alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
100 A.3d 538

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALAN S. PORWICH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 025201979).

October 29, 2014.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-037, concluding that ALAN S. PORWICH of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be admonished for violating *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALAN S. PORWICH is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*25ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3419 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ‘‘Joseph R. Lentol 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. SEAN PATRICK

MALONEY of New York, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. 

ESPAILLAT, Ms. MENG, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. NADLER, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. MEEKS, Miss RICE of New York, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. DELGADO, Mr. JONES, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. 

BOWMAN, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. GARBARINO, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. REED, 

and Mr. ZELDIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, 

as the ‘‘Joseph R. Lentol Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH R. LENTOL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3419 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Joseph 

2 R. Lentol Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph R. Lentol Post 

7 Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

# SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATIONS

The
undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medis
Technologies Ltd. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: August 5, 2004

| | /s/ Robert K. Lifton                
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | Robert K. Lifton                    
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |                                     

| | /s/ Israel Fisher                
| | ---------------------------------
| |                                  
| | Israel Fisher                    
| | Senior Vice President-Finance and
| | Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3650 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of receipt 

of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward satisfying the 

3-day inpatient hospital stay requirement for coverage of skilled nursing 

facility services under Medicare, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2021 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. ESTES, and 

Ms. DELBENE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count 

a period of receipt of outpatient observation services 

in a hospital toward satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital stay requirement for coverage of skilled nursing 

facility services under Medicare, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

5 Medicare Coverage Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3650 IH

1 SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF RECEIPT OF OUTPATIENT 

2 OBSERVATION SERVICES IN A HOSPITAL TO3 WARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL STAY 

4 REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED 

5 NURSING FACILITY SERVICES UNDER MEDI6 CARE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(i) of the Social Se8 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, 

10 an individual receiving outpatient observation services 

11 shall be deemed to be an inpatient during such period, 

12 and the date such individual ceases receiving such services 

13 shall be deemed the hospital discharge date (unless such 

14 individual is admitted as a hospital inpatient at the end 

15 of such period).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to receipt of outpatient observa18 tion services beginning on or after January 1, 2021, but 

19 applies to a period of post-hospital extended care services 

20 that was completed before the date of the enactment of 

21 this Act only if an administrative appeal is or has been 

22 made with respect to such services not later than 90 days 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act. Notwith24 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of 

25 Health and Human Services may implement such amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:29 Jun 26, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3650.IH H3650

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3650 IH

1 ment through an interim final regulation, program in2 struction, or otherwise. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-109261 and No. 333-32819 of LOGIC Devices Incorporated on Form S-8 andRegistration Statement No. 333-16591 of LOGIC Devices Incorporated on Form S-3of our report, dated December 16, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of LOGIC Devices Incorporated, for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,and September 28, 2003.

 

/s/Perry-Smith LLP

 

Sacramento, California

December 22, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony J. GOBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30600

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 23, 2008.

Joseph Thomas Mickel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roy Joseph Richard, Jr., for Defendants Appellant.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony J. Gobert has appealed his jury conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He contends that the evidence introduced to prove his guilt was insufficient. We review this question for a manifest miscarriage of justice because Gobert failed to renew his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence. *See United States v. Avants,*367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir.2004). Under that standard, Gobert must show that the record is “de*463void of evidence of guilt” or that the evidence is “so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” *Avants,*367 F.3d at 449.

Gobert contends only that the Government failed to prove that he was in possession of a firearm. *See United States v. Guidry,*406 F.3d 314, 318 (5th Cir.2005) (listing elements of offense); 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Gobert was observed by an acquaintance in possession of a firearm. Accordingly, there was direct evidence that Gobert possessed a firearm and the record was not “devoid of evidence” as to that element of the offense. *See Avants,*367 F.3d at 449; *United States v. Munoz,*150 F.3d 401, 416 (5th Cir.1998). The conviction is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Shareholders and Board of Directors 

Sizeler Property Investors, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-107043 and No. 333-103380, and Form S-8 No. 333-16073, No. 333-85212, and No. 333-99541) of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedules of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc., Sizeler Property Investors, Inc.’s ****management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

March 16, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0088

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRANDAE LEE ROSSOL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 7, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 1 2023

05/01/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0088
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 369 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve affordability and 

reduce premium costs of health insurance for consumers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2021 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mr. GOMEZ, Ms. CLARKE

of New York, Ms. SEWELL, Mrs. MCBATH, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. 

BARRAGA ́N, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Ms. PORTER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

RYAN, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. DEUTCH, and Ms. SCANLON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 

affordability and reduce premium costs of health insurance for consumers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Afford5 ability Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 369 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVE AFFORDABILITY AND REDUCE PREMIUM 

2 COSTS OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR CON3 SUMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 36B(b)(3)(A) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(A) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—The ap8 plicable percentage for any taxable year shall be 

9 the percentage such that the applicable percent10 age for any taxpayer whose household income is 

11 within an income tier specified in the following 

12 table shall increase, on a sliding scale in a lin13 ear manner, from the initial premium percent14 age to the final premium percentage specified in 

15 such table for such income tier: 

‘‘In the case of household 

income (expressed as 

a percent of poverty line) 

within the following income tier: 

The initial 

premium 

percentage is— 

The final 

premium 

percentage is— 

Up to 150.0 percent ................................... 0.0 0.0

150.0 percent up to 200.0 percent ............. 0.0 3.0

200.0 percent up to 250.0 percent ............. 3.0 4.0

250.0 percent up to 300.0 percent ............. 4.0 6.0

300.0 percent up to 400.0 percent ............. 6.0 8.5

400.0 percent and higher ........................... 8.5 8.5’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

17 36B(c)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

18 amended by striking ‘‘but does not exceed 400 percent’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 369 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# FILED

March 6, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF AP PEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHV ILLE

CITY OF MURFREESBORO, a ) Municipal Corporation in Rutherford ) County, State of Tennessee, ) ) Plaintiff/Appella

nt, ) Rutherford Circuit Consolidated

) Case Nos. 34626 and 34629 )

vs. ) ) MARIANN M. WORTHINGTON, ) Appeal No. 01A01-9703-CV-00124 ) Defendant/Appellee ) ) CITY OF MURFREESBORO, a ) Municipal Corporation in Rutherford ) County, State of Tennessee, ) ) Plaintiff/Appella

nt, )

)

vs. ) ) THOMAS W. WORTHINGTO N and ) wife, Mariann M. Wort hington, )

) Defendants/App

ellees. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of Plaintiff/Appellant City of

Murfreesboro, the petition is denied.

Enter this day of March, 1998.

HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, J.

ALAN E. HIGHERS, J.

DAVID R. FARMER, J.
CIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 22-0751 

MARSHALL BRADLEY ROWE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

SGT. BRADLEY BRAGG, Lewis & 

Clark County Detention Center, 

Respondent. 

FILED 

JAN 1 1 2023 

Bowen G eenwood 

CI_ r ,rerna Court 

o* Montana 

ORDER 

Marshall Bradley Rowe has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, asserting 

that his sentence calculation is in error because his three sentences should all run 

concurrently. Rowe has also filed supplemental documents, including a sentence 

calculation and sentencing judgments. Upon review of his Petition and attachments, we 

deem it appropriate to require a response. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of 

Correction is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which to prepare, file, 

and serve a written response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus together with 

appropriate documentary exhibits. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Marshall Bradley Rowe personally. 

DATED this 10- 4 day ofJanuary, 2023. 

At " "","'Ist,ftV •-• 

. 

A l

Justice 

01/11/2023

Case Number: OP 22-0751
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS                            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999                       
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999           
<CASH>                                       3,660,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,199,197
<PP&E>                                      16,611,562
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,444,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,366,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,156,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,366,434
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,891,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,091,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,091,283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,091,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-31852, No. 33-39266, No.33-45127, No. 33-76066 and No. 33-67945) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-67973) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Compensation Plan, Stock Option Plan for Directors and Charles A. Root StockOption Agreement of Tangram Enterprise Solutions, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2003, except for Note 4, as to which the date is February 13, 2003, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Tangram Enterprise Solutions, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 3, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

DONNELLY CORPORATION
HOLLAND, MICHIGAN

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
February 11, 2000, relating to the combined consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Donnelly Corporation appearing in the corporation's annual
report on Form 10-K for the six months ended December 31, 1999, in that
corporation's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statements for that
corporation's 1998 Employees' Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-67969),
1998 Employee Stock Option Plan (Registration No. 333-67967), 1997 Employees'
Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 33-34746) and Non-Employee Directors'
Stock Option Plan (Registration No. 33-55499).


/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 24, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3690 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3690

   To accommodate certain facilities within the right-of-way on any 
                          Federal-aid highway.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

Ms. Bourdeaux introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To accommodate certain facilities within the right-of-way on any 
                          Federal-aid highway.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solar Use Network Act'' or the ``SUN 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCOMMODATION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON 
              ANY FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other State or Federal law, 
including regulations, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, 
renewable energy generation facilities, electrical transmission and 
distribution infrastructure, and broadband infrastructure and conduit 
shall be treated as a facility covered under part 645 of title 23, Code 
of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), for purposes of 
section 109(l) of title 23, United States Code, for purposes of being 
accommodated under such section.
    (b) State Approval.--A State, on behalf of the Secretary of 
Transportation, may approve accommodating the infrastructure and 
facilities described in subsection (a) within any right-of-way on a 
Federal-aid highway pursuant to section 109(l) of title 23, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, Charles C. Best, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form of Interlink Electronics, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: December 22, 2006