alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the“Report”), I, Lowry F. Kline, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and will be retained by Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 01-159]

Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This collection is required to 
document changes to NASA contracts and ensure that they are made 
quickly and in a cost-effective manner.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by January 28, 
2002.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Office of Management and 
Budget; Room 10236; New Executive Office Building; Washington, DC, 
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nancy Kaplan, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1372.
    Title: Contract Modifications, NASA FAR Supplement Part 18-43.
    OMB Number: 2700-0054.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: NASA procurement and technical personnel use the 
information obtained by this collection to manage each contract, and to 
ensure that the Agency can obtain the best goods and services at the 
best prices.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 88.
    Responses Per Respondent: 2.
    Annual Responses: 176.
    Hours Per Request: 45.
    Annual Burden Hours: 7,920.
    Frequency of Report: On occasion.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-31958 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
```
#### Daniel R. GIANNINI, Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-1998.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2010.

Filed: Dec. 28, 2010.

*97Daniel R. Giannini, Lexington, KY, pro se.

Chad A. Blumenfield, Gregory G. Brook- . er, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, Appellees.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Giannini, a federal prisoner confined at the Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky, appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After careful de novo review, we conclude that Giannini is not entitled to habeas relief. *See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n,*538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). First, we agree with the district court that neither the Due Process Clause nor 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B) creates a liberty interest in receiving a sentence reduction upon completion of a Bureau of Prisons residential drug abuse program, and that no due process violation therefore occurred in this case. *See Richardson v. Joslin,*501 F.3d 415, 420 (5th Cir.2007). Second, we agree with the court that 28 C.F.R. § 550.55(c) and the related Program Statement 5331.02 were promulgated in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act and are reasonable and allowable interpretations of their enabling act. *See*5 U.S.C. § 553; *Lopez v. Davis,*531 U.S. 230, 242, 121 S.Ct. 714, 148 L.Ed.2d 635 (2001). Finally, we agree with the court that the regulation and program statement do not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause with respect to Giannini, who was neither notified of his eligibility for a provisional sentence reduction nor enrolled in a residential drug abuse program before the effective date of the regulation and program statement. *See Grove v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,*245 F.3d 743, 747 (8th Cir.2001). We note that the cases on which Giannini relies with respect to this argument are merely persuasive au*98thority and are factually distinguishable, and that his remaining arguments do not provide any basis to reverse the district court.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota (now retired), adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT ALI TAJ BEY, Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-2188 September 27, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William C. Shelhart, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
exv4w10



 








EXHIBIT 4.10




EXHIBIT B 




[FORM OF EXCHANGE NOTE]




BROADVIEW NETWORKS HOLDINGS, INC.




113/8%
 SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 2012




			
	CUSIP No. [      ]	 	 
	No. [    ]
	 	$ [      ]






     Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” which
term includes any successor entity), for value received promises to pay to
                                        
 or registered assigns the principal sum of
                                  
      Dollars (or
such principal amount as may be set forth in the records of the Trustee hereinafter referred
to in accordance with the Indenture) on September 1, 2012, and to pay interest thereon as
hereinafter set forth.



          Interest Rate: 113/8%





          Interest
Payment Dates: Interest will be payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on
March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning on March 1, 2007.




          Record Dates: February 15 and August 15.




          Reference is made to the further provisions of this Note contained on the reverse side of
this Note, which will for all purposes have the same effect as if set forth at this place.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Note to be signed manually or by
facsimile by its duly authorized officer.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BROADVIEW NETWORKS HOLDINGS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



Dated: August 23, 2006





B-1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, R. Stephen Polley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |        |  |                                       | 
|--- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/    |  | R. Stephen Polley                     | 
|    |  |        | 
|    |  | Name:  |  | R. Stephen Polley                     | 
|    |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer | 

November 11, 2003

-19-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,939,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,195,430
<PP&E>                                         147,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,158,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,497,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,180
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,363,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,158,641
<SALES>                                        260,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,416
<CGS>                                          156,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,692,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,595,956)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,595,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,595,956)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.038)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.038)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Stacy Katz, Appellant, v Town of Bedford Zoning Board of Appeals, Respondent.

[609 NYS2d 24]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of Bedford Zoning Board of Appeals, dated October 17, 1991, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for an area variance for the erection of a ten-foot wire fence encircling her property, the petitioner appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered April 9, 1992, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, and (2) as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered July 7, 1992, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The petitioner applied for an area variance to erect a ten-foot fence within the minimum setback area. The petitioner contended that the fence was necessary to prevent deer from entering onto her property. The Town of Bedford Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter the Zoning Board of Appeals) denied the application finding that the petitioner had not demonstrated that she had any practical difficulty utilizing her property without the variance.

The determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying the petitioner’s application for an area variance is supported by substantial evidence, and it is not illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion *(see,*CPLR 7803 [3]; *Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441; *Matter of Nammack v Krucklin,*149 AD2d 596). The petitioner has failed to establish that compliance with the zoning code would cause practical difficulties rendering the property unusable. Moreover, simply because the alternatives suggested by the Zoning Board of Appeals would be more expensive than the erection of a ten-foot fence does not mandate the granting of the variance. While financial hardship is a factor to be considered, proof that the desired improvement could more easily and cheaply *505be constructed if the variance were granted does not change the nature of the improvement from one that is merely desirable to one that is necessary for the practical utilization of the property *(see, Matter of Biellak v Zoning Bd. of Appeals,*75 AD2d 435, 439). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of E Prime  Aerospace  Corporation,  a
Colorado  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year  ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  Leslie Shealey , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Leslie Shealey
--------------------------
Leslie Shealey
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2006






----------------
[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  E'Prime  Aerospace  Corporation  and will be  retained  by E'Prime
Aerospace Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>   0000827086
<NAME>  CARLYLE INCOME PLUS, L.P.-II

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1995

<CASH>                                  4,689,905 
<SECURITIES>                                    0    
<RECEIVABLES>                              22,552 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0    
<INVENTORY>                                     0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,731,633 
<PP&E>                                 21,351,931 
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,799,755 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         50,422,295 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     284,621 
<BONDS>                                         0    
<COMMON>                                        0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0    
<PREFERRED>                                     0    
<OTHER-SE>                             44,537,692 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           50,422,295 
<SALES>                                 2,448,050 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,628,114 
<CGS>                                           0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,631,828 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          193,376 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           802,910 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (142,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0    
<CHANGES>                                       0    
<NET-INCOME>                             (142,970)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (2.11)

        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.
(the "Company"),  I, Ralph Larry Lyons,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,
hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (a) the Form 10-KSB fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) the information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in
all material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition  and results of
operations  of the  Company  and its  subsidiaries  as of, and for,  the periods
presented in the Form 10-KSB.


Date:  March 31, 2003     /s/ Ralph Larry Lyons
                          ---------------------
                          Ralph Larry Lyons
                          President and Chief Executive Officer


[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Central  Virginia  Bankshares,  Inc. and will be retained by Central
Virginia  Bankshares,   Inc.  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00415

- CV

LAKXN I NCOME

, I NC

. , Appellant

V

.

TLC H OSPITALITY

, LLC , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 96th District

Court

of T ar rant County ( 096

- 315146

- 20 )

July 22, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment o f the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that LAKXN Income, Inc. shall pay all of the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mark Martrell JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30384

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Jennifer McDaniel Kleinpeter, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark Martrell Jackson, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*928PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mark Martrell Jackson has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jackson has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED, gee 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME> MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           393,671
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 393,671
<CASH>                                          75,345
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             717,409
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          26,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,498,650
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                805,381
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            240,845
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           43,420
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                128,356
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           418
<OTHER-SE>                                     306,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,498,650
<PREMIUMS>                                      49,806
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             15,223
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,157)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  73,755
<BENEFITS>                                      33,877
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,892
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            51,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>