alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC

Consol Penn PENN 2013-385 Meeting Notice 11-9-16.pdf

Consol Penn PENN 2013-385 Meeting Notice 11-9-16.htm

secretary-labor-v.consol-pennsylvania-coal-docket-penn2013-385nov09-2016.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"New FMCS Mediators Train to Resolve Labor-Management Conflicts - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s69VTg1o4F\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/new-fmcs-mediators-train-resolve-labor-management-conflicts\/\">New FMCS Mediators Train to Resolve Labor-Management Conflicts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/new-fmcs-mediators-train-resolve-labor-management-conflicts\/embed\/#?secret=s69VTg1o4F\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New FMCS Mediators Train to Resolve Labor-Management Conflicts” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"s69VTg1o4F\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, DC\u2013 The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) hosted 14 newly commissioned mediators Mar. 19-23 in its Washington, DC headquarters as part of an annual training program designed to prepare new mediators to help FMCS labor and management customers better manage disruptive contract and workplace disputes. The five-day program, led by senior FMCS staff, […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Mediator-Training-001-300x200.jpg"}
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Solar Sources Mining, LLC

Solar LAKE 2017-0099 Meeting Notice 12-17-20.pdf

Solar LAKE 2017-0099 Meeting Notice 12-17-20.htm

commission-open-meetingsecretary-labor-v-solar-sources-mining-llc-docket-no-lake-2017-009912-17-2020.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               31,223
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        79,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    199,735
<PP&E>                                               29,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      277,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               126,694
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 12
<OTHER-SE>                                           32,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        277,476
<SALES>                                             124,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    124,481
<CGS>                                               123,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       123,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    2,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       4,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                          2,048
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   2,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       1,841
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                             41
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.29


</TABLE>
#### SEALED APPELLEE, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50412

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2016.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Defendant-Appellant (Appellant) appeals from the district court’s decision denying a joint motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). While his appeal was pending, Appellant was released from prison. Thus, his appeal is DISMISSED as moot. *See United States v. Booker,*645 F.3d 328, 328 (5th Cir.2011).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Secretary of Labor v. Paramont Coal Company Virginia, LLC              

#   Secretary of Labor v. Paramont Coal Company Virginia, LLC

secretary-labor-v-paramont-coal-docketva-2010-369-r-et-al.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

[Docket No. MARAD-11185]


Information Collection Available for Public Comments and 
Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Maritime Administration's (MARAD's) intentions to 
request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved 
information collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before February 19, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Thomas, Maritime 
Administration, MAR-250, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. 
Telephone: 202-366-2646 or Fax 202-493-2288.
    Copies of this collection can also be obtained from that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title of Collection: Regulations for Making Excess or Surplus 
Federal Property Available to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and 
State Maritime Academies.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2133-0504.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Expiration Date of Approval: June 30, 2002.
    Summary of Collection of Information: In accordance with U.S.C. 
12959, MARAD requires approved maritime training institutions seeking 
excess or surplus property to provide a statement of need/justification 
prior to acquiring the property.
    Need and Use of the Information: This information collection is 
used by the requestor to provide a justification of the intended use of 
the surplus property, and is needed by MARAD to determine compliance 
with applicable statutory requirements.
    Description of Respondents: Maritime training institutions.
    Annual Responses: 60.
    Annual Burden: 60 hours.
    Comments: Comments should refer to the docket number that appears 
at the top of this document. Written comments may be submitted to the 
Docket Clerk, U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20590. Comments may also be submitted by electronic 
means via the Internet at http://dmses.dot.gov/submit. Specifically 
address whether this information collection is necessary for proper 
performance of the functions of the agency and will have practical 
utility, accuracy of the burden estimates, ways to minimize this 
burden, and ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected. All comments received will be available 
for examination at the above address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT, 
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An electronic version 
of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://dms.dot.gov.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: December 17, 2001.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31451 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS** ’ AUSTIN c- c MAtaN mToRuIanmmAL Fobruory 24, 1939 *



## _. cc of the City of

,

cnnstruln: the ordinmtie's co hove oxsznTexs 3 

### thnf rooc?n GS ~ollovar

s2Jopoxson, firm, corpomtion~ Or 5330- 'aiation o?erotin~, zmm,-,l~~,or conduotinc cny hoteli restnurent, dining mr, sod5 nater Sountain, liquor dispeneory, or nng ather . *.

.. : :

:I : ; 1

. . 8

I.

ectnbl-Ish,m;r,t

nhoro i’oodor firin!: of r;ny kin.: 1s oervoti ox p.2ralZtoci. to bn z9ncd, or operatlnr:nny d*~iry, crcmcry, r:nct :in rkot) n-mttolr , ine3t p?~kls:;plmt, b*ik- =Y, c:rndyf:m.0ry, c-::ucry,col;iotoroi;o, ~ pewln shollln::crtnbllch-Dnt, vo :ctnble M rkot ( or tinyPotory or othe? pl.1~0 nhore food is stored, pqcke:.,grop:mcd, or uthcraize hnndleo in this ;itnte, sb..;ll zcrk, srql.>y,or kmp in tbolr employ, in or nbout cny 53lfl

plnoc, or iiollv3r my ortl010 of food thezfrros, 

### nnjr parum lnfcated ulth or affected by nuy lnfecsloun or eonta.:lous dlsonso, or :;orkor orploy 4ny poroon to rrork in or nbout any o-id place, ;r 2cllv::rnny nrticlc or fmd l!lorcfrozI, vho nt thb tlzo .of 5.150:.;9oy:.qt h:bdnot in his powcmlon n corti?loota 311:rred by a le:;rllylloomcd phyolcian roslding in ihe county nhoro acid pernon is to be ezployod, or lr;s~ployod, attestins the feet thnt the benrcr hcd been exnnlncd by cuch phyclclcn althin one zcolcprior to the tixe of e.qloy-~ siont , md thnt such er?.~lln.-.tic~ dlocloso the f5ct that such ~-roc~ to 113 mnloyed ms . 

### froo from cny lnfeotiqa or com?-r+oun dls0030, or fctl toiInstitute end h3vo rmde. nodim oxnmtnntlons of ell 3uch ex~ploysee. nt lntervnls of tlze not eroe3Wig sir (6) tenths MU; 5ftnr:such ox~?&wtlons proqtly dlschaqe from their s:sploy:.;eut in or obout any mid place my mu1 nll5orsons found to be lnfeotcd v!ith,oroffooted by any lnfeotlou3 or cont@ou5 dtnsa:<e." ::ehevc 51~0 exmined the provisions of Article 7343 of'our Pen31 Code, :~rhicb 13 ibe Stnte Burber L-i?, . ‘This net rac,ulrosG.lmrbcr to 3rmant ‘to the Bonrd c health certlflcaso upm :~pglicntlon for c li- ” cewe. The llccn3n thu5 obtnined 13 vnlid for one your. :;edo not think the 1lcc:me cculfibe oonstmed. to bn a haclth oertlflosto. So far 213 itoosn detoraIne tho heslth oortiflcoto 15 kopt by thb BOOrd. ;;s **~SVO found**  no provgslon in Artlole 734a'of our

! .

i’ 1;:
;.. : i.~ ,:
: ..
**: I**  **1 ’** 

‘.

### Gr. i<.J. Dortex, lebruor;r24, 1939, page 3
Pcnnl Codo thnt reculros n barber to retain, oxhlblt or lievcR haclth certlflccco for impcotion.

.‘!e. do not think that the ordinance ,ns arltton, opplioe to bcrboro for in our oplnlon bwbere era not reqircd by lea to lmr? or oxhlbit Q hcclth certlfloote 

### for um in the cltp.of Xdlond.

It ia, thoroforc, the opinion of this Iiopsrtnont that the ordinance cubalictodto us docc not roqulre bnrbcre to un~lcrgon 

### Aomozann blood tact in ortierto be permitted to work in the city of Zldlcnd, Texas. : Your8 very truly

blorrleHodgee

. . . !

,’ :. j. ~. 2. .:

..I
#### Ravi KADIYALA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-3342.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 21, 2016.

Decided Jan. 25, 2016.

Glenn Seiden, Attorney, Brooke Laurine Lewis, Attorney, Seiden Law Group, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

William Stewart Cook, Attorney, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Livonia, MI, Melissa A. Murphy-Petros, Attorney, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edel-man *&*Dicker LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Order

After Ravi Kadiyala purchased 49% of the stock of Euro International Mortgage, Inc. (EIM), the firm opened a new account (Account 9378) at Bank of America. Kadi-yala was an authorized signatory on that account. EIM provided him with credentials (username and password) that afforded him access to EIM’s other accounts at the Bank. He used those credentials to transfer $200,000 out of Account 3998, of which he was not a signatory, into Account 9378. He then instructed the Bank to issue cashier’s checks against the new balance in Account 9378. When he learned what Kadiyala had done, Mark Pupke, an authorized signatory on both accounts (and owner of the other 51% of EIM’s stock), told the Bank to cancel the transfer and restore the funds to Account 3998. The Bank complied. Kadiyala contends in this suit under the diversity jurisdiction that, by reversing the transfers and cancelling the checks, the Bank violated his rights under the deposit contracts. The district court granted summary judgment to the Bank.

*634Kadiyala’s appellate argument encounters multiple obstacles, each of which requires us to affirm the district court’s judgment.

First, Kadiyala was not an authorized signatory on Account 3998 and had no contractual entitlement (either as a party or a third-party beneficiary) to specify how the balance of that account would be applied.

Second, Pupke unquestionably *did*have authority over Account 3998 and told the Bank that the movement of the money was unauthorized. Kadiyala does not identify any rule of Illinois law (which governs this dispute) providing that, when a bank receives inconsistent instructions, it must always prefer the first in time.

Third, EIM, not either Kadiyala or Pup-ke, was the depositor. EIM was entitled to decide, through its own rules of corporate governance, who would speak for it. EIM has never contended that it authorized the transfer of funds from Account 3998 to Account 9378, or that it wants $200,000 disbursed to the person Kadiyala specified.

Fourth, the person who acquires rights under a cashier’s check is the payee. Yet the payee has not protested the Bank’s reversal of the transfer or the stop-payment order on the checks. Kadiyala is not authorized to assert claims on behalf of the payee.

Affirmed.