alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rogelio TOMAS-ALONZO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74808.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Michael Lucien Jacob, Law Office of Michael L, Jacob, Bainbridge Island, WA, for Petitioner.

Achiezer Guggenheim, Trial, Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, Esquire, Trial, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rogelio Tomas-Alonzo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mulcasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, *Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

Tomas-Alonzo does not raise any substantive challenge to the BIA’s determination that his asylum application is time-barred. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review as to Tomas-Alonzo’s asylum *193claim. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues that are not addressed in the argument portion of a brief are deemed waived).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Tomas-Alonzo did not demonstrate past persecution or a clear probability of future harm on account of a protected ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zaearias,*502 U.S. 478, 481-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, Tomas-Alonzo’s withholding claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3681 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3681

   To direct the Director of the United States Geological Survey to 
 establish a program to map zones that are at greater risk of sinkhole 
                   formation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2021

Mr. Soto (for himself and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Director of the United States Geological Survey to 
 establish a program to map zones that are at greater risk of sinkhole 
                   formation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sinkhole Mapping Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. SINKHOLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the United States Geological 
Survey shall establish a program to--
            (1) study the short-term and long-term mechanisms that 
        cause sinkholes, including extreme storm events, prolonged 
        droughts causing shifts in water management practices, aquifer 
        depletion, and other major changes in water use; and
            (2) develop maps that depict zones that are at greater risk 
        of sinkhole formation.
    (b) Review of Maps.--Once during each 5-year period, or more often 
as the Director of the United States Geological Survey determines is 
necessary, the Director shall assess the need to revise and update the 
maps developed under this section.
    (c) Website.--The Director of the United States Geological Survey 
shall establish and maintain a public website that displays the maps 
developed under this section and other relevant information critical 
for use by community planners and emergency managers.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX, International, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         963821
<SECURITIES>                                   2361087
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7348295
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175000
<INVENTORY>                                    7762721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18357810
<PP&E>                                         9953455
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2663655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37455042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8351936
<BONDS>                                        1600000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3439
<OTHER-SE>                                     21985107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37455042
<SALES>                                        8950436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8950436
<CGS>                                          5745210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5745210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4316266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             297856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1511975
<INCOME-TAX>                                   639444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            872531
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   872531
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .23



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 12.01




                       STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
                          OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (IN MILLIONS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Year Ended December 31:
                                                        (In millions)
                                          1998     1997      1996      1995       1994
                                          ----     ----      ----      ----       ----
<S>                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>    
HISTORICAL INFORMATION

EARNINGS:

Income from Continuing Operations
    before Income Taxes                $  23.0   $  17.7   $  60.9   $  104.6   $  14.7

Interest Expense (net of amount
    capitalized)                          26.7      23.6      37.9       49.8      56.0

Amortization of Previously
    Capitalized Interest Expense          --         0.4       0.4        0.4       0.3
                                       -------   -------   -------   --------   -------
    Total Earnings                     $  49.7   $  41.7   $  99.2   $  154.8   $  71.0
                                       =======   =======   =======   ========   =======


FIXED CHARGES:

Interest Expense (net of amount
    capitalized)                       $  26.7   $  23.6   $  37.9   $   49.8   $  56.0

Capitalized Interest                       7.4       0.9       0.6        1.5       1.2

    Total Fixed Charges Including
                                       -------   -------   -------   --------   -------
      Capitalized Interest             $  34.1   $  24.5   $  38.5   $   51.3   $  57.2
                                       =======   =======   =======   ========   =======



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges        1.5x      1.7x      2.6x        3.0x     1.2x
                                       =======   =======   =======   ========   =======
</TABLE>



                                       50
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Information on Joining the Arbitrator Roster - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"h5IC6vPSpi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/arbitration\/information-joining-arbitrator-roster\/\">Information on Joining the Arbitrator Roster<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/arbitration\/information-joining-arbitrator-roster\/embed\/#?secret=h5IC6vPSpi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Information on Joining the Arbitrator Roster” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"h5IC6vPSpi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"  Those who wish to be considered for our Roster must demonstrate either (i) experience, competence, and acceptability in decision-making roles in the resolution of labor relations disputes; or (ii)\u00a0 extensive and recent experience in relevant positions in collective bargaining. In addition to (i) or \u00a0(ii), a Roster candidate must demonstrate (iii) capability of conducting [...]"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66931-66932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act

    In accordance with the policy of the Department of Justice, notice 
is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Clean Harbors Inc., et al., Civ. No. C1-01-821, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, on 
November 28, 2001. That action was brought against defendants pursuant 
to the Resource Conservation and Recovery (RCRA) seeking civil 
penalties for certain violations of the State RCRA permit for the 
facility, which is located in Cincinnati, Ohio. The decree requires 
defendants to pay $400,000.00 in civil penalties, to change certain 
procedures at the facility concerning hazardous waste analysis and 
handling, and to apply to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for 
permit modifications associated with these procedures.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree for a period of 30 days from the date of this 
publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC 20503. All comments should refer to United 
States v. Clean Harbors, Inc., et al., DJ# 90-7-1-06612.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, 100 East 
Fifth Street, 220 Potter Stewart Courthouse, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202; 
and at the Region V office of the

[[Page 66932]]

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604-3590. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be 
obtained in person or by mail from the Department of Justice Consent 
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting 
a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per 
page reproduction costs) payable to the Consent Decree Library. When 
requesting a copy, please refer to United States v. Clean Harbors, 
Inc., et al., DJ# 90-7-1-06612.

Catherine R. McCabe,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-31786 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
CCASE:

SOL (MSHA) V. HALLMARK & SON COAL

DDATE:

19790305

TTEXT:

 Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)

 Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, Civil Penalty Proceeding

 MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

 ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. BARB 79-60-P

 PETITIONER A/O No. 01-01721-03001

 v. Coal Branch Strip Mine

HALLMARK & SON COAL COMPANY,

 RESPONDENT

 DISAPPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

 ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 The Solicitor recommends settlement approval for the

originally assessed amounts. However, the Solicitor gives no

reasons beyond the bare statement that the proposed settlement is

reasonable in light of the alleged gravity and negligence of each

violation. The gravity and negligence of the violations are not

explained. The parties must recognize that once a matter is

before the Commission recommended settlements cannot be approved

solely because the operator now agrees to pay the assessed

amounts.

 Accordingly, the Solicitor is ORDERED on or before March 15,

1979 to submit information sufficient to support his

recommendation. Failure to do so will result in issuance of a

show cause order and dismissal of the petition.

 Paul Merlin

 Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge
2014-0757.

#### State v. Mangan.

Greene App. No. 2013-CA-3, 2014-Ohio-960. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Kennedy and French, JJ., dissent.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . P D - 1552- 07

D A V I D M A L D O N A D O , A ppel l ee

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON APP ELLEE ’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW FROM THE THI RTEENTH CO URT O F AP PEALS

NUECES CO UNTY J OHNS ON , J. , f

i l e d a c onc ur r i ng o pi ni on. O P I N I O N B e c a us e no thi ng in the Sixth Am e ndme nt p re ve nts a re pr e se nte d d e fe nd a nt f

ro m vo lun tari ly incriminating himself, Iconcur in the judgme nt of the Court. Represe nted defe ndants ca n, and ofte n do , c ho os e to g ive state me nts to law e nf or c e me nt o ff

ic e rs de sp ite the a dv ic e of a n a tto rn e y

to r e ma in silent. Howeve r, the opinion of the Court should not be taken a s a license for the sta te, in whateve r g uis e , to wi llf

ull y re ma in ig no ra

nt of wh e the r a de fe nd a nt h a s c ouns e l. T he be tte r p ra c tic e wo uld be for the law enfor ceme nt of fice r who de sires to interview a suspect who is in custody to make at least a m in im a l in qu ir

y a s to w h e th e r th e ja il e d s u s p e c t is r e p r e s e n te d b y c o u n s e l. T h is c o u ld be2

a c c omp lis he d b y

c on ta c tin g the a g e nc y

that tr a c ks c ourt

a pp oin tme nts to s e e if

the su sp e c t ha s c ourt
appointed counse l and che cking jail rec ords for inf ormation on reta ined re prese ntation.

Filed: June 4, 2008 Pub lis h
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 23, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40760

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER W. JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-113-ALL

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record

and counsel’s briefshows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is
DENIED.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Optek Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (no. 33-18555 and No. 33-60656) of Optek
Technology, Inc. of our reports dated December 6, 1995, relating
to
the consolidated balance sheets of Optek Technology, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of October 27, 1995 and October 28, 1994, the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended October 27, 1995, and the related schedule, which
reports appear in the October 27, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K
of Optek Technology, Inc.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
January 5, 1996
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E.

meeting_110107.pdf

fmshrc110107.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints William W. Winspear and Robert L. Winspear and either
of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, to sign on behalf Associated Materials
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and on behalf of the
undersigned in my capacity as an officer and/or a director of the Company, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and
to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, granting unto said
attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and either of them with or without the other,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to
effectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned may
or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or either of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney effective
as of January 28, 1998.

<TABLE>
<S>                                   <C>
/s/ WILLIAM W. WINSPEAR               /s/ JAMES F. LEARY
-----------------------               -----------------------
William W. Winspear                   James F. Leary


/s/ ROBERT L. WINSPEAR                /s/ ALAN B. LERNER
-----------------------               -----------------------
Robert L. Winspear                    Alan B. Lerner


/s/ RICHARD I. GALLAND                /s/ A.A. MEITZ
-----------------------               -----------------------
Richard I. Galland                    A. A. Meitz


/s/ DONALD L. KAUFMAN 
-----------------------               -----------------------
Donald L. Kaufman                     Gary D. Trabka
</TABLE>