alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,418
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,224
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,071
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,320
<LOANS>                                        143,220
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,868
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,475
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,311
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,382
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,820
<OTHER-SE>                                         380
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 184,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,972
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  425
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    58
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,455
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,096
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 291
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,068
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    931
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         931
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       666
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.04
<LOANS-NON>                                        978
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,975
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,946
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,344
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                        86
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,594
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,052
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            542


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-642-000]


Cottonwood Energy Company LP; Notice of Issuance of Order

February 2, 2001.
    Cottonwood Energy Company LP (Cottonwood) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Cottonwood will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions at market-based rates. Cottonwood also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Cottonwood requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Cottonwood.
    On January 30, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Cottonwood should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Cottonwood is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Cottonwood's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 1, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3254 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In re Helfrich.

On April 26, 2013, this court found James Helfrich to be a vexatious litigator under S.CtPrae.R. 4.03(B). This court further ordered that Helfrich was prohibited from filing an affidavit of disqualification without first seeking leave. On July 18, 2014, Helfrich presented an application to proceed to file an affidavit of disqualification of Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor.

It is ordered by the court that the application to proceed to file an affidavit of disqualification is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9409-9410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2001-8797]


Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Proposed information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation has submitted the following 
emergency processing public information collection request to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.) 
This notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) 
abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of 
the information collections and their expected burden. Comments should 
be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office 
of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, 
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.

DATES: OMB approval has been requested by January 29, 2001

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Utter, NHTSA, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Room 6125, NRD-31, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Utter's 
telephone number is (202) 366-5351.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Title: National Automotive Sampling System Tire Pressure Special 
Study.
    OMB Control Number: New.
    Frequency: One-time only.
    Affected Public: Passenger Motor Vehicle Operator Users of Gasoline 
Stations
    Abstract: The National Automotive Sampling System Tire Pressure 
Special Study is being conducted to respond to Section 13 of the 
Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and

[[Page 9410]]

Documentation (TREAD) Act of 2000. The act directs the Department of 
Transportation to complete rule making to require a warning system in 
new motor vehicles to indicate under-inflated tires within one year of 
enactment. The stringent requirement for enactment of the rule requires 
that needed data on the frequency and pervasiveness of underinflation 
be collected and provided in a short period. This study will assess the 
extent to which passenger vehicle operators are aware of the 
recommended air pressure for their tires, if they monitor air pressure, 
and to what extent actual tire air pressure differs from that 
recommended by the vehicle manufacturer.
    Estimated One-Time Burden: 1,568 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 13,440.

Raymond P. Owings,
Associate Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 01-3105 Filed 2-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Buckett, II, Chairman and Interim Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|                                            
|/s/ John A. Buckett, II                     
|John A. Buckett, II                         
|Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2008
758 S.E.2d 506

#### In the Matter of Samuel Robert DROSE, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001044.

No. 2014-001044.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 19, 2014.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel E. Berce, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 28, 2008



/s/ Daniel E. BerceDaniel E. BercePresident and Chief Executive Officer




---

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris A. Choate, do
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 28, 2008



/s/ Chris A. ChoateChris A. ChoateExecutive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 10-0136

IN RE  C.B.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s second motion for emergency stay, filed March 16, 2010, is granted.  The trial court Order Regarding Payment of Interim Attorneys’ Fees, dated December 9, 2009, and the trial court Order on Motion for Enforcement and Attorneys’ Fees, dated March 12, 2010, in Cause No. 08-17783-S, styled *In the Interest of Trinity, baby of C.B. and A.M., a minor child*, in the 255th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this March 18, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
                           -----------------------

      1.    Members.  The Board of Directors shall appoint an Audit
Committee of at least two members, consisting entirely of directors of the
Board who meet applicable requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

      2.    Purposes, Duties, and Responsibilities.  The Audit Committee
shall represent the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibility
relating to the accounting, reporting and financial practices of the
Company, and shall have general responsibility for surveillance of internal
controls and accounting and audit activities of the Company.  Specifically,
the Audit Committee shall:

            (i)    Recommend to the Board of Directors, and evaluate, the
      firm of independent certified public accountants to be appointed as
      auditors of the Company, which firm shall be ultimately accountable
      to the Board of Directors through the Audit Committee.

            (ii)    Review with the independent auditors their audit
      procedures, including the scope, fees and timing of the audit, and
      the results of the annual audit examination and any accompanying
      management letters, and any reports of the independent auditors with
      respect to interim periods.

            (iii)    Review the written statement from the outside auditor
      of the Company concerning any relationships between the auditor and
      the Company or any other relationships that may adversely affect the
      independence of the auditor and assess the independence of the
      outside auditor as required under Independent Standard Boards
      Standard No. 1.

            (iv)    Review and discuss with management and the independent
      auditors the financial statements of the Company, including an
      analysis of the auditors' judgment as to the quality of the Company's
      accounting principles.

            (v)    Review the adequacy of the Company's internal controls.

            (vi)    Review significant changes in the accounting policies
      of the Company and accounting and financial reporting proposals that
      may have a significant impact on the Company's financial reports.

            (viii)    Review material pending legal proceedings involving
      the Company and other contingent liabilities.

            (ix)    Review the adequacy of the Audit Committee Charter on
      an annual basis.


<PAGE>


      3.    Meetings.  The Audit Committee shall meet as often as may be
deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment, at a minimum once per
year, either in person or telephonically.  The Audit Committee shall meet
in executive session with the independent auditors at least annually.  The
Audit Committee may create subcommittees who shall report to the Audit
Committee.  The Audit Committee shall report to the full Board of Directors
with respect to its meetings.  The majority of the members of the Audit
Committee shall constitute a quorum.


<PAGE>  2
Termination Agreement (Don Schlosser)



 Exhibit 10.12 
 July 1, 2007 
 Varolii Corporation 
 821 2nd Avenue

 Suite 1000, 10th Floor 
 Seattle, WA 98104 
 Termination of Employment Agreement 
 To Whom It May Concern: 
 Effective as of July 1, 2007, in connection with the termination of my service as the Chief Financial Officer of Varolii Corporation and my
transition to part-time employment status, this letter hereby confirms the termination of my Employment Agreement with Varolii Corporation, dated as of June 1, 2006. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Don Schlosser

	Don Schlosser


  

	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Jeffry Shelby

	Jeffry Shelby
	Vice President and General Counsel
2014-0157.

#### Granata v. Stamatakos.

Franklin App. No. 13AP-424, 2013-Ohio-5548. Reported in 138 Ohio St.3d 1471, 2014-Ohio-1674, 6 N.E.3d 1206. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1620

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits for

illegal aliens and to end Federal mandates for States to provide benefits

for illegal aliens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. DREIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits for illegal aliens and to end Federal mandates for States to provide benefits for illegal aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1620 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF DIRECT FEDERAL FINANCIAL

2 BENEFITS AND UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

3 TO ILLEGAL ALIENS; ELIMINATION OF FED4 ERAL REQUIREMENT FOR PROVISION OF ANY

5 STATE BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of the en7 actment of this Act, notwithstanding any other provision

8 of law—

9 (1) no direct Federal financial benefit or social

10 insurance benefit may be paid or otherwise given to

11 any person not lawfully present in the United

12 States, except pursuant to a provision of the Immi13 gration and Nationality Act;

14 (2) no State is required, under title XIX of the

15 Social Security Act, to provide for medical assistance

16 for any person not lawfully within the United States;

17 and

18 (3) no State (or locality in a State) is required

19 under any Federal law to provide any form of aid or

20 assistance (including the provision of educational

21 services) to any person not lawfully within the Unit22 ed States.

23 (b) UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.—No alien who has

24 not been granted employment authorization pursuant to

25 Federal law shall be eligible for unemployment benefits.

26 (c) CONSTRUCTION.—This section—
3

•HR 1620 IH

1 (1) shall not apply to the provision of foreign

2 aid to aliens abroad, and

3 (2) shall not be construed as affecting the

4 rights of States to provide with State funds for any

5 form of assistance for a person not lawfully within

6 the United States.

7 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

8 term ‘‘person not lawfully within the United States’’

9 means any person who at the time the person applies for,

10 receives, or attempts to receive a benefit, aid, or assistance

11 is not a United States citizen, a permanent resident alien,

12 an asylee, a refugee, a parolee, or a non-immigrant in sta13 tus.

Æ
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2008              

#   FY2008

##           Downloads        

fy08budget_0.pdf

fy08budget_0.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 Company
 Periodic
Report
 /s/ Richard B. Berliner

Richard B. BerlinerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 /s/ Albert E. Gencarella

Albert E. GencarellaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 /s/ Patrick G. Mackey

Patrick G. MackeySenior Vice President(Principal Accounting Officer)
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Berliner
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Berliner Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.