alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106 A.3d 481

#### IN THE MATTER OF ERIK W. MUELLER, A/K/A ERIK MUELLER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 000682000).

January 23, 2015.

*345ORDER

This matter having been duly presented, it is ORDERED that ERIK W. MUELLER, a/k/a ERIK MUELLER of HOWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2000, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years effective June 24, 2011, by Order of this Court filed July 3, 2014, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
#### Mark Lavon CUFFEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-7581.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

Mark Lavon Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

*283Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Lavon Cuffee seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Cuffee that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Cuffee failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Cuffee has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability; deny Cuffee’s motions for appointment of counsel, for transcripts at government expense, and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
-  Home 
-  Safety 
-  Look Before You Book 

# In This Section

                      -  Look Before You Book 
                      -  Travel Planners 
                      -  Passengers 
                      -  Accessibility 
                      -  Research Tips                          -  Research Bus Safety 
                        -  Research Safety Online 
                      -  Report Bus Complaints 
                      -  Consumer Safety Resources 

# Consumer Safety Resources

Look Before You Book Video

Look Before You Book Fact Sheet

Look Before You Book Postcard

Look Before You Book Powerpoint Presentation

Learn Before You Board Fact Sheet

## Bus Safety Resource Kits

These kits are designed to help inform travel planners on the actions they can take to learn about and promote bus safety. They are for any organization reaching out to trip planners: tourism agencies or organizations; travel agencies; associations of travel or meeting planners; and youth, senior, community, and faith-based organizations that plan their own bus travel. They contain valuable information such as articles that can be used in newsletters or on websites, postcards that can be sent to trip planners, presentations for use at conferences, and more.

**Senior Bus Travel Safety Kit**

Article/Editorial Content

Email Template

 

**Student Bus Travel Safety Kit**

Article/Editorial Content

Email Template

 

**Faith-Based Bus Travel Safety Kit**

Article/Editorial Content

Email Template

 

### Find a Bus Company

https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/passenger-safety/search
# WORK ZONE SAFETY PRESS RELEASE: ARKANSAS 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: [Date]**

**CONTACT: [Name, Phone Number, E-Mail]**

**[Organization] Supports the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Work Zone Safety Outreach Campaign in Arkansas****

**[City, State]** – **[Organization]** announced today it is joining efforts to help reduce large truck crashes in works zones by supporting a state-wide work zone safety outreach campaign led by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). **[Organization]** calls on all drivers to “share work zones safely” by staying alert, obeying traffic signs and allowing all vehicles extra space while driving through Arkansas’s active work zones.

Throughout the campaign FMCSA will amplify safety messages through outlets such as billboards and audio ads, reaching commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers traveling through work zones. FMCSA encourages road users to download the IDrive Arkansas app or visit idrivearkansas.com for the most up-to-date work zone information and real-time travel information.

“We are pleased to be a part of an effort to remind not only CMV drivers, but all those on Arkansas’ roadways to slow down and pay attention when driving through work zones,” said **[spokesperson].** “There is a clear need to raise awareness on work zone safety. We’re proud of the great state of Arkansas for many reasons–but we still need everyone to do their part to prevent roadway crashes.” 

According to the Arkansas Department of Transportation, travelers drive across Arkansas’s 16,500 centerline miles of state highways daily. The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse also notes that in 2021, Arkansas saw six crashes involving a CMV, resulting in seven fatalities. In 2023, the Arkansas State Legislature also passed a law allowing the usage of speed cameras in highway work zones. The law allows a camera to be stationed inside a work zone and alert an officer downstream of a speeding vehicle. The officer can then use that data to safely issue a warning or citation once the vehicle exits the work zone. The Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) is grateful for this additional measure in the effort to increase work zone safety across our state.

These are just a few statistics showing the importance of work zone safety outreach efforts in Arkansas, for the collective effort to reduce work zone crashes and save lives. 

For more information on work zone safety, visit the campaign website.

**###**

[INSERT BOILERPLATE]

# image1.png
#### Imelda ULLOA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72942.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

John Wolfgang Gehart, Lourdes Barrera Haley, Esquire, Russell Jauregui, Esquire, Carols Vellanoweth, Esquire, Vellanoweth & Gehart, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Lance Lomond Jolley, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, *109District Director, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Imelda Ulloa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations in removal proceedings, *Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not violate due process by admitting into evidence Ulloa’s Record of Sworn Statement and Form 1-213 Record of Inadmissible Alien. These documents were probative, their admission was not fundamentally unfair, and the preparing officer testified at the hearing regarding the procedures for creating the documents. *See Espinoza v. INS,*45 F.3d 308, 309-10 (9th Cir.1995) (“The sole test for admission of evidence [in removal proceedings] is whether the evidence is probative and its admission is fundamentally fair.”).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Ulloa’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Fernando L. Fernandez, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the ContinucareCorporation (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures” (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-14) for the Registrant andwe have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation.  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date:September 28, 2004 By: /s/ Fernando L. Fernandez     Fernando L. Fernandez  Senior Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer
1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7184

ROBERT F. SPIGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES AUSTIN, Chief of the City of Columbia;

BOB COBLE, Mayor of Columbia; T. C. COUNTY

ADMINISTRATOR; SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; LEON LOTT,

Sheriff of Richland County; P. O.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA01-49-3)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert F. Spigner, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper, OFFICE

OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Alice Price Adams,

David Leon Morrison, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert F. Spigner appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Spigner v. Austin, No. CA-01-

49-3 (D.S.C. June 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 1, 2014*

[Cite as *0710112014 Case Announcements #2,*2014-Ohio-2927.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2014-1071.

#### Randall v. Randall.

Hamilton App. No. C-130527. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent and would grant the stay and continue the bond.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3489 

To require creditors to establish a phone line to assist obligors who are 

50 years of age and older to resolve billing errors, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. MFUME, Mr. WALTZ, Ms. 

PORTER, Mr. KELLER, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. CASE, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. PHILLIPS, Mr. VAN DREW, 

Mr. CARSON, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. O’HALLERAN, and Ms. WILD) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require creditors to establish a phone line to assist obligors who are 50 years of age and older to resolve billing 

errors, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reporting Instances 

5 of Non-authorized Grift Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘RING Act 

6 of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3489 IH

1 SEC. 2. BILLING ERROR ASSISTANCE. 

2 Section 161 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

3 1666) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(f) BILLING ERROR ASSISTANCE.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 

6 the date of the enactment of this subsection, each 

7 creditor shall— 

8 ‘‘(A) establish and publish the phone num9 ber for a toll-free phone line that is dedicated 

10 to directly assisting obligors age 50 and older 

11 to navigate the process described in this section 

12 for resolving billing errors, including the mitiga13 tion of fraudulent activity; and 

14 ‘‘(B) provide a clear, understandable, and 

15 prominent notice to such obligors of the avail16 ability of such phone line through, email, 

17 websites, mailings, and other forms of commu18 nication as determined helpful and appropriate 

19 by the creditor. 

20 ‘‘(2) PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMA21 TION.—Each creditor shall ensure that the operator 

22 of any phone line established pursuant to paragraph 

23 (1) does not require any obligor to disclose person24 ally identifiable information, including a social secu25 rity number, to verify the age of such obligor.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE:

PLACE:

STATUS:

MATTERS TO BE
CONSIDERED:

CONTACT PERSON
FOR MORE INFO:

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW
SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004

December 20, 2013
10:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 8, 2014.

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (entry from
F Street entrance)

Closed

The Commission will consider and act upon the following in a
closed session: Secretary of Labor v. Knox Creek Coal
Corporation, Docket Nos. VA 2010-81-R, et al. (Issues include
whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that
certain violations were not “significant and substantial.”)

Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay /
1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Connecticut, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes: 
Correction

    In notice document 01-30170, appearing on page 63218 in the issue 
of Wednesday, December 5, 2001, make the following correction:
    On page 63218, in the third column, first full paragraph, ``Order 
Date: December 8, 2001.'' should read ``Order Date: December 8, 2000.''

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 01-31258 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11953-000]


Symbiotics, LLC.; Notice Granting Late Intervention

December 18, 2001.
    On November 26, 2001, the Commission issued a notice of the 
preliminary permit application filed by the Symbiotics, LLC. for the 
Wickiup Dam Project No. 11953, located on the Deschutes River, in 
Deschutes County, Florida. The notice established August 13, 2001, as 
the deadline for filing motions to intervene in the proceeding.
    On November 26, 2001, a motion to intervene was filed late by 
American Rivers and WaterWatch of Oregon. Granting the late motion to 
intervene will not unduly delay or disrupt the proceeding or prejudice 
other parties to it. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 214,\1\ the late 
motion to intervene filed in this proceeding by American Rivers and 
WaterWatch of Oregon is granted, subject to the Commission's rules and 
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.214 (2001).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31592 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                          AIRCRAFT INCOME PARTNERS L.P.
                          -----------------------------

                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2002
                            -------------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aircraft Income Partners
L.P. (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.



Date: August 14, 2002                        /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Michael L. Ashner
                                             President and Director
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August 14, 2002                        /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                             Vice President and Treasurer
                                             (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                             Officer)















                                    14 of 14
****Exhibit 32.1 - Officer Certification****
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Health Outcomes Management, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, each of the undersigned officers of Health Outcomes Management, Inc. certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

   (1) The Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Health Outcomes Management, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-KSB.

Date:  May 25, 2005

   /s/ Peter J. Zugschwert   Peter J. ZugschwertActing Principal Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Secion 906, has been provided to Health Outcomes Management, Inc. and will be retained by Health Outcomes Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.