alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2. this Amendment and the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, constitute legal, validand binding obligations, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as suchenforceability may be limited by (i) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium orsimilar laws of general applicability affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights and(ii) the application of general principles of equity (regardless of whether suchenforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law); and     3. execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment and the Credit Agreement, asamended hereby, will not conflict with or result in a breach of, or require any consentunder, the charter or by-laws or other constitutive document of it, or any applicable law orregulation, or any order, writ, injunction, or decree of any Governmental Authority orarbitral panel, or any agreement or instrument to which the Borrower, Parent or any of theirSubsidiaries is a party or by which any of them or any of their property is bound or towhich any of them is subject, or constitute a default under any such agreement orinstrument, or (except for Liens created in accordance with the Security Documents and theother Loan Documents) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien upon any property ofthe Borrower, Parent or any of their Subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of any suchagreement or instrument.**SECTION 3. MISCELLANEOUS**     1. Reference to and Effect on the Existing Credit Agreement and the Other LoanDocuments.               (a) Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Credit Agreement and the otherLoan Documents relating thereto shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified andconfirmed.               (b) The execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment shall not, except as expresslyprovided herein, constitute a waiver of any provision of, or operate as a waiver of any right,power or remedy of the Administrative Agent or the Lenders under, the Credit Agreement or any ofthe other Loan Documents relating thereto.          2. Headings.          Section and subsection headings in this Amendment are included herein for convenience ofreference only and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment for any other purpose or be givenany substantive effect.          3. Applicable Law.          THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNEW YORK.          4. Counterparts.          This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties heretoin separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original,but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument; signaturepages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart sothat all signature pages are physically attached to the same document.
 

 
          **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed anddelivered by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first writtenabove.      **QUIKSILVER AMERICAS, INC.**,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on January 16, 2002 at the Crook County Library, Broughton Room, 200 E. 2nd Street in Prineville, Oregon. A business meeting will begin at 9:00 am and finish at 3:00 pm. Agenda items will include a discussion on the management implications of the Eastside Screens, Litigation Update, ICBEMP update, PAC Recommendations Regarding The Northwest Forest Plan Successes/Failures, Info Sharing and a Public Forum from 2:30 pm till 3:00 pm. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mollie Chaudet, Province Liaison, USDA, Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District, 1230 N.E. 3rd., Bend, OR 97701, Phone (541) 416-6872.

Leslie A.C. Weldon,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-31909  Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### J M TULL METALS COMPANY INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert T. CLINE, Defendant-Appellant Robert T. Cline, Plaintiff-Appellant v. J M Tull Metals Co. Inc.; Ryerson Tull Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-30351.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 2008.

*35Virginia W. Gundlach, Erica N. Beck, Jones Walker, New Orleans, LA, Nan Roberts Eitel, Jones Walker The Watergate, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Merrick J. Norman, Jr., Lake Charles, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY, Circuit Judge, and CARDONE, District Judge.*

*

 United States District Judge, Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM: **

The court, having heard arguments of counsel and considered the briefs and pertinent portions of the record, vacates the district court judgment and remands for further factual development as to whether Body Masters owed a debt to Ryerson Tull or J M Tull Metals, Inc. at the date of bankruptcy.

The summary judgment evidence does not eliminate any genuine issue of material fact concerning the identity of the entity to which Body Masters owed money at the date of bankruptcy. The invoices bear both companies’ names, and the eon-clusory affidavit of a lower level corporate agent fails to establish that the sales to and receipts from Body Masters were for the sole account of J M Tull Metals, Inc.

Contrary to appellee’s argument, the ambiguous stipulation entered in the *36bankruptcy court effected no issue preclusion against Robert T. Cline (“Cline”) because the issue of the corporate identity of the creditor, whether Ryerson Tull, Inc. or J M Tull Metals, Inc., was not actually litigated and decided in that claim determination proceeding.

We also see no merit, from the vantage point of summary judgment appellate review, in Cline’s arguments that his 1984 letter guaranty to J M Tull Metals, Inc. is unenforceable.

Based on the foregoing conclusions, we also vacate the court’s 60(b) ruling on evidence offered untimely by Cline, because the court should reconsider its admissibility in connection with further proceedings.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                               Exhibit 11.1


                           For the Fiscal Years Ended
                    October 30,    October 31,    October 25,
                    1998           1997           1996
                    ----------     ----------     ----------

Adjusted shares 
outstanding
---------------
Weighted average 
common shares
outstanding         6,062,132      4,192,530      3,779,748
Dilutive shares -
common stock
options               524,863        586,406        738,864
Warrant held by
First Source
Financial LLP       1,575,000      3,150,000      3,150,000
Other warrants         44,700        191,968        233,801
Assumed repurchase
of common shares     (245,556)      (449,395)      (358,080)
                    ---------      ---------      ---------
Weighted average
common and
potentially dilutive
shares outstanding  7,961,139      7,671,509      7,544,333
                    =========      =========      =========

Net income
----------
Income before extra-
ordinary item       $  13,004      $  12,505      $  12,895
Extraordinary item,
net of income taxes         -         (1,003)             -
                     --------       --------       --------
     Net income     $  13,004      $  11,502      $  12,895
                     ========       ========       ========

Basic earnings per 
share
------------------
Income before extra-
ordinary item       $    2.15      $    2.98      $    3.41
Extraordinary item,
net of income taxes         -          (0.24)             -
                     --------       --------       --------
     Net income     $    2.15      $    2.74      $    3.41
                     ========       ========       ========

Diluted earnings 
per share
----------------
Income before extra-
ordinary item       $    1.63      $    1.63      $    1.71
Extraordinary item,
net of income taxes         -          (0.13)             -
                     --------       --------       --------
     Net income     $    1.63      $    1.50      $    1.71
                     ========       ========       ========

Notes:
------
SFAS No. 128 requires the disclosure of basic and diluted
earnings per share.  Basic earnings per share is computed by
dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting
period.  Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to
issue common stock were exercised or converted to common stock. 
For the computation of diluted earnings per share, the basic
weighted average number of common shares is increased by
potentially dilutive shares (stock options and warrants)
determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury 
stock method, any proceeds from the exercise of potentially
dilutive shares are assumed to be used to repurchase common
shares outstanding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,381,668
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,393,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,308,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,738,652
<PP&E>                                          13,696,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,197,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,811,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,025,525
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,938,831
<COMMON>                                             8,313
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,368,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,811,407
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,984,127
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,959,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   161,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 380,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    898,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                        33,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       932,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06
        



</TABLE>
# WORK ZONE SAFETY GENERAL PITCH EMAIL: TEXAS 

**POTENTIAL SUBJECT LINE: Improving Work Zone Safety with State-Wide Outreach Campaign**

Hello, **[Name of Reporter/Producer]**

The **[Organization]** would like to pursue a potential **[TV Station/Publication] [segment/story]** to share resources and raise awareness for a work zone safety campaign which focuses on reminding commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers to plan their routes, stay alert, and slow down as they approach Texas work zones. This initiative is part of a national effort led by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the *Our Roads, Our Safety**®* campaign.

**Here’s why the Work Zone Safety Outreach Campaign is so critical in Texas:**

· Texas ranks first in the country on the Global Groundwork Index[footnoteRef:1] for infrastructure project investment. Texas also ranks first in fatalities involving CMVs in the state’s many work zones. [1: ] 

· Texas has more interstate mileage than any other state, and heavily relies on its vast multi-modal freight system and CMV driver population to move key agricultural commodities across the U.S., and logistically serve Texas’ big energy sector. With the state’s continued expansion and year-round construction season, more passenger vehicles and CMV drivers traveling through Texas roadways will likely encounter active work zones at any time, any day of the week. 

· The leading causes of work zone crashes statewide is speeding and distracted driving. Of the 4,380 crashes resulting in fatalities in 2021, 10% had distracted driving listed as a contributing factor; 28% were not wearing a seat belt. All of these factors are entirely preventable.

Through a potential [**segment/feature story**], we welcome the opportunity to share these safety resources/tips and remind **[TV Station/Publication]****[readers/viewers/listeners]**to stay alert and share the road safely, especially when driving through work zones. 

I’d be happy to discuss the topic further via phone and connect you with one of our spokespeople for comment. 

For more information on active work zones in the state, please see below my signature line; and for resources, check out the campaign webpage, here: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/ourroads/work-zone-safety-shareable-material

Looking forward to speaking with you.

Best,

**[Contact name]**

**[Contact phone number]**

**[Contact email address]**

**[Website, Facebook and/or Twitter presence]**

FMCSA is amplifying work zone safety messages through outlets like billboards, audio ads, and truck stops reaching CMV drivers traveling through the following work zones:

· Loop 410 North to FM 3009 and FM 1103 in San Antonio

· I-635/I-30 interchange from U 75 to I-30 in Dallas

· SH 170 to I-35/I-35W Split in Dallas/Fort Worth

· I-45 from downtown Houston to Beltway 8 North

· I-20 between Midland and Odessa

###

1

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3412 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3412

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
  to provide relief to nonbanks from certain stress test requirements 
                            under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

Mr. Loudermilk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
  to provide relief to nonbanks from certain stress test requirements 
                            under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alleviating Stress Test Burdens To 
Help Investors Act''.

SEC. 2. STRESS TEST RELIEF FOR NONBANKS.

    Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``are regulated by a 
        primary Federal financial regulatory agency'' and inserting: 
        ``whose primary financial regulatory agency is a Federal 
        banking agency or the Federal Housing Finance Agency'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``Each Federal primary 
        financial regulatory agency'' and inserting ``Each Federal 
        banking agency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) SEC and cftc.--The Securities and Exchange 
                Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
                may each issue regulations requiring financial 
                companies with respect to which they are the primary 
                financial regulatory agency to conduct periodic 
                analyses of the financial condition, including 
                available liquidity, of such companies under adverse 
                economic conditions.''.
                                 <all>
```
2014-0871.

#### State v. Qunnie.

Cuyahoga App. No. 100317, 2014-Ohio-1435. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and French, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                          90
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,891
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,230
<PP&E>                          16,314
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  21,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,866
<BONDS>                         4,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        36
<OTHER-SE>                      11,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    21,590
<SALES>                         847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                847
<CGS>                           417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (407)
<INCOME-TAX>                    58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (349)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>   0000827086
<NAME>  CARLYLE INCOME PLUS, L.P. - II

       
                              
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                MAR-31-1998

<CASH>                        1,042,090
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                     4,082
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,046,172
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               22,009,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            45,690
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                   21,963,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 22,009,674
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 63,031
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                107,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (44,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             471,947
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    471,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      4.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                      4.97 

        



</TABLE>
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1986-X Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001