alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheets and the Statements of Operations filed as part of the annual report on
Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          5,173
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      61
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,234
<PP&E>                                         29,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             424
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          930
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,830
<SALES>                                         5,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,991 
<CGS>                                               0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   896
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               896
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Empire Iron Mining Partnership, Docket No. LAKE 2006-60-RM.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Empire Iron Mining Partnership, Docket No. LAKE 2006-60-RM.

meeting_120407.pdf

fmshrc120407.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 10.1 to AVAX Technologies, Inc. Form 8-K dated October 2, 2007






Exhibit 10.1


 



AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


2000 Hamilton Street, Suite 204


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19130


 


October 2, 2007


 


Mr. Richard P. Rainey


203 North Blakely Street


Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512


 





	
             
 	
            Re:  
 	
            Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2004, between AVAX Technologies, Inc. and Richard P. Rainey.
 





 


Dear Mr. Rainey:


 


This letter is to confirm the extension of and certain amendments to the above referenced Employment Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings given them in the Employment Agreement. We have agreed as follows:


 


1.         The Corporation engages and employs the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts engagement and employment as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation. While the Executive has been elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation, there is no agreement that the Corporation will continue to elect or nominate the Executive to the Board of Directors.


 


2.          The term of the Agreement is extended from April 1, 2007 through March 31, 2010.


 


3.          The Base Salary is $350,000 effective April 1, 2007, and will not be less than that amount during the extended term of the Agreement. The Base Salary will be reviewed annually, commencing April 1, 2008.


 


4.          For purposes of any notice given pursuant to Section 13 of the Agreement, any notice to the Corporation shall be addressed as follows:


 


If to Corporation:


AVAX Technologies, Inc.


Attention: John Prendergast


2000 Hamilton Street


Suite 204


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19130


 


With a copy to:


Gilmore & Bell, P.C.


Attention: Richard M. Wright, Jr.. 


2405 Grand Boulevard, Suite 1100


Kansas City, MO 64111


 


-1-










5.          Except as expressly set forth above, the Agreement remains in full force and effect, without further amendment.


 


Please acknowledge that the foregoing fairly sets forth our understanding with respect to the amendments to your Employment Agreement, by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to the undersigned. We appreciate your service the past three years and look forward to the next three years of successful development of the AVAX products and technologies.


 


Sincerely,


 


 





	
            /s/ Andrew W. Dahl
 
	
            Andrew W. Dahl, Sc.D.,
 Chairman, Compensation Committee
 Board of Directors
 AVAX Technologies, Inc.
 





 





	
            AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
 
	
            
 /s/ Richard P. Rainey
 
	
            Richard P. Rainey

 

Dated:  October 2, 2007
 





 


 


 















-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ABLE TELCOM
HOLDING CORP. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,078,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               59,696,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,016,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           189,289,735
<PP&E>                                      40,135,969
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,250,931)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             234,596,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,316,075
<BONDS>                                     55,932,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 14,690,000
<COMMON>                                        10,058
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,066,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               234,596,747
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           114,524,482
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              106,812,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,600,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,055,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,669,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,629,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,629,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 3, 2014*

[Cite as *06/03/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2349.]

*1411MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2008-2370.

#### State v. Neyland.

Wood C.P. No. 2007CR0359. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of appellant’s motion for stay of the execution scheduled for October 19, 2016.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. It is further ordered that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state postconviction proceedings, including any appeals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,457,457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               54,589,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 63,369,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           139,914,921
<PP&E>                                      71,322,825
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,453,389)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             235,532,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       81,084,711
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   198,879,645
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               235,532,115
<SALES>                                     32,452,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,452,538
<CGS>                                       24,418,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,090,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,739,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (795,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   628,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,423,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      500,997
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,924,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 13-2017, 13-2047, 13-2072 

UNITED STATES, 

Appellee, 

v. 

WENDELL RIVERA-RUPERTO, a/k/a Arsenio Rivera, 

MIGUEL SANTIAGO-CORDERO, 

DAVIEL SALINAS-ACEVEDO, 

Defendants, Appellants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion for this Court issued January 13, 2017 is 

amended as follows: 

 On page 5, line 23: change "35-years" to "35-years'" 

 On page 12, line 3: change "25-years" to "25-years'" 

 On page 12, line 6: change "105 years" to "105-years'" 

 On page 17, line 12: change "10-years" to "10-years'" 

 On page 17, line 15: change "35-years" to "35-years'" 

 On page 22, footnote 7, line 2: change "19-years" to 

"19-years'"
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. SHAWN BISHOP, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 409 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 14th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                       616
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,865
<PP&E>                                          11,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,488
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,420
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (149)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                276
<DISCONTINUED>                                (10,429)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.78)
        

</TABLE>
2014-0088.

#### Salmons v. Jones.

Lawrence App. No. 13CA11, 2013-Ohio-5417. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1470, 2014-Ohio-1674, 6 N.E.3d 1205. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Sims Crane, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Sims Crane, Inc.

Sims SE 2015-315 Argument Notice 6-29-17.pdf

Sims SE 2015-315 Argument Notice 6-29-17.htm

Secretary of Labor v. Sims Crane Inc, Docket SE2015-315_6-29-17.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### James David KARNATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tracy DANIELS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-35822.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

James David Karnath, Monroe, WA, pro se.

Amanda M. Migchelbrink, Assistant Attorney General, AGWA — Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Washington state prisoner James Karnath appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an excessive force claim, and from its order striking as moot his motion to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. *Colwell v. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs.,*558 F.3d 1112, 1121 (9th Cir.2009). We review for abuse of discretion dismissal without leave to amend. *Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publ’g,*512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir.2008). We vacate and remand.

The district court correctly identified critical deficiencies in the operative complaint, and determined that the record showed that Karnath was no longer housed at the facility where the sole defendant — against whom Karnath sought only injunctive relief — worked. However, the district court abused its discretion when it rejected Karnath’s motion for leave to amend on the ground that it was moot. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); *see also Lucas v. Dep’t of Cow.,*66 F.3d 245, 248 (9th Cir.1995). The court did not discuss the fact that Karnath’s proposed second amended complaint added a claim for money damages, analyze whether amendment would have been futile, address Karnath’s allegations that he could not file his proposed second amended complaint earlier due to lack of access to his legal papers, point to any harm to defendant, or explain why the matter was moot. *See Lucas,*66 F.3d at 248. Thus, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

*115We grant Karnath’s request for judicial notice of pages omitted from his opening brief. Karnath’s remaining motions are denied as moot.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

June 17, 2019

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Tuesday, July 16, 2019

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. SunbeltRentals, Inc.,*Docket No. VA 2013-291. (Issues include whether the Judgeerred in ruling that a particular location in a preheat tower was a “workingplace” for purposes of an examination requirement.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel