alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Panel for Biological Infrastructure (#1215).                    

*Date and Time:*                         Monday-Tuesday, February 26 and 27, 2001 8 a.m.-6 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         4121 Wilson Blvd., Stafford II Room 565, Arlington VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gerald Selzer, Program Director Biological Instrumentation and Multi-User Equipment, National Science Foundation, Rm. 615, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 292-8470.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposal for acquisition of Biological Instrumentation and Multi-User Equipment (MUE) Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under (4) and (6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: January 31, 2001.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-3338  Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEAH M. NELSON,

Appellant,

v.

KENNETH ALAN NELSON, II,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3660

[March 5, 2020]

Appeal and cross appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Robert L. Pegg, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312016DR000138.

Dave Krupski of Dave Krupski, Esq., PLLC, Ponte Vedra Beach, for 

appellant.

Amy D. Shield and Roger Levine of Shield & Levine, P.A., Boca Raton, 

and Bradley W. Rossway of Rossway Swan Tierney Barry Lacey & Oliver, 

P.L., Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Michael Thoben, III,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the           Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and


(2) The information contained in the
Report           fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results           of operations of the Company.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ E.
Michael Thoben, IIIE. Michael Thoben, III
Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 13, 2002 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1399

PATRICK J. MUHAMMAD, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS; ROBERT M. BELL; IRMA S. RAKER; 

ALAN M. WILNER; DALE R. CATHELL; GLENN T. HARRELL, JR.; 

LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA; CLAYTON GREENE, JR., all to be located 

at Robert C. Murphy Court of Appeals Building, 361 Rowe 

Boulevard Annapolis, MD 21401; STATE OF MARYLAND; BOB 

ERHLICH, Governor; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; GARY W. 

KUC; MELVIN HIRSHMAN; MARIANNE LEE; ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE NEWSPAPER; JANE 

DOE NUMBER 2; MARVIN J. GARBIS, in his individual and 

professional capacities; CATHERINE C. BLAKE, in her 

individual and professional capacities; JANE DOE NEWSPAPER, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:06-cv-03444-CCB) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 
Patrick J. Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. William Ferris Brockman, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Patrick J. Muhammad appeals the district court’s 

orders dismissing his civil rights complaint for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration of that 

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Muhammad v. Md. Ct. of Appeals, No. 1:06-

cv-03444-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 11 & Mar. 6, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

October21, 2016

 

 

TIMEANDDATE:                2:00p.m., Wednesday,November9, 2016

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillconsiderandactuponthefollowinginopen

session:*Secretary****ofLaborv.ConsolPennsylvaniaCoalCompany,LLC,*DocketNo.PENN2013-385(IssuesincludewhethertheJudgeerredinmakinghighnegligenceandunwarrantablefailure findings.)

 

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

MEETING:                             1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode:493-925

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

April 25, 2016

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 4, 2016

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Closed

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in closed session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.,*Docket No. WEVA 2011-283 (Issues includewhether the Administrative Law Judge erred by concluding that the violation inquestion was not significant and substantial and was not the result of anunwarrantable failure to comply.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahStewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
2014- 0642.

#### Baldwin v. Cusma.

Stark App. No. 2013CA00145, 2014-Ohio-905. This cause came for further consideration upon appellee’s filing of the motion to strike memo opposing motion to strike affidavit of Greg SvRobey. It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.
#### Darryl L. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Eugene K. Carlton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-8060.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 7, 2014.

Decided: April 16, 2014.

Darryl L. Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Cook v. United States,*No. 0:13-cv-02524-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *257court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 21, 2015 106185

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JORGE MARRERO, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: March 31, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ.

__________ Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Michael K. Gould of counsel), for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered August 15, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the first degree. Defendant was charged in an indictment with numerous crimes following an incident in which he shot his girlfriend in the face at close range causing her serious injuries and rendering her blind in both eyes. In full satisfaction of the indictment, he pleaded guilty to assault in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. In accord with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to 18 years in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals.-2- 106185

Defendant's sole claim is that his sentence is harsh and excessive. However, given defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal, we are precluded from considering it (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Brown, 125 AD3d 1049, 1049 [2015]). We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction. Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1676

To require the President to submit a plan for financing the losses from 
the resolution of savings and loan associations as a condition for the 
      authorization of additional appropriations for such losses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Grams (for himself, Mr. Leach, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Armey, Ms. 
Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. King, Mr. Ramstad, and Mr. 
Baker of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the President to submit a plan for financing the losses from 
the resolution of savings and loan associations as a condition for the 
      authorization of additional appropriations for such losses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RTC Fiscal Accountability Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONAL FUNDING.

    Section 21A(i) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 
1441a(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Conditional funding.--No amount is authorized to be 
        appropriated to the Corporation under any provision of law 
        unless--
                    ``(A) the President transmits a plan to the 
                Congress to finance the losses incurred by the 
                Corporation after the date of the enactment of the 
                Resolution Trust Corporation Conditional Funding Act of 
                1993;
                    ``(B) the plan transmitted--
                            ``(i) provides for the payment of such 
                        losses over a period of not more than 5 years;
                            ``(ii) allows no increase in the public 
                        indebtedness of the United States after the end 
                        of such period with respect to such payments; 
                        and
                            ``(iii) allows no increase in tax revenues 
                        or revenue enhancements in any manner with 
                        respect to such payments; and
                    ``(C) the plan is transmitted to the Congress not 
                less than 30 days after the date of the enactment of 
                such Act.''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

FREDRICK EARL TAYLOR,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 370 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: September 29, 2008

|/s/ Stephen T. Wills                                                                                        | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Stephen T. Wills, Executive
        Vice President andChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marcus Q . Butler , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00042

- CV v.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice

, Appellee Appeal from the 12th District Court of

Madison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 18

- 16128 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice van Cleef

, Chief Justice Stevens

and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecu tion . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Marcus Q . Butler , has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 14, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### Avtar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73918.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Robert Bradford Jobe, Esquire, Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Michael Christopher Heyse, Trial, OIL, Edward Earl Wiggers, Esquire, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief *84Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Agency No. [ AXXX-XXX-XXX ].

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We grant Singh’s second motion for an extension of time to file a petition for panel rehearing.

Singh’s petition for panel rehearing is granted and the memorandum disposition filed on July 7, 2010, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition is being filed concurrently with this order.

No further petition for panel rehearing may be filed; however, petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed with respect to the amended memorandum.
1

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND

HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

)

POCAHONTAS COAL CO., LLC, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-395-R

v. ) WEVA 2014-1028

) WEVA 2014-854

SECRETARY OF LABOR, ) 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH )

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), )

)

Respondent. )

)

RESPONSE TO COMMISSION’S JULY 19, 2018 ORDER

 The Secretary was unaware that Pocahontas was going to file its motion to 

withdraw its PDR under seal, and does not believe that there was any reason 

for Pocahontas to file the motion (and any attachments) under seal.

Consequently, attached to this response is a copy of the Secretary’s July 17, 

2018 response with the “under seal” designation removed. 

KATE S. O’SCANNLAIN

Solicitor of Labor

APRIL E. NELSON

Associate Solicitor

ALI A. BEYDOUN

Counsel, Appellate Litigation

/s/Edward Waldman

EDWARD WALDMAN

Attorney

201 12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5414

(202) 693-9344(o)/(202) 693-9392(f)
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on July 26, 2018, I served a copy of the foregoing response

(with attachment) to the Commission’s July 19, 2018 order via electronic mail 

on:

Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Esq.

Jason M. Nutzman, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Jason.Nutzman@dinsmore.com

Robert.Beatty@dinsmore.com

/s/Edward Waldman

EDWARD WALDMAN

Attorney
Exhibit 21.1


                          dick clark productions, inc.

                            Subsidiaries & Affiliates


dick clark film group, inc.
dick clark presentations, inc.
dick clark media archives, inc.
dick clark restaurants, inc.
C & C Joint Venture
dick clark corporate productions, inc.
Metcalf Restaurants, Inc.
Reno Entertainment, Inc.
Dick Clark's American Bandstand Club-Reno
Buckeye Restaurants, Inc.
Hoosier Entertainment, Inc.
Kenwood Entertainment, Inc.
King of Prussia Entertainment, Inc.
dick clark company - nashville, inc.
St. Ann Entertainment, Inc.
Austin ABG, Ltd.
Austin ABG Partners, Inc.
ABG Operating (Austin), Inc.
Austin Concessions, Inc.
Maybe Productions, Inc.
Family Secrets Productions, Inc.
Bandstand Holdings, Inc.
Matt Jon Productions, Inc.
Click Records, Inc.
Grapevine ABG, Ltd.
ABG Operating (Grapevine), Inc.
dc entertainment, inc.
CPI Productions, Inc.
American Bandstand Records, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7184

ROBERT F. SPIGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES AUSTIN, Chief of the City of Columbia; BOB COBLE, Mayor of Columbia; T. C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; LEON LOTT, Sheriff of Richland County; P. O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA01-49-3) Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert F. Spigner, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Alice Price Adams, David Leon Morrison, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert F. Spigner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Spigner v. Austin , No. CA-01- 49-3 (D.S.C. June 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 28, 2014*

[Cite as *07/28/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3268.]

*1490DISCIPLINARY CASES

2012-1768.

#### In re Resignation of LaCivita.

This cause came on for further consideration upon movant’s filing on June 11, 2014, of a notice of failure to comply with May 2, 2014 court order. In addition, on July 21, 2014, respondent filed a response to an order to show cause.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that this matter is held in abeyance until the Clients’ Security Fund makes a determination regarding Donna Rose’s claim. It is further ordered that respondent shall immediately file a notice with the court once a determination is made.