alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Section 504 and 508 Complaint Process              

#   Section 504 and 508 Complaint Process

##           Downloads        

2021-12-17 Procedures for Section 504 and 508 Complaints.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### STATE ex rel. SPRAGUE, Co. Atty., v. ONE PIN BALL MACHINE STYLED “NEVADA” et al.

No. 34205.

Dec. 12, 1950.

*225 P. 2d 369.*

I. C. Sprague, Co. Atty., McCurtain County, of Idabel, for plaintiff in error.

Ed Shipp, of Idabel, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

I. C. Sprague, county attorney, as relator, brought a proceeding in the name of the State of Oklahoma to confiscate a pin ball machine styled “Nevada”.

Buck Graves, Ben Williams, and the owner or owners of the pin ball machine were notified of the application to confiscate and Buck Graves filed an answer claiming ownership of the machine.

Following a proceeding to determine the issue involved, the trial judge entered an order denying confiscation and further ordering delivery of the possession of said pin ball machine styled “Nevada” to Buck Graves, intervener.

The relator has duly perfected the appeal and, on December 7, 1949, filed a brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. Intervener, Buck Graves, has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court *653but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate its order in favor of intervener, Buck Graves, and to enter a judgment of confiscation in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3582 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 

work opportunity tax credit as applied to certain veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. FALLON (for himself, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. VEASEY, and Mr. VELA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

increase the work opportunity tax credit as applied to 

certain veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Employment 

5 Recovery Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3582 IH

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN WORK OPPORTUNITY 

2 CREDIT AMOUNTS FOR CERTAIN VETERANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(b) of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE FOR TAXABLE YEAR 2021.— 

7 In the case of a taxable year beginning in 2021, 

8 paragraph 3 shall be applied with respect to an un9 employed veteran by substituting ‘$12,000’ for 

10 ‘$6,000’ and by substituting ‘$28,000’ for 

11 ‘14,000’.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

      ( print page 65231)    
Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Partnerships Advisory Panel (State Partnership Agreements), to the National Council on the Arts will be held on January 17-18, 2002. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m on January 17 and from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on January 18 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506.

This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis. Topics will include review of the State Partnership Agreement and Regional Partnership Agreement applications, review of proposals for Challenge America Partnership funds, and discussion of guidelines and policy issues.

Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in attendance.

If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: December 12, 2001.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 01-31051 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 96-3508

___________

Leroy Coolidge, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota.

Block Drug, Inc., *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 3, 1997

 Filed: January 10, 1997

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Coolidge appeals the district court's dismissal of his

1

employment discrimination action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties' submissions on

appeal, we conclude that no error of fact or law requiring reversal appears

and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm

the dismissal with prejudice of Coolidge's federal claims and modify the

dismissal of his possible state tort claims to be without prejudice. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

We deny Coolidge's motions to supplement the record and for the

transcript of a hearing held before the district court.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4184

___________ In re: Jones Truck Lines, Inc., * * Debtor-In-Possession, * *

----------------------- * * Jones Truck Lines, Inc., * * Appeal from the United States Plaintiff - Appellant, * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Target Stores, A Division of Dayton * Hudson Corporation, * * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 5, 1997 Filed: December 19, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for t he Western 1 District of Arkansas. The Honorable James G. Mixon, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court 2 for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- Jones Truck Lines, Inc., the debtor, appeals the district cour t & s affirmance of the 1 bankruptcy court & s decision allowing Target Stores to set off its debt to Jones. After 2 reviewingthe parties & submissions, we conclude the bankruptcy court & s analysis was correct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8 th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00231-CV

In the Matter of M. E. D., a Child

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 2 of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2-5885

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 24, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel E. Berce, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 28, 2009



/s/ Daniel E. BerceDaniel E. Berce President and Chief Executive Officer




---

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris A. Choate, do
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 28, 2009



/s/ Chris A. ChoateChris A. Choate Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Anthony Richardo TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPENCE, Officer, Badge # 346; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-17461.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Anthony Richardo Turner, Tracy, CA, pro se.

Susan Ann Denardo, Esquire, Amie Collins McTavish, Angelo, Kilday and Kilduff, J. Scott Smith, Esquire, Meyers Nave, Bruce A. Kilday, Angelo, Kilday and Kilduff, a Law Partnership, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

California state prisoner Anthony Richardo Turner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with a court order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,*191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Turner’s action for failure to comply with its discovery order after it warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal, it granted an extension of time to comply, and Turner failed to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). *See Pagtalunan v. Galaza,*291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir.2002) (discussing factors that district courts must consider before dismissing under Rule 41(b)).

*211Turner’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Turner’s pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          65,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,519
<PP&E>                                       3,960,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,211,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,908,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,908,168
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,143,982
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  962,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            181,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   181,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    24.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    24.72
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                       |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 2, 2009 |  | /s/ Kevin M. McMullen
|                   |  | Name:                 |  | Kevin M. McMullen                                
|                   |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President  
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Michael E. Hicks 
|                   |  | Name:                 |  | Michael E. Hicks                                 
|                   |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 31.1   RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION   BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

  I, Patrick E. Paddon, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CaliforniaFirst National Bancorp; 
2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does  not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material  fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered  by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer  and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the  registrant and have: 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,    or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within    those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being    prepared;     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls    and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness    of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered    by this report based on such evaluations; and    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal    control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most    recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case    of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely    to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;    and 

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers  and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control  over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses    in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which    are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,    process, summarize and report financial information; and     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls    over financial reporting.

Date: September 26, 2003 Patrick E. Paddon /s/  Patrick E. Paddon   Chief Executive Officer