alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(A)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Murray United Development
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dwight Foster, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  June 13, 2005

                                                    /s/ Dwight Foster
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    DWIGHT FOSTER,
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
#### Fortino CHOLULA-RIOS, a.k.a. Fortinio Rios Cholula, a.k.a. Leonardo Cholula, a.k.a. Leopold Fortino Cholula, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73718.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Fortino Cholula-Rios, Eloy, AZ, pro se.

OIL, David H. Wetmore, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fortino Cholula-Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of Cholula-Rios’s cancellation of removal application. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Bermudez v. Holder,*586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam). Cholula-Rios’s challenge to the IJ’s weighing of the evidence is not a legal argument that confers jurisdiction.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000802781
<NAME> MAGNAVISION CORP.
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         230,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  382,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,106,761
<PP&E>                                       3,195,990
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,657,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,064,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,839,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,683,642
<PREFERRED>                                    131,889
<COMMON>                                   (5,635,544)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,064,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,962,016
<CGS>                                          994,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  994,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,173,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             237,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (412,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (418,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (418,216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3190 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3190

To prohibit rescinding the recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the 
                             Golan Heights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2021

Mr. Gallagher (for himself, Ms. Stefanik, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Wilson of 
South Carolina, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Roy, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. 
  Gaetz, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Norman, Mr. Steube, and Mr. Hice of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit rescinding the recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the 
                             Golan Heights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Israel Sovereignty Reassurance Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RESCINDING THE RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL'S 
              SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE GOLAN HEIGHTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of State 
for fiscal year 2022 may be used to prepare, propose, draft, review, or 
promulgate any regulation, guidance, or executive order or to otherwise 
implement, administer, or enforce any policy that rescinds the 
recognition by the United States that the Golan Heights are a part of 
Israel.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 35 

To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major 

non-NATO ally, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of 

Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF THE IS4 LAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AS A MAJOR 

5 NON-NATO ALLY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective beginning on the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act— 

8 (1) the designation of the Islamic Republic of 

9 Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally pursuant to 

10 section 517(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 35 IH

1 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321k(a)(1)) or any other provi2 sion of law is hereby terminated; and 

3 (2) the President may not issue a separate des4 ignation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 

5 major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) 

6 of such Act or any other provision of law unless the 

7 President submits to Congress a certification de8 scribed in subsection (b). 

9 (b) CERTIFICATION.—A certification described in this 

10 subsection is a certification that contains a determination 

11 of the President that— 

12 (1) Pakistan continues to conduct military oper13 ations that are contributing to significantly dis14 rupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of 

15 the Haqqani Network in Pakistan; 

16 (2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its 

17 commitment to prevent the Haqqani Network from 

18 using any Pakistani territory as a safe haven; 

19 (3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordi20 nates with the Government of Afghanistan to re21 strict the movement of militants, such as the 

22 Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan 

23 border; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 35 IH

1 (4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting 

2 and prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders 

3 and mid-level operatives. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
PLATINUM technology, inc.:


With respect to the registration statements on Form S-1 and Form S-8 of PLATINUM
technology, inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report 
dated July 22, 1997 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not 
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an 
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Chicago, Illinois
July 22, 1997
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3298 

To amend section 125 of title 23, United States Code, to require that 

a project for the permanent repair or reconstruction of a repeatedly 

damaged facility includes feasible and economically justifiable improvements to increase the resilience of such facility, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend section 125 of title 23, United States Code, to 

require that a project for the permanent repair or reconstruction of a repeatedly damaged facility includes feasible and economically justifiable improvements to increase the resilience of such facility, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RELIEF. 

4 Section 125(d) of title 23, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3298 IH

1 ‘‘(6) REPEATEDLY DAMAGED FACILITIES.—An 

2 application submitted under this section for the per3 manent repair or reconstruction of a repeatedly 

4 damaged facility shall include consideration and in5 corporation of feasible and economically justifiable 

6 betterments, including protective features, to in7 crease the resilience of such facility.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust
            2006-7 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date:  March 26, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       ------------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Exhibit 17





Consent of David W. Rennie





I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.








Dated this 27th day of March, 2013








“David Rennie”Name:
David W. RennieTitle:
P. Eng. and Principal Geologistfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.





RPA Inc.1130 Pender Street Suite 388 | Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 4A4| T+1 (604) 602 6767 www.rpacan.com
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31689]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-121-000]

Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 11, 2001, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with a proposed effective date of January 1, 
2002.
    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to a storage services purchased from Columbia 
Gas Transmission (Columbia) under its Rate Schedules SST and FSS. The 
costs of the above referenced storage service comprises the rates and 
charges payable under ESNG's respective Rate Schedule CFSS. This 
tracking filing is being made pursuant to section 3 of ESNG's Rate 
Schedule CFSS.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31689 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
#### Juan Hernan CONTRERAS, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-60880

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 16, 2010.

Marc Seguinot, Esq., Seguinot & Associates, P.C., Dunn Loring, VA, for Petitioner.

Trish A. Maskew, Esq., Tangerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Hernán Contreras, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the Board’s) decision denying his motion to reconsider. Contreras’s motion to reconsider was filed after the Board’s August 10, 2009 dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his motion to reopen his 1995 deportation proceedings. Contreras did not file a petition for review of the Board’s August 10, 2009 dismissal of his appeal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *Guevara v. Gonzales,*450 F.3d 173, 176 (5th Cir.2006). Therefore, that decision became final. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 388-90, 394-95, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). Nevertheless, the arguments in Contreras’s brief are all aimed at challenging the August 10, 2009 dismissal and the IJ’s denial of his motion to reopen. Absent a timely petition for review of the August 10, 2009 order, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Contreras’s claims. *See Stone,*514 U.S. at 394-95, 115 S.Ct. 1537.

Although Contreras raised the issue of venue in his motion to reconsider, he does not make any arguments relating to venue. He has therefore abandoned the only issue before this court. *See Soadjede v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir.2003). Contreras’s petition for review is therefore DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Pilgrims Pride Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: February 11, 2011 |  | /s/ William W. Lovette     
|                        |  | William W. Lovette         
|                        |  | Principal Executive Officer
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2014-1110.

#### State v. Woodley.

Allen App. No. 1-12-13. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case is dismissed, as it is a duplicate of Supreme Court ease No. 2014-1011.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2016              

#   Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2016

##           Downloads        

PAR 2016.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov