alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 Company
 Periodic
Report
 /s/ Richard B. Berliner

Richard B. BerlinerChief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Patrick G. Mackey

Patrick G. MackeySenior Vice President(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Berliner
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Berliner Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 27
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3627 

To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National Guard Bureau 

as reimbursement from States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. RYAN (for himself, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mrs. BUSTOS, and 

Mr. CASE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National 

Guard Bureau as reimbursement from States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guarding Readiness 

5 Resources Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3627 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF FUNDS RECEIVED BY NATIONAL 

2 GUARD BUREAU AS REIMBURSEMENT FROM 

3 STATES. 

4 Section 710 of title 32, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(g) TREATMENT OF REIMBURSED FUNDS.—(1) Any 

8 funds received by the National Guard Bureau from a 

9 State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of 

10 Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands, as reimbursement 

11 under this section for the use of military property, shall 

12 be— 

13 ‘‘(A) credited to— 

14 ‘‘(i) the appropriation, fund, or account 

15 used in incurring the obligation; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) an appropriate appropriation, fund, or 

17 account currently available for the purposes for 

18 which the expenditures were made; and 

19 ‘‘(B) treated as a reprogramming request, pur20 suant to which such funds may not be obligated or 

21 disbursed until after the Chief of the National 

22 Guard Bureau— 

23 ‘‘(i) submits a written request (including a 

24 budget for the use of such funds, disaggregated 

25 by appropriation and subactivity group) to the 

26 Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3627 IH

1 on Appropriations of the Senate and House of 

2 Representatives for authorization; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) receives such authorization. 

4 ‘‘(2) Not later than October 31 of each year, the 

5 Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the 

6 Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appro7 priations of the Senate and House of Representatives an 

8 annual accounting of the use of the funds described in 

9 paragraph (1), disaggregated by appropriation and sub10 activity group, during the immediately preceding fiscal 

11 year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Versar, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore M. Prociv,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /S/ Theodore M. ProcivTheodore M. ProcivPresident and CEO
 September 7, 2004 138




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Versar, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence W. Sinnott,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (3)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(4)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /S/ Lawrence W. SinnottLawrence W. SinnottSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 September 7, 2004 139
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>      0000826745
<NAME>     First Capital Growth Fund - XIV, A Real Estate Limited Partnership
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      1,788,600
<SECURITIES>                                  489,700  
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,200 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,288,500       
<PP&E>                                      7,155,100      
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,174,100    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              8,286,900      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         636,100    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                            0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,647,500       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                8,286,900         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,268,900          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 692,200          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               60,200       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               329,900       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           329,900      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  329,900 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.05 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.05 
        

</TABLE>
2014-0454.

#### State v. Watkins.

Franklin App. Nos. 13AP-133 and 13AP-134, 2013-Ohio-5544. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2014-0120, *State v. Moore,*7th Dist. Mahoning No. 08 MA 20, 2013-Ohio-5868.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 34

  To provide that the final rule of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
  Protection titled ``Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)'' shall 
                        have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that the final rule of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
  Protection titled ``Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)'' shall 
                        have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let Lenders Lend Act''.

SEC. 2. HOME MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE RULE.

    The final rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection titled ``Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)'' (October 
28, 2015; 80 Fed. Reg. 66128) shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2004



/s/ Thomas V. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints William W. Winspear, Robert L. Winspear and James E.
O'Bannon, and any of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign on behalf of
Associated Materials Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
on behalf of the undersigned in my capacity as an officer and/or a director of
the Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and any of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to
effectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned may
or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney effective as
of February 22, 2001.



/s/ WILLIAM W. WINSPEAR                     /s/ MICHAEL CAPORALE, Jr.
-----------------------                     -------------------------
William W. Winspear                         Michael Caporale, Jr.



/s/ ROBERT L. WINSPEAR                      /s/ JAMES F. LEARY
-----------------------                     -------------------------
Robert L. Winspear                          James F. Leary



/s/ RICHARD I. GALLAND                      /s/ ALAN B. LERNER
-----------------------                     -------------------------
Richard I. Galland                          Alan B. Lerner



/s/ JOHN T. GRAY                            /s/ A.A. MEITZ
-----------------------                     -------------------------
John T. Gray                                A.A. Meitz
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Default Proof Credit Card System, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),



I, Vincent Cuervo, Chief Executive Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 28th day of March 2006.



/s/ Vincent Cuervo

------------------------

Vincent Cuervo

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, John D. Hiestand, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MCF Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 9, 2004
#### Jaspal SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74827.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

Robert B. Jobe, Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Julie M. Iversen, Mark C. Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*678MEMORANDUM **

Jaspal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002), and we grant the petition for review.

The BIA abused its discretion in denying as untimely Singh’s motion to reopen. Singh reasonably relied on his former attorney’s repeated fraudulent assurances that he was representing Singh in this court. Once Singh realized he had been deceived, he acted with due diligence to have new counsel review his case. *See Rodriguez-Lariz,*282 F.3d at 1225. The former attorney, Randhir S. Kang, has since been disbarred from this court and has resigned from the state bar with charges pending.

We therefore remand to the BIA for further proceedings. *See generally INS v. Ventura, 537*U.S. 12, 16,123 S.Ct. 353,154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam). In light of our disposition, we need not address Singh’s due process contention.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Filed 10/16/15 P. v. Hernandez CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D067958

 (Super. Ct. No. JCF34300)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, Diane B. 

Altamirano, Judge. Affirmed.

Laura R. Sheppard, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance by Respondent.

Jose Hernandez entered a no contest plea to second degree burglary (Pen. Code,1

§ 459). He was promised probation, however he agreed that if he failed to appear at 

 

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
2

sentencing he would be subject to a prison sentence. Hernandez did not appear for 

sentencing, and he was later arrested. 

Hernandez was sentenced to the lower term of 16 months in prison, subject to 

various fines and fees. One of the fines imposed in the abstract of judgment was a $10 

fine pursuant to section 1202.5. The fine was not mentioned by the court at sentencing. 

Hernandez filed a timely notice of appeal. 

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 

Cal.3d 436 (Wende) indicating that she has been unable to identify any reasonably 

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this court to review the record for 

error as mandated by Wende. We offered Hernandez the opportunity to file his own brief 

on appeal, but he has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On January 13, 2015, Hernandez entered a JC Penney's store, after hours, through 

an unlocked door. Hernandez entered with the intent to steal some clothing but was not 

able to take anything. 

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 

Cal.3d 436, requesting this court to review the record for error. Pursuant to Anders v.

California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following issue:

Whether the $10 fine imposed in the abstract pursuant to section 1202.5 should be 

stricken because it was discretionary and the court did not make an express finding that 

Hernandez had the ability to pay.
3

The issue was never raised in the trial court and is thus waived on appeal. (People 

v. Trujillo (2015) 60 Cal.4th 850.) Thus it does not raise a reasonably arguable issue.

We have reviewed the entire record and have not discovered any reasonably 

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Hernandez on 

this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

WE CONCUR:

AARON, J.

PRAGER, J.*

 

* Judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to 

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,312,020
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  49,892,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    51,092,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,635,658
<PP&E>                                         78,564,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (17,537,660)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,559,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,368,253
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       210,605,858
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,559,107
<SALES>                                        105,487,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,487,348
<CGS>                                          98,008,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,080,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,627,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,766,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41,996,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (647,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (41,348,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,551,673)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (36,797,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>