alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metric Partners Growth Suite Investors,
L.P., a California Limited Partnership (the Partnership), on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas P. Lydon, Jr., as
President and Chief Executive Officer of SSR Realty Advisors, Inc., managing
partner of Metric Realty, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
William A. Finelli, as Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of SSR
Realty Advisors, Inc., managing partner of Metric Realty, the Managing General
Partner of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Thomas P. Lydon, Jr., President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 21, 2003

William A. Finelli, Managing Director
and Chief Financial Officer
March 21, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,838,644
<SECURITIES>                                       593,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,559,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,206,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,302,878
<PP&E>                                          13,394,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                     998,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,054,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,596,784
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            100
<COMMON>                                             8,313
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,387,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,054,990
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,326,139
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,274,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 379,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    849,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                       344,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       505,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Scott L. Vining, certify that:



1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paragon Financial Corporation (the Registrant);



2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4) The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5) The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |        |  |                            
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 23, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining        
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Scott L. Vining            
|                   |  | Title: |  | Principal Financial Officer
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC

Signal Peak WEST 2016-624-R Meeting Notice 1-18-18.pdf

Signal Peak WEST 2016-624-R Meeting Notice 1-18-18.htm

secretary-labor-v-signal-peak-energyllc-docket-west2016-624-r-1-18-18.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Exhibit 7.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: September 14, 2006



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Chris J. Bradbrook                                   
|Chris J. Bradbrook, President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FOIA - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sv1puKGbLp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/foia\/\">FOIA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/foia\/embed\/#?secret=sv1puKGbLp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FOIA” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"sv1puKGbLp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<S>                                         <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS              OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            AUG-31-1999              AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-01-1998              SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1999              AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,963,000                1,850,200
<SECURITIES>                                          0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,939,900                7,479,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     260,300                  227,400
<INVENTORY>                                            0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17,053,100               16,552,300
<PP&E>                                         9,952,300                9,782,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,102,900                8,719,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,664,000               22,140,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         11,048,400                7,745,800
<BONDS>                                                0                       0
<COMMON>                                          63,400                  62,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                            0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    11,552,200              12,982,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,664,000              22,140,200
<SALES>                                       34,146,900              35,319,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              48,727,600              52,237,400
<CGS>                                         14,580,700              16,917,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 36,374,500              35,506,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               180,500                 121,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,408,100)               (308,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (961,400)               (130,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,446,700)               (177,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (83,700)                (62,300)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0                       0
<CHANGES>                                              0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,530,400)               (240,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.24)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.24)                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-7094 September Term, 2021 1: 21-c v -015 26-UNA Filed O n: Decem ber 3 , 20 21 John Be rman ,

App ellant
v . Kristin Drape r,

App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE : T ate l and Rao, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief an d su pple me nt f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P . 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). Upon con siderat ion o f the foregoing an d the m otion to expedite , it is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder, e nte red A ugust 5 , 202 1, d ismissing the case w ithou t prejudice be af f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclu ded tha t ap pellan t failed to st ate a cla im. “To stat e a claim un der RICO, [a plaint if f ] m ust a llege tha t [th e d efend ant] en gaged in a ‘pattern of racket eering act iv ity .’” Ctr. for Im migr. Stu d. v. Cohe n, 8 06 F. Ap p'x 7, 8 (D.C. Cir. 2020 ) (af f irming district court’s d ismissal for failure t o sta te a claim ) (interna l citation om itted ). “W e've repe ate dly said tha t it's ‘vi rtually impossib le’ to iden tif y such a p atte rn by alleging a ‘single schem e, sin gle injury , an d few v ictims.’” Id . (citing Edm ond son & Ga llagher v

. Alba n T owers Ten ant s Ass'n, 48 F.3d 12 60, 12 63 (D.C. Cir. 1995 )). Add itiona lly , altho ugh ap pellan t argues tha t th e d istrict court sh ould no t ha v e d ismissed his am end ed com plaintw ithou t giv ing him a f urthe r opp ortun ity to am end , ap pellan t ne v er actu ally sou ght leave to am end his co mp laint b efore t he district cou rt. Se e Qia n Ibrah im Zh ao v . Unkn own Agent o f CIA, 411 F. Ap p'x 336, 33 7 (D.C. Cir. 20 10) (“By failing to se ek lea v e f rom the district co urt to am end his co mp laint a f ter it was dism issed, app ellantforfeited the rig ht t o se ek lea v e to am end on ap pea l.”). It is

# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-7094 September Term, 2021
FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e m otion to expedite be dism issed a s m oot

. Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20876 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERRYLON MCDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-870-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrylon McDaniel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McDaniel has not filed a response. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2 of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. Spencer v.
Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy requirementNo. 04-20876 -2- demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. McDaniel has served the sentence that was imposed upon the revocation of her supervised release. The order revoking McDaniel’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary.
MOTION DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 2 ... S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 9 .4 (h ), 3 8 .1 (a )– (j ). 3 ... S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 9 .4 (h ), 3 8 .1 (a ), (d ), (f) , (g ), (h ), (j ).



## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 0 8 - 0 0 2 - CV P R I S CI L L A P OR R AS AP P E L L ANT V . TEM PEST REC O V ERY SERV I C ES, A PPELL EE I NC . ( S E R VI CI NG AGE NTF OR PREM I ER A U TO FI N A N C E)

----- ----- -- FR O M CO UN TY CO URT AT LAW NO . 1 OF TARRA NTCO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- O n J u ly2 2 , 2 0 0 8 , w e n o t if ie d A p p e lla n tP r is c illa P o r r a st h a th e rb r ie fd id n o t co m p l yw i th rul e s 9 .4 (h) an d 3 8 .1 (a )

– ( j ) o f t h e T e x a s R u l e s o f A p p e l l a te Pr ocedu r e. 2O n A ugu st12 , 20 08 , w e noti f i ed A ppel l ant t hat her am ended br i ef d i d n o t c o m p l yw i th ru l e s9 .4 (h ) a n d 3 8 .1 (a ), (d ), (f) , (g ), (h ), a n d (j ). 3 W e4 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 38. 8( a ) , 38. 9( a ) , 42. 3. 5 ... S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 3 8 .1 (a ), (d ), (f) , (h ). 6 ... S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 3 8 .8 (a ), 4 2 .3 (b ), (c). 2 al l ow ed A ppel l antunt i l A ugu st22 , 20 08 t o f i l e a seco n d a m e n d e d br i eft hat com pl i ed w i t h t h e a b o v e r ul es. W e st at ed i n ourl et t ert o A ppel l antt hather f ai l ur e t o do so w oul d r esul t i n ourst r i ki ng herbr i efand di sm i ssi ng herappeal fo r w antofpr os ec ut i on. 4O n A u g u s t 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 , w e re c e i v e d A p p e l l a n t’s s e c o n d a m e n d e d b ri e f. I t d o e sn o t c o m p l yw i th ru l e s3 8 .1 (a ), (d ), (f) , a n d (h ). 5 A cc or di ngl y, w e st r i ke A ppe l l ant ’ s br i efan d di sm i sst hi s app ea l f orw ant ofpr os ec ut i on. 6

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: DA U PH I N O T, H O LM A N , an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Se pt e m be r11, 2008