alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 5178

- 17T3 JOHN GENTLESS,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
MAYOR AND BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF STRATFORD,
Defendant s
- Respondent s
.

__________________________ __ _

Argued June 5, 2019

– Decided June 21, 2019 Before Judges Reisner and Mawla. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L

- 3344

- 17. John Gentless, appellant, argued the cause pro se. Stuart A. Platt argued the cause for respondent (Platt & Riso, PC, attorneys; Stuart A

. Platt, on the br ief).
PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 5178

- 17T3

In order to comply with the Borough of Stratford's court

- approved fair
share affordable housing plan, the Borough Council adopted Ordinance 2017

- 11 (the ordinance), adding a housing component to the rehabilitation/redevelopment plan fo r a dilapidated shopping center. Before adopting the ordinance, the Council received a resolution from the Borough's
Joint Land Use B oard ( the B oard) , recommending adoption of the proposed
ordinance as being consistent with the Borough's master plan. In his amended complaint in lieu of prerogative writs , plaintiff John Gentless 1 challenged the
ordinance as not being substantially consistent with the master plan, N.J.S.A.
40 A :12A

- 7 (d) , asserted that the public notice of its proposed adoption was inadequate under N.J.S.A. 40:49

- 2 (a) , and contended that one o f the B oard
members had a conflict of interest because he allegedly lived within two hundred feet of the shopping center. In a comprehensive written opinion, Assignment Judge Deborah Silverman Katz addressed and rejected each of plaintiff's arguments. Among other things, she noted that plaintiff produced no legally competent evidence
that the allegedly

- conflicted B oard membe r owned or had an interest in property near the shopping center

. The judge also found that the B oard's

1 Plaintiff was formerly the Borough's Mayor.3 A

- 5178

- 17T3

recommendation , concerning consistency with the master plan, was based on
expe rt planning testimony that the B oard credited, and the Council's public

no tice provided sufficient information to satisfy N.J.S.A. 40:49

- 2(a). On this appeal from Judge S ilverman Katz's June 5, 2018 order dismissing his complaint, plaintiff raises the same arguments he presented in the trial court.
We affirm for the reasons st ated in the judge's comprehensive written opinion. Defendant's arguments are without sufficient merit to warrant further discussion

. R. 2:11

- 3(e)(1)(E).
Affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"o3fq7dmkmo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/bureau-of-trade-analysis-bta\/how-to-file-carrier-mto-agreements\/\">How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/bureau-of-trade-analysis-bta\/how-to-file-carrier-mto-agreements\/embed\/#?secret=o3fq7dmkmo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How to File an Agreement and Agreement Types” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"o3fq7dmkmo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Under the Shipping Act of 1984, vessel operating common carriers and marine terminal operators have the ability to engage in various activities through agreements filed with the Federal Maritime Commission. These agreements can cover activities such as vessel sharing arrangements and discussion of terminal operations and fees. The Federal Maritime Commission maintains a library of agreements [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3338 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3338

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to modify requirements with 
 respect to whistleblower complaints made by employees of an Office of 
               Inspector General, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2021

  Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. 
  Lynch, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
   Khanna, and Ms. Porter) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to modify requirements with 
 respect to whistleblower complaints made by employees of an Office of 
               Inspector General, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhanced Whistleblower Engagement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS.

    (a) Whistleblower Protection Coordinator.--Section 3(d)(1)(C) of 
the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), in the matter preceding subclause (I), 
        by inserting ``, including employees of that Office of 
        Inspector General'' after ``employees''; and
            (2) in clause (iii), by inserting ``(including the 
        Integrity Committee of that Council)'' after ``and 
        Efficiency''.
    (b) Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and 
Efficiency.--Section 11(c)(5)(B) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 
(5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``, allegations of reprisal,'' 
and inserting the following: ``and allegations of reprisal (including 
the timely and appropriate handling and consideration of protected 
disclosures and allegations of reprisal that are internal to an Office 
of Inspector General)''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Certifications**

I, David P. Jones, Executive Chief Financial Officer of Health Finance Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Finance Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 10, 2008
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
      (the “Company”) each certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained
      in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/Hugh
      W. Mohler





Hugh
      W.
      Mohler


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


August
      11, 2005













/s/
      Mark
      A. Semanie





Mark
      A.
      Semanie


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


August
      11, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           28060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    56823
<ALLOWANCES>                                      6537
<INVENTORY>                                     181237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                268970
<PP&E>                                          708101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  290227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  705420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           144439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           414
<OTHER-SE>                                      342145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    705420
<SALES>                                       11499439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11499439
<CGS>                                          1333611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1418951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    75
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  62786
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     52344
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document

			
	



Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT TO
THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES RETIREMENT GROWTH ACCOUNT PLAN


The Estee Lauder Companies Retirement Growth Account Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 (the “RGA Plan”), is hereby further amended, effective as of May 31, 2022, to add the following new Section 1.6 to the end of Appendix CC (“Provisions Governing Certain Employees of Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation”):
SECTION 1.6    CESSATION OF STATUS AS EMPLOYER
    ADDF shall withdraw from and shall cease to be an Employer under the Plan effective as of May 31, 2022, and all Plan benefit accruals for ADDF Employees shall cease as of such date. Without limiting the foregoing,
(a)    Each ADDF Employee who has become a Participant in the Plan shall cease to be eligible for Retirement Account credits under Section 5.2 of the Plan after May 31, 2022 (eligibility for such credits for Plan Years beginning prior to such date shall be determined in accordance with the otherwise applicable provisions of the Plan), but shall remain eligible for Retirement Account credits under Section 5.4 of the Plan based on the Periodic Adjustment Percentage until the last date as of which a Retirement Account balance is maintained for such Participant. 
(b)    For all purposes under the Plan, each ADDF Employee shall be treated as having terminated employment with the Employer as of May 31, 2022 or, if earlier, the date the ADDF Employee terminated employment with ADDF.
(c)    This Plan shall remain responsible for the payment of all Plan benefits accrued on behalf of ADDF Employees, which benefits shall be payable in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Plan. For Plan valuation purposes, such benefits shall be assigned to the same Group as includes Estee Lauder.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3170

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide relief for 
 taxpayers that were victims of identity theft to commit unemployment 
                            insurance fraud.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2021

 Mr. Wenstrup introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide relief for 
 taxpayers that were victims of identity theft to commit unemployment 
                            insurance fraud.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF FOR TAXPAYERS THAT WERE VICTIMS OF IDENTITY THEFT TO 
              COMMIT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FRAUD.

    In collaboration with the Department of Labor, and applicable to 
tax years beginning in 2020 or 2021, the Commissioner of Internal 
Revenue shall--
            (1) implement a process to hold harmless taxpayers who are 
        flagged for unreported income if those taxpayers believe they 
        are victims of identity theft, or that fraudulent unemployment 
        benefits were claimed in their name, such that no penalties or 
        interest shall accrue against them; and
            (2) require States to report the amount of fraudulent 
        unemployment benefits that are excluded as income from Form 
        1099-G's issued by the State due to suspected or confirmed 
        fraud.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3066 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3066

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include Guam for purposes of 
  statutes prohibiting trafficking in contraband cigarettes, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2021

 Mr. San Nicolas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to include Guam for purposes of 
  statutes prohibiting trafficking in contraband cigarettes, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guam Cigarette Tax Enforcement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) There are many examples of disparities within Federal 
        law in its application to the United States territories, 
        including within the Federal criminal code.
            (2) The territory of Guam has lost significant revenue due 
        to prolific trafficking of contraband cigarettes onto the 
        island.
            (3) Since Guam had increased its tobacco tax by 200 percent 
        in 2010, local numbers have indicated that at least 98 million 
        cigarettes are untaxed every three years, amounting to a loss 
        of approximately $14.6 million.
            (4) Given its proximity to Asian countries where tobacco 
        products, including cigarettes, are incredibly inexpensive, the 
        propensity for cigarette trafficking leading to tax evasion is 
        greater.
            (5) Without the assistance of Federal enforcement and 
        resources, Guam remains vulnerable to cigarette trafficking and 
        is at a high risk for tax evasion.

SEC. 3. GUAM INCLUDED FOR PURPOSES OF STATUTES PROHIBITING TRAFFICKING 
              IN CONTRABAND CIGARETTES.

    Section 2341 of title 18, United States Code, is amended in 
paragraph (4), by inserting after ``the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,'' 
the following: ``Guam,''.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 8, 2001, American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc., 11624 Bowling Green Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63146, made application by renewal and by letter dated May 2, 2001, to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleGamma hydroxybutyric acid (2010)
ILysergic acid diethylamide (7315)
IDimethyltryptamine (7435)
IDihydromophine (9145)
IPhencyclidine (7471)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMetazocine (9240)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
II
 The firm plans to bulk manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances as radiolabeled compounds. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than February 19, 2002. Dated: November 15, 2001. Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 01-31408  Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SourcingLink.net, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel B. Rawlings,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Daniel B. Rawlings

Daniel B. Rawlings
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002