alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, Charles C. Best, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interlink Electronics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000803095
<NAME>                         DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1986-X

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             12,805
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      20,962
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   33,767
<PP&E>                          9,216,416
<DEPRECIATION>                  9,154,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    117,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              22,905
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                         76,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      117,693
<SALES>                            85,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   86,566
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      93,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (6,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (6,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (6,619)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (3.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                QUIKSILVER, INC.

            WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                    ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF REGULATION S-K

            Each director who is not an employee of Quiksilver, Inc. receives an
annual retainer of $20,000, unless they are chairman of a committee of the Board
of Directors, in which case they receive an annual retainer of $25,000. In
addition, non-employee directors receive an attendance fee of $2,000 for each
meeting of the Board of Directors and each meeting of a committee of the Board
of Directors personally attended. Non-employee directors receive $1,000 for each
meeting of the Board and committee of the Board attended telephonically. Under
the terms of the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, non-employee directors receive an
automatic grant of options to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company's common
stock, vesting over three years, upon first becoming a director and an automatic
annual grant of options to purchase 10,000 shares, vesting immediately, on the
date of each annual stockholders meeting thereafter following which they will
continue to serve as a non-employee director. The options have an exercise price
equal to fair market value on the date of grant and a maximum term of ten years.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS


 


On October 5, 2007, the
Company’s Board of Directors approved amendments to the level of compensation
for serving as a non-employee Director (“Outside Director”). These amendments
were made retroactive to June 1, 2007, the beginning of the Company’s current
fiscal year.


 


For serving as a director
of the Company, each Outside Director is paid a $1,500 fee for each Board
meeting attended in person or by telephone and monthly compensation of $500 if
he also serves on any Board committee or $1,000 if he does not serve on any
committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives $3,500 for each Audit
Committee meeting attended in person or by telephone, and other members of the
Audit Committee receive $2,500. Members of the Nominating Committee receive a
$500 fee and members of the Compensation Committee receive a $1,000 fee for
each committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. The Company also
reimburses travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection with attending
meetings of the Board and its committees.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60840 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GUS ALLEN, JR., also known as Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-91-ALL-B-N

-------------------- October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The district court permitted Gus Allen, Jr., to file this out-of-time appeal from his 1995 conviction and sentence, after a jury trial, for distribution of cocaine base (in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). For the first time on appeal, Allen contends that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines’ enhanced penalty provisions for cocaine base because the Government allegedly failed to prove by a preponderance of theNo. 97-60840 -2- evidence that the substance involved was “crack” cocaine. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c), note (D) (definition of “cocaine base” means “crack”). Because trial testimony by both a confidential informant and an undercover drug-enforcement agent showed that the substance involved was “crack” cocaine, the evidence was more than sufficient to warrant enhanced sentencing. See United States v. Canada , 110 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir. 1997) (Government must prove sentencing factors by a preponderance of the evidence). Accordingly, Allen’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30712

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGER DALE ABRAHAM,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-60054

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Roger Dale Abraham appeals his sentence following conviction

for six counts of mail fraud. Abraham contends that the district

court erred in sentencing him by failing to depart downward, by

finding that he committed an "intended loss," and, in the

alternative, by miscalculating the amount of "intended loss" in

determining his base offense level. Insofar as Abraham is

arguing that the district court should have applied U.S.S.G.

§ 2F1.1, comment. (n.10) by departing downward, this court has no

jurisdiction. See United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477

(5th Cir. 1995). 
No. 95-30712

-2-

The district court did not clearly err in determining the

"intended loss" to be the face value of the fraudulent money

orders. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1997 and the Statement
of Income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         168,236
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,236
<PP&E>                                      27,798,675
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,859,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,097,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,960,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,097,426
<SALES>                                      2,977,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,977,773
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,900,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             385,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,180,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,180,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,180,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.300
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.300
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Pocahontas Coal Company, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Pocahontas Coal Company, LLC

Pocahontas WEVA 2014-395-R Meeting Notice 7-13-17.pdf

Pocahontas WEVA 2014-395-R Meeting Notice 7-13-17.htm

secretary-labor-v.pocahontas-coal-llc-docket-weva2014-395-r-etal.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Charles C. Best    
|Charles C. Best        
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 14, 2007
exv4w4



 





EXHIBIT 4.4





 









 








FORM OF GUARANTEE




          The undersigned and its successors under the Indenture has irrevocably and unconditionally
guaranteed, on a senior secured basis to the extent set forth in the Indenture, dated as of August
23, 2006, by and among Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), the Guarantors and
Bank of New York, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (the “Indenture”), (i) the due and
punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes, whether at
maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on the
overdue principal of (including interest accruing at the then applicable rate provided in the
Indenture, the Notes, the Guarantees or any Collateral Agreement after the occurrence of any Event
of Default set forth in Section 6.01(6) or (7) of the Indenture, whether or not a
claim for post-filing or post-petition interest is allowed under applicable law following the
institution of a proceeding under bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law) and interest on the Notes,
to the extent lawful, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company
to the Holders or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms set forth in Article Ten of the
Indenture and (ii) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of
such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in
accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration
or otherwise. Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture
unless otherwise indicated.




          THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNDERSIGNED TO HOLDERS OF THE NOTES AND TO THE TRUSTEE PURSUANT TO THIS
NOTATION OF GUARANTEE (THE “GUARANTEE”) AND THE INDENTURE ARE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN ARTICLE TEN OF
THE INDENTURE AND REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE INDENTURE FOR THE PRECISE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE
AND ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE TO WHICH THE GUARANTEE RELATES. EACH HOLDER OF A NOTE, BY
ACCEPTING THE SAME, (A) AGREES TO AND SHALL BE BOUND BY SUCH PROVISIONS AND (B) APPOINTS THE
TRUSTEE ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR SUCH HOLDER FOR SUCH PURPOSES.




          This Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New
York.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	[NAME OF GUARANTOR] 

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 



A-11
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

April 27, 2018

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 9, 2018

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. TheAmerican Coal Company,*Docket No. LAKE 2011-13 (Issues include whether theJudge erred by applying an incorrect legal standard in denying the Secretary’smotion to approve settlement.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT:                                    1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,504
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       400
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,504)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Lithium Technology Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Franz J. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 11, 2005