alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,028
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,528)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Availability of Government-Owned Invention; Available for 
Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of the general 
availability of exclusive or partially exclusive licenses under the 
following pending patent. Any license granted shall comply with 35 USC 
209 and 37 CFR part 404. Applications will be evaluated utilizing the 
following criteria: (1) Ability to manufacture and market the 
technology; (2) manufacturing and marketing ability; (3) time required 
to bring technology to market and production rate; (4) royalties; (5) 
technical capabilities; and (6) small business status.
    Patent No. 6,094,599 entitled ``RF Diathermy and Faradic Muscle 
Stimulation'' by James Bingham and Richard Olsen issued 25 July 2000. 
This technology represents an RF diathermy coil assembly, including a 
generally elastically deformable patient conforming garment and a 
conductive coil secured to the garment. The conductive coil having a 
woven wire construction such that the coil can deform as the garment 
elastically deforms. The RF diathermy coil assembly can be used for 
wound healing in conjunction with muscle stimulation.

DATES: Applications for an exclusive or partially exclusive license may 
be submitted at any time from the date of this notice.

ADDRESSES: Navy Medical Research Center (NMRC), 503 Robert Grant Ave., 
Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Charles J. Schlagel, Office of 
Technology Transfer, NMRC, phone (301) 319-7427, fax (301) 319-7432, e-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7a4b4bfbbb6b0b2bbb497b9baa5b4f9b9b6a1aef9babebb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6c5d5dedad7d1d3dad5f6d8dbc4d598d8d7c0cf98dbdfda">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 19, 2001.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3227 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), I, J. Bryan Baker, Chief Financial Officer of FirstCityFinancial Corporation (“registrant”), certify, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)   the Quarterly Report of the registrant onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (“Form 10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: August 13, 2009 | /s/ J. Bryan Baker         |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
|                       | J. Bryan Baker             |
|                       | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Moving Expenses OMB No. 1545-0062

Form 3903

© Attach to Form 1040.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Attachment

Sequence No. 62

Name(s) shown on Form 1040 Your social security number

Enter the number of miles from your old home to your new workplace 1 1

Enter the number of miles from your old home to your old workplace 2 2

Subtract line 2 from line 1. Enter the result but not less than zero © 3 3

If line 3 is 35 or more miles, complete the rest of this form. Also, see Time Test in the instructions. If line 3 is less than 35

miles, you may not deduct your moving expenses.

Moving Expenses

Section A—Transportation of Household Goods

4 4

Section B—Expenses of Moving From Old To New Home

5 Travel and lodging not including meals 5

6 Total meals 6

7 Multiply line 6 by 80% (.80) 7

8 Add lines 5 and 7 8

Section C—Pre-move Househunting Expenses and Temporary Quarters

(for any 30 days in a row after getting your job)

9 9

10 10

11

11

Add lines 9, 10, and 12

12 12

13 13

14

15

Section D—Qualified Real Estate Expenses

Expenses of (check one) a selling or exchanging your old home, or

b if renting, settling an unexpired lease.

Expenses of (check one) a buying your new home, or

b if renting, getting a new lease.

Dollar Limits and Moving Expense Deduction

16 Enter the smaller of:

17

16

17

18

Add lines 14, 15, and 16

19

18

Add lines 4, 8, and 18. Enter the total here and on Schedule A, line 18. This is your moving expense

deduction ©

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 3903 (1993)

Pre-move travel and lodging not including meals

Temporary quarters expenses not including meals

Total meal expenses for both pre-move househunting

and temporary quarters

Multiply line 11 by 80% (.80)

14

Transportation and storage for household goods and personal effects

© See separate instructions.

● The amount on line 13, or

● $3,000 ($1,500 if married filing a separate return and at the end

of 1993 you lived with your spouse who also started work in 1993).

● $1,500 ($750 if married filing a separate return and at the end of

1993 you lived with your spouse who also started work in 1993).

Enter the smaller of:

● The amount on line 17, or

Cat. No. 12490K

Note: Any payments your employer made for any part of your move (including the value of any services furnished in kind) should

be included on your W-2 form. Report that amount on Form 1040, line 7. See Reimbursements in the instructions.

19

Part II

Part I

%

%

%

%

15

Caution: If you are a member of the armed forces, see the instructions before completing this form.

Note: If you and your spouse moved to separate homes, see the instructions.

Printed on recycled paper
#### OFFICE DEPOT INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ZUCCARINI, dba County Walk, Defendant-Appellant, DS Holdings LLC, Receiver-Appellee.

No. 10-16383.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*247Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 21, 2010.

Michael Woodrow De Vries, Esquire, Latham *&*Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Zuccarini, Stuart, FL, pro se.

Henry M. Burgoyne, III, Esquire, Karl S. Kronenberger, Esquire, Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld, Esquire, Kronenberger Burgoyne, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for ReceiverAppellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Zuccarini, dba County Walk, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motions: 1) to enjoin appellee DS Holdings, LLC and its receiver from selling certain domain names to satisfy a judgment against Zuccarini in favor of appellee Office Depot, Inc.; 2) to order the return to Zuccarini of certain domain names; and 3) for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), challenging the district court’s underlying order appointing a receiver to auction the domain names. In a prior appeal, this court affirmed the district court’s order appointing a receiver to auction the domain names. *Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini,*596 F.3d 696, 703 (9th Cir .2010).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to enjoin the sale of certain domain names.

We affirm the district court’s denial of Zuccarini’s Rule 60(b) motion and motion to order the return of certain domain names, for the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated September 7, 2010.

Appellees’ requests to designate Zuccarini as a vexatious litigant and for sanctions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 24 - 00078 - CV JARED ORT , A

PPELLANT V. BROOKLYN BONHAM , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 84th District Court Hutchinson County, Texas Trial Court No . 44983 , Honorable Curt Brancheau , Presiding



### July 10 , 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Jared Ort, appeals from the trial court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Now pending before this C ourt is Ort’s motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal. The C ourt finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the C ourt has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning2

the payment of costs, costs will be taxed against Ort. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per C uriam
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  FMCS Annual Report For Fiscal Year 2016 Is Online
Home/News/FMCS Annual Report For Fiscal Year 2016 Is Online Previous			Next
FMCS Annual Report For Fiscal Year 2016 Is Online										The FMCS Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2016–a year of transition and accomplishment for the Agency–is now available online.
To access the full text of the report in PDF,click here.
John Arnold2017-01-13T13:23:49-05:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00413-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1269183D

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

WILLIAM ROGER MCGLOTHLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After William Roger McGlothlin pleaded guilty to possessing child 

pornography, the trial court placed him on ten years’ deferred-adjudication 

community supervision. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.26. But the State later alleged that

McGlothlin violated that community supervision 41 times. After a hearing to 

adjudicate McGlothlin’s guilt, the trial court found 31 allegations true, revoked

McGlothlin’s deferred-adjudication community supervision, adjudicated McGlothlin

guilty of child-pornography possession, and sentenced him to 10 years’ confinement.

The trial court’s judgment orders McGlothlin to pay $450 in reparations: $275 for 

probation fees and $175 for money “DUE TO CSCD.”

On appeal, McGlothlin complains only that the trial court’s reparations order 

violates his due-process right. McGlothlin challenges both bases of the reparations 

award.

Counsel candidly admits that this court has rejected the argument that a trial 

court violates a defendant’s due-process right by imposing probation fees as 

reparations, see, e.g., Zamarripa v. State, 506 S.W.3d 715, 716 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth

2016, pet. ref’d), but he raises it “to preserve it for further review.” Counsel makes no

new argument to support the complaint, nor has he shown that any change in the law 

requires this court to abandon its precedent. Therefore, we decline to reverse course 

and overrule our holding.
3

But our precedent does support modifying the trial court’s judgment to delete 

the $175 described solely as “DUE TO CSCD.” With no additional explanation in the 

record, this description fails to support a reparations award. See Hongpathoum v. State, 

578 S.W.3d 213, 216 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2019, no pet.); Lewis v. State, 

423 S.W.3d 451, 461 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2013, pet. ref’d).

We therefore partially sustain McGlothlin’s point, modify the trial court’s 

judgment to delete $175 from the reparations so that McGlothlin is obligated to pay 

only $275 in reparations, and affirm the judgment as modified.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: May 13, 2021
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy James BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30362.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 13, 2010.

Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Aaron Nicholas Lucoff, Esquire, As*260sistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Greg S. Silvey, Kuna, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, KYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Timothy James Butler appeals from the 160-month sentence imposed upon resentencing following a successful 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Butler contends that the district court procedurally erred by limiting its consideration of his post-sentence rehabilitation in order to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. The record reflects that the district court fully considered Butler’s post-sentence rehabilitation, in conjunction with the remaining 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, when it granted a 21-month downward variance from the advisory Guidelines range. *See United States v. Green,*152 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). The district court did not procedurally err, and the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *see also United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Regulations Governing United States Savings Bonds Series E/EE and H/HH.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 10, 2001, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Vicki S. Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 
Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Regulations Governing United States Savings Bonds Series E/
EE and H/HH.
    OMB Number: 1535-0095
    Abstract: The regulations mandate the payment of H/HH interest by 
Direct Deposit (ACH Method)
    Current Actions: None
    Type of Review: Extension
    Affected Public: Individuals, Businesses or other for-profit, and 
state or local governments.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: February 2, 2001.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 01-3243 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-U