alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             4,924
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  19,484
<PP&E>                                               693
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (182)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    20,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,111
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               2
<OTHER-SE>                                        18,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      20,503
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     34,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (37,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (37,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (37,279)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (2.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (2.28)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Sidney W. Lassen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Sidney W. LassenSidney W. Lassen Chief Executive Officer
February 24, 2005




*A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41417

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS SANTANA-PINA, also known as Jesus Santana, also known as Jesus 

Santana Pena, also known as Jesus Sanatana, also known as Jesus Pina 

Santana, also known as Jesus P. Santana, also known as Jesus Pen Santana, 

also known as Jesus Pena Santana, also known as Jesus Santana Santana,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:14-CR-21-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Santana-Pina

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santana-Pina has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41417 Document: 00513556441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-41417

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41417 Document: 00513556441 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

March 7, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, March 24, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. CAM Mining, LLC, Docket Nos. 

KENT 2013-196, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in

interpreting the preshift examination standard.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

January 5, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 15, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc., Docket No. SE 2011-407-R

(Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in

upholding an imminent danger order.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners IV, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Limited, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of
and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:  May 12, 2005    By:     /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Limited

Technology Funding Partners IV, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 14, 2001

    The following applications for certificates of public convenience 
and necessity and foreign air carrier permits were filed under subpart 
B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's procedural 
regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for answers, 
conforming applications, or motions to modify scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the answer period, DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2001-11156.
    Date Filed: December 11, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 2, 2002.
    Description: Application of Westjet, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. section 
41303, requesting a transfer of the foreign air carrier permit of 
WestJet Airlines Ltd. to engage in chartered and scheduled foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between US and Canadian 
points, operating as ``WestJet.''

    Docket Number: OST-2001-11164.
    Date Filed: December 12, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 2, 2002.
    Description: Application of Caribbean Star Airlines, Inc., pursuant 
to 49 U.S.C. section 41102 and subpart B, requesting the issuance of a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in scheduled 
and charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between points in Florida and Puerto Rico, on the one hand, and points 
throughout the Caribbean region, Mexico and Central and South America, 
on the other hand.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-32236 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30862

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEVEN CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:09-CR-90-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steven Carter appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of 

his supervised release. He argues that the 24-month sentence is an upward 

variance from the guidelines range and plainly unreasonable, contending that 

the district court relied upon unsubstantiated information, failed to give 

adequate reasons for the sentence, and failed to appropriately weigh 

mitigating factors. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 13, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30862 Document: 00514596844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2018
No. 17-30862

2

As Carter did not raise his arguments in the district court, review is for 

plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Carter’s 

two-year sentence was authorized by statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); 

18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a); United States v. Jones, 484 F.3d 783, 

792 (5th Cir. 2007). The district court sufficiently articulated its reasons for 

imposing the statutory maximum sentence, as the district court’s reasons 

indicate that it had considered, inter alia, Carter’s personal history and 

circumstances, Carter’s need for drug rehabilitation, and the need for the 

sentence to deter criminal conduct. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e); United States v. 

Kippers, 685 F.3d 491, 498 (5th Cir. 2012). 

The district court also considered the policy statements of the 

Guidelines. See § 3553(e). Although the Government now disputes the district 

court’s calculation of the guidelines range of imprisonment, the district court’s 

decision to impose the statutory maximum sentence was not plain error. 

See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135; United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332-33 

(5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 265 (5th Cir. 2009); 

United States v. Montez, 952 F.2d 854, 860 (5th Cir. 1992). While the district 

court observed that Carter was “scaring people” and that “people are afraid” of 

him, these factors were not identified by the district court as part of its 

rationale for imposing the sentence. See United States v. Rivera, 784 F.3d 

1012, 1017 (5th Cir. 2015). Finally, Carter’s assertion that the district court 

failed to adequately consider mitigating factors does not demonstrate that the 

district court committed plain error. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135; United 

States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-30862 Document: 00514596844 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2018
Union Calendar No. 98

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1631

[Report No. 103–174]

A BILL

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to

perior Court of the District of Columbia.Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Supermitted for cases under the jurisdiction of theincrease the maximum amount in controversy

JULY 13, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 98

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1631

[Report No. 103–174]

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum

amount in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of

the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the District of Columbia

JULY 13, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase

the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases

under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1631 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

3 Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.

4 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY

5 PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC6 TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION

7 BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is

9 amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior

12 Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of

13 the enactment of this Act.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

February 12, 2016

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 24, 2016

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. OakGrove Resources, LLC,*Docket Nos. SE 2010-1236, et al.**(Issuesinclude whether the Judge erred in concluding that a safeguard notice was valid.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,642
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,664
<PP&E>                                         377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          712
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,548
<SALES>                                        2
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2
<CGS>                                          7
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,113)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1716

To amend the Act of January 26, 1915, establishing Rocky Mountain National Park, to provide for the protection of certain lands in Rocky

Mountain National Park and along North St. Vrain Creek and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 19, 1993

Mr. SKAGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Act of January 26, 1915, establishing Rocky

Mountain National Park, to provide for the protection

of certain lands in Rocky Mountain National Park and

along North St. Vrain Creek and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 TITLE I—ROCKY MOUNTAIN

4 NATIONAL PARK AMENDMENTS

5 SEC. 101. NORTH ST. VRAIN CREEK AND ADJACENT LANDS.

6 The Act of January 26, 1915, establishing Rocky

7 Mountain National Park (38 Stat. 798; 16 U.S.C. 191
2

•HR 1716 IH

1 and following), is amended by adding the following new

2 section at the end thereof:

3 ‘‘SEC. 5. NORTH ST. VRAIN CREEK AND ADJACENT LANDS.

4 ‘‘(a) DONATION OR EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN

5 LANDS.—Promptly following enactment of this section,

6 the Secretary of the Interior shall seek to acquire by dona7 tion or exchange those lands within the boundaries of

8 Rocky Mountain National Park owned by the City of

9 Longmont, Colorado, that are referred to in section 111(d)

10 of the Act commonly referred to as the ‘Colorado Wilder11 ness Act of 1980’ (Public Law 96–560; 94 Stat. 3272;

12 16 U.S.C. 192b–9(d)).

13 ‘‘(b) PROTECTION OF CERTAIN SEGMENTS.—Neither

14 the Secretary of the Interior nor any other Federal agency

15 or officer may approve or issue any permit for, or provide

16 any assistance for, the construction of any new dam, res17 ervoir, or impoundment on any segment of North St.

18 Vrain Creek or its tributaries within the boundaries of

19 Rocky Mountain National Park or on the main stem of

20 North St. Vrain Creek downstream to the point at which

21 the creek crosses the elevation 6,550 feet above mean sea

22 level. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to pre23 vent the issuance of any permit for the construction of

24 a new water gaging station on North St. Vrain Creek at

25 the point of its confluence with Coulson Gulch.’’.
3

•HR 1716 IH

1 TITLE II—LAND EXCHANGE

2 The Secretary of Agriculture shall immediately and

3 actively pursue negotiations with the city of Longmont,

4 Colorado, concerning the city’s proposed exchange of lands

5 owned by the city and located in and near Coulson Gulch

6 for other lands owned by the United States. The Secretary

7 shall report to Congress 2 calendar years after the date

8 of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter on

9 the progress of such negotiations until negotiations are

10 complete.

Æ