alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   The Commission Proposes Changes to its FOIA Rules              

#   The Commission Proposes Changes to its FOIA Rules

The Commission is proposing revisions to its rules implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in light of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, its experience under the rules, the need to update its fee schedule, and the need to update and clarify a number of its FOIA procedures. These proposed changes ensure rapid and effective procedures for requesting information and processing requests under the FOIA.

Proposed FOIA Rules

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40210 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JUAN CARLOS LUNA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 1056

- 2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and GRAVES , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Luna has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna h a s not filed
a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 14, 2013
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40210 Document: 00512441656 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2013
#### Tremon L. DOCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert STEVENSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-7303.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 28, 2016.

Decided: Feb. 4, 2016.

Tremon L. Doctor, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline M. Scrantom, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tremon L. Doctor seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Doctor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense-with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        (10,795)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     93,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,801
<PP&E>                                         142,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 428,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          597,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,106
<OTHER-SE>                                    (171,480)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   428,978
<SALES>                                         84,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,146
<CGS>                                           32,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               209,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (157,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (157,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (157,498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         934,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,669,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,603,726
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,603,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,059,021
<BONDS>                                         61,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     483,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,603,726
<SALES>                                      1,040,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,375,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               362,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,009,029
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,009,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,009,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>  1                                                          Exhibit 32.1


        Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                         of USA Real Estate Investment Trust


       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of USA Real Estate Invest-
ment Trust (the "Trust"), hereby certifies that:

  (i)  the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust for the year
   ended December 31, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
   of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



                                        /s/ Gregory E. Crissman
                                         Gregory E. Crissman
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
106 A.3d 1236

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID WARREN DENENBERG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 047751988).

February 9, 2015.

ORDER

DAVID WARREN DENENBERG of GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, having pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to an Information charging respondent with eight counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.*§ 1341, § 1342 and § 3551, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-13(b)(l), DAVID WARREN DENENBERG is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID WARREN DENENBERG be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID WARREN DENENBERG comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this state.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   United Steelworkers, Local No. 5114, on behalf of Miners v. Hecla Limited              

#   United Steelworkers, Local No. 5114, on behalf of Miners v. Hecla Limited

Hecla WEST 2012-466-CM Argument Notice 11-18-15.pdf

Hecla WEST 2012-466-CM Argument Notice 11-18-15.htm

United Steelworkers Local5114, on behalf of Miners v Hecla Limited, Docket WEST 2012-466-CM, 11-18-15.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Income L.P. (the "Registrant")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Paul
Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman Resources Corporation, a
general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/ Richard Paul Richman
-------------------------------------------
Richard Paul Richman
Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman
Resources Corporation, a general partner of
the Registrant
April 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-44429, 333-85565, 333-77201, 333-43542, 333-47502, 333-48640, 333-64182,
333-104266, 333-118271, and 333-118272 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos.
333-55526, 333-46970 and 333-50458 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos.
333-106391 and 333-63891 on Form S-3/A of our reports dated April 1, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Comverse Technology, Inc.,
and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Comverse Technology,
Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2005.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jericho, New York
April 1, 2005
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

November 1, 2006 

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 15, 2006 

PLACE:	 U.S. Department of Labor Main Auditorium, Francis Perkins 

Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc., Docket No. SE 2005-51. (Issues 

include whether substantial evidence, including inferences drawn 

from the record, supports the conclusion of the Administrative Law 

Judge that the operator violated 30 C.F.R. 75.1725(c) when a miner 

allegedly performed maintenance work on a conveyor belt without 

cutting off the power and blocking the belt against motion; whether 

the judge correctly concluded that the violation was significant and 

substantial; and whether the judge properly assessed the penalty 

against the operator.) 

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             457                     637
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,976                  14,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                       512                     683
<INVENTORY>                                     13,348                  25,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,027                  41,670
<PP&E>                                          33,827                  35,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,819                  25,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,994                  52,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,397                  22,037
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           377                     377
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,117                   6,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,994                  52,247
<SALES>                                         89,753                  91,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,753                  91,706
<CGS>                                           59,706                  66,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,478                  89,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,273                   1,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,893                   3,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,109                  (3,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                     829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,109                  (3,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,109                  (3,995)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56                   (1.11)


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3503 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reimburse eligible persons 

harmed by certain policies of the Department of Homeland Security, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Ms. HERRELL (for herself, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. 

WEBER of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reimburse 

eligible persons harmed by certain policies of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repaying the Rural 

5 Borderlands Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3503 IH

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 

2 HOMELAND SECURITY POLICIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu4 rity shall make payments to eligible persons to reimburse 

5 such persons for— 

6 (1) damage to real or personal property caused 

7 by aliens entering the United States along the south8 ern border, including harm to livestock, destruction 

9 of fences, destruction of crops, damage to buildings, 

10 damage to infrastructure, such as an irrigation pipe, 

11 and environmental damage; or 

12 (2) in the case of a unit of local government, 

13 the provision of care to aliens entering the United 

14 States along the southern border. 

15 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

16 (1) The term ‘‘eligible person’’ means an indi17 vidual, an entity, a unit of local government, or a 

18 State. 

19 (2) The term ‘‘provision of care’’ includes the 

20 provision of housing, transportation, health care, 

21 school, and food. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS