65512 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2001 / Notices

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain set-top boxes

and components thereof by reason of

infringement of claims 18–24, 26–28,

31–33, 36, 42–43, 48–51, 54, 57–61, and

66 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,253,066;

claims 1, 3, 8, and 10 of U.S. Letters

Patent 5,479,268; and claims 14–17, 19,

and 31–35 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,809,204.

On August 7, 2001, complainants

Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.

and StarSight Telecast, Inc. moved to

amend the complaint to add license

agreements and licensees. No party

opposed the motion to amend.

On August 23, 2001, the presiding

ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 24) granting

the motion. No petitions for review of

the ID were filed.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,

and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR

210.42.

Issued: December 14, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31253 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden,

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Employment Standards Administration

is soliciting comments concerning the

following information collections: (1)

Pre-Hearing Statement (LS–18); (2)

Overpayment Recovery Questionnaire

(OWCP–20); (3) Claim for Continuance

of Compensation (CA–12).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted to the office listed in the

addressee section below by February 19,

2002.

ADDRESSES: Ms. Patricia A. Forkel, U.S.

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution

Ave., NW., Room S–3201, Washington,

DC 20210, telephone (202) 693–0339

(this is not a toll-free number), fax (202)

693–1451, E-mail: pforkel@fenix2.dolesa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pre-Hearing Statement (LS–18)

I. Background

The Office of Workers’ Compensation

Programs administers the Longshore

and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act.

The Act provides benefits to workers

injured in maritime employment on the

navigable waters of the United States or

in an adjoining area customarily used by

an employer in loading, unloading,

repairing, or building a vessel. Title 20,

CFR 702.217 provides for the referral of

claims under the Longshore Act for

formal hearings. This section provides

that, before a case is transferred to the

Office of Administrative Law Judges, the

district director shall furnish each of the

parties or their representatives with a

copy of a pre-hearing statement form.

Each party shall, within 21 days of

receipt, complete it and return it to the

district director. Upon receipt, the

district director shall transmit the form

to the Office of the Chief Administrative

Law Judge.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submissions

of responses.

III. Current Actions

The Department of Labor seeks the

approval of the extension of this

information collection in order to carry

out its responsibility to prepare cases for

formal hearings under the Act.

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment Standards

Administration.

Title: Pre-Hearing Statement.

OMB Number: 1215–0085.

Agency Number: LS–18.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; Businesses or other forprofit.

Frequency: On occasion.

Total Annual Respondents/

Responses: 6,800.

Time Per Response: 10 minutes.

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,088.

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):

$0.

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintenance): $2,595.50.

Overpayment Recovery Questionnaire

(OWCP–20)

Background

Both the Federal Coal Mine Health

and Safety Act (30 U.S.C. 923(b) and 20

CFR 725.544(c) and the Federal

Employees’ Compensation Act (5 U.S.C.

8129(b) and 20 CFR 10.320–10.324)

provide for the recovery, waiver,

compromise, or termination of

overpayment of benefits to beneficiaries.

The OWCP–20 collects information

used to ascertain the financial condition

of the beneficiary who has been

overpaid to determine if the

concealment or improper transfer of

assets, and to identify and consider

present and potential income and

current assets for enforced collection

proceedings. The form also provides a

means for the beneficiary to explain

why he/she is not at fault for the

overpayment.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2001 / Notices 65513

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submissions

of responses.

III. Current Actions

The Department of Labor seeks the

extension of approval for this

information collection in order to carry

out its responsibility under the law to

resolve overpayments under the Acts.

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment Standards

Administration.

Title: Overpayment Recovery

Questionnaire.

OMB Number: 1215–0144.

Agency Number: OWCP–20.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households.

Frequency: On occasion.

Total Annual Respondents/

Responses: 4,500.

Time Per Response: 45–75 minutes,

average 1 hour.

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 4,500.

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):

$0.

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintenance): $1,665.

Claim for Continuance of Compensation

(CA–12)

I. Background

Under 5 U.S.C. 8133, Federal

Employees’ Compensation Act, and 20

CFR 10.410, eligible dependents of

deceased Federal employees receive

compensation benefits on account of the

employee’s death. The OWCP monitors

death benefits for criteria which qualify

the beneficiary as the employee’s

dependent under law. The CA–12 is

designated for this purpose.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submissions

of responses.

III. Current Actions

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment Standards

Administration.

Title: Claim for Continuance of

Compensation.

OMB Number: 1215–0154.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households.

Frequency: Annually.

Total Annual Respondents/

Responses: 5,900.

Time Per Response: 5 minutes.

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 492.

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):

$0.

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintenance): $2,006.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for Office of

Management and Budget approval of the

information collection request; they will

also become a matter of public record.

Dated: December 7, 2001.

Margaret J. Sherrill,

Chief, Branch of Management Review and

Internal Control, Division of Financial

Management, Office of Management,

Administration and Planning, Employment

Standards Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–31211 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–CF–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden,

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Employment Standards Administration

is soliciting comments concerning the

following information collection:

OFCCP Reporting and Recordkeeping

Requirements: Supply and Service.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted to the office listed in the

addressee section below by December

19, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to

Ms. Patricia A. Forkel, U. S. Department

of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW.,

Room S–3201, Washington, DC 20210,

telephone (202) 693–0339 fax (202) 693–

1451, EMail pforkel@fenix2.dol-esa.gov.

For questions concerning this

information collection request, please

contact Mr. James Melvin, U. S.

Department of Labor, Office of Federal

Contract Compliance Programs,

telephone (202) 693–0102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The Office of Federal Contract

Compliance is responsible for the

administration of equal opportunity

programs prohibiting employment

discrimination and requiring affirmative

action and applies to Federal

contractors and subcontractors. OFCCP

administers three programs: Executive

Order 11246, as amended; Section 503

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as

amended; and the affirmative action

provisions of the Vietnam Era Veterans’

Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as

amended, (VEVRAA), 38 USC 4212.

This information collection contains all

recordkeeping and reporting

requirements which are derived from

the implementing regulations found at

Title 41 of the Code of Federal

Regulations, chapter 60.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,