alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raymond J. Balsys, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Chapter 63 of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|              |     |                        
|------------- | --- | -----------------------
|July 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ RAYMONDJ. BALSYS   
|              |     | Raymond J. Balsys      
|              |     | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Axiall Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory C. Thompson, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                |                                                     |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| March 25, 2014 | /s/ Gregory C. Thompson                                  |
| * *            | *Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting   Officer* |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine Lamont DOWNS, Jr., a.k.a. Paul Anthony Weaver, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50018.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Carol A. Chen, Esquire, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kathryn Ann Young, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Antoine Lamont Downs, Jr. appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Downs contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to respond to his mitigating arguments and to provide an adequate explanation for the sentence imposed. The record reflects that the district court explicitly noted that Downs’ continued violations of the conditions of his supervised release constituted breach of trust, and that there was a need to protect the public and for deterrence. Thus, the district court did not procedurally err. *See United States v. Musa,*220 F.3d 1096, 1101-02 (9th Cir.2000); *see also United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Downs also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that, under the totality of circumstances, Downs’ 18-month sentence is reasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

July 12, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, August 15, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter The Doe 

Run Company, Docket No. CENT 2015-318-RM. (Issues include 

whether the Judge erred in concluding that the operator had 

violated standards based on strict liability and in failing to conduct 

separate S&S and negligence analyses.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                  VERSAR, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Years Ended June 30,
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------
                                                              1998                  1997               1996
                                                           ----------            ----------         ----------

<S>                                                        <C>                   <C>                <C>       
NET (LOSS) INCOME..............................            $   (8,553)           $    1,256         $      992
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========
(LOSS) INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED
   OPERATIONS..................................            $   (8,829)           $      147         $      ---
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========


Weighted average common shares outstanding -
   Basic.......................................             5,695,212             5,041,455          4,905,126
                                                           ----------            ----------         ----------

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC............            $    (1.50)           $     0.25         $     0.20
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========
(LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE FROM
   DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - BASIC.............            $    (1.55)           $      .03         $      ---
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========


Common shares from above.......................             5,695,212             5,041,455          4,905,126
Assumed exercise of options (treasury stock
   method).....................................                   ---               244,354            342,597
                                                           ----------            ----------         ----------
                                                            5,695,212             5,285,809          5,247,723
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED..........            $    (1.50)           $     0.24         $     0.19
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========
(LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE FROM
   DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - DILUTED...........            $    (1.55)           $      .03         $      ---
                                                           ==========            ==========         ==========
</TABLE>



                                       186
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of FragranceNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis M. Apfel, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By: /s/Dennis M. Apfel
    ---------------------------------
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Financial Officer

February 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements  of the  December  31, 1997 Form 10K of  Resources  Accrued  Mortgage
Investors  2 L.P.  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  for  such
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,908,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,921,007
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,537,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,442,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,537,040
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-K @ year
ended June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          62,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  713,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,955
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 816,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,129
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   816,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,735
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,858
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<FN>
<F1>EPS Primary shown above is actually EPS Basic as required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

----

----

|   | (i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2010, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 31, 2011 | /s/ Gregory E. Crissman     |   |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                            | Gregory E. Crissman,        |   |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer and |   |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer     |   |

----

----

----
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Mark Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp. Docket No. No.KENT 2009-1429-D and Kevin Baird v. PCS Phosphate Co. Docket No. SE 2010-74-DM.              

#   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Mark Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp. Docket No. No.KENT 2009-1429-D and Kevin Baird v. PCS Phosphate Co. Docket No. SE 2010-74-DM.

meeting_081210.pdf

meeting081210.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*August 5, 2014*

[Cite as *08/05/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3386.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014- 0720.

#### Lakewood Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-215. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement a settlement agreement, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to and filed with the Board of Tax Appeals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  financial  statements for the year ended September 30, 1996, included
with  Form  10K-SB,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         166,770
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  67,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    370,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               580,677
<PP&E>                                         216,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (63,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          542,592
<BONDS>                                        3,659,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,294
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,465,536)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,350
<SALES>                                        656,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               656,708
<CGS>                                          578,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  578,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,723,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,877,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,877,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,877,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1631

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase

the maximum amount in controversy permitted for cases

under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Justice Reform Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1631 RFS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY

2 PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDIC3 TION OF SMALL CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION

4 BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is

6 amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply to cases filed with the Superior

9 Court of the District of Columbia on or after the date of

10 the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-943 Lower Tribunal No. F13-5321

________________ 

### Joseph T. Swift , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge. Joseph T. Swift, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.