alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 166 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 166

 To eliminate automatic cost-of-living adjustments in rates of pay for 
Members of Congress, and to nullify any such adjustment occurring after 
                           December 31, 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
   the Committees on House Administration and Post Office and Civil 
                                Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate automatic cost-of-living adjustments in rates of pay for 
Members of Congress, and to nullify any such adjustment occurring after 
                           December 31, 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1) The'' and inserting ``The'';
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (C) 
                as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively; and
                    (C) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of 
                this subsection''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).

SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF ANY AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS 
              OCCURRING SINCE 1992.

    (a) Nullification of Pay Adjustments.--Effective as of the first 
day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the rate of pay for any position 
identified under section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act 
of 1946 shall be equal to the rate which would then be payable for such 
position if no pay adjustment described in subsection (b) had ever 
taken effect.
    (b) Description of Pay Adjustments Nullified.--Subsection (a) 
applies with respect to any pay adjustment under section 601(a)(2) of 
the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (as then in effect) that 
first took effect after December 31, 1992.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Section 908(b)(4)(B)(i) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 
1983 (2 U.S.C. 31-1(b)(4)(B)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative 
        Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)),''; and
            (2) by striking ``et seq.),'' and inserting ``et seq.)''.

                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Condor Capital Corp., Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Robert Stumper, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (Vincent J. Martorana, J.), dated May 8, 2015. The order denied defendant's motion for leave to renew his prior motion to vacate a default judgment, which motion had been denied in an order of the same court entered December 17, 2014.</p><p>ORDERED that the order entered May 8, 2015 is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action to recover for breach of an assigned retail installment contract, a default judgment was entered in 2008. In 2014, defendant moved to vacate the default judgment, alleging that he had a meritorious defense to the action and a reasonable excuse for his default. That motion was denied, and defendant subsequently moved for leave to renew his motion, claiming that there were newly discovered facts which would have changed the prior determination (<i>see</i> CPLR 2221 [e]). Defendant appeals from an order of the District Court denying his subsequent motion. </p><p>In support of his motion for leave to renew, defendant offered proof that plaintiff had recently settled charges against it brought by the New York State Department of Financial Services for fraudulent business practices. However, defendant offered no proof that the transaction in this case was similar to those underlying the action brought by the Department of Financial Services. Similarly, defendant has never stated that any entry in the accounting statement provided by plaintiff was incorrect or that defendant does not, in fact, owe the money sought by plaintiff. We find that, without more, defendant's claim that the newly discovered evidence would have changed the prior determination is speculative (<i>see Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, P.J.S.C. v Credit Suisse Sec. [USA] LLC</i>, 114 AD3d 432 [2014]), and, thus, defendant's motion was properly denied.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Marano, P.J., Garguilo and Brands, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: July 08, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMA-WAVE,
INC.'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-06-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-05-1998
<CASH>                                         $16,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,913
<INVENTORY>                                     21,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,437
<PP&E>                                           5,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,447
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,721
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,287)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,638
<SALES>                                         15,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,246
<CGS>                                            8,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (910)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,090)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1623 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1623

To apply the immigration laws of the United States to the Commonwealth 
        of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
        to the Committees on the Judiciary and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To apply the immigration laws of the United States to the Commonwealth 
        of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF IMMIGRATION LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE 
              COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.

    (a) Application.--Consistent with the reservation of authority by 
the United States in the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of 
America (approved by Public Law 94-241; 90 Stat. 263; 48 U.S.C. 1681 
note), the immigration laws of the United States, including the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, shall apply in their entirety to the 
Northern Mariana Islands to the same extent and in the same manner as 
such laws apply to a State of the United States.
    (b) Immigration and Nationality Act.--Section 101 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101) is amended as follows:
            (1) State.--Paragraph (36) of such section is amended by 
        inserting ``Northern Mariana Islands,'' after ``Puerto Rico,''.
            (2) United States.--Paragraph (38) of such section is 
        amended by inserting ``Northern Mariana Islands,'' after 
        ``Puerto Rico,''.

                                 <all>
```
----

|   | a) | such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp for the quarter ended March      31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vyta Corp      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vyta      Corp. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Paul H. Metzinger                                                           |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul      H. Metzinger,                                                         |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer, President &      Principal Accounting Officer |

----
1

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND

HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

)

POCAHONTAS COAL CO., LLC, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-395-R

v. ) WEVA 2014-1028

) WEVA 2014-854

SECRETARY OF LABOR, ) 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH )

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), )

)

Respondent. )

)

SECRETARY’S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF POCAHONTAS’ MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

 The Secretary supports Pocahontas’ July 9, 2018 motion to withdraw its 

appeal in the above-captioned with the following additional facts:

 First, Pocahontas has long since paid in full the proposed penalties with 

respect to both of the Section 104(e) withdrawal orders before the 

Commission in this case, i.e., Order No. 3576153 ($5,600) and Order No. 

9001636 ($764).

 Second, the agreement between Pocahontas and the Secretary, a copy of 

which was attached to Pocahontas’ motion to withdraw its appeal, does not 

reduce or otherwise affect any other contested penalties. 

 Third, for the same reasons the Commission lacks jurisdiction to review the 

issuance of a notice of pattern-of-violations, as discussed in Pocahontas Coal 
2

Company, 38 FMSHRC 176 (2016), the Commission lacks jurisdiction to 

review the termination of a notice of pattern-of-violations such as that 

contemplated by the above-referenced agreement between the parties. 

CONCLUSION

 Accordingly, the Secretary requests that the Commission grant Pocahontas’ 

motion to withdraw its petition for discretionary review in the abovecaptioned case. 

KATE S. O’SCANNLAIN

Solicitor of Labor

APRIL E. NELSON

Associate Solicitor

ALI A. BEYDOUN

Counsel, Appellate Litigation

/s/Edward Waldman

EDWARD WALDMAN

Attorney

201 12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5414

(202) 693-9344

(202) 693-9392 (fax)

waldman.edward@dol.gov
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on July 17, 2018, I served a copy of the foregoing response 

to motion to withdraw petition for discretionary review via electronic mail on:

Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Esq.

Jason M. Nutzman, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Jason.Nutzman@dinsmore.com

Robert.Beatty@dinsmore.com

/s/Edward Waldman

EDWARD WALDMAN

Attorney
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act

    Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on December 20, 
2001, a proposed Complaint and Consent Decree in United States v. 
Conoco Inc., Civil Action No. H-01-4430, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
    In this action the United States sought civil penalties and 
injunctive relief against Conoco Inc. (``Conoco'') pursuant to Section 
113(b) of the Clean Air Act (``CAA''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b) (1983), 
amended by, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b) (Supp. 1991), alleged violations at 
Conoco's 4 refineries in Colorado, Montana, Oklahoma and Louisiana. 
Under the settlement, Conoco will implement innovative pollution 
control technologies to greatly reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides 
(``No<INF>X</INF>'') and sulfur dioxide (``SO2'') from refinery process 
units and adopt facility-wide enhanced monitoring and fugitive emission 
control programs. In addition, Conoco will pay a civil penalty of $1.5 
million and spend $5.5 million on supplemental and beneficial 
environmental projects. The states of Colorado, Montana, Oklahoma and 
Louisiana will join in this settlement as a signatories to the Consent 
Decree.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Acting Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer 
to United States v. Conoco Inc., D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-07295/1.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Southern District of Texas, U.S. Courthouse, 515 Rusk, 
Houston, Texas 77002, and at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
Texas 75202. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $36.50 (25 cents per page reproduction 
cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-32222 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
-  Home 
-  Regulations 

# In This Section

                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Search Regulations 
                      -  Rulemaking Documents 
                      -  Notices 
                      -  Regulatory Enforcement                          -  Civil Penalties 
                        -  Adjudication Decisions 
                        -  Fine Payments 
                        -  Uniform Fine Assessment 
                      -  Disclaimer 

# FMCSA Regulations and Interpretations – 49 CFR Parts 300-399

# FMCSA Regulations and Interpretations – 49 CFR Parts 300-399

For a searchable, indexed database that contains and links to all guidance documents in effect from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, please visit FMCSA’s Guidance Portal. To view the latest eCFR version of FMCSA’s Regulations in 49 CFR Parts 300-399, click the link in the first column. To search and browse regulations using the eCFR website, use the link below.

Search the eCFR
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE OF WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.

                 Authorized shares 15,000,000 without par value

This Certifies that ____________________________________ is the owner of
____________________________________ full paid and non-assessable
                  COMMON SHARES OF WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.,
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or 
by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly 
endorsed. In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officers and sealed with the Seal of the 
Corporation,

this _________________ day                             of______________A.D._____

                                     [SPECIMEN]
__________________________                             _________________________
               SECRETARY                                            PRESIDENT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ______________
________________________________________________________________________________
Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint _________________________________________________________
Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

     Dated_______________ 19__

     IN PRESENCE OF

__________________________                             _________________________



                           -------------------------
                            THIS SPACE IS NOT TO BE
                               COVERED IN ANY WAY
                           -------------------------


                                       1
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     This certification is not deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”).
     In connection with the Report of the Company, I, Douglas D. Burkett, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Douglas D. Burkett, Ph.D.  Douglas D. Burkett, Ph.D.  Chief Executive Officer  June 9, 2005