alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3053

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
           leasing in the Southern California planning area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2021

   Mr. Levin of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
           leasing in the Southern California planning area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Coasts and Oceans 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 
              PLANNING AREA.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in the Southern California 
Planning Area.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or 
any other law, the Secretary of the Interior may not issue a lease for 
the exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in 
the Southern California planning area, as such planning area is 
described in the document entitled `2019-2024 National OCS Oil and Gas 
Leasing Draft Proposed Program', dated January 2018, or a subsequent 
oil and gas leasing program developed under section 18 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1344).''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Simola , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Francis L. Simola

--------------------------------------------------

Francis L. Simola, President and CEO

Date:  May 13, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 2, 2016

s0418

Order 

Clerk

May 2, 2016

149791

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149791

COA: 319527

Saginaw CC: 99-017628-FC

JAMES WASHINGTON, III, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of April 28, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Montgomery 

v Louisiana, cert gtd 575 US ___; 135 S Ct 1546; 191 L Ed 2d 635 (2015). On order of 

the Court, the case having been decided on January 25, 2016, Montgomery v Louisiana, 

577 US ___; 136 S Ct 718; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016), the application is again considered 

and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the 

sentence of the Saginaw Circuit Court on the defendant’s first-degree murder conviction, 

and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing on that conviction pursuant 

to MCL 769.25 and MCL 769.25a. See Montgomery v Louisiana, supra; Miller v 

Alabama, 567 US ___; 132 S Ct 2455; 183 L Ed 2d 407 (2012).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-K of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, we, Ralph Larry Lyons, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that, to our knowledge:



(a)

such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.







By:

/s/ Ralph Larry Lyons

Date:  March 31, 2006

Ralph Larry Lyons

President and Chief Executive Officer







By:

/s/ Charles F. Catlett, III

Date:  March 31, 2006

Charles F. Catlett, III

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**I, Patrick G. Mackey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Berliner Communications, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report, isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006       /s/ Patrick G. Mackey Patrick G. Mackey    Senior Vice President    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
26
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10896 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **Rene Rigoberto Rodriguez,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 354

- 1

**____________ __________________**  Before **Barksdale, Elrod,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Rene Rigoberto Rodriguez pleaded guilty to illegal receipt of a firearm by a person under indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(n) and 924(a)(1)(D)

. He maintains § 922(n) does not pass the historical test provided in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen , 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), and is therefore in violation of the Second Amendment

. Because

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 16, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10896 Document: 00516789784 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2023No. 22

- 10896

2 Rodriguez ( as he concedes ) did not raise this issue in district court, review is only for plain error. E.g. , United States v. Broussard , 669 F.3d 537, 546 (5th Cir. 2012). Under that standard, Rodriguez must show a forfeited plain error (clear

- or - obvious error, rather than one subject to reasonable dispute) that affected his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes that s howing, we have the discretion to correct the reversible plain error, but generally should do so only if it “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings”. Id. An error is not clear or obvious where an issue is dispute d or unresolved, or where there is an absence of controlling authority. E.g. , United States v. Rodriguez

- Parra , 581 F.3d 227, 230

– 31 (5th Cir. 200 9 ) ; see also United States v. Fields , 777 F.3d 799, 802 (5th Cir. 2015) (“In considering whether an er ror is clear or obvious we look to the state of the law at the time of appeal”

. (citation omitted)). In an unpublished opinion, our court rejected the argument that § 922(n) is clearly

- or - obviously unconstitutional under Bruen

. See United States v. Avila , No. 22

- 50088, 2022 WL 17832287, at *2 (5th Cir. 21 Dec. 2022) , petition for cert. filed ( 20 Apr. 2023) (No. 22

- 7352)

. There is no binding precedent holding § 922(n) unconstitutional, and it is not clear Bruen dictates such a res ult. I d. Accordingly, Rodriguez is unable to demonstrate the requisite clear

- or - obvious error. E.g. , Rodriguez

Parra , 581 F.3d at 230

– 31; United States v. Guerrero

- Robledo , 565 F.3d 940, 946 (5th Cir. 2009) (“It certainly is not plain error for the dist rict court to rely on an unpublished opinion that is squarely on point .” )

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 22-10896 Document: 00516789784 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2023
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Node 
-                   2004 Annual FOIA Report              

#   2004 Annual FOIA Report

foia-2004.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DiVall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                    |  |                                        |  |                                                               
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                    |  |                                       
|Dated: May 13, 2008 |  | By:                                    |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                                            
|                    |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Friday, October 18, 2019

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *KenAmericanResources, Inc.,*Docket No. KENT 2013-0211. (Issues include whether the Judgeerred in concluding that the operator’s employees had not given advance noticeof an MSHA inspection.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

 

Dated: September 18, 2019

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel

 

BillingCode 6735-01
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM A. P. GREEN
INDUSTRIES, INC. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          11,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,441
<INVENTORY>                                     52,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,311
<PP&E>                                          96,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,823
<BONDS>                                         37,124
<COMMON>                                         4,477
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,676
<SALES>                                         62,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,652
<CGS>                                           51,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                       920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Michael Thoben, III, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|/s/    E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                                         
|                                                                      
|E. Michael Thoben, III Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                      
|May 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,628
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             102
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    426,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        509,591
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (7,191)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,029,951
<DEPOSITS>                                     875,530
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,025
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,184
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,461
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,029,951
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,797
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,901
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   193
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,891
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,989
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,902
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,176
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,672
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,672
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,877
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,520
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,168
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,234
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,520
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      496
<RECOVERIES>                                       167
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,191
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,384
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,807
        

</TABLE>