alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christopher DEROUSELLE, Petitioner-Appellant v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-30734

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 28, 2008.

Christopher Derouselle, Angola, LA, pro se.

Zata Walker Ard, District Attorney’s Office for the Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Derouselle, Louisiana prisoner #254414, appeals the dismissal as time barred of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his murder conviction. He argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the limitations period because he diligently pursued postconviction relief. Specifically, he contends that the seven-month delay between the filing of his state habeas application and his written inquiry to the state court about its status does not militate against a finding of “diligence” on his part in determining whether he is entitled to equitable tolling.

Derouselle bears the burden of proof concerning equitable tolling and must demonstrate “rare and exceptional circumstances” warranting its application. *Alexander v. Cockrell,*294 F.3d 626, 629 (5th Cir.2002). To establish an entitlement to equitable tolling, he must show (1) that he pursued his habeas rights diligently and (2) some “‘extraordinary circumstance’” prevented him from effecting a timely filing. *Howland v. Quarterman,*507 F.3d *321840, 845 (5th Cir.2007) (quoting *Lawrence v. Florida,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1079, 1085, 166 L.Ed.2d 924 (2007)), *petition for cert. filed,*(Mar. 20, 2008) (No. 07-10121).

Derouselle waited seven months after he purportedly filed his state habeas application before inquiring about its status in September 2002. Furthermore, regardless whether he received the state court’s November 2002 correspondence informing him that he had no state application pending before it, Derouselle’s next correspondence with the state court did not come until seven months after his September 2002 correspondence, when he moved to supplement his postconviction application. Notably, the one-year limitations period had already expired by that time. He then waited an additional two months after the Louisiana Supreme Court denied writs before filing the instant § 2254 petition. Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in holding that Derouselle did not act with the diligence required to entitle him to equitable tolling. *Cf. Howland,*507 F.3d at 846; *Fisher v. Johnson,*174 F.3d 710, 713 (5th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Stephen G. DEES, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 10-6195.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 28, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 9, 2010.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Diana Pereira, Research and Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*742Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen G. Dees appeals the district court’s order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). Dees asserts that the district court erred in concluding that he posed a substantial risk of danger to others as a result of his mental disorder. Finding no error, we affirm.

After a hearing, the district court found by clear and *convincing*evidence that Dees “is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Dees met this standard. *United States v. LeClair,*338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir.2003) (stating standard of review); *see United States v. Robinson,*404 F.3d 850, 856 (4th Cir.2005) (reviewing for clear error court’s decision regarding defendant’s competency to stand trial and citing *United States v. Cox,*964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir.1992)); *see also United States v. Harvey,*532 F.3d 326, 336-37 (4th Cir.2008) (stating that a finding is clearly erroneous “when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Simex Technologies, Inc.,certifies that the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Simex Technologies, Inc.at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madesolely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications containedin Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).      /s/ Kjell I. Jagelid Kjell I. Jagelid  Chief Executive Officer   
Date: August 23, 2004
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD JILES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2352

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 432012CF000648AXMX.

Richard Jiles, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Cruise Passenger Assistance - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kiaCK6c5l8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/cruise-service-issues\/\">Cruise Passenger Assistance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/complaints-and-assistance\/cruise-service-issues\/embed\/#?secret=kiaCK6c5l8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cruise Passenger Assistance” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"kiaCK6c5l8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Cruise Service Issues There is no federal government agency that regulates cruise customer service issues (e.g. itinerary changes, passenger cancellations, cabin concerns, etc.). Moreover, the Commission has limited jurisdiction over cruise lines (pursuant to 46 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 44102 \u2013 44103) that embark passengers at locations in the U.S.: The Commission\u2019s Office of Consumer Affairs & Dispute [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Daniel B. Maffei on Passage of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TgR8gQZf2G\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-daniel-b-maffei-on-passage-of-the-ocean-shipping-reform-act-of-2022\/\">Statement of Daniel B. Maffei on Passage of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-daniel-b-maffei-on-passage-of-the-ocean-shipping-reform-act-of-2022\/embed\/#?secret=TgR8gQZf2G\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Daniel B. Maffei on Passage of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"TgR8gQZf2G\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"David Eng","title":"Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TcsOaPVGsE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/articles\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter-2\/\">Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/articles\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter-2\/embed\/#?secret=TcsOaPVGsE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"TcsOaPVGsE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Maritime Commission has published on its website an update to Decisions of the Federal Maritime Commission, Second Series (Volume 7). This publication provides a compendium of Initial and Final Decisions of the Commission and selected other orders that may be significant or establish legal precedent. The volume now incorporates the period of June […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6421

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICKY LEE VANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-22, CA-97-316-R)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lee Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Vance seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), his motion for reconsideration, and his motion to

amend. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Vance, Nos. CR-94-22; CA-97-

316-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 1998). We decline to consider Vance’s

claims that were raised for the first time on appeal. See Spencer

v. Murray, 5 F.3d 758, 762 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding that petitioner

cannot raise claims for the first time on appeal absent a showing

of cause and prejudice or actual innocence). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, David Walke, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of FIND/SVP, Inc.;  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):  a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Date: November 10, 2004
 
 **/s/ David Walke**
 David Walke
 Chief Executive Officer
 40
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON FINANCIAL
                         STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
BHA Group Holdings, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated November 11, 1998 included the
related financial statement schedule as of September 30, 1998 and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, included in the
1998 annual report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-58782) on Form S-8 of BHA Group Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated November
11, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, and the related
schedule, which reports are included in the September 30, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of BHA Group Holdings, Inc.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Kansas City Missouri
December 29, 1998



<PAGE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants August 21, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WTtMKNrD7q\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-21-2023\/\">Applicants August 21, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-21-2023\/embed\/#?secret=WTtMKNrD7q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants August 21, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"WTtMKNrD7q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}