alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3265 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply current income 

tax bracket breakpoints to capital gains brackets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2021 

Mr. BARR (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. CLINE, and Mr. MEUSER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply 

current income tax bracket breakpoints to capital gains 

brackets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Middle Class Savings 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF CURRENT INCOME TAX BRACKET 

7 BREAKPOINTS TO CAPITAL GAINS BRACKETS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(j)(5)(B) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3265 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$77,200’’ in clause (i)(I) and 

2 inserting ‘‘$77,400’’, 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘$51,700’’ in clause (i)(II) and 

4 inserting ‘‘$51,800’’, 

5 (3) by striking ‘‘$479,000’’ in clause (ii)(I) and 

6 inserting ‘‘$600,000’’, 

7 (4) by striking ‘‘$452,400’’ in clause (ii)(II) 

8 and inserting ‘‘$500,000’’, and 

9 (5) by striking ‘‘$425,800’’ in clause (ii)(III) 

10 and inserting ‘‘$500,000’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this Act shall apply with respect to taxable years begin13 ning after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Arbitration and Notices-FMCS","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WDjjMkkWvp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-regional\/office-of-client-services\/ocs-units\/\">Office of Client Services – Associated Units<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-regional\/office-of-client-services\/ocs-units\/embed\/#?secret=WDjjMkkWvp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Client Services – Associated Units” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"WDjjMkkWvp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 340 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide the same level 

of Federal matching assistance for every State that chooses to expand 

Medicaid coverage to newly eligible individuals, regardless of when such 

expansion takes place. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Mr. ALLRED, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CARSON, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. 

CASTRO of Texas, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COOPER, 

Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. KIND, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Ms. LEE of 

California, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. 

POCAN, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. VELA, Ms. WILD, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and 

Mr. LEVIN of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

the same level of Federal matching assistance for every 

State that chooses to expand Medicaid coverage to newly 

eligible individuals, regardless of when such expansion 

takes place. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 340 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Incentivizing Medicaid 

3 Expansion Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCREASED FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TO 

5 NEWLY ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(y)(1) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(y)(1)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘2014, 

9 2015, and 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the first 3 

10 consecutive 12-month periods in which the State 

11 provides medical assistance to newly eligible individ12 uals’’; 

13 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2017’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘the fourth consecutive 12-month pe15 riod in which the State provides medical assistance 

16 to newly eligible individuals’’; 

17 (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘2018’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘the fifth consecutive 12-month period 

19 in which the State provides medical assistance to 

20 newly eligible individuals’’; 

21 (4) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘2019’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘the sixth consecutive 12-month period 

23 in which the State provides medical assistance to 

24 newly eligible individuals’’; and 

25 (5) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘2020 and 

26 each year thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘the seventh 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 340 IH

1 consecutive 12-month period in which the State pro2 vides medical assistance to newly eligible individuals 

3 and each such period thereafter’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact6 ment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 240 (Thursday, December 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Change in Time of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the previously 
announced meeting of the Board of Directors scheduled to be held on 
Monday, December 10, 2001, at 2 p.m. (open session) has been 
rescheduled for 10 a.m. that same day.
    No earlier notice of the change in time of this meeting was 
practicable.

    Dated: December 7, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-30925 Filed 12-11-01; 2:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
----

Exhibit 99.11

Consent of Rex Berthelsen 

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-Fof New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with mineral reserveand resource estimates for the Peak Mines and to the use of information derivedfrom the technical report entitled "Technical Report on Peak Gold Mines, NewSouth Wales, Australia," dated January 1, 2009, included in the AnnualInformation Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31,2008. 

Dated this 31st day of March, 2009. 

"Rex Bexthelsen"                                                    Name: Rex Berthelsen Title: MAusIMM and Principal Geologist for NGI 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64834-64835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Deletion of Agenda Item From December 12th Open Meeting; Sunshine 
Act

December 11, 2001.
    The following item has been deleted from the list of agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the December 12, 2001, Open Meeting and 
previously listed in the Commission's Notice of December 5, 2001.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Item No. and Bureau                        Subject
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6  Office of Engineering and   Title: Revision of Part 15 of the
 Technology.                    Commission's Rules Regarding Ultra-
                                Wideband Transmission System (ET Docket
                                No. 98-153).
                               Summary: The Commission will consider a
                                First Report and Order to provide for
                                new ultra-wideband devices.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 64835]]

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-30988 Filed 12-12-01; 12 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Willie E. PHILLIPS, also known as Big Willie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50875

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Willie E. Phillips has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Phillips has filed a response, requesting the appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s *850brief, and Phillips’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Phillips’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Office of Field Operations (National) - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BoCV0hgKBD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-national\/\">Office of Field Operations (National)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-national\/embed\/#?secret=BoCV0hgKBD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Field Operations (National)” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"BoCV0hgKBD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of American Oriental Bioengineering,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

         i.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         ii.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

---------------------------------------
Yanchun Li
Acting Chief Financial Officer
November ___, 2004

This Certification of Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00420-CR

Samuel Rochell Madison

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1407727D)

April 5, 2018

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,054,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,259,000
<PP&E>                                         959,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,804,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,069,000
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       167,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  98,411,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,804,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,861,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,920,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,920,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,920,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

228 

KA 13-01903 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GORDY A. AKINPELU, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), entered September 13, 2013. The order determined that

defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender

Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he

is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act

([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). At the SORA hearing,

defendant’s attorney informed County Court that he reviewed the risk

assessment instrument with defendant and that he and defendant would

“not be contesting those scores.” The court thus adopted the

recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, which

assessed 90 points against defendant, making him a presumptive level

two risk. Defendant did not request a downward departure, and the

court determined that he was a level two risk. Defendant now contends

that he was not afforded due process at the hearing because, among

other reasons, the court did not conduct a sufficient inquiry to

determine whether he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived

his right to contest the level two risk designation. As defendant

concedes, however, his contention is unpreserved for our review

because he did not assert at the hearing that his due process rights

were being violated (see People v Kyle, 64 AD3d 1177, 1178, lv denied

13 NY3d 709; see also People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475, 476, lv denied 10

NY3d 716; People v Gliatta, 27 AD3d 441, 441). In any event, “the due

process protections required for a risk level classification

proceeding ‘are not as extensive as those required in a plenary

criminal or civil trial’ ” (Doe v Pataki, 3 F Supp 2d 456, 470; see

People v Erb, 59 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021), and defendant has cited no

authority to support his contention that “a personal allocution” is
-2- 228 

KA 13-01903 

required in order to waive the right to a SORA hearing (People v

Dexter, 21 AD3d 403, 404, lv denied 5 NY3d 716; see Costas, 46 AD3d at

476). 

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude

that none warrants reversal or modification. 

Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
                         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information
                         extracted from the  consolidated  financial  statements
                         included  herein and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
                         reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              1,164,275
<SECURITIES>                        4,455,044
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,569,164
<ALLOWANCES>                          (49,513)
<INVENTORY>                         1,092,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    8,593,307
<PP&E>                              5,357,447
<DEPRECIATION>                     (4,538,353)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     10,357,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,083,289
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                          111,319,573
<OTHER-SE>                       (103,045,558)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       10,357,304
<SALES>                             9,778,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    9,791,582
<CGS>                               3,684,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      12,042,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (331,465)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      8,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,928,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,928,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,928,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.14)
        



</TABLE>