alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Collective Bargaining Mediation - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fjLVGhAYsS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/resolving-labor-management-disputes\/collective-bargaining-mediation\/\">Collective Bargaining Mediation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/resolving-labor-management-disputes\/collective-bargaining-mediation\/embed\/#?secret=fjLVGhAYsS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Collective Bargaining Mediation” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"fjLVGhAYsS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 1, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XIcQibgM5B\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-1-2021\/\">Applicants November 1, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-1-2021\/embed\/#?secret=XIcQibgM5B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 1, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"XIcQibgM5B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Glenn F. DROWN, Appellant, v. H. V. HIGLEY, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs, et al., Appellees.

No. 13513.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 15, 1957.

Decided May 16, 1957.

*775Mr. Donald M. Murtha, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Howard E. Shapiro, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.

Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellees.

Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

As a result of a reduction in force in an office of the Veterans Administration appellant, rather than a competing employee, lost his position.1 2****There is serious doubt that in their application to the facts of this case the regulations under which this occurred gave due effect to appellant’s length of service as required by statute.2 We do not resolve this doubt because appellant failed to pursue his judicial remedy with the diligence incumbent upon one seeking restoration to a Government position. Twenty-seven months elapsed from the final administrative action on June 18, 1953 to the time of the initiation of the instant litigation. An earlier suit appellant had filed in Minnesota had been dismissed on jurisdictional grounds May 14, 1954; but almost sixteen additional months passed before the present litigation was initiated in this jurisdiction September 2, 1955. Appellant sought to meet the defense of laches only by explaining that the delay was due to his efforts to obtain an attorney in the District of Columbia. Considering the time consumed in the fruitless earlier suit, we think the diligence required of appellant, himself a lawyer, would have avoided a substantial part of this additional delay. Because of appellant’s laches alone, the judgment for appellees will be affirmed. See Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367, 372, 39 S.Ct. 293, 63 L.Ed. 650; Caswell v. Morgenthau, 69 App.D.C. 15, 98 F.2d 296; Grasse v. Snyder, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 192 F.2d 35; Haas v. Overholser, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 223 F.2d 314. Cf. Gurley v. Wilson, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 336, 239 F.2d 957.

Affirmed.

1

. He was, however, given a position of lower grade.

2

. Section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act, 58 Stat. 390 (1944), as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 861. Though appellant’s total length of service exceeded that of the retained employee by more than three months the regulations created a tie with respect to length of service and then broke it in favor of the other employee because he had entered the employment of the particular agency two days before appellant.
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of CF0 Section 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DEFAULT PROOF CREDIT CARD SYSTEM, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Charles A. Menendez,, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of March, 2005.

/s/ Charles A. Menendez,
-----------------
Charles A. Menendez,
Chief Financial Officer
Order entered September 18, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00512-CR

HILARIO SANTIAGO-BATISTA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82818-2016

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due August 11, 2017. By postcard dated August 15, 2017, we 

notified appellant that the brief was overdue and directed him to file his brief and a motion to 

extend time to file the brief within ten days. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we 

have had no communication from appellant.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                     CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned President (principal executive
officer) of Adven, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/ Henri Hornby
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Henri Hornby
                                            President
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: May 9, 2003



THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SS.1350 AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE
DOCUMENT.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors andStockholders 

International Stem Cell Corporation and Subsidiaries 

Oceanside, California 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectusconstituting a part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-166420, 333-166421, 333-166883, 333-169549, 333-164539, 333-150920, 333-159424 and 333-159421) of our report dated March 23, 2011 of International Stem Cell Corporationand subsidiaries (the Company), a development stage company, relating to the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ deficit and stockholders’equity and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (August 17, 2001) to December 31, 2010, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

/s/ Vasquez & Company LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 24, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                                          JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                                                        123
<SECURITIES>                                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                              123
<PP&E>                                                                      5,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                                              1,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                              7,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      33,241
<BONDS>                                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                                    8,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                (39,237)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                7,876
<SALES>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                                0
<CGS>                                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          948,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (959,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (959,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             (959,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                (.11)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
each of the undersigned Randall P. Marx, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Monty R. Lamirato, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigneds'knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 14, 2006                         /s/ Randall P. Marx
                                                -------------------
                                                Randall P. Marx
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 14, 2006                         /s/ Monty R. Lamirato
                                                ---------------------
                                                Monty R. Lamirato
                                                Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 3, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60377 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaint iffAppellee,

versus ELIZAH CLARK, also known as Elijah Clark,

DefendantAppellant.

----------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:02-CR-19-1-BrS

----------------------------------------------------------- Before SMITH, DEMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Elizah Clark appeals his conditional guilty-plea co nviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence

obtained during a search incident to a traffic stop. He argues that because the officer did not have probable cause for the stop, the subsequent search and seizure of evidence were illegal.-2-

Our review of the record and the parties’ arguments convinces us that the district court did

not err in denying the motion to suppress. U n ited States v. Orozco , 191 F.3d 578, 581 (5th Cir.
1999). The officer testified that he stopped Clark’s vehicle o n t he basis of a perceived traffic
violation, i.e. , improper w indshield tinting, creating sufficient probable cause to support the initial
stop. Whren v. United States , 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996); Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968).
Moreover, Clark does not contend that his continued detention following the determination

that he was operating the vehicle without a driver’s license was improper. Nor does he dispute the

district court’s finding that he consented to a search of his vehicle. Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
{"id":1457,"date":"2012-04-24T13:45:10","date_gmt":"2012-04-24T17:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1457"},"modified":"2018-08-17T13:46:33","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T17:46:33","slug":"remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-the-xxi-latin-american-congress-of-ports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-the-xxi-latin-american-congress-of-ports\/","title":{"rendered":"Remarks of FMC Commissioner Mario Cordero at the XXI Latin American Congress of Ports"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>April 24, 2012<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/Latin_American_Congress_of_Ports_2012.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 24, 2012 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1457"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1458,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457\/revisions\/1458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 99.1


                                  Certification


     I, Timothy S. Durham, certify that:

     1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-Q  of  Obsidian
          Enterprises, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report.


Date: September 13, 2002             /s/  Timothy S. Durham
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Timothy S. Durham
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
    OF MICHAEL S. DELL, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
    AND BRIAN T. GLADDEN, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
    SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  Date: August 26, 2010

/s/ MICHAEL S. DELLMichael S. DellChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDell Inc.   Date: August 26, 2010

/s/ BRIAN T. GLADDENBrian T. GladdenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDell Inc.