alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mihretu Bulti DASISA, Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellee.

No. 08-7010.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 12, 2008.

*6Mihretu Bulti Dasisa, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed December 26, 2006, and January 11, 2008, be affirmed. The district court properly held that appellant’s claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. *See Allen v. McCurry,*449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980) (“[A] final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from relitigating issues that were or could have been raised in that action.”); *Apotex, Inc. v. FDA*393 F.3d 210, 217-18 (D.C.Cir.2004) (barring further claims based on the same “nucleus of facts”). Appellant filed another case arising from the same set of circumstances. *See Dasisa v. University of District of Columbia,*05cv1397 (D.D.C. April 12, 2006). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed, sua sponte, appellant’s claims as barred by claim preclusion. *See Gullo v. Veterans Co-op. Housing Ass’n,*269 F.2d 517, 517 (D.C.Cir.1959). Further, that court did not abuse its discretion by denying reconsideration of that dismissal.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
{"id":4579,"date":"2020-02-18T14:58:43","date_gmt":"2020-02-18T18:58:43","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=4579"},"modified":"2020-02-18T14:58:43","modified_gmt":"2020-02-18T18:58:43","slug":"maffei-ny-njfff-ba-annual-dinner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/maffei-ny-njfff-ba-annual-dinner\/","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Speaks at NY\/NJFFF&BA Annual Dinner & Person of the Year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On February 6, 2020, Commissioner Maffei was honored to attend the New York and New Jersey Foreign Freight Forwarders and Brokers Association Annual Dinner where they celebrated David F. Adam, Chairman and CEO of the United States Maritime Alliance, as the association\u2019s 2020 Person of the Year. He was pleased to participate in the afternoon panel discussion with representatives from Customs Central Examination Centers and the Federal Drug Administration. Commissioner Maffei discussed ongoing issues in the maritime industry and the FMC\u2019s 2020 priorities. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On February 6, 2020, Commissioner Maffei was honored to attend the New York and New Jersey Foreign Freight Forwarders and Brokers Association Annual Dinner where they celebrated David F. Adam, Chairman and CEO of the United States Maritime Alliance, as the association\u2019s 2020 Person of the Year. He was pleased... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/maffei-ny-njfff-ba-annual-dinner\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4579"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4580,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579\/revisions\/4580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 4.62


Exhibit 4.62







January 24, 2007




Rich Hoops   

c/o Department of Interior- Bureau of Land Management

1340 Financial Boulevard

Reno, NV

89502







RE:

BLUE MOUNTAIN UNIT AGREEMENT – NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY (“NGPC”) EXHIBITS A AND B – AMENDMENT #2




Dear Mr. Hoops:




Attached for your review and approval is a second amendment to Exhibits A and B of the Blue Mountain Unit Agreement documents submitted by NGPC to you on August 28, 2006.  The amendment changes are as follows:




1.

New owner for Section 13, Tract 9:  RLF Nevada Properties, LLC (formerly part of  the NLRC lease # 189093).

2.

Acreage correction of Section 10 is 654.68 (from 654.88).

3.

Correction of Section 27 owner name to JHG, LLC (DeLong)

4.

Correction of the percentages and totals




These changes are not substantive and have been reviewed and approved by NGPC management.  We respectfully request that these documents replace those previously submitted to your office.




Thanking you in advance for your assistance in completing the processing of this second amendment.




Yours truly,













Kim Niggemann

Project Director




		
	Encls.

	 

	cc:

	Brian Fairbank- President


	 
	Frank Misseldine, Development Manager














 









EXHIBIT “B” JULY, 17 2006

BLUE MOUNTAIN UNIT AREA

HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA

							
	TRACT NO.

	DESCRIPTION OF LAND

	SERIAL NUMBER

	NET ACRES

	PERCENTAGE OF   PARTICIPATION

	BASICROYALTY  AND OWNERSHIP

	WORKING INTEREST AND PERCENTAGE


	FEDERAL LANDS

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	1

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 10

Sec. 12

Sec. 22

Sec. 24

Sec. 26

	N-77668

	3294.94

	29.99594%

	U.S.A.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	2

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 14

	N-51796

	663.76

	6.03713%

	U.S.A.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	3

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 16

	N-80086

	650.32

	5.91489%

	U.S.A.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	4

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 28

	N-80159

	650.32

	5.91489%

	U.S.A.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	PATENTED LANDS

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	5

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 1

Sec. 11

Sec. 13

Sec. 25

Sec. 35

	N-189093

	3172.28

	28.85302%

	Nevada Land & Resource Co.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%
























							
	TRACT NO.

	DESCRIPTION OF LAND

	SERIAL NUMBER

	NET ACRES

	PERCENTAGE OF   PARTICIPATION

	BASICROYALTY  AND OWNERSHIP

	WORKING INTEREST AND PERCENTAGE


	6

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 15

Sec. 23

	187556

	1280

	11.64206%

	Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	7

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 21

	 
	640

	5.82103%

	Crawford Lands.-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	8

	T36N-R34E

Sec. 27

	 
	640

	5.82103%

	JHG, LLC/ Delong Lands-100%

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY-100%













			
	SUMMARY


	FEDERAL LANDS

	5362.34

	47.86000


	PATENTED LANDS

	5732.28

	5214000


	TOTAL

	10994.62

	100
II 

Calendar No. 188 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3210 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1905 15th Street in Boulder, Colorado, as 

the ‘‘Officer Eric H. Talley Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OFFICER ERIC H. TALLEY POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1905 15th Street in Boulder, 

7 Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Officer 

8 Eric H. Talley Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3210 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Eric H. Talley 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 188 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3210 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. der, Colorado, as the ‘‘Officer Eric H. Talley al Service located at 1905 15th Street in BoulDECEMBER 16, 2021 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Update: Final OTI Rules Published, Service Contract Rules to Move Forward for Comment","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NcjRoe24wz\"><a href=\"\/update-final-oti-rules-published-service-contract-rules-to-move-forward-for-comment\/\">Update: Final OTI Rules Published, Service Contract Rules to Move Forward for Comment<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/update-final-oti-rules-published-service-contract-rules-to-move-forward-for-comment\/embed\/#?secret=NcjRoe24wz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Update: Final OTI Rules Published, Service Contract Rules to Move Forward for Comment” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"NcjRoe24wz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
84 A.3d 1056

#### Martin LIPSKY and Daniel Lipsky and Elie Lipsky, Appellees v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 21, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed by operation of law, as the votes among eligible Justices are equally divided.
Consent of Peter Lloyd
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name and to the use of information derived from the technical report entitled “Technical Report on Peak Gold Mines, New South Wales, Australia,” dated January 1, 2009, as amended and restated on June 12, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2010, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 31st day of March, 2011
 
 
 /s/ Peter LloydName:
Peter LloydTitle:
FAusIMM, BESc (Mining), andMining Engineer for New Gold Inc.
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.1 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2005
         (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a) or
         sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard L. Wambold
                                          Chairman, President, and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2005

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Approves Dye\u2019s Final Recommendations on Detention and Demurrage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FDo67vWz4a\"><a href=\"\/commission-approves-dyes-final-recommendations-on-detention-and-demurrage\/\">Commission Approves Dye\u2019s Final Recommendations on Detention and Demurrage<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-approves-dyes-final-recommendations-on-detention-and-demurrage\/embed\/#?secret=FDo67vWz4a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Approves Dye\u2019s Final Recommendations on Detention and Demurrage” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"FDo67vWz4a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: MR. JUSTICE SEAMUS P. 

MCCAFFERY OF THE SUPREME 

COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

No. 430

Judicial Administration Docket

DISSENTING STATEMENT

MADAME JUSTICE TODD

I strenuously dissent. 

It is obvious from recent events that our Court is embroiled in turmoil and needs 

to act immediately. My disagreement with the majority of the Court is with respect to 

what action we should take. 

The crisis in which we find ourselves is marked by fact-laden accusations, 

alleged impropriety, and obvious acrimony. This is precisely the type of conflict —

perhaps the prototypical conflict — for which the citizens of our Commonwealth, in 

response to a similar controversy over two decades ago, constitutionally created the 

independent Judicial Conduct Board and the Court of Judicial Discipline. 

While the basis for my position is procedural and I express no view on the merits, 

there is no question in my mind that this matter, including the question of suspension,

should be immediately referred to the Judicial Conduct Board for expedited treatment, 

and, if appropriate, for trial and resolution by the Court of Judicial Discipline. 

Yet, today, based upon unvetted claims and allegations, a majority of our Court, 

one of whom is deeply involved in this controversy, has suspended a fellow Justice. No 

independent investigative body has made any findings regarding merits or credibility, 
[No. 430] - 2

and, unlike the suspension of Justice Joan Orie Melvin, no formal criminal proceedings

have been instituted. 

Every day, this Court is charged with according due process to litigants, and we 

faithfully carry out that constitutional obligation. Even a Justice is entitled to due 

process.
Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
        Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         In connection with the quarterly report of BF Acquisition Group IV,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned William R. Colucci, being the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to
my knowledge:


         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date:  September 20, 2004



                                   /s/ William R. Colucci
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350; it is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.


                                      -13-


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,992,113               (380,634)
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,115,139              13,561,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,000                 250,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,071,731              14,570,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,109,151              27,585,755
<PP&E>                                      14,723,592               9,934,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,730,529               3,531,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,233,288              34,186,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,859,656               9,845,447
<BONDS>                                    149,128,312                 798,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,608,000               1,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (111,362,680)              22,142,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,233,288              34,186,512
<SALES>                                     94,097,923              60,306,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            94,097,923              60,306,198
<CGS>                                       59,569,445              37,327,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               72,790,326              43,494,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               715,087               (178,453)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,849,719                 325,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,742,791              16,664,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,742,791              16,664,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,742,791              16,664,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46                    0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46                    0.56


</TABLE>