alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00337-CR

DAMEON LAWS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 82nd District Court

Robertson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-03-18640-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Dameon Laws was apparently convicted of aggravated assault approximately 10 

years ago and remains in prison. In his notice of appeal filed on September 25, 2019, Laws 

contends the trial court issued an order on September 10, 20191 which Laws wants to 

1 Although also labeled by Laws with the word, “CORRECTION” at the top and bottom of the document, 

we have determined this to be a new notice of appeal to an order purportedly signed on September 10, 

2019. A previous notice of appeal to an order purportedly signed on August 26, 2019, was docketed by this 

Court’s Clerk as 10-19-00305-CR. That appeal is being addressed in a separate opinion.
Laws v. State Page 2

appeal. We have nothing to indicate the trial court issued any order on that specific date.

In a document attached to the notice of appeal, Laws seeks to consolidate this 

appeal with an appeal he filed at the same time from a conviction in another county. 

Laws asserts that he is striving to be a good citizen while in prison, is going to school to 

receive a degree from Lee College while in prison, was on the A & B honor roll, was on 

the Dean's List for the Summer of 2019, and has worked in the prison system in the 

kitchen since 2013. As relief, he asks this Court to reduce his sentence to time served and 

reduce court cost and attorney’s fees to a reasonable amount.2

Again, we applaud Laws for taking the opportunity to better himself while in 

prison. However, we have no jurisdiction to grant any type of post-conviction relief. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (listing the courts which have jurisdiction of postconviction relief; appellate courts not included). Thus, we have no jurisdiction to grant 

the relief Laws requests.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and all motions which have been filed herein 

are dismissed as moot.

A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this 

Court is rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If Laws desires to have the decision of this 

Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed 

2 From the document filed with this Court, it appears that some of the cost or attorney’s fees may have been 

ordered to be repaid as restitution.
Laws v. State Page 3

with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court's 

judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by 

this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Motions dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 25, 2019

Do not publish 

[CR25]
|   |                                                                                                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                  |

| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           |

|                        |                                                                                    |                |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                        |                                                                                    |
|                        |                                                                                    |                |
| Date: October 15, 2014 | By:                                                                           | /s/ Melvin Gagerman |
|                        |                                                                                    |
|                        | Melvin GagermanChief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the September 30, 1998 Form 10-Q of Aircraft  Income Partners L.P.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      21,934,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,555,449
<PP&E>                                      19,852,562
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,389,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,018,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,619,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,398,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,018,127
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,422,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  891,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,048,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,482,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,482,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,482,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-58982)  pertaining to the 1992 Option Plan of TENERA,  Inc., as
amended, and the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-77413)  pertaining to
the 1993 Outside Director  Compensation and Option Plan, Amended and Restated as
of March 1, 1998, of TENERA,  Inc.,  of our report dated January 19, 2001,  with
respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of TENERA, Inc.,
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                       /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 26, 2001
Consejos para viajar de

forma segura en las zonas

de construcción

FMCSA-ADO-21-003
Manténgase seguro 

en las zonas de 

construcción con estos 

consejos de la campaña 

“Our Roads, Our Safety”

(Nuestras carreteras, 

nuestra seguridad) 

de la FMCSA:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

Investigue su ruta y, cuando sea posible,

evite las zonas de construcción.

Preste atención a la carretera y las señales.

Evite distracciones como su teléfono o 

consumir comida o bebidas.

Reduzca la velocidad si se producen 

cambios en el patrón del tráfico.

Esté atento a los trabajadores.

Cuando se acerque a un carril cerrado, 

no espere hasta el último momento para 

pasarse a un carril abierto.

Tenga en cuenta los puntos ciegos 

y deje espacio adicional entre usted 

y otros vehículos.

FMCSAOurRoads FMCSA DOT_FMCSA FMCSA Obtenga más información en www.ShareTheRoadSafely.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                  Statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials
Incorporated (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Caporale, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                   By: /s/ Michael Caporale, Jr.
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Caporale, Jr.
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Director
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Associated Materials Incorporated and will be retained by Associated
Materials Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Oloruntade OLUMUYIWA, AKA John Doe, AKA Markus Heukelom, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-50603.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and submitted Dec. 9, 2010.

Filed Dec. 21, 2010.

*244Ellyn Marcus Lindsay, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alexandra Wallace Yates, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and HOLLAND, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable H. Russel Holland, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Olumuyiwa appeals his 70-month sentence, arguing that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b), the vulnerable victim enhancement, and that application of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(9)(B), the sophisticated means enhancement, resulted in an unreasonable sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err in applying the vulnerable victim enhancement. Although the district court did not make sufficient findings as to the elderly victims, it made the two determinations it was required to make as to the reloaded victims. *See United States v. Luca,*183 F.3d 1018, 1025 (9th Cir.1999). The district court adopted the presentence report and its addendum which identified reloaded victims as a class of vulnerable victims and identified O.P. as a specific member of that class whom Olumuyiwa knew or should have known was vulnerable, given O.P.’s three deposits into accounts controlled by Olumuyiwa over a 10-day period.

Application of the sophisticated means enhancement did not result in an unreasonable sentence. The sophisticated means enhancement was not intended to apply only to defendants who were operating a fraudulent telemarketing scheme in the United States and who then moved their operations overseas to evade detection or to make detection more difficult. Subsection (B) of the enhancement was intended to apply to defendants who are involved in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme that was being operated from outside the United States, regardless of whether they moved overseas to evade detection or to make detection more difficult. *See*United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual app. C, amd. 577 (2003) (explaining that the enhancement was intended to apply to fraudulent telemarketers who operate from overseas locations *and*to those who move overseas to evade detection by U.S. law enforcement).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



|                                  |  |                                
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Information Analysis Incorporated |  | 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Richard S. DeRose, Chief Financial Officer of Information Analysis Incorporated, a Virginia corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1 | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/ Richard S. DeRose         
|                     |  |     |  | Richard S. DeRose, Executive  
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President, Treasurer, and
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Information Analysis
Incorporated and will be retained by Information Analysis Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Michael Caporale, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials Incorporated;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael Caporale, Jr.Michael Caporale, Jr.Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3714 

To require recipients of coronavirus relief funding to publicly disclose how 

such funds were spent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2021 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require recipients of coronavirus relief funding to publicly 

disclose how such funds were spent, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Where’s our Money 

5 Going Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCOUNTABILITY FOR CORONAVIRUS RELIEF 

7 SPENDING. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, each State or local govern10 ment that received funding under any law specified in subVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:56 Jun 26, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3714.IH H3714

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3714 IH

1 section (c) shall submit a report to Congress detailing the 

2 funding amounts received and a description of how such 

3 funds were spent. Such report shall be made publicly avail4 able on a State or local government website. 

5 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—Any State or local government 

6 that fails to comply with the requirement in subsection 

7 (a) shall be liable to the Federal Government for the re8 payment of any such funds received and shall be ineligible 

9 for any future coronavirus relief funding otherwise made 

10 available after the date of enactment of this Act. 

11 (c) APPLICABLE LAWS.—The laws specified under 

12 this subsection are the following: 

13 (1) The Coronavirus Preparedness and Re14 sponse Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020. 

15 (2) The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 

16 Security Act. 

17 (3) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. 

18 (4) The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### CHILDS v. MOORE, *et al.*

No. 6385.

Opinion Filed September 22, 1914

Rehearing Denied January 5, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Time for Service — Dismissed. A party desiring to appeal has fifteen days in which to serve a case-made after the overruling of a motion for a new trial, and unless such case-made be served within such time or within an extension properly allowed, the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from County Court, Okmulgee \Countyj Mark I. Bozart, County Judge.*

*E. F. Lamb*and *F. M. Carter,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. A. Dickson*and *E. M. Carter,*for defendants in error.

Action by James S. Moore and the Interstate Land Company *207against Lucy Childs. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error.

Dismissed.

TURNER, J.

In the county court of Okmulgee county, the Interstate Land Company and James S. Moore sued Lucy Childs on contract for commissions -alleged to have- been earned by them as real estate brokers, for sale of certain l-ands- belonging to the said Lucy Childs. After issue joined there was trial before a jury. On October 14, 1913, judgment-was rendered in favor of plaintiffs and against Lucy Childs in the sum of $800. From which judgment -an -appeal w-as taken, and the cause is now before us on motion to dismiss. Defendants in error contend that the appeal should be dismissed for the reason that the case-made is a nullity because it was not -signed and settled within fifteen days after -the motion for a new trial was overruled, and htat no valid -order was made extending the time in which to- make and -serve a case-made.

After a careful reading of the record the facts appear to be that on October 15, 1913 a motion for new trial was filed, and on October 20, 1913, arguments were made on the motion and the judge stated in open court that he would overrule- the same and duly enter the fact upon his bench docket. This being the- status of the case and the record failing to- disclose that any extension of time for making and serving case-made was granted until November 21, 1915, the appeal will be dismissed, regardless of -the fact that the court attempted to enter an order on November 13, 1915 purporting to show the motion for new trial was not overruled until that date. The motion for new trial in fact -being overruled on October 20, 1914, the action of the trial court in -attempting to overrule the motion again was -of no effect, -as the matter was *res judicata,*and such motion did not operate to extend the time within which an extension might be granted to make and serve case-made.

A party desiring to -appeal has fifteen days in which to *208serve a case-made after the overruling of a motion for a new trial, and unless such case-made be served within such time, or within an extension properly allowed, the appeal will be dismissed. *Williams v. New State Bank,*38 Okla. 326, 132 Pac. 1087; *McCoy v. McCoy,*27 Okla. 371, 112 Pac. 1040.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2014-0353.

#### In re R.W.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-130151 and C-130152, 2014-Ohio-175. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2013-0579, *In re D.M.,*1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-120794, 2013-Ohio-668; and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and French, JJ., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.