alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Commissioners Jordan and Baker Sworn-in, Restoring Quorum              

#   Commissioners Jordan and Baker Sworn-in, Restoring Quorum

Commissioners Mary Lu Jordan and Timothy J. Baker were sworn in as Members of the Commission.  Four of the five Commission seats are now occupied.  

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Director Says Working Together is Key to the Future@Work - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YHGelcNo3P\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-director-says-working-together-key-futurework\/\">FMCS Director Says Working Together is Key to the Future@Work<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-director-says-working-together-key-futurework\/embed\/#?secret=YHGelcNo3P\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Director Says Working Together is Key to the Future@Work” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"YHGelcNo3P\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Allison-last-day-web-300x200.jpg"}
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00409

- CR

JEROME MIMS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 77th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04

- 002CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jerome Edwin Mims was convicted of the felony offense of manufacture or

delivery of cocaine and placed on community supervision. The trial court revoked

Mims’ community supervision, and he a ppealed. A motion to dismiss his appeal,

signed by Mims and his counsel, was filed on April 3, 2013.

Mims ’ motion is granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). This appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeMims v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Just ice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 18 , 2013

Do not publish

[CR25]
{"id":250,"date":"2018-05-24T16:05:26","date_gmt":"2018-05-24T20:05:26","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=250"},"modified":"2018-08-07T09:11:41","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T13:11:41","slug":"commission-wants-more-information-on-pierpass-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-wants-more-information-on-pierpass-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Wants More Information on PierPass Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>May 24, 2018<\/div>\n<p>Contact: John K. DeCrosta (202) 523-5911<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) today voted to issue a Request for Additional Information (RFAI) in response to an amendment filed in April by the parties to the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www2.fmc.gov\/FMC.Agreements.Web\/Public\/AgreementHistory\/2090\">West Coast MTO Agreement (WCMTOA)<\/a>. The amendment would change the PierPass fee structure and use appointment systems for dray truckers serving facilities at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.<\/p>\n<p>Once WCMTOA responds to the questions posed in the RFAI, the Commission will have another 45 days to analyze the amendment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>May 24, 2018 Contact: John K. DeCrosta (202) 523-5911 The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) today voted to issue a Request for Additional Information (RFAI) in response to an amendment filed in April by the parties to the\u00a0West Coast MTO Agreement (WCMTOA). The amendment would change the PierPass fee structure and... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-wants-more-information-on-pierpass-amendment\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":251,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions\/251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marlon Legrant SAUSSY, a.k.a. Sauce, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-16299.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 2, 2010.

Derek Craig Gilbert, Beaufort, SC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James C. Stuchell, R. Brian Tanner, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Derek C. Gilbert, appointed counsel for Marlon Legrant Saussy, has filed a motion to withdrawal from further representing the appellant, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Saussy’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3363 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3363

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary 
 concerned to pursue a claim against an entity hired by the Secretary 
 concerned to return the personal effects of a deceased member of the 
                    Armed Forces to the next of kin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary 
 concerned to pursue a claim against an entity hired by the Secretary 
 concerned to return the personal effects of a deceased member of the 
                    Armed Forces to the next of kin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SPC Christian Ward Act''.

SEC. 2. CLAIMS RELATING TO THE RETURN OF PERSONAL EFFECTS OF A DECEASED 
              MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 1482(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(11)(A) Delivery of personal effects of a decedent to the 
        next of kin or other appropriate person.
            ``(B) If the Secretary concerned enters into an agreement 
        with an entity to carry out subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
        concerned shall pursue a claim against such entity that arises 
        from the failure of such entity to carry out such subparagraph.
            ``(C) If an entity described in subparagraph (B) fails to 
        carry out subparagraph (A) because of the loss or destruction 
        of the personal effects of a decedent, the Secretary concerned 
        shall reimburse the next of kin or other appropriate person the 
        amount of the value of such personal effects.''.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Melissa Dromgoole v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 931

- CR

Trial court case number: 18 40727

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

This is an appeal from a sentence imposed on October 11 , 2013 . Appellant filed h er notice of appeal on October 11 2013

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26. 2 . The record was due on

December 10 , 2013. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a), 35.2 . The clerk’s record was filed on

December 9 , 2013. The reporter’s record has not been filed. The Court has been informed that court reporter Terri Johns tone and court reporter Cylena Ko rkmas have both taken portions of the reporter’s record for this ap peal.

On January 1 5 , 2014

, the Court notified appellant that unless appellant either paid or provided proof of having made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record by February 14,
2014, t he Court may consider and decide only those issues or points t hat do not require a reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

On February 12, 2014, court reporter Terri Johnstone filed a motion for extension, informing the Court that appellant paid for her portion of the reporter’s record and requesting an

exte nsion to file the reporter’s record until March 14, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c). Terri

Johnstone’s motion for extension is GRANTED. Terri Johnstone is ordered to file her portion of the reporter’s record by March 14, 2014.

With respect to Cylena Korkmas’s portion of the reporter’s record, appellant is notified that this appeal with be considered without the portion of the reporter’s record taken by Cylena Korkmas unless on or before March 5, 2014 the appellant causes the rec ord to be filed in this Court by paying for the record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). If appellant pays for and causes Cylena Korkmas’s portion of the reporter’s record to be filed after March 5, 2014, it will not affect the deadline for appellant’s brief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 2 7 , 2014
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements 

TAMORAH CHAPMAN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2419-10-4 PER CURIAM 

JUNE 21, 2011 

VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND 

 DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY 

Jonathan C. Thacher, Judge 

 (Tamorah Chapman, pro se, on brief). 

 (Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Elizabeth B. Peay, 

Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee Virginia 

Employment Commission. 

 Tamorah Chapman appeals a decision of the circuit court affirming a decision by the 

Virginia Employment Commission (the Commission) denying her unemployment benefits due to 

misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the record, the circuit court’s order, and 

the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.1

 Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the Commission in its final opinion, see In the matter of: Chapman v. 

Department of the Treasury, Commission Decision No. 90709-C (June 30, 2010), as affirmed by 

the circuit court, see Chapman v. Virginia Emp’t Comm’n, Case No. CL-2010-0010194 (Oct. 15, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 In rendering this decision, we do not consider the fourth, sixth, and eleventh 

assignments of error. Rule 5A:18 bars our consideration of the fourth and sixth assignments of 

error because Chapman did not raise these issues before the circuit court. Although Chapman 

listed the eleventh assignment of error in her opening brief, she does not include any argument 

on this issue, as required by Rule 5A:20. 
- 2 - 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3168 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1087 Route 47 South in Rio Grande, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Carlton 

H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2021 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1087 Route 47 South in Rio Grande, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARLTON H. HAND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1087 Route 47 South in Rio 

6 Grande, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3168 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher MYERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7171.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 19, 2016.

Christopher Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Kristi Noel O’Malley, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Myers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Myers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00739

- CV
In the Interest of D.K., K.K. and H.K., Children

On Appeal from the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2011

- CI

- 13484

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having c onsidered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observa nce.

October 1, 2015
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Launches Its First-Ever Podcast on Conflict Resolution - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kqOHzLioKo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-launches-its-first-ever-podcast-on-conflict-resolution\/\">FMCS Launches Its First-Ever Podcast on Conflict Resolution<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-launches-its-first-ever-podcast-on-conflict-resolution\/embed\/#?secret=kqOHzLioKo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Launches Its First-Ever Podcast on Conflict Resolution” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"kqOHzLioKo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. (Nov. 15, 2023) \u2013 The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) launched its first podcast today, giving government employees, labor-management relations industry professionals, and others an inside look at difficult conversations in the realm of conflict resolution and how FMCS and its partners promote dialogue, engagement, and awareness around conflict in the workplace. […]"}