65218 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 18, 2001 / Notices

financial status reports in 51d.10(a)(2)

and (b)(2) are as permitted by 45 CFR

92.41(b); the final program report,

financial status report and final voucher

in 51d.10(a)(3) and in 51d.10(b)(3–4) are

in accordance with 45 CFR 92.50(b).

Information collection requirements of

45 CFR part 92 are approved by OMB

under control number 0990–0169. The

following table presents annual burden

estimates for the information collection

requirements of this regulation.

42 CFR citation Number of

respondents

Responses/

respondent

Burden/response

(hrs.)

Total burden

(hrs.)

Immediate award application:

51d.4(a) and 51d.6(a)(2) .................................................................................. 3 1 3 * (9)

Intermediate award application:

51d.4(b) and 51d.6(a)(2)—Intermediate Awards .............................................. 3 1 10 * (30)

51d.10(a)(1)—Immediate awards—mid-program report if applicable .............. 3 1 2 * (6)

Final report content for both types of award:

51d.10(c) ........................................................................................................... 6 1 3 18

Total ........................................................................................................... 6 18

* This burden is carried under OMB control number 0920–0428.

Send comments to Nancy Pearce,

SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,

Room 16–105, Parklawn Building, 5600

Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.

Written comments should be received

within 60 days of this notice.

Dated: December 11, 2001.

Richard Kopanda,

Executive Officer, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 01–31110 Filed 12–17–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

Notice of Decision and Availability of

Decision Documents on the Issuance

of Permits for Incidental Take of

Threatened and Endangered Species

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

SUMMARY: Between February 17, 2001,

and November 14, 2001, Region 1 of the

Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)

approved seven Habitat Conservation

Plans (Plans) and issued seven

associated permits and transferred three

permits for the incidental take of

threatened and endangered species

pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as

amended (Act). The Service also issued

two Safe Harbor Agreement permits

pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the

Act. Two applicants also withdrew their

permit applications after their Plans had

been noticed in the Federal Register for

public comment. Copies of the permits

and associated decision documents are

available upon request. Charges for

copying (10 cents per page), plus

shipping and handling may apply.

ADDRESSES: If you would like copies of

any of the above documents, please

contact the Fish and Wildlife Reference

Service, 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite

110, Bethesda, Maryland 20814;

telephone (800) 582–3421.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Heather Hollis, Fish and Wildlife

Biologist, Fish and Wildlife Service,

Portland, Oregon; telephone (503) 231–

6241.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9

of the Act and Federal regulation

prohibit the take of wildlife species

listed as endangered or threatened,

respectively. Under the Act, the term

‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue,

hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture,

or collect listed wildlife, or to attempt

to engage in any such conduct. The

Service may, under limited

circumstances, issue permits to

authorize take that is incidental to, and

not the purpose of, carrying out an

otherwise lawful activity. Regulations

governing permits for threatened and

endangered species are found in 50 CFR

17.32 and 17.22.

Between February 17, 2001, and

November 14, 2001, Region 1 of the

Service issued the following permits for

incidental take of threatened and

endangered species, pursuant to section

10(a)(1)(B) and section 10(a)(1)(A) of the

Act. We issued each permit after making

the following determinations: the

application had been submitted in good

faith; all permit issuance criteria were

met, including the requirement that

granting the permit will not jeopardize

the continued existence of listed

species; and the permit was consistent

with the Act and applicable regulations,

including a thorough review of the

environmental effects of the action and

alternatives pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

Copies of these permits, their

accompanying Plans, and associated

documents are available upon request.

Decision documents for each permit

include Findings and

Recommendations; a Biological

Opinion; and either a Finding of No

Significant Impact, a Record of

Decision, or an Environmental Action

Statement. Associated documents may

also include an Implementing

Agreement, Assumption Agreement,

Environmental Assessment, or

Environmental Impact Statement, as

applicable.

Approved plan/permit Permit No. Issuance

date

Habitat Conservation Plans:

John Lang Homes, Cantata—permit transfer .................................................................................................... TE835424–0 03/22/01

San Joaquin Valley Multispecies ....................................................................................................................... TE043280–0 05/31/01

Tacoma Water .................................................................................................................................................... TE044757–0 07/06/01

El Sobrante Landfill ............................................................................................................................................ TE040421–0 07/24/01

Reichel et al. Permit Transfers .......................................................................................................................... TE046730–0

TE046731–0

08/10/01

08/10/01

Keig Wildcat Line ............................................................................................................................................... TE040317–0 09/12/01

Boise Cascade Low-effect ................................................................................................................................. TE028219–0 09/13/01

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 18, 2001 / Notices 65219

Approved plan/permit Permit No. Issuance

date

Deer Canyon Park ............................................................................................................................................. TE035929–0 09/17/01

City of Highland Roadways Project ................................................................................................................... TE049462–0 10/29/01

Safe Harbor Agreements:

Nene Reintroduction, Puu O Hoku Ranch ......................................................................................................... TE028990–0 08/22/01

Russell Pond, Oregon Chub .............................................................................................................................. TE042953–0 09/24/01

In addition to issuing the above

permits, the Service ceased processing

two permit applications after the

applicants withdrew their permit

applications. Both International Paper

and Crown Pacific withdrew their

permit applications after both had

developed draft HCPs that had been

available for public review.

Dated: November 20, 2001.

Rowan Gould,

Deputy Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife

Service, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.

[FR Doc. 01–31104 Filed 12–17–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV–060–1990]

Notice of Intent To Prepare a

Supplemental Environmental Impact

Statement to Analyze the Proposed

Modification to the Pipeline Plan of

Operations for the Pipeline/South

Pipeline Pit Expansion

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

COOPERATING AGENCY: Nevada Division

of Wildlife.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a

supplemental environmental impact

statement to analyze the proposed

modification to the Pipeline Plan of

Operations for the Pipeline/South

Pipeline Pit Expansion, Lander County,

Nevada, and notice of scoping period.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)

of the National Environmental Policy

Act of 1969 (NEPA), 40 Code of Federal

Regulations 1500–1508 Council on

Environmental Quality Regulations, and

43 Code of Federal Regulations 3809,

the Bureau of Land Management’s Battle

Mountain Field Office will be directing

the preparation of a Supplemental

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

to analyze a proposed pit expansion.

The EIS will be prepared by a third

party contractor directed by the BLM.

The project will involve public and

private lands in Lander County, Nevada.

DATES: Written comments on the scope

of the EIS must be post-marked or

otherwise delivered by 4:30 p.m. on

January 17, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Scoping comments should

be sent to the Bureau of Land

Management, Battle Mountain Field

Office, Attention: Pam Jarnecke, 50

Bastian Road, Battle Mountain, Nevada

89820. Comments, including names and

street addresses of respondents, will be

available for public review at the Battle

Mountain Field Office located in Battle

Mountain, Nevada, during regular

business hours, and may be published

as part of the EIS. Individual

respondents may request

confidentiality. If you wish to withhold

your name or street address from public

review or from disclosure under the

Freedom of Information Act, you must

state this prominently at the beginning

of your written comment. Such requests

will be honored to the extent allowed by

law. All submissions from organizations

and businesses, and from individuals

identifying themselves as

representatives or officials of

organizations or businesses, will be

available for public inspection in their

entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam

Jarnecke, Battle Mountain BLM, at (775)

635–4144.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

actions associated with the project

would consist of the following:

• Expansion of the South Pipeline pit

southwest into the Gap mineralized

area.

• Expansion of the South Pipeline ore

deposit southeast into the Crossroads

mineralized area.

• Deepening of the Pipeline/South

Pipeline open pit from the currently

approved 4120-foot elevation (above

mean sea level—amsl) to at least 3600-

foot elevation amsl.

• Increasing the approved height of

250 feet for the Pipeline/South Pipeline

waste rock dump to 400 feet.

• Increasing the mining rate from an

average 150,000 tons per day (tpd) to an

average 250,000 tpd, with a maximum

of 400,000 tpd.

• Translocate waste rock as partial fill

in the Pipeline/South Pipeline open pit,

including portions of the expanded pit.

The life of the project under this

modification would increase seven

years over the time line outlined in the

South Pipeline Final EIS (BLM 2000).

No additional surface disturbance is

proposed under this modification, and

the expansion of the Pipeline/South

Pipeline open pit was defined in this

EIS as a Reasonably Foreseeable Action.

Gerald M. Smith,

Field Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office.

[FR Doc. 01–31185 Filed 12–17–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332–288]

Ethyl Alcohol for Fuel Use:

Determination of the Base Quantity of

Imports

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Determination.

SUMMARY: Section 7 of the Steel Trade

Liberalization Program Implementation

Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2703 note),

which concerns local feedstock

requirements for fuel ethyl alcohol

imported by the United States from CBIbeneficiary countries, requires the

Commission to determine annually the

U.S. domestic market for fuel ethyl

alcohol during the 12-month period

ending on the preceding September 30.

The domestic market determination

made by the Commission is to be used

to establish the ‘‘base quantity’’ of

imports that can be imported with a

zero percent local feedstock

requirement. The base quantity to be

used by the U.S. Customs Service in the

administration of the law is the greater

of 60 million gallons or 7 percent of U.S.

consumption as determined by the

Commission. Beyond the base quantity

of imports, progressively higher local

feedstock requirements are placed on

imports of fuel ethyl alcohol and

mixtures from the CBI-beneficiary

countries.

For the 12-month period ending

September 30, 2001, the Commission

has determined the level of U.S.

consumption of fuel ethyl alcohol to be

1.72 billion gallons. Seven percent of

this amount is 120.3 million gallons

(these figures have been rounded).

Therefore, the base quantity for 2002

should be 120.3 million gallons.