alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Small Mine Development              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Small Mine Development

SMD WEST 2011-1351-M Meeting Notice 12-18-14.pdf

SMD WEST 2011-1351-M Meeting Notice 12-18-14.htm

secretary-labor-v-small-mine-development-docket-west-2011-1351-m-et-al-2pm.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         331,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               457,756
<PP&E>                                       4,666,319
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,414,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,709,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,709,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,709,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               619,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         383,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               536,937
<PP&E>                                       4,916,860
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,282,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,171,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,171,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,171,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               918,352
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   611,498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations – July 27, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0N756FxS40\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-july-27-2018\/\">Revocations – July 27, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-july-27-2018\/embed\/#?secret=0N756FxS40\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations – July 27, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"0N756FxS40\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31877]



[[Page 67152]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 500

[Docket No. 01N-0284]


Import Tolerances; Extension of Comment Period; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment 
period; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting an 
extension of comment period for an advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking (ANPRM) that appeared in the Federal Register of December 7, 
2001 (66 FR 63519). The document gave notice that FDA is extending the 
comment period for the ANPRM that appeared in the Federal Register of 
August 10, 2001 (66 FR 42167), concerning regulation for establishing 
import drug residue tolerances for imported food products of animal 
origin for drugs that are used in other countries, but that are 
unapproved new animal drugs in the United States. The document was 
published with an inadvertent error. This document corrects that error.

DATES: The extension of the comment period to March 11, 2002, and this 
correction were effective on December 7, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris B. Tucker, Office of Policy, 
Planning, and Legislation (HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 01-30331, appearing on page 63519 
in the Federal Register of December 7, 2001, the following correction 
is made:
    1. On page 63519, in the second column under the heading ADDRESSES, 
the mail code for the Dockets Management Branch is corrected to read 
``HFA-305.''

    Dated: December 19, 2001.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-31877 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KAREN PAIGE, 1

Petitioner Below, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCDONALD,

Respondent Below, Appellee. §

§ § Nos. 391, 2020 and 392, 2020 § Consolidated § § Court Below–Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § File No. CN16-04806 § Petition No. 17-31463 §

Submitted: January 13, 2021 Decided: January 29, 2021

ORDER

On December 28, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by

certified mail, directing the appellant, Karen Paige, to show cause why her appeal

should not be dismissed for her failure to respond to the Senior Court Clerk’s

December 3, 2020 letter directing her to pay the Court’s filing fee. Paige signed the

certified mail receipt on January 2, 2021. A timely response to the notice to show

cause was due on or before January 12, 2021. To date, Paige has not responded to

the notice to show cause, nor has she paid the filing fee. Dismissal of the appeal is

therefore deemed to be unopposed.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
#### Bernard MCFADDEN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Robert Richburg, Investigator for Sumter County Police Department; Henry McMaster, South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 10-7130.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 1, 2010.

Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*849PER CURIAM:

Bernard McFadden, a state pretrial detainee, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 *&*Supp.2010) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McFadden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 10(o)(vii)



           FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT
                          (Australia and New Zealand)


This First Amendment to Amended and Restated License Agreement is dated as of
June 1, 2000, between RadioShack Corporation (formerly Tandy Corporation)
("RadioShack") and InterTAN Australia Ltd. ("ITA").

WHEREAS, RadioShack and ITA entered into that certain Amended and Restated
License Agreement on January 25, 1999 (the "Agreement");

WHEREAS, RadioShack has adopted, used, and owns TANDY ELECTRONICS as a trade
name and service mark in Australia and New Zealand in connection with the
operation of retail store services dealing primarily in electronic products and
computers and distribution of catalogs in Australia and New Zealand; and

WHEREAS, ITA wishes to also use TANDY, as well as TANDY ELECTRONICS, as a trade
name and service mark for the operation of ITA owned (or managed) or ITA
franchised retail stores in Australia and New Zealand dealing primarily in
electronic products and related services including catalog, mail order and
repair services in Australia and New Zealand. A copy of the proposed TANDY trade
name logo is attached as Exhibit "A".

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:

1.  A new provision, designated as paragraph 1A., shall be added to the
Agreement immediately following paragraph 1 thereof, and shall be as follows:

"RadioShack grants an exclusive nonassignable license to ITA, provided ITA is
duly appointed a registered user if so required by applicable law, to use, and
to grant sub-licenses to others as herein provided to use, TANDY as a trade name
and service mark in Australia and New Zealand in connection with the operation
of ITA owned or ITA franchised retail stores dealing primarily in electronic
products and related services including catalog, mail order and repair services
rendered in such stores in Australia and New Zealand, such use being subject to
royalties payable in accordance with paragraph 5 hereof."

2.  Every reference in the Agreement to Tandy Corporation shall be deemed to be
a reference to RadioShack Corporation.

3.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and
in full force and effect.
<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be
effective as of the day and year first above written.


                                   RADIOSHACK CORPORATION


                                   By:     /s/ Mark C. Hill
                                           ----------------
                                   Title:  Senior Vice President, Corporate
                                           Secretary and General Counsel

                                   INTERTAN AUSTRALIA LTD.

                                   By:    /s/ James G. Gingerich
                                          ----------------------
                                   Title:   Vice President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-88744, 33-88745, 33-88746 and 333-70653) of
NovaCare, Inc. of our report dated August 30, 1999, except for third and fourth
paragraphs of Note 2 as to which the date is September 10, 1999, which report
includes an explanatory paragraph addressing matters which raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a growing concern, relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears on
page 59 of this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, PA
September 20, 1999
104 A.3d 214

#### IN THE MATTER OF PAUL DAVID DIGIACOMO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 019221995).

December 10, 2014.

ORDER

PAUL DAVID DiGIACOMO, formerly of FLORHAM PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since September 14, 2012, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL DAVID DiGIACOMO is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by PAUL DAVID DiGIACOMO pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *114expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                       558
<INVENTORY>                                    123,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,989
<PP&E>                                         945,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 282,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,097,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,100
<BONDS>                                        365,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     360,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1097,546
<SALES>                                        897,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               897,371
<CGS>                                          745,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  845,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>