alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

  The subsidiaries of the Registrant are Leasing Solutions Receivable, Inc.
("LSRI"), Leasing Solutions Receivables, Inc. II ("LSRI II"), Leasing Solutions
Receivables, Inc. III ("LSRI III"),  Leasing Solutions International, Ltd.
("LSIL"), and Leasing Solutions (Canada) Inc.  LSRI, LSRI II, and LSRI III are
wholly-owned subsidiaries incorporated in California and do business under their
corporate names.  LSIL is incorporated in the United Kingdom and does business
under its corporate name.  Leasing Solutions (Canada) Inc. is incorporated in
Canada and does business under its corporate name.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,999
<PP&E>                                          48,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,233
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,923
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,080
<CGS>                                           78,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (50)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.47)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David A. WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6667.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 14, 2010.

David A. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial show*819ing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly dismissed his motion and Wilson has not made the requisite showing for a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners IV, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Limited, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of
and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:  May 9, 2006             By:     /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Limited

Technology Funding Partners IV, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
2013- 1923.

#### State ex rel. Wilson v. Beljon.

Portage App. No. 2012-P-0055, 2013-Ohio-4753. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1448, 2014-Ohio-1182, 5 N.E.3d 666. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,618
<PP&E>                                       5,404,170
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,443,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 997,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     997,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   997,623
<SALES>                                        707,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               709,243
<CGS>                                          611,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  611,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               255,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (156,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (156,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (156,912)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (11.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.58)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3618 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3618

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain 
                          taxes and revenues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

     Mrs. Napolitano (for herself, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
 Garamendi, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Lowenthal, and Mr. Schiff) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain 
                          taxes and revenues.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local General Sales Tax 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF REVENUES.

    (a) Written Assurances on Use of Revenue.--Section 47107(b) of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by striking ``local 
        taxes'' and inserting ``local excise taxes'';
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ``State tax'' and 
        inserting ``State excise tax''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) This subsection does not apply to State or local general 
sales taxes nor to State or local generally applicable sales taxes.''.
    (b) Restriction on Use of Revenues.--Section 47133 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) 
        by striking ``Local taxes'' and inserting ``Local excise 
        taxes'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``local taxes'' and 
        inserting ``local excise taxes'';
            (3) in subsection (c) by striking ``State tax'' and 
        inserting ``State excise tax''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Limitation on Applicability.--This subsection does not apply 
to--
            ``(1) State or local general sales taxes; or
            ``(2) State or local generally applicable sales taxes.''.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Commission Corrects Interim Rule              

#   Commission Corrects Interim Rule

The Commission has corrected an interim rule that appeared in the Federal Register of December 23, 2013 (78 FR 77354).  The correction adds a conforming change indicating that only original documents need to be filed pursuant to § 2700.75.

interim rule correction.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP02-125-000] 

Take notice that on December 18, 2001, Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP (Gulf South) tendered for filing a request seeking authority to waive certain requirements of sections 10 and 19 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff. Specifically, Gulf South is seeking authority to waive all penalties associated with the Operational Flow Order that was issued on November 24, 2001. 

Gulf South states that copies of this filing has been served upon its customers, interested state commissions and other interested parties. 

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed December 31, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link.                 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31996 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Information Analysis Incorporated                     1998 Report on Form 10-KSB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-26249 and No. 33-305136) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option
Plan and 1996 Stock Option Plan of Information Analysis Incorporated of our
report dated March 4, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Information Analysis Incorporated included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                            /s/ Rubino & McGeehin
Bethesda, Maryland
March 29, 1999


                                       15
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

October 11, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 20, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open

MATTERS TO BE

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of

Labor v. Northshore Mining Company, Docket No. LAKE 2014-

219-M (Issues include whether the Judge erred in interpreting a

regulation that addresses the reporting of eye injuries.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart Deputy

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3601 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3601

    To authorize physicians and other health care providers of the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs to provide information regarding State-
    approved marijuana programs to veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

 Mr. Lamb (for himself and Mr. Meijer) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in 
 addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize physicians and other health care providers of the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs to provide information regarding State-
    approved marijuana programs to veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fully Informed Veteran Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED PROVISION OF INFORMATION ON STATE-APPROVED MARIJUANA 
              PROGRAMS TO VETERANS.

    (a) Authorized Provision of Information.--Notwithstanding the 
provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) or 
any other Federal, State, or local law regulating or prohibiting the 
provision of information on marijuana, the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs shall authorize physicians and other health care providers of 
the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs to provide to veterans who are residents of States with State-
approved marijuana programs information regarding the participation of 
such veterans in such programs.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``information'' includes details such as 
        informational materials, internet websites, and relevant 
        contact information for State-approved marijuana programs.
            (2) The term ``marijuana'' has the meaning given the term 
        ``marihuana'' in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act 
        (21 U.S.C. 802).
            (3) The term ``State'' means each of the several States, 
        the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any 
        territory or possession of the United States, and each 
        federally recognized Indian Tribe.
                                 <all>
```