alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification
         I, Susan Mills, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage
Loan Trust 2006-WF1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under
Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
the Exchange Act periodic reports;

          4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Citibank, N.A.


                                   Date March 30, 2007
                                   CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN
                                   TRUST INC.

                                   By: /s/ Susan Mills
                                   ------------------------
                                   Name: Susan Mills
                                   Title: Vice President
                                   Date: March 30, 2007
<PAGE>


                               AGREEMENT TO EXTEND
                          AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
               BETWEEN THE WARNACO GROUP, INC. AND ANTONIO ALVAREZ

         WHEREAS, The Warnaco Group, Inc., its divisions and subsidiaries
("Warnaco"), and Antonio Alvarez ("Employee") entered into that certain Amended
Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated as of June 11, 2001 and
approved by order of the United States Bankruptcy Court in Warnaco's chapter 11
cases (the "Cases") entered on February 21, 2002; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 2(e) and 20(f) of the Employment
Agreement, Warnaco and Employee wish to extend the Employment Period and amend
the Expiration Date (as both terms are defined in the Employment Agreement) as
set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Employment Period shall be extended, and the Expiration Date
shall be amended, to the date which is the earlier of (i) April 30, 2003, and
(ii) the effective date of a confirmed plan or plans of reorganization for all
or substantially all of the debtors in the Cases.

         2. Except as set forth above, the parties hereto acknowledge and agree
that all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement are unchanged
and ratified.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of Warnaco and Employee has executed this
Agreement, in the case of Warnaco by its duly authorized officer, as of July 16,
2002.


Dated: July 16, 2002                  THE WARNACO GROUP, INC., for itself and
                                      its divisions, subsidiaries and affiliates


                                      By: /s/ Stanley P. Silverstein
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Stanley P. Silverstein
                                         Title: Vice President

Dated:   July 16, 2002                EMPLOYEE


                                      By: /s/ Antonio Alvarez
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                            Antonio Alvarez
#### Marcelino Sulekopa PAPA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1493.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 13, 2010.

William Payne, Lee & Associates, College Park, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, John C. Cunningham, Senior Litigation Counsel, Briena L. Strippoli, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcelino Sulekopa Papa, a native and citizen of Equatorial Guineau, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal.

Papa first challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable fact-finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*
      *785502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Papa fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, he cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999) (citing *INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430-32, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987)). Finally, we uphold the finding below that Papa failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Equatorial Guineau. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2010).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
# Arbitration Archives - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

- Becoming a Labor Arbitrator – Fall 2024 – Online! Instructors:  Arbitrator Sheila Mayberry, Arbitrator Martin Malin, and FMCS Director of Arbitration Arthur Pearlstein Dates: For this virtual course, please note all times referenced are EASTERN time. August 12,  3:00- 4:30pm: Online Orientation Meeting August 19- September 20, 2024: Weekly Reading, Videos, &amp; Discussion Board Assignments September 23-27 11am – 5:00pm EST: Live Webinar Please [...]The post Becoming a Labor Arbitrator &#8211; Fall 2024 &#8211; Online! appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
- Becoming a Labor Arbitrator -IN PERSON! University of Nevada -Las Vegas Jan. 2025 Instructors:  Arbitrators Jeanne Charles and Howell Lankford with FMCS Director of Arbitration Arthur Pearlstein Date:  January 13-17, 2025 Time: Monday-Thursday, 8:30 am-4:30 pm; Friday 8:30 am- 1 pm Cost: $3,000 Once your bio has been approved you will receive a link with directions to pay online.   Training Location: UNLV- Boyd School of Law 4505 S Maryland [...]The post Becoming a Labor Arbitrator -IN PERSON! University of Nevada -Las Vegas Jan. 2025 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3119 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with 

respect to functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3119 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Emergency 

3 Leadership Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE5 TARIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 203 of 

7 the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

11 functions, including— 

12 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra13 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup14 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re15 sponse, and restoration; and 

16 ‘‘(B) upon request of a State, local, or 

17 tribal government or energy sector entity, and 

18 in consultation with other Federal agencies as 

19 appropriate, provision of technical assistance, 

20 support, and response capabilities with respect 

21 to energy security threats, risks, and inci22 dents.’’. 

23 (b) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

24 ensure that the functions of the Secretary described in sec25 tion 203(a)(12) of the Department of Energy OrganizaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:20 Jul 21, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3119.RFS H3119

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3119 RFS

1 tion Act (as added by this Act) are performed in coordina2 tion with relevant Federal agencies. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"id":10,"count":79,"description":"","link":"\/category\/commissioners\/maffei\/","name":"Maffei","slug":"maffei","taxonomy":"category","parent":7,"meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/10"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/7"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3276 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3276

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
   to repeal certain disclosure requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2021

 Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
   to repeal certain disclosure requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Information for 
Investors Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Dodd-Frank.--The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by repealing--
                    (A) subsection (b) of section 953;
                    (B) section 1502;
                    (C) section 1503; and
                    (D) section 1504; and
            (2) in the table of contents for the Act, by striking the 
        items relating to section 1502, 1503, and 1504.
    (b) Securities Exchange Act of 1934.--Section 13 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended--
            (1) by repealing subsections (p) and (q); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (r) as subsection (p).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON FINANCIAL
                         STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT


The Board of Directors
BHA Group Holdings, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated October 31, 2003 included the related
financial statement schedule as of September 30, 2003 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended September 30, 2003, included in the 2003 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-58782) on Form S-8 of BHA Group Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated October
31, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2003,
and the related schedule, which reports are included in the September 30, 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-K of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.

Our report, dated October 31, 2003, on the consolidated financial statements
described above refers to the change in the method of accounting for goodwill
and other intangible assets effective October 1, 2001.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City Missouri
November 11, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-46559, 33-46561, 33-46563, 33-46573, 33-68806, 33-68808, 33-62631and 33-62633
of Elcotel,  Inc. on Forms S-8, of our report dated June 11, 1999,  appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Elcotel,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  for the year
ended March 31, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Tampa, Florida
June 27, 1999
EXHIBIT 10.5

NETZERO, INC.  AMENDMENT TO STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is dated as of April 8, 1999, between Ronald T. Burr ("Founder") and
NetZero, Inc. (the "Company"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to them in that certain Stock Restriction Agreement dated as of
September 11, 1998 (the "Agreement"), between Founder and the Company.

In
consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:





---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

| |  | NETZERO, INC.                  
| |  | -------------------------------
| |  | By:                            
| |  | /s/RONALD T. BURRRonald T. Burr

---

QuickLinks
73 A.3d 522

#### Freddy McCUTCHEN, Petitioner v. Mike WENEROWICZ, Respondent.

No. 71 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 31, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
HAROLD Y. SPECTOR, CPA SPECTOR & ASSOCIATES, LLP 70 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE STEVEN M. SPECTOR, CPA Certified Public Accountants SUITE  630 (888) 584-5577 PASADENA, CA 91101 FAX  (626) 584-6447 admin@swdcpa.com    To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
 of Pacific Alliance Corporation  We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Alliance Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pacific Alliance Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/Spector & Associates, LLPPasadena, CAApril 14, 2010
#### Jennifer WALTER, Administrator of the ESTATE OF Janet H. GARFIELD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-15664.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*229Submitted Nov. 4, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 12, 2010.

Ian Michael Sammis, Esquire, Ian M. Sammis, Esq., San Rafael, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Donna Wade Anderson, Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for DefendantAppellee.

Before: THOMAS and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and SETTLE, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Benjamin Hale Settle, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner. Jennifer Walter has presented no evidence of claimant Janet Garfield’s mental incapacity during the sixty-day period following the Appeals Council’s 1997 decision, see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Social Security Ruling (SSR) 91-5p, 1991 WL 208067, at * 1, and has shown neither a nexus between the Commissioner’s alleged fraudulent concealment and her inability to *230file suit in a timely manner, as is required for equitable estoppel, nor an inability to obtain vital information bearing on the existence of her claim during the tolling period, as is required for equitable tolling, *see Huseman v. Icicle Seafoods,*471 F.3d 1116, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2006). We also affirm the district court’s decision not to exercise its mandamus jurisdiction over Walter’s complaint because the Commissioner has no “clear nondiseretionary duty” to reopen lapsed claims, *Johnson v. Shalala,*2 F.3d 918, 924 (9th Cir.1993) (internal quotation mark omitted) (quoting *Briggs v. Sullivan,*886 F.2d 1132, 1142 (9th Cir.1989)). Walter’s argument that the Special Disability Workload (SDW) process created a “clear nondiseretionary duty” for the Commissioner to reopen Garfield’s claim fails because Garfield was never eligible for the SDW.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"id":1506,"date":"2011-04-08T14:55:21","date_gmt":"2011-04-08T18:55:21","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1506"},"modified":"2018-08-17T14:57:21","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T18:57:21","slug":"the-honorable-michael-a-khouris-keynote-address-at-the-2011-ncbfaa-annual-conference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/the-honorable-michael-a-khouris-keynote-address-at-the-2011-ncbfaa-annual-conference\/","title":{"rendered":"The Honorable Michael A. Khouri’s Keynote Address at the 2011 NCBFAA Annual Conference"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>April 8, 2011<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/NCBFAA_2011_Annual_Meeting.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 8, 2011 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1507,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506\/revisions\/1507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         306
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               306
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       780
<OTHER-SE>                                     276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1056
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1025)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.0)



</TABLE>