alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1653 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1653

         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12   6-chloro-2-amino toluene; 6-             No change      No change      On or before     
                         chloro-ortho-toluidine; 3-                                             12/31/97      ''
                         chloro-2-methyl aniline                                                               .
                         benzenamine; and 3-chloro-2-                                                           
                         methyl (CAS No. 87-60-5)                                                               
                         (provided for in subheading                                                            
                         2921.43.10).................  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           97000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   107017
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     374399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                716960
<PP&E>                                          458703
<DEPRECIATION>                                  102089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1298387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1104191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11132
<OTHER-SE>                                      183064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1298387
<SALES>                                        4523726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4523726
<CGS>                                          3898113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3898113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1751630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               25587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1156985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1156985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1156985)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.109)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.109)


</TABLE>
*********************************************** 

The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was 

released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions 

and petitions for certification is the “officially released” 

date appearing in the opinion. 

All opinions are subject to modification and technical 

correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut 

Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of 

discrepancies between the advance release version of an 

opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut 

Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports 

or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest version is to 

be considered authoritative. 

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the 

opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and 

bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the 

Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not 

be reproduced and distributed without the express written 

permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. 

*********************************************** 
STATE v. MIRANDA—CONCURRENCE

D’AURIA, J., with whom PALMER, J., joins, concurring in the judgment. I concur in this court’s judgment

affirming the conviction of the defendant, Pedro L.

Miranda, of one count of murder in violation of General

Statutes § 53a-54a. I agree fully with part I of that opinion. As to part II, I would not hold that the defendant

failed to adequately preserve the claim that the trial

court improperly permitted the victim’s mother to testify that she had heard that the defendant was connected to the victim’s disappearance. Mather v. Griffin

Hospital, 207 Conn. 125, 138, 540 A.2d 666 (1988) (claim

‘‘distinctly raised’’ although ‘‘not well articulated’’); see

also Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 281

Conn. 719, 729 n.12, 917 A.2d 540 (2007) (court will

address issues ‘‘ ‘functionally’ ’’ raised in trial court). I

believe that reviewing his claim would neither offend

this court’s preservation principles nor ambush either

the trial court or the opposing party. I also do not agree

that the defendant failed to adequately brief any part

of his argument as to this claim. Because the defendant

has not demonstrated that the scant evidence elicited

from the victim’s mother by the state’s question resulted

in harm, however, I concur in the majority’s decision

to affirm the trial court’s judgment. See State v.

Urbanowski, 327 Conn. 169, 172, 172 A.3d 201 (2017)

(affirming judgment without reaching merits of defendant’s evidentiary claim because lack of any demonstrated harm).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 96M-0311]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Public Health Service Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 18, 2000 (65 FR 62359), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0456.  The approval expires on January 31, 2004.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: February 2, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-3320 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE:  3510-22-S
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  January      15, 2010 |   /s/ Margaret M.      Loebl           |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Margaret      M. Loebl                           |
|                                   | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and |
|                                   | Treasurer                                        |

----
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 6, 2014*

[Cite as *06/06/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2424.]

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2008-0822.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. DiAlbert.

On application for reinstatement of John Eugene DiAlbert, Attorney Registration No. 0030101. Application granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio, with a two-year monitored probation.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133097 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DAVID HOLUBOWICZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133097 

 COA: 270992 

Jackson CC: 05-004698-CD 

JACKSON COUNTY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial Innovation—(1194).                    

*Date and Time:*                         April 17, 25, and 26 2001; 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 330 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 and Rooms II-595 and II-545 National Science Foundation Conference Floor, Stafford II Bldg, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Ronald Rardin, Program Director, DMII, (703) 292-8330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington VA 22230.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Unsolicited proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 5, 2001.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-3336 Filed 2-08-01; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
*Pursuant to 5th CIR.R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR.R. 47.5.4.

-1-

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41514

DEWEY GLYNN DAILY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department 

of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal for the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:97-CV-697)

March 8, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PRE CURIAM:*

Dewy Glynn Daily appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

In light of our recent decisions in Flanagan v. Johnson, 154

F.3d 196 (5th Cir. 1998), and Fields v. Johnson, No. 98-10012 (5th

Cir. October 28, 1998), the Attorney General of the State of Texas

now concedes that Appellant’s habeas corpus petition was timely

filed under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of

1996. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the district court and

remand the case for further proceedings.
-2-

VACATED AND REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                3834
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3207
<ALLOWANCES>                                           269
<INVENTORY>                                           2633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      9987
<PP&E>                                                1107
<DEPRECIATION>                                         430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       11797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1262
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             20680
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          9697
<SALES>                                               9430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      9430
<CGS>                                                 4835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        308
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    308
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .07
        

</TABLE>
107 A.3d 677

#### IN THE MATTER OF RAYMOND GOODWIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 013131980).

February 12, 2015.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-142, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to *Rule*l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that RAYMOND GOODWIN of SOMERSET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 20, 2011, should be censured for violating *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and *RPC*8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND GOODWIN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent remain suspended from the practice of law pursuant to the Order filed September 20, 2011 (D-5-11; 069123) pending his compliance, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

*488ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4259]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2000, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Facemate Corporation, Somersworth, New Hampshire. Workers produce cotton flannel cloth.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of January, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-3307  Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M