alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


Administrative Service Agreement


 


This Administrative Service Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated this [_______] the day of [_______], 2022 is between Lion Wealth Limited, herein referred to as “Service Provider”
and Aquarius II Acquisition Corp., herein referred to as “Customer”.


 


Service Provider has agreed to provide services
to the Customer on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement, while Customer is of the opinion that Service Provider has the
proper and necessary qualifications, experience and abilities to provide services to Customer.


 


Therefore in consideration of the matters described
above, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the Customer and the Service Provider agree as follows:


 


		1.	Scope of Work



 


The Service Provider is to provide
the Customer with the following services (the “Services”): Company Administration.


 


The services will include any other
tasks which the Customer and the Service Provider may agree on.


 


		2.	Term of Agreement



 


This Agreement will begin on [_______], 2022 and will remain
in full force and effect until the completion of the Services. This Agreement may be extended by mutual written agreement of the parties.


 


		3.	Termination 



 


If either party seeks termination of
this Agreement, the terminating party must provide a 30 days written notice to the other party.


 


		4.	Compensation 



 


The Customer will provide compensation to the Service Provider of $10,000
per month for the services rendered by the Service Provider as required by this Agreement. Compensation is payable at the completion of
services, provided, however, that the Customer may delay payment of such monthly fee upon a determination by the audit committee of the
board of directors of the Customer that the Customer lacks sufficient funds held outside of the Trust Account (as defined below) to pay
actual or anticipated expenses in connection with an initial business combination. Any such unpaid amount shall accrue without interest
and either be due and payable no later than the date of Customer’s initial business combination. If the Customer does not consummate
an initial business combination, any accrued and unpaid amounts hereunder shall be forgiven. The Service Provider hereby agrees that it does not
have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust
Account for any reason whatsoever.




 




    


    


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly affixed their signatures under
hand on this [_______] day of [_______], 2022.


 


	 	LION WEALTH LIMITED


 


	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Chunning Wang
	 	Title:  	Director


  


	 	AQUARIUS II ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Yan Zhang
	 	Title:  	Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Collects $962,500 In Penalty Payments","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IJ7bH0kHt5\"><a href=\"\/fmc-collects-962500-in-penalty-payments\/\">FMC Collects $962,500 In Penalty Payments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-collects-962500-in-penalty-payments\/embed\/#?secret=IJ7bH0kHt5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Collects $962,500 In Penalty Payments” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"IJ7bH0kHt5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Testimony of Chairman Maffei before Congress: Review of Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Programs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9mfWMkoJHM\"><a href=\"\/testimony-of-chairman-maffei-before-congress-review-of-fiscal-year-2023-budget-request-for-the-coast-guard-and-maritime-transportation-programs\/\">Testimony of Chairman Maffei before Congress: Review of Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Programs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/testimony-of-chairman-maffei-before-congress-review-of-fiscal-year-2023-budget-request-for-the-coast-guard-and-maritime-transportation-programs\/embed\/#?secret=9mfWMkoJHM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Testimony of Chairman Maffei before Congress: Review of Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Programs” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9mfWMkoJHM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Sean L. SILCOX, Appellant v. William SCISM, Warden.

No. 10-2803.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal as Moot Nov. 24, 2010.

Opinion filed: Dec. 8, 2010.

*727Sean L. Silcox, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Timothy S. Judge, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Scranton, PA, Mark E. Morrison, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellee.

Before: RENDELL, FUENTES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Sean Silcox appeals the District Court’s order denying his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons below, we will dismiss the appeal as moot.

The procedural history of this case and the details of Silcox’s claims are well known to the parties, set forth in the District Court’s memorandum order, and need not be discussed at length. Briefly, Silcox challenged a disciplinary sanction which included the loss of good conduct time, revocation of his halfway house placement, and forfeiture of a sentence reduction after he was found guilty of making, possessing, or using intoxicants. He argued that the finding of the hearing officer was not supported by credible evidence and that the BOP failed to follow its own procedures and deprived him of a meaningful opportunity to respond to the charges. As relief, Silcox requested that his early release and good time credit be restored and he be immediately released from custody. The District Court denied the petition, and Silcox filed a timely notice of appeal.

According to the BOP’s inmate locator, Silcox was released from prison on October 22, 2010. By order entered October 26, 2010, the Clerk requested that the parties address whether the appeal is moot in light of Silcox’s release. Neither party has responded.

We conclude that the appeal is moot. Silcox sought relief which would result in his release from prison and he has been released from prison. There is now no effective relief that we could grant Silcox. *See In re Cantwell,*639 F.2d 1050, 1053 (3d Cir.1981) (“[A]n appeal will be dismissed as moot when events occur during the pendency of the appeal which prevent the appellate court from granting any effective relief.”). Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal as moot.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL BRACAMONTES, a/k/a Miguel Rayo Bracamontes, a/k/a 

Miguel Bracamontes-Rayo, a/k/a Reinaldo Palomares,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (7:10-cr-00030-F-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miguel Bracamontes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Brian Scott Meyers, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Bracamontes appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for 

reduction of sentence. The court denied the motion on the 

ground that Bracamontes’ offenses did not involve crack cocaine. 

To the contrary, two of the counts to which Bracamontes pled 

guilty charged him with offenses involving both cocaine and 

fifty grams or more of cocaine base. Because the district court 

abused its discretion in denying Bracamontes’ motion, we vacate 

the district court’s judgment and remand for further 

proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus Antonio JAIME-JUAREZ, also known as El Memil, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-51241

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*597Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, Tx, Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Antonio Jaime-Juarez appeals from his conviction of illegal reentry following removal. He contends that his sentence of 87 months of imprisonment, which was within the applicable guideline sentencing range, was substantively unreasonable. Jaime-Juarez did not object to the reasonableness of his sentence in the district court and therefore our review is for plain error. *See United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007).

Jaime-Juarez’s contention that sentences calculated under the illegal reentry guideline are not entitled to a presumption of reasonableness, is foreclosed. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.2009) (affirming a within-guideline sentence following conviction of illegal reentry and rejecting Appellant’s argument that this Court must examine the empirical basis for the relevant Sentencing Guidelines provision before affording a presumption of reasonableness to the within-guideline sentence). Jaime-Juarez’s argument that his sentence is unreasonable because his offense was a mere international trespass is likewise foreclosed by this Circuit’s precedent. *See United States v. Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d 204, 212 (5th Cir.2008) (rejecting argument that the Appellant’s 87 month prison sentence for illegal reentry was unreasonable because the offense was “no more than simple trespass.”).

Finally, the district court rejected the argument that Jamie-Juarez was unable to comprehend that reentry into the United States could have serious consequences, as Jaime-Juarez had been convicted of illegal reentry once before and had been admonished to this effect. Jaime-Juarez has not shown that the district court’s finding in this regard amounts to plain error.

Jaime-Juarez has failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness given to his within-range sentence. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 553-54 (5th Cir.2006). He has failed to show error, plain or otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT23.1

THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-108744,333-121771 and 333-125159 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March2,  2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of The Warnaco Group, Inc. andSubsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) andmanagement's report of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, (which report on the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to 1) theCompany's plan of reorganization and emergence from bankruptcy asa new entity on February  4,  2003 and 2) a change inmethod of accounting for defined benefit pension plans), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal yearended December  31,  2005.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New YorkMarch 2,  2006

----
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  2015
Home/Time 2014-Present/2015 Previous			Next
2015										On July 29, 2015, the U.S. Senate votes to confirm FMCS Acting Director Allison Beck as the first woman Director of the Agency. She becomes the 18th Director of the FMCS since it was created by Congress in 1947. Ms. Beck was nominated for the position by President Obama on September 18, 2014.
Paula Shank2018-07-02T12:21:42-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-7498.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 29, 2008.

Decided: June 3, 2008.

Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*196PER CURIAM:

Rodney Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of .appealability, deny Wilson’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statements on Passing of Former FMC Chairman Helen Bentley","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZgTGfTrjNk\"><a href=\"\/statements-on-passing-of-former-fmc-chairman-helen-bentley\/\">Statements on Passing of Former FMC Chairman Helen Bentley<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statements-on-passing-of-former-fmc-chairman-helen-bentley\/embed\/#?secret=ZgTGfTrjNk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statements on Passing of Former FMC Chairman Helen Bentley” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ZgTGfTrjNk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}