alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**§ 302 CERTIFICATION**
               I, Steven L. Brink, certify that:
               1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quiksilver, Inc.;
               2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
               3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
               4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
               5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: January 11, 2005 /s/ Steven L. Brink   Steven L. Brink   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lawrence
Insurance Group Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of and for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000805266
<NAME> LAWRENCE INSURANCE GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             9,682
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         942
<MORTGAGE>                                         154
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    2,581
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  16,341
<CASH>                                             943
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,695
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              64
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,701
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 26,441
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                719
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,941)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,701
<PREMIUMS>                                       3,571
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,648
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (12,673)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       8,249
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          8
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             1,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (133)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,097)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  25,931
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              2,328
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                5,921
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,591
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 9,318
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 22,550
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          5,921
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MOHAMAD EL ZEIN , Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006

- HE3, MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- HE3 , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1173

[ February 4, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 17

- 23115 (11)

.

Richard G. Chosid of the Law Offices of Richard G. Chosid , Boca Raton, for appellant.

Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , M AY and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### James W. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HITACHI, LTD., Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc., and Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V., Defendant-Appellees.

No. 2010-1229.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 13, 2010.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 15, 2011.

Michael F. Heafey, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were G. Hopkins Guy III, Eric L. Wesenberg and Jacob M. Heath.

Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Jeffrey G. Homrig. *503Of counsel on the brief was Andrew E. Monach, Morris & Foerster, LLP, of San Francisco, CA.

LINN, CLEVENGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                          470
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                470
<PP&E>                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             0
<BONDS>                           0
<COMMON>                        651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                    (1795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    470
<SALES>                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  0
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               0
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                      0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3558 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3558

  To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington National 
Cemetery a monument honoring Army Security Agency veterans of World War 
 II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

 Ms. Adams (for herself and Mr. Pappas) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington National 
Cemetery a monument honoring Army Security Agency veterans of World War 
 II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Security Agency Monument Act''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF MONUMENT HONORING VETERANS OF THE ARMY SECURITY 
              AGENCY WHO SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES BETWEEN 1945 AND 
              1976, DURING WORLD WAR II, THE KOREAN CONFLICT, AND THE 
              VIETNAM ERA.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the requirements of subsection (c), the 
Secretary of the Army shall place in Arlington National Cemetery a 
monument honoring Army Security Agency veterans who served in the Armed 
Forces between 1945 and 1976, during World War II, the Korean conflict, 
and the Vietnam era.
    (b) Design.--The monument placed under subsection (a) shall be 
based on a design approved by the Secretary of the Army and the 
National Army Security Agency Association.
    (c) Agreement for Construction and Maintenance.--The Secretary of 
the Army may only place a monument under subsection (a) if the 
Secretary enters into an agreement with the National Army Security 
Agency Association under which the Association agrees to pay all costs 
necessary for preparation of the site for the monument and to 
construct, install, and maintain the monument, and to such other 
provisions as the Secretary may require.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``World War II'', 
``Korean conflict'', and ``Vietnam era'' have the meanings given such 
terms in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-29-000]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Complaint

February 2, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 23, 2001, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company (PG&E) filed a Complaint against the California Power Exchange 
Corporation (PX). The Complaint requests that the Commission 
immediately: (1) Order an accounting of recent invoices sent by the PX 
to PG&E and (2) stay any attempted liquidation of PG&E's Block Forward 
Market positions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before February 12, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. 
Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before February 12, 
2001. Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3261 Filed 2-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|   | 1. | 25%      of the Performance Bonus will be based on the annual return on adjusted      equity of the Company (the “ROAEComponent”); |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | 25%      of the Performance Bonus will be based on the achievement of qualitative      objectives for the calendar year as determined by the Compensation      Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Qualitative Component”);      and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | 50%      of the Performance Bonus will be based on capital raising activities of      the Company for the calendar year as determined by the Compensation      Committee (the “Capital RaiseComponent”). |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|                                       |   |   | Reference      Rate |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| ROAE      less than 6%                     |   |   | 0%                  |   |
| ROAE      6% or greater and less than 8%   |   |   | 25%                 |   |
| ROAE      8% or greater and less than 10%  |   |   | 50%                 |   |
| ROAE      10% or greater and less than 12% |   |   | 75%                 |   |
| ROAE      12% or greater                   |   |   | 100%                |   |

----

|   |
|--------|

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3203

___________

Prasith Long, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Immigration

* and Naturalization Service.

John Ashcroft, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: August 29, 2003

 Filed: September 3, 2003

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a Lao citizen, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial of his

application for asylum and withholding of removal. He argues that the BIA erred in

denying his application because the BIA “blurred” his statutory basis for asylum,

inadequately addressed whether he suffered past persecution, and relied exclusively

on the State Department’s country report to distort the political situation in Laos.

After careful review of the record, we deny the petition. See Navarijo-Barrios v.

Ashcroft, 322 F.3d 561, 562 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review).
-2-

Even assuming petitioner established past persecution, his testimony, along

with the State Department’s country report, support the BIA’s conclusion that he

lacks a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Francois v. INS, 283 F.3d 926,

930-31 (8th Cir. 2002). He was not harassed during the nine years before he left

Laos, his wife was not bothered after he left, and there is no indication that his two

daughters who remain in Laos have been harmed. In addition, petitioner and his wife

were issued passports and were permitted to leave the country, see id. at 932;

Manivong v. Dist. Dir., U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 164 F.3d 432, 433 (8th Cir. 1999), and

the country report indicates that conditions in Laos have improved, exit visas and

passports are generally easy to obtain, the government does not interfere with

emigration, and former citizens who fled the regime have been welcomed back, see

Perinpanathan v. INS, 310 F.3d 594, 599 n.1 (8th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                       628
<INVENTORY>                                      9,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,509
<PP&E>                                           1,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                     769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,463
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,821
<SALES>                                          7,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,685
<CGS>                                            4,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    856
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       712
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed Cooperative Research & Development Agreement (CRADA) Negotiations. 

# SUMMARY:

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with OptiQuest Technologies, LLC to develop a water quality model and automated systems for quality control and visualization.

*Inquiries:*                         If any other parties are interested in similar activities with the USGS, please contact: Paul A. Conrads, USGS South Carolina District, Stephenson Center Suite, 129 720 Gracern Road, Columbia, SC 29210 phone: (803) 750-6140.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is submitted to meet the USGS policy requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

Dated: December 7, 2001.

Robert M. Hirsch,

Associate Director for Water.

[FR Doc. 01-32065 Filed 12-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Holding Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: June 29, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo    
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Anthony M. Sanfilippo        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00690

- CV

Thomas ROSAS , Jaime Rosas, and all Occupants,

Appellants

v.

21ST MORTGAGE C ORPORATION

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CV

- 00771

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is

ORDERED that costs shall be assessed against a ppellant.

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam , Justice