alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        130,241
<SECURITIES>                                  140,525         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 199,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,608
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              532,997 
<PP&E>                                        135,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                 59,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                859,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         219,103
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        18
<COMMON>                                           65
<OTHER-SE>                                    265,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  859,884
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              158,261
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 157,266 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2542

ROY C. HUDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

MARK K. HUDSON,

Party in Interest,

versus

CASE FARMS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-97-247-4)

Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: August 6, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phyllis A. Palmieri, Morganton, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Terry A. Clark, Harley H. Jones, EDWARDS, BALLARD, CLARK, BARRETT

& CARLSON, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Roy C. Hudson appeals from the district court order

granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Case

Farms of North Carolina, Inc. (“Case”), in his employment discrimination action filed under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(ADEA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West Supp. 1999). Finding no

error, we affirm. Even assuming that Hudson could make out a prima

facie case of age discrimination, Hudson fails to rebut Case’s

legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for declining to allow him

to remain Assistant Hatchery Manager. See O’Connor v. Consolidated

Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 310-13 (1996); Vaughan v.

MetraHealth Cos., 145 F.3d 197, 200-02 (4th Cir. 1998). Hudson’s

state law claim of employment discrimination was likewise properly

dismissed. See Henson v. Liggett Group, Inc., 61 F.3d 270, 277

(4th Cir. 1995).

We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in

the materials before the court and argument will not aid the decisional process, we grant Case’s motion to submit the case on the

briefs.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1657 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1657

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-ethylamino-p-cresol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-ethylamino-p-cresol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-ETHYLAMINO-P-CRESOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12   3-Ethylamino-p-cresol (CAS               No change      No change      On or before     
                         No. 120-37-6) (provided for                                            12/31/97        
                         in subheading 2922.29.15)...  Free                                                     
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1631

AMENDMENT
In the Senate of the United States,

May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1631) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum amount in

controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the

Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court

of the District of Columbia’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Page 1, line 5, strike out ø1993¿ and insert: 1994

Attest:

Secretary.
Exhibit 10.35





AMENDMENT





This AMENDMENT No. 1, dated June
25, 2002, to Promissory Note (the Note) dated July 2, 2001 by James Scoroposki (Payor) and Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (Payee).





The parties hereto hereby agree as follows:





1.    The first full paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payor hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the order of the Payee, the principal amount of ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($1,797,450)
together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The Payor further agrees to pay interest on such principal amount at the rate Payee is charged from time to time by GMAC Commercial Credit LLC (the Bank Rate). All amounts payable
hereunder shall be payable to Payee in United States dollars at such bank account as shall be designated by the Payee in immediately available funds or as otherwise specified to Payor in writing. Payment on this note shall be applied first to any
expenses of collection, then to accrued interest, and thereafter to the outstanding principal balance hereof. The principal amount and accrued interest are due and payable on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2003 and (ii) to the extent of the proceeds
of any Warrant Share Sale (as defined below), the third business day following the date upon which Payor sells any or all of the Warrant Shares (a Warrant Share Sale).





2.    The principal amount and accrued interest due under the Note shall in any event be due and payable on August 31,
2003, and such due date shall not be extended under any circumstances.





3.    Except as
expressly amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the original terms thereof.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Note as of the day and year first above written.





ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.By:

/s/    GREGORY E. FISCHBACHTitle:    Chief Executive Officer


/s/    JAMES SCOROPOSKIJames Scoroposki
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Lucky, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Lucky,*118 Ohio St.3d 446, 2008-Ohio-3178.]

(No. 2008-0532

Submitted June 3, 2008

Decided July 2, 2008.)

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. III.

{¶ 2} Because the court of appeals entered its judgment on appellant’s third assignment of error below prior to the release by this court of its opinion in *State v. Smith,*117 Ohio St.3d 447, 2008-Ohio-1260, 884 N.E.2d 595, this cause is *447remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in *State v. Smith.*

David A. Yost, Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney, and Elizabeth A. Matune, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Theresa G. Haire, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Cupp, J., dissents and would not accept the appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, each of the undersigned Jason Young, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steve Olson, the Chief Technology Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds’knowledge and belief:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Jason YoungJason YoungChief Executive Officer
 Dated: May 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Steve OlsonSteve OlsonChief Technology Officer and

Acting Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE A. P.
   GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
   MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
   REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               5,539
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       46,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,600
<INVENTORY>                                         53,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   113,710
<PP&E>                                             105,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     319,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               44,118
<BONDS>                                             37,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             9,014
<OTHER-SE>                                         114,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       319,901
<SALES>                                            207,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   207,365
<CGS>                                              170,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      170,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KE NN E T H R . MI C KA S an dYA S MI NA K . M I CK A S, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. N A TI O N A L CA SU A LTY I N SU RA N CE C OMP AN Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17150 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 3 4 7 - SRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona S us an R . B ol t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , O ’S C A N N L A I N , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . K enneth R . M i ckas and Y as m i na K . M i ckas appealpro se f rom the di stri ct c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g th e ird iv e r s itya c tio n a lle g in g f r au da g a in s t th e ir f o rm e rin s u r an c e c o m p an y . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e 

# FI LED JU L 6 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17150 2 r e v i e w d e n o v o ad i s mi s s a lf o rf a i l u r e t o s t a t e ac l a i m u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) . B arr e n v . H arr i ngton , 152 F . 3d 1193, 1194 ( 9th C i r . 1998) ( o r d e r ) . W e a f

f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssedth e seco n dam en d edco m p l ai n tb ecau se pl a i nt i f f s f a i l e d t o a l l e ge s uf

f i c i e ntf a c t s t o s t a t e af

r aud c l a i m on the ba s i s of d e f e n d an t’s a lle g e dm is r e p r e s e n ta tio n s r e g ar d in g p la in tif f s ’ c ab c o m p an y . See A s hc r of t v . I qbal , 1 2 9 S .C t. 1 9 3 7 , 1 9 4 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) ( “[ A ] c o m p la in t m u s t c o n ta in s u f f ic ie n t f a c tu a l m a tte r , a c c e p te da s tru e , to s ta te ac la im to r e lie f th a t is p lau s ib le o n its f a c e .” ( c ita tio n an din te rn a l qu o ta tio nm ark s o m itte d ) ) ; E c h o ls v . B e a u ty B ui l t H om es , Inc. , 6 4 7 P .2 d6 2 9 , 6 3 1 ( A r iz . 1 9 8 2 ) ( s ta tin g e le m e n ts o f f r au dc la im un der A ri zona l aw ). P l ai nt i ff s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. P l a i nt i f f s ’ “ O bj e c t i on t o N ot i c e of A ppe ar anc e ” and “ O bj e c t i on t o N ot i c e of D is a s s o c ia tio n ” ar e d e n ie d . AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66006-66007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31516]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Board of Directors on Thursday, 
January 17, 2002. The meeting begins at 1:00 p.m. The session includes 
the following items: (1) Welcome & Introductions, & ITS America 
Antitrust Policy & Conflict of Interest Statements; (2) Approval of 
Minutes from the September 21, 2001 Board Meeting; (3) December 17, 
2001 Executive Committee Meeting Report; (4) Federal Report; (5) 
President's Report; (6) Finance Committee Report and Approval of 2002 
Budget; (7) Nominating Committee Report; (8) Bylaws Task Force Report; 
(9) 511 Guidelines Resolution Review and Approval; (10) Coordinating 
Council Reorganization; and (11) Adjournment.
    ITS America provides a forum for national discussion and 
recommendations on ITS activities including programs, research needs, 
strategic planning, standards, international liaison, and priorities.
    The charter for the utilization of ITS America establishes this 
organization as an advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA) 5 USC app. 2, when it provides advice or 
recommendations to DOT officials on ITS policies and programs. (56 FR 
9400, March 6, 1991).

DATES: The Board of Directors of ITS AMERICA will meet on Thursday, 
January 17, 2002 at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW, 
Washington, DC 20008, (202) 328-2000; Fax (202) 234-0015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue SW, 
Suite 800, Washington, DC 20024. Persons needing further information or 
who request to speak at this meeting should contact Debbie M. Busch at 
ITS

[[Page 66007]]

AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-2904 or by Fax at (202) 484-3483. The 
DOT contact is Kristy Frizzell, FHWA, HOIT, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 
366-9536. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday 
through Friday, except for legal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: December 17, 2001.
Jeffrey Paniati,
Program Manager, ITS Joint Program Office, US Department of 
Transportation.
[FR Doc. 01-31516 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 12, 2004



/s/ Robert W. EriksonRobert W. EriksonPresident




November 12, 2004



/s/ George Wm. EriksonGeorge Wm. EriksonChairman & General Counsel




November 12, 2004



/s/ Robert F. HartmanRobert F. HartmanVice President, Secretary & Treasurer




17
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 20, 2012

t0118 

# Order

January 20, 2012

144072 (79)

ITALO PARISE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144072

DETROIT ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for full

- Court review of the motion to disqualify

Chief Justice Y OUNG and Justice M ARKMAN is considered, and it is GRANTED. Upon

full

- Court consideration of the plaintiff’s motion, we DENY the motion for the reason

that no justice is persuaded that there is any ground for the disqualification of Chief

Justice Y OUNG or Justice M ARKMAN

.

Y OUNG , C.J. ( not participating ). I do not participate in the order or the full

Court’s decision on the motion for disqualification of another justice, pursuant to MCR

2.003(D)(3)(b), for the reasons stated in my November 25, 2009, dissent from the rule’s

promu lgation 1 and in my March 31, 2010, statement of nonparticipation in a similar

motion in Pellegrino v Ampco Systems Parking

. 2 I believe that rule to have serious

constitutional flaws.

1 See 485 Mich cxxx, clxvii

- clxxxv (Y OUNG , J., dissenting).

2 485 Mich 1134, 1155

- 1165 (2010) ( Y OUNG , J., not participating).
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
Report), I, Kamlesh Tejwani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    Kamlesh TejwaniKamlesh Tejwani Chief Executive Officer  March 29, 2004