alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
PLATINUM technology, inc.:


With respect to the registration statements on Form S-8 of PLATINUM technology,
inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
October 16, 1997 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not 
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an 
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Chicago, Illinois
October 16, 1997
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

d0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140165(36) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140165 

 COA: 286463 

Wayne CC: 08-005166-FC 

WILLIAM EDWARD WESTBROOK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 2, 2010 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – January 29, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LH1UQKPLLW\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-29-2015\/\">Applicants – January 29, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-29-2015\/embed\/#?secret=LH1UQKPLLW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – January 29, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"LH1UQKPLLW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David L. Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



| |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  | Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
| |  |                         |  | 
| |  |                         |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HealthExtras, Inc. and will be retained by HealthExtras, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael P. Donovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



| |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  | Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
| |  |                         |  | 
| |  |                         |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HealthExtras, Inc. and will be retained by HealthExtras, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. North American Drillers, Inc., Docket No. LAKE 2008-2-R et al.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. North American Drillers, Inc., Docket No. LAKE 2008-2-R et al.

meeting_022411.pdf

meeting022411.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Richmond Sand & Stone, LLC              

#   Richmond Sand & Stone, LLC

On August 13, 2019, the Commission issued its decision in *Richmond Sand & Stone, LLC*, Docket No. YORK 2018-31-M

Commission-Decision(Richmond Sand & Stone, LLC)YORK 2018-31.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 15, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zx1hHsXfIf\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-15-2021\/\">Applicants November 15, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-15-2021\/embed\/#?secret=zx1hHsXfIf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 15, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zx1hHsXfIf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 21- SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
 1.
COMERCIALIZADORA DE CARNES DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. 2.
COMPANIA INCUBADORA HIDALGO S.A. DE C.V. 3.
INMOBILIARIA AVICOLA PILGRIMS PRIDE, S. DE R.L. 4.
PILGRIMS PRIDE S.A. DE C.V. 5.
GALLINA PESADA S.A. DE C.V. 6.
PILGRIM'S PRIDE FUNDING CORPORATION 7.
PPC OF DELAWARE BUSINESS TRUST 8.
PILGRIMS PRIDE MKTG, LTD. 9.
PILGRIM'S PRIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION 10.
GRUPO PILGRIMS PRIDE FUNDING HOLDINGS S. DE R.L. DE C.V. 11.
GRUPO PILGRIMS PRIDE FUNDING S. DE R.L. DE C.V. 12.
VALLEY RAIL SERVICE, INC. 13.
PILGRIMS PRIDE OF NEVADA, INC. 14.
PILGRIMS PRIDE DUTCH FUNDING B.V. 15.
DALLAS REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD 16.
NACRAIL LLC 17.
SERVICIOS ADMINISTRATIVOS PILGRIMS PRIDE S.A. DE C.V. 18.
FOOD PROCESSORS WATER COOPERATIVE INC. 19.
PFS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 20.
MAYFLOWER INSURANCE COMPANY 21.
TO-RICOS, INC. 22.
PILGRIMS PRIDE CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC. 23.
PPC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY 24.
GREATER SHENANDOAH VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CO.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles A. Menendez, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of DEFAULT
PROOF CREDIT CARD SYSTEM, INC.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c.	disclosed in this amended annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: July 28, 2005


    /s/ Charles A. Menendez,
    --------------------
        Charles A. Menendez,
        Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joseph William WOLFE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10737.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 2016.

Joseph William Wolfe, Edgefield, SC, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Joseph William Wolfe, federal prisoner # 37730-177, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the dismissal of his motion for review of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1), alleging that he was eligible for sentencing without regard to the applicable statutory minimum sentence. He also seeks to proceed IFP on appeal from the dismissal of his motion “to request a writ to vacate” his federal conviction and sentence, which he claimed resulted from fraud and errors of a constitutional dimension.

There are no nonfrivolous appellate issues because the district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Wolfe’s motions. This appeal therefore is from the denial of “meaningless, unauthorized motionfs].” *United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994). Wolfe has failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, *see id.,*and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2; *Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197,202 & n. 24 (5th Cir.1997). Wolfe’s motion for the appointment of counsel and his motion for relief from a void federal judgment also are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar RAMIREZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-40431

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2016.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

A jury found Omar Ramirez-Lopez guilty of illegal reentry after deportation. At trial, Ramirez-Lopez sought to establish that he acted under duress, testifying that he crossed into the United States because he was being pursued by men from Mexico who were threatening him and that he believed they would kill him. Ramirez-Lopez sought to inform the jury of statements made by his pursuers; the government successfully objected to the statements as hearsay. Ramirez-Lopez’s counsel neither informed the court of the purpose for which the statements were offered nor objected to the exclusion of Ramirez-Lopez’s testimony regarding them. Ramirez-Lopez contends that the exclusion of his testimony regarding the threatening statements is reversible error.

Where a ruling excludes evidence, Rule 103(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence requires the aggrieved party to inform the court of the substance of the evidence by an offer of proof unless the substance was apparent from the context. No formal offer of proof is required, but “the party must at least inform the trial court what counsel intends to show by the evidence and why it should be admitted.” *United States v. Clements,*73 F.3d 1330, 1336 (5th Cir.1996). Failure to make a proffer precludes appellate review. *Id.*Because Ra*353mirez-Lopez’s counsel failed to inform the court that he was offering the statements for a permissible, non-hearsay purpose, Ramirez-Lopez did not preserve the issue for review. *See United States v. John,*597 F.3d 263, 276-77 (5th Cir.2010); *United States v. Winkle,*587 F.2d 705, 710 (5th Cir.1979).

Finally, to the extent that Ramirez-Lopez attempts to maintain that the exclusion of his testimony abridged his right to present a complete defense and violated due process, that argument is without merit, because he failed “to comply with established rules of procedure and evidence.” *John,*597 F.3d at 276-77.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  May 21, 2010
By:
/s/ Chen GaoName: Chen GaoTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer