alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# WORK ZONE SAFETY GENERAL PITCH EMAIL: PENNSYLVANIA 

**POTENTIAL SUBJECT LINE: Improving Work Zone Safety with State-Wide Outreach Campaign**

Hello, **[Name of Reporter/Producer]**

The **[Organization]** would like to pursue a potential **[TV Station/Publication] [segment/story]** to share resources and raise awareness for a work zone safety campaign which focuses on reminding commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers to plan their routes, stay alert, and slow down as they approach Pennsylvania work zones. This initiative is part of a national effort led by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the *Our Roads, Our Safety**®* campaign.

**Here’s why the Work Zone Safety Outreach Campaign is so critical in Pennsylvania:**

· Travelers drive across thousands of miles in Pennsylvania daily, encountering active work zones at any time, any day of the week. In fact, travelers drive across Pennsylvania’s 120,000 miles of roadways and 32,000 bridges daily. 

· In 2021, 34% of work zone fatalities involved a CMV driver. This is not uncommon in Pennsylvania. From 2012 to 2017, Pennsylvania had 38 work zone fatalities involving a CMV, placing the state consistently in the top 10 for work zone fatalities.

Through a potential [**segment/feature story**], we welcome the opportunity to share these safety resources/tips and remind **[TV Station/Publication]****[readers/viewers/listeners]**to stay alert and share the road safely, especially when driving through work zones. 

I’d be happy to discuss the topic further via phone and connect you with one of our spokespeople for comment. 

For more resources check out the campaign webpage here: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/ourroads/work-zone-safety-shareable-material

Looking forward to speaking with you.

Best,

**[Contact name]**

**[Contact phone number]**

**[Contact email address]**

**[Website, Facebook and/or Twitter presence]**

###

1

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Michael Khoury, certify that:    
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SourcingLink.net, Inc.;    
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;    
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;    
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     
b.
[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     
c.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     
d.
Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and    
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
    
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
   
Date: October 14, 2004
/s/    Michael Khoury
**Exhibit
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc.,
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Chen Gao


Chen
      Gao


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer








Dated:
      November 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 357 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 357

 To direct Federal departments and agencies to verify eligibility for 
  Federal benefits for individuals 105 years of age or older, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2021

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct Federal departments and agencies to verify eligibility for 
  Federal benefits for individuals 105 years of age or older, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN 
              ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--The head of each Federal department or agency that 
provides Federal benefits to individuals who have attained 105 years of 
age or more shall take appropriate steps to ensure, on a semiannual 
basis, that each such individual remains eligible for such benefits.
    (b) Authority To Issue Regulations.--The head of each Federal 
department or agency specified in paragraph (1) may issue regulations 
to implement this section.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
payments of Federal benefits made on or after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit31(b)**

 

**ASSISTEDHOUSING FUND L.P. ICERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Brett J. Atkinson, certify that:

 

1)              I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Assisted Housing Fund L.P. I;

2)              Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

4)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

6)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or notsignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: May 14, 2004 |
|--------------------|
|               |
| By:      | /s/  BRETT  J. ATKINSON |   |
|               | Brett J. Atkinson |
|               | *Treasurer  Principal Accounting Officer* |

 

1

----
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Martin County Coal Corporation and Geo/Environmental Associates, Docket Nos. KENT 2002-42-R, KENT 2002-43-R, KENT 2002-44-R, KENT 2002-45-R, KENT 2002-251, KENT 2002-261, and KENT 2002-262.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Martin County Coal Corporation and Geo/Environmental Associates, Docket Nos. KENT 2002-42-R, KENT 2002-43-R, KENT 2002-44-R, KENT 2002-45-R, KENT 2002-251, KENT 2002-261, and KENT 2002-262.

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
#### Warren CHASE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wayne M. EVERD; The Annapolis Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-6321.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 30, 2008.

Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Michael John Winkelman, McCarthy & Costello, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Chase appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking the return of property and money as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Chase v. Everd,*No. 1:07-cv-02581-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
----

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                             |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer                      |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing      General Partner of                                |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                            |
| May      15, 2009                                               |
|                                                            |
|                                                            |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                                           |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                               |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of              |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                             |
| Managing      General Partner of                                |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                            |
| May      15, 2009                                               |
#### Butler County Bar Association *v.*Minamyer.

[Cite as *Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Minamyer,*139 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2014-Ohio-2807.]

(No. 2009-2284

Submitted June 26, 2014

Decided June 30, 2014.)

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, William Eric Minamyer, Attorney Registration No. 0015677, last known business address in Loveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of April 24, 2012, wherein the court revoked the stay of the original suspension and suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent shall serve one year of probation to be supervised by a monitor appointed by relator in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9).

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9), on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor. It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as *1245provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
#### Eduardo LEON-FLORES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72848.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

James Franklin Metcalf, Metcalf & Metealf, P.C., Yuma, AZ, for Petitioner.

Sarnia Naseem, OIL, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Counsel Phoenix, Esquire, Office of the District Director, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department *131of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eduardo Leon-Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting a waiver of inadmissibility under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, *Figueroa v. Mulcasey,*543 F.3d 487, 491 (9th Cir.2008), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of Leon-Flores’ application for relief under section 212(c), *see 8*U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) and *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir.2007) (“Discretionary decisions, including whether or not to grant § 212(c) relief, are not renewable.”), and Leon-Flores has not raised a colorable due process challenge to the discretionary determination, *see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). His contentions that the BIA applied an incorrect legal standard in adjudicating his application for section 212(c) relief are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,971,821
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,314,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,156,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,074,239
<PP&E>                                          15,045,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,143,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,202,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,015,704
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,343,500
<COMMON>                                             9,090
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,870,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,202,288
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,267,800
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,431,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 275,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,337,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (521,562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,080,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.12)
        

</TABLE>