alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3561 

To assist survivors of stroke and other debilitating health occurrences in 

returning to work. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mrs. BEATTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To assist survivors of stroke and other debilitating health 

occurrences in returning to work. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Return to Work 

5 Awareness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTING SURVIVORS OF STROKE AND OTHER DE7 BILITATING HEALTH OCCURRENCES IN RE8 TURNING TO WORK. 

9 The Secretary of Labor, acting through the Job Ac10 commodation Network, may disseminate information and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3561 IH

1 promote awareness among survivors of stroke and other 

2 debilitating health occurrences, such as traumatic brain 

3 injury and heart attack, and the families of such survivors, 

4 as well as among private employers, government agencies, 

5 employee representatives, and service providers to— 

6 (1) assist survivors of stroke and such other de7 bilitating health occurrences in returning to work; 

8 (2) improve survivor’s employability and dem9 onstrate to employers the most effective ways to cap10 italize on the value and talent that these survivors 

11 add to the workplace; and 

12 (3) enhance self-employment and entrepreneur13 ship options for survivors. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
-  Home 
-  Mission 
-  Policy 

# In This Section

                      -  Mission 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  Chief Counsel 
                      -  Strategic Plan                          -  2012-2016 
                        -  MAP-21 
                      -  Budget 
                      -  Grants 
                      -  Contact Us 

## Contact

Julie BerglingGovernmental Affairs SpecialistU.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave., SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**julie.bergling@dot.gov**Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# The Statutory Rulemakings Report - July 2019 and January 2020

Statutory Rulemakings Letters FINAL 3-24-20.pdf (2.76 MB)

Pursuant to section 5307 of the FAST Act (P.L. 114-94), the letters provide written notification for each of the rulemakings subject to section 5307(c), including a description of actions taken to date, explanations of delay, and expected dates of rulemaking completion.

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					julie.bergling@dot.gov.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the "Report") of
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
2006, each of the undersigned Randall P. Marx, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Monty R. Lamirato, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigneds'knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 17, 2006                         /s/ Randall P. Marx
                                                -------------------
                                                Randall P. Marx
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 17, 2006                         /s/ Monty R. Lamirato
                                                ---------------------
                                                Monty R. Lamirato
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.26


 


TRANSOMA
MEDICAL, INC.


SUMMARY
OF TEAM INCENTIVE PLAN II


 


In fiscal 2007, we provided our named executive
officers with the opportunity to earn additional cash incentive compensation
through our Team Incentive Plan II, or “TIP.”  
The TIP is designed to reward named executive officers for achieving and
surpassing specified company and divisional goals related to financial growth,
product development and commercialization, and operational improvement.


 


Under the terms of the TIP, our named executive
officers, as well as other executives are eligible to earn annual cash
incentive payments based on achievement of these company and divisional
objectives. We derive these objectives from our overall fiscal year operating
plan established by our board of directors. Our objectives take into account a
variety of factors, including our prior year results, our expected economic and
market influences, our business opportunities, investment requirements and
competitive situation. If there is a material unanticipated event, such as an
acquisition, we may adjust the objectives to reflect the event. The
compensation committee must approve any proposed adjustment. Generally, the
objectives require performance at levels intended to positively impact
stockholder value, and reflect moderately aggressive to aggressive goals that
are attainable, but require strong performance. Our compensation committee
retains the discretion to increase or decrease a named executive officer’s TIP
award payout, with input from the chief executive officer, to recognize either
inferior or superior individual performance in cases where this performance is
not fully represented by the performance measures.


 


For fiscal 2007, rewards under the TIP were based on
two tiers of specific objectives. The first tier related to high level
initiatives that required significant contributions from our employees, tied to
revenues, profits, product development and specific operational goals. The
second tier of objectives was more specific to the responsibilities of small
groups and individuals. Many of these objectives were instrumental towards
achieving the first tier objectives. Each tier represented 50% of the potential
TIP reward to the executives. This was intended to balance the executives’
focus (and rewards) between those objectives that have the most significant
impact on stockholder value and those over which the executives have the most
influence.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6577

BERLIN BRYCE FUTRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN CARMICHAEL, Warden; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-95-2102-6-18AK)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Berlin Bryce Futrell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Futrell v.

Carmichael, No. CA-95-2102-6-18AK (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826821
<NAME> CERBCO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>               
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1997   
<CASH>                                                                18,970
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          6,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                            1,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      28,379
<PP&E>                                                                25,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        14,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        43,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  3,446
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                 148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            25,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          43,555
<SALES>                                                               14,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      14,636
<CGS>                                                                 11,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         11,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             486
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      429
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.29
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>   0000827086
<NAME>  CARLYLE INCOME PLUS, L.P. - II

       
                              
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                              4,133,357
<SECURITIES>                                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                          15,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    4,148,787
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     29,079,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  16,486
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         29,052,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       29,079,832
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      142,893
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      196,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (53,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 1,742,445
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,742,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           26.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                           26.27
                                             <PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christy McCELLON, also known as 90, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10526

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2016.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John W. Stickels, Esq., Stiekels *&*Associates, P.C., Arlington, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*242Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Christy McCellon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). McCellon has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of McCellon’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as McCellon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. McCellon’s motion for the appointment of new counsel, is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Motion for Temporary Relief Denied 

as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00944-CV

IN RE AMELIA V. KELLY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11CV0325

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 25, 2014, relator Amelia V. Kelly filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable John Ellisor, 

presiding judge of the 122nd District Court of Galveston County, to vacate three 

orders pertaining to a motion by the real party in interest to enforce the final 

judgment in the underlying litigation by foreclosure of relator’s real property.
2

Along with her petition, relator also filed in this court a motion for temporary 

relief, asking this court to stay enforcement of one of the challenged orders in 

which the trial court ordered foreclosure of the subject property and a 

corresponding Sheriff’s sale of the property. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10.

Just in October of this year, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in

this court with respect to the same orders that are challenged in the present case. 

We denied relator’s previous petition. See In re Kelly, No. 14-14-00789-CV, 2014 

WL 5492809, *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 30, 2014, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op., per curiam). Relator now returns with a new petition for 

writ of mandamus, but presents the same issues and arguments that were contained 

in the earlier petition. Relator has not identified any compelling reason for us to 

reconsider our prior decision, nor are we aware of any such reason.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We further 

deny as moot relator’s motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection
with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Axiall Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy Mann, Jr., certify, to the best of my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Timothy Mann, Jr.President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorApril 28, 2016
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3249 

To codify the policy of Executive Order 13950 (relating to combating race 

and sex stereotyping), and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2021 

Mr. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. NORMAN, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. BISHOP

of North Carolina, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. BABIN, Mr. GROTHMAN, 

Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. FALLON, and Mr. CLYDE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To codify the policy of Executive Order 13950 (relating 

to combating race and sex stereotyping), and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Contents of Our Char5 acter Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL FUNDING LIMITATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be used 

8 by any Federal official or agency to adopt, fund, require, 

9 or promote any policy, activity or entity that promotes emVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:36 Jun 15, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3249.IH H3249

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3249 IH

1 ployee training or educational programs or activities that 

2 promote race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating. 

3 (b) RACE OR SEX STEREOTYPING OR SCAPEGOATING

4 DEFINED.—For the purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘race 

5 or sex stereotyping or scapegoating’’ consists of the fol6 lowing list of prohibited divisive concepts: 

7 (1) One race or sex is inherently superior to an8 other race or sex. 

9 (2) The United States is fundamentally racist 

10 or sexist. 

11 (3) An individual, by virtue of his or her race 

12 or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, 

13 whether consciously or unconsciously. 

14 (4) An individual should be discriminated 

15 against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly 

16 because of his or her race or sex. 

17 (5) Members of one race or sex cannot and 

18 should not attempt to treat others without respect to 

19 race or sex. 

20 (6) An individual’s moral character is nec21 essarily determined by his or her race or sex. 

22 (7) An individual, by virtue of his or her race 

23 or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in 

24 the past by other members of the same race or sex. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3249 IH

1 (8) Any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, 

2 anguish, or any other form of psychological distress 

3 on account of his or her race or sex. 

4 (9) Meritocracy or traits such as a hard work 

5 ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a par6 ticular race to oppress another. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I HT TECHNOL OGY, I

NC., A.C.S.A.S. TECHNOL OGY CORPORATI ON A/K/A ACSAS TECHNOL OGY, L L C, K. HARRI S R & D, SHI EL D TECH, L L C F/K/A AX I S L I CENSI

NG, L L C AND KERRY HARRI S, Appellants,

v. C. MACK, Appellee

. § § § § § § § § No. 08-10-00189- CV

Appea l from 408th District Court of B exar County , Texas (TC # 2008-CI -17190)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending befor e the Court is Appe l l an t s ’ motion to dismiss this appea l pursuant to T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a) (1) beca use Appellant no longe r desires to prosec ute the appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l with prejudice

. Costs are assessed ag ainst the party incurring same. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d).
September 29, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.