alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr, Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0b2CBzxadh\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-chairman-federal-maritime-commission-before-the-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation-united-states-senate\/\">Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr, Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-richard-a-lidinsky-jr-chairman-federal-maritime-commission-before-the-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation-united-states-senate\/embed\/#?secret=0b2CBzxadh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr, Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"0b2CBzxadh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
*This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WESTAMERICA BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-16775

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02451-JAMDAD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 12, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: FISHER, CALLAHAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of Westamerica Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

1. The district court properly determined that the set aside agreement

(Agreement) between Westamerica and Hartford, by its plain language, imposed

no obligation on Westamerica to ensure that construction work had been completed

before disbursing funds set aside to pay for that work. The Agreement authorized

Westamerica to make payment “on the authorization of” the borrower, without any

verification requirements, and explicitly provided that Westamerica “makes no

representations as to the use of such funds after such withdrawal,” that

Westamerica “undertakes no obligation to determine or insure . . . that such

improvements have been properly completed” and that “[Westamerica] will not be

responsible to the Borrower or to [Hartford] for proper use of funds disbursed.”

2. The extrinsic evidence Hartford proffered did not introduce any

ambiguity into Agreement. Evidence of industry usage “can be invoked only to

interpret, not to create, contractual terms.” 1 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th),

Contracts § 755 (citing Peiser v. Mettler, 50 Cal. 2d 594, 609 (1958)). There is no

evidence that Hartford’s executive’s expectations regarding the Agreement were

shared with Westamerica. See Banning Ranch Conservancy v. Superior Court, 193

Cal. App. 4th 903, 915 (2011) (“[A] party’s undisclosed subjective intent cannot be

used to override the contractual terms themselves.”). The provisions Hartford has

cited from the construction loan agreement between Westamerica and the borrower
3

were expressly for Westamerica’s benefit, and none obligated Westamerica to

verify completion before disbursing funds.

3. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of

Westamerica on Hartford’s conversion claim because that claim was dependent on

Hartford’s contract claim.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, B. Michael Adler, President and Chief Executive Officer of WQN, Inc. certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WQN,Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: May 12, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – September 15, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ptWGr9HPLn\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-15-2017\/\">Applicants – September 15, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-15-2017\/embed\/#?secret=ptWGr9HPLn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – September 15, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ptWGr9HPLn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KANA Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Fields, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification
is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                         |  |  |  |                              
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael S. Fields        
|                         |  |  |  | Michael S. Fields            
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"User Fees Revised Effective October 1, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vDRuF9W6jM\"><a href=\"\/user-fees-revised-effective-october-1-2016\/\">User Fees Revised Effective October 1, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/user-fees-revised-effective-october-1-2016\/embed\/#?secret=vDRuF9W6jM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“User Fees Revised Effective October 1, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vDRuF9W6jM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.333-146217) of Volcano Corporation and in the related Prospectus for the registration of commonstock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units, the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-136655) pertaining to the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 2005 Equity CompensationPlan of Volcano Corporation, and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-145761) pertainingto the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan and 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Volcano Corporationof our reports dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofVolcano Corporation and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting ofVolcano Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSacramento, California
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  filing  of the
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  March  31,  2006  (the
"Report") by National Coal Corp. ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:

         1.       to the best of our  knowledge,  the Report fully complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  May 22, 2006               /s/ Jon Nix
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Jon Nix
                                  President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 22, 2006               /s/ T. Michael Lovr
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  T. Michael Love
                                  Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00669-CR

William Edward Hughes, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY, 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR952, HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant William Edward Hughes was convicted of four counts of sexual assault

of a child and assessed four consecutive twenty-year prison terms. His retained attorney at trial,

Eddie Shell, signed and filed a notice of appeal on Hughes’s behalf. The reporter’s record has not

been filed and is overdue. When notified by the Court, Shell replied in a letter that he was not

retained for the appeal and does not know whether Hughes wishes to pursue the appeal.

Having signed the notice of appeal, Shell is Hughes’s lead counsel on appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 6.1(a). Shell’s letter to the Court does not comply with either rule 6.4 or 6.5. See

Tex. R. App. P. 6.4 (nonrepresentation notice), 6.5 (withdrawal of counsel).

To avoid further delays and protect the rights of the parties, the appeal is abated and

the trial court is instructed to determine, following a hearing if necessary, if Hughes wishes to pursue

the appeal and, if so, if Hughes is presently indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3. If the court finds
2

that Hughes wishes to appeal and is indigent, it shall appoint counsel to represent Hughes in this

appeal and order the preparation of the reporter’s record. Copies of all findings, conclusions, and

orders, and a transcription of the reporter’s notes if a hearing is held, shall be tendered for filing in

this Court no later than June 6, 2008.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: May 7, 2008

Do Not Publish
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/
Daniel W. FairfaxDaniel W. FairfaxVice President, Finance and
Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
June 14, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Two Marine Terminal Agreements at Port of Tacoma Become Effective","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"leIWerSUbI\"><a href=\"\/two-marine-terminal-agreements-at-port-of-tacoma-become-effective\/\">Two Marine Terminal Agreements at Port of Tacoma Become Effective<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/two-marine-terminal-agreements-at-port-of-tacoma-become-effective\/embed\/#?secret=leIWerSUbI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Two Marine Terminal Agreements at Port of Tacoma Become Effective” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"leIWerSUbI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         137,572
<SECURITIES>                                   185,264
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,004)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               437,077
<PP&E>                                          57,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,907)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,839,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,627
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,748,974
<OTHER-SE>                                   (399,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,839,056
<SALES>                                         60,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,585
<CGS>                                           22,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,825)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (259,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (259,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (259,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.41)


</TABLE>