alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Northshore Mining Co. - Oral Argument and Open Meeting POSTPONED                

#   Northshore Mining Co. - Oral Argument and Open Meeting POSTPONED  

The oral argument and open meeting for *Northshore Mining, Co*., Docket No. LAKE 2017-224, et al. has been postponed and will be rescheduled for a later date.  

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
exv10w106



 











EXHIBIT 10.106




MADISON PARK, L.L.C.

30 East 71st #1A

New York, NY 10021

(212) 717-0520

(212) 717-4263



as of October 1, 2007




CONFIDENTIAL




EZCORP, Inc.

1901 Capital Parkway

Austin, TX 78746




Gentlemen:



The purpose of this letter is to extend the term of the existing advisory services agreement dated
as of October 1, 2004 between EZCORP, Inc. (“EZCORP”) and Madison Park, L.L.C. (“Madison Park”)
regarding advisory services to be rendered by Madison Park to EZCORP (the “Agreement”) until the
earlier of: (1) December 31, 2007; or (2) the completion of a review currently being undertaken by
EZCORP, Inc. and any action taken as a result thereof.



All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MADISON PARK, L.L.C.

 	 
	 	
 	 
	 	By:  	Virginia D. Dodson 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 
	 


AGREED AND ACCEPTED ON THIS DAY OF October 3, 2007 and effective as of October 1, 2007.




	 	 	 	 	 
	EZCORP, INC.

 	 
	 	 
	By:  	 	 
	Title:
84 A.3d 1059

#### Laquaille BRYANT, Petitioner v. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 186 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 31, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**Consent
        of Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
        Firm**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on
        Forms S-3 (No. 333-38266, No. 333-54912, No. 333-116973, No. 333-126084,
        No.
        333-130248, No. 333-131744 and No. 333-137994) and the Registration Statements
        on Forms S-8 (No. 33-75268, No. 33-80662, No. 33-93394, No. 333-29801, No.
        333-60057, No. 333-79789, No. 333-43504, No. 333-72098, No. 333-117193, No.
        333-126083, No. 333-133010 and No. 333-143016) of InSite Vision Incorporated
        of
        our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial
        statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
        which appear in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/
        Burr,
        Pilger & Mayer LLP
 
 Palo
        Alto, California
 March
        17,
        2008
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Arbitration for Advocates - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sdYWSc27As\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/arbitration-for-advocates\/\">Arbitration for Advocates<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/arbitration-for-advocates\/embed\/#?secret=sdYWSc27As\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Arbitration for Advocates” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"sdYWSc27As\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Unassociated Document


                     Exhibit
      10.15

    


    


    


    


    Description
      of the Terms Pursuant to which Global Music International, Inc. Employs James
      Fallacaro, Christopher Mauritz and Ji Shen

    


    We
      entered into an oral one-year
      employment agreement with Mr. Fallacaro in January, 2007, pursuant to which
      he
      is to be paid a salary of $150,000, which is payable as described
      below.  We also provide Mr. Fallacaro with health insurance
      benefits.

    


    We
      agreed to pay Corinne Fallacaro
      $50,000 in connection with her resignation as Chief Executive Officer and
      President, which is payable as described below.  We also provide her
      with health insurance benefits. She is not currently employed by
      us.

    


    Messrs.
      Mauritz and Shen are “at-will”
employees.  Mr. Mauritz is compensated at the rate which would,
      commencing January 1, 2007, net him $78,000 per year  after applicable
      federal, state, FICA and Medicare taxes, and is provided with health insurance
      benefits.  Mr. Shen is compensated at a rate of $78,000 per
      year.

    


    The
      amounts payable to James Fallacaro
      and Corinne Fallacaro are to be paid on a pari passu basis
      on  the earlier to occur of the date that (i) the Board in its
      discretion determines that the Company is cash-flow positive, (ii) such payment
      would no longer jeopardize the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
      and (iii) certain insolvency or related events occur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              260496
<DEPRECIATION>                                      168630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      101941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               883460
<BONDS>                                             457890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              6096
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1245505)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        101941
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     72460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   47748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (120208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### Yervand Armenaki ZOHRABYAN; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-70739.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 21, 2008.

*491Sassoun A. Nalbandian, Law Offices of Sassoun A. Nalbandian, Valley Village, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Gregory B. Friel, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lead petitioner Yervand Armenaki Zohrabyan and his family, natives of Iran and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying their application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Bandari v. INS,*227 F.3d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir.2000), and we grant the petition for review and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on omissions from Zohrabyan’s asylum application and perceived inconsistencies in his testimony. Omissions from an asylum application generally do “not comprise specific, cogent reasons for [an] adverse credibility finding.” *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003); see *also Aguilera-Cota v. INS,*914 F.2d 1375, 1382 (9th Cir.1990) (“A failure to state each and every ground for a claim of political asylum at the time of the initial application should not prejudice that claim ... ”). Further, several of the omissions and inconsistencies are of minor import or do not go to the heart of Zohrabyan’s claim. *See Bandari,*227 F.3d at 1166-67 (omissions of details and inconsistencies in dates are insufficient to uphold an adverse credibility finding.). Finally, Zohrabyan was not given the opportunity to explain the remaining omissions and inconsistencies. *See Chen v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 611, 618 (9th Cir.2004) (reversing adverse credibility finding, in part because petitioner was denied a reasonable opportunity to explain a perceived inconsistency).

We remand so the agency may determine whether, taking his testimony as true, Zohrabyan is eligible for relief. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|Exhibit 11


ARTICLE XV


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002


In connection with the
Annual Report of Winter Sports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending May 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jami M. Phillips,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|This certification is being
furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/
      Jami M. Phillips   |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|Jami M. Phillips                        |  |  | 
|Chief
      Financial Officer           |  |  | 
|                                        | 
|August
      29, 2002                   |
----

| Dated:      May 19, 2008 | /s/      Matthew Boyle       |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                     | Matthew      Boyle           |
|                     | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                     |                         |
|                     |                         |
|                     |                         |
| Dated:      May 19, 2008 | /s/      Paul N. Farquhar    |
|                     | Paul      N. Farquhar        |
|                     | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Wednesday, April 17, 2024.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 

20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

STATUS: Open. 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open 

session: Morton Salt, Inc., Docket No. CENT 2023-0120. (Issues 

include whether the Commission has authority to review the 

Secretary’s decision to issue a notice of pattern of violations.) 

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, 

must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 

29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Phone Number

for Listening to 

Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.

Passcode: 678-100.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Dated: March 19, 2024.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

Billing Code 6735-01
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 500
          - [Docket No. 01N-0284]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting an extension of comment period for an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 7, 2001 (66 FR 63519).   The document gave notice that FDA is extending the comment period for the ANPRM that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 10, 2001 (66 FR 42167), concerning regulation for establishing import drug residue tolerances for imported food products of animal origin for drugs that are used in other countries, but that are unapproved new animal drugs in the United States.  The document was published with an inadvertent error.  This document corrects that error.                    

# DATES:

The extension of the comment period to March 11, 2002, and this correction were effective on December 7, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doris B. Tucker, Office of Policy, Planning, and Legislation (HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7010.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 01-30331, appearing on page 63519 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 7, 2001, the following correction is made:                

                    1.  On page 63519, in the second column under the heading                     **ADDRESSES**                    , the mail code for the Dockets Management Branch is corrected to read “HFA-305.”                

Dated: December 19, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-31877 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### DIETHELM *&*CO., Limited, Libelant-Appellee, v. THE FLYING TRADER, her engines, boilers, etc., and Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

No. 351, Docket 24179.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 10, 1957.

Decided May 27, 1957.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, Edward J. Heine, Jr., and L. De Grove Potter, New York City, of counsel, for Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., respondent-appellant.

Hill, Rivkins, Middleton, Louis & Warburton, New York City, J. Edwin Carey and Melvin J. Tublin, New York City, for libelant-appellee.

Before CHASE, HINCKS and LUM-BARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on opinion below. See Diethelm & Co. v. S.S. The Flying Trader, D.C., 141 F. Supp. 271.