65232 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 18, 2001 / Notices

impacts associated with the proposed

action.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts, the proposed

action does not have a potential to affect

any historic sites. It does not affect

nonradiological plant effluents and has

no other environmental impact.

Therefore, there are no significant

nonradiological environmental impacts

associated with the proposed action.

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that

there are no significant environmental

impacts associated with the proposed

action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

As an alternative to the proposed

action, the staff considered denial of the

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’

alternative). Denial of the application

would result in no change in current

environmental impacts. The

environmental impacts of the proposed

action and the alternative action are

similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

This action does not involve the use

of any different resource than those

previously considered in the Final

Environmental Statement for the

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1

and 2, dated April 1984.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

On December 6, 2001, the staff

contacted the Pennsylvania State

official, Dennis Dyckman of the

Pennsylvania Department of

Environment and Natural Resources,

regarding the environmental impact of

the proposed action. The State official

had no comments. In addition, the

licensee notified the Federal Emergency

Management Agency and the

Pennsylvania Emergency Management

Agency, who indicated support for

rescheduling the exercise.

Finding of No Significant Impact

On the basis of the environmental

assessment, the NRC concludes that the

proposed action will not have a

significant effect on the quality of the

human environment. Accordingly, the

NRC has determined not to prepare an

environmental impact statement for the

proposed action.

Further details with respect to the

proposed action can be found in the

licensee’s letter dated October 16, 2001.

Documents may be examined, and/or

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public

Document Room (PDR), located at One

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike

(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.

Publicly available records will be

accessible electronically from the

ADAMS Public Library component on

the NRC web site, http://www.nrc.gov

(the Electronic Reading Room). Persons

who do not have access to ADAMS or

who encounter problems in accessing

the documents located in ADAMS,

should contact the NRC PDR Reference

staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,

or 301–415–4737, or by e-mail at

pdr@nrc.gov.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day

of December 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Christopher Gratton,

Sr. Project Manager, Section 2, Project

Directorate 1, Division of Licensing Project

Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 01–31157 Filed 12–17–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

International Uranium (USA)

Corporation; Notice or Consideration

of Issuance of Amendments to Facility

Operation Licenses, ProposedNo

Significant Hazards Consideration

Determination, Opportunity for a

Hearing; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of issuance; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects a

notice appearing in the Federal Register

on December 11, 2001 (66 FR 64064),

that considers issuance of notice of

opportunity for hearing issued to the

International Uranium (USA)

Corporation. This action is necessary to

correct an erroneous text.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

William von Till, Fuel Cycle Licensing

Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear

Material Safety and Safeguards,

telephone (301) 415–6251.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page

64064, in the third column, in the first

complete paragraph, the text is changed

from ‘‘The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) proposes to accept

the license amendment for the NRC

Materials License SUA–1358 to

authorize the licensee, International

Uranium (USA) Corporation (IUSA), to

allow for the and reclamation of the

White Mesa uranium mill, located near

Blanding, Utah,’’ to read, ‘‘The U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

proposes to accept the license

amendment for the NRC Materials

License SUA–1358 to authorize the

licensee, International Uranium (USA)

Corporation (IUSA), to allow for the

receipt and processing of alternate feed

material, from the Molycorp facility

located in Mountain Pass, California, at

the White Mesa uranium mill, located

near Blanding, Utah.’’ Also, on page

64065 in the second column, in the fifth

complete paragraph the text is changed

from ‘‘The NRC staff has prepared an

Environmental Assessment for the

proposed reclamation plan for NRC

Source Material License SUA–1358,’’ to

read, ‘‘The NRC staff has prepared an

Environmental Assessment to assess the

potential environmental impacts of

allowing for the receipt and processing

of alternate feed material, from the

Molycorp facility located in Mountain

Pass, California, for NRC Source

Material License SUA–1358.’’

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day

of December, 2001.

Melvyn N. Leach,

Chief, Fuel Cycle Licensing Branch, Division

of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 01–31156 Filed 12–17–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

POSTAL SERVICE

Request for Comments on an Outline

for Discussion: Concepts for Postal

Transformation

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published

a notice with request for public

comment in the Federal Register (66 FR

51480–51481) on October 9, 2001. The

document on which comments are

requested is available on the Postal

Service’s public Web site at

www.usps.com/strategicdirection or at

www.usps.com keyword:

transformation. Comments were due

November 1, 2001. The comment period

is hereby extended until January 31,

2002.

DATES: The Postal Service must receive

your comments on or before January 31,

2002. No additional extensions on the

comment period will be granted.

ADDRESSES: Those responding are

encouraged to e-mail their comments to

transformation@email.usps.gov. Those

wishing to send written comments

should mail them to Julie S. Moore,

Executive Program Director, Office of

Transformation, Strategic Planning,

Room 4011, United States Postal Service

Headquarters, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,

Washington, DC 20260–1520.