alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1808

TANYI ERNEST AYAMBA, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-937-614) Submitted: January 12, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Payne, BLAIR & LEE, P.C., College Park, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jennifer A. Wright, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tanyi Ernest Ayamba, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. On appeal, Ayamba contends that the Board erred in finding that he failed to meet his burden of establishing his eligibility for asylum. The record reveals, however, that the asylum application was denied on the ground that Ayamba failed to demonstrate that he filed his application within one year of the date of his arrival in the United States. See8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000). We lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). Given this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of Ayamba’s asylum claim. Ayamba also contends that the Board and immigration judge erred in denying his request for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that Ayamba failed to make the- 3 - requisite showing before the immigration court. We therefore uphold the denial of his request for withholding of removal. We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Ayamba fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) ( 2005). We find that Ayamba failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
/**
 * @file
 * Dialog API inspired by HTML5 dialog element.
 *
 * @see http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/commands.html#the-dialog-element
 */

(function ($, Drupal, drupalSettings) {
  /**
   * Default dialog options.
   *
   * @type {object}
   *
   * @prop {boolean} [autoOpen=true]
   * @prop {string} [dialogClass='']
   * @prop {string} [buttonClass='button']
   * @prop {string} [buttonPrimaryClass='button--primary']
   * @prop {function} close
   */
  drupalSettings.dialog = {
    autoOpen: true,
    dialogClass: '',
    // Drupal-specific extensions: see dialog.jquery-ui.js.
    buttonClass: 'button',
    buttonPrimaryClass: 'button--primary',
    // When using this API directly (when generating dialogs on the client
    // side), you may want to override this method and do
    // `jQuery(event.target).remove()` as well, to remove the dialog on
    // closing.
    close(event) {
      Drupal.dialog(event.target).close();
      Drupal.detachBehaviors(event.target, null, 'unload');
    },
  };

  /**
   * @typedef {object} Drupal.dialog~dialogDefinition
   *
   * @prop {boolean} open
   *   Is the dialog open or not.
   * @prop {*} returnValue
   *   Return value of the dialog.
   * @prop {function} show
   *   Method to display the dialog on the page.
   * @prop {function} showModal
   *   Method to display the dialog as a modal on the page.
   * @prop {function} close
   *   Method to hide the dialog from the page.
   */

  /**
   * Polyfill HTML5 dialog element with jQueryUI.
   *
   * @param {HTMLElement} element
   *   The element that holds the dialog.
   * @param {object} options
   *   jQuery UI options to be passed to the dialog.
   *
   * @return {Drupal.dialog~dialogDefinition}
   *   The dialog instance.
   */
  Drupal.dialog = function (element, options) {
    let undef;
    const $element = $(element);
    const dialog = {
      open: false,
      returnValue: undef,
    };

    function openDialog(settings) {
      settings = $.extend({}, drupalSettings.dialog, options, settings);
      // Trigger a global event to allow scripts to bind events to the dialog.
      $(window).trigger('dialog:beforecreate', [dialog, $element, settings]);
      $element.dialog(settings);
      dialog.open = true;
      $(window).trigger('dialog:aftercreate', [dialog, $element, settings]);
    }

    function closeDialog(value) {
      $(window).trigger('dialog:beforeclose', [dialog, $element]);
      $element.dialog('close');
      dialog.returnValue = value;
      dialog.open = false;
      $(window).trigger('dialog:afterclose', [dialog, $element]);
    }

    dialog.show = () => {
      openDialog({ modal: false });
    };
    dialog.showModal = () => {
      openDialog({ modal: true });
    };
    dialog.close = closeDialog;

    return dialog;
  };
})(jQuery, Drupal, drupalSettings);
#### CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. KESSINGER et al.

No. 25534.

Feb. 5, 1935.

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1935 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts are identical in this case with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The *480award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.
SEAN DAVID GRIFFIN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 245

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed February 25, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Terry D. Terrell , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, MAKAR

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,031
<SECURITIES>                                     7,425
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,398
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         246,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        265,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        841
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,618
<SALES>                                         10,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,725
<CGS>                                            8,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re: CAO HUU TRAN, Debtor Cao Huu Tran, Appellant, v. Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc.; Harvey’s Tahoe Management Company; Lawrence Loheit; and The Golden 1 Credit Union, Appellees.

No. 06-16696.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 2008.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Anthony J. Palik, Esq., Placerville, CA, for Appellant.

Robert G. Aisenstein, Esq., Henderson, NV, Roxanne T. Daneri, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Appellees.

Lawrence J. Loheit, Sacramento, CA, pro se.

Before: B. FLETCHER and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Cao Huu Tran appeals the ruling of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit affirming the ruling of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California sustaining objections by the Chapter 13 Trustee and certain creditors to confirmation of Appellant’s third amended Chapter 13 plan and dismissing Appellant’s Chapter 13 case.

Appellant incurred large gambling debts over the several months prior to filing his Chapter 13 petition, and admitted to gambling at least once after filing his petition. He also borrowed large sums of money from family members to repay other gambling debts. At the time he filed his Chapter 13 petition, Appellant owed just under $150,000 to casinos and family members, all gambling-related debt. The bankruptcy court identified Appellant’s admitted gambling problem as the major obstacle to confirmation of the plan.

The bankruptcy court denied confirmation of Tran’s third amended Chapter 13 plan and ultimately dismissed Tran’s case because, though Tran was given several opportunities to prove that his gambling problem would not render his plan infeasible, and though he was given additional time in which to do so, Tran failed to submit a confirmable plan. Under these circumstances, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying confir*568mation and dismissing the case. *See*11 U.S.C. § 1807(c).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Acker,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Kevin J. Acker                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin J. Acker                        |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| March 11, 2008                   |   |

 

 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to West SuburbanBancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-109261 and No. 333-32819 of LOGIC Devices Incorporated onForm S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-16591 of LOGIC Devices Incorporatedon Form S-3 of our report, dated December 21, 2007, relating to our audit ofthe financial statements and financial statement schedule for the year endedSeptember 30 2007, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LOGICDevices Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 2007.

 

 

  /s/  Hein & Associates LLP

 

 

 

Irvine, CA

December 21, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TENNECO
CREDIT CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         211,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  710,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,991)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          69,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,234)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,000,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        707,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,000,341
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,053
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,396
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,992
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,473
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1166411
<SECURITIES>                                    667234
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      80708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1166411
<PP&E>                                           73163
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4377435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           767710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5838
<OTHER-SE>                                     3609725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4377435
<SALES>                                           8217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 35223
<CGS>                                            25679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   203886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (327593)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (505251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (66076)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (439175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (439175)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 13 February 2001.
    Time of Meeting: 0830-1700.
    Place: 11th floor Conf. Room, Presidential Towers, Crystal City, 
Virginia.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Ad Hoc Study on 
``Adapting Future Wireless Technologies'' will have their kickoff 
meeting to outline study goals, breakout into specific panels, and 
schedule meetings. There will be NO outside briefings at this 
kickoff meeting. If you require additional information or have any 
questions, please call Mr. Jeff Ozimek, the Study Staff Assistant on 
(732) 532-5496.

Wayne Joyner,
Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3327 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 99.2


                   MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE GROWTH AND INCOME FUND
                               LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the filing of Meridian Healthcare Growth and Income Fund
Limited Partnership's (the "Fund") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, George V. Hager, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of
Meridian Healthcare Investments, Inc., Development General Partner of the Fund,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Fund.



Date:    11/13/02               By:     /s/ George V. Hager, Jr.

                                George V. Hager, Jr.
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Meridian Healthcare Investments, Inc.
                                Development General Partner
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

May 24, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 4, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter McNary v. 

Alcoa World Alumina, LLC, Docket No. CENT 2015-279-DM.

(Issues include whether the Judge erred by determining that the 

complainant had failed to establish interference with his rights 

under the Mine Act.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel