alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, S.
Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D., certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of InSite Vision
Incorporated;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Dated:
March 31, 2005
 
 /s/ S. Kumar
      Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.S. Kumar Chandrasekaran,
      Ph.D.
      Chief Executive
      Officer
|Exhibit 10.9


ARTICLE XIV


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002


In connection with the
Annual Report of Winter Sports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending May 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Collins,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|This certification is being
furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/
      Michael J. Collins   |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|Michael
      J. Collins                  |  |  | 
|Chief
      Executive Officer             |  |  | 
|                                          | 
|August
      29, 2002                     | 

|
|
2014- 0634.

#### State v. Robinson.

Summit App. No. 26802, 2013-Ohio-5237. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co. Inc., Docket No. WEVA 2008-1265              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co. Inc., Docket No. WEVA 2008-1265

meeting_WolfRunMining_110212.pdf

SOL vs. Wolf Run Mining DOCKET WEVA 2008-1265.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 32(A)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Murray United Development
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dwight Foster, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 15, 2004                       / s /  Dwight Foster
                                            ---------------------
                                            DWIGHT FOSTER,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-109261and No. 333-32819 on Form S-8 of LOGIC Devices Incorporated andRegistration Statement No 333-16591 on Form S-3 of LOGIC Devices Incorporated ofour report dated December 23, 2010, relating to our audit of the financialstatements, which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which isincorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LOGIC Devices Incorporatedfor the year ended September 30, 2010.

 

 

 /s/  Hein & Associates LLP

 

 

 

 

Irvine, CA

December 23, 2010
#### Clyde Lacy RATTLER, Appellant v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKER COMP. PROGRAMS, Appellee.

No. 10-5315.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 2, 2010.

Clyde Lacy Rattler, Washington, DC, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*534
      *JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and supplement filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 16, 2010, be affirmed. Appellant did not identify any error in the district court’s decision, which stated that the application for benefits must be submitted by appellant’s employing agency, even if he is currently retired from Federal service.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
****
 **Exhibit
23.1**
 
 **Consent
of Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm**
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (No. 33-75268 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock
Purchase Plan, No. 33-80662 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, No.
33-93394 pertaining to the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, No. 333-29801
pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, No. 333-60057 pertaining to the 1994
Stock Option Plan, No. 333-79789 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, No.
333-43504 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock Purchase Plan,
No. 333-72098 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and No. 333-117193
pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock Purchase Plan) and the
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-38266, No. 333-54912 and No.
333-116973) of InSite Vision Incorporated of our report dated March 4, 2005,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of InSite Vision
Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
 
 
 /s/ Burr,
Pilger & Mayer LLP
 
 Palo
Alto, California
 March 31,
2005
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3363 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary concerned 

to pursue a claim against an entity hired by the Secretary concerned 

to return the personal effects of a deceased member of the Armed 

Forces to the next of kin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary concerned to pursue a claim against an entity 

hired by the Secretary concerned to return the personal 

effects of a deceased member of the Armed Forces to 

the next of kin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SPC Christian Ward 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3363 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLAIMS RELATING TO THE RETURN OF PERSONAL 

2 EFFECTS OF A DECEASED MEMBER OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES. 

4 Section 1482(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new para6 graph: 

7 ‘‘(11)(A) Delivery of personal effects of a dece8 dent to the next of kin or other appropriate person. 

9 ‘‘(B) If the Secretary concerned enters into an 

10 agreement with an entity to carry out subparagraph 

11 (A), the Secretary concerned shall pursue a claim 

12 against such entity that arises from the failure of 

13 such entity to carry out such subparagraph. 

14 ‘‘(C) If an entity described in subparagraph (B) 

15 fails to carry out subparagraph (A) because of the 

16 loss or destruction of the personal effects of a dece17 dent, the Secretary concerned shall reimburse the 

18 next of kin or other appropriate person the amount 

19 of the value of such personal effects.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Robert Thomas v. CalPortland Company              

#   Robert Thomas v. CalPortland Company

On March 1, 2024, the Commission issued its decision in Robert Thomas v. CalPortland Company, Docket No. WEST 2018-0402-DM et al.  

Commission%20Decision%28Robert%20Thomas%20v.CalPortland%20Co%29%20WEST%202018-0402%202019-0205.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
August 28 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHRISTOPHER WASHINGT ON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00643

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

______ __________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this d ecision certified below for observance.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3560 

To amend the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to permit services provided 

by grant recipients to include provision of sanitary napkins and tampons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Ms. MENG, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to permit 

services provided by grant recipients to include provision 

of sanitary napkins and tampons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Youth Men5 strual Product Access Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 311(a)(2)(C) of the Runaway and Homeless 

8 Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 11211(a)(2)(C)) is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (iii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3560 IH

1 (2) in clause (iv) by striking the period at the 

2 end; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(v) provision of sanitary napkins and 

5 tampons that conform to applicable indus6 try standards.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Statement by FMCS Director Allison Beck On Tentative Agreement in Verizon-CWA-IBEW Talks - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FnsJPt4Xys\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/statement-fmcs-director-allison-beck-tentative-agreement-verizon-cwa-ibew-talks\/\">Statement by FMCS Director Allison Beck On Tentative Agreement in Verizon-CWA-IBEW Talks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/statement-fmcs-director-allison-beck-tentative-agreement-verizon-cwa-ibew-talks\/embed\/#?secret=FnsJPt4Xys\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement by FMCS Director Allison Beck On Tentative Agreement in Verizon-CWA-IBEW Talks” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"FnsJPt4Xys\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2013 Following the announcement of an agreement in principle in Verizon-CWA-IBEW talks, union officials praised Labor Secretary Thomas Perez and Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Director Allison Beck and other officials who assisted in the negotiations. IBEW President Lonnie Stephenson praised officials. \u201cI offer my deep gratitude to Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez […]"}
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

January 14, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 29, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Mill Branch 

Coal Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. VA 2012-435-R et 

al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in

upholding certain imminent danger orders.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel