[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67173-67175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Interior Wetlands Environmental Impact Statement; Hiawatha 
National Forest, Chippewa County, MI

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental impacts of 
proposed land management activities, and corresponding alternatives, 
within the Interior Wetlands project area. The project is located on 
the Sault Ste. Marie Ranger District, Hiawatha National Forest, 
Chippewa County, Michigan, approximately 35 miles southwest of Sault 
Ste. Marie, Michigan. The project area is approximately 30,600 acres 
and management activities are being proposed on less than 15 percent of 
the area.
    Jack pine stands experience a cyclical outbreak of jack pine 
budworm. Older trees are more susceptible to defoliation which can lead 
to mortality and dead tops. In the Interior Wetlands project area much 
of the jack pine is more than 60 years old. The jack pine in the 
project area experienced budworm defoliation during the 1991/1992 
outbreak and is showing some defoliation during the outbreak that began 
in 2001. The Forest Service is evaluating the options available to 
develop a more evenly distributed age-class and to improve the vigor of 
jack pine stands in order to minimize the impacts of budworm 
defoliation. In addition to proposing jack pine salvage and 
regeneration in Interior Wetlands, the Forest Service evaluated some 
other management opportunities within the entire project area to 
implement the Hiawatha National Forest Land and Resource Management 
Plan (Forest Plan, 1986). The proposed action includes salvage and 
regeneration of jack pine, timber harvesting and regeneration of other 
species, changes to the transportation system, changes to the old 
growth system, timber stand improvement projects, and wildlife and 
fisheries habitat improvement projects.
    Overall guidance of land management activities on the Hiawatha 
National Forest is provided by the Forest Plan. In order to meet the 
objectives and desired future conditions set forth in the Forest Plan, 
the following purpose and need has been identified for the Interior 
Wetlands project area: (1) Reduce the impacts of the jack pine budworm 
by creating a more evenly distributed age-class structure (which also 
improves habitat for sandhill crane, merlin, northern harrier, and 
other species), improving vigor, and increasing growth rates in jack 
pine stands. (2) Regenerate older aspen and mixed balsam fir/aspen/
paper birch stands to maintain these forest types; provide habitat for 
white-tailed deer, ruffed grouse, snowshoe hare, and other species; 
improve vigor, and increase growth rates. (3) Regenerate older black 
spruce stands to improve vigor and to increase growth rates. (4) Remove 
some trees in some jack pine, aspen, balsam fir/aspen/paper birch, 
northern hardwoods, paper birch, black spruce, red pine, white pine, 
and cedar to either concentrate growth on the remaining trees or to 
provide space for new trees to become established. (5) Provide useable 
wood products to local markets and improve timber age-class 
distribution, vigor, and growth rates on merchantable stems to ensure a 
more even flow of wood products in the future. (6) Prepare areas where 
jack pine and black spruce are being regenerated by reducing the slash 
and exposing mineral soil for a seedbed. (7) Manage an efficient 
transportation system through construction, reconstruction, 
maintenance, and decommissioning of roads. (8) Improve the quality and 
survival of some white pine stems damaged by white pine weevil and 
blister rust. (9) Evaluate stands currently in the old growth system 
and other stands to determine if there is a different arrangement of 
stands that could provide better existing old growth characteristics 
and better placement across the landscape. (10) Adjust wildlife opening 
system by creating openings or maintaining existing openings by 
removing woody encroachment to provide habitat for sandhill crane, 
black bear, ruffed grouse, and other species. (11) Improve fish habitat 
(primarily brook trout) by adding log bank cover and placing spawning 
gravel. (12) Design projects and/or develop mitigation measures, as 
appropriate, to minimize impacts to the resources to acceptable levels 
defined by laws, regulations, or policies.
    A roads analysis for the project area will be conducted in 
conjunction with the EIS. The roads analysis is not a decision document 
but is necessary to make an informed decision. At a minimum, the roads 
analysis will identify: needed and unneeded roads; road associated 
environmental and public safety risks; site-specific priorities and 
opportunities for road improvements and decommissioning; areas of 
special sensitivity, unique resource values, or both; and any other 
information that may be needed to support project-level decisions. 
Adjacent landowners, citizens groups, State, local, and Tribal 
governments, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the 
transportation system.
    The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will analyze the 
direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of the 
alternatives. Past, present, and projected activities on National 
Forest system lands will be considered. The DEIS will disclose the 
analysis of site-specific mitigation measures and their effectiveness. 
The DEIS is expected

[[Page 67174]]

to be filed with the EPA and available for public review by November 
2002.

DATES: Comments concerning the proposed action and scope of the 
analysis should be received by January 28, 2002 to receive timely 
consideration in the DEIS. A public meeting about this project will be 
held on December 4, 2001 at 6:30 pm.

ADDRESSES: Mail written comments to Stevan J. Christiansen, District 
Ranger, St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie Ranger Districts, 1798 West US-
2, St. Ignace, MI 49781. The public meeting for this project will be 
held at the Trout Lake Town Hall on the main street of Trout Lake (M-
123).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Sjogren, Team Leader, St. 
Ignace Ranger District. Phone: (906) 643-7900 ext. 133. Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ae7f9e0e5edf8efe4caecf9a4ecefeea4fff9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c312f36333b2e39321c3a2f723a393872292f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information presented in this notice is 
included to help the reviewer determine if they are interested in or 
potentially affected by the proposed land management activities. The 
information in this notice is summarized. Contact the person identified 
in the For Further Information Contact section to obtain additional 
information about desired future condition, purpose and need, proposed 
action, design criteria and/or mitigation measures, and maps. The 
information packet and color maps are also available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/hiawatha.
    The project area is approximately 30,600 acres and is located near 
the town of Trout Lake, Chippewa County, Michigan. Proposed activities 
within the project area include portions of the following areas: T44N, 
R4W, Sections 19, 31; T44N, R5W, Sections 2-11, 13-27, 35, 36; T44N, 
R6W, Sections 1-18, 21-24; T45N, R5W, Sections 8-10, 15-17, 19-22, 27-
33; T45N, R6W, Sections 23, 25, 26, 31, 32, 34-36.
    To meet the purpose and need, this project proposes:
    1. To salvage (through clearcut harvest) and regenerate 
approximately 2,216 acres of mature and overmature jack pine.
    2. To harvest (clearcut) and regenerate approximately 289 acres of 
mature and overmature aspen, balsam fir/aspen/paper birch, and black 
spruce stands.
    3. To harvest (clearcut) and regenerate approximately 119 acres of 
mature black spruce stands.
    4. To harvest some trees (partial removal cuts) on approximately 
508 acres in jack pine, aspen, balsam fir/aspen/paper birch, northern 
hardwoods, black spruce, red pine, white pine, and cedar.
    5. To harvest (commercially thin) about 148 acres in northern 
hardwoods and paper birch.
    6. Prepare sites for jack pine regeneration by rollerchopping about 
1,400 acres and prescribed burning about 400 acres.
    7. To adjust the transportation system by: constructing 
approximately 1.7 miles of classified roads, 1.5 miles of temporary 
roads on existing unclassified road corridors and then decommission, 
and 23.1 miles of temporary roads; changing the classification of 
approximately 2.8 miles from unclassified to classified; performing 
road maintenance on approximately 7.8 miles of classified roads, and 
2.8 miles unclassified roads changed to classified roads; 
reconstructing approximately 0.1 mile of classified road; and 
decommissioning approximately 0.3 miles of classified roads and 
approximately 3.2 miles of unclassified roads.
    8. To prune approximately 40 acres of weevil and blister rust 
damaged white pine saplings.
    9. To adjust the old growth system by removing from the existing 
system about 348 acres with limited existing old growth conditions or 
in unfavorable locations and adding to the system about 223 acres with 
some existing old growth conditions or in more favorable locations.
    10. To create wildlife openings on about 9 acres and maintain 
openings on about 157 acres by removing woody encroachment.
    11. To improve fish habitat in Biscuit Creek by adding log bank 
cover along approximately 750 feet and placing 75 square yards of 
spawning gravel in the stream.
    12. To develop design criteria and/or mitigation measures to reduce 
the impacts of management activities on resources. Specifically, design 
projects and/or mitigation measures to control road use; protect 
threatened, endangered and sensitive species; protect plant habitat; 
protect wildlife and protect and/or improve scenic integrity; protect 
heritage resources; provide safe snowmobiling in area of timber 
harvest; provide good seed source jack pine cones; and protect soil and 
hydrology.

Range of Alternatives

    The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of 
these will be the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the 
proposed activities will be implemented. Additional alternatives will 
examine varying levels and locations for the proposed activities to 
achieve the proposal's purposes in response to the issues identified 
during public involvement.

Preliminary Issues

    The public has had several previous opportunities to comment on 
these proposed actions. The original Interior Wetlands EA (circa 1997) 
was included in the NEPA quarterly, scoping letters were sent out, and 
public meetings were held. The public commented again during the 30-day 
public comment period (April 1999), and when the EA was appealed. In 
September 2000, the Forest Service released the Revised Interior 
Wetlands Project Set EA for another 30-day public comment period. From 
the public comments received from 1997-2000, preliminary issues that 
may be addressed in this EIS are as follows:

    1. There is too much timber harvest proposed in the area, there 
is too much clearcutting proposed, and other resources (e.g. 
wildlife, wetlands, soils, and hydrology) would be negatively 
impacted.
    2. There is too much road construction to accommodate the timber 
harvest, there are too many temporary roads proposed, and other 
resources (e.g. wildlife, wetlands, soils, and hydrology) would be 
negatively impacted by the construction and by ineffective closure 
and obliteration of temporary roads.
    3. There is too much focus on providing timber products and not 
enough focus on restoring the ecosystem to more natural conditions.

Decisions To Be Made

    The St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie District Ranger will decide the 
following:

    1. Whether or not to salvage and harvest timber and if so, the 
selection and site-specific location of appropriate timber 
management practices (silvicultural prescription, logging system, 
fuels treatment, and reforestation); road construction/
reconstruction/maintenance/decommissioning necessary to provide 
access and protect resources; and appropriate mitigation measures.
    2. Whether or not to make adjustments to the old growth system.
    3. Whether or not to maintain existing wildlife openings and 
create new ones.
    4. Whether or not to modify fish habitat by adding log bank 
cover and placing spawning gravel.
    5. What, if any, specific project monitoring requirements would 
be needed to ensure mitigation measures are implemented and 
effective.

Public Involvement and Scoping

    The public is encouraged to attend the public meeting at 6:30 p.m. 
on December 4, 2001 at the Trout Lake Town Hall. Forest Service 
officials will be available at that time to present an overview of the 
purpose and need and

[[Page 67175]]

proposed action. It is also an opportunity for the public to comment on 
the project.
    Public participation is an important part of the analysis. The 
public may visit Forest Service officials at any time during the 
analysis and prior to the decision. Public scoping has been ongoing for 
the Interior Wetlands project. The Forest Service will be seeking 
additional information, comments, and assistance from Federal, State, 
and local agencies, as well as local Native American tribes and other 
individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by 
the proposed action. This input will be used in preparation of the 
draft and final EIS. The scoping process will:

    Identify potential issues.
    Identify issues to be analyzed in depth.
    Identify alternatives to the proposed action.
    Explore additional alternatives that will be derived from issues 
recognized during scoping.
    Identify potential environmental effects of this project and 
alternatives (e.g. direct, indirect, and cumulative effects and 
connected actions).

Estimated Dates for Filing

    The DEIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) and to be available for public review by November 2002. At 
that time EPA will publish a Notice of Availability of the DEIS in the 
Federal Register. The comment period on the DEIS will be 45 days from 
the date the EPA publishes the Notice of Availability in the Federal 
Register. It is very important that those interested in the management 
of this area participate at that time.
    The final EIS is scheduled to be completed by February 2003. In the 
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments and 
responses received during the comment period that pertain to the 
environmental consequences discussed in the DEIS and to applicable 
laws, regulations, and policies considered in making a decision 
regarding the proposal.

Reviewer's Obligations

    The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers 
notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the 
environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental 
impact statements must structure their participation in the 
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and 
alerts the agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont 
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft 
environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until 
after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the 
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) 
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. 
Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that 
those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of 
the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections 
are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can 
meaningfully consider and respond to them in the final EIS.
    To be most helpful, comments on the DEIS should be as specific as 
possible and may address the adequacy of the statement or the merit of 
the alternatives discussed. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council 
on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing the procedural 
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in 
addressing these points.

Responsible Official

    The District Ranger of the St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie Ranger 
Districts, Hiawatha National Forest, 1798 West US-2, St. Ignace, MI 
49781, is the Responsible Official. As the Responsible Official, he 
will decide if the proposed project will be implemented. He will 
document the decision and reasons for the decision in the Record of 
Decision.

    Authority: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4346); Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Parts 1500-1508); U.S. Department of Agriculture NEPA 
Policies and Procedures (7 CFR Part 1b).

    Dated: November 7, 2001.
Clyde Thompson,
Forest Supervisor, Hiawatha National Forest, 2727 North Lincoln Road, 
Escanaba, MI 49829.
[FR Doc. 01-31894 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>