alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,609
<PP&E>                                         318,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,804,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,447,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,306
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,309,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,804,094
<SALES>                                        550,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               550,940
<CGS>                                          125,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,274,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (37,035)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,667,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,354,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,354,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,354,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Moving Small Shipments in Boxes or Barrels Overseas - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ETJE39Yv5T\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/consumer-affairs-dispute-resolution-services\/moving-small-shipments-in-boxes-or-barrels-overseas\/\">Moving Small Shipments in Boxes or Barrels Overseas<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/consumer-affairs-dispute-resolution-services\/moving-small-shipments-in-boxes-or-barrels-overseas\/embed\/#?secret=ETJE39Yv5T\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Moving Small Shipments in Boxes or Barrels Overseas” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ETJE39Yv5T\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"To avoid problems when shipping small packages overseas:","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 10.14

                            AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

Ferro:        Adolph J. Ferro, Ph.D., 5868 Suncreek, Lake Oswego,Oregon 97034

Epitope:      Epitope, Inc., 8505 S.W. Creekside Place, Beaverton, Oregon 
              97008

Agritope:     Agritope, Inc., 8505 S.W. Creekside Place, Beaverton, Oregon 
              97008

SAMase
Technology:   SAMase ethylene control technology described and claimed in
              United States patent 5,416,250, issued May 16, 1995, for an
              invention titled "Genetic Control of Ethylene Biosynthesis in
              Plants using S-Adenosylmethionine Hydrolase," invented by
              Adolph J. Ferro, Richard K. Bestwick, and Lyle R. Brown.

Date:         November 11, 1996

                                  BACKGROUND

Ferro is a co-inventor of the SAMase Technology, which was transferred to
Agritope in 1987 upon the merger of Agricultural Genetic System, Inc., into
Agritope.  On December 9, 1987, Ferro and Epitope entered into an Agreement
(the "1987 Agreement") providing for payment of a royalty on the SAMase
Technology to Ferro in connection with the acquisition of the SAMase
Technology by Agritope.  The parties wish to amend the 1987 Agreement to
provide for a one-time payment.

                                   AGREEMENT

      Payment.  Upon execution of this agreement, Epitope shall pay Ferro
$590,000 as the final payment for the acquisition of the SAMase Technology. 

      Amendment and Release.  Ferro accepts the foregoing payment in full
satisfaction of Epitope's remaining obligations with respect to acquisition of
the SAMase Technology under the 1987 Agreement, and agrees that the 1987
Agreement is superseded by this agreement.  Ferro hereby releases Epitope from
any further obligations under the 1987 Agreement.  Ferro warrants that he has
not assigned any interest in the 1987 Agreement to any other party.

      Miscellaneous.  This agreement is the entire agreement with respect to
its subject matter, is governed by Oregon law, and shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the parties and their permitted successors and
assigns.

                                          EPITOPE, INC.

                                          By 
Adolph J. Ferro, Ph.D.                          Gilbert N. Miller
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                and Chief Financial Officer

                                          AGRITOPE, INC.

                                          By 
                                                Gilbert N. Miller
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                and Chief Financial Officer
#### Daniel MELLINGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mr. BAUKNECHT; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 08-6061.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2008.

Decided: May 30, 2008.

Daniel Mellinger, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Mellinger appeals a district court order granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Mellinger v. Bauknecht,*No. 0:06-cv-03441-RBH, 2007 WL 4276415 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark A. Scharmann, certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Alliance Corporation; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.            The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the            registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.            The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 14, 2009

 

|   |  

/s/Mark A. Scharmann

Mark A. Scharmann

President (*Principal Executive Officer)* |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  THE ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
                     TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, S. Scott Harding, Chief Executive Officer of ADVO, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
     ended September 25, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

          b) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                                          By:     /s/ S. SCOTT HARDING
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      S. Scott Harding
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 9, 2004

I, Donald E. McCombs, Executive Vice President, President -- Operations Group
and Acting Chief Financial Officer of ADVO, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
     ended September 25, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

          b) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                                          By:     /s/ DONALD E. MCCOMBS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     Donald E. McCombs
                                                 Executive Vice President,
                                             President -- Operations Group and
                                               Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 9, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7777
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus IVAN LOWELL DECKARD, a/k/a Joseph Francis Vale, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-95-45, CA-97-11-4) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ivan Lowell Deckard, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ivan Lowell Deckard seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Deckard , Nos. CR-95-45; CA97-11-4 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 19 97). We deny Deckard's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janet Mathews, Chief FinancialOfficer of Gaiam, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Janet  Mathews       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Janet  Mathews           |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| July 29,  2003           |

 

----
#### Sylvester Robert ALLEN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74125.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*770Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 15, 2008.

Sylvester Robert Allen, Pearsall, TX, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sylvester Robert Allen, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.

We have reviewed the response to this court’s order to show cause, and we conclude that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, the petition for review is summarily denied.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioner’s motion to reopen was based on new evidence consisting of his state court motion that seeks to vacate the judgment of conviction and to withdraw his guilty plea. The pendency of a post-conviction motion cannot negate the finality of a conviction. *Grageda v. INS,*12 F.3d 919, 921 (9th Cir.1993). Moreover, petitioner is prohibited from collaterally attacking the propriety of his state court conviction in immigration proceedings. *See Urbina-Mauricio v. INS,*989 F.2d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir.1993).

The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  2004
Home/Timeline 1990-2013/2004 Previous			Next
2004										Director Hurtgen mediates an end to the 141-day Southern California grocery strike, the longest in the industry’s history. To increase mediator expertise on strategic industries and bargaining issues, the agency launches a mediator training initiative and increases outreach to labor and management.
D2015-06-18T12:45:01-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Accessibility |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail