alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

DATE/TIME: Thursday, January 18, 2001, 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.

LOCATION: 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036.

STATUS: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) 
of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

AGENDA: January 2000 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes by the Ninety-
Seventh Meeting (November 16, 2000) of the Board of Directors; 
Chairman's Report; President's Report; Committee Reports; Review of 
Unsolicited Grant Applications; Other General Issues.

CONTACT: Dr. Sheryl Brown, Director, Office of Communications, 
Telephone: (202) 457-1700.

    Dated: January 2, 2001.
Charles E. Nelson,
Vice President for Management and Finance, United States Institute of 
Peace.
[FR Doc. 01-327 Filed 1-2-01; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
Deny and Opinion Filed May 22, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00656-CV 

IN RE WALLACE LANE SCHOOLER, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-53643-2012 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Evans 

Relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, petition for writ of 

mandamus requesting that the Court order relator discharged from the restraint of his liberty 

imposed by the trial court’s May 15, 2015 “Order Holding Respondent in Contempt for Failure 

to Pay Child Support, for Failure to Pay Medical Reimbursement, for Failure to Timely Return 

the Parties’ Children as Ordered, Granting Judgment and for Commitment to County Jail,” the 

trial court’s May 18, 2015 “Order for Capias,” and the trial court’s May 18, 2015 “Order to 

Appear on Motion to Revoke Suspension of Commitment.” Relator contends that the trial 

court’s orders were rendered in violation of his due process rights. 

Because relator is not presently confined, we treat the petition as a petition for writ of 

mandamus. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court 

has clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re 
 –2– 

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We conclude 

relator has failed to establish a right to the relief requested. 

We deny the petition. 

150656F.P05 

/David Evans/ 

DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TONY P. FINNO,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee for THE C-BASS 

MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2006-RP2,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3218

[August 8, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 12-

003687.

Tony P. Finno, Margate, pro se.

Kimberly S. Mello and Joseph H. Picone of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., 

Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, I, Kristi
J.  Kampmann,  Chief  Financial Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., hereby
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     (1)  such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
          for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2002, fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2002,
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.



                                       /s/  Kristi  J.  Kampmann
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kristi  J.  Kampmann,
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer


Date:     February  13,  2003


<PAGE>
[Cite as Seiverth v. Perrysburg , 2023

- Ohio

- 2767.]

IN THE COURT OF CL AIMS OF OHIO

{¶1} In this public

- records case, Requester Jonathan Dougl as Seiverth seeks

certain record s from Respondent City of Perrysburg. After mediation failed to successfully

resolve all disputed issues between the parties

, Respondent moved to dismiss

Requester ’ s complaint for failure to state a claim.

{¶2} P ursuant to R.C . 2743.75( F)(1 ), a Special Mas te r has iss ued a Report and

Recommendation (R&R)

. The Special Master re c ommends denying Respondent ’ s

motion to di smiss. (R&R, 3

- 4). The Special Master further recommends :

- Respondent be ordered to produce to Requester unre dacted copies of all

records tha t were re dacted based on attorney

- client privilege and/or R.C.

3707.17 [sic]

.

- Respondent be ordered to produce to Requester all records filed with the

court for in camera revie w.

- Requester recover his filing fee and the costs he incurred in connection

with this case.

(R &R, 11.)

{¶3} Neither party has filed timely objections to th e Report and Recommendation

, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75 ( F)(2) . Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), i f neither p arty

timely objects, t hen this Court “ sh all promptly issue a final orde r adopting the report and

recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident

on the face of the report and recommendation. ” Upon inde p endent review, the Court find s JONATHAN DOUGLAS SEIVERTH

Requester

v.

CITY OF PERRYSBURG

Respondent Case No. 2022

- 00850PQ

Judge Lisa L. Sadler

JUDGMENT ENTRYCase N o. 2022

- 00850PQ

- 2

- JUDGMENT ENTRY

typographical error s referencing R.C. 3707.17, in s tead of R.C. 3701.1 7

, in the Report and

Recommendation

. See R&R at 1, 11. The Court further finds, however, that the Special

Master has correctly applied R.C. 3701.17

. The Court also finds no e rror of law or other

defect e viden t on th e face of the Repor t and R ecommendation

. The Court adopts the

Report an d Recommendation

, excepting the typographical e rrors

. {¶4} In accordance with the Special Master ’ s recommendations

, the Court

DENIES Respondent City of Perrysburg ’ s 12(B)(6) M oti on To Dismiss Requester ’ s

Co mp laint (filed on June 14, 2023) ; the Court ORDERS R espondent to produce to

Requester unr edacted co pies of all records that were redacted based on attorney

- client

privilege or R.C. 370 1 .17 , or both, and all records filed with the Court for in camera review ;

and the Court ORDERS that Requester is enti tled to reco ver from Respondent t h e

amount o f th e fili ng f ee of twenty

- five dollars and any other cos ts associate d with the

action that are in curred by Requester

, excepti ng attorn e y fees. Court costs are asse ss ed

to Respondent. The Clerk shall serve upon all pa rties noti ce of this judgm e nt and its dat e

of e ntry upon the jou rnal.

LISA L. SADLER Judge

Filed July 18

, 2023
Sent to S.C. Reporter 8 /10/ 23
#### Walter Guillermo PEREZ-ROJO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77180.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 2010.

Filed Nov. 18, 2010.

*113Brian P. Brosnahan, Esquire, Jacob Nathaniel Foster, Esquire, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Walter Guillermo Perez-Rojo, Patterson, CA, pro se.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Andrew Jacob Oliveira, Esquire, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RYMER, Circuit Judge, and TRAGER, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable David G. Trager, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Walter Guillermo Perez-Rojo petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) finding him removable as charged for illegal entry into the United States. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and grant the petition.

Conceding that evidence of alienage should have been suppressed under *Lopez-Rodriguez v. Mukasey,*536 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2008), the government asks us to remand. We decline to do so. No reason appears why DHS could not have developed whatever record it wanted to develop at the original hearing; the agency could not have been surprised by *Lopez-Rodriguez,*as our law has been clear for years. *See, e.g., Orhorhaghe v. INS,*38 F.3d 488 (9th Cir.1994).1

PETITION GRANTED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. When asked at oral argument what new evidence it would introduce on remand, the government could not answer because, DHS, not DOJ, had that information. *See*Oral Argument at 9:23, *Perez-Rojo v. Holder,*No. 05-77180, *available at*http://www.ca9.uscourts. gov/datastore/media/2010/11/02/05-77180. wma; *id.*at 12:53. We are thus left to speculate whether there is simply no evidence that the government could introduce to defend its actions, in which case the request for a remand was unnecessary, or whether the government did have such evidence, but a bureaucratic snafu caused it to fumble the appeal. The government's decision to ask for a remand without fully assessing its case *114wasted Perez-Rojo’s and the court’s resources, and, through no apparent fault of his own, forced the government's lawyer to argue an appeal he stood no chance of winning.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000803644
<NAME> FCNB CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,329
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             755
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,231
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    202,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          48,389
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            48,729
<LOANS>                                        574,105
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 918,084
<DEPOSITS>                                     616,512
<SHORT-TERM>                                   217,301
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,753
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,912
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 918,084
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 48,562
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,140
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   489
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                63,191
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,012
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,179
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,329
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 580
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,021
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,021
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.29
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,637
<LOANS-PAST>                                       982
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 15,350
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,123
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,194
<RECOVERIES>                                       455
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,713
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,713
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

June 17, 2008 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Spartan Mining Company, Docket Nos. WEVA 

2004-117-RM, et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law 

Judge properly found violations and assessed penalties for the 

following standards: 30 C.F.R.§ 75.606 (requiring protecting cables); 

30 C.F.R. § 75.511 (requiring locking and tagging out before 

electrical work); 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725(a) (requiring unsafe equipment 

to be removed from service); and 30 C.F.R. § 75.313(a)(3) (requiring 

withdrawal from a working section in mine fan outage)) 

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3667 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3667

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to target additional child 
 care funds by allocating to States based on the number of children in 
                    poverty, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2021

 Mrs. Miller of West Virginia (for herself and Mr. Walberg) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to target additional child 
 care funds by allocating to States based on the number of children in 
                    poverty, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Targeting Child Care Funds Based on 
Poverty Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIONAL MATCHING FUNDS BASED ON SHARE OF 
              CHILDREN IN POVERTY.

    Section 418(a)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
618(a)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking all that precedes ``total'' and inserting 
        the following:
                    ``(B) Allotments to states.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in 
                        clause (ii), the''; and
            (2) by adding after and below the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Special rule.--To the extent that 
                        the total amount referred to in clause (i) for 
                        fiscal year 2022 or for any succeeding fiscal 
                        year exceeds the total amount so referred to 
                        for fiscal year 2020, the excess shall be 
                        allotted among the States based on the share of 
                        each State of the number of children in poverty 
                        who have not attained 13 years of age.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew A. Stevens, Chief
Financial Officer of Zila, Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Andrew A. StevensAndrew A. StevensChief Financial OfficerJune 10, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Zila, Inc. and will be
retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
August 6, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 6th day of August, 2015.

10-14-00329-CR	EX PARTE JULIE ANN VON TUNGELN - ON APPEAL FROM THE 18TH DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. F43117-A – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
<PAGE>




                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION













                                   EXHIBIT 32


































<PAGE>


                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION



                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                                       OF
                    COMMERCIAL NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Commercial National Financial Corporation (the "Registrant"). This
Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003.

We certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

This Certification is executed as of August 13, 2003.

                                           /s/ Jeffrey S. Barker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jeffrey S. Barker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ Patrick G. Duffy
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick G. Duffy
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Commercial National Financial Corporation and will be retained by
Commercial National Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF REGISTRANT**

 
| **Subsidiary**                          |   | **State of Incorporation** |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
| West  Suburban Bank                     |   | Illinois                   |   |
|                                    |   |                       |   |
| West  Suburban Insurance Services, Inc. |   | Illinois                   |   |
|                                    |   |                       |   |
| WSUB  Inc.                              |   | Illinois                   |   |
|                                    |   |                       |   |
| Melrose  Holdings, Inc.                 |   | Illinois                   |   |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,758)
<INVENTORY>                                        805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,023
<PP&E>                                          19,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,539)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       168,994
<OTHER-SE>                                   (160,836)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,272
<SALES>                                         31,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,150
<CGS>                                           31,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                       316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>