alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2004



/s/ Ronald J. DomanicoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-11351

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

IRVING ALEXANDER FLORES-FUENTES,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-64-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Irving Alexander Flores-Fuentes appeals the 24-month prison sentence 

he received upon the revocation of his supervised release, contending that it is 

substantively unreasonable. He argues that the district court improperly 

considered as an aggravating factor the leniency of the sentence he received 

for a new conviction that was based on the same conduct underlying his 

supervised release violation. The court, however, made no finding as to the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 3, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-11351 Document: 00514585555 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2018
No. 17-11351

2

propriety of that sentence. Instead, it explained that it based the revocation 

sentence on the need to address the conduct underlying the supervised release 

violation, to deter Flores-Fuentes from committing additional crimes, and to 

account for Flores-Fuentes’s “extensive” criminal history, all of which were 

proper factors for the court to consider. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (2)(B); see 

also United States v. Rivera, 797 F.3d 307, 309 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) 

(explaining that, in imposing a revocation sentence, the court is “punishing the 

defendant’s breach of the court’s trust,” and that ‘“the nature of the conduct 

leading to the revocation [may] be considered in measuring the extent of the 

breach of trust”’ (quoting U.S.S.G. ch. 7, pt. A, introductory cmt.)).

Flores-Fuentes has not demonstrated that the district court gave 

substantial weight to an irrelevant or improper factor or that it made a clear 

error in judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. See United States v. 

Winding, 817 F.3d 910, 914 (5th Cir. 2016). He has not overcome the 

presumption that his revocation sentence, which was within the range 

recommended by the guidelines policy statements, is reasonable, see United 

States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), and 

thus has not shown that the revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable, see 

United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-11351 Document: 00514585555 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2018
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

May 29, 2017

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 14, 2017

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC, et al., Docket Nos. PENN

2014-108, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in 

concluding that sending a miner into the pit in question constituted 

“high negligence” rather than reckless disregard.”)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 678-100

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
106 A.3d 485

#### IN THE MATTER OF OUSMANE D. AL-MISRI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 006961979).

February 2, 2015.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-097, concluding that OUSMANE D. ALMISRI of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be admonished for violating *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that the violation charged is *de minimus*and undeserving of formal discipline, and that the formal complaint in District Docket No. VA-2012-0015E therefore should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against OUSMANE D. AL-MISRI in District Docket No. VA-2012-0015E, is hereby dismissed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 13564 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:12

- cr - 00040

- MSS

- AAS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ROBERTO GUZMAN , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (April 11, 2018) Before TJOFLAT , JILL PRYOR and NEWSOM , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: Thomas Burns , appointed counsel for Roberto Guzman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 17-13564 Date Filed: 04/11/2018 Page: 1 of 22 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Guzman ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 17-13564 Date Filed: 04/11/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 23


                        Consent of Independent Auditors




The Board of Directors
Markel Corporation

We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration  Statements  No.
33-28921,  No.  33-46706 and No. 33- 61598 on Form S-8 of Markel  Corporation of
our reports dated February 7, 1996, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets
of Markel  Corporation and subsidiaries  (the "Company") as of December 31, 1995
and  1994,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income,  changes  in
shareholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1995, and the related financial  statement  schedules,
which reports are included or  incorporated  by reference in the Company's  1995
annual report on Form 10-K.  Our reports refer to the adoption by the Company of
the  provisions  of the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board's  Statement of
Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 115,  Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 22, 1996

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Second Bancorp Incorporated
("Second Bancorp") Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rick L. Blossom, Chief Executive Officer of Second Bancorp,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of Second Bancorp.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements

TAMORAH CHAPMAN MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2419-10-4 PER CURIAM JUNE 21, 2011 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMEN T COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

FROM THE CIRCUIT COUR T OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Jonathan C. Th acher, Judge
(Tamorah Chapman, pro se , on brief).

(Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Atto rney General; Elizabeth B. Peay, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee Virginia Employment Commission.

Tamorah Chapman appeals a decision of th e circuit court affirming a decision by the
Virginia Employment Commission (the Commission) denying her unemployment benefits due to

misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the record, the circuit court’s order, and
the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. 1 Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the Comm ission in its final opinion, see In the matter of: Chapman v.
Department of the Treasury , Commission Decision No. 90709-C (J une 30, 2010), as affirmed by

the circuit court, see Chapman v. Virginia Emp’t Comm’n , Case No. CL-2010-0010194 (Oct. 15,
2010). We dispense with oral argument and su mmarily affirm because the facts and legal

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 In rendering this decision, we do not consider the fourth, sixth, and eleventh assignments of error. Rule 5A:18 bars our cons ideration of the fourth and sixth assignments of error because Chapman did not raise these issues before the circuit court. Although Chapman listed the eleventh assignment of error in her opening brief, she does not include any argument on this issue, as required by Rule 5A:20.- 2 - contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not
aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 16, 2009 

p0909 

Order 

 

September 16, 2009 

138681 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138681 

 COA: 282938 

Wayne CC: 07-005084-FH 

WAYNE MICHAEL JEDYNAK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secreatry 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under provisions of 49 U.S.C. sections 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the applications. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2001-11085.                 

*Date Filed:*                     December 3, 2001.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

PTC COMP 0881 dated 4 December 2001 

 Mail Vote 184 Resolution 010p 

TC2/12/23/123 Special Passenger Amending Resolution from Lithuania. 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 February 2002.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2001-11124.                 

*Date Filed:*                     December 7, 2001.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

TC23/TC123 Africa—TC3 

Africa-South Asian Subcontinent, Africa-South West Pacific 

Mail Vote 180—Africa-South East Asia 

Mail Vote 181—Africa-Japan/Korea 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 0141 dated 2 November 2001 

Africa-South Asian Subcontinent Resolutions r1-r12 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 0142 dated 2 November 2001 

Africa-South West Pacific Resolutions r13-r24 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 0138 dated 29 October 2001 

                    Africa-South East Pacific Resolutions r25-r36                           ( print page 66965)    

PTC23 AFR-TC3 0149 dated 23 November 2001 (Affirmative) 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 0152 dated 30 November 2001 

Africa-Japan/Korea Resolutions r37-r59 

MINUTES—PTC23 AFR-TC3 0146 dated 13 November 2001 

TABLES—PTC23 AFR-TC3 Fares 0065 dated 13 November 2001 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 Fares 0066 dated 13 November 2001 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 Fares 0069 dated 23 November 2001 

PTC23 AFR-TC3 Fares 0070 dated 7 December 2001. 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 April 2002.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-31718 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: December 17, 2001.
    Time: 11 am to 1 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gloria B. Levin, Phd., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3166, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1017, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#462a23302f28210625353468282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e525b485750597e5d4d4c1050575610595148">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 4, 2002.
    Time: 2 pm to 4:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant application.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Richard Marcus, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5168, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1245, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5c7dcd6ddd4c7d19bd8d4c7d6c0c6f5dbdcdd9bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="592b303a31382b3d7734382b3a2c2a19373031773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306, 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-31707 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Holding Corporation, (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin C.
      Cunningham, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 28, 2007
                /s/
                    Martin C. Cunningham
                  
                  Martin
                    C. Cunningham
                  Chairman
                    of the Board
                  and
                    Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal
                    Executive Officer)
----

----

----

|   | (i) | the      accompanying annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Trust for the year ended      December 31, 2007, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Trust. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 28, 2008 | /s/ Gregory E. Crissman          |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Gregory      E. Crissman,        |   |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer and |   |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |

----

----
Aura Systems, Inc.
                                   Term Sheet



Instrument

               Convertible Note

Amount

               $500,000

Use of Proceeds

               Working capital

Closing

               July 10, 2002

Interest

               8% simple interest due in arrears.

Term

               180 days

Conversion Price

               $0.11 per share

Registration Rights

               To be  included  in  Registration  Statement  to be filed  within
               ninety days following issuance of common stock.

Documentation

               Company  will  provide  complete   documentation   subsequent  to
               Closing.

Other Conditions

               If Aura Systems,  Inc.  ("Aura")  receives  equity funding for an
               amount  of at least $2  million  (unrelated  to the  contemplated
               sale-leaseback of the building) between July 1, 2002 and the time
               of the final payment of the loan and accrued  interest,  the loan
               will convert  into common  stock  either at a conversion  rate of
               $0.11 per  share or the  average  of the new  equity  sale  rate,
               whichever is lower.

               Should,  at any time prior either to the conversion or payment in
               full of the note,  Aura grant a security  interest in the patents
               to one or more entities as part of an equity  funding,  Aura will
               grant the  participant  note  holders a  security  interest  pari
               passu.  This provision is inapplicable to strategic  transactions
               involving technology licensing or transfers.





On behalf of Aura Systems, Inc.

         __________________________on this date_________________
         Carl Albert, Chairman



On behalf of Investors:    Amount of participation $250,000

         __________________________on this date_________________
         Lancer Offshore, Inc.

                                    Amount of participation $250,000

         _________________________on this date__________________
         Prudent Bear Fund