alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Authorization and Consent of Subsidiary Corporation

to be Included in a Consolidated Income Tax Return

Form 1122

(Rev. December 1998)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

© For the first year a consolidated return is filed, this form must be attached for each subsidiary.

For the calendar year , or other tax year beginning , and ending ,

Name Employer identification number

Number, street, and room or suite no.

City or town, state, and ZIP code

Name of common parent corporation Employer identification number

the subsidiary, the subsidiary authorizes the Commissioner or

District Director of Internal Revenue to do so.

The subsidiary corporation named above authorizes its common

parent corporation to include it in a consolidated return for the

tax year indicated and for each later year the group must make

a consolidated return under the regulations. If the parent

corporation does not make a consolidated return on behalf of

The subsidiary consents to be bound by the provisions of the

consolidated return regulations.

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that the subsidiary named above has authorized me to sign this form on its behalf, that I have examined this

form, and the information contained herein, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature of officer Date Title

Form 1122 (Rev. 12-98)

© © ©

Please

Sign

Here
#### Christopher A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill BOOK; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-17199.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Christopher A. Jones, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.

Janet E. Traut, AGNV-Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.

*170Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Christopher A. Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials disciplined him in retaliation for threatening to file a lawsuit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact and computation of damages following a bench trial. *Lentini v. Cal. Ctr. for the Arts, Escondido,*370 F.3d 837, 843 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

Following the bench trial, the district court properly denied judgment to Jones regarding three defendants because it found that those defendants reasonably interpreted Jones’ threat as including conduct not protected by the First Amendment. *See Rhodes v. Robinson,*408 F.3d *559,*567-68 (9th Cir.2005) (listing elements of a retaliation claim in the prison context).

The district court did not clearly err in finding that Jones was entitled to only nominal damages. *See Lentini,*370 F.3d at 850-51 (describing deferential standard applied to award of damages).

Jones’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**
I, Patrick G. Mackey, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Novo Networks, Inc.
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report, isbeing prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: May 19, 2005                                                       /s/ Patrick G. Mackey   Patrick G. Mackey   Senior Vice President
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00113

- CR

J ASON P EREZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Ap peal from the 213th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1664900D )

February 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the t rial c ourt’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I,Grayling Hofer, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 1, 2006  /s/Grayling Hofer Grayling Hofer Chief Accounting Officer Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Charles C. Best    
|Charles C. Best        
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 13, 2008
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Income L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.






/s/Richard Paul Richman


Richard Paul Richman


Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman


Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant


October 26, 2011




---
9

Distribution:

Emily Toler Scott, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

Jason Hardin, Esq.

Artemis Vamianakis, Esq.

FABIAN VANCOTT

215 South State Street, Suite 1200

Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2323

Ali Beydoun, Esq. 

Office of the Solicitor

US Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 401 

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

April Nelson, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

US Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA

U.S. Department of Labor 

201 12th Street South, Suite 401 

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

Administrative Law Judge L. Zane Gill

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

Office of Administrative Law Judges

721 19th Street, Suite 443

Denver, CO 80202-2536
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3332]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  February 13, 2001 at 11 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436 Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be considered:
    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-355 and 731-TA-659-660 (Review) (Grain-Oriented 
Silicon Electrical Steel from Italy and Japan)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and 
Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on February 23, 
2001.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. EC-01-003: Approval of final report in Inv. No. 
332-413 (The Economic Impact of U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Cuba).
    (2) Document No. ID-01-001: Approval of study coverage, objectives, 
methodology, travel requirements, annotated outline, and revised 
staffing plan and work schedule in Inv. No. 332-423 (The Effects of EU 
Policies on the Competitive Position of the U.S. and EU Horticultural 
Products Sector).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: February 2, 2001.

    By order of the Commission:
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3332 Filed 2-5-01; 3:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
```
Exhibit 32.1



DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |                                        |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                   |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                   |  |                                       
|Dated: May 3, 2004 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                    
|                   |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
|                   |  |                                        |  | Chief Financial Officer               



This certification is
made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### Michael WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN AIRCRAFT CENTER, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-2261.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 18, 2011.

Michael Walton, Appellant Pro Se, Wendy Lyn Furhang, Stephanie E. Lewis, Andreas Neal Satterfield, Jr., Jackson Lewis, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Walton appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation granting summary judgment in favor of Lockheed Martin on Walton’s Title VII and breach of contract claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Walton*
      *765
      *v. Lockheed Martin Aircraft Ctr.,*No. 6:09-cv-00462-HMH, 2010 WL 3951512 (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of our opinion dated March 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Environmental Power Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and tothe incorporation by reference of such opinion into previously filed registration statements of Environmental Power Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-98559); Form S-8 (File No. 33-70078); Form S-8 (File No. 33-118521); Form S-8(File No. 333-126439); Form S-8 (File No. 333-128032); Form S-8 (File No. 333-134284); Form S-3 (File No. 333-118491); Form S-3 (File No. 333-121572) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-138999). 

/s/ VITALE, CATURANO & Co., Ltd. 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 28, 2007
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David W. Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ David W. Hempstead





David W. Hempstead


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


August 20, 2012





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-144885, 333-116799,
333-105398, 333-105397, 333-103556, 333-65332 and 333-59433 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
No. 333-57301 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 17, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule of Georgia Gulf Corporation (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption by Georgia
Gulf Corporation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, on January 1, 2007), and our report dated March 17, 2009, relating to the effectiveness of Georgia Gulf Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Georgia Gulf Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 17, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               121
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                           26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3,792
<PP&E>                                             3,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    11,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              5,695
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                             150
<OTHER-SE>                                         4,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      11,430
<SALES>                                            8,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8,687
<CGS>                                              5,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      8,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       18
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                          18
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .001
        


</TABLE>
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC16-2276

____________

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc.,

Petitioner,

vs.

ELIZABETH E. ANTHONY-IRISH, 

Respondent.

October 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

U.S. Bank National Association seeks review of the decision of the Fifth 

District Court of Appeal in U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Anthony-Irish, 204 So. 3d 

57 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), 

Fla. Const. We conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. 

Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this case. 

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, 

and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
- 2 -

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct 

Conflict of Decisions 

Fifth District - Case No. 5D15-3153

(Volusia County)

Michael K. Winston and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., 

West Palm Beach, Florida; and Matthew J. Conigliaro of Carlton Fields Jorden 

Burt, P.A., Tampa, Florida, 

for Petitioner

Steven L. Brannock and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, 

Florida, 

for Respondent

Barry L. Miller of Barry L. Miller, P.A., Orlando, Florida,

for Amici Curiae Jean Bagga and Bassam Bagga
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

GIROD TITLING TRUST

VERSUS

MARCUS L. PITTMAN, III

NO. 2023 CW 0604

AUGUST 14, 2023

In Re: Marcus L. Pittman, III, applying for supervisory

writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

Tammany, No. 2022-15610. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMc

CHH

SMM