alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ernst & Young LLP       (box) Suite 700                (box) Phone: 919 981 2800
                        3200 Beechleaf Court 27604-1063
                        P.O. Box 40789
                        Raleigh, North Carolina 27629-0789




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-31852, No. 33-39266, No. 33-45127 and No. 33-76066) pertaining
to the 1988 Stock Option Plan of Tangram Enterprise Solutions, Inc., of our
report dated February 28, 1997, with respect to the financial statements and
schedule of Tangram Enterprise Solutions, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                     /s/ Ernst & Young L.L.P.



Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1996






     Ernst & Young L.L.P. is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.

<PAGE>
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**1331PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW**

**SUITE520N**

**WASHINGTON,DC 20004**

** **

 

 

March 10, 2014

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:��������������� 10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 20, 2014

 

PLACE:��������������������������������� TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from� F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:������������������������������� Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:�������������������� TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Connolly-Pacific Co.,* Docket� �Nos. WEST 2011-1064-RM, et al. (Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in applying certainstandards to the operator�s stone and rock mining operations.) 

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. � 2706.150(a)(3) and � 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:��������������� Jean Ellen������� (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 18 - 00334 - CV JOSE RICARDO BACA AN D MARIA BACA, APPELL ANT S V. SAFECO INSURANCE COM PANY OF INDIANA, JOHN ADAMS, AND RYA N BASINGER, APPELLEE S On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CI - 20161 - 136, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding



### August 26 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and P ARKER , JJ. Appellant s , Jose Ricardo Baca and Maria Baca, have filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of their appeal. The Court finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not address costs, costs will be taxed against2

appellants . T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Voter Information and Registration - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m4MJQN9Tej\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/voter-information-and-registration\/\">Voter Information and Registration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/voter-information-and-registration\/embed\/#?secret=m4MJQN9Tej\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Voter Information and Registration” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"m4MJQN9Tej\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"On March 7, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting.\u00a0 Agencies subject to the order (including FMCS), are required to promote nonpartisan voter registration, engagement, and participation. As part of this order, FMCS would like to direct employees, affiliates, stakeholders, other parties, and members of the public to voter information found […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32100]



[[Page 50]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 252-312b; FRL-7118-2]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave 
Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air 
Quality Management District portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen 
(NO<INF>X</INF>) emissions from cement kilns. We are proposing to 
approve the local rule to regulate these emission sources under the 
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by February 1, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions and EPA's 
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal 
business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revisions 
at the following locations: California Air Resources Board, Stationary 
Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, 
Sacramento, CA 95812. Mojave Desert AQMD, 14306 Park Avenue, 
Victorville, CA 92392-2310

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charnjit Bhullar, Rulemaking Office 
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-
3960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the local rule: 
MDAQMD Rule 1161. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal 
Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final action 
without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not 
controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish 
a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments 
in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not plan to 
open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should 
do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further 
activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct 
final action.

    Dated: November 29, 2001.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 01-32100 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,757
<PP&E>                                       5,344,631
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,001,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 481,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     481,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   481,922
<SALES>                                        626,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               626,748
<CGS>                                          396,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  396,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            133,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   133,986
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.74


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Neal                Ludeke                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
| Neal                Ludeke                                                                                                                                                                   |   |   |        |
| Chief                    Financial Officer of Wilder RichmanResources                    Corporation, a general partner ofthe                    RegistrantApril                    15, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04608]


Collis, Inc., Elizabethtown, KY; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of August 30, 2001 the United Steelworkers of America, 
AFL-CIO-CLC, District 8 requested administrative reconsideration of the 
Department of Labor's Notice of negative Determination Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance. The 
denial notice was signed on August 8, 2001 and published in the Federal 
Register on August 23, 2001 (66 FR 44378).
    The petitioner presented additional information that appears to 
warrant additional investigation. The information provided by the 
petitioner shows that a portion of plant production may have been 
shifted to Mexico. The information further shows the possibility of 
increased company imports from Mexico contributing importantly to the 
layoffs at the subject plant.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of December 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31629 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Alfredo NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ, aka Alfredo Navarro Gutierrez, aka Alfredo Gutierrez Navarro, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-70730.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 2016.*

Filed Jan. 27, 2016.

*479Jennifer R. Khouri, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *479*See*Fed. R.App, P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Alfredo Navarro-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) May 9, 2013, order reinstating his 1999 expedited removal order. Our review is “limited to confirming the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement regulations.” *Garcia de*Rincon, *v. DHS,*539 F.3d 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir.2008). We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Navarro-Gutierrez’s collateral attack on his 1999 expedited order of removal. *See id.*at 1137-38 (our jurisdiction is limited to reviewing “three discrete inquiries an immigration officer must make in order to reinstate a removal order: (1) whether the petitioner is an alien; (2) whether the petitioner was subject to a prior removal order, and (3) whether the petitioner reentered illegally”); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A), (e).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Cite as Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080.]

S HROYER , A PPELLANT , v. B ANKS , W ARDEN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080.] Appeal from dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus — Habeas corpus not available to remedy claim con cerning validity of an indictment — Judgment affirmed. (No. 2009-0599 — Submitted August 11, 2009 — Decided August 19, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hocking County, No. 09CA3.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, James R. Shroyer, for a writ of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is not available to challenge the validity of a charging instrument.
McCuller v. Hudson , 121 Ohio St.3d 168, 2009-Ohio-721, 902 N.E.2d 979, ¶ 1. In addition, Shroyer’s plea of guilty to the charges contained in the bill of information waived his claimed right to an indictment. State ex rel. Morris v.
Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 716 N.E.2d 208. Finally, Shroyer’s
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not cognizable in habeas corpus.
Everett v. Eberlin , 114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 6. Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ James R. Shroyer, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney Genera l, and Samuel Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

______________________
#### Jaborie BROWN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, U.S. Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S.P. Lee County, Virginia, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 10-7353.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2011.

Jaborie Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*821PER CURIAM:

Jaborie Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Brown v. United States,*No. 7:10-cv-00390-jct-mfu, 2010 WL 3585431 (W.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*May 28, 2014*

[Cite as *05/28/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2245.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2014-0318.

#### James v. State.

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-28, 2014-Ohio-140. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in the case, the court accepts the appeal. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and this cause is remanded for application of *Mansaray v. State,*138 Ohio St.3d 277, 2014-Ohio-0750.

*1402O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      5,553,700
<SECURITIES>                                3,698,100         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   9,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            9,511,300 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,519,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,065,600
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,449,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9,519,600
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,748,300
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 378,300 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               55,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,160,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,160,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                2,160,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   14.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   14.40
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated September 26, 2007, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Versar Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2007. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Versar Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-129893, effective November 22, 2005,
File No. 333-129489, effective November 4, 2005, File No. 333-121619 effective
December 23, 2004, File No. 333-106111 effective June 13, 2003 and File No.
333-21469 effective February 10, 1997).

|                   |  |                       
|------------------ |  | ----------------------
|McLean, Virginia   |  | /S/ Grant Thornton LLP
|September 26, 2007 |  |                       

35
106 A.3d 482

#### IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY R. POCARO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 023391982).

January 28, 2015.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented, it is ORDERED that JEFFREY R. POCARO of FANWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective October 23, 2014, by Order of this Court filed September 24, 2014, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.