alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
66982 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 248 / Thursday, December 27, 2001 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Rehabilitation Research and

Development Service Scientific Merit

Review Board, Notice of Meeting

The Department of Veterans Affairs

gives notice under Public Law 92–463

(Federal Advisory Committee Act) as

amended, by section 5(c) of Public Law

94–409 that a meeting of the

Rehabilitation Research and

Development Service Scientific Merit

Review Board will be held at the

Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1001 14th Street,

NW, Washington, DC on January 23–24,

2002.

The sessions on January 23–24, 2002,

are scheduled to begin at 8:00 a.m. and

end at 6:30 p.m. The purpose of the

meeting is to review rehabilitation

research and development applications

for scientific and technical merit and to

make recommendations to the Director,

Rehabilitation and Development

Service, regarding their funding.

The meeting will be open to the

public for the January 23 session from

8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. for the discussion

of administrative matters, the general

status of the program, and the

administrative details of the review

process. On January 23 from 9:00 a.m.

through January 24, 2002, the meeting is

closed during which the Board will be

reviewing research and development

applications.

This review involves oral comments,

discussion of site visits, staff and

consultant critiques of proposed

research protocols, and similar

analytical documents that necessitate

the consideration of the personal

qualifications, performance and

competence of individual research

investigators. Disclosure of such

information would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of personal

privacy. Disclosure would also reveal

research proposals and research

underway which could lead to the loss

of these projects to third parties and

thereby frustrate future agency research

efforts.

Thus, the closing is in accordance

with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), and (c)(9)(B)

and the determination of the Secretary

of the Department of Veterans Affairs

under Sections 10(d) of Public Law 92–

92–463 as amended by Section 5(c) of

Public Law 94–409.

Those who plan to attend the open

session should write to Ms. Victoria

Mongiardo, Program Analyst,

Rehabilitation Research and

Development Service (122P),

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810

Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC

20420 (Phone: 202–408–3684) at least

five days before the meeting.

Dated: December 17, 2001.

By the Direction of the Secretary.

Nora E. Egan,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–31829 Filed 12–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-04199]

      ( print page 9611)    
Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on September 19, 2000, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at United States Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, Florida.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 5th day of January 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-3291  Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828186
<NAME> 88A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         204,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  174,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,418
<PP&E>                                      10,105,793
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,455,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,029,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,002,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,029,249
<SALES>                                        304,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            123,463
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,463
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, Scott C. Petersen and Gary H. Ritondaro, the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation (the Company), individually and not
jointly has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Certification as of the 18 day of March, 2003.

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/Scott C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer
|                                            
|/s/Gary H. Ritondaro
Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes ** this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAVIER GOMEZ-PEREZ, AKA

Francisco Perez Gomez, AKA Antonio

Hernandez, AKA Javier Gomez Perez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10271

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01307-DGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Javier Gomez-Perez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month

sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

FILED

JAN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SR/Research 2 08-10271

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Perez’s counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. Gomez-Perez has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

The government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that

Gomez-Perez waived his right to appeal. We grant that motion.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 10.27  2010 Annual Incentive
Program  For
2010, the Company established an annual incentive program (the 2010 Annual
Incentive Program) covering all non-union employees. This program replaced all
prior annual cash incentive programs for non-union employees.  The
2010 Annual Incentive Program provides employees with a target opportunity
based on the competitive level of target opportunity of employees in similar
jobs at market reference companies that is payable in cash if certain company
financial performance, division financial performance, and individual
performance targets during 2010 are attained. Depending on the level of
attainment, payment of the target opportunity may be from 0% to 150%. Payments
are to be made in cash during the first two quarters following the year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000805020
<NAME> UNI-MARTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,993,388
<SECURITIES>                                   407,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,510,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                   132,600
<INVENTORY>                                 15,683,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,230,011
<PP&E>                                     115,529,929
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,474,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,593,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,503,416
<BONDS>                                     40,386,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       728,666
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,818,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,593,782
<SALES>                                    349,636,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           352,200,375
<CGS>                                      267,324,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              359,037,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               104,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,234,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,837,525)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,261,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,575,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                  (1,468,140)
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,044,065)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.91)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                       171,143
<OTHER-SE>                                   (221,343)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ David W. Hempstead

David W. Hempstead

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1617

AN ACT

To authorize the establishment on the grounds of

a nearby university medical center.members of severely ill children being treated atprovide temporary accommodations for familyAffairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, of a facility tothe Edward Hines, Jr., Department of Veterans
IB

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1617

AN ACT

To authorize the establishment on the grounds of the Edward

Hines, Jr., Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital,

Hines, Illinois, of a facility to provide temporary accommodations for family members of severely ill children

being treated at a nearby university medical center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1617 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT FOR

2 USE OF PROPERTY AT EDWARD HINES, JR.,

3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HOS4 PITAL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

6 may enter into a long-term lease or similar agreement with

7 the organization known as The Caring Place at Loyola,

8 Inc., a not-for-profit organization operating under the

9 laws of the State of Illinois, to permit that organization

10 to establish on the grounds of the Edward Hines, Jr., De11 partment of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, a

12 facility to provide temporary accommodations for family

13 members of severely ill children who are being treated at

14 the Loyola University of Chicago Medical Center and

15 other hospitals.

16 (b) CONDITIONS.—An agreement under subsection

17 (a) shall ensure that there shall be no cost to the United

18 States as a result of the property use authorized by that

19 subsection and may permit the use of the property without

20 rent.

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1663

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT BLUE 60.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.12 Pigment Blue 60 (CAS No.

81–77–6) (provided for in

subheading 3204.17.50) ..... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

10 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or
2

•HR 1663 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or

2 after the 15th day after the date of the enactment

3 of this Act.

4 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN

5 ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tar6 iff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provi7 sion of law, upon proper request filed with the ap8 propriate customs officer before the 90th day after

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or

10 withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

11 goods described in heading 9902.32.12 of the Har12 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (as

13 added by subsection (a)) that was made—

14 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

15 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

16 the enactment of this Act;

17 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

18 entry or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after

19 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the * Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation. The HONORABLE MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Uni ted States District Judge for the 1 District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4186

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Michael James Fay, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 1997 Filed: August 4, 1997

___________ Before LOKEN and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and FENNER, District Judge. *

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Fay was convicted of embezzling union funds. Granting his motion for a downward departure, the district court sentenced Fay to three months in prison, six 1 months on work release, three years of supervised release, a $10,000 fine, and an-2-

assessment for costs of c onfinement. Some weeks later, the probation officer advised the court tha t the Bureau of Prisons cannot supervise inmates on work release. Th e court then entered an amended judgment making the six-month term of work release the fir st six months of Fay’s three-year term of supervised release. Accepting tha t modification, Fay moved toclarify the amended judgment so that it specified when he mustpay the assessed costs of confinement. The court entered a second amende d judgment containing that clarification. After servi ng three months in prison, Fay began his term of supervised release. During the first six months -- the work release period -- he violated the conditions of supervised release by lying to his probation officer and submitting forged documents to his new emplo yer. After a violations hearing, the district court revoked supervised re lease and sentenced Fay to two years in prison plus completion of his term o f supervised release and payment of the original fine. On appeal, Fay argues for the first time that the amended judgment violated Rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Crimina l Procedure because he was not present “at t he imposition of sentence.” Therefore, Fay reas ons, the violations occurred during work release under the original judgment, not during supervised release under the invalid amended judgment, so the distri ct court only had author ity to imprison him for the remainder of the six-month work release term
. We conclude that this issue was not properlypreserved. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### SINCLAIR-PRAIRIE OIL CO. et al. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et al.

No. 24335.

Feb. 12, 1935.

Paul B. Mason, Edward H. Chandler, Summers Hardy, and Frank Orr, for plaintiffs in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al., cause No. 24271, this day decided (170 Okla. 517, 41 P. [2d] 453), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.