alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42nd FMCS ARBITRATION SYMPOSIUM

Friday, October 13, 2023 

8:00 am REGISTRATION & CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST

8:45 am WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS 

Kathy Hall, Field Operations Manager, FMCS Region II, Philadelphia , PA

Peter Donatello, Field Operations Manager, FMCS Region I, Woodbridge, NJ 

Barbara Lichtman, Commissioner, FMCS, Philadelphia, PA 

9:00 am KEYNOTE: FMCS VISION FOR THE FUTURE 

Presenter: Javier Ramirez, Director of Field Operations, FMCS, Washington, DC

9:30 am HOW THE ARBITRATORS RULE – PANEL 1 

Moderator: Barbara Lichtman, Commissioner, FMCS, Philadelphia, PA 

Panelist: Dean L. Burrell, Esq., Morristown, New Jersey

Panelist: Michael R. Ricci, Guilford, CT 

Panelist: Haydee Rosario, Esq., NAA, Bronx, NY 

Panelist: Mary Ellen Shea, NAA, Amherst, MA 

10:30 am CANNABIS: WHAT’S NEW? 

Moderator: Ezio Borchini, Esq., NAA, Bethesda, MD 

Panelist Jessica Caggiano, Esq., Willig, Williams and Davidson, Philadelphia, PA, 

Panelist: Arthur R. Thibault Jr., Esq., Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, 

P.C., Liberty Corner, NJ

11:30 am FMCS OFFICE OF ARBITRATION 

Arthur Pearlstein, Esq., Director of FMCS Office of Arbitration, Washington, DC 

12:00 noon LUNCH 

1:15 pm

Moderator: 

Panelist:

Panelist:

Panelist:

Panelist:

HOW THE ARBITRATORS RULE – PANEL II

Barbara Lichtman, Commissioner, FMCS, Philadelphia, PA 

Robert H. Barron, Esq., NAA, Wynnewood, PA 

Lisa Charles, NAA, Princeton, NJ 

Ralph Colflesh, Esq., NAA, Philadelphia, PA

Jane Desimone, Esq., NAA, Pittsburgh, PA 

2:15 pm ETHICS IN ARBITRATION

Robert Douglas, Esq. NAA, Woodmere, NY 

3:15 pm CLOSING REMARKS 

3:30 pm ADJOURN

FMCS is an independent federal government agency. Opinions or points of view expressed during sessions at FMCS Arbitration Symposium do 

not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the FMCS or the federal government. Any products or services outside of FMCS, 

discussed during sessions at FMCS Arbitration Symposium are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval 

or endorsement by the FMCS or the federal government.
105 A.3d 1099

#### TONIQUE GRIFFIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND OBED PRINVIL, ADMINISTRATOR, REGINALD LEWIS AND CLAUDE CRAIG, DEFENDANTS. AND ANOTHER RELATED CASE.

January 23, 2015.

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of whether the trial court erred in barring the testimony of a witness who claimed that her superiors directed her to lie to the person investigating plaintiffs’ claims of sexual harassment.
# March 2024 F7 Notices
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3331 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3331

  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide taxpayers with 
               information regarding the Federal budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2021

Mr. Arrington introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide taxpayers with 
               information regarding the Federal budget.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Receipt Act''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION REGARDING THE FEDERAL BUDGET.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary's delegate, shall 
provide, to each individual filing a Federal income tax return for a 
taxable year, a one-page document which contains, with respect to the 
most recently completed fiscal year--
            (1) total Federal outlays during such year;
            (2) total Federal revenues collected during such year;
            (3) the Federal deficit or surplus for such year; and
            (4) the total Federal debt held by the public.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 38th Annual NCBFAA Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MOMxjpL642\"><a href=\"\/remarks-of-fmc-chairman-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-at-the-38th-annual-ncbfaa-conference\/\">Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 38th Annual NCBFAA Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/remarks-of-fmc-chairman-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-at-the-38th-annual-ncbfaa-conference\/embed\/#?secret=MOMxjpL642\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Remarks of FMC Chairman Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. at the 38th Annual NCBFAA Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"MOMxjpL642\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  1997
Home/Timeline 1990-2013/1997 Previous			Next
1997										FMCS celebrates its 50th anniversary and receives Vice President’s Hammer Award for “Progress in Reinventing Government.”
FMCS arbitration rules and policies are revised for the first time since 1979.
D2015-06-18T12:46:02-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Accessibility |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
#### Vincent M. COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Carlton D. JONES, Prosecuting Attorney, Miller County, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-2183.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 20, 2016.

Filed: Jan. 26, 2016.

*647Vincent M. Cooper, Ouachita River Correctional Unit, Malvern, AR, pro se.

Jennifer L. Merritt, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

[Unpublished]

PER CURIAM.

Vincent M. Cooper appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and denied his motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to amend his complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Cooper’s complaint sought po.stconviction access to DNA testing of certain evidence used at his criminal trial. Upon de novo review, this court concludes that the dismissal was proper. *See Dist. Attorney’s Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. Osborne,*557 U.S. 52, 69, 72-75, 129 S.Ct. 2308, 174 L.Ed.2d 38 (2009) (discussing contours of substantive and procedural due process rights related to postconviction access to DNA testing); *Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.,*517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir.2008) (grant of motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cooper’s motions. *See Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail,*437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006) (abuse-of-discretion standard applies to denial of motion for appointment of counsel; discussing relevant factors); *Joshi v. St. Luke’s Hosp., Inc.,*441 F.3d 552, 555, 557-58 (8th Cir.2006) (abuse-of-discretion standard applies to denial of motion for leave to amend complaint; denial may be justified by futility of amendment).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                   MICROTOUCH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ----------------------------------------
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER             1994           1995           1996
 SHARE:                                      ----------     ----------     ----------
 
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C>
Income applicable to common stock.......     $5,673,000     $1,684,000     $5,697,000
                                              ---------     ----------   ------------
Shares:
  Weighted average number of shares           
   outstanding..........................      6,722,000      8,114,000      7,694,000
  Weighted average number of common           
   equivalent shares....................        599,000        493,000        372,000
                                              ---------     ----------     ----------
  Weighted average shares outstanding         
   as adjusted..........................      7,321,000      8,607,000      8,066,000
                                              ---------     ----------     ----------
Primary earnings per share..............     $     0.77     $     0.20     $     0.71
                                              =========     ==========     ==========
<CAPTION>
                                                   YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ----------------------------------------
COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER       1994           1995           1996
 SHARE:                                      ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>            <C> 
Income applicable to common stock.......     $5,673,000     $1,684,000     $5,697,000
                                             ----------     ----------     ----------
Shares:
  Weighted average number of shares           
   outstanding..........................      6,722,000      8,114,000      7,694,000
  Weighted average number of common           
   equivalent shares....................        853,000        493,000        498,000
                                             ----------     ----------     ----------
  Weighted average shares outstanding         
   as adjusted..........................      7,575,000      8,607,000      8,192,000
                                             ----------     ----------     ----------
Fully diluted earnings per share........     $     0.75     $     0.20     $     0.70
                                             ==========     ==========     ==========
 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  for the  three  months  ended  January  31,  1997  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          15,613
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   248,191
<ALLOWANCES>                    14,000
<INVENTORY>                     26,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                379,414
<PP&E>                          1,955,337
<DEPRECIATION>                  714,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,992,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,436,292
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        310
<OTHER-SE>                      (444,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1,992,535
<SALES>                          432,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 432,741
<CGS>                            188,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    188,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               17,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (147,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (147,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0
        


</TABLE>
PreviousNext

## FMCS Issues Joint Statement on Barton Healthcare System and the California Nurses Association Cooling Off Period

WASHINGTON, D.C. — On behalf of Barton Healthcare System (Barton Health) and the California Nurses Association (CNA), the U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) has issued the following statement:

“On the request of the mediator, the parties have agreed to abide to a 35-day cooling off period beginning Feb. 19, 2019. During this period, neither party may conduct any sanctioned labor action, to include strikes or lockouts. However, the parties will continue to be actively engaged in negotiations to exchange proposals under the guidance of FMCS.

Only official representatives of CNA are authorized to speak on behalf of CNA regarding any matters related to the parties’ negotiations. Similarly, only official representatives of Barton Health are authorized to speak on behalf of Barton Health regarding any matters related to the parties’ negotiations.”

As is Agency practice, FMCS does not disclose information regarding meeting dates and locations, nor information regarding the status or substance of the negotiations.

Greg Raelson

#### Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

FacebookTwitterEmail
EXHIBIT 32







SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS




The
undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medis
Technologies Ltd. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









Dated:
      November 10, 2008/s/
      Jose
      MejiaJose
      MejiaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer






/s/
      Israel
      FisherIsrael
      FisherSenior
      Vice President-Finance and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 5.1

CONSENT OF BEHRE DOLBEAR COMPANY LIMITED

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for
the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) of New Gold Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading General Development of the Business  Business of New Gold  Three Year History in the Companys Annual Information Form and
to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.



|                              |  |                               |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | 
|BEHRE DOLBEAR COMPANY LIMITED
|                              |  |                              
|By:                           |  | /s/ Derek C. Rance            |  | 
|Name:                         |  | Derek C. Rance                |  | 
|Title:                        |  | Chairman and Senior Associate |  | 

March 28, 2007
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3458 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors 

of the Federal Reserve System from providing bailouts or other financial 

assistance to a pension plan of a State or political subdivision thereof, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2021 

Mr. BABIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on Financial 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board 

of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from providing bailouts or other financial assistance to a pension 

plan of a State or political subdivision thereof, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Pen5 sions Accountability and Security Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3458 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON BAILOUTS FOR STATE AND LOCAL 

2 PENSION FUNDS. 

3 The Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Gov4 ernors of the Federal Reserve System may not provide any 

5 loan, grant, or other form of financial assistance— 

6 (1) to a pension plan (as defined under section 

7 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

8 of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002)) established or main9 tained by the government of any State or political 

10 subdivision thereof, or by any agency or instrumen11 tality of such a State or political subdivision; or 

12 (2) to the government of any State or political 

13 subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality 

14 of such a State or political subdivision, unless such 

15 government, agency, or instrumentality certifies that 

16 the financial assistance will not be used, directly or 

17 indirectly, to fund such a pension plan. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Telecom, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, David
Stewart, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of November 2003.

/s/ DAVID STEWART
-----------------------------------

David Stewart
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Jose G. BASERVA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert A. REMES; Carliner & Remes PC, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-1960.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 17, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 8, 2010.

Angel L. Arias, The Arias Law Group, P.A., Miami Gardens, Florida, for Appellant. Tracie N. Wesner, Matthew A. Ranck, Eccleston & Wolf, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

*880Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose G. Baserva appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendants in this legal malpractice action. We have reviewed the record and Baserva’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Baserva v. Remes,*No. 1:08-cv-00997-LO-IDD, 2009 WL 1392532 (E.D. Va. May 18 2009) & 2009 WL 2232749 (July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*