alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
770 S.E.2d 399

#### In the Matter of Leo A. DRYER, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000624.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 27, 2015.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent request the Court transfer respondent to incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). ODC and respondent also request the Court appoint Robert Joseph Lowe, Jr., Esquire, as successor lawyer pursuant to Rule 31(j), RLDE.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Robert Joseph Lowe, Jr., Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Lowe shall take action as required by Rule 31(j), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Lowe may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment. Respondent shall promptly respond to Mr. Lowe’s requests for information and/or documentation and shall fully cooperate with Mr. Lowe in all other respects.

Further, this Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow, operating, and/or any other law account(s) of respondent, shall serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Robert Joseph Lowe, Jr., has been duly appointed by this Court and that respondent is enjoined from making withdrawals or transfers from or writing any check or other instrument on any of the account(s).

*650Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Robert Joseph Lowe, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Lowe’s office.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Community Development Revolving Loan Program for Credit Unions

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration.

ACTION: Notice of application period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) will accept 
applications for participation in the Community Development Revolving 
Loan Fund's Loan Program throughout calendar year 2002, subject to 
availability of funds. Application procedures for qualified low-income 
credit unions are in NCUA Rules and Regulations.

ADDRESSES: Applications for participation may be obtained from and 
should be submitted to: NCUA, Office of Credit Union Development, 1775 
Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

DATES: Applications may be submitted throughout calendar year 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Credit Union Development 
at the above address or telephone (703) 518-6610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 705 of the NCUA rules and regulations 
implements the Community Development Revolving Loan Program for Credit 
Unions. The purpose of the Program is to assist officially designated 
``low-income'' credit unions in providing basic financial services to 
residents in their communities that result in increased income, 
ownership and employment. The Program makes available low interest 
loans in amounts up to $300,000 in the aggregate to qualified 
participating ``low-income'' credit unions. Program participation is 
limited to existing credit unions with an official ``low-income'' 
designation. Student credit unions are not eligible to participate in 
this program.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 705.9 of the NCUA 
rules and regulations that states NCUA will provide notice in the 
Federal Register when funds in the program are available.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on December 
13, 2001.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-31289 Filed 12-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
**EXHIBIT          32.1**

**CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, **

**AS          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF          THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (a) | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Information                    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                    the                    financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                       |                                      |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                    May 19, 2006 |                                       | /s/                    Shannon T. Squyres |
|                                   | By:                    Shannon T. Squyres  |
|                                   | Chief                    Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         43
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,879
<PP&E>                                          10,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                     939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,845
<SALES>                                          8,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,615
<CGS>                                            5,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,248)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (302)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,995)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 3-12043, Form S-8 No. 333-74984, Form S-8 No. 333-111929, Form S-3 No. 333-117472, Form S-3 No. 333-127198, Form S-3 No. 333-130113 and Form S-4 No. 333-111975) of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated November
19, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 26, 2009.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Dallas, Texas


November 19, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Score One, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Hoi-ho Kiu, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Lai Ming Lau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


                                                        /s/ Hoi-hu Kiu
                                                        --------------
                                                        Hoi-ho Kiu
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        April 19, 2006




                                                        /s/ Lai Ming Lau
                                                        ----------------
                                                        Lai Ming Lau
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        April 19, 2006





                                        1
{"id":5137,"date":"2020-10-21T10:18:56","date_gmt":"2020-10-21T14:18:56","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=5137"},"modified":"2020-10-21T10:18:56","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T14:18:56","slug":"commission-grants-temporary-relief-requested-by-cma-cgm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-grants-temporary-relief-requested-by-cma-cgm\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Grants Temporary Relief Requested by CMA CGM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission voted to grant the <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.fmc.gov\/readingroom\/docs\/P2-20\/P2-20_Order.pdf\/\">temporary relief sought by CMA CGM<\/a> from certain service contract and tariff filing requirements.<\/p>\n<p>The carrier sought relief from Commission regulations as part of its efforts to respond to a malicious cyberattack it experienced in September.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission granted the request for exemption from relevant service contract filing requirements and relevant tariff publishing requirements.\u00a0 Both exemptions are subject to certain conditions.\u00a0 The exemption from tariff publishing requirements applies only to cargo received on or after the date of the order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission voted to grant the temporary relief sought by CMA CGM from certain service contract and tariff filing requirements. The carrier sought relief from Commission regulations as part of its efforts to respond to a malicious cyberattack it experienced in September. The Commission granted the request for... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-grants-temporary-relief-requested-by-cma-cgm\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5137"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5137"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5138,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5137\/revisions\/5138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEONARD JACOB BOYD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. SCHMIDT; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-35441

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-00564-CL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

Oregon state prisoner Leonard Jacob Boyd appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various federal

and state law violations arising out of his arrest and detention. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a

FILED

JAN 28 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
dismissal for failure to comply with a court order, Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d

639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Boyd’s action

because Boyd failed to comply with the district court orders instructing him to

respond to defendants’ interrogatories. See id. at 642-43 (discussing the five

factors for determining whether to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to

comply with a court order); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.

