alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
 
                           CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
           COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          SEPTEMBER 30,        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                        ------------------   ------------------
                                                         1998       1997      1998       1997
                                                        -------    -------   -------    -------
                                                           (UNAUDITED)          (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                     <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Net income available to common stock................  $12,793    $12,624   $39,301    $37,184
                                                        -------    -------   -------    -------
Shares:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding..........   25,402     24,975    25,353     24,815
  Dilutive effect of stock options....................      137        265       192        289
                                                        -------    -------   -------    -------
  Average diluted shares outstanding and
     equivalents......................................   25,539     25,240    25,545     25,104
                                                        -------    -------   -------    -------
Basic earnings per common share:
  Net income..........................................  $  0.50    $  0.51   $  1.55    $  1.50
                                                        =======    =======   =======    =======
Diluted earnings per common share:
  Net income..........................................  $  0.50    $  0.50   $  1.54    $  1.48
                                                        =======    =======   =======    =======
</TABLE>
76 A.3d 535

#### Johnna SEETON, Petitioner v. John T. ADAMS, District Attorney of Berks County, (in his Official Capacity only), Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 24, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The Petition for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum is dismissed as moot.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6348

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WARREN C. ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CR-91-32-WMN, CA-97-991-WMN)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 2, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren C. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Allen Bonner, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Robinson, No. CR-91-32-WMN; CA-97-991-WMN

(D. Md. Jan. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 24, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael Caporale, Jr.Michael Caporale, Jr.Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 96
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Air Brook Airport Express, Inc. (the
“Company”) on form 10K-SB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
      (the “Report”), I, Donald M. Petroski, the Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




January
      29, 2007


/s/ Donald
      M. Petroski


DONALD
      M.
      PETROSKI, Chief
      Executive Officer,


President,
      Chief Financial Officer and Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Labor and Management Industry, Sports, and Government Leaders Make National Conference a Virtual All-Star Event - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"H564bMfOTf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/labor-and-management-industry-sports-and-government-leaders-make-national-conference-a-virtual-all-star-event\/\">Labor and Management Industry, Sports, and Government Leaders Make National Conference a Virtual All-Star Event<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/labor-and-management-industry-sports-and-government-leaders-make-national-conference-a-virtual-all-star-event\/embed\/#?secret=H564bMfOTf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Labor and Management Industry, Sports, and Government Leaders Make National Conference a Virtual All-Star Event” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"H564bMfOTf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 14, 2022) \u2013 The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) National Labor-Management Conference (NLMC), held virtually on July 12-13, once again demonstrated why it is considered the nation\u2019s premier labor-management event. The NLMC is the largest labor-management conference in the country; this year, the more than 1,200 registered participants included leaders in […]"}
<PAGE>  1                                                         Exhibit 14.1


                          USA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
                                    CODE OF ETHICS



     1.  Trustees and officers should always act in the Trust's best interests.

     2.  Trustees and officers should avoid any conflicts of interests with the
         Trust.

     3.  Trustees and officers should avoid the personal use of Trust assets.

     4.  Trustees and officers should maintain the confidentiality of the
         proprietary information of the Trust.

     5.  Any Trustee or officer who believes that there has been a violation of
         this code of ethics should report it immediately to the Audit
         Committee.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF ‘TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

I&. 1. Pat camp 

Aret. Criminal Dlrtrlot Attorne7 

San Antonlo, Texhr 

Dear Sir: 

Yaroh 18, lOSO 

roii0mg rtatc of 

Is based upon the 

tax, but the taxparor 

I ohook to pay hi8 wife’ I poll 

or arosrtalnrd this Saot on 

turned the ohsok to the taxpayer, 

aln a ruffloient mount to pay th0 

upon, the tagmyjrer paid to the Tu 

nal amount rrqulroa for his ‘wlfe*r poll 

ea the Tax Collsotor t& dellter to hfm 

ate Jenuary 31, 1939, 80 that hb would be 

entitled to vote, m oontentlon being made that hir;wlfe .ras 

editha to a poll tax that would atithorizr her to votd; 

The Tax oolleotor reiused to 1st~~ to the taxpayer his gall 

tax reoelpt a8 ot date January Sl, 1939. 
Mr. W. Pat Camp, &oh 16, 1930, Page e 

Artlole 7278 

193l, proildeer 

oi ths R‘vl‘ea Statutae, a8 rmendoa In 

II 

. . . any pereon, inoiuabg a lienholder, barlng an lntereet in property agalnet whloh there am 

taxer whloh hai been lnoluded In an l eeeeemment with 

other property may pay the proportionate part of 

the tax.8 agalnet hle proprrty without being requlred to pay ear other tax.8 lnoludrd In the aeee8ement.* 

Artiole 7379, Rerleed Statutes, prorldeer 

“No real l etate trot apart, uesd or deelgnated 

a8 a homerteed ‘hell be ‘old for taxer other than 

the taxer due on l uoh homeetead.a 

Slaoe the taxpayer in queetlon wae paying hlr taxer i 

oa hi8 homerteed, he had a right under thr law to pay eald 

tax without the prqmeat of any other tu that may hare been 

!’ 

aeereeed agalnet him. Slaoe’ nelhhor hle poll tax aor that ! 

or hle wlfr war, or oould hare bow, a lien ,011 his harneetoad, 

he war satltlea to pay hle poll tax without paying the tax 

oa hi8 homeetead. 

In Parker v. Buehy, 170 S,W. 104Z, the Court ot 

Civil Appeal8 held that where the,moaeJ ior the poll tu 

wee paid to the Tu Oolleotor on or before January 3let, 

he wae entitled to hi8 poll tax x8orlpt whloh would authorize 

him to vote, although the Ihx Collrotor did not aotuallr 

leeue the reoelpt until come dare thereafter. 

‘he Suprame Court, in Hlgglne v. Bordagee, 88 Tex. 

4!58, 31 8. WI 52, and Barnett v. Eureka Paring Oo., Z54 S.W. 

lOSl, epeoliioelly held that the homertoad war not liable ror 

any tax cave aaa exoept tha taxee dua agalnet the homerteed, 

and rurther held therein that Ii the petition or the State 

ror tuee revealed that the property eou&t to be r0r801088a 

oa far tax88 wae a hclmeetead, ana that the tax on any other 

pyeexJ wae embraord In. said cult, the judgmeat wae absolutr- 

. 

It 18 our o p lnlthat o a l la6e the taxpayer paid to tha 

Tax Oolleotor the amount of Ha poll tax oa January Slet, ho 

18 entltled to a poll tax reoelpt whloh would entitle him to 

vow. 

Your8 very truly 

ATIQRNEY (ZENElUL.OF TGXAB 

OWBIPRP 

APPROVED: /a/ Gerald 0. Mann .-II-- ---- ~-
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Buy American Report 2008              

#   Buy American Report 2008

##           Downloads        

buyamerican.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          234162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                241586
<PP&E>                                          801339
<DEPRECIATION>                                  799054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  243871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      237701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    243871
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                117430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    32368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  85062
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              85062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     85062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T K I R IN D E V I , a .k .a . K ir an D e v i, a .k .a . R ita P a te l, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72638 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 191- 210 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K i r i n D e vi , anat i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova lpr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED SEP 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72638 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . M a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft, 381 F .3 d9 4 2 , 9 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by denyi ng D evi ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed m ore than fi ve ye ar s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nal o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and D e vi f a i l e d t o pr e s e nts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e of c h an g e dc i r c u ms t an c e s i n I n d i at o qu a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l at o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e a ls o M a lty , 38 1 F . 3dat94 5 (“ T he cr i t i ca lqu es t i on i s . . . w hether c i rc um st ance s have c hang ed s uf f i c i e nt l ythatape t i t i one rw ho pr e vi ous l ydi d nothave al e gi t i m at e c l a i m f or as ylum no w has aw el l -f ou nd ed fe arof pers ec ut i on . ”) . D e vi ’ s c ont e nt i on thatthe B I A f a ile dto c o n s id e ra ll th e e v id e n c e s h e p r e s e n te dw ith th e m o tio n to r e o p e n is n o t s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.