[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67134-67151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 2, 35, and 37

[Docket No. RM01-8-000]


Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements

Issued December 20, 2001.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), DOE.

ACTION: Order seeking comments on proposed data sets.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As contemplated in the notice of proposed rulemaking issued by 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) earlier in this 
proceeding, Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements, (66 FR 40929), 
FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 32,554 (2001) (NOPR), this order invites 
comment on a proposed set of uniform data elements for public 
utilities' quarterly electronic filings that would accompany the final 
rule. Uniform data sets are necessary to ensure that the requested data 
is reported in a consistent, informative manner by all reporting public 
utilities.

DATES: Written comments must be received by the Commission by January 
28, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Office of the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

H. Keith Pierce (Technical Information), Office of Markets, Tariffs, 
and Rates, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208-0525
Barbara D. Bourque (Information Technology Information), Office of 
Markets, Tariffs, and Rates, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208-2338
Gary D. Cohen (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426 (202) 208-0321

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III, Chairman; William L. Massey, 
Linda Breathitt, and Nora Mead Brownell.

Order Seeking Comments on Proposed Data Sets

Issued December 20, 2001.

I. Background

    On July 26, 2001, the Commission issued a notice of proposed 
rulemaking in this proceeding, Revised Public Utility Filing 
Requirements, 66 FR 40929, FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 32,554 (2001) 
(NOPR), proposing to revise the Commission's filing requirements for 
public utilities. The Commission is currently engaged in reviewing the 
comments filed in response to the NOPR.
    Among other matters, the NOPR stated that ``[l]ater in this 
rulemaking process, we plan to conduct further proceedings to develop 
the instruction manual to be used to make Index of Customer filings, 
which will define the data elements to be included in Index of 
Customers filings.'' Uniform data sets are necessary to ensure that 
required data are reported in a consistent, informative manner by all 
reporting public utilities.
    As explained in the NOPR, the Commission is considering requiring 
public utilities to make quarterly electronic filings when we issue a 
final rule in this proceeding. As explained in the text of proposed 
Sec. 35.10b, the filing requirements would pertain to every 
jurisdictional electric service, under part 35 of the Commission's 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 35, that was effective some time during the 
reporting quarter. In this order, we invite comment on a proposed set 
of uniform data elements for public utilities' quarterly electronic 
filings that would accompany the final rule.

II. Discussion

A. Suggestion To Postpone Action on Proposed Rulemaking Pending 
Completion of Comprehensive Review of Market Monitoring Information

    As explained above, we are currently engaged in reviewing the 
comments filed in response to the NOPR and, with one exception, will 
not address those comments here. The exception is the issue raised in 
some comments to the NOPR that the Commission should postpone action on 
the proposals in the NOPR pending completion of the Commission's 
comprehensive review of the information needed by the Commission for 
market monitoring purposes.
    This argument maintains that, if the Commission's comprehensive 
review of market monitoring information concludes that the 
transactional data proposed in the NOPR to be reported in Index of 
Customers filings are later found to be unnecessary, then issuance of a 
final rule requiring the electronic filing of that information (and 
posting of that information on a website) would result in public 
utilities incurring unnecessary expenses to establish procedures to 
collect and report these data. The same commenters also argue that it 
would be wasteful to force public utilities to design and implement 
procedures to report transactional data for market monitoring purposes, 
merely to have those reporting requirements withdrawn, once the 
Commission completes its review of needed market monitoring 
information.
    We find these arguments without merit because, although the 
Commission has not completed its comprehensive review of market 
monitoring data, we believe that the information proposed to be 
reported would be the minimum needed for market monitoring purposes, 
even if we later determine that additional data also will be necessary. 
Moreover, as we noted in the NOPR, we

[[Page 67135]]

believe that the proposed reporting requirements would improve the 
quality of information reported to the Commission by prescribing that 
public utilities report information in a consistent, accessible format.

B. Proposed Data Sets

    Attached to this order are tables specifying proposed data elements 
that identify (with greater detail than provided in the NOPR) the 
information to be reported in Index of Customers filings. The Index of 
Customers is intended to electronically collect data on all 
jurisdictional contracts, including, among other matters, data 
concerning service agreements, bilateral contracts, rate schedules, and 
interconnection agreements. As such, many different types of 
jurisdictional services must be accommodated by the data elements. 
Depending on the service(s) offered by a particular public utility, it 
may have to submit data for only a certain subset of the data elements 
identified in the Appendices. The data elements are organized to show 
what data are required for various types of services.
    To aid in identifying the data elements, we have included 
definitions (in many cases, with examples). We have also identified 
whether the data elements are to be filed as file identification 
information, contract data, and/or transactional data. For the sake of 
clarity, certain data elements that will be system-generated have been 
omitted from these tables. Some data elements will appear in more than 
one section; others will be unique to a section. For instance, the 
``company_name'' data element will be used to identify the respondent, 
filing agent, buyer, or seller, depending on where it is entered into 
the system.
    We received several comments concerned with the appropriate time 
increment for reporting pricing data for transactions (i.e., whether 
the pricing data should be reported in hourly or even shorter 
increments). We are proposing that, if a price changes during a day, 
then respondents should submit high, low, and (weighted) average prices 
on a daily basis for those transactions that are shorter than a day. If 
prices remain unchanged for two days or more, they may be reported as a 
single datum entry. We invite comments from a computer systems 
perspective about whether filing pricing data this way would be less 
burdensome than submitting pricing data for each period of time a 
unique price is charged (i.e., if a power sale involved five price 
changes in an hour, it would be filed as five transactions for that 
hour).
    It is our desire to collect Index of Customer information in the 
least burdensome way. We have tried to follow OASIS standards wherever 
possible to minimize the introduction of new data elements or formats. 
If commenters see a way for the proposed data sets to match up better 
with the OASIS Standards and Communication Protocols Document, version 
1.4 (OASIS S&CP Document), they should address this in their comments.
    In the attached tables, there are a number of field definitions 
that include the term {registered} in the list of valid entries. This 
means that we will allow other terms to be entered into the field, but 
only after they have been approved by the Commission and entered into 
the validation tables for that field. The reason for this is to ensure 
data integrity. If we allowed free form text in these fields, it would 
hinder our ability to perform meaningful searches of the data because 
companies do not always use the same name for the same item, or there 
may be misspellings. We invite respondents to submit other proposed 
entries for these fields either as part of this NOPR process or at any 
time in the future.
    The first table (Appendix A) is an overview of the types of data we 
propose to collect, identifying the sections of the data collection: 
filer identification, contract data, and transaction data. The first 
three columns indicate which data elements pertain to each section. 
File Identification Information, designated by an F in the first 
column, provides information about the identity of the filer and the 
party on whose behalf the filing is being made (if different). The data 
must be filed by every public utility filing an Index of Customers 
report. Contract Data, identified by a C in the second column, include 
the contract data elements that every public utility filing an Index of 
Customers must provide to describe its contracts.
    Every jurisdictional service that was effective some time during 
reporting quarter must be included on the Index of Customers. This 
includes services for which service agreements have already been filed 
with and approved by the Commission, services for which service 
agreements conform with filed and approved standard forms of service 
agreements, rate schedules, and unique services such as individually 
negotiated bilateral agreements. Transactional Data, shown by a T in 
the third column of Appendices A and B, identifies the transactional 
data elements that every public utility filing an Index of Customers 
must provide to describe its power sales. To the extent that a public 
utility makes no power sales during the applicable quarter, it is not 
required to report any transactional data in its Index of Customers 
filing for that quarter. The NOPR proposed to require transactional 
data for every electric commodity sale, whether the rate was cost-
based, market-based, under a rate schedule, or under a tariff. In 
addition, if any other services are approved for market-based rates in 
the future, they will have to be reported in this section.
    The second table (Appendix B) is a detailed look at the data 
elements including their format. Where applicable, we have identified 
the analogous OASIS data element. We have also included the intended 
field length and a list of valid entries. This table is intended for 
computer and technical personnel to review. Respondents are encouraged 
to comment on these items which will aid the successful development of 
the system.
    The third table, shown in Appendix C, shows which elements will be 
required for short term transmission contracts and which will be 
required for long term transmission contracts.
    The NOPR proposes that public utilities report in the Index of 
Customers all of their sales transactions, ``including book outs and 
net outs.''\1\ A number of parties' comments expressed concern about 
how the Commission would define the ``book outs'' and ``net outs'' that 
must be reported in the Index of Customers, contending that including 
``book outs'' and ``net outs'' would be burdensome and that ``book 
outs'' are nonphysical transactions that should not be reported.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 32,554 at 34,071-72.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In industry parlance, a ``book out'' is the offsetting of opposing 
buy-sell transactions (e.g., a sale of 100 MW from A to B and a sale of 
90 MW from B to A would result in these transactions being booked-out 
and treated as a 10 MW sale from A to B). A ``net out'' is similar, but 
instead concerns the offsetting of dollars rather than MW (e.g., if A 
owes B $2,700 and B owes A $3,000, the transactions are netted out and 
treated as a single transaction of $300).
    As noted by many parties, the Commission found in Morgan Stanley 
Capital Group, Inc., 69 FERC para. 61,175 at 61,696 (1994), as modified 
in 72 FERC para. 61,082 at 61,435-36 (1995) (Morgan Stanley) that we 
would not extend our power marketer reporting requirements to purely 
financial transactions \2\ and in

[[Page 67136]]

New York Mercantile Exchange, 74 FERC para. 61,311 at 61,987 (1996) 
(NYMEX), we found that we lack jurisdiction under sections 203 and 204 
of the FPA over the trading of electricity futures contracts approved 
for trading by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). We 
held, however, that we do have jurisdiction under Secs. 205 and 206 of 
the FPA over transactions that go to physical delivery. Intervenors 
contend, based on our precedent in Morgan Stanley and NYMEX, that we 
should not require the reporting of ``book outs'' and ``net outs'' in 
the Index of Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ We note, however, that in Docket No. RM02-3-000 we are 
proposing to revise the Uniform System of Accounts (USofA) to 
require reporting on derivatives, and we are seeking comment on the 
extent to which marketers should be required to follow the USofA and 
what information, if any, should be reported by these entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Subsequent to issuance of Morgan Stanley, respondents' quarterly 
transaction reports have reported their ``book outs'' and ``net outs'' 
of physical transactions on an aggregated basis. Reporting these book 
outs and net outs of physical transactions is appropriate because the 
underlying transactions are not purely financial transactions. Our 
proposal in the NOPR does not rewrite the line we drew in Morgan 
Stanley or in NYMEX. The same transactions for which book outs and net 
outs are currently reported in quarterly transaction reports are to be 
reported in the Index of Customers. The comments filed in response to 
the NOPR have not persuaded us to reconsider this issue.
    However, to avoid confusion, we will give specific guidance as to 
which book outs or net outs must be reported under the proposals in the 
NOPR, as clarified in this order. In Morgan Stanley and NYMEX, the 
Commission stated that it has jurisdiction over those transactions that 
go to physical delivery, and does not have jurisdiction over purely 
financial transactions. However, commenters suggest that booked-out 
transactions do not go to physical delivery and, therefore should not 
have to be reported. We note that, in Morgan Stanley and NYMEX, the 
Commission was distinguishing between transactions that were purely 
financial, i.e., transactions usually performed in the futures market, 
and physical transactions, i.e., scheduled sale or purchase 
transactions to meet load. Commenters are not drawing the line between 
futures transactions and physical transactions, but between physical 
transactions that are delivered in full and those that are offset 
either all or in part (e.g., they argue that two offsetting 100 MW 
sales result in no deliveries; thus nothing need be reported on either 
transaction despite the fact that the sales were not financial 
positions but in fact physical power sales that were offset similar to 
a net interchange between two control areas). Just because a MW for a 
sale was not used to meet a distant load but instead met a more local 
load due to scheduling and physics does not change the fact that each 
individual transaction of such a series of offset transactions is a 
physical transaction. Accordingly, we clarify that we are proposing 
that sales of power that are offset through a book out or net out based 
on the physical characteristics (i.e., location of source and sink) of 
the transactions must be reported as separate transactions.
    Morgan Stanley did not address the issue of whether book outs and 
net outs are to be reported on an aggregated or disaggregated basis. In 
the absence of specific guidance on this issue, respondents have 
elected to file this information on an aggregated basis. To provide the 
public and Commission with more useful information, we clarify that, 
under the proposal in the NOPR, public utilities would be required to 
report book outs and net outs of physical transactions on a 
disaggregated basis showing each individual leg of the transaction that 
generated the book out or net out.

D. Additional Discussion on Data Elements

    The majority of the data elements are self-explanatory: 
contact_name, contact_address, contact_email and the like. However, 
several data elements require additional discussion.
1. Company Identification Data Elements
    Appendix A identifies the data elements ``company_name,'' 
``company_duns'' and a series of related data elements necessary to 
identify a contact person, address and means of contact. These data 
elements will be used to collect data on the multiple parties related 
to the filing of the report and the information contain in the report. 
The data collection anticipates the need to collect information on up 
to three types of parties: (a) Filing Agent--the company or 
organization making the filing with the Commission (this could be the 
public utility itself, or an organization such as a law firm making the 
filing on the utility's behalf; (b) Seller--the public utility 
providing services; and (c) Purchaser--the buyer of the public 
utility's service(s). Not all data elements will be required for all 
parties. For example, there is no need for a company DUNS \3\ number 
for the filing agent. For the purchaser, the Commission intends to 
require only company name and the associated DUNS number. No contact 
data will be required. A separate Index of Customers filing will be 
required for each public utility. Each filing is required to include 
the name (contact_name) and location information for at least one 
contact person. Contacts can be listed for the filing agent and/or the 
seller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ DUNS numbers refer to the Data Universal Numbering System, 
maintained by Dun and Bradstreet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. ``Contract_service_agreement_id''
    The Commission is not proposing any particular method for a utility 
to create unique contract service agreement identifiers. However, 
whatever method a utility adopts should be readily relatable to any 
service or revenue a utility must report (such as in a Form No. 1 
filing, rate proceeding, or Commission audit).
3. ``Contract commencement _dt'' and ``begin_ date''
    The contract commencement date is the initial date service 
commenced under the contract. This date, once established, does not 
change in subsequent quarterly Index of Customers filings.
    Electric utility contracts may provide for several unbundled 
services under a single contract. The purpose of the ``begin_date'' 
data element is to identify the initial date an individual service 
commenced. This date can differ from the date service commenced under a 
contract, or from other services under a contract. This date, once 
established, does not change in subsequent quarterly Index of Customers 
filings.
    The distinction between ``contract_commencement_date'' and 
``begin_date'' can best be illustrated with an example. Power sales or 
transmission might be provided under a contract before various 
ancillary services (also provided for under the contract) are 
commenced. Under this scenario, the date service under the contract 
commences would be reported under the ``contract_commencement_date'' 
data element and the date when each ancillary service commenced would 
be reported with its own ``begin_date.''
4. ``Contract termination_dt,'' ``cancellation of_contract,'' 
``actual_termination_ dt,'' and ``end_date''
    The ``contract_termination_dt'' data element is intended to capture 
the expected initial contract's termination

[[Page 67137]]

date. If the contract terminates during the reporting period, then the 
flag ``cancellation_of_contract'' should be provided, as well as the 
actual termination date (i.e., ``actual_termination_dt'').
    Electric utility contracts may provide for several unbundled 
services under a single contract. The purpose of the ``end_date'' data 
element is to identify the date an individual service terminates. This 
date, once established, does not change in subsequent quarterly Index 
of Customers filings.
5. ``Rate,'' ``rate_min,'' ``rate_max,'' and ``rate_desc.''
    The first three of these data elements will be used to collect both 
contract and transaction information. However, the definitions for the 
required data are different, depending on whether the rate information 
is applicable to contract data or transactional data.
a. Contractual Rate Data
    Appendix A proposes four rate related data elements: ``rate,'' 
``rate_min,'' ``rate_max'' and ``rate_desc.'' \4\ The ``rate'' element 
is a numeric input that should reflect the stated rate during the 
reporting period. The ``rate_min'' and ``rate_max'' data elements 
should report the lowest and highest rate for any unit of service 
received during the reporting period as provided in the contract. For 
contracts with stated rates, the rate information in all three data 
elements would be the same. The ``rate_desc'' data element can be 
completed as simply as stating ``maximum approved rate.'' However, if a 
cost-based rate is discounted or negotiated below the FERC-approved 
maximum rate, then the utility must describe the method by which the 
rate is calculated. This may be as simple, for example, as ``Stated 
rate,'' or, if based on some index, an example would be ``Fixed cost of 
$x.xxxx plus 80% of Index Price Y.'' The rate data element, in this 
instance, may be left blank. Market-based power sales contracts need 
not provide any rate information for the contract record. That 
information will be collected in the transaction record.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ When a split savings price is paid, this would be reported 
in the ``rate_desc.'' data element.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Transaction Rate Data
    Appendix A proposes three rate-related data elements: ``rate,'' 
``rate_min,'' and ``rate_max.'' The rates required for these data 
elements should be solely for the respondent's services or sales under 
a FERC tariff. As noted above, we are proposing that in lieu of 
submitting minute-by-minute data, respondents should submit high, low, 
and weighted average prices on a daily basis for those transactions 
which are shorter than a day.
    Public utilities filing transaction data on power sales will be 
required to include transaction data for all products and services 
(whether market-based or cost-based) related under the terms of the 
contract to the power sale.
    The transaction data element ``total_transaction_charge'' is the 
total revenue for the transaction period received from the customer for 
the service or sale under the terms of the contract. This would include 
revenues received for all services related to a product that is the 
subject of the transaction report. The ``total_transaction_charge'' is 
also to include all other applicable revenue for other services 
provided under the contract, such as ancillary services or bundled 
transmission provided by the respondent or others under the contract.
6. ``Product_name,'' ``product_type_ name,'' ``product_sub type_name,'' 
``increment_name,'' ``increment_peaking_ name'' and ``term_name''
    The purpose of these data elements is to identify the service 
provided (product_name), along with some general characteristics of the 
service to improve analysis of the data. For example, ``product_ name'' 
could be ``schedule system control and dispatch;'' ``product_type'' 
could be ``transmission;'' and ``product_sub_ type'' could be 
``ancillary service.''
    We are proposing to require the data element ``term_name'' because 
the Commission often establishes different reporting and other 
requirements for short-term, as opposed to long-term, contracts. For 
example, as shown in Appendix C, the standard form of service agreement 
provided by Order No. 888-B \5\ requires significantly less information 
for short-term transportation as compared to long-term transportation. 
The Commission does not propose in this NOPR to change the standard 
form of service agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-
discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities and 
Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting 
Utilities, Order No. 888, 61 FR 21540 (May 10, 1996), FERC Stats. & 
Regs. para. 31,036 (1996) (Order No. 888), order on reh'g, Order No. 
888-A, 62 FR 12274 (March 14, 1997), FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 
31,048 (1997) (Order No. 888-A), order on reh'g, Order No. 888-B, 81 
FERC para. 61,248 (1997), order on reh'g, Order No. 888-C, 82 FERC 
para. 61,046 (1998), aff'd in part sub nom., Transmission Access 
Policy Study Group, et al. v. FERC, 225 F. 3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2000), 
cert. granted in part and denied in part, 121 S. Ct. 1185 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. ``{Registered}''
    Various proposed data elements require the use of codes to identify 
certain services and other information. The Commission proposes, to the 
extent possible, to use the codes and definitions already accepted and 
in use on the OASIS system. For example, for the data element 
``product_name,'' the Commission proposes to use SC--Scheduled system 
control and dispatch, and RV--Reactive supply and vol. control from the 
OASIS S&CP Document data set.\6\ The Index of Customers, however, will 
require the reporting of more than just the OATT services. Therefore, 
the OASIS registered codes do not reflect the variety of services 
offered by utilities under Part 35 of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ OASIS S&CP Document, Appendix A-2, AS_TYPE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We invite comments as to whether the same voluntary industry 
working group(s) that seek industry consensus and periodically 
recommend revisions to the OASIS S&CP Document would be available to 
aid the Commission in developing and maintaining the various codes for 
Index of Customer Data Sets, or whether another approach would be 
preferable.
8. ``Ferc designation''
    The ``ferc_designation'' data element is designed to identify the 
FERC-approved designation for the tariff or rate schedule that 
identifies the terms and conditions of service and the applicable 
rates. These data are the same as required by Sec. 35.9(a) and 
35.9(b)(1) of the Commission's regulations. We have revised the OASIS 
data element for ``tariff_designation'' because the data element also 
applies to sales provided under a rate schedule.
9. Identifying Nonconforming Contracts
    We invite comment on whether respondents should identify 
nonconforming contracts as part of their Index of Customers submittals.

E. Electronic Format

    The Commission is developing software to capture, manage, and 
disseminate its data. We invite interested parties who wish to 
participate in a pilot test of this data collection to contact Barbara 
Bourque at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afcdceddcdceddce81cdc0dadddedacaefc9caddcc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec8e8d9e8e8d9e8dc28e83999e9d9989ac8a899e8fc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

III. Public Comment Procedure

    This order specifies the data sets that we are considering adopting 
as part of a final rule in this proceeding. Prior to taking final 
action on this proposal, we are inviting comments from interested

