alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mendecino Ventures, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  March 31,  2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Jehu Hand, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

/s/ Jehu Hand
By: Jehu Hand
President and Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

jlf/Inventory

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIGOBERTO RAMOS-LOPEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72603

Agency No. A098-596-266

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, AND TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Rigoberto Ramos-Lopez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming the immigration

judge's denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
jlf/Inventory 2 08-72603

protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Santos-Lemus v.

Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel reversal of the IJ's conclusion that petitioner

failed to establish that the harm he suffered at the hands of gang members in El

Salvador was on account of a protected ground. See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563

F.3d 855, 858-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (concluding that resistance to gang activity is not

a particular social group for the purpose of establishing nexus to a protected

ground); Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2001) (personal

retribution is not persecution on account of a protected ground). Accordingly,

petitioner's asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims fail.

Contrary to petitioner's allegation, the BIA did not issue a streamlined

decision, and the BIA's decision did not constitute a due process violation. See

Falcon-Cariche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir. 2003). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### The State ex rel. Johnson, Appellant, *v.*Hudson, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Johnson v. Hudson,*118 Ohio St.3d 308, 2008-Ohio-2451.]

(No. 2008-0326

Submitted May 21, 2008

Decided May 28, 2008.)

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because res judicata bars Johnson’s successive habeas corpus petition, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 1976, the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court convicted appellant, John A. Johnson, of aggravated murder with specifications, kidnapping, and rape. The common pleas court sentenced Johnson to death for the aggravated murder with specifications and further sentenced him to prison for his kidnapping and rape convictions. On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed. *State v. Johnson*(Jan. 30, 1978), Cuyahoga App. No. 36618, 1978 WL 217677. In 1978, we reversed Johnson’s death sentence and modified the sentence to life imprison*309ment based on *Lockett v. Ohio*(1978), 438 U.S. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 L.Ed.2d 973, and *Bell v. Ohio*(1978), 438 U.S. 637, 98 S.Ct. 2977, 57 L.Ed.2d 1010.

John A. Johnson, pro se.

Nancy Hardin Rogers, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 3} In 1998, Johnson filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Richland County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from prison because he had never been returned to the common pleas court for resentencing pursuant to Crim.R. 32 and 43 after his death sentence had been modified. The court of appeals dismissed Johnson’s petition, and on appeal, we affirmed. *Johnson v. Mitchell*(1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 123, 707 N.E.2d 471.

{¶ 4} In October 2007, Johnson filed a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Richland County. Johnson claimed that he was entitled to the writ because both his 1976 sentencing entry and this court’s 1978 entry modifying his death sentence to life imprisonment were void for several reasons, including that the sentencing entry did not comply with Crim.R. 32. Appellee, Mansfield Correctional Institution Warden Stuart Hudson, filed a motion to dismiss. The court of appeals granted the warden’s motion and dismissed the petition.

{¶ 5} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Johnson could have raised his claims in his previous petition. *Wells v. Hudson,*113 Ohio St.3d 308, 2007-Ohio-1955, 865 N.E.2d 46, ¶ 6. Having filed a previous petition, Johnson is barred by res judicata from filing a successive habeas corpus petition. *Everett v. Eberlin,*114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 8.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Fresno,
      October 10 2007.

     

    Board
      of
      Directors

    FacePrint
      Global Solutions Inc

    1111
      E.
      Herndon Avenue, Suite 115

    Fresno,
      CA, 93720

    Attn
      Jean
      Houle, Fax: 559-685-9160

    And
      Peter
      Hogan, attorney, fax: 310-208-1154

    


    As
      of
      Friday October 12, 2007, 5hrs pm, I am resigning as an officer and director
      of
      the company. This decision is made for the best interest of the company. I
      will
      be available anytime for any question during the transition period. I want
      to
      wish you all the best.

     

    Best
      regards

     

    
      	/s/
              Pierre
              Cote	 	 	 
	
              

            	 	 	
            


    

     

    Pierre
      Cote

    5301
      N.
      Ricewood Avenue

    Fresno,
      CA 93711

    559-435-4363
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Thomas R. Quinn, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date:  May 19, 2015

By:
/s/ Thomas R. Quinn, Jr.Thomas R. Quinn, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

                     FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

         This First Addendum to Consulting Agreement is made and entered into
effective the 31st day of October 1996 (the "Effective Date"), by and between
Christie N. Lambrinides ("Mr. Lambrinides") and Skyline Chili, Inc., an Ohio
corporation (the "Company").

         WHEREAS, Mr. Lambrinides and the Company entered into a Consulting
Agreement dated August 31, 1994 (the "Consulting Agreement") pursuant to which
Mr. Lambrinides has been providing consulting services to the Company;

         WHEREAS, the initial term of the Consulting Agreement expired on
October 30, 1996; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 9(a) of the Consulting Agreement, Mr.
Lambrinides and the Company have mutually agreed to renew the Consulting
Agreement for an additional one year term.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions contained herein, Mr. Lambrinides and the Company agree as follows:

         1. RENEWAL OF CONSULTING PERIOD. From the Effective Date through
October 26, 1997 (the "Consulting Period"), Mr. Lambrinides shall continue to
provide such Consulting Services as are reasonably requested by the Company. All
of the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall continue to apply
during this extended Consulting Period. The Company shall continue to maintain
the life insurance policy on Mr. Lambrinides' life in the amount of $250,000
from the Effective Date through October 26, 1997.

         2. TERM OF FIRST ADDENDUM. Unless terminated on an earlier date or
renewed as provided in the Consulting Agreement, the extended term of the
Consulting Agreement and this First Addendum shall expire on October 26, 1997.
All references in the Consulting Agreement to its "initial term" shall now be
deemed references to the extended term described in this First Addendum as the
context requires.

         3. MISCELLANEOUS. Except as modified in this First Addendum, all of the
terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain in effect and are
hereby reaffirmed by the parties hereto. Capitalized terms used in this First
Addendum and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Consulting Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mr. Lambrinides and the Company have signed this
First Addendum as of the Effective Date.

                                     /s/ Christie N. Lambrinides
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Christie N. Lambrinides


                                     SKYLINE CHILI, INC.

                                     By: /s/ Kevin R. McDonnell
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                     Its:  President, CEO
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Can't We All Just Get Along?  Bullying Behavior - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tDqAg5w7Uv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/cant-just-get-along-bullying-behavior-webinar\/\">Can’t We All Just Get Along?   Bullying Behavior<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/cant-just-get-along-bullying-behavior-webinar\/embed\/#?secret=tDqAg5w7Uv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Can’t We All Just Get Along?   Bullying Behavior” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"tDqAg5w7Uv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Harriette H. Charbonneau, Director of Human Resources, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20573.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Sec. 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive.

Harold J. Creel, Jr.,

Chairman.

The Members of the Performance Review Board Are:

1. Joseph E. Brennan, Commissioner

1. Antony M. Merck, Commissioner

3. John A. Moran, Commissioner

4. Delmond J.H. Won, Commissioner

                    5. Norman D. Kline, Chief Administrative Law Judge                          ( print page 65504)    

6. Frederick M. Dolan, Jr., Administrative Law Judge

7. Paul B. Lang, Administrative Law Judge

8. Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary

9. Bruce A. Dombrowski, Executive Director

10. Vern W. Hill, Director, Bureau of Enforcement

11. Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing

12. Florence A. Carr, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis

13. Austin L. Schmitt, Deputy Executive Director

[FR Doc. 01-31270 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000804127
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVI LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,873,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,928,495
<PP&E>                                      10,518,848
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,274,424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,172,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          366,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,562,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,172,919
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,086,854
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  679,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                967,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            967,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   967,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    67.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    67.49
        

</TABLE>
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

November 6, 2017

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, November 29, 2017

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. TheAmerican Coal Company,*Docket No. LAKE 2011-701 (Issues include whether onremand the Judge erred by not adequately explaining the basis for the assessedpenalty amounts.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.  Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT:                                    1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A  (Second Amendment) for the period
ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/
Chen Gao
 Chen Gao
 Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
   Dated:
April 2, 2008
#### Kathleen JENNINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jim ROGERS, Warden, Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-30019

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 23, 2010.

Kathleen Jennings, St. Gabriel, LA, pro se.

Jerry L. Jones, District Attorney’s Office, Monroe, LA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kathleen Jennings, Louisiana prisoner #468423, appeals the dismissal, as time barred, of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, which she filed to challenge her jury trial conviction of second degree murder. Jennings contends that her § 2254 petition was timely in light of *Jimenez v. Quarterman,*555 U.S. 113, 129 S.Ct. 681, 172 L.Ed.2d 475 (2009).

A one-year limitations period applies to state prisoners filing federal habeas petitions. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). In most cases, the limitations period runs from the date that the conviction being challenged became final through “the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.” *Id.*§ 2244(d)(1)(A). Under *Jimenez,*when a habeas petitioner is granted the right to file an out-of-time appeal, “‘the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review’ must reflect the conclusion of the out-of-time direct appeal, or the expiration of the time for seeking review of that appeal.” *Jimenez,*129 S.Ct. at 686-87 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A)).

Accordingly, Jennings’ one-year limitation period began to run upon expiration of the 90-day period for seeking a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court following the Louisiana Supreme Court’s denial, on direct review, of her writ application. *See*Sup.Ct. R. 13.1. In view of the foregoing, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Jennings also argues the merits of her constitutional claims. Because a COA was *907not granted as to these issues, we will not consider them in this appeal. *See Lackey v. Johnson,*116 F.3d 149, 151 (5th Cir.1997).

JUDGMENT REVERSED; CASE REMANDED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.