alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         17,464
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,385,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,319,806)
<INVENTORY>                                    23,419,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,991,710
<PP&E>                                         7,074,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,784,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 81,862,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,238,328
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       179,731
<OTHER-SE>                                     53,465,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   81,862,028
<SALES>                                        66,385,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,385,151
<CGS>                                          28,652,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,652,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28,974,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,143,790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,376,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,238,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,365,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,872,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,872,611
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.31



</TABLE>
#### Alex Andronico BAIRES-CHAVEZ, aka Edardo Gascan, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74814.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 22, 2008.

Edgardo Quintanilla, Esq., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Minick, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alex Andronico Baires-Chavez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for relief under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations. *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary decision to deny Baires-Chavez § 212(c) relief. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii); *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir.2007) (“Discretionary decisions, including whether or not to grant § 212(c) relief, are not reviewable.”). Baires-Chavez’s contentions that the agency improperly weighed the factors in his case, and that the BIA improperly considered his criminal offense, do not state colorable due process claims. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B), (D); *Vargas-Hernandez,*497 F.3d at 923.

We reject Baires-Chavez’s contention that the BIA violated due process by acting ultra vires. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (BIA may review de novo questions of discretion); *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

To the extent Baires-Chavez contends that the IJ was biased, we agree with the BIA that he was not prevented from reasonably presenting his case. *See Colmenar,*210 F.3d at 971.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2004



/s/ Ronald J. DomanicoRonald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Chuck Bay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kana Software, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

/s/ Chuck Bay		                  Chuck Bay
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metric Partners Growth Suite Investors,
L.P., a California Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Fred Lieblich, as Chief Executive
Officer of Metric Realty, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and
William A. Finelli, as Chief Financial Officer of Metric Realty, the Managing
General Partner of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Fred Lieblich
-----------------------
Fred Lieblich
Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2004

/s/ William A. Finelli
-----------------------
William A. Finelli
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004
| Applicable      Margin forLIBOR Loans | Applicable      Margin forBase Rate Loans | Applicable      Margin for Peso Revolving Loans |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| 6.0%                                  | 4.0%                                      | 5.8%                                                 |

| Month     | Number      of days after the last day of the month |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| October   | 60                                                  |
| November  | 30                                                  |
| December  | 45                                                  |
| January   | 45                                                  |
| February  | 30                                                  |
| March     | 45                                                  |
| April     | 45                                                  |
| May       | 30                                                  |
| June      | 45                                                  |
| July      | 45                                                  |
| August    | 30                                                  |
| September | 90                                                  |

----

----
EXHIBIT 11.1

                        booktech.com, inc. and Subsidiary

                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share

                   Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 and 1999
                                   (unaudited)



                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                      -------------------------
                                                         2000(1)        1999
                                                      ------------   ----------

BASIC NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net loss attributable to common shares as reported .. $ (1,450,600)  $ (396,414)
                                                      ------------   ----------
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding
  Common stock ......................................    7,814,488    6,016,552
                                                      ------------   ----------

Basic net loss per common share .....................        $(.19)       $(.07)
                                                      ------------   ----------

DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net loss attributable to common shares as reported .. $ (1,450,600)  $ (396,414)
                                                      ------------   ----------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
  Effect of potentially dilutive common shares ......         --           --
  Common stock ......................................    7,814,488    6,016,552
                                                      ------------   ----------

         Total ......................................    7,814,488    6,016,552
                                                      ------------   ----------
Diluted net loss per common share ...................        $(.19)       $(.07)
                                                      ============   ==========



(1) Restated. See Note 8 to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
    Statements.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65527-65528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 3831]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Executive Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 
9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1105, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas, which are assisted by the Department of State and which are 
attended by dependents of U.S. Government families and children of 
employees of U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools. The agenda includes a review of 
the recent activities of American-sponsored overseas schools and the 
overseas schools regional associations, a presentation on the status of 
education in the United States and its impact on American-sponsored 
overseas schools, and selection of projects for the 2002 program.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting and join in 
the discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of 
public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to the 
State Department is controlled, and individual building passes are 
required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should so advise 
the office of Dr. Keith D. Miller, Department of State, Office of 
Overseas Schools, Room H328, SA-1, Washington, DC 20522-0132, telephone 
202-261-8200, prior to January 21, 2002. Each visitor will be asked to 
provide a date of birth and Social Security number at the time of 
registration and attendance and must carry a valid photo ID to the 
meeting. All attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.


[[Page 65528]]


    Dated: December 11, 2001.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 01-31265 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    A Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact Statement were filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in a civil antitrust case,                     *United States*                     v.                     *3D Systems Corporation and DTM Corporation*, Civ. Action No. 1:01CV01237. By September 26, 2001, the United States published a notice in the Washington Post and the                     **Federal Register**                    , seeking public comments on the proposed settlement, in accord with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b) through (h). The 60-day comment period expired on November 26, 2001. Due to the unanticipated disruption of mail service to the U.S. Department of Justice, the United States requests that anyone who submitted a comment before the expiration of the comment period resubmit the comment by facsimile or e-mail to J. Robert Kramer II, Chief, Litigation II Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1401 H Street, NW., Suite 3000, Washington, DC 20530 (facsimile: (202) 307-5802; e-mail:                     *comments.lit2@usdoj.gov*; telephone: (202) 307-0924). Comments should be resubmitted by facsimile or e-mail within 15 days of the date of this notice.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations & Merger Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 01-31478  Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportationas as Nominee for Commissioner of the Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iMyywAaM9a\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-before-the-u-s-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportationas-as-nominee-for-commissioner-of-the-federal-maritime-commission\/\">Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportationas as Nominee for Commissioner of the Federal Maritime Commission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-before-the-u-s-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportationas-as-nominee-for-commissioner-of-the-federal-maritime-commission\/embed\/#?secret=iMyywAaM9a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportationas as Nominee for Commissioner of the Federal Maritime Commission” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"iMyywAaM9a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
*Order Entered August 22, 2011:*

#### Richard v Schneiderman *&*Sherman, PC,

Docket No. 297353.

On the Court’s own motion the August 11, 2011, opinion is hereby vacated. A new opinion will be issued.***

***

 New opinion reported at 294 Mich App 37, vacated and remanded, 490 Mich 1001 — Reporter.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  

					
	[Certificate_Number]	  	Incorporated Under the	  	[Number_of_Shares]
		  	Laws of the State of Delaware	  	
		  	August 7, 2020	  	

 Eve Holding, Inc. 

The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations, 

preferences and relative, participating, optional or special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and 

the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [Holder_Name] is the registered owner of [Shares_Written_Out] Shares of the [Stock_Designation_Name] of

 Eve Holding, Inc. 
 transferable only
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this [_]th day of [_], 20[_]. 

 

					
	  
	 	            	  	  

	Assistant Secretary	 		  	Secretary

 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS, IF ANY
NUMBER 13-13-00461-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

WILLI "FREE I" GARNER, 

T.D.C.J. NO. 606635, Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on November 25, 2013. On

December 10, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been 

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of 
2

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not 

significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response 

has been received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a 

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

16th day of January, 2014.