alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment  to Equity Awards



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO EQUITY AWARDS 
 This Amendment to Equity Awards (the “Amendment”) by and
between Red Hat, Inc. (the “Company”) and Joanne Rohde (the “Executive”) shall be effective as of October 11, 2007. 
 Background 
  

	A.	Pursuant to the equity award agreements between the Company and Executive, as may have been amended from time to time (as so amended, the “Award Agreements”), Executive
holds an aggregate of 731,250 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Options”). 

  

	B.	Effective as of the date hereof, Executive has previously retired from employment with the Company and resigned as an officer of the Company. 

  

	C.	Immediately following Executive’s retirement, the Company and Executive entered into a letter agreement effective as of the date hereof (the “Consulting Agreement”),
pursuant to which Executive agreed to provide consulting services for a period of six months. 

  

	D.	Executive has requested that the Company amend the Award Agreements to provide for an extension of the period during which Executive’s vested Options may be exercised, as set
forth below in this Amendment. As an inducement for Executive to enter into and perform the transactions contemplated by the Consulting Agreement, the Company has agreed to enter into this Amendment subject to Executive having previously entered
into the Consulting Agreement. 

  

	E.	Executive acknowledges that Executive has reviewed the terms of the Award Agreements and the applicable equity compensation plans of the Company and has received adequate
opportunity to obtain professional advice, including legal, tax and accounting advice, with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Consulting Agreement and this Amendment. 

  

	F.	In consideration of the Company’s and Executive’s respective obligations under the Consulting Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows. 

 Agreement 

Notwithstanding anything in any Award Agreements to the contrary, Executive’s vested
Options shall be exercisable by Executive for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days after the term of the Consulting Agreement has expired (the “Exercise Period”); provided, however, that in no event shall the
Exercise Period for any Option extend beyond the later of (a) the 15th day of the third month of the year in which the applicable Award Agreement
would have otherwise expired and (b) the scheduled expiration date of such Option. 
  

 Page 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

									
	RED HAT, INC.	 		 	EXECUTIVE
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael R. Cunningham
	 		 	 /s/ Joanne Rohde

	Name:	 	Michael R. Cunningham	 		 	Joanne Rohde
	Title:	 	General Counsel	 		 	Date:	 	October 11, 2007
	Date:	 	October 11, 2007	 		 		 	

  

 Page 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3419 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3419

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Joseph R. Lentol 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

  Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Sean Patrick 
     Maloney of New York, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. 
Espaillat, Ms. Meng, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Tonko, 
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Meeks, Miss Rice of New York, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. 
 Delgado, Mr. Jones, Mr. Torres of New York, Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke of 
 New York, Mr. Jacobs of New York, Ms. Malliotakis, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. 
    Garbarino, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Zeldin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Joseph R. Lentol 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH R. LENTOL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joseph R. Lentol Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph R. 
Lentol Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1



                       [Mitchell, Wiggins & Company, LLP]


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




To Board of Directors
Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the December 31, 2002,  annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Central Virginia Bankshares,  Inc., of our report dated
January  17,  2003,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Central
Virginia Bankshares, Inc., and subsidiary, as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated  statements of income,  stockholders'  equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Mitchell, Wiggins & Company, LLL


Richmond, Virginia
March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          50,542
<SECURITIES>                                     5,966
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,245
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,181      
<PP&E>                                         105,479     
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,953   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,584     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,123   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                            56
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,955      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,584        
<SALES>                                              0         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,386         
<CGS>                                                0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  349,468         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 657      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,516)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,528)     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,988)     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 1, 2006  /s/ Francis L. Simola Francis L. Simola Chairman, President and CEO
#### David CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-73977.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 3, 2015.*

Filed Jan. 21, 2016.

Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire, Law Office of Mario Acosta, Jr., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Joseph D. Hardy, Jr., Esquire, Trial, OIL, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jesse David Lorenz, Esquire, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*472Before: D.W. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

We amend the memorandum disposition filed on August 6, 2015. We file an amended memorandum disposition in light of the en banc decision in *Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch,*No. 09-71415. The mandate shall issue in the ordinary course.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM**

David Chavez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and we grant the petition.

The BIA erred as a matter of law when it applied the modified categorical approach to conclude that Chavez’s conviction for petty theft with priors in violation of California Penal Code §§ 484(a) and 666 constituted an aggravated felony theft offense. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(G); 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). California law does not require the jury to unanimously agree as to which of the disjunctively worded forms of theft set forth in § 484(a) is the basis for the defendant’s conviction. *See People v. Fenderson,*188 Cal.App.4th 625, 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 17, 27 (2010); *People v. McLemore,*27 Cal.App.4th 601, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 687, 689 (1994). As a result, the statute is not divisible and the modified categorical approach is inapplicable. *See Descamps v. United States,*— U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 2282, 2285, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013); *Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch,*809 F.3d 515, 525 (9th Cir.2015) (en banc); *Rendon v. Holder,*764 F.3d 1077, 1081, 1086 (9th Cir.2014).

Because the modified categorical approach does not apply and “a petty theft conviction, under Cal.Penal Code §§ 484(a) and 666, is not a categorical match to the federal definition of a theft offense,” *United States v. Rivera,*658 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.2011), the BIA erred when it concluded that Chavez was removable as charged under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(G) and 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).

Petition Granted.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

October 13, 2006 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, October 26, 2006 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Hanson Aggregates New York, Inc., 

Docket No. YORK 2005-22-M. (Issues include whether the 

Administrative Law Judge erred when he granted the Secretary of 

Labor’s motion for summary decision and found that the operator 

violated the requirement of 30 C.F.R. § 56.14211(c) that a raised 

component of mobile equipment must be secured to prevent 

accidental lowering when persons working on or around the 

equipment are exposed to the hazard of accidental lowering of the 

component). 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs, subject to 

29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v . Knight Hawk Coal, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v . Knight Hawk Coal, LLC

Knight Hawk LAKE 2014-121-R Meeting Notice 3-24-16.pdf

Knight Hawk LAKE 2014-121-R Meeting Notice 3-24-16.htm

secretary-labor-v-knight-hawk-coal-docket-lake2014-121-r-etalmarch-24-2016.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1
CertificationCertification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the Company) certifies that the Amendment No. 1 to
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended July 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in that Form
10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  September 20, 2004 | Timothy S. Durham
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners IV, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Limited, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Partnership as of and for the
period covered by the Report.


Date:  May 12, 2004    By:     /s/   Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Limited

Technology Funding Partners IV, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
|                                  |  |                           
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Information Analysis Incorporated |  | 2006 Report on Form 10-KSB



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Sandor Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer of Information Analysis Incorporated, a Virginia corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



| | 1 | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /S/ Sandor Rosenberg                         
|                     |  |     |  | Sandor Rosenberg, Chairman of the            
|                     |  |     |  | Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Information Analysis
Incorporated and will be retained by Information Analysis Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3626 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3626

    To amend title 37, United States Code, to require the Secretary 
concerned to pay a member in the reserve component of an Armed Force a 
 special bonus or incentive pay in the same amount as a member in the 
                 regular component of that Armed Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

     Mr. Ryan (for himself, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Neal, Mr. 
Ruppersberger, Mr. San Nicolas, Mrs. Bustos, Mrs. Axne, Mr. Kahele, and 
 Ms. Spanberger) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 37, United States Code, to require the Secretary 
concerned to pay a member in the reserve component of an Armed Force a 
 special bonus or incentive pay in the same amount as a member in the 
                 regular component of that Armed Force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reserve Incentive 
Pay Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUAL SPECIAL BONUS AND INCENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF THE 
              RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 37, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 357. Special bonus and incentive pay authorities for members of 
              the reserve components of the armed forces
    ``The Secretary concerned shall pay a member of the reserve 
component of an armed force a special bonus or incentive pay in the 
same monthly amount as that paid to a member in the regular component 
of such armed force performing comparable work requiring comparable 
skills.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
356 the following:

``357. Special bonus and incentive pay authorities for members of the 
                            reserve components of the armed forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jean-Marc Stiegemeier, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Farmstead Telephone Group, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.    The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and

2.    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Dated:  April 6, 2005

/s/ Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
------------------------------
Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>