alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16



Mr. Howard Farkas
The Farkas Group, Inc.
6601 East Progress Avenue
Englewood, Colorado  80111

Re:  Repayment of Loan

Dear Howard:

        This letter will memorialize our recent conversations regarding the
repayment of your promissory note in the principal amount of $256,250.00 to
Logic Devices Incorporated (the "Company") which came due July 24, 1998 (the
"Note"). Defined terms used herein will have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Note unless otherwise defined herein. In consideration of the foregoing and
for other good and valuation consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, you and the Company agree as follows:

1.  The Maturity Date will be extended to July 24, 1999.

2.  Default Interest will continue to accrue on the Note until payment and will
    be paid on the extended Maturity Date.

3.  The principal and the accrued and unpaid Interest on which Default Interest
    is based was $302,048.90 on July 24, 1998.

4.  At the point when, prior to the extended Maturity Date, the Nasdaq NMS
    market price of the shares of common stock of the Company reaches $3.25 on a
    last sale basis on a given trading day, you agree to sell the shares of
    common stock which you purchased with the proceeds of the Note as promptly
    as practicable and consistent with existing market conditions. If the market
    price drops below $3.25, further sales will not be required until the
    closing price reaches this point again.

5.  All proceeds from any sales by you of the Company's common stock purchased
    with the proceeds of the Note will be promptly remitted to the Company in
    payment of the amounts owing to the Company under the Note until such Note
    has been paid in full. Thereafter, any further sales will no longer be
    subject to Section 4 above and you will be entitled to retain all the
    proceeds from any such additional sales.

6.  The terms of the Notes, as modified hereunder, will continue in full force
    and effect, and the Company retains all rights and remedies available to it
    thereunder.

WITHOUT IMPLICATION THAT ANY SUCH CONSENT IS REQUIRED, YOU HEREBY WAIVE THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2(f) OF THE REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND
THE COMPANY REGARDING 


                                       48
<PAGE>   2

ANY FUTURE REGISTRATIONS OF THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES.

    If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign and return the duplicate
original of this letter agreement to my attention.



                                             Yours truly,



                                             /s/ William Volz
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William Volz
                                             President


Accepted and Agreed:


  /s/ Howard L. Farkas
-------------------------
Howard L. Farkas


January 8, 1999



                                       49
# Sheet1

# image1.gif
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofBallistic Recovery Systems, Inc. does hereby certify that:

a.               the AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. for the year endedSeptember 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ballistic Recovery Systems,Inc.

 
| Date: December  9, 2004 |   | /s/  Robert L. Nelson                                         |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | By  Robert L. Nelson                                          |
|                    |   | Principal Executive Officer  and Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"January 2024 OTI License Revocations and Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qArfq5ojXV\"><a href=\"\/oti\/january-2024-oti-license-revocations-and-surrenders\/\">January 2024 OTI License Revocations and Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/january-2024-oti-license-revocations-and-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=qArfq5ojXV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“January 2024 OTI License Revocations and Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"qArfq5ojXV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 10.1


 


 
 


 


September 28, 2007


 


InfoTech USA, Inc.


Attn:  J. Robert Patterson


7 Kingsbridge Road


Fairfield, NJ 07004


973-227-8772


 





	
             
 	
            Re:
 	
            Letter of Credit No. NZS536153
 









	
             
 	
            Applicant:  Info Tech USA, Inc.
 





Dear Robert:


Ingram Micro Inc. is authorizing the cancellation of the Letter of Credit issued by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., copy of which is attached.


Subsequently, we are reduced the credit limit to $250K form $500K.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Chris Sweeney


Chris Sweeney


Director of Credit


 


Enc.


 


INGRAM MICRO INC.


1759 Wehrle Drive


Williamsville, NY 14221-7887


(716) 633-3600


www.ingrammicro.com
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 15, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00518-CV

PIROCHEM INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

XELLIA PHARMACEUTICALS APS, F/K/A AXELLIA 

PHARMACEUTICALS, APS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-36994

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of a judgment rendered on a suit on a sworn 

account. We abated the appeal for the trial court to clarify whether its March 25, 

2014 order granting summary judgment to appellee Xellia Pharmaceuticals APS

was a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 

2001). Then, the trial court signed a “modified interlocutory partial summary 

judgment,” clarifying that its earlier summary judgment order was not final 
2

because it did not dispose of Xellia’s request for attorney’s fees. The trial court 

ordered that the issue of attorney’s fees is “a remaining fact issue for trial.” 

The trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Xellia is not a final 

judgment. See Wasserberg v. RES-TX One, LLC, No. 14-13-00674-CV, 2014 WL 

6922545, at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 9, 2014, pet. filed) (mem. 

op.); Youngblood & Assocs, P.L.L.C. v. Duhon, 57 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). Thus, we lack jurisdiction. See, e.g., 

Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195.

The appeal is reinstated and dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

/s/ Sharon McCally

Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
#### FORT PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN MASTER LEASE LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2009-1242.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 1, 2010.

Anthony G. Graham, Graham & Martin, LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, Robert R. Waters, Waters Law Group, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Defendant-Appellant.

*514Arianna Frankl, Seth H. Ostrow, Ostrow Kaufman & Frankl LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

ON MOTION

Fort Properties, Inc. moves to lift the stay of the briefing schedule and for leave to withdraw Seth H. Ostrow and Ostrow Kaufman & Frankl LLP as counsel. American Master Lease LLC moves to remand this case to the district court for further proceedings.

American Master Lease has not demonstrated in its motion why remand may be appropriate. We deny the motion without prejudice to American Master Lease making arguments in its brief concerning remand. Because American Master Lease filed its opening brief before the Supreme Court issued its decision in *Bilski v. Kappos,*- U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3218, 177 L.Ed.2d 792 (2010), we deem the better course is to require the appellant to file a new opening brief which may also include any arguments about recent case law.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) American Masters Lease LLC’s motion to remand is denied without prejudice.

(2) Fort Properties, Inc.’s motions are granted. The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted. The appellant is directed to file a replacement opening brief within 45 days of the date of filing of this order.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Promotes Use of Video Arbitration - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aXJjO5X7JJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-promotes-use-of-video-arbitration\/\">FMCS Promotes Use of Video Arbitration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-promotes-use-of-video-arbitration\/embed\/#?secret=aXJjO5X7JJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Promotes Use of Video Arbitration” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"aXJjO5X7JJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2014 To better align with the current needs necessitated by the ongoing National Emergency, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) has launched a major effort aimed at promoting the successful use of video to conduct arbitration hearings for parties to labor-management disputes. FMCS had previously been exploring ways to facilitate the use […]"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

*Meeting Date and Time:*                         Friday, January 11, 2002, Time 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Address:*                         Bethlehem Township Municipal Building, 4225 Easton Avenue, Bethlehem PA 18020.                    

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E. Church Street, Room A-208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

Dated: December 18, 2001.

C. Allen Sachse,

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-31585  Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 pertaining to the 2004 Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-116405), and the1996 Stock
Incentive Plan (No. 333-114013 and No. 333-18601) of HemaCare Corporation of our report dated February 17, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of HemaCare Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                       | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP                   | 
|                                       | 
|Los Angeles, California
March 25, 2005 | 

---



QuickLinks
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Policy and Procedures for Preventing and Eliminating Harassing Conduct              

#   Policy and Procedures for Preventing and Eliminating Harassing Conduct

##           Downloads        

2021-12-1720and20-20Harassing20for%20website.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Shared Neutrals Program - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N6XRNaPAeZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/\">Shared Neutrals Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/sharedneutrals\/embed\/#?secret=N6XRNaPAeZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Shared Neutrals Program” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"N6XRNaPAeZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### FORUM SUBSEA RENTALS, formerly known as DPS Offshore, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tarek A. ELSHARHAWY; Shelly L. Elsharhawy, also known as Shelly L. Chilman; Globaltech Offshore, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 14-20717.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2016.

Jon Wesley Wise, George J. Fowler, Iii, Esq., Fowler Rodriguez, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Brady, Brady Firm, P.C., Liberty, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

*237Before PRADO, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the oral arguments of counsel, and pertinent portions of the record. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued on September 17, 2014, after the bench trial.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.