alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00083-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR20-0471

Before Birdwell, Bassel, Womack, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell

DAVID MICHAEL BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Michael Brown appeals his conviction for felony driving while 

intoxicated, as enhanced by a prior felony conviction. Brown pleaded guilty pursuant 

to a plea agreement, and the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the 

agreement to fifteen years’ confinement. As part of his agreement, Brown waived his 

right to appeal. The trial court’s certification thus stated (1) that this is a plea-bargain 

case and Brown has no right to appeal, and (2) that Brown has waived his right to 

appeal.1

 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

We notified Brown of the certification issue and informed him that unless he 

or another party filed a response by June 28, 2021, showing grounds for continuing 

the appeal, we would dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.

In his response, Brown argues that he received ineffective assistance of 

counsel. However, this argument does not provide a valid basis for continuing the

appeal. See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Williams v. State, 

No. 02-19-00415-CR, 2019 WL 7407717, at *1 n.1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 31, 

2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Indeed, this case does not 

fit any of the recognized bases for appeal of a bargained-for sentence: the record 

does not reflect that Brown’s sentence exceeded the State’s recommendation, that he

is appealing a matter raised by a written motion that was ruled on before trial, or that 

1

Based on our independent review of the record, we have determined that the 

certification contains no defects. See Jones v. State, 488 S.W.3d 801, 805 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2016).
3

the trial court granted Brown permission to appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. 

art. 44.02; Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Therefore, consistent with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Wade Birdwell

Wade Birdwell

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: July 29, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,471                   4,321
<SECURITIES>                                    32,191                  15,566
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,220                  32,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,955                   1,701
<INVENTORY>                                     15,954                  18,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,935                  74,327
<PP&E>                                          28,339                  36,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,887                  15,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,345                  97,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,875                  27,526
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            82                      84
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,287                  69,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,345                  97,104
<SALES>                                        144,370                 157,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,370                 157,491
<CGS>                                           88,950                 104,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,950                 104,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,653                  47,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   529                     427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,776                   3,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,408                   1,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,368                   2,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,368                   2,671
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.22                    0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20                    0.38


</TABLE>
#### David ATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Khairul B. EMRAM, Doctor; Samuel V. Pruett, Warden; Harvard W. Stephens, O.H.S. Medical Director; Linda Shear, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-6915.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 7, 2010.

David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Anne Grace, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, McLean, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Atkins v. Emram,*No. 1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD, *8782010 WL 2490965 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3346 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3346

 To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating the 
          rates charged for broadband internet access service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2021

Mr. Kinzinger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating the 
          rates charged for broadband internet access service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Rate Regulation of Broadband 
Internet Access Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATION OF BROADBAND RATES PROHIBITED.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal 
Communications Commission may not regulate the rates charged for 
broadband internet access service.

SEC. 3. EXCEPTIONS.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the authority of 
the Commission to--
            (1) condition receipt of universal service support under 
        section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) 
        by a provider of broadband internet access service on the 
        regulation of the rates charged by such provider for the 
        supported service; or
            (2) enforce subpart Y of part 64 of title 47, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (relating to truth-in-billing 
        requirements).

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Broadband internet access service.--The term 
        ``broadband internet access service'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 8.1 of title 47, Code of Federal 
        Regulations.
            (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission.
            (3) Rate.--The term ``rate'' means the amount charged by a 
        provider of broadband internet access service for the delivery 
        of broadband internet traffic.
            (4) Regulation.--The term ``regulation'' or ``regulate'' 
        means, with respect to a rate, the use by the Commission of 
        rulemaking or enforcement authority to establish, declare, or 
        review the reasonableness of such rate.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA IN RE THE PETITION OF ANDREA MARIE ANTILLON

PR 22-0004 FILED APR

1 2 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Atenlontana Andrea Marie Antillon has petitioned this Court for admission

toactive statusin the State Bar of Montana after having been oninactive status since March 2020. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment
of the appropriate fees tothe State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted
tothe active practice of law in the stateof Montana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six rnonths of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall submit tothe Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance

at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education

to be credited
tothe time Petitioner wasoninactive status. The Clerk is directed
to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and tothe State Bar of Montana. DATED this z_ day of April, 2022. For the Court, Chief Justice04/12/2022Case Number: PR 22-0004
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
							CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  Protected: Mediation Skills -City of Houston Health Department

															Home/FMCS Institute Course, Webinar/Protected: Mediation Skills -City of Houston Health Department Next
	
			loading...


		Protected: Mediation Skills -City of Houston Health Department										This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:
Password: Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134679 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134679 

 COA: 266653 

Wayne CC: 03-013914-01

DERRICK DEJUAN JAMES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Brain Tree International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **George I. Norman, III**, Principal Accounting Officer and            Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | **•** | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | **•** | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Principal Accounting Officer

Principal Financial Officer

September 28, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company’s Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-04403]

                    In accordance with section 250(A), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on March 21, 2001, applicable to workers of Gynecare, Melo Park, California. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 16, 2001 (66 FR 19522).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of medical catheters. New information shows that Ethicon, A Johnson and Johnson Co. is the parent firm of Gynecare, Menlo Park, California.

Information also shows that workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Gynecare, Ethicon, A Johnson and Johnson Co. Menlo Park, California.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Gynecare, Menlo Park, California who were adversely affected by a shift of production of medical catheters to Mexico.

The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-04403 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Gynecare, Ethicon, A Johnson and Johnson Co., Menlo Park, California who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 21, 1999, through March 21, 2003, are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of November 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-31139 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          45,478
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    354,415
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        970,853
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,430,233
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,102,590
<SHORT-TERM>                                   123,343
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,245
<LONG-TERM>                                     72,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,901
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,430,233
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 79,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26,292
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   742
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               106,997
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              43,571
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,888
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           51,109
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,579
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,007
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 46,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,036
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,036
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,633
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,130
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,725
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    61
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,916
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,837
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,609
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,932
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,739
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,739
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 4, 2002.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Santo P. Pasqualucci, Falmouth, Massachusetts; to acquire voting 
shares of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc., Falmouth, Massachusetts, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Falmouth Co-operative Bank, 
Falmouth, Massachusetts.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Albert V. Schulze and Michelle A. Schulze, Orwigsburg, 
Pennsylvania, Albert V. Schulze (custodian for Alan Jacob Schulze, 
Rebecca Lauren Schulze, Cameron Prescott Keener, Christian James 
Keener, and Sara Anne Graver), Michelle Schulze (custodian for Zachary 
David Garland, Alex Nicholas Pellish, Jillian Michelle Pellish, Brianna 
Noel Horn, and William I. Horn, III), Dale Keener, Hamburg, 
Pennsylvania, and Janet Keener, Hamburg, Pennsylvania; to retain shares 
of Union Bancorp, Inc., Pottsville, Pennsylvania, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Union Bank and Trust Company, 
Pottsville, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-31439 Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S