alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3507 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the rescission of a 

military decoration except under certain circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. JACKSON (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. FALLON, Mr. NORMAN, 

Ms. HERRELL, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. MAST, 

Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. ROY, and Mr. GAETZ) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the rescission of a military decoration except under certain circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Cancel Culture 

5 from Degrading Honor Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3507 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF RESCISSION OF A MILITARY 

2 DECORATION EXCEPT UNDER CERTAIN CIR3 CUMSTANCES. 

4 Section 1136 of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

7 ‘‘No’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(b) RESCISSION OF MILITARY DECORATION: PROHI11 BITION; EXCEPTIONS.—The Secretary concerned may not 

12 rescind the award of a military decoration described in 

13 subsection (a) after the day that is 10 years after the date 

14 of such award except in the following circumstances: 

15 ‘‘(1) Such award was based on fraud or other 

16 misinformation. 

17 ‘‘(2) The individual awarded such decoration is 

18 prohibited from interment or memorialization in the 

19 National Cemetery Administration or Arlington Na20 tional Cemetery under section 2411 of title 38.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements of HemaCare Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-135663, 333-166928, 333-116405, 333-153072, 333-132603,
333-18601 and 333-114013) of our report dated March 21, 2011, with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements
of HemaCare Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of HemaCare Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP
Irvine, California
March 21, 2011
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Node 
-                   2018 Annual FOIA Report              

#   2018 Annual FOIA Report

FMSHRC FINAL.pdf

FMSHRC FINAL.xml

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 99.1

**Certification of CEO Pursuantto****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Land Lease (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), Terry Considine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                      |                        |   |   |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/: TERRY CONSIDINE |                        |   |        |
|                           |                        |   |   |
| Name:                | **Terry Considine**         |   |   |   |
| Title:               | **Chief Executive Officer** |   |   |   |
| Date:                     | **March 24, 2003**          |   |   |   |

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Exhibit
                                      99.4


                   MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE GROWTH AND INCOME FUND
                               LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the filing of Meridian Healthcare Growth and Income Fund
Limited Partnership's (the "Fund") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy M. Gisriel, the Chief Financial Officer of
Brown Healthcare, Inc., Administrative General Partner of the Fund, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Fund.



By: /s/Timothy M. Gisriel

Timothy M. Gisriel
Chief Financial Officer
Brown Healthcare, Inc.
Administrative General Partner
August 6, 2002
#### Allen BISHOP, Appellant, v. Ken SAVAGE, director of Fort Smith Transit Department, Appellee.

No. 10-2835.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 22, 2010.

Filed: Dec. 16, 2010.

Allen Bishop, Fort Smith, AR, pro se.

Wyman Rice Wade, Jr., Daily & Woods, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

*86PER CURIAM.

Allen Bishop appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In his complaint, Bishop asserted that he was subjected to racial discrimination when bus drivers employed by the Fort Smith Transit Department refused to stop for him when he signaled to them from locations that were not designated as bus stops, which he alleged he was permitted to do under the terms of the Fort Smith Transit Ride Guide. Upon careful de novo review, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Bishop, *see Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc.,*559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.2009), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. We agree with the district court that Bishop effectively sued only the City of Fort Smith (City), and that the City could not be liable under section 1983 because Bishop did not allege that his rights were violated as a result of an official policy or custom of the City. *See Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp.,*172 F.3d 531, 535-36 (8th Cir.1999) (unless pleading expressly and unambiguously states public official is sued in individual capacity, defendant is assumed to be sued in official capacity; suit against public employee in his or her official capacity is merely suit against public employer; political subdivision may be held liable for unconstitutional acts of its officials or employees only when those acts implement or execute unconstitutional policy or custom of subdivision); *see also McGautha v. Jackson Cnty., Mo., Collections Dep’t,*36 F.3d 53, 55 (8th Cir.1994) (when official’s discretionary decisions are constrained by policies not of that official’s making, those policies, rather than subordinate’s departures from them, are act of municipality; proof of single incident of unconstitutional activity is insufficient to establish custom or practice).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2013- 0090.

