alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**Certification        of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        Section 1350**

**as        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002**

|   | (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

|   |                                                                                              |                                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                     | /s/ D.                JONATHAN MERRIMAN |
|   | **D.                  Jonathan Merriman****Chief                  Executive Officer**   |

|   |                                                                                    |                                                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                           | /s/ PETER                V.                COLEMAN |
|   | **Peter                  V. Coleman****Chief                  Financial Officer**  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of E Prime  Aerospace  Corporation,  a
Colorado  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year  ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  Leslie Shealey , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Leslie Shealey
--------------------------
Leslie Shealey
Chief Financial Officer
February 01, 2007






----------------
[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  E'Prime  Aerospace  Corporation  and will be  retained  by E'Prime
Aerospace Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
EX-10.19



 





Exhibit 10.19




FORM OF LETTER AGREEMENT FOR APOLLO REAL ESTATE ADVISORS




APOLLO REAL ESTATE ADVISORS L.P.




October 9, 2007




Mr. Richard A. Baker

Chief Executive Officer

NRDC Acquisition Corp.

3 Manhattanville Road

Purchase, NY 10577



Dear Mr. Baker:



We hereby confirm our agreement with you that, as part of his on-going professional
responsibilities and employment, and with no additional consideration offered or received, Mr.
Brian M. Earle, a partner of Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P., has been directed to provide certain
services to NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) related to and in connection with the Company’s
consummation of its initial business combination, substantially on the terms set forth in the
Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. B33-14487). It is agreed that Mr. Earle
will undertake such tasks and responsibilities upon oral or written request to him by any officer
or director of the Company.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





APOLLO REAL ESTATE ADVISORS L.P.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ William
A. Mack	 
	 	 	Name:  	William A. Mack	 
	 	 	Title:  	Founder and Senior Partner	 
	 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



NRDC ACQUISITION CORP.





			
	By:	 	/s/ Richard A. Baker

Richard A. Baker

Chief Executive Officer
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

July 12, 2019

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, August 15, 2019

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *The Doe Run Company,*DocketNo. CENT 2015-318-RM. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concludingthat the operator had violated standards based on strict liability and infailing to conduct separate S&S and negligence analyses.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
|   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                               |

| 2.     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods indicated. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |

|                                 |                                                                                                                                 |                               |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                                                                 |
|                            |                                                                                                                            |                          |
| Date:                March ___, 2008 | By:                                                                                                                        | /s/                Melvin Gagerman |
|                                 | Melvin                GagermanChief                Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial                Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Bonanza BRILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7521.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2016.

Jay Bonanza Briley, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, Rosie Haney, David Sang Hak Lee, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Bonanza Briley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, as well as denying his motion for reconsideration. We grant Bri-ley’s motions for leave to file an addendum to his informal brief, for an extension of time to file a reply brief, and to add a supplement to his reply. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

With regard to Briley’s appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Briley,*No. 1:12-cr-00482-LO-1 (E.D.Va. filed July 22, 2015; entered July 23, 2015 and Sept. 14, 2015).

Turning to the denial of § 2255 relief, the order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Briley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Briley’s motions for appointment of counsel and for summary judgment, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss this portion of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*157
      *AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO



























































---
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
    
 
   
                       ASSOCIATED MATERIALS INCORPORATED
    
 
   
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    
   
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
    
 
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,               PRO FORMA
                                      -----------------------------------------------   ---------
                                       1993      1994      1995      1996      1997       1997
                                      -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   ---------
<S>                                   <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income before income tax expense....  $12,352   $12,975   $ 1,805   $13,994   $22,613    $24,632
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense..................  $ 7,581   $10,580   $11,474   $10,882   $ 9,795    $ 7,926
  Portion of rents representative of
     interest factor................    2,833     2,957     3,301     3,737     3,904      3,904
  Amortization of debt..............      202       540       540       445       398        247
                                      -------   -------   -------   -------   -------    -------
          Total fixed charges.......  $10,616   $14,077   $15,315   $15,064   $14,097    $12,077
  Earnings..........................  $22,968   $27,052   $17,120   $29,058   $36,710    $36,709
Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges...........................     2.16x     1.92x     1.12x     1.93x     2.60x      3.04x
                                      =======   =======   =======   =======   =======    =======
</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Commissioner Sola to Accompany Vote on Notation No. 20-20, Interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3rqdPzZ4SC\"><a href=\"\/sola-interpretive-rule-detention-demurrage\/\">Statement of Commissioner Sola to Accompany Vote on Notation No. 20-20, Interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/sola-interpretive-rule-detention-demurrage\/embed\/#?secret=3rqdPzZ4SC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Commissioner Sola to Accompany Vote on Notation No. 20-20, Interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3rqdPzZ4SC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Esteban SALGUERO-ORTIZ, a/k/a Cadejo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7837.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Esteban Salguero-Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Karen Dunn, Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Esteban Salguero-Ortiz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see. Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Salguero-Ortiz *278has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act),
each of the undersigned officers of Novo Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the
Periodic Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
780(d)) and information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Steven W. CapleSteven W. CaplePresident(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Patrick G. MackeyPatrick G. MackeySenior Vice President(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 Date: May 17, 2004 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

Reasonable Accommodation Procedures

Appendix D: Reporting Form

1. Name of requesting individual:

2. Office of requesting individual: 

3. Job held or desired by employee/applicant requesting the reasonable accommodation 

(including occupational series, grade level, and office): 

4. Determination of Disability:

 ___ Does have a disability 

 ___ Does not have a disability 

 ___ No determination made

5. Accommodation is:

 ___ Approved as originally requested

 ___ Alternative offered (describe: ________________________________________)

 ___ Denied

6. Date accommodation requested:

 Request initially received by:

 Date referred to Disability Program Coordinator, if applicable: 

7. Date accommodation approved or denied: 

 Date accommodation provided (if different): 

 If time frames outlined in RAP were not met, explain why: 

Appendix C: Page 1
8. Accommodation needed for (check one): 

 ___ Application Process

 ___ Performing Job Functions or Accessing Work Environment

 ___ Accessing a Benefit or Privilege of Employment (e.g. attending training program)

9. Accommodation Requested (describe):

10. Accommodation Provided (if different from requested):

11. Cost of accommodation provided: 

12. Was medical information required to process this request? If yes, explain why.

13. Sources of technical assistance, if any, consulted in identifying possible accommodations

(see Appendix E for examples): 

Appendix C: Page 2
Was reconsideration sought? If so, was it denied or granted? (Specify reasons and attach 

Chairman’s written grant or denial).

Additional Comments: 

Signature of Submitting Official (DPC):

Date:

Appendix C: Page 3
June 17, 2009 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 1, 2009 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Secretary of Labor v. Musser Engineering, Inc., and PBS 

Coals, Inc., Docket Nos. PENN 2004-152 and PENN 2004-158. 

(Issues include whether Musser and PBS violated 29 C.F.R.§ 

75.1200 when the operator of the Quecreek mine failed to maintain 

an accurate mine map showing the boundaries of adjacent abandoned 

mine workings, whether the alleged violations were “significant and 

substantial,” whether the companies were guilty of gross negligence, 

and whether the Administrative Law Judge properly increased the 

proposed penalty amounts.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must 

inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 

C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.