alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Section 508 - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ebfnJEkVNz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/section-508\/\">Section 508<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/section-508\/embed\/#?secret=ebfnJEkVNz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Section 508” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ebfnJEkVNz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Section 508 requires that Federal agencies’ electronic and information technology is accessible to people with disabilities. The Center for Information Technology Accommodation (CITA), in the U.S. General Services Administration’s Office of Governmentwide Policy, has been charged with the task of educating Federal employees and building the infrastructure necessary to support Section 508 implementation. At its […]"}
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00722-CV

Jesus CERVANTES,

Appellant

v.

NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, and Ron Bordelon,

in his official capacity as Workers’ Compensation Commissioner,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-02-26260-MCV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the summary judgment and dismissal 

order of the trial court are AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against 

appellant, Jesus Cervantes, in relation to this appeal because he qualifies as an indigent under 

TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED July 10, 2013.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
CERTIFICATION

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

         I, Pasquale Catizone, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
         International Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this annual report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant,
                  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
                  by others within those entities, particularly during the
                  period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
                  and

         c)       presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

         a)       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                  or other employees who have a significant role in the
                  registrant's internal controls.


Date: April 26, 2005


/s/ Pasquale Catizone
-------------------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KEVIN MOBLEY,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 64 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Amended Motion for Writ of Mandamus” is 

DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Congratulates Department of Defense Education Activity and Overseas Federation of Teachers on Pivotal Agreement - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SVEuNQQyE9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-congratulates-department-of-defense-education-activity-and-overseas-federation-of-teachers-on-pivotal-agreement\/\">FMCS Congratulates Department of Defense Education Activity and Overseas Federation of Teachers on Pivotal Agreement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-congratulates-department-of-defense-education-activity-and-overseas-federation-of-teachers-on-pivotal-agreement\/embed\/#?secret=SVEuNQQyE9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Congratulates Department of Defense Education Activity and Overseas Federation of Teachers on Pivotal Agreement” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"SVEuNQQyE9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. (Oct. 26, 2022) \u2013 The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) welcomed representatives from the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) and the Overseas Federation of Teachers (OFT) to its Washington, DC headquarters yesterday to congratulate the parties on a pivotal tentative labor agreement. \u00a0It is the parties\u2019 first successor contract agreement in […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/6.jpg"}
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of Letters of Authorization to take marine mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service implementing regualtions [50 CFRs 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby given that the following Letters of Authorization to take polar bears incidental to oil and gas industry exploration activities in the Beaufort Sea and adjacent northern coast of Alaska have been issued to the following companies:
                        ( print page 66916) Company
Activity
Location
Date issuedPhillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Sunrise #1
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Cirque #3 and #4
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Anfros #1
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Spark #2-#5
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Cayman #1
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Alpine West #1
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Moose's Tooth A&C
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Rendezvous B
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Clover B
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Lookout A
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Sunrise #3
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Sunrise #2
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Callisto #1
Nov. 8, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Ganymede #1
Nov. 9, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Nanuq #5
Nov. 9, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Grandview #1
Nov. 9, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Lookout #2
Nov. 9, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Hunter A
Nov. 9, 2001.Phillips Alaska, Inc
Exploration
Hunter #2
Nov. 9, 2001.Anadarko Petroleum Corp
Exploration
Whiskey Gulch A and B
Nov. 9, 2001.
 CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Letter of Authorization is issued in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and Regulations “Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 2000).” Dated: November 26, 2001. David B. Allen, Regional Director.


[FR Doc. 01-31711 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
FMCS | 2100 K St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov

NEWS RELEASE

Friday, January 29, 2016 Contact: John Arnold

For Immediate Release Director of Public Affairs

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: 202-606-8100

FMCS Announces Regional Labor Relations Workshops Engaging Federal 

Workers to Design the Future Workplace

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) announced today a series 

of specialized two-day workshops on space management and labor relations to be held in Boston, Chicago, 

Denver, and Los Angeles. The FMCS, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), and the General Services 

Administration (GSA) collaborated to develop the workshops.

Effective Federal agency workspace management requires employee engagement and labor relations 

knowledge and skills. The National Strategy for Reducing the Federal Government’s Real Estate 

Footprint and the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Reduce the Footprint 

(RTF) Memorandum present opportunities to improve Federal workspace quality and functionality while also 

reducing real estate costs. To summarize the critical employee engagement interests that must be 

addressed through the OMB RTF initiative, the inter-agency work group of FMCS, FLRA and GSA have 

created this training video.

The workshops will include:

 A tour of a redesigned federal space developed in partnership with agencies to create an effective 

and efficient 21st century workspace.

 An overview by GSA of its owned and leased space project lifecycle and key opportunities for 

employee engagement and labor-management collaboration.

 A review by the FLRA of the statutory duty and scope of bargaining and impasse resolution, as well 

as opportunities for pre-decisional involvement during office moves.

 Collaborative problem-solving skills training and resources by FMCS to support effective predecisional involvement and collective bargaining.

 A discussion with agencies and labor organizations that recently went through office moves about 

their experiences and lessons learned.

 Resource materials for future reference and to share with colleagues.

There is NO COST to attend these workshops. Registration is expected to exceed capacity. Preference will be 

given to registrants who indicate that their management or union counterpart will also attend. To register, 

click the link for the session that you wish to attend.

March 9-10, 2016 Chicago, IL REGISTER HERE

March 22-23, 2016 Boston, MA REGISTER HERE

April 19-20, 2016 Denver, CO REGISTER HERE

May 11-12, 2016 Los Angeles, CA REGISTER HERE
FMCS | 2100 K St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov

###

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government 

agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. 

Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 district offices and more than 60 field offices, the agency 

provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government agencies and communities.
#### Clarence T. FOX, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mildred L. RIVERA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-7689.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Fox v. Rivera,*No. 2:07-cv-03051-GRA, 2007 WL 3273551 (D.S.C. Nov. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Brunswick
Technologies, Inc.'s unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for
the three months ended September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.  Amounts
are rounded to thousands
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                       130
<INVENTORY>                                      4,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,795
<PP&E>                                          12,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,750
<OTHER-SE>                                         135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,729
<SALES>                                         10,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,309
<CGS>                                            8,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (113)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    412
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2029
JAMES H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBERKELEY COUNTY; JAMES H. ROZIER, JR., supervisor and individual; ROBERT W. METTS, tax collector and individual; CAROLYN M. UMPHLETT, treasurer and individual; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-2336-2-23) Submitted: January 27, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James H. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Patrick Corrigan, III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on May 2, 1997; Appellant did not file a notice of appeal within the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain anextension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7568

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VERNON LANCE THOMAS, a/k/a Anthony Mack, a/k/a V, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-92-68, CA-97-614) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon Lance Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Vernon Lance Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Thomas , Nos. CR-92-68; CA-97-614 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED