alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"id":6477,"date":"2022-03-11T16:01:25","date_gmt":"2022-03-11T20:01:25","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=6477"},"modified":"2022-03-14T09:52:59","modified_gmt":"2022-03-14T13:52:59","slug":"next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-examines-available-technology-platforms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-examines-available-technology-platforms\/","title":{"rendered":"Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Examines Available Technology & Platforms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The next meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission Maritime Transportation Data Initiative will be held on:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Date<\/strong>: Tuesday, March 15, 2022<\/p>\n<p><strong>Time<\/strong>: 3:00-4:00 PM (Eastern Time)<\/p>\n<p>The meeting is open to the public and can be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zoomgov.com\/j\/1614456920?pwd=OVdNYzA2empWeFhyQjFuUmpFQ2g0QT09\">viewed online via a link<\/a> provided here prior to the meeting.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel is leading this initiative at the direction of Chairman Daniel B. Maffei.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Scheduled Participants<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Gordon Downes\u2014Chief Executive Officer, NYSHEX<\/li>\n<li>Thomas Holwell\u2014Product Manager, Government, Lloyd\u2019s List<\/li>\n<li>Tim McLaughlin\u2014Vice President, Trade Analytics & Solutions, S&P Global<\/li>\n<li>Miles Varghese\u2014Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer, CargoLogik<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The next meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission Maritime Transportation Data Initiative will be held on: Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 Time: 3:00-4:00 PM (Eastern Time) The meeting is open to the public and can be viewed online via a link provided here prior to the meeting. Commissioner Carl W.... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-examines-available-technology-platforms\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6477"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6477"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6477\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6481,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6477\/revisions\/6481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8) dated September 15, 1998 pertaining to the Associated Materials
Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 333-63435) and the
Associated Materials Incorporated Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan
(File No. 333-63445) of our report dated February 5, 1999, with respect to the
financial statements of Associated Materials Incorporated included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 22, 1999
2014-0905.

#### Canady v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.

Muskingum App. No. CT2013-0020, 2014-Ohio-596. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon review of the memorandum of appellee, Time Warner, Inc., in response to jurisdiction, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum in response is stricken as untimely pursuant to S.CtPrae.R. 7.03(A)(1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         183,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,253
<PP&E>                                       2,606,588
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,708,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,128,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,128,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,128,647
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,751
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Saul Joseph STANLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN, Warden; Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-6224.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.

Saul Joseph Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WOTNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saul Joseph Stanley seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the dis*713trict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stanley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  Sugar City, ID School Board and Teachers Reach Agreement with FMCS Help
Home/News/Sugar City, ID School Board and Teachers Reach Agreement with FMCS Help Previous			Next
Sugar City, ID School Board and Teachers Reach Agreement with FMCS Help										Release date: 9/28/2015
With the assistance of federal mediator Darrell Clark and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Sugar-Salem Education Foundation and the Sugar-Salem School Board in Sugar City, ID have reached a contract agreement after months of difficult negotiations. According to local news reports, FMCS assistance played a key role. School Superintendent Alan Dunn was quoted in news reports as saying the Clark was very good and “knew his stuff.”
For local news coverage, click here.
John Arnold2015-09-28T19:07:16-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                  AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                                          1,308,600
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  12,692,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               28,060,400
<PP&E>                                                         16,462,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 13,337,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 33,328,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          12,105,900
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                           61,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     18,496,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   33,328,500
<SALES>                                                        64,353,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               88,307,800
<CGS>                                                          64,797,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  88,751,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                357,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (801,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (221,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (508,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (580,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

** **

**Certifications of**

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

We, William J. Volz,President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kimiko Milheim, Chief FinancialOfficer, of LOGIC Devices Incorporated (the Company), do hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge:

 
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form  10-K of the registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit  (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained  in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                     |

 

 
| Dated: December 14, 2009 | By:   /s/  William  J.  Volz                         |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                             | William J. Volz, 

President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

 
| Dated: December 14, 2009 | By:   /s/  Kimiko Milheim                        |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                    | Kimiko Milheim,

Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LOGIC DevicesIncorporated and will be retained by LOGIC Devices Incorporated and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  How Agencies Can Join the Shared Neutrals Program
Home/Shared Neutrals Program/How Agencies Can Join the Shared Neutrals Program How Agencies Can Join the Shared Neutrals ProgramKimberly Warren2023-06-06T21:41:34-04:00						How Agencies Can Join Shared Neutrals****In order to request mediators for disputes, an agency must be a participating member of the SN Program.
To join the SN Program, the agency must sign the Agency Agreement to Participate and forward it to the SN Program Coordinator at sharedneutrals@fmcs.govThe agency is required to follow all of the program responsibilities and provide volunteer employees to participate as mediators in the program.Shared Neutrals ProgramRequesting a Shared Neutral
Shared Neutrals Policies and Procedures
Standards of Practice for Shared Neutrals
Becoming a Shared Neutral
How Agencies Can Join the Shared Neutrals Program Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co. Inc., Docket No. WEVA 2008-1265              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Co. Inc., Docket No. WEVA 2008-1265

meeting_WolfRunMining_120612.pdf

meeting120612a.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov