alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric SOUTHERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10014

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 15, 2010.

Brian Albritton, U.S. Attorney General, David P. Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shawn A. Arnold, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Folsom, appointed counsel for Eric Southers in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Southers’ conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [NM-930-1430-ET; NMNM 87650] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Public Land Order. 

# SUMMARY:

This order revokes Public Land Order No. 7052 in its entirety as it affects public land and federally reserved mineral interest withdrawn for protection of the unique geological formations of the Tent Rocks Area of Critical Environmental Concern. The land is withdrawn from mining and all forms of disposition other than exchange by Presidential Proclamation No. 7394 which established the Kasha-Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 27, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jeanette Espinosa, BLM New Mexico                               ( print page 66923)                            State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502, 505-438-7597.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows: 

1. Public Land Order No. 7052, which withdrew public land and federally reserved mineral interests to protect the unique geological formations of the Tent Rocks Area of Critical Environmental Concern, is hereby revoked in its entirety. 

2. The land will be managed in accordance with the laws and regulations pertaining to the Kasha-Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument. 

Dated: December 3, 2001. 

J. Steven Griles, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31769 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-2848; MM Docket No. 01-168; RM-10187] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In response to a                         *Notice of Proposed Rule Making,*66 FR 41489 (August 8, 2001), this document adds Channel 266A to Mendocino, California, and removes channel 224A from Mendocino, California. This action enables Station KMFB(FM) to operate with maximum facilities as a Class A FM station, utilizing its current site for that station. The coordinates for Channel 266A at Mendocino are 39-20-33 North Latitude and 123-46-51 West Longitude.                     

# DATES:

Effective January 22, 2002. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

R. Barthen Gorman, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-168, adopted November 28, 2001, and released December 7, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractors, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 reads as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 

1. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under California, is amended by removing Channel 224A and adding Channel 266A at Mendocino, California. 

Federal Communications Commission 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-31562 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### Eugene REED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-50515

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 27, 2010.

Kell Asher Simon, Ross Law Group, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Susan Desmarais Bonnen, Esq., Randall Keith Hill, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

*927Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s grant of the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant-Appellee Texas Department of Transportation (“DOTD”), dismissing Reed’s employment discrimination action grounded in disparate treatment on the basis of race. We have reviewed the entire record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties and the applicable law as presented therein and as independently determined, and are satisfied that the judgment of the district court should be, and hereby is, AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods indicated. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                   |                                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                March __, 2008 | By:                                                                                          | /s/Melvin                Gagerman Melvin Gagerman |
|                                | Chief                Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial                Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-39,908]


Cleveland Caroknit Lawndale, NC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on August 27, 2001, in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Cleveland Caroknit, Lawndale, 
North Carolina.
    An investigation applicable to the petitioning group of workers is 
in process (TA-W-39,518). Consequently, further investigation in this 
case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of December 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment, Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31632 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Fabrice SADHVANI, Appellant v. Michael CHERTOFF, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., Appellees.

No. 06-5405.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Brian William Shaughnessy, Shaughnessy, Volzer & Gagner, Paul Shearman Allen, Paul Shearman Allen & Associates, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Madelyn Elise Johnson, R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j).

For the reasons well stated by the district court, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing *en bane. See*Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the  "Company")  certifies  that the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the fiscal  quarter  ended January 31, 2002, as amended by Amendment
No. 1, fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information  contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 25, 2003                 /s/ Timothy S. Durham
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Timothy S. Durham
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
the undersigned officer of Pilgrims Pride Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 26, 2009 (the Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: January 22, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Gary D. Tucker                          
|                       |  |  |  | Gary D. Tucker                              
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller 
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
FMCS | 250 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov

NEWS RELEASE

Thu., Dec. 14, 2023 Contact: Greg Raelson

For Immediate Release Director, Congressional & Public Affairs

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8081

FMCS Statement on Latest Columbia River Basin Agreement

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Dec. 14, 2023) – The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) 

was again privileged to lead mediation efforts between the US Government (USG) and parties 

involved in a long-running Federal lawsuit over the operation of the Columbia River Power 

System. 

The National Wildlife Federation, the State of Oregon, the State of Washington, the 

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 

Indian Reservation, the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, and 

the Nez Perce Tribe have agreed with the USG on a series of commitments and actions which 

will keep the conflict out of the court room and move toward habitat restoration and repairs in 

order to restore salmon and other fish species populations to the Columbia River Basin. 

The continued efforts of all the parties in these complex and long-running negotiations are to 

be commended, and FMCS congratulates them on their progress and the resolving of these 

intricate and multi-faceted issues.

###

The U.S. Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service (FMCS) is the nation’s premier public agency 

for dispute resolution and conflict management. FMCS was created by Congress as a neutral 

and independent government agency upon enactment of the Labor-Management Relations Act 

of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act) and mandated to resolve industrial conflict and promote labormanagement peace and cooperation, minimizing the impact of these disputes on the free flow 

of commerce. With headquarters in Washington, D.C. and offices across the country, the agency 

has a proud track record of decades of effective dispute resolution and conflict management 

services for employers and unions across industries and work activities in the private, public, and 

federal sectors. FMCS is also recognized for its success facilitating negotiated rulemaking 

processes and for its robust employment mediation program in the federal sector as well as its 

global program, partnering with more than 60 countries to provide international consulting and 

training. For more on FMCS or to request services, visit www.fmcs.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do each hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 15, 2005
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Paul K. Danner     
|                       |  | Paul K. Danner         
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining    
|                       |  | Scott L. Vining        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor              

#   Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor

May 22, 2014-OA-Brody WEVA 2014-81-R.pdf

May%2022%2C%202014-OA-Brody%20WEVA%202014-81-R.htm

May 22-2014 Part 1.mp3

May 22-2014 Part 2.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### Denis Omar SANCHEZ-VIGIL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70657.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Wayne Spindler, Tarzana, CA, for Petitioner.

Regina Byrd, Esquire, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Denis Omar Sanehez-Vigil, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence findings of fact, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and de novo claims of due process violations, *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Sanehez-Vigil failed to establish gang members targeted him on account of a protected ground. *See Bolshakov v. INS,*133 F.3d 1279,1280-81 (9th Cir.1998) (criminal street gang activity does not establish persecution on account of a protected ground). Accordingly, Sanchez-Vigil’s asylum and withholding of re*146moval claims fail. *See Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir.2009).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Sanchez-Vigil failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to El Salvador. *See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 747-48 (9th Cir.2008). Sanchezs Vigil’s contention that the BIA applied the wrong standard to his CAT claim is not supported by the record. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.