alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-39,908]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on August 27, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Cleveland Caroknit, Lawndale, North Carolina.

An investigation applicable to the petitioning group of workers is in process (TA-W-39,518). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of December 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment, Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-31632  Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT
10.22


 


 


 


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


 


Amount $100,000                                                                                 February
12, 2007


 


 


 


                For
value received, the undersigned, GeoPetro Resources Company (“Payor”), hereby
promises to pay on demand to Stuart J. Doshi (“Holder”) the principal sum of
One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) with interest from February 12, 2007 at a rate
of eight percent (8%) per annum, payable upon repayment of the loan.


 


 


	
  Signed by:

  	
   

  
	
  GeoPetro Resources Company

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ J. Chris Steinhauser

  	
   

  
	
  J. Chris Steinhauser

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel SANTOS-GUEVARA, also known as Samuel Reyes-Guevara, also known as Samuel Santos Guevara, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20107

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carmen Roe, Esq., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Following a stipulated bench trial, the district court found Samuel Santos-Guevara guilty of being an alien previously removed after conviction for an aggravated felony who was found in the United States without having obtained consent to reenter and sentenced him to 40 months in prison. Santos-Guevara appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment as barred by the applicable five-year statute of limitations. The Government concedes that the indictment was returned more that five years after Santos-Guevara was “found in” the United States and that the indictment is barred by the statute of limitations.

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. *United States v. Gunera,*479 F.3d 373, 376 (5th Cir.2007). Prosecution under § 1326 for unlawful presence must be instituted by indictment returned or information filed within five years after the alien is found in the United States. *Id.;*18 U.S.C. § 3282(a). “[A] previously deported alien is ‘found in’ the United States when his physical presence is discovered and noted by the immigration authorities, and the knowledge of the illegality of his presence, through the exercise of diligence typical of law enforcement authorities, can reasonably be attributed to the immigration authorities.” *United States v. Santana-Castellano,*74 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir.1996).

A December 2003 letter from immigration authorities sent to Santos-Guevara under his alias shows that by that date immigration authorities had enough information, including an FBI fingerprint background check, to be reasonably attributed with knowledge of Santos-Guevara’s illegal presence in the United States, despite any false, misleading, or missing information in Santos-Guevara’s applications for temporary protected status. Because knowledge of Santos-Guevara’s illegal presence in the United States can reasonably be attributed to immigration authorities more than five years before the July 15, 2009, indictment was returned, the indictment was not timely. *See Santana-Castellano,*74 F.3d at 598. We REVERSE the denial of the motion to dismiss the indictment, VA*875CATE Santos-Guevara’s conviction and sentence, and DISMISS the indictment.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 Company
 Periodic
Report
 /s/ Richard B. BerlinerRichard B. BerlinerChief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Patrick G. MackeyPatrick G. MackeySenior Vice President(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 14, 2005
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not
being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Berliner
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Berliner Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

 

I, D. Jonathan Merriman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MCF Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days priorto the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls. 

 

Date:May 6, 2004
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Oak Grove Resources, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Oak Grove Resources, LLC

Oak Grove SE 2010-1236 Argument Notice 2-24-16.pdf

Oak Grove SE 2010-1236 Argument Notice 2-24-16.htm

Secretary of Labor v Oak Grove LLC Docket SE2010-1236 et al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

May 9, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 18, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Closed

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in 

closed session as a continuation of the meeting held on May 4, 

2016: Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc., Docket No. 

WEVA 2011-283 (Issues include whether the Administrative Law 

Judge erred by concluding that the violation in question was not 

significant and substantial and was not the result of an 

unwarrantable failure to comply.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jean-Marc Stiegemeier, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Farmstead Telephone Group, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.    The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and

2.    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


Dated:  April 7, 2006

/s/ Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
-------------------------
Jean-Marc Stiegemeier
President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee, Boise, ID; USDA, 
Forest Service Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393) the Boise 
and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet Wednesday, January 16, 2001 in Boise, Idaho for a 
business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on January 16, begins 
at 10:30 AM, at the Bureau of Reclamation Office, 1150 North Curtis 
Road, Boise, Idaho. Agenda topics will include development of committee 
operating guidelines, and process for soliciting project proposals, 
reviewing project proposals and recommending project proposals for 
approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Swick, McCall District Ranger 
and Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 634-0400.

    Dated: December 19, 2001.
David F. Alexander,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-32055 Filed 12-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


North Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory Committee 
Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet on Thursday, January 17, 2002, at the Lewis County 
Law and Justice Center (old county annex building), 345 West Main 
Street, Chehalis, Washington. The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. and 
continue until 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to:
    (1) Provide committee members with the rules and regulations that 
govern it, and its role,
    (2) Discuss the project approval process,
    (3) Elect a committee chair, and
    (4) Provide for a Public Open Forum.
    All North Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are 
encouraged to attend. The ``open forum'' provides opportunity for the 
public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory 
Committee. The ``open forum'' is scheduled as part of agenda item (4) 
for this meeting. Interested speakers will need to register prior to 
the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written 
comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Tom Knappenberger, Public Officer, at (360) 891-5005, or 
write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 
10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: December 18, 2001.
Claire Lavendel,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-31583 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3579 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 332
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3579

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 200 East Main Street in Maroa, Illinois, as the ``Jeremy L. Ridlen 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JEREMY L. RIDLEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 East Main Street in Maroa, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jeremy L. Ridlen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jeremy L. 
Ridlen Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 332

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3579

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 200 East Main Street in Maroa, Illinois, as the ``Jeremy L. Ridlen 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
104 A.3d 244

#### IN THE MATTER OF BARBARA J. LIEBERMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 025051977).

December 18, 2014.

ORDER

BARBARA J. LIEBERMAN of NORTHFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since June 4, 2014, having tendered her consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARBARA J. LIEBERMAN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that she be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 25, 2014*

[Cite as *06/25/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-2725.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2013- 2027.

#### Thomas v. Neal.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of James Thomas. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. On motion for a ruling. Motion denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50189.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Michael Scott Lowe, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Daniel Benjamin Levin, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail Ivens, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raymond Mendez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendez first contends that the district court erred in concluding that Mendez is ineligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582(c)(2). This contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 673 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that a defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582(c)(2) when the application of that amendment does not result in a lower sentencing range). Here, the district court appropriately found at sentencing that Mendez was responsible for the distribution of 139 kilograms of crack cocaine. This finding of fact maintained Mendez’s base offense level at 38, which did not lower his sentencing range. *See Leniear,*574 F.3d at 673-74.

*210Mendez also contends that the district court procedurally erred in imposing his sentence by failing to address his mitigating argument and to adequately explain the reasons for declining to impose a lower sentence. He further contends that his guideline sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his limited involvement in the conspiracy. Mendez’s arguments are foreclosed by *Dillon v. United States,*-U.S.-, 180 S.Ct. 2683, 2690-94,177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (holding that BookeYs holdings do not apply to section 3582(c)(2) proceedings and therefore do not require treating section lB1.10(b) as advisory).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.