alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Scott R. Oglum, Chief Executive
      Officer of Theater Xtreme entertainment Group, Inc., hereby certify that the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
      2007:





(1)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      that
      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Theater Xtreme
      Entertainment Group, Inc.




Dated:
      November 19, 2007


/s/
                  Scott R. OglumScott
                  R. Oglum, Chief Executive
                  Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that
      Section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
      Act
      except to the extent that this certification is expressly incorporated by
      reference into any such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                      12,009
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              342,502
<ALLOWANCES>                               (46,124)
<INVENTORY>                                431,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           784,800
<PP&E>                                     232,382
<DEPRECIATION>                             101,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,651,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      432,513
<BONDS>                                    354,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,758
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       633
<OTHER-SE>                                 748,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,651,118
<SALES>                                  1,435,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,435,730
<CGS>                                    1,060,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,377,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            32,284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          45,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (20,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (7,781)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (12,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.23)
        

<PAGE>
#### George DIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-16002

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 28, 2008.

George Dix, Vero Beach, FL, pro se.

Christopher N. Bellows, Kelly-Ann Gibbs Cartwright, Holland *&*Knight, LLP, Miami, FL, Erika Renee Royal, Holland & Knight, LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before ANDERSON, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

George Dix filed a complaint against the United Parcel Service (“UPS”) for discrimination on the basis of race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was heard by a jury which returned a verdict for UPS. During the trial, Dix reported to his lawyer that he overheard a couple of the jurors make disparaging remarks about his lawyer’s preparedness and the pace of the trial. Dix says he heard the comments while the judge and lawyers were at a sidebar bench conference. Based on that information, Dix’s lawyer moved for a mistrial which was denied. A motion for a new trial made at the conclusion of the trial was also denied.

We review both the denial of a motion for a new trial and motion for a mistrial for an abuse of discretion. *Bianchi v. Roadway Exp., Inc.,*441 F.3d 1278, 1282 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) *cert. denied,*— U.S.—, 127 S.Ct. 397, — L.Ed.2d — (2006). “Just cause to discharge a juror exists where the district court finds evidence that the juror has had improper *817extrinsic contact, or where it finds that the juror for some other reason cannot decide the issues fairly.” *United States v. Register,*182 F.3d 820, 840 (11th Cir.1999) (citation omitted). The district court has broad discretion to investigate and remedy jury misconduct. *United States v. Dominguez,*226 F.3d 1235, 1246-47 (11th Cir.2000).

The record reflects that the district judge conducted a painstaking examination of each juror to determine whether there were comments or observations made by any of them relating to the merits of the case, and found that there were none. Whatever comments were made concerned their perception of the performance of counsel or the pace of the trial in general. Each juror stated that any such comments would not affect their ability to remain impartial in the case, and that there had been no discussion of the merits of the case. Our review of the record reflects that the jury that considered Dix’s case focused on the evidence and the law, and reached a verdict free from any improper influence. The district court properly found that the jurors retained the ability to decide the issues in the case fairly and on the merits. Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion resulting from the denial of Dix’s motions.

AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants January 25, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XoOG8P9AJN\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-25-2021\/\">Applicants January 25, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-25-2021\/embed\/#?secret=XoOG8P9AJN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants January 25, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"XoOG8P9AJN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jay Steffenhagen, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HemaCare Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 14, 2008

|/s/JAY STEFFENHAGENJay Steffenhagen Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Guideline, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Stone, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





**/s/
      Peter Stone**


Peter
      Stone


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      30,
      2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 02-13]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 02-13 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: December 10, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 64956)          ( print page 64957)          ( print page 64958)    

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[FR Doc. 01-30948  Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-C
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Compromise Agreements Yield over $2.3 Million in Penalties & Changes to Business Practices - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SL1gP5ICft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/articles\/compromise-agreements-yield-over-2-3-million-in-penalties-changes-to-business-practices\/\">Compromise Agreements Yield over $2.3 Million in Penalties & Changes to Business Practices<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/articles\/compromise-agreements-yield-over-2-3-million-in-penalties-changes-to-business-practices\/embed\/#?secret=SL1gP5ICft\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Compromise Agreements Yield over $2.3 Million in Penalties & Changes to Business Practices” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SL1gP5ICft\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Maritime Commission has entered into compromise agreements with three different companies resulting in the collection of more than $2.3 million in civil penalty payments, and commitments by each company to reform specific business practices. The agreements are the result of investigations by the Commission\u2019s Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC). CMA-CGM, S.A. […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP02-117-000]

Take notice that on December 3, 2001, Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective on January 1, 2002: 

First Revised Sheet No. 24

First Revised Sheet No. 257 

Nautilus states that the purpose of this filing is to provide existing and new shippers an opportunity, under certain specified circumstances, to release all or a part of production from a lease that was previously dedicated to Nautilus.

Nautilus states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.214 or § 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the “e-Filing” link.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31080 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December  31,  2006  (the   "Report")  of  Roma   Financial   Corporation   (the
"Corporation") as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof, we, Peter A. Inverso,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and Sharon
L. Lamont, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/Peter A. Inverso                                  /s/Sharon L. Lamont
-------------------------------------                -----------------------
Peter A. Inverso                                     Sharon L. Lamont
President and Chief Executive Officer                Chief Financial Officer


March 9, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10867 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PRIMITIVO PROVENCIO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-22-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Primitivo Provencio-Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.