alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About FMSHRC 
-  Latest FMSHRC News 
-                   Robert F. Cohen, Jr. and William I. Althen sworn in as Commissioners              

#   Robert F. Cohen, Jr. and William I. Althen sworn in as Commissioners

Commissioner Robert F  Cohen Jr  Press Release Release 8-06-2013

Commissioner William I  Althen Press Release Release 8-06-2013

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11175-025]


Crown Hydro, LLC; Notice of Teleconference To Discuss Section 106 
Consultation for an Application To Amend the Crown Mill Project

    a. Project Name and Number: Crown Mill Hydroelectric Project No. 
11175.
    b. Project licensee: Crown Hydro, LLC.
    c. Date and Time of Teleconference: Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 
from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Central Standard Time.
    d. FERC Contact: Jennifer Polardino, (202) 502-6437 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761c1318181f1013045806191a1704121f1819361013041558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb4bbb0b0b7b8bbacf0aeb1b2bfacbab7b0b19eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>
    e. Purpose of Meeting: Commission staff will hold a teleconference 
to discuss the status of consultation under section 106 of the National 
Historic Preservation Act for an application to amend the license of 
the unconstructed Crown Mill Hydroelectric Project. Crown Mill, LLC 
(licensee) proposes to move the location of the project's powerhouse 
about 250 feet north to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) lands 
within the campus of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam. Crown 
Mill, LLC also proposes to construct a new tailrace tunnel instead of 
connecting to an existing tunnel. The project would be located on the 
Mississippi River, in the downtown area of the City of Minneapolis, 
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested entities are invited to participate in the teleconference. 
Please call or email Jennifer Polardino at (202) 502-6437 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="69230c0707000f0c1b47190605081b0d000706290f0c1b0a470e061f">[email protected]</a> by Thursday, November 30, 2017, to RSVP and 
to receive the teleconference call-in information.

    Dated: October 31, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24142 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000825851
<NAME> WELLESLEY IV FDS 9/30/98
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          43,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,099
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,143
<PP&E>                                       2,364,561
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,150,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,335
<BONDS>                                         89,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,149,459
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,963,477)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,216
<SALES>                                        485,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               498,738
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               507,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Cherokee International, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterlyperiod ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffrey M. Frank, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and R. Van Ness Holland, Jr., as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)                The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Jeffrey M. Frank         |
|-------------------------------|
| Name:                         | Jeffrey M. Frank |
| Title:                        | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                         | August 14, 2002 |
|                          |
| /s/  R. Van Ness Holland, Jr. |
| Name:                         | R. Van Ness Holland, Jr. |
| Title:                        | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                         | August 14, 2002 |

 

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
<PAGE>

[LOGO PEAT MARWICK LLP]
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON FINANCIAL
                        STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
BHA Group, Inc.:
 
The  audits  referred to  in our  report  dated November  12, 1996  included the
related financial statement schedule  as of September 30,  1996 and for each  of
the  years in the  three-year period ended  September 30, 1996,  included in the
1996 annual  report on  Form  10-K. This  financial  statement schedule  is  the
responsibility  of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on  this  financial statement  schedule  based  on our  audits.  In  our
opinion,  such financial statement schedule, when  considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements  taken as a  whole, presents fairly,  in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
We  consent to incorporation by reference  in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of BHA Group,  Inc. of our  report dated November 12,  1996 relating to  the
consolidated  balance sheets of BHA Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September
30, 1996  and  1995,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  earnings,
shareholders'  equity and  cash flows  for each of  the years  in the three-year
period ended  September  30, 1996,  and the  related schedule,  which report  is
incorporated  by reference in the September 30,  1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of BHA  Group, Inc.  We also  consent to  the reference  to our  firm under  the
heading 'Selected Financial Data,' in Form 10-K.
 
                                                         KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Kansas City, Missouri
December 20, 1996



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Obsidian Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 22, 2003             /s/  Timothy S. Durham
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                Timothy S. Durham
                                 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank A. Buttacavoli, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Chapter 63 of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |     |                                                                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ FRANKA. BUTTACAVOLI                                                               
| |     | Frank A. Buttacavoli
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
July 24, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parlux Fragrances, Inc. and will be retained by Parlux Fragrances, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Kwabena OFORI, a/k/a Stefan Lloyd Morally, a/k/a Albert Ofori, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-4464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 29, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 13, 2010.

Benjamin Kent, Law Offices of Benjamin Kent, Centreville, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Michael W. Gachés, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

George Kwabena Ofori appeals the judgment of conviction entered after he was found guilty of one count of falsely claiming to be a United States citizen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911 (2006), and one count of social security fraud, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B) (2006). He claims the district court erred by admitting evidence of prior bad acts. Finding no error, we affirm.

Review of a district court’s determination of the admissibility of evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) is for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Queen,*132 F.3d 991, 995 (4th Cir.1997). In general, any evidence which tends to make the existence of a fact of consequence to an issue in the case “more probable or less probable” than without the evidence is relevant under Fed.R.Evid. 401 and therefore generally admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 402. Evidence of other crimes is not admissible to prove bad character or criminal propensity. Rule 404(b). Such evidence is admissible, however, to prove “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident[.]” *Id.; see Queen,*132 F.3d at 994. Rule 404(b) is an inclusive rule, allowing evidence of other crimes or acts except that which tends to prove only criminal disposition. *See Queen,*132 F.3d at 994-95.

*786Evidence of prior acts is admissible under Rule 404(b) and Fed.R.Evid. 403 if the evidence is (1) relevant to an issue other than the general character of the defendant, (2) necessary, and (3) reliable, and (4) if the probative value of the evidence is not substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect. *Queen,*132 F.3d at 997. A limiting jury instruction explaining the purpose for admitting evidence of prior acts and advance notice of the intent to introduce evidence of prior acts provide additional protection to defendants. *See id.*

We conclude that the evidence was relevant and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the probative value of the evidence was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements  No. 333-95657 and No. 333-148383 on Forms S-8 and  No. 333-170380 on Form S-3 of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the “Company”), of our report dated May 26, 2011, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2011.
 
 
 
 /s/ Marcum LLP
 Miami, Florida
 May 26, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FLOWERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED
APRIL 24, 1999 AND THE FLOWERS INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
APRIL 24, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-24-1999
<CASH>                                          18,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,132
<INVENTORY>                                    268,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               659,980
<PP&E>                                       1,489,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 461,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,772,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          642,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,752
<OTHER-SE>                                     520,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,772,391
<SALES>                                      1,304,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,304,513
<CGS>                                          607,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,209,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,835
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-51024 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus REBECCA JEAN STEWART, also known as Cynthia Alexander, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CR-67-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 24, 1998 Before WISDOM, DUHE’, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rebecca Jean Stewart, filed an 18 U.S.C. Section 3582 motion to correct or modify her sentence, arguing that the district court denied that motion. Stewart did not file a notice of appeal. Over three months later, however, she filed a motion to reconsider. The district denied that motion and Stewart filed a notice of appeal.No. 97-51024 -2-

** United States v. DeLos Reves , 842 F.2d 755, 757 (5th Cir. 1988).

*** See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b); United States v. Brewer , 60 F.3d 1142, 1145 (5th Cir. 1995).

  See Brewer , 60 F.3d at 1144. Even if we were to construe Stewart’s motion to reconsider as a request to file a late notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Fed. R. App. P.4(b) allows for an extension of the time period in which to file an appeal, but that extension is limited to thirty days. See United States v. Awalt , 728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984). Stewart’s motion was filed well after this period. Federal courts have an obligation to examine sua sponte the basis for their jurisdiction. **  Stewart did not file a timely motion to reconsider. *** We do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. ****

Stewart’s appeal is DISMISSED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Launches Lessons In Leadership Speaker Series - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lgqIJHu7xP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-launches-lessons-in-leadership-speaker-series\/\">FMCS Launches Lessons In Leadership Speaker Series<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-launches-lessons-in-leadership-speaker-series\/embed\/#?secret=lgqIJHu7xP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Launches Lessons In Leadership Speaker Series” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"lgqIJHu7xP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"WASHINGTON, D.C. (Apr. 18, 2022) \u2013 On Wednesday, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) conducted the first of a new series of virtual speaking engagements called the Lessons in Leadership Speaker Series. The Lessons in Leadership series brings outstanding leaders from various federal organizations to share insights on their leadership styles and career experiences, […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/ssCapture-1024x559.jpg"}