alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"August 2023 Revocations & Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AKbAVacDc3\"><a href=\"\/oti\/august-2023-revocations-surrenders\/\">August 2023 Revocations & Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/august-2023-revocations-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=AKbAVacDc3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“August 2023 Revocations & Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"AKbAVacDc3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JirkaRysavy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  August 2, 2004 | /s/  Jirka Rysavy                     |   |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Jirka  Rysavy                         |
|                            | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7035

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY PRESTON ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-91-11-ST-MU, CA-94-83-5-MU)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Breimann, Jr., STREET, STREET, STREET, SCOTT & BOWMAN,

Grundy, Virginia, for Appellant. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adams, Nos. CR91-11-ST-MU; CA-94-83-5-MU (W.D.N.C. May 31, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Christian R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO and Sheriff of San Mateo County, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-17747.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

Christian R. Williams, pro se.

David Abraham Silberman, Esquire, Deputy County Counsel, Redwood City, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Christian R. Williams, who is civilly committed in the State of California, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations against the County of San Mateo and the San Mateo Sheriffs Department (collectively, “the County”), including challenges to conditions of his confinement. *112We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. *Jones v. Blanas,*393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court examined Williams’s various conditions of confinement claims under the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference standard. Because Williams is civilly committed, and not a prisoner, the correct legal standard, as set out by this court in *Jones v. Blanas,*is that of substantive due process. 393 F.3d at 932 (holding a civil detainee under conditions similar to or more restrictive than the conditions imposed on criminal detainees constituted “punishment,” and therefore violated the civil detainee’s Fourteenth Amendment rights). In addition, neither the district court nor the County provided Williams with the information required under *Rand v. Rowland,*154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc). Further, contrary to defendants’ argument, Williams’s claims are not time barred because the applicable statute of limitations was tolled by California’s equitable tolling doctrine. *See Jones,*393 F.3d at 930. Because the district court applied the incorrect legal standard in granting the County’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Williams’s conditions of confinement claims, we vacate and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

The district court properly dismissed Williams’s remaining claims because he failed to show that the injuries he suffered were the result of. the County’s failure to train or an official policy or custom. *See City of Canton v. Harris,*489 U.S. 378, 385-87, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989). We affirm as to these claims.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Empresa S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, José Antonio de Almeida Filippo, Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 26, 2013



|       |  |                                                   
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ José Antonio de Almeida Filippo               
|Name:  |  | José Antonio de Almeida Filippo                   
|Title: |  | Executive Vice  President                        
|       |  | and Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"NOVEMBER 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SmLrMmDhCh\"><a href=\"\/november-2020-activity-report\/\">NOVEMBER 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/november-2020-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=SmLrMmDhCh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NOVEMBER 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SmLrMmDhCh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30908]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal-State Compacts between the Pueblos of Isleta, 
Laguna, Sandia, San Juan, Santa Ana, Santa Clara and Acoma and the 
State of New Mexico, which were executed on or about October 3, 2001.

DATES: This action is effective December 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240; (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: November 30, 2001.
Neal A. McCaleb,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 01-30908 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Update on Port Congestion Surcharges","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hlRzJuPJBb\"><a href=\"\/update-on-port-congestion-surcharges\/\">Update on Port Congestion Surcharges<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/update-on-port-congestion-surcharges\/embed\/#?secret=hlRzJuPJBb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Update on Port Congestion Surcharges” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"hlRzJuPJBb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,875,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,374,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,374,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          738,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,636,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,374,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,016,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,416,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                474,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               (340,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jay W. Hobson, Vice President, Finance and, Chief Financial Officer of
Oretech, Inc. ("Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

       o      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
              ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
              Exchange Commission ("Report"), fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
       o      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date:  February 16, 2004

/s/ Jay W. Hobson
-----------------
Jay W. Hobson
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Consent of Kevin Scott


I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 27th day of March, 2013
 
 
 “Kevin Scott”Name:
Kevin ScottTitle:
former P. Eng. and Principal Metallurgistand General Manager Vancouver Officefor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
 
 RPA Inc.55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com
#### NOLLMAN & CO. *v.*WENTWORTH LUNCH COMPANY.

APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 154.

Argued April 15, 1910.-

Decided April 18, 1910.

On the authority of *Toxaivay Hoteldpompany*v. *Smothers & Co. ',*216 U. S. 439, *held*that a- corporation engaged in a general restaurant *592business is not subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as engaged in manufacturing, printing, publishing, trading and mercantile pursuits.

This case involved the question whether a corporation principally or solely engaged in carrying on a general restaurant business comes within those classes of corporations which are subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 as engaged in manufacturing, printing, publishing, trading or mercantile pursuits.

*Mr. Maurice P. Davidson*for appellants and petitioners.

*Mr. Reno R. Billington*for appellee and respondent.

*Mr. William, C. Rosenberg,*by permission of the court, filed a brief as *amicus curice.-*

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment affirmed on the authority of *Toxaway Hotel Company*v. *Smothers & Co.,*decided February 21, 1910 (216 U. S. 439).1

1

 The pertinent part of the headnote in this case is as follows:

A corporation engaged principally in running hotels is not a corporation engaged principally in trading or mercantile pursuits, within the meaning of § 4, subs, *b,*of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898.

Where' Congress has not expressly declared a word to have' a particular meaning, it will be presumed to have used the word in its well-understood public and judicial meaning, and cases based on a declaration made by Parliament that the word has a certain meaning are not in point in determining the intent of .Congress in using the word.

An qccupation that is not trading is not a mercantile pursuit.

A corporation not otherwise amenable to the Bankruptcy Act does not become so because it incidentally engages in mercantile pursuit; and so held as to a hotel company which, in addition to inn-keeping in which it was principally engaged, conducted a small store as an 'incident to its hotel business.