alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
      EXHIBIT 31.1 -- SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, the Chief Executive Officer of Pactiv Corporation (the
"company"), certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a)  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (a)  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  August 14, 2003


/s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
----------------------------
Richard L. Wambold
Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Statement by Commissioner Vekich in Support of Commissioner Bentzel\u2019s Assessment of the People\u2019s Republic of China\u2019s Control of Container and Intermodal Chassis Manufacturing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7oVFQxt10J\"><a href=\"\/statement-by-commissioner-vekich-in-support-of-commissioner-bentzels-assessment-of-the-peoples-republic-of-chinas-control-of-container-and-intermodal-chassis-manufacturing\/\">Statement by Commissioner Vekich in Support of Commissioner Bentzel\u2019s Assessment of the People\u2019s Republic of China\u2019s Control of Container and Intermodal Chassis Manufacturing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-by-commissioner-vekich-in-support-of-commissioner-bentzels-assessment-of-the-peoples-republic-of-chinas-control-of-container-and-intermodal-chassis-manufacturing\/embed\/#?secret=7oVFQxt10J\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement by Commissioner Vekich in Support of Commissioner Bentzel\u2019s Assessment of the People\u2019s Republic of China\u2019s Control of Container and Intermodal Chassis Manufacturing” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"7oVFQxt10J\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Chairman Daniel B. Maffei on the Denial of the PMSA\/WSC Petition for Review","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"djlbvla9cd\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-chairman-daniel-b-maffei-on-the-denial-of-the-pmsa-wsc-petition-for-review\/\">Statement of Chairman Daniel B. Maffei on the Denial of the PMSA\/WSC Petition for Review<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-chairman-daniel-b-maffei-on-the-denial-of-the-pmsa-wsc-petition-for-review\/embed\/#?secret=djlbvla9cd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Chairman Daniel B. Maffei on the Denial of the PMSA\/WSC Petition for Review” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"djlbvla9cd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Laurie Ellen FLANAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENICIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local government agency; Shalee Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 08-17368, 08-17694.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Laurie Ellen Flanagan, Stockton, CA, pro se.

James Thomas Gotch, Kathleen Darmagnac, Louis A. Leone, Esquire, Stubbs & Leone, Walnut Creek, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

*188Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes these appeals are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In Appeal No. 08-17368, Laurie Ellen Flanagan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action as a sanction for failing to comply with her discovery obligations, and from the order denying her motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion both the dismissal of an action under the district court’s inherent powers and the denial of a motion for reconsideration. *Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distribs.,*69 F.3d 337, 348 (9th Cir.1995); *Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Flanagan’s action for failing to comply with her discovery obligations, where the court previously imposed monetary sanctions on Flanagan’s attorney for failing to provide timely and proper initial disclosures, Flanagan never provided complete initial disclosures, Flanagan refused for many months to respond substantively to legitimate discovery requests, and the court found that defendants were prejudiced. *See Anheuser-Busch, Inc.,*69 F.3d at 348 (listing factors to be considered before imposing the sanction of dismissal).

The district court also did not abuse its discretion by denying Flanagan’s motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) because Flanagan did not present newly discovered evidence, demonstrate clear error or manifest injustice, or show an intervening change in the controlling law. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or.,*5 F.3d at 1263.

We lack jurisdiction to review Flanagan’s challenge to the district court’s order imposing monetary sanctions against her former attorney. *See Cabrera v. City of Huntington Park,*159 F.3d 374, 382 (9th Cir.1998) (party lacks standing to appeal an order imposing sanctions against his or her attorney).

Flanagan’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

In Appeal No. 08-17694, appellants have abandoned their challenge to the district court’s order denying their request for costs because they do not raise it in their brief. *See Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc.,*797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir.1986).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

                         Statement furnished pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Phyllis A. Murphy, President and Chief Executive Officer and Stephen L. Mourlam,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Webster City Federal
Bancorp ("the Company") each certify in his or her capacity as an officer of the
Company that he or she has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form
10-QSBKSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and that to the best of his or
her knowledge:

      (1)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            report.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to
be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


May 10, 2004                   /s/
Date                           -------------------------------------------------
                               Phyllis A. Murphy
                               President and Chief Executive Officer


May 10, 2004                   /s/
Date                           -------------------------------------------------
                               Stephen L. Mourlam
                               Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Semiannual OIG Reports - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PPE04O7y2O\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/inspector-general\/other-oig-reports\/\">Semiannual OIG Reports<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/inspector-general\/other-oig-reports\/embed\/#?secret=PPE04O7y2O\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Semiannual OIG Reports” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"PPE04O7y2O\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires each Inspector General to prepare a Semiannual Report summarizing the activities of the Office of the Inspector General for the six months ending March 31 and September 30 of each year.  This report is submitted to the Chairman by April 30 and October 31 of each [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel  on the Extended Weekend Gates at SSA Terminals in Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BmPK2Quk7x\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-the-extended-weekend-gates-at-ssa-terminals-in-oakland-seattle-and-tacoma\/\">Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel  on the Extended Weekend Gates at SSA Terminals in Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-the-extended-weekend-gates-at-ssa-terminals-in-oakland-seattle-and-tacoma\/embed\/#?secret=BmPK2Quk7x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel  on the Extended Weekend Gates at SSA Terminals in Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BmPK2Quk7x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Zubiar Uddin KHAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70709.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Farshad Owji, Esquire, Owji Law Group, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Oil, Andrew Jacob Oliveira, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Zubiar Uddin Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and deny the petition for review.

Even if Khan timely filed his asylum application, substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the discrepancies between Khan’s testimony and the letter from the Sanan Academy he submitted regarding the date and other details central to his alleged attack by religious fundamentalists, *see Pal v. INS,*204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000), and the agency reasonably found Khan’s explanations for the inconsistencies unconvincing, *see Rivera v. Mukasey,*508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir.2007). Without *265credible testimony, Khan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Far ah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Khan’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not credible, and he points to no other evidence the agency should have considered, substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Nos. 67962-7-I; 67963-5-I.

Division One.

October 29, 2012.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ryan Robert Grant, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 10-1-09830-1, Brian D. Gain, J., entered October 28, 2011. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
{"id":1484,"date":"2011-10-24T14:22:12","date_gmt":"2011-10-24T18:22:12","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1484"},"modified":"2018-08-17T14:23:30","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T18:23:30","slug":"remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-the-biogas-usa-west-conference-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-the-biogas-usa-west-conference-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Remarks of FMC Commissioner Mario Cordero at the Biogas USA West Conference 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>October 24, 2011<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/Cordero_Biogas_101211.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>October 24, 2011 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1484"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1484"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1485,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1484\/revisions\/1485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}