alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Multi-Benefit Realty Fund '87-1 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000802200
<NAME> MULTI-BENEFIT REALTY FUND '87-1
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      317
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          24,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,934)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         12,214
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,195
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
{"id":7894,"date":"2023-08-31T10:34:52","date_gmt":"2023-08-31T14:34:52","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=7894"},"modified":"2024-02-23T15:16:39","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T19:16:39","slug":"industry-advisory-names-of-non-compliant-nvoccs-posted-to-fmc-website","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/industry-advisory-names-of-non-compliant-nvoccs-posted-to-fmc-website\/","title":{"rendered":"Industry Advisory – Names of Non-Compliant NVOCCs Posted to FMC Website"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission will begin posting the names of <a href=\"\/non-compliant-nvoccs\/\">Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (NVOCCs) that do not publish a tariff<\/a>, contrary to Commission regulations (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-46\/chapter-IV\/subchapter-B\/part-520\/section-520.3\">46 C.F.R. \u00a7520.3(a)<\/a>). The public is advised that the NVOCCs listed are at risk of the Commission taking steps to revoke the license or terminate the registration of these NVOCCs. The list will be updated weekly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission will begin posting the names of Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (NVOCCs) that do not publish a tariff, contrary to Commission regulations (46 C.F.R. \u00a7520.3(a)). The public is advised that the NVOCCs listed are at risk of the Commission taking steps to revoke the license or terminate the... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/industry-advisory-names-of-non-compliant-nvoccs-posted-to-fmc-website\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[50,4],"tags":[56],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7894"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7894"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7896,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7894\/revisions\/7896"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### Maria De Los Angeles ZENDEJAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73400.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Carlos Ramirez, Esquire, Law Office of Noemi G. Ramirez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Anthony Paul Nicastro, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Vanessa Lefort, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los An-geles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria De Los Angeles Zendejas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for adjustment of status. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact. *Blanco v. Mukasey,*518 F.3d 714, 718 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Contrary to Zendejas’ assertion, the IJ did not violate due process by admitting the documents presented by the Department of Homeland Security to show Zen-dejas had made a false claim to United States citizenship on June 23, 1999, because the documents were probative and *246their admission was fundamentally fair. *See Espinoza v. INS,*45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th Cir.1995).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Zendejas is inadmissible, and therefore ineligible for adjustment of status, where the record indicates she made a false claim to United States citizenship to gain entry to the United States in 1999. *See Pichardo v. INS,*216 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir.2000) (false claim to United States citizenship is a “non-waivable ground of inadmissibility” under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)).

We lack jurisdiction to review Zendejas’ challenge to her 1999 expedited removal order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A); *Avendano-Ramirez v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 324 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty of the National 

Guard in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2021 

Mrs. BUSTOS (for herself and Mr. RYAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty 

of the National Guard in connection with the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS OF CERTAIN DUTY 

4 OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN 

5 CONNECTION WITH THE CORONAVIRUS DIS6 EASE 2019. 

7 (a) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 

8 costs of duty performed by members of the National 

9 Guard under section 502(f) of title 32, United States 

10 Code, for a mission assignment validated by the Federal 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 324 IH

1 Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pursuant to a 

2 declaration specified in subsection (b) shall be 100 per3 cent. 

4 (b) DECLARATIONS.—A declaration specified in this 

5 subsection is any declaration as follows: 

6 (1) A major disaster declared by the President 

7 under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

8 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 5170) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

10 (COVID–19). 

11 (2) An emergency declared by the President 

12 under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

13 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

14 5191) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

15 (3) A national emergency declared by the Presi16 dent under the National Emergencies Act (50 

17 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) with respect to the Coronavirus 

18 Disease 2019. 

19 (4) A public health emergency declared under 

20 section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

21 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to the Coronavirus Dis22 ease 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan VASQUEZ-ALMANZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10666.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.*

Filed Dec. 4, 2013.

Erica Leigh Seger, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter Hormel, Esquire, Law Office of Peter Hormel, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Vasquez-Almanza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vasquez-Almanza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Vasquez-Almanza the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 4.40


 


Office Premises Use Contract


 


Party A: Nanjing Cultural and Artwork Property
Exchange Co., Ltd.


