alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant—Appellee, and HSBC Bank USA; Department of the Treasury; Real Time Resolutions, Incorporated; Wells Fargo Bank West N.A.; Hud, Defendants.

No. 09-2217.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 9, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

Mary E. Goulet, Whitham, Curtis, Christofferson *&*Cook, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, Cochran & Owen, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA,*No. 8:08-cv-03429-RWT (D.Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee’s motion to strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Madera and Fresno County Resource Advisory Committees; Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Resource Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393) the 
Sierra National Forest's Resource Advisory Committees (RAC) for Madera 
and Fresno Counties will meet on January 12, 2002. The Madera Resource 
Advisory Committee will meet at the Mariposa/Minarets Ranger Station in 
North Fork, CA. The Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
at the Pineridge/Kings River Ranger Station in Prather, CA. The purpose 
of the meetings is to provide an overview of Resource Advisory 
Committee roles and responsibilities and to determine how the RAC will 
conduct business for future meetings.

DATES: Both the Madera and the Fresno meetings will be held on January 
12, 2002. The meetings will be held from 8 a.m. To 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Madera County RAC meeting will be held at the Mariposa/
Minarets Ranger Station, 57003 Road 225, North Fork CA. The Fresno 
County RAC meeting will be held at the Pineridge/Kings River Ranger 
Station, 29688 Auberry Road, Prather CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Exline, USDA, Sierra National 
Forest, 1600 Tollhouse Road, Clovis, CA 93611 (559) 297-0706 ext. 4804 
e-MAIL <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#433028263b2f2a2d260325306d2526276d3630"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e2d353b263237303b1e382d70383b3a702b2d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Roles and responsibility of Advisory Committee; (2) Flow of work; (3) 
Project process, submission forms and deadlines; (4) Election of RAC 
chairperson; (5) Public comment. The meeting is open to the public. 
Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: December 14, 2001.
James L. Boynton,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-31323 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         157,040
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               227,585
<PP&E>                                         16,410,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,111,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,158,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          367,070
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,158,101
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,089,565
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,550,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               72,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (533,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (533,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
                                CERTIFICATION

I, Robert S. Chilton certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form
10-K of HemaCare Corporation.

2.   Based  on  my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and  other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in  all
material  respects the financial condition,  results  of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for,  the periods presented in
the report:

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

       a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

       b. 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

	c.	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting;

 5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

       a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

       b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 16, 2004

/s/ Robert S. Chilton
_______________________
Robert S. Chilton
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Anthony P. LANE, Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee.

No. 07-3125.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 15, 2008.

Filed: May 30, 2008.

Anthony P. Lane, North Little Rock, AR, pro se.

Willy Le, Assistant Regional Counsel, Tina M. Waddell, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Dallas, TX, Stacey E. McCord, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

*422PER CURIAM.

In this interlocutory appeal, Anthony P. Lane appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We find no abuse of discretion. *See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail,*437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006) (there is no statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil case; discussing factors). However, it appears from documents Lane filed near the time of the August 2007 order at issue, and from his filings in this court, that his mental status has changed and that he and the district court might now benefit from the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, we affirm but we clarify that the district court’s order is without prejudice to Lane’s right to renew his request for counsel as the case progresses. *See Nelson v. Shuffman,*476 F.3d 635, 636 (8th Cir.2007) (per curiam).

1

. The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Fair Act Inventory

The Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act (P.L. 105-270) requires each 

Federal agency to conduct an inventory of the commercial activities its Federal 

employees perform. The FAIR Act assigned the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) to monitor agency compliance, and OMB issued Circular A-76 to provide 

additional guidance. Each Federal agency must prepare and submit to OMB an 

inventory of the activities performed by its Federal employees, classifying each activity 

as either commercial or inherently governmental.

The Chief Operating Officer in consultation with the Director of Human Resources and 

Office of General Counsel conduct an assessment each year for review in preparation 

for submission to OMB. By annually reviewing and revising a complete workforce 

inventory, FMCS can better understand the functions its workforce is performing. FMCS 

supervisors can use this analysis to improve human capital resource distribution. This 

inventory becomes the starting point in the analysis of functions that an agency may 

review under the A-76 program, also known as Competitive Sourcing. Functions found 

to be inherently governmental or commercial, but not suitable for competition, may 

undergo reengineering efforts or management reviews. Functions deemed suitable for 

competition may be examined as potential candidates for competitive sourcing studies.

Chief Operating Officer

Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service 

One Independence Square

250 E Street, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20427
Requester Categories and Fees

The FOIA allows the FMCS to charge fees to process your FOIA request. If we 

estimate that the fees for processing your request will exceed $25, we will not 

begin to process it without your permission. Fees are determined based on the 

type of requester you are (commercial use, news media/education/noncommercial scientific institution, and all others, including members of the general 

public) as set out in 29 C.F.R. 1401.36.

• Commercial use requesters such as law firms and businesses must pay for 

search and review time and reproduction costs.

• Requesters that qualify as news media/education/scientific/noncommercial scientific institution are not charged for search and review 

costs and only pay reproduction costs after the first 100 pages. If you are 

one of these organizations, you may request a fee waiver. You may 

request documents and a waiver of fees in the same request.

• Members of the general public pay search costs after the first two hours 

but do not pay review costs and only pay reproduction costs after the first 

100 pages.

You may indicate in your request your willingness to pay fees and the amount. 

We will not process your request until we have an agreement with you about 

fees. If the fees total more than $250, the FMCS may request payment in 

advance.

Fee Schedule

In accordance with 29 C.F.R. 1401.36, fees for processing FOIA requests 

depend on the status of the requester and the FMCS employee performing the 

search or review. See the charts below:

Requester Fee Categories

REQUESTER CATEGORY SEARCHING REVIEWING DUPLICATION 

CHARGES

Commercial (including law firms) Fee Fee Fee for all 

Duplication

Educational, Non-commercial Scientific 

Institution, or News Media No Fee No Fee No Fee for first 100 pages
All other requesters (including members of 

the general public)

Fee after 2 

hours No Fee No Fee for first 100 pages

Search Fee Schedule

The current search and review fees are determined by the General Schedule 

(GS) salary level which is representative of the FMCS employee performing the 

initial search and review services. Please note, FMCS is authorized to recover 

search and review costs even if no responsive records are found or, after review, 

there is no disclosure of records.

FEE SCHEDULE FEES

Reproduction Fees $0.20 per page

GS 9-14 $37 per hour

GS 15> $61 per hour
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Again Ranks Among \u201cBest Places to Work\u201d In Federal Government - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"17ZLAe4UNT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-ranks-among-best-places-work-federal-government\/\">FMCS Again Ranks Among \u201cBest Places to Work\u201d In Federal Government<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-ranks-among-best-places-work-federal-government\/embed\/#?secret=17ZLAe4UNT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Again Ranks Among \u201cBest Places to Work\u201d In Federal Government” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"17ZLAe4UNT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, DC \u2013 The U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) today was again ranked among the top five Federal government\u2019s small agencies as being a \u201cbest place to work\u201d in the yearly 2016 government rankings, released by the Partnership for Public Service at a news conference this morning. In two individual categories within the […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council on Tuesday, 
January 15, 2001, at its headquarters. The meeting begins at 1 p.m.
    The General Session includes the following items: (1) Housekeeping 
Items: Welcome, Introductions, Antitrust statement, previous minutes, 
etc.; (2) Coordinating Council Reorganization; (3) Closing Housekeeping 
(Next meeting dates/locations?); (4) Adjournment.
    ITS AMERICA provides a forum for national discussion and 
recommendations on ITS activities including programs, research needs, 
strategic planning, standards, international liaison, and priorities.
    The charter for the utilization of ITS AMERICA establishes this 
organization as an advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA) 5 U.S.C. app. 2, when it provides advice or 
recommendations to DOT officials on ITS policies and programs. (56 FR 
9400, March 6, 1991).

DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS AMERICA will meet on Tuesday, 
January 15, 2001 from 1 p.m.-4 p.m. at the ITS America Offices in 
Conference Room #1.

ADDRESS: ITS America, 400 Virginia Avenue, SW., Suite #800, Washington, 
DC 20024. (202) 484-4847 and the fax (202) 484-3483.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue SW., 
Suite 800, Washington, DC 20024. Persons needing further information or 
who request to speak at this meeting should contact Debbie M. Busch at 
ITS AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-2904 or by FAX at (202) 484-3483. 
The DOT contact is Kristy Frizzell, FHWA, HOIT, Washington, DC 20590, 
(202) 366-9536. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday 
through Friday, except for legal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)
    Issued on: December 18, 2001.
Jeffrey Paniati,
Program Manager, ITS Joint Program Office, Department of 
Transportation.
[FR Doc. 01-31525 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
767 S.E.2d 202

#### The STATE, Respondent, v. Demetrius PRICE, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213426.

No. 27470.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard Nov. 20, 2014.

Decided Dec. 23, 2014.

*93Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in *State v. Price,*400 S.C. 110, 732 S.E.2d 652 (Ct.App.2012). After careful consideration of the briefs, record, and appendix, the writ of certiorari is

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, Acting Chief Justice, BEATTY, HEARN, JJ., Acting Justice James E. Moore and Acting Justice Paul M. Burch, concur.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Black Castle Mining Co. and Secretary of Labor v. Michael Vira, employed by Black Castle Mining Co., Docket No. WEVA 2006-891-R, et al and WEVA 2007-421              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Black Castle Mining Co. and Secretary of Labor v. Michael Vira, employed by Black Castle Mining Co., Docket No. WEVA 2006-891-R, et al and WEVA 2007-421

meeting _blackcastle_101712.pdf

sol-v.black-castle-mining-docket-weva2007-421.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
101 A.3d 1078

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EUGENE C. BAUM (A/K/A EUGENE C. BAUM, JR.), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

July 3, 2014.

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of whether the jury instruction on mental disease or defect effectively negated the diminished capacity defense by blending the law on self-induced intoxication and mental disease or defect.