alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


    


    Exhibit
      10.3

    


    FORM
      OF

    STOCK
      GRANT CERTIFICATE

    


    


    This
      Stock
      Grant Certificate certifies that, pursuant to the ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), the Board of Directors of ARIAD
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) has granted shares of Common Stock, $.001
      par value per share, of the Company (the “Stock Grant”), as
      follows:

    


    Name
      of Participant: 

    Number
      of Granted Shares: 

    Grant
      Price: 

    Grant
      Date: 

    


    The
      Stock
      Grant is subject to all the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in
      the
      2006 Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, and to the following
      additional terms specified by the Board of Directors of the Company. Capitalized
      terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning set forth
      in
      the 2006 Plan. 

    


    Legends.
      To the
      extent the Participant is an affiliate at the date of issuance of the Granted
      Shares, all certificates representing the Granted Shares to be issued to the
      Participant pursuant to this Stock Grant Certificate shall contain a legend
      required by virtue of the fact that the Participant is an affiliate (as defined
      in Rule 144(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) of the
      Company.

    


    Tax
      Considerations.
      The
      Participant acknowledges and agrees that any income taxes or other taxes due
      from the Participant with respect to the Granted Shares shall be the
      Participant’s responsibility. 

    


    In
      witness
      whereof, the Company has caused this Stock Grant Certificate to be executed
      by
      its duly authorized officer.

    


    


    Dated:

     

     

    ARIAD
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.:

     

    


      
        	 	 	 	 
	Harvey
                J. Berger, M.D.	 	Edward
                M. Fitzgerald	 
	Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer	 	Senior
                Vice President	 
	 	 	Finance
                and Corporate Operations	 
	 	 	Chief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828413
<NAME> INTERNATIONAL SEMICOND
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           19085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    57100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      42000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                118185
<PP&E>                                         1134821
<DEPRECIATION>                                  375700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1420552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           336790
<BONDS>                                         416201
<COMMON>                                          9802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5308912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1420552
<SALES>                                          15738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15738
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1052887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              105234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1142383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1142383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1142383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.11)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-02789]


The Trane Company; Tyler, TX; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
January 19, 1999, applicable to workers of The Trane Company, a 
division of American Standard, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4713).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that some employees of The Trane Company, a division of American 
Standard, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas were leased from Remedy 
Intelligent Staffing, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas to produce single 
cylinder reciprocating compressors for air conditioning units at the 
Tyler, Texas facility. Information also shows that workers separated 
from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a 
separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Remedy Intelligent 
Staffing, Incorporated.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending the 
certification to include workers of Remedy Intelligent Staffing, 
Incorporated, Tyler, Texas leased to The Trane Company, a division of 
American Standard, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of The Trane Company, a division of American Standard, 
Incorporated who were adversely affected by a shift of production to 
Mexico.

    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-02789 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of The Trane Company, a division of American 
Standard, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas and leased workers of Remedy 
Intelligent Staffing, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas who were engaged in 
employment related to the production of single cylinder 
reciprocating compressors for air conditioning units for The Trane 
Company, a division of American Standard, Incorporated, Tyler, Texas 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after December 1, 1997 through January 19, 2001 are eligible to 
apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


    Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of January, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-3286 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY &HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

FOIA Appeals’ LOG 

FY 2010 - Present 

FISCAL YEAR APPEAL 

DATE

APPEAL

TYPE:

a. Request

B. Expedite

C. Fee Waiver

Disposition APPEAL 

DISPOSAL 

DATE

Original 

Request 

RECEIVED 

DATE

Disposal

DATE

FOIA 

Tracking No.

Information

Requested

Disposition Exemption No. & 

Description

2010 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2011 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2012 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2013

5/24/13 Request Appeal granted in part 

and denied in part 

pursuant to FOIA 

Exemption # 5

7/3/13 4/27/13 5/20/13 FY13-102 Copies of memos and 

documents describing 

the impact of Federal 

budget sequestration 

upon FMSHRC 

operations and 

functions

DENIED Exemption # 5

2014 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2015 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2016 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2017

4/25/17 Expedite &

Fee Waiver

Appeals denied as moot 5/2/17 4/25/17 5/1/17 FY17-64 All department emails to 

Leadership Directories 

GRANTED N/A

2018 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2019 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2020 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2021 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2022

6/29/22 Request Three of three sitting 

Commissioners recused 

3/2/22 5/9/22 FY22-21 Correspondence 

discussing whether 

former employee was 

GLOMAR –

neither 

confirmed nor 

Exemption #6
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY &HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

FOIA Appeals’ LOG 

FY 2010 - Present 

FISCAL YEAR APPEAL 

DATE

APPEAL

TYPE:

a. Request

B. Expedite

C. Fee Waiver

Disposition APPEAL 

DISPOSAL 

DATE

Original 

Request 

RECEIVED 

DATE

Disposal

DATE

FOIA 

Tracking No.

Information

Requested

Disposition Exemption No. & 

Description

pursuant to FMSHRC 

FOIA Rule 2702.5(a) 

using agency devices 

associated with their

official duties to view 

unauthorized material

denied existence 

of such records 

2023 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

2024
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.      Section 1350**

**as      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   |                                                                                                          |                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                 | /s/ D.              JONATHAN MERRIMAN  |
|   | **D.                Jonathan Merriman****Chairman                and Chief Executive                Officer** |

|   |                                                                          |                                                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                 | /s/ JOHN              D.              HIESTAND |
|   | **John                D. Hiestand****Chief                Financial Officer** |

----
**Exhibit 31.2****PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**I, Albert E. Gencarella, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Berliner Communications, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report, isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2007                                                               /s/ Albert E. Gencarella   Albert E. Gencarella   Chief Financial Officer
OMB No. 1545-0062 Foreign Moving Expenses

Form 3903F

© Attach to Form 1040.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Attachment

© See separate instructions. Sequence No. 63

Name(s) shown on Form 1040 Your social security number

1 City and country in which your old workplace was located ©

2 City and country in which your new workplace is located ©

Moving Expenses

Section A.—Transportation of Household Goods

3 Transportation and storage for household goods and personal effects 3

Section B.—Expenses of Moving From Old To New Home

Travel and lodging not 4 4 including meals

5 Total meals 5

6 Multiply line 5 by 80% (.80) 6

7 Add lines 4 and 6 7

Section C.—Pre-move Househunting Expenses and Temporary Quarters (for

any 90 days in a row after getting your job)

8 Pre-move travel and lodging not including meals 8

9 9 Temporary quarters expenses not including meals

10

Multiply line 10 by 80% (.80)

10

11

Add lines 8, 9, and 11

11

Section D.—Qualified Real Estate Expenses

13 Expenses of (check one): a selling or exchanging your old home, or 13

b if renting, settling an unexpired lease.

14 Expenses of (check one): a buying your new home, or

b if renting, getting a new lease.

14

Dollar Limits

15

16

Enter the smaller of:

Add lines 13, 14, and 15

17

18

Enter the smaller of:

17

Add lines 3, 7, and 17 18

19 Amount of expenses allocable to excluded income or housing costs (see instructions) 19

20 Subtract line 19 from line 18. This is your moving expense deduction. Enter here and on Schedule

A (Form 1040), line 18 ©

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 3903F (1991)

Total meal expenses for both pre-move househunting

and temporary quarters

12 12

15

16

● The amount on line 12, or

● $4,500 ($2,250 if married filing a separate return, and at the end of

1991 you lived with your spouse who also started work in 1991).

● The amount on line 16, or

● $6,000 ($3,000 if married filing a separate return, and at the end of 1991 you lived with

your spouse who also started work in 1991).

Note: Any payments your employer made for any part of your move (including the value of any services furnished in kind)

should be included on your Form W-2. Report that amount on Form 1040, line 7. See Reimbursements in the instructions.

20

Cat. No. 12493R

Part II

Part I

%

%

%

%
1 Because appellant filed the notice of appeal more than fifteen days late, the instrument itself

cannot serve as an implied motion for extension of time. S ee Verburgt v. Dorner

, 959 S.W.2d 615,

617 (Tex. 1997). 

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00085-CV

Mary Moran, Appellant

v.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 98-14145, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The judgment in this case was signed October 28, 2003. A motion for new trial was

timely filed; accordingly, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before January 26, 2004. S ee

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). The notice of appeal was not filed until February 11, 2004, sixteen days

late. No timely motion for extension of time was filed. 1 The clerk’s office notified appellant of this

problem and r equested proof of timely mailing or an affidavit swearing that the filing was timely

m ailed. S ee id. 9.2(b), (c). In response, appellant stated that the filing deadline was mistakenly2 We note that the date of service (by telefacsimile) shown in the certificate of service is February

11, as well.

2 calculated and the notice of appeal had not been filed until February 11, 2004. 2 Because a late-filed

notice of appeal does not confer jurisdiction on this court, we must dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 2 (court may not alter time for perfecting appeal); Verburgt

, 959

S.W.2d at 617.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 6, 2004
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Nickum, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Nickum,*118 Ohio St.3d 198, 2008-Ohio-2198.]

(No. 2007-1740

Submitted May 6, 2008

Decided May 14, 2008.)

John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Spiert, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Simpkins,*117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Land
Lease (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Terry Considine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    TERRY CONSIDINE 
|Name:  |  | Terry Considine        
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 11, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40194

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL ZIPPER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(C 94 CR 185)

_________________________________________________________________

(September 13, 1995)

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Zipper argues that the court erred when it refused to allow a

recess so that he could research the implications of counsel taking

the stand. The government correctly argues that this argument is

reviewed for plain error. The trial transcript shows that Zipper's

counsel did not object to the court's suggestion that, instead of
-2-

taking the stand himself, counsel recall Agent O'Brien to establish

that only one bundle of marijuana was open.

Nevertheless, it is unnecessary for us to engage in a plain

error analysis. To show error, Zipper minimally must demonstrate

that the court abused its discretion and that, as a result, he

suffered "serious prejudice." United States v. Correa-Ventura, 6

F.3d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir. 1993). As the government points out,

however, the trial court did not deny Zipper's request for a

recess; more accurately, it merely postponed any decision about

whether to allow a recess by offering counsel the option to recall

Agent O'Brien, which counsel chose to follow. Thus, Zipper does

not meet the first prong of his burden in showing that the district

court committed any error, plain or otherwise.

A F F I R M E D.