alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 3, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Rex Coal Company, Inc.,*Docket Nos. KENT 2010-956, et al.**(Issuesinclude whether the Judge erred in upholding a citation alleging that theoperator failed to provide immediate notification that an accident had occurred.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3508 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye Falls, New 

York, as the ‘‘CW4 Christian J. Koch Memorial Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3508 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHRISTIAN KOCH MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye 

4 Falls, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘CW4 Christian J. Koch Memorial Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘CW4 Christian J. 

10 Koch Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3508 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttian J. Koch Memorial Post Office’’. Honeoye Falls, New York, as the ‘‘CW4 Chris- al Service located at 39 West Main Street, in
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Closed Meeting Notice 5-26-16.pdf

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Closed Meeting Notice 5-26-16.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exclusion of Income from
Sources in United States Possessions

vm 4563

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

D> See separate instructions,
b> Attach to Form 1040.

| 1980

Name(s) as shown on Form 1040

Your social security number

Year

Name of possession

1978

1979

1980

Total Gross Income and Possessions Exclusion

(See Instructions A and B)

Periods when you received income Gross income during periods shown in columns (b) and (c)
from sources in U.S. possessions From sources Th US.
(Dates are inclusive) possessions Fi
From salary, wages, From sources From sources
or active conduct Other income oats oe essen within US.
Year From— To of a trade or
business
(a) ) © @) ) (0) ()
1 1978
$ $ $ $
2 1979)
3 1980)
4Totals. 2. 2 2 ee we $ $ $ $
5 Income from sources in U.S. possessions. Add columns (d) and (e), line4. . 2. 2 ee we . |_$
6 Income from sources other than U.S. possessions. Add columns (f) and (g), line4. . . . 2. ww $
7 Total gross income for test period. Add lines 5 and 6. (See instruction A to determine if you qualify for

the exclusion.) . -_. +

Source of Gross Income from Salary, Wages, or Active Conduct ‘of a Trade or Business

(Column (d) above)

Name and address of employer

Year

(if self-employed, write Self-employed)

Kind of business

1978

1979

1980

313-173-2

“#F US, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1940~O-313-173

Form 4563 (1980)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

January 10, 2011 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 20, 2011 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Ames Construction, Inc., Docket No. 

WEST 2009-0693-M. (Issues include whether a non-production 

operator may be strictly liable for a violation occurring in an area 

which the operator allegedly controls or supervises.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 161

To limit fees paid to outside attorneys who represent the Federal Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To limit fees paid to outside attorneys who represent the

Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outside Counsel Fee

5 Limitation Act of 1991’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON ATTORNEY FEES.

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the fol8 lowing limitations shall apply with respect to fees, paid

9 from appropriated sums, to attorneys who are not Federal

10 employees but who represent the United States (including
2

•HR 161 IH

1 any Federal agency or Federal official acting in official

2 capacity):

3 (1) No fee shall exceed the rate of $125 per

4 hour of work.

5 (2) The total of such fees paid to a single attor6 ney or law firm in a single year shall not exceed

7 $1,000,000.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6895

WILLIE ALBERT JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM STAFFORD, Major, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-45-1-2-MU) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Albert Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Willie Albert Jones filed a notice of appeal after the district court dismissed his petition for relief ostensibly filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). However, Jones’s informal brief states that he is attempting to appeal state court judgments entered on July 14, 1997, and December 12, 1997. Further, the record suggests that the proceeding Jones seeks to challenge is ongoing in state court. Lower federal courts do not have jurisdiction to review state court proceedings. See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 476 (1983).Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Jones’s petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 371 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 371

                    For the relief of Robert Feiss.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

 Ms. Brownley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Robert Feiss.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $39,709.66 to Robert 
Feiss of Ojai, California, in compensation for payments he was entitled 
to but did not receive for years 2011 through 2013 under the Primary 
Care Incentive Payment Program established under section 1833(x) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(x)) and in consideration of the 
fact--
            (1) that Robert Feiss has served as an outspoken advocate 
        for the health care needs of his patients through his work as a 
        primary care physician; and
            (2) that, on May 30, 2018, the United States Court of 
        Federal Claims found that ``It appears that, through no fault 
        of his own, plaintiff has lost over $39,000 in government 
        Medicare incentive payments that he was entitled to by 
        providing Family Practice services'' and that ``the evidence 
        strongly supports plaintiff's argument that he was providing 
        Family Practice services and should have been classified as 
        such, but a coding error denied plaintiff this status for 
        several years''.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Robert Feiss may have against the United States arising on 
the basis of payments owed for years 2011 through 2013 under the 
Primary Care Incentive Payment Program described in section 1(1)(B).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

EPC Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Buzzard Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Microgy, Inc., a Colorado corporation 

Microgy Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Microgy O&M, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company 

MST Production, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership 

MST GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company 

MST Estates, LLC, a Texas limited liability company 

Hereford Biogas, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company 

Mission Biogas, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company 

Rio Leche Estates, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
EPATI MALAUULU,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10207

D.C. No. 2:15

- cr

- 00124

- KJM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Epati Malauulu appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty

- plea conviction and 240

- month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and

possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture and substance

containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violat ion of 21 U.S.C.

* This disposition i s not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 10207

§§ 841(a)(1) and 8 46. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Malauulu’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withd raw as counsel of record. Malauulu has filed a

“ Supplemental Brief for Appoint ment of Counsel,” which we treat as a pro se

supplemental opening brief

. No answering brief has been filed.

Malauulu waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

To the extent that the forfeiture order falls outside the scope of the waiver,

we affirm as to that issue.

We decline to address on direct appeal Malauulu’s pro se claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Rahman , 642 F.3d 1257,

1260 (9th Cir. 2011)

.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

. Malauulu’s request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED

. AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To Pulitzer Publishing Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-14107, 33-14108, 33-56263, 33-56265 and 333-26329 of Pulitzer Publishing
Company on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 6, 1998 (February 27, 1998 as
to the last paragraph of Note 3), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Pulitzer Publishing Company for the year ended December 31, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Saint Louis, Missouri
March 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000827230
<NAME> MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,471
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          15,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        130,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,612
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,711
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,543
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

The following is a copy of the consent previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP. This consent has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP.

 

**Consent of Independent Public Accountants**

 

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofour report dated May 13, 2002 included in this annual report on Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement No. 333-75559, No. 33-18793, No. 333-62581 and No. 333-84714. 

 

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

May 31, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 20, 2012

t0118

Order 

January 20, 2012

144072 (79)

ITALO PARISE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144072

DETROIT ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for full-Court review of the motion to disqualify 

Chief Justice YOUNG and Justice MARKMAN is considered, and it is GRANTED. Upon 

full-Court consideration of the plaintiff’s motion, we DENY the motion for the reason 

that no justice is persuaded that there is any ground for the disqualification of Chief 

Justice YOUNG or Justice MARKMAN.

YOUNG, C.J. (not participating). I do not participate in the order or the full 

Court’s decision on the motion for disqualification of another justice, pursuant to MCR 

2.003(D)(3)(b), for the reasons stated in my November 25, 2009, dissent from the rule’s 

promulgation1 and in my March 31, 2010, statement of nonparticipation in a similar 

motion in Pellegrino v Ampco Systems Parking.

2

 I believe that rule to have serious 

constitutional flaws.

 

1 See 485 Mich cxxx, clxvii-clxxxv (YOUNG, J., dissenting). 

2 485 Mich 1134, 1155-1165 (2010) (YOUNG, J., not participating).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<CIK>                             0000805370
<NAME>                            dick clark productions, inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

 <S>                      <C>
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Jun-30-1999
 <PERIOD-START>                    Jul-01-1998
 <PERIOD-END>                      Jun-30-1999
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
 <CASH>                                6,023
 <SECURITIES>                         39,075
 <RECEIVABLES>                         4,540
 <ALLOWANCES>                              0
 <INVENTORY>                           5,067
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                     49,638
 <PP&E>                               23,698
 <DEPRECIATION>                       12,791
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       69,918
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 5,064
 <BONDS>                                   0
 <COMMON>                             18,875
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
 <PREFERRED>                               0
 <OTHER-SE>                           42,936
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         69,918
 <SALES>                              72,334
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     72,334
 <CGS>                                60,690
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                        60,690
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                      9,587
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (2,209)
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,266
 <INCOME-TAX>                          1,514
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,752
 <DISCONTINUED>                            0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
 <CHANGES>                                 0
 <NET-INCOME>                          2,752
 <EPS-BASIC>                          0.30
 <EPS-DILUTED>                          0.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2
  
 First Amendment to Employment Agreement
   Severance Benefits
 13. Severance Benefits
 13.1 Change in Control




---



##### 



13.2 Termination Without Cause e.g.
 13.3 Definition of Good Reason




---



##### 



13.4 Stock Options and Restricted Stock
 13.5 Release Required
 13.6 No Other Right to Severance Benefits
 13.7 Timing of Severance Pay




---



##### 



13.8 Termination of Your Right to Severance Benefits




---



##### 



Very truly yours,

ZILA, INC.By:
    /s/ David R. BethuneDavid R. BethuneChairman and CEO  /s/ Gary V. Klinefelter
    
    Date: June 9, 2009Gary V. Klinefelter