alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Jayson Turner v. National Cement Company of California Docket No. WEST 2006-568-DM.              

#   Jayson Turner v. National Cement Company of California Docket No. WEST 2006-568-DM.

meeting_100710.pdf

meeting100710.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

February 6, 2015

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 19, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Big Ridge, 

Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. LAKE 2011-699-R, et al.

(Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in

upholding certain orders issued pursuant to sections 103(j) and 

103(k) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart
Deputy General Counsel
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 23, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Thomas N. ChieffeThomas N. ChieffePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-41415) and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51193, 33-60093, 33-60091, 33-59091, 33-58148 and 33-58146)
of The Warnaco Group, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 1999 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the two
fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 1999 which appears in this
Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 2000
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Generational Divide: Myth, Reality, or Should We Go Back to Work - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ihuOJw73IR\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/generationaldividemythreality\/\">Generational Divide: Myth, Reality, or Should We Go Back to Work<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/fmcs-institute\/generationaldividemythreality\/embed\/#?secret=ihuOJw73IR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Generational Divide: Myth, Reality, or Should We Go Back to Work” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ihuOJw73IR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7161

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WILLIAM R. ABBOTT, a/k/a Rusty Abbott, a/k/a panther_one@yahoo.com, a/k/a bigruss912@hotmail.com , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. ( 2:07

- cr - 00214

- RGD

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William R. Abbott , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wi lliam R. Abbott appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Abbott , No. 2:07

- cr - 00214

- RGD

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2020) . We deny Abbott’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisi onal process.
AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nicolas Jaimes RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-40534

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2016.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nicolas Jaimes Ramirez, Folkston, GA, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Nicolas Jaimes Ramirez, federal prisoner # 30906-279, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He seeks to challenge the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion in which he sought a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1.

When, as in this ease, a district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, the appellant may either pay the filing fee or challenge the court’s certification decision. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997). Our inquiry into an appellant’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). If we uphold the district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith, the appellant must pay the filing fee or, alternatively, we may dismiss the appeal sua sponte under 5th Circuit Rule 42.2 if it is frivolous. *Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 *&*n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We review the district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Evans,*587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir.2009). Amendments 782 and 788 retroactively lowered the base offense levels in § 2Dl.l(c) by two levels and have the effect of lowering Ramirez’s total offense level to 33. When combined with his Criminal History Category of I, the amended guidelines range of imprisonment is 135 to 168 months. Ramirez was sentenced to 130 months, below the minimum of the amended guidelines range. The district court could not further reduce his term of imprisonment because he did not *270receive a downward departure pursuant to a government motion to reflect his substantial assistance to authorities. *See*U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A), (B), comment. (MCA)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. *See Evans,*587 F.3d at 672. Because the appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous, Ramirez’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; *Howard,*707 F.2d at 220; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under' the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE
DELL INC. 401(K) PLAN
       1. Effective October 15, 2007, Subsection 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended, as underlined, to
be and read as follows:
 (a)
    
    A Participant shall elect to defer an integral percentage from 0% to
50% (or such lesser percentage as may be prescribed from time to time by the
Committee) of his Considered Compensation for a Plan Year by having the Employer
contribute the amount so deferred to the Plan.
 2. Effective October 15, 2007, Section 16.5 is hereby amended to be and read as follows:
 16.5
    
    Acquisition, Holding and Sale of Company Stock.




---



##### 








---



##### 



th
 DELL INC.By:
    
    /s/ Thomas H. WelchIts:
    
    Vice President Legal & Asst. SecretaryATTEST:/s/ Robert Potts
Presidential Documents

66270 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / Presidential Documents

Executive Order 13246 of December 18, 2001

Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of

the Treasury

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, including Subchapter III of Chapter

33 of title 5 of the United States Code, it is hereby ordered that:

Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 3 of this Executive Order,

the officers named in section 2, in the order listed, shall act as and perform

the functions and duties of the office of Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary)

during any period when both the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary of

the Treasury (Deputy Secretary) have died, resigned, or are otherwise unable

to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary.

Sec. 2. Order of Succession.

(a) Under Secretaries of the Treasury (including the Under Secretary of

the Treasury for Enforcement), in the order in which they shall have taken

the oath of office as such officers;

(b) General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury; and

(c) Deputy Under Secretaries of the Treasury and those Assistant Secretaries

of the Treasury appointed by the President by and with the consent of

the Senate, in the order in which they shall have taken the oath of office

as such officers.

Sec. 3. Exceptions.

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 2(a)–

(c) in an acting capacity shall act as Secretary pursuant to this Executive

Order.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Executive Order, the President

retains discretion, to the extent

permitted by Subchapter III of Chapter 33 of title 5 of the United States

Code, to depart from this Executive Order in designating an acting Secretary.

Sec. 4. Executive Order 11822 of December 10, 1974, is hereby revoked.

[FR Doc. 01–31671

Filed 12–20–01; 8:45 am]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 18, 2001.

W

Billing code 3195–01–P
106 A.3d 482

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER H. JACOBY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003981987).

January 23, 2015.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented, it is ORDERED, that PETER H. JACOBY, formerly of BEDMINSTER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year effective June 7, 2011, by Order of this Court filed June 7, 2011, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue with his treatment and medication regimen until discharged by his medical providers.
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  2018
Home/Time 2014-Present/2018 Previous			Next
2018										On June 06, 2018, President Trump appointed Richard Giacolone to serve as the Acting Director for FMCS, for which he was subsequently confirmed by Congress in a unanimous voice-vote as Director.  Mr. Giacolone began his mediation career at FMCS in the Chesapeake, Virginia field office in 1995. He was the former Director of the FMCS International/ADR Department and Special Assistant to the Director of FMCS. Prior to receiving his commission with FMCS, Mr. Giacolone was Labor Relations Advisor for the Department of the Navy and has an extensive background in labor relations representing management.
Barbara Washington2020-12-08T13:02:21-05:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**Sunshine Act Meetings**

 

**TIMEAND DATE:**              10 a.m., Tuesday,March 12, 2024.

 

**PLACE:**                                 The Richard V.Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504 North,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

 

**STATUS:**                               Open. 

 

**MATTERSTO BE**

**CONSIDERED:**                    TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *MortonSalt, Inc.*,**Docket No. CENT 2023-0120. (Issues include whether theCommission has authority to review the Secretary’s decision to issue a noticeof pattern of violations.) 

                                                

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

 

**CONTACTPERSON**

**FOR MORE INFO:**              Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202)708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

Phone Number

for Listening to 

Meeting:                                  1-(866)236-7472.

                                                Passcode:678-100.

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

 

Dated: February 15, 2024.

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart,

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel.

 

BillingCode 6735-01
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Node 
-                   2015 Annual FOIA Report               

#   2015 Annual FOIA Report 

FMSHRC.FY15.Final_.xml

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov