alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3425 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3425

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the exception 
 for de minimis payments by third party settlement organizations with 
 respect to returns relating to payments made in settlement of payment 
 card and third party network transactions, as in effect prior to the 
               enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

 Mrs. Miller of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the exception 
 for de minimis payments by third party settlement organizations with 
 respect to returns relating to payments made in settlement of payment 
 card and third party network transactions, as in effect prior to the 
               enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF EXCEPTION FOR DE MINIMIS PAYMENTS AS IN EFFECT 
              PRIOR TO ENACTMENT OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 6050W(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Exception for De Minimis Payments by Third Party Settlement 
Organizations.--A third party settlement organization shall be required 
to report any information under subsection (a) with respect to third 
party network transactions of any participating payee only if--
            ``(1) the amount which would otherwise be reported under 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to such transactions exceeds 
        $20,000, and
            ``(2) the aggregate number of such transactions exceeds 
        200.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 9674 of the American Rescue Plan Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 99.20

Consent of Wayne Valliant

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with mineral reserve
and resource estimates for the Mesquite Mine and to the use of information
derived from the technical report entitled Technical Report on the Mesquite
Mine, Brawley, California dated February 26, 2010, included in the Annual
Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2009
and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the
registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2010.

|/s/ Wayne Valliant                                                                           | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Wayne Valliant                                                                        | 
|Title:  P. Geo. and Principal Geologist for Scott
      Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139259

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139259 COA: 279714 Ottawa CC: 06-030628-FH DANTE ERIC WELLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
Motor Carrier Safety Progress Report

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

(as of December 31, 2005)

SAFETY OUTCOMES 2003 2004 2005 

● Large Truck Fatalities 5,036 5,190 * 

● Large Truck Fatality Rate (per 100 million truck vehicle miles traveled) 2.3 2.3 * 

● Intercity Bus Fatalities 36 58 * 

● Large Truck Injuries 122,000 116,000 * 

● Large Truck Injury Rate (per 100 million truck vehicle miles traveled) 56.0 51.3 * 

Sources: NHTSA (fatalities and injuries), FHWA (vehicle miles traveled). *Data not available.

DATA QUALITY 2004 2005

ACCURACY

● Percentage of FMCSA reported crashes matched to a carrier 87% 86% 

● Percentage of FMCSA reported inspections matched to a carrier 97% 98% 

TIMELINESS

● Average time to upload a crash to FMCSA 84 days 57 days 

● Average time to upload an inspection to FMCSA 15 days 15 days 

COMPLETENESS

● Percentage of fatal crashes reported to FMCSA 92% *

 *Data not available. 

PROGRAM OUTPUTS FY 2004 Total FY 2005 Total FY 2006 

(Oct-Dec 2005) 

INCREASING ENFORCEMENT

● Number of Federal Compliance Reviews 7,637 7,998 1,845 

● Number of State Compliance Reviews 3,745 4,593 1,076 

● Number of enforcement cases initiated 5,192 4,427 904 

 - Unsat/Unfit out-of-service orders 415 596 103 

● Roadside inspections, trucks 2,949,487 2,950,640 663,467 

● Roadside inspections, buses 42,864 48,625 11,683 

● States participating in PRISM 37 42 42

INCREASING SAFETY AND SECURITY AWARENESS

● New Entrant Safety Audits: 

 - Total 25,316 34,121 7,958 

 - Federal 10,013 10,065 1,459 

 - State 15,031 22,091 6,126 

 - Contractor ** 1,398 247 

 - Seminar 272 567 126 

● ITS-CVO: Number of Federal, State, 

and industry attendees at briefings 2,205 1,235 175 

● Web site visits to Analysis and 

Information (A&I) Online 1,417,701 1,674,741 415,600 

● HM Security Sensitivity Visits (SSVs) 1,462 1,809 393 

● Federal/State personnel training: 

 - For Compliance Reviews 93 176 55 

 - For roadside inspections 3,586 3,793 995 

 - For hazardous materials 2,611 2,149 387 

 - For in-service 1,332 1,910 121 

IMPROVING SAFETY INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY

● States participating in CVISN 

 (In Planning, Design, Deployment) 8, 3, 31 8, 1, 33 8, 1, 30 

● States that have completed 

 Core CVISN Capability Deployment 

9 9 12 

RULEMAKINGS (October-December 2005) 

● Safety Fitness Procedures; RIN 2126-AA37; FMCSA-1998-3639; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Withdrawal (November 7, 2005). 

**Data not available. FMCSA began collecting data on safety audits by contractors in FY 2005.
SPEAKER’S BIO

GREGORY GOLDSTEIN

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER 

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE

Gregory Goldstein is the Chief Operating Officer of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation 

Service (FMCS). In this capacity, he is responsible for overseeing FMCS’s critical operations 

initiatives which include budget, finance, human resources, information technology and 

procurement activities. 

Prior to joining FMCS, Mr. Goldstein held executive positions at the Department of Health and 

Human Services where he was the Executive Officer and Director of Operations, Management 

and Technology and the Deputy Director, Center of Substance Abuse Prevention for the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. In these roles he provided 

executive leadership to federal, public, and private organizations in developing public health 

initiatives. 

Mr. Goldstein was previously the Assistant Branch Head for Behavioral Health Integration at 

Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), In this capacity he led public health initiatives which 

included research and program evaluation, data surveillance, program development and 

information technology for Marine Corps behavioral health programs. His previous positions 

include Senior Drug Policy Advisor within the Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Health, Department of Health and Human Services, a program analyst at HQMC, Drug 

Demand Reduction program manager at Edwards Air Force Base. Mr. Goldstein is also a 

Virginia Army Nation Guardsmen with over 27 years of military service.

Mr. Goldstein has a Masters degree in Health Science from Touro University and a Bachelors 

of Science in Management from Park University. 

www.fmcs.gov
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65473-65474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31233]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER02-496-000]


Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

December 13, 2001.
    Take notice that on November 30, 2001, Central Vermont Public 
Service Corporation (CVPS) tendered for filing a letter stating that 
CVPS will not file a Forecast 2002 Cost Report for FERC Electric 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 4, since there are no customers expected to 
take such service.

[[Page 65474]]

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before December 21, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31233 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 20 
December 2001 at 10 am in the Commission's offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, NW., 
Washington, DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the 
appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and 
memorials.
    Draft agendas are available to the public one week prior to the 
meeting. Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written 
or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, 
Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-
504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: Dated in Washington, DC, November 26, 2001.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31692 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the  "Company")  certifies  that the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the fiscal  quarter ended July 31, 2002, as amended by Amendment No.
1,  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information  contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 25, 2003                /s/ Timothy S. Durham
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Timothy S. Durham
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,939<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    106,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,182
<PP&E>                                         752,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 951,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,780
<BONDS>                                        463,709<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,584
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   951,564
<SALES>                                        503,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,632
<CGS>                                          392,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,609
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<FN>
<F1>Are presented net of the allowances for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Represent revolving credit loans and long-term debt, less current maturities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Anthony Andre SHARP, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph A. BICK, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-16648.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*205Submitted Aug. 10, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 9, 2010.

Anthony Andre Sharp, Norco, CA, pro se.

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Anthony Andre Sharp’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on September 1, 2010, is withdrawn. An amended memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained.

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony Andre Sharp appeals pro se the dismissal of his petition for removal of a California state court action to federal court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1

Sharp contends the district court erred by denying his petition for removal because the state court and state officials are violating his constitutional rights. We affirm the district court’s conclusion that, as the plaintiff in the underlying state court action, Sharp cannot remove the case to federal court. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1446(a); *see also American Int’l Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.,*843 F.2d 1253, 1260 (9th Cir.1988) (“The right to remove a state court case to federal court is clearly limited to defendants.”).

The district court, after it denied removal, was without jurisdiction to dismiss Sharp’s action, and further erred in failing to remand to the state court. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). We reverse the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice, and we remand with instructions that the district court remand Sharp’s action to the Sacramento County Superior Court.

All pending motions are denied.

Each party to bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. For the reasons stated in the district court’s July 15, 2008, order, a certificate of appealability is unnecessary in this case.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 66384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-2847; MM Docket No. 01-223; RM-10157]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Crystal Beach and Stowell, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule, withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition for rule making filed by 
Tichenor License Corporation requesting the substitution of Channel 
287C3 for Channel 287A at Crystal Beach, Texas and reallotment of 
Channel 287C3 to Stowell, Texas. See 66 FR 48108, September 18, 2001. 
Tichenor License Corporation withdrew its interest in the allotment of 
Channel 287C3 at Stowell, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 01-223, adopted November 28, 2001, and 
released December 7, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for public inspection and copying during regular business 
hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th 
Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. This document may 
also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex 
International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, 
or via e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#78090d19141d0011160c38191714561b1715"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1465617578716c7d7a6054757b783a777b79">[email protected]</span></a>.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-31561 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 35.1****

**Statement ofCompliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.**

I, Joseph Panepinto, Vice Presidentof The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York  corporation (the “Trustee”), state: 

(a) A review of the Trustee’sactivities for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of the Trustee’s performance under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreementsdated November 5, 2004 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the“Depositor”) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “SecuritiesIntermediary”), in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, theTrustee and the Securities Intermediary (as amended in each such case, the “TrustAgreement”), has been made under my supervision. 

(b) To the best of my knowledge andbased on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the TrustAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for PPLUS Trust SeriesGSC-4 Trust Certificates. 

|                | The Bank of New York Mellon        (formerly The Bank of New York), as Trustee       |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                 |
| Date: March 6, 2009 | /s/ Joseph Panepinto                                                                 |
|                | Joseph Panepinto                                                      Vice President |
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tyOxIULTrn\"><a href=\"\/resources-services\/filing-carrier-mto-agreements\/\">How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/resources-services\/filing-carrier-mto-agreements\/embed\/#?secret=tyOxIULTrn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tyOxIULTrn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}