[[Page 67138]]

persons on the proposals discussed in this order and fully set out in 
the attachments. The Commission invites interested persons to submit 
comments, data, views and other information concerning matters set out 
in this order.
    To facilitate the Commission's review of the comments, commenters 
are requested to provide an executive summary of their position on the 
issues raised in this order, including any revisions they would suggest 
to the proposed data sets (along with the reasons supporting their 
suggested revisions), along with any related matters or alternative 
proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. Commenters are requested 
to identify each specific question posed by this order that their 
discussion addresses and to use appropriate headings. Commenters should 
make comments as specific as possible, and when comments address 
specific data elements or issues, use the same terms as are used in 
this order. Commenters should separately identify any additional issues 
they wish to raise. Commenters should double space their comments.
    Comments may be filed on paper or electronically via the Internet 
and must be received by the Commission within 30 days after publication 
of this order in the Federal Register. All comments, whether submitted 
electronically or in a paper filing, should be preceded by a caption 
identifying the name (Public Utility Filing Requirements) and docket 
number (Docket No. RM01-8-000) of this proceeding and should reference 
that they are being filed in response to this order. Those filing 
electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For paper filings, 
the original and 14 copies of such comments should be submitted to the 
Office of the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426.
    For the convenience of Commission Staff, we request that paper 
filings be accompanied by a computer diskette copy in a Commission-
prescribed format (see discussion immediately below). We request that 
the accompanying computer diskette should have a label providing the 
following information: Docket No. RM01-8-000; the name of the filing 
entity; the software and version used to create the file; and the name 
and telephone number of a contact person. Any discrepancies between the 
paper filing and the accompanying diskette will be resolved by 
reference to the paper filing.
    Comments filed via the Internet must be prepared in WordPerfect, MS 
Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To file the document, 
access the Commission's website at www.ferc.gov and click on ``e-
Filing,'' and then follow the instructions for each screen. First time 
users will have to establish a user name and password. The Commission 
will send an automatic acknowledgment to the sender's E-Mail address 
upon receipt of comments.
    User assistance for electronic filing is available at 202-208-0258 
or by E-Mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e287848b8e8b8c85a284879081cc848786cc9791"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80e5e6e9ece9eee7c0e6e5f2e3aee6e5e4aef5f3">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments should not be submitted 
to the E-Mail address. All comments will be placed in the Commission's 
public files and will be available for inspection in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room at 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426, 
during regular business hours. Additionally, all comments may be 
viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely via the Internet through FERC's 
Homepage using the RIMS link. User assistance for RIMS is available at 
202-208-2222, or by E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07556e6a744a6674736275476162756429616263297274"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ca98a3a7b987abb9beafb88aacafb8a9e4acafaee4bfb9">[email protected]</span></a>.

IV. Document Availability

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
Internet through FERC's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC's 
Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
Eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
    From FERC's Home Page on the Internet, this information is 
available in both the Commission Issuance Posting System (CIPS) and the 
Records and Information Management System (RIMS).

--CIPS provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the 
Commission since November 14, 1994.
--CIPS can be accessed using the CIPS link or the Energy Information 
Online icon. The full text of this document is available on CIPS in 
ASCII and WordPerfect 8.0 format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading.
--RIMS contains images of documents submitted to and issued by the 
Commission after November 16, 1981. Documents from November 1995 to the 
present can be viewed and printed from FERC's Home Page using the RIMS 
link or the Energy Information Online icon. Descriptions of documents 
back to November 16, 1981, are also available from RIMS-on-the-Web; 
requests for copies of these and other older documents should be 
submitted to the Public Reference Room.
    User assistance is available for RIMS, CIPS, and the Website during 
normal business hours from our Help line at (202) 208-2222 (E-Mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9ae9c9bb4988a8d9c8bb99f9c8b9ad79f9c9dd78c8a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ec9fbfcd3ffedeafbecdef8fbecfdb0f8fbfab0ebed">[email protected]</span></a>) or the Public Reference at (202) 208-1371 (E-
Mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fefeafdf3f6fcb1edfaf9faedfaf1fcfaedf0f0f2dff9faedfcb1f9fafbb1eaec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfbfbaada3a6ace1bdaaa9aabdaaa1acaabda0a0a28fa9aabdace1a9aaabe1babc">[email protected]</span></a>).
    During normal business hours, documents can also be viewed and/or 
printed in FERC's Public Reference Room, where RIMS, CIPS, and the FERC 
Website are available. User assistance is also available.

The Commission Orders

    Interested persons may file comments on the proposed data sets as 
discussed in this order and shown in Attachment A to this order within 
thirty (30) days of the date of publication of this order in the 
Federal Register, as discussed in the body of this order.

    By the Commission.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

[[Page 67139]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.031


[[Page 67140]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.032


[[Page 67141]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.033


[[Page 67142]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.034


[[Page 67143]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.035


[[Page 67144]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.036


[[Page 67145]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.037


[[Page 67146]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.038


[[Page 67147]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.039


[[Page 67148]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.040


[[Page 67149]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.041


[[Page 67150]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.042


[[Page 67151]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE01.043

[FR Doc. 01-32005 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-C


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>