alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



(a)

such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-KSB.







By:

/s/ Ralph Larry Lyons

Date:  March 30, 2004

Ralph Larry Lyons

President and Chief Executive Officer







By:

/s/ Charles F. Catlett, III

Date:  March 30, 2004

Charles F. Catlett, III

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67253-67254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 22, 2002.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4470:
    1. South Alabama Bancorporation, Inc., Mobile, Alabama; to merge 
with Gulf Coast Community Bancshares, Inc., Wewahitchka, Florida, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Wewahitchka State Bank, Wewahitchka, 
Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411

[[Page 67254]]

Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Hardin County Bancorp, Inc., Rosiclare, Illinois; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
State Bank of Rosiclare, Rosiclare, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 20, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-31875 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of TechTeam Global, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the 2002 Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: 3-12-03                                        /s/ David W. Morgan
      -------------------------                      ---------------------------
                                                     David W. Morgan

















                                       81
[EXHIBIT 32]


              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10K of
Admiral Financial Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003,
Wm. Lee Popham, Chairman, CEO and CFO of Admiral Financial Corp. hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, that::

  1.  Such Annual Report on Form 10Q for the period ended December
      31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.  The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10Q
      for the period ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Admiral Financial Corp.

                                         ADMIRAL FINANCIAL CORP.


Date:   February 13, 2005                By:/s/  Wm. Lee Popham
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Wm. Lee Popham, Chairman,
                                            CEO and CFO


<PAGE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3579 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

200 East Main Street in Maroa, Illinois, as the ‘‘Jeremy L. Ridlen 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. BOST, Mr. 

KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. KINZINGER, Mr. RUSH, Mr. CASTEN, Ms. NEWMAN, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mr. FOSTER, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

LAHOOD, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 200 East Main Street in Maroa, Illinois, as 

the ‘‘Jeremy L. Ridlen Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JEREMY L. RIDLEN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 200 East Main Street in Maroa, 

6 Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jeremy 

7 L. Ridlen Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3579 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jeremy L. Ridlen 

5 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# National Consumer Protection Week

More Americans than ever are realizing the American dream of homeownership. At the same time, an increasing number of homeowners are living the nightmare of overwhelming debt and home foreclosure resulting from fraudulent lending practices. Subprime lending—the extension of high-rate, high-fee loans to people considered to be high-risk borrowers—has grown substantially in recent years. Unfortunately, fraudulent and abusive lending practices have also grown.

High-cost lending is not limited to home mortgages. Check cashing outlets, payday loan companies, rent-to-own stores, subprime auto lenders, and pawn shops are additional examples of high-cost lenders.

While it is crucial that as many consumers as possible have access to credit, their access must not be hindered by unlawful lending practices. Federal law enforcement agencies have increased their enforcement activities to stop lenders who engage in fraudulent and abusive lending practices. In addition, Federal agencies and consumer groups have implemented aggressive education campaigns to help consumers learn how to safeguard the equity in their homes.

Consumers can protect themselves from loan fraud by taking some commonsense precautions, including comparison shopping among several lenders, negotiating, and resisting, indeed refusing to yield to, pressure to sign any loan papers they don't understand. Nonprofit credit and housing counseling services are available to help consumers manage their credit and make decisions about loans and loan terms.

To help protect consumers, the Federal Trade Commission, the National Association of Consumer Agency Administrators, the U.S. Postal Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the National Association of Attorneys General, the Department of Justice, and private consumer organizations have joined forces to inform Americans about their rights as borrowers, about the responsibilities of lenders, and about protecting their assets. This information is available in writing, by telephone, and online.

I encourage all Americans to take advantage of this opportunity to learn more about how to protect themselves against fraudulent and abusive lending practices. By becoming wise and well-informed consumers, we can reduce the incidence of fraud and deception in the marketplace.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 5 through February 10, 2001, as National Consumer Protection Week. I call upon government officials, industry leaders, consumer advocates, the media, and the American people to participate in programs helping citizens to be responsible and wise consumers.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-3475

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### Genghis Khan A. STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duran HARMON, Correctional Officer, as an individual and in his official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-55626.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

Genghis Khan A. Stevenson, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

John Paul Walters, II, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Genghis Khan A. Stevenson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that correctional officers used excessive force against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Childress v. Darby Lumber, Inc.,*357 F.3d 1000, 1009 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

Stevenson contends that the district court abused its discretion by entering summary judgment before he had adequate time to conduct discovery. There was no abuse of discretion because Stevenson did not seek a continuance under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f), and because the district court granted Stevenson’s motions for additional time to file his *98opposition and his objections. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(f); *Foti v. City of Menlo Park,*146 F.3d 629, 638 (9th Cir.1998) (courts of appeal generally do not consider an issue not addressed in district court).

Stevenson’s contention that the district court abused its discretion by not considering evidence, first submitted in his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations, is also unpersuasive. *See United States v. Howell,*231 F.3d 615, 621 (9th Cir.2000) (“[W]e conclude that a district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider evidence presented for the first time in a party’s objection to a magistrate judge’s recommendation.”). Moreover, the record reflects that the district court reviewed Stevenson’s objections and the evidence attached thereto.

Stevenson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 07-15-00040-CV

In the Interest of O.A.P., a Child §

§

§

§

From the 237th District Court of

 Lubbock County

February 11, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated Wednesday, February 11, 2015, it is

ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
#### Terrance A. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George M. HINKLE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7148.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2010.

Terrance A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance A. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prison*700er satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 16.1


THURMAN SHAW & CO., L.C.
Certified Public Accountants
                                                            James K. Thurman
                                                            Jeffrey L. Shaw
                                                            Justin R. Shaw


January 11, 2001


To Whom It May Concern,

We have  served  as the  auditors  for LASV  Enterprises  for the  period  ended
September  30, 1999.  During the audit period,  there has been no  disagreements
with LASV Enterprises in regards to accounting  principles,  financial statement
disclosures, auditing scope or procedures. All audit fees have been paid.


Sincerely,

/s/ Jeffrey L. Shaw, CPA
--------------------------
Jeffrey L. Shaw, CPA
Thurman Shaw & Co., L.C.
# To Extend Nondiscriminatory Treatment (Normal Trade Relations Treatment) to the Products of the Republic of Georgia

                    1. The Republic of Georgia (Georgia) has made progress, since its emergence from communism, toward democratic rule and the creation of a free market economy. Georgia has also made considerable progress toward respecting fundamental human rights consistent with the objectives of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (the “Trade Act”) (19 U.S.C. 2431,                     *et seq*.). Further, I have found Georgia to be in full compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements under the Trade Act. In 1993, Georgia concluded a bilateral trade agreement with the United States and in 1994 concluded a bilateral investment treaty with the United States. Georgia acceded to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on June 14, 2000. The extension of unconditional normal trade relations treatment to the products of Georgia will permit the United States to avail itself of all rights under the WTO with respect to Georgia.                

2. Pursuant to section 3002 of Public Law 106-476, 114 Stat. 2101, 2175, and having due regard for the findings of the Congress in section 3001 of that law, I hereby determine that title IV of the Trade Act should no longer apply to Georgia.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including but not limited to section 3002 of Public Law 106-476, do hereby proclaim that:

(1) Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of Georgia; and

(2) The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Georgia shall be effective as of the date of signature of this proclamation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-320

Billing code 3195-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4307]

      ( print page 9607)    
Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on November 15, 2000, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Lightnin, SPX Corporation, Wytheville, Virginia. Workers produce industrial mixing equipment.

The petitioner has stated that they no longer wish to pursue the petition for the Wytheville facility and wish to withdraw the petition. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of January, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-3306  Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard F. Latour, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MicroFinancial Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                                                                      /s/ Richard F. Latour   Richard F. Latour   President and Chief Executive Officer   Date: May 11, 2006