alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00892

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Bonifacio Hernandez AVILA

, Appellee

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13945CR

Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting

Bonifacio Hernandez Avila habeas relief and dismissing his criminal case with prejudice is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 24, 2024.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                              3,528
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      55,167
<ALLOWANCES>                       (1,435)
<INVENTORY>                        64,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  139,804
<PP&E>                             64,611
<DEPRECIATION>                     (3,202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    463,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             121,135
<BONDS>                           192,319
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           17,128
<OTHER-SE>                         73,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      463,300
<SALES>                           316,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  316,862
<CGS>                             221,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     221,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 26,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (35,451)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (36,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                     (9,811)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (3,348)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (50,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.92)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the followingRegistration Statements of Continucare Corporation:       (i) Form S-3 No. 333-16801and Related Prospectus,   (ii) Form S-3 No. 333-43231and Related Prospectus,   (iii) Form S-8 No. 333-44431,   (iv) Form S-8 No. 333-61246,and   (v) Form S-8 No. 333-119337;ofour report dated September 14, 2005 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Continucare Corporationincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June30, 2005.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  Certified Public AccountantsWest Palm Beach, Florida
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Continucare Corporation (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: September 18, 2006 By:  /s/ Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.    Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.    President and Chief Executive Officer  
1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 1585

_____________________________
N EVEL T HERON T HOMPSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County

. William E. Davis , Judge

.

June 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J.
, and B ILBRE Y , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Order entered April 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00219-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.B.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-56844-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Stephanie M. Hunn’s April 9, 2020 letter 

informing the Court she will not be filing a reporter’s record because she has 

received only partial payment for the record. Specifically, she has received 

payment for the record of the proceedings held August 22, 2019, August 23, 2019, 

and November 7, 2019. However, she has not received payment for “additional 

transcripts” that have been requested.

To ensure the appeal proceeds on the proper record, we ORDER appellant 

to file, no later than April 20, 2020, written verification he (1) no longer is 

requesting the reporter’s record and is proceeding on the clerk’s record alone; (2) 
has paid for the “additional transcripts” requested; or, (3) is proceeding only on the 

record of the proceedings for which he has already paid. We caution appellant that 

failure to comply may result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC

Peabody LAKE 2017-450 Argument Notice 11-21-19 (2).pdf

Peabody LAKE 2017-450 Argument Notice 11-21-19.htm

Commission Oral Argument_Secretary of Labor v. Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC, Docket No. LAKE 2017-450_11-21-2019.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
J

- S34022

- 19

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

MICHAEL ALLAN FROST

Appellant :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1656 WDA 2018
Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered October 24, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County Criminal Division at

No(s): CP

- 20

- CR

- 0001288

- 1999

BEFORE: DUBOW, J., McLAUGHLIN, J., and COLINS, J. *

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY DUBOW, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 26, 2019

I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s determination that
, even
though the trial court and clerk of court erred, Appellant was not prejudiced

and we can review Appellant’s appeal.

Rule 904 provides that the appointment of counsel is effective

throughout the PCRA proceeding, including on appeal. Pa.R.Crim.P. 904(F)(2).

Further, hybrid representation is not allowed and , thus , when a n attorney

represents a petition er , the court clerk who receives any pro se fi lings must

forward them to the petitioner’s attorney within 10 days of receipt.

Pa.R.Crim.P. 576 (A)(4). The rules do not provide exceptions to these

requirements.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.J

- S34022

- 19

- 2

-

Here, counsel represented Appellant. The tria l court, however, served

its Pa.R.A.P. 1925( b ) Order on Appellant and not his counsel

. 1 Since the court

failed to follow the rules pertaining to Appellant’s representation by counsel, I

would find the trial court’s Rule 1925( b ) Order to be a nullity , and would

remand the appeal to the trial court to serve the Rule 1925( b ) Order properly

to enable Appellant’s counsel to assist Appellant.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

1 This error led to significant other errors.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KEVIN MOBLEY,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 64 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of November , 2020, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the “Amended Motion for Writ of Mandamus” is

DENIED.
78 A.3d 614

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Jose MENDEZ, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 23, 2013.

*359
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2013, Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal *Nunc Pro Tunc*is DENIED, and his “Application for Relief, Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 in the Form of a Remand to the Trial Court with Permission to Amend his Previously Filed *Pro Se*P.C.R.A. Petition” is DENIED.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor obo of McGary, et al. v. The Marshall County Coal Company, et al.              

#   Secretary of Labor obo of McGary, et al. v. The Marshall County Coal Company, et al.

Marshall Cty WEVA 2015-583-D Argument Notice 6-13-16.pdf

Marshall Cty WEVA 2015-583-D Argument Notice 6-13-16.htm

Secretary of Labor on behalf of McGary et al v The Marshall County Coal Company et al, Docket WEVA2015-583-D et al -oa.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 10.146

LOGO

October 12, 2010

BY US MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Joel Legon

Interim Chief Financial Officer

43 Chapin Road

Barrington, RI 02806

Dear Joel,

This letter confirms that, effective October 10, 2010, you have agreed to serve, and were appointed by the Board of Directors of
Comverse Technology, Inc. (the Company), as Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, initially reporting to me. Your annual base salary, effective October 10, 2010, will be $400,000 (Annual
Base Salary), payable in accordance with the Companys payroll practices for similarly situated employees, subject to withholding of Federal and State income taxes, Social Security and other customary deductions. In addition, during the
term of employment, you will be entitled to an annual additional supplemental payment of $14,000 payable as additional salary (but not deemed base salary for other purposes under this offer letter) during the course of the year in accordance with
the regular payroll practices of the Company.

You will cease to be eligible to participate in the Comverse Incentive Compensation Plan
effective October 9, 2010. Effective October 10, 2010, your on-target bonus opportunity shall be $200,000 (Target Bonus) and your maximum bonus opportunity shall be $300,000, pro-rated to cover the period from and after
October 10, 2010. Any bonus will be payable based upon the achievement of certain performance criteria developed by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and sent under separate cover. Any bonus will be subject to withholding of Federal
and State income taxes, Social Security and other customary deductions.

Effective October 10, 2010, in the event that you are terminated
without cause by the Company, you will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (i) 50% of Annual Base Salary and (ii) 50% of Target Bonus.

Other than as specifically set forth herein, the terms and conditions of your employment as set forth in the offer letter, dated February 12, 2009, remain full force and effect. Please contact me if
you would like to discuss further.



Sincerely,/s/ Andre DahanAndre DahanPresident and Chief Executive Officer


810 Seventh Avenue, 32ndFloor, New York, NY 10019  Telephone (212) 739-1000 Facsimile (212) 739-1001

www.cmvt.com
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC

On May 8, 2023, the Commission issued a decision in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Tara Otten v. Continental Cement Company, LLC, Docket No. CENT 2021-0013-D.

Commission Decision(SEC obo Tara Otten v Continental Cement Co LLC )CENT 2021-0013.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: 

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF 

TEXAS, INC.,

Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00140-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Francisco X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso, Texas, and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We 

therefore conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The writ will issue only if 

Respondent does not do so within ten days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, Soto, JJ.