alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on January 17, 2002. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m., in the Siuslaw River Room, at Siuslaw National Forest Headquarters, 4077 SW Research Way, Corvallis, OR. Agenda items will include: Grand Ronde Stewardship; 2001 in Review; Focus on the Coming Year (theme, projects, topics); and Round Robin Information Sharing. A fifteen-minute public comment period is scheduled at 1:45 p.m. The committee welcomes the publics' written comments on committee business at any time. The meeting should end around 3:00 p.m. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. Lunch will be on your own in Corvallis.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541/750-7075 or write to Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, OR 97339.

Dated: December 19, 2001.

Gloria D. Brown,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-31739  Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete Noble MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.

Pete Noble Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pete Noble Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying various motions Muhammad had filed regarding his term of supervised release. In denying Muhammad relief, the district court noted that the issues raised in Muhammad’s motions would be addressed during the course of his then-pending supervised release revocation proceedings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Muhammad seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 2, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 55]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-32134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
on January 28, 2002 in Weaverville, California. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss the selection of Title II projects under Public 
Law 106-393, H.R. 2389, the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000, also called the ``Payments to States'' Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 28, 2002 from 6:30 to 8:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Trinity County Public 
Utilities District Conference Room, 26 Ponderosa Lane, Weaverville, 
California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Andersen, Designated Federal 
Official, USDA, Shasta Trinity National Forests, PO Box 1190, 
Weaverville, CA 96093. Phone: (530) 623-1709. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7218131c16170001171c3214015c1417165c0701"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="147e757a70716667717a5472673a7271703a6167">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The focus of the meeting is to continue the 
development of an overall strategy for selecting Title II projects. The 
meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be 
provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the 
committee at that time.

    Dated: December 21, 2001.
S.E. ``Lou'' Woltering,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-32134 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. R. 1631

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to increase the maximum amount

in controversy permitted for cases under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims

and Conciliation Branch of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia Justice

Reform Act of 1994’’.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY PERMITTED FOR CASES UNDER JURISDICTION OF SMALL

CLAIMS AND CONCILIATION BRANCH OF SUPERIOR COURT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11–1321, D.C. Code, is amended by

striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)

shall apply to cases filed with the Superior Court of the District

of Columbia on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Larry D. HALL, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas McBRIDE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-7723.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 29, 2008.

Decided: June 3, 2008.

*199Larry D. Hall, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry D. Hall, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). In his informal brief, Hall has failed to address the district court’s finding that his § 2254 petition was untimely filed. Therefore, Hall has waived appellate review of the district court’s ruling. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b); *Edwards v. City of Goldsboro,*178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Terrance L. BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph HIGGS, Superintendent; Officer Fulton, Correctional Officer; Officer Sorrell; Mr. Firth, Counselor; L. Wallace, Inmate Service Member/Om*817budsman; Edith Sherman, Nurse/Medical Personnel; Director of Medical, Rappahannock Regional Jail; Director of Security, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7007.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 7, 2010.

Terrance L. Butler, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance L. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Butler v. Higgs,*No. l:10-cv-00173-JCC-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 2, 2010). We deny Butler’s motions for appointment of counsel and a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,776
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,480
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,776
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)


</TABLE>
NUMBERS 13-10-00187-CR AND 13-10-00188-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ARNOLD FRANKLIN HORTON, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 163rd District Court

of Orange County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Arnold Franklin Horton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion 

to dismiss his appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of 

the cases, we grant appellant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeals. Having dismissed the appeals at 

appellant's request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will 
2

issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of December, 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains  summary financial  information extracted  from the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheets for POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES at
June  30,  2000  and  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  for
POWERCOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES for the period ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         157,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  358,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               620,097
<PP&E>                                          19,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,720,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,057,626
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,818
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,720,114
<SALES>                                         63,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,818
<CGS>                                           40,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (195,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (195,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (195,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)








</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Hempstead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ David W. Hempstead

David W. Hempstead

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*June 26, 2014*

[Cite as *06/26/2014 Case Announcements #2,*2014-Ohio-2762.]

*1434MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-0851.

#### Freedom Mtge. Corp. v. Vitale.

Tuscarawas App. No. 2013 AP 08 0037, 2014-Ohio-1549. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon review of the motion for stay of sale, it is ordered by the court that appellee shall file a response, if any, to the motion for stay no later than Wednesday, July 2, 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX International
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,481,696
<SECURITIES>                                   10,495,572
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,001,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,662,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,869,324
<PP&E>                                         5,598,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                 943,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,644,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,152,858
<BONDS>                                        1,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,296
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,436,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,644,625
<SALES>                                        2,187,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,187,711
<CGS>                                          1,277,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,277,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               934,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,008
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-72,551-05 IN RE HAROLD VINCENT GILMORE, Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 10337 17-B IN THE 263RD DIST RICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ris County

and his applica tion has not been prope rly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , shall forwa

rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court, respond that Rel at o r h as not filed a habea s application in Har ris County , forwa

rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the State
rec eived Relator’s habea s application, or forwa rd a copy of an orde r establishing new deadlines in
acc ordanc e with the Supreme Court's emer g ency order s reg arding the COVI D-19 State of Disaster. See TEX. CODE CRI M. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.R.APP.P .73.4(b)( 5); Twenty-Ninth2

Emerge ncy Order Regarding the C ovid-19 St a t e o f Di s a ster , No. 20-9135 (Tex. Nov. 11, 2020). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the date of this order
.
Filed: J anuar

y 27, 2021 Do not publish
Order entered July 18 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01540 - CV STEVEN V. TIPPS, Appellant

V. PURPLE TREE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 04540 - B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 15, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to July 30, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the quarterly report of California Service Stations, Inc.
(the  "Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
Vincent Sammarro
hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Vincent Sammarro
Vincent Sammarro

President
principal executive officer
November 30, 2004





<PAGE>