alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints William W. Winspear, Robert L. Winspear and James E.
O'Bannon, and any of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign on behalf Associated
Materials Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and on behalf of
the undersigned in my capacity as an officer and/or a director of the Company,
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999,
and to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, granting unto said
attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and any of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to effectuate the same
as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned may or could in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or
any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney effective as
of March 15, 2000.


<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
/s/ WILLIAM W. WINSPEAR                 /s/ DONALD L. KAUFMAN
--------------------------------        --------------------------------
    William W. Winspear                     Donald L. Kaufman

/s/ ROBERT L. WINSPEAR                  /s/ JAMES F. LEARY
--------------------------------        --------------------------------
    Robert L. Winspear                      James F. Leary

                                        /s/ ALAN B. LERNER
--------------------------------        --------------------------------
    Richard I. Galland                      Alan B. Lerner

/s/ JOHN T. GRAY                        /s/ A.A. MEITZ
--------------------------------        --------------------------------
    John T. Gray                            A.A. Meitz
</TABLE>
2014-0851.

#### Freedom Mtge. Corp. v. Vitale.

Tuscarawas App. No. 2013 AP 08 0037, 2014-Ohio-1549. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the notice of bankruptcy and suggestion of stay, it is ordered by the court that this cause is stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy case. The parties shall notify this court immediately upon conclusion of the bankruptcy proceedings or a lifting of the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. 362.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3499 

To prohibit affirmative action in Federal Government hiring and other 

personnel actions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. GOSAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit affirmative action in Federal Government hiring 

and other personnel actions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Excellence Re5 place Identity Traits Act’’ or the ‘‘MERIT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN FED7 ERAL GOVERNMENT HIRING. 

8 The Federal Government may not establish, imple9 ment, or otherwise carry out any hiring practice or proVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:11 Jun 28, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3499.IH H3499

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3499 IH

1 gram that uses affirmative action based on race, color, re2 ligion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national or3 igin, or disability as a basis for a personnel action with 

4 respect to Federal employees or members of the uniformed 

5 services, and no Federal funds may be provided to any 

6 entity (including Federal contractors (or subcontractors 

7 thereof)) that has in place any such practice or program. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 
 I, 
Adam
DeBard, Chief Operating Officer,of Global Diversified Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended January 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
March 17, 2008
   By: /s/ Adam
DeBard
 Adam DeBard
 Chief Operating
Officer        (PrincipalAccounting
and Financial Officer)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, Appellant

No. 06-18-00132-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17F-1099-005). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the trial court’s 

cumulation order for the reasons stated in cause number 06-18-00133-CR. As modified, the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME> MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           404,088
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 404,088
<CASH>                                          80,052
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             697,459
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          26,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,356,572
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                796,103
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            198,395
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           42,145
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                132,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           411
<OTHER-SE>                                     280,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,356,572
<PREMIUMS>                                      28,929
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              8,064
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (213)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  35,694
<BENEFITS>                                      21,499
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,096
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            25,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
CONSENT
OF STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.,


INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-135663), 2004 Stock
Purchase Plan (No. 333-116405 and 333-153072) and 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (No.
333-132603, 333-18601 and 333-114013), of HemaCare Corporation our report dated
April 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
HemaCare Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2007.









/s/
Stonefield Josephson, Inc.




CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




Los
Angeles, California


March
25, 2009
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON FINANCIAL
                         STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
BHA Group Holdings, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated November 9, 1999 included the related
financial statement schedule as of September 30, 1999 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended September 30, 1999, included in the 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-58782) on Form S-8 of BHA Group Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated November
9, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1999,
and the related schedule, which reports are included in the September 30, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
November 16, 1999


                                      42
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3862] 

# Department:

United States Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 [79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459], Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*], Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition, “Surrealism: Desire Unbound,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about February 4, 2002, to on or about May 12, 2002, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is United States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: December 19, 2001. 

Patricia S. Harrison, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-31811 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3250 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3250

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit uniformed law 
enforcement officers to carry agency-issued firearms in certain Federal 
                  facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2021

     Mr. Hollingsworth (for himself, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Rutherford) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit uniformed law 
enforcement officers to carry agency-issued firearms in certain Federal 
                  facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Officers of the Law In 
Civilian Establishments Act of 2021'' or as the ``POLICE Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING UNIFORMED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO CARRY AGENCY-
              ISSUED FIREARMS.

