alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Irrevocable Powers of Attorney of all the recorded shareholders



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Irrevocable Powers of Attorney 
 Our Company, hereby irrevocably authorizes Mr. Shi Yuzhu (ID Card
No. 340103196209153519) to be the authorized representative of our company to exercise the rights set forth below during the effective term of this Power of Attorney: 
 We authorize Mr. Shi Yuzhu as the representative of our company to exercise all the shareholders’ voting rights enjoyed by our company in the shareholders meeting of Shanghai Zhengtu Network Technology Co.,
Ltd. (“Zhengtu Network”) according to the laws and the Articles of Association of Zhengtu Network. All the shareholders’ voting rights enjoyed by our company, including, but not limited to, the right to sell or transfer the
whole or any part of the shares held by our company in Zhengtu Network, and the right to appoint and elect the director, general manager and other senior management personnel of Zhengtu Network in the shareholder meeting as the authorized
representative of our company. 
 The premise of the aforesaid authorization and delegation is that the representative shall be a PRC citizen and Shanghai
Zhengtu Network Technology Co., Ltd. consents with the relevant authorization and delegation. In the case that there is requirement by Shanghai Zhengtu Network Technology Co., Ltd. to change the representative by written notice, our company will
promptly withdraw the authorization and delegation to the representative and will make the same authorization and delegation to the other PRC citizen designated by Shanghai Zhengtu Network Technology Co., Ltd. 
 This Power of Attorney lasts for ten (10) years and shall be effective on the date of execution. 
  

	
	Shanghai Lanlin Bio-technology Co.,Ltd
	Signature:
	
	Date: September 7, 2006


  

 Goliath - POA
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Threat Reduction Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 29, 2000 (65 FR 82984), the Department of Defense 
published an announcement of a closed Threat Reduction Advisory 
Committee meeting to be held on February 15, 2001. The meeting is 
hereby postponed until a later date. A new notice announcing will be 
published in the future.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Don Culp 703-767-5717.

    Dated: February 1, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-3140 Filed 2-06-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
2014-0429.

#### Chappell v. Morgan.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Ronald Chappell. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. On petitioner’s motion to amend petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion to expedite decision. Motions denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
J

- S35036

- 16

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

SYHEAM MANN,

Appellant No. 262 EDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order December 24

, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 23

- CR

- 0004106

- 2009

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., BENDER, P.J.E ., and MUSMANNO, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED JULY 08, 2016

I write separately only to note that this Court’s decision in

Commonwealth v. Riggle , 119 A.3d 1058 (Pa. Super. 2015), pertaining to

timely PCRA petitions asserting illegal sentencing claim s based on sentencing

statutes rendered unconstitutional by Alleyne v. United States , 133 S.Ct.

2151 (2013), is currently being reconsidered by an en banc panel of this

Court in Commonwealth v. Ciccone , No. 3114 EDA 2014 (certified for en

banc review by or der dated October 26, 2015, without the filing of a panel

decision). As of the date of the filing of this memorandum, however,

Riggle is still good law. Accordingly, I join the majority memorandum in its

entirety.

Judge Musmanno joins this concurring s tatement.
(First Circuit — Hamilton Co., O., Circuit Court —

Jan. Term. 1898.

Before Cox, Swing and Smith, JJ.

#### FRANK BROKAMP and NELLIE BROKAMP v. THE METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Life Insurance. Company npt liable for premiums paid upon a void ‘ ' policy issued by one of’its agents without the knowledge of the insured and under false representations by the agent.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county- . .............

. The plaintiffs sued for recovery of $65, paid to the defendant company by one of them as premiums on a- policy of insurance on the life of the other, her husband. The petition alleged that the policy, which was for more than. $200, was null and void for the reason that it was issued without the knowledge or consent of the insured, and without his having been examined by á physician, and that théapplication was filled out by an agent of the defendant company, who represented to the wife that the matter was regular in every way, and that relying upon these representations she paid in as premiums on the said void policy the sum here sued for. A demurrer to the petition was" sustained below.

*O’Hara &*Hojfmeister, for Plaintiff in Error,

*C. D. Robertson,*and *Robert O. Pugh,*for the Insurance Company.

By the Court.

This judgment is affirmed upon the reasoning and authority of the case reported in 25 Insurance Law Journal, page-103, and upon the provisions of section 3626, Revised Statutes.
**FEDERAL****MINE SAFETY ANDHEALTHREVIEWCOMMISSION**

** **

SUNSHINEACTNOTICEBAC6735-01

January30, 2017

 

TIMEANDDATE:                10:00a.m.,Wednesday,February15, 2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichardV.BackleyHearingRoom,Room511N,1331PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW,Washington,DC20004(enterfromFStreetentrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommissionwillhearoralargumentinthematter*Secretaryof*

*Laborv.CanyonFuelCompany,LLC,*DocketNos.WEST2015-635,etal.(IssuesincludewhethertheJudgeerredinconcludingthattheoperatorhadviolatedstandardsgoverningthesafetyofalternative escapeways.)

 

 

Anypersonattendingthisoralargumentwhorequiresspecialaccessibilityfeaturesand/orauxiliaryaids,suchassignlanguageinterpreters,mustinformtheCommissioninadvanceofthoseneeds.Subjectto 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACT PERSON

FORMORE INFO:                Emogene Johnson (202)434-9935/ (202) 708-9300for TDD

Relay/1-800-877-8339for toll free.

 

 

PHONENUMBERFORLISTENINGTO

ARGUMENT:1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode:129-339

 

 

 

 

SarahL.StewartDeputyGeneralCounsel
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.






/s/ Chen
Gao


Chen
Gao


Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer






Dated:
May 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DiVall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                        |  |                    |  |                                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                                    |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo
|                       |  |  |  |                                        |  |                    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
-  Home 
-  Regulations 
-  Hazardous Materials 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials 
                      -  Cargo Tanks                          -  Cargo Tank Safety 
                        -  Cargo Tank Safety Advisory Notices 
                        -  Cargo Tank Registration and Resources 
                        -  Rollover Prevention 
                      -  General HM Safety Advisory Notices 
                      -  Safety Permit 
                      -  National HM Route Registry 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Security 
                      -  Spill Reporting & Prevention 
                      -  Training & Education 
                      -  State Programs 
                      -  Frequently Asked Questions 

## Contact Us

Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationHazardous Materials Division
1200 New Jersey Avenue SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Phone:**202-385-2400****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Hazardous Materials Brochures

These brochures are designed to support the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) mission to reduce the number of truck and bus crashes, and, as extension of that, to make the transportation of hazardous materials safer. Unless otherwise indicated, all file formats are PDF.

### DOT Chart 16 - Hazardous Materials Markings, Labeling and Placarding Guide

Download this brochure

### The Hazardous Materials Safety Permit Program Brochure

Download this brochure

### "Safe and Secure Transportation of Food - What's Your Role?" Brochure

Download this brochure

### "Transporting HM by Highway" User Guide

Download this User Guide

### "Transporting HM by Highway" User Guide (Spanish)

Download this User Guide
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 15, 2004



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO























































23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         655,233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               830,232
<PP&E>                                          13,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,016,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,179,678
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,203,880)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,016,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,300,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,240,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,240,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,240,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826821
<NAME> CERBCO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        18,961
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  5,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                    1,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              27,723
<PP&E>                                                        25,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                                14,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                42,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          3,299
<BONDS>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                         148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    25,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  42,587
<SALES>                                                       18,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              18,783
<CGS>                                                         16,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 16,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  307
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              320
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.21
        

</TABLE>
#### Theresa UREKEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TETRA HOLDINGS (US) INC.; Kent Norris; Remy Ozaraga, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-16651.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2008.*

Filed May 23, 2008.

*558Todd A. Murray, Esq., Law Office of Todd A. Murray, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark P. Grajski, Esq., William D. Bishop, Jr., Esq., Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: HUG and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and MILLS **, District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Theresa Urekew (“Urekew”) appeals the district court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of Tetra Holdings (US), Inc., Kent Norris, and Remy Ozaraga (collectively, “Tetra”). “Summary judgment, a final order over which we take jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, is reviewed *de novo,*drawing all reasonable inferences supported by the evidence in favor of the non-moving party.” *Bodett v. CoxCom, Inc.,*366 F.3d 736, 742 (9th Cir.2004) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). We also must determine whether the district court properly applied the relevant law. *Lolli v. County of Orange,*351 F.3d 410, 414 (9th Cir.2003). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. *Valdez v. Rosenbaum,*302 F.3d 1039, 1043 (9th Cir.2002). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

ERISA preempts Urekew’s three remaining claims for (1) breach of implied contract, (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress. All three claims relate to Tetra’s decision to characterize Urekew’s termination as “for cause” and allege that Tetra made this decision to deprive her of severance benefits. Therefore the claims relate to an administrative decision regarding plan coverage and are preempted by ERISA. *See*29 U.S.C. § 1144(a); *Campbell v. Aerospace Corp.,*123 F.3d 1308, 1311 (9th Cir. 1997) (recognizing “that Congress used the words ‘relate to’ in a broad sense”). AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of COO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Land Lease (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert G. Blatz, as Chief Operating Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/:      Robert G. Blatz
|Name:                     |  | Robert G. Blatz        
|Title:                    |  | Chief Operating Officer
|Date:                     |  | March 11, 2004         



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7123
GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden of Greensville, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-436-2) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Samuel Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Garraghty , No. CA-96- 436-2 (E.D. Va. May 22 & July 5, 1996). We also deny Appellant's motions for psychiatric assistance, counsel, and an evidentiary hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED