alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KANA Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Fields, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification
is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael S. Fields        
|                       |  |  |  | Michael S. Fields            
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Chadwick David MYERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-1967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 19, 2016.

Chadwick David Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:.

Chadwick David Myers appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy action with respect to his income tax liability for the tax years 2003 through 2009, and imposing a penalty against Myers for making frivolous arguments, 26 U.S.C. § 6673 (2012). We have reviewed the rec*208ord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. *Myers v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue,*No. 30321-13L (U.S.T.C. May 28, 2015). We deny the Commissioner’s motions to strike Myers’ brief and for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Letter of Commissioner Sola to President Joe Biden","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4wgAnKi3FS\"><a href=\"\/letter-of-commissioner-sola-to-president-joe-biden\/\">Letter of Commissioner Sola to President Joe Biden<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/letter-of-commissioner-sola-to-president-joe-biden\/embed\/#?secret=4wgAnKi3FS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Letter of Commissioner Sola to President Joe Biden” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"4wgAnKi3FS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
ex_374021.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


BRIDGELINE DIGITAL, INC. 


2016 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment") to the Bridgeline Digital, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the "Plan"), is made as of February 1, 2021. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.


 


WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors to amend the Plan, subject, in the case of amendments requiring stockholder approval under the rules of any securities exchange on which the Stock may then be listed, to the approval by the Company's stockholders of such amendment;


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of Shares available for grant under the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, this Amendment shall be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval, and shall become effective as of the date on which the Company’s stockholders approve such Amendment (the "Effective Date"); and


 


WHEREAS, if the Company’s stockholders fail to approve this Amendment, the existing Plan shall continue in full force and effect.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

			
	 	 	
			 

			
	 	 	
			(a) Shares Issuable. The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued in respect of Awards (including Stock Appreciation Rights) granted under the Plan, subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in this Section 3, shall be 1,650,000 shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued in respect of Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan, subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 3, shall be 1,650,000 shares. For purposes of this limitation, the shares of Stock underlying any Awards which are forfeited, cancelled, reacquired by the Company or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise), shares that are tendered in payment of the exercise price of any Award and shares that are tendered or withheld for tax withholding obligations shall be added back to the shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan. Shares issued under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or shares reacquired by the Company.

			



 


	 	
			2.

				
			Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

			



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, buy its duly executed officer, has executed this Amendment to the Bridgeline Digital, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, as of the date first indicated above.


 


	 	
			Bridgeline Digital, Inc.


			 


			 


			By: /s/ Thomas Windhausen


			Thomas Windhausen


			Chief Financial Officer
#### TRACY *et al.*v. DENNIS.

No. 6547.

Opinion Filed January 5, 1915.

(145 Pac. 772.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Settlement of Case-Made — Notice. Where no notice of the time of settlement of a case-made is given or. waived, and there is no appearance of the opposite party either in person or by counsel, a case-made so settled is a nullity, and no jurisdiction is vested in this court to decide any question arising thereon.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from County Court, Creek County; Warren N. Brown, Judge.*

Action between Joe Tracy and another and J. M. Dennis. From the judgment, the parties first mentioned bring error.'

Dismissed.

*Pryor & Boekwood,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wm. L. Cheatham,*for defendant in error.

RIDDLE, J.

Motion is filed to- dismiss this appeal, on the ground that no notice was given of the time and place of allow*209ing and settling tbe ease-xnade, and that same was allowed and settled without notice to defendant in error; that defendant in error made no appearance or suggestion of amendments, nor did he otherwise waive notice or a right to be present at the time said case-made was settled. Plaintiffs in error concede the existence of this state of facts. The motion to dismiss is sustained. *Moore v. Howard Mer. Co.,*40 Okla. 491, 139 Pac. 524.

*Wyant v. Wheeler,*38 Okla. 68, 132 Pac. 137.

All the Justices concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"David Eng","title":"Forms and Applications - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RYMHRhS2ha\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/forms-and-applications\/\">Forms and Applications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/forms-and-applications\/embed\/#?secret=RYMHRhS2ha\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Forms and Applications” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"RYMHRhS2ha\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"For Ocean Transportation Intermediaries For Passenger Vessel Operators For Filing an Agreement Information Form for Agreements (FMC-150 [PDF, 178 KB]) and Data Template (MS Excel [XLSX, 38.1 KB]) Instructions [PDF, 37.6 KB] for the Monitoring Report Form Monitoring Report Form (FMC-151 [PDF, 65.4 KB]) and Monitoring Report Form in (MS Word [DOC, 109 KB) For Service Contracts Service [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed withthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Vilia Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2007
|   | /s/ Vilia Valentine     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Vilia Valentine         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Neurosurgical,
Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan Gold, President
and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S.
 Neurosurgical, Inc.  /s/ Alan
 GoldAlan GoldPresident
 and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2009
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on the Launch of Fact Finding 30","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3HqM8MaWwA\"><a href=\"\/sola-on-the-launch-of-fact-finding-30\/\">Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on the Launch of Fact Finding 30<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/sola-on-the-launch-of-fact-finding-30\/embed\/#?secret=3HqM8MaWwA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on the Launch of Fact Finding 30” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3HqM8MaWwA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 19a0231n.06
No. 18

- 2137

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
GABRIELLE WILLIAMS
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., d/b/a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL

- DEARBORN
Defendant

- Appellee

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, THAPAR , and LARSEN , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM

. Plaintiff Gabrielle Williams was a phlebotomist at Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Beaumont Hospital

– Dearborn (“Beaumont”). In February 2017, her employment was
terminated after she sent private Facebook messages to a coworker’s wife , accusing the coworker of having an affair. Williams filed this lawsuit against Beaumont, asserting that she was fired in violation of Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (“WPA”) , Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Michigan’s Elliot t

- Larsen Civil Rights Act. The district court granted summary judgment to Beaumont , disposing of all claims. In this appeal, Williams challenges the entirety of the district court’s ruling. We review the summary judgment ruling de novo and find that o nly one argument warrants attention here: Williams asserts that the district court erred by applying a “clear and convincing” burden of proof to her claim that she actually reported a violation of law. Under the WPA, the “clear andNo. 18

- 2137 , Williams v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

- 2

- convincing” standard on ly applies to “about to report” claims, not “actual report” claims. M ICH
. C OMP
. L AWS § 15.363(4). However, this distinction has no bearing on the result because Williams has not presented any credible evidence to support her claim even under the lower preponderance
standard.
H aving duly considered the balance of Williams’ appellate arguments, we find that they merely rehash arguments fully and properly disposed of by the district court. The district court’s opinion represents a well

- reasoned and prope r application of the law to the record facts. Williams’ arguments fail to identify any additional error. Concluding that a full opinion explicitly addressing her arguments would be entirely duplicative, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district

court based on the analysis set forth in its September 4, 2018 opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      The undersigned, Phyllis A. Murphy, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Webster City Federal Bancorp (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


--------------------                          ----------------------------------
Dated                                         Phyllis A. Murphy
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants February 21, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"txAFoRcIBv\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-february-21-2020\/\">Applicants February 21, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-february-21-2020\/embed\/#?secret=txAFoRcIBv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants February 21, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"txAFoRcIBv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell P. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7307.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.

Darrell P. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell P. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to determine whether Amendment 709 is clarifying or substantive pursuant to USSG § 1B1.11(b)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a), (c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Unit*
      *797
      *ed States v. Johnson,*No. 2:01-cr-10079-jpj-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*