alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 50429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23665]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[CDC-2017-0048; Docket Number NIOSH-156-C]

Final Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) Value 
Profiles

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIOSH announces the availability of the following four 
Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) Value Profile documents: 
Acetonitrile [CAS No. 75-05-8], Chloroacetonitrile [CAS No. 107-14-2], 
Methacrylonitrile [CAS No. 126-98-7], and Nitrogen dioxide [CAS No. 
10102-44-0].

DATES: The final IDLH Value Profile documents were published on 
September 29, 2017.

ADDRESSES: These documents may be obtained at the following link: 
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/default.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Todd Niemeier, MS, CIH, NIOSH, 
Education and Information Division (EID), Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 
1090 Tusculum Ave., MS-C32, Cincinnati, OH 45226, phone 513/533-8166 
(not a toll-free number), email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5, 2017, NIOSH published a request 
for public review in the Federal Register [82 FR 21239] on IDLH Value 
profiles. We did not receive public comments, but did receive peer and 
stakeholder comments. These comments received were reviewed and 
addressed where appropriate.

Frank Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-23665 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Commends the State of Alaska and the Inlandboatmen\u2019s Union on Tentative Agreement - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ok8hHDhI9v\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-commends-the-state-of-alaska-and-the-inlandboatmens-union-on-tentative-agreement\/\">FMCS Commends the State of Alaska and the Inlandboatmen\u2019s Union on Tentative Agreement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-commends-the-state-of-alaska-and-the-inlandboatmens-union-on-tentative-agreement\/embed\/#?secret=Ok8hHDhI9v\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Commends the State of Alaska and the Inlandboatmen\u2019s Union on Tentative Agreement” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"Ok8hHDhI9v\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, DC \u2013 Following the announcement of a tentative agreement on Aug. 1 in talks between the State of Alaska and the Inlandboatmen\u2019s Union (IBU), the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) commended the parties on their compromise which effectively ended a work stoppage that began on July 24. Seattle-based FMCS Commissioner and Regional Director […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 66013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 558 (Sub-No. 5)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--2001

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroads' 2001 cost of capital.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2001. The decision solicits 
comments on: (1) The railroads' 2001 cost of debt capital; (2) the 
railroads' 2001 current cost of preferred stock equity capital; (3) the 
railroads' 2001 cost of common stock equity capital; and (4) the 2001 
capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market value basis.

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due no later than January 
14, 2002. Statements of the railroads are due by March 29, 2002. 
Statements of other interested persons are due by April 22, 2002. 
Rebuttal statements by the railroads are due by May 13, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of statements and a copy of 
the statement on a 3.5 inch disk in WordPerfect 9.0, and an original 
and 1 copy of the notice of intent to participate to: Surface 
Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 
1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard J. Blistein, (202) 565-1529. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To obtain a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from the Board's contractor, Da- To Da 
Legal, Suite 405, 1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006, phone (202) 
293-7776. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD 
services 1 (800) 877-8339.] A copy of the decision can also be obtained 
from the Board's Internet site (www.stb.dot.gov).
    We preliminarily conclude that the proposed action will not 
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the 
conservation of energy resources.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: December 13, 2001.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Clyburn, and 
Commissioner Burkes.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31368 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1846

ANTHONY A. AGWUMEZIE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge;

Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-493-DKC)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Agwumezie, Appellant Pro Se. Craig David Roswell, Jeanie

Lynn Scherrer, NILES, BARTON & WILMER, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Agwumezie appeals the district court’s order

granting in part Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss and

the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for new trial

following a jury trial in his civil action against Allstate. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the

magistrate judge. See Agwumezie v. Allstate Insurance, No. CA-02-

493-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2002; June 9, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Derick SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Penny L. BURNSIDE, Kim Dickey, Angela Fryer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-10478

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 2008.

Derick Smith, Orlando, FL, pro se.

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

*877PER CURIAM:

This is Derick Smith’s *pro se*appeal of the district court’s order striking his refiled complaint in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. After the district court dismissed his initial complaint without prejudice, a decision that Smith did not appeal within the time set forth by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(B), Smith re-filed a complaint in the same case. The district court struck the re-filed complaint and noted that if Smith wished to pursue his claims he should file a complaint in the proper venue, the Northern District of Florida. Smith contends that the district court abused its discretion by striking his re-filed complaint.1

Whether construed as a denial of leave to file an amended complaint, or as the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, we review the district court’s decision to strike Smith’s re-filed complaint only for an abuse of discretion. See *Fla. Evergreen Foliage v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Co.,*470 F.3d 1036, 1040 (11th Cir.2006); *Burke v. Smith,*252 F.3d 1260, 1263 (11th Cir.2001).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by striking the re-filed complaint. It was not the proper vehicle for attacking a final judgment which was entered almost four months earlier. Moreover, even if the district court had construed Smith’s filing as a Rule 60(b) motion, that motion would have been due to be denied as Smith’s claim was still barred. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

1

. We cannot consider the arguments Smith raises regarding venue because he did not file a timely appeal from the district court's dismissal of his initial complaint. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); *see also Rinaldo v. Corbett,*256 F.3d 1276, 1278 (11th Cir.2001).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-005302]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act Pub. L. 103-1 concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on September 4, 2001, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Tyco Electronics, TDI Division, Romeoville, Illinois. Workers produced battery packs.

An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers remains in effect (NAFTA-004168). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 11th day of December, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-31627  Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
-  Home 
-  Regulations 
-  Notices and Rulemaking Documents 

# In This Section

-  Regulations 
-  Search Regulations 
-  Rulemaking Documents 
-  Notices 
-  Regulatory Enforcement 
-  Disclaimer 

# Lease and Interchange of Vehicles by Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers

### Action

Notice on applicability.

### Summary

Section 219(d) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) restricted Mexico-domiciled motor carriers from leasing commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) to U.S. carriers to transport property into the United States until the international obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) chapter on cross-border trade in services were met. Given FMCSA's acceptance of applications for long-haul operating authority from Mexico-domiciled motor carriers following the conclusion of the U.S.-Mexico Cross Border Long-Haul Trucking Pilot Program, the obligations are fulfilled and the restriction is no longer applicable.

### Document

View PDF

## Details

**Published Date**

11/22/2016

**Effective Date**

11/22/2016

**Federal Register**

                  2016-28018              

**Docket Number**

        FMCSA-2013-0161      

**CFR Part(s)**

        376
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Agency Departments - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Av59OzXbJm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/\">Agency Departments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/embed\/#?secret=Av59OzXbJm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Agency Departments” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"Av59OzXbJm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant:

LOA Int'l (USA) Transport Co., Inc., dba LOA Container Line, 721 Brea Canyon Road, Suite 3, Walnut, CA 91789, Officer: Charster Lou, President (Qualifying Individual).

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicant:

Orion Logistics Inc., 9688 Fontainebleau Blvd., #509, Miami, FL 33172, Officer: Jose Alejandro Carbonell, President (Qualifying Individual).

Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant:

Sunjin Shipping (U.S.A.), Inc., 145-63 226th Street, Springfield Gardens, NY 11413, Officers: Key Y. Chung, President (Qualifying Individual), Soon Kim, Secretary. 

Dated: December 14, 2001. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-31291 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Eugene WILSON, II, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4828.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

*272Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Nancy C. Dickenson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Christine Madeleine Spurell, Research and Writing Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia; Dennis H. Lee, Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Eugene Wilson, II, pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was sentenced to 200 months in prison. On appeal, his attorney has filed an Anders* brief, concluding that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but questioning whether Wilson’s classification as an armed career criminal pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007), was unconstitutional since Wilson’s predicate convictions were not charged in the indictment. Although informed of his right to do so, Wilson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. After a thorough review of the entire record, we affirm.

As counsel notes, Wilson’s argument is barred by controlling circuit precedent. We have repeatedly found that the indictment need not reference or list prior convictions used as a basis for an armed career criminal sentence. *See, e.g., United States v. Thompson,*421 F.3d 278, 284 n. 4 (4th Cir.2005); *United States v. Cheek,*415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.2005).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Wilson’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

*Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, each of the undersigned Jason Young, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steve Olson, the Chief Technology Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds’ knowledge and belief:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 11, 2010
By:
/s/ Jason YoungJason YoungChief Executive Officer




Dated:  August 11, 2010
By:
/s/ Steve OlsonSteve OlsonChief Technology Officer andActing Principal Financial Officer