alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,220
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       400
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,220)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Leeco, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Leeco, Inc.

Leeco KENT 2012-166 Meeting Notice 2-25-16.pdf

Leeco KENT 2012-166 Meeting Notice 2-25-16.htm

secretary-labor-v-leeco-inc-docket-kent2012-166.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23







                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Ariel Corporation on Form S-8 of our report, which includes an explanatory
paragraph about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated
March 6, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements of Ariel Corporation
at December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.





                                                      Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.





Princeton, New Jersey

March 30, 1998
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Mediators Assist in Contract Agreement for Detroit Casinos - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ltnl9uxOCI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/mediators-assist-in-tentative-agreement-for-detroit-casinos\/\">Mediators Assist in Contract Agreement for Detroit Casinos<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/mediators-assist-in-tentative-agreement-for-detroit-casinos\/embed\/#?secret=ltnl9uxOCI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mediators Assist in Contract Agreement for Detroit Casinos” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ltnl9uxOCI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Updated: 12\/14\/2015 With assistance from FMCS Commissioner Jim Statham and Michigan state mediators, the Detroit Casino Council and union representatives for approximately 6,000 casino employees have ratified a new, five-year\u00a0collective bargaining agreement for three large Detroit casinos,\u00a0 the Greektown Casino, the MGM Grand Detroit and the Motor City Casino. For local news coverage, click here."}
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1848

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with appropriate

endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the United States

for the vessel IMPATIENT LADY.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 22, 1993

Mr. DEUTSCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with

appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel IMPATIENT

LADY.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and section 12106 of title

5 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the department

6 in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a certifi7 cate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for

8 employment in the coastwise trade of the United States
2

•HR 1848 IH

1 for the vessel IMPATIENT LADY (official number

2 553952).

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT #11

                        ENVIRONMENTAL POWER CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
<S>                                                                                   <C> 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                              
                                                                                
NET EARNINGS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996                                             1,565,279 
                                                                                      ============= 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                                               11,159,966 
                                                                                                    
DILUTIVE COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                                               105,887            
                                                                                      -------------            
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES AND DILUTIVE COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING         11,265,853 
                                                                                      ============= 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                                     0.14 
                                                                                      ============= 
                                                                                                   
FULLY DILUTIVE EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                                          
                                                                                                   
NET EARNINGS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996                                             1,565,279
                                                                                      =============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                                               11,159,966 
                                                                                                   
DILUTIVE COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                                               161,935
                                                                                      ------------- 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES AND DILUTIVE COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING         11,321,901
                                                                                      =============
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                                     0.14
                                                                                      =============
</TABLE>
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BESTWAY (USA), INC., Appellant

v.

INTEX RECREATION CORP., Appellee

______________________

2020

- 2200

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019

- 00454.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OHN S. A RTZ

, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by S TEVEN A.

C ALOIARO , Reno, NV.

R. T REVOR C ARTER

, Faegre Drinker Biddle & ReathLLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellee. Also represented by R EID E. D ODGE

, D ANIEL M. L ECHLEITER

, A NDREW M. M C C OY

.

______________________ Case: 20-2200 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 09/07/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE

, Chief Judge

, N EWMAN and

O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 7, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 20-2200 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 09/07/2021
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1653

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 6-chloro-2-amino toluene;

6-chloro-ortho-toluidine; 3-

chloro-2-methyl aniline

benzenamine; and 3-chloro2-methyl (CAS No. 87-60-

5) (provided for in subheading 2921.43.10) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
2

•HR 1653 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

4 or after the 15th day after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act.

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN

7 ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tar8 iff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provi9 sion of law, upon proper request filed with the ap10 propriate customs officer before the 90th day after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or

12 withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

13 goods described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Har14 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (as

15 added by subsection (a)) that was made—

16 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

17 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

18 the enactment of this Act;

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

20 entry or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after

21 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
              LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS (UNAUDITED)
                         (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPUTATION OF COVERAGE OF FIXED CHARGES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             ------------------------------------------------------
                                                               1992       1993       1994       1995        1996
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ----------
<S>                                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net loss...................................................  $  (3,797) $  (2,057) $  (4,650) $  (7,026) $  (16,610)
  Add:
    Extraordinary loss (1).................................     --         --          1,324     --           3,253
    Provision for income taxes.............................     --         --         --             66          28
  Add fixed charges (2):
    Interest expense.......................................      1,783      2,096        966      4,522       8,243
    Interest portion of rentals............................     --             27         74        106         159
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ----------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges..................     (2,014)        66     (2,286)    (2,332)     (4,927)
  Less fixed charges.......................................      1,783      2,123      1,040      4,628       8,402
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ----------
Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges................  $  (3,797) $  (2,057) $  (3,326) $  (6,960) $  (13,329)
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ----------
                                                             ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ----------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) In 1994--loss on early termination of the Company's bank credit facility. In
    1996--loss on early redemption of 9.95% and 10.35% Senior Notes.
 
(2) Fixed charges consist of interest on all indebtedness, including
    amortization of debt expense, and one-third of rental expense (which is
    estimated to represent the approximate interest portion thereof).
#### Eva HINES, Appellant, v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 12987.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 3, 1957.

Robert L. Myre of Garrison, Myre & Myre, Paducah, Ky., for appellant.

Ernest W. Rivers and Charles A. Williams, Paducah, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought by her complaint to recover from the appellee, Royal Indemnity Company, payment of a judgment recovered by her against appellee’s insured for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident caused by the negligent operation of the insured automobile. The District Judge sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure of the insured or the appellant to give notice to the appellee of the accident until approximately twenty-three months after the accident and for failure of the insured to cooperate with the insurer. The policy required written notice to be given to the insurer as soon as practicable after the accident.

For the reasons given by the District Judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 141 F.Supp. 234, and on the basis of the authorities cited therein, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

     I, Henry D. Sahakian, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of
Uni-Marts, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:  May 28, 2004
       ---------------------------


                                          /S/ HENRY D. SAHAKIAN
                                          -------------------------
                                          Henry D. Sahakian
                                          Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of China Forestry, Inc. (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yuan Tian, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      on the dates and for the periods
presented.








Date:
      March 31, 2009
              By:  /s/Yuan
      Tian
                Yuan
      Tian
                Chief
      Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofFirstCity Financial Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: August 9,  2006 |     | /s/ James T. Sartain       |   |
|----------------------------|----------|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |     | James T. Sartain           |
| * *                   | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----