alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1721 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1721

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant a special use 
                                permit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 1993

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant a special use 
                                permit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PERMIT.

    Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the Secretary of the 
Interior is authorized to issue a special use permit allowing the 
installation, operation, and maintenance of a communications shelter 
and associated antennas within the boundaries of Katmai National Park 
and Preserve at Cape Gull.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS.

    Any permit issued under this Act shall--
            (1) be in effect for at least five years but no more than 
        twenty five years;
            (2) not be transferrable except by permission of the 
        Secretary of the Interior;
            (3) encompass no more than one quarter acre of land 
        adjacent to the existing Federal communications facilities;
            (4) allow reasonable access, including by use of aircraft, 
        boat, or other motorized vehicles, to the permit holder for the 
        purpose of construction, repair, and maintenance;
            (5) require the permit holder to avoid unreasonable 
        disturbance to fish and wildlife;
            (6) require, to the extent practicable, that any structures 
        blend into the natural environment; and
            (7) require the permit holder to dismantle and remove all 
        structures upon expiration of the permit.

SEC. 3. FEES.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to charge reasonable 
fees sufficient to cover the cost of processing the permit application 
and for use of Federal land.

                                 <all>
```
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

 BAC 6735-01

 

August 27, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 11, 2014

 

         PLACE:             The RichardV. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,DC 20004 (entry from  F Street entrance)

 

       STATUS:                        Open 

 

MATTERSTO BE 

  CONSIDERED:                   TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Dawes Rigging & Crane Rental*, Docket No. LAKE 2011-206-M.(Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that the method ofassembling a crane violated a mandatory standard.)

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

CONTACT PERSON 

  FOR MORE INFO:              EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD 

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                ______________________________

                                                EmogeneJohnson

                                                AdministrativeAssistant
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul GARCIA-BENITEZ, a/k/a Mario, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7221.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 12, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 13, 2011.

Saul Garcia-Benitez, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

*673Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saul Garcia-Benitez appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Garcia-Benitez,*No. 5:06-cr-00046-GEC-3 (W.D.Va. June 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00511

- CR

Benjamin Wilcox , Appellant

v.
The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, NO. CR

- 19

- 2377

- E , THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Benjamin Wilcox seeks to appeal judgment s of conviction for Sexual Performance by Child , Possess ion with Intent to Promote Child Pornography, and Possession of
Child P ornogr aphy

. See Tex. Penal Code § § 43.25 (c) , 43. 26 (d), (g) . The trial court has certified
that this is a plea

- bargain case and Wilcox has no right o f appeal . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d ).

____________ ______________________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice
Before J ustices Go odwin, Baker, and Kelly
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 20, 2022
Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                           36,761,516
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 37,167,113
<PP&E>                            5,229,597
<DEPRECIATION>                    2,582,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   42,241,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,740,972
<BONDS>                             150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            125,001
<OTHER-SE>                       40,375,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     42,241,190
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  9,013,113
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    15,653,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (1,232,043)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   17,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (5,407,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (5,410,898)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (5,410,898)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finanical information extracted from Registrant's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,987
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 166

To eliminate automatic cost-of-living adjustments in rates of pay for Members

of Congress, and to nullify any such adjustment occurring after December 31, 1992.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on House Administration and Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To eliminate automatic cost-of-living adjustments in rates

of pay for Members of Congress, and to nullify any

such adjustment occurring after December 31, 1992.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS.

5 Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

6 of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (1)—

8 (A) by striking ‘‘(1) The’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘The’’;
2

•HR 166 IH

1 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A)

2 through (C) as paragraphs (1) through (3), re3 spectively; and

4 (C) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by para5 graph (2) of this subsection’’; and

6 (2) by striking paragraph (2).

7 SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF ANY AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST8 MENT FOR MEMBERS OCCURRING SINCE

9 1992.

10 (a) NULLIFICATION OF PAY ADJUSTMENTS.—Effec11 tive as of the first day of the first applicable pay period

12 beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this

13 Act, the rate of pay for any position identified under sec14 tion 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946

15 shall be equal to the rate which would then be payable

16 for such position if no pay adjustment described in sub17 section (b) had ever taken effect.

18 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PAY ADJUSTMENTS NUL19 LIFIED.—Subsection (a) applies with respect to any pay

20 adjustment under section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Re21 organization Act of 1946 (as then in effect) that first took

22 effect after December 31, 1992.
3

•HR 166 IH

1 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

2 Section 908(b)(4)(B)(i) of the Supplemental Appro3 priations Act, 1983 (2 U.S.C. 31–1(b)(4)(B)(i)) is amend4 ed—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘section 601(a)(2) of the Legis6 lative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C.

7 31(2)),’’; and

8 (2) by striking ‘‘et seq.),’’ and inserting ‘‘et

9 seq.)’’.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 003 57

- CV

IN RE: A PURPORTED LIEN OR CLAIM AGAI NST HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

, From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 18394 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On May 14

, 201 5

, counsel of record for Appellee Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. filed a motion to withdraw

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5. Counsel moved this court to allow Haynes and Boone, LLP, and attorneys Werner A. Powers and Lisa S. Barkley to withdraw

, and to allow attorney Elizabeth Conroy Davidson to represent Appellee Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. in this appeal. The unopposed motion shows it was sent to Appell ee b y first class mail and by certified mail, see id. R. 6.5(b), and it meets the other motion requirements, see id. R. 6.5(d).

The motion to withdraw and for substitution of counsel i s GRANTED. See id.
We DIRECT the clerk of this court to update this court’s records to show Appell ee ’s new attorney of record in this appeal.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      22706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 93797
<PP&E>                                           35249
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  114099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           290342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         32085
<OTHER-SE>                                     1289111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    114099
<SALES>                                             70
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    70
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                306175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (306105)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               40682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (138088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (138088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 484875
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    138088
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)



</TABLE>
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

NOTICE OF RIGHTS: ACCESSIBILITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND FACILITIES

SECTION 508 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT (29 U.S.C. § 794d)

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to ensure that all 

electronic and information technology is accessible to individuals with disabilities to the same 

extent that the technology is accessible to individuals without disabilities, unless doing so would 

impose an undue burden on the agency. Examples of electronic and information technology 

include websites, e-filing systems, and telephones. Where it would impose an undue burden to 

develop and maintain technology which meets this standard, agencies are required to provide the 

relevant electronic information to individuals with disabilities by alternative means. This right of 

accessibility applies to employees and members of the public. Further information regarding 

Section 508 and standards for compliance may be found at www.section508.gov. 

For questions regarding the accessibility of the Commission’s electronic and information 

technology, please contact the Commission’s Section 508 Coordinator, Michelle Williams

(mwilliams@fmshrc.gov).

Individuals with disabilities have the right to file a complaint alleging agency noncompliance with Section 508. Complaints alleging Commission non-compliance with Section 

508 should be filed with the Commission. For information about filing a complaint, please see 

our Section 508 complaint procedures (accessible at https://www.fmshrc.gov/eeo-policies). If 

an agency other than the Commission is responsible for the non-compliance, please contact that 

agency’s Section 508 Coordinator. Contact information for Section 508 Coordinators may be 

found at https://www.section508.gov/tools/coordinator-listing. 

ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT (42 U.S.C. §§ 4151-4157)

Pursuant to the Architectural Barriers Act (“ABA”), any facility constructed, altered, 

leased or financed by the United States shall whenever possible be designed, constructed and/or 

altered to ensure ready access by individuals with physical disabilities. 

Questions or concerns regarding accessibility of Commission facilities may be sent to 

Theodosia Villatoro-Sorto (TVillatoro-Sorto@fmshrc.gov), however the ABA is enforced by the 

United States Access Board. Information on how to submit a complaint to the Access Board 

may be found at www.access-board.gov/aba-enforcement/file-a-complaint.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00044-CR

Stewart Thomas Mettz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. CR-18-0144-C, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Stewart Thomas Mettz was charged with capital murder for killing police officer 

Kenneth Copeland, who was a peace officer and who was acting in the lawful discharge of 

his official duty at the time of the murder. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.03. Following a trial, the 

jury found Mettz guilty. The State did not seek the death penalty, and therefore, the trial court 

automatically assessed punishment at life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. See id.

§ 12.31. Mettz appealed his conviction.

Mettz’s court-appointed attorney on appeal filed a motion to withdraw supported 

by an Anders brief contending that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967). Mettz’s court-appointed attorney’s brief, which 

concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit, meets the requirements of Anders by 

presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable 
2

grounds to be advanced. See id.; Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); 

see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81-82 (1988) (explaining that Anders briefs serve purpose 

of “assisting the court in determining both that counsel in fact conducted the required detailed 

review of the case and that the appeal is . . . frivolous”). Mettz’s counsel represented to the Court 

that he provided copies of the motion and brief to Mettz; advised Mettz of his right to examine the 

appellate record, file a pro se brief, and pursue discretionary review following the resolution of the 

appeal in this Court; and provided Mettz with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate 

record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014). After requesting a copy of the appellate record, Mettz filed a pro se brief 

challenging his conviction.

We have independently reviewed the record and considered appellate counsel’s 

brief and Mettz’s pro se brief, and we have found nothing that might arguably support the appeal.

See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. We agree with counsel that the appeal 

is frivolous and without merit. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment of conviction.

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis

Affirmed

Filed: August 23, 2024

Do Not Publish
#### Yelson Otoniel TORREZ-LUNA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-74032.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 29, 2010.

Jenny Tsai, Green & Tsai, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Susan Bennett Green, Trial, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yelson Otoniel Torrez-Luna, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which dismissed his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

*211We reject Torrez-Luna’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on his membership in a particular social group, namely young men who resist gang recruitment. *See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder,*563 F.3d 855, 858-62 (9th Cir.2009) (rejecting as a social group young Honduran men resisting gangs); *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir.2008) (rejecting as a social group “young men in El Salvador resisting gang violence”). We also reject Torrez-Luna’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on his political opinion, namely his position that he is resistant to gangs. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); *Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir.2009). Because Torrez-Luna failed to demonstrate that he was persecuted on account of a protected ground, we uphold the agency’s denial of his asylum and withholding of removal claims. *Id.*at 856.

In addition, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Torrez-Luna failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured at the acquiescence of the government if he returns to Honduras. *See Santos-Lemus,*542 F.3d at 748.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.