alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2005 of HemaCare Corporation (the “Company”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in suchreport.

Verytruly yours,
| /s/ JUDI IRVING           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Judi Irving               |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| /s/ ROBERT S. CHILTON     |   |
| Robert S. Chilton         |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

Dated:   March 20, 2006

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toHemaCare Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2020

b1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2020

161280

ANGELICA IVANIKIW,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161280

COA: 352251

Oakland CC: 17

- 857782

- DO

ALEKSEI IVANIKIW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2020 order

of t he Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question s presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust
            2006-6 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

  Date: March 26, 2007


             /s/ Steve Bailey
             ---------------------------
             Steve Bailey
             Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
{"id":1169,"date":"2014-03-10T09:37:25","date_gmt":"2014-03-10T13:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1169"},"modified":"2018-08-16T09:38:24","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T13:38:24","slug":"commission-meeting-scheduled-for-april-16-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-april-16-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for April 16, 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>April 10, 2014<\/div>\n<h2>Sunshine Act Meeting<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Date<\/strong>:<br \/>\nApril 16, 2014; 10:00 AM<\/p>\n<p><strong>Place<\/strong>:<br \/>\n800 North Capitol Street, N.W.<br \/>\nFirst Floor Hearing Room<br \/>\nWashington, D.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Status<\/strong>:<br \/>\nThe first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matters to be Considered<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Open Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Direct Final Rulemaking on Parts 501 and 503 of the Commission\u2019s Regulations Concerning Public Information and Delegation of Authority<\/li>\n<li>Staff Briefing on Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services\u2019 Activities<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Closed Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Discussion on Nondisclosure Provision of Section 6(j) of the Shipping Act<\/li>\n<li>Docket No. 12-03: The Auction Block Company, et. al. v. The City of Homer, et. al.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Contact:<\/strong><br \/>\nKaren V. Gregory<br \/>\nSecretary<br \/>\n202-523-5725<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 10, 2014 Sunshine Act Meeting Date: April 16, 2014; 10:00 AM Place: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W. First Floor Hearing Room Washington, D.C. Status: The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session. Matters to be Considered: Open Session Direct Final... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-april-16-2014\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26,4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1169"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1169"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1170,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1169\/revisions\/1170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-6CB (the
               "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
          Bank of New York, as Trustee.

          Date: March 27, 2007


             /s/ Steve Bailey
             ---------------------------
             Steve Bailey
             Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anna Veronica MURRIETA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10465.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Anea Iulia Pop, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Firm Address: SUITE 4800 Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*184Mark Willimann, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anna Veronica Murrieta appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Murrieta contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider her individual circumstances and arguments for a lower sentence. The record indicates that the district court considered Murrieta’s arguments in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and did not otherwise procedurally err. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Murrieta also contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), her sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is reasonable. *See Carty,*520 F.3d at 993-94.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jehu Hand, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mendecino
Partners, Ltd.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4.        The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
efectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including



<PAGE>


any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: January 31, 2004

/s/ Jehu Hand
Jehu Hand
President and Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Obsidian  Enterprises,
Inc. (the  "Company")  certifies  that the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for the  quarter  ended  January  31,  2003,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 21, 2003                 /s/  Timothy S. Durham
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Timothy S. Durham
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  a.
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. for the year ended
September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb.
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
 Date: March 6, 2008
    /s/ Larry E. WilliamsBy Larry E. WilliamsPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: March 6, 2008
    /s/ Carl D. LangrBy Carl D. LangrPrincipal Accounting Officer
exv10w4



 





Termination of the Amended 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan




On September 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of RTW, Inc. adopted the following resolutions




     WHEREAS, the Company has established, and the shareholders have approved, the RTW,
Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which is intended to qualify under Section 423 and
421 of the Code, which ESPP was last amended by the Board on April 27, 2005 and the amendment was
approved by the shareholders on June 15, 2005; and



     WHEREAS, the 2007 Phase of the Plan would otherwise end as of April 15, 2008, at which time
the Company would immediately exercise all options on behalf of any optionee who has not withdrawn
from the ESPP and will issue to such optionee the number of whole shares of common stock purchased
with the amount set aside on the optionee’s behalf, and



     WHEREAS, Section 12.2 of the Merger Agreement provides that the Company will terminate the
2007 Phase of the ESPP immediately prior to the earlier of the Effective Time of the Merger or
December 31, 2007; and



     WHEREAS, Section 2(i) of the ESPP reserves to the Board the discretion to designate the
Termination Date of any Phase of the ESPP; and



     WHEREAS, Section 3(b) of the ESPP reserves to the Committee the discretion to determine the
length of time of each Phase of the ESPP;



     THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: (1) the Termination Date of the 2007 Phase of the ESPP be and
hereby is the final payroll payment date immediately prior to the earlier of the Effective Time of
the Merger or December 31, 2007; and (2) then outstanding options under the 2007 Phase of the ESPP
will be immediately exercised as of the Termination Date for that whole number of Shares that may
be purchased based on amount of each Participant’s accumulated payroll withholdings as of the
Termination Date, and that any amount not used to purchase Shares shall be returned to the
Participant without interest; and (3) the Shares issued as a result of the exercise of the options
under the ESPP be considered as outstanding as of the Effective Time of the Merger for purposes of
receiving the Merger Consideration; and



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority reserved to the Board under Section 12 of the
ESPP, the ESPP be and hereby is amended to provide that no further Phases will commence after the
Termination Date for the 2007 Phase; and



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that, subject to the rights of the participants as set forth in the
resolutions above, the ESPP be and hereby is terminated effective as of the Effective Date of the
Merger, and that any and all common stock reserved under the ESPP as of the Effective Date of the
Merger, shall be cancelled, withdrawn and no longer available for issuance under the ESPP.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50209 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CANDELARIO TRUJEQUE

- NOVELO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 361

- 1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Candelario Trujeque

- Novelo appeals his 54

- month, above

- G uidelines sentence of imprisonment following his guilty plea to illegal reentry in to the United States following previous deportation. Trujeque

- Novelo argues that that the 54

- month sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Specifically, Trujeque

- Novelo contends that the district court assigned too

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 10, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50209 Document: 00513265335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2015No. 15

- 50209

2 much weight to his dated criminal history, failed to consider his avoidance of

non - immigration offen ses since 1995 , and did not adequately consider his age of 65

. We review the district court’s non

- G uideline s sentence for abuse of discretion under the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States , 522 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Gere zano - Rosales , 692 F.3d 393, 400 (5th Cir. 2 012). The record reflects that the district court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors. The district court acknowledged Trujeque

- Novelo’s argument that some of his convictions were dated and noted that his age is a factor it usually considers in favor of mitigation

. The district court, nevertheless, determined that an upward variance was appropriate to address Trujeque

- Novelo’s underrepresented criminal history category and “pattern of recidi vism.” Trujequ e - Novelo had 15 prior convictions, including two convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and seven immigration

- related convictions. T wo lengthy sentences for prior convictions of illegal reentry following deportation did not deter Trujeque

- Novelo from committing the same crime again. Under the totality of the circumstances, t he district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing this sentence

. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-50209 Document: 00513265335 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2015
106 A.3d 479

#### IN THE MATTER OF DIEGO P. MILARA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 049331991).

January 22, 2015.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*1:20—3(g)(4) and *Rule*1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of DIEGO P. MILARA of HARRISON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991;

And on October 29, 2014, the Court having ordered respondent to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics the outstanding requests for records and information within sixty days;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court that respondent has failed to comply with the Court’s Order;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DIEGO P. MILARA is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending his compliance, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DIEGO P. MILARA be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

*342ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by DIEGO P. MILARA pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DIEGO P. MILARA comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.