alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Private: Test Client Services - Current - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6T4KILTpoJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/private-test-client-services\/\">Protected: Private: Test Client Services – Current<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/private-test-client-services\/embed\/#?secret=6T4KILTpoJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Protected: Private: Test Client Services – Current” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"6T4KILTpoJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/quote.png"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Multi-Benefit Realty Fund 87-1 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000802200
<NAME> MULTI BENEFIT REALTY FUND 87-1
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,003)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         12,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,612
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        46
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Intro

# Core Q1-15, 17-90

# Core Perf Q16

# Core Trend Items

# Telework Remote Work Q91-91A

# Demographics
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Arthur Barchenko, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Electronic Control
Security Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business
issuer's's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's Board
of Directors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small
business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and



SIGNATURE              TITLE                           DATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Arthur Barchenko
--------------------
Arthur Barchenko       President, Chief Executive      September 27, 2006
                       Officer (Principal Financial
                       Officer and Accounting Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Conducts Over A Million Online Meeting Minutes in 30 Days - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kvQSTMW58X\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-conducts-over-a-million-online-meeting-minutes-in-30-days\/\">FMCS Conducts Over A Million Online Meeting Minutes in 30 Days<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-conducts-over-a-million-online-meeting-minutes-in-30-days\/embed\/#?secret=kvQSTMW58X\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Conducts Over A Million Online Meeting Minutes in 30 Days” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"kvQSTMW58X\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2014 The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), reached a monumental milestone while exhibiting its flexibility during the COVID-19 heath crisis by conducting more than a million minutes of online meetings in 30 days using its primary virtual platform. In a press release dated March 17, FMCS announced its virtual mediation capabilities in […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-214-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 26, 2001, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective February 26, 2001.

Second Revised Sheet No. 254
Third Revised Sheet No. 255
Third Revised Sheet No. 256

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to propose 
changes to Northwest's tariff provisions related to facilities 
reimbursement procedures associated with the construction of laterals.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's customers and interested state regulatory commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3143 Filed 2-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
73 A.3d 520

#### ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, Washington County, Pennsylvania, Brian Coppola, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Supervisor of Robinson Township, Township of Nockamixon, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Township of South Fayette, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Peters Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania, David M. Ball, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Councilman of Peters Township, Township of Cecil, Washington County, Pennsylvania, Mount Pleasant Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania, Borough of Yardley, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Maya Van Rossum, The Delaware Riverkeeper, Mehernosh Khan, M.D. v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Robert F. Powelson, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission, Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Linda L. Kelly, In Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and Michael L. Krancer, In His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection. Appeal of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Robert F. Powelson, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission.

No. 100 MAP 2012.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 25, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2013, the Notice of Appeal is quashed.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would note probable jurisdiction and direct expedited treatment for appeal proceedings.
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-95657 and No. 333-148383 on Forms S-8 and No. 333-132288 and No. 333-112472 on Forms S-3 of our report dated July 10, 2007, relating to the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the Company) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to transactions with related parties as described in Note 2) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

Certified Public Accountants



Fort Lauderdale, Florida

June 06, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10514

Summary Calendar

ERVIN STERLING BROWN, JR.,

Petitioner–Appellant,

v.

RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CV-22

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Ervin Sterling Brown, Jr., formerly Texas prisoner # 559314, moves for a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the order of the district court

denying his application for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Brown challenges a May 7, 2009, prison disciplinary hearing at which he was

found guilty of extorting property from another prisoner. Brown also moves for

appointment of counsel; that motion is denied.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10514 Document: 00511297164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2010
No. 10-10514

Brown was released from prison after the district court denied his habeas

application. He had served his 20-year sentence at the time of his release. His

case no longer presents a case or controversy, and we lack jurisdiction to

consider his appeal. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

APPEAL DISMISSED. COA DENIED. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL DENIED.

2

Case: 10-10514 Document: 00511297164 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2010
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66427-66428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[Docket No. TA-W-38, 893] and [NAFTA-04613]


The Budd Company Stamping and Frame Division Philadelphia, PA, 
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration

    By letter of July 9, 2001 the petitioner requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance, applicable to 
petition numbers TA-W-38,893 and NAFTA 04613, respectively. The denial 
notices were signed on May 10, 2001 and published in the Federal 
Register on May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28553 and 28554, respectively).
    The petitioner indicated that the subject firm opened a new 
stamping plant in Silao, Mexico during the fall of 2000. The petitioner 
further stated that the opening of the Mexican plant resulted in a 
significant shift in plant production to Mexico.

[[Page 66428]]

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 30th day of November 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31619 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 9, 2009 

p1202 

Order 

 

December 9, 2009 

138822 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138822 

 COA: 289217 

Wayne CC: 07-011987 

QUINCY PENN HARRIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED as moot, because the defendant 

has completed his sentence.
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Trintiy3 Corporation, (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
        D.
        Hargreaves, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  June 24, 2005
              /s/
                Steven D. HargreavesBy:
                  Steven D. HargreavesIts:
                  Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to Trinity3 Corporation and will be retained by Trinity3 Corporation
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kevin Bernard MINOR, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-4878.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 29, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 20, 2010.

*783Arthur S. Cheslock, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Bernard Minor pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and fifty grams or more of cocaine base, and to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Minor was sentenced to 138 months of imprisonment for the drug charge and to a concurrent term of ten years on the gun charge. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the following issues: (1) whether Minor’s guilty plea was adequate, and (2) whether Minor was properly sentenced. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss in part and affirm in part.

We agree with the Government that Minor knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence in his plea agreement, except for conditions not extant in this appeal. *United States v. Broughton-Jones,*71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir.1995). This appeal waiver was specifically reviewed at Minor’s plea hearing, which generally complied with Fed. R.Crim.P. 11. *United States v. General,*278 F.3d 389, 400 (4th Cir.2002). Because Minor waived only his right to appeal his sentence, however, we grant only the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal of Minor’s sentence.

The issues raised in counsel’s *Anders*brief fail for the reasons previously discussed: Minor’s plea hearing contained no reversible error and Minor waived appellate review of his sentence. In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.* We therefore affirm Minor’s convictions. This court requires that counsel inform Minor, in writing, of the right to petition the Su*784preme Court of the United States for further review. If Minor requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Minor.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.*

*

 Despite notice, Minor has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.