alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Baltazar Montanez VERDUZCO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70191.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 16, 2008.

Baltazar Montanez Verduzco, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Holly M. Smith, John C. Cunningham, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The regulations provide that “a party may file only one motion to reopen,” and that the motion “must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened.” *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, filed more than two years after the final administrative decision was rendered. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). Nor did the BIA abuse its discretion in determining that petitioners failed to alleged changed circumstances in Mexico that would exempt them from the time limits for filing a motion to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. The motion to reinstate voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. *See Garcia v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       174,927,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       19,631,000
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         20,327,000
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             210,244,000
<CASH>                                          10,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          11,132,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      12,597,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             273,974,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            141,205,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         50,406,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,430,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               273,974,000
<PREMIUMS>                                  96,054,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         12,770,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             112,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 214,000
<BENEFITS>                                  71,627,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 25,454,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         6,647,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,422,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,244,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,198,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,198,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             126,260,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         67,119,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            4,508,000
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          26,100,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            40,954,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            130,833,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of T. Rowe
Price Realty
Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate
Limited
Partnership included in the accompanying Form 10-Q for the period
ended March
31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826315
<NAME> T. ROWE PRICE REALTY INCOME FUND IV, AMERICA'S
SALES-COMMISS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,445,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      22,553,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,210,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,525,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,824,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,525,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               820,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                277,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   277,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not contained in registrant's unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Partners' capital.
<F3>Not applicable.  Net income per limited partnership unit is
$0.36.
</FN>
        <PAGE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor obo Juan Smitherman v. Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor obo Juan Smitherman v. Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC

Warrior Met SE 2021-0153 Meeting notice 3-21-23.pdf

Warrior Met SE 2021-0153 Meeting notice 3-21-23.htm

commission-open-meetingsecretary-labor-behalf-smitherman-v-warrior-met-coal-mining-docket-se-2021.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of SourcingLink.net, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report), I, Gary Davidson, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 13, 2003



/s/ Gary J. DavidsonGary J. Davidson Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than January 4, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Mutual of Richmond, Inc., Richmond, Indiana, and Richmond 
Mutual Bancorporation, Inc., Richmond, Indiana; to acquire AmTrust 
Capital Corporation, Peru, Indiana, and thereby indirectly acquire 
AmericanTrust Federal Savings Bank, Peru, Indiana, and Indiana 
Financial Service Corporation, Peru, Indiana, and thereby engage in the 
operation of a savings association, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii). 
Comments on this application must be received not later than January 
14, 2002.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Union Planters Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee; to engage de 
novo through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Planters Investment 
Advisors Inc., Memphis, Tennessee, in financial and investment advisory 
activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(6)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-31438 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group III,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                               /s/ William Colucci
                              ------------------------------
                              William Colucci, Treasurer
                              BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3508 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3508

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye Falls, New York, as the ``CW4 
               Christian J. Koch Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHRISTIAN KOCH MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 39 West Main Street, in Honeoye Falls, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``CW4 Christian J. Koch Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``CW4 
Christian J. Koch Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
PA

DRIVING SAFEL

W

Y THROUGH 

ORK

ZONES

PENNSYLVANIA

FAST FACTS

34

IN 2021,

% 5,

NEW ENTR

000

ANT 

CARRIERS IN PA 

BEING EDUCATED 

OF WORK ZONE ON HOW TO 

FATALITIES INVOLVED OPERATE SAFELY ON 

A CMV DRIVER.1 ROADWAYS.

STAY ALERT 

PENNSYL

Your Summer 2023 Work Z

V

one Hot Spots

ANIA:

• I-80 near Stroudsburg

• I-70 in District 9 (Breezewood to Maryland Line)

• I-78 in Berks County (Roadway Widening/Reconstruction)

• I-78 in Berks County (Bridge Rehabilitation)

• SR 79 in Allegheny County (North of Pittsburgh)

1 National Work Zone Information Clearinghouse

Work zones present unique challenges for 

large trucks and buses. Do your part to 

make roads safer by remembering to plan 

your route, move early into an open lane, 

avoid distractions, obey signs and signals 

to slow down or stop, and keep extra 

space between vehicles.

NATIONAL WORK 

ZONE FACTS 2021

Total Work Zone Fatalities: 956

Drivers and Passengers: 778

Pedestrians and Bicyclists: 173

Others: 5

(Occupants of non-motor vehicle transport 

device and persons on personal conveyances)

Total Fatal Work Zone Crashes 

Involving 

a CMV: 291

From 2020 to 2021, the number of 

fatal work zone crashes involving a 

large truck or bus increased by 41%.

For more information on driving safely around large trucks 

and buses, visit www.ShareTheRoadSafely.gov and for 

more on work zone safety, visit www.workzonesafety.org.

FMCSA-ADO-23-011
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Harris JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-51108

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 2, 2016.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Ellen A. Lockwood, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shane John Stolarczyk, Esq., Keller Sto-larczyk P.L.L.C., Boerne, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

William Harris Jones was convicted by a jury of using a cellular phone and the internet to attempt to coerce and entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The district court sentenced Jones to 120 months of imprisonment and 10 years of supervised release and imposed the following special conditions of supervised release: a prohibition on sexually oriented materials; a prohibition on alcohol consumption; a prohibition on residing where firearms are kept; a requirement that Jones submit to treatment and abide by the treatment program rules, including submitting to polygraph testing; and a prohibition on using or possessing a computer, the internet, or an internet-enabled device without prior written permission of the probation officer. Jones contends, for the first time on appeal, that these conditions do not meet the statutory requirements and the district court failed to adequately explain its reasons for imposing these conditions.

We review Jones’s claims of error for plain error. *See United States v. Tang,*718 F.3d 476, 482 (5th Cir.2013); *United States v. Miller,*665 F.3d 114, 134 (5th Cir.2011). A district court’s discretion in imposing conditions of supervised release is subject to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. *257§ 3583(d). *United States v. Ellis,*720 F.3d 220, 225 (5th Cir.2013), Because it is debatable whether the aforementioned conditions satisfy these statutory requirements, any errors in their imposition are not plain. *See Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009); *United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). Assuming arguendo that the district court plainly erred by not adequately explaining its reasons for imposing the aforementioned conditions, any error did not affect Jones’s substantial rights because Jones has not shown that providing reasons would have changed the outcome. *See Tang,*718 F.3d at 483.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janet Mathews, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  August 9, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Janet Mathews       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Janet  Mathews           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: August 16, 2010
By:
/s/  Chen GaoName: Chen GaoTitle: Chief Executive Officer

Chief Accounting Officer