alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,798<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    101,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,070
<PP&E>                                         750,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                 276,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 936,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,176
<BONDS>                                        463,730<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     281,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   936,230
<SALES>                                        740,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               740,363
<CGS>                                          581,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  581,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,048
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<FN>
<F1>Presented net of the allowances for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Represents revolving credit loans and long-term debt, less current
maturities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order filed, December 3, 2021.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 21

- 00468

- CV

____________

SCWYANA SMITH , Appellant

V.

BEAR CREEK MEADOW HOA INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 52368



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 16, 2021. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court sent past due notice for the reporter’s record on

November 17, 2021. No response was received, and the record has not been filed

with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue

the following order.

We order Delicia Struss , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal

within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consist s of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan

.
Exhibit 10.1


September 27, 2007


Dr. Robin L. Smith
930 Fifth Avenue
Suite 8H
New York, NY  10021

Dear Robin:

This letter is being written to serve as an amendment to the employment
agreement by and between you and NeoStem, Inc. (the "Company") dated as of May
26, 2006 pursuant to which you serve as the Company's Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer (the "Agreement") and letter dated January 26, 2007.
Except as set forth herein, your employment agreement shall remain unchanged.
Initially capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the
meaning set forth in the Agreement.

1.   Base Salary.
On October 1, 2007, your Base Salary shall be increased to $275,000. During the
Term of the Agreement, your Base Salary shall be increased by 10% on each one
year anniversary of the execution of this Amendment.

2.   Cash and Stock Bonuses.
$187,500 cash bonus shall be paid for 2007 on October 1, 2007. $250,000 cash
bonus shall be paid for 2008 on October 1, 2008. Additionally, the company will
pay membership and annual fees for a club in NY of your choice that can be used
for business entertainment, meetings etc.

3.   Term.
The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended until December 31, 2010.

4.   Severance
Section 7(b)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

        "(b) Termination of Your Employment by the Company Without Cause or
        Voluntary Termination by You With Good Reason. If the Company terminates
        your employment without Cause or if you terminate your employment with
        Good Reason the following shall apply:

           (i) The Company shall pay to you the Base Salary at the time of
           termination for a period equal to two years following the date of
           such termination (the "Severance Period"). Payments of severance can
           be

                                      -5-
<PAGE>

           paid in equal installments over a 12 month period to begin the day of
           termination. You shall be under no obligation to secure alternative
           employment during the Severance Period, and payment of the Base
           Salary shall be made without regard to any subsequent employment you
           may obtain."

5.   Acknowledgement of Stock Option Grant.
You hereby acknowledge the grant to you on Sept 27, 2007 of an option under the
EPP to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock, $.001 par value
(the "Common Stock") at a per share exercise price equal to market vesting as to
(i) 150,000 shares now; (ii) 100,000 shares upon the achievement of certain
business milestones set by the compensation committee, and shall otherwise be
subject to all of the terms and conditions of the EPP.

Except as provided in this letter agreement, the terms of the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged.

Very truly yours,

NeoStem, Inc.
By:  /s/ Richard Berman
Name:  Richard Berman
Title:  Chair, Compensation Committee

Accepted and Agreed:

/s/ Robin Smith
Robin Smith

                                      -6-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,978
<PP&E>                                         114,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                (55,694)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,746
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,927)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,691
<SALES>                                         36,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,821
<CGS>                                           29,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP02-122-000] 

Take notice that on December 13, 2001, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC, (KMITG) tendered for filing its annual reconciliation filing pursuant to section 35 (Crediting of Imbalance Revenue) of its General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-B. 

KMIGT states that it has served copies of its filing upon all jurisdictional customers, interested State Commissions, and other interested parties. 

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before December 26, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link.                 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31690 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23
 
Keller Bruner & Company, L.L.C.
Certified Public Accountants
 
The Board of Directors
FCNB Corp
 
We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated January 23, 1998
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FCNB Corp and its subsidiaries of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears on page 45 of
the 1997 FCNB Corp Annual Report, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in the
following Registration Statements of FCNB Corp: Number 33-63092 on Form S-8 and
Number 33-55040 on Form S-3.


Keller Bruner & Company, L.L.C.
Frederick, Maryland
March 20, 1998
#### William HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, RECORDS DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-6649.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dee. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2010.

William Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hill v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr.,*No. 1:10-cv-00273-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 338 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 338

To clarify the counting of electoral votes in Congress to be a National 
                        Special Security Event.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2021

    Mr. Torres of New York (for himself and Ms. Moore of Wisconsin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the counting of electoral votes in Congress to be a National 
                        Special Security Event.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTING OF ELECTORAL VOTES IN CONGRESS IS A NATIONAL 
              SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT.

    The counting of electoral college votes in Congress pursuant to 
section 15 of title 3, United States Code, is a National Special 
Security Event (as such term is defined in section 2001(9) of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 601(9))).
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company              

#   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company

AmCoal LAKE 2011-701 Meeting Notice 11-30-17.pdf

AmCoal LAKE 2011-701 Meeting Notice 11-30-17.htm

secretary-labor-v.american-coal-company-docket-no.lake-2011-701-nov-30-2017.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Director Allison Beck Takes Future@Work Discussion to Cornell University as Neutral-In-Residence - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"af3Yx1WapN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-director-allison-beck-takes-futurework-discussion-cornell-university-neutral-residence\/\">FMCS Director Allison Beck Takes Future@Work Discussion to Cornell University as Neutral-In-Residence<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-director-allison-beck-takes-futurework-discussion-cornell-university-neutral-residence\/embed\/#?secret=af3Yx1WapN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Director Allison Beck Takes Future@Work Discussion to Cornell University as Neutral-In-Residence” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"af3Yx1WapN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"FMCS Director Allison Beck meets with Cornell University faculty members and students this week as she takes part in the Neutral-in-Residence program in the university’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations. On the list of Future@Work topics for discussion with students and faculty are labor-management issues arising from the new workplaces of the 21st Century […]"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Office of Policy and Strategy - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ocXYxY3wB5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-policy-and-strategy\/\">Office of Policy and Strategy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-policy-and-strategy\/embed\/#?secret=ocXYxY3wB5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Policy and Strategy” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ocXYxY3wB5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"*Page Under Construction”"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John J. GANNON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 290, Docket 24312.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 13 and 14, 1957.

Decided May 23, 1957.

Seymour M. Waldman, of Waldman & Waldman, New York City (Louis Wald-man, of Waldman & Waldman, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Morton S. Robson, Asst. U. S. Atty., S. D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and SWAN and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 Defendant’s receipts of income in 1951 were so substantial that his failure to file a return was completely inexcusable, and his only hope to upset his just conviction is based upon his claims of error in the admission of evidence. But these are without merit. Evidence of weekly and other substantial receipts from his employers as claimed “expense” money was directly admissible as an integral part of the plaintiff’s case, since the size, amount, and circumstances of these receipts were sufficient to permit the jury to believe that payments by way of compensation were included. The prosecution did not have to prove specific amounts, and the defendant made no attempt to disclose that he spent these sums or any part for the benefit of his employers. And evidence of similar omissions to file a return in six prior years is relevant on the issue of his intent; the multiplication of instances tends to negative any element of innocent intent. 2 Wigmore on Evidence § 302, p. 196 (3d Ed.1940); United States v. Brand, 2 Cir., 79 F.2d 605, 606, certiorari denied Brand v. United States, 296 U.S. 655, 56 S.Ct. 381, 80 L.Ed. 466.

Affirmed.