alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,844
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,347)
<INVENTORY>                                     22,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,960
<PP&E>                                          88,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,961
<SALES>                                        199,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,318
<CGS>                                          163,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          596
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   219
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,179
<PP&E>                          8,456
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  19,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,997
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        36
<OTHER-SE>                      7,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    19,427
<SALES>                         30
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                30
<CGS>                           15
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (246)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (246)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (246)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
#### Michael Louis FRAZIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald S. MOBLEY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-7438.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 26, 2016.

Decided: Feb. 1, 2016.

Michael Louis Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department, of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Louis Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S:C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have ■ independently reviewed the record and conclude that Frazier has not *188made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

December 22, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 7, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Maxxim Rebuild Company, LLC,

Docket Nos. KENT 2013-566, et al. (Issues include whether the 

Judge erred in ruling that the facility is subject to the jurisdiction of 

the Mine Safety and Health Administration.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Mr.Abel Acosta, Clerk 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

P.O.Box 12308 Ca~ital Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Dear Clerk, 

~2 11J85 -0 I 

May 5, 2015 

I would like to enquire if there has been anything filed by 

the State in response to the Court'.s Order dated Febuary 24,2015 

in regards to my writ of Habeas Corpus 11.07, as I have not heard 

anything, and have requested the clerk ·Of. the Trial Court to 

forward any and all copies of any and all documentatibn, records, 

responses, filed in response to the Courts Order, so that I may 

file a response to the States r~ply if riecessary. 

The Order was dated 2/24/2015. 

Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Mr.Billy Haynes 

Clements H/S 

9601 Spur 591 

Amarillo, Texas 

#1723231 

79107 

I am proceeding in ~ro se fashion on my 11~07, so I don't have 

the assistance of counsel in obtaining any of the following 

requested. 

RECEIVED ~~~ COURT OF CRiMIM~t ~?PEALS 

MAV 1 l 2015 

--··------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           15835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   419725
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     154430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                798392
<PP&E>                                           43674
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2076408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1151052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7519
<OTHER-SE>                                      925356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2076408
<SALES>                                         159715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                177151
<CGS>                                            83197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   161937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (114912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (114912)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Duane G. Debs,President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Duane G. Debs                     |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Duane G. Debs                         |   |   |
| President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| March 14, 2007                        |   |   |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WestSuburban Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
com 3 9 0 3 Moving Expenses

> Attach to Form 1040.

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service > See separate Instructions.

OMB No. 1545-0062

1988

Attachment
Sequence No. 62

Name(s) as shown on Form 1040

Your social security number

»

Enter the number of miles from your old home to your new workplace .
Enter the number of miles from your old home to your old workplace - a ee .
Subtract line 2 from line 1. Enter the result (but not less than zero) . . ad

If line 3 is 35 or more miles, complete the rest of this form. If line 3 is less than 35 miles, you may not take a
expenses. This rule does not apply to members of the armed forces.

1
2
3

deduction for moving

| Part || Moving Expenses

Section A.—Transportation of Household Goods

4 Transportation and storage for household goods and personal effects 4
Section B.—Expenses of Moving From Old to New Home
5 Travelandlodgingnotincludingmeals . . . . 2... 1... LS
6 Totalmeals. © 2 2 2 1 ee | 6 | | TL
7 Multiply line 6 by80%(.80) . 2. 1. ee ee 7
8 AddlinesSand7. . . en 8 _
Section C.—Pre-move Househunting Expenses
9 Travelandlodgingnotincludingmeals . . . . . 2... 1... LO
to Tosineats. es La | L
11 Multiply line 10 by80%(.80). 2. 2 2. 2 ee ee
12_AddlinesQand11. . . . | 12
Section D.—Temporary Quarters (for any 30 days in inarow wafter gettingy your ur job)
13 Lodging expenses not includingmeals . . . 2... 2... ee LB yy
14 Totalmeas. 2. 2 1. ee ee La |
15 Multiply line 14by80%(80), . 2.2... 2... 1... LS
16 Addlinesi3andi5 . Fe ee |}

Section E.—Qualified Real Estate Expenses

17

18

} Part 1! MDYSIEM Limitations

19
20

21

22

23

Expenses of (check one): a CL) selling or exchanging your old home; or

b C1 ifrenting, settlingan unexpiredlease. . . . .L17
Expenses of (check one): a im] buying your new home, or
b (1 _ifrenting, gettinganewlease . . . . . . [18

Addlines12and16. . . . . 19

Enter the smaller of line 19 or $1, 500 ($750 if if married, “filing a separate return,
and at the end of the tax year you lived with your spouse who also started work

20

during the tax year)

Addlines17,18,and20. 2... 2 eee ee ee LBD

TM

Enter the smaller of line 21 or $3,000 ($1,500 if married, filing a separate return, and at the end of the tax
year you lived with your spouse who also started work during the tax year)

22

Add lines 4, 8, and 22. This is your moving expense deduction. Enter here and on Schedule A (Form
1040), line 19. (Note: Any payments your employer made for any part of your move (including the value of
any services furnished in kind) should be included on Form W-2. Report that amount on Form 1040, line 7.

See Reimbursements inthe Instructions.) . . . . wee >

23

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate Instructions.

Form 3903 (1988)
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         GUNDLE/SLT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                JURISDICTION OF      EFFECTIVE
                         ENTITY NAME                             INCORPORATION       OWNERSHIP
--------------------------------------------------------------  ---------------      ---------
<S>                                                             <C>                  <C>
GSE Lining Technology, Inc....................................  Delaware                100%
GSE Lining Technology GmbH....................................  Germany                 100%
Gundle GmbH...................................................  Germany                 100%
GSE Lining Technology Pty. Ltd................................  Australia               100%
GSE Lining Technology Pte. Ltd................................  Singapore               100%
GSE Lining Technology Ltd.....................................  United Kingdom          100%
GSE U.K. Ltd..................................................  United Kingdom          100%
Gundle Environmental Ltd......................................  United Kingdom          100%
GSE Clay Lining Technology Co.................................  South Dakota            100%
GSE International, Inc........................................  Delaware                100%
GSE Foreign Sales, Ltd........................................  Barbados                100%
GSE Ventures, Inc.............................................  South Dakota            100%
Gundwater, Inc................................................  Nevada                  100%
</TABLE>
 
                                       36
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30458 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. S U S A N M O L IN A R I D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 6: 06- C R
- 60034- 2 B ef ore SM ITH , ST E W A R T an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e at t or ney appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent Su sa n M ol i nari has m ove d f orl eave t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ersv. C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . M ol i n arih as n otfi l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rc h 13, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  RELATING TO CHANGE OF CONTROL
 
   Certain Definitions
 Effective Date
 Change of Control
   Change Period
 Code
 1




---



##### 



Separation from Service
 Specified Employee
 Terms of Employment
 Position and Duties
 Compensation
 Termination of Employment
 Death or Disability
 Cause Cause
 2




---



##### 



Good Reason
    Notice of Termination
  Termination Date
 3




---



##### 



Obligations of the Company upon Termination
 Good Reason
       4




---



##### 



Death, Retirement or Disability
 Cause, Other than for Good Reason except
 Limitation on Payment
 5




---



##### 



Confidential Information
 Non-Solicitation Covenant
 Successors and Assigns
    6




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
   If to the Executive
  If to the Company
 
     7




---



##### 



TECHTEAM GLOBAL, INC.By:Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVEBy: 8
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134679 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134679 COA: 266653 Wayne CC: 03-013914-01 DERRICK DEJUAN JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date: 

February 12, 2001 at 2 p.m. 

# Place:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status: 

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-413 and 731-TA-913-918 (Preliminary) (Stainless Steel Bar from France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on February 12, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on February 20, 2001.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: 

(1) Document No. EC-01-003: Approval of final report in Inv. No. 332-413 (The Economic Impact of U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Cuba). 

(2) Document No. ID-01-001: Approval of study coverage, objectives, methodology, travel requirements, annotated outline, and revised staffing plan and work schedule in Inv. No. 332-423 (The Effects of EU Policies on the Competitive Position of the U.S. and EU Horticultural Products Sector). 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: February 2, 2001. 

By order of the Commission:

 Donna R. Koehnke,

 Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-3331 Filed 2-5-01; 3:13 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-42605) of Asset Investors Corporation of our reports (a) date January
29, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Asset  Investors  Corporation and (b) dated January 29, 1999 with respect to the
financial statements and schedules of Commercial Assets, Inc., both of which are
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 1, 2000
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00408-CV

FELIX AUZ, Appellant

V.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC. AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 

ASSOCIATION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-37321

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 2, 2013. On October 1, 2014, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby and Donovan.