alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL02-40-000]

Take notice that on December 10, 2001, Cargill-Alliant, LLC (Cargill-Alliant), filed a complaint requesting fast track processing against Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (MISO). Cargill-Alliant requests the Commission to order MISO to implement its open access transmission tariff, and develop and implement its related business practices, in a fair, consistent, and non-discriminatory manner.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before December 31, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before December 31, 2001. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31063 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certificate pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alan Gold, President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S.
Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S.
                    Neurosurgical, Inc.  /s/ Alan Gold
Alan Gold
President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0001089341
<NAME>  TELECORP PCS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         $28,223
<SECURITIES>                                        $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $38,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                    $2,281
<INVENTORY>                                    $20,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $91,685
<PP&E>                                        $622,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $91,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $966,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $145,090
<BONDS>                                       $729,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         $279,128
<PREFERRED>                                       $149
<COMMON>                                          $890
<OTHER-SE>                                    $204,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $966,597
<SALES>                                       $127,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $127,457
<CGS>                                          $40,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $265,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               ($3,897)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $34,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(168,373)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(168,373)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(168,373)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.84)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Foreign OTI Registration Status Changes - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dOuWCUHs8M\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/foreign-oti-registration-status-changes\/\">Foreign OTI Registration Status Changes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/foreign-oti-registration-status-changes\/embed\/#?secret=dOuWCUHs8M\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Foreign OTI Registration Status Changes” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"dOuWCUHs8M\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Monthly update of Foreign NVOCC Terminations and Surrenders","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          60,296
<SECURITIES>                                       100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,085
<PP&E>                                           5,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                     546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,647
<SALES>                                         28,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,127
<CGS>                                           23,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,770)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.45)


</TABLE>
#### Hector Roberto PARADA-CHICAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72971.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 2010.

Filed Nov. 10, 2010.

*218Antonio M. Zaldana, Law Office of Antonio M. Zaldana, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner.

Bryan Stuart Beier, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Hector Roberto Parada-Chicas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of petitioner’s applications for an Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”) § 212(c) waiver, an INA § 212(h) waiver, and adjustment of status. He was ordered removed on the basis of his California conviction for possession of cocaine for sale and his prior California conviction for assault with a firearm. His case was originally considered by the IJ in 1997 and remanded by the BIA for reasons not relevant here. He now attempts to challenge the use of certain conviction documents admitted in the original, July 1997 hearing. The documents were admitted into evidence at the earlier hearing without objection and, hence, were properly relied upon by the government in the second hearing. We therefore deny the petition for review of that issue.

Parada-Chicas’s claims that the immigration court violated his due process rights were never raised to the BIA. Because they were not exhausted, we lack jurisdiction to review them. *Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

In its review of the IJ’s decision, the BIA not only adopted it, but added an additional reason why the petitioner is ineligible for the relief he seeks. The petitioner’s conviction for assault with a firearm is an aggravated felony crime of violence. *United States v. Moriel-Luna,*585 F.3d 1191, 1200-01 (9th Cir.2009). Because he has been convicted of a crime of violence, there is no statutory counterpart for inadmissibility to the ground on which he was ordered removed. *Id.*Hence, he is barred from relief under the statutory counterpart rule. *Id. at*1201-02. Petitioner has not challenged the BIA’s reliance on that ground in his briefs to us.

The petition for review is therefore DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity3 Corporation. (the "Company") on  First Amended Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shannon T. Squyres, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: August 18, 2004
/s/ Shannon T. SquyresBy: Shannon T. SquyresIts: Chief Executive Officer 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trinity3 Corporation and will be retained by Trinity3 Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
86 A.3d 830

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Jose A. CARRASQUILLO, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 19, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

> *504(1) Should the standard for presentence withdrawal of a guilty plea, which has devolved into an absolute right to withdraw, be clarified to hold that the trial judge has discretion to determine that an insincere assertion of innocence, unsupported by any facts or rational theory of defense, is not a “fair and just reason”?

> (2) Can undisputed psychological harm to a child rape victim that would result from [respondent’s] decision to plead guilty and then withdraw his plea constitute prejudice to the Commonwealth?

The Prothonotary shall establish parallel briefing tracks for this case and *Commonwealth v. Hvizda,*No. 526 MAL 2013, and the two cases, though not consolidated, shall be listed for argument at the same Court session.

The Commonwealth’s Petition for Leave to File Reply to Answer to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and HuntsmanInternational LLC (the “Companies”) for the period ended March 31, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)                                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| /s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Peter R. Huntsman         |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                  |
| May 7, 2007          |

 

 

67

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"The Honorable Michael A. Khouri’s Keynote Address at the 2011 NCBFAA Annual Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OBWnA1SU0V\"><a href=\"\/the-honorable-michael-a-khouris-keynote-address-at-the-2011-ncbfaa-annual-conference\/\">The Honorable Michael A. Khouri’s Keynote Address at the 2011 NCBFAA Annual Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/the-honorable-michael-a-khouris-keynote-address-at-the-2011-ncbfaa-annual-conference\/embed\/#?secret=OBWnA1SU0V\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Honorable Michael A. Khouri’s Keynote Address at the 2011 NCBFAA Annual Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"OBWnA1SU0V\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
3Jn tbe Wniteb ~tates ~ourt of jf eberal ~Iaitns 

No. 18-1062C 

(Filed July 23, 2018) 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

************************ 

* 

ZHORDRACK BLOODYWONE, * 

* 

Plaintiff, * 

* 

v . * 

* 

THE UNITED STATES, -}.,· 

* 

Defendant. * 

·k 

************************ 

ORDER 

FILED 

JUL 2 3 2018 

U.S. COURT OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS 

On July 18, 2018, the Court received from Mr. Zhordrack Bloodywone, a 

prisoner at Green Haven Correctional Facility in Stormville, New York, a complaint 

alleging mistreatment by prison staff, along with an application to proceed in forma 

pauperis. The Court has reviewed the complaint and it is clear that Mr. 

Bloodywone is confused regarding the jurisdiction of our court. 

Plaintiff complains of abuse from prison officials and names four of them as 

defendants. The United States Court of Federal Claims has no jurisdiction over 

criminal matters, see Joshua v. United States, 17 F .3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994), nor 

over matters sounding in tort, see Sellich v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 679, 681 

(1980); 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(l). Furthermore, our court does not have jurisdiction 

over suits against private individuals. See Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 

186, 190 (2003). We have jurisdiction to hear certain actions for money brought 

against the United States government, but have no power to hear matters 

concerning the actions of state government officials, such as the state prison 

employees who are the subject of Mr. Bloodywone's complaint. See Trevino v. 

United States, 557 F. App'x 995, 998 (Fed. Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Mr. 

Bloodywone's complaint is hereby DISMISSED under Rule 12(h)(3) of the Rules of 

the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Clerk is directed to close the case. 

Because Mr. Bloodywone was confused regarding our court's jurisdiction, and in 

7016 3010 DODD 4308 4782 
light of the minimal judicial resources taken up by this matter, the Court will not 

require that he pay the filing fee. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

-2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1675

CHARLES A. GULDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-1519)

Submitted: September 9, 2002 Decided: September 24, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Gulden, Appellant Pro Se. Francis Patrick King, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Gulden appeals the district court’s order granting

the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Gulden v. White, No. CA-01-1519 (E.D. Va. May 7, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED