alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed. R. App.

P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 18, 2009 *

Decided February 20, 2009

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 3137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

MATEO MORALES,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin.

No. 3:07

‐ cr

‐ 00166

‐ bbc

‐ 1

Barbara B. Crabb,

Chief Judge

.

O R D E R

Mateo Morales, a federal inmate, was found with a small amount of marijuana and

disciplined by prison officials. Soon thereafter he pleaded guilty to possessing the marijuana,

see 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2), and a district court sentenced him to six months’ imprisonment. 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 3137 Page 2

Morales now appeals, arguing that the prison disciplinary process should have barred the

subsequent criminal proceeding.

This claim is without merit. We, together with every other circuit, have held that prison

disciplinary proceedings do not implicate double jeopardy concerns. See, e.g.

, United States v.

Simpson

, 546 F.3d 394, 397

‐ 98 (6th Cir. 2008); Fogle v. Pierson

, 435 F.3d 1252, 1261

‐ 62 (10th Cir.

2006); Meeks v. McBride

, 81 F.3d 717, 722 (7th Cir. 1996); Garrity v. Fiedler

, 41 F.3d 1150, 1152

‐ 53

(7th Cir. 1994). Thus, there is no reason why Morales could not be disciplined by the prison

and prosecuted by the government for the very same conduct.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

** **

**Certifications of**

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

We,William J. Volz, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kimiko Milheim,Chief Financial Officer, of LOGIC Devices Incorporated (the Company), do herebycertify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge:

 
| (1) | the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant, to which this certification is  attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                     |

 

 
| Dated:  January 30, 2012 | By:    /s/  William J.  Volz                         |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                             | William  J. Volz, 

President

(Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

 

 
| Dated:  January 30, 2012 | By:    /s/  Kimiko  Milheim                        |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                      | Kimiko  Milheim,

Chief  Financial Officer

(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to LOGIC Devices Incorporated and will be retained by LOGIC DevicesIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Optek Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 33-60656, 33-18555 and 333-419) on Form S-8 of
Optek Technology, Inc. of our reports dated December 16, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Optek Technology,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1997 and October 25,
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended October 31, 1997, and the related
schedule which reports appear in the October 31, 1997 annual
report on Form 10-K of Optek Technology, Inc.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Dallas, Texas
January 26, 1998
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 11, 2001, Genesis 1:29 Corporation, P.O. Box 2175, 133 Bond Avenue, Petaluma, California 94654, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basis classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The firm plans to cultivate marihuana to supply physician's patients within the State of California.
                    ( print page 65993) This Notice of Application is being published as required pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 CFR and does not authorize the applicant to manufacturer, distribute or possess any controlled substance. Since Marihuana is a Schedule I controlled substance identified in section 1308.11(d) of Title 21 CFR and has no legitimate medical use, the DEA intends to take all appropriate measures necessary to comply with domestic and international treaty obligations. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than February 19, 2002. Dated: December 13, 2001. Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 01-31409 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Lithium Technology Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, John J. McGovern, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 11, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

** **

**Certifications of**

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

We, William J. Volz,President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kimiko Milheim, Chief FinancialOfficer, of LOGIC Devices Incorporated (the Company), do hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge:

 
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form  10-K of the registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit  (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained  in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                              |

 
| Dated: December  21, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | By:    /s/  William  J.  Volz                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| William J. Volz,  

President and Chief  Executive Officer

 

Dated: December  21, 2007

By:    /s/  Kimiko Milheim                       

Kimiko Milheim,

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LOGIC DevicesIncorporated and will be retained by LOGIC Devices Incorporated and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000803112
<NAME> SECOND BANCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,934
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    231,324
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        565,737
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,279
<DEPOSITS>                                     669,397
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,989
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,312
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,557
<COMMON>                                        27,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 867,279
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 51,361
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,994
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   291
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                65,646
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,343
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,785
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           33,861
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,956
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 462
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,108
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,108
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.47
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,809
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,963
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   171
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,483
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,748
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,180
<RECOVERIES>                                       776
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6693** 

ERNEST EUGENS PICKETT , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
MR. MARVIN BROWN; MR. SCOTTIE THOMPSON; HON. MS. E. JOINER; MR. GARY C. LEMEL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv - 00496

- RMG )

Submitted : August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ernest Eugens Pickett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ernest Eugens Pickett appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pickett’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Pickett v. Brown , No. 4:13

- cv - 00496

- RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument wou ld not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Multi-Media - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"I4fhFLgEaB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/resources\/multi-media\/\">Multi-Media<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/resources\/multi-media\/embed\/#?secret=I4fhFLgEaB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Multi-Media” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"I4fhFLgEaB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 95

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Shawn Glenn Helmenstein, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190336

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Dennis H. Ingold (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Wayne D. Goter (on

brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
1

State v. Helmenstein

No. 20190336

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Shawn Helmenstein appeals from an amended criminal judgment. In 

1999, a jury convicted Helmenstein of murder, a class AA felony in violation of 

N.D.C.C. § 12.1-16-01(1) and robbery, a class A felony in violation of N.D.C.C. 

§ 12.1-22-01. State v. Helmenstein, 2000 ND 223, ¶ 1, 620 N.W.2d 581 

(affirming conviction). The district court sentenced Helmenstein to life 

imprisonment with the possibility of parole on the murder charge and a 

consecutive ten-year term of imprisonment on the robbery charge. The court’s 

judgment did not specify when Helmenstein would be eligible for parole. In 

2019, Helmenstein filed a motion to correct the criminal judgment requesting 

the court clarify when he would be eligible for parole. The court granted his 

motion, in part, and amended the criminal judgment to include a life 

expectancy determination and a statement detailing N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-09.1, 

which requires violent offenders to serve 85% of their sentence before being 

eligible for parole.

[¶2] On appeal, Helmenstein argues his sentence is an unconstitutional ex 

post facto application of the law because the district court’s life expectancy 

determination was calculated according to the mortality table identified by 

N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 51, which did not become effective until after the date 

of Helmenstein’s crimes and sentence. He also argues the violent offender 

sentencing statute, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-09.1, is unconstitutionally vague and 

therefore void. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). 

Helmenstein did not raise these constitutional issues before the district court, 

and therefore we will not consider them on appeal. See State v. Kieper, 2008 

ND 65, ¶ 16, 747 N.W.2d 497 (explaining constitutional issues raised for the 

first time on appeal will not be considered). See also State v. Seidel, 2018 ND 
2

215, ¶ 1, 917 N.W.2d 514 (summarily affirming criminal judgment when 

constitutional argument was not raised before the district court).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte
|   | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the Trust (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June 8, 2012 |                                                             |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | USA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|         | By:  /s/ Jeffrey B. Berger                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|         | Jeffrey B. Berger, Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

|   | USA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | By:  /s/ Gregory E. Crissman       |
|   | Gregory E. Crissman, Chief Financial Officer |