alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THEATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS Auerrrti.~~.

TEXAS November 21, 1963

HonorableJoe Resweber County Attorney 'HarrisCounty Houston,Texas Opinion No. C-182 Re: Whether certain instruments submittedto the County Clerk ,ofHarris County by the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools can be filed Dear Mr. Resweber: In the County Clerk's Office, and related question. The questionswhich you have ,asked deal with certain Instrumentssubmittedto the County Clerk for filing. The instrumentsare claims 'ofliens again&the estates of former patients of various State Hospitalsor Special Schools for the care and maintenanceof the patientswhile they were in the hospital or school. The,claims are verified by a Claims Representativeof the Board For Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools, The questionsthat you have asked are as folloz:

"(1) Can these instruments be filed in the County Clerk's office? "(2) If so, in what record should they be recorded?" Article 6601 of Vernon's Civil Statutes reads as follows: "All deeds of trust,mortgages or judgments which are required to be recorded in order to create a judgmentlien, or other instrumentsof writing intended to create a lien, shall be recorded in a book or books separatefrom those in which deeds or other conveyances are recorded." (Emphasisadded). Article 6626 of Vernon'sCivil Statutes reads in part as follows:

"The following instrumentsof writing which shall have been acknowledged or proved according -885-Hon. Joe Resweber,page 2 (C-182)

to law, are authorizedto be recorded,viz: all deeds, mortgages,conveyances, deeds of trust;. bonds for title, covenants,defeasancesor other instrumentsof writing concerningany lands or tenements,or goods and chattels,or moveable property of any description;

. . .I* It is well settled that the duties of % recordingofficer such as the County Clerk are ministerial. First National Bank v. McElroy 112 S.W. 801 (Tex.Civ.&pp. 1908); The instruments submitted'show on their face that they are instrumentsof writing intended to create a lien and therefore fall clearly within the purview of Article 6601, quoted above. However, this opinion is not intended to pass on whether these particularinstrumentscreate a valid lien. The recordingofficer does not have the power to pass on ,the validity of such an instrument;it is his duty to file the instrumentprovided that it complies with the form prescribedby dFCicle 6626, as set out above. Such instrumentshould be filed in accordance with Article 6601 and placed in the mortgage records.

Instrumentsof writing intended to create a lien which are in the proper form should be filed in the County Clerk's Office in accordancewith Article 6601 of Vernon's Civil Statutes. Yours very truly,

JGNrwb APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE George Gray, Qairman Cecil Rotsch Paul Robertson WAGGONER CARR Attorney General
*A ?F-@- Jack G. Norwood Assistant

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone -886-
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints William W. Winspear, Robert L. Winspear and James E.
O'Bannon, and any of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign on behalf of
Associated Materials Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
on behalf of the undersigned in my capacity as an officer and/or a director of
the Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and any of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to
effectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned may
or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney effective as
of February 22, 1999.



/s/ WILLIAM W. WINSPEAR                /s/ DONALD L. KAUFMAN               
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
William W. Winspear                    Donald L. Kaufman



/s/ ROBERT L. WINSPEAR                 /s/ JAMES F. LEARY             
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
Robert L. Winspear                     James F. Leary



/s/ RICHARD I. GALLAND                 /s/ ALAN B. LERNER                 
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
Richard I. Galland                     Alan B. Lerner



/s/ JOHN T. GRAY                       /s/ A.A. MEITZ                     
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
John T. Gray                           A.A. Meitz
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-41466

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2016.

Grover Glenn Roque-Jaekson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Plano, TX, Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Blake Ross, Law Office of Kevin B. Ross, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ramos has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Ramos’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. *See*. *United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramos’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from' further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir, R. 42.2, Ramos’s pro se motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### VAN PELT v. GRANT.

No. 34419.

July 11, 1950.

220 *P.*2d 242.

*268Forrest Van Pelt, of Oklahoma City, pro se.

Arthur H. Dolman, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, Forrest Van Pelt, to secure possession of an automobile and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on the automobile, which mortgage was given as security for the payment of a promissory note dated September 8, 1948, due December 8, 1948, in the principal sum of $800.

Judgment was for the plaintiff in the sum of $767.75 with costs and attorney’s fee. A motion for new trial was filed and an order entered overruling the same, and defendant has appealed.

At the trial of the case it was stated that the only thing in controversy was whether or not the defendant had been given proper time to pay the balance due of $750. It was the contention of defendant that the action had been prematurely brought because it was unwarranted and unnecessary. The only evidence offered in support of this contention was that of the defendant who stated that $50 was paid on or about December 8, 1948, with an agreement that if the principal amount was reduced by $100, the plaintiff would wait until March 8, 1949, before beginning an action for possession of the automobile. It is admitted that defendant only paid $50 on the principal. The action was filed March 15, 1949, and there is a total failure of any proof or evidence showing that the action was prematurely brought.

This was the sole issue presented to the trial court- who disposed of the same as a matter of law, and we think properly so. The allegations in the petition in error presented in the brief that the court erred in sustaining the motion to strike the counterclaim of defendant and in denying the defendant the right to a jury all present this single issue.

We have said that where a motion to dismiss has been filed upon the ground that the appeal is without merit and for delay only, and from an examination of the petition in error, the brief of plaintiff in error, and the record, it is shown that no contest is presented to this court, the appeal will be dismissed. Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560, 67 P. 2d 447; Humphreys v. Liberty National Bank, 180 Okla. 44, 67 P. 2d 790. The appeal is manifestly without merit and for delay only.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP02-92-001] 

Take notice that on December 7, 2001, K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company (KN Wattenberg) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, a corrected tariff sheet, to become effective December 1, 2001: 

Second Revised Sheet No. 0 

On November 30, 2001, KN Wattenberg submitted a filing in Docket No. RP02-92-000 to cancel its tariff. KN Wattenberg sought an effective date of December 1, 2001. KN Wattenberg, however, inadvertently included the wrong effective date on the tariff sheets included in the filing. In this filing, KN Wattenberg has attached a corrected tariff sheet and a corrected marked version of the tariff sheet. 

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31994 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,930)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,625
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,731
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,243
<CGS>                                          151,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,597
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55


</TABLE>
73 A.3d 524

#### Blandon EVERETT, Relator, Petitioner v. Jon FISHER, Respondent.

No. 61 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 1, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
106 A.3d 1237

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANDREY V. ZIELYK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 026891986).

February 10, 2015.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*l:20-3(g)(4) and *Rule*1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of ANDREY V. ZIELYK of PARSIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986;

And on October 29, 2014, the Court having ordered respondent to appear for an audit at the Office of Attorney Ethics and provide the records and information requested;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court that respondent has failed to comply with the Court’s Order;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREY Y. ZIELYK is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREY Y. ZIELYK be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ANDREY V. ZIELYK pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

*467ORDERED that ANDREY V. ZIELYK comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this state.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Solar Sources Mining, LLC              

#   Solar Sources Mining, LLC

On September 30, 2019, the Commission issued its decision in *Solar Sources Mining, LLC*, Docket No. LAKE 2017-52.  

Commission-Decision( Solar Sources Mining LLC)LAKE 2017-52.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 10(cc)

                               SECOND ADDENDUM
                               TO THAT CERTAIN
                            EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                   BETWEEN
                       FARMSTEAD TELEPHONE GROUP, INC.
                                     AND
                              ROBERT G. LAVIGNE
                         DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2000
        AS AMENDED BY THAT FIRST ADDENDUM DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2003

                              (the "Agreement")


This Second Addendum to the Agreement is effective as of the 1st day of
January 2004 (the "Effective Date").

                                  RECITALS

The Executive and Company are parties to the Agreement.

The parties wish to modify the Agreement for the limited purpose of
extending the duration of Executive's Employment Period through December
31, 2004.

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.    The date referenced in Section 2.1(a) of the Agreement is changed
from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004.

2.    Unless specifically defined, all capitalized terms in this Second
Addendum shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

3.    The Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as specifically
modified by the terms of this First Addendum to the Agreement.

Executed by the parties as of the Effective Date.


ROBERT G. LAVIGNE                 FARMSTEAD TELEPHONE GROUP, INC.

/s/Robert G. LaVigne____           By:_/s/ Joseph J. Kelley
------------------------               --------------------
                                   Name: Joseph J. Kelley
                                   Title:_Chairman - Compensation Committee


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, February 12, 2001.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicated procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    February 2, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3204 Filed 1-2-01; 4:09 pm.
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form  S-8 Nos.  333-74635  and  333-74631)  pertaining  to the  Total  Research
Corporation 1995 and 1986 Stock Incentive Plans and in the related Prospectus of
our report  dated August 27, 1999,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedule of Total  Research  Corporation  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1999.




MetroPark, NJ
September 28, 1999                                       /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP