T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KH AL E D N AWAY A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70664 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 642- 440 ME MOR AN DU M *

KH AL E D N AWAY A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71398 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 642- 440

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry14, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED JAN 27 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

B efo re: H U G , S C H R O E D E R , an d R A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K ha l e d N a w a y a , ana t i ve of S audi A r abi aa nd c i t i z e n of S y r i a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

tw o or de r s i s s ue d by the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( “ B I A ” ) . I n the fi rs t , the B IA adop t ed and affi rm ed a deci si on by an Im m i grat i on Judg e ( “ IJ ”) f in d in g N a w a y ar e m o v ab le u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ) f o rf a ilu r e to m a in ta in hi s F - 1 noni m m i gr a nts tude nts t a tus a nd de ny i ng e qui t abl e e s t oppe l . I n the s e c ond, th e B I A d e n ie d N a w a y a ’s m o tio n to r e c o n s id e rits f ir s t o r d e r , a n d h e ld th a t it l a c ke d author i ty t o appl y e qui t abl e e s t oppe l a ga i ns tthe D e pa rtm e ntof H om e l a nd S ecu ri ty. T hi s c ou rt“ re vi ew [s ] the agency’ s l egal det erm i nat i on s de nov o, and factual fi nd i ng s f

or subst ant i al evi dence. ” W akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d 1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . P e t i t i one r ’ s s t a tus w a s t e rm i na t e d be c aus e he f a i l e d t o pur s ue af

ul l c our s e of s tu d y . T h e p r in c ip a l is s u e litig a te d b e f o r e th e I Ja n d th e B I A w a s e q u itab le es t op pel du e t o the al l eged autho ri za t i on by pet i t i on er ’ s D es i gn at ed S choo l O ff i ci al o f alig h te rc o u r s e lo a d th a n th e o n e r e q u ir e d b yth e r e g u la tio n s . 8 C .F .R . § 2 1 4 .2 ( f ) ( 6 ) ( iii) . E q u itab le e s to p p e l d o e s n o t ap p lyin th is c a s e . O ne of the r e qui r e m e nt s f

orthe appl i c a t i on of

e qui t abl e e s t oppe l i s tha tthe party c l ai m i ng es t op pel “ m ustbe i gn orantof the true f ac t s. ” Morga n v. G on zales ,3

495 F . 3d 1084, 1092 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . T he S upr e m e C ourte xpl a i ne d i n H ec klerv. Cm t y. H eal th Serv. , tha t“ [ i ] f

a tthe t i m e w he n he a c t e d, s uc h pa rtyha d know l e dge of the truth, or had the m eans by w hi ch w i th rea sonabl e di l i gence he coul d acqui re the know l e dge s o tha ti tw oul d be ne gl i ge nc e on hi s pa rtt o r e m a i n i gnor a ntbynot us i ng thos e m e a ns , he c a nnotc l a i m t o ha ve be e n m i s l e d byr e l y i ng upon the r e p r e s e n ta tio n o rc o n c e a lm e n t.” 4 6 7 U .S . 5 1 , 5 9 n .1 0 ( 1 9 8 4 ) . T h e ap p lic ab le reg u l at i o n s cl earl y sp el l o u tth e th ree l i m i t ed si tu at i o n s i n w h i ch a l i g h t er co u rse l oad i s perm i tt ed: ac adem i c di ff i cul t i es , m edi ca l cond i t i on s, and o n the fi nal t erm i f f e w e rc o u r s e s a r e r e q u i r e d t o c o mp l e t e th e c o u r s e o f s tu d y . 8 C. F. R. § 2 1 4 .2 ( f ) ( 6 ) ( iii) . P e titio n e rd o e s n o t c o n te n d th a t a n yo f th e s e r e a s o n s ap p lyto h is c a s e . PETI TI O N D EN I ED .