alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF COO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Land
Lease (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert G. Blatz, as Chief Operating Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    ROBERT G. BLATZ 
|Name:  |  | Robert G. Blatz        
|Title: |  | Chief Operating Officer

Date: March 11, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 8, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. HopkinsCounty Coal, LLC,*Docket Nos. KENT 2009-820-R, et al.**(Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that MSHA wasauthorized to gain access to certain personnel records as part of adiscrimination investigation without obtaining a warrant.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
July 19, 1951
Hon. C. D. Wright County Attorney Briscoe County Silverton, Texas Opinion No. V-12.06. R,e: Whether citations indelinquent tax suits should be accompanied by a copy of Dear Sir: the petition.

You request our opinion with reference towhether d citation ina delinquent tax suit should be accompanied by a copy of the plaintiff’s petition.

Rule 101, Tex. Rules Civ. Proc., provides that a citation “shall be accompanied by a copy ofplaintiff’s petition, ” Rule 106 provides that “the citation shall be served by the officer delivering to each defendant, in person, a true copy of the citation with the date of delivery endorsed thereon andwith a copy of the petition attached thereto.”

However, **Rule** 117a, which was promulgated by order ofAugust 18, 1947, and became effective December 31, 1947, controls the form of citation indelinquent tax suits. Rule 117a provides, in part:

“‘Inall suits for collection of delinquent advalorem taxes, the rules of civil procedure governing issuance and service of citation shall control the issuance and service of citation therein, except as herein otherwise specially provided. n (Emphasis added.) Subdivision 1of said rule reads as follows: “Where any defendant fitatax suit is a resident of the State ofTexas and is not qubject to citation by publication under subdivision 3below, the process shall conform substantially to the form hereinafter set out for personal service and shall contain the essential elements and be served and returned and otherwise **regu** lated by the provisions ofRules 99 tol07, inclusive. ” Subdivision 2thereof provides: “Where any such defendant is absent. from the State or is anonresident of the State and’id not subjectHon. C. D. Wright, Page 2 (V-1206)

to citation by publication under subdivision 3below, the process shall conform substantially to the form hereinafter set out for personal service and shall contain the essential elements and be served and returned and otherwise i+egulated by the provisions ofRule 108.” Subdivision 4 reads in part as follows: “Any process authorized by this **rule** may issue

‘ jointly inbehalf ofall taxing units who are plaintiffs or intervetiors in anv tax suit. The statement ofthe

Subdivision 6of said rule provides aform of citation by personal service either inor out of the State, and this form does not provide that a copy ofplaintiff’s petition should be attached thereto or accompanied therewith.

It is our opinion that Rule 117a creates an exception to the above quoted portions ofRules 101 and 106 and that citations
; suits for delinquent advalorem taxes need not be accompanied a copy of plaintiff’s petition. A like result was reacb,ed with refeience to citations in personal property tax suits. Atk’y Gen. Op. V-l 120 (1950). SUMMARY

Citations in delinquent tax suits need not be adcompanied by a copy of plaintiff’s petition. Rule 1l?a, Rules of Civil Procedure.

APPROVhD: Jesse P. Luton, Jr. Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant WVG/mwb Yours very truly, PRICE DANIEL Attorney General

W. V. Geppert Assistant
Exhibit 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.
(the  "Company"),  I, Charles F. Catlett,  III,  Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial  Officer,  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to my
knowledge:

         (a) the Form 10-KSB fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) the information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in
all material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition  and results of
operations  of the  Company  and its  subsidiaries  as of, and for,  the periods
presented in the Form 10-KSB.


Date:  March 31, 2003           /s/ Charles F. Catlett, III
                                ----------------------------
                                Charles F. Catlett, III
                                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                Officer


[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Central  Virginia  Bankshares,  Inc. and will be retained by Central
Virginia  Bankshares,   Inc.  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                       9,495
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              236,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                36,668
<INVENTORY>                                472,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           707,504
<PP&E>                                     344,151
<DEPRECIATION>                             119,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,783,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      679,149
<BONDS>                                    411,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      101,836
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       652
<OTHER-SE>                                 577,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,783,133
<SALES>                                  1,950,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,950,251
<CGS>                                    1,413,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,780,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            83,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          63,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                  (46,250)
<NET-INCOME>                               (32,153)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.51)






</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Consolidation Coal Company              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Consolidation Coal Company

Consol VA 2012-42 Meeting Notice 1-19-17.pdf

Consol VA 2012-42 Meeting Notice 1-19-17.htm

secretary-labor-v-consolidation-coal-docket-va2012-42-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40890 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
AVILINO MORENO

- GUTIERREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 462

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Avilino Moreno

Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno

- Gutierrez h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40890 Document: 00513080660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 40890

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40890 Document: 00513080660 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 19, 2014*

[Cite as *06/19/2014 Case Announcements #2,*2014-Ohio-2665.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-0997.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Armengau.

On June 18, 2014, respondent filed a motion for an order staying all proceedings.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Kennedy, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part but would grant a temporary stay only until respondent’s criminal trial is completed.

O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant the stay.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Foundry Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Timothy D. Heffner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Timothy D. HeffnerTimothy D. HeffnerVice President Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial OfficerJuly 30, 2004
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1606

To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to lower the target price of program

crops in 1994 and 1995 in commodity programs operated by the Department of Agriculture.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to lower the target

price of program crops in 1994 and 1995 in commodity

programs operated by the Department of Agriculture.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN TARGET PRICES FOR PROGRAM

4 CROPS IN 1994 AND 1995.

5 (a) WHEAT.—Section 107B(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Agri6 cultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445b–3a(c)(1)(B)(iii)) is

7 amended by striking ‘‘1995 crops.’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: ‘‘1993 crops. Beginning with 1994 crops, the es9 tablished price for wheat for a crop year shall be three
2

•HR 1606 IH

1 percent less than the established price for wheat for the

2 preceding crop year.’’.

3 (b) FEED GRAINS.—Section 105B(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the

4 Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1444f(c)(1)(B)(iii)) is

5 amended—

6 (1) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘1995 crops of

7 corn.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘1993 crops of

8 corn. Beginning with 1994 crops, the established

9 price for corn for a crop year shall be three percent

10 less than the established price for corn for the pre11 ceding crop year.’’;

12 (2) in subclause (II), by striking ‘‘per bushel.’’

13 and inserting the following: ‘‘per bushel for the

14 1991, 1992, and 1993 crops of oats. Beginning with

15 1994 crops, the established price for oats for a crop

16 year shall be three percent less than the established

17 price for oats for the preceding crop year.’’; and

18 (3) in subclause (III)—

19 (A) by striking ‘‘1995 crops’’ and inserting

20 ‘‘1993 crops’’; and

21 (B) by adding at the end the following new

22 sentence: ‘‘Beginning with 1994 crops, the es23 tablished price for grain sorghums for a crop

24 year shall be three percent less than the estab-
3

•HR 1606 IH

1 lished price for grain sorghums for the preced2 ing crop year.’’.

3 (c) UPLAND COTTON.—Section 103B(c)(1)(B)(ii) of

4 the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1444–

5 2(c)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘1995 crops.’’ and

6 inserting the following: ‘‘1993 crops. Beginning with 1994

7 crops, the established price for upland cotton for a crop

8 year shall be three percent less than the established price

9 for upland cotton for the preceding crop year.’’.

10 (d) RICE.—Section 101B(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Agricul11 tural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1441–2(c)(1)(B)(iii)) is

12 amended by striking ‘‘1995 crops.’’ and inserting the fol13 lowing: ‘‘1993 crops. Beginning with 1994 crops, the es14 tablished price for rice for a crop year shall be three per15 cent less than the established price for rice for the preced16 ing crop year.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require lenders to post current 
  interest rates charged for various categories of loans to consumers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

   Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require lenders to post current 
  interest rates charged for various categories of loans to consumers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) chapter 3 of 
the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1661 et seq.) is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following new section:
``Sec. 148. Posting of rates of interest charged for various categories 
              of loans to consumers
    ``(a) A creditor shall post a sign at each place of business where 
he extends credit to consumers which--
            ``(1) shall state in clear and conspicuous language the 
        current rates of interest he charges for each category of loan 
        he makes to consumers;
            ``(2) shall be situated so that it is easily visible to 
        individuals who enter the premises of the creditor; and
            ``(3) complies with regulations prescribed by the Board 
        under this section.
    ``(b) The Board shall prescribe regulations to carry out this 
section.''.
    (b) The table of sections of such chapter is amended by adding at 
the end thereof the following new item:

``148. Posting of rates of interest charged for various categories of 
                            loans to consumers.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 13, 2004



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
#### Harry L. PAYNE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America Railroad Retirement Board.

No. 15715.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 27, 1957.

Wm. Harrison Norton, No. Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.

Myles F. Gibbons, Chicago, 111., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to Review Order of Railroad Retirement Board dismissed without prejudice, on motion of petitioner,
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Becoming a Labor Arbitrator - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l3ctbYOijU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/becoming-labor-arbitrator\/\">Becoming a Labor Arbitrator<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/becoming-labor-arbitrator\/embed\/#?secret=l3ctbYOijU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Becoming a Labor Arbitrator” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"l3ctbYOijU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}