alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of President



I, Wm. Lee Popham, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Admiral Financial Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: May 12, 2009



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, President
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-34]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Algona, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Algona, IA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, March 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on November 20, 
2000 (65 FR 69662). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on March 22, 2001. No adverse 
comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct 
final rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on January 22, 2001.
Richard L. Day,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 01-3650 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132050 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 132050 

 COA: 267816

 Wayne CC: 86-683235 
 CHARLES JEROME BENSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Paul D. Meyer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 22, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-022]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aero-Space Technology Advisory 
Committee (ASTAC); Aviation Operations Systems Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Aero-
Space Technology Advisory Committee, Aviation Operations Systems 
Subcommittee meeting.

DATES: Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday, March 
29, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research 
Center, Building 262, Room 100, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Robert A. Jacobsen, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett 
Field, CA 94035, 650/604-3743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Aviation Operations Systems Program Review
--Aircraft Icing Research Project Review
--Human Automation Integration Research Project Review
--Human Error and Countermeasures Research Project Review
--Psychological/Physiological Stressors and Factors Research Project 
Review

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: February 6, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-3478 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133300 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133300 

 COA: 273883 

Macomb CC: 2002-001166-FH 

FAITH ANN MORTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
|                                  |  |                                  
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Information Analysis Incorporated |  | 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Sandor Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer of Information Analysis Incorporated, a Virginia corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



| | 1 | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ Sandor Rosenberg                                                           
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Sandor Rosenberg, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Information Analysis
Incorporated and will be retained by Information Analysis Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary information extracted from the financial
statements of the December 31, 1996 Form 10K of Resources Accrued Mortgage
Investors 2 L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by reference for such
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,873,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,884,983
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,501,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,370,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,501,016
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,794,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,670,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            123,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 3

- 0319

_____________________________ S ANCHEZ M. D AVIS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ircuit Court for Jackson County

. Ana M. Garcia , Judge

. May 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Luke Newman of Luke Newman, P.A. , Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

TIME AND DATE:

PLACE:

STATUS:

MATTERS TO BE
CONSIDERED:

CONTACT PERSON
FOR MORE INFO:

November 24, 2014

10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 4, 2014

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from
F Street entrance)

Open

The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open
session: Secretary of Labor v. Brody Mining, LLC, Docket Nos.
WEVA 2009-1000, et al. (Issues include whether the
Administrative Law Judge erred by vacating certain “significant
and substantial” designations and “unwarrantable failure to
comply” designations.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD
Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

LIL usr b-

Sarah L. Stewart
Deputy General Counsel
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Harry Ng, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Hector Candelas, Respondent. NO. DECIDED Stephen David Fink, Esq., for appellant. The Law Offices of Perry Ian Tischler, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Sally E. Unger, J.), entered September 16, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the principal sum of $10,000 based upon defendant's failure to repay a loan. Defendant interposed an answer which contained several affirmative defenses but did not assert a statute of frauds defense. Defendant moved for summary dismissing the complaint on the grounds, among other things, that the action is barred by the statute of frauds and that plaintiff did not plead or prove the essential elements of the loan. Plaintiff opposed the motion, arguing that he had given defendant a $10,000 check on which he had written, in the memo section, that the money was being given as a loan and that defendant had, in fact, acknowledged the loan since he had repaid $200 of it. The Civil Court granted defendant's motion solely on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of frauds. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the court should not have granted defendant's motion based on the statute of frauds since defendant had waived this defense.</p><p>The Civil Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was barred by the statute of frauds since defendant had waived the affirmative defense of the statute of frauds by failing to assert it either in his answer to the complaint or in a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint (<i>see </i>CPLR 3211 [a] [5]; [e]; <i>23/23 Communications Corp. v General Motors Corp.</i>, 257 AD2d 367 [1999]; <i>Con-Solid Contr. v Litwak Dev. Corp.</i>, 236 AD2d 437 [1997]; <i>see also </i>CPLR 3018 [b]).</p><p>The other grounds asserted in support of defendant's summary judgment motion are without merit.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<p>Paul Kenny</p><br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: April 07, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

March 3, 2017

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Thursday,March 16,2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillconsiderandactuponthefollowinginopen

session:*SecretaryofLaborv.BussenQuarries,Inc.,*DocketNo.CENT2015-385.(IssuesincludewhethertheJudgeerredinconcludingthattheoperatorhadviolatedthemandatorystandardgoverningthe requirementto use fallprotection.)

 

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

ARGUMENT:1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode:129-339

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,977
<SECURITIES>                                    58,271
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 249,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        184,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,607
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,194
<SALES>                                          4,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,881
<CGS>                                            3,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    130
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>