alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3337]



[[Page 9728]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: February 22-23, 2001; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Room II-575, Stafford II Conference Center, National 
Science Foundation, 4121 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Filbert Bartoli, Program Director, Room 675, 
Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
292-8339.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Unsolicited proposals submitted 
in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-2).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 5, 2001.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-3337 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

October 23, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 19, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: United Steelworkers, Local No. 5114, on behalf of Miners

v. Hecla Limited, Docket No. WEST 2012-466-CM. (Issues 

include whether the Judge erred in determining the length of the 

compensation period and the number of miners who were entitled 

to compensation under 30 U.S.C § 821.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
EXHIBIT 10.6



June 30, 2007



SandRidge Capital, L.P.


1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 325


Houston, Texas 77056



Attention: Mr. Andrew M. Rowe



Re:    Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Rowe:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2008 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.


			
		• 	SB Bristol Energy Fund LP


			
		• 	CMF SandRidge Master Fund LP


			
		• 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.


			
		• 	SSB Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.


			
		• 	CMF SandRidge Feeder (Cayman) Ltd.



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC



By:    /s/ Jennifer Magro


        Jennifer Magro


        Chief Financial Officer & Director



By:    /s/ Andrew M. Rowe



Print Name: Andrew M. Rowe



JM/sr


1
#### In re Kelley MALA, Petitioner.

No. 10-3960.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. Nov. 18, 2010.

Opinion Filed: Dec. 29, 2010.

Kelley Joseph Mala, Miami, FL, pro se.

Jason T. Cohen, Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent.

Before: BARRY, FISHER AND STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Kelley Mala seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the District Court of the Virgin Islands to, inter alia, vacate the order transferring his case to the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.

I.

On May 30, 2007, petitioner Kelley Mala filed a civil complaint in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. On September 14, 2010, the District Court, upon motion of the defendants, ordered petitioner Kelley Mala’s suit transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Mala did not appeal. On September 29, Mala filed a motion asking the District Court to reconsider the order transferring the case and alter, amend, or correct the order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). He also filed a motion to alter, amend, or correct under Rule 59(e). The District Court has not issued a ruling on either motion. Mala now asks that we issue a writ of mandamus compelling the *627District Court to vacate the transfer order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).

A writ of mandamus is a “drastic remedy” that should only be granted in “extraordinary circumstances.” *In re Nwanze,*242 F.3d 521, 524 (3d Cir.2001). The petitioner must have no other adequate means to obtain the relief desired and the petitioner must show a “clear and indisputable” right to the 'writ. *See Kerr v. United States District Court,*426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). Mandamus is the appropriate mechanism to seek review of an allegedly improper transfer order. *See Sunbelt Corp. v. Noble, Denton & Assocs., Inc.,*5 F.3d 28, 30 (3d Cir.1993).

Mala cannot demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the writ. The District Court’s decision to transfer the complaint to the District of Puerto Rico did not amount to a “judicial usurpation of power.” *In re Nwanze,*242 F.3d at 524. The District Court transferred Mala’s complaint because the defendants reside in different states, a substantial part of the events giving rise to the complaint occurred in Puerto Rico, the witnesses and documents related to the claims are in Puerto Rico, and only one of the defendants (named in the amended complaint) resides in the judicial district of the Virgin Islands. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1391(b); *see also*28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Inasmuch as venue appears to be proper in the District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Mala cannot show a clear and indisputable right to the writ.

Accordingly, Mala has not met his burden of showing that his right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable.” As a result, we shall deny his mandamus petition.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986; Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed Cooperative Research & Development Agreement 
(CRADA) Negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with Sequoia Scientific, Inc. for development of a laser sensor system 
for collecting fluvial sediment data in rivers.
    Inquiries: If any other parties are interested in similar 
activities with the USGS, please contact: John R. Gray, USGS Office of 
Surface Water, 415 National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, 
VA 20192; phone (703) 648-5318.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
policy requirements stipulated in survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

    Dated: December 7, 2001.
Robert M. Hirsch,
Associate Director for Water.
[FR Doc. 01-32066 Filed 12-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            5858
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      20703
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            8603
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              8750
<LOANS>                                         171688
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  210397
<DEPOSITS>                                      157523
<SHORT-TERM>                                      8127
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1684
<LONG-TERM>                                      23500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         19546
<OTHER-SE>                                          17
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  210397
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  10577
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1224
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11915
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5222
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6693
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      270
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3073
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2174
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.94
<LOANS-NON>                                        325
<LOANS-PAST>                                       111
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    500
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2792
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      593
<RECOVERIES>                                        39
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2508
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1454
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1054


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONALD CHARLES BURRELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 498 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED . It is further ordered that the Petition to Amend Petition for

Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

.
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 2 (Thursday, January 3, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, January 11, 2002, 8:30 a.m.

PLACE: Hilton Washington, 1919 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Monroe Room, 
Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS: Open to the public.

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of December 7, 2001 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. State Advisory Committee Appointments of District of Columbia, 
Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia
VI. Future Agenda Items

9:30 a.m.  Document Production Hearing for the Education Accountability 
Project.
10:00 a.m.  Environmental Justice Hearing.

Debra Carr,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-32258 Filed 12-28-01; 4:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-00-M
Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 16, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00841-CR

CLIFFORD CURTIS BELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-27307-Q

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the 

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and 

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

120841F.U05
#### In re: Jodi B. HUSSEY, Mark A. Hussey, Debtors. Mary Alice Gwynn, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jodi B. Hussey, Mark A. Hussey, Deborah Menotte, U.S. Trustee Office, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-14294.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2009.

Mary Alice Gwynn, Delray Beach, FL, pro se.

Gary J. Rotella, Jay Lewis Farrow, Gary J. Rotella & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

*399Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and COHILL,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. The district court initially imposed sanctions upon Gwynn on two grounds: first, that her appeal from the bankruptcy court was without support in the evidence or the law; and second, that she misrepresented to the district court that she had informed the bankruptcy judge that she had a copy of the tape. The transcript of the June 29, 2007, oral argument before the district court does not clearly indicate that Gwynn actually misrepresented to the district court what she had told the bankruptcy court. Indeed, on reconsideration, the district court indicated that Gwynn may have only inadvertently implied that she had told the bankruptcy judge she had a copy of the tape. We agree that there probably was only a misunderstanding, rather than a misrepresentation. However, that was only an alternative ground of the sanctions order. Even if the misrepresentation ground would not itself support the sanctions imposed by the district court, the sanction is nevertheless amply supported on the basis of the district court’s alternative ground — i.e., the lack of legal and factual support for Gwynn’s appeal from the bankruptcy court to the district court. The district court’s order on reconsideration indicates that the sanctions order could properly be based solely on this ground. We agree, especially in light of the minimal nature of both the monetary and the non-monetary sanctions imposed.

Because the result would not differ in any event, and in light of the inadequate briefing in this appeal, we decline to address the precise source of the district court’s authority to grant sanctions under these circumstances. Whether the district court’s authority derives from one of the rules discussed in the briefs, or from the district court’s inherent authority, it is clear that the district court did have inherent authority to impose the sanctions at issue here.

AFFIRMED.1

1

. Appellant's pending motion to strike certain pages of the appellee’s brief is denied as moot in light of the fact the panel disregarded same.
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  Performance and Accountability Report (PAR)
Home/Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) Performance and Accountability Report (PAR)D2023-11-14T12:54:47-05:00
FMCS FY2023 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR)
FMCS FY2022 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR)
FMCS FY2021 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Masilla, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.Thomas A. Masilla, Jr.Principal Executive OfficerMarch 16, 2006


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 355 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 355

  To require the national instant criminal background check system to 
notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State 
 and local law enforcement agencies whenever the information available 
 to the system indicates that a person illegally or unlawfully in the 
         United States may be attempting to receive a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the national instant criminal background check system to 
notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State 
 and local law enforcement agencies whenever the information available 
 to the system indicates that a person illegally or unlawfully in the 
         United States may be attempting to receive a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Alien NICS Alert Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT NICS NOTIFY ICE AND STATE AND LOCAL LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ATTEMPTED RECEIPT OF FIREARM BY 
              PERSON ILLEGALLY OR UNLAWFULLY IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 103(e) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (34 
U.S.C. 40901(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Requirement to notify ice and state and local law 
        enforcement agencies of attempted receipt of firearm by person 
        illegally or unlawfully in the united states.--The Attorney 
        General shall ensure that, whenever the information available 
        to the system established under this section indicates that a 
        prospective firearm transferee is illegally or unlawfully in 
        the United States, the system shall transmit to the Immigration 
        and Customs Enforcement Agency and to relevant State and local 
        law enforcement agencies a notice that the person may have 
        attempted to receive a firearm in violation of section 
        922(g)(5) of title 18, United States Code, and shall include 
        with the notice all relevant information possessed by the 
        system.''.
                                 <all>
```