alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,649
<SECURITIES>                                     6,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                      840
<ALLOWANCES>                                       667
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         406,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        342,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,635
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,006
<SALES>                                         14,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,308
<CGS>                                           12,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,959
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James T. Sartain, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FirstCityFinancial Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 13, 2004         /s/ James T. Sartain        James T. Sartain    *Chief Executive Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,838,644
<SECURITIES>                                       593,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,559,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,206,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,302,878
<PP&E>                                          13,394,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                     998,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,054,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,596,784
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,133,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,313
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,254,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,054,990
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,326,139
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,274,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 379,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    849,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                       344,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       505,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,144
<PP&E>                                         145,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,023)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,303
<BONDS>                                         23,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,250
<SALES>                                         12,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,884
<CGS>                                            3,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    623
<INCOME-TAX>                                       218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SPIEKER PROPERTIES, INC.

 1. Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership

 2. Spieker Washington Interest Partners, a California general partnership

 3. Fremont Bayside Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership

 4. Spieker Partners-Livermore Ltd., a California limited partnership

 5. Spieker Properties #172, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

 6. Spieker Properties #221 Partners, Limited Partnership, a California general
partnership

 7. Spieker Properties #178, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

 8. Spieker Properties #166, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

 9. Spieker Properties #177, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

10. Spieker Properties #237 Partners, a California general partnership

11. Spieker Properties #122, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

12. Spieker Properties #219 Partners, a California general partnership

13. Spieker Properties #185, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

14. Spieker Properties #183, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

15. Spieker Properties #144, Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership

16. Spieker Properties #179, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

17. Spieker Properties #238 Partners, a California general partnership

18. Spieker Properties #154, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership

19. Sand Hill Northwest Properties, LLC

20. San Mateo Office Limited, a California limited partnership
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6352

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(CR-87-371-HM, CA-03-3178-L)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Maxwell, Nos.

CR-87-371-HM, CA-03-3178-L (D. Md. filed Feb. 4, 2004; entered

Feb. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-39,039]

      ( print page 111)    
                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 7, 2001, applicable to workers of Fashion International located in Scranton, Pennsylvania. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 27, 2001 (66 FR 34256).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. Company information shows that worker separations occurred at A.D.M. Services, Inc. when it closed in March, 2001. A.D.M. Services provided designing services and markers supporting the production of men's sport coats and men's and ladies' blazers at Fashion International, Scranton, Pennsylvania which also closed in March, 2001. A.D.M. Services, Inc. workers were inadvertently omitted from the certification.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Fashion International who were adversely affected by increased imports of men's sport coats and men's and ladies' blazers.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover the workers of A.D.M. Services, Inc., Scranton, Pennsylvania.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-39,039 is hereby issued as follows:

“All workers of Fashion International and A.D.M. Services, Inc., Scranton, Pennsylvania who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 24, 2001, through June 7, 2003, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of December, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-32209 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 9, 2020

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Knight Hawk Coal, LLC, Docket 

No. LAKE 2019-87-R. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in

overturning the Secretary’s revocation of a mine’s ventilation 

plan.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 236-7472

Passcode: 678-100

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

Dated: December 12, 2019

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel

Billing Code 6735-01
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00647-CV

Serreva Page, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2005-1353A, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Serreva Page seeks to appeal from a district court order terminating her

parental rights. See Tex. Family Code Ann. § 263.405 (West 2008). The order terminating

appellant’s parental rights was signed and entered by the district court on November 2, 2006.

Pursuant to subsection 263.405(a) ofthe family code, appellant’s appeal is governed by the supreme

court rules for accelerated appeals in civil cases. Id. § 263.405(a). Thus, appellant was required to

file her notice of appeal within 20 days after the district court’s order was signed. See Tex. R. App.

P. 26.1(b) (time to perfect appeal), 28.1(b) (perfection of accelerated appeal). Our review of the

record shows that appellant did not file her notice of appeal until October 6, 2009, almost three years

after the district court’s order was signed. We conclude appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely.

Under these circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner

other than dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 926-27 (Tex. 2005);
2

Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2005). We therefore dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 15, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1717 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1717

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   the temporary suspension of the duties on certain infant nursery 
                        intercoms and monitors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 1993

  Mr. Skaggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   the temporary suspension of the duties on certain infant nursery 
                        intercoms and monitors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY TARIFF PROVISIONS SUSPENDING THE 
              DUTIES ON CERTAIN INFANT NURSERY INTERCOMS AND MONITORS.

    Headings 9902.85.25 and 9902.85.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain infant nursery 
intercommunication systems and monitor systems, respectively) are 
amended by striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/97''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided in this section, the 
amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods entered 
on or after the fifteenth day after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (b) Retroactive Application for Certain Liquidations and 
Reliquidations.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 
(19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
filed with the appropriate customs officer after the fifteenth day 
after the enactment of this Act and before the one hundred and ninety-
fifth day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry that 
was made after December 31, 1992 and before such fifteenth day, and 
with respect to which there would have been no duty if the amendment 
made by section 1 applied to such entry, shall be liquidated or 
reliquidated as though such amendment applied to such entry.

                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E.

argument_102307.pdf

fmshrc_102307.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000892 04-FEB-2020 07:48 AM