alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1626

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing temporary suspension of duty

on umbrella frames.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing temporary

suspension of duty on umbrella frames.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UMBRELLA FRAMES.

4 Heading 9902.66.03 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

6 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

9 (b), the amendment made by section 1 applies with respect

10 to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for con-
2

•HR 1626 IH

1 sumption, after the 15th day after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec4 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

5 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro6 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

8 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend9 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

10 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

11 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en12 actment of this Act;

13 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

14 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

15 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

16 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc17 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
2014-0562.

#### ProMedica Fed. Credit Union v. Wardrop.

Lucas App. No. L-13-1075, 2014-Ohio-965. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
SCHEDULE D Capital Gains and Losses (Form 1120) © Attach to Form 1120, 1120-A, 1120-C, 1120-F, 1120-FSC, 1120-H, 1120-IC-DISC, 1120-L, 1120-ND,

1120-PC, 1120-POL, 1120-REIT, 1120-RIC, 1120-SF, or certain Forms 990-T.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Name Employer identification number

Short-Term Capital Gains and Losses—Assets Held One Year or Less

(f) Gain or (loss)

(Subtract (e) from (d))

(e) Cost or other

basis (see

instructions)

(c) Date sold

(mo., day, yr.)

(b) Date acquired

(mo., day, yr.)

(a) Description of property

(Example: 100 shares of Z Co.)

(d) Sales price

(see instructions)

1

2 Short-term capital gain from installment sales from Form 6252, line 26 or 37 2

( )

3

Unused capital loss carryover (attach computation)

3

4

Net short-term capital gain or (loss). Combine lines 1 through 4

4

Long-Term Capital Gains and Losses—Assets Held More Than One Year

5

7 Enter gain from Form 4797, line 7 or 9 7

8 Long-term capital gain from installment sales from Form 6252, line 26 or 37 8

11 Net long-term capital gain or (loss). Combine lines 6 through 10

9

Summary of Parts I and II

12 Enter excess of net short-term capital gain (line 5) over net long-term capital loss (line 11) 12

13 Net capital gain. Enter excess of net long-term capital gain (line 11) over net short-term capital

loss (line 5)

13

14

Add lines 12 and 13. Enter here and on Form 1120, page 1, line 8, or the proper line on other

returns

14

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, Schedule D (Form 1120) (2006)

see the Instructions for Forms 1120 and 1120-A.

Cat. No. 11460M

Short-term gain or (loss) from like-kind exchanges from Form 8824

5

6

9 Long-term gain or (loss) from like-kind exchanges from Form 8824

11

Part I

Part II

Part III

Note. If losses exceed gains, see Capital losses in the instructions.

10 Capital gain distributions (see instructions) 10

© See separate instructions.

OMB No. 1545-0123

2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00184-CR

Sallia VASQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR10163

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED August 19, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6778

MARIO HOWARD LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GERALDO MALDONADO, Warden; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CA-02-1604-2-12)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Howard Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mario Howard Lloyd, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Lloyd v. Maldonado, No. CA-02-1604-2-12 (D.S.C. Apr. 8,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
stozere

OLOUIL
9T/S1/60
ST/EL60
91/91/60

12/60
91/ST/80

91/01/80
91/67/90
91/07/90
ST/L0'L0
SU/SL/LO
91/6L/S0
91/60/90
SU/ST/LO
91/€0/90
9V/ez/so
91/20/90
9L/Serbo
91/02/+0
91/0E/90
91/90/b0
91/90/bO
SULVEO
91/02/90
9L/SZ/0.
91/L0/€0
SU/LO/EO
91/81/0
91/P0/r0
9L/ZO/EO
91/62/20
9U/SZ/+0
91/b7/90
9T/LV/Z0
91/70/90
91/81/P0
91/E7/90
91/10/20
9U/8Z/C1
9U/II/L0
ST/LO/O
STOEL
SU/OEicl

9I/1Z/b0
91/1/10
SULIZI
SULVE
91/61/¢0
SUSI/T1
9U/0L/SO
S1/60/11
9U/EZ/+0
ST/EO/11
SUPE

bio

ayayawo
atajawio>
ayajawod
ayajawoy
ayajduo}
ayajawiod
ayajawo>
syajaMod

BuIpusd
ayaaiiog,
ara|autod,
ayajawioy
sya]dw0D
ayayduios
a9dwioy)

ey2]0WI0D
syajawod
ayoyauro3
ayajquio,
ayajdwo5
Bocitive)
ayajaut0>
aajdwio>
ayadu0
aajauo)
ayajdwod
ayajamo}
‘ayajawo2)
arajauro>)
ayayduro
‘ay9dui0>
ayajau0>,
‘aqa[awi0D
ayajduo>)
‘ayajdwio>
a19]0W0D
‘aqojawioz)

ayaydwiod
aya]awod
‘aajau0D
Eve)
yajduto)
ayo|ditos)
s}e|dw0)
a9]dWo
y9]qW0D
aye|dutoz
ayajduio7)

wares In
Sp1099y ON
ques IM
spi0o3y ON
VIOd 1edosduyy
‘Spi0say ON
qweID [IM
ques ny

‘Spi093y ON
wey my
wep [Md

Sp10a2y ON

‘Spi000y ON.
queID [IN

‘Sp1008Y ON,

‘Sps0oey ON
WEIN [INL

spu029yf ON,
qwresy [IN

VIOd Jedosdu]
Sps029y ON
qwrer penred
weih [My
qesD NL
query [Ind
BNO
‘Spsooay ON,
‘spay ON
aquiaseq ON
spioo2y ON,

‘Sp1009y ON
wel jn
wes [ing

UMEIPUNT A

Spu023y ON
wep [MT
weip [ny

‘Spi003y ON.
wey |INY

‘Sp100ay ON.
wel [ny

20
weip ny

‘Spr092y ON,
quer [Md

spuooay ON
sp100ay ON,
AauaBy 10N
Sp1002y ON,

ysonboy 91/Lz/60

ysanboy SU/E1/60

ysonboy, 9/z1/60

ysonboy 91/€1/60

ysonboy 9U/s7/80

ysonboy 91/81/80

ysonbay 91/91/80

ysonboy 91/50/80
sonboy,

ysonbox

ysonboy

ysandoy

ysonbay,

ysondoy

ysonboy, SU/L/S0

ysonboy 9/1/50

ysonboy 91/82/50

sono, 91/90/50

ysonboy 9i/t0/so

ysonboy 91/9z/40

asanboyl 91/0Ee0

ysandoy 91/01/40

ysonboy, 91/90/60

asonboy ou/ie/eo

ysonboy, gu/zeo

ysonboy 9ust/eo

ysandoy, S1/eUE0

ysandoy 91/60/€0

ysondoy 9i/p0/€0

jsondoy, 9u/e0/€0

sondoy 9U/E0/€0

ysonboy g1/z0/e0

ysonbox 91/z0/€0

ysonboy 91/67/20

ysanbox g1/ezreo

ysonbox, 9181/20

jsanboy

ysonbay,

ysanboy

ysonboy

asandoy

ysonboy

ysanboy

ysonboy

ysonboy

sandbox

ysonboy,

ysandoy

asanboy

ysonboy

asonboy,

xojautod, ysonbow

aL

eG
Bury241 (VIO) y UOpeULO;U] Jo WOpeals

80-91
450-91
950-91

oul

(sows) eo1mag UoneM!2U05 *g UoReIPaW [Eepey
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40890

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AVILINO MORENO-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-462-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Avilino MorenoGutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno-Gutierrez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40890 Document: 00513080660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-40890

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-40890 Document: 00513080660 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
EX-10.2.(A) AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



 







EXHIBIT 10.2(a)





     AMENDMENT dated as of October 3, 2007, between AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS, INC., a New York
corporation (the “Company”), and STEPHEN M. DYOTT (the “Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Executive entered an employment agreement with the Company dated as of April 19,
2007 (the “Employment Agreement”); and the Company desires to amend the Employment
Agreement to provide additional incentives for the Executive to remain in the employ of the Company
on the terms and conditions set forth herein, and the Executive desires to continue such employment
on the terms and conditions set forth herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for
other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement
as follows:




     1. In the second sentence of Section 5.1.1, the phrase “within 10 business days of” is
amended in its entirety to read “on”.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and the
Executive has hereunto set his hand, as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Patrick W. Kellick
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Patrick W. Kellick 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	/s/ Stephen M. Dyott
 	 
	 	Name:  	Stephen M. Dyott 	 
	 	 	 



4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,144
<PP&E>                                         152,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,095
<BONDS>                                         61,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,530
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In
connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul
D. Carrico, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ PAUL D. CARRICOPaul D. CarricoPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director  March 11, 2010


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In
connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gregory C. Thompson, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ GREGORY C. THOMPSONGregory C. ThompsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer  March 11, 2010
No. 07-15-00040-CV

In the Interest of O.A.P., a Child §

§

§

§ From the 237th District Court of

Lubbock County

February 11, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated Wednesday, February 11, 2015, it is

ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0016 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD GARZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 27, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 24 2021

11/24/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FILER'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000803605
<NAME> THE MARINA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,527,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  916,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,613,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,720,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 524,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,982,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          760,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,221,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,982,124
<SALES>                                     10,754,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,643,104
<CGS>                                        8,158,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,430,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,212,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,212,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.24


</TABLE>
#### Jamie Edward BYRD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-12770

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 2008.

Jamie Edward Byrd, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Amy Lee Copeland, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Federal prisoner Jamie Byrd, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We issued a certificate of appealability on four issues: (1) whether the district court erred in failing to consider whether Byrd’s counsel was ineffective for not challenging his underlying state conviction for theft by taking, which the district court used in calculating his criminal history category for sentencing; (2) whether Byrd sufficiently requested a stay of his § 2255 motion to allow him to complete his challenges to his prior state convictions in state court; (3) if Byrd sufficiently raised the request for a stay, whether the district court impliedly denied it; and (4) if the district court did deny the request for a stay, whether it erred in doing so.

Byrd first contends, and the government concedes, that the district court failed to address the first of these issues. It should have addressed all of the issues, including that one. Therefore, to avoid causing piecemeal litigation, we vacate the denial of Byrd’s motion and remand with instructions for the district court to address the issue of whether Byrd’s counsel was ineffective for not challenging Byrd’s underlying state conviction for theft by taking.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 10.09



[Letterhead of Environmental Power Corporation]



March 29, 2004



Mr. Kamlesh Tejwani

95 Falmouth Street

Short Hills, NJ 07078



|RE: | Employment Agreement and Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------



Dear Kam:



The purpose of this letter is to set forth our understanding with respect to the agreement between Environmental Power Corporation (the Company) and you regarding (a) the Employment Agreement, dated as of
July 3, 2003, between you and the Company, as amended by that certain letter agreement (the Letter Agreement), dated as of December 17, 2003 (as so amended, the Employment Agreement) and (b) the Nonstatutory Stock Option
Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2003, between you and the Company, as amended by the Letter Agreement (as so amended, the Option Agreement).



You and the Company hereby agree as follows:



A.    Amendment of the Employment Agreement. Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows:



1.1    Initial
Employment Period. Until the Renewal Date (as defined below), the Executive shall be an at will employee of the Company, and either the Company or the Executive may terminate the Executives employment with the Company at any
time for any reason, in which case this Agreement shall terminate (except for the provisions of Sections 6 and 7, which shall remain in full force and effect), the Executive will not be entitled to the vesting or exercise, in whole or in part, of
the option described in Section 3.4 of this Agreement, but the Executive will be paid such amounts as are described in Section 5.2(a) of this Agreement. The period commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending on the earlier of the Renewal
Date or the termination of the Executives employment with the Company is referred to as the Initial Period. For purposes of this Agreement, the Renewal Date shall mean the closing of the sale of equity securities of the
Company or its subsidiary, Microgy Cogeneration Systems, Inc., resulting in gross proceeds to the Company or Microgy of at least $3,500,000.



B.    Amendment of the Option Agreement. The Option Agreement will be amended and restated in its entirety in the form attached to this letter
as Exhibit A.



C.    Confirmation of
Agreements. In all other respects, the Employment Agreement and the Option Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and remain in full force and effect.



If the foregoing accurate sets forth your understanding of the agreement between you and the Company with respect to the subject matter of this letter, please indicate
your agreement by executing a copy of this letter where indicated below and returning it to me.



Very truly yours,



Joseph E. Cresci

Chairman

Environmental Power Corporation



|                       
|-----------------------
|AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
|                       
|/s/    Kamlesh Tejwani 
|Kamlesh Tejwani