65946 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / Notices

reflected on Schedule B, which sets

forth the amount to be refunded to each

party under the terms of this settlement.

Williams will make the refunds to each

of the customers listed thereon on or

before January 31, 2002.

Williams states that a copy of its filing

was served on all jurisdictional

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed on or before December 26, 2001.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘RIMS’’

link, select ‘‘Docket#’’ and follow the

instructions (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments, protests and

interventions may be filed electronically

via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s web

site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31444 Filed 12–20–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL01–115–002, et al.]

Kinder Morgan Power Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

December 17, 2001.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission.

Any comments should be submitted in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

1. Kinder Morgan Power Company v.

Southern Company Services, Inc.

[Docket No. EL01–115–002]

Take notice that on December 10,

2001, Southern Companies Services,

Inc. tendered for filing with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a compliance filing

pursuant to the Commission’s Order

issued on November 23, 2001.

Comment Date: January 9, 2002.

2. Illinois Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–185–003]

Take notice that on December 11,

2001, Illinois Power Company (Illinois

Power), filed with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (Commission) a

motion requesting a waiver of the

requirement to file a market analysis in

this proceeding. Illinois Power states

that upon acceptance of the Emergency

Energy Tariff filed in Docket No. ER02–

399–000 it will file a notice of

cancellation of the Power Sales Tariff

accepted in this proceeding.

Illinois Power states that a copy of its

motion has been mailed to each person

on the official service list in this

proceeding, each party having a service

agreement under the Power Sales Tariff

and each MAIN member currently

participating in the Callable Reserves

Emergency Energy Procedure under

MAIN Guide No. 5B.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

3. Western Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–3105–001]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, Western Resources, Inc. (WR)

tendered for filing with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a refiling of the Electric

Interchange Agreement between WR

and Kansas City Power & Light in

compliance with Order 614 as required

by the acceptance letter dated November

20, 2001.

WR request and effective date of

September 26, 2001.

Comment Date: January 3, 2002.

4. Ameren Services Company

[Docket No.ER02–196–001]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, Ameren Services Company (ASC)

tendered for filing a Network Integration

Transmission Service Agreement and

Network Operating Agreement between

ASC and Illinois Municipal Electric

Agency. ASC asserts that the purpose of

the Agreement is to replace the

unexecuted Agreements in Docket No.

ER 02–196–000 with the executed

Agreements.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

5. Midwest Independent Transmission

System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02–485–000]

Take notice that on December 13,

2001, the Midwest Independent

Transmission System Operator, Inc.

(Midwest ISO) submitted revisions to

Attachment N (Recovery of Costs

Associated with New Facilities) of the

Midwest ISO Open Access

Transmission Tariff to implement

specific ROE and accelerated

depreciation incentives.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

6. Ameren Services Company

[Docket No. ER02.–525–000]

Take notice that on December 11,

2001, Ameren Services Company (ASC)

tendered for filing Service Agreements

for Firm Point-to-Point Transmission

Service and Non-Firm Point-to-Point

Transmission Service between ASC and

Dominion Nuclear Marketing II, Inc.

ASC asserts that the purpose of the

Agreements is to permit ASC to provide

transmission service to Dominion

Nuclear Marketing II, Inc. pursuant to

Ameren’s Open Access Transmission

Tariff.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

7. Central Vermont Public Service

Corporation, and Green Mountain

Power Company

[Docket No. ER02–528–000]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, Central Vermont Public Service

Corporation (CVPS), Green Mountain

Power Corporation (GMP), and Vermont

Electric Power Company, Inc. (VELCO)

tendered for filing termination

agreements and subsequent

amendments to VELCO’s Electric Rate

Schedule FERC No. 234 (Rate Schedule

234) effective February 28, 2002.

The proposed termination agreements

reflect that the City of Burlington

Electric Department, Village of

Lyndonville Electric Department,

Village of Northfield Electric

Department, Village of Orleans Electric

Department, Town of Hardwick Electric

Department, Town of Stowe Electric

Department and Washington Electric

Cooperative, Inc. (collectively, the

Vermont Secondary Purchasers) and

VELCO have mutually agreed to

terminate their power purchase

agreements under Rate Schedule No.

234.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the all affected parties to the amended

rate schedule and the Vermont Public

Service Board.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

8. American Transmission Company

LLC

[Docket No. ER02–529–000]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, American Transmission Company

LLC (ATCLLC) tendered for filing an

executed Generation-Transmission

Interconnection Agreement between

ATCLLC and Cloverland Electric

Cooperative.

ATCLLC requests an effective date of

June 29, 2001.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2001 / Notices 65947

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

9. Duke Energy Marshall County, LLC

[Docket No. ER02–530–000]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, Duke Energy Marshall County,

LLC (Duke Marshall) tendered for filing

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission (Commission) pursuant to

section 205 of the Federal Power Act its

proposed FERC Electric Tariff No. 1.

Duke Marshall seeks authority to sell

energy and capacity, as well as ancillary

services, at market-based rates, together

with certain waivers and preapprovals.

Duke Marshall also seeks authority to

sell, assign, or transfer transmission

rights that it may acquire in the course

of its marketing activities. Duke

Marshall requests pursuant to section

35.11 of the Commission’s regulations

that the Commission waive the 60-day

minimum notice requirement under

section 35.3(a) of its regulations and

grant an effective date for this

application of February 1, 2002, the date

on which Duke Marshall anticipates

commencing the sale of test energy.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

10. American Transmission Company

LLC

[Docket No. ER02–531–000]

Take notice that on December 12,

2001, American Transmission Company

LLC (ATCLLC) tendered for filing an

executed Distribution-Transmission

Interconnection Agreement between

ATCLLC and the City of Plymouth.

ATCLLC requests an effective date of

June 25, 2001.

Comment Date: January 2, 2002.

11. California Independent System

Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER02–532–000]

Take notice that on December 13,

2001, the California Independent

System Operator Corporation tendered

for filing an Amendment to Schedule 1

of the Participating Generator

Agreement between the ISO and

Southern California Edison Company

(SoCal Edison) for acceptance by the

Commission. The ISO states that this

filing has been served on SoCal Edison

and the California Public Utilities

Commission.

The ISO is requesting waiver of the

60-day notice requirement to allow the

Participating Generator Agreement to be

made effective December 13, 2001.

Comment Date: January 3, 2002.

12. The Potomac Edison Company

[Docket No.ER02–533–000]

Take notice that on December 13,

2001, Allegheny Energy Service

Corporation on behalf of The Potomac

Edison Company (Potomac Edison),

submitted a Notice of Cancellation of

Service Agreement No. 22 (including its

Amendments and Supplements) with

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, a

customer under Potomac Edison’s Rate

Schedule designated as FERC Electric

Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 2.

Potomac Edison has requested a

waiver of notice to allow the

cancellation to be effective January 1,

2002.

Comment Date: January 3, 2002.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest such filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection. This filing may also be

viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘RIMS’’ link,

select ‘‘Docket#’’ and follow the

instructions (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments, protests and

interventions may be filed electronically

via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s web

site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31466 Filed 12–20–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[AD–FRL–7121–9]

Notice of Deficiency for Clean Air Act

Operating Permit Program in the

District of Columbia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of deficiency.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority

under the Clean Air Act, EPA is

publishing this Notice of Deficiency

(NOD) for the District of Columbia’s

Clean Air Act title V operating permit

program. The NOD is based upon EPA’s

finding that the District of Columbia’s

requirements for public notification do

not comply with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act and its implementing

regulations. Publication of this Notice is

a prerequisite for withdrawal of the

District of Columbia’s title V program

approval, but EPA is not withdrawing

this program through this action.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2001.

Because this NOD is an adjudication

and not a final rule, the Administrative

Procedure Act’s 30 day deferral of the

effective date of a rule does not apply.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paresh R. Pandya, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency Region III (3AP11),

1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA

19103 at (215) 814–2167, or by e-mail at

pandya.perry@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On May 22, 2000, EPA promulgated a

rulemaking that extended the interim

approval period of 86 operating permits

programs until December 1, 2001 (65 FR

32035). Sierra Club and the New York

Public Interest Research Group

challenged the action. In settling the

litigation, EPA agreed to publish a

notice in the Federal Register, so that

the public would have the opportunity

to identify and bring to EPA’s attention

alleged deficiencies in title V programs.

The EPA published that notice on

December 11, 2000 (65 FR 77376).

As stated in the Federal Register

notice, EPA agreed to respond by

December 1, 2001 to timely public

comments on programs that have

obtained interim approval; and EPA

agreed to respond by April 1, 2002 to

timely comments on fully approved

programs. The EPA is publishing a NOD

if the Agency determines that a

deficiency exists, and is notifying the

commenter in writing to explain the

reasons for not making a finding of

deficiency on other issues. The EPA

received one timely comment letter

pertaining to the District of Columbia’s

title V program. In reviewing the

commenter’s concerns, EPA agrees that

the commenter has identified a

deficiency in the District of Columbia’s

title V operating permit program relating

to the District of Columbia’s public

notification requirements. The EPA is

addressing that deficiency in this notice.

In addition, the commenter raised other

issues that EPA has determined are not

deficiencies. The EPA is responding to

the commenter in writing, explaining

the basis for EPA’s decision.