alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31994]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-92-001]

K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company; Notice of 
Tariff Filing

December 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 7, 2001, K N Wattenberg Transmission 
Limited Liability Company (KN Wattenberg) tendered for filing as part 
of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, a corrected tariff 
sheet, to become effective December 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 0

    On November 30, 2001, KN Wattenberg submitted a filing in Docket 
No. RP02-92-000 to cancel its tariff. KN Wattenberg sought an effective 
date of December 1, 2001. KN Wattenberg, however, inadvertently 
included the wrong effective date on the tariff sheets included in the 
filing. In this filing, KN Wattenberg has attached a corrected tariff 
sheet and a corrected marked version of the tariff sheet.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31994 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1617

To authorize the establishment on the grounds of the Edward Hines, Jr.,

Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, of a facility

to provide temporary accommodations for family members of severely

ill children being treated at a nearby university medical center.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the establishment on the grounds of the Edward

Hines, Jr., Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital,

Hines, Illinois, of a facility to provide temporary accommodations for family members of severely ill children

being treated at a nearby university medical center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1617 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT FOR

2 USE OF PROPERTY AT EDWARD HINES, JR.,

3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HOS4 PITAL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

6 may enter into a long-term lease or similar agreement with

7 the organization known as The Caring Place at Loyola,

8 Inc., a not-for-profit organization operating under the

9 laws of the State of Illinois, to permit that organization

10 to establish on the grounds of the Edward Hines, Jr., De11 partment of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, a

12 facility to provide temporary accommodations for family

13 members of severely ill children who are being treated at

14 the Loyola University of Chicago Medical Center and

15 other hospitals.

16 (b) CONDITIONS.—An agreement under subsection

17 (a) shall ensure that there shall be no cost to the United

18 States as a result of the property use authorized by that

19 subsection and may permit the use of the property without

20 rent.

Æ
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2964

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United

v. * States District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Eric Delon Fonville, * 

* [UNPUBLISHED] 

Appellant. *

__________

Submitted: May 11, 2009

Filed: May 18, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

On May 1, 2008, Eric Delon Fonville (Fonville) filed a motion with the district

court1

 requesting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Fonville argued

his sentence was based upon the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G. or

Guidelines), and therefore, his sentence should be reduced pursuant to the Guidelines’

amendments which retroactively reduced the offense level applicable to cocaine base

(crack) offenses. See Amendment 706 to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c); Amendment 715 to

U.S.S.G. §§ 1B1.10, 2D1.1. The district court denied Fonville’s motion because
-2-

Fonville was sentenced according to the terms of a Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) (formerly Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(1)(C)) plea agreement, which

was agreed to by the parties and accepted by the sentencing court. 

On appeal, Fonville argues his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement does not

preclude a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In United States v.

Scurlark, 560 F.3d 839, 842-43 (8th Cir. 2009), our court held that when a sentence

is based upon a binding Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, courts are bound by the

terms of the agreement and have no authority under § 3582(c)(2) to alter those terms

because of the subsequently amended Guidelines for the retroactive crack cocaine

sentencing reduction. We follow our precedent, as we must, and affirm the district

court’s opinion and judgment denying Fonville’s motion for a reduced sentence.

______________________________
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



Certification of Principal Accounting Officer



I, Wm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Admiral Financial Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: May 12, 2009



/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham, Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 21



               SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


      Acclaim Cable Holdings, Inc.                      Delaware
      Acclaim Coin-Operated Entertainment, Inc.         Delaware
      Acclaim Comics, Inc.                              Delaware
      Acclaim Distribution, Inc.                        Delaware
      Acclaim Corporate Center I, Inc.                  New York
      LJN Toys, Ltd.                                    New York
      Oyster Bay Warehouse Corp.                        New York
      Acclaim Redemption Games, Inc.                    California
      Iguana Entertainment, Inc.                        Texas
      Acclaim Studios - Salt Lake City, Inc.            Utah
      Acclaim Japan, Ltd.                               Japan
      Acclaim Entertainment Canada, Ltd.                Canada
      Acclaim Entertainment Espana SA                   Spain
      Acclaim Entertainment G.m.b.H.                    Germany
      Acclaim Entertainment, SA                         France
      Acclaim Entertainment, Ltd.                       United Kingdom
      Iguana Entertainment Ltd.                         United Kingdom
      Probe Entertainment Limited                       United Kingdom
      Acclaim Redemption Games Limited                  U.S. Virgin Islands
      Acclaim Character Animation, L.P.                 Delaware
      ACA Holdings, Inc.                                Delaware
      Acclaim Europe Ltd.                               United Kingdom
      Annodeus Inc.                                     Delaware
      TNM Holdings, Inc.                                Delaware
      Annodeus G.m.b.H.                                 Germany
      Annodeus S.A.                                     France
      Annodeus Limited                                  United Kingdom
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 02-1251/2115

___________ Dr. Genick Bar-Meir, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the North American Die Casting * District of Minnesota. Association, MN Chapter 16; Henry * Bakemeyer; Larry Winkler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 3, 2002 Filed: December 19, 2002

___________ Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Genick Bar-Meir filed this action against the North American Die Casting Association (NADCA) MN Chapter 16; its Vice Chairman for Education, Larry Winkler; and Henry Bakemeyer, a Wisconsin resident hired to teach NADCA courses. He claimed they infringed his copyright of a book entitled “Fundamentals of Die Casting Design” by selling materials for a course created by non-party1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
2 The Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- NADCA. Bar-Meir appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment for defendants, all pretrial rulings, 2and the award of costs and attorneys’ fees against him. We agree with the district court that the undisputed evidence shows defendants never possessed the materials Bar-Meir claims were infringing, and thus defendants could not be responsible for displaying or distributing the materials. See Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. , 464 U.S. 417, 433 (1984) (defining infringer of copyright). Moreover, the course syllabus he alleges was derived from his book was not substantially similar, and thus was not infringing. See Hartmann v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. , 833 F.2d 117, 120 (8th Cir. 1987) (test for substantial similarity). We reject Bar-Meir’s contention that he was improperly denied an oral argument on the summary judgment motion. See Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Cathey , 977 F.2d 447, 448- 49 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). We hold there was no abuse of discretion in any of the discovery rulings, see SDI Operating P’ship v. Neuwirth , 973 F.2d 652, 655 (8th Cir. 1992) (standard of review), or in denying Bar-Meir leave to file an amended complaint, see Deutsche Fin. Servs. Corp. v. BCS Ins. Co. , 299 F.3d 692, 700 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). We also hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding defendants their costs and attorneys’ fees, upon finding that the action was objectively unreasonable and there was a need to deter future similar suits. See17 U.S.C. § 505; Mary Ellen Enters., Inc. v. Camex, Inc. , 68 F.3d 1065, 1072 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review; factors to consider in imposing costs and fees).-3- Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11


                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1997          1996         1995
                                             -------       -------      -------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>          <C>
Net (loss) income                            $  (399)      $   122      $ 1,384
                                             =======       =======      =======

Weighted average common shares - basic         6,122         6,041        5,420
Dilutive options                                  50             3            8
                                             -------       -------      -------

Adjusted weighted average common shares
   and assumed conversions - diluted           6,172         6,044        5,472
                                             =======       =======      =======

Net (loss) income per share - basic          $ (0.07)      $  0.02      $  0.26
                                             =======       =======      =======

Net (loss) income per share - diluted        $ (0.06)      $  0.02      $  0.25
                                             =======       =======      =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,095,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,451,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                   629,670
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,379,681
<PP&E>                                       3,741,114
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,574,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,349,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,834,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,998
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,063,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,349,897
<SALES>                                     25,185,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,185,008
<CGS>                                        9,988,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,320,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                864,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            736,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   736,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1689

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel MOONSHINE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel MOONSHINE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and section 12106 of title

5 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation

6 may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate

7 endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the
2

•HR 1689 IH

1 United States for the vessel MOONSHINE (official num2 ber 974226).

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, Scott C. Petersen and Gary H. Ritondaro, the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation (the Company), individually and not
jointly has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Certification as of the 2nd day of June, 2003.

|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer
|                                                              
|/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. Ritondaro
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration


International Standards on the Transport of Dangerous Goods; 
Public Meetings

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), Department 
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to advise interested persons that RSPA will 
conduct a public meeting to discuss the outcome of the twentieth 
session of the United Nation's Sub-Committee of Experts on the 
Transport of Dangerous Goods (UNSCOE) held December 5-11, 2001 in 
Geneva, Switzerland.

DATES: January 16, 2002, 9:30 a.m.-12 p.m., Room 3328.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at DOT Headquarters, Nassif 
Building, Room 3328, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Richard, International Standards 
Coordinator, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Department of 
Transportation, Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-0656.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of the meeting will be 
to discuss outcomes of proposals presented to the twentieth session of 
UNSCOE. Topics to be covered during the public meeting will include (1) 
Criteria for Environmentally Hazardous Substances, (2) Intermodal 
requirements for the transport of solids in bulk containers, (3) 
Harmonized requirements for compressed gas cylinders, (4) Portable tank 
requirements, (5) Classification of individual substances, (6) 
Requirements for packagings used to transport hazardous materials, (7) 
Requirements for infectious substances, and (8) Hazard communication 
requirements.
    The public is invited to attend without prior information.

Documents

    Copies of documents for the UNSCOE meeting may be obtained by 
downloading hem from the United Nations Transport Division web site at 
http://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc/c3doc_2001.html. 
Information concerning UN dangerous goods meetings including agendas 
can be downloaded at http://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc/c3.html. These sites may also be accessed through the international 
section of RSPA's Hazardous Materials Safety website at http://hazmat.dot.gov/intstandards.htm. RSPA's site provides information 
regarding the UNSCOE and the Globally Harmonized System of 
Classification and Labeling for Chemicals, a summary of decisions taken 
at the 21st session of the UN Committee of Experts, meeting dates and 
summary of the primary topics which are to be addressed in the 2001-
2002 biennium.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 21, 2001.
Robert A. McGuire,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 01-32011 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M