alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:**I, Richard B. Berliner, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Berliner Communications, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inSecurities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2006                                                       /s/ Richard B. Berliner   Richard B. Berliner   Chief Executive Officer
Order entered January 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01030-CR

RICKY PEDRO GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-81559-2011

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,682
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,523
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,913
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,380
<LOANS>                                        125,669
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,221
<DEPOSITS>                                     134,122
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,226
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,609
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           959
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 172,221
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,749
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  429
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   146
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,324
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,500
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,824
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      395
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,064
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,173
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            977
        

</TABLE>
#### John L. MILLS, a/k/a John Lewis Mills, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-7276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 27, 2016.

Decided: Feb. 3, 2016.

John L. Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John L. Mills seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct: 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling, is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mills has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *196materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

631 FEDERAL APPENDIX

*DISMISSED,*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67541-67542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act 1986; Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed Cooperative Research & Development Agreement 
(CRADA) negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating

[[Page 67542]]

entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with Devon Energy Corporation to develop information on coal bed 
methane resources in North Central Louisiana.
    Inquiries: If any other parties are interested in similar 
activities with the USGS, please contact Peter Warwick, 12201 Sunrise 
Valley Drive, MS 956, Reston, VA 21092, phone: (703) 648-6469.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
policy requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

    December 5, 2001.
P. Patrick Leahy,
Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 01-32067 Filed 12-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
Exhibit 4.12


Exhibit 4.12
  


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE




October  30th, 2006

Cdn. $ 1,000,000




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Vannessa Ventures Ltd., a corporation incorporated under the laws of British Columbia (the "Corporation") hereby promises to pay ON DEMAND, provided such demand is made after the earlier of:

 

(a)

the occurrence of an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Secured Convertible Debenture dated March 1, 2006 given by the Corporation to the Holder); and

 

(b)

December 31, 2006,




to Exploram Enterprises Ltd., together with its successors and assigns (the "Holder"), the amount of Cdn. $ 1,000,000 (the "Advance Amount"), in lawful money of Canada at the principal offices of Exploram Enterprises Ltd. in Calgary, Alberta, and to pay interest on the outstanding amount owing from time to time at the rate of 9.5% per annum commencing on the date of this Promissory Note until full and final payment.  Interest accruing and due hereunder shall be payable in cash, monthly in arrears, on the last day of each month commencing on November 30th, 2006 in lawful money of Canada, at Calgary, Alberta.  The Advance Amount or any part thereof may be repaid in whole or in part at any time by the Corporation without penalty.




This Note is secured by a general security agreement provided by the Corporation to the Holder on March 1, 2006.

 

The Corporation will pay on demand all costs of collection and legal fees on a solicitor and his own client full indemnity basis paid or incurred by the Holder in enforcing the obligations of the Corporation hereunder.

 

The Corporation waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest and all other demands and notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Note.

 

No delay or omission on the part of the Holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right under this Note.  No waiver of any right shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the Holder, nor shall a waiver on one occasion be construed as a bar to or waiver of any such right on any future occasion.

 

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws in force from time to time in the Province of Alberta, Canada, without regard to its choice of law principles.  

 

Dated this 30th day of October, 2006.

 

VANNESSA VENTURES LTD.




By: ________________________________  

Name:

J.R. Morgan

Title:

President & Chief Executive Officer




By: ________________________________  

Name:

C.B. Boyer 

Title:

Controller
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James China SMITH, Jr., a/k/a JJ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-5207.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

*796Henry M. Anderson, Jr., Anderson Law Firm, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Carrie A. Fisher, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James China Smith, Jr., pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base. At his sentencing hearing, Smith objected to a government witness who testified regarding Smith’s statements following a polygraph examination. The court overruled the objection, noting that it was not relying on the results from the polygraph, but was relying on statements made by Smith himself after being informed that he had failed the examination. Smith told the examiner that he had lied about whether he had continued to engage in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine while on bond. Thus, the court found that Smith was ineligible for a safety valve reduction. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (2006); *U.S.,Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”) § 5C1.2 (2009).

We do not find that the district court abused its discretion in relying on Smith’s statements following his polygraph examination. *United States v. Hopkins,*310 F.3d 145, 154 (4th Cir.2002) (providing review standard). Sentencing courts are given wider latitude on evidentiary matters because the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at sentencing. *Id.*Evidence may be considered at sentencing as long as it has sufficient indicia of reliability, *see*USSG § 6A1.3(a), p.s., including hearsay statements. *See United States v. Wilkinson,*590 F.3d 259, 269 (4th Cir.2010) (noting that “a sentencing court may give weight to any relevant information before it, including uncorroborated hearsay, provided that the information has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its accuracy”) (citation omitted).

Accordingly, we affirm Smith’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
74 A.3d 120

#### David LUSICK, Petitioner v. Defacto Judge Pam Pryor Cohen DEMBE, Joseph Evers, Clerk Of Court, Sara Siegel Business MGR PA Department Of Corrections, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Travis Anderson, Esq., Kathy Diffily, Esq, A Taylor Williams Esq, Respondents.

No. 79 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 29, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2013, the Petition for Review is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 30, 2020

No. 04-19-00713-CR

John Derek ALLEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC6678

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted. 

We order the appellant’s brief due April 22, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions 

of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances 

justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the 

brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed 

by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work 

schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------

                             List of Subsidiaries
                                      Of
                                InterTAN, Inc.


                               Jurisdiction of           Name Under Which
Subsidiary Name                  Organization          Subsidiary Operates
---------------                  ------------          -------------------

InterTAN Australia Ltd.       New South Wales (Aus.)   Tandy Electronics

InterTAN Canada Ltd.          Alberta (Can.)           RadioShack

Technotron Sales Corp.        New South Wales (Aus.)   Technotron Sales Corp.
  Pty. Ltd.                                              Pty. Ltd.

InterTAN Texas, Inc.          Texas (U.S.A)            InterTAN Texas, Inc.

Note: The Company sold its subsidiary in the United Kingdom, InterTAN U.K. Ltd.,
      in January, 1999.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

12/17/2001 66 FR 64969.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

December 19, 2001 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

The following Docket Nos. and Company have been added to Item E-70 of the Commission Meeting of December 19, 2001.

*Item No.:*                         E-70.                    

*Docket No. and Company:*                         ER00-2998-001, ER00-2999-001, ER00-3000-001, and ER00-3001-001, Southern Company Services, Inc.                    

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-32143  Filed 12-26-01; 4:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Description of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors 
 On September 12, 2007, the Board of
Directors of Danaher Corporation approved the following compensation arrangement for the chairs of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Effective as of September 12, 2007, the chair of
each such committee will receive, in addition to the other compensation paid to Danaher’s non-employee directors, an annual retainer of $15,000, paid in quarterly installments. The retainer for 2007 shall be pro rated based on the date this
compensation arrangement was approved by the Board.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

March 12, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 8, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Wade Sand & Gravel Company,*Docket No. SE 2013-120-M. (Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding the Secretaryof Labor’s interpretation of his regulations governing the proposal of civilpenalties.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                EmogeneJohnson

                                                AdministrativeAssistant
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4652-N-18]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number for the Procedure for 
Obtaining Certificates of Insurance for Capital Program Projects

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of OMB approval number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection of information pertaining to the requirement 
for the consolidated public housing certificate of completion.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur Methvin, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, Southwest, Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 708-0614, extension 4037. This is not a toll-free 
number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises 
that OMB has responded to the Department's request for approval of the 
information collection pertaining to the requirement for the 
consolidated public housing certificate of completion. The approval 
number for this information collection is 2577-0046, which expires 10/
31/2004.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: December 18, 2001.
Michael Liu,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 01-31882 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M