alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11

Statement Regarding the Computation of Basic and Diluted Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           1997          1996           1995
                                       -----------    -----------    ----------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C> 
Basic earnings per common share              $1.49          $0.99        $1.19
Basic average shares outstanding         5,903,868      5,919,977    5,881,129
Diluted earnings per common share            $1.49          $0.99        $1.19
Diluted average share outstanding        5,918,571      5,933,411    5,895,803

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

The undersigned officers of Wilson Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:

| *1.* | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

/s/ Clark Wilson_____________

Clark Wilson

President and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006

 

/s/ Arun Khurana_____________

Arun Khurana

Vice President of Corporate Development

and Chief Financial Officer 

November 14, 2006

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000828186
<NAME> 88A.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         188,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,501
<PP&E>                                      10,081,449
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,718,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,683,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,639,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,683,417
<SALES>                                        832,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  605,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    18.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1654 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1654

          To suspend temporarily the duty on diamino imid sp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on diamino imid sp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIAMINO IMID SP.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12   1-H-Naphth [2. 3-f \1\-]                 No change      No change      On or before     
                         isoindole-1, 3, 5, 10 (2H)-                                            12/31/97      ''
                         tetrone, 4, 11-Diamino (CAS                                                           .
                         No. 128-81-4) (provided for                                                            
                         in subheading 2925.19.50)...  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in heading 9902.31.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 
        was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
        withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
EX-4.1



 





Exhibit 4.1






	COMMON
THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN




	Certificate Number

WWW 00000000




	ALLEGHANY CORPORATION
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF DELAWARE




	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF $1® EACH OF THE COMMON STOCK OF
Alleghany Corporation transferable in person or by duly authorized attorney on the books of
the Corporation,
on surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar




	In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers and its corporate seal to be affixed hereunto this




	COUNTERSIGNED AN^ REGISTERED: ; ) COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVKiES, 1L#eu#.

(CHICACSQ)/’ /VAV,




	TRANSFER AGENT At0 REGISTRAR





 









 












	INCORPORATED UNDER

THE LAWS OF




	DELAWARE




	COMMON ST©CK




	ALLEGHANY CORPORATION
FULLY PAID AND NO N-ASSESSABLE SHARES OFTHE PAR VALUE OF $l°° EACH OF THE COMMON STOCK OF




	COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

HARRIS TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK




	TRANSFER AGEfT AND REGIS’ RAB EY
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Kentucky Fuel Corporation              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Kentucky Fuel Corporation

Kentucky Fuel KENT 2011-1557 Meeting Notice 4-5-16.pdf

Kentucky Fuel KENT 2011-1557 Meeting Notice 4-5-16.htm

secretary-labor-v-kentucky-fuel-corporation-docket-kent2011-1557-etal.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

August 27, 2014

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, September 11, 2014

 PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from 

F Street entrance)

 STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

 CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy LLC, Docket 

No. WEST 2010-1130. (Issues include whether a particular 

accident was required to be immediately reported.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

 FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD 

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

_____________________________

Emogene Johnson

Administrative Assistant
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1222

JOHN A. KADE,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(01-486-BLA)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Kade, Petitioner Pro Se. Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Christian

P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.;

Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John A. Kade seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000).

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is

based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Kade’s motion for an extension of time to file

supplemental materials and affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Kade v. Director, Office of Workers’ Comp. Prog., No. 01-486-

BLA (BRB Jan. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.6 SUMMARY OF INCENTIVE PROGRAM



 






Exhibit 10.6




Summary of Incentive Program




     On April 26, 2006, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of Colonial
Properties Trust (the “Company”) adopted a new incentive program (the “Incentive Program”) in which
certain executive officers of the Company, including all of the “named executive officers”
identified in the Company’s 2006 proxy statement, will participate. The program provides for the
following one-time awards:




	 	*	 	the grant of a specified number of restricted shares which vest at the end of the
five-year service period beginning on April 26, 2006 (the “Vesting Period”), and/or
	 
	 	*	 	an opportunity to earn a performance bonus, based on absolute and relative total
shareholder return over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December
31, 2008 (the “Performance Period”).





     A participant’s restricted shares will be forfeited if the participant’s employment is
terminated prior to the end of the Vesting Period, and a participant’s right to receive a
performance payment will be forfeited if the participant’s employment is terminated prior to the
end of the Performance Period, unless termination of employment results from the participant’s
death or disability, in which case the participant (or the participant’s beneficiary) will earn a
pro-rata portion of the applicable award. Performance payments, if earned, will be paid in cash,
common shares, or a combination of the two. Each performance award has specified threshold, target
and maximum payout amounts. The maximum payout amounts range from $500,000 to $6,000,000 per
participant.



     Each participant will be required to retain for five years at least 75% of any restricted
shares that vest and any common shares of the Company issued in satisfaction of the performance
amount, net of any shares disposed of to pay taxes. A merger or similar corporate transaction will
not accelerate the vesting or payment of any award, although the Board of Trustees (or a designated
committee) may, in its sole discretion, adjust the total shareholder return results or otherwise
modify an award in the event of such a transaction.



     The restricted share grants and performance awards under the Incentive Program were made under
the Company’s existing Employee Share Option and Restricted Share Plan, a copy of which has been
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1734

To prohibit the possession or transfer of non-sporting handguns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the possession or transfer of non-sporting

handguns.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST POSSESSION OR TRANS4 FER OF NON-SPORTING HANDGUNS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

7 following:

8 ‘‘(s)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess

9 or transfer a non-sporting handgun.

10 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the continuous

11 and otherwise lawful possession of a non-sporting handgun
2

•HR 1734 IH

1 by a person during any period that began before the effec2 tive date of this subsection.’’.

3 (b) NON-SPORTING HANDGUN DEFINED.—Section

4 921(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(29)(A) The term ‘non-sporting handgun’ means a

7 firearm which—

8 ‘‘(i)(I) is designed to be fired by the use of a

9 single hand; and

10 ‘‘(II) is not a sporting handgun; and

11 ‘‘(ii) any combination of parts from which a

12 firearm described in clause (i) can be assembled.

13 ‘‘(B) The term ‘sporting handgun’ means a firearm

14 which—

15 ‘‘(i) is designed to be fired by the use of a sin16 gle hand; and

17 ‘‘(ii) the Secretary has determined, using the

18 criteria applied in making determinations under sec19 tion 925(d)(3), to be of a type generally recognized

20 as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to

21 sporting purposes.’’.

22 (c) PENALTY.—Section 924(a)(1)(B) of such title is

23 amended by striking ‘‘or (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘(r), or (s)’’.

Æ
#### Lenora HUMPHREY-BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES INC. and Does 1-20, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-57066.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 2010.

Filed Dec. 14, 2010.

Vincent Nolan, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lorraine O’Hara, Esquire, Eileen C. Zorc, Esquire, Colleen Marie Regan, Esquire, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michael L. Wolfram, Camarillo, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, RIPPLE,* and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Lenora Humphrey-Baker appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant United Airlines Inc. *118in this diversity case brought under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). Defendant terminated Plaintiffs employment after concluding that her disability prevented her from performing the essential tasks of her job as a customer service representative, even with a reasonable accommodation. *See Green v. State,*42 Cal.4th 254, 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 390, 165 P.3d 118, 119 (2007) (holding that the FEHA protects only employees with a disability who can perform the essential duties of the job with reasonable accommodation). On de novo review, *Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co.,*26 F.3d 885, 888 (9th Cir. 1994), we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff testified that her essential duties as a customer service representative included working at the ticket counter and the gate area only. She claims that she received no training in how to work at the loading ramp or in the baggage area, and only occasionally assisted in those areas. Defendant, however, contends that all four potential job assignments were essential duties of a customer service representative at the time of Plaintiffs termination. This dispute creates a genuine issue of material fact regarding which duties were essential to the customer service representative position at the time of Plaintiffs termination.

Furthermore, the district court erred by refusing to consider the May 8, 2006, report from Dr. Thorardson, which released Plaintiff to work as of June 13, 2006, with “no restrictions.” If a person can perform the essential duties of a job without an accommodation, a fortiori she can perform those duties with an accommodation. Viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the release creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiff could perform the essential duties of her job *with*a reasonable accommodation at the time of her termination.

Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion by holding that Plaintiff is judicially estopped from asserting that she can work *without*an accommodation. *Johnson v. Oregon,*141 F.3d 1361,1368-69 (9th Cir.1998). On remand, the trier of fact must decide whether Plaintiff could perform the • essential duties of her job *with*a reasonable accommodation at the time of her termination.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES FOR THE SIX 
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,816<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,267
<PP&E>                                         509,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                (189,636)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,142
<BONDS>                                        232,061<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,542
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,048
<SALES>                                        366,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,529
<CGS>                                          265,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE PRESENTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>BONDS REPRESENT REVOLVING CREDIT LOANS AND LONG-TERM DEBT LESS CURRENT 
MATURITIES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>