alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S 10-KSB AS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         363,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,128,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,681,323
<PP&E>                                       2,330,022
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,499,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,016,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,026,928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,984
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,902,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,016,538
<SALES>                                      8,080,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,205,051
<CGS>                                        5,707,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,680,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,483,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,728
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,556,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,556,951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company              

#   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company

American LAKE 2011-701 Argument Notice 4-20-16.pdf

American LAKE 2011-701 Argument Notice 4-20-16.htm

Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Company, Docket LAKE 2011-701 etal.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 10.2



     TRANSBOTICS APPOINTS CROFT, PACKER AND KENNINGTON TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CHARLOTTE,   NC  -  July  24  -   Transbotics   Corporation,   (OTC  BB:   TNSB)
(www.transbotics.com),  announced  that its board of directors had increased the
number of the whole board of  directors  by three and  appointed  the  following
individuals to the board :

     o    Mr. Neville Croft , shareholder, Vice President AutoMotion division of
          Transbotics
     o    Mr. Anthony Packer, shareholder, businessman, sports commentator
     o    Mr. Curt Kennington, shareholder, retired businessman

They will hold office until the next election of directors by the stockholders.

"We are delighted to have all three join our team," said Bruce Wise, Chairman of
the Board of Directors.  "All of these men are  shareholders  in our Company and
have a very strong business  acumen.  It will be a great asset to Transbotics to
be able to tap  into  their  business  backgrounds.  This  is just  the  kind of
experience and knowledge  Transbotics needs in the years to come to continue our
growth plans."

For  over 20  years  Transbotics  Corporation  has  specialized  in the  design,
development,  support and installation of automation  solutions with an emphasis
on  Automatic   Guided  Vehicles  (AGVs).   The  Company  designs,   integrates,
manufactures,  installs and supports automation  solutions that efficiently move
products and  materials  in the work place  through  technologies  such as AGVs,
robotics, conveyors, palletizers and related products.

Transbotics provides flexible,  automated  transportation solutions to a variety
of industries,  including automotive (tier one supplier), aerospace and defense,
food  and  beverage,  paper  and  allied  products,  newsprint  and  publishing,
entertainment,  microelectronics,  plastics  and  primary  metals.  Transbotics'
current customers  include Fortune 500 companies as well as small  manufacturing
companies.

This release  (including  information  incorporated by reference  herein) may be
deemed  to  contain  certain  forward-looking  statements  with  respect  to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance
and business of the Company.  These  forward-looking  statements involve certain
risk, including,  without limitation,  the uncertainties detailed in Transbotics
Corporation Securities and Exchange Commission filings.


                                       25
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
annual report of Second Bancorp Incorporated (Second Bancorp) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

I, David L. Kellerman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Second Bancorp,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                     
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Second Bancorp.

|      |                   |  |                                             |                                    
|----- | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|Date: | February 27, 2004 |  | /s/ David L. Kellerman

David L. Kellerman,
|      |                   |  |                                             | Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

*This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

117
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WAYNE THOMAS ANDERSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2886 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### Tate Ryan GRESHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Vincent FISCHER; Howard E. Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-50642

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 20, 2016.

Michael Mowla, Cedar Hill, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*358Joanna Lippman Salinas, Esq., Fletcher, Farley, Shipman & Salinas, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.*

*

 Judge Haynes concurs in the judgment only.

PER CURIAM: **

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the judge. With the clear posture of what Officer Fischer saw on this occasion, his behavior was objectively reasonable. This is the qualified immunity officers are given by the law. With the benefit of possible view today of this affair, and with more thought by the law enforcement officials, a different conduct in some respect could be called for. Nonetheless, today we must say that Officer Fischer’s conduct was objectively reasonable. It means that injured parties cannot argue and litigate about what happened or how they saw the same event.

When officers come upon a disturbance as did this officer after 1 a.m. at Aspen Heights Apartments, it is their duty to get the attention of the people then and determine what must be done to obtain peace and legal obedience. It is the right and duty for the officer to take control, to direct the movement or speech of those present as required to reach that peace and legal conduct.

Counsel and the Plaintiff here need to understand this. Judge Yeakel pointed out this law, as he did to explain why no claim can be made against the City of San Marcos or Chief of Police without evidence of any policy that was the moving force behind any constitutional violation.

AFFIRMED.

