alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
100 A.3d 189

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID G. CHRISTOFFERSEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 038631983).

October 21, 2014.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-384, concluding that DAVID G. CHRISTOF-FERSEN of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), *RPC*1.15(c) (failure to segregate funds), and *RPC*1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for a period of two years;

And DAVID G. CHRISTOFFERSEN having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

*3It is ORDERED that DAVID G. CHRISTOFFERSEN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts on a quarter basis for a period of two years, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
QUARTER OF 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         119,586
<SECURITIES>                                    66,369
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,547
<INVENTORY>                                     20,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,992
<PP&E>                                           3,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,762
<SALES>                                         70,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,014
<CGS>                                           24,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,041)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[DESCRIPTION] Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for the Year Ending 06/30/96.
[TEXT]
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THESE SCHEDULES CONTAIN SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996.  THIS
INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THIS
FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             174
<SECURITIES>                                        21
<RECEIVABLES>                                      832
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167
<INVENTORY>                                        745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1667
<PP&E>                                            4335
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                         547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3179
<SALES>                                          15306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15306
<CGS>                                             9592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    612
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3492 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend certain morale, welfare, 

and recreation privileges to recipients of the gold star lapel button. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself and Ms. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend certain 

morale, welfare, and recreation privileges to recipients 

of the gold star lapel button. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Families 

5 Benefits Protection Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3492 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MORALE, WELFARE, AND 

2 RECREATION PRIVILEGES TO CERTAIN RE3 CIPIENTS OF THE GOLD STAR LAPEL BUTTON 

4 OR NEXT OF KIN DECEASED PERSONNEL 

5 LAPEL BUTTON. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 54 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 

9 ‘‘§ 1067. Use of commissary stores and MWR facilities: 

10 certain recipients of the gold star lapel 

11 button or next of kin deceased personnel 

12 lapel button 

13 ‘‘(a) ELIGIBILITY.—A covered individual shall be per14 mitted to use commissary stores and MWR retail facilities 

15 on the same basis as a member of the armed forces on 

16 active duty. 

17 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 ‘‘(1) The term ‘covered individual’ means an 

19 adult individual who— 

20 ‘‘(A) is the surviving child of a member; 

21 and 

22 ‘‘(B) who has received a gold star lapel 

23 button under section 1126 of this title or a next 

24 of kin deceased personnel lapel button. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3492 IH

1 ‘‘(2) The term ‘MWR retail facilities’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 1063 of this 

3 title.’’. 

4 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

5 at the beginning of chapter 54 of title 10, United States 

6 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

7 item: 

‘‘1067. Use of commissary stores and MWR facilities: certain recipients of the 

gold star lapel button or next of kin deceased personnel lapel 

button.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Sec'y of Labor on behalf of Jimmy Lee Hoover              

#   Sec'y of Labor on behalf of Jimmy Lee Hoover

On January 19, 2023, the Commission issued its decision in Sec'y of Labor on behalf of Jimmy Lee Hoover v. Moseneca Manufacturer LLC, d/b/a American Tripoli, Docket CENT 2024--0024.

Commission%20Decision%28Hoover%20v%20MoSeneca%29CENT%202024-0024.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
107 A.3d 679

#### IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN GREENMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 010132003).

February 20, 2015.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*l:20-3(g)(4) and *Rule*1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of JONATHAN GREEN-MAN of FAIR LAWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003;

And on January 14, 2015, the Court having ordered respondent to appear for an audit at the Office of Attorney Ethics with the *491records requested to date, on or before February 13, 2015, or be temporarily suspended without further notice;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court that respondent has failed to comply with the Court’s Order;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JONATHAN GREENMAN is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JONATHAN GREENMAN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JONATHAN GREENMAN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that JONATHAN GREENMAN comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Michael Khoury, certify that:    
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SourcingLink.net, Inc.;    
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;    
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;    
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     
b.
[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     
c.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     
d.
Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and    
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
    
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
   
Date: May 30, 2005
/s/    Michael Khoury
#### Appeal of OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS CO.

No. 4514.

Opinion Filed January 26, 1915.

(146 Pac. 21.)

*-Appeal from, State Board of Equalization. 'OJmies Mitschrichr Referee.*

Appeal of the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company from assessment of the State Board of Equalization.

Report of referee confirmed, and judgment ordered accordingly.

*422
      *Flynn, -Ames, Chambers, Lowe & Richardson,*for petitioner.

*•Chas. West,*Atty. Gen., and *S'. I. McBllwes,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

KANE, C. J.

This was an appeal by the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company from the action of the State Board of Equalization in assessing its property for the purposes of taxation for the year 1912. By agreement of counsel, the cause was referred 'to the same referee as appointed in cause No. 4512, In the Matter of the -Appeal of the *Caney River Gas Co.*from the Assessment of the State Board of Equalization, *post,*146 Pac. 20. The cause now comes on to be heard upon the motion of the appellant to confirm the report of the referee and objections filed thereto by the Attorney General. As the cases were tried together and are in all respects similar, the report of the referee herein will be confirmed, and judgment ordered accordingly upon the authority of the former case.

All the Justices concur.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Node 
-                   2005 Annual FOIA Report              

#   2005 Annual FOIA Report

foia-2005.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132464 & (40) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, E. RICHARD RANDOLPH and BETTY J. Justices 

RANDOLPH,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 132464 

 COA: 259943 

Newaygo CC: 01-018281-CH

CLARENCE E. REISIG, MONICA REISIG, 

WILLIAM HINKLEY, and DEBRA HINKLEY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings 

ordered by the Court of Appeals. 

d1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 4, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Cleo Anthanett CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC.; Stephanie Archer-Smith, Executive Director; Portia McConnell, Director of Children Services; Michelle Young, Regional Director; Toni Adair, Sr. Family Services Coordinator; John J. Schiavone, Executive Director, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-1769.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 28, 2015.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2016.

Cleo Anthanett Christopher, Appellant Pro Se. James Douglas Bragdon, Brian Travis Tucker, Gallagher Evelius *&*Jones, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *139*Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc.,*No. l:14-ev-03184-RDB, 2015 WL 3745025 (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*