alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor obo of McGary, et al. v. The Marshall County Coal Company, et al.              

#   Secretary of Labor obo of McGary, et al. v. The Marshall County Coal Company, et al.

Marshall Cty WEVA 2015-583-D Meeting Notice 6-14-16.pdf

Marshall Cty WEVA 2015-583-D Meeting Notice 6-14-16.htm

secretary-labor-behalf-mcgary-et-al-v-marshall-county-coal-company-et-al-docket-weva2015-583-d-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      4.1

    


    FOURTH
      AMENDMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS AGREEMENT

    


    REFERENCE
      IS MADE to that certain Shareholders Rights Agreement dated as of September
      22,
      2005, as amended from time to time (the “Rights
      Plan”),
      between Idaho General Mines, Inc., an Idaho corporation (the “Company”),
      and
      Registrar and Transfer Company (the “Rights
      Agent”).
      

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Board of Directors determined that it is in the best interests of the
      Company and its shareholders to amend the Rights Plan to accelerate the Final
      Expiration Date of the Rights Plan to October 4, 2007 (the “Plan Amendment”);
      and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Holders of the Rights Certificates have duly and validly approved the Plan
      Amendment. 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
      consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
      undersigned agree as follows:

    


    1.
      Pursuant to Section 27 thereof, the “Final Expiration Date” set forth in Section
      7(a) of the Rights Plan is hereby amended to be on the Close of Business on
      October 4, 2007.

    


        2.
      Except as
      expressly amended hereby, the Rights Plan shall remain in full force and effect
      as by its terms set forth. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have
      the meanings assigned to them in the Rights Plan. 

    


    DATED
      as
      of this 4th day of October, 2007.

     

    
      	IDAHO GENERAL MINES, INC.	 	 	REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
              Bruce D.
              Hansen 	 	By:	/s/
              Diane
              Sayer
	 	
              
Bruce
              D. Hansen	 	 	
              
Diane
              Sayer
	
               

            	
              Its: Chief
                Executive Officer

            	 	
              Its:

            	
              
                

                Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment Standards Administration

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In                         **Federal Register**                         Volume 66, Number 244, beginning on page 65513 in the issue of Wednesday, December 19, 2001, under Current Actions, under Average hours per response, make the following corrections: On page 65513,                         **Supplementary Information,**                         Background, third sentence, reads “This information collection contains all recordkeeping and reporting requirements which are derived from the implementing regulations found at Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 60.” Strike the word “all”. On page 65514, the Average hours per response for the Standard Form 100 was previously listed as 3.8                               ( print page 67319)                            hours. This should be changed to 3.7 hours.                    

Dated: December 20, 2001.

Margaret J. Sherrill,

Chief, Branch of Management Review and Internal Control, Division of Financial Management, Office of Management, Administration and Planning, Employment Standards Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-31962  Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-CM-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4184

___________

In re: Jones Truck Lines, Inc., *

*

Debtor-In-Possession, *

*

----------------------- *

*

Jones Truck Lines, Inc., *

* Appeal from the United States

Plaintiff - Appellant, * District Court for the 

* Western District of Arkansas.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Target Stores, A Division of Dayton * 

Hudson Corporation, *

*

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 5, 1997 

 Filed: December 19, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Arkansas.

The Honorable James G. Mixon, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court 2

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

Jones Truck Lines, Inc., the debtor, appeals the district court&s affirmance of the 1

bankruptcy court&s decision allowing Target Stores to set off its debt to Jones. After 2

reviewing the parties& submissions, we conclude the bankruptcy court&s analysis was

correct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997,  AND  THE  STATEMENT  OF
OPERATIONS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         15
<SECURITIES>                                   6,676
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,691
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 78,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     78,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   78,208
<SALES>                                        9,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,891
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  10.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 361

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
                penalty in the income tax rate brackets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
                penalty in the income tax rate brackets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Make Marriage Great Again Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN INCOME TAX RATE BRACKETS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(k) Elimination of Marriage Penalty.--In the case of any taxable 
year beginning after December 31, 2020--
            ``(1) in lieu of the table which would otherwise apply 
        under subsection (a) or (j)(2)(A) for such taxable year, the 
        table which applies under subsection (c) or (j)(2)(C), 
        respectively, shall apply determined by substituting for each 
        dollar amount contained therein a dollar amount which is twice 
        such dollar amount (as otherwise in effect for such taxable 
        year),
            ``(2) subsection (c) shall be applied without regard to the 
        phrase `who is not a married individual (as defined in section 
        7703)', and
            ``(3) subsections (d) and (j)(2)(D) shall not apply.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Continucare Corporation (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: September 12, 2007 By:  /s/ Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.    Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.    President and Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# qcourtof§ppeaIs' fortbejfeberaI Qtircuit
JOHN A. BROWN, Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

2012-3118 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. AT0752110629-I-1. ON MOTION

ORDER The Department of the Army moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time, until December 14, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-3118 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 11/28/2012JOHN BROWN V. ARMY The motion is granted.

s27 FOR THE COURT /s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-3118 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 11/28/2012
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"With FMCS Assistance, Norwalk, OH Schools Reach Agreement with Teachers - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1baluw9pKr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/with-fmcs-assistance-norwalk-oh-schools-reach-agreement-with-teachers\/\">With FMCS Assistance, Norwalk, OH Schools Reach Agreement with Teachers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/with-fmcs-assistance-norwalk-oh-schools-reach-agreement-with-teachers\/embed\/#?secret=1baluw9pKr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“With FMCS Assistance, Norwalk, OH Schools Reach Agreement with Teachers” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"1baluw9pKr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Release Date: 11\/20\/2015 After months-long negotiations, representatives of the Norwalk, OH city school board and the Norwalk Teachers Association agreed to a tentative contract after several sessions with an FMCS mediator.\u00a0 Talks leading to the agreement began last February. For local news coverage, click here."}
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP Docket No. PENN 2008-51-R, et seq.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP Docket No. PENN 2008-51-R, et seq.

meeting_121709.pdf

meeting_121709.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
78 A.3d 612

#### United States Citizen and Wrongly Convicted Pennsylvania Death Row Prisoner Herbert J. BLAKENEY, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Edward M. Marsico, Esq., County District Attorney’s Office Harrisburg, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., Respondents.

No. 114 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 16, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Exercise of King’s Bench and/or Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DISMISSED. *See Commonwealth v. Reid,*537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to, forward the filings to counsel of record.