T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R AMON GU T I E R R E Z - MAL DO NA DO ; MAR C I A T HE R E S A C AS T E L AN - L I R A, P et i t i o n ers, v. A L B E R T O R . G O N Z A L E S , A tt orney G e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 03- 74173 04- 71896 A ge nc yN os . A 077- 065- 056

A 077- 065- 043 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w , R a m on G ut i e rr e z - M a l dona do and M ar ci a T here saC as t el an-L i ra , nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders sum m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng an 

# FI LED OC T 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS03- 74173/ 04- 71896 2 i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng G ut i e rr e z - M a l dona do’ s appl i c a t i on f orc a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l , a nd de ny i ng pe t i t i one r s ’ m ot i on t o r e ope n. O ur j ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n a n dd e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law . H erna ndezv. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 1 4 , 1 0 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e d is m is s in p art, d e n yin p art, an dg r an t in p a rt th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w in N o . 0 3 - 7 4 1 7 3 , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w in N o . 0 4 - 7 1 8 9 6 . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that G u tie rr e z - M a ld o n a d o f

a ile dto s h o w e x c e p tio n a l an de x tr e m e lyu n u s u a l h ar d s h ip to aqu a lif

y in g r e la tiv e . Se e R o m e r o - T o rr es v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 2 7 F .3 d8 8 7 , 8 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . T o th e e x te n t G u tie rr e z - M a ld o n a d o c o n te n d s th a t th e a g e n c yv io la te dh is due pr oc e s s r i ght s bydi s r e ga r di ng hi s e vi de nc e of har ds hi p, thi s c ont e nt i on i s not s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r da n dd o e s n o t a m o u n t to ac o lo r ab le c o n s titu tio n a l c la im . See M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( “ [T ] ra di t i on al abus e of di s c r e t i on c ha l l e nge s r e c a s ta s a l l e ge d due pr oc e s s vi ol a t i ons do not c o n s titu te c o lo r ab le c o n s titu tio n a l c la im s th a t w o u ldin v o k e o u rju r is d ic tio n .” ) . T he I Jgr a nt e d pe t i t i one r s vol unt aryde partur e f ora60- daype r i od and the B IA stre am l i ned and re du ce d the vo l un t ary departure peri od t o 3 0 d ay s. In03- 74173/ 04- 71896 3 P ad i l la-P ad i l la v. G on zales , 46 3 F . 3d 97 2, 98 1 (9th C i r. 20 06 ), w e hel d “ that be c aus e the B I A i s s ue d as tr e a m l i ne d or de r , i tw a s r e qui r e d t o a f f i rm the e nt i r e tyof the IJ ’ s dec i si on , i ncl ud i ng the l ength o f the vo l un t ary departure peri od . ” W e th e r e f o r e r e m a n df

o rth e B I A to r e in s ta te th e 6 0 - d ayv o lu n taryd e p artu r e p e r io d . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e th e B I A c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e s ub m itte da n da c te dw ith in its br oa d di s c r e t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng tha tthe e vi de nc e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o w arr ant r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ) ( T h e B IA ’s de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n s ha l l be r e ve r s e d i f i ti s “ arbi tr ary , i rr a t i ona l , or contraryt o l aw . ”) . P e titio n e r s ’ r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . IN N o. 03 -741 73 : P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N I E D in p a r t ; G R A N T E D in p a r t ; a n d R E M A N D E D . E ac h p arty s hal l bear its o w n c o s ts f

o rth is p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . I N N o . 0 4 - 7 1 8 9 6 : P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .