11225, upon the earlier of December 31, 1998 or the completion of a
public offering of its common stock, the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND
($100,000.00) DOLLARS AND 00/100. Interest shall accrue from the date hereof at
the rate of twelve percent per annum (or at the highest rate permitted by law,
if lower) on the unpaid principal balance from time to time outstanding.

                  Payment of the principal of, and interest on, this Note shall
be payable at the aforesaid address in the lawful money of the United States of
America, or at such other place as the holder of this Note shall have designated
to the Maker in writing.

                  Maker waives presentment, protest, demand, and notice of
protest, of demand and of dishonor and of nonpayment of this Note and expressly
agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to
time by Lender without in any way affecting the liability of Maker hereof.

                  This Note is not negotiable or assignable by the Lender.

                  This Note will in all respects be governed by and construed in
accordance with the New York Uniform Commercial Code.


                                              ROYAL CANADIAN FOODS CORP.


                                              By:
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Sheldon Golumbia, President
Order entered January 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01297-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.K. AND V.G., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-30160-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 17, 2019 motion to extend time to file brief. We 

GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 22, 2019. We caution 

that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Interlink  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Charles C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/S/  CHARLES C. BEST
-----------------------
Charles C. Best
Chief Financial Officer

July 24, 2006
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2114

___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee ,

v. Gregory Richard Sills, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
.

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ Submitted: September 30, 2022 Filed: October 27, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Gregory Sills appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and imposed a term of imprisonment, followed by an additional term of supervised

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief challenging the

reasonableness of the sentence. After reviewing the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. The sentence is within the statutory limits, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (2016), and is presumptively reasonable because it is within the applicable advisory range under the sentencing guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a); United States v. Petreikis , 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009). The district court sufficiently considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors and did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); Miller , 557 F.3d at 917; see also United States v. Richart , 662 F.3d 1037, 1054 (8th Cir. 2011). The court’s reasoned decision to impose “a sentence above [the] probation officer’s recommendation does not render [Sills’s] sentence substantively unreasonable.” United States v. Wrice , 834 Fed. Appx. 301, 302 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Acclaim Entertainment, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(numbers 333-68667, 333-40025 and 333-51967) filed on Form S-8 and in the
registration statements (numbers 033-59819, 333-45071, 333-72503, 333-71211,
333-69367) filed on Form S-3 of Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated
October 23, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Acclaim
Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of August 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit)
and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule for each of the
years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2001, which report appears in
the August 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acclaim Entertainment, Inc.

Our report dated October 23, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has working capital and stockholders' deficits at August 31,
2001 and a recurring use of cash in operating activities that raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of that uncertainty.


New York, New York
December 7, 2001
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5

<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 27

<S>                                     <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           FISCAL YEAR END
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,887,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,950,566
<PP&E>                                         285,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (23,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,982,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     723,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,982,178
<SALES>                                         14,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,942
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               692,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (689,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (689,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (689,559)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT

 
| **Subsidiary**                          | ** ** | **State of Organization** |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
|                                    |       |                      |
| West Suburban Bank                      |       | Illinois                  |
|                                    |       |                      |
| West Suburban  Insurance Services, Inc. |       | Illinois                  |
|                                    |       |                      |
| Melrose Holdings, Inc.                  |       | Illinois                  |
|                                    |       |                      |
| West Suburban  Management, LLC          |       | Delaware                  |
|                                    |       |                      |
| West Suburban Realty,  LLC              |       | Delaware                  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         (214)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  (3,732)
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    73,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,958
<PP&E>                                         55,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,460
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,477
<SALES>                                        84,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               84,195
<CGS>                                          32,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  32,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (81,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (81,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (81,157)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.002)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         147,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,547,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                   347,954
<INVENTORY>                                  2,738,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,433,301
<PP&E>                                       2,424,160
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,801,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,540,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,516,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       136,318
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (431,996)
<SALES>                                      4,037,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,037,161
<CGS>                                        2,172,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,011,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               347,954
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,222,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,222,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,751,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

November 1, 2017

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, November 15, 2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Alcoa World Alumina, LLC,*Docket Nos. CENT 2015-128-M et al.**(Issues include whether the Judge erred in making negligence andunwarrantable failure determinations because he concluded that a particularminer was not acting as an agent of the operator.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

PHONE NUMBER                

FOR LISTENING TO                       

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
#### Keven A. McKENNA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Sandra POWELL, in her representative capacity; George Healy, in his representative capacity, Defendants, Appellees.

No. 10-1820.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Heard Jan. 3, 2011.

Decided Jan. 27, 2011.

*582Keven A. McKenna pro se, with whom Keven A. McKenna, P.C. was on brief.

Michael W. Field, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Before TORRUELLA, STAHL and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Keven McKenna appeals from an order dismissing his federal court action under the so-called *Younger*doctrine. *See Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971) (requiring district courts to stay or dismiss a federal action in favor of continued prosecution of related state litigation). Defendants Sandra Powell, director of the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, and George Healy, chief judge of the Rhode Island Workers Compensation Court, contend that dismissal was required in light of ongoing state judicial proceedings.

Having read the briefs and record with care, we think this case is a paradigm for *Younger*abstention. We see no reason to expand upon the magistrate judge’s thoughtful report and recommendation, *McKenna v. Powell,*No. 10-017, 2010 WL 2474037 (D.R.I. Apr. 28, 2010), subsequently adopted by the district court, *McKenna v. Powell,*No. 10-017, 2010 WL 2346619 (D.R.I. June 9, 2010). *See, e.g., Mir-Yepez v. Banco Popular de P.R.,*560 F.3d 14, 15 (1st Cir.2009) (“We consistently have espoused the view that when a lower court accurately takes the measure of a case, applies the correct legal rules, and articulates a convincing rationale, ‘an appellate court should refrain from writing at length to no other end than to hear its own words resonate.’ ” (quoting *Lawton v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of Am.,*101 F.3d 218, 220 (1st Cir.1996))). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the judgment below. *See*1st Cir. Loe. R. 27.0(c).

*Affirmed.*
#### Albert RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta KELLY, Warden-Chief; Keith Dawkins, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4; R. Wallace, Treatment Program Supervisor; D. Jones/Shiftlett, Mrs., former TPS; D. Hudson, Grievance Coordinator; D. Bernado, Mrs., Grievance Office/Designer; Witt, Mrs., Offender Records/Designer; Bailey, Mrs., Medical Administrator; Webb, Mrs., LPN Nurse; G.F. Sivels, Mrs., Regional Ombudsman; David Robinson, Regional Director; Evans, Mrs., Offender Records, Designee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7447.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

*720Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Randolph seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Randolph seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Randolph’s motion for transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*