alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Becoming a Shared Neutral - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pyclcwVaHw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/becominganeutral\/\">Becoming a Shared Neutral<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/becominganeutral\/embed\/#?secret=pyclcwVaHw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Becoming a Shared Neutral” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"pyclcwVaHw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
                                      99.4


                   MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE GROWTH AND INCOME FUND
                               LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the filing of Meridian Healthcare Growth and Income Fund
Limited Partnership's (the "Fund") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy M. Gisriel, the Chief Financial Officer of
Brown Healthcare, Inc., Administrative General Partner of the Fund, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Fund.



Date:    11/12/02               By: /s/Timothy M. Gisriel

                                Timothy M. Gisriel
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Brown Healthcare, Inc.
                                Administrative General Partner
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.01 --- LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARY                              ADDRESS

FRANCE
Radius France S.A.                      BP422 World Trade Center
                                        CNIT-2 Place De La Defense
                                        92053 La Defense, France

Radius S.A.R.L.                         (shell corporation)

SuperMac Europe S.A.R.L.                Dissolved on 1/11/95

ASIA
Radius KK                               Yanada Bld. 5F
                                        6-7-10 Roppongi
                                        Minato-ku, Tokyo
                                        Japan

Nihon SuperMac K.K.                     Japan

SuperMac Asia Pacific                   Hong Kong (Dormant)

UNITED KINGDOM
Radius UK Ltd.                          13 Westminster Court
                                        Hipley Street
                                        Old Woking,
                                        Surrey GU22 9LQ
                                        United Kingdom

SuperMac Technology Europe

GERMANY
Radius GmbH                             Grosse Bleichen 35
                                        20354 Hamburg
                                        Germany

OTHERS
Radius FSC Inc.                         Bay Street
                                        Bridgetown
                                        Barbados

Radius (Australia) Pty. Ltd.            Level 5, 18-20 Orion Road
                                        Lane Cove, NSW 2066
                                        Australia
                                        (Dormant)

Radius Canada                           Canada




                                      -57-
#### In re: FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; Fire Insurance Exchange; Fire Underwriters Association; Farmers Group, Inc.; Mid-Century Insurance Company; Farmers Insurance Exchange, Petitioners.

No. 10-704.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 27, 2010.

Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Frederick Brown, Matthew S. Kahn, Julian WingKai Poon, Gibson Dunn, Los Angeles, CA, Richard C. Ford, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, Barnes H. Ellis, Stoel Rives LLP, Stephen A. Redshaw, Timothy W. Snider, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for Petitioners.

Before MURPHY, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

*296ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendants’ petition for permission to appeal the district court’s order granting the plaintiffs motion to modify the plaintiff class. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 5; Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). The decision whether to grant the petition is purely discretionary. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(f); *Vallario v. Vandehey, 554*F.3d 1259, 1262 (10th Cir.2009) (this discretion is “ ‘unfettered and akin to the discretion exercised by the Supreme Court in acting on a petition for certiorari.’ ”) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f) advisory committee’s note).

Upon a careful review of the materials filed with this court and the applicable law, we conclude that this matter is not appropriate for immediate review. None of the concerns noted by this court to justify an interlocutory appeal is present here. *Id.*at 1263-64.

Accordingly, the petition for permission to appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          26,370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,420,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,446,521
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,446,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,473,063
<BONDS>                                        225,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     748,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,446,521
<SALES>                                      1,793,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,744,697
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               849,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                828,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            828,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   828,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"International Services - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ou9UHnQuij\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/international\/\">International Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/international\/embed\/#?secret=ou9UHnQuij\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“International Services” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ou9UHnQuij\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
NUMBERS 13-17-00693-CV, 13-17-00694-CV, 13-17-00695-CV, 

13-17-00696-CV, 13-17-00697-CV, AND 13-17-00698-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

STEVE W. PARK, AGENT

FOR TEXAS DRP LLC, D/B/A 

A-ACTION BAIL BONDS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Contreras

The appellant’s brief in the above causes was ordered to be filed on or before 

October 8, 2018. On October 19, 2018, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the 

brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of 
2

prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days 

from the date of receipt of the Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure 

and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. 

To date, no response has been received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a 

motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, these appeals

are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 

(c). 

DORI CONTRERAS

Justice

Delivered and filed the 20th

day of November, 2018.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-54546, 333-82999, 333-111524, 333-105275, 333-99831, 333-139429,333-151117, 333-151118, 333-155934, 333-156203, and 333-156615 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-01111, 033-56501, 333-39881, 333-73117, 333-53174, 333-30954, 333-90047, 333-73113, 333-111322, 333-101795, 333-72882, 333-66372, 333-154833, and 333-155935 onForm S-8 of our reports dated August 27, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AmeriCredit Corp. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of AmeriCredit Corp. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2010. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas 

August 27, 2010
Form of Executive Completion Bonus in connection with the RWE Divestiture



  Exhibit 10.16 
  March 20, 2006 
 «Name» 
 «Company» 
 «Locality» 
  

	RE:	EXECUTIVE COMPLETION BONUS AGREEMENT 

 Dear «Name1»:

 You received a letter in December 2005 advising you that you would be eligible to receive a special Executive Completion bonus. 
 Your knowledge, skills and executive leadership are essential to the successful completion of our planned divestiture with RWE. Having a dedicated executive team
committed personally to the success of the divestiture is critical to our successfully achieving this transaction. We are pleased that you are part of our Executive Management Team. 
 This special completion bonus is intended to provide you with additional incentive to remain with American Water through the closing of the divestiture transaction. You will be rewarded for continuing to devote your
fullest efforts to effectively performing your duties and responsibilities, including your personal leadership and support in positively marketing our business and preparing for the divestiture from RWE in whatever form the transaction occurs.

 You will be eligible to receive a completion bonus targeted to be «Compl_»% of your annual base salary in effect on January 1, 2006
provided the following conditions are met: 
  

	•	 	 You must effectively perform your job duties and responsibilities including demonstrating personal leadership and support to positively marketing our business and
preparing for the divestiture 


  

	•	 	 You must maintain confidentiality of this agreement, including its existence and the specific terms and conditions stated herein. 


  

	•	 	 Your employment with American Water must not be voluntarily terminated by you or terminated by the Company “for cause.” 


 Determination of whether the above conditions for payment of the completion bonus have been satisfied shall be at the sole discretion of RWE. 







 «Name» 
 Executive Completion Bonus Agreement 
 March 20, 2006 
 Page 2 
  
 If the conditions are satisfied, you will be entitled to 50%
of the targeted amount of your completion bonus. Your entitlement to the remaining 50% of the targeted amount will be based upon your personal leadership and support in positively marketing our business and preparing for the divestiture as
determined in the sole discretion of RWE. Your completion bonus will be paid within thirty (30) days of closing in a lump sum and will be reduced by any applicable federal, state and local taxes required to be withheld. 
 To acknowledge and confirm your agreement to be eligible for this senior executive completion bonus, subject to the above conditions, please sign, date and return one
copy of this letter agreement to the undersigned within 14 days of the above date. 
 Sincerely, 
 George MacKenzie 
 President and CEO 
 American Water 
 Acknowledgement and Acceptance: 
  

									
	 Signed:
	 	  
	 		 	Date:                         
		 	«Name»
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 353 

To modify the Standard Form 86 questionnaire used for national security 

eligibility determinations to include questions regarding an individual’s 

membership in, or association with, organizations spreading conspiracy 

theories regarding the Government and participation in the activities 

occurring at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2021 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To modify the Standard Form 86 questionnaire used for 

national security eligibility determinations to include 

questions regarding an individual’s membership in, or 

association with, organizations spreading conspiracy 

theories regarding the Government and participation in 

the activities occurring at the United States Capitol on 

January 6, 2021, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 353 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Security Clearance Im3 provement Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF STANDARD FORM 86 TO IN5 CLUDE QUESTIONS REGARDING AN INDIVID6 UAL’S MEMBERSHIP IN, OR ASSOCIATION 

7 WITH, ORGANIZATIONS SPREADING CON8 SPIRACY THEORIES REGARDING THE GOV9 ERNMENT AND PARTICIPATION IN THE AC10 TIVITIES OCCURRING AT THE UNITED 

11 STATES CAPITOL ON JANUARY 6, 2021. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

13 date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office 

14 of Personnel Management shall modify section 29 (relat15 ing to associations) of Standard Form 86 (commonly re16 ferred to as ‘‘SF–86’’) to include the following questions: 

17 (1) ‘‘Have you ever been a member of, associ18 ated with, or knowingly engaged in activities con19 ducted by an organization or movement that spreads 

20 conspiracy theories and false information about the 

21 United States Government?’’. 

22 (2) ‘‘Did you participate in the activities occur23 ring at the United States Capitol on January 6, 

24 2021, or in any similar activity?’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 353 IH

1 (b) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—Each question re2 quired to be included in Standard Form 86 under sub3 section (a) shall include— 

4 (1) an option for the individual filling out such 

5 Form to answer each question ‘‘Yes’’ or ‘‘No’’; and 

6 (2) a separate area for such individual, if such 

7 answer is ‘‘Yes’’, to provide additional information 

8 regarding such answer, including the nature of, and 

9 reasons for, the individual’s involvement with the or10 ganization, movement, or activities described under 

11 such question. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,864
<INVENTORY>                                     69,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,764
<PP&E>                                         133,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,886
<BONDS>                                         75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,296
<SALES>                                        452,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          314,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,038
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,490
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46


</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Jaxun v. Asarco, LLC, Docket No. WEST 2006-416.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Jaxun v. Asarco, LLC, Docket No. WEST 2006-416.

meeting_053107.pdf

fmshrc053107.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov