alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 4973

- 16T4

STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. LLOYD N. RIDDICK, a/k/a TIGUE LLOYD RIDDICK,
Defendant

- Respondent.

__________________________

Argued November 9, 2018

– Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment No. 17

- 04

- 0560.
Justin M. Blasi, Special Deputy Attorney General/ Acting Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Dennis Calo, Actin g Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Justin M. Blasi, of counsel and on the brief). James K. Smith, Jr., Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; James K. Smith, Jr., Susan

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

November 19, 20182 A

- 4973

- 16T4 C. Green and Michele Friedman, Assistant Deputy Public Defenders, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
D efendant Lloyd N. Riddick pled guilty under N.J.S.A. 2C:40

- 26(b) to fourth degree operating a motor vehicle during a period of license suspension by operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended for a second or subsequent violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4

- 5 0. On July 24, 2017, t he trial court sentenced defendant to 180 days in the county jail under N.J.S.A. 2C:40

- 26(c), suspended the sentence , and imposed a one

- ye ar noncustodial probationary term. On appeal, the State contends the suspended custodial sentence is an illegal sen tence requiring reversal. Although we agree the sentence was illegal, we are nonetheless constrained to dismiss this appeal.
T he State c an move to correct an illegal sentence at any time. State v. Shepard , 125 N.J. Super. 332, 336 (App. Div. 1973) . However, the sentence
must be corrected before it has been completed. State v. Murray , 162 N.J. 240, 247 (1998)

. The court may stay a proba tionary sentence "on appropriate terms if an appeal is filed." R. 2:9

- 3(c). If the State fails to move for a stay pending appeal and the sentence has already been completed, double jeopardy principles
will bar a sentence increase. See State v.Farr , 183 N.J. Super. 463, 470

- 72 (App. Div. 1982). Once the period of probation or sentence suspension is over, the3 A

- 4973

- 16T4

sentence is complete. See N.J.S.A. 2C:45

- 2(c). The court cannot enlarge the punishment after the sentence imposed has been satisfied and the defen dant discharged. State v. Schubert , 212 N.J. 295, 309 (2012 ). Notably, the State did
not addressed this issue. The State did not request a stay of sentence, and defendant has completed his probationary term. The sentence cannot be corrected. Accordingl y, this appeal must be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 24, 2014*

[Cite as *07/24/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3216.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2011-0538.

#### State v. Davis.

Butler App. No. CA2009-10-263, 2011-Ohio-787. This cause came for further consideration upon appellant’s filing of a motion for stay of execution of death sentence scheduled for August 17, 2016.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution of death sentence pending disposition of available state remedies, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. It is further ordered that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state posteonvietion proceedings, including any appeals.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 6, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00426

- CV

Michael J. DeLitta; Axiom Medical Consulting, LLC; Axiom Professionals, LLC; Axiom Properties, LLC; and DelCom Properties, LLC, Appellant s

v.

N ancy Schaefer, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on June 1 9, 2014

. Having

reviewed the record , it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of ju risdiction. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### YONG LIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1449.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 1, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 13, 2010.

*784Yong Lin, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ada Elsie Bosque, Theo Nickerson, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yong Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to remand and dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Lin’s motions. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(a), 1003.23(b)(1) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Lin*(B.I.A. Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
100 A.3d 191

#### IN THE MATTER OF T.T. VAN DAM, A/K/A T. THOMAS VAN DAM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003051973).

October 23, 2014.

ORDER

T.T. VAN DAM, a/k/a, T. THOMAS VAN DAM, of WEST-WOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that T.T. VAN DAM, a/k/a T. THOMAS VAN DAM, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by T.T. VAN DAM, a/k/a T. THOMAS VAN DAM, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *6expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000804138
<NAME> ASSET INVESTORS CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2542
<PP&E>                                          115993
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  159093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3401
<BONDS>                                          56604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       83802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    159093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2406
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2406
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Information Analysis Incorporated                     2002 Report on Form 10-KSB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Form SB-2 No.
333-95775 dated September 4, 2000 and Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
33-26249 and No. 33-305136) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option Plan and 1996
Stock Option Plan of Information Analysis Incorporated and in the related
prospectus' of our report dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Information Analysis Incorporated included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001.

                                                /s/ Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered

Bethesda, Maryland
April 4, 2003
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-10926 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Deaunte Johunkin, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-528-1

______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represen t Deaunte Johunkin has moved for leave to withdraw and has file d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johunkin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflecte d therein. We concur with counsel’s

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10926 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2024No. 23-10926

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-10926 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2024
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 16
March 27, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for Forum Retirement Partners, L.P.
and, under the date of February 9, 1996, except as to note 7, which is as of
March 25, 1996, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Forum
Retirement Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1994. We have read Forum Retirement Partners, L.P.'s
statements included under Item 9 of its Form 10-K dated March 31, 1997, and we
agree with such statements.

Very truly yours,



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
-------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



                                     E-16
# WORK ZONE SAFETY PRESS RELEASE: PENNSYLVANIA 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: [Date]**

**CONTACT: [Name, Phone Number, E-Mail]**

**[Organization] Supports the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Work Zone Safety Outreach Campaign in Pennsylvania****

**[City, State]** – **[Organization]** announced today it is joining efforts to help reduce large truck crashes in works zones by supporting a state-wide work zone safety outreach campaign led by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). **[Organization]** calls on all drivers to “share work zones safely” by staying alert, obeying traffic signs and allowing all vehicles extra space while driving through Pennsylvania’s many active work zones.

“We are pleased to be a part of an effort to remind not only CMV drivers, but all those on Pennsylvania’ roadways to slow down and pay attention when driving through work zones,” said **[spokesperson].** “There is a clear need to raise awareness on work zone safety. We’re proud of the great state of Pennsylvania for many reasons–but we still need everyone to do their part to prevent roadway crashes.” 

According to the National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse, in 2021 34% of work zone fatalities involved a CMV driver These are just a few statistics showing the importance of work zone safety outreach efforts in Pennsylvania, for the collective effort to reduce work zone crashes and save lives. 

For more information on work zone safety, visit the campaign website.

**###**

[INSERT BOILERPLATE]

# image1.png
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Battelle, Unions Reach Tentative Agreement with Mediator Assistance - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"A3q8j4nv5x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/battelle-unions-reach-tentative-agreement-with-mediator-assistance\/\">Battelle, Unions Reach Tentative Agreement with Mediator Assistance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/battelle-unions-reach-tentative-agreement-with-mediator-assistance\/embed\/#?secret=A3q8j4nv5x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Battelle, Unions Reach Tentative Agreement with Mediator Assistance” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"A3q8j4nv5x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"fmcs mediator, federal mediator, tentative agreement"}
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ENOVSYS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC,

Defendants-Cross-Appellants

______________________ 

2016-1691, 2016-1767

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-05210-SS, 

Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & 

Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiffappellant.

MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by 

BRYANT C. BOREN, JR., ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Palo Alto, 

CA; TIMOTHY S. DURST, BRIAN DOUGLAS JOHNSTON, Dallas, TX. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jean-Marc Stiegemeier, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Farmstead
Telephone Group, Inc. ("registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  April 6, 2005

/s/ Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
-------------------------
Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

THOMAS A. DEHAYS

, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1981

[November 16, 2017 ]

Administrative appeal from Florida Atlantic University Residency

Appeals Committee.

Thomas A. DeHays, Boca Raton, pro se.

Daniel A. Jones, Office of the General Counsel, Florida Atlantic

University, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Continucare Corporation (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 7, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | RICHARD C. PFENNIGER, JR.            
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer