alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants January 31, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FCGA5VcipQ\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-31-2020\/\">Applicants January 31, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-31-2020\/embed\/#?secret=FCGA5VcipQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants January 31, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"FCGA5VcipQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VANCE LEON HASKELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 361 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 952 WDA 

2018 entered on September 13, 

2019, affirming the Order of the 

Erie County Court of Common Pleas 

at No. CP-25-CR-0000731-1998 

entered on June 21, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is 

REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for reconsideration in light of this 

Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Johnson, 40 EAP 2018.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 2007 (the “Form
      10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in
      the
      Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.








Date:  November
                19, 2007
            /s/
                Lonnie “Bo” PilgrimLonnie
                “Bo” PilgrimCo-Principal
                Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacey STEMBRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-13257

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 27, 2010.

Nancy J. Hess, Thomas F. Kirwin, Pamela A. Moine, United States Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, J. Ryan Love, U.S. Attorney, Panama City, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Attorney at Law, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Stacey Stembridge appeals his sentence of 87 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(ii). Stem-bridge argues that his sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.

Stembridge argues that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to consider whether he was entitled to a reduction of sentence for his substantial assistance, but this argument lacks merit. The district court “may depart from the guidelines ... [u]pon motion of the government stating that the defendant has provided substantial assistance,” and the comments to the provision state that “[substantial weight should be given to the government’s evaluation of the extent of the defendant’s assistance.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 *&*cmt. n. 3 (2009). The government did not move for Stembridge to receive a lesser sentence and, when the district court discussed the matter with the parties, the government stated that Stembridge “did not qualify” for the reduction because he did not “cooperate[ ] [until] after [he was] in federal custody.” The district court determined that a sentence at the top of the guideline range was necessary because Stembridge’s “Criminal History Category underrepresented] the seriousness of his criminal history” and that “[a] lower sentence would not be sufficient.” *See United States v. Irey,*612 F.3d 1160, 1194-95 (11th Cir.2010) (discussing *Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 358, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2469, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007)). The district court did not commit a procedural error in sentencing Stembridge.

We AFFIRM Stembridge’s sentence.
#### MODELLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAMOUS BATHROBE CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 279, Docket 24358.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 15, 1957.

Decided May 3, 1957.

Nemeroff, Jellzne, Danzig & Paley, New York City (pern E_ Henninger^ New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

William R. Liberman, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

*955Before HINCKS, STEWART and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Cashin, 151 F.Supp. 542.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         402,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  595,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,984
<INVENTORY>                                     74,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,140,776
<PP&E>                                      22,933,452
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,508,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,594,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,621,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,594,375
<SALES>                                      3,628,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,629,292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,367,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,105,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,105,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,105,225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   EEO Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act              

#   EEO Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

Equal Employment Opportunity Dataposted pursuant to Title III of the Notification andFederal Employee Anti-discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No Fear Act),Public Law 107-174.

##           Downloads        

No FEAR Act Data 2024 2Q.pdf

Section 301 of the Notification and Federal Employees Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (the “No Fear Act”) requires each federal agency to post summary statistical data pertaining to complaints of employment discrimination filed against the agency by employees, former employees and applicants for employment for each quarter of the current fiscal year and the year-end data for the past five years.

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3547 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to encourage widespread and proper 

use of child safety seats, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. SIRES, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Ms. LEE of California) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to encourage widespread and proper use of child safety seats, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhancing Child Pas5 senger Safety in Underserved Communities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 402(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3547 IH

1 (1) in clause (vii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

2 and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(ix) to encourage widespread and 

5 proper use of child safety seats (including 

6 booster seats), with an emphasis on en7 couraging the use of such child safety seats 

8 in underserved populations; and 

9 ‘‘(x) to increase public awareness of 

10 the dangers of pediatric vehicular 

11 hyperthermia;’’. 

12 SEC. 3. NATIONAL SAFETY PRIORITY PROGRAMS. 

13 Section 405(b)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is 

14 amended— 

15 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking clause (v) 

16 and inserting the following: 

17 ‘‘(v) carry out programs in low-income 

18 and underserved populations to— 

19 ‘‘(I) recruit and train nationally 

20 certified child passenger safety techni21 cians among first responders, includ22 ing law enforcement, fire, and emer23 gency medical personnel, organiza24 tions for children, and other individVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:53 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3547.IH H3547

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3547 IH

1 uals serving low-income and under2 served populations; 

3 ‘‘(II) educate parents and care4 givers about the proper use and in5 stallation of child safety seats; and 

6 ‘‘(III) purchase and distribute 

7 child safety seats to families in low-in8 come and underserved populations; 

9 and’’; and 

10 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘100 percent’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘90 percent’’; and 

13 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

14 inserting ‘‘, except that 10 percent of such 

15 funds shall be used to carry out a program de16 scribed in subparagraph (A)(v).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. San Juan Coal Company, Docket No. CENT 2004-212.               

#   Secretary of Labor v. San Juan Coal Company, Docket No. CENT 2004-212. 

meeting_011807.pdf

fmshrc011807.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31197]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
1:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 20, 2001, to consider the following 
matters:

Discussion Agenda

Memorandum and resolution re: 2002 FDIC Budget.
Memorandum and resolution re: Revised Policy Statement Regarding 
Minority-Owned Depository Institutions.

    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); (202) 416-
2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: December 13, 2001.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31197 Filed 12-13-01; 4:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Arbitrating in the Federal Sector - July 2024 *In Person* (Washington, DC) - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HmFuExsgDe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/eventsregister\/arbitrating-in-the-federal-sector-july-2024-washingtondc\/\">Arbitrating in the Federal Sector – July 2024 *In Person* (Washington, DC)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/eventsregister\/arbitrating-in-the-federal-sector-july-2024-washingtondc\/embed\/#?secret=HmFuExsgDe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Arbitrating in the Federal Sector – July 2024 *In Person* (Washington, DC)” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"HmFuExsgDe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"When: Tuesday, July 23\u00a0 –\u00a0 \u00a0Wednesday, July 24, 2024\u00a0 \u00a0Time: 8:30 am – 4:30 pm Where: FMCS Headquarters, 250 E Street SW Washington, DC (walking distance from L’Enfant Plaza Metro or Federal Center SW Metro) Instructors: Arthur Pearlstein, FMCS Director of Arbitration and Alan Symonette, Esq., National Academy of Arbitrators Seeking to start or expand […]"}
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21062 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SALVADOR RIVAS-SOMOSA, also known as Salvador Aspercis Rivas-Somosa, also known as Salvador Sumoza Rivas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-324-1

-------------------- June 16, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Salvador Rivas-Somosa appeals his conviction for unlawfully reentering the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the indictment was insufficient because it failed to allege that he specifically intended to enter the United States unlawfully. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Trevino-Martinez , 86 F.3d 65, 69 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.