Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2001 / Notices 66425

determined to review the ID and

remanded the ID to the ALJ for either a

modification of the ID or a statement of

reasons supporting his decision to allow

only limited intervention. Commission

Order and Notice of Review, dated

October 30, 2001.

On November 20, 2001, the ALJ

issued Order No. 7, in which he

supplied reasons for the restrictions that

he placed on Microchip. Microchip filed

a submission concerning Order No.7 on

November 28, 2001. On December 5,

2001, complainant Chamberlain

responded in opposition to the

submission. On the same date, the

Commission investigative attorney filed

a response in support of Microchip.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and section

210.45 of the Commission’s rules of

practice and procedure, 19 CFR 210.45.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 18, 2001.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31600 Filed 12–21–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–466]

In the Matter of Certain Organizer

Racks and Products Containing Same;

Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

November 21, 2001, under section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Spectrum

Concepts, Inc. of Carlsbad, California.

An amended complaint was filed on

December 14, 2001, and supplementary

letters were filed on November 27 and

December 14, 2001. The complaint, as

amended and supplemented, alleges

violations of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain organizer racks and products

containing same, by reason of

infringement of claims 1, 6, 8, 11, 12,

13, and 24 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,740,924. The complaint further alleges

that an industry in the United States

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of

section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after the investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and

permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and

supplements, except for any

confidential information contained

therein, are available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s ADD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server at http://

www.usitc.gov. The public record for

this investigation may be viewed on the

Commission’s electronic docket (EDISON-LINE) at http://dockets.usitc.gov/

eol/public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

telephone 202–205–2580.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.10

(2001).

Scope of Investigation: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

December 18, 2001, Ordered that

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain organizer racks

and products containing same, by

reason of infringement of claims 1, 6, 8,

11, 12, 13, or 24 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,740,924, and whether an industry in

the United States exists as required by

subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Spectrum

Concepts, Inc., 1911 Palomar Oaks Way,

Carlsbad, CA 92008–6511;

(b) The respondent is the following

company alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and is the party upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Bryan Plastics Ltd., 5 Bovis Pointe,

Claire, Quebec, Canada H9R 4N3;

(c) Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 401, Washington,

D.C. 20436, who shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation;

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Delbert R. Terrill, Jr. is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge;

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR §§ 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such

responses will be considered by the

Commission if received no later than 20

days after the date of service by the

Commission of the complaint and the

notice of investigation. Extensions of

time for submitting responses to the

complaint will not be granted unless

good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and to

authorize the administrative law judge

and the Commission, without further

notice to that respondent, to find the

facts to be as alleged in the complaint

and this notice and to enter both an

initial determination and a final

determination containing such findings,

and may result in the issuance of a

limited exclusion order or a cease and

desist order or both directed against that

respondent.

Issued: December 18, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31559 Filed 12–21–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the