alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 235

[DFARS Case 2001-D002]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Research and 
Development Streamlined Contracting Procedures; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a correction to the preamble to the proposed 
rule published at 66 FR 63348-63349, December 6, 2001, pertaining to 
streamlined research and development contracting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angelena Moy, Defense Acquisition 
Regulations Council, OUSD (AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-1302; 
facsimile (703) 602-0350.

Correction

    In the issue of Thursday, December 6, 2001, on page 63349, in the 
first column, the second sentence of the Background section is 
corrected to read as follows: ``The standard format is available on the 
research and development streamlined solicitation (RDSS) website at 
http://www.rdss.osd.mil.''

Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
[FR Doc. 01-31354 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2020

No. 04-20-00495-CV

IN RE Alicia P. WILLEFORD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

Proceeding 

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice 

Real party in interest, Jimmy Willeford’s response was originally due on October 22,

2020. One extension of time has been granted to November 12, 2020. On November 20, 2020,

Willeford filed a motion requesting a twenty-one day-extension to file a response.

The motion is GRANTED and the response is due no later than December 11, 2020. 

Counsel for Mr. Willeford is cautioned that further delays in filing the response are disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on November 23, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-11792, styled in the Matter of the Marriage of Alicia P. 

Willeford and Jimmy D. Willeford, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The 

Honorable Richard Price issued the order at issue in this original proceeding.
**EXHIBIT 12.1****COMPUTATION FOR RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                       **Fiscal Year Ended October 31**   **2001**  **2002**  **2003**  **2004**  **2005** Earnings:                    Income before provision for income taxes $45,412  $59,986  $90,067  $121,992  $158,346 Add:                    Interest expense  10,873   8,640   8,267   6,390   21,950 Interest attributable to rentals  856   1,155   1,922   2,443   3,556                 Total earnings $57,141  $69,781  $100,256  $130,825  $183,852                 Fixed Charges:                    Interest expense  10,873   8,640   8,267   6,390   21,950 Interest attributable to rentals  856   1,155   1,922   2,443   3,556                 Total fixed charges $11,729  $9,795  $10,189  $8,833  $25,506                                      Ratio  4.9   7.1   9.8   14.8   7.2 
85
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ODELL JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 279 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ODELL JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 280 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determi ned that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10489 C onfer enc e Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. HARVEY L S EARCY D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp eal f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ct C ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ct of T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 7

- CR- 2 1 2

- ALL

B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappoi nt ed t o r epr es ent H ar veyL. Sear c y has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lifo r n ia , 3 8 6 U. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. S e a r c y h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e . Our i nde pe nde nt r e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of A pp eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Charles Lee Timms

, * From the 104 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 2 23 64

- B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 08 6

- C R * May 9 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams , J. )

This court has considered Charles Lee Timms ’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00389-CR

EX PARTE Kenneth Richard RIKER II

From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25621A

Honorable Mark Cashion, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 2, 2020

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant and his 

attorney. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See 

id.; Hypolite v. State, 647 S.W.2d 294, 295 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983); Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 

108, 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish
Computation of Per Share Earnings
Exhibit 11.1





                            October 31, October 25,  October 27,
                               1997         1996        1995
Adjusted Shares Outstanding

Weighted average common
    shares outstanding        4,192,530    3,767,083   3,318,649

Warrants                      3,352,968    3,383,800   3,404,801

Stock Options                   625,656      795,759    967,461

   Total common shares and
    common share equivalents  8,171,154    7,946,642   7,690,911


20% common stock limitation    (493,912)    (319,728)   (663,730)
     
Adjusted weighted average
   shares outstanding         7,677,242    7,626,914    7,027,181


Adjusted Net Earnings 

Net earnings               $11,502,000   $12,895,000   $9,838,000

Adjustment for 20% common
  stock limitation                   -            -        27,000

Adjusted earnings for computation
     of earnings per share  $11,502,000  $12,895,000   $9,865,000


Earnings Per Share

Adjusted earnings for computation
     of earnings per share $11,502,000   $12,895,000   $9,865,000

Adjusted weighted average shares
     outstanding             7,677,242     7,626,914    7,027,181

Earnings per common share       $1.50          $1.69        $1.40







     
NOTES:

Primary earnings per share and fully diluted earnings per share
were substantially the same in all periods presented.

The modified treasury stock method is used to calculate net
earnings per common share.  The calculation uses the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding and, when fully
dilutive, common equivalent shares outstanding (warrants and
stock options).  Under the method, all warrants and options are
assumed to be exercised and up to 20% of common shares
outstanding are assumed to be repurchased.  The remaining
proceeds, if any, are then assumed to be used to reduce debt and
the resulting reduction in interest expense is added back to net
earnings for calculation of earnings per share.


1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16
                                                                                
                                      NOTE
                                      ----
$139,000.00                                              Blossburg, Pennsylvania
                                                                  April 30, 1987

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Milesburg Energy, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
("Maker"), promises to pay WITHOUT RECOURSE and WITHOUT INTEREST to Richard Mase
and Sylvia B. Mase (collectively "Holder") the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE
THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS ($139,000.00), ON DEMAND after the CONDITION DATE.

     The Condition Date shall be the fifth business day following the date that
Condition I, as that term is defined by a certain Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated April 30, 1987 between Environmental Power Corporation and Neil W.
Hedrick, Richard Mase and Sylvia B. Mase, has been satisfied.

     Maker (i) waives trial by jury in any action on this Note or any security
for this Note, (ii) waives all requirements of diligence in collection,
presentment, notice of non-payment, protest, notice of protest, suit and all
other conditions precedent in connection with the collection and enforcement of
this Note or the realization of any security for this Note; (iii) waives the
right to require the Holder to proceed against any other person or to pursue any
other remedy before proceeding against it, and (iv) agrees that, if consented to
by Maker, no renewal or extension of this Note, including a renewal or extension
in which this Note is surrendered, no release, surrender or substitution of
security for this Note or the indebtedness evidenced hereby, no modification or
waiver of the terms of any instrument referred to herein or any other agreement
now or hereafter directly relating to this Note or the indebtedness evidenced
hereby, and, whether or not consented to by Maker, no delay or omission in
exercising any right or power under this Note or any security for this Note or
the indebtedness evidenced hereby, shall affect Maker's liability, and (vi)
agrees that additional makers, endorsers, guarantors, or sureties may become
parties hereto without notice to Maker and without affecting the Maker's
liability hereunder.

     Maker agrees to pay all reasonable costs and expenses including reasonable
attorneys' fees incurred by Holder in any proceeding for collection of the debt
evidenced hereby.

     This Note is given in satisfaction of a certain note given by Maker to
Holder dated April 21, 1987 in the principal amount of $139,000.00.
<PAGE>
 
     This Note shall take effect as a sealed instrument on the date first set
forth above and shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.

WITNESS                                MILESBURG ENERGY, INC.

/s/ Robert L. Diamond                  By: /s/ Neil W. Hedrick, President
------------------------------             -------------------------------
                                           Neil W. Hedrick, President

                                       2
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of China Forestry, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yuan Tian, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, individually certify that:








·
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and·
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
      and for the periods presented.








/s/
      Yuan Tian
              ---------------------
              Yuan
      Tian
              Director
      and  Chief Executive Officer
              
              Dated:  March
      31, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to China Forestry, Inc. and will be retained
by China Forestry, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
333-10559 and 333-58347 on Form S-8 and 33-56555 and 333-31591 on Form S-3 of 
Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 1999 (March 
9, 1999 as to paragraph 4 of Note 18) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 
10-K of Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.

//Deloitte & Touche, LLP//

March 29, 1999
San Diego, California
2014-0300.

#### Pegg v. Mausser.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Maurice Pegg. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11

                           VYTA CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                 December 31, 2005         December 31,
                             -----------------------  -----------------------
                                2005         2004        2005         2004
                             -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------
<S>                          <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
Net loss                     $ (345,674)   (217,568)  (1,033,254)   (423,862)
                             ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding   6,855,418   4,548,386    6,327,884   4,525,670

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares
  issuable upon exercise of
  outstanding options and
  warrants                            -           -            -           -
                             -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------

                              6,855,418   4,534,386    6,327,884   4,525,670
                             ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========

Net loss per share,
  basic and diluted          $    (0.05)      (0.05)       (0.16)      (0.09)
                             ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========
</TABLE>


Stock  options  and  warrants  are  not considered in the calculations for those
periods  with net losses as the impact of the potential common shares (1,926,877
shares  at December 31, 2005 and 3,809,094 shares at December 31, 2004) would be
to  decrease  net  loss  per  share.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

BAC 6735-01

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

October 10, 2014

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 22, 2014

 PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from 

F Street entrance)

 STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

 CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion Consultants,

Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-952-R, et al. (Issues include whether the 

Administrative Law Judge erred in ruling that the violation of the 

order in question was the result of high negligence.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

 FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

______________________________

Emogene Johnson

Administrative Assistant
Order entered November 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00134-CR

HAMID SHOHREH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-82213-2013

ORDER

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue the mandate in this appeal forthwith. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50326 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN JOSE GUARDIOLA-BARRIOS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2337-ALL Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Jose Guardiola-Barrios raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3348 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow payments under 

the Medicare program for certain items and services furnished by offcampus outpatient departments of a provider to be determined under 

the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2021 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

payments under the Medicare program for certain items 

and services furnished by off-campus outpatient departments of a provider to be determined under the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department 

services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3348 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SOS: Sustaining Out3 patient Services Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ALLOWING MEDICARE PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN 

5 ITEMS AND SERVICES FURNISHED BY OFF6 CAMPUS OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENTS OF A 

7 PROVIDER TO BE DETERMINED UNDER THE 

8 PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOS9 PITAL OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES. 

10 Section 1833(t)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(1)(B)) is amended— 

12 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

13 (2) in clause (v)— 

14 (A) by inserting before ‘‘does not include’’ 

15 the following: ‘‘subject to clause (vi),’’; and 

16 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

17 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(vi) includes, with respect to a year 

21 (beginning with 2022), any item or serv22 ice— 

23 ‘‘(I) that is furnished during 

24 such year by an off-campus outpatient 

25 department of a provider (as defined 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3348 IH

1 in subparagraph (B) of paragraph 

2 (21)); and 

3 ‘‘(II) with respect to which the 

4 greatest total amount paid with re5 spect to a physician speciality under 

6 the physician fee schedule under sec7 tion 1848 for all such items or serv8 ices furnished by physicians in such 

9 specialty during the previous year was 

10 less than $2,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 5,152
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         38,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (1,404)
<INVENTORY>                                           55,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     107,235
<PP&E>                                                76,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (18,951)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       371,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 90,585
<BONDS>                                              125,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   1
<OTHER-SE>                                           130,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         371,863
<SALES>                                              329,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     329,444
<CGS>                                                225,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        225,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    19,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       27,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                          10,890
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   16,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          16,448
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.00



</TABLE>