alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – October 29, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FNB60Za7y2\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-october-29-2014\/\">Applicants – October 29, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-october-29-2014\/embed\/#?secret=FNB60Za7y2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – October 29, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"FNB60Za7y2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 10.6


 


Smart Repair Pro Inc.


 


July [      ], 2021


 


To: Purex Inc. (“Purex”)


 


Re: Acknowledgement of Loan


 


		1.	On March 1, 2020 Smart Repair Pro Inc. (the “Lender”), has made available to Purex,
an aggregate amount of 135,000 (the “Principal”).



 


		2.	The Principal bared a simple interest of 4% per annum (the interest together with the Principal: “Loan”).



 


		3.	Parties hereby acknowledge that on May 3, 2021 Purex repaid to Lender the entire Principal. Parties further
confirm that Purex paid to the Lender a part of the outstanding interest in an amount of $4,000 and that Purex will pay to the Lender
the balance of the outstanding interest no later than September 30, 2021.



 


		4.	Any mortgages or liens which made in favor of Lender as part of the Loans are hereby nulled, and Company
is hereby authorized to null all mortgages or liens which made in favor of Lender in connection with the provision of the Loan.



 


Sincerely,


 


	Smart Repair Pro Inc.
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Smart Repair Pro	 
	Name:		 
	Title: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:
	 	 	 
	Purex Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Purex Inc.	 
	Name: 	 	 
	Title:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 22
- 00345
- CV

___________ ___ _____ IN RE LAKESIDE RESORT JV, LLC D/B/A/ MARGARITAVILLE RESORT LAKE CONROE

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 457 th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21
- 12
- 16463
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER
R elator, Lakeside Resort JV, LLC d/b/a Margaritaville Resort Lake Conroe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the finality of the trial court’s February 4, 2020 Final D efault Judgment. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann

. § 22.221. Relator filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Stay, alleging that prejudice will result if execution efforts on the trial court’s February 4, 2020 Default Judgment are not stayed before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.2 The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that all further execution efforts on the February 4, 2020 Final Default Judgment in Cause No. 21

- 12

- 16463

- CV are STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P

. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator as a condition to any relief herein granted. The response of the Real Party in Interest, Kellie Stanley Mendez, is due November 14, 2022.
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED. ORDER ENTERED November 2, 2022.
PER CURIAM Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group
III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Justin P. DiNorscia, Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: July 11,2005
                        /s/ Justin P. DiNorscia
                        -------------------------------------
			Justin P. DiNorscia, Treasurer
                        BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
#### Walter SARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GT PAYROLL SYSTEMS, Diversity Services/Diversity Staffing, Stacey Strother, Individually, Defendants-Appellees.*

No. 09-3832-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 15, 2010.

Ambrose Wotorson, Law Office of Ambrose Wotorson, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellant.

Gail I. Auster, Law Offices of Gail I. Auster & Associates, PC, Scarsdale, NY, for Appellees.

PRESENT: WILFRED FEINBERG, B.D. PARKER and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the official caption in accordance with this order.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendants, the court’s denial of Appellant’s application to amend his witness list on the eve of trial, and the court’s post-verdict denial of his motion for a new trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

One day before trial Appellant sought to amend his witness list to include Donna Chatman (“Chatman”), his alleged harasser. The court denied this application. Appellant argues that this refusal worked a manifest injustice against him. Appellant also objects to the district court’s uncalled-witness charge that allowed the jury to draw inferences for or against either party as a result of Chatman’s failure to testify.

“A motion for relief from judgment is generally not favored and is properly *570granted only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.” *United States v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters,*247 F.3d 370, 391 (2d Cir.2001) (citations omitted). “Appellate review of a decision to grant or deny relief ... is restricted to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion.” *Kotlicky v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co.,*817 F.2d 6, 8 (2d Cir.1987) (citations omitted).

On the facts of this case the district court did not abuse its discretion, either in denying Appellant’s request to amend his witness list, or in denying Appellant’s subsequent motion for a new trial.

“A jury instruction is erroneous if it misleads the jury as to the correct legal standard or does not adequately inform the jury on the law.” *United States v. Wilkerson,*361 F.3d 717, 732 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting *United States v. Walsh,*194 F.3d 37, 52 (2d Cir.1999)). Here, the district court neither misled nor misinformed the jury by instructing that it was free to draw favorable or unfavorable inferences for or against either party from Chatman’s absence from the stand. The jury instruction was not erroneous.

For the foregoing reasons, the verdict, ruling and order of the district court are hereby AFFIRMED.
aecexh1004.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing






	Exhibit 10.04




	AMENDMENT TO AND EXTENSION OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     Aspen Exploration Corporation (“Aspen”) entered into an employment agreement with Robert A. Cohan on January 1, 2003 (the “Employment Agreement”).

     On April 22, 2005, the board of directors of Aspen approved an extension of the Employment Agreement from its current expiration date of December 31, 2005 and an increase in his compensation.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration Aspen and Mr. Cohan agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


	1.      	Paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide for an expiration date of December 31, 2008. 
	 
	2.      	Paragraph 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to reflect Mr. Cohan’s present positions as president, treasurer, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer of Aspen. 
	 
	3.      	Paragraph 3(a) is hereby amended to reflect that, commencing January 1, 2006, Mr. Cohan’s salary will be increased to $160,000 per year, to be paid in accordance with Aspen’s normal payroll procedures. 
	 
	4.      	If any provision of the Employment Agreement is inconsistent with the terms of this Amendment and Extension, the terms of this Amendment and Extension control. 
	 
	5.      	All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in effect and operative through the term of the Employment Agreement and thereafter, in accordance with its terms. 
	 



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of Aspen approved this Amendment to and Extension of Employment Agreement by resolutions dated April 22, 2005, and the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective immediately.


	ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION


					
	By:  	  	/s/ R. V. Bailey  	  	May 16, 2005  
	                                       R. V. Bailey, Chairman  	  	  





	EMPLOYEE


					
	By:  	  	/s/  Robert A. Cohan  	  	May 12, 2005  
	                                        Robert A. Cohan
#### Robert E. SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF FRANKLIN, TN; James G. Johnson, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 07-5902.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 15, 2008.

BEFORE: COLE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and FORESTER, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Karl S. Forester, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert E. Sanchez appeals a district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee City of Franklin, Tennessee (“City”), on his retaliatory-discharge claim brought under the Tennessee Public Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-1-304, (“TPPA”). The district court concluded that Sanchez failed to provide evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude that he was discharged from his position. Because discharge, as opposed to resignation, is one of the necessary elements in order to prevail on a retaliatory-discharge claim under the TPPA, *see Wooley v. Madison County,*209 F.Supp.2d 836, 844 (W.D.Tenn.2002), the district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment.

Applying a de novo standard of review, as we must, *Williams v. Mehra,*186 F.3d 685, 689 (6th Cir.1999) (en banc), we conclude that the district court’s well-reasoned opinion supports the grant of summary judgment to the City, and that the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this Court would be reiterative. We therefore affirm the judgment issued by the Honorable Aleta A. Trauger on June 28, 2007 on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Remarks of Commissioner Mario Cordero at Sala de las Americas, August 1, 2012 (En Espanol)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"L0JI7F6MO5\"><a href=\"\/remarks-of-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-sala-de-las-americas-august-1-2012-en-espanol\/\">Remarks of Commissioner Mario Cordero at Sala de las Americas, August 1, 2012 (En Espanol)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/remarks-of-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-sala-de-las-americas-august-1-2012-en-espanol\/embed\/#?secret=L0JI7F6MO5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Remarks of Commissioner Mario Cordero at Sala de las Americas, August 1, 2012 (En Espanol)” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"L0JI7F6MO5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): November 15, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 9, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 26 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-24, CP2018-46.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-24765 Filed 11-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Office of Administrative Law Judges\u00a0(ALJ) - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5PD8Luhj6d\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-administrative-law-judges-alj\/\">Office of Administrative Law Judges\u00a0(ALJ)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-administrative-law-judges-alj\/embed\/#?secret=5PD8Luhj6d\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of Administrative Law Judges\u00a0(ALJ)” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"5PD8Luhj6d\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"If a person or company is unable to settle a dispute that involves a possible violation of the Shipping Act, that person or company may file a complaint. The complaint will be referred to the Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ). A complaint involving claims of $50,000 or less may be handled by a settlement […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
April 28, 2004		

Tim Angst3044 Briggs CourtPleasanton, CA 94588

Dear Tim:

I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President of WW Operations, for KANA Software, Inc. reporting directly to me.

This letter outlines the proposed terms of employment with KANA.  Your start date will be mutually agreed upon.

	

Your annual salary will be $200,000 paid on a semi-monthly basis
Your "at target" pay including base salary and variable pay will be $400,000

I will recommend you be granted an option to purchase 400,000 shares of stock as your hire grant.  This grant is subject to approval b the Board of Directors after your employment begins.  The option would vest over four years subject to a six-month cliff and would be governed by the terms ser forth in the Company's standard form of stock options agreement.

In the event of a change in control of 50%  or more of the outstanding stock of the Company and following such change you are not offered the same position in the combined entity as held prior to the Change of Control, then 100% of the unvested shares shall immediately vest.

The company will provide to you the health, holiday, vacation and other benefits available to all its full time employees.  Enclosed for your review, is information related to some of the benefits.

To indicate your acceptance of this offer of employment, please sign below and return to me.  Your employment at KANA is subject to signing the attached Employee Invention Assignment, Confidentiality and Arbitration Agreement.  Your employment will not be governed by a written or oral contract.  You will be an "at-will" employee, which means that either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time, for any or no reason, and with or without notice.  This at-will nature of your employment cannot be modified except in writing signed by an executive office of KANA.  In the event that you are terminated without cause, you shall receive 12 months base pay and 12 months vesting over 12 months of severance pay.

Tim, all of us welcome you in joining KANA and we look forward to having you on our team.  Meanwhile, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (650) 614-8380.

Sincerely,

 

Tom DoylePresident and Chief Operating OfficerKANA Software, Inc.

 

Accepted

Signature	________________________

Name		________________________

Date		________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       73762
<SECURITIES>                               3750000
<RECEIVABLES>                               572534
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (730)
<INVENTORY>                                 890751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           5286317
<PP&E>                                     4504494
<DEPRECIATION>                             (109355)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9681456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4335749
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                      5101
<OTHER-SE>                                 5340456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               9681456
<SALES>                                     225431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            225431
<CGS>                                       112329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               528468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              7777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (423143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (423143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (423143)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.09)


</TABLE>