alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

  2021 and 2022 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements

  The compensation for the executive officers of Cerus Corporation regarding annual base salaries and target bonus percentages were as follows:

   

  					
	Name
	2021
Annual Base
Salary as of
March 1
	2021
Targeted Bonus
(paid in 2022)
	2022
Annual Base
Salary as of
March 1
	2022
Targeted Bonus
(to be paid in
2023)

	William M. Greenman
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$702,000
	65%
	$740,000
	70%

	Kevin D. Green
VP, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	$446,995
	45%
	$469,345
	50%

	Richard J. Benjamin 
Chief Medical Officer
	$458,079
	45%
	$474,112
	45%

	Laurence M. Corash, M.D.
Chief Scientific Officer
	$459,331
	45%
	$470,814
	45%

	Vivek Jayaraman
Chief Operating Officer
	$502,200
	50%
	$527,310
	55%

	Chrystal N. Menard
Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel
	$433,182
	45%
	$450,509
	45%

	Carol Moore
Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality 
	$387,893
	45%
	$401,469
	45%
#### Carolyn MCCOY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-56250.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 7, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 10, 2010.

Laura Eve Lackey-Krank, Rohlfing *&*Kalagian, LLP, Long Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Daniel Paul Talbert, Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Carolyn McCoy (“McCoy”) challenges the district court’s decision upholding the Appellee Commissioner of Social Security’s determination that McCoy was not disabled.

The ALJ chose to adopt the non-treating physician’s conclusions because they accurately reflected the medical evidence. The ALJ found that, based on the objective medical evidence, the majority of medical conditions which formed the basis for the treating physician’s functional assessment did not impair McCoy because the conditions were being successfully treated or had been resolved. Thus, the treating physician’s conclusions were not supported by the medical records.

The ALJ’s statements regarding the medical evidence as it related to the conflicting medical opinions provided a specific and legitimate explanation for rejecting the treating physician’s conclusions. *See Andrews v. Shalala,*58 F.3d 1035, 1043 (9th Cir.1995); *Magallanes v. Bowen,*881 F.2d 747, 751 (9th Cir.1989). Furthermore, the ALJ summarized all of the facts and conflicting clinical evidence from multiple sources in a detailed and thorough fashion, stating his interpretation and making findings. *See Id.*Therefore, the ALJ’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and correctly applied the applicable law. *See Valentine v. Commissioner,*574 F.3d 685, 690 (9th Cir.2009). AFFIRMED.

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (#1110).                

*Date and Time:*                     December 19, 2017; 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room E 3410, Alexandria, VA 22314.                

                    Please contact Rachel Evans at                     *rlevans@nsf.gov*                     to obtain a visitor badge. All visitors to the NSF will be required to show photo ID to obtain a badge.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Brent Miller, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room C 12016, Alexandria, VA 22314; Tel No.: (703) 292-8400.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     The Advisory Committee for the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) provides advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities of the divisions that make up BIO.                

*Agenda:*                     This meeting will be held telephonically among the Advisory Committee members; public visitors will be able to attend the meeting in person at NSF headquarters. Agenda items will include welcoming new Advisory Committee (AC) members, review of the AC's function, discussion of potential future AC activities, and other matters relevant to the Directorate for Biological Sciences.                

Dated: November 6, 2017.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-24543 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6064

REGINALD PATTERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARVIN L. POLK, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-525-5-H) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Patterson v. Polk , No. CA-98-525-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-2847; MM Docket No. 01-223; RM-10157] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule, withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a petition for rule making filed by Tichenor License Corporation requesting the substitution of Channel 287C3 for Channel 287A at Crystal Beach, Texas and reallotment of Channel 287C3 to Stowell, Texas.                         *See*66 FR 48108, September 18, 2001. Tichenor License Corporation withdrew its interest in the allotment of Channel 287C3 at Stowell, Texas.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-223, adopted November 28, 2001, and released December 7, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail                     *qualexint@aol.com.*

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos,

 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-31561 Filed 12-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3353 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3353

   To amend the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act to modernize 
  verification of contact lens prescriptions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2021

   Mr. Rush (for himself, Mr. Burgess, Ms. Blunt Rochester, and Mr. 
  McKinley) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act to modernize 
  verification of contact lens prescriptions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Contact Lens Prescription 
Verification Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 4 of the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act (15 U.S.C. 
7603) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
                    (B) by moving such redesignated subparagraphs 2 ems 
                to the right;
                    (C) by striking ``A seller may'' and inserting 
                ``(1) Sellers generally.--A seller may''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(2) Online sellers.--An online seller of contact lenses 
        shall provide a method that enables an individual to 
        electronically transmit, in accordance with HIPAA privacy 
        regulation (as defined in section 1180(b)(3) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d-9(b)(3))), a copy of a contact 
        lens prescription for such individual.
            ``(3) Encryption required.--Any protected health 
        information (as defined for purposes of the HIPAA privacy 
        regulation) that an online seller sends pursuant to this 
        section by email shall be encrypted.'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(6), by striking ``and telephone 
        number'' and inserting the following: ``, telephone number, and 
        email address''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting the following: ``but does not include a call made 
        using an artificial or prerecorded voice.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         150,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  656,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,900
<INVENTORY>                                    498,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,681,900
<PP&E>                                         127,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,011,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,027,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,837,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,853,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,011,200
<SALES>                                        888,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               888,500
<CGS>                                          744,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  744,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               263,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (71,300)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (190,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (190,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (190,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        


</TABLE>
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

JUNE 22, 2015 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD33267 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

 v. 

 JANE HERNANDEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant.
<PAGE>

                                                                (Exhibit 11.1)

                                QCS CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                                 ____________

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     3 MO. ENDED    6 MO. ENDED    3 MO. ENDED    6 MO.ENDED
                                                    DEC. 31, 1996  DEC. 31, 1996  DEC. 31, 1995  DEC. 31, 1995

<S>                                                <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss                                           $    (955,692)  $ (1,528,613)   $  (332,841)   $  (734,516)

Preferred dividend payable not included
  in net loss                                            (60,779)      (121,558)             -              -
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------

Net loss for net loss per share computation        $  (1,016,471)  $ (1,650,171)   $  (332,841)   $  (734,516)
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                  17,162,292     16,982,711     15,536,000     15,536,000
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------

Net loss per share of common stock                 $       (0.06)  $      (0.10)   $     (0.02)   $     (0.05)
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------
                                                   -------------   ------------    -----------    -----------

</TABLE>

          See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP02-35-001]

Take notice that on December 4, 2001, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to comply with the Commission's Letter Order issued on November 28, 2001, in Docket Nos. RP02-35-000 and RP00-15-004:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 1070

DTI states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the condition imposed by the Letter Order. DTI requests an effective date of November 1, 2001, for its proposed tariff sheet.

DTI states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures have been served upon DTI's customers, interested state commissions and on all persons on the official service list compiled by the Secretary of the Commission for this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

*Acting Secretary.*

[FR Doc. 01-31070 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of income and consolidated
statement of cash flows for the period ended June 30, 1994 included in the
Company's Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 1995, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1994
<CASH>                                          327461
<SECURITIES>                                     90147
<RECEIVABLES>                                   415731
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9492
<INVENTORY>                                     164992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1058033
<PP&E>                                          386030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  196070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1567052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           377238
<BONDS>                                         232834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      37796
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                      899225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1567052
<SALES>                                        1365513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1537766
<CGS>                                           644979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   735388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                190796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 198608
<INCOME-TAX>                                     57194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             141414
<DISCONTINUED>                                     400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    141814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>