alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, E. Michael Thoben, III, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  |                                                
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/    E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                  
|                      |  | E. Michael Thoben, III                         
|                      |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
F OR P UBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI # I REP ORTS AND PACIF IC REP ORTER

NO. CAAP-17-0000866
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
STATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOUGLAS M. CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FIRST CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 1PC151000320)
ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Nakasone, J.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Published Opinion entered on October 28, 2021 (docket no. 166) in the above case is hereby corrected as follows:

At page 26, in the 27 t h line, the word "711-7112" should be replaced with "711-1112" so that as corrected, the text reads as: "with HRS § 711-1112."

The clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 17, 2021. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000866 17-DEC-2021 08:51 AM Dkt. 170 OCOR
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20446

Conference Calendar

__________________

ALFREDO URDIALES,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

W.C. LAROWE,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-93-3718

- - - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Alfredo Urdiales has moved for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis ("IFP") on appeal. Urdiales must show that he will

present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley,

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). To prevail on his denial-ofaccess-to-the-courts claim, Urdiales must show he was prejudiced

by the alleged violation. Henthorn v. Swinson, 955 F.2d 351, 354

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 988 (1992). Urdiales cannot

show prejudice because W.C. LaRowe has not prevented him from

filing an action to correct his prison records. Urdiales knows

the facts and can obtain the documents he needs through

discovery. 
No. 95-20446

-2-

Urdiales argues that the district court should have held an

evidentiary hearing to enable him to provide additional factual

allegations supporting his claim. See Spears v. McCotter, 766

F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). There was no abuse of discretion in

dismissing the complaint without holding a Spears hearing because

the deficiencies in Urdiales's pleadings cannot be remedied

through more specific pleading. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8,

9 (5th Cir. 1994). The motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal

is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Jose PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-16261.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 13, 2010.

Michael Bradley Bigelow, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Justain Riley, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

*263Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is *263suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jose Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Perez contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s one-year statute of limitations, due to his lack of legal sophistication, abandonment by appellate counsel, and other circumstances beyond his control. Perez’s contention fails because a pro se petitioner’s lack of legal sophistication is not an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable tolling. *See Rasberry v. Garcia,*448 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir.2006). Moreover, because there is no constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel in state post-conviction proceedings, attorney negligence does not amount to an extraordinary circumstance sufficient to warrant equitable tolling. *See Miranda v. Castro,*292 F.3d 1063, 1066-68 (9th Cir.2002). Similarly, Perez has failed to establish that any of his remaining contentions entitles him to equitable tolling.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### ESTATE OF Mary V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; Daniel B. Allison, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased, Petitioners—Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-1273.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

Daniel B. Allison, II, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Clarence Pett, Bruce R. Ellisen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel B. Allison, II, individually and as the administrator of the Estate of Mary V. Allison, appeals from the tax court’s orders imposing sanctions on him and upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the estate’s gift tax. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. *Estate of*
      *867
      *Mary V. Allison v. Comm’r of IRS,*Nos. 00-247; 00-714 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 12, 2009 & Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2013 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  |                                                          
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  | DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2, L.P.
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 12, 2013 |  |  |  | By:                                      |  | /s/ Lynette L. DeRose                                    
|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                                  
|                         |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner  
|                         |  |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | By:                                      |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                                       
|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  | President, and Chief Executive Officer of the            
|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  | Provo Group, Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership
|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  | (principal executive officer of the registrant)          

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
<PAGE>



                     BRIDGE FINANCING AMENDMENT AGREEMENT




         This Bridge Financing Amendment Agreement ("Amendment Agreement") is
entered into as of March 20, 2002, by Lithium Technology Corporation ("LTC")
and Arch Hill Capital N.V. ("ARCH") (LTC and Arch collectively referred to
herein as the "Parties").


                                   RECITALS


         WHEREAS, the Parties have executed a Bridge Financing Agreement dated
December 31, 2001 (the "Agreement") and LTC has issued Notes to Arch under
such Agreement (the "Notes"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 4 of the Agreement and Section 1 of the Notes,
provides that the entire principal balance and all other sums due and payable
under this Note shall be payable on the earlier of (i) the closing date of the
Financing, and (ii) March 31, 2002 (the "Maturity Date"),

         WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the Maturity Date to May
31, 2002.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained
herein, the Parties agree as follows:

     1.  Section 4 of the Agreement and Section 1 of the Notes shall be
     amended to read as follows:

     " the entire principal balance and all other sums due and payable under
     this Note shall be payable on the earlier of (i) the closing date of the
     Financing, and (ii) May 31, 2002 (the "Maturity Date")."

     2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and the Notes shall
     remain the same and shall continue to have the same force and effect as
     originally written.

                                      46

<PAGE>



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment Agreement as
of the date first above written.


LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



By:      /s/ David J. Cade
         -----------------
         David J. Cade
         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



ARCH HILL CAPITAL N.V.



By:      /s/ H.H. van Andel
         ------------------
         H.H. van Andel
         Chief Executive Officer


                                      47
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

December5, 2016

 

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Tuesday,December13, 2016

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Closed

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will considerandactupon the following in

closedsession:*Daniel****B.LoweandMatthewVaradyv.VerisGoldUSA,Inc.,etal.*(IssuesincludewhethertheAdministrativeLawJudgeerredindismissingtwodiscriminationcaseswheretheoriginaloperatorwas the subject of bankruptcyproceedings.)

 

Anypersonattendingthismeetingwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emogene JohnsonAdministrative Assistant
2014-0533.

#### State ex rel. Hillman v. Carr.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*August 4, 2014*

[Cite as *08104/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3364.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2013- 0711.

#### State v. Belew.

Lucas App. No. L-ll-1279, 2013-Ohio-1078. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Brockton D. Hunter. It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 12, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00028

- CV

N. K. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE CHI EF J USTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on December 29, 2021

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order to the extent it

terminates a ppellant’s parental rights to the two chil dren and does not reach the provisions

terminating Mother’s rights to those children. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,956
<SECURITIES>                                    18,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,203
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                          4,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,385
<CGS>                                            4,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,389)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 13-2017, 13-2047, 13-2072

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

WENDELL RIVERA-RUPERTO, a/k/a Arsenio Rivera, MIGUEL SANTIAGO-CORDERO, DAVIEL SALINAS-ACEVEDO,

Defendants, Appellants.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion for this Court issued January 13, 2017 is amended as follows:

On page 5, line 23: change "35-years" to "35-years'"

On page 12, line 3: change "25-years" to "25-years'"

On page 12, line 6: change "105 years" to "105-years'"

On page 17, line 12: change "10-years" to "10-years'"

On page 17, line 15: change "35-years" to "35-years'"

On page 22, footnote 7, line 2: change "19-years" to "19-years'"
EX-10.21



 





Exhibit 10.21









Exhibit A

April 19, 2007 Summaries of Stock Purchase

and Stock Purchase Agreements




April 22, 2007




Eric Blachno

3333 Allen Parkway 804

Houston, TX 77019




Dear Eric:




          You and Synacor, Inc. (the “Company”) signed an offer letter dated as of April 6, 2007
(the “Offer Letter”). This letter supersedes and replaces Section 4 of the Offer Letter in its
entirety and revises Section 7 of the Offer Letter, as described below. The remaining terms of the
Offer Letter remain in full force and effect.




          4. Stock Rights. On April 19, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors granted to you the
following rights to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock: (a) a right to purchase 140,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“First Stock Right”) and (b) a right to purchase 40,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Second Stock Right” and collectively with the First Stock
Right, the “Stock Rights”), each as evidenced by the applicable Summary of Stock Purchase and
Stock Purchase Agreement attached to this letter as Exhibit A. You acknowledge and agree that
except for the Stock Rights, you are not entitled to receive nor do you have any rights or
interests to any other capital stock of the Company, including (without limitation) any options to
purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock.




          7. Severance Pay. The last sentence of Section 7 is hereby deleted.




          We hope that you will accept this amendment to the Offer Letter. Except as amended by this
letter agreement, the Offer Letter remains in full force and effect.




          If you have any questions, please call me at (716) 362-3305.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





Synacor, Inc. 

 	 
	 	/s/  Julia Culkin
 	 
	 	Julia Culkin 	 
	 	Vice President of Human Resources 	 
	 




 









 










Exhibit A

April 19, 2007 Summaries of

Stock Purchase and Stock Purchase Agreements



I have read and accept this amendment to the Offer Letter:






	 	 	 
	/s/  Eric Blachno
	 
	Signature of Eric Blachno






	 	 	 
	Dated:

	 	4/22/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9N84]

Park County and the contiguous Counties of Big Horn, Fremont, Hot Springs, Teton and Washakie in the State of Wyoming; and Carbon, Gallatin and Park Counties in the State of Montana constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a result of a forest fire that closed the east entrance to Yellowstone National Park from July 29 through August 13, 2001. Eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic injury assistance as a result of this disaster until the close of business on September 17, 2002 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, FT. Worth, TX 76155.

The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. The number assigned for economic injury for this disaster is 9N8400 for the State of Wyoming and 9N8500 for the State of Montana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

Dated: December 17, 2001.

Hector V. Barreto,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01-31648 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
FILED

March 6, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE

 

CITY OF MURFREESBORO, a )

Municipal Corporation in Rutherford )

County, State of Tennessee, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Rutherford Circuit Consolidated

) Case Nos. 34626 and 34629

)

vs. )

)

MARIANN M. WORTHINGTON, ) Appeal No. 01A01-9703-CV-00124

)

Defendant/Appellee )

)

CITY OF MURFREESBORO, a )

Municipal Corporation in Rutherford )

County, State of Tennessee, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

)

vs. )

)

THOMAS W. WORTHINGTON and )

wife, Mariann M. Worthington, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

 

ORDER

 

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of Plaintiff/Appellant City of

Murfreesboro, the petition is denied.

Enter this day of March, 1998.

 

HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, J.

 

ALAN E. HIGHERS, J.

 

DAVID R. FARMER, J.