67250 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2001 / Notices

all of that information as CBI.

Information so marked will not be

disclosed except in accordance with

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

In addition to one complete version of

the comment that includes any

information claimed as CBI, a copy of

the comment that does not contain the

information claimed as CBI must be

submitted for inclusion in the public

version of the official record.

Information not marked confidential

will be included in the public version

of the official record without prior

notice. If you have any questions about

CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,

please consult the person listed under

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare

My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following

suggestions helpful for preparing your

comments:

1. Explain your views as clearly as

possible.

2. Describe any assumptions that you

used.

3. Provide copies of any technical

information and/or data you used that

support your views.

4. If you estimate potential burden or

costs, explain how you arrived at the

estimate that you provide.

5. Provide specific examples to

illustrate your concerns.

6. Offer alternative ways to improve

the notice or collection activity.

7. Make sure to submit your

comments by the deadline in this

notice.

8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,

be sure to identify the docket control

number assigned to this action in the

subject line on the first page of your

response. You may also provide the

name, date, and Federal Register

citation.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

The preliminary organophosphorous

cumulative risk assessment is being

made available for comment. The

assessment represents a new way of

analyzing data about potential exposure

to pesticides. The Agency’s methods

result in measurements of the

probability of exposure to more than

one organophophorous pesticide and an

assessment of such combined exposure.

While EPA is interpreting the results of

these analyses and the soundness of

these methods, it is too soon to draw

firm conclusions about risks or consider

risk management possibilities. The risk

mitigation measures that have already

been taken on individual members of

this group of pesticides have led to

significant reduction in potential risk,

and EPA is continuing to address risks

as they are identified. The Agency has

confidence in the methods used to

generate the results given the numerous

scientific reviews conducted before

completion of this preliminary

cumulative risk assessment. Based on

this analysis, EPA continues to have

confidence in the overall safety of our

food supply and emphasizes the

importance of eating a varied diet rich

in fruits and vegetables. Pesticide

residues in drinking water do not

appear to be a major contributor to risk.

Although most indoor uses of

organophophorous pesticides have been

eliminated through earlier risk

reduction actions, a few remaining uses

may be re-evaluated.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection,

Agricultural commodities, Chemicals,

Pesticides and pests.

Dated: December 19, 2001.

Lois A. Rossi,

Director, Special Review and Reregistration

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 01–31938 Filed 12–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

December 13, 2001.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before January 23, 2002.

If you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th

Street, SW., DC 20554 or via the Internet

to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via the

Internet at jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–0391.

Title: Program to Monitor the Impacts

of the Universal Service Support

Mechanism, CC Docket Nos. 98–2002

and 96–45.

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 900

respondents; 1,439 responses.

Estimated Time Per Response: 40

minutes to 1.5 hours.

Frequency of Response: Annual

reporting requirement and third party

disclosure requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 1,716.

Total Annual Cost: N/A.

Needs and Uses: The Commission has

a program to monitor the impacts of the

universal service support mechanisms.

The program requires periodic reporting

by telephone companies and the

universal service administrator. The

information is used by the Commission,

Federal-State Joint Boards, Congress,

and the general public to assess the

impacts of the decisions of the

Commission and Joint Boards. This

information collection has been revised

because several data elements contained

in the monitoring program were

eliminated due to access reform.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0823.

Title: Pay Telephone Reclassification,

Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC

Docket No. 96–128.

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Numbers of Respondents: 400.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2001 / Notices 67251

Estimated Time Per Response: 2 to 35

hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirement; recordkeeping

requirement; and third part disclosure

requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 400 hours.

Total Annual Cost: $480,000.

Needs and Use: In the Memorandum

Opinion and Order issued in CC Docket

No. 96–128, the Commission clarified

requirements established in the

Payphone Orders for the provision of

payphone-specific coding digits by LECs

and PSPs, to IXCs, beginning October 7,

1997. Specifically, the Order clarified

that only FLEX ANI complies with the

requirements; required that LECs file

tariffs to FLEX ANI as a nonchargeable

option to IXCs; required that LECs file

tariffs to recover costs associated with

implementing FLEX ANI; and grants

permission and certain waivers. This is

an extension of a currently approved

collection. The Commission is seeking

approval to extend this collection for

three years, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31863 Filed 12–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB

for Review and Approval

December 12, 2001.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commissions, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before January 28, 2002.

If you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les

Smith, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–A804, 445 12th

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 or

via the Internet to lesmith@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Les

Smith at (202) 418–0217 or via the

Internet at lesmith@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

OMB Control Number: 3060–0053.

Title: Application for Consent to

Transfer of Control of Corporation

Holding Station License.

Form Number: FCC Form 703.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit

institutions.

Number of Respondents: 40.

Estimated Time Per Response: 36

mins.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirement; Third party

disclosure.

Total Annual Burden: 24 hrs.

Total Estimated Cost: $2,000.

Needs and Uses: The

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, and 47 CFR 5.59 of FCC Rules

require applicants for Experimental

Radio Services to submit FCC 703 when

they propose to change, via a transfer of

stock ownership, the control of a

station. This information is used to

determine eligibility for licenses,

without which, violations of ownership

regulations may occur. The FCC has

made various revisions to Form 703: (1)

Expiration date was deleted; (2) public

coast and common carrier Alaska public

fixed stations questions were removed;

(3) fee multiple was deleted; (4) ‘‘FOR

FCC USE ONLY’’ field was removed; (5)

fields were added for the transferee’s

address and contact information to

include an ‘‘Attention’’ field; (6) field

labeled ‘‘FCC Registration Number

(FRN)’’ was added; (7) Internet URL

address was added; (8) references to

item numbers were changed to match

the change in the form numbering; (9)

instructions pertaining to FCC Forms

159 and 160 were added; (11) only

Experimental Radio Service regular and

courier addresses are given; and (12)

instructions were revised.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0057.

Title: Application for Equipment

Authorization, 47 CFR Sections 2.911,

2.925, 2.932, 2.944, 2.960, 2.1033(a),

and 2.1043.

Form Number: FCC 731.

Type of Review: Revision of currently

approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.

Number of Respondents: 5,600.

Estimate of Time Per Response: 24

hrs. (avg.)

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirements; Third party

disclosure.

Total Annual Burden: 134,400.

Total Annual Costs: $1,120,000.

Needs and Uses: Under sections of 47

CFR parts 15 and 18 of FCC Rules,

regulated equipment must comply with

the FCC’s technical standards before it

is approved for marketing. Rules

governing certain equipment operating

in the licensed service also require

equipment authorization under 47 CFR

part 2. On September 13, 2001, the FCC

adopted a First Report and Order, ET

Docket No. 00–47, that established a

‘‘Class III Permissive Change.’’

Manufacturers can now make changes

affecting the frequency, power, and

modulation parameters of software

defined radios without having to file a

new equipment authorization

application. However, new software can

not be loaded into radios until the FCC

or a designated Telecommunications

Certification Body (TCB) approves the

manufacturer’s software changes and

test data showing compliance with FCC

technical standards using the new

software. In addition, the FCC now

allows ‘‘electronic labeling’’ for software

defined radio transmitters’a liquid

crystal display or similar screen

displays the FCC identification number.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0805.

Title: Section 90.523, Eligibilty;

Section 90.527, Regional Plan

Requirements, and Section 90.545, TV/

DTV Interference Protection Criteria.

Form Number: N/A.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; and Not-for-profit

institutions.

Number of Respondents: 26,656.

Estimated Time per Response: 0.25

hrs. to 10,000 hrs.