1992) (although dismissal is a harsh penalty, the district court’s dismissal should

not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it “committed a clear

error of judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Boyd’s action for failure

to comply with court orders, we do not consider Boyd’s challenges to the district

court’s interlocutory orders. See Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1386 (9th

Cir. 1996) (“[I]nterlocutory orders, generally appealable after a final judgment, are

not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute, whether the failure to

prosecute is purposeful or is a result of negligence or mistake.” (citation and

internal question marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-35441
#### Mercy Magaly LOPEZ-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Mercy Magaly Galan-Lucero, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-5333-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2011.

Howard L. Baker, Wilens & Baker, P.C., New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Tony West, Assistant Attorney General; Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director; Allen W. Hausmam, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, ROBERT A. KATZMANN, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Mercy Magaly Lopez-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Ecuador, seeks review of a December 1, 2009, order of the BIA denying her motion to reconsider. *In re Mercy Magaly Lopez-Ramirez,*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Dec. 1, 2009). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *See Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). A motion to reconsider must “state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board *550decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

In this case, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Lopez-Ramirez failed to point to any legal or factual error in its prior decision. *See id.*Indeed, as the BIA concluded, contrary to Lopez-Ramirez’s contention in her motion, it had reasonably found that the medical evidence she presented to demonstrate that she had suffered from a stroke did not establish that she had suffered any memory loss that would explain the significant discrepancies and omissions between her credible fear interview, asylum application, and testimony, on which the agency relied in finding her not credible. Thus, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider its affirmance of the immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination. *See Jin Ming Liu,*439 F.3d at 111; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34.1(b).
FMCS | 250 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov

NEWS RELEASE

Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2020 Contact: Greg Raelson

For Immediate Release Office of Congressional & Public Affairs

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8081

FMCS Statement on Continued Labor Negotiations 

Between Bath Iron Works and International Association of 

Machinists Local S6 (UPDATED)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) issued the following 

statement today on the labor negotiations between Bath Iron Works and International Association of 

Machinists Local S6:

“Today, representatives from Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6 

agreed to three additional articles as progress continues in their negotiations with FMCS assistance. 

Though FMCS cannot comment on the substance or status of their specific negotiations, FMCS 

mediators are working with the parties to resolve the issues that divide them. The parties have agreed 

to a total to eight articles including many of the key topics in this dispute.”

As is Agency practice, FMCS will not release information regarding meeting dates and locations for 

these negotiations.

###

The U.S. Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service (FMCS) is the nation’s premier public agency for 

dispute resolution and conflict management. FMCS was created by Congress as a neutral and 

independent government agency upon enactment of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 (TaftHartley Act) and mandated to resolve industrial conflict and promote labor-management peace and 

cooperation, minimizing the impact of these disputes on the free flow of commerce. With headquarters 

in Washington, D.C. and offices across the country, the agency has a proud track record of decades of 

effective dispute resolution and conflict management services for employers and unions across industries 

and work activities in the private, public, and federal sectors. FMCS is also recognized for its success 

facilitating negotiated rulemaking processes and for its robust employment mediation program in the 

federal sector as well as its global program, partnering with more than 60 countries to provide 

international consulting and training. For more on FMCS or to request services, visit www.fmcs.gov
United States Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


EXHIBIT 10.7




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




1.

This agreement, (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”) is between GelTech Solutions, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and David A Rosenfeld (the “Employee).




2.

This Agreement is effective as of August 28, 2007 and shall continue to be effective for ninety (90) days, unless otherwise agreed by the Employee and the Company.




3.

A base salary of $4,062.50 per month will be paid to the Employee to provide CFO services to the Company on a part-time basis.  Additionally, the Company will grant to Employee 40,000 options five-year non-qualified options under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, vesting 90 days after the effective date of this Agreement, with an exercise price of $0.66 per share.  The option grant shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors and execution of the Company’s standard Stock Option Agreement.




4.

The title of the Employee will be Chief Financial Officer.




5.

Employee will be reimbursed for mileage at $0.485 per mile, plus actual tolls, from Orlando, FL to Jupiter, FL and return, if Employee commutes to the Company location using his vehicle.  




6.

The Company will provide hotel accommodations (or other suitable temporary living quarters) and meals when the Employee is in Jupiter, FL providing services to the Company.




7.

The Company will pay the Employee consistent with the timing and method of paying other members of management.  Appropriate federal taxes will be withheld from payments made to Employee.




8.

Employee’s salary in the first and last month of employment will be prorated if the employee works less than four weeks in such months.




9.

The Company acknowledges that the Employee works under the exclusive legal authority and management of the Company and not Nperspective, LLC.




10.

The Company agrees to indemnify Employee in his duties as an Employee and Chief Financial Officer to the extent permitted by governing law.  The Company shall pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by Employee if he is party to any proceeding arising out of his being an Employee or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, as long as the Employee acted in good faith and with reasonable care in carrying out his duties as an Employee and as Chief Financial Officer.




11.

The Employee agrees that any proprietary information gained while engaged/employed will only be used to further the mission of the Company.  Hence, such information will otherwise be kept in strict confidence both during and after employment with the Company.




I have read and understood the scope of services and fees described in this Agreement.  I hereby agree to the terms of this Agreement with respect to David A Rosenfeld.










									
	/s/ Michael Cordani

	     

	8-28-07

	 
	 
	 
	/s/ David A. Rosenfeld

	     

	8/28/07


	Michael Cordani

	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 
	David A. Rosenfeld

	 
	Date


	CEO & Chairman

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	GelTech Solutions, Inc.