alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2911
<PP&E>                                          101941
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3378)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  158226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2935
<BONDS>                                          51006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       78586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    158226
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    212
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       212
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     EX 27 for OTC America
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000803265
<NAME>                        OTC America
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,211,784
<SECURITIES>                                   144,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,456,261
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,458,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,823
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,788,462
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       150
<OTHER-SE>                                     (355,174)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,458,261
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (394,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (394,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (394,548)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.32)




</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company              

#   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company

AmCoal LAKE 2011-701 Argument Notice 11-29-17.pdf

AmCoal LAKE 2011-701 Argument Notice 11-29-17.htm

Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company, Docket No. LAKE 2011-701-Nov29 2017.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
**Exhibit 31(a)**

 

**ASSISTEDHOUSING FUND L.P. ICERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Robert K. Stump, certify that:

 

1)              I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Assisted Housing Fund L.P. I;

2)              Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

4)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

6)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or notsignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:           | May 14, 2004               |
|-----------------|----------------------------|
|            |
| By:   | /s/  ROBERT  K. STUMP |   |
|            | Robert K. Stump            |
|            | *President*                |
|                 |                            |  |  |

 

1

----
#### Lenir RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY; Pentagon Police Department; Defense Department; George W. Bush, the defendant, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-1200.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lenir Richardson appeals a district court order summarily dismissing her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. *Richardson v. Metro Transit Auth.,*No. 1:07-cv-01281-LMB-TRJ (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 22, 2008; entered Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08631) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 23, 1996,  of our report dated February 10, 1997 on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of First Coastal Corporation
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



                                  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Portland, Maine
March 31, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-020-02-1610-DU] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Correction to notice of availability and protest period. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 30, 2001, regarding the availability of the Proposed Planning Analysis and Environmental Assessment (PA/EA) for public domain lands in Arkansas and Louisiana. The notice contains information that is incorrect. The PA/EA became available and the 30-day protest period began on December 14, 2001.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judy Pace, Bureau of Land Management, 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404, Jackson, MS 39206; telephone (601) 977-5403. 

*Correction:*                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 30, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 231), in DOCID: fd30no01-11 on page 59811, under the                         **DATES**                         caption, change the protest ending date to January 13, 2002.                     

Dated: December 5, 2001. 

Bruce Dawson, 

Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 01-31747 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period  ending  September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert W. Erikson,  the President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.


November 14, 2002                                /s/Robert W. Erikson
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert W. Erikson
                                                 President
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Again Selected As \u201cBest Place to Work\u201d Among Small Federal Agencies in Back-to-Back Years - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Xnvefpa1Sx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-again-selected-as-best-place-to-work-among-small-federal-agencies-in-back-to-back-years\/\">FMCS Again Selected As \u201cBest Place to Work\u201d Among Small Federal Agencies in Back-to-Back Years<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-again-selected-as-best-place-to-work-among-small-federal-agencies-in-back-to-back-years\/embed\/#?secret=Xnvefpa1Sx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Again Selected As \u201cBest Place to Work\u201d Among Small Federal Agencies in Back-to-Back Years” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"Xnvefpa1Sx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2013 The U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) again received the top ranking among small Federal agencies as a Best Place to Work in the Federal Government, according to the 2018 rankings released today by the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service and Boston Consulting Group. With rankings first being held in 2003, […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/FMCS-Ranked-1a-300x200.jpg"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick CRITES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4976.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 7, 2014.

Decided: April 15, 2014.

Brian J. Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Crites pleaded guilty to transmitting a threat to injure the person of another in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(a). The district court sentenced Crites to ten months’ imprisonment, and he now appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.

On appeal, Crites argues that the district court erred in applying an enhancement under the Guidelines for an official victim. In reviewing the district court’s calculations under the Guidelines, “we review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error.” *United States v. Manigan,*592 F.3d 621, 626 (4th Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We will “find clear error only if, on the entire evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” *Id.*at 631 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

The Guidelines provide that a district court shall apply a six-level increase in offense level when the victim of the offense is a government officer or employee, the offense was motivated by the victim’s status as an officer or employee of the government, and the base offense level is derived from Chapter Two, Part A of the Guidelines. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 3A1.2(a), (b) (2013). The commentary to that section provides that the “[GJuideline applies when sped-*226fíed individuals are victims of the offense ... [and] does not apply when the only victim is an organization, agency, or the government.” U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2 App. n. 1. Because Crites threatened government employees rather than the government in general, we conclude that the district court did not err in applying the enhancement for an official victim under the Guidelines. *See, e.g., United States v. Polk,*118 F.3d 286, 297-98 (5th Cir.1997).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX International, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         387,446
<SECURITIES>                                   10,741,463
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,638,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,886,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,915,258
<PP&E>                                         5,882,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,108,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,690,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          947,879
<BONDS>                                        1,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,298
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,792,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,690,068
<SALES>                                        5,287,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,287,064
<CGS>                                          2,860,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,860,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,031,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             44,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                694,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                   231,928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            462,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   462,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-64615) of American LandLease, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American Land Lease, Inc.; management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American Land Lease, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 6, 2006