alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3361

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
 establish a United States Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2021

  Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Mast, and Mr. 
   Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
 establish a United States Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Ambassador at Large 
for Arctic Affairs Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR AT LARGE FOR ARCTIC AFFAIRS.

    Title I of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2651a et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:

``SEC. 64. UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR AT LARGE FOR ARCTIC AFFAIRS.

    ``(a) Establishment.--There is established within the Department of 
State an Ambassador at Large for Arctic Affairs (referred to in this 
section as the `Ambassador'), appointed in accordance with subsection 
(b).
    ``(b) Appointment.--The Ambassador shall be appointed by the 
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
    ``(c) Duties.--
            ``(1) Diplomatic representation.--Subject to the direction 
        of the President and the Secretary of State, the Ambassador is 
        authorized to represent the United States in matters and cases 
        relevant to Arctic affairs in--
                    ``(A) contacts with foreign governments, 
                intergovernmental organizations, and specialized 
                agencies of the United Nations, the Arctic Council, and 
                other international organizations of which the United 
                States is a member; and
                    ``(B) multilateral conferences and meetings 
                relating to Arctic affairs.
            ``(2) Chair of the arctic council.--The Ambassador shall 
        serve as the Chair of the Arctic Council when the United States 
        holds the Chairmanship of the Arctic Council.
            ``(3) Policies and procedures.--The Ambassador shall 
        coordinate United States Arctic policies.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**I, Richard B. Berliner, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Berliner Communications, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006       /s/ Richard B. Berliner Richard B. Berliner    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)  
25
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1681 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1681

To waive the time limitations applicable to awarding the Medal of Honor 
                     posthumously to Ruben Rivers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

   Mr. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive the time limitations applicable to awarding the Medal of Honor 
                     posthumously to Ruben Rivers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the time 
limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States 
Code, with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons in the 
Armed Forces shall not apply with respect to the posthumous award of 
the Medal of Honor to Ruben Rivers of Tecumseh, Oklahoma, in 
recognition of acts performed by him at the risk of his life and beyond 
the call of duty during November 1944 while serving as a staff sergeant 
in the United States Army in Bougaltroff, France, during World War II.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael J. Keough                                  
|Date: November 9, 2006 |  |     |  | Michael J. Keough President and Chief Executive
Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THEODORE M. PROCIV PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Versar, Inc. (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /S/ Theodore M. ProcivTheodore M. ProcivPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Lonnie OGLESBEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden; Captain Wilson; Captains Johnson; S.I.A. Pitt; A.M. Shift Prison Guards; Webb, Special Housing Unit Guard; Kegley, Special Housing Unit Guard; c/o Hamilton, Special Housing Unit Guard; Anders, Special Housing Unit Guard; Moore, Special Housing Unit *682Guard; Mr. Fortner, Special Housing Unit Guard; Stanley, Special Housing Unit Guard; Jarrell, Special Housing Unit Guard; Other Unnamed Guards, Special Housing Unit; Shreiber, Special Housing Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 4, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2010.

Lonnie Oglesbee, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lonnie Oglesbee appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.* Because the record contains allegations that prison staff denied Oglesbee grievance forms and retaliated against him for using the administrative grievance process, we conclude that the failure to exhaust is not clear from the face of the complaint. *See Anderson v. XYZ Corr. Health Servs.,*407 F.3d 674, 682-83 (4th Cir.2005); *see also Moore v. Bennette,*517 F.3d 717, 725 (4th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We deny Oglesbee’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*

*

 Generally, dismissals without prejudice are interlocutory and not appealable. *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir.1993). However, a dismissal without prejudice could be final if no amendment to the complaint could cure the defect in the plaintiff’s case. *Id.*at 1066-67. We conclude that the defect in this case (the failure to exhaust administrative remedies) can only be cured by something more than an amendment to the complaint and that the order is appealable.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 16

- 3256

_____________________________ M ICHAEL J. L ENTON , Appellant,

v.

R HONDA M ICHELE P ARKER , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Cour t for Duval County

. Henry E. Davis , Judge

. March 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and M AKAR and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Michael J. Lenton, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
#### In Re: Christopher Leonard OLSZOWY; Anna Olszowy, Petitioners.

No. 10-2303.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 3, 2011.

Christopher Leonard Olszowy; Anna Olszowy, Petitioners Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher and Anna Olszowy petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order invalidating the district court’s order denying their motion for a stay. We conclude that the Olszowys are not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353*(4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by the Olszowys is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
2014-0557.

#### State ex rel. Evans v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Relator’s motion for order deeming legal conclusions to be admitted or for partial default is denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>  94
EXHIBIT (23)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


Board of Directors and Stockholders of Uni-Marts, Inc.
State College, Pennsylvania

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements No. 333-69136, No. 333-07697 and No. 333-24903 of
Uni-Marts, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 29, 1997
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uni-Marts, Inc. for
the year ended September 30, 1997.



/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

January 12, 1998
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 13, 2020

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. M-Class Mining, LLC,*Docket No. LAKE 2018-0188-R. (Issuesinclude whether the Judge erred in ruling that a section 103(k) safety orderwas validly issued and was not an abuse of discretion.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)236-7472

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

 

Dated: January 21, 2020

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel

 

BillingCode 6735-01
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Extension of Time for Comments Relating to the Lodging of a 
Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that the public comment period on a proposed 
Consent Decree in United States and State of Colorado v. Robert 
Friedland, Civil No. 96 N 1213 (D. Colo.), has been extended at the 
request of a member of the public. The Department of Justice will 
continue to accept comments until February 20, 2001. The Consent Decree 
was lodged on December 22, 2000 with the United States District Court 
for the District of Colorado. Notice of the public comment period was 
previously published at 65 FR 83084 (December 29, 2000).
    Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of 
the Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to, United States and 
State of Colorado v. Robert Friedland, Civil No. 96 N 1213, and D.J. 
Ref. #90-11-3-1133B.
    The Decree may be examined at the office of the U.S. Department of 
Justice, Environmental Enforcement Section, 999 18th Street, Suite 945, 
North Tower, Denver, Colorado; at U.S. EPA Region 8, Office of Regional 
Counsel, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, South Tower, Denver, Colorado. A 
copy of the Decree may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 
20044. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of 
$5.50 for the Decree (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to 
the Consent Decree Library.

Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-3272 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I Roger J. Klatt, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Gundle/SLTEnvironmental, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or person’s performing the equivalentfunction):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. Date March 12, 2004/S/Roger J. KlattRoger J. KlattExecutive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer