alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 6, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m., Thursday, February 19, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Big Ridge, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. LAKE 

2011-699-R, et al.; and Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Secretary of 

Labor, Docket Nos. SE 2011-477-R, et al. (Issues include whether

the Administrative Law Judges erred in upholding certain orders

issued pursuant to sections 103(j) and 103(k) of the Federal Mine 

Safety and Health Act of 1977.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, February 28, 2023

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 

20004 (enter from F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor on behalf of Otten v. Continental 

Cement Co., Docket No. CENT 2021-0013. (Issues include whether 

the Judge erred in concluding that the operator took an adverse 

employment action against the complainant in violation of sections 

105(c) and 103(f) of the Mine Act.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, 

must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 

29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 236-7472

Passcode: 678-100

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

Dated: February 17, 2023

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel

Billing Code 6735-01
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6820

RODERICK DENNIS FOLKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Commissioner of

Operations, South Carolina Department of Corrections; C. J. CEPAK, Warden, Broad River

Correctional Institution, South Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-594-2-20AJ)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Dennis Folks, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick

Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant claims that he was

denied due process when he was placed in maximum security following

a prison riot, and that his placement in maximum security constituted cruel and unusual punishment. We find that Appellant failed

to establish a liberty interest in remaining in the general population because he did not show that the conditions in maximum

security are atypical and significant in relation to the ordinary

incidents of prison life. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484-

86 (1995); Beverati v. Smith, 120 F.3d 500, 504 (4th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, he was not entitled to a hearing or other process

prior to his placement in maximum security. Furthermore, Appellant's second claim fails because the mere fact of segregated

confinement, without more, does not amount to cruel and unusual

punishment. See Sweet v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, 529

F.2d 854, 861 (4th Cir. 1975). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2014-0633.

#### State v. Steinfurth.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for -writ of habeas corpus of Angela Steinfurth. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2659-011 Oregon]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Powerdale Hydroelectric Project, located on the Hood River in Hood River County, Oregon, and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project. There are no federal lands within the project boundaries although a portion of the project is located in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area.

The FEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

                    A copy of the FEA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The FEA may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link—select “Docket #” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

For further information, contact Bob Easton at (202) 219-2782.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-32187 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

KAREN PAIGE,1

 

Petitioner Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

MICHAEL MCDONALD, 

Respondent Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ 

§ Nos. 391, 2020 and 392, 2020 

§ Consolidated

§ 

§ Court Below–Family Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ File No. CN16-04806 

§ Petition No. 17-31463 

§

Submitted: January 13, 2021 

 Decided: January 29, 2021 

ORDER 

On December 28, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by 

certified mail, directing the appellant, Karen Paige, to show cause why her appeal 

should not be dismissed for her failure to respond to the Senior Court Clerk’s 

December 3, 2020 letter directing her to pay the Court’s filing fee. Paige signed the 

certified mail receipt on January 2, 2021. A timely response to the notice to show 

cause was due on or before January 12, 2021. To date, Paige has not responded to 

the notice to show cause, nor has she paid the filing fee. Dismissal of the appeal is 

therefore deemed to be unopposed. 

1

 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). 
2 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T APRI L 27, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [P UB L I SH]

IN THE UNITE D STATE S COURT OF AP P EALS
F OR THE E LEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10802 (D.C. Docke t No. 07-00282-CR-CG)

UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,
versus MATTHEW MASON DODG E, a.k.a. f low_matt, Def endant- Appellant.

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- On Appea l from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alaba ma

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- (Opinion J anuar

y 14, 2009, 554 F.3r d 1357, 11 Cir. 2009) t h (April 27, 2009)

Be fore EDMONDSON, Chief J udg e, TJ OFL AT, BI RC H, DUB I

NA, BL ACK, CARNES, BA RKETT, HUL L , MARCUS, W I L SON and PRYOR, Circuit J udg es.

B Y T H E C O U R T : A m ember of t his Court in active se rvice having reque sted a poll on whether this case should be rehea rd by the Court sitti ng en banc, and a majority of the judge s in this Court in active service having voted in favor of g ranting

a re hear ing e n banc,
I T I S ORDERED t hat t he above cause shall be rehea rd by t h is court en banc. The previous panel' s opinion is hereby VACATED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Shareholders and Board of Directors 

SizelerProperty Investors, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-107043 and No. 333-103380) on Form S-3, and (No. 333-16073, No. 333-85212, and No. 333-99541) on Form S-8 of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. of our reports dated February 24, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,and all related financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

February 24, 2005
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Reports & Budget Submissions 
-  Budget and Annual Performance Reports 
-                   FY2022  Justification               

#   FY2022  Justification 

##           Downloads        

FMSHRC FY 2022 Congressional Budget Justification.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ L. Paul Latham                                         |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| L. Paul Latham                                             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                      |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing General Partner of                                |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                       |
| August 13, 2010                                            |
|                                                       |
|                                                       |
| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                           |
| Mel G. Riggs                                               |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of              |
| Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                             |
| Managing General Partner of                                |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                       |
| August 13, 2010                                            |
2014-0600.

#### State v. Devore.

Richland App. No. 13CA109. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul D. Carrico, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ PAUL D. CARRICO Paul D. Carrico President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


August 16,
2010

---



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Georgia Gulf Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory C. Thompson, certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ GREGORY C. THOMPSON Gregory C. Thompson Chief Financial Officer


August 16,
2010

---



QuickLinks
#### The State ex rel. Roberts, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.,*139 Ohio St.3d 185, 2014-Ohio-2112.]

*186(No. 2013-0349

Submitted April 29, 2014

Decided May 21, 2014.)

Agee, Clymer, Mitchell & Laret and Robert M. Robinson, for appellant.

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Latawanda N. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court of appeals.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, D. Keith LaVanway, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, certify
that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials Incorporated;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayD. Keith LaVanwayVice President  Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.10    
    


TC ACQUISITION CORP.  


                        ,
2006 


Law
Offices of Tyler R. Meade

1816 Fifth Street

Berkeley, California 94710 


Gentlemen:



        This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial public offering ("IPO") of the securities
of TC Acquisition Corp. ("TCAC") and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by TCAC of a "Business Combination" or TCAC's liquidation (as described in TCAC's IPO prospectus; such date the
"Termination Date"), Law Offices of Tyler R. Meade shall make available to TCAC certain office, administrative support and secretarial services as may be required by TCAC from time to time, situated
at 1816 Fifth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710. In exchange therefore, TCAC shall pay Law Offices of Tyler R. Meade the sum of $7,500.00 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date. 



	Very truly yours,
	

TC ACQUISITION CORP.
	

By:	
 	

 
	 	 	

	 	 	Name: Robert J. Majteles

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
	

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	

LAW OFFICES OF TYLER R. MEADE
	

By:	
 	

 
	 	 	
 Name:

Title:













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.10