alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                            CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                                                   Place of
Name                                                             Incorporation
----                                                            ----------------

Capital Associates International, Inc.                              Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing I Corporation                                 Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing II Corporation                                Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing III Corporation                               Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing IV Corporation                                Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing V Corporation                                 Colorado

CAI Equipment Leasing VI Corporation                                Colorado

CAI Leasing Canada, Limited                                      Alberta, Canada

CAI Partners Management Company                                     Colorado

CAI Securities Corporation                                         California

CAI - UBK Equipment Corporation                                     Colorado

Capital Equipment Corporation                                       Colorado

Whitewood Credit Corporation                                        Colorado

CAI Lease Securitization-I Corporation                              Delaware

Capital Associates International de Mexico s. de R.L. de C.V.        Mexico

Capital Associates Technology Group, Inc.                             Utah

CAI-RBE Equipment Corp.                                             Colorado

Name Brand Computer Outlet                                          Colorado

CAI-ALJ Equipment Corp.                                             Colorado
2013-2003.

#### HSBC Bank USA, Natl. Assn. v. Sherman.

Hamilton App. No. C-120302, 2013-Ohio-4220. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2014-Ohio-1182, 5 N.E.3d 667. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. On motion for stay of sheriffs sale. Motion denied.
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

					
	 Name of Company:
	 	 NOAH EDUCATION HOLDINGS LTD.
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands)

		 	 Number
 XXX
	  	 Shares
 [            ]

		
	 Number:
	 	 US$50,000 Share Capital divided into
 1,000,000,000 shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.00005 each

		
	 Shares:
  
 Issued to:
	 	THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT--------------------------------------- xxxx ------------------------------------------—is the registered holder of
--------------------------------------------------- xxx ---------------------------------------------- Share in the above-named Company subject to the memorandum and articles of association thereof.
		
	 Dated
	 	GIVEN UNDER the common seal of the said Company on             
200[            ].
		
	 Transferred from:
	 	THE COMMON SEAL of the said Company was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
		
		 	 DIRECTOR
                                        


		
		 	 DIRECTOR/SECRETARY
                                        










 TRANSFER 
 I                                       
  (the Transferor) for the value received DO HEREBY transfer to
                                         (the
Transferee) the
                                         shares
standing in my name in the undertaking called NOAH EDUCATION HOLDINGS LTD. 
 To hold the same unto the Transferee 
  
 Dated 
 Signed by the Transferor 
 in the presence of: 
  
  

			
	  
	  	  

	 Witness
	  	Transferor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      24,367,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     610,186,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                280,010,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    566,492,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  6,855,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             913,480,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 703,266,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,332,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,473,000
<LONG-TERM>                                  9,024,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,302,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,919,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             913,480,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             51,908,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           15,723,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               616,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            68,247,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          26,047,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          33,496,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       34,751,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                3,939,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             595,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             28,591,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,425,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  11,425,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,975,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,492,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   970,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                13,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              8,075,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,300,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                5,138,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   754,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            6,855,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         6,855,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.06


Compensation of Directors

     Directors are compensated in the form of cash and grants of stock.
Specifically, non-employee directors receive in July shares of the Corporation's
common stock worth approximately $10,000 and are paid $833 per board meeting
attended.

     For all committee meetings except the Audit Committee, Directors are paid
$500 per committee meeting attended. Members of the audit committee receive $700
per audit committee meeting attended. The chairperson of the Audit Committee
also receives a fee of $2,000 for her service as audit committee chairperson.

     Michael S. Maurer, who is the Chairman of the Board of Directors but is not
an employee, receives an annual director fee composed of a cash payment equal to
$40,000 in January and a grant of shares of the Corporation equal to
approximately $40,000 in July. Mr. Maurer receives no other fees in his capacity
as a director.

Morris L. Maurer and Philip B. Roby are not separately compensated for their
services as directors of the Corporation or the Bank.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   KC Transport, Inc.              

#   KC Transport, Inc.

On April 5, 2022, the Commission issued its decision in *KC Transport, Inc*., Docket No. WEVA 2019-0458.

Commission- Decision (K C Transport Inc) WEVA 2019-0458.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Ray BARBER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 29, 2008.

*227Donald Ray Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Ray Barber appeals from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Barber,*Nos. 3:93-cr-00124-FDW-1, 3:07-cv-00454-FDW, 2007 WL 3124611 (W.D. N.C. Oct. 25, 2007). In addition, we decline to consider the claim raised by Barber for the first time on appeal. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710

ROBERT THOMAS JAN 47/2018
v. : Docket No. WEST 2018-0402-DM
CALPORTLAND COMPANY ;
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW

The petition for discretionary review filed by CalPortland Company is granted.

Mary Lu [ien, Comfajssioner


Distribution:

Brian P. Lundgren, Esq.
Davis Grimm Payne & Marra
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4040
Seattle, WA 98104

Colin F. McHugh, Esq.
Navigate Law Group

101 East 8th St., Ste. 260
Vancouver, WA 98660

Robert Thomas
566 23rd Avenue
Longview, WA 98632

Ali Beydoun, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

US Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450

April Nelson, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

US Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

Administrative Law Judge Margaret Miller
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges

721 19th Street, Suite 443
Denver, CO 80202-2536
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW

SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004

May 17, 2013

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 29, 2013 (to commence shortly after 

completion of meeting on first scheduled case)

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Knox Creek Coal Corporation,

Docket Nos. VA 2010-81-R, et al. (Issues include whether the 

Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that certain 

violations were not “significant and substantial” because of 

assumptions that were made concerning abatement.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW 

SUITE 9500 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001 

October 3, 2011 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 13, 2011 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Big Ridge, Inc., Docket Nos. LAKE 2011-116-R, et al., 

Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC, Docket Nos. LAKE 2011-118-R, 

et al., and Independence Coal Co., Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-402-

R, et al. (Issues include whether the Secretary of Labor may 

require that mine operators provide certain information and records 

to her.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826821
<NAME> CERBCO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                          19,412
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    5,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                      1,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                27,645
<PP&E>                                                          25,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  14,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  42,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            3,338
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                           148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      25,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    42,366
<SALES>                                                         11,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                11,946
<CGS>                                                           10,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   10,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     63
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 24
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        24
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Ramey, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Ramey,*118 Ohio St.3d 191, 2008-Ohio-2218.]

(No. 2007-0125

Submitted May 6, 2008

Decided May 14, 2008.)

Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Shaw *&*Miller, Mark J. Miller, and Brian W. Ross, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Simpkins,*117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.
2014-0823.

#### State ex rel. Taylor v. Judge Presiding over Montgomery Cty. Court of Common Pleas Case Nos. 2004 CR 2771 and 2004 CR 1799.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
#### The COLONY, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13008.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 22, 1957.

Richard C. Oldham and Baldwin C. Burnam, Louisville, Ky., for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Grant M. Wiprud, John M. Morawski, and Marvin W. Weinstein, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before McALLISTER', MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

*76PER CURIAM.

The sole question on this review is whether the five-year statute of limitations contained in section 275(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 275(c) was applicable, in this case, as the Tax Court held.1

The petitioner is a corporation dealing in real estate. Its income tax returns for the years in question contained understatements of gross income of more than twenty-five per cent resulting from an erroneous overstatement of the basis 'of land sold, rather than from any omission of gross receipts. Under these circumstances it is the petitioner’s contention that the general three-year limitation pé’riód of section 275(a) of the 1939 'Code- is applicable. As petitioner’s counsel correctly points out, the decisions of 'the Courts of Appeals of several other "circuits give clear support to this view. Uptegrove Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 570; Deakman-Wells Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 894; Goodenow v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 1956, 238 F.2d 20; cf. Slaff v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 65; Davis v. Hightower, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 549.

The reasoning of these cases is not without considerable persuasive force, and if the question were here for the first time, we might be disposed to follow them. However, the question has already been decided by this court in Reis v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 900, where it was held that the five-year limitation was applicable when the taxpayer’s understatement of gross income of inoré than twenty-five per cent was the result of his overstatement of the cost basis of property sold. The facts in the !Reis, case. ar.e, of course, not identical with the facts in the present case, but the issue presented is the same.

‘ Upon the authority of Reis v. Commissioner. the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

1

. “(c) Omission from gross income. If f ¡the taxpayer omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein which is in excess Of '25 per centum of the amount of gross income stated in the return, the tax may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of such tax may be begun without assessment, at any time within 5 years after the return was filed.”
103 A.3d 797

#### IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN MORTON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 050681998).

December 10, 2014.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-057, concluding that BENJAMIN MORTON of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), *RPC*1.8(a) (prohibited business transaction with a client), *RPC*1.15(d) and *Rule*1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and *RPC*8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BENJAMIN MORTON is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective January 6, 2015; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

*103ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Order entered January 13, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00996-CR 

No. 05-14-00997-CR 

No. 05-14-00998-CR 

MICHAEL JERARD RICHARDSON, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 416-82939-2012, 416-82940-2012, 416-82942-2012 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandates in 

these appeals INSTANTER. 

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

 JUSTICE