alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  GENERAL**OF ‘** **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

I&. 1. Pat camp Aret. Criminal Dlrtrlot Attorne7 San Antonlo, Texhr Dear Sir: Yaroh 18, lOSO

roii0mg rtatc of Is based upon the

tax, but the taxparor I ohook to pay hi8 wife’ I poll or arosrtalnrd this Saot on turned the ohsok to the taxpayer, aln a ruffloient mount to pay th0 upon, the tagmyjrer paid to the Tu nal amount rrqulroa for his ‘wlfe*r poll
ea the Tax Collsotor t&dellter to hfm ate Jenuary 31, 1939, 80 that hb would be entitled to vote, m oontentlon being madethat hir;wlfe .ras editha to apoll tax that would atithorizr her to votd; The Taxoolleotor reiused to 1st~~ to the taxpayer his gall tax reoelpt a8ot date January Sl, 1939.Mr. W.Pat Camp,&oh 16, 1930, Page

## e
Artlole 7278 193l, proildeer oi ths R‘vl‘ea Statutae, a8

## rmendoa In

II. . . any pereon, inoiuabg a lienholder, barlng an lntereet in property agalnet whloh there am taxer whlohhai been lnoluded In an l eeeeemmentwith other property maypay the proportionate **part of**  the tax.8 agalnet hle proprrty without being requlred to pay ear other tax.8 lnoludrd In the aeee8ement.* Artiole 7379, Rerleed Statutes, prorldeer “Noreal l

etate trot apart, uesd or deelgnated a8 ahomerteed ‘hell **be** ‘old for taxer other than the taxer due on l uohhomeetead.a Slaoe the taxpayer in queetlon waepaying hlr taxer i oa hi8 homerteed, he had a right under thr law to pay eald tax without the prqmeat of any other tu that mayhare been !’ aeereeed agalnet him. Slaoe’ 

### nelhhor hle poll tax aor that ! or hle wlfr war, 

### or **oould** hare bow, alien ,011his harneetoad, he war satltlea to pay hle poll tax without paying the tax oa hi8 homeetead.

In Parker v. Buehy, 170 S,W. 104Z, the Court ot Civil Appeal8 held that where the,moaeJ ior the poll tu wee paid to the Tu Oolleotor on or before January 3let, he wae entitled to hi8 poll tax x8orlpt whloh would authorize himto vote, although the Ihx Collrotor did not aotuallr leeue the reoelpt until comedare thereafter.

‘he Suprame Court, in Hlgglne v. Bordagee, 88 Tex. 4!58, 31 8. WI52, and Barnett v. Eureka Paring Oo., Z54 S.W. lOSl, epeoliioelly held that the homertoad war not liable ror any tax cave aaa exoept tha taxee dua agalnet the homerteed, and rurther held therein that Ii the petition or the State ror tuee revealed that the property eou&t to be r0r801088a oa far tax88 wae ahclmeetead, ana that the tax on any 

### other pyeexJ wae embraord In.said cult, the judgmeat wae absolutr-

. It 18our 

### o plnloa that 

### l la6e the taxpayer paid to tha Tax Oolleotor the amount of Hapoll tax oa January Slet, ho 18 entltled to apoll tax reoelpt whloh would entitle him to vow. Your8 very truly ATIQRNEY(ZENElUL.OF TGXAB
OWBIPRP APPROVED:

/a/ Gerald 0. Mann .-II-- ---- ~-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000802843
<NAME> NOVA CARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          22,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  289,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (33,263)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,895
<PP&E>                                         141,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                (71,327)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,319
<BONDS>                                        326,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           666
<OTHER-SE>                                     507,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,014,304
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,066,451
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  952,654<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,044<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,708
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,801
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<FN>
<F1>"Total Costs" consist of cost of services and selling and administrative
expenses.
<F2>"Other Expenses" consist of amortization of goodwill and minority interest
offset by interest income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### John C. MONTUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Teresa A. SCHWARTZ; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-16715.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 22, 2008.

John C. Montue, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Heather M. Heckler, David J. Neill, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner John C. Montue appeals pro se from the district court’s *504judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the Board of Prison Term’s 1997 decision finding him ineligible for parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

We conclude that the district court properly determined this petition was duplicative of the petition filed in district court case no. 98-01580. Therefore, the district court’s judgment dismissing the petition is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66895-66896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting; Sunshine Act

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 1:20 p.m. on 
Thursday, December 20, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
John M. Reich (Appointive), seconded by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. 
(Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Director James E. 
Gilleran (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman Donald 
E. Powell, that Corporation business required its consideration of the 
matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier 
notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not 
require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public 
observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed 
meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, (5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and 
(c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: December 21, 2001.


[[Page 66896]]


Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31954 Filed 12-21-01; 1:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

May 30, 2019

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 12, 2019

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC, Docket No. LAKE 2017-99.

(Issues include whether the Judge abused his discretion and failed 

to adequately explain the basis for the civil penalty he imposed.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co., Docket No. WEVA 2007-600, et al.               

#   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co., Docket No. WEVA 2007-600, et al. 

meeting_013113.pdf

sol-v.wolf-run-docket-weva2007-600-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc., Docket No. CENT 2006-212-RM.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc., Docket No. CENT 2006-212-RM.

meeting_051508.pdf

fmshrc051508.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT
      23





CONSENT
      OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
      FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
      S-8 No. 3-12043, Form S-8 No. 333-74984, Form S-8 No. 333-111929, Form S-3
      No.
      333-117472, Form S-3 No. 333-127198, Form S-3 No. 333-130113 and Form S-4 No.
      333-111975) of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and in the related Prospectuses
      of
      our reports dated November 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and the effectiveness
      of
      internal control over financial reporting of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation,
      included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 29,
      2007.





ERNST & YOUNG LLP














Dallas,
      Texas


November
      13, 2007
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Buy American Report 2005              

#   Buy American Report 2005

##           Downloads        

buyamerican05.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 12, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00741-CV

BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH , BAYLOR REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AT GRAPEVINE D/B/ A BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE MEDICAL CENTER–GRAPEVINE, S ARAH HOLLOWAY, R.N., JOSHUA JOSEPH, R.N., AND KATHARY N VIL, R.N., Appellants V. DEANA BRIDGES, SHANA BRID GES AND JIMMY BRIDGES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS WRONGF UL DEATH BENEFICIAIRIES, HEIRS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF SHEILA BRIDGES, DECEASED, Appellees
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-16354

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garcia, Breedlove, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Garcia Before the Court is appellants’ motio n to dismiss this appeal based on

settlement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the
appeal. See id.

230741F.P05 / Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH, BAYLOR REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AT GRAPEVINE D/B/A BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE MEDICAL CENTER --GRAPEVINE , SARAH HOLLOWAY, R.N., JOSHUA JOSEPH, R.N., AND KATHARYN VIL, R.N. , Appellants

No. 05-23-00741-CV V.

DEANA BRIDGES, SHANA BRIDGES AND JIMMY BRIDGES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES, HEIRS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF SHEILA BRIDGES, DECEASED, Appellees On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-16354. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia, Justices Breedlove and Kennedy participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
As agreed by the parties, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs, if any, of this appeal.–3– Judgment entered April 12, 2024.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 302 

AN ACT 

To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions 

from the competitive service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 302 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing a Patron3 age System Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘PPSA Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON EXCEPTION OF COMPETITIVE 

5 SERVICE POSITIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—No position in the competitive 

7 service (as defined under section 2102 of title 5, United 

8 States Code) may be excepted from the competitive service 

9 unless such position is placed— 

10 (1) in any of the schedules A through E as de11 scribed in section 6.2 of title 5, Code of Federal 

12 Regulations, as in effect on September 30, 2020; 

13 and 

14 (2) under the terms and conditions under part 

15 6 of such title as in effect on such date. 

16 (b) SUBSEQUENT TRANSFERS.—No position in the 

17 excepted service (as defined under section 2103 of title 

18 5, United States Code) may be placed in any schedule 

19 other than a schedule described in subsection (a)(1). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 302 

AN ACT 

To impose limits on excepting competitive service 

other purposes. positions from the competitive service, and for