alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3290 

To prohibit the disposition of a firearm to, and the possession of a firearm 

by, an adult who, while a juvenile who had attained 15 years of age 

but not 18 years of age, committed an offense that would have been 

a felony if committed by an adult. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Ms. VAN DUYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the disposition of a firearm to, and the possession of a firearm by, an adult who, while a juvenile 

who had attained 15 years of age but not 18 years 

of age, committed an offense that would have been a 

felony if committed by an adult. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disarming Felons 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3290 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISPOSITION OF FIREARM TO, 

2 AND POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY, AN ADULT 

3 WHO, WHILE A JUVENILE WHO HAD AT4 TAINED 15 YEARS OF AGE BUT NOT 18 YEARS 

5 OF AGE, COMMITTED AN OFFENSE THAT 

6 WOULD HAVE BEEN A FELONY IF COM7 MITTED BY AN ADULT. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION ON DISPOSITION.—Section 922(d) 

9 of title 18, United States Code, is amended in the 1st sen10 tence— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

12 (8)(B)(ii); 

13 (2) by striking the period at the end of para14 graph (9) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

15 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(10) while a juvenile who had attained 15 

18 years of age but not 18 years of age, committed an 

19 act of juvenile delinquency that would have been a 

20 felony if committed by an adult.’’. 

21 (b) PROHIBITION ON POSSESSION.—Section 922(g) 

22 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

23 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

24 (8)(C)(ii); 

25 (2) by striking the comma at the end of para26 graph (9) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3290 IH

1 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(10) who, while a juvenile who had attained 15 

4 years of age but not 18 years of age, committed an 

5 act of juvenile delinquency that would have been a 

6 felony if committed by an adult,’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Order entered January 24, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01 03 0
- CR
RICKY PEDRO GARZA , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 401
- 81559
- 2011 

### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effe ctive representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
Th is appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
2014-0818.

#### State v. Werber.

Cuyahoga App. No. 100290, 2014-Ohio-609. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Corey L. MOSES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-30886

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 2, 2016.

Carol Mignonne Griffing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brian David Landry, Esq., Weems, Schimpf, Gilsoul, Haines, Landry & Car-mouche, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Corey L. Moses, BERLIN, NH, pro se.

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Corey L. Moses has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Moses has filed responses. The record is .not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Moses’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Moses’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See,*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Moses’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This article contains summary information extracted for the year ended
December 31, 1998 10-K consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement
of Operations by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000804217
<NAME>                        Neal Ludeke
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         1,885,257
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  71,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         44,300,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,014,726)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,958,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,633,904)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,958,954
<SALES>                                        6,830,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,078,399
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,989,206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,305,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (216,504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (216,504)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3671 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program of 

payments to teaching health centers that operate graduate medical education programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2021 

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

program of payments to teaching health centers that 

operate graduate medical education programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Doctors of Community 

5 Act’’ or the ‘‘DOC Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3671 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO 

2 TEACHING HEALTH CENTERS THAT OPERATE 

3 GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PRO4 GRAMS. 

5 Section 340H(g) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 256H(g)) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—To carry out this section, 

10 there are appropriated, to remain available until ex11 pended, such sums as may be necessary, not to ex12 ceed— 

13 ‘‘(A) $230,000,000, for the period of fiscal 

14 years 2011 through 2015; 

15 ‘‘(B) $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

16 2016 and 2017; 

17 ‘‘(C) $126,500,000 for each of fiscal years 

18 2018 through 2023; 

19 ‘‘(D) $554,400,000 for fiscal year 2024; 

20 ‘‘(E) $571,200,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

21 ‘‘(F) $588,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; 

22 ‘‘(G) $604,800,000 for fiscal year 2027; 

23 ‘‘(H) $621,600,000 for fiscal year 2028; 

24 ‘‘(I) $638,400,000 for fiscal year 2029; 

25 ‘‘(J) $655,200,000 for fiscal year 2030; 

26 ‘‘(K) $672,000,000 for fiscal year 2031; 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3671 IH

1 ‘‘(L) $688,800,000 for fiscal year 2032; 

2 ‘‘(M) $729,200,000 for fiscal year 2033; 

3 and 

4 ‘‘(N) for fiscal year 2034 and each fiscal 

5 year thereafter, the dollar amount applicable 

6 under this paragraph for the preceding fiscal 

7 year, adjusted in accordance with paragraph 

8 (3).’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(3) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—For pur11 poses of paragraph (1)(N), the dollar amount appli12 cable under paragraph (1) for fiscal years beginning 

13 after fiscal year 2033 shall be equal to the dollar 

14 amount applicable for the preceding fiscal year, in15 creased by the percentage increase in the medical 

16 care component of the consumer price index for all 

17 urban consumers (U.S. city average), as such per18 centage increase is estimated by the Secretary for 

19 the 12-month period ending with March of the pre20 vious year.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 356 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 356

  To provide greater flexibility to agencies to make appointments to 
 positions for which there is a severe shortage of candidates, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide greater flexibility to agencies to make appointments to 
 positions for which there is a severe shortage of candidates, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Hiring Improvement Reform 
and Enforcement Act'' or the ``Federal HIRE Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY APPOINTMENT FLEXIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 31 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 3116 the following new section:
``Sec. 3117. Agency appointment flexibility
    ``(a) In General.--The head of an agency may, without regard to the 
provisions of section 3304 and sections 3309 through 3318, appoint a 
qualified individual to a position within the agency that is in the 
competitive service and for which the head of the agency determines 
that there is a severe shortage of candidates.
    ``(b) Rule of Construction.--This provision shall not be construed 
as superseding or otherwise affecting any authority granted to the head 
of any agency under any other provision of law to make appointments 
without regard to a provision of chapter 33.
    ``(c) Agency Defined.--The term `agency' has the meaning given such 
term under section 551.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 31 of 
title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 
related to section 3116 the following item:

``3117. Agency appointment flexibility.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Steven Weinreb, Chief
Financial Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 containing the financial statements of Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account (a
separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real
Property Partnership.



Date: March 25, 2011/s/ Steven WeinrebSteven Weinreb Chief Financial Officer Pruco Life Insurance
Company


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

EXHIBIT 21.1

REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES

The following table sets forth, at June 30, 2002, the Registrants
subsidiaries and their respective incorporation jurisdictions. The Registrant,
or a subsidiary of the Registrant, owns 100% of the voting securities of each
of the subsidiaries listed below.

|                                                |  |              
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|                                                |  | STATE OF     
|SUBSIDIARIES                                    |  | INCORPORATION
|                                                |  |              
|Continucare Home Health of Florida, Inc.        |  | Florida      
|Continucare Managed Care, Inc.                  |  | Florida      
|Continucare Medical Management, Inc.            |  | Florida      
|Continucare Payment Corporation                 |  | Florida      
|Continucare Physician Practice Management, Inc. |  | Florida      
|Maxicare, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware     
|Maxicare Select, Inc.                           |  | Florida      
|Sunset Harbor Home Health, Inc.                 |  | Florida      

1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 11


     EARNING PER SHARE

     The numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share are
     as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Six months ended
                                                                     -------------------------------
                                                                     March 31, 1999   March 31, 2000
                                                                     --------------   --------------
<S>                                                                     <C>             <C>
     Numerator  - Net loss as reported............................       (459,100)     ($3,269,225)

     Denominator - Weighted average number of shares outstanding..      6,688,300       11,898,500
     Effect of dilutive securities                                           --               --
        Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding....      6,688,300       11,898,500

     Basic earnings (loss) per share..............................         ($0.07)          ($0.28)
     Diluted earnings (loss) per share............................         ($0.07)          ($0.28)

</TABLE>

                                       16
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Scott L. Vining, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 23, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining    
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Scott L. Vining        
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.8.1  


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

TO MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT NO. CONVX  


        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT NO. CONVX ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of this 28th day of September, 2006, by and between  ATEL
Ventures, Inc., a California Corporation, with its principal office at 600 California Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108 ("Lessor")
and Convio, Inc. with its principal office at 11921 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78759 ("Lessee"). 


        WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee have entered into a Master Lease Agreement No.CONVX dated as of March 15, 2006 (each Equipment Schedule
as it incorporates the Master Lease Agreement being hereinafter referred to as a "Lease"); and, 


        WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee now desire to amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth. 



        NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 3 (c)) (viii) to change 180 days to 270 


        Except
as is herein specifically amended, all of the terms, covenants and provisions of each Lease remain in full force and effect. 


        All
capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as in each Lease. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year written above. 



	ATEL Ventures, INC.

("Lessor")	 	CONVIO, INC.

("Lessee")
	

By:	

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
	
 	

By:	

/s/ James R. Offerdahl

	Title:	Executive Vice President
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
#### Paul CARRILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE, Warden and Jerry Brown, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 09-56527.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Nancy G. Kendall, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Paul Carrillo, Calipatria, CA, pro se.

Kathleen R. Frey, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*219MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Paul Carrillo appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Carrillo contends that the district court erred in dismissing his petition as untimely because the one-year limitations period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) does not apply to petitions challenging administrative decisions. This contention is foreclosed by *Shelby v. Bartlett,*391 F.3d 1061, 1063-65 (9th Cir.2004). To the extent that Carrillo is requesting us to overturn the holding of *Shelby,*we may not do so. *See United States v. Camper,*66 F.3d 229, 232 (9th Cir.1995).

The pro se motion to file an amicus brief received by the court on September 8, 2010, is deemed filed and is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 7, 2001

    The following applications for certificates of public convenience 
and necessity and foreign air carrier permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's procedural 
regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for answers, 
conforming applications, or motions to modify scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period, DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2001-11092.
    Date Filed: December 4, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: December 26, 2001.
    Description: Application of Northwest Airlines, Inc., pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. sections 41108, 41102 and subpart B, requesting the issuance 
of a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to 
engage in the scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property 
and mail between a point or points in the United States via 
intermediate points to a point or points in Poland and beyond. 
Northwest also requests that the Department integrate this certificate 
authority with all of Northwest's existing certificate and exemption 
authority to the extent consistent with U.S. bilateral agreements and 
DOT policy.

Dorothy Y. Beard,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-31719 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P