alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.19  


 
 

EqualLogic, Inc.
  
    Director Compensation Policy    
    



        The following director compensation policy will come into effect upon the closing of the proposed initial public offering (the "IPO") of EqualLogic, Inc.
(the "Company"). 


Cash Compensation  


        Each non-employee director of the Company who is not affiliated with a holder who beneficially owns (determined in accordance with SEC rules) more
than 5% of the Company's outstanding capital stock (each, an "Eligible Director") will be paid the following annual cash retainers, payable quarterly in arrears and pro-rated for any
partial period: 



	Position
 
	 	Annual Retainer

	Board of Directors	 	 	 
	 	Non-Executive Chair	 	$	50,000
	 	Other Eligible Directors	 	$	25,000
	Audit Committee	 	 	 
	 	Chair	 	$	14,000
	 	Other Members	 	$	7,000
	Compensation Committee	 	 	 
	 	Chair	 	$	7,000
	 	Other Members	 	$	3,500
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	 	 	 
	 	Chair	 	$	5,000
	 	Other Members	 	$	2,500





        Per-meeting
fees will not be paid. 


Equity Compensation  


        Each Eligible Director who is first elected or appointed to the Company's board of directors after the closing of the IPO is automatically granted an option
(each, a "New Director Option") to purchase that number of shares of the Company's common stock as has an aggregate Black-Scholes value of $250,000 on the date of such initial election or appointment
(the "New Director Grant Date"). The exercise price of each New Director Option shall equal the fair market value of one share of the Company's common stock on the New Director Grant Date. Each New
Director Option vests as to 25% of the underlying shares on the one-year anniversary of the New Director Grant Date, and as to 6.25% on each three-month anniversary thereafter. 


        Each
Eligible Director is automatically granted an option (each, an "Annual Director Option") to purchase that number of shares of the Company's common stock as has an aggregate
Black-Scholes value of $125,000 on the date of the Company's annual meeting of stockholders (the "Annual Director Grant Date"). The exercise price of each Annual Director Option shall equal the fair
market value of one share of the Company's common stock on the Annual Director Grant Date. Each Annual Director Option vests as to 25% of the underlying shares on each three-month anniversary of the
Annual Director Grant Date. 


        All
option vesting is conditioned on continued service as a director of the Company. 


        For
purposes of calculating the Black-Scholes value of New Director Options and Annual Director Options, the methodologies and assumptions will be those most recently used by the Company
for financial statement reporting purposes. 










Expense Reimbursement  


        All directors (including directors who are not Eligible Directors) are reimbursed for their ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred in attending board and board
committee meetings. 











QuickLinks


EqualLogic, Inc. Director Compensation Policy
FLRA/FMCS NEWS

WASHINGTON, DC

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 771-444-5859 March 12, 2024

FLRA/FMCS Public Town Hall – March 27, 2024

The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) and Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service 

(FMCS) announce a joint Agency Public Town Hall on March 27, 2024 at 1:00pm Eastern.

The virtual and in-person town hall will feature leadership from both agencies discussing the 

relationship between the FLRA and FMCS, how each serves its community and the public, and 

the benefits of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It will be open to the public and will feature 

2 sessions.

The 1

st session will feature FLRA Chairman Susan Tsui Grundmann; FMCS Deputy Director of 

Field Operations Javier Ramirez; and Martin Malin, Chairman of the Federal Service Impasses 

Panel. They will discuss the respective roles and relationships of the bodies they lead.

The 2

nd session will be a discussion between ADR experts – FMCS Commissioner Thomas 

Olson; FLRA Collaboration and Dispute Resolution Office (CADRO) Director Michael Wolf;

and Merritt Weinstein, CADRO Senior Dispute Resolution Specialist. This roundtable will 

discuss what happens “behind the scenes” during ADR and what stakeholders should do to get 

the most out of these processes.

For in person registration, click here --- For Zoom registration, click here.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to 

federal-sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3283 

To repeal the joint resolution entitled ‘‘A joint resolution to promote peace 

and stability in the Middle East’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2021 

Mr. MEIJER (for himself, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. GOLDEN, 

Mr. MEEKS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. UPTON, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. COLE, Ms. JACOBS of California, Mrs. KIM of California, Mr. MALINOWSKI, Mr. LIEU, 

Ms. LEE of California, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. STEUBE, and Mr. 

SMITH of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the joint resolution entitled ‘‘A joint resolution 

to promote peace and stability in the Middle East’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF JOINT RESOLUTION TO PROMOTE 

4 PEACE AND STABILITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. 

5 The joint resolution entitled ‘‘A joint resolution to 

6 promote peace and stability in the Middle East’’ (Public 

7 Law 85–7; 22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31374]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1399-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama, (FEMA-1399-DR), dated December 7, 2001, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 12, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Readiness, Response and 
Recovery and Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b565a5f5c5e155f5a575e7b5d5e565a155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81ece0e5e6e4afe5e0ede4c1e7e4ece0afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of December 7, 2001:

    Blount, Butler, Cherokee, Dale, Etowah, Fayette, Lamar, St. 
Clair, and Winston Counties for Public Assistance (already 
designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Joe M. Allbaugh,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-31374 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Cargo Shipment Assistance - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UxmDILsJbT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/cargo-shipment-assistance\/\">Cargo Shipment Assistance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/cargo-shipment-assistance\/embed\/#?secret=UxmDILsJbT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cargo Shipment Assistance” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UxmDILsJbT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About The Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services (CADRS) can assist you with problems with shipping cargo on oceanborne vessels in the U.S. foreign commerce. Entities subject to the Commission\u2019s jurisdiction include: Matters beyond the Commission\u2019s jurisdiction will be returned to the complainant and may suggest a more suitable governmental or private agency. […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              I
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                             <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999      Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                2,096            2,307
<SECURITIES>                            500                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,180            2,492
<ALLOWANCES>                           (101)            (104)
<INVENTORY>                               0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,112            5,483
<PP&E>                               10,394            9,722
<DEPRECIATION>                       (6,399)          (5,472)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       11,278           11,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,913            2,914
<BONDS>                                   0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                0
<PREFERRED>                               0                0
<COMMON>                              4,905            4,887
<OTHER-SE>                           (1,016)          (1,899)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         11,278           11,899
<SALES>                                   0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     22,738           28,175
<CGS>                                     0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        11,543           14,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     10,847           12,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (464)            (522)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,172              961
<INCOME-TAX>                            289              205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     883              756
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                0
<CHANGES>                                 0                0
<NET-INCOME>                            883              756
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.12             0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.12             0.11



</TABLE>
#### Milo D. BURROUGHS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and Department of Transportation, Intervenor.

No. 2010-3180.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 14, 2010.

*482Vincent D. Phillips, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.

Jeffrey A. Gauger, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Milo D. Burroughs, Yelm, WA, pro se.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motions to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and to permit the Department of Transportation to intervene,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The respondent’s and intervenor’s briefs are due within 40 days of the date of filing of this order.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Continucare Corporation (the“Registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation.  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date:May 23, 2005 By: /s/ Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.   Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> ART. 5 FDS FOR 2nd QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000825410
<NAME> LANDAUER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   1,355
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           10,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                                70
<INVENTORY>                                              1,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        14,594
<PP&E>                                                  25,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                          11,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          41,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   14,346
<BONDS>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                              26,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            41,640
<SALES>                                                 22,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        22,338 
<CGS>                                                    7,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            7,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         10,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                             3,840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      6,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             6,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .73
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  |                                                                      
|                     |  | /s/ Ronald J. Domanico                                               
|                     |  | Ronald J. Domanico, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-11004

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERSON GONZALEZ TOVAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-103-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerson Gonzalez Tovar appeals his conviction for production of child 

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). In the factual basis for his 

guilty plea, Tovar admitted that he produced a visual depiction and that it “was 

produced using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in 

interstate or foreign commerce.” 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 15, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-11004 Document: 00514515080 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2018
No. 17-11004

2

Tovar asserts that the factual basis for his guilty plea is insufficient 

under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 because he did not admit that 

the offense caused the materials to move interstate in the recent past. Relying 

on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2077 

(2014), Tovar contends that a conviction in the absence of such proof 

impermissibly intrudes upon the police power of the States.

We review Tovar’s forfeited objection to the factual basis for plain error. 

See United States v. Trejo, 610 F.3d 308, 313 (5th Cir. 2010) (footnote omitted). 

To establish plain error, Tovar must show a forfeited error that is clear or 

obvious and that affects his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States, 

556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes such a showing, this court has the 

discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness, 

integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See id.

We have rejected similar challenges. See, e.g., United States v. Looney, 

606 F. App’x 744, 746-47 (5th Cir. 2015). Given the current state of the law, 

as Tovar concedes, the district court’s finding that there was a sufficient factual 

basis for his guilty plea was not a clear or obvious error. See Puckett, 556 U.S. 

at 135. He raises the issue to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s 

motions for summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an extension of time to 

file an appellate brief, are DENIED.

 Case: 17-11004 Document: 00514515080 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2018