alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Hecla Limited, et al              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Hecla Limited, et al

Hecla WEST 2012-760-M Meeting Notice 5-26-16.pdf

Hecla WEST 2012-760-M Meeting Notice 5-26-16.htm

secretary-labor-v-hecla-limited-et-al-docket-west2012-760-m-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
**Exhibit 31(b)**

 

**ASSISTED HOUSING FUND L.P. ICERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett J.Atkinson, certify that:

 

1)              Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Assisted Housing Fund L.P.I;

2)              Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3)              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

5)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2003 |   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
| By:                           |   |   | /s/  BRETT J. ATKINSON |
|                          |   |   | Brett  J. Atkinson |
|                          |   |   | *Treasurer  Principal Accounting Officer* |

 

1

----
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Secured Income L.P. (the “Registrant”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief
      Financial Officer of Wilder Richman Resources Corporation, a general partner
      of
      the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
      Neal
      Ludeke


Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Wilder Richman


Resources
      Corporation, a general partner of


the
      Registrant


April
      18,
      2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-659
In Re: JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-92-135) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seekingthis court to compel the district court to enter an order to prevent certain United States Attorneys from participating in any pleadings concerning Appellant. Mandamus is a drastic remedy, only to be granted in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987) (citing Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394 (1976)). The party seeking mandamus relief has the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate avenues ofrelief and that his right to the relief sought is "clear and indisputable." Mallard v. United States Dist. Court , 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989) (quoting Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 384 (1953)); Beard , 811 F.2d at 826. Courts are extremely reluctant to grant a writ of mandamus, and the decision is within the discretion of the court addressing the application for the writ. Beard , 811 F.2d at 827 (citations omitted). We find that Appellant has not met his burden of proof such that mandamus is the proper remedy in this situation. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal, In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979), and given that the district court previously denied Appellant's motion for the same relief he seeks before this court, Appellant's right to relief by way of mandamus is not clear. See Mallard , 490 U.S. at 309; In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny Appellant's request for mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>   1
                             SKYLINE CHILI, INC.
                      FORM 10-KSB FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                               OCTOBER 29, 1995
                                      
                                      
                                  EXHIBIT 21
                                  ----------
    
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


1.       Skytime, Inc. - Distributes "Cincinnati Recipe" and "Hook & Ladder"
         chili-related grocery products.

2.       Skyline Restaurants, Inc. - Operates one franchised Skyline Chili
         Restaurant in Cincinnati, Ohio in partnership with restaurant manager.

3.       LCW Skyline Co. - Operates one Skyline Chili Restaurant in Cincinnati,
         Ohio.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             1,301,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                              11,963,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         15,811,624
<PP&E>                                   42,941,669
<DEPRECIATION>                         (12,354,613)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           61,148,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    29,475,250
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                218,702,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             61,148,344
<SALES>                                   5,225,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          5,225,081
<CGS>                                     8,268,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            14,534,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            504,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,572,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (11,386,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (11,386,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                           (11,386,249)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.11)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                 509,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  43,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  27,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 591,206
<PP&E>                                               0                  44,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  17,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 624,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 248,399
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  10,295
<COMMON>                                             0                  65,732
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 523,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 624,738
<SALES>                                        688,213               1,071,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               688,213               1,071,824
<CGS>                                          462,789                 722,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  462,789                 722,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               286,433                 479,544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58,590)               (127,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (58,590)               (127,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (58,590)               (127,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)                  (0.07)



</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Robert Thomas v. Calportland Company              

#   Robert Thomas v. Calportland Company

CalPortland WEST 2018-0402-DM et al Argument notice 10-10-23.pdf

CalPortland WEST 2018-0402-DM et al Argument notice 10-10-23.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
 

SUITE 9500
 

WASHINGTON, DC 20001
 

June 10, 2009 

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, June 25, 2009 

PLACE:	 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED:	 The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary 

of Labor v. Musser Engineering, Inc., and PBS Coals, Inc., Docket 

Nos. PENN 2004-152 and PENN 2004-158. (Issues include whether 

Musser and PBS violated 29 C.F.R. § 75.1200 when the operator of 

the Quecreek mine failed to maintain an accurate mine map showing 

the boundaries of adjacent abandoned mine workings, whether the 

alleged violations were “significant and substantial,” whether the 

companies were guilty of gross negligence, and whether the 

Administrative Law Judge properly increased the proposed penalty 

amounts.) 

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 

1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of CEO  Section 906

AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of DEFAULT PROOF CREDIT CARD
SYSTEM, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Vincent  Cuervo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of July 2005.

/s/ Vincent  Cuervo
-----------------
Vincent  Cuervo
Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Statement on Continued Labor Negotiations Between Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6 - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QlaE4MEYK4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-statement-on-continued-labor-negotiations-between-bath-iron-works-and-international-association-of-machinists-local-s6\/\">FMCS Statement on Continued Labor Negotiations  Between Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-statement-on-continued-labor-negotiations-between-bath-iron-works-and-international-association-of-machinists-local-s6\/embed\/#?secret=QlaE4MEYK4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Statement on Continued Labor Negotiations  Between Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"QlaE4MEYK4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. (Aug. 5, 2020) – The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) issued the following statement today on the labor negotiations between Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6: \u201cYesterday, representatives from Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6 agreed to three additional articles as progress continues in […]"}