FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT SEPT 18, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 15029 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 7 - 6 0 9 3 2 - CV - W PD C H A R L E S M O G F O R D , P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s D E P A R T M E N T O F C O R R E C T I O N S , W a lte rA . M c N e il, S e c r e ta ry , A T T O RN E Y G E N E R A L O F T H E S T A T E O F F L O R I D A , B ill M c C o llu m , R e s p o n d e n ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 18, 2008) B efo re M A R C U S , W IL S O N an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es.2

P E R C U R I A M: C ha r l e s M ogf

or d, aF l or i dapr i s one r , appe a l s the di s m i s s a l of hi s pe t i t i on f

or aw r it o f h ab e a s c o rp u s a s b a rr e d b y th e o n e y e a rs ta tu te o f lim ita tio n . 2 8 U .S .C . § 2254; A nt i t e rr or i s m a nd E f f e c t i ve D e a th P e na l ty A c tof 1996, P ub. L . N o. 104- 1 3 2 , 1 1 0 S ta t. 1 2 1 4 . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt g r a n te d ac e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility to a ddr e s s “ w he the r[ M ogf or d’ s ] m ot i on t o m i t i ga t e unde r3. 800( c ) of the F l or i da R u le s o f C r im in a l P r o c e d u r e to lle d th e o n e y e a rs ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s f

o rh is pet i t i on of w ri tof habeas corpus un der 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4, and i f s o, w hether an o ra l order denyi ng the m ot i on w as no tsuff i ci entt o re- st artthe peri od of l i m i t at i on s. ” W e a f f i rm. W e r e vi e w de novo the di s m i s s a l of ape t i t i on a s ba rr e d by the s t a tut e of l i m i t at i on . S t ee d v . H ea d, 21 9 F . 3d 12 98 , 13 00 (11th C i r. 20 00 ). T he A ct pr ovi de s aone y e a rs t a tut e of l i m i t a t i on tha tbe gi ns t o run a f t e rthe l a t e s tof

f our event s, w hi ch i ncl ud es “ the dat e on w hi ch the j ud gm entbeca m e f i nal . . . . ” 28 U . S . C . § 2244( d) ( 1) . T ha tpe r i od c a n be t ol l e d f or“ [ t ] he t i m e dur i ng w hi c h a p r o p e r ly f

ile d ap p lic a tio n f

o rS ta te p o s t- c o n v ic tio n o ro th e rc o lla te r a l r e v ie w is pe ndi ng. ” I d. § 2244( d) ( 2) . T o qua l i f y a s a n “ appl i c a t i on f

orS t a t e pos t - c onvi c t i on orothe rc ol l a t e r a l r e vi e w , ” apl e a di ng m us ta c tua l l y s e e k “ r e vi e w ” by m a ki ng a good f a i th r e que s tf

orl e ga l r e l i e f

f r om the c ourt . S i bl e y v. C ul l i ve r , 377 F . 3d3

1 1 9 6 , 1 2 0 0

– 0 1 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . M ogf or d’ s a r gum e nttha thi s pos t - c onvi c t i on m ot i on t ol l e d the s t a tut e of l i m i t at i on i s f

orec l osed by ou r pre ce dent . M og ford m ov ed t o reduce hi s s ent ence base d o n ass i st ance he prov i ded t o the go vernm ent , hi s l ac k o f avi ol entcr i m i nal r e c o r d , a n d “ s e n t e n c e ma n i p u l a t i o n ” b y th e p r o s e c u t o r . Se e Fl a . R. Cr i m. P. 3 .8 0 0 ( c ) . M o g f

o r d ’s m o tio n , w h ic h w a s ap le af o rle n ie n c y a n d w a s n o t a chal l enge t o the l egal i ty of hi s s ent ence , di d n ott ol l the l i m i t at i on peri od . S ee A l e xa nde rv. S e c ’ y , D e p’ tof C orr . , 523 F . 3d 1291, 1297 ( 11th C i r . 2008) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtc orr e c t l y c onc l ude d tha tM ogf or d’ s pe t i t i on i s t i m e - ba rr e d. AF F I RME D.