alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned officers’ knowledge:
 
 ·
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 ·
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Tony Liu
 Tony Liu
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 March 15, 2010
 
 
 /s/ Yanchun Li
 Yanchun Li
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 March 15, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                   193
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         32,477
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,139
<INVENTORY>                           27,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      62,572
<PP&E>                                65,681
<DEPRECIATION>                        29,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       107,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 20,349
<BONDS>                               23,029
<COMMON>                                  87
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                            61,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         107,574
<SALES>                               31,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     142,432
<CGS>                                 21,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         98,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      31,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         118
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       10,757
<INCOME-TAX>                           3,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    7,332
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           7,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .97
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10864

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCUS LELAND FREEMAN, also known as Big Mark,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-68-8-A

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Marcus Leland Freeman, federal prisoner # 29129-077, 

appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for relief

from his conviction and sentence, purportedly pursuant to FED. R.

CRIM. P. 52(b). Freeman’s appeal is “from the denial of a

meaningless, unauthorized motion.” See United States v. Early,

27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Freeman’s appeal is frivolous

and is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Freeman, who is

represented by counsel, is hereby warned that any further
No. 04-10864

-2-

repetitious or frivolous attempts to circumvent statutory

restrictions on filing second or successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motions to vacate, whether pursued by him pro se or with

the assistance of any other person (including any attorney)

acting on his behalf, may result in the imposition of sanctions

against him. These sanctions may include dismissal, monetary

sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in

this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
{"agency":"FMCS","generated":"2014-07-25 15:45:35","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FMCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["46"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["48"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["3"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q3"}
<TABLE> <
S> <C>
            
<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                  63
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                          341
<ALLOWANCES>                            (7)
<INVENTORY>                             51
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       466
<PP&E>                                3025
<DEPRECIATION>                       (2399)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1726
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                42
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                            135
<OTHER-SE>                         1100621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3233
<SALES>                               2139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2139
<CGS>                                 1617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         3747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1647)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1647)
<DISCONTINUED>                         385
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1262)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.30)
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 25th Annual AgTC Meeting, June 21, 2012","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8xmvBhJsWh\"><a href=\"\/remarks-of-fmc-chairman-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-at-the-25th-annual-agtc-meeting-june-21-2012\/\">Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 25th Annual AgTC Meeting, June 21, 2012<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/remarks-of-fmc-chairman-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-at-the-25th-annual-agtc-meeting-june-21-2012\/embed\/#?secret=8xmvBhJsWh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 25th Annual AgTC Meeting, June 21, 2012” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8xmvBhJsWh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"People\u2019s Republic of China Provides Clarity to its Recently Implemented Value Added Tax Measures","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7iOOJiOuX9\"><a href=\"\/peoples-republic-of-china-provides-clarity-to-its-recently-implemented-value-added-tax-measures\/\">People\u2019s Republic of China Provides Clarity to its Recently Implemented Value Added Tax Measures<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/peoples-republic-of-china-provides-clarity-to-its-recently-implemented-value-added-tax-measures\/embed\/#?secret=7iOOJiOuX9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“People\u2019s Republic of China Provides Clarity to its Recently Implemented Value Added Tax Measures” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"7iOOJiOuX9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
10.9




AMENDMENT
TO





EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT




This
Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated November 15, 2009,
is made by and among American Oriental Bioengineering Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), and Binsheng Li, residing at Nangang District, Harbin,
China(the
“Executive”).  Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the
meaning for such term specified in the Employment Agreement (as defined
below).




WHEREAS, the Executive and the
Company entered into an Employment Agreement dated April 9, 2009 (the
“Employment Agreement”);




WHEREAS,  under the
Employment Agreement, the Executive was initially granted a certain number
of shares of common stock (the “Shares”) and an option (the
“Option”)  to purchase a certain number of shares of common stock
(the "Initial Grant"), which numbers were based upon the Company's internal
method for valuing each share of its common stock issued or issuable under
its 2006 Equity Incentive Plan at the time of the grant (the "Per Share Value"),
to reach a total annual compensation value for accounting purposes (the
"Total Value");




WHEREAS, as the result of an
error in the calculation of the Per Share Value, the number of shares
issuable under the Option was incorrect and should have been lower although the
Total Value, the exercise price and the Shares remain unchanged from the date of
the Initial Grant;




WHEREAS, the Option
should be reduced and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
has ratified, approved and confirmed in all respects, the reduction in
the Option;




NOW THEREFORE,in
consideration of the foregoing and for other consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




1. The first
sentence of Section 7 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated
in its entirety by inserting the following:




“The
Executive shall receive 51,380 shares of the Company's common stock and 33,169
stock options for services to be rendered during the Term.”




2. Except as
specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect unmodified and the parties hereby reaffirm the
same.




3. This
Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of New York, without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles
thereof.




4. This
Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an
original and all of which shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument,
with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument.  A facsimile signature shall be deemed to be an original
signature for purposes of this Amendment.




[REMAINDER
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first
above written.




AMERICAN ORIENTAL
      BIOENGINEERING, INC.By:  /s/ Tony
      LiuName: Tony
      LiuTitle:   Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


EXECUTIVE:





/s/ Binsheng
Li


Binsheng
Li
Order entered October 23, 2012

In The

No. 05-11-01498-CR

No. 05-11-01499-CR

No. 05-11-01500-CR

JOSEPH GEORGE BUCKALOO, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-53490-W

ORDER

Before the Court is the State of Texas’s October 22, 2012 Second Motion for Extension of

Time to File Brief. We GRANT the motion. The clerk is directed to file the brief tendered by the

State on October 22, 2012.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Wednesday, July 1, 2015 Contact: John Arnold 

For Immediate Release Director of Public Affairs

Web site: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8100 

FMCS Congratulates Both Sides 

In Final Settlement for Rhode Island Pension Case 

WASHINGTON, DC—U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) Acting 

Director Allison Beck congratulated Rhode Island state officials and union negotiators on the 

implementation of a settlement agreement to Rhode Island’s longstanding public employee 

pension dispute. 

Ms Beck led a team of FMCS mediators who worked with the parties to craft a settlement 

agreement last year that provided the foundation for resolving the statewide pension dispute. 

Provisions of the negotiated agreement are part of the Rhode Island state budget signed into law 

on June 30, 2015 by Governor Raimondo and are to be implemented with the state’s new fiscal 

year. 

“On behalf of the FMCS mediators who assisted in this important negotiation, we are gratified 

that the dedication and hard work of the retiree and union negotiating teams, and by the 

negotiators for the Administration and the Treasurer’s office in this complex and lengthy process 

have achieved a successful resolution. Their professionalism and perseverance were the keys to 

ultimately gaining a consensual resolution to what had been an intractable legal dispute. I 

especially want to commend FMCS Boston and Providence mediators, Commissioners Josh Flax 

and Joseph Kelleher, for their tireless assistance to the parties. Theirs was a tremendous effort, 

and they have my personal thanks as well.” 

### 

The U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. 

government agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and 

cooperation. Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 district offices and more than 60 field 

offices, the agency provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government 

agencies and communities. 

NEWS RELEASE

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20427
**Exhibit
23.2**
 
 **C** **ONSENT
OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM**
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 33-75268, 33-80662, 33-93394, 333-29801, 333-60057, 333-79789,
333-43504, 333-72098 and 333-117193) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan
and the 1994 Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan,  the 1994
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option
Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Stock Option Plan and
1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.
333-38266, 333-54912 and 333-116973) and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated January 30, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of InSite Vision Incorporated, included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
 
 
 
 Palo
Alto, California
 March 28,
2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jeronimo BERNAL-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10043

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeronimo Bernal-Garcia, Federal Medical Center Houston Unit, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

. Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jeronimo Bernal-Garcia pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and was sentenced to 168 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. The district court’s judgment was entered on October 10, 2007. On December 13, 2007, Bernal-Garcia filed a pro se motion to file an out-of-time appeal arguing that trial counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal despite having been asked' to do so. He also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and the appointment of appellate counsel. The district court denied Bernal-Garcia’s motion to file an out-of-time appeal as untimely because it was not filed within thirty days of the expiration of the appeal period as required by Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). Further, because the motion was untimely, the district court determined that Bernal-Garcia was not entitled to proceed IFP or to the appointment of appellate counsel.

Bernal-Garcia filed a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion. He also filed motions to proceed IFP on appeal and for the appointment of appellate counsel. The district court granted Bernal-Garcia’s IFP motion but denied his motion for the appointment of appellate counsel. Bernal-Garcia now moves this court for leave to proceed IFP on appeal and for the appointment of appellate counsel.

Because the district court has granted Bernal-Garcia’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal, the IFP motion before this court is denied as moot. Further, this court can dismiss an appeal during consideration of an interlocutory motion if the appeal “is frivolous and entirely without merit.” 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Bernal-Garcia did not file a notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of the criminal judgment. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). His motion to file an out-of-time appeal was filed beyond the time for extending the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(4). Thus, the district court did not err in enforcing the time limitations set forth in Rule 4(b), and this court may not reverse its decision to do so. See *United States v. Leijano-Cruz,*473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir.2006). Because the instant appeal is without arguable merit, Bernal-Garcia’s motion for the appoint*302ment of appellate counsel is denied, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.