alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001090448
<NAME> MENDOCINO PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,851
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,015
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Marshall THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10378

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2016.

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Marshall Thomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Thomas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 99.1

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



     The  undersigned,  Phyllis A. Murphy,  is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Webster City Federal Bancorp (the "Company").

     This  statement  is being  furnished in  connection  with the filing by the
Company of the Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

           By execution of this statement, I certify that:

     A)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a) or
          78o(d)) and

     B)   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the  Company  as of the dates and for the  periods  covered  by the
          Report.

     This  statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this  statement  will  accompany  the  Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


                                                 /s/ Phyllis A. Murphy
----------------------------                     ------------------------------
Dated                                            Phyllis A. Murphy
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KHALED NAWAYA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70664

Agency No. A079-642-440

MEMORANDUM*

KHALED NAWAYA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71398

Agency No. A079-642-440

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted January 14, 2011

San Francisco, California

FILED

JAN 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Khaled Nawaya, a native of Saudi Arabia and citizen of Syria, petitions for

review of two orders issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). In the

first, the BIA adopted and affirmed a decision by an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

finding Nawaya removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B) for failure to maintain

his F-1 nonimmigrant student status and denying equitable estoppel. In the second,

the BIA denied Nawaya’s motion to reconsider its first order, and held that it

lacked authority to apply equitable estoppel against the Department of Homeland

Security.

This court “review[s] the agency’s legal determinations de novo, and factual

findings for substantial evidence.” Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th

Cir. 2009). 

Petitioner’s status was terminated because he failed to pursue a full course of

study. The principal issue litigated before the IJ and the BIA was equitable

estoppel due to the alleged authorization by petitioner’s Designated School Official

of a lighter course load than the one required by the regulations. 8 C.F.R. 

§ 214.2(f)(6)(iii). Equitable estoppel does not apply in this case. 

One of the requirements for the application of equitable estoppel is that the

party claiming estoppel “must be ignorant of the true facts.” Morgan v. Gonzales,
3

495 F.3d 1084, 1092 (9th Cir. 2007). The Supreme Court explained in Heckler v.

Cmty. Health Serv., that “[i]f at the time when he acted, such party had knowledge

of the truth, or had the means by which with reasonable diligence he could acquire

the knowledge so that it would be negligence on his part to remain ignorant by not

using those means, he cannot claim to have been misled by relying upon the

representation or concealment.” 467 U.S. 51, 59 n.10 (1984). The applicable

regulations clearly spell out the three limited situations in which a lighter course

load is permitted: academic difficulties, medical conditions, and on the final term

if fewer courses are required to complete the course of study. 8 C.F.R.

§ 214.2(f)(6)(iii). Petitioner does not contend that any of these reasons apply to his

case. 

PETITION DENIED.
**_____________________________________________________________________________________**

**Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service**

**FY2016 Service Contract Inventory Planned Analysis**

I. **Background**

The Service Contract Inventory is a tool designed to help agencies develop a better understanding of how contracted services are being used to support mission and operations, and to determine whether contractor skills are being utilized in an appropriate manner. Section 743 of Division C of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, Public Law (P.L.) 111-117, requires civilian agencies to prepare an annual inventory of their service contracts. It also requires that civilian agencies analyze their inventory to determine if the mix of Federal employees and contractors is effective or requires rebalancing. 

Prior to issuing their inventories, civilian agencies are required to submit a planned analysis to the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). This document, created by the Office of Procurement and Operational Support, fulfills that requirement for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). 

II. **FY2016 Product and Service Codes (PSC) Selected for Review**

In accordance with OMB guidelines and recommendations, this planned analysis is designed to inform OFPP of the PSC that the FMCS will analyze from the FY 2015 inventory. Table 1 on page two will numerically display the codes that will be analyzed.

III. **Rationale for Selection**

For its FY2016 review, FMCS will identify PSC that were not the primary focus of the previous year’s analysis.  Instead, FMCS will focus on the largest obligations of FY2016:  The relocation of the National Office in Washington, DC.  The agency relocated from the NW quadrant of the city, to the SW quadrant of Washington, DC.  Contractors were used during this transition period and were overseen by staff to ensure that sufficient oversight of contractors was in place.

Table 1 

**Responsible Officials**

*For government-wide inventory analysis see:**https://www.acquisition.gov/***

2

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 ADOPTED
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The   undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year period ended December 31,2003 of
HemaCare Corporation (the "Company") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in such report.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Judi Irving
______________________________
Judi Irving
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert S. Chilton
______________________________
Robert S. Chilton
Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  June 21, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of HemaCare Corporation (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

Very
truly yours,

|                                                                |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ JOHN DOUMITT John Doumitt
Chief Executive Officer           |  | 
|/s/ ROBERT S. CHILTON Robert S. Chilton
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

Dated:
March 26, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to HemaCare Corporation and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

      Re: Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
      Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-R2

I, John P. Grazer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-R2 (the "Exchange Act Periodic
Reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing agreement in all material respects; and;

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-l8 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, FIS Tax Services, American Security Insurance Company, Standard
Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.

By: /s/ John P. Grazer
    ---------------------------------
Name: John P. Grazer
Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 26, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Summary of Fees - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"inwGfzfqCP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/summary-of-fees\/\">Summary of Fees<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/summary-of-fees\/embed\/#?secret=inwGfzfqCP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Summary of Fees” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"inwGfzfqCP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About The Commission provides two options for making payment for services \u2013 electronic and by check. Some Commission services, such as Freedom of Information Act requests must be paid after the request has been processed and the requester receives an FMC invoice for the actual services rendered. However, most Commission services can be paid without […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
#### NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; Double Diamond Inc., Movants-Appellees, v. Rachel D. CORTEZ; Felicia G. Hernandez; Crystal I. Moore; Teresa D. Morath; Mary Noble, Claimants-Appellants.

No. 07-10230.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 15, 2008.

Robert Glenn Chadwick, Jr., for Movants-Appellees.

William O. Wuester, Douglas Wuester & Stenholm, Fort Worth, TX, for Claimants-Appellants.

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254 (2008) (holding that, regardless of the parties’ agreement to the contrary, district courts must review an arbitrator’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under the highly deferential standard set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"id":1461,"date":"2012-03-28T13:48:36","date_gmt":"2012-03-28T17:48:36","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1461"},"modified":"2018-08-17T13:53:37","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T17:53:37","slug":"remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-panama-week-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/remarks-of-fmc-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-panama-week-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Remarks of FMC Commissioner Mario Cordero at Panama Week 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>March 28, 2012<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/Panama_Week_2012_Conference.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 28, 2012 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1461"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1461"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1461\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1462,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1461\/revisions\/1462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>

                           CONNING CORPORATION



                            POWER OF ATTORNEY
                            -----------------


I, the undersigned, as a director of Conning Corporation hereby
constitute Fred M. Schpero and Paul W. Kopsky, Jr. or either of them
singly, with full power to sign for me, in my name and in the capacity
checked below, the annual report of Conning Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999 on Form 10-K and any and all amendments to
this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission and I hereby
ratify and confirm my signature as it may be signed by the above-
mentioned people to said Form 10-K and to any and all amendments
thereto.

Witness my hand on the date set forth below.




Signature
---------



/s/ John A. Fibiger
-------------------


John A. Fibiger
---------------
Name (Typed or printed)


Date March 14, 2000
    ---------------




WLH:mef/powers/Conning



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                          CONNING CORPORATION



                           POWER OF ATTORNEY
                           -----------------

I, the undersigned, as a director of Conning Corporation hereby
constitute Fred M. Schpero and Paul W. Kopsky, Jr. or either of them
singly, with full power to sign for me, in my name and in the capacity
checked below, the annual report of Conning Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999 on Form 10-K and any and all amendments to
this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission and I hereby
ratify and confirm my signature as it may be signed by the above-
mentioned people to said Form 10-K and to any and all amendments
thereto.

Witness my hand on the date set forth below.




Signature
---------



/s/ Richard A. Liddy
--------------------



Richard A. Liddy
----------------
Name (Typed or printed)


Date   3/15/2000
     -------------




<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                          CONNING CORPORATION



                           POWER OF ATTORNEY
                           -----------------

I, the undersigned, as a director of Conning Corporation hereby
constitute Fred M. Schpero and Paul W. Kopsky, Jr. or either of them
singly, with full power to sign for me, in my name and in the capacity
checked below, the annual report of Conning Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999 on Form 10-K and any and all amendments to
this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission and I hereby
ratify and confirm my signature as it may be signed by the above-
mentioned people to said Form 10-K and to any and all amendments
thereto.

Witness my hand on the date set forth below.




Signature
---------



/s/ Arthur C. Reeds, III
------------------------




Arthur C. Reeds, III
--------------------
Name (Typed or printed)


Date   3/14/00
    -------------