 


Add: 4/F, Building F4, Zidong International Creative
Park, Qixia District, Nanjing.


 


Party B: Kashi Longrui Business Management Services
Co., Ltd.


 


Whereas Party A cooperates
with Party B and now both parties hereby enter into the following contract with respect to Party B using the office space of Party A for
office purposes on the basis of equal cooperation and mutual benefit, intending to be bound hereby:


 


I. Term of cooperation: from January 1, 2022 to
December 31, 2022.


 


II. Each party’s rights and obligations


 


1. Party A will provide Party B with office space,
including but not limited to office premises, office furniture and broadband internet access.


 


2. Party B shall pay Party A usage fee of RMB
90,000 Yuan (in words: RMB ninety thousand Yuan only) each month prior to the 10th day of each month, and Party B may use the
office premises, office furniture and other facilities provided by Party A.


 


3. Party has the ownership of the fixed assets
and facilities on the business premises and shall be responsible for coordinating with the property owner, industrial and commercial administration,
tax and legal authorities.


 


4. The maintenance, service and additional facilities
and equipment inside the office and the sanitation, hiring and labor costs shall all be borne by Party A.


 






     


     


    

 


5. Both parties shall jointly maintain the sanitation,
safety and security of the office environment.


 


6. Both parties shall operate according to law
and jointly comply with the rules and regulations related to property rights and the national policies and regulations.


 


III. Liabilities for default


 


Party B shall be deemed in
default and Party A has the right to terminate this contract if:


 


1. Party B is delinquent in payment of the rent
hereunder for more than one month; or


 


2. Party B causes any losses to Party A due to
its illegitimate business operation.


 


IV. Others


 


1. This contract shall take effect upon being
signed and sealed by both parties. Any matters not specified herein shall be resolved by both parties through friendly consultations and
may be incorporated into supplementary agreements to be executed by both parties with the mutual consent of both parties. The supplementary
agreements shall bear the same legal effect as this agreement.


 


2. Any dispute arising hereunder shall be resolved
by both parties through friendly consultations, if consultation fails, either party may file lawsuit with the people’s court having
competent jurisdiction over the place where Party A is located.


 


3. This contract is made in duplicate, one copy
for each party and each copy bearing the same legal effect.


 


	Party A’s seal:	Party B’s seal:
	Legal representative/ representative’s signature:	Legal representative/ representative’s signature:
	Date:1/1/2022	Date:1/1/2022
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SOKO Fitness & Spa Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xia Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: August 30, 2010
 
 By:  /s/ Xia Yu
 Name: Xia Yu
 Title: Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on the Port of Gulfport Roundtable","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JR7Pq6U5nC\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-the-port-of-gulfport-roundtable\/\">Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on the Port of Gulfport Roundtable<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-the-port-of-gulfport-roundtable\/embed\/#?secret=JR7Pq6U5nC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on the Port of Gulfport Roundtable” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"JR7Pq6U5nC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER et al., Appellees.

No. 13063.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 16, 1957.

Kelsey D. Bartlett, Toledo, Ohio, pro se.

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, Ohio, Wm. Saxbe, Huntington Carlile and Thomas L. Startzman, Columbus, Ohio, Robert O. Stout, Marion, Ohio, for appellees.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appel-lees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., *956157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees’ motion.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 13, 2011

Mr. Grant D. Blaies

Blaies & Hightower, L.L.P.

777 Main St., Suite 1900

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Mr. Jack Gilbert Duffy Jr.

Attorney at Law

6220 Midway Road

Haltom City, TX 76117

RE:Case Number:  09-0025

Court of Appeals Number:  02-07-00122-CV

Trial Court Number:  236-218405-06

Style:HARRIS METHODIST FORT WORTH

v.

JO FAWN OLLIE

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 09-0025Page 1**
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – December 30, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rhs8cfwTSh\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-30-2014\/\">Applicants – December 30, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-30-2014\/embed\/#?secret=rhs8cfwTSh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – December 30, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"rhs8cfwTSh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}