alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 80 
          - [FRL-7122-1] 
          - RIN 2060-AJ76 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

EPA published a direct final rule on October 31, 2001 that exempts motorcycles with emission control devices that could be affected by the use of leaded gasoline from having to be equipped with gasoline tank filler inlet restrictors. However, we received an adverse comment during the 30 day comment period and are now withdrawing that direct final rule. 

# DATES:

As of December 27, 2001, EPA withdraws the direct final rule published at 66 FR 54955, on October 31, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Babst at (202) 564-9473. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the direct final rule for “Prohibition on Gasoline Containing Lead or Lead Additives for Highway Use: Fuel Inlet Restrictor Exemption For Motorcycles.” We published the direct final rule on October 31, 2001 (66 FR 54955), that exempts motorcycles with emission control devices that could be affected by the use of leaded gasoline from having to be equipped with gasoline tank filler inlet restrictors. We stated in that                     **Federal Register**                     document that if we received adverse comment by November 30, 2001, we would publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the                     **Federal Register**                    . We subsequently received adverse comment on that direct final rule. We will address the comment in a subsequent final action based on the parallel proposal also published on October 31, 2001 (66 FR 54965). As stated in the parallel proposal, we will not institute a second comment period on this action.                 

Dated: December 19, 2001. 

Jeffrey R. Holmstead, 

Assistant Administrator for Office of Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 01-31797 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>   1
 
EXHIBIT 23.1 -- CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-46143) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan of Second Bancorp, Inc. and in the related Prospectus and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42347) pertaining to the 1991 Incentive
Stock Option Plan of Second Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1999
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Second Bancorp, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Cleveland, Ohio
March 24, 1999
 
                                       68
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       180,784,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       17,000,000
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         17,756,000
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             215,172,000
<CASH>                                          16,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           9,741,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      12,390,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             274,523,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            136,685,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         49,382,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,751,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               274,523,000
<PREMIUMS>                                  93,540,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         13,277,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (2,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 153,000
<BENEFITS>                                  65,234,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 24,788,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         8,689,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,257,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,334,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,923,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,923,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             130,833,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         67,379,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          (2,145,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          26,765,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            42,433,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            126,869,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6216.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 29, 2008.

Dewayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Office of the United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Anderson,*No. 1:06-cr00020-IMK-JSK-8 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 16, 2008). We also deny the motion for bail or release pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of FragranceNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason
S. Apfel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Jason S. Apfel
    -------------------
    President and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2002
74 A.3d 1025

#### UNITED POLICE SOCIETY OF MT. LEBANON; Retired Police Officers; Mark Kubit, Mary Eichinger, John Michalec, David White, Les Palombine, Mary Sue Joyce, William Laurence, Kevin Macken, Tom Gianni, Robert Gehrmann, Pat O’Donnell, and Blaise Larotonda v. MT. LEBANON COMMISSION; Stephen M. Feller; Mt. Lebanon Pension Plan Administrator; Municipality of Mt. Lebanon. Petition of Les Palombine and Robert Gehrmann.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 10, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2013, the Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, with an additional issue required to be addressed by this Court, are as follows:

> Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the trial court’s conclusion that the Respondent municipality acting through Marcia Taylor disregarded the clear language of Section 4.09 of the pension plan by terminating Officers Gehrmann’s and Palombine’s two percent (2%) cost of living payments before they had equaled ninety percent (90%) of their final average monthly compensation.

> Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the trial court’s conclusion that the Respondent municipality used its *129own failure to comply with Act 205 as a defense to its refusal to properly calculate the COLA benefits to which Officers Gehrmann’s and Palombine’s are entitled under the police officers pension plan.

Additionally, the parties are directed to address the issue of the possible remedy or range of remedies appropriate under the Municipal Pension Plan Funding Standard and Recovery Act (“Act 205”), 58 P.S. §§ 895.101-895.803, and case law interpreting Act 205, under the factual scenario posed by this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (134)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,163
<PP&E>                                           4,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,955
<SALES>                                          5,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,798
<CGS>                                            3,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    921
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (305)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31830]



[[Page 66803]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-2846; MM Docket No. 00-173; RM-9964, RM-10328]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Burgin and Science Hill, KY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At the request of Vernon R. Baldwin this document allots 
Channel 290A to Burgin, Kentucky. At the request of Pulaski County 
Broadcasting, this document also allots Channel 291A to Science Hill, 
Kentucky. See 65 FR 59164, published October 4, 2000. The reference 
coordinates for the Channel 290A allotment at Burgin, Kentucky, are 37-
48-37 and 84-41-30. The reference coordinates for the Channel 291A 
allotment at Science Hill, Kentucky, are 37-10-36 and 84-29-10.

DATES: Effective January 22, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order in MM Docket No. 00-173, adopted December 5, 2001, and 
released December 7, 2001. The full text of this decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, 
Portals ll, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, 
telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f4f0e4e9e0fdecebf1c5e4eae9abe6eae8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c0d091d1019041512083c1d1310521f1311">[email protected]</span></a>

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio Broadcasting.


    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Kentucky, is 
amended by adding Burgin, Channel 290A and by adding Science Hill, 
Channel 291A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-31830 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,711
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,354
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,438
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,801
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,680
<LOANS>                                        103,156
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,386
<DEPOSITS>                                     117,443
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                226
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,359
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 152,386
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,663
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  970
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   222
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,855
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 716
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,909
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 146
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    952
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         952
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.22
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,787
<LOANS-PAST>                                        82
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,814
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,666
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      225
<RECOVERIES>                                       183
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,624
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,624
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Wendell McClain, Coy McClain, Wade Dameron, and Gary Conway v. Misty Mountain Mining, Inc., Stanley Osborne, and Simon Ratliff, Docket Nos. KENT 2005-96-D, KENT 2005-97-D, KENT 2005-98-D, and KENT 2005-99-D.              

#   Secretary of Labor on behalf of Wendell McClain, Coy McClain, Wade Dameron, and Gary Conway v. Misty Mountain Mining, Inc., Stanley Osborne, and Simon Ratliff, Docket Nos. KENT 2005-96-D, KENT 2005-97-D, KENT 2005-98-D, and KENT 2005-99-D.

meeting_040606.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of MURRAY UNITED DEVELOPMENT CORP.
(the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, ANTHONY CAMPO, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By:           / s /  ANTHONY CAMPO
            --------------------------------
            Anthony Campo
            Chief Financial Officer
            December 11, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30777 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro Rodriguez-Linares (Rodriguez) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.