alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                          MICROFINANCIAL, INCORPORATED
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 REGARDING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
                           QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004


     James R. Jackson Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
MicroFinancial, Incorporated, (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Covered Report") and, except as
corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

-    the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-    the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of this
August 13, 2004.


                                      /s/ JAMES R. JACKSON JR.
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1704

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 1,8 Dichloroanthraquinone

and 1,8 Diaminonapthalene.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 7, 1993

Mr. GINGRICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 1,8

Dichloroanthraquinone and 1,8 Diaminonapthalene.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN

4 CHEMICALS.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new headings:
2

HR 1704 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 1,8

Dichloroanthraquinone (provided for in subheading

2914.70.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94

9902.31.13 1,8

Diaminonapthalene (provided

for in subheading

2921.59.10) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of FirstCity Financial Corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date:  May 14, 2004
    /s/ James T. SartainJames T. SartainChief Executive Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sean M. McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30486

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 28, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert Watts Gillespie, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

G. Warren Thornell, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Sean M. McCoy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). McCoy has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. McCoy’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VANCE LEON HASKELL,

Petitioner :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: No. 361 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Unpublished Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court at No. 952 WDA 2018 entered on September 13, 2019, affirming the Order of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas at No. CP

- 25

- CR

- 0000731

- 1998 entered on June 21, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of June , 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED , the order of the Superior Court is VACATED , and the case is

REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for reconsideration in light of this

Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Johnson , 40 EAP 2018.
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC16

- 2276

____________

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc .,

Petitioner,

vs.

ELIZABETH E. ANTHONY

- IRISH,

Respondent.

October 1 5 , 2018

PER CURIAM.

U

. S

. Bank National Association seeks review of the decision of the Fifth

District Court of Appeal in U.S. Bank Nat ional Ass ’n v. Anthony

- Irish

, 204 So. 3d

57 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) , based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3),

Fla. Const. W e conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.

Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.- 2

-

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal

– Direct
Conflict of Decisions

Fifth District

- Case No. 5 D 15

- 3153

(Volusia County)

Michael K. Winston and Dean A. Morande of Ca rlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida; and Matthew J. Conigliaro of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tampa, Florida

,

for Petitioner

Steven L. Brannock and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & Humphries , Tampa, Florida,

for Respondent

Barry L. Miller of Barry L. Miller, P.A., Orlando, Florida,

for Amici Curiae Jean Bagga and Bassam Bagga
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9K67]


Commonwealth of Massachusetts (And Contiguous Counties in 
Connecticut, New York and Vermont)

    Berkshire County and the contiguous counties of Franklin, Hampden, 
and Hampshire in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Litchfield in 
Connecticut; Columbia and Rensselaer in New York; and Bennington in 
Vermont constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a result of 
a fire that occurred on January 17, 2001 in the Town of Great 
Barrington. Eligible small businesses and small agricultural 
cooperatives without credit available elsewhere may file applications 
for economic injury assistance as a result of this disaster until the 
close of business on November 2, 2001 at the address listed below or 
other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd, South 3rd Floor, Niagara 
Falls, NY 14303.
    The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small 
agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. The numbers assigned for 
economic injury for this disaster are 9K6700 for Massachusetts; 9K6800 
for Connecticut; 9K6900 for New York; and 9K7000 for Vermont.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

    Date: February 2, 2001.
Kristine Marcy,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-3403 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,128,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,977,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (281,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     311,216,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (46,454,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             276,345,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,245,000
<BONDS>                                    153,493,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  84,437,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               276,345,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,380,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,280,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,608,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,555,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3317; Amendment #4] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated January 30, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Titus County as a disaster area due to damages caused by a severe winter ice storm beginning on December 12, 2000 and continuing through January 15, 2001. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in Camp County, Texas may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 

Any counties contiguous to the above named primary county and not listed herein have been previously declared. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is March 9, 2001 and for economic injury the deadline is October 9, 2001.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: February 1, 2001. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 01-3402 Filed 2-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Nine Months Ended
                                              March 31
                                     --------------------------
                                         1998          1997
                                     ------------  ------------
<S>                                  <C>           <C>
Net loss                              $ (805,375)   $ (466,310)
Net loss per common share             $    (0.17)   $    (0.14)
                                      ==========    ==========
Weighted average number of shares      4,804,048     3,405,131
  of common stock outstanding         ==========    ==========
 
</TABLE>

Diluted loss per share is not presented as the effect of the potential
conversion of preferred stock to common stock would decrease loss per share.

                                      11-1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Craig JONES, also known as Paco, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30215

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

Emily Katherine Greenfield, Stephen Andrew Higginson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George Frazier, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Craig Jones, Pollock, LA, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Craig Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jones’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further re*879sponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC311997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN011997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP301997
<CASH>                                         223,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         104,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,165,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,732
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,002,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,165,988
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               648,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  793,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (145,038)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (145,038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (145,038)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (252,823)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (397,861)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1746 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1746

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3,6-Trimethylphenol (TMP).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1993

 Mrs. Roukema introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3,6-Trimethylphenol (TMP).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TMP.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and 
inserting ``12/31/95''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in subheading 9902.30.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated January 24, 1997, included in this Form 10-K of
Spieker Properties, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 1996,
filed with the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3
(File Nos. 333-18483, 333-14325, 333-09425, 333-04299 and 333-00346).

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Francisco, California
March 28, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TechTeam Global, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William C.
Brown, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    /s/ William C. Brown
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William C. Brown
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
# FILED
April 1, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON
STEVEN COBB, Petitioner\Ap

pellant,

vs. Lake Circuit No. 96-7590 Appeal No. 02A01-9707-CV-00144 JOSEPH VINSON, Chair man LCRCF Disciplinar

y Board, et al, Respondents\A

ppellees.

SEPARATE CONCURRENCE

HOLL Y KIR BY LI LLA RD, J. I agree with the

majority’s a

nalysis in this case. How

ever, I concur se parately to emphasi

ze that our review, under either the common law writ of certiorari or the s tatutory writ, should be limited to hearing the petitioner’s claims regarding “the illegality of acts taken by the disciplinary board.” William

s v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction , No. 02A01-9503-CV-00046 1995 WL 575142 (Tenn. App. Oc t. 2 1995). Even if the requirements of a statutory writ of certiorari are met, our

re vie w should not include the substance of the disciplinary proceeding, i.e. whether the petitioner actually committed the acts with which he was charged.

HOLL Y KIR BY LI LLA RD, J.