alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65232-65233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31167]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Request for Comments on an Outline for Discussion: Concepts for 
Postal Transformation

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published a notice with request for public 
comment in the Federal Register (66 FR 51480-51481) on October 9, 2001. 
The document on which comments are requested is available on the Postal 
Service's public Web site at www.usps.com/strategicdirection or at 
www.usps.com keyword: transformation. Comments were due November 1, 
2001. The comment period is hereby extended until January 31, 2002.

DATES: The Postal Service must receive your comments on or before 
January 31, 2002. No additional extensions on the comment period will 
be granted.

ADDRESSES: Those responding are encouraged to e-mail their comments to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#097d7b68677a6f667b64687d606667496c64686065277c7a797a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d090f1c130e1b120f101c091412133d18101c141153080e0d0e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>. Those wishing to send written comments 
should mail them to Julie S. Moore, Executive Program Director, Office 
of Transformation, Strategic Planning, Room 4011, United States Postal 
Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-
1520.

[[Page 65233]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Van Coverden (202) 268-8130.

Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 01-31167 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Exhibit 99.16

 

| **Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle    Associates Inc** | ****Suite    388, 1130 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4 **T**(604) 602-6767**F**(604) 602-0235 **www.scottwilson.com** |  |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|

|                                     |                     |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                     |                     |
| **CONSENT OF EXPERT**                    |                     |
| United States Securities and    Exchange | **Date: March 31, 2009** |
| Commission                               |                          |

Re: 

New Gold Inc. (the "Company")Annual Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 

I, David Rennie, P.Eng., Principal Geologist forScott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., do hereby consent to consent to theinclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is beingfiled with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of referencesto my name in connection with mineral resource estimates for the New AftonProject and to the use of information derived from the technical report entitled"New Afton Project NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report" dated April 2007 andrevised on June 22, 2007, included in the Annual Information Form of New GoldInc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2008. 

(Signed) "David Rennie" 

David Rennie, P.Eng. Principal Geologist Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. 

Email: david.rennie@scottwilson.com 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Claudia MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-40467

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2016.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Claudia Martinez appeals the district court’s decision revoking her supervised release which followed her conviction for transporting illegal aliens for private finan*243cial gain. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); *United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 118-19 (5th Cir.2005). Martinez pleaded true to associating with a felon; however, she denied committing the new law violation of possession with the intent to distribute marijuana (and conspiracy to do so), or associating with a person engaged in criminal activity. She argues on appeal that the evidence failed to establish that she knew of the marijuana hidden in the spare tire of the vehicle driven by her to the border patrol checkpoint. Our review is for an abuse of discretion. *United States v. Arbizu,*431 F.3d 469, 470 (5th Cir.2005).

Martinez’s nervousness at the border patrol checkpoint is circumstantial evidence of her guilty knowledge. *See United States v. Jones,*185 F.3d 459, 464 (5th Cir.1999). The inconsistency in her statements during questioning also is circumstantial evidence of guilty knowledge. *See United States v. Mendoza,*522 F.3d 482, 489-90 (5th Cir.2008).

Martinez’s contention that the district court should not have considered her prior smuggling conviction in making its revocation decision is without merit. *See United States v. Grandlund,*71 F.3d 507, 509 (5th Cir.1995) (noting that revocation hearings are not part of the criminal prosecution and are not formal trials); ' *see also*§ 3583(e) (noting that a district court may revoke supervised release after considering the'factors set forth in section 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1)). Contrary to Martinez’s assertion, the core facts of the prior smuggling attempt were substantially similar to the facts advanced by the Government in the instant proceedings.

In sum, Martinez has not shown that the ■district court abused its discretion in concluding that it was more likely than not that she participated in the marijuana-possession offense and associated with a person engaged in illegal activity. *See Hinson,*429 F.3d at 118-19; *Arbizu,*431 F.3d at 470. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATION
            Exhibit
      31.1





I, Scott
R. Oglum, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we
have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors;




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.




Dated:
February 19, 2008





/s/ Scott R.
Oglum


Scott R.
Oglum


Chief
Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Episodes - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qmwdOzwyc9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/resources\/multi-media\/crpodcast\/episodes\/\">Episodes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/resources\/multi-media\/crpodcast\/episodes\/embed\/#?secret=qmwdOzwyc9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Episodes” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"qmwdOzwyc9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/RSS-feed.png"}
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

CECILE FOY GSANGER NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

July 15, 2015

Hon. Johnathan T. Ball

Attorney at Law

6521 N. 10th Street, Ste. A

McAllen, TX 78504

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez

Hidalgo County District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cau se No. 13

- 15

- 00004

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR

- 3545

- 13

- C

Style: Alicia Esquivel Delgado v. The State of Texas

Appellant ’s motion for extension of time to file brief in the above cause was this

day GRANTED by this Court. The time has been e xtended t o Thursday, July 16, 2015

.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ilia Lekach, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Chapter 63 of Title 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                          By:    /s/ Ilia Lekach
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Ilia Lekach
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   June 28, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Parlux Fragrances, Inc. and will be retained by Parlux Fragrances,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman International LLC (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | /s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive OfficerNovember 17, 2004
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Vincent  Cuervo, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of DEFAULT
PROOF CREDIT CARD SYSTEM, INC.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c.	disclosed in this amended annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 28, 2005

    /s/ Vincent  Cuervo
    --------------------
    Vincent  Cuervo
    Chief Executive Officer
#### In re: Rayford KNIGHT, a/k/a Cherokee, a/k/a Chief, Petitioner.

No. 07-2178.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 6, 2008.

Decided: May 28, 2008.

Rayford Knight, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rayford Knight petitions for a writ of mandamus, asserting the district court has unduly delayed acting on a “Motion to Clarify Sentence” he claims to have filed in October 2006. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act on the motion. Our thorough review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the only motion filed by Knight in October 2006 was a motion for return of property. Knight’s two prior mandamus petitions seeking an order compelling the district court to act on that motion were denied as moot because the district court had already acted on the motion. *See In Re: Knight,*253 Fed.Appx. 249 (4th Cir.2007), *amended*(4th Cir. Dec. 13, 2007) (unpublished order correcting typographical error); *
      *In Re: Knight,*242 Fed.Appx. 908 (4th Cir.2007). Because there was no “Motion to Clarify Sentence” filed in the district court and this court has already denied as moot two prior mandamus petitions seeking district court action on the only motion Knight filed in October 2006, we dismiss as frivolous Knight’s instant petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny Knight’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*

In case No. 07-4684, Knight petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to act on a motion for release he claimed he filed in October 2006. Because the only motion Knight filed in October 2006 was a motion for return of properly, we liberally construed Knight’s mandamus petition as referring to that motion. Knight did not challenge this characterization in his rehearing petition in that case.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sunjun Liu, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/  Shujun Liu
    ------------------------------------
    SHUJUN LIU
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN

DATED: APRIL 12, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"F-7 Down Page - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HSfnkLrNdZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/f7down\/\">F-7 Down Page<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/f7down\/embed\/#?secret=HSfnkLrNdZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“F-7 Down Page” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"HSfnkLrNdZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}