alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States governmentHere’s how you knowHere’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
				**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A **lock**(Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.Federal Maritime Commission



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        SearchFederal Maritime Commission



Menu
				Close
							AboutComplaints and AssistanceLicensing and CertificationProceedingsDatabases and PublicationsNews and Advisories



Affilite Info for Search FMC.gov
        Search FMC.gov
        Search Home
 Licensing and Certification
 Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Status Changes
 On this page
OTI License Applications


2024
2023
2022
2021OTI License Revocations and Surrenders


Current Revocations and Surrenders
Previous Updates



This page contains notices on the status of Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) licenses. OTI License applications filed with the FMC and any later revocations, suspensions, surrenders, will be listed here.



This list may be used in combination with the List of FMC Licensed & Bonded OTIs. Notice: After 1/22/2020 you must refer to the OTI LIST to determine if a license has been reissued.



OTI License Applications


2024


August 9, 2024August 5, 2024July 29, 2024July 22, 2024July 15, 2024July 8, 2024July 1, 2024June 24, 20241
2
3
4

Next Page



2023


December 26, 2023December 18, 2023December 11, 2023December 4, 2023November 20, 2023November 13, 2023November 6, 2023October 30, 20231
2
3
...
7

Next Page



2022


December 27, 2022December 19, 2022December 12, 2022December 5, 2022November 21, 2022November 14, 2022November 7, 2022October 31, 20221
2
3
...
7

Next Page



2021


December 20, 2021December 13, 2021December 6, 2021November 29, 2021November 22, 2021November 15, 2021November 8, 2021November 1, 20211
2
3
4

Next Page







OTI License Revocations and Surrenders


Current Revocations and Surrenders


June 30, 2024 [PDF, 84 KB]



May 31, 2024 [PDF, 78 KB]



April 30, 2024 [PDF, 123 KB]



March 31, 2024 [PDF, 124 KB]



February 29, 2024 [PDF, 121 KB]



January 31, 2024 [PDF, 123 KB]






Previous Updates


Archived OTI License Revocations and Surrenders Return to top
    
    
    
    **FMC Information**
    
    
    
    About the FMC
    
    
    
    Employment Opportunities
    
    
    
    Site Policies
    
    
    
    FOIA
    
    
    
    **Government Information**
    
    
    
    Inspector General
    
    
    
    U.S. Office of Special Counsel
    
    
    
    Open Government at the FMC
    
    
    
    USA.gov
    
    
    
    Federal Maritime Commission
    
    
    Our mission is to **ensure a competitive and reliable** **international ocean transportation supply system** that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.
    
    
    
    X
    
    YouTube
    
    LinkedIn800 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20573inquiries@fmc.gov
No. 896.

#### The United States ex rel. Annie Kelley, Petitioner, *v.*J. M. Peters, Sheriff, etc.

May 31, 1910.

*Mr. H. Winship Wheatley*for the petitioner.

*Mr. William M. Acton*for the respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
{"id":1073,"date":"2014-11-06T16:08:37","date_gmt":"2014-11-06T20:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1073"},"modified":"2018-08-14T16:09:18","modified_gmt":"2018-08-14T20:09:18","slug":"commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-13-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-13-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 13, 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>November 6, 2014<\/div>\n<h2>Sunshine Act Meeting<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Time and Date<\/strong>:<br \/>\nNovember 13, 2014; 10:00 AM<\/p>\n<p><strong>Place<\/strong>:<br \/>\n800 North Capitol Street, N.W.<br \/>\nFirst Floor Hearing Room<br \/>\nWashington, D.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Status<\/strong>:<br \/>\nThe first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matters to be Considered<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Open Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Briefing on Mid-Atlantic North East Port Forum held October 1st Concerning Causes and Implications of Congestion at U.S. Ports<\/li>\n<li>Briefing on the Danish Maritime Forum<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Closed Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Staff Update on the G6 Alliance Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 012194<\/li>\n<li>Staff Briefing on Economic and Trade Conditions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Contact:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Karen V. Gregory<br \/>\nSecretary<br \/>\n202-523-5725<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>November 6, 2014 Sunshine Act Meeting Time and Date: November 13, 2014; 10:00 AM Place: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W. First Floor Hearing Room Washington, D.C. Status: The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session. Matters to be Considered: Open Session... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-13-2014\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26,4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1073"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1074,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073\/revisions\/1074"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market  Latin  America,  Inc.) for the
quarter  ended June 30,  2005,  I, Aubrey  Brown,  Chief  Executive  Officer of
Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market Latin  America,  Inc.),  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

a)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Paragon Financial  Corporation (kna
     New Market Latin America, Inc.) for the Quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully
     complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

b)   the  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q/A of
     Paragon Financial Corporation (kna New Market Latin America,  Inc.) for the
     quarter ended June 30, 2005,  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,
     the financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Paragon  Financial
     Corporation (kna New Market Latin America, Inc.)





                            /s/ Aubrey Brown
                                ------------
                                Aubrey Brown, Chief Executive Officer


Date:    October 10, 2008



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Paragon Financial  Corporation (kna New Market Latin America,  Inc.)
and will be  retained by Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market  Latin
America,  Inc.) and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30305 Conference Calendar

__________________
ROBERT MYLES, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Acting Warden RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-3984 E

- - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis , Robert Myles, #87712, appeals from the district court's denial of his postjudgment motion for copies of state trial records and transcripts. In his appellate brief, however, Myles argues solely the issue whether the district court erred by previously denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the denial ofNo. 96-30305 -2- which Myles failed to appeal. A pro se habeas petitioner abandons issues that he does not argue. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Myles does not address the denial of his postjudgment motion, he has abandoned argument on the only issue before this court. Myles’ appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Myles is warned that the filing of future frivolous appeals may result in the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Myles is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
|   | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Peter A. Inverso                  |           | /s/ Sharon L. Lamont    |
|---------------------------------------|----------------|-------------------------|
| Peter A. Inverso                      |           | Sharon L. Lamont        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |           | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                                 | March 11, 2011 |                    |   | Date: | March 11, 2011 |   |
----

Exhibit 99.6 

**CERTIFICATION**
I, Basil Huxham, certify that: 
1. 

I havereviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc.; 
2. 

Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 
3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 
4. 

The issuer'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: 
(a) 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Designed suchinternal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

(c) 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

(d) 

Disclosed inthis report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 
5. 

The issuer'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer'sauditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 
(a) 

Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b) 

Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2009 

*"Basil Huxham"                          *Basil Huxham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 6.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Martin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 21, 2006



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Paul Martin                                                
|Paul Martin, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 99.14

Consent of Dennis Bergen

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with mineral
resource estimates for the New Afton Project and to the use of information
derived from the technical report entitled Technical Report on the New Afton
Project, British Columbia, Canada dated December 31, 2009, included in the
Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December
31, 2009 and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in
the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold
Inc.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2010.

|/s/ R. Dennis Bergen                                                                                      | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name: R. Dennis Bergen                                                                                    | 
|Title: P. Eng., and Associate Principal Mining
    Engineer for Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc

---
# Jfotti'tl)**Court of** **Antonio, February** **26, 2015** **No. 04-14-00729-CV** **Jeremiah Trombly,** **Appellant v.** **Department of** **the Air** **Force, Appellee** **Trial Court** **Ca.se No.** **CV-14-0000304**

## RDER**The Court** **has reviewed** **the record** **and briefs** **in this appeal** **and has** **determined that** **oral**

### argument**will not** **significantly aid** **it in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See Tex.** **R. App.** **P. 39.8.** **Therefore, all** **requests for** **oral argument** **arc denied,** **and the** **cause is** **advanced for** **ON BRIEFS** **submission on** **April 1,** **2015, to** **the following** **panel: Justice** **Patricia O. Alvarez.** **Justice Luz** **Elena D.** **Chapa. and Justice** **Jason Pulliam.** **All parties** **will be** 

### notified**of the** **Court's decision** **in this** **appeal in** **accordance with** **TEX R.** **APP. P.** **48. Hither** **parly may** **file motion** **requesting the** **Court to** **reconsider its** **determination that** **oral argument** **will not** **significantly aid** **the Court** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues presented** **in the** **appeal. See** **TEX, R.** **App. P.** **39.8. Such** **motion should** **be filed** **within ten** **(10) days** **from the** **dale of** **this order.** **It is** **so ORDERED** **on February** **26, 2015.** **Patricia C).** **Alvarez. Justice** 

## IN**WITNESS WHEREOF,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **a/fixed the** **seal o/i** **court on** **this February** **26. 2015.**
#### Sherrie L. DURHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nat E. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Personnel; James G. Neeley, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development; E. Riley Anderson, in his individual and official capacity as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; William M. Barker, in his individual and official capacity as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; Adolpho A. Birch, Jr., in his individual and official capacity as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; Lance B. Bracy, in his individual and official capacity as the Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the Board of Pro*334fessional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; Cornelia A. Clark, in her individual and official capacity as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; Janice M. Holder, in her individual and official capacity as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee; David N. Shearon, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education and Specialization, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-5701.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 19, 2008.

Before GUY, SUHRHEINRICH, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Sherrie L. Durham, an attorney proceeding *pro se,*appeals from the dismissal of her civil rights action challenging the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court governing attorney registration and continuing legal education requirements as violative of her rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff argues that the district court erred in finding that she had failed to state a claim for violation of her due process, equal protection, and First Amendment rights; erred in denying her motion to file a second amended petition for declaratory judgment; and erred in denying her motion for disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 144.

After carefully reviewing the record and the arguments presented on appeal, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we are convinced that the district court did not err with respect to the issues raised on appeal. Moreover, because the reasons supporting the judgment have been ably articulated by the district court, we conclude that issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth by the district court in (1) its memorandum and order of March 14, 2007, adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as modified; and (2) the order of May 3, 2007, denying plaintiffs post-judgment motions.
EXHIBIT 32.02





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWK Holdings Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Burgon, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated: November 8, 2010
/s/ Paul BurgonPaul BurgonInterim Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.