alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Glynn F. Voisin appointed to serve as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Commission              

#   Glynn F. Voisin appointed to serve as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Commission

On September 30, 2019, the Commissioners unanimously appointed Glynn F. Voisin to serve as the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Commission.  Judge Voisin comes to the Commission after a distinguished career as a Chief Administrative Law Judge and Administrative Law Judge for other federal agencies.

Voisin Final Press Release (2).pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### Ronald A. LEHRER and Carol J. Lehrer, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-75584.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 15, 2008.

Filed May 23, 2008.

John Gigounas, Esq., Simpson & Gigounas, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners-Appellants.

Robert R. Di Trolio, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Randolph L. Hutter, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., FAX, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

*550Before: B. FLETCHER and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Ronald and Carol Lehrer appeal from the United States Tax Court’s grant of partial summary judgment on the question of whether they made an effective 26 U.S.C. § 475(f) election for mark-to-market treatment of their losses from trades of securities for the tax years 1999, 2000, and 2001. They also challenge certain discovery rulings of the tax court.

With respect to the Petitioners’ purported § 475(f) election, we review the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment de novo. Petitioner urges this court to allow an election several years after filing of the relevant tax returns and after the start of the audit of those returns. In so doing, Petitioners ask us to ignore the reasoned judgment of the Internal Revenue Service in Revenue Procedure 99-17. Petitioner’s claim rests, in part, on an argument that the revenue procedure is not an agency pronouncement carrying the force of law that is entitled to deference under *Chevron, USA, Inc. v. NRDC, Inc.,*467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). We need not reach that question. Revenue Procedure 99-17 is a persuasive pronouncement promulgated under an express grant of congressional authority and is entitled to deference under *Skidmore v. Swift & Co.,*323 U.S. 134, 139-140, 65 S.Ct. 161, 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944). We hold that Petitioners’ election did not meet the requirements of § 475(f) in light of this persuasive interpretation. Even if we were to disregard the Service’s judgment as to the proper procedures for making a § 475(f) election, Petitioners’ position— that such an election can be made at any time after the relevant returns are filed, without seeking or qualifying for an extension — is unreasonable and we reject it.

With respect to Petitioners’ challenges to the Tax Court’s discovery rulings, we review for abuse of discretion. The Tax Court made a reasoned judgment that the discovery sought was not intended to produce evidence relevant to its determination. We cannot say that the Tax Court abused its discretion in so ruling.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,419<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     65,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,483
<PP&E>                                         537,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,925
<BONDS>                                        231,853<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,493
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,952
<SALES>                                        187,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,565
<CGS>                                          138,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE PRESENTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>BONDS REPRESENT REVOLVING CREDIT LOANS AND LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT
MATURITIES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
105 A.3d 625

#### IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. PALMER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 015251991).

January 14, 2015.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*l:20-3(g)(4) and *Rule*1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of MICHAEL J. PALMER of MONTCLAIR, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL J. PALMER is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that MICHAEL J. PALMER be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by MICHAEL J. PALMER pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that MICHAEL J. PALMER comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ANTHONY SCOTT RYALS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-4078 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### Hill, Appellee, *v.*The State of Ohio, Appellant.

[Cite as *Hill v. State,*139 Ohio St.3d 451, 2014-Ohio-2365.]

(No. 2013-1043

Submitted May 28, 2013

Decided June 12, 2014.)

The Owen Firm, L.L.C., and Todd A. Long, for appellee.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *Mansaray v. State,*138 Ohio St.3d 277, 2014-Ohio-750, 6 N.E.3d 35.

Judgment reversed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

*452Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Solicitor General, and Samuel C. Peterson, Deputy Solicitor, for appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted  from audited
financial statements contained in Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,136,000
<SECURITIES>                                   415,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,769,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,000
<INVENTORY>                                    380,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,814,000
<PP&E>                                       2,698,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,875,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,776,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,250,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,466,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,443,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,776,000
<SALES>                                     10,921,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,921,000
<CGS>                                        9,687,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,687,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,288,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                47,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,090,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,090,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 600,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (490,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 
1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, effective on the corresponding 
date shown below:
    License Number: 4656N.
    Name: Barsan International, Inc.
    Address: 50 Cragwood Road, Third Floor, South Plainfield, NY 07080.
    Date Revoked: October 24, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 7913N.
    Name: Conterm Consolidation Services (USA), Inc.
    Address: 555 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 700, Long Beach, CA 90802.
    Date Revoked: October 24, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 4148F.
    Name: Fleura Meler dba US Western Forwarders.
    Address: 19528 Ventura Blvd., Suite 380, Tarzana, CA 91356.
    Date Revoked: October 24, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 3261N.
    Name: Geologistics Services, Inc. dba Matrix Container Lines.
    Address: 205 South Whiting Street, Suite 500, Alexandria, VA 22304.
    Date Revoked: October 24, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 15765N.
    Name: Rush Interamerican Cargo Services, Inc.
    Address: 10862 NW 27th Street, Miami, FL 33172.
    Date Revoked: November 1, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 16999N.
    Name: Sonic Container Line, Inc.
    Address: 870 Sivert Drive, Wood Dale, IL 60191.
    Date Revoked: November 1, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 16470N.
    Name: South Beach Maritime Company.
    Address: 8626 NW 55th Place, Coral Springs, FL 33067.
    Date Revoked: November 6, 2001.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 16838N.
    Name: Webtrans Logistics, Inc. dba ANC International.
    Address: 21136 S. Wilmington Avenue, #110, Carson, CA 90810.
    Date Revoked: October 27, 2001.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 01-31266 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
H. R. 3285 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To amend gendered terms in Federal law relating to the President and the President’s spouse. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century President Act’’. 

SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF TERMS RELATING TO THE PRESIDENT 

AND THE SPOUSE OF A PRESIDENT. 

Section 879(b)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘the wife of a former President during his lifetime, 

the widow of a former President until her death or remarriage’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the spouse of a former President during a former 

President’s lifetime, the surviving spouse of a former President 

until the surviving spouse’s death or remarriage’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Co. Docket No. LAKE 2010-408-R              

#   Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal Co. Docket No. LAKE 2010-408-R

meeting_AmericanCoal_110212.pdf

solvstheamericacoaldocketlake2010-408-r.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10159

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGELA COKER MAYHALL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:10-CR-60-1

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Angela Coker Mayhall appeals the 20-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. “This Court must examine the basis of its

jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). The website of the Bureau of Prisons shows that Mayhall was

released from prison on May 18, 2012, and the district court imposed no further

term of supervised release. Therefore, Mayhall has no “concrete and continuing

injury,” and there is no case or controversy over which this court may exercise

jurisdiction under Article III, § 2, of the Constitution. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523

U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Consequently, the appeal is DISMISSED as MOOT.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 15, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-10159 Document: 00512054696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/15/2012
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

s0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144662 & (11)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144662

COA: 307264

Mecosta CC: 10

- 006998

- FC

CLIFFORD LEE CRYSLER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is

DENIED.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 11, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1093 Lower Tribunal No. 21-39718 SP

________________ 

### MGA Insurance Company, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs. 

### New Vista Diagnostic Imaging Services, LLC,

a/a/o Hector Yaque , Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for MiamiDade County, Ayana Harris, Judge. Dutton Law Group, P.A., and Rebecca Delaney, Scott W. Dutton and Christopher S. Dutton (Tampa), for appellant. Douglas H. Stein, P.A., and Douglas H. Stein, for appellee.
Before EMAS, HENDON and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Port Royal Prop., LLC v. Woodson Elec. Sols., Inc., 305 So. 3d 50, 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“[A] trial court’s ruling on a motion to transfer venue under section 47.122 is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”); Taylor v. Dasilva, 401 So. 2d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (“When venue is proper in more than one county, the choice rests with the plaintiff and should not be disturbed without a showing of substantial inconvenience or the likelihood of injustice.”) (internal citation omitted); Gov’t Employees Ins. Co. v. Burns, 672 So. 2d 834, 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“[I]n order to successfully challenge that selection, the burden is upon the defendant to show either substantial inconvenience or that undue expense requires a change for the convenience of the parties or witnesses.”); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Mooney, 147 So. 3d 42, 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“[I]n order for a court to consider the convenience of the witnesses, the court must know who the witnesses are and the significance of their testimony.” (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Young, 690 So. 2d 1377, 1379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997))); R.C. Storage One, Inc. v. Strand Realty, Inc., 714 So. 2d 634, 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (noting affidavits in support of appellant’s motion to transfer venue were insufficient as they were “little more than a laundry list of witness, their places of residence and the conclusory3

statement that it would be inconvenient for them to travel to [another county]”).