alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                  |  |                                
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Information Analysis Incorporated |  | 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8,
No. 333-05136 and No. 333-138836) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Information Analysis Incorporated and in the related prospectuses of our report dated March 30, 2011 with respect to the 2010
and 2009 financial statements of Information Analysis Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K).

/s/ Reznick Group, P.C.

Vienna, Virginia

March 31,
2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3714 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3714

    To require recipients of coronavirus relief funding to publicly 
      disclose how such funds were spent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require recipients of coronavirus relief funding to publicly 
      disclose how such funds were spent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Where's our Money Going Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCOUNTABILITY FOR CORONAVIRUS RELIEF SPENDING.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 6 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, each State or local government that received 
funding under any law specified in subsection (c) shall submit a report 
to Congress detailing the funding amounts received and a description of 
how such funds were spent. Such report shall be made publicly available 
on a State or local government website.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any State or local government that fails to 
comply with the requirement in subsection (a) shall be liable to the 
Federal Government for the repayment of any such funds received and 
shall be ineligible for any future coronavirus relief funding otherwise 
made available after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Applicable Laws.--The laws specified under this subsection are 
the following:
            (1) The Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental 
        Appropriations Act, 2020.
            (2) The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.
            (3) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021.
            (4) The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Berliner Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the " Company "),
      does
      hereby certify that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
      " Periodic
      Report ")
      of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
              B. BerlinerRichard
              B. BerlinerChief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)




/s/ Albert
              E. GencarellaAlbert
              E. GencarellaChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)




November
      14 ,
      2007




*The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report
      or as a separate disclosure document.*





*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Berliner Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Berliner
      Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.*
#### Jose Luis RIOS and Maria Elena Rios, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70172.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 13, 2010.

Jose Luis Rios, Long Beach, CA, pro se. Maria Elena Rios, Long Beach, CA, pro se.

Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, OIL, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Rios and Maria Elena Rios, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Peru, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Toufighi v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed more than ten years after the BIA’s final order of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i)(motion to reopen must be filed within ninety days of final order of removal).

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contention that they did not receive the BIA’s 1997 decision because petitioners failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

We also lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceeding, *see Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.*2002)*
      *1*
      *,*and its underlying order dismissing petitioners’ appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying suspension of deportation, *Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. To the extent that this court might have jurisdiction over the denial of *sua sponte*reopening, *see Kucana v.*Holder, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 827, 175 L.Ed.2d 694 (2010), we find the agency did not abuse its discretion in denying such relief.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

d0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138034(82)

PATRICK MCCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138034 COA: 284129 Oakland CC: 2006-079432-NO ALISON SCOFIELD, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANDREA DEAN, OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR, AMY ALLEN, CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT HOUSE/ OAKLAND COUNTY CARE HOUSE, CAROLE BOYD, OAKLAND COUNTY FRIEND OF THE COURT, THOMAS CALLAHAN, and MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,795
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,825
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    429,124
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           429,124
<LOANS>                                        521,117
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (7,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,039,071
<DEPOSITS>                                     864,125
<SHORT-TERM>                                    34,781
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,326
<LONG-TERM>                                     33,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,680
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,039,071
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,668
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,356
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    31
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,055
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,962
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,093
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,101
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,149
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,149
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.51
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,671
<LOANS-PAST>                                       791
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,304
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,295
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      483
<RECOVERIES>                                        53
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,949
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,495
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,454
        

</TABLE>
Asset Investors Corporation

                       Subsidiaries as of January 29, 1999



    AIC Management Corporation
    AIC Manufactured Housing Corp.
    AIOP Brentwood West, L.L.C.
    AIOP Gulfstream Harbor, L.L.C.
    AIOP Lost Dutchman Notes, L.L.C.
    AIOP Mullica, L.L.C.
    AIOP Serendipity, L.L.C.
    Asset Investors Acceptance, Inc.
    Asset Investors Equity, Inc.
    Asset Investors Finance Corporation
    Asset Investors Funding Corporation
    Asset Investors Mortgage Funding Corporation
    Asset Investors Operating Partnership, L.P.
    Asset Investors Secured Financing Corporation
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 20, 2006



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO

























































---
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

March 3, 2017

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 16, 2017

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Bussen Quarries, Inc., Docket No. 

CENT 2015-385. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in 

concluding that the operator had violated the mandatory standard 

governing the requirement to use fall protection.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 129-339

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Paul D. Meyer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in thisquarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 10, 2005
August 9, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LANIS RAY HITT, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00268-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Lanis Ray Hitt, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          127331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      918
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                128249
<PP&E>                                          801339
<DEPRECIATION>                                  795468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  140861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      136358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    140861
<SALES>                                            303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   303
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 16584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 22, 2020.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted through a videoconference involving all Commissioners. 

Any person wishing to listen to the proceeding may call the number listed below.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in 

open session: Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co., LLC, Docket No. 

PENN 2019-0008 (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling that the operator had failed to 

adequately insulate and protect a power cable.)

 Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary 

aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson, (202) 434-9935 / 

(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Phone Number for Listening to Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.

Passcode: 678-100.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Dated: October 14, 2020.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

BILLING CODE 6735-01
#### In the Matter of Stephen LAW, Debtor, Lili Lin; Stephen Law, Appellants, v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.

No. 07-56239.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.*

Filed Jan. 14, 2009.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Stephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders approving a compromise agreement and authorizing distribution of real estate sale proceeds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. *See Arrow Elecs., Inc. v. Howard Justus (In re Kaypro),*218 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The BAP properly upheld the bankruptcy court’s order approving the compromise agreement between the trustee and the judgment creditors, because the agreement was in the best interest of the creditors, interest holders, and the estate. *See*Fed. R. BankrP. 9019(a) (authorizing bankruptcy court to approve a compromise *153or settlement); *Port O’Call Inv. Co. v. Blair (In re Blair),*538 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir.1976) (per curiam) (“Liquidation is to be accomplished as rapidly as possible consistent with obtaining the best possible realization upon the available assets and without undue waste by needless or fruitless litigation.”).

The BAP properly affirmed the order authorizing the trustee to distribute the property sale proceeds because it was conditioned on a judicial determination of Lili Lin’s purported interest. *See*11 U.S.C. § 368(e) (“The court ... shall prohibit or condition ... use, sale, or lease [of property] as is necessary to provide adequate protection” to an entity’s interest in such property).

Appellants’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Appellants’ motion to file a late reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief received on April 10, 2008.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.