alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"id":5337,"date":"2021-01-15T11:41:29","date_gmt":"2021-01-15T15:41:29","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=5337"},"modified":"2021-01-15T11:41:29","modified_gmt":"2021-01-15T15:41:29","slug":"nprm-on-service-contract-filing-relief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/nprm-on-service-contract-filing-relief\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Issues Proposed Rule on Service Contract Filing Relief"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission today issued a <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.fmc.gov\/readingroom\/proceeding\/20-22\/\">Notice of Proposed Rulemaking<\/a> (NPRM) that, if adopted, will permit ocean carriers to file original service contracts at the agency up to 30 days after going into effect.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the public have until March 4, 2021 to file comments in response to this NPRM.\u00a0 The Commission will consider all public comments before voting on final regulatory actions.<\/p>\n<p>Current FMC regulations require the filing of initial service contracts with the FMC before an ocean carrier is permitted to receive and move cargo under the terms of that contract. Amendments to previously filed service contracts may be filed up to thirty days following the commercial effective date of the amendment. Following an April 2020 Commission vote that addressed COVID related impacts to the supply chain, the Commission granted temporary regulatory relief that allowed ocean carriers to file initial service contracts up to 30 days after contract terms had been agreed to.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission today issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that, if adopted, will permit ocean carriers to file original service contracts at the agency up to 30 days after going into effect. Members of the public have until March 4, 2021 to file comments in response to... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/nprm-on-service-contract-filing-relief\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5337"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5339,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5337\/revisions\/5339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>

                                                                  (Exhibit 11.1)

                                     QCS CORPORATION
                             COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED                     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    ---------------------------        --------------------------------     
                                                       MARCH 31,      MARCH 31,             MARCH 31,         MARCH 31,
                                                         1997           1996                  1997              1996
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------
                                                             (UNAUDITED)                            (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>                 <C>                 <C> 
Net loss                                            $  (809,651)   $  (251,703)         $  (2,338,264)     $  (986,219)

Preferred dividend payable not included 
  in net loss                                           (59,298)              -              (180,856)                -
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------

Net loss attributed to common
    shareholders                                    $  (868,949)   $  (251,703)         $  (2,519,120)     $  (986,219)
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------

Weighted average number of common 
  shares outstanding                                  17,166,531     15,536,000             17,043,090       15,536,000
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------ 

Net loss per share of common stock                     $  (0.05)      $  (0.02)              $  (0.15)        $  (0.06)
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------
                                                     ------------   ------------         -------------      ------------


</TABLE>

              See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.



                                       -12-
Cause number: 01-15-00088-CR

Style: Bruce Edward Gorden

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed: March 31, 2015

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The motion does not show that it was delivered to appellant “in person or mailed—both by certified and by firstclass mail” at his last known address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). Accordingly, we deny the motion to 

substitute counsel. By filing this motion, Seth Kretzer has appeared as counsel of record for appellant. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 6.2, 9.1. Sorcha Landau remains as appellant’s lead counsel until new lead counsel is designated or a 

motion to withdraw or substitute counsel that complies with Rule 6.5 is filed and granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.

6.1(c), 6.5.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Date: April 12, 2016
Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
 Suite 388, 1130 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC  V6E 4A4
 T(604) 602-6767F(604) 602-0235
 www.rpacan.com
 
 
 CONSENT OF R. DENNIS BERGEN
 
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2011, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 26th day of March, 2012
 
 (Signed)“R. Dennis Bergen”
 
 Name:        R. Dennis Bergen
 Title:         P. Eng. and Associate Principal Mining Engineer
 for Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0042 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JO H NATHAN ALBERT BERTSCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 8 2023

06/08/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0042
Exhibit 32.1
CertificationCertification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the Company) certifies that the Amendment No. 2 to
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended July 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in that Form
10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  September 22, 2004 | /s/ Timothy S. Durham
Timothy S. Durham
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         191,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               39,646,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,493,880)
<INVENTORY>                                 35,595,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,205,111
<PP&E>                                       7,545,202
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,291,402)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,385,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,884,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       174,475
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,944,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,385,244
<SALES>                                     87,640,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,640,006
<CGS>                                       39,183,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,183,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            44,348,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               195,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,531,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,617,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   660,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,277,920)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,277,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Raymond J. Balsys, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amendment to Form 10-K of Parlux Fragrances, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



Dated:  July 29, 2010

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ RAYMOND J. BALSYS                     
| | Raymond J. Balsys,
Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Fraud Alert: Transnational Fraud Ring Targets U.S. Government Procurement Offices and Vendors - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YHR68WJgvA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fraud-alert-transnational-fraud-ring-targets-u-s-government-procurement-offices-and-vendors\/\">Fraud Alert: Transnational Fraud Ring Targets U.S. Government Procurement Offices and Vendors<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fraud-alert-transnational-fraud-ring-targets-u-s-government-procurement-offices-and-vendors\/embed\/#?secret=YHR68WJgvA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Fraud Alert: Transnational Fraud Ring Targets U.S. Government Procurement Offices and Vendors” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"YHR68WJgvA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"In July 2018, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) discovered that members of a transnational fraud ring based in Atlanta, Georgia, had impersonated a DHS procurement official to obtain computer equipment from private vendors. Further investigation into the ongoing fraud scheme revealed that the subjects were also stealing electronic […]"}
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification
is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ John M. Thompson                                
|                       |  |  |  | John M. Thompson                                    
|                       |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Grigor TASALYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71257.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Areg Kazaryan, Law Offices of Areg Kazaryan, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Shelley Goad, Assistant Director, OIL, John D. Williams, Esquire, Tim Ramnitz, Trial, DOJ, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Grigor Tasalyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Husyev v. Mukasey,*528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Tasalyan’s hearing testimony and his airport interview statements were inconsistent as to his reasons for coming to the United States, whether he had been arrested in Armenia, and whether he feared returning to Armenia, *see Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir.2004), and Tasalyan’s asylum application omitted his employment as a driver for the Armenian National Movement, *see Husyev,*528 F.3d at 1183. The IJ properly considered and rejected Tasalyan’s explanations for the inconsistencies. *See Li,*378 F.3d at 963. In the absence of credible testimony, Tasalyan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Tasalyan’s CAT claim is based on testimony the agency found not credible, and he points to no other evidence to *259show it is more likely than not he would be tortured if he returned to Armenia, his CAT claim fails. *See id.*at 1156-57. Finally, the record does not support Tasa-lyan’s contention that the BIA failed to address his CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Diversified Industries, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam Debard, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adam Debard


Adam Debard


Principal Accounting Officer





October 20, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7417

ROBERT EARL BROOKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-569-5-BR)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brooks v. Freeman, No. CA-94-569-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

                                   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the quarterly report of Mendocino Partners, Inc.
(the  "Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002,  Jehu
Hand hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

            (1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The  information  contained  in the  quarterly  report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jehu Hand

Jehu Hand
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive and financial officer
September 1, 2004





<PAGE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFSTONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.,INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-135663), 2004Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-116405) and 1996 Stock Incentive Plan(No. 333-132603, 333-18601 and 333-114013), of HemaCareCorporation our report dated March 29, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of HemaCare Corporation included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2007

----