alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01065
- CR
ARTHUR FRANKLIN MILL ER, JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 81265
- 2013



### O RDER Before the Court are two motions filed by appellant on January 29, 2015.
The Court GRANTS A ppellant’s Motion to Permit Current Counsel to Withdraw on Appeal and Substitute New Counsel on Appeal. We DIRECT t he Clerk to remove Lori Ordiway as appellant’s attorney of record, and to substitute H. Jay Ethington , Cody L. Skipper , and Mark H. Nancarrow as attorneys of record for appellant.
The Court DENIES Appellant’s Motion for Court to Reconsider Setting Appeal f or Submission Without Oral Argument. The appeal will be submitted without oral argument on March 31, 2015, to a panel consisting of Justice Lang, Justice Stoddart, and Justice Schenck, per the Clerk’s Notice of January 15, 2015 in this cause. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.8./s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Briefed on Supply Chain Innovation Team Launch and Seeks Comment on Two Rulemakings","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PigtBftUi2\"><a href=\"\/fmc-briefed-on-supply-chain-innovation-team-launch-and-seeks-comment-on-two-rulemakings\/\">FMC Briefed on Supply Chain Innovation Team Launch and Seeks Comment on Two Rulemakings<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-briefed-on-supply-chain-innovation-team-launch-and-seeks-comment-on-two-rulemakings\/embed\/#?secret=PigtBftUi2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Briefed on Supply Chain Innovation Team Launch and Seeks Comment on Two Rulemakings” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"PigtBftUi2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Wendy EFFENDY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70154.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

*195Houman Varzandeh, Esq., VHF Law Group, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Wendy Effendy, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Abebe v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 1037, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Effendy established changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the delay in filing his asylum application beyond the one-year deadline. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Effendy’s asylum claim.

Based on the different names, birth dates, and places of birth that Effendy presented in his Indonesian passports and in his child’s birth certificate, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003) *196(upholding adverse credibility finding where inconsistencies went to key elements of the asylum claim, including identity); *Pal v. INS,*204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000) (“At the very least, the record does not compel the opposite conclusion.”). Accordingly, in the absence of credible testimony, Effendy’s withholding of removal claim fails. *See Fatah,*348 F.3d at 1156.

Effendy fails to raise any substantive challenge to the denial of his CAT claim. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not addressed in the argument portion of a brief are deemed waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B ENERGY GROWTH FUND, L.P. G-2
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000801582
<NAME>              P-B ENERGY GROWTH FUND, L.P. G-2
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1995

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1995

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1995

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          4,492

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   9

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,501

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,501

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           390

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      4,111

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,501

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"JUNE 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hwGAqTF4cn\"><a href=\"\/june-2021-activity-report\/\">JUNE 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/june-2021-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=hwGAqTF4cn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“JUNE 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"hwGAqTF4cn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


International Uranium (USA) Corporation; Notice or Consideration 
of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operation Licenses, ProposedNo 
Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, Opportunity for a 
Hearing; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of issuance; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on December 11, 2001 (66 FR 64064), that considers issuance of 
notice of opportunity for hearing issued to the International Uranium 
(USA) Corporation. This action is necessary to correct an erroneous 
text.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William von Till, Fuel Cycle 
Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office 
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, telephone (301) 415-6251.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 64064, in the third column, in the 
first complete paragraph, the text is changed from ``The U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposes to accept the license amendment 
for the NRC Materials License SUA-1358 to authorize the licensee, 
International Uranium (USA) Corporation (IUSA), to allow for the and 
reclamation of the White Mesa uranium mill, located near Blanding, 
Utah,'' to read, ``The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
proposes to accept the license amendment for the NRC Materials License 
SUA-1358 to authorize the licensee, International Uranium (USA) 
Corporation (IUSA), to allow for the receipt and processing of 
alternate feed material, from the Molycorp facility located in Mountain 
Pass, California, at the White Mesa uranium mill, located near 
Blanding, Utah.'' Also, on page 64065 in the second column, in the 
fifth complete paragraph the text is changed from ``The NRC staff has 
prepared an Environmental Assessment for the proposed reclamation plan 
for NRC Source Material License SUA-1358,'' to read, ``The NRC staff 
has prepared an Environmental Assessment to assess the potential 
environmental impacts of allowing for the receipt and processing of 
alternate feed material, from the Molycorp facility located in Mountain 
Pass, California, for NRC Source Material License SUA-1358.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of December, 2001.
Melvyn N. Leach,
Chief, Fuel Cycle Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and 
Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 01-31156 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy Alberto RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10615

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 17, 2010.

Wifredo A. Ferrer, Andrea G. Hoffman, Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rudy Alberto Rodriguez, Big Spring, TX, pro se.

*409Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rudy Alberto Rodriguez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro *se,*appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 38 and his related post-trial motion for discovery. On April 26, 2006, a jury in the Southern District of Florida found Rodriguez guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least five hundred grams but less than five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. On December 30, 2009, Rodriguez filed a *pro se*motion for a new trial under Rule 33, based on his claim of newly discovered evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. At that time, he also filed a *pro se*motion for discovery related to the alleged misconduct.1 The district court denied both motions, and Rodriguez now appeals.

We review a district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Garcia,*13 F.3d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir.1994). We also review a district court’s denial of a post-trial motion for discovery for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Espinosa-Hernandez,*918 F.2d 911, 913 (11th Cir.1990). *“Pro se*pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by attorneys and will, therefore, be liberally construed.” *Tannenbaum v. United States,*148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir.1998).

Rule 33 states that “[a]ny motion for a new trial grounded on newly discovered evidence must be filed within 3 years after the verdict or finding of guilty.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Rodriguez filed his motion for a new trial more than three years after the jury found him guilty. We therefore conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez’s untimely motion for a new trial and his related post-trial motion for discovery.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Although Rodriguez’s motions were not received by the district court until January 5, 2010, we consider them filed on December 30, 2009, because they were executed, and presumably delivered to prison authorities for mailing, on that day. *See Williams v. McNeil,*557 F.3d 1287, 1290 n. 2 (11th Cir.2009) ("Under the ‘prison mailbox rule,’ a *pro se*prisoner’s court filing is deemed filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing.”).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Unveils Plan for Data Collection Initiative Mandated by OSRA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ISF4n7j84i\"><a href=\"\/fmc-unveils-plan-for-data-collection-initiative-mandated-by-osra\/\">FMC Unveils Plan for Data Collection Initiative Mandated by OSRA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-unveils-plan-for-data-collection-initiative-mandated-by-osra\/embed\/#?secret=ISF4n7j84i\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Unveils Plan for Data Collection Initiative Mandated by OSRA” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ISF4n7j84i\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Order entered July 3 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00183

- CV

SANTOS NAVARRO ROSAL ES, Appellant

V.

LONE STAR CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATI ON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 14021



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 27, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time

to file his reply brief. We GRANT the motion . We ORDER the reply brief tendered to this

Court by appellant on July 1, 2019 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK ALAN DUGAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 326 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification
is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: July 28, 2006 |  | /s/ John M. Thompson         
|                     |  | John M. Thompson             
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-95657 and No. 333-148383 on Forms S-8 and No. 333-132288 and No. 333-112472 on Forms S-3 of Parlux Fragrances, Inc. (the Company), of our report dated July 5, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company, and of our report on internal control over financial reporting dated July 5, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008.







/s/ Rachlin LLP



Miami, Florida



June 5, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-39,644]


A-1 Manufacturing Inc.; Garment Corporation of America; 
Brilliant, AL; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on July 16, 2001 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at A-1 Manufacturing, Inc., Brilliant, 
Alabama.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-39,204, as amended). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Dated: Signed in Washington, DC this 13th day of August, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31138 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M