alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**



**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906**

**CERTIFICATION FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K**



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Castle Holding Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:





| | (1) | except for the inclusion of unaudited financial statements, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                             







|Dated: October 31, 2016 | By: | */s/ John V. Cappello*                  | 
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------- | 
|                        |     | John V. CappelloChief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (144)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,494
<PP&E>                                           5,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,160)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,550
<SALES>                                         13,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,330
<CGS>                                            8,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (577)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas J. MACWILLIAMS, a/k/a Greg, a/k/a Corporal George, Defendant-Appellant. *287United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas J. MacWilliams, Greg, Corporal George, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 08-6025, 08-6027.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 28, 2008.

Thomas J. MacWilliams, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Office of the United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. MacWilliams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the release of evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. MacWilliams,*Nos. 1:06-cr00059-IMK-JSK-1; 1:06-cr-00059-01-IMKJSK (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       6,712,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,603,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   981,079
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,810,333
<PP&E>                                      11,679,543
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,672,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,661,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,305,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,944
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,332,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,661,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,158,735
<CGS>                                        6,083,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,302,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                525,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            485,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   485,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the June 30, 1997 Aircraft  Income  Partners L.P. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,009,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,872,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,170,371
<PP&E>                                      91,516,052
<DEPRECIATION>                              68,669,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,017,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,378,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,638,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,017,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,800,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  572,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,392,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                835,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            835,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   835,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 319 

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Idaho. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2021 

Mr. SIMPSON (for himself and Mr. FULCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district 

of Idaho. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

4 IDAHO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by 

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi7 tional district judge for the district of Idaho. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

9 In order that the table contained in section 133(a) of title 

10 28, United States Code, will reflect the change in the num11 ber of judgeships authorized by subsection (a), such table 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 319 IH

1 is amended by striking the item relating to Idaho and in2 serting the following: 

‘‘Idaho ............................................................................................. 3’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Rosalba AQUINO-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74630.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008 *.

Filed May 22, 2008.

Rosalba Aquino-Garcia, Anaheim, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Anthony P. Nicastro, Esq., Russell J.E. Verby, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rosalba Aquino-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s continuous physical presence determination for substantial evidence. *Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006). We grant the petition for review and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s determination that Aquino-Garcia’s continuous physical presence was broken due to her acceptance of voluntary departure after a border apprehension in 1998, where the agency relied solely on Aquino-Garcia’s testimony to make its de*527termination and her testimony does not indicate that Aquino-Garcia was informed of the terms of her departure or that she accepted them voluntarily or knowingly. *See id.*at 619 (holding that administrative voluntary departure under threat of deportation breaks the accrual of continuous physical presence only where the record shows the alien was informed of the terms of departure and knowingly and voluntarily accepted them).

We therefore grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings. *INS v. Ventura,*587 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor              

#   Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor

Meeting-May 29-2014.pdf

May 29-2014-Brody WEVA 2014-82-R Meeting Notice.htm

brody-mining-v.secretary-labor-may-29-2014-part-one.mp3

brody-mining-v.secretary-labor-may-29-2014-part-two.mp3

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3419 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3419

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Joseph R. Lentol 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH R. LENTOL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joseph R. Lentol Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph R. 
Lentol Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3419

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 66 Meserole Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Joseph R. Lentol 
                             Post Office''.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER02-496-000] 

                    Take notice that on November 30, 2001, Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (CVPS) tendered for filing a letter stating that CVPS will not file a Forecast 2002 Cost Report for FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 4, since there are no customers expected to take such service.                           ( print page 65474)    

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before December 21, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                    using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-filing” link.                 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31233 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 23.1  CONSENT
OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 File Nos. 33-11703, 33-16529, 33-18717, 33-26003, 33-34919, 33-38536,
33-40879, 33-44305, 33-44333, 33-48890, 33-59098, 33-65190, 33-50999, 33-51275,
33-56017, 33-60213, 33-60215, 333-01211, 333-06403, 333-08651, 333-15977,
333-40849, 333-76445, 333-90263, and 333-48780) pertaining to the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan; 1982 Stock Option Plan; 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan;
1985 Stock Incentive Program; 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan; 1987 Stock
Option Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; 1993 Long-term Incentive Stock
Plan; WaveFront Technologies, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan; Alias Research, Inc.
1998 Employee Share Ownership Plan, 1989 Employee Share Ownership Plan, 1990
Employee Share Ownership Plan, 1994 Stock Plan; Amended and Restated 1996
Supplemental Non- Executive Equity Incentive Plan; 1989 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan; Cray Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1989 Employee
Benefit Stock Plan; Directors Stock Option Plan of our report dated July 23,
2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Silicon Graphics, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended June 28, 2002.   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP   Palo Alto, California September 20, 2002
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants July 10, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aRdvugt4sL\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-july-10-2023\/\">Applicants July 10, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-july-10-2023\/embed\/#?secret=aRdvugt4sL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants July 10, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"aRdvugt4sL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}