Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2001 / Notices 66429

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NATA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

there was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–05164; Kysor Panel

Systems, A Div. of Enodis Corp.,

Portland, OR

NAFTA–TAA–04953; G.E. Lighting, Inc.,

Bucyrus, OH

NAFTA–TAA–04455; Sunlite Casual

Furniture, Paragould, AR

NAFTA–TAA–05326; FB Johnston

Group, North Carolina Div.,

Hillsborough, NC

NAFTA–TAA–05081 & A, B, C & G;

Spartan International, Inc.,

Cherokee Finishing Plant, SC,

Spartan Plant, Spartansburg, SC,

Rosemont Plant, Jonesville, SC King

Finishing Plant, Dover, GA and

Retail Business Office, Charlotte,

NC

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2,

Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as

amended.

NAFTA–TAA–05346; Contract Apparel,

Inc., El Paso, TX

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–05081D; & E, F, H & I;

Spartan International, King Mill,

August, GA, Cleveland Mills,

Lawndale, NC, Cleveland-Caroknit,

Jefferson SC, Sales Office, New

York, NY and Corporate Office,

Spartanburg, SC: July 13, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05434; Tect, Inc., Sewing

and Embellishment Departments,

Allentown, PA: October 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05433; Tect, Inc., Temple

Sewing Plant, Temple, PA: October

12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05430; Tect, Inc., Topton

Sewing Plants, Topton, PA: October

12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05432; Tect, Inc., Knitting

Department, Allentown, PA:

October 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05349; Brooks

Automation, Tracking Div.,

Including Leased Workers of K

Force Professional Staffing, Volt

Contractors, Superior Contractors

and Aerotek Contractors, Colorado

Springs, Co: September 20, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05393; Liebert Corp.,

Irvine California Operations, Irvine,

CA: September 27, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04988; California Cedar

Products Co., Roseburg Sawmill,

Roseburg, OR: June 11, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05342; Curtain and

Drapery Fashions, Inc., Gastonia,

NC: September 20, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05431; Tect, Inc., Cutting

and Automated Sewing

Departments, Allentown, PA:

October 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05374; Axiohm

Transaction Solutions, Inc.,

American Magnetics Division,

Cypress, CA: September 20, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05494; Sportrack

Accessories, Div. of Sportrack

Automotive, Shelburne, VT:

October 26, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–05398; IFF, Inc., Salem,

OR: October 3, 2000.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of November

and December, 2001. Copies of these

determinations are available for

inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210

during normal business hours or will be

mailed to persons who write to the

above address.

Dated: November 30, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–31634 Filed 12–21–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–38,809]

Blue Mountain Products Pendleton,

OR; Notice of Affirmative

Determination Regarding Application

for Reconsideration

By letter of July 17, 2001, the

petitioner requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance, petition TA–W–38,809. The

denial notice was signed on June 18,

2001 and published in the Federal

Register on July 5, 2001 (66 FR 35462).

The Department has reviewed the

request for reconsideration and has

determined that further clarification of a

survey response from a major customer

of the subject firm would be

appropriate.

Conclusion

After careful review of the

application, I conclude that the claim is

of sufficient weight to justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. The application

is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of

December 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade, Adjustment

Assistant.

[FR Doc. 01–31624 Filed 12–21–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–39,908]

Cleveland Caroknit Lawndale, NC;

Notice of Termination of Investigation

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade

Act of 1974, an investigation was

initiated on August 27, 2001, in

response to a worker petition which was

filed on behalf of workers at Cleveland

Caroknit, Lawndale, North Carolina.

An investigation applicable to the

petitioning group of workers is in

process (TA–W–39,518). Consequently,

further investigation in this case would

serve no purpose; and the investigation

has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of

December 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment,

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–31632 Filed 12–21–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–40,133 and TA–W–40,133A]

Eagle Knitting Mills, Inc. Shawano, WI;

Eagle Knitting Mills, Inc. Kenosha, WI;

Notice of Termination of Investigation

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade

Act of 1974, an investigation was

initiated on September 28, 2001, in

response to a worker petition at Eagle

Knitting Mills, Inc., Shawano and

Kenosha, Wisconsin.

A negative determination applicable

to the petitioning group of workers was

issued on May 14, 2001 (TA–W–39,070).

The petition filed in the subject case is

identical to that filed for the prior case.

No new information is evident which