Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2001 / Notices 64799

Phase II of ESPH

Child intercepts—200 respondents × 4

locations = 800 respondents (padded

to 1000)

Adult intercepts—200 respondents × 4

locations = 800 respondents (padded

to 1000)

Child focus groups—24 grps × 12

respondents/grp = 288 respondents

(padded to 300)

Adult focus groups—32 grps × 12

respondents/grp = 384 respondents

(padded to 400)

Professional staff—120 respondents

Total = 2272 respondents (padded up to

2700)

Phase II of ESPH Web Site Development

Total = 300 respondents

Dietary Guidelines Low-Literacy

Materials

English-speaking intercepts—80

respondents (padded to 100)

Spanish-speaking intercepts—80

respondents (padded to 100)

English-speaking focus groups—12

groups × 10 respondents = 120

respondents

Spanish-speaking focus groups—12

groups × 10 respondents = 120

respondents

Professional staff—30 respondents

(padded to 60)

Total = 430 respondents (padded up to

500)

Spanish Conversion

Spanish focus groups—12 groups × 10

respondents = 120 respondents

Spanish intercepts—112 respondents

(padded to 130)

Total = 232 respondents (padded to 250)

Grand Total = 3750 respondents.

Number of Responses per

Respondent: 15.

Estimated Time per Response:

Total Intercepts (one on one

interviews) = 2810 × 30 min (per

contractor) = 84,300/60 = 1405 hours.

Total Focus Groups = 1060 × 2 hrs

(per contractor) = 2120 hours.

Total Estimated Hours of Burden not

to exceed = 3525 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on

Respondents: Public reporting burden

for this collection of information is

estimated to average 3750 respondents

with a total estimated burden of 3525

hours.

Dated: December 5, 2001.

George A. Braley,

Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition

Service.

[FR Doc. 01–30835 Filed 12–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–30–U

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Newspapers Used for Publication of

Legal Notice of Appealable Decisions

for the Northern Region; Idaho,

Montana, North Dakota, and Portions

of South Dakota and Eastern

Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice lists the

newspapers that will be used by all

Ranger Districts, Forests, and the

Regional Office of the Northern Region

to publish legal notice of all decisions

subject to appeal under 36 CFR parts

215 and 217 and to publish notices for

public comment and notice of decision

subject to the provisions of 36 CFR part

215. The intended effect of this action

is to inform interested members of the

public which newspapers will be used

to publish legal notices for public

comment or decisions; thereby allowing

them to receive constructive notice of a

decision, to provide clear evidence of

timely notice, and to achieve

consistency in administering the

appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in

the listed newspapers will begin with

decisions subject to appeal that are

made on or after December 14, 2001.

The list of newspapers will remain in

effect until another notice is published

in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Appeals and Litigation Group Leader;

Northern Region; PO Box 7669;

Missoula, Montana 59807. Phone: (406)

329–3696.

The newspapers to be used are as

follows:

Northern Regional Office.—Regional

Forester decisions in Montana:

The Missoulian, Great Falls Tribune,

and the Billings Gazette.

Regional Forester decisions in

Northern Idaho and Eastern

Washington: The Spokesman Review.

Regional Forester decisions in North

Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.

Regional Forester decisions in South

Dakota: Rapid City Journal.

Beaverhead/Deerlodge—Montana

Standard

Bitterroot—Ravalli Republic

Clearwater—Lewiston Morning Tribune

Custer—Billings Gazette (Montana)

Rapid City Journal (South Dakota)

Dakota Prairie National Grasslands—

Bismarck Tribune (North Dakota)

Rapid City Journal (South Dakota)

Flathead—Daily Interlake

Gallatin—Bozeman Chronicle

Helena—Independent Record

Idaho Panhandle—Spokesman Review

Kootenai—Daily Interlake

Lewis & Clark—Great Falls Tribune

Lolo—Missoulian

Nez Perce—Lewiston Morning Tribune

Supplemental notices may be placed

in any newspaper, but time frames/

deadlines will be calculated based upon

notices in newspapers of record listed

above.

Dated: December 7, 2001.

Kathleen A. McAllister,

Deputy Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 01–30861 Filed 12–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Salmon-Challis National Forest

Noxious Weed Environmental Impact

Statement; Intent To Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) for a Proposed Forest-Wide

Noxious Weed Management Program

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service is

gathering information and preparing an

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

for a forest-wide noxious weed

management program. The intent of this

program is to: Protect the natural

condition and biodiversity of

ecosystems by preventing and/or

limiting the introduction and

subsequent spread of invasive, nonnative plant species that displace native

vegetation; eliminate new invaders

before they become established; contain

and reduce known and potential weed

seed sources throughout the forest;

prevent or limit the spread of

established weeds into areas containing

little or no infestation; protect sensitive

and unique habitats including research

natural areas, wetlands, riparian areas,

and sensitive plant populations; and

develop criteria to prioritize invasive

weed species and treatment areas.

Prioritization will be given to treating

areas that may contribute to the spread

of weeds into Lemhi, Custer, and Butte

Counties within the Salmon-Challis

National Forest (S–CNF).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Salmon-Challis NF embraces

Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

practices (as defined in Forest Service

Handbook 3409) in managing various

pests, including noxious and invasive

non-native weeds. This philosophy is