alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50246

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Antonio Gonzalez-Hernandez appeals his within-guidelines sentence imposed upon his conviction for illegal reentry. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his 78-month sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to effectuate the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He argues that the 16-level enhancement required by the illegal reentry guideline overstated the risk of recidivism and the risk of danger he poses to the community *923and greatly overstated the seriousness of his offense. He argues further that his guideline range of imprisonment failed to account for a childhood during which his parents died when he was very young.

At sentencing, the district court found that the Guidelines were adequate and that a fair and reasonable sentence could be achieved with a sentence within the advisory range. The district court stated that even if it did not choose to follow the Guidelines, it would still find 78 months to be an adequate sentence given Gonzalez’s “grossly undercounted criminal history.” Gonzalez had 30 prior convictions for which he received no criminal history points because 29 of them were too old and one was a non-countable misdemeanor. The district court also rejected Gonzalez’s argument that his sentence did not reflect his difficult childhood, noting that under the Guidelines, family history is not relevant. The district court found that Gonzalez’s childhood did not justify a sentence below the advisory guideline range.

The district court gave sufficient reasons for imposing a within-guidelines sentence. *See Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 356, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). Gonzalez has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness applicable to his within-guidelines sentence. *See id.*at 347, 127 S.Ct. 2456. Therefore, he has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in imposing a sentence within the applicable guidelines range. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 46, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-030-1020-00]


Notice of Intent To Amend Plans; Corrections

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Corrections to Notice of intent to Prepare Plan Amendments

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Grand Staircase-Escalante 
National Monument (GSENM) published in the November 30, 2001 issue of 
the Federal Register (FR) a Notice of Intent to Amend the GSENM 
Management Plan, the Paria Management Framework Plan, and the Escalante 
Management Framework Plan. As published, the notice contained the 
following errors: (1) The notice was incorrect and unclear about which 
plans are associated with the Willow Gulch and Clark Bench grazing 
allotments; and (2) The notice inadvertently omitted the inclusion of 
the Willow Gulch grazing allotment in planning criteria number 1.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Monument Manager, Grand Staircase-
Escalante National Monument, 190 E Center, Kanab, Utah 84741 (Phone: 
435-644-4300).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction 1: In the Federal Register issue 
of November 30, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 231), FR Doc. 01-29729, on Page 
59812, in the second column, under the ``Summary'' caption, correct the 
first sentence to read:
    Summary: Pursuant to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Planning 
Regulations (43 CFR 1600) this notice advises the public that the BLM, 
Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) is considering 
amendments to the following plans:
    (1) The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) 
Management Plan, and the Paria Management Framework Plan regarding the 
Clark Bench Allotment; and
    (2) The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) 
Management Plan and the Escalante Management Framework Plan regarding 
the Willow Gulch Allotment.
    Correction 2: In the Federal Register issue of November 30, 2001 
(Volume 66, Number 231), FR Doc. 01-29729, on Page 59812, the third 
column, under the ``Supplementary Information'' caption, correct the 
second paragraph, Item 1 to read:
    1. These plan amendments/EAs are initiated in response to the 
voluntary relinquishment of the sole grazing preference/permit for the 
Clark Bench grazing allotment and a portion of the grazing preference/
permit for the Willow Gulch grazing allotment. These plan amendments 
will be addressed through two separate EAs. The analyses and decisions 
will apply only to these allotments.

    Dated: December 12, 2001.
Sherry Barnett,
Deputy Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 01-31764 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

June 11, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 23, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will hear oral argument in the matter *Secretary of Labor v.Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., et al.,*Docket Nos. VA 2013-275, *et al*.**(Issuesinclude whether a workplace examination must be “adequate” under the standardin question.)

 

 

Any person attending this oral argument who requiresspecial accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Associated Materials Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 23, 2007
    By:
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayD. Keith LaVanwayVice President  Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Vincent  Cuervo, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of DEFAULT
PROOF CREDIT CARD SYSTEM, INC.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c.	disclosed in this amended annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March  28, 2005

    /s/ Vincent  Cuervo
    --------------------
    Vincent  Cuervo
    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3539 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3539

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, as the ``Atanasio 
                      Taitano Perez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2021

 Mr. San Nicolas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, as the ``Atanasio 
                      Taitano Perez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ATANASIO TAITANO PEREZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 223 West Chalan Santo Papa in Hagatna, Guam, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Atanasio Taitano Perez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Atanasio 
Taitano Perez Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward WILLIAMSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 08-6113, 08-6291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 29, 2008.

Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*236PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his motion requesting court records furnished without costs for appellate review. We dismiss the appeal of his Rule 60(b) motion for lack of jurisdiction because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. With respect to Williamson’s appeal of his motion requesting court records, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Williamson,*Nos. 3:06-cv-02363-HMH; CR-76-19 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2007; Feb. 5, 2008). Williamson’s motion for certificate of appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FLOWERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FORTY WEEKS ENDED
OCTOBER 9, 1999 AND THE FLOWERS INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
OCTOBER 9, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-09-1999
<CASH>                                          22,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,342
<INVENTORY>                                    294,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               704,398
<PP&E>                                       1,563,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 495,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,845,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          714,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     458,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,845,579
<SALES>                                      3,230,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,230,712
<CGS>                                        1,541,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,141,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,573
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)


</TABLE>
Order filed, December 3, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00468-CV

____________

SCWYANA SMITH, Appellant

V.

BEAR CREEK MEADOW HOA INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-52368

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 16, 2021. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court sent past due notice for the reporter’s record on 

November 17, 2021. No response was received, and the record has not been filed 

with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue 

the following order.

We order Delicia Struss, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
103 A.3d 1215

#### IN THE MATTER OF FRANCIS J. FALKENSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 041362005).

December 12, 2014.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-071, concluding that FRANCIS J. FALKENSTEIN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), *RPC*1.16(b)(4) (failure to terminate the representation of a client when the client insists upon taking action with which the lawyer fundamentally disagrees), *RPC*5.5(a)(1) (practicing law while ineligible), and *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANCIS J. FALKENSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Exhibit 10.16  




  



Dr. Keith
Blundy

Chief Operating Officer

Cancer Research Technology Limited

Sardinia House

Sardinia Street

London WC2A 3NL 


9
March 2004 


Dear
Dr. Blundy: 


	Re:
	Amended and Restated License Agreement between Cancer Research Technology Limited (formerly Imperial Cancer Research Technology
Limited) and Biomira Inc. dated 14th November 2000 (the "License")



	1.
	Defined
terms used in this letter but not defined in this letter are as defined in the License.



	2.
	Article 5.1
of the License provides that where Biomira Inc. ("Biomira") grants a sublicense under the License, Biomira shall pay to Cancer Research Technology Limited
("CRTL") a royalty on any Sublicense Revenue received by Biomira.



	3.
	Pursuant
to Article 3.3 of the License we have sought your consent to grant a sublicense under the License to Cancer Vac Pty Limited ("Cancer Vac") and we have provided you with
the Final Draft of the proposed sub-license (the "Draft").



	4.
	Pursuant
to Section 2.7 of the Final Draft as a result of Cancer Vac and Prima Biomed Limited executing and delivering to Biomira the subscription agreement and the shareholder
agreement referred to in that Section, we will receive shares in Cancer Vac which we warrant are currently valued at [+] (the "Shares").



	5.
	In
consideration for CRTL's consent to the proposed sub-license which shall be provided by a side-letter from you to us, we confirm that the
Shares will be treated as Sublicense Revenue for the purposes of the License, at the value at which they are currently valued.



	6.
	We
therefore confirm that upon execution of the sub-License, CRTL shall be entitled to Sublicense Revenue royalty in the sum of [+] which shall be
creditable against the minimum Sublicense Revenue royalties as provided for in the License and already paid by Biomira to CRTL. 





BIOMIRA
INC. 2011 - 94 St. Edmonton, AB, Canada T6N 1H1    Tel: (780) 450-3761    Fax: (780) 463-0871

http://www.biomira.com 


[+]
DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY PURPOSES 







 

	7.
	Applicable
law and jurisdiction governing this letter of agreement shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Article 14 of the License. 




I
would be grateful if you would confirm your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing both copies and returning one copy to me. 



	Yours sincerely,	 	 
	
BIOMIRA INC.	
 	

 
	

Per:	
 	

 
	

/s/ Edward A. Taylor
 Edward A. Taylor

Vice President

Finance & Administration & CFO	
 	

/s/ Robert D. Aubrey
 Robert D. Aubrey

Vice President

Marketing & Business Development





Confirmed
and agreed to by Cancer Research Technology Limited as of 9 March 2004. 



	Signature:	 	/s/ K S Blundy
	 	 
	

Print Name:	
 	

K S Blundy
	
 	

 
	Title:	 	COO
	 	 
	    	 	 	 	 




BIOMIRA
INC. 2011 - 94 St. Edmonton, AB, Canada T6N 1H1    Tel: (780) 450-3761    Fax: (780) 463-0871

http://www.biomira.com 


[+]
DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY PURPOSES 


2