alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2017

p0125 

# Order

Clerk February 1, 2017

154566

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 154566

COA: 327208

Saginaw CC: 14

- 040317

- FC

DEVAUN LAROY LOPEZ,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Cl erk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing: (1) whether prior testimony is admissible under MRE 804(b)(1) where the

proponent of the statement has caused the declarant to be unavailable under MRE 804(a),

regardless of any intent by the proponent to cause unavailability; and, (2) if some form of

intent is required, what standards should apply when det ermining whether the

proponent’s actions were intended to cause the declarant to be unavailable. The parties

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.10.1

                                  AMENDMENT I
                                     OF THE
                          PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY
                                  PENSION PLAN


        The Pulitzer Publishing Company Pension Plan (the "Plan") is amended as
follows. 

        1.      Section 1.02(b) of the Plan is revised in its entirety to read
as follows, effective January 1, 1996:

                "(b)  for determining lump sum values, mortality rates from the
                applicable mortality table prescribed by the Commissioner of
                the Internal Revenue Service (which as of April 5, 1995 was the
                1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table) and the annual rate of
                interest on 30-year Treasury securities as of the fourth 
                calendar month preceding the first day of the calendar quarter 
                that includes the Annuity Starting Date for the distribution". 

        2.      The following sentences are added at the end of Section 3.06 of
the Plan, effective January 1, 1989:

                "Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the
                Accrued Benefit of a Participant who, by reason of a change in 
                employment status, ceases to be an Employee under the Plan and 
                becomes an active Participant in the Joseph Pulitzer Pension 
                Plan (or any other defined benefit plan of the Company or an 
                Affiliate), or vice versa, will be determined without regard to
                the period of the Participant's employment with the Company or 
                an Affiliate during which he or she is or was actively 
                participating in (i.e., accruing benefits under) the Joseph 
                Pulitzer Pension Plan (or such other plan).  In the case of 
                any such Participant, the Committee may direct the transfer of 
                assets and the accrued benefit liability from the Plan to, or
                permit the receipt of assets and assumption of accrued benefit 
                liability from, the Joseph Pulitzer Pension Plan (or such other
                plan), subject to the requirements of Section 414(1) of the 
                Code."



                                            PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY



Dated: 10/25/95                         By: /S/ Ronald H. Ridgway 
       --------                             ---------------------------
                                            Senior Vice President-Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,150
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         110,282
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,262
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,848
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,848
<LOANS>                                        117,361
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,946
<DEPOSITS>                                     124,304
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,154
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,213
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           829
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 155,946
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,625
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,419
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    33
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,077
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,880
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,197
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      170
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,225
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.60
<LOANS-NON>                                         69
<LOANS-PAST>                                        49
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   124
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    242
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,668
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      105
<RECOVERIES>                                        70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,366
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            437
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9827-9828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-210-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 12, 2001, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (Eastern Shore) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Twenty-Third Revised Sheet No. 7 
and Twenty-Third Revised Sheet No. 8, with an effective date of 
February 1, 2001.
    Eastern Shore states that the purpose of the filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to storage services purchased from Columbia 
Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) under its Rate Schedules FSS 
and SST. The costs of the above referenced storage service comprise the 
rates and charges payable under Eastern Shore's respective Rate 
Schedule CFSS. Eastern Shore states that this tracking filing is being 
made pursuant to Section 3 of Eastern Shore's Rate Schedule CFSS.
    Eastern Shore states that copies of the filing have been served 
upon its jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance

[[Page 9828]]

with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may 
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.200(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3428 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

March 31, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 16, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. 

WEVA 2014-82-R, et al. (Issues include whether the 

Administrative Law Judge had jurisdiction to adjudicate the 

validity of a Pattern of Violations notice and whether he erred in

dismissing the notice.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Node 
-                   2002 Annual FOIA Report              

#   2002 Annual FOIA Report

foia-2002.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6680
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN FITZGERALD PRESCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR95-323-PJM) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Fitzgerald Prescott, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Andrew Clayton White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Steven Michael Dettelbach, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on his allegations of newly discovered evidence, the prosecutor's knowing use of perjured testimony, and the government's violation of the disclosure requirements of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Prescott , No. CR95-323-PJM (D. Md. Apr. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.33-24527, No. 33-65002, No. 33-65004, No. 33-58657, No. 333-04169, No.333-56593, No. 333-40328, No. 333-64106, No. 33-65724, No. 333-85204 and No.333-104462 of Quiksilver, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, dated January 20,2004, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph regarding a change in the Company’s method of accountingfor goodwill and intangible assets, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of Quiksilver, Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2003.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

CAREY JAMES BURTON JUNIOR

, §

Appellant §

vs. § CASE NO. 14

- 14

- 00745

- CR

TRIAL COURT NO. 14CR0096

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

Appel lee §

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES, Cary James Burton Junior, the Appellant herein, and moves the Court for

an extension of time to file Appellant's Brief in t his cause, pursuant to Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, and in support thereof would show the Court as follows:

I.

The Appellant in this cause was convicted in the 405th District Court of Galveston County,

Texas in cause number 14C R0096 of the felony offense of Failing to Register as Sex Offender and

his punishment was assessed at 4 years TDC.

II.

Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 30, 2015. The undersigned counsel received a

letter from Appellant on January 27, 2015 stating that he longer desires to pursue this appeal.

III.

The Appellant hereby requests an extension of time so that the undersigned counsel can

send a copy of the Motion to Dismiss Appeal to appellant in TDC (Holliday Unit) for his signature ACCEPTED

14-14-00745-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/30/2015 4:50:46 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKas requir ed by Rule 42.2 TRAP, and would show unto the Court that 45 additional days should be

sufficient to allow for the completion of this.

IV.

Due to the above

- referenced, Appellant’s counsel respectfully requests a 45 day extension to

obtain appellant’s sig nature on the Motion to Dismiss, as required by Rule 42.2, TRAP.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of

Appellant, respectfully prays that this Honorable Court extend the time for filing Appellant's Brief

in this cause.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Greg Russell

Greg Russell

Attorney for Appellant

711 59 th Street

Galveston, Texas 77551

(409) 497

- 4743

(409) 497

- 4721 Fax

SBN: 17411550



### CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICE

As Attorney of Record for Appellant, I do hereby Certify that a true and correct

copy of the above and foregoing document was this date provid ed to the Attorney for

Appellee, Mr. Jack Roady, District Attorney of Galveston County at t he offices of the

### District Attorney of Galveston County, Texas, 600 59 th 

### Street, Galveston, Tx. 77551,

on the 30 th 

### day of January 2015, via certified electronic service provider.

/s/ Greg Russell

Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I do hereby certify that this brief is in compliance with rule 9.4(i) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is computer generated, and its

relevant portions contain 426 word s.

/s/ Greg Russell

Attorney for Appellant
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

I, Kevin Wiley, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) forthe registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 12, 2008
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CAUSE NO. DA 20-0437 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS: FRANCIS A. BOLTON,JOSHUA N. BOLTON,TIM J. BYRNES,SHAWN COATES, DANILE F. EMETT, MICHAEL L. GIACOMINO,ROBERT W.KENT, KEVIN S. LANE, JACOB S. PETERSEN,DANIEL J. POWERS,MARK J. POWERS,KEVIN J. SEYMOUR., DAVIID B. STARCEVICH,JESSE E. TRACY,CLARK R. WARD,and RYAN P. ZEMLJAK,

Claimants and Appellants, Vs. BUTTE SILVER BOW PUBLIC WORKS,WATER UTILITY DWISION,

Respondent and Appellee ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF UPON MOTION of the Appellants and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for the filing of the Appellant's opening brief is extended to and inc ss l_ uding December 1, 2020.

— DATED THIS c_ i DAY OF 2020.

CC: Jeffrey W.Dahood Cynthia L. Walker BY 

# FILED OCT 2 1 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 10/21/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0437