alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003**

**EXHIBIT31.02**

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO – PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caraustar;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Caraustar as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Caraustar’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Caraustar and have:

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure and controls procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Caraustar, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of Caraustar’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in Caraustar’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Caraustar’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, Caraustar’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Caraustar’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Caraustar’s auditors and the audit committee of Caraustar’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Caraustar’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inCaraustar’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

|                  |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: August 12, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ RONALD J. DOMANICO |
|                  |   |      | ***Vice President and Chief******Financial Officer*** |
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Newtown Energy, Inc.

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Closed Meeting Notice 5-4-16.pdf

Newtown WEVA 2011-283 Closed Meeting Notice 5-4-16.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Open House Events Draw Crowds for Tours and Demos at New Headquarters - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GNvshBXy5I\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-open-house-events-draw-crowds-tours-demos-new-headquarters\/\">FMCS Open House Events Draw Crowds for Tours and Demos at New Headquarters<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-open-house-events-draw-crowds-tours-demos-new-headquarters\/embed\/#?secret=GNvshBXy5I\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Open House Events Draw Crowds for Tours and Demos at New Headquarters” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"GNvshBXy5I\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Two FMCS Open House events earlier this month attracted scores of visitors Jan.9 and Jan. 12 to the Agency’s new headquarters for tours of state-of-the-art meeting and conferencing facilities, demonstrations of new technologies, and information on FMCS programs and services. Great turn-out today at our new @FMCS_USA Headquarters open house! We're excited to share our […]"}
1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3619

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Francisco Robles, also known as * District of Nebraska.

Juan Valle Cillo, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 6, 2007

Filed: December 13, 2007 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Francisco Robles guilty of conspiring to distribute or possess with

intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine mixture, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district court1

 sentenced him within the advisory

Guidelines range to 240 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On

appeal, his counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
-2-

Counsel first argues that the evidence was insufficient because the

government’s trial witnesses lied. However, credibility determinations are the

province of the jury, making them virtually unreviewable on appeal. See United

States v. Davis, 471 F.3d 938, 948 (8th Cir. 2006). Accepting all of the trial evidence

and inferences therefrom that support the verdict, as we must, we conclude that a

reasonable jury could have found that a conspiracy involving 500 grams or more of

methamphetamine mixture existed, Robles knew about it, and he knowingly became

a part of it. See United States v. Urkevich, 408 F.3d 1031, 1036 (8th Cir. 2005)

(standard of review and elements of offense).

Next, counsel argues that the 240-month prison sentence is unreasonable

because Robles was merely a drug user, not a dealer. This is the version of events that

Robles advanced in his testimony at trial and in his allocution at sentencing, but it is

clear that the district court disbelieved his story in favor of the government’s trial

evidence. We conclude he has not shown that the court failed to consider a relevant

factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an

improper or irrelevant factor, or considered only the appropriate factors but committed

a clear error of judgment in weighing those factors. See United States v. Haack, 403

F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir. 2005) (categories of error under reasonableness review).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), and finding no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, we affirm the judgment of the

district court.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         540,507                       0
<SECURITIES>                                   507,026                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          64,567                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,217,230                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          227,455                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        18,834                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     970,941                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,217,230                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,424,643                 717,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (17,463)                (11,780)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,407,180)               (705,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,407,180)               (705,656)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                   (.04)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
     SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         19,172
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          3,093
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   149,099
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       258,136
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                445,721
<DEPOSITS>                                    368,680
<SHORT-TERM>                                   13,457
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             3,679
<LONG-TERM>                                    22,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        3,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                445,721
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                19,711
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               9,231
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  500
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               29,442
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             12,474
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,170
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          15,799
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 24
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 9,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,318
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      9,318
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,336
<EPS-BASIC>                                      2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                       150
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,590
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,228
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     175
<RECOVERIES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,366
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,366
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of MURRAY UNITED DEVELOPMENT CORP.
(the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, DWIGHT FOSTER, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By:           / s /  DWIGHT FOSTER
            --------------------------------
            Dwight Foster
            Chief Executive Officer
            December 11, 2002
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Lehigh Anthracite Coal, LLC

Lehigh PENN 2014-108 Argument Notice 6-14-17.pdf

Lehigh PENN 2014-108 Argument Notice 6-14-17.htm

Secretary of Labor v Lehigh Anthracite Coal et al Docket PENN 2014-108 et al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6849

TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

D. LANDAUER, N.P.; DR. ARAKAKY; DAVID A. RYLAK, MD of Augusta Health Center; C. D. WHITLOCK, Lieutenant; RUSSELL, Asst. Warden; MACDANIEL, Correctional Officer; PEALE, Correctional Officer; E. SHIPP, RN, Director of Nursing; T. HAMILTON, RN; JOHN A. WOODSON, ACC Warden; DR. S. HERRICK, Director of Health Services; THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, The A ugusta Correctional Center; LACOUR, Laundry Manager; THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, exclusively; FRIDLEY, Sgt.; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; S. CONNER, ACC Grievance Coordinator; LEWIS, Augusta Correctional Center Of ficer; TAMMY COYNER; ERIC BURCH

,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

MICHAEL R. PLAUTZ, MD Augusta Otolaryngology Assoc.; STEPHEN PARK, MD of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; DR. DANIEL PETERS, of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; AUGUSTA HEALTH CENTER; AUGUSTA OTOLARYNGOLOGY ASSOC.; UVA NEUROSURGERY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Elizabeth Kay Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:18

- cv

- 00097

- EKD

- JCH )2 Submitted : October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

Tamar Devell Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Dewayne Lonas, MORAN, REEVES & CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Tamar Devell Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary

judgment to some, but not all of the defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P . 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,

545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims

as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation

marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court has not yet adjudicated all of

the claims raised in Harvey’s complaint. Id. at 696

- 97. Specifically, the court has not yet

ad judicated the unresolved claims against the remaining defenda nts. We conclude that t he

order s Harvey seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or

collateral order s. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand

to the district court for consideration of the unresolved claim s. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proc ess.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED