alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cornell Sheron EVANS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-5135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

*819Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Keith Loren Kimball, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Caroline S. Platt, Research and Writing Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Darryl J. Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornel Sheron Evans pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). He appeals the seventy-eight month sentence he received, arguing that the district court clearly erred in applying an adjustment for reckless endangerment during flight, *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 3C1.2 (2009). We affirm.

Evans stipulated that, when Virginia Beach police attempted a traffic stop of his car, he continued to drive until he lost control of his vehicle while making a turn on the rain-wet road, then got out of the car and ran, throwing a loaded 9mm pistol over a fence toward an interstate highway as he went. He was then apprehended. At the sentencing hearing, the district court received evidence that, during his brief flight, Evans accelerated to a speed “well over the reckless limits” despite the presence of other vehicles, “just barely made” one turn, and later spun out of control. On these facts, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Evans “recklesslessly created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person while fleeing from a law enforcement officer.” USSG § 3C1.2. *See, e.g., United States v. Carter,*601 F.3d 252, 254-56 (4th Cir.2010).

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.

No. 10-12685

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 24, 2010.

Walter J. Andrews, Hunton & Williams, McLean, VA, Anna Price Lazarus, Hunton *479& Williams, Miami, FL, Robert Jeffrey Morrow, Hunton & Williams, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.

John A. Greco, Warren Bittner, Julie O. Bru, Henry Joseph Hunnefeld, City of Miami Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.

Before HULL, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The summary judgment in favor of State National Insurance Company is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the Order Granting State National Insurance Company’s Motion For Summary Judgment entered by the district court on May 10, 2010.

AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8cBt2BRGW0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/federal-mediator-helps-teachers-union-lake-villa-school-board-reach-tentative-agreement\/\">Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/federal-mediator-helps-teachers-union-lake-villa-school-board-reach-tentative-agreement\/embed\/#?secret=8cBt2BRGW0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Mediator Helps Teachers Union, Lake Villa School Board Reach Tentative Agreement” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"8cBt2BRGW0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Lake Villa (IL) Federation of Teachers and District 41 board of education\u00a0announced that a tentative agreement was reached after a 10-month impasse. The agreement, reached with the help of a Federal mediator, comes after teachers indicated they would go on strike Feb. 29 if a new deal were not reached by that date. A […]"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of income and consolidated
statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-K for the period
ending June 30, 1995, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                          307875
<SECURITIES>                                    208094
<RECEIVABLES>                                   641203
<ALLOWANCES>                                     13465
<INVENTORY>                                     291587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1508873
<PP&E>                                          515470
<DEPRECIATION>                                  261024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2206619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           573182
<BONDS>                                         233335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16998
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                     1329011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2206619
<SALES>                                        1989969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2228268
<CGS>                                           908516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1032059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                269678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               18188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 316719
<INCOME-TAX>                                     91863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             224856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    224856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – March 4, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Zxp6zZ53er\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-march-4-2015\/\">License Applicants – March 4, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-march-4-2015\/embed\/#?secret=Zxp6zZ53er\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – March 4, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Zxp6zZ53er\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 12, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 am to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 6100 Bldg., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-31706  Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.       Right Associates Government Services, Inc., a Virginia corporation

2.       Right License Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation

3.       RMC of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation

4.       Right Human Resources, Inc., a Canadian corporation

5.       Right Associates, Ltd., a U.K. corporation

6.       Cavendish Partners, Inc., a U.K. corporation

7.       Right Management Consultants, SA, a French corporation

8.       Right ARJ Management Consultants, SA, a French corporation

9.       Right Management Consultants (Belgium), SA

10.      Right Management Consultants Holdings Pty. Ltd., an Australian
         corporation

11.      Right Management Consultants Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation

12.      Right Management Consultants (NSW) Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation

13.      Right Management Consultants (QLD) Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation

14.      Right Management Consultants International Pty. Ltd. (Singapore)

15.      Right from Home Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation

16.      Right Management Consultants Ltd. (Hong Kong)

17.      Right Management Consultants Ltd. (New Zealand)

18.      Sinova International Holding A/S, a Danish corporation

19.      Sinova AB, a Swedish corporation

20.      Sinova Sweden AB, a Swedish corporation

21.      Right Search & Selection Sweden AB, a Swedish corporation

22.      Kjaer & Kjerulf A/S, a Danish corporation

23.      Plambech & Partner A/S, a Danish corporation

24.      Right Search & Selection Danish A/S, a Denmark corporation

25.      Norway AS, a Norwegian corporation

26.      Right Search & Selection Norway A/S, a Norwegian corporation

27.      Right WayStation, Inc. (71%), a Japanese corporation

28.      Saad-Fellipelli Recursos Humanos Ltda. (51%), a Brazilian limited
         liability quota company

29.      Coaching- Psicologia Estrategica Ltda. (51%), a Brazilian limited
         liability quota company

30.      Right Management Consultants Holding SL, a Spanish corporation

31.      Right Management Consultants Iberia SL (51%), a Spanish corporation

32.      Claessens Nederland BV, a Netherlands corporation

33.      Multi Consult Loopbaanadvies Outplacement BV, a Netherlands corporation

34.      Right Management Consultants Ireland Ltd.

35.      Right Management Consultants Luxembourg Sarl
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3303 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax credit 

for new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicles by State subsidies 

for these vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Mr. ESTES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the tax credit for new qualified plug-in electric drive 

motor vehicles by State subsidies for these vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Close the Double Sub5 sidy Loophole for Electric Vehicles Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3303 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE TAX CRED2 IT REDUCTION IN CONNECTION WITH STATE 

3 SUBSIDY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 30D of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(8) REDUCTION FOR STATE SUBSIDIES.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount allowed 

9 as a credit under this section (without regard to 

10 this paragraph) with respect to a vehicle to 

11 which this section applies shall be reduced (but 

12 not below zero) by the amount of any subsidy 

13 in connection with the acquisition or ownership 

14 of the vehicle made available by the State in 

15 which such vehicle is registered and placed in 

16 service by the taxpayer. 

17 ‘‘(B) SUBSIDY.—For purposes of subpara18 graph (A), term ‘subsidy’ means direct or indi19 rect financial assistance, including tax credits 

20 or deductions from taxable income, grants, 

21 loans, rebates, vehicle license tax discounts, and 

22 vouchers.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply to property placed in service 

25 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2022, Quarter Q2

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 3

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 3

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

FMCS Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service

Agency / 

Component

Number of requests 

backlogged

Number of requests 

processed

Number of requests 

received

FMCS 0 14 16
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  FMCS Hosts International Leaders at National Headquarters
Home/News/FMCS Hosts International Leaders at National Headquarters Previous			Next
FMCS Hosts International Leaders at National Headquarters										As evidence that FMCS expertise in labor dispute resolution is recognized and valued around the world, the Agency hosted leaders from many nations June 29-30 for discussions about labor-management conflict and the role of the Agency in providing mediation and other dispute resolution services.
John Arnold2017-06-30T12:59:22-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2739

ROBERT J. MCCARTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusTOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army; DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-903-A) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Robert J. McCarty, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Robert J. McCarty appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCarty v. West , No. CA-98-903-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED