alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             173,531
<SECURITIES>                                       101,487
<RECEIVABLES>                                       79,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,524
<INVENTORY>                                         35,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   405,499
<PP&E>                                              45,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     457,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               75,196
<BONDS>                                            115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,519
<OTHER-SE>                                         258,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       457,563
<SALES>                                            280,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   296,490
<CGS>                                              118,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      248,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     48,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.61



</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   The Commission Swears-in Two Administrative Law Judges; Congratulations to John T. Sullivan and Michael G. Young              

#   The Commission Swears-in Two Administrative Law Judges; Congratulations to John T. Sullivan and Michael G. Young

John Sullivan has served as an Attorney-Advisor at the Commission since 1996.  He has provided counsel to five Commission chairs and has represented the Commission before the Courts of Appeals.  

Michael Young has served the Commission since 2003 in the capacities of Commissioner and as an Attorney-Advisor.  He has twice led the Commission as Acting-Chair.  

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,940
<PP&E>                                          51,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          280,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,665
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     (18,803)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,851
<SALES>                                        238,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,741
<CGS>                                          247,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (55,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (55,789)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (55,789)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000826326
<NAME>                        ANTENNAS AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           150,300
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    503,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                      19,426
<INVENTORY>                                      462,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,106,908
<PP&E>                                           687,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                   297,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,507,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,082,974
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          42,571
<OTHER-SE>                                       325,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,570,048
<SALES>                                        3,195,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,195,345
<CGS>                                          2,417,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    822,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (102,057)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (147,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     335,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (482,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (482,668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .01



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24

- 0352 IN THE MATTER OF: M.N., YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Merannda Button is granted an extension of time to and including September 3, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. No further extensions will be granted. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2024

07/12/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0352
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   KenAmerican Resources, Inc.              

#   KenAmerican Resources, Inc.

On January 16, 2020, the Commission issued its decision in *KenAmerican Resources, Inc*., Docket No. KENT 2013-211.  

Commission-Decision(KenAmerican Resources Inc)KENT 2013-211.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
105 A.3d 627

#### IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE J. OTLOWSKI, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 247121968).

January 15, 2015.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-067, concluding that GEORGE J. OTLOW*218SKI, JR., of PERTH AMBOY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*8.1(a) (false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court this date having granted respondent’s petition for review in respect of DRB 14-067, and having determined that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE J. OTLOWSKI, JR., is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of P.D. and C.D., Children

No. 06-14-00052-CV

Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District 

Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2013-378). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Amy, has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of 

appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 29, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Office of Field Administration - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QJJ1YmYEqd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-administration\/\">Office of Field Administration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-administration\/embed\/#?secret=QJJ1YmYEqd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Field Administration” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"QJJ1YmYEqd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 7.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2006                                     
|                                                         
|/s/ Chris J. Bradbrook                                   
|Chris J. Bradbrook, President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ames Paul CHEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10309.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2008.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Dyanne C. Greer, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.

*549Jeffrey A. Williams, Esq., FPDAZ— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Ames Paul Chee appeals his jury conviction and sentence for one count of abusive sexual contact on an Indian Reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2244(a)(1). He seeks a new trial, arguing that: (1) the district court improperly admitted hearsay statements; and (2) the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the testifying victim. Alternatively, Chee seeks to have his sentence vacated and recalculated to include a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.1. Chee also argues that cumulative error warrants reversal.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that no violation of the hearsay rules occurred. Also, even assuming that the prosecutor’s comment during her closing argument constituted vouching, it was harmless error as the district court gave an effective curative jury instruction on vouching and instructed the jury to disregard any comment made by the prosecutor that the witness was telling the truth. *See Hall v. Whitley,*935 F.2d 164, 165-66 (9th Cir.1991) (prosecutor’s isolated comment did not make trial fundamentally unfair in light of curative jury instructions and overwhelming evidence of guilt). Additionally, the district court did not err in declining to grant Chee a two-level reduction of his sentence for acceptance of responsibility as his written statement was a self-serving attempt to minimize his conduct, *see United States v. Scrivener,*189 F.3d 944, 948 (9th Cir.1999), and Chee challenged his factual guilt at trial. Finally, no cumulative error occurred.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
2014-0659.

#### State ex rel. Rarden v. Hedric.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
  1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
  TOSECTION 906 OF
  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
  connection with the Quarterly Report of Foundry Networks, Inc. (the Company)
  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby
  R. Johnson Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

---

38

---