alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2023 Justification              

#   FY2023 Justification

##           Downloads        

FY2023 Justification April.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 21

                             PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.     Right Associates Government Services, Inc., an American
       corporation

2.     Right License Holding, Inc., an American corporation

3.     RMC of Illinois, Inc., an American corporation

4.     Right Management Consultants Canada Inc., a Canadian
       corporation

5.     Right Associates, Ltd., a U.K. corporation

6.     Right Coutts Ltd., a U.K. corporation

7.     Right Coutts Consulting Ltd., a U. K. corporation

8.     Right Corecare Ltd., a U.K. corporation

9.     Atlas Group Holdings Limited, a U.K. corporation

10.    Garon Bonvalot SA, a French corporation

11.    Right Management Consultants, SA, a French corporation

12.    Right ARJ Management Consultants, SA, a French corporation

13.    Right Management Consultants (Belgium), SA, a Belgium
       corporation

14.    Right Management Consultants Holdings Pty. Ltd., an Australian
       corporation

15.    Right Management Consultants Pty. Ltd., an Australian
       corporation

16.    Right Management Consultants (NSW) Pty. Ltd., an Australian
       corporation

17.    Right Management Consultants (QLD) Pty. Ltd., an Australian
       corporation

18.    Right Management Consultants Ltd. (Hong Kong)

19.    Right Management Consultants Ltd. (New Zealand)

20.    Right Sinova International Holding A/S, a Danish corporation



<PAGE>

21.    Right Sinova AB, a Swedish corporation

22.    Right Kjaer & Kjerulf A/S, a Danish corporation

23.    Right Management Consultants Norway AS, a Norwegian
       corporation

24.    Right Management Consultants Japan, Inc. (85%), a Japanese
       corporation

25.    Right do Brasil Ltda. (51%), a Brazilian limited liability
       quota company

26.    Right Management Consultants Holding SL, a Spanish corporation

27.    Right Management Consultants Iberia SL, a Spanish corporation

28.    Right Nederland BV, a Netherlands corporation

29.    Coutts Consulting (Nederland) BV, a Netherlands corporation

30.    Assessment & Development Consult Holding B.V., a Netherlands
       corporation

31.    Right Management Consultants Ireland Ltd., an Irish
       corporation

32.    Right Transition Limited, an Irish corporation

33.    Right Management Consultants Luxembourg Sarl, a Luxembourg
       corporation

34.    Right Coutts (Deutschland) Gmbh, a German corporation

35.    Right Coutts (Schweiz) AG, a Switzerland corporation

36.    Right Management Consultants (Italy) srl, an Italian
       corporation
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of FragranceNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis M. Apfel, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                        By:/s/ Dennis M. Apfel
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Chairman, Chief Executive
                                        Officer and Chief Financial Officer




February 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K, of our report
dated February 23, 2001 included in Registration Statements
on Form S-8 File No 33-30991, File No. 33-52622, File
No. 33-60101 and File No. 33-60101 and File No. 333-18601
and on Form S-3 File No. 33-44869 and File No. 333-18599. It
should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements
of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2000 or performed and
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
------------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 29, 2001
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                  PLATINUM technology, inc. and subsidiaries
                     Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended 
                                                                  March 31,    
                                                             ------------------ 
                                                              1998       1997
                                                             -------   -------- 
<S>                                                          <C>       <C>
Basic income (loss) per share:
  Net income (loss)                                          $ 3,665   $(25,269)
                                                             -------   --------
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                  64,249     60,947
                                                             -------   --------
           Per share amount                                  $  0.06   $  (0.41)
                                                             =======   ========
Diluted income (loss) per share:  
  Net income (loss)                                          $ 3,665   $(25,269)
                                                             -------   -------- 
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                  64,249     60,947

  Add: Effect of dilutive securities
    Stock options                                              4,739        -- 
    Convertible preferred stock                                1,768        --
                                                             -------   -------- 
  Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding          70,756     60,947 
                                                             -------   --------
           Per share amount                                  $  0.05   $  (0.41)
                                                             =======   ========
</TABLE>
# 2023 Report
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Big Ridge, Inc., Docket Nos. LAKE 2009-377, et al.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Big Ridge, Inc., Docket Nos. LAKE 2009-377, et al.

argument_022113.pdf

argument_022113.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   William Metz v. Carmeuse Lime, Inc., Docket No. PENN 2009-541-DM              

#   William Metz v. Carmeuse Lime, Inc., Docket No. PENN 2009-541-DM

meeting_041112.pdf

wiiliam-metz-v-carmeuse-lime-docket-penn2009-541-dm.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3533 

To establish occupational series for Federal positions in software development, 

software engineering, data science, and data management, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. OBERNOLTE (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To establish occupational series for Federal positions in software development, software engineering, data science, 

and data management, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OCCUPATIONAL SERIES FOR DIGITAL CAREER 

4 FIELDS. 

5 Not later than 270 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Personnel 

7 Management shall, pursuant to chapter 51 of title 5, 

8 United States Code, establish one or more occupational 

9 series covering Federal Government positions in the fields 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3533 IH

1 of software development, software engineering, data 

2 science, and data management. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Pamela MELVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USA TODAY; The Washington Post; The Boston Globe; Chicago Sun-Times; Detroit Free Press; Los Angeles Times; The Philadelphia Inquirer; Tampa Bay Times; The Dallas Morning News; The Atlanta Journal-Constitution; The Star-Ledger, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-2055.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 19, 2016.

*203Pamela Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen M. Faraci, Sr., Leclair Ryan, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Leslie Paul Machado, Laurin Howard Mills, Leclair Ryan, PC, Alexandria, Virginia; Bradfute W. Davenport, Jr., Troutman Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part, and affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion'.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Melvin appeals the district court’s order of January 20, 2015, dismissing her complaint and a subsequent order denying her motions to clarify the court’s previous order and for relief from judgment. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

Melvin’s appeal of the district court’s January 20 order is untimely. Parties áre accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order , to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007). The district court’s order dismissing Melvin’s complaint was entered on the docket on January 20, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on September 8, 2015. Because Melvin failed to file a timely notice of appeal from the January 20, 2015 order, we do not have jurisdiction to review that order. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal.

As to Melvin’s appeal of the court’s subsequent order denying her motions to clarify and for relief from judgment, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Melvin v. USA Today,*No. 3:14-cv-00439-JRS, 2015 WL 4548679 (E.D.Va. July 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            437
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                      795
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,103
<PP&E>                                          9,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,962
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           52
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,448
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,517
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  47,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                      150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Brain Tree International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George I. Norman, III, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   George I. Norman, III





George I. Norman, III


Principal Accounting Officer


Principal Financial Officer


October 13, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

y0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139695 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139695 

 COA: 290163 

Wayne CC: 05-006457 

GARY VERNARD PATTERSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3175 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 135 Main Street in Biloxi, Mississippi, as 

the ‘‘Robert S. McKeithen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3175 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ROBERT S. MCKEITHEN POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 135 Main Street in Biloxi, Mis5 sissippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert S. 

6 McKeithen Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert S. McKeithen 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS