alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jeremy P. Feakins, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Jeremy P. Feakins

Jeremy P. Feakins

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

May 5, 2017



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00622

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF J. P. A

. III, L.K.S., C.S.S. II, G.E.O.S. , C HILD REN

On appeal from th e County Court at Law No. 1

of Calhoun County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLANT ’S BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

On October 20, 201 4, M.H.S. and C.S., parents of J.P.A. III, L.K.S., C.S.S. II,

G.E.O.S. , filed a notice of appeal in this parental termination case. M.H.S. filed an

extension of time to file her appellate brief. We granted that extension until January 23,

2015

. C.S. ’s brief was due on December 11, 2 014. C.S. has filed no brief and has

requested n o extens ion of time to file his brief

. Th is Court requires strict adherence to

the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases and looks with di sfavor upon

this delay

.2

Now on the 78 th day of this appeal, a ppellant C.S. is hereby ORDERED to file his

appellate brief with thi s Court on or before January 23, 2015. Any extension of time will

not be favorably entertained by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed t he 6th

day of January , 201 5

.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew A. Stevens, Chief
Financial Officer of Zila, Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18

U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Andrew A. Stevens  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Zila, Inc. and will be
retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. 36
[EXHIBIT 32]

          CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10Q of Admiral Financial Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended March
31,  2004,  Wm.  Lee  Popham, Chairman, CEO and  CFO  of  Admiral
Financial  Corp. hereby certifies pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such  Annual  Report on Form 10Q for the  period  ended
          March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
          10Q  for  the  period  ended  March  31,  2004,  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition   and  results  of  operations   of   Admiral
          Financial Corp.

                                ADMIRAL FINANCIAL CORP.


     Date: May 12, 2004         By:/s/ Wm. Lee Popham
                                   ------------------------
                                   Wm. Lee Popham, Chairman, CEO and CFO
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                THERMA-WAVE, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, L. Ray Christie, in my capacity as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Therma-Wave, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Therma-Wave"),
and in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by Therma-Wave
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2004 (the "Report"),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Therma-Wave.

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Therma-Wave and
will be retained by Therma-Wave and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 5th day of November 2004.

                               /s/ L. Ray Christie
                               -----------------------------
                               L. Ray Christie
                               Senior Vice President,
                               Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed by Therma-Wave as part of
the report or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 or
any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 27, 2014*

[Cite as *06/27/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2802.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-0557.

#### State ex rel. Evans v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator’s request for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52, it is ordered by the court that the request is denied.
Exhibit          15.1

         

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING            FIRM** 

           We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File        Nos. 333-120841; 333-109915; 333-91330; 333-11530; 333-09134; 333-06098 and 333-135450) of        Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd. (the “Company”), of our report dated July 2,        2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this        Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.

         

         

         

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global

Tel Aviv, Israel

October 15, 2007

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that the public comment period is extended by two weeks for a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Koch                               ( print page 9880)                            Petroleum Group, L.P.,*                     Civil Action No. 00-2756-PAM-SRN, which was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on December 22, 2001. Notice of the proposed settlement was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2001, (Vol. 66, No. 8, PG. 2444-2445), beginning a 30-day public comment period, which will expire on February 12, 2001. The period for public comment is extended by two weeks, or through February 26, 2001.                

                    Comments should be addressed to the Acting Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Koch Petroleum Group, L.P.,*                     D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-07110.                

Robert D. Brook, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 01-3453  Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                             Boston Acoustics, Inc.
                               300 Jubilee Drive
                          Peabody, Massachusetts 01960


                                 June 6, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Boston Acoustics, Inc. (the "Issuer") is today filing with the Commission
the Issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2002
(the "Filing"). The Filing includes financial statements with respect to which
Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has issued an accountant's report.

     Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, the Issuer
hereby advises the Commission that Andersen has represented to the Issuer that
the audit is subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and audit practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on audits,
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.


                                 Very truly yours,

                                 Boston Acoustics, Inc.

                                 By: /s/ Debra A. Ricker-Rosato
                                     --------------------------
                                     Debra A. Ricker-Rosato
                                     Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0641. IN RE ESTATE OF LEON KIRKLAND AND IN RE ESTATE OF

RUBY KIRKLAND.

A16A0642. IN RE ESTATE OF LEON KIRKLAND AND IN RE ESTATE OF

RUBY KIRKLAND.

Based upon thisCourt’s dismissal of two other related appeals, A16A0038 and

A16A0039, and the subsequent denial of the Appellant’sMotion forReconsideration,

and in consideration of the Appellant’s admission that the appeals in A16A0641 and

A16A0642 are moot due to the dismissal in the other two related cases, the

Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED and A16A0641 and A16A0642

are both Dismissed.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/08/2016

March 08, 2016
August 21 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ISAAC TRENARD TOLDER , Appellant
NO. 14

- 11

- 00179

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for ob servance.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 40 40

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Jo hn E. Peet

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.

Nan cy A. Berryhil l, Act in g C omm is si on er o f So ci al Secu rit y

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta - Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 5, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Octo be r 11 , 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.

Jo hn E. Peet ap pe al s th e or de r of th e di st ric t co ur t a f f i r mi n g a pa rti al ly 1 fav or ab le de te rm in at io n on hi s ap pl ic at io n fo r su pp le m en ta l se cu rit y in co m e. Peet ’s

The Hon or ab le Dav id S. Dot y , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of 1 Mi n n e s o t a, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le St ev en E. Rau , Uni te d S ta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta

.pr o se br ie f rai se s se ve ral arg um en ts be y on d th e sc op e of th is co ur t’s rev ie w o f th e

Decem be r 18 , 20 14 de ci si on be fo re it , in cl ud in g cl ai m s th at rel at e to pr io r di sa bi li ty
pr oc eed in gs

. As t o th os e cl ai m s th at arg ua bl y rel at e to th e ap pe al ed de ci si on , th is

co ur t co nc lu de s th at (1 ) t h e a d mini st rat iv e la w jud ge (ALJ) pr op erl y li m it ed hi s

co ns id erat io n to th e pe rio d wit h i n th e sc op e of a rem an d or de r of th e App eal s Co un ci l, se e 2 0 C.F.R. § 41 6.1 47 7 (upo n rem an d fro m App eal s Co un ci l, ALJ sh al l
ta ke an y act io n or de red by App eal s Co un ci l, an d m ay ta ke an y ad di ti on al act io n th at is no t in co ns is te nt wit h rem an d or de r); an d (2 ) th e ALJ di d no t err in pr oc eed in g wit h Peet ’s he ari ng d e sp it e hi s un rep res en te d st at us , as th e reco rd sh ows th at Peet ha d be en pr ov id ed se ve ral no ti ces of hi s rig ht to b e a cco m pa ni ed by rep res en ta ti on , to ge th er wit h li st s of or ga ni zat io ns to co nt act fo r in fo rm at io n reg ard in g at to rn ey s, se e 42 U.S.C. § 13 83 (d )(2 )(D) (Co m m is si on er sh al l no ti fy cl ai m an t in writ in g, to ge th er wit h no ti ce of ad ve rs e de te rm in at io n, of op ti on s fo r ob ta i n i n g at to rn ey rep res en ta ti ve s, an d sh al l ad vi se of av ai la bi li ty of le ga l se rv ic e or ga ni zat io ns pr ov id in g free le ga l se rv ic es ); W in ge rt v. Bo wen , 89 4 F.2 d 29 6, 29 8 (8 th Ci r. 19 90 ) (co nc lu di ng cl ai m an t was ad vi se d of r i g h t t o co un se l th ro ug h So ci al Secu rit y Adm in is tra ti on ’s no ti ce of hi s he ari ng , whi ch ex pl ai ne d hi s rig ht to co un se l, an d cl ai m an t’s re sp on se to no ti ce). Th e jud gm en t i s af fir m ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 9, 2014*

[Cite as *06/09/2014 Case Announcements #2,*2014-Ohio-2484.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-0197.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.

This cause is scheduled for oral argument on Tuesday, June 10, 2014. Upon consideration of respondent’s expedited motion for continuance of oral argument, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1**  **8 19** 

In re: MOORTHY SRINIVASAN RAM , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 3 : 09

- c r - 0 0020

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : September 24 , 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Moorthy Srinivasan Ram , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Moorthy Srinivasan Ram petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district
court denied Ram’s motion on August 29, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Ram ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 33985] 

LB Railco, Inc. (LB Railco) has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate lines leased from the San Francisco Port Commission between a junction with Union Pacific Services, near Amador Street and Cargo Way, and the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility, and thence beyond to Piers 92, 94, and 96, a total distance of approximately one-half mile in San Francisco, CA. 

LB Railco indicates that it intends to commence operations by December 30, 2000. The earliest the transaction can be consummated is December 29, 2000 (7 days after the exemption was filed). 

                    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio*. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33985, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on John F. McHugh, McHugh & Barnes, P.C., 20 Exchange Place, New York, NY 10005. 

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.” 

Decided: December 29, 2000.

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-331 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### In the Matter of Loyd Rex CONNER, Debtor, Loyd Rex Conner, Appellant, v. First National Bank, Haskell, Appellee.

No. 08-10746.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 5, 2009.

Ronald L. Yandell, Law Offices of Ron L. Yandell, Wichita Falls, TX, for Appellant.

Henry Lowndes Rugeley, III, Davison Rugeley *&*Spurgers, Wichita Falls, TX, for Appellee.

*816Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the district court correctly affirmed the bankruptcy court order modifying the debtor’s plan. Based on the district court’s July 11, 2008 thorough Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order, we affirm its judgment.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



Date: August 12, 2003



| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Caraustar Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Caraustar Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.