alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000803112
<NAME> SECOND BANCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          29,461
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    236,534
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        534,190
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 833,912
<DEPOSITS>                                     657,851
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,164
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,526
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,731
<COMMON>                                        14,155
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 833,912
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 49,113
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,431
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                62,544
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,803
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           31,741
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 634
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,260
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.15
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,673
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,465
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    25
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,836
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,126
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,000
<RECOVERIES>                                       622
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,748
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,748
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of CyPost Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10QSB for the period ended March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Javan Khazali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ JAVAN KHAZALI
Javan Khazali
Chief Financial Officer and CEO
May 15, 2003


<PAGE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury Customs Service [T.D. 01-92]
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Customs Broker License Cancellations.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 USC 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111, Subpart D), the following Customs broker licenses are cancelled. Because previous publication of these records cannot be readily verified, the records are now being published to ensure Customs compliance with administrative requirements. Name
License
PortHarry I. Hoskins
00193
Seattle.John P. Hausman
00194
Seattle.Victor D. Harlow
00200
Seattle.
 Dated: December 17, 2001. Bonni G. Tischler, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 01-31388 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.1 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2006
         (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a) or
         sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard L. Wambold
                                          Chairman, President, and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

Date: August 8, 2006

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00132

- CR v. The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17F

- 1099

- 005 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the trial court’s
cumulation order for the reasons stated in cause number 06

- 18

- 00133

- CR. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). I L/RESEARCH 1 09- 55268 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T Q U I N CY W I N STO N A D A M S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. S H E L D O N B R O O K S , D D S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 55268 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 2 1 5 - A H S- SS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A l i c e m a r i e H . S t ot l e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Q ui nc yW i ns t on A da m s , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng 

# FI LED MA R 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI L/RESEARCH 2 09- 55268

d e lib e r a te in d if

f e r e n c e to h is d e n ta l n e e d s in v io la tio n o f th e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, So rr el s v . McKee , 290 F . 3d 965, 969 ( 9th C i r . 2002) , a nd w e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd. T he r e c or d doe s noti ndi c a t e tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr ovi de d A da m s w i th a ny no t i ce un der R and v . R ow land , 15 4 F . 3d 95 2 (9th C i r. 19 98 ) ( en banc). F urther, th e e rr o rw a s n o t h a rm le s s b e c au s e it d o e s n o t ap p e a rth a t A d a m s h a dr e c e n tly re ce i ved a R and no t i ce i n any other l i t i gat i on , and the re cord do es no tdi sc l ose that h e h a dac o m p le te u n d e r s tan d in g o f th e r e q u ir e m e n ts o f

F e d e r a l R u le o f

C iv il P r o c e du r e 5 6 . Se e id. a t961- 62. E a c h p a rtys h a ll b e a rits o w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2983 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 

interest paid on student loans without reduction for employer educational 

assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2021 

Mr. KINZINGER (for himself and Mrs. MURPHY of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction for interest paid on student loans without reduction for employer educational assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Readily Ending Debt 

5 Under Corporate Engagement Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘RE6 DUCE Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2983 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION NOT OFFSET 

2 BY EMPLOYER EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 221(d)(2)(A) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘127,’’. 

5 (b) CHANGE TO DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT

6 RULE.—Section 221(e)(1) of such Code is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘, or for which an exclusion is allowable under 

8 section 127 to the taxpayer by reason of the payment by 

9 the taxpayer’s employer of any indebtedness on a qualified 

10 education loan of the taxpayer’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         24,944
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  51,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               286,273
<PP&E>                                         16,492,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,947,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,624,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          409,351
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,624,645
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,186,118
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,547,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (371,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (371,651)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No.1864-005]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC or Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects staff has reviewed the applications for new license for the Bond Falls Project, and has prepared a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. In the draft EIS, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the existing projects and has recommended that approval of the projects, with appropriate environmental protection measures, would be in the public interest.

Copies of the draft EIS are available for review in the Public Reference Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Any comments should be filed within 60 days from the date of this notice and should be addressed to Linwood A. Watson, Jr., Acting Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20246. Please affix “Bond Falls Project No. 1864-005,” as appropriate, to all comments. For further information, please contact Patrick Murphy at (202) 219-2659.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31086 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board

ACTION: Meeting date change of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Systems 
Technology for the Future U.S. Strategic Posture closed meeting 
scheduled for February 13-14, 2001, has been changed to February 7-8, 
2001. The meeting will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson 
Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA.

    Dated: February 1, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-3139 Filed 2-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66889-66890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31700]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Funding Opportunity for AmeriCorps*VISTA Financial Asset 
Development Projects, Placements of AmeriCorps*VISTA Members, and 
Supervisory Grants; Correction

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service published a 
document in the Federal Register of December 14, 2001, concerning its 
funding opportunity for AmeriCorps*VISTA financial asset development 
projects, AmeriCorps*VISTA member placements, and supervisory grants. 
The document contained incorrect information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Gurr, (202) 606-5000, Ext. 
212.

[[Page 66890]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 14, 2001, in FR Doc. 01-30843, 
on page 64806, in the second column, under SUMMARY, paragraph 4. The 
entire paragraph is corrected to read as follows:
    A total of up to 400 AmeriCorps*VISTA members may be allocated for 
placement. Applicant organizations will be expected to place no less 
than three (3) AmeriCorps*VISTA members per site. Under this 
announcement, small supervision grants for all sponsors selected for a 
supervisory grant of up to approximately $200,000 total, will be 
considered based on the size and scope of the project. Short-term, 
eight-to-ten week summer placements may also be requested under this 
announcement.

    Dated: December 19, 2001.
Matt Dunne,
Director, AmeriCorps*VISTA.
[FR Doc. 01-31700 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald J. Domanico                           
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Ronald J. Domanico                               
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  |    



37
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7516

JEFFREY ALLAN PETTREY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TOM SCOTT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-986-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Allan Pettrey, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield,

Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST

VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allan Pettrey seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Pettrey has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as submitted
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                        |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2002 |  |                                                      
|                        |  |                                                      
|                        |  | /s/ Thomas V. Brown                                  
|                        |  |                                                      
|                        |  | Thomas V. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer