alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  CONFORMED COPY



                        SENIOR NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT


     SENIOR NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT dated as of September 21, 2000 between
Mutual Group Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and MRM CAPITAL TRUST
I, a statutory business trust organized under the laws of the State of Delaware
(the "Trust").

     WHEREAS the Trust desires to purchase from the Company, and the Company
desires to sell to the Trust, certain of the Company's securities;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     Section 1. Purchase and Sale. (a) Upon the terms and subject to the
conditions of this Agreement, the Company agrees to sell to the Trust, and the
Trust agrees to purchase from the Company, $41,240,000 aggregate principal
amount of the Company's Auction Rate Reset Senior Notes Series A (the "Senior
Notes") issued pursuant to an Indenture dated as of September 21, 2000 among the
Company, Mutual Risk Management Ltd., a company organized under the laws of
Bermuda, as Guarantor (the "Guarantor"), and The Chase Manhattan Bank, a New
York banking corporation, as Indenture Trustee (the "Indenture Trustee"), as
supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 21, 2000
between the Company, the Guarantor, and the Indenture Trustee (such indenture,
as so supplemented, is referred to herein as the "Indenture").

     (b) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement, the
Company shall deliver the Senior Notes to the Property Trustee, on behalf of the
Trust, on September 21, 2000 (the "Closing Date"). In consideration therefor,
the Trust shall pay to the Company $41,240,000 on the Closing Date.

     Section 2. Representations and Warranties of the Company. The Company
represents and warrants that the Senior Notes have been duly authorized and
executed by the Company, and when duly authenticated and delivered to and paid
for by the Trust, will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of
the Company entitled to the benefits of the Indenture and enforceable against
the Company in accordance with their terms (subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and other similar
laws affecting creditors' rights generally, and subject to general principles of
equity,
<PAGE>

regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law).

                                       2
<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Senior Note
Purchase Agreement to be duly executed as of the date hereof.

                         MUTUAL GROUP LTD.


                         By: /s/ Elizabeth Price
                            ---------------------------
                            Title: Assistant Secretary


                         MRM CAPITAL TRUST I


                         By: /s/ Richard O'Brien
                            ---------------------------
                            Title: Administrative Trustee
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

December 17, 2009 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 7, 2010 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP, 

Docket Nos. PENN 2008-51-R, et seq. (Issues include whether an 

order issued to the operator under 30 C.F.R. § 75.363(a) (requiring 

that hazardous conditions be corrected or posted) should be amended 

to allege a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.360(b) (requiring that the 

person conducting a preshift examination identify hazardous 

conditions). 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of E Prime  Aerospace  Corporation,  a
Colorado  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year  ended
September  30,2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  James D Oldham III, Chief Executive Officer,  President and Director
of the Company,  does hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ James D Oldham III
------------------------------------------------
James D Oldham III
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
December 12, 2006






----------------
[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  E'Prime  Aerospace  Corporation  and will be  retained  by E'Prime
Aerospace Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: Date: March 20, 2006



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO





















































---
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2022              

#   Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2022

##           Downloads        

FY2022 Performance and Accountability Report_15NOV2022.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30DAY-12-02]
 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-7090. Send written comments to CDC, Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. *Proposed Project:*
                     Key Informant Interviews to Identify the Barriers to the Implementation of the New Targeted Testing and Treatment of Latent TB Infection Recommendations—NEW—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention (NCSHTP). In April 2000, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) issued new recommendations for targeted tuberculin testing and treatment regimens for persons with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI.) CDC proposes to collect data to identify potential barriers to the acceptance, implementation, and adherence to targeted testing and treatment of LTBI guidelines. The specific purpose of this research is: A. Identify barriers to acceptance, implementation, and adherence to the new targeted testing and treatment of LTBI recommendations. B. Identify possible education and communication messages, materials, and behavior change strategies to overcome those barriers. C. Identify acceptable dissemination and media channels. Approximately, one hundred key-informant telephone interviews with physicians who evaluate tuberculin skin test results and make treatment decisions for individuals with LTBI will be conducted. The target group will include physicians who work in the private sector and public sector in urban and rural areas from throughout the United States. The total burden hours for this data collection are 89 hours. Respondents
Number of respondents
Number of responses/respondent
Average burden/response (in hours)Office staff (screening)
480
1
5/60Physicians (interviews)
100
1
30/60Physicians (verification)
10
1
5/60
 Dated: December 19, 2001. Nancy E. Cheal, Acting Associate Director for Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


[FR Doc. 01-32045 Filed 12-28-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING **201 7**  **WY 41**  **April Term, A.D. 201**  **7 April 19, 2017**  **TONYA OEDEKOVEN, Appellant**  **(Defendant),**
**v. THE STATE OF WYOMING,**  **Appellee (Plaintiff).**  **S -**  **16 -**  **0292**



### O **RDER** 

### A**FFIRMING** 

### J**UDGMENT AND** 

### S **ENTENCE** [¶1] **Thi s**  **matter** came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional “no contest” plea to one count o f felony theft
. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6
- 3
- 4 0 2
. The district court imposed an 18 to 36 month sentence, which was suspended in favor of three years of supervised probation
. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s December 6 , 201 6 , “ Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order .” [¶2] On February 13 , 201 7 , Appellant’s court- appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The next day, this Court entered an “Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that, on or before March 30 , 2017, Appellant w ould be permitted to file a pro se brief specifying the issues she would like the Court to c onsider. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal.” Appellant did not file a pro se brief or any other pleading in the time allotted.[¶3] Now, f ollowing a careful review of the record and the “ Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s December 6, 2016, “Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order” should be affirmed
. It is, therefore, [¶4] **ORDERED** that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court- appointed counsel for A ppellant, Tonya Oedekoven , is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for A ppellant; and it is further [¶5 ] **ORDERED** that the district court’s December 6, 2016, “Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. [¶6] **DATED** this 19 th day of April , 201 7
. **BY THE COURT:** /s/ **E. J A** **MES BUR KE**  **Chief Justice**
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
W. Erikson, the President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to and for purposes
of  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of the Company  for the dates and periods  covered by
               the Report.


February 14, 2003                          /s/Robert W. Erikson
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Robert W. Erikson
                                           President
AMENDMENT
      TO

    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    Dated
      as
      of September 21, 2007 


    


    This
      AMENDMENT TO THE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”)
      amends
      the Promissory Note dated as of September 1, 2006 by and between Innofone.com,
      Incorporated, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
      and
      Doug Mandell (the “Holder”)
      (the
“Note”).
      Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the meanings
      ascribed to such terms in the Note. 

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Note;

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
      of
      which are hereby acknowledged, the Note is hereby amended and modified as
      follows:

    


    1. Amendment
      to Maturity Date Section.
      Maturity Date shall be amended to be September 1, 2008.

    


    2. Amendment
      to Interest Section.
      Interest shall be amended to equal 16% per annum, compounded annually and
      payable on the Maturity Date.

    


    3. Amendment
      to Repayment Section.
      Subsection (a) of the Repayment section shall be amended to state that all
      Principal and accrued and unpaid Interest shall be due and payable in one
      balloon payment on the Maturity Date.

    


    4. No
      Other Amendments.
      Except
      as specifically amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Note shall
      remain in full force and effect.

    


    5. Issuance
      of Stock.
      As
      consideration for the amendment of the terms of the Note as set forth herein,
      the Company agrees to issue to the Holder 150,000 shares of common stock, par
      value $.001 per share, of the Company.

    


    6. Counterparts;
      Facsimile Signatures.
      This
      Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts and by facsimile, each
      of
      which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute
      one
      and the same instrument.


    


    [Signature
      page to follow]

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed
      as
      of the date first above written.

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              INNOFONE.COM,
                INCORPORATED

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	
            
	 	 	
              

              Alex
                Lightman, 

              CEO
                & President

            
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
              HOLDER

            
	 	 
	 	
              

              Doug
                Mandell

            




    
      
         

      

      
        2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 1 5 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk March 1 5 , 2021

16 2201(24 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 2201

v COA: 35 4241

M uskegon CC: 17

- 004949

- FH

JON THOMAS HART

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief , the motion of defendant

- appellant to file a supplement to the

application that raises a new issue is GRANTED. The supplement will be accepted for

filing i f submitted on or before April 5 , 2021.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6849

TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

D. LANDAUER, N.P.; DR. ARAKAKY; DAVID A. RYLAK, MD of Augusta 

Health Center; C. D. WHITLOCK, Lieutenant; RUSSELL, Asst. Warden; 

MACDANIEL, Correctional Officer; PEALE, Correctional Officer; E. SHIPP, RN, 

Director of Nursing; T. HAMILTON, RN; JOHN A. WOODSON, ACC Warden; 

DR. S. HERRICK, Director of Health Services; THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS, The Augusta Correctional Center; LACOUR, Laundry 

Manager; THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, exclusively; FRIDLEY, Sgt.; 

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; S. 

CONNER, ACC Grievance Coordinator; LEWIS, Augusta Correctional Center 

Officer; TAMMY COYNER; ERIC BURCH,

Defendants - Appellees, 

and

MICHAEL R. PLAUTZ, MD Augusta Otolaryngology Assoc.; STEPHEN PARK, 

MD of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; DR. DANIEL 

PETERS, of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; AUGUSTA 

HEALTH CENTER; AUGUSTA OTOLARYNGOLOGY ASSOC.; UVA 

NEUROSURGERY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00097-EKD-JCH)
2

Submitted: October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tamar Devell Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Dewayne Lonas, MORAN, REEVES & 

CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Tamar Devell Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary 

judgment to some, but not all of the defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims 

as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation 

marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court has not yet adjudicated all of 

the claims raised in Harvey’s complaint. Id. at 696-97. Specifically, the court has not yet

adjudicated the unresolved claims against the remaining defendants. We conclude that the 

orders Harvey seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or 

collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand 

to the district court for consideration of the unresolved claims. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED