alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement by Carl W. Bentzel Before the Surface Transportation Board on Urgent Issues in Freight Rail Services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"u1aH3aKEIQ\"><a href=\"\/statement-by-carl-w-bentzel-before-the-surface-transportation-board-on-urgent-issues-in-freight-rail-services\/\">Statement by Carl W. Bentzel Before the Surface Transportation Board on Urgent Issues in Freight Rail Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-by-carl-w-bentzel-before-the-surface-transportation-board-on-urgent-issues-in-freight-rail-services\/embed\/#?secret=u1aH3aKEIQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement by Carl W. Bentzel Before the Surface Transportation Board on Urgent Issues in Freight Rail Services” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"u1aH3aKEIQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 3.47
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        HOME DIALYSIS OF FAIRFIELD, INC.


     The undersigned, a majority of whom are citizens of the United States,
desiring to form a corporation for profit under Ohio Revised Code Section
1701.01, et seq., do hereby certify:

     FIRST:    The name of said corporation shall be
               HOME DIALYSIS OF FAIRFIELD, INC.
 
     SECOND:   The place in Ohio where its principal office is to be located is
Fairfield, Butler County, Ohio.

     THIRD:    The corporation is formed for the purpose of engaging in any
lawful act or activity for which corporations may be formed under Sections
1701.01 to 1701.98, inclusive, of the Ohio Revised Code.

     FOURTH:   The number of shares of stock which the said corporation is
authorized to have outstanding is eight hundred fifty (850), all of which shall
be without par value.

     FIFTH:    The corporation, through its Board of Directors, shall have the
right and power to repurchase any of its outstanding shares at such price and
upon such terms as may be agreed upon between the corporation and the selling
shareholder or shareholders.

     SIXTH:    The amount of stated capital with which the corporation shall
begin business is Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars.

     SEVENTH:  No holder of shares of any class of this corporation shall, as
such holder, have any preemptive rights in, or preemptive rights to purchase or
subscribe to, any shares of the
<PAGE>
 
corporation, or any bonds, debentures, or other securities convertible into any
shares of the corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto subscribed our names this 8th day of
June, 1994.

                              /s/ Kenneth R. Thompson, II
                              ---------------------------------------
                              KENNETH R. THOMPSON, II,
                              Incorporator


                              /s/ Linda B. Woodrow
                              ---------------------------------------
                              LINDA B. WOODROW,
                              Incorporator

 
 
 
                                       2
Exhibit 7.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: March 31, 2008



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Martin                                               
|Paul Martin Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NUMBER 13-11-00544-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE ESTATE OF ROSE MARIE WENDLANDT, DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on February 9, 2012, due to the bankruptcy 

of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 8. 

Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. 

The Court hereby orders the parties to file, within fourteen days of the date of this 

order, an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to

reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. 
2

Failure to respond to this order will result in reinstatement and dismissal of the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

1st day of November, 2013.
Exhibit
10.10




AMENDMENT
TO





EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT




This
Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated November 15, 2009,
is made by and among American Oriental Bioengineering Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), and Wilfred Chow, residing in New York, New York (the
“Executive”).  Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the
meaning for such term specified in the Employment Agreement (as defined
below).




WHEREAS, the Executive and the
Company entered into an Employment Agreement dated April 9, 2009 (the
“Employment Agreement”);




WHEREAS,  under the
Employment Agreement, the Executive was initially granted a certain number
of shares of common stock (the “Shares”) and an option (the
“Option”)  to purchase a certain number of shares of common stock
(the "Initial Grant"), which numbers were based upon the Company's internal
method for valuing each share of its common stock issued or issuable under
its 2006 Equity Incentive Plan at the time of the grant (the "Per Share Value"),
to reach a total annual compensation value for accounting purposes (the
"Total Value");




WHEREAS, as the result of an
error in the calculation of the Per Share Value, the number of shares
issuable under the Option was incorrect and should have been lower although the
Total Value, the exercise price and the Shares remain unchanged from the date of
the Initial Grant;




WHEREAS, the Option
should be reduced and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
has ratified, approved and confirmed in all respects, the reduction in
the Option;




NOW THEREFORE,in
consideration of the foregoing and for other consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




1. The first
sentence of Section 7 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated
in its entirety by inserting the following:




“The
Executive shall receive 57,225 shares of the Company's common stock and 36,942
stock options for services to be rendered during the Term.”




2. Except as
specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect unmodified and the parties hereby reaffirm the
same.




3. This
Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of New York, without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles
thereof.




4. This
Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an
original and all of which shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument,
with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument.  A facsimile signature shall be deemed to be an original
signature for purposes of this Amendment.




[REMAINDER
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first
above written.




AMERICAN ORIENTAL
      BIOENGINEERING, INC.By:  /s/ Tony
      LiuName: Tony
      LiuTitle:   Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 EXECUTIVE:





/s/ Wilfred
Chow


Wilfred
Chow
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-7
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-7


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                     
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------
|May 7, 2009 |  | /s/ David T. Blair                  
|            |  | David T. Blair                      
|            |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|            | 
|            |  | /s/ Hai V. Tran                     
|            |  | Hai V. Tran                         
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer             



22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001090448
<NAME> MENDOCINO PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,851
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,015
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,763 & AP-76,764

Ex parte JESUS DE LEON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 06-CR-0405-G & 06-CR-2746-G

IN THE 404 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

KELLER,P.J.,filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON and COCHRAN,

JJ., joined.

The plea agreement provided that applicant waived his right to appeal, applicant’s attorney

provided an affidavit saying that his understanding was that no appeal would be forthcoming, and

the habeas judge found that applicant breached the plea agreement by appealing. I do not think that

the pre-printed nature of the waiver of appeal makes it ambiguous, nor do I think that the trial judge

can retroactively override a waiver of appeal after he has accepted the plea agreement. The habeas

judge’s finding that applicant breached the plea agreement first appears to me to be supported by the

record.

But it does not matter. The plea agreement contains no “partial remedies” clause. That is,

there is no provision that says that, if applicant breaches the agreement by appealing, the State can
DE LEON CONCURRENCE — 2

prosecute applicant’s brother while the remainder of the plea agreement remains in force. Absent 

a partial remedies clause, the State has three choices when a defendant breaches the plea agreement:

(1) request specific performance, if that is possible, (2) follow its end of the agreement, relinquish 1

anyrights lost as a result of the defendant’s breach, and have the remaining portions of the agreement

remain in effect, or (3) have the entire agreement set aside. Once the State prosecuted applicant’s

2 3

brother, it made options (1) and (2) impossible. Regardless of who breached the plea agreement

first, once the State acted contrary to the plea agreement, it was no longer entitled to specific

performance of any part of the agreement, and applicant was entitled to have the agreement set aside

in its entirety.

With these comments, I concur in the Court’s judgment. 

Filed: June 5, 2013

Publish

 State v. Moore, 240 S.W.3d 248, 252 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). 1

Ex parte Ervin, 991 S.W.2d 804, 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (State can waive an illegal

2

portion of a judgment and maintain the remainder of the plea agreement).

 Windom v. State, 968 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). 3
EXHIBIT 31


                                                  CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jehu Hand, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mendocino Partners,
 Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 1, 2004

/s/ Jehu Hand
CEO and Chief Financial Officer
President
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"September 2019 Activity Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qQJCy8TydX\"><a href=\"\/september-2019-activity-report\/\">September 2019 Activity Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/september-2019-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=qQJCy8TydX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“September 2019 Activity Report” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"qQJCy8TydX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}