alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER02-505-000] 

Take notice that on December 11, 2001, New England Power Company (NEP), on behalf of itself and Cambridge Electric Light Company, Central Maine Power Company, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company (Sponsors) submitted for filing a corrected transmittal letter for Notice of Cancellations of certain power contracts, originally filed on December 7, 2001. The corrections include no substantive changes. 

The Sponsors state that this filing has been served upon each of the parties originally served in this proceeding on December 7, 2001. 

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before the comment date. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket                    #                    ” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-filing” link.                 

Comment Date: January 2, 2002. 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31467 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3419 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, 

as the ‘‘Joseph R. Lentol Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3419 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JOSEPH R. LENTOL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Joseph 

5 R. Lentol Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph R. Lentol Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 67290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Industrial Gas Pipeline Right-of-Way Permit Application Crossing 
Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) advises the 
public that Air Products, L.P., of Houston, Texas, has submitted an 
application to install a 10-inch nominal pipeline for transportation of 
industrial gas from Bayport, Texas, to Freeport, Texas, containing 
approximately 52.7 miles in length and crossing portions of Harris, 
Galveston, and Brazoria Counties, Texas. The pipeline will be within an 
existing 300-foot wide pipeline right-of-way corridor that crosses the 
Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge, in Brazoria County, Texas. The 
portion that will cross the Service land is approximately 165.11 rods 
and will utilize a 12-foot by 55-foot surface site, in Brazoria County, 
Texas. The pipeline will consist of 10\3/4\ inches O.D. steel line 
pipe, 0.365-inch wall thickness, API specification 5L Grade X-42, 
coated with fusion bonded epoxy, and cathodically protected, and will 
be buried at a minimum of 5 feet. An Environmental Analysis and 
Cultural Resources Review has been prepared and is on file.
    This notice informs the public that the Service will be proceeding 
with the processing of the application, the compatibility determination 
and the approval processing which includes the preparation of the terms 
and conditions of the permit.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 28, 
2002 to receive consideration by the Service.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Regional Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Realty, Attention: Lena V. 
Marie, Realty Specialist, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103-
1306, telephone number 505-248-7411 or fax number 505-248-6803.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Refuge Manager for the Brazoria National 
Wildlife Refuge has approved the route of the pipeline that lies within 
an existing 300-foot wide right-of-way corridor.
    Right-of-Way applications for pipelines are to be filed in 
accordance with Section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C.), as amended by the Act of November 16, 1973, (37 Stat. 576, 
Public Law 93-153).

    Dated: November 26, 2001.
Esther M. Pringle,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-31858 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
75 A.3d 484

#### Allan BOWMAN v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (HITACHI METALS AUTOMOTIVE AND ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY). Petition of Hitachi Metals Automotive & Zurich Insurance Company.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 18, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Petitioner’s Application for Stay and Application to Amend Petition for Allowance of Appeal are also DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 9, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Fernando L. FernandezFERNANDO L. FERNANDEZSenior Vice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC

Solar Sources LAKE 2017-99 Argument Notice 6-12-19.pdf

Solar Sources LAKE 2017-99 Argument Notice 6-12-19.htm

Commission Oral Argument_Secretary of Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC, Docket No. LAKE 2017-99_06-12-2019.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Morton Salt, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Morton Salt, Inc.

Morton%20Salt%20CENT%202023-0120%20meeting%20notice%203-12-24.pdf

Morton20CENT20meeting203-12-24.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

137160 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. LINDA ROBINSON, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, J ustices

v SC: 137160 COA: 277339 Oakland CC: 06-072938-NO BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC., d/b/a DEAN FOODS AGRILINK, IVANHOE HUNTLEY 7001 OLR, L.L.C., IVANHOE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, and IVANHOE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1020 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2008

Clerk
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010
y0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139695

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139695 COA: 290163 Wayne CC: 05-006457 GARY VERNARD PATTERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 10, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CERBCO,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
F. Hartman, the Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of the Company  for the dates and periods  covered by
               the Report.


February 14, 2003                        /s/Robert F. Hartman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Robert F. Hartman
                                         Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
{"id":5441,"date":"2021-03-08T16:39:15","date_gmt":"2021-03-08T20:39:15","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=5441"},"modified":"2021-03-09T10:13:08","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T14:13:08","slug":"letter-of-commissioners-bentzel-sola-seeking-information-on-houston-channel-restrictions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/letter-of-commissioners-bentzel-sola-seeking-information-on-houston-channel-restrictions\/","title":{"rendered":"Letter of Commissioners Bentzel & Sola Seeking Information on Houston Channel Restrictions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On March 2, 2021, Commissioners Carl W. Bentzel and Louis E. Sola <a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/BentzelSolaHoustonShipChannelMarch2021.pdf\">sent a letter<\/a> to Mr. Ric Campo, Chairman of the Port Commission of the Port of Houston Authority, and Captain Reginal McKamie, Chairman of Houston Pilot Board, inquiring about how the Houston Ship Channel Large Vessel Restriction statute is impacting the operation of container ships at that port.<\/p>\n<p><em>Carl W. Bentzel and Louis E. Sola are Commissioners with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. The thoughts and comments expressed here are their own and do not necessarily represent the position of the Commission.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On March 2, 2021, Commissioners Carl W. Bentzel and Louis E. Sola sent a letter to Mr. Ric Campo, Chairman of the Port Commission of the Port of Houston Authority, and Captain Reginal McKamie, Chairman of Houston Pilot Board, inquiring about how the Houston Ship Channel Large Vessel Restriction statute... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/letter-of-commissioners-bentzel-sola-seeking-information-on-houston-channel-restrictions\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[39,7,31],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5441"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5441"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5449,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5441\/revisions\/5449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
2014-0759.

#### State v. Carrington.

Cuyahoga App. No. 97769, 2012-Ohio-4717. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.
----

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                L. Paul Latham                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.                Paul Latham                                             |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer                      |
| of                Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing                General Partner of                                |
| Southwest                Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                                      |
| November                13, 2007                                          |
|                                                                      |
|                                                                      |
| /s/                Mel G. Riggs                                           |
| Mel                G. Riggs                                               |
| Vice                President and Chief Financial Officer of              |
| Southwest                Royalties, Inc., the                             |
| Managing                General Partner of                                |
| Southwest                Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                                      |
| November                13, 2007                                          |
#### K-SWISS INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GTFM, INC., a New York corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-56612.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2008.

Filed May 15, 2008.

*773Before: W. FLETCHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Louis H. Poliak, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

K-Swiss Inc. (K-Swiss) appeals the district court’s holding that the district court lacks personal jurisdiction over GTFM, Inc. (GTFM). We reverse and remand for jurisdictional discovery.

In response to GTFM’s motion to set aside the default judgment, K-Swiss requested the opportunity to conduct jurisdictional discovery. The district court did not explicitly rule on K-Swiss’s request. Instead, it simply granted GTFM’s motion, holding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over GTFM.

“We review de novo the district court’s determination that it does not have personal jurisdiction over” the defendant. *Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy,*453 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir.2006). Where, as here, “the district court only implicitly denie[s] the request to authorize discovery,” we review the district court’s failure to allow discovery de novo. *Cal. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Leavitt,*523 F.3d 1025, 1031 & n. 9 (9th Cir.2008). Because the district court did not make any factual findings in support of its conclusion that it lacks personal jurisdiction over GTFM, we examine the record de novo. *Cf. Rano v. Sipa Press, Inc.,*987 F.2d 580, 587 (9th Cir.1993).

K-Swiss has had no opportunity to conduct jurisdictional discovery. Based on the record before this court, we conclude that “pertinent facts bearing on the question of jurisdiction are in dispute.” *See Am. W. Airlines, Inc. v. GPA Group, Ltd.,*877 F.2d 793, 801 (9th Cir.1989). We further conclude that the record was not “sufficiently developed for the district court to rule on all ... issues pertaining to jurisdiction.” *Cf. Pebble Beach,*453 F.3d at 1160. We therefore direct the district court to allow K-Swiss to conduct appropriate jurisdictional discovery. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.