alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 510
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor's address for Phibro Animal Health.
 DATES: This rule is effective December 27, 2001.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lonnie W. Luther, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0209.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Phibro Animal Health, One Parker Plaza, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, has informed FDA of a change of sponsor's address to 710 Rt. 46 East, suite 401, Fairfield, NJ 07004.  Accordingly, the agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 510.600(c)(1) and (c)(2) to reflect the change. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.”  Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510
 Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as follows: PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
 1.  The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                    21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e. 2. Section 510.600 is amended in the table in paragraph (c)(1) by revising the entry for “Phibro Animal Health” and in the table in paragraph (c)(2) by revising the entry for “066104” to read as follows: § 510.600
 
 (c)  * * * (1)  *     *     * Firm name and address
Drug labeler code*         *         *         *         *         *         *Phibro Animal Health, 710 Rt. 46 East, suite 401, Fairfield, NJ  07004
066104*         *         *         *         *         *         *
 (2)  * * * Drug labeler code
Firm name and address*         *         *         *         *         *         *066104
Phibro Animal Health, 710 Rt. 46 East, suite 401, Fairfield, NJ  07004( print page 66743)*         *         *         *         *         *         *
 Dated: November 30, 2001. Claire M. Lathers, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.


[FR Doc. 01-31715 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Save the Date for the FMCS 2016 National Labor-Management Conference! - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZlOr0AmlIw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/save-date-fmcs-2016-national-labor-management-conference\/\">Save the Date for the FMCS 2016 National Labor-Management Conference!<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/save-date-fmcs-2016-national-labor-management-conference\/embed\/#?secret=ZlOr0AmlIw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Save the Date for the FMCS 2016 National Labor-Management Conference!” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ZlOr0AmlIw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"FMCS is\u00a0pleased to announce the return of the highly acclaimed FMCS National Labor- Management Conference August 17-19, 2016! For years, this biennial conference was the\u00a0place for labor relations practitioners to get the most up-to-date information about sectoral trends, practical bargaining tools, and broad networking opportunities. Today, new technologies and business models are fundamentally changing nearly […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/NLMC-FMCS-Program-Cover-A-6.jpg"}
Exhibit
10.2





Exhibit A of the Employment
Agreement


EMPLOYEE RELOCATION EXPENSE AGREEMENT

EXECUTIVE RELOCATION PROGRAM FOR CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED


Churchill Downs
Incorporated (the “Company”) has, or will, pay or reimburse William E. Mudd , or third party
vendors for certain expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred by you, or by
the Company on your behalf, in connection with relocating you and/or your
immediate family (the “Relocation Payments”). This agreement is not an employment contract. Nothing in this Agreement
is intended to alter your status as an at-will employee.  In
consideration of the Relocation Payments, you agree:


For purposes of this
Agreement, Relocation Payments include any payments or reimbursements made to
you or on your behalf in connection with relocating you and your family. Mudd’s
relocation payments include, but are not limited to, any payments or
reimbursements associated with: relocation allowance; tax gross-up; moving and
storing household goods; selling your former home and purchasing a new home;
home search trips; travel to your new location; temporary housing; return trips
home; school and home search services and similar payments.


You are not eligible for
relocation payments for expenses paid or reimbursed by another company or
source, and you agree to repay to the Company any such relocation payments made
by the Company. In addition, you agree to notify the Company if you or any of
your household members is receiving, or is eligible to receive, any relocation
assistance from any other company or source so that the relocation payments
made to you can be coordinated with the payments from the other company or
source. Failure to so notify the Company may result in your forfeiture of all
relocation payments not yet made.


If, before the expiration
of 24 months after the “effective date” of your employment agreement you
voluntarily terminate your employment you agree to repay to the Company the
relocation payments made to you or on your behalf. Such repayment must be made
within 30 days following your termination as follows:


	
  Length of Employment

  	
  Percent
  or Expense to be Repaid

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Less than one
  year

  	
  100%

  
	
  One to two years

  	
  50%

  



 


If you do not make the
repayment required under paragraphs 2 and/or 3, and the Company resorts to
litigation to obtain such repayment, you will be liable to the Company for all
of the Company’s litigation costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and
interest at the highest legal rate, unless the Company does not prevail in such
litigation.


By signing below, you
understand that this Agreement is a legally enforceable contract between
yourself and Churchill Downs Incorporated. However, nothing in this Agreement
is intended to alter your status as an at-will employee.


	
  

  	
  Dated:

  	
  10/1/07

  	
   

  	
  /s/ William E. Mudd

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Employee Signature

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  William E. Mudd

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Printed Name
#### In re: Ralph D. DAVIS, Petitioner.

No. 10-1845.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 4, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 22, 2010.

Ralph D. Davis, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ralph D. Davis petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to unseal a search warrant. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. On November 1, 2010, the district court issued an order unsealing the affidavit in support of the search warrant, the application for the search warrant, and the search warrant itself. Accordingly, because the district court has recently resolved the motion in question, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *843and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  1990
Home/Timeline 1990-2013/1990 Previous			Next
1990										Bernard E. DeLury is appointed by President Bush as FMCS’s twelfth director.
Congress enacts the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act. Both are aimed at increasing the use of ADR to reduce the cost of litigation in government and improve government decision-making.
D2015-07-31T19:42:50-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ L. Paul Latham                                         |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| L. Paul Latham                                             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                      |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing General Partner of                                |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                       |
| August 14, 2009                                            |
|                                                       |
|                                                       |
| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                           |
| Mel G. Riggs                                               |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of              |
| Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                             |
| Managing General Partner of                                |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                       |
| August 14, 2009                                            |
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Administrative Law Judge Hearings Order              

#   Administrative Law Judge Hearings Order

Administrative Law Judge Hearing Order.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
74 A.3d 119

#### READING AREA WATER AUTHORITY v. The SCHUYLKILL RIVER GREENWAY ASSOCIATION, Bern Township, Intervenor, Petition of: The Schuylkill River Greenway Association and Bern Township.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 28, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

> a. Whether Commonwealth Court erred in its determination that a municipal water authority has the power to condemn a permanent easement of dimensions sufficient to enable a private developer to install and permanently maintain privately owned and operated wastewater facilities and privately owned and operated storm water management facilities in a portion of the easement separate and apart and for a distinct purpose from the publicly owned water facilities?

> b. Whether Commonwealth Court erred in its determinations that “facilitat[ing] the construction of ... storm water management facilities” to enable development of private land and “providing ... storm water manage*117ment” constitute public purposes to justify taking of private land?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABLE TELCOM FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                        NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                2,410,236
<SECURITIES>                            546,875
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,557,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           3,464,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     20,880,860  
<PP&E>                                8,119,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       36,712,883 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                15,666,936
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  8,193
<OTHER-SE>                           16,899,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         36,712,883
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     11,578,375
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         9,426,923 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,187,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      237,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,036,306)  
<INCOME-TAX>                           (255,553)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (533,393)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0 
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (533,393)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co.              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co.

Consol Penn PENN 2014-816 Argument Notice 3-22-18.pdf

Consol Penn PENN 2014-816 Argument Notice 3-22-18.htm

Secretary of Labor v Consol Pennsylvania Coal Docket PENN2014-816 3-22-18.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov