alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 4 to Benefit Equalization Plan



 Exhibit(10)E 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN 
 Effective as of October 11, 2001, the Valley National Bancorp Benefit Equalization Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:

 1. The phrase in Section 3.1 of the Plan which begins with “Each Person who qualifies” and ends with “(a) minus
(b) as follows:” is amended to read: “Each Participant who qualifies for a Normal, Early, Disability, or Deferred Pension Plan Benefit, or who has completed at least five Years of Continuous Service under the Pension Plan and is
entitled to an immediately distributable benefit from the Pension Plan, shall be entitled to a SERP Benefit equal to (a) minus (b) as follows:”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7455

ROBERT WAYNE SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00489-NCT)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Wayne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Wayne Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0022

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.Z.L.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Kathy Seeley, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0022
Lithium Technology Corporation 10K


Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Lithium Technology Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April 1, 2011


/s/ Timothy J. RyderTimothy J. Ryder

Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley Ann ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6084.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

*203Shirley Aim Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shirley Ann Rogers appeals the district court’s order denying her motion seeking modification of her sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Rogers,*No. 6:12-cr-00857-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
2013-2043.

#### Privett v. QSL-Milford, L.L.C.

Clermont App. No. CA2013-04-025, 2013-Ohio-4129. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2014-Ohio-1182, 5 N.E.3d 668. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 18, 2023

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 

20004 (enter from F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: American Soda, LLC, Docket No. WEST 2021-0278. 

(Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that the 

operator had failed to report an accident in a timely manner.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, 

must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 

29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 236-7472

Passcode: 678-100

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

Dated: May 4, 2023

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel

Billing Code 6735-01
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended September 30,
         2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec. 13(a)
         or sec. 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Andrew A. Campbell
                                          Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

Date: November 9, 2005

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, September 17, 2021.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted through a videoconference involving all Commissioners. 

Any person wishing to listen to the proceeding may call the number listed below.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in 

open session: Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co., LLC, Docket No. PENN 2019-

0094 (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that the location of a lifeline violated a 

safety standard and constituted an S&S violation.)

 Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary 

aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson, (202) 434-9935 / 

(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Phone Number for Listening to Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.

Passcode: 678-100.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Dated: September 3, 2021

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

BILLING CODE 6735-01
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32209]



[[Page 111]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-39,039]


Fashion International A.D.M. Services, Inc. Scranton, 
Pennsylvania; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 7, 2001, applicable to 
workers of Fashion International located in Scranton, Pennsylvania. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2001 (66 FR 
34256).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Company information 
shows that worker separations occurred at A.D.M. Services, Inc. when it 
closed in March, 2001. A.D.M. Services provided designing services and 
markers supporting the production of men's sport coats and men's and 
ladies' blazers at Fashion International, Scranton, Pennsylvania which 
also closed in March, 2001. A.D.M. Services, Inc. workers were 
inadvertently omitted from the certification.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Fashion International who were adversely affected by 
increased imports of men's sport coats and men's and ladies' blazers.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of A.D.M. Services, Inc., Scranton, Pennsylvania.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-39,039 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Fashion International and A.D.M. Services, 
Inc., Scranton, Pennsylvania who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after February 24, 2001, through 
June 7, 2003, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of December, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-32209 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.T.M., a child, * From the 266th District Court

 of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CV32308.

No. 11-15-00311-CV * December 30, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period  ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
F. Hartman, the Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.


May 14, 2003                        /s/Robert F. Hartman
                                    Robert F. Hartman
                                    Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

p0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144359

E.T. MACKENZIE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144359

COA: 297864

Lenawee CC: 08-002968-CK

SUTTON PLACE-RAISIN TWP., L.L.C.,

Defendant,

and 

UNITED BANK & TRUST,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
SUMMARY SHEET OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.72 
 CMGI, INC. 
 SUMMARY SHEET 
 OF 
 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION 
 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The executive officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. From time to time, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and determines the salaries that are paid to the Company’s executive officers. The following table sets forth the annual salary rates
(effective November 1, 2007), target bonus and target grant under the Company’s FY 2008 Performance Based Restricted Stock Bonus Plan for the Company’s executive officers. 
  

									
	 Name
	  	Base
Salary	  	Target Bonus
(as % of base
salary)	 	 	Target Grant
Under FY 2008
Performance Based
Restricted Stock
Bonus Plan
	 Joseph C. Lawler
	  	$	645,000	  	125	%	 	N/A
	 Steven G. Crane
	  	$	400,000	  	60	%	 	90,000
	 Peter L. Gray
	  	$	300,000	  	50	%	 	90,000
	 Mark J. Kelly
	  	$	315,000	  	60	%	 	90,000
	 William R. McLennan
	  	$	400,000	  	60	%	 	150,000
	 David J. Riley
	  	$	238,000	  	50	%	 	90,000
	 Scott D. Smith
	  	$	400,000	  	60	%	 	90,000
#### James A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael STUDIVENT, Official Capacity; Tommy Stevens, Individual and Official Capacity; Deborah Lankford, Individual and Official Capacity; *804Samuel Lankford, Individual and Official Capacity; Lankford Protective Services, Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-2039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

James A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Studivent, Appellee Pro Se; William L. Hill, Frazier, Franklin, Hill & Fury, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Sarah Helen Roane, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James A. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against Defendants Samuel Lankford, Deborah Lankford, and Lankford Protective Services. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P; 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the district court has not adjudicated all of Williams’s claims against all the Defendants, the order Williams seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 29, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D2022

- 1800 Lower Tribunal No. 18

- 8002 CC

________________



### Mercantil Bank, N.A.

, Appellant,

vs.


### Doctor Battery, I nc ., et al.

, Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Diana Gonzalez

- Whyte , Judge.

Law Offices of Victor K. Rones, P.A., Victor K. Rones and Jeremy S. Rones, for appellant

. Law Office of Ray Garcia, P.A., Ray Garcia and Nataline Garcia, for appellees

.

Before LOGUE

, C.J

. , and FERNANDEZ and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   American Soda, LLC              

#   American Soda, LLC

On February 2, 2024, the Commission issued its decision in American Soda, LLC, WEST 2020-0278.  

Commission%20Decision%28American%20Soda%20LLC%29WEST%202020-0278_.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 21, 2023

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 

20004 (enter from F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor on behalf of Smitherman v. Warrior Met 

Coal Mining LLC, Docket No. SE 2021-0153. (Issues include 

whether a miner was terminated in violation of section 105(c) of the 

Mine Act because the operator believed he was involved in making 

a safety complaint.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, 

must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 

29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 236-7472

Passcode: 678-100

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

Dated: March 10, 2023

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel

Billing Code 6735-01
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2006



/s/ Ronald J. DomanicoRonald J. Domanico, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
# FNS-101: Commodity Supplemental Food Program

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Print Version

Page updated: March 02, 2022