alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2006 (the Report), I, Richard E. Kessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard E. Kessel  
|Richard E. Kessel      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|March 17, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

          - 25 CFR Part 292 
          - RIN 1076-AD93

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule: reopening of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice reopens the comment period for the proposed rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 14, 2000.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

Comments must be received on or before February 25, 2002. 

# ADDRESSES:

Mail comments to George Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street NW, MS 2070-MIB, Washington, DC 20240. Comments may be hand delivered to the same address from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday or sent by facsimile to 202-273-3153. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Pierskalla, Office of Indian Gaming Management, 202-219-4066. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 14, 2000, the Bureau of Indian Affairs published a proposed rule (65 FR 55471) concerning Gaming on Trust Lands Acquired After October 17, 1988. The deadline for receipt of comments was November 13, 2000. Six comments were received after                           ( print page 66848)                        November 13, 2000. Several of these comments raise substantive issues that may result in modification of the proposed rule. The comment period is reopened to allow consideration of the comments received after November 13, 2000, and to allow additional time for comment on the proposed rule. Comments must be received on on before March 27, 2002.                 

This notice is published in accordance with the authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs by 209 Department Manual 8.1. 

Dated: December 11, 2001. 

Neal A. McCaleb, 

Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 01-31664 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
#### APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULTIMETRIXS, LLC, Mark Kesel, Boris Kesil, and Elik Gershenzon, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 2010-1149, 2010-1150.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 9, 2010.

Rohit K. Singla, Munger, Tolies & Olson, LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Virginia L. Boesch and Sarala V. Nagala.

Jeffrey I. Kaplan, Kaplan Gilman & Pergament, LLP, of Woodbridge, New Jersey, argued for defendant-appellee.

GAJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
================================================================================
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

                                Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                       March 31,                March 31,
                             -------------------------  ------------------------
                                 2005         2004         2005         2004
                             ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------
<S>                          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss                     $  (272,204)    (291,888)    (696,066)  (1,048,786)
                             ============  ===========  ===========  ===========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding   91,259,033   81,663,563   90,753,924   71,139,776

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares
  issuable upon exercise of
  outstanding options and
  warrants                             -            -            -            -
                             ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

                              91,259,033   81,663,563   90,753,924   71,139,776
                             ============  ===========  ===========  ===========

Net loss per share,
  basic and diluted          $         *            *    (    0.01)   (    0.01)
                             ============  ===========  ===========  ===========
<FN>
* Less than ($0.01) per share.

Stock  options  and  warrants  are  not considered in the calculations for those
periods with net losses as the impact of the potential common shares (76,181,877
shares  at  March  31, 2005 and 81,231,877 shares at March 31, 2004) would be to
decrease  net  loss  per  share.
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL FORSHEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 203 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

June 11, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 23, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., et al., Docket Nos. VA 2013-275, et 

al. (Issues include whether a workplace examination must be 

“adequate” under the standard in question.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the three months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                  0000828509
<NAME>                    ATS MONEY SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                           U.S. Dollars

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1
<CASH>                                  1,974,279
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,235,575
<ALLOWANCES>                              145,669
<INVENTORY>                               764,412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,926,851
<PP&E>                                    392,814
<DEPRECIATION>                            225,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          6,884,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,519,241
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    5,942
<OTHER-SE>                              4,213,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            6,884,910
<SALES>                                 6,118,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        7,535,119
<CGS>                                   2,916,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,504,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        2,680,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,369,087
<INCOME-TAX>                              563,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       806,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              806,087
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .14


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Admiral Financial Corp., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wm. Lee Popham, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2009





/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham President

Admiral Financial Corp.





/s/ Wm. Lee Popham

Wm. Lee Popham Principal Accounting Officer

Admiral Financial Corp.
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000826773
[NAME] ADINA, INC.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          APR-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               OCT-31-1998
[CASH]                                              91
[SECURITIES]                                       849
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                   940
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                     940
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                             1763
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           207
[OTHER-SE]                                      (1030)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                       940
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                         0
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer** **Exhibit 31.2**
I, Andrew A. Stevens, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 of Zila, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. Date: March 9, 2005 /s/ Andrew A. StevensAndrew A. StevensChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6246

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT ALLEN TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.

(CR-99-567-S, CA-01-4256-S)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Allen Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Lee Evans, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Allen Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Taylor, Nos. CR-99-567-S; CA-01-

4256-S (D. Md. filed Jan. 3, 2002 & entered Jan. 4, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit (23)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Uni-Marts, Inc.
State College, Pennsylvania


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-69136, No. 333-07697, No. 333-75107 and No. 333-24903 of Uni-Marts, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated November 10, 2000, appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Uni-Marts, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2000.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Uni-Marts, Inc., listed in
Item 14(a)(2). This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
Uni-Marts, Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 21, 2000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7516

JEFFREY ALLAN PETTREY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TOM SCOTT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-986-1) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Allan Pettrey, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Allan Pettrey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pettrey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Honorable Frank Wrlght 

County Auditor 

Fsnnin County 

Bonham, Texas 

Dear Sir: opinion NO. o-3669 

Re: Doea the comniseioners' court 

have the authority to donate 

to a fund sponsored by an American Legion Poet for ths purpose 

of purchasing ~~pulmotor? 

Your letter of June 2, 1941, requeeting an opinion of this 

department upon the above stated question has been received. 

The courts of Texas have repeatedly held tbet county comlesionere' courts may exercise only such authority ~8 is conferred, exprfiesly or by impllcrtlon, by the Constitution and the etatutee of thla 

state. The authorities to thlpl effect are 80 numeroue we do mt deem 

It neceeaary to cite them. 

In Opinion No. o-1001, this department held that the oomisslonera' court does not have authority to donate county funds to the 

American Red Cmaa and other charitable organlzrtlone. 

Opinion No. O-591 of this depvtment held that the oommissloners' court of Galveeton County, Text, me without wthorlty to expend county funds for the employment of life guard6 for the Galveston 

beach. 

There are ?dmy other oplnione of this &epertznent holding in 

effect that the county oomal~eionere' 00~t has Ilo leg*1 authority it0 

expend county funds for any purpose unlees duly authorized by l&w. 

After a careful search of the authorltlee, we fall to fM PII~ authority, 

authorizing the ownul~sioners' court to donate or expend any oountyfunde 

for the above mentioned purpose. Therefore, the above stated queetion 

Is respectfully Ummred in the negative. 
.- 

Honorable Frank Vright, page 2 (o-3669) 

Trusting that the foregoing ful4 rImwere your inquiry, we 

Yours very truly, 

., ATTOBNEYGE~LOF TEXAS 

By: AraellWilllm8 If3 

Ardell Willl8.m~ 

Assistant 

AW:db 

APPROVEDJune 15, 191 

Glen R. Lewie 

Acting Attorney General 

APPROVED 

opinion 

comuiittie 

By BWB 

chairman