Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 67073

cents per pound assessment rate for

imported pork and pork products.

On August 13, 2001, AMS published

in the Federal Register (66 FR 42469) a

proposed rule which would increase the

per pound assessment on imported pork

and pork products consistent with the

increase in the 2000 average price of

domestic barrows and gilts to provide

comparability between imported and

domestic assessments. The proposal was

published with a request for comments

by September 12, 2001. No comments

were received.

Accordingly, this final rule

establishes the new per-pound and perkilogram assessments on imported pork

and pork products.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1230

Administrative practice and

procedure, Advertising, Agricultural

research, Marketing agreement, Meat

and meat products, Pork and pork

products.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, 7 CFR part 1230 is amended

as follows:

PART 1230—PORK PROMOTION,

RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER

INFORMATION

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

part 1230 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 4801–4819.

Subpart B—[Amended]

2. Section 1230.110 is revised to read

as follows:

§ 1230.110 Assessments on imported pork

and pork products.

(a) The following Harmonized Tariff

Schedule (HTS) categories of imported

live porcine animals are subject to

assessment at the rate specified.

Live porcine animals Assessment

0103.10.0000 ............ 0.45 percent Customs

Entered Value.

0103.91.0000 ............ 0.45 percent Customs

Entered Value.

0103.92.0000 ............ 0.45 percent Customs

Entered Value.

(b) The following HTS categories of

imported pork and pork products are

subject to assessment at the rates

specified.

Pork and Pork Products

Assessment

cents/lb cents/kg

0203.11.0000 ................ .27 .595242

0203.12.1010 ................ .27 .595242

0203.12.1020 ................ .27 .595242

0203.12.9010 ................ .27 .595242

0203.12.9020 ................ .27 .595242

0203.19.2010 ................ .32 .705472

0203.19.2090 ................ .32 .705472

0203.19.4010 ................ .27 .595242

0203.19.4090 ................ .27 .595242

0203.21.0000 ................ .27 .595242

0203.22.1000 ................ .27 .595242

0203.22.9000 ................ .27 .595242

0203.29.2000 ................ .32 .705472

0203.29.4000 ................ .27 .595242

0206.30.0000 ................ .27 .595242

0206.41.0000 ................ .27 .595242

0206.49.0000 ................ .27 .595242

0210.11.0010 ................ .27 .595242

0210.11.0020 ................ .27 .595242

0210.12.0020 ................ .27 .595242

0210.12.0040 ................ .27 .595242

0210.19.0010 ................ .32 .705472

0210.19.0090 ................ .32 .705472

1601.00.2010 ................ .38 .837748

1601.00.2090 ................ .38 .837748

1602.41.2020 ................ .41 .903886

1602.41.2040 ................ .41 .903886

1602.41.9000 ................ .27 .595242

1602.42.2020 ................ .41 .903886

1602.42.2040 ................ .41 .903886

1602.42.4000 ................ .27 .595242

1602.49.2000 ................ .38 .837748

1602.49.4000 ................ .32 .705472

Dated: December 21, 2001.

A.J. Yates,

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 01–32003 Filed 12–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 72

RIN 3150–AG83

List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage

Casks: NAC–UMS Revision;

Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of

effective date.

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) is confirming the

effective date of December 31, 2001, for

the direct final rule that appeared in the

Federal Register of October 16, 2001 (66

FR 52486). This direct final rule

amended the NRC’s regulations by

revising the NAC–UMS Universal

Storage System listing within the list of

approved spent fuel storage casks to

include Amendment No. 2 to Certificate

of Compliance No. 1015. This document

confirms the effective date.

DATES: The effective date of December

31, 2001, is confirmed for this direct

final rule.

ADDRESSES: Documents related to this

rulemaking, including comments

received, may be examined at the NRC

Public Document Room, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. These

same documents may also be viewed

and downloaded electronically via the

rulemaking Web site (http://

ruleforum.llnl.gov). For information

about the interactive rulemaking Web

site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher (301)

415–5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Nuclear

Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, telephone (301)

415–6219 (e-mail: jmm2@nrc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

October 16, 2001 (66 FR 52486), the

NRC published in the Federal Register

a direct final rule amending its

regulations in 10 CFR part 72 by

revising the NAC–UMS Universal

Storage System listing within the list of

approved spent fuel storage casks to

include Amendment No. 2 to Certificate

of Compliance No. 1015. Amendment

No. 2 modifies the present cask system

design to add miscellaneous spent fuel

related components to the approved

contents list for the NAC–UMS

Universal Storage System and change

the required actions in response to a

failure of the cask heat removal system.

Several other minor administrative

changes were made and are discussed in

Section 12 of the Safety Evaluation

Report. Also, specific changes to were

made to Technical Specifications that

permit the storage of these components

and the other requested changes.

Conditions 1b and 6 of the Certificate of

Compliance were also changed. In the

direct final rule, NRC stated that if no

significant adverse comments were

67074 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

received, the direct final rule would

become final on the date noted above.

The NRC did not receive any comments

that warranted withdrawal of the direct

final rule. Therefore, this rule will

become effective as scheduled.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day

of December 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Michael T. Lesar,

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division

of Administrative Services, Office of

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–31923 Filed 12–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Parts 208 and 225

[Regulations H and Y; Docket No. R–1055]

Risk–Based Capital Guidelines; Capital

Adequacy Guidelines; Capital

Maintenance; Capital Treatment of

Recourse, Direct Credit Substitutes

and Residual Interests in Asset

Securitizations

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System

ACTION: Final rule; correction

SUMMARY: This document corrects the

Federal Reserve’s regulatory text of a

final rule published in the Federal

Register of November 29, 2001 (66 FR

59614), regarding the capital treatment

of recourse, direct credit substitutes,

and residual interests in asset

securitizations. This correction rectifies

errors made in Attachment II in

Appendix A, part 208 and Appendix A,

part 225.

DATES: This correction is effective

January 1, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas Boemio, 202–452–2982 or

Arleen Lustig, 202–452–2987.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction:

In the final rule FR Doc. No. 01–

29179, beginning on 66 FR 59614 in the

issue of November 29, 2001, make the

following corrections.

PART 208—[CORRECTED]

1. In Appendix A to Part 208,

Attachment II, on page 59643:

A. In the column for Components, in

the fourth entry under Supplementary

Capital, replace the word ‘‘stocks’’ with

the word ‘‘stock.’’

B. In the column for Minimum

requirements, the fourth entry is revised

to read, ‘‘Banks should avoid using

minority interests to introduce elements

not otherwise qualifying for tier 1

capital.’’

C. In the column for Minimum

requirements, remove the eleventh entry

beginning with ‘‘As a general rule

***’’ in its entirety.

D. Remove footnote 3 following the

table.

PART 225—[CORRECTED]

2. In Appendix A to Part 225,

Attachment II, on page 59651:

A. In the column for Minimum

requirements, the second entry is

revised to read ‘‘Organizations should

avoid using minority interests to

introduce elements not otherwise

qualifying for tier 1 capital.’’

B. In the column for Minimum

requirements, in the eleventh entry of

the table, replace the word ‘‘banks’’ with

‘‘organizations.’’

By order of the Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System, December 20, 2001.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01–31887 Filed 12–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 31887–22–S

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2001–NE–40–AD; Amendment

39–12569; AD 2001–26–05]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton

Sundstrand Model 247F Propellers

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for

comments.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that is

applicable to certain Hamilton

Sundstrand model 247F propellers. This

action requires a one-time rework of

certain model 247F propellers by

removing all four propeller blades from

service, replacing those blades with

serviceable propeller blades, and

marking the propeller with a new part

number. This amendment is prompted

by nine reports of the blades partially

slipping at the bond joint between the

blade tulip and the composite blade

airfoil interface. The actions specified in

this AD are intended to prevent the loss

of a propeller blade, which may result

in loss of airplane control.

DATES: Effective January 14, 2002. The

incorporation by reference of certain

publications listed in the rule is

approved by the Director of the Federal

Register as of January 14, 2002.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules

Docket must be received on or before

February 26, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), New England

Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 2001–NE–

40–AD, 12 New England Executive Park,

Burlington, MA 01803–5299. Comments

may be inspected at this location, by

appointment, between 8:00 a.m. and

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays. Comments may

also be sent via the Internet using the

following address: 9-aneadcomment@faa.gov. Comments sent

via the Internet must contain the docket

number in the subject line. The service

information referenced in this AD may

be obtained from Hamilton Sundstrand,

A United Technologies Company,

Publications Manager, Mail Stop 2AM–

EE50, One Hamilton Road, Windsor

Locks, CT 06096. This information may

be examined, by appointment, at the

FAA, New England Region, Office of the

Regional Counsel, 12 New England

Executive Park, Burlington, MA, or at

the Office of the Federal Register, 800

North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,

Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank Walsh, Aerospace Engineer,

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine

and Propeller Directorate, 12 New

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA

01803–5299; telephone (781) 238–7158,

fax (781) 238–7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

has received nine reports of blades

partially slipping at the bond joint

between the blade tulip and the

composite blade airfoil interface on

Hamilton Sundstrand model 247F

propellers, part numbers (P/N’s)

810610–1 and 815550–1. Investigation

reveals that this partial slippage is due

to debonding of that interface. This

amendment requires, within 30 days of

the effective date of this AD as a onetime action, reworking certain model

247F propellers by removing all four

existing propeller blades P/N’s

R810640–1, R810640–2, and R810640–3

from service, replacing those blades

with serviceable propeller blades, and

marking the propeller with a new part

number. To date, no blade has come free

from the hub. This condition, if not

corrected, could result in the loss of a

propeller blade, which may result in

loss of airplane control.