alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Forest Counties Payments Committee has scheduled a business meeting on January 19-20, 2002, to discuss how it will provide Congress with the information specified in Section 320 of the Fiscal Year 2001 Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., and is open to the public. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 19-20, 2002. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Pontchartrain Hotel, 2031 Saint Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70140. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Randle G. Phillips, Executive Director, Forest Counties Payments Committee, (202) 208-6574; or via e-mail at                         *rphillips01@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 320 of the 2001 Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (Pub L. 106-291) created the Forest Counties Payments Committee to make recommendations to Congress on a long-term solution for making Federal payments to eligible States and counties in which Federal lands are situated. The Committee will consider the impact on eligible States and counties of revenues from the historic multiple use of Federal lands; evaluate the economic, environmental, and social benefits which accrue to counties containing Federal lands; evaluate the expenditures by counties on activities occurring on Federal lands which are Federal responsibilities; and monitor payments and implementation of Pub. L. 106-393, The Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. 

Dated: December 19, 2001. 

Elizabeth Estill, 

Deputy Chief, Programs and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 01-31873 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
2014-0334.

#### In re Lowery v. Johnson.

In Mandamus. On complaint in mandamus of Charles B. Lowery. On S.Ct.Prae.R. 12.04 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                             15,486
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      48,624
<ALLOWANCES>                       (1,419)
<INVENTORY>                        69,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  150,127
<PP&E>                             63,771
<DEPRECIATION>                      1,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    479,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              94,214
<BONDS>                           215,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           18,801
<OTHER-SE>                         80,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      479,821
<SALES>                           236,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  236,967
<CGS>                             164,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     164,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 20,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (35,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (36,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                     (6,488)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      (287)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (43,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.55)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                        |  |                    |  |                                                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo
|                    |  |  |  |                                        |  |                    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge

standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

BAC 6735-01

October 21, 2016

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 2016

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from 

F Street entrance)

STATUS: Open 

MATTERS TO BE 

CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter Secretary of 

Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC, Docket No. 

PENN 2013-385 (Issues include whether the Judge erred in making 

high negligence and unwarrantable failure findings.)

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 

interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON 

FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO

ARGUMENT: 1-(866) 867-4769

Passcode: 493-925

__________________________________

Sarah L. Stewart

Deputy General Counsel
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Thomas v. CalPortland Co.              

#   Thomas v. CalPortland Co.

Thomas WEST 2018-402-DM Meeting Notice 9-19-19.pdf

Thomas, WEST 2018-402-DM, Meeting Notice 9-19-19.htm

commission-open-meetingthomas-v-calportland-co-docket-no-west-2018-402-dm09-19-2019.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0542

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ERIC JOE JAYNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2023

12/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0542
#### Christian, Appellant, *v.*Gansheimer, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Christian v. Gansheimer,*118 Ohio St.3d 235, 2008-Ohio-2219.]

(No. 2008-0284

Submitted May 6, 2008

Decided May 14, 2008.)

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because the petition fails to state a viable claim and is barred by res judicata, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Appellant, Alan J. Christian, was convicted of felonious assault on a peace officer with a firearm specification and was sentenced to prison. On appeal, the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County affirmed. *State v. Christian,*Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 170, 2005-Ohio-1440, 2005 WL 704866. The court of appeals also denied Christian’s motion for judgment for failure to prosecute and want of jurisdiction, in which he claimed that the trial court had lacked jurisdiction over his case because the notary public who witnessed the criminal complaint “impersonated” the police chiefs oath and signature. See *State v. Christian,*Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 170, 2005-Ohio-2381, 2005 WL 1152098.

{¶ 3} Christian subsequently filed a habeas corpus petition in this court in which he raised the same claim concerning the allegedly defective criminal complaint. We dismissed the petition. *Christian v. Gansheimer,*114 Ohio St.3d 1406, 2007-Ohio-2632, 867 N.E.2d 841.

{¶ 4} Christian then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County raising the same claim. After the case was transferred to the Court of Appeals for Allen County on a motion for change of venue, the court of appeals dismissed the petition.

{¶ 5} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. An extraordinary writ is not available to challenge the validity or sufficiency of a charging instrument, and Christian had an adequate remedy at law by appeal to raise his claim. *State ex rel. Elko v. Suster,*110 Ohio St.3d 212, 2006-Ohio-4248, 852 N.E.2d 731, ¶ 3. Any defect concerning the criminal complaint is not cognizable in habeas corpus because Christian was convicted and sentenced upon a subsequent valid charging instrument. See *State ex rel. Jackson v. Brigano*(2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 180, 181, *236724 N.E.2d 424; *Sopko v. Maxwell*(1965), 3 Ohio St.2d 123, 124, 32 O.O.2d 99, 209 N.E.2d 201.

Alan J. Christian, pro se.

Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 6} Moreover, res judicata bars Christian from raising the same issue he previously raised in an appeal and in his prior habeas corpus case. *Lynch v. Wilson,*114 Ohio St.3d 118, 2007-Ohio-3254, 868 N.E.2d 982, ¶ 6; *Everett v. Eberlin,*114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 8 (res judicata bars successive habeas corpus petitions).

{¶ 7} Therefore, the court of appeals correctly dismissed Christian’s petition, and we affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Eonorabla David County Atto:mey El F'sso,

Texas D6ar sir: **AUSTIN I:**  **i ’** **, r**  April 17, 1939

eatook and **ran**

The qumationis whether tha benefitOS thirr hti0le plr0ri4145 r0r th6 paptent 0f 0~1~ fifty par wit **regi6trati0n r6O**  **3.6 o6rt6l~~fn6t6noO6,**  applieil ,to tha 6itUation ***hem a**  **&Wr6OXl l-61666**  **,-rtaia prOdUOt6**  **Ot Bi6**  **OWR 8Ibd**  **al60 PUl-OhO666**  **JStOdlXOt6 Of**  **Other tBITAOr6,**  **OoW6ycl and**  **tr4lli6&Wrt6** both **~Ob66O6** Q? ~OdUOt6 to his oWlIOUI**nery and**  after **pTOO666in$** them in turn tranaport6 tttea te market.Ron. David E. LIulcahy, April 17~,

1929, Fage 2
.

'~8 do not believe that the stipulation of the statute providingfor traneportatlon to market or other points r0r sale or prooeming permit6a person, in riret operatinga commerolal enterprisesuoh as a oannery,to traneportthe produotsof such oannery to market in a tehlale regietered under Artlole 66756-6a. Nor do m, believe it was intendedto permita person to transport productspurohasedtram others,with the aid of the oheapor lloense.

.wO aFo Or the OphiOIl, thar6fOm, thsat the kmfit6 of the Artiolo l00mao only to a pmmon who truI6- pX't6 hi6 OWD pOdUOt6 to Mtk6t Or other @6t6 for 6610
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lithium Technology Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amir Elbaz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Amir Elbaz                    
|                    |  |  |  | Amir Elbaz Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FILER'S FORM 10-K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000803605
<NAME> THE MARINA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,719,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,390,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,219,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,964,629
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,960,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,608,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,091,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,517,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,608,604
<SALES>                                      9,471,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,145,522
<CGS>                                        6,904,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,138,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,006,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,006,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.94


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Nicola Pignati,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of New Focus, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of New Focus, Inc.





By:

/S/    NICOLA PIGNATIName:

Nicola PignatiTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer





I, William L. Potts, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of New Focus, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of New Focus, Inc.





By:

/S/    WILLIAM L. POTTS, JR.Name:

William L. Potts, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial Officer




1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin Tyrone YOUNG, a/k/a Too Short, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7433.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2016.

Calvin Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Tyrone Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). *147When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Young’s motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-005302]


Tyco Electronics, TDI Division, Romeoville, Illinois; Notice of 
Termination

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act Pub. L. 103-1 concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with section 
250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on September 
4, 2001, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Tyco 
Electronics, TDI Division, Romeoville, Illinois. Workers produced 
battery packs.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (NAFTA-004168). Consequently, further investigation 
in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 11th day of December, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31627 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Epitope, Inc., to our report dated November 6, 1996, relating to the financial
statements of Andrew and Williamson Sales, Co., which are referenced in such
Form 10-K.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Numbers 33-
68510, 33-67618, 33-57246, 33-52920, 33-42841, 33-39166, and 33-32673),
Form S-8 (Numbers 33-63106, 33-63220, 33-63218, 33-41712, 33-13416, 33-21545,
33-82788, and 33-60789), and Form S-4 (Number 333-15705) of Epitope, Inc. of
our report dated November 6, 1996.




Boros & Farrington, APC
December 27, 1996