alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FINNELL et al. v. JAVINE et al.

No. 34483.

May 9, 1950.

*218 P. 2d 381.*

John R. Woodard, of Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

A. E. Adriaenssens and F. E. Riddle, both of Tulsa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This case is presented upon motion to dismiss appeal, filed herein on behalf of the defendants in error.

In June, 1946, plaintiffs in error herein filed, as plaintiffs, an action in the district court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, seeking the cancellation of a contract of sale and quieting of their title to the real estate therein described. The defendants, who are defendants in error herein, tendered the balance due under the terms of said contract and sought to quiet their title to said premises. A trial of these issues resulted in a judgment in favor of defendants, from which an appeal was perfected to this court.

The judgment of the lower court was affirmed (Finnell v. Javine, 202 Okla. 31, 209 P. 2d 887) and mandate duly issued. After the mandate was spread of record and upon application of the defendants, the trial court made an order in compliance with, and effectuating the mandate and opinion of this court, wherein plaintiffs were required to prepare and deliver an abstract of *71title to the property, to prepare and tender a warranty deed conveying the premises to defendants, and to release a $200 deposit theretofore made in trust by defendants. Said order also required the defendants to accept the tender and pay the balance of some $2,500 yet unpaid on the purchase price, or to reject the conveyance. The title was quieted in accord with the completion or rejection of the transfer. Subsequently, plaintiffs filed a motion for new trial and upon its being overruled bring the matter here for review. Defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss upon the grounds that there was no judgment from which an appeal lay, inasmuch as all matters in issue had been determined by the first appeal and that the latter order of the trial court was merely vitalizing the mandate of this court.

With this contention, we agree. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that where an opinion has been rendered by this court and the trial court issues an order in substantial compliance with the mandate and opinion, an appeal therefrom is without merit and will be dismissed. Hill v. Hill, 71 Okla. 312, 178 P. 94; Ward v. Carter, 96 Okla. 183, 221 P. 48; Eli v. Carter Oil Co., 172 Okla. 519, 46 P. 2d 351.

Appeal dismissed.

DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources    POSTPONED              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal Resources    POSTPONED

Emerald Coal-Meeting Notice.pdf

Emerald Coal PENN 2009-697 Meeting Notice 6-18-14.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP,

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127920 and 333-118272 on Form S-8 of our
report dated May 31, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Comverse Technology, Inc., and of our report dated May 31, 2011 relating to internal control over financial reporting (which
report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of Comverse Technology, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Comverse Technology, Inc. for the
year ended January 31, 2011.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|New York, New York       
|October 5, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66414-66415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent To File an Application for a New License

December 18, 2001.
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File An Application for a 
New License.
    b. Project No.: 82.
    c. Date filed: November 19, 2001.
    d. Submitted by: Alabama Power Company--current licensee.
    e. Name of project: Mitchell Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Coosa River in Chilton and Coosa Counties, 
Alabama. The project does not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act.
    h. Licensee contact: Jim Crew, JFCREW@southernco,com, (205) 257-
4265, or Barry Lovett, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c0e0700031a0918180c3f23393824293e222f23622f2321"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a080106051c0f1e1e0a39253f3e222f3824292564292527">[email protected]</span></a>, (205) 257-1268.
    i. FERC contact: Ron McKitrick, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa8895949b969ed4979991938e88939991ba9c9f8899d49c9f9ed48f89"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d0f12131c111953101e1614090f141e163d1b180f1e531b181953080e">[email protected]</span></a>, (770) 
452-3778.
    j. Effective date of current license: November 1, 1975.
    k. Expiration date of current license: July 31, 2007.
    l. Description of the project: The project consists of the 
following existing facilities: (1) The Mitchell Dam consisting of: (a) 
a 964-foot-long concrete spillway section equipped with twenty-three 
30-foot-wide by 15-foot-high timber-faced radial gates and three 30-
foot-wide by 25-foot-high steel gates; (b) a 449-foot-long west 
embankment; (2) the 5,850-acre Mitchell Lake with a normal water 
surface elevation of 312 feet msl; (3) the original powerhouse 
containing one generating unit with an installed capacity of 20 MW; (4) 
a new powerhouse containing three generating units with an installed 
capacity of 150 MW; (5) four 115-kV transmission lines; and (6) other 
appurtenances.
    m. Each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at

[[Page 66415]]

least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing license. All 
applications for license for this project must be filed by July 31, 
2005.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31595 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, Marcel van Heesewijk, certify that:    
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SourcingLink.net, Inc.;    
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;    
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;    
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     
b.
[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     
c.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     
d.
Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and    
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
    
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
   
Date: May 30, 2005
/s/    Marcel van Heesewijk
Specimen Stock Certificate





Exhibit 4.1


	Number  	  	Shares  
	  
	JESTERS RESOURCES, INC. 
	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 
	NEVADA 100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, 
	$0.00001 PAR VALUE 
	  
	  	  	CUSIP _____
	  	  	SEE REVERSE  
	  	  	FOR  
	This  	  	CERTAIN  
	certifies  	  	DEFINITIONS  
	that  	  	  
	is the owner of  	  	  
	  
	  
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE 
	SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 
	  
	  
	JESTERS RESOURCES, INC. 
	transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly 
	authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly 
	endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby 
	are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the 
	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, 
	as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid 
	unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS 
	the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature 
	of its duly authorized officers 
	  
	  
	  
	  
	PRESIDENT  	[SEAL]  	SECRETARY  



 







     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.


	TEN COM  	as tenants in common  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT  _____________________	Custodian  ___________________
	TEN ENT  	as tenants by the entireties  	                                 (Cust)	              (Minor)  
	JT TEN  	as joint tenants with the right of  	                                                   Act_________________________________  
	  	survivorship and not as tenants  	  	     (State)  
	  	in common  	  	  




Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


	For value received,  	________________________________________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto  
	  	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER                                                                        
	  	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE                                                                       
	  
	  
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
	  
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	______________________________________________________________________________  shares of  
	the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint  
	  
	_____________________________________________________________________________, Attorney to  
	transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the  
	premises.  	  
	  
	Dated    ______________________________
	  
	X    ________________________________________________________________________________
	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN  
	EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE  
	GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions)  




 

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:

 

 

TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of FragranceNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jason S. Apfel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Jason S. Apfel
     ------------------
     President and Chief Executive Officer


November 13, 2002
108 A.3d 1275

#### IN THE MATTER OF DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 017742002).

March 6, 2015.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-185, recommending that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to *Rule*l:20-13(c), DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN, formerly of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003, should be disbarred based on respondent’s guilty plea in the Supreme Court of New York to three counts of grand larceny (first degree), in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.40(2), and one count of scheme to defraud (first degree), in violation of New York Penal Law § 190.65(l)(b), conduct that in New Jersey violates *RPC*1.15(a) (knowing misappropriation of funds), and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and the principles of *In re Wilson,*81 *N.J.*451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979) and *In re Hollendonner,*102 *N.J.*21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985);

And DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN having failed to appear on the order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that DOUGLAS R. ARNTSEN comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

*586ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
#### Mulbah Ford DUWANA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1563.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 3, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 1, 2010.

Mulbah Ford Duwana, Petitioner Pro Se. Edward Earl Wiggers, David H. Wet-more, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

*794Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mulbah Ford Duwana, a native and citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its refusal to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Duwana*(B.I.A. Apr. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001090445
<NAME>                        HOMESERVICES.COM INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         12,172
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                   446
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,331
<PP&E>                                         34,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,282
<BONDS>                                        43,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       104
<OTHER-SE>                                     87,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,131
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,549
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               73,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,710
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,710
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.44


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [AK-962-1410-HY-P; F-14940-A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of modified decision. 

# SUMMARY:

                        As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that the decision approving lands for conveyance to Dinyea Corporation, notice of which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 23, 1996, 61 FR 67573, is modified by changing the uses allowed on site easement EIN 1 D3. Notice of the modified decision will also be published four (4) times in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.                     

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are: 

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until January 28, 2002 to file an appeal. 

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. 

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. Except as modified, the decision, notice of which was given December 23, 1996, is final. 

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christy Favorite, 907-271-5656, or by e-mail at                         *Christy_Favorite@ak.blm.gov.*

Christy Favorite,

Land Law Examiner, Branch of ANCSA Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 01-31757 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P