alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  1999
Home/Timeline 1990-2013/1999 Previous			Next
1999										C. Richard Barnes, a career mediator, is appointed by President Clinton as FMCS’s fourteenth director and introduces a long-range vision designed to position the agency as a global disseminator of labor relations and conflict management best practices.
D2015-06-18T12:45:46-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Accessibility |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
{"id":272,"date":"2018-03-14T16:32:38","date_gmt":"2018-03-14T20:32:38","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=272"},"modified":"2018-08-07T09:20:09","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T13:20:09","slug":"acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-testifies-to-congress-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-testifies-to-congress-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri Testifies to Congress"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>March 14, 2018<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/Page\/WrittenTestimony03-14-18.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 14, 2018 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8,4,6],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272\/revisions\/273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
HemaCare Corporation

                                EXHIBIT 11

              Net Income per Common and Common Equivalent Share

                                                    Year Ended
                                                   December 31,
                                           ---------------------------
                                              2000           1999
                                           -----------    ------------
             BASIC
             -----
Weighted average common shares used
  to compute basic earnings per
  share...............................       7,566,800      7,393,001
                                           ===========    ============

                   Net income..........    $4,350,000     $ 1,057,000
                                           ===========    ============

Basic net income per share.............    $     0.57     $      0.14
                                           ===========    ============

             DILUTED
             -------
Weighted average common shares used to
  compute basic earnings per share....      7,566,800      7,393,001
                                           ===========    ===========

Dilutive preferred equivalent shares..        464,481        500,000
Dilutive common equivalent shares
  attributable to stock options
  (based on average market price).....        703,714        243,680
Dilutive common equivalent shares
 attributable to warrants (based on
 average market price)...............          40,532         20,838
                                           -----------    -----------
Weighted average common shares and
 equivalents used to compute
 diluted earnings per share..........       8,775,527      8,157,519
                                           ===========    ===========

               Net income...........       $4,350,000     $1,057,000
                                           ===========    ===========

Diluted net income per share ......        $     0.50     $     0.13
                                           ===========    ===========
DONEIL BARRETT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NOS. 1D13-5695, 1D13-5697 & 

1D13-5701

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 2, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Jeffrey Lewis, General Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, 

Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel Region One, Tallahassee, 

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 7.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: September 14, 2006



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ Paul Martin                                   
|Paul Martin                                       
|Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODERICK SKINNER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

RENEE PFISTER, Nurse; DANELLI 

TAYLOR, Nurse, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16054 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00340-MMD-VPC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Roderick Skinner, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a deliberate indifference claim arising out of events 

that occurred while he was detained at Washoe County Jail. We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-16054 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 

1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate and remand.

The district court concluded that Skinner failed to exhaust his administrative 

remedies. It is undisputed that Skinner did not file a grievance related to his 

present claims. However, it is unclear from the record when Skinner was 

aggrieved sufficiently to trigger the grievance deadline, and even if he was 

aggrieved, whether Skinner was able to initiate the grievance process due to his 

illness and subsequent hospitalization. See Marella v. Terhune, 568 F.3d 1024, 

1027 (9th Cir. 2009) (remanding for the district court to consider whether prisonerplaintiff was able to initiate the grievance process while receiving medical 

treatment and during administrative lockdown). We vacate and remand for the 

district court to consider whether administrative remedies were unavailable to 

Skinner.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Sean Deson, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Sean Deson
                                       --------------
                                       Sean Deson, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 28, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.J.H., child v. Department of Family and Protective

Services

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00245

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 00233J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from a final decree terminating parental rights. Appeals from orders

terminating the parent

- child relationship must be brought to final disposition within 180 days of

the date the notice of appeal is filed. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a), reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T

C ODE

, tit. 2, subtit. F app. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case on April 4, 2018. T hus,

we must issue our decision on the case by September 24, 2018.

Appellant’s brie f was originally due on April 30, 2018. We already granted appellant two

extensions. Appellant ’s new counsel now seeks a third extension until July 6, 2018. We grant this

motion, but we will not grant any further extensions absent exceptional circumstances

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

Appellee’s brief is due July 26, 2018

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jennifer Caughey

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 26 , 2018
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Jirka Rysavy, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Gaiam, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)        All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: October 27, 2004 | /s/ Jirka Rysavy                      |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Jirka Rysavy                          |
|                   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-267-002]

Take notice that on November 28, 2001, Northern Border Pipeline Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets effective April 1, 2001: 

Second Revised Sheet No. 177

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 250A

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 251

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 253

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 266 

                    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order dated November 8, 2001 in Docket No. RP01-267-001 (97 FERC ¶ 61,162).                          ( print page 65192)    

Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been served on all parties on the Commission's service list for this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “RIMS” link, select “Docket#” and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-31078 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                                

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of ADVO, Inc. ("ADVO") of our report dated October 21, 1997, included in the
1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of ADVO.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of ADVO listed in Item
14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-38237) pertaining to the ADVO, Inc.'s President's Club Stock
Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-11323) pertaining to the ADVO, Inc. 401(k) Plan,
(Form S-3 No. 333-03777) pertaining to Dividend Reinvestment, (Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to the ADVO Form S-8 No. 333-24131) pertaining to the 1986
Employee Restricted Stock Plan, as amended, (Form S-8 No. 33-15856) pertaining
to the 1986 Stock Option Plan, and (Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the ADVO
Form S-8 No. 33-58483) pertaining to the 1988 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan,
as amended, of ADVO and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated October
21, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with
respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of ADVO.


                                                         Ernst & Young LLP   /s/
                                                                                
Hartford, Connecticut
December 12, 1997
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 23, 2023

No. 04-23-00050-CR

IN RE Angel Yahir DURON CASILLAS

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R

Relators moved to consolidate this original proceeding with Cause Nos. 04-23-00048-

CR, 04-23-00049-CR, 04-23-00050-CR, 04-23-00052-CR, 04-23-00053-CR, 04-23-00054-CR, 

and 04-23-00055-CR. Real party in interest is not opposed to the motions. Having considered the 

motions, we GRANT relators’ motions to consolidate. 

We ORDER Cause Nos. 04-23-00048-CR, 04-23-00049-CR, 04-23-00050-CR, 04-23-

00052-CR, 04-23-00053-CR, 04-23-00054-CR, and 04-23-00055-CR, consolidated for purposes 

of briefing and argument, if any. The parties must file any motions and briefs as if the 

proceedings were one; however, all cause numbers must be included on the documents.

The court will dispose of the original proceedings with separate orders and opinions 

except to the extent the original proceedings involve the same defendant.

It is so ORDERED on January 23, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
#### HOWMEDICA OSTEONIC CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

No. 2007-1363, 2007-1435.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 2008.

*ORDER*

The cross appeal filed by Wright Medical Technology, Inc., in 2007-1435 is dismissed because it does not seek to enlarge the judgment but merely asserts an alternative ground to affirm the judgment below.

Three briefs filed in this case, the “Brief of Cross Appellant,” the “Combined Response and Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant Howmedica Osteonics Corp.,” and the “Reply Brief of Cross Appellant,” are stricken without prejudice to refiling proper response and reply briefs in compliance with the page or word limits of Fed. RApp. P. 32(a)(7). No increase in the applicable page and word limits will be granted. The parties are directed to file compliant briefs according to the following schedule:

> (1) The response brief of defendant-appellee Wright Medical Technology, Incorporated shall be filed no later than Monday, April 21, 2008.

> (2) The reply brief of plaintiff-appellant Howmedica Osteonics Corporation shall be filed no later than Thursday, April 24, 2008.