alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                2065
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         4251
<ALLOWANCES>                                           325
<INVENTORY>                                           6047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     12963
<PP&E>                                                1289
<DEPRECIATION>                                         498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       14920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3547
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             21156
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         10756
<SALES>                                               8969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      8969
<CGS>                                                 5078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         8398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        526
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .12
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1   STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that, to our knowledge:  (a) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (b) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.    By: /s/ Ralph Larry Lyons Date:  April 17, 2007 Ralph Larry Lyons President and Chief Executive Officer    By: /s/ Charles F. Catlett, III Date:  April 17, 2007 Charles F. Catlett, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
3

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE N520

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1720

TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF IN-PERSON HEARINGS 

April 20, 2021

Glynn F. Voisin, Chief Administrative Law Judge:

 In view of the risks presented by the novel coronavirus COVID-19, the Federal Mine 

Safety and Health Review Commission, Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge (OCALJ) 

is, effective immediately, suspending all in-person hearings, settlement judge conferences and 

mediations until August 31, 2021. 

At the discretion of the presiding administrative law judge and in coordination with the 

parties, hearings may proceed by videoconference or by telephone. Similarly, settlement judge 

conferences and mediations may be held by videoconference or by telephone. If the parties agree 

that an evidentiary hearing is not needed, cases may also be presented for a decision on the 

record. 

The parties will be notified if the hearing needs to be rescheduled. OCALJ will reassess 

the risks presented by in-person hearings prior to August 31, 2021, and issue a subsequent order 

informing the public as to whether the suspension of in-person hearings will continue.

If you have any questions with regard to the notice, please contact the presiding 

administrative law judge.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

Glynn F. Voisin,

Chief Administrative Law Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7777

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

IVAN LOWELL DECKARD, a/k/a Joseph Francis

Vale,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District

Judge. (CR-95-45, CA-97-11-4)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivan Lowell Deckard, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ivan Lowell Deckard seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Deckard, Nos. CR-95-45; CA97-11-4 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1997). We deny Deckard's motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

November 28, 2017

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *JeffreyPappas v. CalPortland Company, et al.*,**Docket No. WEST 2016-264-DM (Issuesinclude whether the Judge erred in ruling that the operators had notdiscriminated against the miner by not rehiring him.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lola Kress, U.S. Small Business Administration, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, Jacksonville, Florida 32256-7504, telephone (904) 443-1933.

Steve Tupper,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-31650 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Juan Jose PEREZ, III, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Larry G. SPENCE, Sheriff of Willacy County, his individual capacity; Lupe olivarez, Sergeant, his individual capacity; N/Unknown Coy, Sergeant, his individual capacity; Irma Ambriz, Nurse, her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-40572.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2016.

Juan Jose Perez, III, Teague, TX, pro se.

Eileen Marie Leeds, Guerra, Leeds, Sabo & Hernandez, P.L.L.C., Brownsville, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*239PER CURIAM: *

Juan Jose Perez, III, now Texas prisoner # 1717846, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s grant of summary-judgment and dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Perez filed a civil rights complaint against employees of the Willacy County Jail alleging that they violated his rights while he was a pretrial detainee. Perez’s motion is a challenge to the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997).

Without any citation to the record and without providing any factual background, Perez makes conclusory assertions that the district court erred in failing to appoint counsel and an investigator to assist with his complaint. He does not address the district court’s reasons for granting summary judgment on the substance of his claims against the defendants that they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, they violated provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, they retaliated against him, and they failed to train officials to handle medical needs of pretrial detainees.

Perez has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This court’s dismissal of these appeals as frivolous count as one strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Perez is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Adam M. HANSAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-1218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 22, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 21, 2010.

David P. Olslund, Arnold, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas J. Cawley, Jill Marie Dennis, Hunton & Williams, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adam Hansan appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his case without prejudice for untimely service. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a plaintiff to serve a defendant within 120 days after- a complaint is filed. The district court must extend the 120-day period if the plaintiff shows good cause for his failure to timely serve the defendant. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Additionally, the district court has discretion to extend the period if the plaintiff can *794show excusable neglect for his failure to serve. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b); *Henderson v. United States,*517 U.S. 654, 662-68, 116 S.Ct. 1638, 134 L.Ed.2d 880 (1996). We review a dismissal for untimely or improper service for abuse of discretion. *Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd.,*986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993).

We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Hansan’s case. Service was untimely, as it was made almost fifteen months after the original complaint was filed and over seven months after the case was transferred from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Further, Hansan was unable to establish good cause or excusable neglect justifying the delay. Hansan argues that there was good cause because he was effectively acting pro se while he searched for local counsel after his case was transferred and he believed that the Defendant had already been served. Pro se status, however, is insufficient to establish good cause, even where the pro se plaintiff mistakenly believes that service was made properly. *See McNeil v. United States,*508 U.S. 106, 113, 113 S.Ct. 1980, 124 L.Ed.2d 21 (1993) (“[W]e have never suggested that procedural rules in ordinary civil litigation should be interpreted so as to excuse mistakes by those who proceed without counsel.”); *Jonas v. Citibank,*414 F.Supp.2d 411, 416 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (holding that a pro se plaintiffs mistaken belief that service was proper did not amount to good cause). Additionally, Hansan provided no justification for his seven-month delay in finding local counsel in order to effect proper service, thus failing to demonstrate excusable neglect warranting an extension.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Jay E. Bruna, appellant.

721 N.W.2d 362

Filed September 22, 2006.

No. S-05-529.

Lawrence G. Whelan for appellant.

Jon Bruning, Attorney General, Kevin J. Slimp, and George R. Love for appellee.

Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the briefs and record and having heard oral arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals in *State v. Bruna,*14 Neb. App. 408, 710 N.W.2d 329 (2006), is correct and accordingly affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Affirmed.

Hendry, C.J., not participating.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

December 29, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 3, 2017

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor on behalf of Greathouse, et al. v.

Monongalia County Coal Company, et al., Docket Nos. WEVA

2015-904-D, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling 

that certain bonus plans instituted by the operators interfered with 

miners’ rights under the Mine Act.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 129-339

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of
T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund III, America's
Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate Limited Partnership included in
the accompanying Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000805298
<NAME> T. ROWE PRICE REALTY INCOME FUND III, AMERICA'S
SALES-COMMIS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,468,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   131,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      31,780,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,059,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,952,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,846,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,952,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,280,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,004,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                906,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            906,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   906,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not contained in registrant's unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Partners' capital.
<F3>Not applicable.  Net income per limited partnership unit is
$3.54.
</FN>
        
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,166,358               1,166,358
<SECURITIES>                                   345,223                 345,223
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,783                 244,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,756,364               1,756,364
<PP&E>                                      20,166,587              20,166,587
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,663,373               5,663,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,259,578              16,259,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          239,832                 239,832
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,019,746              16,019,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,259,575              16,259,578
<SALES>                                        595,930               1,162,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               613,248               1,196,916
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               250,566                 481,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,810                   6,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                355,572                 708,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            355,572                 708,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   355,572                 708,837
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.61                   15.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.61                   15.16


</TABLE>