alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 13, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5RJx82WgTv\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-13-2023\/\">Applicants November 13, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-13-2023\/embed\/#?secret=5RJx82WgTv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 13, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"5RJx82WgTv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

FMC File No. 17195

This Compromise Agreement is entered into between:

(1) the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission); and

(2) Posey International, Inc. (Respondent).

WHEREAS, the Commission is considering the initiation of an assessment proceeding 

against Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violation of 46 C.F.R. 

§515.20(c).

WHEREAS, such proceeding would be based on the Commission’s allegation that 

Respondent engaged in certain practices, to wit:

Respondent operated without a Qualifying Individual as required 

under 46 C.F.R. Part 515 for a period in excess of one year.

WHEREAS, the Commission is authorized under section 13(c) of the Shipping Act, 46 

U.S.C. § 41109(c), and Subpart W of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 

C.F.R. § 502.601 – 502.605, to compromise and collect civil penalties for the alleged violation

set forth and described above; and,

WHEREAS, Respondent terminated the practice that was the basis of the alleged 

violation set forth herein, and has committed to maintain measures designed to eliminate such 

practice in the future; and,

WHEREAS, Respondent has cooperated and disclosed to the Commission information, 

facts, and documents relevant to its transportation activities and practices; and,

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all 

civil penalties arising from the alleged violation set forth above and described herein,

Respondent and the Commission hereby agree upon the following terms of settlement:
1. Respondent shall make payment to the Commission by cashier’s check or by wire 

transfer in the amount of $22,000.00 on or before June 6, 2016.

2. This Compromise Agreement shall forever bar the commencement or institution of 

any assessment proceeding or other claim of recovery of civil penalties from 

Respondent, its officers, directors, or employees arising from the alleged violation set 

forth above that occurred for a period in excess of one year prior to April 20, 2016.

3. It is expressly understood that this Compromise Agreement is not, and is not to be 

construed as, an admission by Respondent to the alleged violation set forth above.

4. This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604.

Posey International, Inc.

Signature: __________________________

Printed Name: ______________________

Title: ______________________________

Date: ______________________________
APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

FMC File No. 17195

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and 

accepted:

By the Federal Maritime Commission:

_______________________________________

Peter J. King, Director (Date)

Bureau of Enforcement

_______________________________________

Vern Hill (Date)

Managing Director
84 A.3d 323

#### Reinaldo CORREA, Appellant v. Business Manager Paula TOSKI and Inmate Accounting Sarah Siegal and Record Director Cindy Raymond and Superintendent Debra Sauers and Acting Secretary of Corrections, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 21, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the Annual Report of FIND/SVP, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter M. Stone, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 **/s/
Peter M. Stone**
 Peter M.
Stone
 Chief
Financial Officer
 March 18, 2005
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
86 A.3d 229

#### Eric S. TORRES, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 18, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of February, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. SPRAGUE, Co. Atty., v. ONE PIN BALL MACHINE STYLED “BALLYHOO” et al.

No. 34209.

Dec. 12, 1950.

225 *P.*2d *371.*

I. C. Sprague, Co. Atty., McCurtain County, of Idabel, for plaintiff in error.

Ed Shipp, of Idabel, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The issues involved in the case at bar are controlled by State of Oklahoma ex rel. I. C. Sprague, County Attorney, v. One Pin Ball Machine, Styled “Nevada”, No. 34205, 203 Okla. 652, 225 P. 2d 369, this day decided, and the opinion therein disposes of the issues herein.

The cause is reversed and remanded in accordance with the directions in said cause No. 34205.

*655DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN G. WILLIAMS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4959

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 2, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bolender v. State, 658 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1995); Hughes v. 

State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Williams v. State, 

249 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971).

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
32.1
 Form
10-KSB
 Pacific
Alliance Corporation
 File No.
33-08732-D
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Pacific
Alliance Corporation (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.
 
 I, Mark
A. Scharmann, President/Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:
 
 1.  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and
 
 2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Alliance
Corporation.
 
 Dated:  May 25,
2005
 
 
 
 /s/ Mark
A. Scharmann
 President/Principal
Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – March 28, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qtUzyVldeg\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-28-2017\/\">Applicants – March 28, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-28-2017\/embed\/#?secret=qtUzyVldeg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – March 28, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"qtUzyVldeg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 1688

RUDIS ONAN CHICAS

- SANCHEZ

,

Petitioner

,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR

, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : January 2, 2020 Decided: January 14, 2020

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Christina A. Wilkes, WILKES LEGAL, LLC, Takoma Park, Maryland , for Petitioner. Joseph H . Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director,

David J. Schor

, Office of Immigration Litigation

, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rudis Onan Chicas

- Sanchez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion for

reconsideration and reopening. We have thoroug hly reviewed the record and conclude that

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Urbina v. Holder, 745

F.3d 736, 741 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"U.S. Senate Confirms Federal Maritime Commissioner William P. Doyle to Another Term","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vFgzMYNn3N\"><a href=\"\/u-s-senate-confirms-federal-maritime-commissioner-william-p-doyle-to-another-term\/\">U.S. Senate Confirms Federal Maritime Commissioner William P. Doyle to Another Term<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/u-s-senate-confirms-federal-maritime-commissioner-william-p-doyle-to-another-term\/embed\/#?secret=vFgzMYNn3N\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“U.S. Senate Confirms Federal Maritime Commissioner William P. Doyle to Another Term” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vFgzMYNn3N\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3665

)

NICHOLAS JOSEPH DESABATINO, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 31, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota

County; Thomas W. Krug, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellant. 

Christopher E. Cosden of Law Office of

Christopher E. Cosden, Fort Myers, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EX-35 (a)
(logo) Bank of America

Bank of America
475 CrossPoint Parkway
PO Box 9000
Getzville, NY 14068-9000

Annual Statement as to Compliance
BAFC 2006-3

I, H. Randall Chestnut, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., (the
"Servicer"), hereby certify as pursuant to section 2.17 of the Servicing
Agreement between Banc of America Funding Corporation (together with its
permitted successors and assigns, the "Depositor") and Bank of America National
Association, as Servicer (together with its permitted successors and assigns,
the "Servicer") that: (i) a review has been made under my supervision of the
Servicer's activities under this agreement during the 2006 calendar year and
(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under this agreement in all material respects
throughout the calendar year 2006.


March 1, 2007


Bank of America, N.A.
as Servicer.

By: /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
Name:  H. Randall Chestnut
Title: Senior Vice President
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntsman International LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

/s/ J. Kimo Esplin
-------------------------------
J. Kimo Esplin
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
{"id":534,"date":"2010-06-30T12:18:01","date_gmt":"2010-06-30T16:18:01","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=534"},"modified":"2018-08-07T12:18:22","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T16:18:22","slug":"commissioner-dye-testifies-to-congress-regarding-ocean-vessel-capacity-shipping-container-availability-and-fact-finding-investigation-number-26","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commissioner-dye-testifies-to-congress-regarding-ocean-vessel-capacity-shipping-container-availability-and-fact-finding-investigation-number-26\/","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Dye Testifies to Congress Regarding Ocean Vessel Capacity, Shipping Container Availability, and Fact-Finding Investigation Number 26"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>June 30, 2010<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/CoastGuardSubcommitteeHearingStatement_Dye_06-30-10.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>June 30, 2010 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,9,6],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=534"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":537,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534\/revisions\/537"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edith Grace BIAMI, Defendant.

No. 65-CR-5.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

Aug. 6, 1965.

*918James B. Brennan, U. S. Atty., by Robert J. Lerner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Darryl K. Nevers, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

GRUBB, District Judge.

The defendant has moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the allegations in the indictment, as supplemented by a bill of particulars, do not constitute a violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 1071, which prohibits harboring or concealing “any person for whose arrest a warrant or process has been issued under the provisions of any law of the United States, so as to prevent his discovery and arrest, after notice or knowledge of the fact that a warrant or process has been issued for the apprehension of such person, * *

The indictment, as supplemented by the bill of particulars, alleges that the defendant had knowledge that a federal warrant of arrest had been issued for the apprehension of Clarence Perkins, Jr., and that when federal and Milwaukee law enforcement officials came to the defendant’s apartment, identified themselves, and announced they had a warrant for the arrest of Perkins, the defendant “did refuse to admit said police officials on at least two occasions during the early morning hours of July 30,1964.”

 The word “conceal” as used in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1071, is defined: “to hide, secrete or keep out of sight.” The word “harbor,” in the same statute, is defined: “to lodge, to care for after secreting the offender.” United States v. Thornton, 178 F.Supp. 42, 43 (E.D.N.Y.1959).

The defendant argues that the law enforcement officials knew where Perkins was and, consequently, the defendant could not have concealed or harbored Perkins from them. The record is not clear in this respect. It is no doubt likely that the enforcement officers at least suspected he was at this place.

But, as the Government points out, the statute is directed at the conduct of the defendant. The refusal to admit the officials was an active measure taken by the defendant to prevent the discovery and arrest of Perkins. If the Government officials knew where Perkins was, this would not alter the nature of the defendant’s conduct.

The motion to dismiss the indictment must be and it is hereby denied.