alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. American Soda, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. American Soda, LLC

American Soda WEST 2020-0278 Argument notice 5-16-23.pdf

American Soda WEST 2020-0278 Argument notice 5-16-23.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Motor Carrier Safety Progress Report

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

(as of March 31, 2003)

SAFETY OUTCOMES 2000 2001 2002 

● Large Truck Fatalities 5,282 5,082 4,902** 

● Large Truck Fatality Rate (per 100 million truck vehicle miles traveled) 2.6 2.4 * 

● Intercity Bus Fatalities 47 46 * 

● Large Truck Injuries 140,000 131,000 127,000** 

● Large Truck Injury Rate (per 100 million truck vehicle miles traveled) 68.0 62.9 * 

Sources: NHTSA (fatalities and injuries), FHWA (truck vehicle miles traveled). *Data not available. **Preliminary.

DATA QUALITY 2001 2002

ACCURACY

● Percentage of FMCSA reported crashes matched to a carrier 88% 85% 

● Percentage of FMCSA reported inspections matched to a carrier 94% 94% 

TIMELINESS

● Average time to upload a crash to FMCSA 191 days 106 days 

● Average time to upload an inspection to FMCSA 32 days 35 days 

COMPLETENESS

● Percentage of fatal crashes reported to FMCSA 80% *

*Data not available. 

PROGRAM OUTPUTS FY 2001 Total FY 2002 Total FY 2003 

(Oct-Dec 2002) 

FY 2003 

(Jan-Mar 2003) 

INCREASING ENFORCEMENT

● Number of Federal Compliance Reviews 10,086 7,537* 2,446 2,807 

● Number of State Compliance Reviews 3,402 2,832 781 1,079 

● Number of enforcement cases initiated 5,413 4,013 1,381 1,449 

 - Unsat/Unfit out-of-service orders 174 191 70 92 

 - Operations out-of-service orders 2 0 0 0 

● Roadside inspections, trucks 2,627,605 2,808,062 707,810 709,937 

● Roadside inspections, buses 35,786 36,233 8,720 9,257 

● States participating in PRISM 20 25 25 25 

*Decrease in FY 2002 resulted from a shift of resources to HM security visits (see below).

INCREASING SAFETY AND SECURITY AWARENESS

● ITS-CVO: Number of Federal, State, 

and industry attendees at briefings 2,653 1,342 663 850 

● Web sites visits to Analysis and 

Information (A&I) Online 372,504 584,926 200,537 226,102 

● HM Security Sensitivity Visits (SSVs) - 30,893 466 612 

● Federal/State personnel training: 

 - For Compliance Reviews 123 102 15 12 

 - For roadside inspections 3,972 3,993 595 595 

 - For hazardous materials 1,933 1,380 408 372 

 - For in-service 361 256 65 0 

IMPROVING SAFETY INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY

● States participating in CVISN 

 (In Planning, Design, Deployment) 17, 4, 30 10, 7, 34 10, 7, 34 8, 8, 35 

FINAL RULEMAKINGS, JAN-MAR 2003 

● Technical correction in response to a petition; Commercial Driver’s License Program Improvements and Noncommercial Motor Vehicle Violations; 

Final Rule (January 29, 2003). 

● Civil Penalties; Final Rule (March 31, 2003).
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

March 2, 2010 

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 24, 2010 

PLACE:	 The United States Department of Labor Auditorium, Frances Perkins 

Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal Corporation, Docket No. WEVA 

2007-335. (Issues include whether certain violations of roof control 

requirements constituted an “unwarrantable failure to comply.”) 

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1244 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge. Jonathan R. Rodriguez, Pro Se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1

  I, Scott Runkles, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on
     Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
     this report on Form 10-K/A Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18
     and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
     otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
     noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
     report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Ocwen Loan
     Servicing, LLC. as Servicer.

     Dated:  June 5, 2008

     /s/ Scott Runkles
     Scott Runkles, Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Private: test button - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9SLMh0THwg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/private-test-button\/\">Protected: Private: test button<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/private-test-button\/embed\/#?secret=9SLMh0THwg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Protected: Private: test button” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"9SLMh0THwg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"There is no excerpt because this is a protected post."}
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

February 4, 2010 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 18, 2010 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Wolf Run Mining Company, Docket No.WEVA 2008-804. 

(Issues include whether a violation of a safeguard notice issued by the 

Secretary may be designated as “significant and substantial.”) 

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3563 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit high deductible 

health plans to provide chronic disease prevention services to plan enrollees prior to satisfying their plan deductible. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

high deductible health plans to provide chronic disease 

prevention services to plan enrollees prior to satisfying 

their plan deductible. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chronic Disease Man5 agement Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3563 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal 

3 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(F) PREVENTIVE CARE SERVICES AND

6 ITEMS FOR CHRONIC CONDITIONS.—For pur7 poses of subparagraph (C)— 

8 ‘‘(i) preventive care shall include any 

9 service or item used to treat an individual 

10 with a chronic condition if— 

11 ‘‘(I) such service or item is low12 cost, 

13 ‘‘(II) in regards to such service 

14 or item, there is medical evidence sup15 porting high cost efficiency of pre16 venting exacerbation of the chronic 

17 condition or the development of a sec18 ondary condition, and 

19 ‘‘(III) there is a strong likeli20 hood, documented by clinical evidence, 

21 that with respect to the class of indi22 viduals utilizing such service or item, 

23 the specific service or use of the item 

24 will prevent the exacerbation of the 

25 chronic condition or the development 

26 of a secondary condition that requires 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3563 IH

1 significantly higher cost treatments, 

2 and 

3 ‘‘(ii) an individual who has been pre4 scribed preventive care for any chronic 

5 condition may be presumed to have been 

6 diagnosed with such condition if such pre7 ventive care is customarily prescribed for 

8 such condition.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to coverage for months beginning 

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Direction for Review - KenAmerican Resources, Inc.              

#   Direction for Review - KenAmerican Resources, Inc.

On January 22, 2019, the Commission granted the petition for discretionary review filed by the Secretary of Labor for Docket No. KENT 2013-211.

PDR-Secy(KenAmerican Resources Inc)KENT 2013-0211.pdf

Commission- Decision (KenAmerican Resources Inc) KENT 2013-0211.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit
32.1








Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of UniTek Global Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), does
hereby certify that, to his knowledge:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/
      C. Scott HiseyC.
      Scott Hisey
                        Chief
      Executive Officer
                        (Principal
      Executive Officer)






/s/
      Ronald J. LejmanRonald
      J. Lejman
                          Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer
                          (Principal
      Financial Officer)
   August
17, 2010


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report
or as a separate disclosure document.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to UniTek Global Services, Inc. and will be retained by UniTek Global
Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 15 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00518

- CV

PIROCHEM INTERNATION AL, L.L.C. , Appellant

V.

XEL L IA PHARMACEUTICALS A PS, F/K/A AXELLIA PHARMACEUTICALS, APS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 36994

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of a judgment rendered on a suit on a sworn

account. We abated the appeal for the trial court to clarify whether its March 25,
2 014 order granting summary judgment to appellee Xellia Pharm aceuticals APS was a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001)

. Then, t he trial court signed a “modified interlocutory partial summary judgment,” clarifying th at its earlier summary judgment order was not final2

because it did not dispose of Xellia’s request for attorney’s fees. The trial court ordered that the issue of attorney’s fees is “a remaining fact issue for trial.”
The trial court’s order granting summ ary judgment to Xellia is not a final judgment. See Wasserberg v. RES

- TX One, LLC , No. 14

- 13

- 00674

- CV, 2014 WL 6922545, at *4 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 9, 2014, pet. filed) (mem. op.); Youngblood & Assocs, P.L.L.C. v. Duhon , 57 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). Thus, we lack jurisdiction

. See, e.g. , Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195.
The appeal is reinstated and dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction

.

/s/ Sharon McCally Jus tice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                          44,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,383
<PP&E>                                         466,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                (93,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 992,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       269,925
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   992,130
<SALES>                                      1,878,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,878,115
<CGS>                                        1,417,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,785,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
78 A.3d 1058

#### REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Objector v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY IN LIQUIDATION (Ancillary Matter to in Re: Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation, No. 1 Rel 2001). Appeal of Republic Western Insurance Company, Objector.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 30, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2013, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s “request for leave to present oral argument is DENIED.