alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEDIATOR, GS-241-12

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS

To be considered minimally qualified for the FMCS Mediator, GS‐241‐12 position;

your resume MUST clearly reflect your full‐time labor relations or workplace dispute

experience, engaged in collective bargaining negotiations and/or workplace disputes 

with parties in one or more of the following capacities: Negotiator, Representative, 

Counsel, Mediator, Consultant, Facilitator, or Trainer.

Specialized experience for the mediator position may include: 

➢ Participating in the negotiation or mediation of labor agreements or assisting in the 

resolution of workplace conflict issues;

➢ Being in an organizational position that involves identifying and solving problems related to 

workplace relations and conflict resolution, drawing conclusions and recommending 

appropriate courses of action;

➢ Working as a representative of labor or management in a corporation, company or labor 

organization;

➢ Working for a Federal, state or local government entity in a capacity that involves dealing 

with labor relations, collective bargaining, human resources, workplace conflict resolution, 

and/or the interpretation or application of labor laws and regulations;

➢ Teaching, training, making presentations, facilitating or leading groups on issues relating to 

labor relations, human resources, alternative dispute resolution, or conflict management;

➢ Serving as a Lead Negotiator, Second Chair Negotiator, or Negotiating Committee Member 

of a collective bargaining agreement; and/or

➢ Serving as Counsel to parties engaged in workplace disputes and/or collective bargaining 

negotiations; and/or

➢ Serving as a Facilitator, Mediator, Counsel, or Negotiator of a public policy matter; and/or

➢ Designing workplace conflict management systems; and/or

➢ Serving as an Ombuds.

FMCS Office of Human Resources ‐ January 2023
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Standards of Practice for Shared Neutrals - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"93v8I2uwD2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/standards-of-practice-for-shared-neutrals\/\">Standards of Practice for Shared Neutrals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/standards-of-practice-for-shared-neutrals\/embed\/#?secret=93v8I2uwD2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Standards of Practice for Shared Neutrals” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"93v8I2uwD2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Overview While these standards are for mediators to follow,\u00a0all\u00a0participants are encouraged to review them carefully. Policies and practices that uphold these standards will help ensure fairness for the parties and the process. Competency Shared neutrals must meet the basic qualifications for participation in the program. In addition, mediators should strive to enhance their skills. If […]"}
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51639

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS ESPARZA-ROMO, also known as

Carlos Esparza,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-621-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos EsparzaRomo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas W. CODER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Secretary of the Army, Respondent.

No. 10-7140.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 10, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2010.

Thomas W. Coder, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Coder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 *&*Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Coder v. O’Brien,*719 F.Supp.2d 655 (W.D.Va.2010). We deny Coder’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Order entered January 3, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01511-CR

LUIS ARMANDO QUIROZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA-1470927-L

ORDER

On December 30, 2016, the clerk’s record was filed in this appeal. The documents in the 

clerk’s record are arranged alphabetically. Rule 1 of Appendix C to the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure provides that the trial court clerk must “(d) arrange the documents in 

ascending chronological order, by date of filing or occurrence.” See TEX. R. APP. P. app. C.

We STRIKE the December 30, 2016 clerk’s record and ORDER the Dallas County 

Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, the clerk’s record in chronological 

order as mandated by the rules of appellate procedure.

 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed August 28, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01101-CV 

IN RE CARLISLE COATINGS & WATERPROOFING, INC., Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 401st Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 401-02576-2014 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court direct the trial 

court to vacate its August 12, 2014 order denying relator’s motion to quash its deposition and 

ordering relator to produce a designated corporate representative for deposition within 21 days of 

the date of the trial court’s order. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties, so we do 

not recount them here. 

Although relator has provided an appendix in support of its petition for writ of 

mandamus, the appendix does not comply with rule 52.3(k) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Rule 52.3(k) requires that the appendix contain “a certified or sworn copy of any 

order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of.” TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.3(k). The documents attached to relator's petition are not sworn or certified copies as 

required by rule 52.3(k). Because relator has failed to authenticate the mandamus record as 
 –2– 

required by the rules of appellate procedure, it has failed to establish her right to relief. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8. Accordingly, we deny the petition. 

141101F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
2014-0777.

#### State ex rel. Worthy v. Marcelain.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3590 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require facilities generating 

electricity from wind or solar power to obtain local government approval 

as a condition of eligibility for certain tax credits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2021 

Mr. JACOBS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

facilities generating electricity from wind or solar power 

to obtain local government approval as a condition of 

eligibility for certain tax credits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Control and 

5 Community Preservation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3590 IH

1 SEC. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL OF FACILITIES 

2 GENERATING ELECTRICITY FROM WIND OR 

3 SOLAR POWER REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN TAX 

4 CREDITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45(d) of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(12) APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT RE9 QUIRED FOR WIND AND SOLAR FACILITIES.—In the 

10 case of any facility which uses wind or solar energy 

11 to produce electricity and the construction of which 

12 begins after the date of the enactment of this para13 graph, such facility shall not be treated as a quali14 fied facility unless the construction of such facility 

15 is approved (at such time and in such manner as the 

16 Secretary may provide) by the local government 

17 within the jurisdiction of which such facility is lo18 cated.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICATION TO CERTAIN ENERGY PROP20 ERTY.—Section 48(a) of such Code is amended by adding 

21 at the end the following new paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(8) APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT RE23 QUIRED FOR CERTAIN SOLAR FACILITIES.— 

24 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

25 property which is part of a specified solar facil26 ity, such property shall not be treated as energy 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3590 IH

1 property unless the construction of such facility 

2 is approved (at such time and in such manner 

3 as the Secretary may provide) by the local gov4 ernment within the jurisdiction of which such 

5 facility is located. 

6 ‘‘(B) SPECIFIED SOLAR FACILITY.—For 

7 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘specified 

8 solar facility’ many any facility— 

9 ‘‘(i) which uses solar energy to gen10 erate electricity, 

11 ‘‘(ii) which has a nameplate capacity 

12 rating of at least 20,000 megawatts, and 

13 ‘‘(iii) construction of which begins 

14 after the date of the enactment of this 

15 paragraph.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to facilities the construction of 

18 which begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 20 December 2001 at 10 am in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and memorials.

Draft agendas are available to the public one week prior to the meeting. Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

Dated: Dated in Washington, DC, November 26, 2001.

Charles H. Atherton,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31692  Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
104 A.3d 257

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT S. SEGUIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 018001976).

January 6, 2015.

ORDER

ROBERT S. SEGUIN of MILLTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this. State in 1976, having tendered his consent to *188disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT S. SEGUIN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ROBERT S. SEGUIN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED

        FIRST: The name of the corporation is Information Analysis Incorporated.

        SECOND: That, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.1-707 of
the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, ARTICLE 3 of the Articles of Incorporation
shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in lieu thereof:

        3.      Capital Stock. The aggregate number of shares which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue and the par value per share are as
follows:

        Class                Number of Shares         Par Value Per Share
        -----                ----------------         -------------------
        Common Stock         15,000,000                       $.01

        THIRD: The amendment was adopted at a shareholder meeting held on June
30, 1997.

        FOURTH: The amendment was proposed by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation and submitted to the shareholders in accordance with the Virginia
Stock Corporation Act.

        FIFTH: The Corporation has 5,730,871 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

        SIXTH: The total number of votes cast for the amendment by the Common
Stock was 3,625,058. The number cast was sufficient for approval by the
shareholders.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned president of Information Analysis
Incorporated has executed these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation on the 22nd day of July, 1997 and declares that the facts stated
herein are true and correct on such date.

                                               INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED


                                               /s/  Sandor Rosenberg
                                               _________________________________
                                                    Sandor Rosenberg, Chairman

                                       18
769 S.E.2d 183

#### Re: DESIGNATION OF ASSOCIATE CHIEF MAGISTRATE IN WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 17, 2015.

ORDER

The judges of the summary courts of South Carolina being a part of the uniform statewide judicial system and pursuant to the provisions of Section 4, Article V, South Carolina Constitution,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Randy B. Foxworth be designated as Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts for Williamsburg County and his authority shall include, but not be limited to, the administrative purposes and acts set forth in my Order dated December 22, 2014, designating Chief Judges statewide.

The authority conferred on the Interim Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts for Williamsburg County by this Order shall become effective *636immediately and shall continue through June 30, 2015, unless changed or revoked by Order of the Chief Justice.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-32819 of Logic Devices, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-16591 of Logic Devices, Inc. on Form S-3, of our report dated November 12,
2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Logic Devices, Inc. for
the year ended September 30, 2001.


                                        /s/ Hood and Strong LLP
                                        ---------------------------
                                            Hood and Strong LLP



Menlo Park, California
December 20, 2001






                                       42
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID B. ROSS,

Appellant,

v.

ASSOCIATES IN NEUROLOGY, INC., a Florida Corporation, etc., f/k/a 

UNICARE MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation,

UNIVERSAL MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and

LAURIE C. SANDERS,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-984

[March 17, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-8260 CACE 

(02).

W. Sam Holland, Miami, for appellant.

Warren Brown of the Law Offices of Warren Brown, P.A., Davie, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
Annual Report of InterTAN, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Brian E. Levy, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 , as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/S/    BRIAN E. LEVY


---

Brian E. Levy


President and Chief Executive Officer


September 26, 2002
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 File No. 333-113116, Form S-4 File No. 333-110683, and Form S-8 File Nos. 33-48890, 33-51275, 33-56017, 33-58017, 333-01211, 333-08651, 333-40849,333-76445, 333-48780, 333-71628, 333-90263, 333-100124 and 333-112346) of Silicon Graphics, Inc. of our reports dated September 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Silicon Graphics, Inc.,for each of the two years in the period ended June 24, 2005 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Jose, California 

October 13, 2006