alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000803497
<NAME> SKYLINE CHILI, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                           2,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,873
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,793
<PP&E>                                          26,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,154
<BONDS>                                          5,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,414
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,885
<SALES>                                         31,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,068
<CGS>                                            9,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

March 9, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 17, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Pocahontas Coal Co., LLC. v. Secretary of Labor, Docket 

No. WEVA 2014-202-R; and Pocahontas Coal Co., LLC v. 

Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-642-R, et al. (Issues 

include whether the Administrative Law Judges erred in ruling that 

they lacked jurisdiction to review a Notice of Pattern of Violations 

and a Notice of Safeguard, respectively.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Emogene Johnson

Administrative Assistant
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

December 4, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, December 17, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F 

Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Lewis-Goetz and Company, Inc.,

Docket No. WEVA 2012-1821. (Issues include whether the Judge 

erred in ruling that a mine operator was not strictly liable for 

violations of a standard requiring that safety belts and lines be 

worn by miners under prescribed conditions.)

Any person attending this meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      S.
      Kumar Chandrasekaran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of InSite Vision Incorporated on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information
      contained in such Annual Report of InSite Vision Incorporated on Form 10-K
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of InSite Vision Incorporated.








By:  /s/
      S.
      Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.


Name:  S.
      Kumar
      Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.


Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer


Date: March
      31, 2006








I,
      S.
      Kumar Chandrasekaran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of InSite Vision Incorporated on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information
      contained in such Annual Report of InSite Vision Incorporated on Form 10-K
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of InSite Vision Incorporated.








By:  /s/
      S.
      Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.


Name:  S.
      Kumar
      Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer


Date: March
      31, 2006




The
        signed originals of these two written statements required by Section 906
        have
        been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3598 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3598

   To expand the Protecting Europe's Energy Security Act of 2019 and 
  require the reinstatement of sanctions waived with respect to Nord 
        Stream 2 AG and corporate officers of Nord Stream 2 AG.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2021

  Mr. Keller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To expand the Protecting Europe's Energy Security Act of 2019 and 
  require the reinstatement of sanctions waived with respect to Nord 
        Stream 2 AG and corporate officers of Nord Stream 2 AG.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Wellbeing by 
Expanding Russian Sanctions Act'' or the ``POWERS Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PROTECTING EUROPE'S ENERGY SECURITY ACT OF 2019.

    Section 7503(a)(1)(B) of the Protecting Europe's Energy Security 
Act of 2019 (title LXXV of Public Law 116-92; 22 U.S.C. 9526 note) is 
amended--
            (1) in clause (iv), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``; and'' and inserting ``; 
        or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vi) engaged in any transaction with any 
                        foreign person described in any of clauses (i) 
                        through (v); and''.

SEC. 3. REINSTATEMENT OF WAIVED SANCTIONS.

    Any sanctions under section 7503 of the Protecting Europe's Energy 
Security Act of 2019 (title LXXV of Public Law 116-92; 22 U.S.C. 9526 
note) or any other provision of law waived with respect to Nord Stream 
2 AG or any corporate officer of Nord Stream 2 AG before the date of 
the enactment of this Act--
            (1) shall be reinstated; and
            (2) notwithstanding subsection (f) of that section, may not 
        be waived except pursuant to an Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Third Amendment to Promissory Note



THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTEdated this 15TH  day of June 2005, is by and among DW Leasing Company, LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company (Borrower) and Fair Holdings, Inc. (Fair), an Ohio corporation. The parties agree as follows:



Recitals



WHEREAS, Borrower and Fair entered into that certain Promissory Note  dated January 17, 2002 in the principal amount of $500,000 which was amended by a certain amendments to dated August 31, 2003 and November 29, 2004 (collectively Note);



WHEREAS,Fair has agreed amend the Note again in order to increase the amount that Borrower may borrow under the Note from $800,000.00 to $1,300,000.00;



WHEREAS, Fair is willing to amend the Note subject to the terms herein and subject to the amendment of the Note as herein provided;



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and the mutual promises herein contained, the parties agree that the Note shall be, and hereby is, amended as provided herein and the parties further agree as follows:



| | 1. | Increase in the allowable principal balance:The Notes principal balance of $800,000.00 is hereby increased to $1,300,000.00 such that Borrower may borrow up to a total amended principal balance on the Note of $1,300,000.00.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



All other terms and conditions contained in the Note shall remain the same and shall continue in full force and effect that are not specifically amended herein and shall continue during the term of the Note without change.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower, and Fair have caused this Third Amendment to Promissory Note to be executed by its duly authorized by their representatives as of the day first written above.





|Fair Holdings, Inc.
By:  /s/ Timothy S. Durham
Timothy S. Durham, CEO |  | DW Leasing Company, LLCBy:  /s/ Timothy S. Durham
Timothy S. Durham, Member
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carl W. STEWARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-4820.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 4, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 18, 2011.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, Edward H. Weis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, Thomas C. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Steward pleaded guilty to tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (2006). At the sentencing hearing, the district court determined that the total amount owed by Steward in unpaid taxes exceeded $80,000. Accordingly, the court applied a base offense level of 16, pursuant to *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”) §§ 2T1.1 and 2T4.1 (tax table) (2009). After calculating the appropriate level increases and decreases, the district court determined that Steward’s total offense level was 17 and his criminal history category was I, yielding an advisory Guidelines range of twenty-four to thirty months. The district court sentenced Steward to twenty-four months.

Steward now appeals, claiming that the amount of unpaid taxes on which the district court relied in calculating his offense level did not reflect the deductions that Steward could have claimed had he filed accurate tax returns. Steward concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in *United States v. Delfino,*510 F.3d 468 (4th Cir.2007), and we agree.

Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err. We affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *771in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1630

To prevent unemployment and community disruption caused by the

government subsidization of runaway plants in Puerto Rico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To prevent unemployment and community disruption caused

by the government subsidization of runaway plants in

Puerto Rico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto

4 Rico—U.S. Employment and Community Stabilization

5 Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. Section 2 of the Puerto Rican Federal Rela7 tions Act (48 U.S.C. 737) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘The rights’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)

9 The rights’’, and
2

•HR 1630 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

2 new subsections:

3 ‘‘(b) Neither Puerto Rico nor any official of Puerto

4 Rico shall grant or provide, or continue to grant or pro5 vide, any exemption or other benefit to any business or

6 group of businesses that is a runaway business.

7 ‘‘(c) No business or group of businesses shall make

8 application for, or receive or otherwise enjoy continuing

9 benefit from, any such exemption or other benefit where

10 such applicant or recipient is a runaway business.

11 ‘‘(d) Puerto Rico shall require applicants or recipients

12 to certify by sworn statement initially and annually there13 after that such applicant or recipient is not a runaway

14 business.

15 ‘‘(e) Any governmental unit or any individual em16 ployee or former individual employee of a runaway busi17 ness and the labor union, if any, that represents or pre18 viously represented such employee, that suffer economic

19 injury because of such runaway business, shall have a

20 cause of action and may bring suit in the appropriate

21 United States district court to recover compensation for

22 the injuries suffered and for the expenses incurred in the

23 suit, including a reasonable sum for attorneys’ fees, and

24 to obtain equitable remedies.
3

•HR 1630 IH

1 ‘‘(f) Neither Puerto Rico, nor any official of Puerto

2 Rico, shall be subject to suit or subject to such cause of

3 action providing that the appropriate officials of Puerto

4 Rico have taken all legal steps to ensure compliance with

5 subsection (d).

6 ‘‘(g) For the purposes of subsections (b), (c), (d), and

7 (e), a runaway business is a business or group of busi8 nesses that by seeking to do business in Puerto Rico or

9 by doing business in Puerto Rico substantially and ad10 versely affect the employment or other working conditions

11 of 25 or more individual employees of that business or

12 group of businesses in any State of the United States.’’.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST‘S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000308

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, FOR THE 

LXS 2005-9N TRUST FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MYRNA TOLBE TUMBAGA and ROGER BOLUSAN TUMBAGA, 

Defendants-Appellants

and

IRENEA BOLUSAN TUMBAGA; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK 

OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWHEQ 

INC., CWHEQ REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-C; 

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Defendants-Appellees

and

JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; DOE 

ENTITIES 1 20; AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20,

Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC161000015)

ORDER

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the "Stipulation for Dismissal 

with Prejudice of Notice of Appeal Filed April 29, 2022," by 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000308

18-JUL-2024

09:26 AM

Dkt. 51 OAWST
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

2

Defendants-Appellants Myrna Tolbe Tumbaga and Roger Bolusan 

Tumbaga, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that 

(1) the appeal has docketed; (2) the parties stipulated to 

dismiss the appeal with prejudice, under Hawai‘i Rules of 

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), and have addressed 

attorneys' fees and costs; and (3) the stipulation is dated and 

signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation 

is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The 

parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on 

appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, July 18, 2024.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

TIMEAND DATE:                2:00 p.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2023

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                      The Commission will consider and act upon the following inopen session: *Thomas v. CalPortland Co.*,**Docket Nos. WEST 2018-0402-DMand WEST 2019-0205. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in ruling that theminer had established that the operator had discriminated against him undersection 105(c)(3) of the Mine Act.) 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)236-7472

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

 

Dated: September 22, 2023

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel

 

BillingCode 6735-01
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION

I, Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this annual report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal annual that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and







---





(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  April 20, 2004





/s/ Charles F. Catlett, III



Charles F. Catlett, III, Senior Vice

President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Kyriaki Cleo KYRIAZI, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN ELECTRIC CO. et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 475-73.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

July 17, 1979.

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in *Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v.*Novotny,- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2345, 60 L.Ed.2d 957 (1979).

It is on this 17 day of July, 1979,

ORDERED that this Court’s opinion of October 30, 1978, 461 F.Supp. 894, be, and it hereby is, vacated insofar as it holds that defendants are liable under Title 42 United States Code, § 1985(3).