alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

   CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

      Re: Argent Securities Inc.
      Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-W3

I, John P. Grazer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on form
10-K of Argent Securities Trust 2006-W3 (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing agreement in all material respects; and;

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, FIS Tax Services, American Security Insurance Company, Standard
Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

ARGENT SECURITIES INC.


By: /s/ John P. Grazer
    ---------------------------------
Name: John P. Grazer
Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 26, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Commissioner Sola Attends Event Welcoming Explora 1 to PortMiami - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZCHah7Ggqa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/ftdo\/commissioner-sola-attends-event-welcoming-explora-1-to-portmiami\/\">Commissioner Sola Attends Event Welcoming Explora 1 to PortMiami<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/ftdo\/commissioner-sola-attends-event-welcoming-explora-1-to-portmiami\/embed\/#?secret=ZCHah7Ggqa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Attends Event Welcoming Explora 1 to PortMiami” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ZCHah7Ggqa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/CavaSola.png","thumbnail_width":682,"thumbnail_height":912,"description":"Commissioner Louis E. Sola attended an event held at PortMiami on November 3, 2023, that celebrated the maiden call of the cruise ship Explora 1. During the event, Commissioner Sola met with Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava and the two discussed developments at PortMiami, trends in the maritime industry, and the important economic drivers […]"}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 29, 2016 

# Order

Clerk Ju ne 2 9, 2016

150677 (5 6 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 150677

v COA: 321045

Ottawa CC: 13

- 037857

- AR

BRANDON MICHAEL HALL,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Rev. Edward Pinkney for l eave to

f

ile an a micus c uriae b rief is DENIED. The motion to waive fees is GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Brain Tree International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donna T. Norman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Donna T. Norman





Donna T. Norman


Chief Executive Officer


October 13, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LONZINE ADAMS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-3524 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 29, 2016. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas L. Krug, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Lonzine Adams appeals the order denying as untimely his motion to release property. In his motion, Adams stated that law enforce ment confiscated approximately $493 and a cellphone when he was booked into jail after being arrested on charges that were later dismissed. The postconviction court treated Adams' motion as filed under section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2015), and denied it as untimely because more than sixty days had elapsed since the conclu sion of his criminal proceedin gs. In support of the order, the court attached the State's notice of nolle prosequi.-2- Section 705.105(1) provides: Title to unclaimed evidence or unclaimed tangible personal property lawfully seized pursuant to a lawful investigation in the custody of the court or clerk of the court from a criminal proceeding or seized as evidence by and in the custody of a law enforcement agency shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding. "When summarily denying a motion for return of property pursua nt to the sixty-day time bar, the trial court must attach those portions of the record showing that the property was seized pursuant t o a lawful investigation or h eld as evidence." Burden v. State, 890 So. 2d 566, 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (citing Cloud v. State, 801 So. 2d 964, 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), and McKinnon v. State, 752 So. 2d 134, 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)); accord White v. State, 926 So. 2d 473, 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the postconviction cour t to attach those portions of the record indicating that the cash and the c ellphone were seized and held as evidence by law enforcement or that they were seized pu rsuant to an investigation and were in the custody of the court clerk. Othe rwise, the court must entertain Adams' motion on the merits. See White, 926 So. 2d a t 474; Cloud, 801 So. 2d at 964. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              260496
<DEPRECIATION>                                      162621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       97875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               851192
<BONDS>                                             414640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              6096
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1174053)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         97875
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     33504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   15254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (48758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Numbers 33-68510,
33-67618,  33-57246,  33-52920,  33-42841,  33-39166, and 33-32673),  and in the
Registration  Statements  on Forms S-8 (Numbers  33-63220,  33-63218,  33-41712,
33-13416,  33-21545,  33-82788,  33-63106, and 33-60789) of Epitope, Inc. of our
report dated November 12, 1998 appearing in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Portland, Oregon
December 23, 1998
#### SUN OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 15987.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 17, 1957.

John R. Brown, Circuit Judge, dissented.

Robert E. May, Washington, D. C., Joiner Cartwright, Herf M. Weinert, Beaumont, Tex., Martin A. Row, Leo J. Hoffman, Dallas, Tex., Omar L. Crook, May, Shannon & Morley, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

W. Russell Gorman, C. Louis Knight, Samuel W. Jensch, Attys., Federal Power Commission, Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., Howard E. Wahren-brock, Sol., Washington, D. C., for respondent, Federal Power Commission.

Before BORAH, RIYES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*78PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on a petition for review of an order of the Federal Power Commission and was argued by counsel. Upon consideration whereof, and of the briefs filed by the parties, it is

Ordered and adjudged by this Court that the petition for review in this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed on the authority of Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 236 F.2d 819, certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 967, 77 S.Ct. 354, 1 L.Ed. 321.

Dismissed.

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge,

dissents for the reasons set forth at length in his dissent, Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 236 F.2d 785 at page 793, and particularly Part II, Suspension Cases.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Office of Field Operations (Regional) - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UhUcEdMtmy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-regional\/\">Office of Field Operations (Regional)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/aboutus\/agency-departments\/office-of-field-operations-regional\/embed\/#?secret=UhUcEdMtmy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Field Operations (Regional)” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"UhUcEdMtmy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                      12,009
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              342,502
<ALLOWANCES>                               (46,124)
<INVENTORY>                                526,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           879,800
<PP&E>                                     232,382
<DEPRECIATION>                             101,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,727,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      432,513
<BONDS>                                    354,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,758
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       633
<OTHER-SE>                                 807,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,727,648
<SALES>                                  1,435,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,435,730
<CGS>                                    1,003,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              317,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            32,284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          45,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             36,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                13,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         23,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .42
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.5

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

 Principal Amount: $570,000                                Due: February 1,2007

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Obsidian Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation  ("Maker")  promises to pay to the order of Fair Holdings,  Inc., an
Ohio  Corporation  ("Payee") the principal sum of Five Hundred Seventy  Thousand
and 00/100 Dollars  ($570,000.00)  with interest  thereon at the rate of fifteen
percent (15%) per annum, and with payment in foil of the entire unpaid principal
balance  of this Note and all  interest  accrued  in  respect of this Note on or
before February 1,2007 ("Maturity Date").

     Interest shall be paid in monthly  installments and with a final payment in
an amount equal to the then unpaid  principal,  all accrued and unpaid  interest
and any and all other  charges set forth  herein due and payable on the Maturity
Date.  Said monthly  installments  of interest  shall commence on the 1st day of
March,  2002 and continue on the same date of each month  thereafter  until this
Note is paid in foil.

     In  addition,  Maker agrees to pay  interest  after  maturity of any unpaid
Installment of interest or after the maturity of this Note at a rate of interest
equal to twenty percent (20%) per annum,  until any late Installment of interest
or this Note is paid in foil.

     All or a portion of the unpaid  principal  balance of this Note and accrued
interest thereon may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty;  however
any prepayments shall be applied first to accrued and unpaid interest.

     Payments of both  principal and interest of this Note are to be made at the
offices of Payee at 111  Monument  Circle,  Suite  3680,  Indianapolis,  Indiana
46204, or at such other place as the holder shall designate to Maker in writing,
in lawful money of the United States of America.  All payments  shall be applied
first to accrued interest and then to principal.

     In the event of Maker's  failure to make  timely  payment of any amount due
under this Note, or Maker's  failure to make timely payment of any other amounts
of any kind due from Maker to the holder, the holder may, at its option, declare
all amounts under this Note to be immediately due and payable.  If the holder is
required to bring suit to effect collection of this Note, all costs and expenses
of  collection,  including,  but not limited to, the holder's  attorneys'  fees,
shall be paid by Maker.

     This Note shall be construed  and enforced in  accordance  with the laws of
the  State of  Indiana,  without  giving  effect to  conflicts  or choice of law
principles.

     Made and  delivered  at  Indianapolis,  Indiana on this 8th day of Janaury,
2002.

                                          OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.


                                          /s/ Timothy S. Durham
                                          Timothy S. Durham, Chairman