alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         157,446
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,793
<PP&E>                                         16,443,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,557,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,806,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          355,886
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,806,879
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               745,249
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  952,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               53,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (260,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (260,264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
84 A.3d 699

#### The BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and B & W Nuclear Environmental Services, Inc. v. AMERICAN NUCLEAR INSURERS and Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters and Other Interested Party: Atlantic Richfield Company. American Nuclear Insurers and Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters v. The Babcock & Wilcox Company and B & W Nuclear Environmental Services, Inc., and Atlantic Richfield Company. Petition of Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. (f/k/a the Babcock & Wilcox Company) and Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Group, Inc. (f/k/a B & W Nuclear Environmental Services, Inc.), and Atlantic Richfield Company.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 24, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of January 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

> (1) Does a policy holder forfeit its right to insurance coverage by settling an underlying and covered claim without its insurer’s consent, where the insurer is defending subject to a reservation of rights to disclaim coverage, the settlement is at arm’s length, is fair and is reason*215able, and the insurer has failed to offer any amounts in settlement?
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Alternative Bargaining Processes - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ajb3XQFDy4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/resolving-labor-management-disputes\/alternative-bargaining-processes\/\">Alternative Bargaining Processes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/resolving-labor-management-disputes\/alternative-bargaining-processes\/embed\/#?secret=Ajb3XQFDy4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Alternative Bargaining Processes” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"Ajb3XQFDy4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
January 12, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AMANDA LATRICE BROWN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00036

- CV V.

GREGORY FITZGERALD B ROWN , Appellee

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, GREGORY
FITZGERALD BROWN , signed July 14, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceed ings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We order appellee, GREGORY FITZGERALD B ROWN , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Consent of Ian T. Blakley
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Peak Gold Mines, New South Wales, Australia” dated March 25, 2013, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 27th day of March, 2013
 
 
 “Ian T. Blakley”Name:
Ian T. BlakleyTitle:
P. Geo and Principle Geologist and Vice-President and general Manager of RPA UK Ltd.
 
 RPA Inc.55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned officer’s knowledge:





i.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tony Liu


Tony Liu


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


May 9, 2011








/s/ Yanchun Li


Yanchun Li


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


May 9, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 334 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 334

   To provide law enforcement agencies investigating the January 6th 
 attack on the U.S. Capitol with the authority to require a company to 
 disclose the beneficial owners of the company, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2021

 Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Malinowski, Mr. 
  Schiff, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Mr. O'Halleran, Ms. 
 Speier, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Norton, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Casten, 
 Ms. Dean, Mr. Foster, Mr. Lynch, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Himes, Mrs. Luria, 
 Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Jones, Mr. Vargas, and Mr. Bowman) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide law enforcement agencies investigating the January 6th 
 attack on the U.S. Capitol with the authority to require a company to 
 disclose the beneficial owners of the company, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insurrection Financing Transparency 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--A law enforcement agency may require a reporting 
company to provide the agency with a report that contains the 
information described in section 5336(b)(2) of title 31, United States 
Code, if the law enforcement agency certifies to the reporting company 
that the report is required to carry out the agency's investigation 
into the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol.
    (b) Penalties.--The penalties provided under section 5336(h) of 
title 31, United States Code, shall apply to a violation of this 
section to the same extent as they apply to a violation of such section 
5336.
    (c) Definitions.--The definitions provided in section 5336(a) of 
title 31, United States Code, apply to this section.
                                 <all>
```
74 A.3d 1024

#### Jason T. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

No. 56 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 1, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2013, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal *Nunc Pro Tunc*is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



Certification of President



I, William R. Colucci, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: September 15, 2008



/s/ William R. Colucci

William R. Colucci, President
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as submitted
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                              
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date November 14, 2002 |  |                                                              
|                       |  |                                                              
|                       |  | /s/ Ronald J. Domanico                                       
|                       |  |                                                              
|                       |  | Ronald J. Domanico
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
    connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity3 Corporation (the "Company")
    on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
    and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shannon
    T. Squyres, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
          June 20, 2005
/s/ Shannon T. SquyresBy: Shannon T. SquyresIts: Chief Executive Officer 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trinity3 Corporation and will be retained by Trinity3 Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Abdur R.H. MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby HARLESS, Superintendent, Wilkes Correctional Center; Sergeant Cox, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-6313.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 30, 2008.

Abdur R.H. Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdur R.H. Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Muhammad v. Harless,*No. 5:08-cv-00015-GCM, 2008 WL 496059 (W.D. N.C. Feb. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jami M. Phillips, certify that:

      To my knowledge:

      (A)   Amendment No. 3 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
            the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 accompanying this Certification,
            filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
            (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

      (B)   The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of
the accompanying Report, including for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act, or as a separate disclosure document.

Dated: December 30, 2003


                              /s/ Jami M. Phillips
                              --------------------
                                Jami M. Phillips
                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       46
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

                    On September 25, 2001, a notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (66 FR 49035), that an application had been filed with the Fish and Wildlife Service by Clayton Green for a permit (PRT-048095) to import one polar bear (                    *Ursus maritimus*) taken from the Southern Beaufort Sea population, Canada for personal use.                 

                    Notice is hereby given that on November 21, 2001, as authorized by the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,                     *as amended*                     (16 U.S.C. 1361*et seq.*) the Fish and Wildlife Service authorized the requested permit subject to certain conditions set forth therein.                 

Documents and other information submitted for these applications are available for review by any party who submits a written request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203, telephone (703) 358-2104 or fax (703) 358-2281. 

Dated: December 7, 2001. 

Monica Farris, 

Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority.

[FR Doc. 01-30996 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge f or the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1462

___________ James Land, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 1, 1998 Filed: July 6, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARDARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James Land appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to 1 the Com missioner, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Lan d suppl emental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’-2-

submissions, we affirm the judgment of the District Court for the reasons set forth in its memorandum. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.