alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 No. 33-75268 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock
Purchase Plan, No. 33-80662 pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, and No.
33-93394 pertaining to the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of InSite Vision
Incorporated of our report dated January 29, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of InSite Vision Incorporated included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                             /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Walnut Creek, California
March 29, 1999



                                       45
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3319 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3319

 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2021

   Mr. Posey (for himself, Mr. Ryan, and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responders' Equipment Access 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO REGULATIONS EXEMPTING ENGINES/EQUIPMENT FOR 
              NATIONAL SECURITY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall revise the 
regulations under section 1068.225(d) of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act)--
            (1) to authorize--
                    (A) manufacturers and secondary engine 
                manufacturers to request a national security exemption 
                under such section 1068.225(d) for engines or equipment 
                intended to be used by Federal, State, or local 
                agencies for providing law enforcement, disaster 
                relief, search and rescue, or emergency medical 
                services; and
                    (B) an agency of the Federal Government responsible 
                for national defense and the Department of Homeland 
                Security (including the Federal Emergency Management 
                Agency) to endorse a request described in subparagraph 
                (A); and
            (2) to specify that a request for a national security 
        exemption described in paragraph (1)(A), and an endorsement of 
        such a request described in paragraph (1)(B), is not required 
        to specify a quantity of engines or equipment to be exempted in 
        order to receive such an exemption.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            2864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      612
<ALLOWANCES>                                       159
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3426
<PP&E>                                             314
<DEPRECIATION>                                      75
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                        2442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   444
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Khoury, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SourcingLing.net, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SourcingLing.net, Inc.





|Date: May 30, 2005 | /s/ Michael Khoury 
Michael Khoury
Director, President
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------



|-  13 -
|-------
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           2,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (158)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,039
<PP&E>                                           6,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,634)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           311
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,212
<SALES>                                         24,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,146
<CGS>                                           14,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BUSINESSES OF PACTIV CORPORATION COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              24
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   918
<PP&E>                                           2,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                     578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,133
<BONDS>                                          1,528
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,581
<SALES>                                          2,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,158
<CGS>                                            1,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 56
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (155)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (7)
<CHANGES>                                         (32)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.83)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Virtual Services - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fh94RbzrGU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/virtual-services\/\">Virtual Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/virtual-services\/embed\/#?secret=fh94RbzrGU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Virtual Services” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"fh94RbzrGU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/tech-services-images.png","thumbnail_width":1820,"thumbnail_height":355}
**EXHIBIT
      3.8**





**CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT**


**OF
      THE**


**RESTATED
      CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**


**OF**


**INSITE
      VISION INCORPORATED**


**a
      Delaware Corporation**











INSITE
      VISION INCORPORATED ,
      a
      corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the
      State of Delaware (the “Corporation”) DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:




ONE:  The
      amendment to the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth
      below was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
      the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by the directors and
      stockholders of the Corporation.




TWO:  The
      first
      paragraph of Section A of ARTICLE IV of the Restated Certificate of
      Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“(A)  Classes
      of Stock. The
      total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the corporation
      shall have authority to issue is One Hundred Twenty-Five Million (125,000,000)
      of which One Hundred Twenty Million (120,000,000) shares, par value of $0.01
      per
      share, shall be Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) and Five Million (5,000,000)
      shares, par value of $0.01 per share, shall be Preferred Stock (“Preferred
      Stock”).”




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to
      be
      executed by S. Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D., its Chief Executive Officer, and
      attested by Lyle M. Bowman, Ph.D., its Secretary, on this 1 st day of
      June, 2004.









INSITE
                VISION INCORPORATEDBy:
            /s/
                S. Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.Name:
            S.
                Kumar Chandrasekaran, Ph.D.Title:
            Chief
                Executive Officer











Attest:
            /s/
                Lyle M. Bowman, Ph.D.Name:
            Lyle
                M. Bowman, Ph.D.Title:
            Secretary
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2454

KEITH MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ORANGEBURG, SOUTH CAROLINA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT FIVE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1111-5-06BD) Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: September 21, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laura P. Valtorta, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Andrea E. White, Thomas K. Barlow, DUFF, DUBBERLY, TURNER, WHITE & BOYKIN, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Keith Miller appeals the district court's order granting theDefendant's motion for summary judgment in his racial discrimination employment action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Orangeburg South Carolina Consol. Sch. Dist. Five , No. CA-98-1111- 5-06BD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"id":1524,"date":"2010-12-01T15:27:18","date_gmt":"2010-12-01T19:27:18","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1524"},"modified":"2023-02-03T13:09:48","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03T17:09:48","slug":"statement-of-commissioner-rebecca-f-dye-before-the-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/statement-of-commissioner-rebecca-f-dye-before-the-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement of Commissioner Rebecca F. Dye Before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>December 1, 2010<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/CommDye_Testimony_Nomination_Hearing_112410.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>December 1, 2010 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,9],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1524"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1524"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1524\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7430,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1524\/revisions\/7430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

 

**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSENLLP**

 

 

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the“Securities Act”), provides that any part of a registration statement at thetime such part becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a materialfact or an omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein ornecessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring asecurity pursuant to such a registration statement (unless it is proved that atthe time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) maysue, among others, every accountant who has consented to be named as havingprepared or certified any report or valuation which is used in connection witthe registration statement, with respect to the statement in such registrationstatement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared orcertified by the accountant.

 

This 10-K is incorporated byreference into Rotonics Manufacturing Inc.’s filings on Form S-3 Nos.333-70569,33-62721 and 33-70526 and Form S-8 No. 33-88410 (collectively the“Registration Statements”) and, for purposes of determining any liability underthe Securities Act, is deemed to be a new registration statement for eachRegistration Statement into which it is incorporated by reference.

 

On May 24, 2002, RotonicsManufacturing Inc. dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent auditor andappointed Windes & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation to replace ArthurAndersen.  Rotonics’ understanding isthat the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has taken the positionthat it will not accept consents from Arthur Andersen if the engagement partnerand the manager for the Rotonics audit are no longer with Arthur Andersen.  Both the engagement partner and the mangerfor the Rotonics audit are no longer with Arthur Andersen.  As a result, Rotonics has been unable toobtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference intothe Registration Statements of its audit report with respect to Rotonics’financial statements as of June 30, 2001 and for the year then ended.  Under these circumstances, Rule 437a underthe Securities Act permits Rotonics to file this Form 10-K without a writtenconsent from Arthur Andersen.  As a result,however, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under section 11(a) of theSecurities Act for any untrue statements of material fact contained in thefinancial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a materialfact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against ArthurAndersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any purchase ofsecurities under Registration Statements made on or after the date of this Form10-K.  To the extent provided in section11(b)(3)(C) of the Securities Act, however, other persons who are liable underSection 11(a) of the Securities Act, including the Company’s officers anddirectors, may still rely on Arthur Andersen’s original audit reports as beingmade by an expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense underSection 11(b) of the Securities Act.

 

----
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 8, 2015

N o. 04

- 12

- 00602

- CR

Michael Jason TUCKER

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 03

- 0067

- CRA

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: 1 Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The court has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion

is DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 Retired Chief Justice Catherine Stone not participating.