alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2006-2 10-K

Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Barbara Garafalo, certify that:



1.          I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2006-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.          Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.          Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.          Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all
material respects; and



5.          All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.



In
giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The
Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.



|Dated:
    March 30, 2022 | By: | /s/
    Barbara Garafalo                                     
|------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |     | Barbara
    Garafalo                                         
|                          |     | President                                                    
|                          |     | (senior
    officer of depositor in charge of securitization)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3539 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 331
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3539

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, as the ``Atanasio 
                      Taitano Perez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ATANASIO TAITANO PEREZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Atanasio Taitano Perez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Atanasio 
Taitano Perez Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 331

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3539

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, as the ``Atanasio 
                      Taitano Perez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

               April 4 (legislative day, March 31), 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q of Aircraft  Income Partners L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,129,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,222,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,995,965
<PP&E>                                      83,415,052
<DEPRECIATION>                              65,436,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,974,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,665,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,308,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,974,453
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,880,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               892,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,728,387
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,728,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,728,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher Lee GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50373

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 2016.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Scott W. McCrum, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Christopher Lee Gonzales, San Antonio, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Lee Gonzales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzales has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions 'of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. .

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                              297,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,000
<INVENTORY>                                 36,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           635,243
<PP&E>                                   1,916,028
<DEPRECIATION>                             635,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,322,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,847,797
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       382  
<OTHER-SE>                                 525,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,322,560
<SALES>                                    896,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           898,795
<CGS>                                      321,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              321,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          43,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            314,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               314,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1


**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**




The
      undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medis
      Technologies Ltd. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









Dated:
                August 9, 2007/s/
              ROBERT K. LIFTONRobert
                K. LiftonChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer






/s/
              ISRAEL FISHERIsrael
                FisherSenior
                Vice President-Finance and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
#### Anthony Leroy GREEN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Loretta KELLY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-7413.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 9, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 20, 2010.

Anthony Leroy Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leroy Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Resolution Copper Mining, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Resolution Copper Mining, LLC

Resolution Copper WEST 2013-319-RM Meeting Notice 6-18-15.pdf

Resolution Copper WEST 2013-319-RM Meeting Notice 6-18-15.htm

secretary-labor-v-resolution-copper-mining-docket-west2013-319-rm-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<R>





EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1

to the

SPONSORED PROJECT AGREEMENT

between

MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (Sponsor)

and the

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ISU)




WHEREAS the Sponsor and ISU mutually agree to amend the research program under the Sponsored Project Agreement with an effective date of May 1, 2005;




NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following changes:




Section 1.0  Project Period




Section 1.0 Shall be modified as underlined:




Project Period. The (“Project Period”) of this Agreement is September 1, 2005 through February 28, 2007.




Section 3.0 – Compensation




Section 3.1 shall be modified as underlined:




As consideration for ISU’s performance of the Project, Sponsor agrees to pay ISU the total sum of one hundred fifty-five thousand eight hundred thirty-nine U.S. dollars ($155,839) as detailed in the approved budget in the attached Appendix B incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The payment terms shall be as follows: fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) due within 90 days of execution of the Agreement, and four (4) equal payments of twenty-six thousand four hundred fifty-nine dollars and seventy-five cents ($26,459.75) due each by January 31, 2006, April 30, 2006, July 31, 2006 and October 31, 2006.




ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties agree to execute this Amendment based upon their written approval.




IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY




By: /s/ Gary Gillet

By: /s/ Terri DuMoulin

Gary Gillet

Terri DuMoulin

Title:  Associate Director

Title:  President




Date: October 13, 2005

Date: October 11, 2005














   IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION







By: /s/ Kenneth Kirkland

Date: October 13, 2005

Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D.

Executive Director
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19

- 0086 Filed February 5, 2020
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. FELIX MEJIA , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Becky Goettsch , District Associate Judge and Thomas P. Murphy , Judge.

Felix Mejia appeals his conviction for indecent exposure. AFFI RMED.

Martha J. Lucey , State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau , Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sheryl Soich , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J. , Doyle, J., and Vogel, S.J. * *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (20 20 ).2

VOGEL , Senior Judge

. Felix Mejia appeals his conviction for indecent exposure. On December 17, 2018, the district court found him guilty after a bench trial on the minutes of evidence

. On appeal, he argues his counsel was ineffective for failing to ensure his waiver of jury trial was voluntary and intelligent. 1 We review an ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claim de novo. State v. Feregrino , 7 56 N.W.2d 700, 703 (Iowa 2008). To succeed, the defendant must show counsel breached a duty and prejudice resulted. Id. at 705

. Mejia signed a stipulation for a trial on the minutes of evidence . However, he argues his written stipulation is deficient a nd the court failed to perform a proper colloquy to verify his waiver was voluntary and intelligent

. See Iowa R. Crim. P. 2.17(1) (“Cases required to be tried by jury shall be so tried unless the defendant voluntarily and intelligently waives a jury trial in writing and on the record . . . .”). Even if we assume his attorney breached a duty by failing to ensure his waiver was voluntary and intelligent, he must show prejudice resulted. See Feregrino , 756 N.W.2d at 708 (“The absence of an oral colloquy or a written waiver does not necessarily prove that a defendant failed to understand the nature of the right waived by proceeding to a non

- jury trial.”)

. On the record before us, we cannot determine whether prejudice resulted from his counsel’s alleged failure to obtain a proper jury

- trial waiver. See also State v. Gomez Garcia , 904 N.W.2d 172, 186

1 Effective July 1, 2019, the Iowa legislature pro hibited ineffective

- assistance

- of

counsel claims on direct appeal. See 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140, § 31 (codified at Iowa Code § 814.7). The Iowa Supreme Court recently determined these amendments do not apply to appeals pending before July 1, 2019. See Sta te v. Macke , 933 N.W.2d 226, 230

– 36 (Iowa 2019). Because Mejia filed his notice of appeal on January 2, 2019, we will consider his ineffective

- assistance claim

.3

(Iowa 2017) (“The existing record is inadequate to determine whether Gomez Garcia would have declined to waive the jury and was thereby actually prejudiced.”). Therefore, we affirm his conviction and preserve his deficient

- waiver claim for a postconviction

- relief proceeding

. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of SourcingLink.net, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marcel van Heesewijk, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President of Sales of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  August 8, 2003



/s/ Marcel van HeesewijkMarcel van HeesewijkChairman, Chief Executive Officer andVice President of Sales




25
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sportsquest, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.
      Thomas
      Kidd ,
      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      August 12, 2008




/s/R.
                Thomas KiddR.
                Thomas KiddPrincipal
                Financial and Accounting Officer