alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Land
Lease (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Shannon E. Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    SHANNON E. SMITH
|Name:  |  | Shannon E. Smith       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 11, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3643 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3643

  To amend chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, to direct the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to allow a veteran to receive a full year 
supply of contraceptive pills, transdermal patches, vaginal rings, and 
     other hormonal contraceptive products, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

Ms. Underwood (for herself and Mr. Lamb) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, to direct the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to allow a veteran to receive a full year 
supply of contraceptive pills, transdermal patches, vaginal rings, and 
     other hormonal contraceptive products, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Contraception Expansion 
for Veterans Act'' or the ``ACE Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. FULL YEAR SUPPLY OF CONTRACEPTIVE PILLS, TRANSDERMAL PATCHES, 
              VAGINAL RINGS, AND OTHER HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS.

    (a) Full Year Supply.--Chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after section 1720J the following new section:
``Sec. 1720K. Full year supply of contraceptive pills, transdermal 
              patches, vaginal rings, and other hormonal contraceptive 
              products
    ``(a) Request for Full Year Supply.--The Secretary shall ensure 
that a veteran who is enrolled in the system of annual patient 
enrollment under section 1705 of this title and who receives a 
prescription for contraceptive pills, transdermal patches, vaginal 
rings, or other hormonal contraceptive products may, upon request, fill 
such prescription as a full year supply.
    ``(b) Notice.--A veteran described by subsection (a) shall be 
notified of the option for a full year supply provided by subsection 
(a) at the time at which the prescription is issued.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1720J the following new item:

``1720K. Full year supply of contraceptive pills, transdermal patches, 
                            vaginal rings, and other hormonal 
                            contraceptive products.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 13, 2004



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
101 A.3d 1077

#### IN THE MATTER OF ADAM K. BLOCK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 046571993).

November 20, 2014.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-026, concluding on the record certified to the *34Board pursuant to *Rule*l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that ADAM K. BLOCK of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be censured for violating *RPC*5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), and *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ADAM K. BLOCK is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3743 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 181
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3743

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2021

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To increase funding for the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and 
Drug Administration and for the Foundation for the National Institutes 
                               of Health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting the Foundation for the 
National Institutes of Health and the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the 
Food and Drug Administration Act''.

SEC. 2. REAGAN-UDALL FOUNDATION AND FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL 
              INSTITUTES OF HEALTH.

    (a) Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and Drug Administration.--
Section 770(n) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
379dd(n)) is amended by striking ``$500,000 and not more than 
$1,250,000'' and inserting ``$1,250,000 and not more than $5,000,000''.
    (b) Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.--Section 
499(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290b(l)) is amended 
by striking ``$500,000 and not more than $1,250,000'' and inserting 
``$1,250,000 and not more than $5,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 181

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3743

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To increase funding for the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and 
Drug Administration and for the Foundation for the National Institutes 
                               of Health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 9, 2021

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-4779

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus NICHOLAS RANDOLPH KELLAM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00043-WLO) Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 16, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter L. Jones, JONES, FREE & KNIGHT, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, David P. Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Nicholas Randolph Kellam was convicted of two counts of distribution of cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000), and sentenced to concurrent 120-month prison terms. He now appeals his conviction. We affirm. At trial, Nancy Love Foye testified that her husband, Edward, was incarcerated on federal drug charges. Based on a discussion with her husband and in an effort to obtain a reduction of his prison term, Nancy contacted Kellam and expressed her interest in purchasing cocaine base from him. She then informed authorities that she was willing to provide them with evidence of Kellam’s drug dealing. The authorities accepted her offer, and she completed two controlled buys of cocaine base from Kellam. During closing argument, defense counsel commented on the fact that the United States did not call Edward Foye to testify. Counsel stated that the evidence suggested that Foye and Kellam were in the drug business together. The district court sustained the United States’ objection to these statements and instructed the jury that “whether Mr. Foye was involved in a previous drug connection is not for you to determine. . . . What is at issue here is whether Mrs. Foye . . . did the things which . . . cause you to believe that the defendant committed the crimes with which he is charged.”- 3 - On appeal, Kellam claims that, in sustaining the objection, the district court deprived him of a fair trial. We disagree. Generally, to properly comment on a missing witness, the party failing to call the witness must have it peculiarly within its power to call the witness and the witness must be able to elucidate issues relevant to trial. United States v. Brooks , 928 F.2d 1403, 1412 (4th Cir. 1991). Here, the district court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the objection. First, Edward Foye was equally available to each side and could have been subpoenaed to appear. Second, his testimony would not have shed light on the issue of whether Kellam sold drugs to Nancy Foye on two occasions in 2005. We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

June 17, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, July 16, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., Docket No. VA 2013-291. (Issues 

include whether the Judge erred in ruling that a particular location 

in a preheat tower was a “working place” for purposes of an 

examination requirement.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
**Exhibit
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc.,
      (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Chen Gao


Chen
      Gao


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer








Dated:
      August 14, 2007
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 25, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00582-CV

GERMAINE JAMES, Appellant

V.

JOSE AGUILERA, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1048608

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This attempted appeal is from an interlocutory order signed by the trial court 

on July 15, 2014, sustaining a contest to an affidavit of indigence filed by 

appellant. On August 28, 2014, we directed the Harris County District Clerk to file 

a partial clerk’s record in order that we might determine our jurisdiction. The 

record has been filed and there is no final appealable judgment. See Kilsby v. MidCentury Ins. Co. of Tex., No. 14-07-00981-CV, 2008 WL 889428 (Tex. App.–
2

Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008, no pet.) (memo op.) (dismissing appeal of 

interlocutory order sustaining challenge to affidavit of inability to pay costs).

On September 25, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a). In response, appellant filed a Motion to Continue Appeal and an 

Amended Motion to Continue Appeal. Appellant has not demonstrated that this 

Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s motions are 

denied and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Further, we deny as moot appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal on another 

basis.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC              

#   Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC

On April 10, 2018, the Commission issued its decision in *Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC*, Docket Nos. PENN 2014-108 et al.  

Commission-Decision(Lehigh Antracite Coal LLC)PENN 2014-108 et al.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30552

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIELLE COLLINS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:16-CR-125-7

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danielle Collins appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his 

conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He asserts that the 

district court erred in denying a reduction in his offense level under U.S.S.G. 

§ 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility. We review the denial of a reduction 

for acceptance of responsibility with greater deference than clear error review 

and will not reverse unless the district court’s decision was without foundation. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 16, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30552 Document: 00514390428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2018
No. 17-30552

2

See United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008); United 

States v. Buchanan, 485 F.3d 274, 287 (5th Cir. 2007). 

The presentence report (PSR) recommended against a § 3E1.1 reduction 

on the basis that Collins was arrested and charged with a new criminal offense 

after pleading guilty in this case. Collins failed to rebut the facts in the PSR, 

and the district court properly relied on the undisputed finding as to Collins’s

post-plea criminal conduct. See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 329 (5th 

Cir. 1998). 

In light of that finding, the district court did not err in denying Collins a 

reduction under § 3E1.1. Section 3E1.1 provides that a district court deciding 

whether to grant a reduction should consider as a factor whether the defendant 

voluntarily ended or withdrew from criminal conduct, even if the conduct is not

related to the offense of conviction. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(B)) (2015); United 

States v. Rickett, 89 F.3d 224, 227 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Watkins, 

911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). Because the uncontested record reflected

that Collins did not withdraw from criminal conduct, the district court’s refusal 

to award a reduction under § 3E1.1 was not without foundation. See JuarezDuarte, 513 F.3d at 211. Finally, to the extent Collins’s plea agreement 

obligated the Government to move for a § 3E1.1 reduction, Collins’s appellate 

brief fails adequately to argue that the Government breached the agreement. 

Collins thereby waived that argument. See United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 

433, 446–47 (5th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 17-30552 Document: 00514390428 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2018
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David W. Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ David W. Hempstead


David W. Hempstead


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


October 22, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2014-0060.

#### State v. Dukles.

Medina App. No. 12CA0100-M, 2013-Ohio-5263. Reported at 138 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2014-Ohio-1674, 6 N.E.3d 1205. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.