alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,330
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,200
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,782)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS Supports \"Progress Through Partnership\" at Florida Labor-Management Conference - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"P54YPlpAiG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-supports-progress-partnership-florida-labor-management-conference\/\">FMCS Supports “Progress Through Partnership” at Florida Labor-Management Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-supports-progress-partnership-florida-labor-management-conference\/embed\/#?secret=P54YPlpAiG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS Supports “Progress Through Partnership” at Florida Labor-Management Conference” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"P54YPlpAiG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"The four-day Florida Labor Management Conference in St. Petersburg Beach ends on a high note with strong support from FMCS mediators promoting the conference theme of Progress Through Partnership and taking part in the program that reached a\u00a0 big audience of union and employer representatives. Click here for a Twitter post from the conference.\u00a0 Follow […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/mediators-300x225.jpg"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    A Complaint, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, proposed Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact Statement were filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in a civil antitrust case,                     *United States*                     v.                     *Premdor Inc., Premdor U.S. Holdings, Inc., International Paper Company, and Masonite Corporation,*                     Civ. Action No. 1:01CV01696. By August 28, 2001, the United States published a notice in the Washington Post and the                     **Federal Register,**                     seeking public comments on the proposed settlement, in accord with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b) through (h). The 60 day comment period expired on October 29, 2001. Due to the unanticipated disruption of mail service to the U.S. Department of Justice, the United States requests that anyone who submitted a comment before the expiration of the comment period resubmit the comment by facsimile or e-mail to J. Robert Kramer II, Chief, Litigation II Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1401 H Street, NW., Suite 3000, Washington, DC 20530 (facsimile: (202) 307-5802; e-mail:                     *comments.lit2@usdoj.gov;*                     telephone: (202) 307-0924). Comments should be resubmitted by facsimile or e-mail within 15 days of the date of this notice.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations & Merger Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 01-31477  Filed 12-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Meeting of the ACRS 
Subcommittee on Materials and Metallurgy; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Materials and Metallurgy will hold a 
meeting on January 15-16, 2002, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, January 15, 2002--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business
Wednesday, January 16, 2002--8:30 a.m. until 12:00 Noon

    The Subcommittee will review the preliminary results of the 
Fracture Analysis of Vessels: Oak Ridge (FAVOR) code calculation 
associated with the Reevaluation of the Technical Basis for the 
Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule Screening Criterion Project. The purpose 
of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, and other interested 
persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor, can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Noel F. Dudley (telephone 301/415-6888) between 7 
a.m. and 3:45 p.m. (EST). Persons planning to attend this meeting are 
urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: December 12, 2001.
Sher Bahadur,
Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 01-31214 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
1... To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the children by their initials and the parents

by their first names only. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2008).

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00387-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.S., V.H., A.H., and J.S.

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-PA-00476

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2009

AFFIRMED

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating Denine M.’s parental rights.

1

 The trial

court found Denine M. to be indigent but concluded that her appellate points were frivolous. See

TEX.FAM.CODE ANN.§ 263.405(d) (Vernon 2008). Denine M.’s court-appointed appellate attorney

has also concluded that her appellate points are frivolous. Counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

and a brief in support of that motion,stating that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds
04-08-00387-CV

-2-

for relief. See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003WL21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from order terminating parental rights). Counsel

sent a copy of the brief to Denine M. and advised her of her right to examine the record and to file

a pro se brief. Denine M., however, did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record, we agree

that Denine M.’s appeal is frivolous and without merit. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s

judgment terminating Denine M.’s parental rights and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Karen Angelini, Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"Education and Outreach - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ooclt9f6ch\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/\">Education and Outreach<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/services\/education-and-outreach\/embed\/#?secret=ooclt9f6ch\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Education and Outreach” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"ooclt9f6ch\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1612. ANDREW CARTER v. RONDA INGRAM et al.

Andrew Carter brought this civil action against the defendants, Ronda Ingram

and Bill Ingram. On January 28, 2015, the trial court granted summary judgment to

the defendants. Carter filed a motion to vacate judgment, which the trial court denied

on November 20, 2015. On December 18, 2015, Carter filed a notice of appeal to this

Court. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order sought

to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.”

Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (citation and

punctuation omitted). Instead of filing a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s

January 2015 summary judgment order, Carter filed a motion to vacate judgment,

which was in substance a motion for reconsideration.

1 See Masters v. Clark, 269 Ga.

App. 537, 538 (604 SE2d 556) (2004) (“[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature

used. Under our rules, pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.”

(citation and punctuation omitted)). However, the denial of a motion for

reconsideration is not directly appealable, and the filing of such a motion does not

extend the time for filing an appeal. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536

SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). 

1

In his motion, Carter did not present groundsfor setting aside the order under

OCGA § 9-11-60 (d); instead, he argued that some of the defense witnesses gave

conflicting statements and that he had other evidence for the trial court to consider.

June 09, 2016
Because Carter failed to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of the

appealable judgment entered against him, his appeal is untimely. The defendants’

motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/09/2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Telecom, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, David Stewart,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of August 2003.


/s/ DAVID STEWART
---------------------------------

David Stewart
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Healthy Fast Food, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brad Beckstead,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      March 26, 2009
            /s/
      Brad BecksteadBrad
      Beckstead, Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov","title":"FMCS mediator and spouse help disabled theft victim - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GznQ1Xb3ge\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-mediator-and-spouse-help-disabled-theft-victim\/\">FMCS mediator and spouse help disabled theft victim<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmcs.gov\/fmcs-mediator-and-spouse-help-disabled-theft-victim\/embed\/#?secret=GznQ1Xb3ge\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMCS mediator and spouse help disabled theft victim” — Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service\" data-secret=\"GznQ1Xb3ge\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"San-Antonio-TX-based FMCS mediator Walter Darr and his wife Lara were moved by a local TV-news story about a disabled Marine veteran whose livelihood was threatened when a wood saw that was vital to his work was stolen from his home workshop. Inspired by the plight of the former Marine, Water and his wife purchased a […]"}