alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
    


        LAB INTERNATIONAL INC.  


CONTINUED UNDER THE CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT PROROGÉE EN VERTU DE LA LOI CANADIENNE SUR LES LES SOCIÉTÉS PAR ACTIONS 



	 	 	 	 	 
	NUMBER / NUMERO

00404	 	 	 	SHARES / ACTIONS

**50,000**





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	CUSIP 50535P 10 3
	**THE LAURUS MASTER FUND LTD**
	THIS CERTIFIES THAT

LES PRÉSENTES ATTESTENT QUE	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	*50,000*********

**50,000********

***50,000*******

****50,000******

*****50,000*****





	 	 	 
	IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF EST LE DÉTENTEUR IMMATRICULÉ DE	 	 
	 	 	 
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES WITHOUT NOMINAL OR PAR VALUE OF	 	ACTIONS ORDINAIRES SANS VALEUR NOMINALE OU AU PAIR, ENTIEREMENT LIBEREES ET NON-COTISABLES, DE




LAB INTERNATIONAL INC.



	    These shares are transferable on the books of the Corporation by the registered holder or his attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.	 	    Ces actions sont transférables sur les registres de la Société par le défenteur immatriculé ou son mandalaire, sur remise de ce certificat regulièrement
endossé Ce certificat n'est pas valicle à moins d'étre contresigne par I'Agent de Transfert et immatriculé par le Registraire.
	    Witness the signatures of the duly authorized officers of the Corporation.	 	    En Foi De Quoi les représentants dûment autorisés de la Societé ont signé.











DATED    July 13,
2006

DATE 









	 	 	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/Illegible
	 	 	CHEF DE LA DIRECTION FINANCIERE
	COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED CONTRESIGNE ET IMMATRICULÉ EQUITY TRANSFER SERVICES INC. TORONTO TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED AGENT DE TRANSFERT ET REGISTRAIRE	 	 
	 	 	 
	EQUITY TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY TORONTO	 	CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	 	 	 
	
 /s/ Illegible	 	

/s/Illegible
	AUTHORIZED OFFICER—OFFICER AUTORISÉ	 	CHEF DE LA DIRECTION
	 	 	 
	TRANSFERABLE TORONTO

1299-969403-26926546722	 	TRANSFÉRABLE TORONTO















QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10108

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL GUERRERO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:18-CR-21-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Guerrero appeals his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in 

possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and 

his within-guidelines sentence of 18 months of imprisonment. He raises 

arguments relating to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and the sufficiency of 

the factual basis in support of his guilty plea. The Government has filed a 

motion for summary affirmance, which Guerrero does not oppose. In the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 4, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10108 Document: 00515145989 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2019
No. 19-10108

2

alternative, the Government seeks an extension of time to file its brief. For 

the following reasons, we dispense with further briefing and AFFIRM.

First, Guerrero argues that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as interpreted 

by this court and that the factual basis in support of his guilty plea is 

insufficient because it does not establish a constitutionally sufficient 

connection between the firearm he possessed and interstate commerce. As he 

concedes, these arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Alcantar, 733 

F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 

(5th Cir. 2001).

Second, Guerrero argues that the factual basis in support of his guilty 

plea is insufficient because it does not establish that he knew that the firearm 

had traveled in interstate commerce. We have concluded that a § 922(g)(1) 

conviction does not require proof that a defendant knew that the firearm had 

traveled in interstate commerce. See United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 81

(5th Cir. 1988). Guerrero does not articulate any argument that this specific 

holding in Dancy has been unequivocally overruled by Rehaif v. United States, 

139 S. Ct. 2191, 2196 (2019). See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 145-46 (discussing this 

court’s rule of orderliness). 

In light of the foregoing, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

The Government’s motions for summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an 

extension of time to file an appellate brief, are DENIED.

 Case: 19-10108 Document: 00515145989 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RAYETTA LEE,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 52 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2019

, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process GRANTED and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
Exhibit 23

Keller Bruner & Company, L.L.P.

Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors
FCNB Corp

We consent to  incorporation  by reference of our report dated January 26, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FCNB Corp and its subsidiaries as
of  December  31,  1999 and 1998,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
income,  changes  in  shareholders'  equity  and cash flows for the years in the
three-year  period ended  December 31, 1999,  which report appears on page 36 of
the 1999 FCNB Corp Annual Report, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in the
following  Registration  Statements of FCNB Corp:  Number  33-63092 on Form S-8,
Number 33-55040 on Form S-3, Number  333-49329 on Form S-3, and Number 333-52997
on Form S-8.



/s/Keller Bruner & Company, L.L.P.
----------------------------------
Keller Bruner & Company, L.L.P.
Frederick, Maryland
March 21, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF: NUMED HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 6/30/98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    1,207
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             4,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                517
<INVENTORY>                                  23
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          5,627
<PP&E>                                      962
<DEPRECIATION>                              776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            9,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     5,484
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      6
<OTHER-SE>                                4,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              9,638
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,327
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             2,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                               (263)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.04)


</TABLE>
#### Robert R. STALIK v. UNITED STATES of America et al.

No. 5532.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 8, 1957.

Gus Rinehart, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

Wm. Walter Hentz, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul A. Sweeney and Alan S. Rosenthal, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., and H. Dale Cook, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellees.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of ap-pellees.
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods indicated. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                                                       |                               |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date:                March __, 2008 | By:                                                                                                                              | /s/                Melvin Gagerman |
|                                | Melvin                GagermanChief                  Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial                    Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
{"agency":"FMSHRC","generated":"2020-04-24 14:55:08","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FMSHRC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["12"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q2"}
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           American Land Lease, Inc.

                       Subsidiaries as of March 27, 2002
<TABLE>

<S>                                              <C>

Acacia Meadows Arizona, L.L.C.                    CAX DTR Securitization Corp.

AIC Home Sales Corp.                              CAX La Casa Blanca East, L.L.C.

AIC Management Corporation                        CAX La Casa Blanca Mini-Storage, L.L.C.

AIC Management Holdings, L.L.C.                   CAX La Casa Blanca, L.L.C.

AIC Property Management Company, L.L.C.           CAX Lakeshore, L.L.C.

AIOP Brentwood West, L.L.C.                       CAX New Era Homes, L.L.C.

AIOP Florida Properties I, L.L.C.                 CAX Rancho Mirage, L.L.C.

AIOP Florida Properties II, L.L.C.                CAX Riverside II, L.L.C.

AIOP Gulfstream Harbor, L.L.C.                    CAX Riverside III, L.L.C.

AIOP Gulfstream Outlet I, L.L.C.                  CAX Riverside Maintenance, L.L.C.

AIOP Gulfstream Outlet II, L.L.C.                 CAX Riverside, L.L.C.

AIOP Gulfstream Outlet III, L.L.C.                CAX Saddlebrook, L.L.C.

AIOP Lost Dutchman Notes, L.L.C.                  CAX Savanna, L.L.C.

AIOP Mullica, L.L.C.                              CAX White Sands, L.L.C.

AIOP Serendipity, L.L.C.                          Commercial Assets Finance, Inc.

ALL Homes Corp                                    CR Golf Course Management, L.L.C.

ALL Services, L.L.C.                              Fiesta MHP Investors, L.L.C.

Asset Investors Acceptance, Inc.                  Fiesta/Encanta MHP, L.L.C.

CAX Saddlebrook, L.L.C.                           Lakeshore Utilities, Inc.

Asset Investors Finance Corporation               Lakeshore Utilities, L.L.C.

Asset Investors Funding Corporation               Park Royale MHP, L.L.C.

Asset Investors Mortgage Funding Corporation      Riverside Gold Course and Marina, L.L.C.

Asset Investors Operating Partnership, L. P.      Riverside Golf Course Community, L.L.C.

Asset Investors Secured Finance Corporation       Riverside Utilities, L.L.C.

Prime Forest Partners                             Royal Palm Village, L.L.C.

Casa Encanta Commercial, L.L.C.                   Southern Palms MHP, L.L.C.

CAX Acquisition Corp.                             Sun Valley Arizona, L.L.C.

CAX Cannery, L.L.C.                               ALL TRS Holding Company, Inc.

CAX Cypress Greens II, L.L.C.                     Marina Dunes at Monterey, L.L.C.

CAX Cypress Greens, L.L.C.

 </Table>
#### Clorey Eugene FRANCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-7346.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 26, 2016.

Decided: Feb. 3, 2016.

Clorey Eugene France, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clorey Eugene France seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 6, 2015. The notice of appeal, dated. August 6, 2015, was filed on August 11, 2015.1 Because France failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED,.*

1

. For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mail- ' ing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

2

*,*While France filed a timely post-judgment motion, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), he failed to comply with the district court's order to file a corrected motion with a signature. Accordingly, the motion was stricken.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 358 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 358

   To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify regulations 
          concerning hours of service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify regulations 
          concerning hours of service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Regulating Edible 
Supplies and Horticulture Trucking Act'' or the ``FRESH Trucking Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF HOURS OF SERVICE REGULATIONS.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall amend part 395 of title 49, Code of Federal 
Regulations, to establish that, with respect to a motor carrier or 
driver transporting any agricultural, horticultural, or floricultural 
commodity (including both fresh and processed products, as well as sod 
and other agricultural products sensitive to temperature and climate 
and at the risk of perishing in transit)--
            (1) loading and unloading of commercial motor vehicles 
        shall be excluded from on-duty time requirements;
            (2) there shall be no requirement of a 30-minute rest break 
        within the first 8 hours of the hours of service on-duty 
        requirements and such carrier or driver may take breaks at any 
        time during trip; and
            (3) such carrier or driver may complete a scheduled trip if 
        they are over the hours of service maximum on-duty drive 
        schedule and are within 150 miles of their scheduled delivery 
        point.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>  1                                                          Exhibit 32.1


        Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                         of USA Real Estate Investment Trust


       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of USA Real Estate Invest-
ment Trust (the "Trust"), hereby certifies that:

  (i)  the accompanying annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Trust for the year
   ended December 31, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
   of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



  Date:  March 20, 2006              /s/ Gregory E. Crissman
                                         Gregory E. Crissman
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
      10.37

     

    August
      30, 3007

     

    Amendment
      to Deepak Gupta's Employment Agreement, dated December
      3,
      2006
      with Workstroarn,

     

    On
      August
      28, 2007, Workstream Inc. (the "Company") amended an employment agreement
with
      Deepak Gupta dated December 3, 2006,
      pursuant
      to which Mr. Gupta was appointed as President
      of the software
      and technology business division. Under the amendment Mr. Gupta is
      to
      receive a guaranteed bonus of $25,000 per quarter starting 2/28/2007 and
      continuing until
      2/28/2008, Additionally, Mr. Gupta is to receive 200,000 stock options with
      an
      exercise price
      of
      $1.05 per share, expiring in 5 years, and 200,000 restricted stock units (RSU)
      convertible
      into Company
      common
      stock on a one-for-one basis. The stock option and RSU awards
      require the approval by the Company's shareholders of an increase to the number
      of shares
      available
      pursuant to the Company's stook option plan. The stock options and
      RSU's will
      not be
      vested until the company's common stock trades at or above $3.00 per share
      on
the
      NASDAQ exchange for 20 consecutive trading days. All other terms and conditions
      are pursuant
      to the employment agreement dated December 3, 2006 and previously filed on
      December
      6, 2006,

    

      
        	
                Signature:

              	
                

              	
                 

              
	 	
                Deepak
                  Gupta            Date:
8/30/2007

              	 
	 	
                 

              	 


      

      


      
        	
                

              	
              
	
                Michael
                  Mullarkey               Date:
                  8/10/2007

                Chairman
                  of the Board 

                Workstream
                  Inc.
Executive Order 13240

# Council of Europe in Respect of the Group of States Against Corruption

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288) (the “Act”), and having found that the Council of Europe in Respect of the Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) is a public international organization in which the United States participates within the meaning of the Act, I hereby designate GRECO as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities conferred by the Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect privileges, exemptions, or immunities that such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by law.

[FR Doc. 01-31665

Billing code 3195-01-P