alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Optek Technology, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-419, 33-60656, 33-18555, 333-64323, 333-64327)
on Form S-8 of Optek Technology, Inc. of our reports dated December
11, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Optek
Technology, Inc. as of October 30, 1998 and October 31, 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended October 30, 1998, and the related schedule which
reports appear in the October 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K
of Optek Technology, Inc.



KPMG LLP





Dallas, Texas
January 27, 1999
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3538 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance the carbon oxide 

sequestration credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. RYAN (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. WALBERG, 

Mr. VEASEY, Mr. MCKINLEY, Ms. WILD, and Mr. ARMSTRONG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance 

the carbon oxide sequestration credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coordinated Action 

5 To Capture Harmful Emissions Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3538 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCEMENT OF CARBON OXIDE SEQUESTRA2 TION CREDIT. 

3 (a) INCREASE IN APPLICABLE DOLLAR AMOUNT.— 

4 Subparagraph (A) of section 45Q(b)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For any taxable year 

7 beginning in a calendar year after 2021, the ap8 plicable dollar amount shall be an amount equal 

9 to— 

10 ‘‘(i) for purposes of paragraph (3) of 

11 subsection (a), an amount equal to the 

12 product of $85 and the inflation adjust13 ment factor for such calendar year deter14 mined under section 43(b)(3)(B) for such 

15 calendar year, determined by substituting 

16 ‘2020’ for ‘1990’, and 

17 ‘‘(ii) for purposes of paragraph (4) of 

18 such subsection, an amount equal to the 

19 product of $60 and the inflation adjust20 ment factor for such calendar year deter21 mined under section 43(b)(3)(B) for such 

22 calendar year, determined by substituting 

23 ‘2020’ for ‘1990.’ ’’. 

24 (b) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED FACILITY.—Para25 graph (2) of section 45Q(d) of the Internal Revenue Code 

26 of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3538 IH

1 ‘‘(2) at which carbon capture equipment in2 stalled at such facility captures qualified carbon 

3 oxide during the taxable year.’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                   MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE GROWTH AND INCOME FUND
                               LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the filing of Meridian Healthcare Growth and Income Fund
Limited Partnership's (the "Fund") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert H. Fish, the Chief Executive Officer of
Meridian Healthcare Investments, Inc., Development General Partner of the Fund,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Fund.



Date:    11/13/02               By:   /s/  Robert H. Fish

                                Robert H. Fish
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                Meridian Healthcare Investments, Inc.
                                Development General Partner
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7127

HERMAN L. MOODY, Petitoner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-83) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman L. Moody, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Herman L. Moody seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moody’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Moody v. Angelone , No. CA-01-83 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of CF0 Section 906

AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of DEFAULT PROOF CREDIT CARD
SYSTEM, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles A. Menendez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of July, 2005.

/s/ Charles A. Menendez,
-----------------
Charles A. Menendez,
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL FORSHEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 203 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Lamont M. JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7421.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

Lamont M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Marquise Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

Information Analysis Incorporated                     2002 Report on Form 10-KSB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Richard S.
DeRose, Chief Financial Officer of Information Analysis Incorporated, a Virginia
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

          *    the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
               ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
               Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report") fully
               complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          *    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: April 4, 2003                          By:  /S/ Richard S. DeRose
      ----------------                            ------------------------------
                                                  Richard S. DeRose, Executive
                                                  Vice President, Treasurer, and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Information Analysis Incorporated and will be retained by
Information Analysis Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request
#### Floyd BENNETT-BEY, Appellant v. Douglas SHULMAN, Commissioner, I.R.S., Appellee.

No. 10-5100.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 28, 2010.

Floyd Bennett-Bey, Washington, DC, pro se.

Janet Arlene Bradley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

*510Before HENDERSON, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 3, 2010, 688 F.Supp.2d 7, be affirmed. Appellant has not shown any error in the court’s decision or in appellee’s assertion that the court lacked jurisdiction over claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and any claim under 26 U.S.C. § 7429.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the December 31, 1999, annual report
on Form 10-KSB of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., of our report dated January
15,  2000,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Central  Virginia
Bankshares,  Inc.,  and  subsidiary,  as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,  and the
related consolidated statements of income,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ Mitchell, Wiggins & Company, LLP



Richmond, Virginia
March 30, 2000
CONFORMED COPY


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 1997 Commission File Number
0-16304
     
Optek Technology, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware  75-1962405
(State or other jurisdiction  (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)  Identification No.)

1215 West Crosby Road, Carrollton, Texas     75006
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

Registrant s telephone number, including area code:  (972)
323-2200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ( X )    No (    )

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant s knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K. (   )

The aggregate market value of the registrant s voting stock held
by non-affiliates as of October 31, 1997 was:  $67,909,282 (* see
note on index page).

The number of shares outstanding of each class of registrant s
common stock as of October 31, 1997 was:  Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, 4,259,534 shares.
___________________

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant s definitive proxy statement to be
furnished to stockholders in connection with its Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on March 17, 1998 are incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
                                                                 

                                                             
<PAGE>


The Company's Form 10-k for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1997
is amended to add Exhibit 27 attached hereto.


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                6619
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         6616
<ALLOWANCES>                                           628
<INVENTORY>                                           6954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     21096
<PP&E>                                                1217
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       22653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4669
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             25144
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         16343
<SALES>                                              20668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     20668
<CGS>                                                12967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        18969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1699
<INCOME-TAX>                                           252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1462
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1462
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .23


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>          18,285,616
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>         29,528,787
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      8,809
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>            1,982,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 31,520,272
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          97,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                97,629
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>       20,179,472
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       11,243,171
<NET-ASSETS>                   31,422,643
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                  24,722
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                   (378,494)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (353,772)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>        2,055,393
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>      (5,761,710)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>          (4,060,089)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>         (4,060,089)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              92,563
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 14,626
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   379,554
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>           33,452,688
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  43
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         4
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    47
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      1.13
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>            681,666
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                  1.7
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance 
with the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*August 6, 2014*

[Cite as *08/06/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3399.]

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2014-0187.

#### State ex rel. Rhodes v. Porter.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made as of the 1st day of
January 2002 by and between RIGHT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC., a Pennsylvania
Corporation and RICHARD J. PINOLA.

     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an employment agreement as
of December 12, 1995 (the "1995 Employment Agreement") which replaced an earlier
employment entered into as of July 1, 1992, and which was amended as of January
1, 1999. Pursuant to these two earlier agreements, and the 1999 Amendment,
Employee has been continuously employed by the Company since July 1, 1992.
Defined terms used herein, shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in
the 1995 Employment Agreement, unless the context herein requires a different
interpretation.

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue the employment of Employee, in
accordance with the terms of the 1995 Employment Agreement, except as modified
by the 1999 Amendment and herein, and Employee desires to accept such
employment.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts, mutual promises and
covenants contained in the 1995 Employment Agreement, the 1999 Amendment, and
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Company and Employee agree as
follows:

     1. Term. Term of Employee's employment with Company shall be extended for a
three (3) year period commencing as of January 1, 2002 and continuing up to and
through December 31, 2004.

     2. Base Salary. The base salary provided for in Section 4(a) of the 1995
Employment Agreement is amended to Five Hundred and Eighty Thousand Dollars
($580,000). The corresponding references in Section 3(c) (regarding Change of
Control), and Section 6(a) (regarding Severance Compensation) are amended to
Five Hundred and Eighty Thousand Dollars ($580,000).

     3. Ratification In All Other Respects. The 1995 Employment Agreement, as
previously amended, is hereby ratified and affirmed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement
as of the date first above written.

                                  RIGHT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.

                                  By: /S/ CHARLES J. MALLON
                                      ---------------------
                                     Charles J. Mallon, Executive Vice President

                                  EMPLOYEE

                                  /S/ RICHARD J. PINOLA
                                  ---------------------
                                  Richard J. Pinola