alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 
 
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued4337F
Air-Land & Sea Transport, Inc., 3000 Wilcrest, Suite #350, Houston, TX 77042
March 30, 2000.12237N
Costa Rica Carriers, Inc., 8620 NW 70th Street, Miami, FL 33166
October 6, 2000.15703N
MSD Line, Inc., 2400 S. Wilmington Avenue, Compton, CA 90220
November 24, 2000.4105F
Overseas Mahanm Inc., 24 Lillian Lane, Plainview, NY 11803-5613
March 18, 1999.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 01-3219 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 17, 2014*

[Cite as *06/17/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2595.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-0481.

#### Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories.

Franklin App. No. 11AP-996, 2013-Ohio-1675. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the renewed motions for admission pro hac vice of James F. Hurst, Derek J. Sarafa, Steffen N. Johnson, and Samantha L.Maxfield, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FragranceNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis M. Apfel, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Dennis M. Apfel
     -------------------
     Chairman, Chief Executive
     Officer and Chief Financial Officer


November 10, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  784,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,291
<INVENTORY>                                    418,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,272,089
<PP&E>                                       3,651,277
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,274,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,754,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,794,154
<BONDS>                                        950,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,684
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,754,262
<SALES>                                      5,493,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,493,800
<CGS>                                        4,142,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,285,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (30,380)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,612)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88-89]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 89]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 22, 2002.
    Time: 11:30 am to 1:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 45 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Conference Room E1/2, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: John R. Lymangrover, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4552.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-32167 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Income L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Wilder Richman Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









/s/  James Hussey


James Hussey


Chief Financial Officer of Wilder Richman


Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant


March 31, 2011
#### Jose Luis FLORES-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73502.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 27, 2008.

Alejandro Garcia, Esq., City of Commerce, CA, for Petitioner.

*582CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, USSA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Flores-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for relief under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary denial of relief because Flores-Ramirez’s contention that the IJ deprived him of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of his case does not state a colorable due process claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); *see also Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir. 2001) (the agency’s “misapplication of relevant case law” may not be reviewed in this context).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 13, 2004



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66894-66895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-120-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

December 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 11, 2001, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets which 
sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing. The 
proposed effective dates of such tariff sheets are indicated on 
Appendix A.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to: (1) Storage service purchased from 
Dominion Transmission, Inc. (Dominion) under its Rate Schedule GSS, the 
costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable under 
Transco's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS, and (2) storage service purchased 
from Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) under its Rate 
Schedule X-28, the costs of which are included in the rates and charges 
payable under Transco's Rate Schedule S-2. This filing is being made 
pursuant to tracking provisions under section 3 of Transco's Rate 
Schedule GSS, section 4 of Transco's Rate Schedule LSS and section 26 
of the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's Third revised Volume 
No. 1 Tariff.
    Transco states that included in Appendices B and C attached to the 
filing are the explanations of the rate changes and details regarding 
the computation of the revised GSS, LSS and S-2 rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the

[[Page 66895]]

Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31688 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2011-1438

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 08- CV-0116, Judge Larry R. Hicks.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

V ERNON M. W INTERS , Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was C HARANJIT B RAHMA , of Washington, DC.

M ARK T. J ANSEN , Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were G IA L. C INCONE ; and C EDRIC C. Y.
T AN and K RISTIN M. C OOKLIN , of Washington, DC.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE
, L INN , and P ROST
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Company- WEST 2008-788-R              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Company- WEST 2008-788-R

November 13-Meeting.pdf

sol-vs.twentymile-coal-docket-west2008-788-r-etal-2pm-session.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury Customs Service [T.D. 01-93]
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Customs broker license revocations.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (19 USC 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111), the following Customs broker licenses are revoked. Please be aware that some of these entities may continue to provide broker services under another valid brokerage license. Name
License
PortBehring International, Inc
06434
Seattle.Consolidated Freightways Export-Import Services, Inc
07687
Seattle.Ingham International, Inc
05252
Seattle.Ted L. Rauch, Inc
06656
Seattle.Steeb Marine Services, Inc
05768
Seattle.Carmichael International Services
09143
Seattle.Emery Customs Brokers
05614
Seattle.Kuehne & Nagel, Inc
06558
Seattle.David K. Lindemuth Co., Inc
07601
Seattle.Radix Group International
07500
Seattle.
 Dated: December 17, 2001. Bonni G. Tischler, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 01-31387 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
August 31, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of August, 2016.

10-16-00025-CR	TIMOTHY ANDREA MOORE v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-501-C2 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE IGNACIO REYES

- MORFIN,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 20

- 73698

Agency No. A047

- 734

- 518

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 19, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ignacio Reyes

- Morfin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order sustaining the Department

of Homeland Security’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his

application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S .C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 73698

§ 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision to deny

cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); see also Szonyi v. Barr

,

942 F.3d 874, 896 (9th Cir. 2019) (“This court lacks jurisdiction to review the

merits of a discretionary decision to deny cancellation of removal . . . .”). The

petition does not raise a colorable legal or constitutional claim over which we

retain juris diction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) ; Martinez

- Rosas v. Gonzales , 424

F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.