alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1 —    Section 1350 Certification**     I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:      (1)     the    Form 10-Q    of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2008    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    § 13(a) or § 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and      (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended. /s/  RICHARD    L. WAMBOLD    Richard L. Wambold    Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer     Date May 6, 2008     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall    not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of    Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as    amended. A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Delivers Its First-ever Spanish Language Outreach Webinar - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J4EwOK0yA6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/join-our-first-spanish-language-webinar-on-conflict-resolution\/\">FMCS Delivers Its First-ever Spanish Language Outreach Webinar<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/join-our-first-spanish-language-webinar-on-conflict-resolution\/embed\/#?secret=J4EwOK0yA6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Delivers Its First-ever Spanish Language Outreach Webinar” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"J4EwOK0yA6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service delivered on Jan. 26 its first-ever Spanish language webinar. To date, the Agency\u00a0has delivered nearly 50\u00a0free live webinars for labor and employment practitioners. The webinars have been a big success, with hundreds of attendees benefiting from the extensive knowledge of FMCS mediators and ADR professionals. This Spanish language webinar […]"}
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 02, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 02, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0137. ANTOINE BERNARD RICHARDS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

15T12744
#### COACH, INC., and Coach Services, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DI DA IMPORT AND EXPORT, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-1480.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 7, 2016.

Decided Jan. 22, 2016.

Steven P. McKey, Attorney, Donald A. Cole, Attorney, Bryan Cave LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Carolyn Shields, Attorney, Liu *&*Shields LLP, Flushing, NY, for Defendant-Appellant,

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge, DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Order

Coach contends in this suit under the Lanham Act that DI DA infringed its trademarked double-C logo. The district court wrote an opinion concluding that Coach is likely to prevail and is entitled to interlocutory relief. 2015 WL 832410, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22222 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 25, 2015). DI DA immediately appealed.

The parties’ briefs disagree about what relief the district court afforded to Coach, and consequently they disagree about the standard of review and the appropriate legal analysis. A little searching through the record revealed the reason for this disagreement: the district court had not awarded *any*relief. It issued an opinion but not an injunction and did not try to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d)(1). After the panel identified this shortcoming during the oral argument, Coach returned to the district judge and asked him to issue a formal order. The judge complied and entered a document captioned “Temporary Restraining Order.” Just to make sure that we did not take that caption as a misnomer — issuing a TRO three years into a lawsuit makes little sense — the order states explicitly that it took effect on February 25, 2015, and' expired on March 11, 2015.

The district court’s order presents DI DA with two insuperable problems. First, the order’s caption and limited duration show that it is a genuine TRO, which canonically cannot be appealed. *Sampson v. Murray,*415 U.S. 61, 86 & n. 58, 94 S.Ct. 937, 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974). Second, the order’s expiration means that DI DA is not now bound by any injunctive order and cannot appeal for that reason as well; DI *633DA is not adversely affected by the belated TRO, which expired before being issued.

DI DA has asked us to retain jurisdiction in case the district court should issue a preliminary injunction, as Coach has asked it to do. But, if the district court issues an appealable order, DI DA may file a new appeal. Any such appeal will be submitted to this panel under Operating Procedure 6(b), after an abbreviated briefing schedule that permits the parties to supplement their current briefs with arguments appropriate to what, if anything, the district court does in response to Coach’s request. The current appeal, which concerns the district court’s decision of February 2015 and an expired TRO, is no longer live.

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Thursday, June 18 2015 Contact: John Arnold, Director 

For Immediate Release Office of Public Affairs 

Web site: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8100 

 

FMCS Statement on Tentative Agreement 

Between the New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA) 

And the New York City Alliance of Hospitals 

WASHINGTON, D.C. —Allison Beck, Acting Director of the Federal Mediation and 

Conciliation Service (FMCS), today announced that with the assistance of Federal mediators, a 

tentative settlement has been reached between the New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA) 

and the New York City Hospital Alliance, representing major medical facilities in the city of 

New York. 

Bargaining under the auspices of FMCS mediators, including FMCS Acting Director Allison 

Beck, Deputy Director Scot Beckenbaugh, and Commissioner Cynthia Jeffries, the nurses’ union 

and hospital group reached a tentative agreement after many hours of intense talks early today. 

Ms. Beck commended the work of FMCS Deputy Director Beckenbaugh and Commissioner 

Jeffries for their roles in helping the nurses’ union and hospital group overcome major 

differences at the bargaining table. “We are gratified that our team of mediators was able to 

provide assistance in these challenging and complex negotiations,” Ms. Beck said. “Ultimately, it 

was perseverance and hard work by the nurses and hospital management that enabled them to 

reach agreement.” 

The tentative agreement is subject to ratification. As is Agency practice, the FMCS will not 

comment on the substance or content of the agreement or negotiation. 

### 

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government 

agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. 

Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 district offices and more than 60 field offices, the agency 

provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government agencies and communities. 

NEWS RELEASE

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20427
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Michael SEARCY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4622.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

Matthew C. Joseph, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*274Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Michael Searcy pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was sentenced to 70 months in prison. On appeal, Searcy’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but raising the claim that Searcy received ineffective assistance of counsel. Although informed of his right to do so, Searcy has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. After reviewing the entire record for any meritorious claims, we affirm.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal unless the record conclusively establishes ineffective assistance. *United States v. Richardson,*195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999). To allow for adequate development of the record, claims of ineffective assistance generally should be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. *United States v. King,*119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir.1997). We find that the record does not conclusively establish ineffective assistance.

Accordingly, we affirm Searcy’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Vessel-Operating Common Carriers","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ViYLHN9vgx\"><a href=\"\/resources-services\/vessel-operating-common-carriers\/\">Vessel-Operating Common Carriers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/resources-services\/vessel-operating-common-carriers\/embed\/#?secret=ViYLHN9vgx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Vessel-Operating Common Carriers” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ViYLHN9vgx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 3, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60377

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

ELIZAH CLARK, also known as Elijah Clark,

 DefendantAppellant.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:02-CR-19-1-BrS

-----------------------------------------------------------

Before SMITH, DEMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elizah Clark appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction for possession of a firearm by a

convicted felon. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence

obtained during a search incident to a traffic stop. He argues that because the officer did not have

probable cause for the stop, the subsequent search and seizure of evidence were illegal. 
-2-

Our review of the record and the parties’ arguments convinces us that the district court did

not err in denying the motion to suppress. United States v. Orozco, 191 F.3d 578, 581 (5th Cir.

1999). The officer testified that he stopped Clark’s vehicle on the basis of a perceived traffic

violation, i.e., improper windshield tinting, creating sufficient probable cause to support the initial

stop. Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). 

Moreover, Clark does not contend that his continued detention following the determination

that he was operating the vehicle without a driver’s license was improper. Nor does he dispute the

district court’sfinding that he consented to a search of his vehicle. Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3399 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the consideration of invasive 

species when prescribing fishways, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself and Mr. POCAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the consideration 

of invasive species when prescribing fishways, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF INVASIVE SPECIES. 

4 Section 18 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 811) 

5 is amended by inserting after ‘‘the Secretary of Com6 merce.’’ the following: ‘‘In prescribing a fishway, the Sec7 retary of Commerce or the Secretary of the Interior, as 

8 appropriate, shall consider the threat of invasive species.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
-  Home 
-  Mission 
-  Policy 

# In This Section

                      -  Mission 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  Chief Counsel 
                      -  Strategic Plan                          -  2012-2016 
                        -  MAP-21 
                      -  Budget 
                      -  Grants 
                      -  Contact Us 

# The Motor Carrier Efficiency Study 2008 Annual Report

MC-Efficiency-2008-Annual-Report-Enclosure-FINAL-March-2010-508.pdf (113.44 KB)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – April 6, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DKoY6uSYcc\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-april-6-2017\/\">Applicants – April 6, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-april-6-2017\/embed\/#?secret=DKoY6uSYcc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – April 6, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DKoY6uSYcc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
     THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS 
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         13,368
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                   19,000
<INVENTORY>                                    31,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,934
<PP&E>                                         1,982,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 652,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,127,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,634,452
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,511,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,127,572
<SALES>                                        1,656,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,699,851
<CGS>                                          661,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  661,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (220,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (220,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>