alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES PAUL WRIGHT, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 20-5080

(D.C. Nos. 4:20-CV-00237-GKF-FHM &

4:12-CR-00197-GKF-1)

(N.D. Okla.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before PHILLIPS, McHUGH, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

On July 7, 2022, this court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) and 

ordered supplemental briefing on one issue: whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery is a 

crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). In response, 

the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Remand, asking this court to remand this matter to 

the district court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in 

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding 

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral 

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 15, 2022

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 20-5080 Document: 010110724361 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 Page: 1
2

United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022). For good cause shown, this motion is 

granted.

In dismissing Mr. Wright’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and denying him a COA, the 

district court reasoned that “every circuit court to have considered the issue has 

concluded an attempted Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under the elements 

clause.” R. vol. I at 211. But in Taylor, the Supreme Court unequivocally ruled that 

attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under the elements clause: 

“Whatever one might say about completed Hobbs Act robbery, attempted Hobbs Act 

robbery does not satisfy the elements clause.” 142 S. Ct. at 2020. Rather than address in 

the first instance what Taylor means for Mr. Wright’s § 2255 motion, we remand his case 

to the district court for further consideration in light of Taylor. 

The Clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

Appellate Case: 20-5080 Document: 010110724361 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 Page: 2
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity3 Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, StevenD. Hargreaves, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

                (1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Steven D. Hargreavess |
|---------------------------|
| Steven D. Hargreaves      |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 12, 2002         |

 

----
#### Kareemah BELL, Appellant v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Appellee.

No. 08-7038.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 12, 2008.

Kareemah Bell, Landover Hills, MD, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 29, 2008, be affirmed. Nothing in appellant’s complaint suggests she is pursuing a civil action either arising under federal law or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,087
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,518
<PP&E>                                          29,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,808
<BONDS>                                         79,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,455
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,918
<SALES>                                        318,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,820
<CGS>                                          236,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,894
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,841
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (376)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before STEPHENS , LAWRENCE, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Joshua J. SMITH Captain ( O

- 3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 201900300

Decided: 20 July 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marin e Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge s : Emily A. Jackson Hall ( arraignment ) Glen R. Hines (trial) K. Scott Woodard ( Entry of Judgment ) 1
Sentence adjudged 23 July 2019 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina , co nsisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : confinement for 35 years 2 and a dismissal

.

1 Due to the departure of the presiding trial judge from active service, Circuit Judge Woodard was detailed for the purpose of the Entry of Judgment by the Chief Trial Judge, Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

2 The convening aut hority suspended confinement in excess of 25 years pursuant to a pretrial agreement.United States v. Smith , NMCCA No. 201900300 Opinion of the Court

2 For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59
, 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
{"id":979,"date":"2015-05-07T15:37:40","date_gmt":"2015-05-07T19:37:40","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=979"},"modified":"2018-08-10T15:38:39","modified_gmt":"2018-08-10T19:38:39","slug":"pay-gov-scheduled-service-interruption-on-saturday-may-9-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/pay-gov-scheduled-service-interruption-on-saturday-may-9-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Pay.gov \u2013 Scheduled Service Interruption on Saturday, May 9, 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>May 7, 2015<\/div>\n<p>Please note that Pay.gov will be conducting scheduled upgrades of its systems on Saturday, May 9, 2015 from 6:00 PM to Midnight (EDT). During that time, the Pay.gov site will not be available and no payments will be accepted. We apologize for any inconvenience.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>May 7, 2015 Please note that Pay.gov will be conducting scheduled upgrades of its systems on Saturday, May 9, 2015 from 6:00 PM to Midnight (EDT). During that time, the Pay.gov site will not be available and no payments will be accepted. We apologize for any inconvenience.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=979"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":980,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979\/revisions\/980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
EXHIBIT 31.3


RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification





I,
Sandor Rosenberg, certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed
this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Information Analysis Incorporated;





2.
 Based on my
knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;





Date: April 30, 2019
By:
/s/ Sandor Rosenberg
Sandor
Rosenberg, Chairman of the Board,
Chief
Executive Officer and President








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302
has been provided to Information Analysis Incorporated and will be
retained by Information Analysis Incorporated and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 01-ACE-7]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Ankeny, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Ankeny, IA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 27, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-52OC, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in Federal Register on September 24, 2001 
(66 FR 48794). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on December 27, 2001. Adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on December 18, 2001.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 01-31727 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF September 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>          12,868,472
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>         18,945,572
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      9,943
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>            5,412,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 24,367,701
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          44,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                44,822
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>       18,245,779
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        6,077,100
<NET-ASSETS>                   24,322,879
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                 103,033
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                 (1,120,221)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>        (1,017,188)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>        3,931,463
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     (10,927,781)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         (11,159,852)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        (11,159,852)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>             235,981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (14,626)
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                (1,123,231)
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>           29,902,805
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  43
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    43
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                       3.7
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>            681,666
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                  1.7
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**1331PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW**

**SUITE520N**

**WASHINGTON,DC� 20004**

** **

 

 

November 22, 2013

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:��������������� 1:00 p.m., Thursday, December 5, 2013

 

PLACE:��������������������������������� TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (entry from��� F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:������������������������������� Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:�������������������� TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *UnitedMine Workers of America on behalf of Franks v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP*,Docket No. PENN 2012-250-D; and *United Mine Workers of America on behalf ofHoy v. Emerald Coal Resources, LP*, Docket No. PENN 2012-251-D**(Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that miners� suspensionsfor refusing to provide certain safety-related information to the operatorconstituted unlawful discrimination.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.� Subject to29 C.F.R. � 2706.150(a)(3) and � 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:��������������� Jean Ellen������� (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

February 16, 2018

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                2:00 p.m., Thursday, March 22, 2018

 

PLACE:                                  TheDepartment of Labor Auditorium, Frances Perkins Building, 200 ConstitutionAvenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210 

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v. ConsolPennsylvania Coal Co.,*Docket No. PENN 2014-816 (Issues include whether theJudge erred in concluding that the operator violated a reporting requirementthat applies when an accident has a “reasonable potential to cause death.”)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT:                                    1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – November 2, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XWn2M5dUNg\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-november-2-2018\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – November 2, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-november-2-2018\/embed\/#?secret=XWn2M5dUNg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – November 2, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"XWn2M5dUNg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}