alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM NANOPIERCE
TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1998  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000827161
<NAME>                                         Nanopierce Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         125
<SECURITIES>                                   1,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,775
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 969,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,185
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,004,600
<COMMON>                                       1,302
<OTHER-SE>                                     (270,029)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   969,058
<SALES>                                        138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               844,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (851,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (851,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (851,095)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
Offer Letter Agreement with Jaap de Lange dated October 1, 2003



 Exhibit 10.9 
 BioForm Logo 
 October 1, 2003 
 Mr. Jacob Th.J. Delange 
 [HOME ADDRESS] 
 Dear Jacob: 
 We are pleased to offer you employment as Director of European Sales of BioForm Inc., to begin
on October 1, 2003. In this role, your place of business shall be based in The Netherlands and you shall report to me. Your job description for this position is attached. 
 Your annual base salary will be Euros110,000 paid to you monthly, one month in arrears. Upon completing your six month anniversary, you will receive a
pro-rated bonus of 20% of your base salary (based on six months employment). Should for any reason you are terminated prior to completion of these six months this bonus will be payable to you on a prorated basis. 
 Upon completion of your first six months of service, you will be eligible for the annual management bonus program. The annual management bonus program
consists of a minimum of 20% of your base salary, paid on a pro-rata basis every 6 months. The annual management bonus program is contingent upon achieving your sales target and mutually agreed upon MBO’s associated with launching and growing
the European business. 
 In addition, after six months of service you will be receiving a performance and salary review. BioForm will also
provide social benefits in accordance with Dutch employment laws. The details are to be provided separately. 
 You will receive an incentive
stock option for 15,000 shares of common stock, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and applicable ISO rules and limitations. Options are priced at the next meeting of the Board of Directors and begin vesting as of your date of hire. This
stock option will vest 25% on the first anniversary of your hire and monthly thereafter over a four year total vesting period. 







 A car allowance or a leased car arrangement will be provided based on a mutually agreeable decision.
BioForm will also provide a Euro 2000 cash advance for travel related expenses, and this advance will be paid back to the company at the time of separation. 
 The notice period will be eight weeks by either party or as required under Dutch employment law. Upon termination of the contract, BioForm Incorporated may deduct from any amounts owing there under any advances,
reversed commissions, recoverable draws or other amounts then owed by the employee to BioForm Incorporated, (or to a third party if BioForm Incorporated is responsible contractually for such amounts). 
 Additionally, this offer is extended to you with the condition of signing our “Agreement Regarding Proprietary Information and Inventions” upon
starting your new role. 
 The BioForm team looks forward to you joining us in our very exciting venture! I personally look forward to
working with you and to the substantial contribution that I believe you will make to our team. 
  

					
	Sincerely,	 		 	Offer Accepted:
			
	 /s/ Lee Fagot
	 		 	 /s/ Jacob Th.J. Delange

	 Lee Fagot
	 		 	Mr. Jacob Th.J. Delange
	 Vice President
	 		 	(Signature)
	 International Sales
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Kevin M. McMullen                                       
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Kevin M. McMullen                                           
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President             
|                     |  |       
|                     |  |        |  | /s/ Michael E. Hicks                                        
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Hicks                                            
|                     |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-125-000]


Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; Request for Waiver of OFO 
Penalty Provisions

December 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 18, 2001, Gulf South Pipeline Company, 
LP (Gulf South) tendered for filing a request seeking authority to 
waive certain requirements of sections 10 and 19 of the General Terms 
and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff. Specifically, Gulf South is 
seeking authority to waive all penalties associated with the 
Operational Flow Order that was issued on November 24, 2001.
    Gulf South states that copies of this filing has been served upon 
its customers, interested state commissions and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed December 
31, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This 
filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the 
``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 
202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may 
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31996 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1808

TANYI ERNEST AYAMBA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-937-614)

Submitted: January 12, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Payne, BLAIR & LEE, P.C., College Park, Maryland, for

Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jennifer A.

Wright, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tanyi Ernest Ayamba, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s decision

denying his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

On appeal, Ayamba contends that the Board erred in

finding that he failed to meet his burden of establishing his

eligibility for asylum. The record reveals, however, that the

asylum application was denied on the ground that Ayamba failed to

demonstrate that he filed his application within one year of the

date of his arrival in the United States. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000). We lack jurisdiction to review this

determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). Given this

jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of

Ayamba’s asylum claim.

Ayamba also contends that the Board and immigration judge

erred in denying his request for withholding of removal. “To

qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he

faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race,

religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or

political opinion.” Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir.

2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on

our review of the record, we find that Ayamba failed to make the
- 3 -

requisite showing before the immigration court. We therefore

uphold the denial of his request for withholding of removal.

We also find that substantial evidence supports the

finding that Ayamba fails to meet the standard for relief under the

Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant

must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she

would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.”

8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find that Ayamba failed to

make the requisite showing before the immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Wilder Richman  Historic  Properties
II, L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Richard Paul Richman,  Chief Executive  Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  (S) 1350, as adopted  pursuant to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ Richard Paul Richman
-------------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Registrant
June 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,083<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,311
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,863<F2><F3>
<PP&E>                                         964,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 943,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,692
<BONDS>                                        550,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,160
<PREFERRED>                                     40,734
<COMMON>                                       335,843
<OTHER-SE>                                    (91,773)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   943,795<F4><F5>
<SALES>                                         67,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,174
<CGS>                                           18,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   496
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,750<F6><F7><F8>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (52)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,698
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
<FN>
<F1>Includes 5,242 of restricted cash
<F2>Includes 3,683 of Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
<F3>Also includes, 11,641 of Other Assets and 7,456 of Receivable-Net
<F4>Includes 376,326 of Paid in Capital in Excess of Par
<F5>Also Includes 58,759 of Minority Interest
<F6>Includes 45,000 Distribution to Minority Interest Holders
<F7>Also Includes 223,000 of Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
<F8>Also Includes 5,896 of Gain from Sales of Real Estate
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW

SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004

October 5, 2012

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, October 17, 2012

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Manalapan Mining Co., Inc., Docket 

No. KENT 2008-737 (Issues include whether the Administrative 

Law Judge erred in concluding that certain violations were not the 

result of the operator’s unwarrantable failure to comply.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I Samir T. Badawi, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gundle/SLTEnvironmental, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the period covered by this reportbased on such;  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or person’s performing the equivalentfunction):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls.   DateMarch 8, 2004  /S/ Samir T. Badawi  Samir T. Badawi President & Chief Executive Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EDUARDO PANO CANO, a.k.a. Eduardo

Cano Pano,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10025

D.C. No. 1:02-cr-05050-AWI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2011** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Pano Cano appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute

methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

FILED

NOV 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10025

and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

Cano contends that the district court erred in denying him a minor role

adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The district court considered Cano’s

argument that he was substantially less culpable than his co-defendants, and

rejected it. In light of Cano’s efforts to further the conspiracy, the district court did

not commit error by concluding that he did not meet his burden to prove that he

was entitled to a minor role adjustment. See United States v. Rosas, 615 F.3d

1058, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.