alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1775

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include services provided

by interns and residents at Federally-qualified health centers that provide

services in a rural area in determining the amount of payment to hospitals under part A of the medicare program for the indirect costs

of medical education.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. PAYNE of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include

services provided by interns and residents at Federallyqualified health centers that provide services in a rural

area in determining the amount of payment to hospitals

under part A of the medicare program for the indirect

costs of medical education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Federally-Quali5 fied Health Center Resident Training Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1775 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR INDIRECT COSTS OF

2 GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROVIDED

3 IN CERTAIN RURAL FEDERALLY-QUALIFIED

4 HEALTH CENTERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(iv) of the

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(iv)) is

7 amended by inserting after ‘‘the hospital’’ the following:

8 ‘‘or providing services at any Federally-qualified health

9 center (as defined in section 1861(aa)(4)) that provides

10 services in a rural area (if the hospital incurs all, or sub11 stantially all, of the costs of the services furnished to the

12 hospital by such interns and residents)’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) shall apply to cost reporting periods begin15 ning on or after October 1, 1993.

Æ
#### Roberto CONDE-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72986.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*112Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

Hardeep Singh Rai, Indus Law Group LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Francis William Fraser, I, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Conde-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law, including claims of due process violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Conde-Rodriguez’s motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to show he was prejudiced by his former counsel’s representation. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 899-900 (9th Cir.2003) (prejudice results when counsel’s performance “was so inadequate that it may have affected the outcome of the proceedings”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Conde-Rodriguez’s contentions that the BIA failed to apply the correct legal standard and failed to consider the evidence he submitted with his motion to reopen are belied by the record.

To the extent Conde-Rodriguez seeks an order remanding to the BIA to reinstate his voluntary departure period, we lack jurisdiction to grant that request. *See Garcia v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir.2004) (order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      25,237,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      34,664,880
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                447,780,928
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    522,408,459
<ALLOWANCE>                                (8,893,098)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,095,359,510
<DEPOSITS>                                 886,180,891
<SHORT-TERM>                                72,950,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         35,996,821
<LONG-TERM>                                 26,050,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,185,897
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,995,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,095,359,510
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,423,562
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           18,318,306
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               182,123
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            38,923,991
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          18,310,166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,936,050
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       18,987,941
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             132,021
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             18,291,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,056,818
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,978,818
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,978,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.52
<LOANS-NON>                                  9,309,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,073,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,355,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,023,011
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  101,000
<RECOVERIES>                                 (177,000)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            8,893,098
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,850,681
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      5,042,417
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1650 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1650

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,7,11,15 tetramethyl-l-hexadecen-3-
                                  01.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,7,11,15 tetramethyl-l-hexadecen-3-
                                  01.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,7,11,15 TETRAMETHYL-L-HEXADECEN-3-01.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12   3,7,11,15 Tetramethyl-l-                 No change      No change      On or before     
                         hexadecen-3-01 (CAS No. 505-                                           12/31/97        
                         32-8) (provided for in                                                                 
                         subheading 2905.22.20)......  Free                                                     
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT #11
                         ENVIRONMENTAL POWER CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net earnings available to shareholders                                         $      4,613,863

Effect of dividends to preferred shareholders                                  $        (30,178)
                                                                               -----------------

Net earnings available to common shareholders                                  $      4,583,685
                                                                               =================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                           11,120,893

Basic earnings per common share                                                $           0.41



DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net earnings available to shareholders                                         $      4,613,863

Effect of dividends to preferred shareholders                                  $        (30,178)
                                                                               -----------------

Net earnings available to common shareholders                                  $      4,583,685
                                                                               =================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                           11,120,893

Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options                                              138,972
                                                                               -----------------

Weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding                           11,259,865
                                                                               =================

Diluted earnings per common share                                              $           0.41
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We
  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
  Forms S-8 File Nos. 333-120841; 333-109915; 333-91330; 333-11530; 333-09134
  and 333-06098 of our report dated March 8, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
  financial statements of Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd. included in its annual
  report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission.

|12
      York Gate
      Regent's Park
      London NW1 4QS
      May 31, 2005 | /s/BLICK ROTHENBERG
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------
|BLICK
      ROTHENBERG 
      CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
      REGISTERED AUDITORS 
|                                                                               |                    

-61-

---
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, I, Paul
H.  Metzinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies,
Inc.,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     a)   such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
          for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2003, fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     b)   the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2003,
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.


                                      /s/Paul  H.  Metzinger
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Paul H. Metzinger, Chief Executive Officer
                                      &  President

Date:  February 17, 2004


               A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section
               906  has  been provided to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and will
               be retained by NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
               Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1


August
4, 2006


Mr. Stephen W. Bershad

66 Arroyo Hondo Trail

Santa Fe, NM  87508


Dear
Mr. Bershad:


Reference is made to the Employment Agreement, dated October 12, 2000
(the “Employment Agreement”), between Axsys Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
and you.


The Company desires to extend the Initial Period (as defined in Section
2(a) of the Employment Agreement) until October 12, 2007, subject to the
earlier termination of the Initial Period by you in your sole discretion or by
the Company, acting through its Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, by
30 days’ prior written notice to the other.


If the foregoing extension of the Initial Period meets with your
approval, please indicate your acceptance in the space provided below.


	
  

  	
  AXSYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Eliot M. Fried

  
	
   

  	
  A member of the Compensation Committee

  
	
   

  	
  of the Board of Directors

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and Agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Stephen W. Bershad

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen W. Bershad
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 11, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00492

- CV

Eric HOYELA , Jes us Oyuela, Cynthia Arredondo, Emede Barrera, Jose Leon Garcia Jr., Edelmira Gomez, Jorge Solis, Jorge Alberto Barrera, Jose Saenz, Alvaro Pena, Erika Madariaga, Gina Madariaga, Ester Madariaga, Maria Lamar Trevino, and Monica Aguirre

, Appellant s

v.

STARR COUNTY

, Texas

, Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 16

- 514 The Honorable Everardo Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellants have filed a motion for leave to file a motion for extension of time to file appellants’ brief. No motion for leave is required. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d). We therefore deny the motion for leave as moot.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 11

Statement Regarding the Computation of Basic and Diluted Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1999           1998            1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>            <C>
Basic EPS weighted-average shares outstanding              11,719,983     11,561,232     11,496,668
Effect of dilutive securities-stock options                   233,929        309,731        241,044
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted EPS weighted-average shares outstanding            11,953,912     11,870,963     11,737,712
====================================================================================================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Group Management
Corp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lamar Sinkfield, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lamar Sinkfield
    ---------------------------
    Lamar Sinkfield
    Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-040]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 31, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing and approval a Gas 
Transportation Agreement between Tennessee and AFG Industries, Inc. 
(AFG) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A (FT-A Agreement) and a 
copy of a January 26, 2001 Firm Transportation Negotiated Rate 
Agreement entered into between Tennessee and AFG (Negotiated Rate 
Agreement). The filed FT-A Agreement and the Negotiated Rate Agreement 
reflect a negotiated rate arrangement between Tennessee and AFG to be 
effective February 1, 2001 through October 31, 2010.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3442 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40508 Summary Calendar

LINDA F. JOHN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CLEAR LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston (USDC No. 05-40508)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed for these reasons: 1. The court did not abuse its discretion by denying a continuance for discovery. The failure of counsel to take the deposition earlier or respond to notices of the pending motion for summary judgment do not excuse the2 delay. And no particular reason was given to explain the need for the late deposition. 2. The deposition was not filed within the discovery period. Plaintiff did not suggest to the district court or this court any material evidence obtained by the Walker deposition. AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 374 

To prohibit the availability of United States contributions to the World 

Health Organization until Congress receives a full report on China and 

the COVID–19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2021 

Mrs. BOEBERT (for herself, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. BUDD, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. GAETZ, and Mr. ROUZER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the availability of United States contributions 

to the World Health Organization until Congress receives 

a full report on China and the COVID–19 pandemic, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘World Health Organi5 zation Accountability Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 374 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

2 No Federal funds authorized to be appropriated or 

3 otherwise made available for United States contributions 

4 to the World Health Organization or for United States 

5 participation in any of the activities of the World Health 

6 Organization may be obligated or expended until the date 

7 on which the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 

8 Health and Human Services jointly submit to Congress 

9 a report describing the manner and extent to which the 

10 handling by the World Health Organization and the Gov11 ernment of the People’s Republic of China of the COVID– 

12 19 outbreak prior to March 11, 2020, contributed to the 

13 emergence of the COVID–19 global pandemic. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS