alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

October 25, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 10, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Peabody Twentymile Mining, LLC, Docket No. WEST 

2014-930-R, et al. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in

rejecting consideration of the operator’s approved ventilation plan 

because it is inconsistent with the language of a mandatory 

standard governing ventilation.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 493-925

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Lorrie A. Hayes,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 13-0030 (JDB)

Neva Van Valkenburg,

 Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s remaining claim construed as brought under 

42 U.S.C. § 2000a. Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss Pl.’s Compl. [Dkt. # 11]; see May 14, 2013 Order 

[Dkt. # 8] (dismissing claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983). On June 3, 2013, plaintiff was 

ordered to respond to the instant motion by July 8, 2013, or risk summary dismissal of the case 

on what would be treated as a conceded motion to dismiss. Order [Dkt. # 12]. Plaintiff has not 

responded to the motion and has not sought additional time to respond. Hence, the Court will 

grant defendant’s motion to dismiss as conceded and will now dismiss the case. A separate 

Order accompanies this Memorandum. 

____________s/________________ 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

DATE: August 2, 2013
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the quarterly report of Mendocino Partners, Inc.
(the  "Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,  Jehu
Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jehu Hand

Jehu Hand
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive and financial officer
September 1, 2004





<PAGE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Our History - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YwgUXhKMXt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/our-history\/\">Our History<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/our-history\/embed\/#?secret=YwgUXhKMXt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Our History” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"YwgUXhKMXt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         142,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,722,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,500
<INVENTORY>                                 12,535,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,694,000
<PP&E>                                      16,192,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,257,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,598,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,063,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,784,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,598,900
<SALES>                                      9,562,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,562,700
<CGS>                                        7,252,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,154,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               959,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             434,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,378,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (44,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,333,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,333,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)
        



                                       

</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2017 Justification               

#   FY2017 Justification 

##           Downloads        

FMSHRC_FY 2017 Congressional Justification 2-09-2017.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### Anthony HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. Randell NERO; The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-7407.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

Anthony Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*716PER CURIAM:

Anthony Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel, 529*U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Howard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, David Natan, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of SFBC International, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2005



| | /s/DAVIDNATAN          
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                               7,926
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                           136
<INVENTORY>                                          2,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             150,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     246,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                42
<OTHER-SE>                                          25,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       246,741
<SALES>                                            193,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   243,370
<CGS>                                              187,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      214,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        397
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    397
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           397
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .07



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Nelson Rodriguez, Petitioner, v Daniel Senkowski, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[608 NYS2d 732]

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate in the State prison system, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. He contends that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating visiting procedures by excessive physical contact with a visitor. The report was made by a correction officer who personally witnessed the incident and stated that he observed petitioner and a female visitor (petitioner’s wife) embracing and that petitioner reached under the female’s blouse, unfastened her bra and exposed her breasts to view; that petitioner fondled her breasts with his hands and that they rubbed their groin area together. The report was introduced at the hearing but the correction officer did not testify. Petitioner denied the charges and claimed that the only physical contact was kissing, hugging and backrubbing. Petitioner’s version was supported by his wife, who testified by telephone, and the testimony of another inmate who witnessed the event. The version offered by petitioner and his wife simply presented a credibility question for the Hearing Officer who credited the misbehavior report *(see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin,*76 NY2d 964, 966), which supplied substantial evidence to support the determination *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130).

The Hearing Officer determined that the charge of excessive physical contact was not sustained. However, based on the misbehavior report, the Hearing Officer sustained the charge of violating visiting procedures. The penalty imposed was 30 days’ keep lock with loss of packages, commissary and telephone privileges. The disposition was affirmed on administrative appeal. Because substantial evidence supports the deter*762mination, the determination should be confirmed. We note that there is no merit in petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer was required to call the author of the misbehavior report to testify *(see, supra,*66 NY2d, at 142).

Mikoll, J. P., White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000825811
<NAME> ALL-AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           (484)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                       454
<INVENTORY>                                      9,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,897
<PP&E>                                          36,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,287
<BONDS>                                         59,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,833
<SALES>                                        109,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,768
<CGS>                                           72,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (22.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (22.02)
        

</TABLE>