alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three month period ending March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,983,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,010,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,918,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,010,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    23
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03



</TABLE>
{"id":1413,"date":"2013-02-13T12:01:34","date_gmt":"2013-02-13T16:01:34","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1413"},"modified":"2023-02-03T13:17:27","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03T17:17:27","slug":"statement-of-commissioner-rebecca-dye-revised-timetable-for-retrospective-review-of-existing-rules-to-include-service-contract-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/statement-of-commissioner-rebecca-dye-revised-timetable-for-retrospective-review-of-existing-rules-to-include-service-contract-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Dye Revised Timetable for Retrospective Review of Existing Rules to Include Service Contract Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>February 13, 2013<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/StatementonServiceContractReview2-13-13.pdf\">Click to download the document.<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>February 13, 2013 Click to download the document.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,9],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1413"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1413"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1413\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7436,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1413\/revisions\/7436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANAGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME> MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           389,083
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 389,083
<CASH>                                         168,953
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,932,304
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          74,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,402,245
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,046,736
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            445,026
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  57,039
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           27,598
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                237,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           412
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,402,245
<PREMIUMS>                                     191,931
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             30,293
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (2,168)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 152,160
<BENEFITS>                                     132,696
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     70,064
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           130,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,127
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Income L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Paul Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/  Richard Paul Richman


Richard Paul Richman


Chief Executive Officer of Wilder Richman


Resources Corporation, a general partner of the Registrant


March 31, 2011
#### Maria Aparacida LACERDA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74333.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 23, 2010.

Alexander H. Lubarsky, Esquire, Yevgeniy Chechenin, Community Legal Centers, San Mateo, CA, for Petitioner.

*227OIL, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, Claire Workman, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Aparacida Lacerda, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, *Figueroa v. Mukasey,*543 F.3d 487, 496 (9th Cir.2008), and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

In denying Lacerda’s cancellation application, the agency failed to consider the potential hardship Lacerda’s two United States citizen children would suffer if Lacerda is removed to Brazil and her children are required to remain in the United States pursuant to a custody order. *See Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 1006, 1012 (9th Cir.2005) (‘When the children will not accompany the removed parent, the agency must evaluate the hardship caused by that separation.”).

We need not reach Lacerda’s remaining contentions.

We grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SourcingLink.net, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary J. Davidson, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
 
(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 13, 2002

 
 
 
 
 /s/   GARY J. DAVIDSON
 
 
**Gary J. Davidson Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer** |
<PAGE>

Information Analysis Incorporated                     1999 Report on Form 10-KSB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-26249 and No. 33-305136) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option
Plan and 1996 Stock Option Plan of Information Analysis Incorporated of our
report dated February 24, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Information Analysis Incorporated included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                           /s/ Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered
                                           ________________________________


Bethesda, Maryland
March 29, 2000
#### Bernard J. MALONE, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Little Falls Dairy Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Moe BOLSTEIN and David Gimpel, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 203, Docket 24323.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 6, 1957.

Decided March 28, 1957.

James A. McTiernan, Little Falls, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

Bartle Gorman, Utica, N. Y. (J. Walter Augar, Utica, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Brennan, D. C., 151 F.Supp. 544.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7469

MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, Coffee Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Margaret B. Seymour , Senior District Judge. ( 6:20

- cv - 01104

- MBS )

Submitted : July 14, 2021 Decided: July 30, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the di strict court’s order a do pting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for relief from a supervised release violation warrant in his federal criminal case. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, s ee Rufus v. Warden , No. 6:20

- cv - 01104

- MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 8, 2020), but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice, se e 28 U.S.C. § 2106; Timms v. Johns , 627 F.3d 525, 533 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on January 21, 2002, in Yreka, California. The purpose of the meeting is organizational and will serve as an orientation to RAC committee members regarding the Secure Rural School and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held January 21, 2002 from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Miners Inn and Convention Center, 122 E. Miner Street, Yreka, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Heidi Perry, Meeting Coordinator, USDA, Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, California, 96097, (530) 841-4468; e-mail                         *hperry@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Roles and Responsibilities for Advisory Committees; (2) Rules, Operational Guides and Conflict of Interests; (3) Project Submittal Process; (4) Project Timelines (5) Public Proposal Workshop (6) Public Comment. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: December 13, 2001.

Margaret J. Boland,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-31698  Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Filed 7/28/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 159

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Noah Donald Hoffer, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160040

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Britta K. Demello Rice, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.

Justin J. Vinje, P.O. Box 4031, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-4031, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Hoffer

No. 20160040

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Noah Hoffer appealed from an order deferring imposition of his sentence entered after he entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance, and possession of drug paraphernalia, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.  Hoffer argues that probable cause plus an exception to the warrant requirement was necessary to justify law enforcement’s warrantless seizure of personal property, a backpack in this case.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3), and (7).  See State v. Heier, 2016 ND 158.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Daniel D. Narum, D.J.

[¶3]The Honorable Daniel D. Narum, D.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Grievance MediationD2016-11-01T17:33:20-04:00

## Grievance Mediation

FMCS grievance mediation is a means of helping labor and management improve their relationships by more quickly resolving contractual disputes and improving workplace communications. The grievance mediation process encourages cooperative problem-solving between labor and management. Grievance mediation is not a substitute for contractual grievance procedure, but an additional step, prior to arbitration. For frequently asked questions, click here.

- Services
- Resolving Labor-Management Disputes    - Collective Bargaining Mediation
  - Alternative Bargaining Processes
  - Grievance Mediation
  - Technology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGS      - Overview
    - Tags Log-In
    - TAGS Tour
    - Meeting / Conference / Convention Facilitation
    - Online Mediation
    - Online Meetings
    - Online Surveys
    - Strategic Planning & Focus Group Surveys
    - Contact Us 
- Building Labor-Management Relationships    - Initial Contracts
  - LMC-LMF Partnerships
  - Effective Contract Administration
  - Effective  Communications
  - Labor-Management Partnership Building
  - Organizational Development
  - Repairing Broken Relationships
  - Card Check Services 
- Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government    - Workplace Mediation
  - Administrative Program Disputes
  - Facilitation
  - Dispute Resolution Systems Design
  - Regulatory Negotiations
  - Public Policy Dialogues 
- Education and Outreach    - FMCS Collaboration with Universities
  - FMCS Institute      - Arbitration for Advocates
    - Arbitration for Advocates in the Federal Sector
    - Art and Science of Dealing with Difficult People
    - Becoming a Labor Arbitrator
    - Can’t We All Just Get Along?   Bullying Behavior
    - Essential Neutral Skills Series: Consciously Competent Neutral
    - Essential Neutral Skills Series: The Art and Science of Inquiry
    - Evidence and Witness Examination in Arbitration
    - Generational Divide: Myth, Reality, or Should We Go Back to Work
    - Leadership Conflict Resolution Skills: The Six Competencies of Outcome-Based Communication
    - Mediation Skills
    - Meeting Madness: Tools and techniques to make your meetings matter
    - Negotiation Skills 
  - Skills Development Training
  - International Services      - Interactive International Map 
  - Conferences and Workshops 
- Arbitration    - Requesting a Panel
  - Arbitration Policies and Procedures
  - Arbitrator Code of Professional Responsibility
  - Information for FMCS Roster Arbitrators
  - Information on Joining the Arbitrator Roster
  - Arbitration Contact Information