alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(First Circuit — Hamilton Co., O., Circuit Court

Jan. Term, 1898.)

Before Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### THE HAUCK BREWING CO v. GISECKE ET AL.

*Bill of Exceptions*— Additions *after signing and sealing*— Effect—

A bill of exceptions is probably rendered invalid where subsequent to its being signed and sealed and allowed special charges asked and refused are added thereto, and the bill, as thus enlarged, is not re-signed and sealed and allowed.

Swing, J.

We think it very doubtful whether there is any bill of *225exceptions here for us to consider. The record discloses that.on March 30, 1895, a bill.of exceptions was allowed, signed and sealed and made a part of the record. And it. further discloses the following entry on the journal of the court:

> “It appearing to the court that the special charges askedl by the plaintiff and the special cnarges asked by the defendant and ruled on by the court were by inadvertence omitted! from the bill uf exceptions, heretofore, to-wit, March 30, 1895, allowed by the court and filed herein, on motion of the defendant it is ordered that the entry allowing said bill of exceptions and the filing thereof be and the same are hereby set aside and held for naught. And now comes the defendant and presents to the court his certain bill of exceptions, embodying all the evidence and the charges of the court, which having been examined by plaintiff’s counsel, and being found by the court to be true, is allowed, signed and sealed, and on motion is hereby made part of the record of this case.”

Which entry was made April 27, 1895.

We find a bill of exceptions among the papers which was signed by the judge, not on March 3 or April 27, but on April 5.

On the cover of the bill appears the following indorsement:

> “The within now includes the special charges inadvertently omitted when the bill was first filed, and it is ordered refiled as of this date.

> “Howard O. Hollister, Judge.

> “April 27, 1895.” .

The journal entry set aside the allowance and signing of the bill as of March 30, and says that the judge on April 27, signed and sealed a true bill which is signed and allowed as a bill of exceptions, but instead' we find the above on the bill, which says the bill is refiled as of that date. Or*226dering a bill to be refiled can hardly be considered as equivalent to signing, sealing and allowing a bill, and was hardly so considered by the judge, as what the judge did was simply to endorse the above words on the cover of the bill, and not in the place usual for the signing of the bill, to-wit, at the end of the bill; and if the bill was not signed and allowed on April 27, 1895, there is admittedly no bill of exceptions here.

*Von Seggern & Dewald,*for Plaintiff.

*Corcoran & Corcoran,*for Defendant.

' But without regard to this question, we have gone over the whole record and considered all the questions raised by the plaintiff in error, with the result that we find no error in the record.

The judgment will therefqre be affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2048WM

_____________ Marc Colley, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Board of Police Commissioners, Kansas * Appeal from the United States City, MO; James F. Ralls, President; * District Court for the Western Jack W. R. Headley, Vice-President; * District of Missouri. Dona Boley, Treasurer; Stacey Daniels, * Dr., Member; Honorable Emanuel * [UNPUBLISHED] Cleaver, ex-officio member, all parties * above in their official capacities as * members and officers, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: October 16, 1997

Filed: November 4, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. At a time when Marc Colley was a Kansas City police officer, Colley wa s involved in a physical altercation with an a rrestee at police headquarters. The incident was captured on police video tape, and the tape was replayed on television. Colley was-2-

late r convicted of assault and lost his job as a police officer. Colley then sued th e members of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City (the Board) contending the Board rel eased the tape to the media in violation of state and federal law. Th e district court granted the Board's motion for judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P.12(c). The district court rejected Colley's state law claims because the tape's release did not violate state law and the Board was entitled to sovereign immunity on Colley's action for invasion of privacy under state tort law. The district court also ruled that Colley could not maintain hi s federal claims against the Board under a respondeat superi or theory. Contrary to Colley's view, Colley's criminal activity is not protected by the federa

l constitutional right to privacy. See Eagle v. Morgan , 88 F.3d 620, 625 (8th Cir. 1996) Having reviewed the district court's grant of judgment on the pleadings de novo using the same standard that governs motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), se e Westcottv . City of Omaha , 901 F.2d 1486, 1488 (8th Cir. 1990), we conclude th e judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R

. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.1

        Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79775), Form S-8 (File No. 333-86320) and
Form S-8 (File No. 333-95997) of Lithium Technology Corporation of our report
dated April 14, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appears in
this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 15, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 99.1 (BDO LOGO)
    
    BDO Seidman, LLP
Accountants and Consultants
    
    1900 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 557-0300
Fax:
           (310) 557-1777
 April 11, 2005 Zila, Inc.
5227 North 7th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014 Dear Sirs/Madams: This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a letter of
preferability from a registrants independent registered public accounting firm whenever there has
been a change in accounting principle or practice. During the quarter ended April 30, 2005, Zila, Inc. (the Company) changed the date of their
annual goodwill impairment test under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, to the first day of their fourth fiscal quarter (May 1, 2005).
According to management of the Company, this change was primarily for the following reasons:  1.
    The impairment test procedures may be carried out during the fourth quarter and up to
the filing of the Companys Form 10-K, which will better align with the Companys annual
planning and budgeting process, resulting in efficiencies and savings in professional
fees.2.
    The change will not delay, accelerate or avoid an impairment charge. A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining the preferability
of accounting principles among alternative principles has not been established by the accounting
profession. Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have reviewed the
pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting, in this particular case on a
subjective basis, and our belief stated below is based on our determination made in this manner. We believe that the Companys change in method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative
practice of accounting, which, based upon the information furnished to us by management of the
Company, is also preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this
belief, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management. We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Zila, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries as of any date or for any period. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not
express, an opinion on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on
the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Zila, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries as of any date or for any period. Very truly yours, /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul D. Meyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|             
|-------------
|PAUL D. MEYER
|             

Paul D. Meyer

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003



A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered March 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00999-CV

LOUIS MARTIN, JR., Appellant

V.

U.S. MERCHANTS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-15757

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s March 12, 2014 unopposed motion to extend appellate deadlines 

and ORDER the reply brief be filed no later than March 24, 2014. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1631 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 98

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1631

                          [Report No. 103-174]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 13, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                  Union Calendar No. 98
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1631

                          [Report No. 103-174]

 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on the District of Columbia

                             July 13, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum 
amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the 
   Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Justice Reform 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY PERMITTED FOR CASES 
              UNDER JURISDICTION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION 
              BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    (a) In General.--Section 11-1321, D.C. Code, is amended by striking 
``$2,000'' and inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to cases filed with the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9717-9718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Subsistence Resource Commission for Lake Clark National 
Park and Preserve has scheduled their meeting for February 15, 2001. 
The meeting will be held at the Park hangar in Port Alsworth, Alaska. 
The meeting will commence at 10:00 am and conclude that afternoon. The 
public is welcome to attend. The following agenda items will be 
discussed:
    (1) Call to order.
    (2) Roll call-Confirm Quorum.
    (3) Introductions.
    (4) Superintendent's Welcome.
    (5) Additions, corrections and agenda approval.
    (6) Approval of SRC meeting minutes.

[[Page 9718]]

    (7) SRC Purpose and Role.
    (8) Status of Membership.
    (9) Report on October 2000 Chair Workshop
    a. NPS Customary Trade Regulations.
    b. Rule Making For 1 Year Resident Zone Requirement.
    c. Revise SRC Charter to Allow Alternates.
    (10) Old Business.
    a. Proposal #33 (Customary and Traditional Use Determination for 
Tuxedni Bay salmon).
    (11) New Business.
    a. Update on 2001-2002 Federal Subsistence Board Proposals.
    (1) Proposal #1 and #2 Statewide-Definitions.
    (2) Proposal #16 Unit 9B-C & T.
    (3) Proposal #19 Unit 9B-Sheep.
    b. Federal Subsistence Fisheries Report.
    (12) Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Report.
    a. Subsistence Program Report.
    b. Resource Program Report.
    (13) Agency Reports and Public Comments.
    (14) SRC Work Session-Prepare correspondence/recommendations.
    (15) Set time and place of next meeting.
    (16) Adjournment.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, February 15, 
2001 and conclude around 4:30 p.m.
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Park Service hangar, Port 
Alsworth, Alaska Phone (907) 781-2218.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Fink, Chief of Operations, 4230 
University Drive, Suite 311, Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Phone (907) 271-
3751 or Karen Stickman, Subsistence Coordinator, 1 Park Place, Port 
Alsworth, Alaska 99653 Phone (907) 781-2218.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commission is 
authorized under Title VIII, Section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Pub. L. 96-487 and operate in 
accordance with provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act. Note 
that under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), transcripts of any 
person giving public comments may be made available under a FOIA 
request.

Ralph Tingey,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-3351 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert G. LaVigne, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Farmstead Telephone Group, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.    The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and

2.    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


Dated:  April 7, 2006

/s/ Robert G. LaVigne
---------------------
Robert G. LaVigne
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. (S)1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Power Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Jeffrey Macartney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/ R. Jeffrey Macartney
                                                       ------------------------
                                                        R. Jeffrey Macartney
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        March 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   208293
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     162683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1001712
<PP&E>                                           38023
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2376125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         01379063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7086
<OTHER-SE>                                      997062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2376125
<SALES>                                          66965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 93568
<CGS>                                            34468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   235442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (4439)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (224375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (224375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>