alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial                           ( print page 89)                        property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2002.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 am to 1:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         45 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Conference Room E1/2, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John R. Lymangrover, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4552.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-32167 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2526 In Re: DOROTHY P. LITZENBERG, Plaintiff - Appellant.

No. 97-2692 DOROTHY P. LITZENBERG (Mrs.), Plaintiff - Appellant, and CECIL COUNTY LAND CORPORATION, Secre tary/ Treasurer Dorothy Litzenberg, Plaintiff, versus JOHN H. LITZENBERG; CECIL FEDERAL BANK; CONESTOGA TITLE COMPANY, Office of Thrift Supervision, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (MISC-94-67, CA-97-3681-JFM)2 Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Appellant appeals the districtcourt's orders denying several motions filed in regard to a previously litigated civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In Re: Litzenberg , No. MISC-94-67; CA-97-3681-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 17 &Dec. 8, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion to recuse the district court judge, her petition for immediate review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FOIA LOG FY 2017              

#   FOIA LOG FY 2017

 

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-19-1999

USA v. One Toshiba Color TV

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-3578,98-3579

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. One Toshiba Color TV" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 207.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/207
Filed July 19, 1999 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

NOS. 98-3578 and 98-3579 

No. 98-3578 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ONE TOSHIBA COLOR TELEVISION; 

TWO ANSWERING MACHINES; 

ONE HEALTH TECH COMPUTER 

*Reginald McGlory, Appellant 

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.) 

(D.C. Civ. No. 90-cv-00138) 

No. 98-3579 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ASSORTED JEWELRY 

*Reginald McGlory, Appellant 

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.) 

(D.C. Civ. No. 90-00370) 

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN 

GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, 

ROTH, McKEE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. 

O R D E R 

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing 

en banc in the above appeals, it is 
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court list the above cases 

for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /S/ Edward R. Becker 

 CHIEF JUDGE 

DATED: July 19, 1999 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
II 

Calendar No. 472 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3508 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 4, 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye Falls, New 

York, as the ‘‘CW4 Christian J. Koch Memorial Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHRISTIAN KOCH MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye 

6 Falls, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘CW4 Christian J. Koch Memorial Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3508 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘CW4 Christian J. 

5 Koch Memorial Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 472 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3508 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttian J. Koch Memorial Post Office’’. Honeoye Falls, New York, as the ‘‘CW4 Chris- al Service located at 39 West Main Street, in 

AUGUST 4, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVI  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-KSB  for
the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund  Management
XVI,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner  of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Patrick W. Keene
                               Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                               AEI Fund Management XVI, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               March 25, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, Charles C. Best, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1704 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1704

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 1,8 Dichloroanthraquinone 
                       and 1,8 Diaminonapthalene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 1993

 Mr. Gingrich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 1,8 Dichloroanthraquinone 
                       and 1,8 Diaminonapthalene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN CHEMICALS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new headings:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  1,8 Dichloroanthra- quinone (provided for in subheading                     No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        2914.70.20).............................................  Free                                                31/94             
           9902.31.13  1,8 Diaminonaptha- lene (provided for in subheading                         No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        2921.59.10).............................................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                   NATIONAL HEALTH ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                            COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS

1) Expert Systems, Inc.
   1301 Hightower Trail
   Suite 201
   Roswell, GA 30350-2917
   (An Arizona Corporation)

2) First Strategic Group, Ltd.
   7032 Comstock
   Suite 100
   Whittier, CA 90602-1388
   (A Delaware Corporation)

3) Health Enhancement International, Inc.
   3200 N. Central Avenue
   Suite 1700
   Phoenix, Az 85012-2437
   (An Arizona Corporation)

4) NHE Systems, Inc.
   3200 N. Central Avenue
   Suite 1700
   Phoenix, Az 85012-2437
   (An Arizona Corporation)
#### Milton BRATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eliot KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-2911-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2011.

Milton Braten, Greenville, SC, pro se.

Stephen D. Straus, Daniel G. Ecker, Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, Hawthorne, NY, for Appellee.

*517PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, RICHARD C. WESLEY, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Plaintiff-Appellant Milton Braten, *pro se,*appeals from the March 15, 2009 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Baer, *J.)*dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and its June 1, 2009 order denying his motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case.

This Court reviews the district court’s dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction *de novo, see Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co.,*239 F.3d 440, 447 (2d Cir. 2000), and the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion, *see Harris v. Kuhlmann,*346 F.3d 330, 357 (2d Cir.2003). We review the district court’s factual findings regarding domicile— whether there has been a change in residence, and intent of permanence — for clear error. *See Palazzo ex rel. Delmage v. Corio,*232 F.3d 38, 42 (2d Cir.2000). A party seeking diversity jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing that diversity exists. *See Herrick Co. v. SCS Commc'ns, Inc.,*251 F.3d 315, 322-23 (2d Cir.2001). After having reviewed the appellant’s contentions on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion.

We have considered Braten’s remaining arguments on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains  summary financial  information extracted  from the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheets for POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES at
March 31,  2000  and  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  for
POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the period ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         363,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  354,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               874,303
<PP&E>                                          20,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,985,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,211,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,925
<OTHER-SE>                                     773,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,985,423
<SALES>                                         28,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,898
<CGS>                                           34,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  314,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (12,639)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (328,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (333,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.4)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.4)








</TABLE>