65516 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2001 / Notices

increase in burden hours results in large

part from accounting for developing,

maintaining, and disclosing AEGC test

records, and basing the number of tags

required under § 1926.417(a), (b), and

(c) (‘‘Lockout and tagging of circuits’’)

on the number of jobsites instead of the

number of employees. In addition,

capital costs rose from $0 to $933,333

because OSHA is accounting for the cost

of purchasing new, and replacing worn

or damaged, warning signs and tags. The

Agency will summarize the comments

submitted in response to this notice,

and will include this summary in its

request to OMB to extend the approval

of these information-collection

requirements.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently-approved informationcollection requirement.

Title: Electrical Standards for

Construction (29 CFR part 1926, subpart

K).

OMB Number: 1218–0130.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Federal government; State, local,

or tribal governments.

Number of Respondents: 70,000.

Frequency of Recordkeeping: On

occasion; quarterly; semi-annually; or

(initially).

Average Time per Response: Varies

from one minute to tag an electrical

circuit or piece of equipment, to one

hour to develop a written AEGC

program.

Total Annual Hours Requested:

84,803.

Total Annual Costs (O&M): $933.333.

IV. Authority and Signature

John L. Henshaw, Assistant Secretary

of Labor for Occupational Safety and

Health, directed the preparation of this

notice. The authority for this notice is

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3506), and Secretary of

Labor’s Order No. 3–2000 (62 FR

50017).

Signed at Washington, DC, on December

14, 2001.

John L. Henshaw,

Assistant Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 01–31271 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–26–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration

Maritime Advisory Committee for

Occupational Safety and Health: Notice

of Meeting

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Maritime Advisory Committee

for Occupational Safety and Health:

Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Maritime Advisory

Committee for Occupational Safety and

Health (MACOSH), established under

section 7 of the Occupational Safety and

Health Act of 1970 to advise the

Secretary of Labor on issues relating to

occupational safety and health

programs, policies, and standards for

the maritime industries in the United

States, will meet in Baltimore,

Maryland.

DATES: MACOSH will meet on February

20 and 21, 2002, from 8:30 a.m. until

approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Committee will meet at

the Baltimore Marriott Waterfront Hotel,

800 Aliceanna Street, Baltimore,

Maryland. Mail comments, views, or

statements in response to this notice to

Joseph V. Daddura, Acting Director,

Office of Maritime Safety Standards,

OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room

N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20210. Telephone (202)

693–2086; fax: (202) 693–1663.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph V. Daddura, Acting Director,

Office of Maritime Safety Standards,

OSHA: Telephone (202) 693–2086.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All

interested persons are invited to attend

the public meetings of MACOSH at the

time and place indicated above.

Individuals with disabilities wishing to

attend should contact Theda Kenney at

(202) 693–2222 no later than February 1,

2002, to obtain appropriate

accommodations.

Meeting Agenda

This meeting will include discussion

of the following subjects: MACOSH

input on OSHA priorities, vertical

tandem lifts in the longshoring industry,

an update on the NIOSH diesel exhaust

epidemiology study, an NFPA update

on the changes to NFPA 306 ‘‘Control of

Gas hazards on Vessels,’’ discussion of

common issues with OSHA Advisory

Committee on Construction Safety and

Health, and MACOSH work group

reports.

Public Participation

Written data, views, or comments for

consideration by MACOSH on the

various agenda items listed above may

be submitted, preferably with copies, to

Joseph V. Daddura at the address listed

above. Submissions received by

February 1, 2002, will be provided to

the members of the committee and will

be included in the record of the

meeting.

Requests to make oral presentations to

the Committee may be granted if time

permits. Anyone wishing to make an

oral presentation to the Committee on

any of the agenda items noted above

should notify Joseph V. Daddura by

February 1, 2002. The request should

state the amount of time desired, the

capacity in which the person will

appear, and a brief outline of the

content of the presentation.

Authority: This notice issued under the

authority of sections 6(b)(1) and 7(b) of the

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

(29 U.S.C. 655, 656), the Federal Advisory

Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), and 29 CFR

part 1912.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of

December 2001.

John L. Henshaw,

Assistant Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 01–31189 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–26–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–255]

Nuclear Management Company, LLC;

Palisades Plant Environmental

Assessment and Finding of No

Significant Impact

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) is considering

issuance of an amendment to Facility

Operating License No. DPR–20, held by

Nuclear Management Company, LLC

(NMC or the licensee), for operation of

the Palisades Plant, located in Van

Buren County, Michigan, and the NRC

is issuing this environmental

assessment and finding of no significant

impact.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

The proposed amendment would

change the limiting conditions for

operation (LCOs), surveillance

requirements (SRs), and design features

in the Technical Specifications (TSs) to

provide more flexible fuel loading

constraints for the Palisades fuel storage

racks and accommodate future core

designs. The changes affect TS Sections

3.7.15, ‘‘Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) Boron

Concentration,’’ 3.7.16, ‘‘Spent Fuel

Assembly Storage,’’ and 4.3, ‘‘Design

Features—Fuel Storage.’’ Allowed

uranium enrichments for storage would

be increased. Enrichment limits for

storage racks for unirradiated fuel

(currently limited to fuel assemblies

having a maximum average planar

uranium-235 (U–235) enrichment of

4.20 weight percent) would be increased