alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3436]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT01-6-001]

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 29, 2001, Gulf South Pipeline Company, 
LP (Gulf South) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective December 31, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 4000
First Revised Sheet No. 4001
First Revised Sheet No. 4002

    Gulf South submitted the above referenced tariff sheets in 
accordance with the Commission's letter order issued January 22, 2001, 
in Docket No. GT01-6-000 to reflect its recent name change from Koch 
Gateway Pipeline Company to Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3436 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10497 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEOBARDO CASTRO-CHAVEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-190-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Leobardo Castro-Chavez raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10280

2 Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 51056 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JERMAINE TRAMON MEDEARIS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:07

- CR

- 43

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jermaine Tramon Medearis appe al s the 51

- month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Medearis argues that the
sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to achieve the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He asserts that the sentence does not punish him for violating the c ourt’s trust, but rather for the new conviction underlying the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 10, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-51056 Document: 00512466108 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2013No. 12

- 51056

revocation of his supervised release

. Medearis further argues that the sentence punishes him for problems that he has been trying to overcome, i.e, his depression and the ability to acclimate to life outside prison. We review preserved challenges to revocation sentences under a “plainly unreasonable” stand ard. United States v. Miller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). However, because Medearis failed to object in the district court to the reasonableness of his revocation sentence, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391

- 92 (5th Cir. 200 7 ). To show plain error, Medearis must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 1 35 (2009). If Medearis makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id. Medearis has not shown error, plain or otherwise, with regard to his revocation sentence. His 51

- month sentence , which was at the bottom of the sentencing range recommended by the policy statements , is entitled to a

p resumption of reasonableness. See United States v. Lopez

- Velasquez , 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008). To the extent that Medearis di sagrees with the revocation sentence or disputes the weight that the district court afforded various s entencing factors, he has failed to rebut the presumpti on of reasonableness. See United States v. Ruiz , 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-51056 Document: 00512466108 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2013
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., et al              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., et al

Sunbelt VA 2013-275, et al Argument Notice 6-23-15.pdf

Sunbelt VA 2013-275, et al Argument Notice 6-23-15.htm

Secretary of Labor v Sunbelt Rentals, et al Docket VA2013-275 et al_June23-2015.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion Consultants              

#   Secretary of Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion Consultants

DQ, WEVA 2011-357-R, Meeting Notice 10-22-14.pdf

DQ, WEVA 2011-357-R, Meeting Notice 10-22-14.htm

secretary-labor-v-dq-fire-docket-weva2011-357-r-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FMCS 70th Anniversary Schedule of Events 

August 22, 2017 

Time: Room 7005 Room 7008 Room 7009 Beck Room 

09:00 - 09:30am Check-in and Coffee 

09:30 - 10:30am 

Workshop A 

Conflict Assessment 

Training Interest-Based Bargaining Relationship Development & 

Training 

FMCS 

Information 

Room 

10:45 - 11:45am 

Workshop B 

Mediation Skills 

For the Workplace Affinity Bargaining Arbitration 

Services 

12:00 - 12:45pm Acting Director’s Remarks, and Cake Cutting Ceremony 

1:00 - 2:00pm Mediation Skills 

For the Workplace

C3 Conflict Resolution 

Series Live Panel 

(webinar available online)
U. 8. TREASURY DEPARTMENT—INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

RETURN OF INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION AND
rorm 1122 CONSENT OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION INcLUDED INA | LOGO
UNITED STATES CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAX RETURN |e net wrt n sie sobw

FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1960

or other taxable year beginning _ , 1960

If return is for calendar :

year 1960, file on or before | ond ending —_— — —_—— —-19
March 18, 1961. If return PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT PLAINLY

is for a year other than a

calendar year, file on or | NAME

“before 15th day of third

month following close of |~\unnerendarest — —_
such taxable year.

Employer Identification No. City or town, postal zone number, State ~ OO

1. Date incorporated

2. Place incorporated a a
3. Capital stock outstanding at beginning of taxable year (a) om | (b) crsterred

4. Kind of business

| ( Active (J Inactive

§. Name of common parent corporation (Give name of corporation which filed the consolidated income tax return for the entire affiliated
group)

6. Address of common parent corporation

istrict Director's Office in which consolidated retum is filed

The above-named subsidiary corporation hereby (1) authorizes the above-named common parent corporation to make
a consolidated income tax return on its behalf for the taxable year for which this form is filed and (2) authorizes such
common parent corporation (or, in the event of its failure, the Commissioner or the District Director of Internal Revenue)
to make a consolidated income tax return on its behalf for each taxable year thereafter for which a consolidated return
must be made by the affiliated group under the provisions of the consolidated return regulations.

The above-named subsidiary corporation, in consideration of the privilege of joining in the making of a consolidated
return with the above-named common parent corporation, hereby consents to and agrees to be bound by the provisions of
the above-mentioned regulations.

SIGNATURE AND VERIFICATION
I declare under the penalties of perjury that the above-named subsidiary has authorized me to sign this form on its behalf, and that
this form has been examined by me and the information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, correct, and
complete.

Corporate
Seal

~__Date Signature _ Title

INSTRUCTIONS
Duplicate originals of this form must be prepared by each subsidiary corporation for each taxable year for which a consolidated return
is made by the affiliated group. One of these forms must be attached to the consolidated income tax return as part thereof; the other must
be filed (at or before the time the consolidated income tax return is filed) in the office of the district director for the district prescribed for the
filing of a separate return by the subsidiary.

U.S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1950~O-596172
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2007 of Palatin Technologies,
Inc. (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  September 12, 2007 | /s/ Carl SpanaCarl SpanaPresident and Chief Executive
     Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon. Robert S. Calvert

Comptrollerof Public Accounts opinionNo. ww-338 Capitol Station Re: Whether the Hotor Vehicle Austin, Texas Sales Tax levied by Article 7047K,V.C.S., applieswhere an automobile dealer secures a motor vehicle from a manufacturerto be used by a salesmanfor demonstrationpurposeswhen no considerationIs Dear Mr. Calvert: involved? question: In your letter requestyou submit to us the following

"Where an automobiledealer has secured a vehicle from the manufacturerand has the manufacturer'scertificateand wishes to let a salesmanhave the vehicle to use for demonstrationpurposes, and no consideration was Involved,would the tax be due?" Section 3 (b) of Article 7047K, V.C.S., provides: "The term 'retailsale' or 'retailsales' as herein used shall Include all sales of motor vehicles except those whereby the purchaser acquires a motor vehicle for the exclusive purpose of resale and not for use." Article 7OJ+7K

only levies the tax upon a "sale" of a motor vehicle. If the transfer of the motor vehicle to the automobiledealer constitutesa "sale" the tax will apply as ,you state the motor vehicle Is to be used for "demonstration purposes." The dealer did not acquire same for the exclusive purpose of resale, but acquired It-foruse, that Is for use as a demonstrator. Attorney General'sOpinion O-3742. However, you state that "no consideration was involved." This being true there was not a "sale" involved. Even if the transactioncould be ,termed a sale, no tax would be due forHon. Robert S. Calvert,,page 2 (~~-338)

the simple reason that 1.1s of the sale price--whichIs nothing--amounts

to a tax of .OOOO. SUMMARY The motor vehicle sales tax levied by Artlole 7047K, V.C.S., does not apply to transactions

where an automobile dealer,without a consideration, acquires a motor vehicle from a manufacturerto be used as a demonstrator. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney Qeneral of Texas

W. V. GCeppert Assistant wvff:gs APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Qeo. P. Blackburn, Chairman J. C. Davis, Jr. Milton Richardson Leonard Passmore REVIEWEDBOR THE ATTORNEYGENF3AL BY James N. Ludlum
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-117092, 333-108114, 33-75908, 333-84974, 333-34160, 33-75906 and 33-86532) of LodgeNetEntertainment Corporation of our report dated March 13, 2007, relating to the financial statements,financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.Minneapolis, MN
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training.
    Date: March 4-7, 2001.
    Time: 6:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Mary Bell, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, PHS, DHHS, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 
20892-8328, 301-496-7978.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower,; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: February 2, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-3454 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| Date: November  9, 2006 | /s/ J. Bryan Baker        |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | J. Bryan Baker            |   |
| * *                | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2019

No. 04-18-00014-CV

Virginia BRETADO,

Appellant

v.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-09066

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice (not participating)

Patricia O. Alvarez (recused)

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3 (“A motion for 

rehearing may be granted by a majority of the justices who participated in the decision of the 

case. Otherwise, it must be denied).

It is so ORDERED on this January, 2019.

 PER CURIAM 

 ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1779

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as the ‘‘Jerry

L. Litton United States Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Ms. DANNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe,

Missouri, as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post

Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Mis6 souri, is designated as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States

7 Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1779 IH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office Building’’.

Æ