    Section 930 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the lawful carrying of agency-issued firearms and 
        other dangerous weapons in Facility Security Level I and II 
        Federal civilian public access facilities by a uniformed 
        officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a 
        political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to 
        engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, 
        investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law.''; and
            (2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) The term `Facility Security Level' means a security 
        risk assessment level assigned to a Federal facility by the 
        facility's security agency in accordance with the biannually 
        issued Interagency Security Committee Standard.
            ``(5) The term `civilian public access facility' means a 
        facility open to the general public.
            ``(6) The term `uniformed officer, agent, or employee' 
        means an officer, agent, or employee wearing a clearly 
        identifiable agency standard-issued uniform with a clearly 
        identifiable agency-issued identification badge.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 1, 2013

t0424

Order 

May 1, 2013

146725 & (52)

In re Estate of TERRI A. SHOLBERG

_________________________________________

DIANE K. SHOLBERG, as Personal

Representative for the Estate of Terri A. 

Sholberg,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146725

COA: 307308

Emmet CC: 10-002711-NI

ROBERT TRUMAN and MARILYN TRUMAN,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

DANIEL TRUMAN,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. We 

further ORDER that trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this 

appeal. The application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2012 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals remains pending.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3481 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for limitations on duty 

hours for yardmaster employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. CARBAJAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for limitations on duty hours for yardmaster employees, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Yardmaster 

5 Protection Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON DUTY HOURS OF YARDMASTER 

7 EMPLOYEES. 

8 (a) LIMITATIONS ON DUTY HOURS OF YARDMASTER

9 EMPLOYEES.—Section 21103 of title 49, United States 

10 Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3481 IH

1 (1) in the heading of such section, by inserting 

2 ‘‘AND YARDMASTER EMPLOYEES’’ after ‘‘TRAIN

3 EMPLOYEES’’; 

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘or yardmaster employee’’ after 

5 ‘‘train employee’’ each place it appears; and 

6 (3) in subsection (e), by inserting ‘‘or 

7 yardmaster’’ after ‘‘During a train’’. 

8 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 21101 of title 49, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘a yardmaster 

11 employee,’’ after ‘‘dispatching service employee,’’; 

12 and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(6) ‘yardmaster employee’ means an indi15 vidual responsible for supervising and coordi16 nating the control of trains and engines oper17 ating within a rail yard.’’. 

18 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec19 tions for chapter 211 of title 49, United States Code, is 

20 amended by striking the item relating to section 21103 

21 and inserting the following: 

‘‘21103. Limitations on duty hours of train employees and yardmaster employees.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose MEDEROS-UGARTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50504

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 29, 2010.

*854Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Mederos-Ugarte, an illegal alien, appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission following removal. He argues that his twenty-four-month term of imprisonment, which exceeds his advisory sentencing range, is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to achieve the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He contends that the court failed adequately to take into account his family circumstances and the benign nature of his offense.

The district court imposed the above-guideline sentence pursuant to § 3553(a). This court reviews the substantive reasonableness of a sentence, including those based on variances, “under an abuse-of-discretion standard ... tak[ing] into account the totality of the circumstances.” *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir.2008).

The district court noted that Mederos-Ugarte had twenty-one criminal history points, three convictions that did not count against him, a continuous criminal record, at least ten aliases, at least four birth dates, and four warrants against him. It found that he was a danger to the public. Although Mederos-Ugarte presented mitigating arguments, the court concluded that they did not outweigh the fact that the guideline range did not adequately account *855for his criminal history or the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment, to afford deterrence, and to protect the public.

The sentence does not unreasonably fail to reflect the § 3553(a) factors. *See United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 708 (5th Cir.2006). Mederos-Ugarte seeks to have us reweigh those factors, which we will not do. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586. The sentence does not exceed the statutory-maximum sentence that could have been imposed for a § 1326 offense, and the extent of the variance is not unreasonable. *See, e.g., United States v. Brantley,*537 F.3d 347, 348-50 (5th Cir.2008). Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.