alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

SHAWN BISHOP,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 409 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 10.36





AMENDMENT


This AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of June 25, 2002, to Promissory Note (the Note) dated October 1, 2001 by
Gregory Fischbach (Payor) and Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (Payee). The parties hereto hereby agree as follows:





1.    The first full paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payor hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the order of the Payee, the principal amount of ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
DOLLARS ($1,676,250) together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The Payor further agrees to pay interest on such principal amount at the rate Payee is charged from time to time by GMAC Commercial Credit LLC (the Bank Rate). All
amounts payable hereunder shall be payable to Payee in United States dollars at such bank account as shall be designated by the Payee in immediately available funds or as otherwise specified to Payor in writing. Payment on this note shall be applied
first to any expenses of collection, then to accrued interest, and thereafter to the outstanding principal balance hereof. The principal amount and accrued interest are due and payable on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2003 and (ii) to the extent of
the proceeds of any Warrant Share Sale (as defined below), the third business day following the date upon which Payor sells any or all of the Warrant Shares (a Warrant Share Sale).





2.    The principal amount and accrued interest due under the Note shall in any event be due and payable on August 31,
2003, and such due date shall not be extended under any circumstances.





3.    Except as
expressly amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the original terms thereof.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Note as of the day and year first above written.





ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.By:

/s/    GREGORY E. FISCHBACHTitle:    Chief Executive Officer





/s/    JAMES SCOROPOSKIJames Scoroposki
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Sidney W. Lassen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ Sidney W. LassenSidney W. Lassen Chief Executive Officer March 12, 2004
#### In re: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner.

No. 08-1441.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. March 31, 2008.

Filed: May 21, 2008.

*104Eliston F. George, Oakwood, VA, pro se.

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On March 21, 2007, George, a prisoner proceeding pro se, petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and improper jury instructions. On February 12, 2008, George petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the District Court to act upon his habeas corpus petition.

In the intervening time, on January 31, 2008, the District Court entered an order dismissing George’s habeas corpus petition. The District Court construed George’s petition as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissed it as a second or successive § 2255 motion filed without authorization from the Court of Appeals.

Because the District Court has now provided George the relief he sought in his mandamus petition to this Court, *ie.,*a ruling on his habeas corpus petition, we dismiss his mandamus petition as moot.
**Exhibit 31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Adam DeBard, certify that:
 
 1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Diversified Industries, Inc.;
 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 Date:December 17, 2004  By: /s/ Adam DeBard
 -------------------------------------
 
 Chief Operating Officer (Principal Accounting and
 Financial Officer)
Presidential Documents

66258 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / Presidential Documents

Executive Order 13241 of December 18, 2001

Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of

Agriculture

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, including Subchapter III of Chapter

33 of title 5 of the United States Code, it is hereby ordered that:

Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 3 of this Executive Order,

the officers named in section 2, in the order listed, shall act as and perform

the functions and duties of the office of Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary)

during any period when both the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary of

Agriculture (Deputy Secretary) have died, resigned, or are otherwise unable

to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary.

Sec. 2. Order of Succession.

(a) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services;

(b) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs;

(c) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Rural Development;

(d) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer

Services;

(e) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment;

(f) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Research, Education, and Economics;

(g) Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food Safety;

(h) General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture;

(i) Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Administration; and

(j) Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Congressional Relations.

Sec. 3. Exceptions.

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 2(a)–

(j) in an acting capacity shall act as Secretary pursuant to this Executive

Order.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Executive Order, the President

retains discretion, to the extent permitted by Subchapter III of Chapter

33 of title 5 of the United States Code, to depart from this Executive

Order in designating an acting Secretary.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / Presidential Documents 66259

Sec. 4. Executive Order 11957 of January 13, 1977, is hereby revoked.

Filed 12

[FR Doc. 01

–20–

–

01; 8:45 am]

31666

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 18, 2001.

W

Billing code 3195–01–P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 66270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31671]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 66270]]


                Executive Order 13246 of December 18, 2001

                
Providing an Order of Succession Within the 
                Department of the Treasury

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including Subchapter III of Chapter 33 of 
                title 5 of the United States Code, it is hereby ordered 
                that:

                Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 3 of 
                this Executive Order, the officers named in section 2, 
                in the order listed, shall act as and perform the 
                functions and duties of the office of Secretary of the 
                Treasury (Secretary) during any period when both the 
                Secretary and the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury 
                (Deputy Secretary) have died, resigned, or are 
                otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of 
                the office of Secretary.

                Sec. 2. Order of Succession.

                    (a) Under Secretaries of the Treasury (including 
                the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement), 
                in the order in which they shall have taken the oath of 
                office as such officers;
                    (b) General Counsel of the Department of the 
                Treasury; and
                    (c) Deputy Under Secretaries of the Treasury and 
                those Assistant Secretaries of the Treasury appointed 
                by the President by and with the consent of the Senate, 
                in the order in which they shall have taken the oath of 
                office as such officers.

                Sec. 3. Exceptions.

                    (a) No individual who is serving in an office 
                listed in section 2(a)-(c) in an acting capacity shall 
                act as Secretary pursuant to this Executive Order.
                    (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this 
                Executive Order, the President retains discretion, to 
                the extent

                 permitted by Subchapter III of Chapter 33 of title 5 
                of the United States Code, to depart from this 
                Executive Order in designating an acting Secretary.

                Sec. 4. Executive Order 11822 of December 10, 1974, is 
                hereby revoked.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                     December 18, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-31671
Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Continucare Corporation (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date:October 30, 2006 By: /s/ Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.       Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.  President and Chief Executive Officer
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2015 Justification              

#   FY2015 Justification

##           Downloads        

FY2015_Justification_0.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3720 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3720

To authorize appropriations for the national scenic byways program, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize appropriations for the national scenic byways program, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scenic Byways Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAYS PROGRAM.

    There are authorized to be appropriated out of the general fund of 
the Treasury, for the national scenic byways program under section 162 
of title 23, United States Code--
            (1) $55,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;
            (2) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;
            (3) $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;
            (4) $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; and
            (5) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.
                                 <all>
```
#### David Faustino REVOLORIO-MARROQUIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70993.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

Estela S. Richeda, Law Office of Estela S. Richeda, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

William Clark Minick, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Elizabeth Young, *107Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David Faustino Revolorio-Marroquin, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Revolorio-Marroquin contends gang members tried to extort payments from him and shot him on account of his religion. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Revolorio-Marroquin failed to establish gang members were motivated, even in part, by Revolorio-Marroquin’s religion. *See id.*(“[t]o reverse the BIA finding we must find that the evidence not only supports that conclusion, but *compels*it”) (emphasis in original); *see also Borja v. INS,*175 F.3d 732, 735-36 (explaining “extortion plus” is necessary to satisfy nexus requirement). Because he failed to demonstrate that the gang members were or would be interested in him on account of a protected ground, his asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



(a)

such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.







By:

/s/ Ralph Larry Lyons

Date:  March 31, 2005

Ralph Larry Lyons

President and Chief Executive Officer







By:

/s/ Charles F. Catlett, III

Date:  March 31, 2005

Charles F. Catlett, III

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer
78 A.3d 604

#### Jessica JOHNSON and John Johnson, Respondents v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania and David J. Moran, M.D., Petitioners.

No. 104 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 6, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Review and the Application for Relief are DENIED.