alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 11, 2016

No. 04-14-00620-CV

Rosa Obregon PEREZ, Ricardo O. Perez, individually and as next friend of Rosa Elia Perez, 

Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez,

Appellants

v.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26130

Honorable Robert Cadena, Judge Presiding

ORDER ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice, dissenting

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On April 28, 2016, appellee filed a motion for rehearing en banc. On June 1, 2016, 

appellants filed a response to motion for rehearing en banc. On June 13, 2016, appellee filed a 

reply on rehearing en banc. A majority of the en banc court grants appellee’s motion for 

rehearing en banc and orders en banc reconsideration of the panel’s opinion and judgment. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7. Accordingly, “the panel’s judgment...[will] not become final, and the case 

will be resubmitted to the court for en banc review and disposition.” Id.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ADVO, INC.'S
FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,937
<INVENTORY>                                      3,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,316
<PP&E>                                         231,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                 120,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,099
<BONDS>                                        180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           299
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,871)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   289,177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,129,187
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  806,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,820
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.40<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.35<F2>
<FN>
<F1>THE EPS-PRIMARY TAG REPRESENTS BASIC EPS UNDER SFAS 128.
<F2>THE EPS-DILUTED TAG REPRESENTS DILUTED EPS UNDER SFAS 128.
</FN>


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Assisted by a Federal Mediator, Janitors in Los Angeles Reach New Contract, Avoiding Possible Strike - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bDpis4AbIz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/assisted-federal-mediator-janitors-los-angeles-reach-new-contract-avoiding-possible-strike\/\">Assisted by a Federal Mediator, Janitors in Los Angeles Reach New Contract, Avoiding Possible Strike<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/assisted-federal-mediator-janitors-los-angeles-reach-new-contract-avoiding-possible-strike\/embed\/#?secret=bDpis4AbIz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Assisted by a Federal Mediator, Janitors in Los Angeles Reach New Contract, Avoiding Possible Strike” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"bDpis4AbIz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Janitors\u00a0 represented by Service Employees International Union United Service Workers West in Los Angeles and other California locations ratified a new labor contract this week, reached with the last–minute assistance of FMCS Commissioner Isael Hermosillo, avoiding a possible strike by approximately 20,000 covered employees. According to news media accounts,\u00a0 building workers in Southern California and […]"}
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 356 

To provide greater flexibility to agencies to make appointments to positions 

for which there is a severe shortage of candidates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2021 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide greater flexibility to agencies to make appointments to positions for which there is a severe shortage 

of candidates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Hiring Im5 provement Reform and Enforcement Act’’ or the ‘‘Federal 

6 HIRE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY APPOINTMENT FLEXIBILITY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 31 of title 5, United 

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3116 

10 the following new section: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 356 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3117. Agency appointment flexibility 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The head of an agency may, 

3 without regard to the provisions of section 3304 and sec4 tions 3309 through 3318, appoint a qualified individual 

5 to a position within the agency that is in the competitive 

6 service and for which the head of the agency determines 

7 that there is a severe shortage of candidates. 

8 ‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This provision shall 

9 not be construed as superseding or otherwise affecting any 

10 authority granted to the head of any agency under any 

11 other provision of law to make appointments without re12 gard to a provision of chapter 33. 

13 ‘‘(c) AGENCY DEFINED.—The term ‘agency’ has the 

14 meaning given such term under section 551.’’. 

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

16 for chapter 31 of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

17 by inserting after the item related to section 3116 the fol18 lowing item: 

‘‘3117. Agency appointment flexibility.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Allen RAEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-8027.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 22, 2008.

Kerry J. Jacobson, Office of the United States Attorney, Lander, WY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Loretta R. Green, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Cheyenne, WY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before McCONNELL, SEYMOUR, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

STEPHANIE K. SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

On July 19, 2006, defendant-appellant David Allen Rael was indicted for unlawful possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(9) and 924(a)(2) (Count One), and for making a materially false statement to acquire a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) and § 924(a)(2) (Count Two). He filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that his underlying domestic violence conviction did not constitute a crime of domestic violence as defined by federal law. The district court denied that motion, and Mr. Rael conditionally pled guilty to Count One. He was sentenced to “time served” on Count One and 3 years of supervised release. Count Two was dismissed pursuant to the plea agreement.

Mr. Rael’s prosecution on Count One was predicated on a prior conviction under Wyoming’s “simple assault; battery” statute. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501(b). On appeal he argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss Count One because a battery under the Wyoming statute can be committed without the use or attempted use of physical force, and thus convictions under this stat*842ute do not meet the federal definition of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we REVERSE for the reasons stated in our holding in *United States v. Hays,*526 F.3d 674 (10th Cir.2008).

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and IOti-i Cir. R. 32.1.

EBEL, Circuit Judge,

Dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons articulated in my dissent in the matter of *United States v. Hays,*526 F.3d 674 (10th Cir.2008).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 66 FR 63422, 
December 6, 2001.
    Status: Closed meeting.
    Place: 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
    Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Thursday, December 
13, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.
    Change in the Meeting: Time Change.
    The closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2001 at 10 
a.m. has been changed to Friday, December 14, 2001 at 10 a.m.

    Dated: December 12, 2001.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31031 Filed 12-12-01; 4:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3419 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3419

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Joseph R. Lentol 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH R. LENTOL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joseph R. Lentol Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph R. 
Lentol Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company              

#   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company

American LAKE 2011-13 Meeting Notice 7-14-16.pdf

American LAKE 2011-13 Meeting Notice 7-14-16.htm

secretary-labor-v-american-coal-company-docket-no.lake-2011-13-7-14-16.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ARTHUR RICHARD EHRHARDT , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 820

[ June 28 , 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 20000287CFAXMX

.
Arthur Ehrhardt, Stuart, pro se

.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages

Jones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Arthur Ehrhardt appeals his plea of nolo contendere to false imprisonment and sentence to twenty

- four months’ probation. The record does not indicate Ehrhardt ever attempted to withdraw his plea, nor does the transcript of his plea hearing suggest Ehrhard t preserved his right to appeal in any way. Without any contemporaneously reserved issue or a preserved direct appeal under one of the four exceptions described in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.

– d., any other matters raised on ap peal “must be preserved by a motion to withdraw a plea before [those matters] may be raised on direct appeal.” Harriel v. State , 710 So. 2d 102, 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Ehrhardt neither reserved the right to appeal by contemporaneously preserving an issue nor moved to withdraw the entry of his no contest plea

. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), which allows summary affirmance where an appellant fails to demonstrate any basi s for reversal after appealing under Rule 9.140. See Leonard v. State , 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla. 2000) (requiring district courts summarily affirm, rather than dismiss, frivolous appeals after entry of a2 nolo contendere plea). See also Fla. R. App. P. 9. 140(b)(2)(A)(i)

– (ii); Fla. R. App. P. 9.135(a)

.
Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,868
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              25
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    364,791
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         364,791
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        556,174
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,005,354
<DEPOSITS>                                     860,723
<SHORT-TERM>                                    29,625
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,084
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,123
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,005,354
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,777
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     5
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                33,526
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,293
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,233
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               7,606
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,174
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,471
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,400
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   480
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,756
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,935
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      303
<RECOVERIES>                                       361
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,993
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,376
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,617


</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC.

Signal Peak WEST 2010-1130 Meeting Notice 9-11-14.pdf

Signal Peak, WEST 2010-1130, Meeting Notice 9-11-14.htm

secretary-labor-v.signal-peak-docket-west2010-1130.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov