alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  With Assistance from FMCS, Five-Month Lockout Ends at Illinois Facility
Home/News/With Assistance from FMCS, Five-Month Lockout Ends at Illinois Facility Previous			Next
With Assistance from FMCS, Five-Month Lockout Ends at Illinois Facility										With help from FMCS mediator Conrad Bowling, unions representing workers at the Clifford-Jacobs facility north of Champaign, IL and the employer have reached an agreement to end a five-month lockout.  The four-year agreement covers workers at the plant represented by  the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 601, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Local 1626 and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local 1000.
For local news coverage, click here.
John Arnold2016-02-29T11:16:01-05:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
#### In re a GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION of TITANIUM INDUSTRY.

Misc. No. 7113.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

July 6, 1978.

Otto G. Obermaier, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert W. Wilder, Antitrust Division, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MARSH, District Judge.

In reliance upon Rule 6(d), Fed.R. Crim.P., John Doe moves for a preindictment order requiring that all proceedings before the grand jury in the above-entitled antitrust investigation which are held in the presence of government counsel be steno-graphically recorded and preserved.

We think the motion should be granted.

In the case of *United States v. Price,*474 F.2d 1223, 1225 (9th Cir. 1973), reaffirming *United States v. Thoresen,*428 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1970), it was held that:

> “[T]he district court must exercise its discretion in passing upon a preindictment motion for recordation of grand jury proceedings and that a district court abuses its discretion in denying the motion of parties situated as were appellants, in absence of a Government showing that it has a legitimate and compelling interest to be served by nonrecordation.”

No such showing has been made by the Government.

We understand all grand jury proceedings to include the testimony of witnesses, colloquies between Government counsel and witnesses, *United States v. Lardieri,*497 F.2d 317 (3rd Cir. 1974), and the Government counsel’s communications, colloquies and presentations to the grand jury in the presence of and in the absence of a witness. Everything should be recorded except the grand jury’s deliberations and voting.

Rule 6(d), Fed.R.Crim.P., permits but does not require the recordation of grand jury evidence. In *United States v. Rubin,*559 F.2d 975, 988 (5th Cir. 1977), the court stated:

> “The far better practice is to record grand jury proceedings, including the comments of the prosecutor.”

In *United States v. Peden,*472 F.2d 583, 584 (2d Cir. 1973), the court indicated it could see no good reason why, as a matter of course, statements by the prosecutor should not be recorded.

The American Bar Association’s Special Committee on Standards for the Administration of Criminal Justice has concluded that “the prosecutor’s communications and presentations to the Grand Jury should be on the record.”

In this particular antitrust investigation, we think it would be an abuse of discretion *38not to grant a preindictment motion to record all proceedings in the presence of government counsel.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Labor and Management Look Ahead at Federal Sector Labor Relations at FMCS Future@Work Conference - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"c09rkSx0XU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/labor-management-look-ahead-federal-sector-labor-relations-fmcs-futurework-conference\/\">Labor and Management Look Ahead at Federal Sector Labor Relations at FMCS Future@Work Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/labor-management-look-ahead-federal-sector-labor-relations-fmcs-futurework-conference\/embed\/#?secret=c09rkSx0XU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Labor and Management Look Ahead at Federal Sector Labor Relations at FMCS Future@Work Conference” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"c09rkSx0XU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Juneman-Cobert-Wednesday-FMCS-2649-300x200.jpg"}
#### Larry D. DITZLER, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and Department Of Transportation, Intervenor.

No. 2010-3148.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Before LOURIE, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Department of Transportation moves to summarily affirm the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) dismissing Larry D. Ditzler’s appeal asserting a violation of veteran’s preference rights pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 3330.

The jurisdiction of the Board is not plenary; rather it is limited to actions designated as appealable to the Board “under any law, rule, or regulation.” *Monasteri v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.,*232 F.3d 1376, 1378 (Fed.Cir.2000) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 7701(a)). Although 5 U.S.C. §§ 3308-20 relating to veterans’ preference rights applies to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) applicants and employees, 5 U.S.C. *480§ 3830(a), the section which would grant jurisdiction to the Board, does not. That was recently made clear by this court’s decision in *Morse v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.,*621 F.3d 1346 (Fed.Cir.2010), which held that § 3330(a) was not one of the provisions specifically enumerated as applicable to the FAA personnel management system.

This petition for review arises out of Ditzler’s allegation that his veteran’s preference rights were violated when he was not selected for the position of Air Traffic Control Specialist, a position that the petitioner conceded below was within the FAA. The Board dismissed his petition for lack of jurisdiction for the very reasons provided in our decision in *Morse.*Summary affirmance is appropriate when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists. *Joshua v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed.Cir.1994). Because *Morse*controls this petition as a matter of law leaving no substantial question regarding its outcome, we agree with the Department that summary affirmance is warranted under the circumstances presented here.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to summarily affirm is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
{"id":1147,"date":"2014-06-06T09:07:51","date_gmt":"2014-06-06T13:07:51","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1147"},"modified":"2018-08-16T09:09:18","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T13:09:18","slug":"commission-meeting-schedule-for-june-18-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-june-18-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Meeting Schedule for June 18, 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>June 6, 2014<\/div>\n<h2>Sunshine Act Meeting<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Time and Date<\/strong>:<br \/>\nJune 18, 2014; 10:00 AM<\/p>\n<p><strong>Place<\/strong>:<br \/>\n800 North Capitol Street, N.W.<br \/>\nFirst Floor Hearing Room<br \/>\nWashington, D.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Status<\/strong>:<br \/>\nThe first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matters to be Considered<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Open Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Briefing by U.S. Harbor Trucking Representatives on Trucking Trends and Conditions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Closed Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Staff Briefing on Economic and Trade Conditions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Contact:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Karen V. Gregory<br \/>\nSecretary<br \/>\n202-523-5725<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>June 6, 2014 Sunshine Act Meeting Time and Date: June 18, 2014; 10:00 AM Place: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W. First Floor Hearing Room Washington, D.C. Status: The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session. Matters to be Considered: Open Session... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-june-18-2014\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26,4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1147"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1147"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1147\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1148,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1147\/revisions\/1148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34127]


Parksierra Corporation (Successor-in-Interest to California 
Northern Railroad Company Limited Partnership)--Trackage Rights 
Exemption-North Coast Railroad Authority

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board is granting a petition for 
exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 
for ParkSierra Corporation, successor-in-interest to California 
Northern Railroad Company Limited Partnership, to acquire from North 
Coast Railroad Authority incidental trackage rights over a 10.5-mile 
segment of line in northern California between Schellville, milepost 
NWP 40.60 (SP 72.50), and Lombard, milepost SP 62.00, subject to 
employee protective conditions.

DATES: This exemption is effective on January 10, 2002. Petitions to 
stay must be filed by January 7, 2002. Petitions to reopen must be 
filed by January 22, 2002.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34127 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of all pleadings must be 
served on petitioner's representative, Troy W. Garris, 1300 19th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1600. [TDD 
for the hearing impaired 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: Da 2 Da Legal, Suite 405, 1925 K 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 293-7776. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
1-800-877-8339.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: December 17, 2001.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Clyburn, and 
Commissioner Burkes.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31644 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-350-1220-AA]


Emergency Closure Order

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Emergency closure of trails, Fort Sage Off Highway Vehicles 
Area.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective immediately, certain 
roads and trails in the Fort Sage Off Highway Vehicle Area are closed 
to all vehicle use. The affected routes are (1) A 4WD vehicle trail 
located in Sections 1 and 2, T. 25 N., R. 17 E., M.D.M, traversing 
easterly-westerly; (2) a 4WD vehicle trail located in Sections 2 and 
11, T. 25 N., R. 17 E., M.D.M, traversing easterly-westerly; (3) a 
motorcycle trail located in Sections 2 and 11, T. 25 N., R. 17 E., and 
Section 34, T. 26 N., R. 17 E., M.D.M, traversing northerly-southerly; 
(4) All vehicle trails in Sections 7, 18, 19, and 30 T. 25 N., R. 18 
E., M.D.M except the road to Willow Springs. The authorized officer 
reserves the right to allow administrative access when it is determined 
to be in the interest of the government (i.e. emergency-search and 
rescue, fire suppression).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this closure is to allow for 
recovery of lands burned by wildfire in August, 2001. Vehicular use of 
the area has the potential for causing adverse impacts to soil, 
vegetation, wildlife, wildlife habitat, scenic, and recreation 
resources until stabilization of the area has occurred. The closure 
will remain in effect until vegetation recovery is sufficient to 
delimit the trails and routes and adjacent soil, vegetation, wildlife, 
wildlife habitat, scenic, and recreation resources are not at risk of 
adverse impact from trail use of motorized vehicles. The authority for 
this closure is 43 CFR 834.12.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: James Sippel, Outdoor Recreation Planner, 
BLM Eagle Lake Field Office (530) 257-0456.

Linda D. Hansen,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-31753 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    Notice is hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. 
Chevron U.S.A. Production Company Civil Action No. 01-D-1921 (D. CO) 
was lodged with the District Court for the District of Colorado on 
September 28, 2001. This notice was previously published in the Federal 
Register on October 15, 2001 and the public was given 30 days to 
comment. No comments were received. However, because of severe 
disruption in the mail service, the United States is unable to conclude 
with certainty that any comments mailed in response to that notice 
would have been received. As a result, the United States is providing 
this second opportunity for comment. Any prior commenter should 
resubmit their comments as directed below.
    Under this Consent Decree Chevron shall pay a civil penalty and 
perform injunctive relief to resolve claims alleging violations of the 
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. The Compliant asserts claims pursuant to 
section 301(a) and 311(b)(3) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) & 
1321(b)(3), for spills of produced water and oil from pipelines at 
Chevron's Rangely Weber Sand Unit and oil exploration and production 
unit, in Rangely, Colorado. Under the terms of the settlement, Chevron 
shall pay a $750,000 civil penalty and perform work over the next few 
years at the Rangely Unit in an effort to achieve compliance with the 
Act.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be sent via telefax to the 
Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, at (202) 616-6583, or, alternatively, 
mailed to the United States Attorney's Office, District of Colorado, 
1225 17th Street, Suite 700, Denver, Colorado 80202 and should refer to 
United States v. Chevron U.S.A. Production Company Civil Action No. 01-
D-1921 (D. Co), DOJ Ref. #90-5-1-1-4513.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of United 
States Attorney, District of Colorado, 1951 Stout St., Suite 1200, 
Denver Co, 80294 (303) 454-0100. A copy of the proposed consent decree 
may be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $9.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs, including attachments), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bob Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-31781 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

          - [A-557-805] 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Commerce is extending the time limits of the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. The review covers three producers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the United                               ( print page 65472)                            States. The period of review is October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2000.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 19, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Irina Itkin or Elizabeth Eastwood, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, at (202) 482-0656 or (202) 482-3874, respectively. 

*Postponement of Final Results of Administrative Review:*                         The Department published the preliminary results of the 1999-2000 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia on November 6, 2001 (66 FR 56057). The current deadline for the final results in this review is March 6, 2002. We must conduct sales and cost verifications of the information provided by the respondents. Due to scheduling problems with one of the companies participating in this review, we are unable to complete verification before March 2002. Because we need additional time for verification, we have extended the deadline until May 6, 2002.                     

This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: December 12, 2001. 

Louis Apple, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-31256 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P