**

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"id":1467,"date":"2012-02-13T13:57:11","date_gmt":"2012-02-13T17:57:11","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1467"},"modified":"2018-08-17T14:01:47","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T18:01:47","slug":"president-obama-announces-intent-to-nominate-fmc-chairman-and-commissioner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/president-obama-announces-intent-to-nominate-fmc-chairman-and-commissioner\/","title":{"rendered":"President Obama Announces Intent to Nominate FMC Chairman and Commissioner"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>February 13, 2012<\/div>\n<p>Contact: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary (202-523-5725)<\/p>\n<p>On Friday, February 10, 2012,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the-press-office\/2012\/02\/10\/president-obama-announces-more-key-administration-posts\">President Obama announced his intent to nominate<\/a>\u00a0Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. for another term as Federal Maritime Commissioner and Chairman, and to nominate William P. Doyle for Federal Maritime Commissioner.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Federal Maritime Commission is the independent federal agency responsible for regulating the nation’s international ocean transportation for the benefit of exporters, importers, and the American consumer. The FMC’s mission is to foster a fair, efficient, and reliable international ocean transportation system while protecting the public from unfair and deceptive practices.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>February 13, 2012 Contact: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary (202-523-5725) On Friday, February 10, 2012,\u00a0President Obama announced his intent to nominate\u00a0Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. for another term as Federal Maritime Commissioner and Chairman, and to nominate William P. Doyle for Federal Maritime Commissioner. The Federal Maritime Commission is the independent... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/president-obama-announces-intent-to-nominate-fmc-chairman-and-commissioner\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,21],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1467"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1467"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1467\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1468,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1467\/revisions\/1468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Meeting Notice 7-9-15.pdf

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Meeting Notice 7-9-15.htm

secretary-labor-v-newtown-energy-docket-weva2011-283.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the quarterly report of Califonria Service Stations, Inc.
(the  "Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, Vincent
Samarro hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Vinsent Sammarro

Vincent Sammarro
President
(principal executive officer)
February 18, 2005





<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

[OJP (OJJDP)-1337C]


Publication of Final Program Plan for Fiscal Year 2002

AGENCY: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office 
of Justice Programs, Justice.

ACTION: Notice regarding publication of the Office of Juvenile Justice 
and Delinquency Prevention's Final Program Plan for fiscal year (FY) 
2002.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 
(OJJDP) is publishing this notice to inform the public that it will 
postpone publication of its FY 2002 Final Program Plan to accommodate 
any written comments sent through the U.S. mail which may not yet have 
reached OJJDP due to precautions taken in response to the anthrax 
attacks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OJJDP at 202-307-5911. [This is not a 
toll-free number.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OJJDP's Proposed Program Plan for fiscal 
year 2002 was published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2001 (66 
FR 53692-710). The October 23 Notice requested that comments on the 
Proposed Plan be received by December 7, 2001.
    During that time period, however, mail delivery to OJJDP was 
severely disrupted as a result of the extraordinary circumstances 
arising from the September 11 terrorist acts and subsequent anthrax 
attacks involving the U.S. mail.
    OJJDP expects to receive its backlogged mail within the next few 
weeks. Consequently, in order to properly review, consider, and respond 
to any comments submitted by the public on its Proposed Plan, OJJDP 
will delay publication of the FY 2002 Final Program Plan. OJJDP will 
make every effort to respond to comments in a timely manner and to 
publish its Final Program Plan in the Federal Register in early 2002.

    Dated: December 18, 2001.
Terrence S. Donahue,
Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 01-31540 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1161. RUFUS CHARLES WITHERSPOON v. THE STATE. 

In 1990, Rufus Charles Witherspoon was convicted of felonymurder and other

crimes and sentenced to life in prison. The Supreme Court affirmed his convictions.

See Witherspoon v. State, 262 Ga. 2 (412 SE2d 829) (1992). In 2017, Witherspoon

filed two pro se motions in arrest of judgment, which the trial court denied. He

thereafter filed this appeal. We lack jurisdiction. 

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of felony murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. 

See OCGA § 16-5-1 (c), (e) (1); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765)

(2012) (Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (1)

(322 SE2d 711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a

sentence of death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of

murder”). Accordingly, Witherspoon’s appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the

Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 12, 2018

02/12/2018
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31267]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transporation Intermediary License; Correction

    In the Federal Register Notice listing applicants for licenses as 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary published October 24, 2001 (66 FR 53795) 
the reference to Direct Shipping Line is corrected to read: ``Direct 
Shipping Corp.''

    Dated: December 14, 2001.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31267 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```