alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of American Oriental Bioengineering,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

       i.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       ii.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

 /s/ Tony (Shujun) Liu
------------------------------------
Tony (Shujun) Liu
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 17, 2004

This Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 33-42261) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan of Second Bancorp, Inc. and in the related Prospectus and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42347) pertaining to the 1991 Incentive
Stock Option Plan of Second Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1997
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Second Bancorp, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 25, 1997
**Exhibit 32**

 

(a)                                  **Certificationby Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report**

 

I, RobertK. Lifton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Medis Technologies Ltd. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | /s/ ROBERT  K. LIFTON |   |
|                           | Robert K. Lifton |
|                           | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

(b)                                 **Certificationby Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report**

 

I, IsraelFisher, Chief Financial Officer of Medis Technologies Ltd. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | /s/ ISRAEL  FISHER |   |
|                           | Israel Fisher |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, B. Michael Adler, President and Chief Executive Officer of WorldQuestNetworks, Inc. certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of WorldQuest Networks, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):
 a. All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004   By:/s/ B. Michael Adler  B. Michael AdlerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Connecticut District Advisory Council, located in the geographical area of Hartford, Connecticut will hold a public meeting at 8:30 a.m., on Monday, January 14, 2002, Connecticut District Office, 330 Main Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06106, to discuss such matters as may be presented. For further information, write or call Marie Record, District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 330 Main Street, Hartford, Connecticut—(860) 240-4700.

                    Anyone wishing to attend and make an oral presentation to the Board must contact Marie A. Record, no later than January 9, 2002 via E-mail or fax. Marie A. Record, District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, Connecticut District Office 330 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-4670 phone or (860) 240-4714 fax or E-mail                     *marie.record@sba.gov.*

Steve Tupper,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-31097 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
City of San Antonio and Chief 

Charles 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00097-CV

Brian MCENERY,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO and Chief Charles N. Hood,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-06603

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Abate Appeal is DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000826326
<NAME>                        Antennas America, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

       

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         27,638
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,344
<INVENTORY>                                    307,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               482,411
<PP&E>                                         630,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,318,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          898,265
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       37,686
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,318,748
<SALES>                                        474,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               474,844
<CGS>                                          341,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (144,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (53,397)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (90,754)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (90,754)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        



</TABLE>
101 A.3d 1078

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. ANTOINE D. WATTS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

October 30, 2014.

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted.
Exhibit 4.59


Exhibit
  4.59

NOTICE OF LEASE AMENDMENT #189093

NLRC is the Lessor and NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER, INC. is the Lessee under that certain Geothermal Lease, dated March31, 2003 and designated in the files of NLRC as Contract No. 189093, relating to use of Premises situate in the County of Humboldt, State of Nevada, (the "Premises") for the purpose of Geothermal Power Production. Said contract, together with any and all modifications, supplements and amendments thereto, whether or not referred to above, being hereinafter called the "Lease".

Effective October 3, 2006, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the lease is amended and modified as follows:

AGREEMENT

1.

The description of the Premises is amended to remove the following Leased acreage,

more particularly described as that property situate in Humboldt County

Township 36 North, Range 34 East, M.D.B.& M. 

Section 13 All 640.00 acres

The remaining Leased acreage is more particularly described in Revised Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; which shall replace any and all previous legal descriptions or Exhibits of said Lease.

2.

The above reduction changes the current Leased acreage from 3,172.28 to 2,532.28 acres,

a total reduction of 640.00 acres.

3.

It is mutually understood and agreed that the Lease fee shall be reduced to $5,064.56 payable annually in advance, and continuing each subsequent year, during the term of the Agreement, with an annual increase per the terms of the Lease Agreement

4.

Except as herein amended and supplemented, the Lease shall remain unchanged and

continue in full force and effect as written.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, in duplicate, as of the day and year first written above.

NEVADA LAND AND RESOURCE COMPANY, LLC




By: 

                                       /s/                                              

Dorothy Timian-Palmer 

Chief Operating Officer








REVISED EXHIBIT "A"

Nevada Geothermal Power

Geothermal Lease #189093




				
	 
	 
	 
	Acres


	 

	All that property situated in Humboldt County, NV, more particularly described as: 

Township 36 North, Range 34 East, M.D.M. 


	Section 01

	All

	 
	638.80


	Section 11

	All

	 
	640.00


	Section 25

	All

	 
	640.00


	Section 35

	All except ptn in RR R/W

	 
	613.48


	 
	 
	 
	2532.28


	 
	 
	Acres leased in Humboldt County:

	2532.28


	 
	Total Acres in Geothermal Lease # 189093
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VIDEO JUKEBOX NETWORK, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,451,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,886,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                   365,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,295,610
<PP&E>                                      15,460,156
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,741,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,523,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,613,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,298,758
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,002
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,586,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,523,301
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,373,546
<CGS>                                        6,187,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,379,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,572
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,189,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,175,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,175,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Telecom, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Alexander
Vinogradov, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day May of 2004.

ALEXANDER VINOGRADOV
---------------------

Alexander Vinogradov
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

WILLIE LEE DAVIS GETER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1863 (RWR) 

)

CYNTHIA SYDNOR et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

FINAL MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Willie Lee Davis Geter filed this pro se complaint under the Freedom of

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint

or to grant summary judgment. By Order dated December 11, 2008, the plaintiff was advised of

his obligations to respond to the motion, and was warned that failure to respond by January 22,

2009 could result in facts alleged by the defendant being treated as admitted and the motion

being treated as conceded. Because the plaintiff has not responded, the facts set forth in the

defendants’ statement of material facts will be treated as admitted, as authorized by Local Civil

Rule 7(h), and the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted.

Along with the dispositive motion, the defendants filed a statement of material facts

supported by a sworn statement by an agency official. The statement of material facts

establishes, among other things, that defendants responded to the plaintiff’s FOIA request by

letter, advising that they did not maintain the records plaintiff was seeking and further advising

him of the his appeal rights. (Def.’s Stmt. of Mat. Facts ¶¶ 7-8.) The statement of material facts
-2-

also establishes that the plaintiff did not pursue his appeal rights. (Id. ¶ 9.) Because a

precondition of filing a civil action filed under the FOIA is the prior exhaustion of administrative

remedies, the complaint in this action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

See Jones v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 576 F. Supp. 2d 64, 66 (D.D.C. 2008) (stating that failure to

exhaust in a FOIA case “is properly the subject of a motion brought under Rule 12(b)(6) for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the complaint be, and hereby is, GRANTED. The

complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 

This is a final, appealable order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4.

SIGNED this 9th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ 

RICHARD W. ROBERTS

United States District Judge
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark A. LEAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-1631.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 23, 2010.

Decided Nov. 30, 2010.

Donald J. Schmid, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard H. Parsons, Attorney, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, TERRENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

*96ORDER

Mark Leazier’s felony convictions made it a federal crime for him to possess a gun, *see*18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006), but an Indiana law-enforcement officer investigating Leazier for hunting deer illegally caught him shooting a 9mm pistol. The officer informed federal agents, and Leazier was prosecuted under § 922(g)(1). He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment, 10 months below the bottom of his guidelines range. Leazier filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer moves to withdraw because he cannot identify any nonfrivolous argument to pursue. *See Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Leazier has not responded to counsel’s submission. *See*Cir. R. 51(b). We confine our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. *See United States v. Schuh,*289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir.2002). Counsel verified that Leazier does not want his guilty plea set aside and thus appropriately omits possible challenges to the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. *See United States v. Knox,*287 F.3d 667, 670-72 (7th Cir.2002).

Counsel reports that he searched the record for possible challenges to Leazier’s sentence and considers arguing that the district court erred in counting two of his prior convictions as felony crimes of violence, which yielded a base offense level of 24 under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2). Leazier had objected that one of those convictions, for robbery, was reduced to misdemeanor theft, but, as counsel notes, Leazier withdrew that objection after reviewing the written judgment. He thus waived the objection, and so we agree with counsel that an appellate claim would be frivolous. *See United States v. Venturella,*585 F.3d 1013, 1019 (7th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1547, 176 L.Ed.2d 139 (2010).

Counsel also considers arguing that Leazier’s prison sentence is unreasonably long. But the prison term is below the guidelines range and thus is presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Liddell,*543 F.3d 877, 885 (7th Cir.2008); *United States v. George,*403 F.3d 470, 473 (7th Cir.2005). No circumstance warrants disregarding that presumption here, so we agree with counsel that it would be frivolous to challenge the reasonableness of Leazier’s sentence.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.