alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael J. Keough                
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Michael J. Keough                    
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  |    



36
CONFORMED COPY


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2 to
Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 1997 Commission File Number
0-16304
     
Optek Technology, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware  75-1962405
(State or other jurisdiction  (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)  Identification No.)

1215 West Crosby Road, Carrollton, Texas     75006
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

Registrant s telephone number, including area code:  (972)
323-2200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ( X )    No (    )

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant s knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K. (   )

The aggregate market value of the registrant s voting stock held
by non-affiliates as of October 31, 1997 was:  $67,909,282 (* see
note on index page).

The number of shares outstanding of each class of registrant s
common stock as of October 31, 1997 was:  Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, 4,259,534 shares.
___________________

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement to be
furnished to stockholders in connection with its Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on March 17, 1998 are incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
                                                                 

                                                             
<PAGE>


The Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31,
1997 is amended to substitute the Lease Agreement attached hereto
as Exhibit 10 for the document previously filed for such exhibit.


<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
 
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
                           CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
           COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 JUNE 30,             JUNE 30,
                                                            -------------------   -----------------
                                                              1998       1997      1998      1997
                                                            --------   --------   -------   -------
                                                                (UNAUDITED)          (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                         <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Net income available to common stock....................  $13,331    $12,819    $26,508   $24,560
                                                            -------    -------    -------   -------
Shares:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding..............   25,376     24,655     25,328    24,735
  Dilutive effect of stock options........................      209        253        220       300
                                                            -------    -------    -------   -------
  Average diluted shares outstanding and equivalents......   25,585     24,908     25,548    25,035
                                                            -------    -------    -------   -------
Basic earnings per common share:
          Net income......................................  $  0.53    $  0.52    $  1.05   $  0.99
                                                            =======    =======    =======   =======
Diluted earnings per common share:
          Net income......................................  $  0.52    $  0.51    $  1.04   $  0.98
                                                            =======    =======    =======   =======
</TABLE>
 
                                       18
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Grayling Hofer, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: Date: March 20, 2006



/s/ Grayling Hofer

Grayling Hofer

Chief Accounting Officer

Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                        2,487
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                    964
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              8,624
<PP&E>                                          759
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               10,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4,181
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      5,779
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 10,074
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             32,443
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                25,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (182)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 163
<INCOME-TAX>                                     63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             100
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    100
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01


</TABLE>
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00155-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRENDA BREWER, DEANNA

MEADOR, PENNY ADAMS,

SABRA CURRY AND DEBORAH

BEANE, APPELLANTS } APPEALED FROM 3RD

V. } DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR

LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC., } ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER FOR RELEASE OF CONTEMNOR

On December 22, 2014, following a hearing at which Reporter Ms. Helen C. Wooten was

present with her counsel, this Court found that Ms. Helen C. Wooten was in contempt of this

Court for violating its order entered on November 4, 2014. As part of the penalty assessed, Ms.

Helen C. Wooten was arrested and confined in the Smith County Jail, subject to the terms and

conditions set forth in this Court’s Judgment of Contempt dated December 22, 2014. Ms. Helen

C. Wooten’s confinement was ordered to continue until the complete record in this appeal was

presented in legible format for filing in this Court and Ms. Helen C. Wooten received

notification from the Court that the record had been accepted and filed. Those two conditions

have now been satisfied. Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Sheriff of Smith County, Texas, immediately

release Reporter Ms. Helen C. Wooten from confinement in the Smith County Jail.

FILE COPY
WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, 12th

Court of Appeals District of Texas, at Tyler.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at my office this the

29th day of December 2014, A.D.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

12TH COURT OF APPEALS

By: ________________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              58
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                       609
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,721
<PP&E>                                           9,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,318
<BONDS>                                          4,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,380
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    92
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (286)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,837
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jairton Aurelio GRANDOS-ARREDONDO, a/k/a Jair, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7179.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2010.

Jairton Aurelio Grandos-Arredondo, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jairton Grandos-Arredondo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grandos-Arredondo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Develop Collective Bargaining Skills with FMCS Training - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"X3D2wpAbtg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/develop-collective-bargaining-skills-fmcs-training\/\">Develop Collective Bargaining Skills with FMCS Training<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/develop-collective-bargaining-skills-fmcs-training\/embed\/#?secret=X3D2wpAbtg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Develop Collective Bargaining Skills with FMCS Training” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"X3D2wpAbtg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Collective bargaining in today\u2019s environment is challenging. Economic uncertainties, com- plex health and pension benefit issues, social media, and influences from external forces often make the collective bargaining process difficult to navigate. Improved negotiation skills can increase your odds of achieving a collective bargaining agreement that meets the needs of both sides. Click here for […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 01-158]


Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). The information obtained through 
this collection is used by NASA management and contracting offices to 
assess progress toward meeting statutory goals for small businesses/
small disadvantaged businesses.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by January 28, 
2002.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Office of Management and 
Budget; Room 10236; New Executive Office Building; Washington, DC, 
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nancy Kaplan, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1372.
    Title: Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns and 
Related Contract Provisions, NASA FAR Supplement Part 18-19, SF 295.
    OMB Number: 2700-0073.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: NASA requires reporting of small disadvantaged 
business subcontract awards in order to meet its Congressionally 
mandated goals.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 225.
    Responses Per Respondent: 2.
    Annual Responses: 450.
    Hours Per Request: 12.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,400.
    Frequency of Report: Semi-annually.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-31960 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

p1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138828

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138828 COA: 288001 Wayne CC: 05-004643-FC JACARL HARLAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   United Steelworkers, Local No. 5114, on behalf of Miners v. Hecla Limited              

#   United Steelworkers, Local No. 5114, on behalf of Miners v. Hecla Limited

Hecla WEST 2012-466-CM Meeting Notice 11-19-15.pdf

Hecla WEST 2012-466-CM Meeting Notice 11-19-15.htm

united-steelworkers-local5114-behalf-miners-v-hecla-limited-docket-west-2012-466-cm-11-19-15.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov