alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBSIDIARIES OF

                            COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                                            Jurisidiction of
    Subsidiary                                               Incorporation

    Comverse Government Systems Corp.                           New York
    Comverse Network Systems, Inc.                              Delaware
    CTI Capital Corporation                                     Delaware
    Comverse Information Systems Corp.                          Delaware
    Comverse Infomedia Systems Corp.                            Delaware
    Boston Technology International, Inc.                       Delaware
    Boston Technology Securities                                Delaware
    Voice Mail One                                              Delaware
    Boston Technology Japan                                     Delaware
    Boston Technology Mexico                                    Delaware
    Boston Technology Europe                                    Delaware
    Boston Technology Investments                               Delaware
    Boston Technology Pac Rim                                   Delaware
    Boston Technology Australia/New Zealand                     Delaware
    Boston Technology India                                     Delaware
    Enhanced Communications Corporation                         Delaware
    Startel Corporation                                         California
    Dale, Gesek, McWilliams & Sheridan, Inc.                    New Jersey
    Efrat Future Technology Limited                             Israel
    Telemesser Limited                                          Israel
    C.I.S. Comverse Information Systems Ltd.                    Israel
    Comverse Investments Ltd.                                   Israel
    Telemesser International (1995) Ltd.                        Israel
    Netology Ltd.Israel
    Comverse Technology (Europe) Ltd.                           U.K.
    Comverse Technology GmbH                                    Germany
    Comverse Technology Nordic OY                               Finland
    Comverse Asia Pacific Limited                               Hong Kong
    Comverse Australasia Pty. Ltd.                              Australia
    Boston Technology Limited                                   Virgin Islands
    Boston Technology International Inc., S.A. de C.V.          Mexico
    Boston Technology Servicios Mexico S.C.                     Mexico
    Boston Technology Far East Ltd.                             Hong Kong
    Comverse Technology Singapore Pte Ltd.                      Singapore
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – December 15, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"79kkqurRhb\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-december-15-2015\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – December 15, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-december-15-2015\/embed\/#?secret=79kkqurRhb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – December 15, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"79kkqurRhb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Contact Us - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fkR8RKYrg3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/contact-us\/\">Contact Us<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/contact-us\/embed\/#?secret=fkR8RKYrg3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contact Us” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"fkR8RKYrg3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|        |                                                                                       |                                                                                                                                                          |   |                                       |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|  Date: |                          November 13     | ,                  2007                                                                                                                                       | By:    | /s/                    William J. Loughman |
|        |                                                                                       | William                    J. Loughman                                                                                                                        |
|        |                                                                                       | President,                    Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and                    Principal                    Accounting Officer |

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – July 26, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZDyynhiHV7\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-26-2019\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – July 26, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-26-2019\/embed\/#?secret=ZDyynhiHV7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – July 26, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ZDyynhiHV7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10207

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

CICILY ANN LOYA,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 1:17-CR-83-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cicily Loya pleaded guilty of aiding and abetting possession with the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 17, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10207 Document: 00515162393 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2019
No. 19-10207

2

intent to distribute marihuana and was sentenced to 37 months in prison and 

four years of supervised release (“SR”). Loya’s first term of SR was revoked on 

January 18, 2017, and the district court sentenced her to three months in 

prison and 18 months of SR. The court revoked Loya’s second term of SR and 

sentenced her to 18 months in prison, which was above the recommended 

guidelines range of three to nine months. The court stated that the sentence 

addressed “the issues of adequate deterrence and protection of the public.”

On appeal, Loya contends that the sentence is both procedurally and 

substantively unreasonable. Because she did not “contemporaneously object”

to procedural or substantive reasonableness, our review is for plain error. 

United States v. Ferguson, 369 F.3d 847, 849 (5th Cir. 2004). 

The district court must provide “some explanation” if it imposes a revocation sentence outside the advisory range. United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 

256, 262 (5th Cir. 2009). The record reflects that the court “adequately 

explain[ed] the chosen sentence to allow for meaningful appellate review and 

to promote the perception of fair sentencing.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 

38, 50 (2007).

Loya also maintains that the 18-month sentence is substantively 

unreasonable because there is nothing to justify a sentence that is twice the 

maximum recommended sentence. We may not second-guess the findings of 

the sentencing court, which “is in a superior position to find facts and judge 

their import under § 3553(a) with respect to a particular defendant.” United 

States v. Heard, 709 F.3d 413, 435 (5th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks 

and citation omitted). Nothing in the record compels a finding that the court’s 

balancing of the § 3553(a) factors was unreasonable or plainly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-10207 Document: 00515162393 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2019
<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-25813 of Printware, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 24,
2000 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Printware, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
________________________

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 22, 2000

<PAGE>
[ARTICLE]      5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                           YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                       Dec-31-1999
[PERIOD-START]                          Jan-01-1999
[PERIOD-END]                            Dec-31-1999
[CASH]                                           56
[SECURITIES]                                   7492
[RECEIVABLES]                                  1253
[ALLOWANCES]                                    (51)
[INVENTORY]                                    2142
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                              11374
[PP&E]                                         1429
[DEPRECIATION]                                 1243
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                15356
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           834
[BONDS]                                           0
[COMMON]                                      19031
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                             0
[PREFERRED]                                       0
[OTHER-SE]                                    (4446)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                  15356
[SALES]                                        4623
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               4623
[CGS]                                          3486
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  2183
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                  0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                  0
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              (653)
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (393)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (668)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             275
[DISCONTINUED]                                    0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                   0
[CHANGES]                                         0
[NET-INCOME]                                    275
[EPS-BASIC]                                     .07
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   .07
</TABLE>
768 S.E.2d 401

#### Michael D. HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of South Carolina, South Carolina Attorney General, Solicitor for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, South Carolina Department of Corrections and City of Greenwood, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001239.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2015.

ORDER

We agreed to consider Petitioner Hall’s allegations of unfairness in our original jurisdiction “to determine what relief, if any, may be available to inmates who are being adversely affected by unserved [arrest] warrants.” *Hall v. State,*S.C.Sup.Ct. Order (filed August 14, 2014). On December 9, 2014, we heard oral arguments concerning the practices and procedures for serving arrest warrants on persons incarcerated in the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC).

We conclude that complaints of SCDC inmates concerning adverse impacts resulting from unserved arrest warrants can be resolved by administrative action. It appears that local law *272enforcement is often unaware of the SCDC’s Office of General Counsel’s policy that it will be responsible for serving arrest warrants on SCDC inmates, if those warrants are forwarded to it. This policy is reflected in a 1986 memorandum issued by the South Carolina Judicial Department’s Office of Court Administration, and reiterated in that Office’s February 2012 memorandum. In order to help disseminate this SCDC policy, we republish the pertinent part of these memoranda below:

> The Office of General Counsel at the SCDC has requested that all warrants to be served upon any inmate within the Department be forwarded to their office for subsequent service. Court Administration endorses this request as the warrants could then be transmitted, by corrections personnel, to the particular institution where the individual is housed with instructions as to proper service. Such warrants can then be forwarded to one central location allowing their tracking and service.

> It is now requested that all warrants to be served upon inmates who are in the custody of the SCDC be transmitted to:

> Office of General Counsel South Carolina Department of Corrections

> 4444 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29210

We order that Court Administration distribute a copy of this order to all summary court judges and clerks of court. We direct all magistrates, municipal court judges, and clerks of court to notify law enforcement officers of this order when an arrest warrant is issued, and to make copies of the order available. Finally, we dismiss this matter in our original jurisdiction as the issue raised by Petitioner Hall is now moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J.

/s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J.

/s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J.

*273/s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J.

/s/KAYE G. HEARN, J.

FOR THE COURT
FMCS SERVICES —

CONNECTING WITH TECHNOLOGY

The full spectrum of our services can be delivered utilizing FMCSprovided technology platforms. We know that in-person meetings 

and conversations may be preferred and that there are still times 

when this is just not possible or practical. 

We have been helping people “connect” around their workplace 

issues for over 70 years, and bring the same professionalism, 

expertise and support to our technology-supported approaches 

as we do to in-person meetings. We have already used technology 

support in working with organizations and unions in virtually every 

sector—private, public, and federal— across industries ranging 

from healthcare, education, manufacturing, construction and 

public services. 

Telephonic Mediation & 

Conference Calls

➢ Assess needs

➢ Address process issues 

➢ Narrow substantive issues

➢ Conduct entire mediations 

Some agencies and organizations 

routinely utilize this approach, 

with success.

If you have questions, or are wondering whether your current needs 

can be addressed virtually, please go to www.fmcs.gov or contact 

your local mediator and start a conversation. You are likely to be 

amazed at what we can do together! 

Contact your local mediator: 

“Virtual” Meetings, Negotiations and Mediation

➢ A visual connection matters

➢ FMCS mediator hosts & supports

➢ Joint sessions & separate confidential breakout 

rooms to meet with each party are available

➢ Exchange and edit written proposals 

➢ Deliver interactive training & facilitation

Utilizing these platforms mediators can mediate, train, 

facilitate, and more.

Electronic Flip Charts, Surveys & More

➢ Maximize efficiency of your online meeting time

➢ Capture ideas in real time in your meeting

➢ Brainstorm & evaluate ideas offline

➢ Assess skills & needs for training

Our demo site: https://tags.fmcs.gov/4DAction/FC/

AccessMain?Guest*Fmcs2020$

11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,706
<SECURITIES>                                    31,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,669
<INVENTORY>                                     11,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,743
<PP&E>                                           8,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,353
<SALES>                                         76,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,718
<CGS>                                           47,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   289
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                       980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,684
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>