alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34 (d)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007



KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 23, 2023 No. 04-23-00050-CR IN RE Angel Yahir DURON CASILLAS Original Mandamus Proceeding 

### O R D E R Relators moved to consolidate this original proceeding with Cause Nos. 04-23-00048- CR, 04-23-00049-CR, 04-23-00050-CR, 04-23-00052-CR, 04-23-00053-CR, 04-23-00054-CR, and 04-23-00055-CR. Real party in interest is not opposed to the motions. Having considered the motions, we GRANT relators’ motions to consolidate. We ORDER Cause Nos. 04-23-00048-CR, 04-23-00049-CR, 04-23-00050-CR, 04-23- 00052-CR, 04-23-00053-CR, 04-23-00054-CR, and 04-23-00055-CR, consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument, if any. The parties must file any motions and briefs as if the proceedings were one; however, all cause numbers must be included on the documents. The court will dispose of the original proceedings with separate orders and opinions except to the extent the original proceedings involve the same defendant.

It is so ORDERED on January 23, 2023. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
Order entered April 10, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00219
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H .B.R., A CHILD On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469
- 56844
- 2017

ORDER Before the Court is court reporter Stephanie M. Hunn’s April 9, 2020 letter informing the Court she will not be filing a reporter’s record because she has received only partial payment for the rec ord

. Specifically, she has received payment for the record of the proceedings held August 22, 2019, August 23, 2019, and November 7, 2019. However, she has not received payment for “additional transcripts” that have been requested. To ensure the appeal p roceeds on the proper record, we ORDER appellant to file, no later than April 20, 2020, written verification he (1) no longer is requesting the reporter’s record and is proceed ing on the clerk’s record alone; (2)has paid for the “additional transcripts” r equested; or, (3) is proceed ing only on the

record of the proceedings for which he has already paid. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s
record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
/s/ RO BERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Mediation Skills - August 2024 - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mvbz03yVUs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/eventsregister\/mediation-skills-august-2024\/\">Mediation Skills – August 2024<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/eventsregister\/mediation-skills-august-2024\/embed\/#?secret=mvbz03yVUs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mediation Skills – August 2024” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"mvbz03yVUs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"This course takes place over 6 DAYS: (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday) August 20-22 and 27-29, 2024 Time: 11am – 5pm Eastern Standard Time Instructors: experienced FMCS Mediators Cost: $1600.00\u00a0 – Early bird $1500.00 if registered by July 20, 2024   Location: This course will be conducted entirely online using Zoom for Government.\u00a0 Please contact the [...]"}
EXHIBIT 32.0








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

/s/ William J. WagnerWilliam J. WagnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Guida R. SajdakGuida R. SajdakSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





April 29, 2016
Shared Neutrals: A Federal Interagency Collaborative Effort In Support of ADR

AGENCY AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE

By signing below, I assert that I have authority to represent that 

_________________________________________________________________, 

[name of agency], hereinafter, "the Agency," agrees to participate in Shared

Neutrals, an interagency collaborative effort in support of Alternative Dispute 

Resolution (ADR). 

The Agency agrees to:

Allow staff members who have been approved by Shared Neutrals, to work on 

an ad hoc basis as neutrals for other federal agencies, schedules permitting;

Abide by principles of confidentiality, as outlined in section 574 of the 

Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (Pub. Law 104-320), and the 

Shared Neutrals Standards of Practice; 

Assist, if necessary, in obtaining appropriate facilities for meetings, 

scheduling an initial mediation conference with the disputants and 

reimbursing travel expenses for Shared Neutrals mediators used by the 

Agency. 

It is understood that by signing this document the Agency does not in any way 

compromise its authority to control the work schedule of any employee who is 

acting as a neutral under this project.

Authorized Agency Official Title Date

(Dispute Resolution Specialist,

General Counsel or Solicitor)

Address Telephone

FMCS Form

SN Agency Agreement

Revised 12/3/18
#### Jimmy TAHIR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74943.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Gihan L. Thomas, Esquire, Law Offices of Gihan L. Thomas, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carmel Ai*158leen Morgan, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Russell J.E. Verby, Esquire, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jimmy Tahir, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

The agency denied Tahir’s asylum application claim as time barred. Tahir does not challenge this finding in his opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Tahir failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia. *See id.*at 1067-68.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Tahir did not suffer past persecution because the three incidents when fireworks were set outside his home and the one bomb threat against his church, considered individually or cumulatively, do not constitute persecution. *See id.*at 1059-60. Moreover, the record also does not compel the conclusion that Tahir demonstrated a pattern or practice of persecution against Christians in Indonesia. *See id.*at 1060-62.

However, the agency found Tahir failed to demonstrate a clear probability of persecution on account of his Christian religion based on what occurred to him. In reaching this conclusion, the agency did not apply the disfavored group analysis. In light of our intervening decision in *Tampubolon v. Holder,*610 F.3d 1056, 1062 (9th Cir.2010), we remand for the agency to assess Tahir’s withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis in the first instance. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1067; *see also INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Developing Collective Bargaining Skills

Collective Bargaining Skills for Teams

Are you prepared with the tools and techniques needed to achieve collective 

bargaining success in today’s challenging environment?

Program Description 

Collective bargaining in today’s environment can be challenging. Economic uncertainties,

complex health and benefit issues, social media, and influences from external forces often 

make the collective bargaining process difficult to navigate. Improved negotiation skills can 

increase your odds of achieving a collective bargaining agreement that meets the needs of 

both sides. 

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) assists parties at all stages of the 

collective bargaining process, from assessing the bargaining relationship, to negotiations and 

relationship development training, to facilitation, and mediation. All FMCS training programs 

are developed and designed to meet the needs of the parties, their current relationship,

knowledge, and skill level. 

Upon completion of this program, participants will be able to identify communications 

barriers and develop strategies to overcome them. They will improve their understanding of 

the collective bargaining process and table dynamics, and identify bargaining strategies

and learn skills to increase their odds not only for success at the table, but also for a productive

labor-management relationship. FMCS continually demonstrates that a problem-solving

mindset, open communications, respect, trust and transparency are the essential ingredients 

for productive and mutually beneficial collective bargaining and labor-management 

relationships. 

FMCS | 250 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov
FMCS training programs are developed with the parties and designed to meet their needs, 

their current relationship, knowledge, and skill level. 

Agenda

A Negotiation Skills program can cover topics such as: 

I. Historical and Legal Framework of Collective Bargaining

a. Collective Bargaining History

b. Legal Definition of Collective Bargaining

II. Subjects of Bargaining

a. Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining

b. Permissive Subjects of Bargaining

c. Illegal Subjects of Bargaining

III. Structure of Bargaining

a. Joint Sessions

b. Caucuses

IV. Traditional Negotiation Stages

a. Exchange

b. Discussion

c. Reaching Conclusions

V. Impasse and Other Outcomes of Bargaining

VI. Best Practices and Effective Use of a Mediator

For More Information

For more information about FMCS and its programs, please contact FMCS Headquarters or

visit our website at www.fmcs.gov.

FMCS | 250 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6025

WYATT HESSING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY P. BRUNELLE, Police Officer; ERICCA FIGUEROA, Police 

Officer; JOSEPH GUZDOWSKI, Police Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00595-HEH)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wyatt Hessing, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wyatt Hessing appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action without prejudice 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), for failure to comply with a prior 

court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Hessing v. Brunelle, No. 3:13-cv-00595-HEH 

(E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### DODGE-FREEDMAN POULTRY COMPANY, Debtor, Appellant, v. DELAWARE MILLS, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 5213.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

May 21, 1957.

Joseph Kruger, Boston, Mass., Widett & Kruger, Boston, Mass., on the brief, for appellant.

Robert P. Booth, Manchester, N. H., Wyman, Starr, Booth, Wadleigh & Lang-dell, Manchester, N. H., on the brief, for Delaware Mills, Inc., appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court on the opinion by Judge Connor reported in 148 F.Supp. 647.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
Nos. 33-68806, 33-68808, 33-62631 and 33-62633 of Elcotel, Inc. and 
subsidiaries on Forms S-8, of our report dated June 23, 1997, appearing 
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Elcotel, Inc. and subsidiaries for 
the year ended March 31, 1997.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Tampa, Florida

June 27, 1997
#### Dupe KUFORIJI; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73304.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Dupe Kuforiji, Woodinville, WA, pro se.

Georgina Biobaku, Woodinville, WA, pro se.

James A. Hurley, Esquire, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Esquire, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the Dis*308trict Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dupe Kuforiji and her daughter, natives and citizens of Nigeria, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies regarding Kuforiji’s identity and marital status, and her failure to provide sufficient corroboration in the absence of credible testimony. *See id.*at 1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable “[i]n the totality of circumstances”); *see also Aden v. Holder,*589 F.3d 1040, 1046 (9th Cir.2009) (“[t]he highly deferential standard of review compels us to let stand the BIA’s determination that petitioner’s corroboration was insufficient.”). Accordingly, in the absence of credible testimony, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------



                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-9T1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-9T1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance