alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement
Home/News/Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement Previous			Next
Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement										The Lake Villa (IL) Federation of Teachers and District 41 board of education announced that a tentative agreement was reached after a 10-month impasse. The agreement, reached with the help of a Federal mediator, comes after teachers indicated they would go on strike Feb. 29 if a new deal were not reached by that date. A ratification vote is expected within the next few weeks.
For local news coverage, click here.
Kimberly Warren2016-02-24T10:59:53-05:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Cases on Review              

#   Cases on Review

Cases Currently On Review Before The Commission

Commission Decisions On Appeal

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Victor Torres              

#   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Victor Torres

On July 28, 2023, the Commission issued its decision in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Victor Torres, Docket No. WEST 2023-0256-DM.

Commission Decision(Sec-Victor Torres v WG Yates)WEST 2023-0256.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Statement on Tentative Agreement in Professional Referee Organization and Professional Soccer Referees Association Contract Talks - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aXFqJp4uDh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-statement-on-tentative-agreement-in-professional-referee-organization-and-professional-soccer-referees-association-contract-talks\/\">FMCS Statement on Tentative Agreement in Professional Referee Organization and Professional Soccer Referees Association Contract Talks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-statement-on-tentative-agreement-in-professional-referee-organization-and-professional-soccer-referees-association-contract-talks\/embed\/#?secret=aXFqJp4uDh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Statement on Tentative Agreement in Professional Referee Organization and Professional Soccer Referees Association Contract Talks” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"aXFqJp4uDh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2014 On Jan. 7, 2019, representatives from the Professional Referee Organization and the Professional Soccer Referees Association reached tentative agreement on a successor collective bargaining agreement under the auspices of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). Subject to the ratification of the membership, the new agreement will cover a five-year term with […]"}
<                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended January 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 16, 2004            /s/ Rick D. Snow
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                  Rick D. Snow
                                Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel (Visual Arts Section B, Access, Education, Heritage/Preservation categories), to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference at 3:00 p.m. on February 12, 2001 in Room 726 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20506. 

This meeting is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. 

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5691. 

Dated: February 1, 2001. 

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts. 

[FR Doc. 01-3110 Filed 2-5-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
#### Marcus Arthur FONTAINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-55475.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 4, 2010.

Marcus Arthur Fontaine, Sherman Oaks, CA, pro se.

Jennifer Leigh Williams, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

*146Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marcus Arthur Fontaine appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition and petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Fontaine contends that when the district court ordered that “no further supervision” would be imposed after his five-year term of imprisonment, the court precluded all supervision, including parole supervision. The record reflects that the district court’s intent was that there be no supervised release following the five-year commitment. There is no indication, however, that the district court intended to vacate the sentence entirely if Fontaine was released on parole. Indeed, once a prisoner is released from prison on parole by order of the United States Parole Commission, the parolee remains under the jurisdiction of the Parole Commission “until the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which such parolee was sentenced.” 18 U.S.C. § 4210(a). Fontaine thus remains under the jurisdiction of the Parole Commission until the expiration of his sentence.

Fontaine also contends that he was incarcerated beyond any mandatory maximum when accounting for time served in state custody. State time served, however, does not affect the computation of the full-term expiration of a federal sentence. *See*28 C.F.R. § 2.21; *Bowen v. U.S. Parole Comm’n,*805 F.2d 885, 888 (9th Cir.1986).

Fontaine’s motion for status of appeal is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEPHEN M. HLUBOKY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 618

[ August 10, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott Suskauer , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 502015CF000541A

.

Stephen M. Hluboky, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Antowan THORNE, also known as Anthony Thorne, Appellant.

No. 08-3109.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 12, 2011.

Roy W. McLeese, III, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Neil H. Jaffee, Jonathan Stuart Jeffress, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Before: GINSBURG, TATEL, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed November 25, 2008, be affirmed. The district court’s imposition of a 30-month revocation sentence of imprisonment was reasonable in view of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the policy statements in the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The *514sentence was consistent with the Sixth Amendment because the court did not treat the Guidelines as mandatory. The sentence was likewise consistent with the Ex Post Facto Clause because the statutory and Guidelines provisions appellant invokes as bases for the alleged violation do not “ ‘impose[ ] a punishment for an act which .was not punishable at the time it was committed’ ” or otherwise “ ‘impose[ ] additional punishment to that then prescribed.’” *Weaver v. Graham,*450 U.S. 24, 28, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981) (quoting *Cummings v. Missouri,*71 U.S. (4 Wall) 277, 325-26, 18 L.Ed. 356 (1866)). The sentence was also consistent with the Double Jeopardy Clause; it was not a new punishment but was instead part of the punishment for the original conviction. *See Johnson v. United States,*529 U.S. 694, 699-701, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000). Finally, appellant has not demonstrated under the plain-error standard that the government, in seeking a revocation sentence, breached the plea agreement appellant entered in the District of Columbia Superior Court in a related case. *See United States v. Valdez-Sanchez,*414 F.3d 539, 542 (5th Cir.2005).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Supreme Court of Louisiana 

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #063

FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

The Opinions handed down on the 8th day of December, 2015, are as follows:

PER CURIAMS: 

2014-BA-2452 IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-52

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude 

petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the 

practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of 

one year. Should petitioner commit any misconduct during the 

period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be 

terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to 

the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement. 

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

WEIMER, J., additionally concurs.
12/08/15 

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA 

NO. 2014-BA-2452 

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-52

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING 

PER CURIAM 

Petitioner successfully passed the Louisiana Bar Examination. However, the 

Committee on Bar Admissions (“Committee”) advised petitioner that it was unable 

to certify him for admission to the bar on character and fitness grounds relating to 

his failure to disclose three arrests on his law school application. 

 Petitioner then applied to this court for admission to the practice of law. We 

remanded the matter to the Committee on Bar Admissions Panel on Character and 

Fitness to conduct an investigation and appointed a commissioner to take character 

and fitness evidence. Following the proceedings, the commissioner filed his report 

with this court, recommending petitioner be admitted to the practice of law. The 

Committee objected to that recommendation, and oral argument was conducted 

before this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9(D)(11). 

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude 

petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in 

Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of one year. Should petitioner commit 

any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice 

may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules 

for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement. 

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.