alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                Exhibit 99.1(iv)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  [CHASE Logo]

                               OFFICER CERTIFICATE

            Annual Statement as to Compliance for Calendar Year 1999

                  Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates
              Series 1997-2 of Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities
                              Corp. (the "Company")

        Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
   dated as of December 1, 1997 by and among Chase Commercial Mortgage
   Securities Corporation As Depositor, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Servicer,
   Lennar Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer, State Street Bank & Trust Co., as
   Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
   Series 1997-2 (the "Agreement'). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
   defined shall the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

   1. A review of the activities of Chase Commercial Mortgage Bank (a unit of
      The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
      Agreement, during the preceding year, and its performance under the
      Pooling Agreement, has been made under this officer's supervision; and

   2. To the best of this officer's knowledge, we have maintained an effective
      internal control system relating to our servicing of the Mortgaged Loans
      and have fulfilled our obligations throughout such year.

   3. The Servicer has received no notification regarding qualification, or
      challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC from the IRS or any
      other governmental agency.

   4. Terms not  separately  defined  herein have the meanings  specified in
      the Pooling Agreement.


   IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of
   the 23 day of March, 2000



                                                /s/ Janice Smith
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Janice M. Smith, Vice President
                                          Chase Commercial Mortgage Bank



                     380 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           -----------------------------------------------------------
                     CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE BANKING CORP.
           -----------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5 th C IR .R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th C IR .R. 47.5.4.
-1- UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41514

DEWEY GLYNN DAILY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:97-CV-697) March 8, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PRE CURIAM: * Dewy Glynn Daily appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In light of our recent decisions in Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196 (5 th Cir. 1998), and Fields v . Johnson , No. 98-10012 (5 t h Cir. October 28, 1998), the Attorney General of the State of Texas

now concedes that Appellant’ s habeas corpus petition was timely filed under the Antiterr orism and Effective Death Penalty Act of
1996. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.-2-

VACATED AND REMANDED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 172 meeting to be held February 27-March 1, 2001, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: February 27: Plenary Session Convenes; (1) Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Working Group (WG)-2 Convenes to work on Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS); (5) WG-3 Convenes to work on VHF Data Link 2 and 3 Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS). February 28: (6) Working Group 3 continues. March 1: Plenary Sessions Reconvenes: (7) Review ICAO Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel (AMCP) Activities; (8) Report on Next Generation Communications (NEXCOM) Advisory Rulemaking Committee and other FAA digital activities; (9) Report on Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee, Systems Architecture Interfaces work on NEXCOM; (10) Review Status of EUROCAE WG-47; (11) Other Business; (12) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (13) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 1, 2001.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 01-3311  Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
NUMBER S 13 - 1 7 - 00 693 - CV , 13 - 17 - 00694 - CV, 13 - 17 - 00695 - CV,

13 - 17 - 00696 - CV, 13 - 17 - 00697 - CV, AND 13 - 17 - 00698 - CV



### COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ STEVE W. PARK, AGENT FOR TEXAS DRP LLC , D / B / A A - ACTION BAIL BONDS , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion by Justice Contreras The appellant’ s brief in the above cause s was ordered to be filed on or before October 8, 2018. On October 19 , 201 8 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of2

prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of th e Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’ s failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellant ha s failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the se appeal s

are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b) , (c)

.

DORI CONTRERAS Justice D elivered and filed the 20th day of November , 20 1 8

.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-24527, No. 33-65002, No. 33-65004, No. 33-58657, No. 333-04169, and No.
333-56593 of Quiksilver, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, dated December 30,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quiksilver, Inc. for the
year ended October 31, 1999.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
January 26, 2000
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard E. Kessel, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Environmental Power Corporation.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 27, 2009   
|                       
|/s/ Richard E. Kessel  
|Richard E. Kessel      
|Chief Executive Officer
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**1331PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW**

**SUITE520N**

**WASHINGTON,DC  20004**

** **

 

 

June 3, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 18, 2014

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from    F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP,* Docket Nos. PENN 2009-697, et al.; *Secretaryof Labor v.**Emerald CoalResources, LP,*Docket Nos. PENN 2010-445-R,et al.; *Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP*, Docket No.PENN 2011-168; *Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP*, DocketNo. PENN 2012-278.  * *(Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judges erred in concluding that impermissibleaccumulations of coal existed.)  

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.  Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                Jean Ellen        (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Schedule J 

(Form 1118) 

(Rev. January 2009) 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Adjustments to Separate Limitation Income (Loss) Categories for 

Determining Numerators of Limitation Fractions, Year-End 

Recharacterization Balances, and Overall Foreign and Domestic 

Loss Account Balances

For calendar year 20 , or other tax year beginning , 20 , 

and ending , 20 

Attach to Form 1118. For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 1118. 

OMB No. 1545-0122 

Name of corporation Employer identification number 

Part I Adjustments to Separate Limitation Income or (Losses) in Determining Numerators of Limitation 

Fractions (see instructions) 

(i) 

General category income 

(ii) 

Passive category income 

(iii) 

Other income* 

(iv) 

U.S. income 

1 Income or (loss) before adjustments 

2 Allocation of separate limitation losses: 

a General category income ( ) ( )

b Passive category income ( ) ( )

c Other income* ( ) ( )

3 Subtotal— Combine lines 1 through 2c. 

4 Allocation of overall foreign losses ( )

5 Allocation of domestic losses ( ) ( ) ( )

6 Subtotal— Combine lines 3 through 5. 

7 Recapture of overall foreign losses ( ) ( ) ( )

8 Subtotal— Combine lines 6 and 7. 

9 Recharacterization of separate limitation income: 

a General category income ( )

b Passive category income ( )

c Other income* ( )

10 Recapture of overall domestic 

losses ( )

11 Numerator of Limitation Fraction— 

Combine lines 8 through 10. Enter each 

result here and on Schedule B, Part II, line

7, of corresponding Form 1118. 

Part II Year-End Balances of Future Separate Limitation Income That Must Be Recharacterized (section 904(f)(5)(C)) 

a General category income 

b Passive category income

c Other income*

Part III Overall Foreign Loss Account Balances (section 904(f)(1)) 

Complete for each separate limitation income category. 

1 Beginning balance 

2 Current year additions

3 Current year reductions (other than 

recapture) ( ) ( ) ( )

4 Current year recapture (from Part I, line 7) ( ) ( ) ( )

5 Ending balance—Combine lines 1 

through 4. 

Part IV Overall Domestic Loss Account Balances (section 904(g)(1)) 

1 Beginning balance 

2 Current year additions

3 Current year reductions (other than 

recapture) ( ) ( ) ( )

4 Subtotal—Combine lines 1 through 3.

5 Current year recapture (from Part I, line 

10) 

6 Ending balance—Subtract line 5

from line 4. 

* Important: See Computer-Generated Schedule J in instructions. Cat. No. 10309U Schedule J (Form 1118) (Rev. 1-2009)
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC

Consol PENN 2018-0169 Argument Notice 10-7-20.pdf

Consol PENN 2018-0169 Argument Notice 10-7-20.htm

Commission Oral Argument_Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co., LLC, Docket No. PENN 2018-0169_10-07-2020.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 99.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory E. Fischbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    GREGORY E.
FISCHBACHGregory E. Fischbach Chief Executive Officer





November 26, 2002





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
exv10w3



 







EXHIBIT 10.3




ORTHOLOGIC CORP.




Amendment No. 1 to Les M. Taeger’s Employment Agreement

dated January 16, 2006



Effective June 5, 2006, Mr. Les M. Taeger’s base salary is increased to $227,000 per year.



Additionally, OrthoLogic may terminate Mr. Taeger’s employment at any time, immediately and without
cause, by giving written notice to Mr. Taeger. If OrthoLogic terminates Mr. Taeger without cause,
provided Mr. Taeger first executes a Severance Agreement in the form then used by OrthoLogic,
OrthoLogic shall continue to pay to Mr. Taeger his minimum base salary in effect at the time of
termination for a period of one year following the date of termination, at the time and in the
manner dictated by OrthoLogic’s standard payroll policies. Should such termination occur as a
result of a change in control, OrthoLogic shall also pay Mr. Taeger a pro-rata share of his bonus
at the time of termination.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John M. Holliman, III
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	John M. Holliman, III	 	 
	 

	 	Executive Chairman	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date: June 5, 2006
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Jeffrey Pappas v. CalPortland Company              

#   Jeffrey Pappas v. CalPortland Company

On May 10, 2018, the Commission issued its decision in*Jeffrey Pappas* v. *CalPortland Company and Riverside Cement Company*, Docket No. WEST 2016-264-DM.  

Commission-Decision(SEC obo Pappas v. Calportland Co.  Riverside Cement Co.) WEST 2016-264-DM.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-7058 

PEDRO P. DEL ROSARIO, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

Mark R. Lippman, The Veteran Law Group, of La Jolla, California, argued for claimantappellant. 

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. 

With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, 

Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director. Of counsel on the brief were David J. 

Barrans, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Y. Ken Lee, Attorney, Office of the General 

Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr. 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-7058 

PEDRO P. DEL ROSARIO, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

in CASE NO(S). 06-1596 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, Circuit Judge, and FOLSOM*, District 

Judge). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED March 2, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk 

 

* The Honorable David Folsom, Chief District Judge, of the Eastern District of Texas, sitting 

by designation.