#### State ex rel. Evans v. Marshall.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B)(5) by the full court pursuant to the Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 2(A). Motion denied.
#### Mauricio Antonio GARCIA-ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-75144.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

*107Edgardo Quintanilla, Quintanilla Law Firm, Inc., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Claire Workman, Trial, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mauricio Antonio Garcia-Ortiz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Husyev v. Mukasey,*528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and de novo claims of due process violations, *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

We reject Garcia-Ortiz’ contention that the denial of his asylum application as untimely violated his due process rights, because the applicable statutes and regulations provide aliens “adequate notice of procedures and standards that will be applied to their claims for relief.” *Husyev,*528 F.3d at 1182. Accordingly, Garcia-Ortiz’ asylum claim fails.

*108Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Garcia-Ortiz failed to establish that gang members harmed him on account of his membership in the particular social group of his family. *See Molina-Estrada, v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1095 (9th Cir.2002) (no compelling evidence the applicant was persecuted on account of his family membership); *see also Parussimova v. Mukasey,*555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir.2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). Because Garcia-Ortiz failed to demonstrate he was persecuted, or fears persecution, on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition for review as to his withholding of removal claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00245-CR

ARIEL PEREZ, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

On Appeal from the 485th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1743406R) 

November 22, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel 

 Justice Dabney Bassel
|   | **Exhibit 23.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form S-8 (No. 333-43462) and Form S-3 (No. 33-89602) of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report, dated April 12, 2007, relating to the audit of the consolidated financial statements, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

Winchester, Virginia

April 12, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Lowrance
Electronics, Inc. (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in that Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: June 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Darrell J. Lowrance

Darrell J. LowrancePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: June 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Douglas J. TownsdinDouglas J. TownsdinVice President of Financeand Chief Financial Officer
 This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.'s
333-44429, 333-85565 and 333-77201 on Form S-8, and in Registration Statement
No.'s 333-86343, 333-77221, 333-63891 and 333-30799 on Form S-3 of our report
dated March 6, 2000 (April 3, 2000 as to Note 12), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Comverse Technology, Inc. for the year ended January 31,
2000.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
April 25, 2000
Exhibit 10.78

SHARE ISSUANCE AGREEMENT

SHARE ISSUANCE AGREEMENT (this Agreement), dated as of
March 6, 2008, by and between Lithium Technology Corporation (LTC) and Arch Hill Capital N.V. (Arch Hill Capital).

WHEREAS:

A.         Pursuant to a Debt Settlement Agreement dated
February 27, 2008 LTC agreed to issue 302,714,400 shares of LTC common stock (the Shares) to Arch Hill Capital in settlement of the debt set forth in the Debt Settlement Agreement; and

B.The parties desire LTC to issue to Arch Hill Capital shares of LTC Series C Preferred Stock in
partial settlement of the obligation of LTC to issue the Shares.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the mutual
agreements contained in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.         In
lieu of issuing 112,542,100 shares of LTC Common Stock, LTC shall issue to Arch Hill Capital and Arch Hill Capital shall acquire from LTC 45,016.84 shares of Series C Preferred Stock convertible into 112,542,100 shares of Common Stock.

2.        LTC shall have a remaining obligation to deliver 190,172,300 shares of LTC Common Stock to
Arch Hill Capital pursuant to the terms of the Debt Settlement Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Amir Elbaz         
|    |  | Amir Elbaz             
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer

ARCH HILL CAPITAL, N.V.



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Christiaan A. van den Berg
|    |  | Christiaan A. van den Berg    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Reports & Budget Submissions 
-                   Budget and Annual Performance Reports              

# Budget and Annual Performance Reports

FY2015 Justification

FY2014 Justification

FY2013 Justification

FY2012 Justification

FY2011 Justification

FY2010 Justification

FY2009

FY2008

FY2007

FY2006

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹ Previous 
-                Page            1 
-                Current page            2 

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Sims Crane              

#   Sims Crane

On July 11, 2019 the Commission issued its decision in *Sims Crane*, Docket No. SE 2016-81.

Commission-Decision(Sims Crane)SE 2016-81.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov