alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 53532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): November 16, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 9, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 373 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-22, CP2018-
44.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-24763 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of Bioaccelerate, Inc. (the
"Company") for the three months ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Basil
Parker, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                        /s/ Basil Parker
                        -----------------------------
                        Basil Parker
                        President and Director
                        April 29, 2004
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Chairman Michael A. Khouri Puerto Nuevo Terminals LLC Cooperative Working Agreement, FMC No. 201292","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AMmTMPfAI1\"><a href=\"\/statement-chairman-khouri-puerto-nuevo-terminals-llc\/\">Statement of Chairman Michael A. Khouri Puerto Nuevo Terminals LLC Cooperative Working Agreement, FMC No. 201292<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-chairman-khouri-puerto-nuevo-terminals-llc\/embed\/#?secret=AMmTMPfAI1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Chairman Michael A. Khouri Puerto Nuevo Terminals LLC Cooperative Working Agreement, FMC No. 201292” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"AMmTMPfAI1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Chander Kaur NARANG; Shantanu Narang, Petitioners, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-71700.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2015.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2016.

Mohinder Singh, Alamo, CA, for Petitioner,

Oil, David Schor, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and DAVIS,** Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Andre M. Davis, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Chander Narang petitions on behalf of herself and Shantanu Narang, her son, for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial of their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

1. The BIA’s decision was supported by substantial individualized evidence. *See Singh v. Holder,*753 F.3d 826, 832-33 (9th Cir.2014). It follows that the determination that the government rebutted Petitioners’ well-founded fear of future persecution in India was also supported by substantial evidence. *See id.*at 832.

2. The Immigration Judge (IJ) committed no due process violation when he accepted the government’s untimely brief. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1012 (9th Cir.2010), *as amended*(noting that an untimely brief may be considered).

3. The due process claim predicated on the IJ’s failure to make separate findings on Petitioners’ requests for asylum, withholding of removal and CAT relief is unavailing. We review the BIA decision, and the BIA reviewed each request for relief separately. *See Vitug v. Holder,*723 F.3d 1056, 1062 (9th Cir.2013).

4. Finally, there is no viable due process claim predicated on the IJ’s bias. A biased IJ is one who does not allow a petitioner to fully testify or present evidence supporting her claims. *See Reyes-Melendez v. INS,*342 F.3d 1001, 1006 (9th *730Cir.2003). Nothing in the record reflects any such bias.

5. The BIA’s decision to deny Petitioners’ CAT claim is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioners failed to establish that it was more likely than not that they would be subjected to torture if returned to India. *See Sowe v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1281, 1288 (9th Cir.2008).

PETITION DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### QUOC XUONG LUU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. BABCOCK, Lieutenant; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-15704.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Quoc Xuong Luu, pro se.

*142Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Quoc Xuong Luu, a former California prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

After giving Luu specific notice of the deficiencies in Luu’s original complaint and giving leave to submit an amended complaint, the district court properly dismissed Luu’s due process claim concerning his temporary loss of prison privileges because Luu failed to allege facts implicating a protected liberty interest. *See Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (protected liberty interest arises only when a restraint exceeds an inmate’s sentence in “an unexpected manner” or imposes “atypical, significant deprivation on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life”). The district court properly dismissed the remaining claims because Luu did not allege facts sufficient to show that the defendants deprived him of a constitutional right. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (to violate the Eighth Amendment “a prison official’s act or omission must result in the denial of ‘the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities’ ” (quoting *Rhodes v. Chapman,*452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981))); *Serrano v. Francis,*345 F.3d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir.2003) (to state equal protection claim, plaintiff must show that defendants acted with an intent or purpose to discriminate against him based upon his membership in a protected class).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
I, Linden Boyne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quaterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bioaccelerate Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 15, 2003





                                       /s/ Linden Boyne
                                       -----------------------
                                       Linden Boyne
                                       Secretary and Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Freedom of Information Act Requests and Reports - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DNtF1rDWdK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/freedom-of-information-act-requests-reports\/\">Freedom of Information Act Requests and Reports<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/freedom-of-information-act-requests-reports\/embed\/#?secret=DNtF1rDWdK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Freedom of Information Act Requests and Reports” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DNtF1rDWdK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) generally provides that any person has right to obtain access to federal agency records, except to the extent that such records (or portions of them) are protected from public disclosure. The Federal Maritime Commission proactively makes a great deal of information available to the public, reducing the need […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended March 31,
         2006, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Andrew A. Campbell
                                          Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

Date: May 10, 2006

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7119-9]


Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits Superfund Site Notice of Proposed De 
Minimis Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed de minimis settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(g)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) has offered a de minimis settlement under an 
Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) to settle claims for past and 
future response costs at the Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits Superfund Site 
(Site) located in Whitehouse, Duval County, Florida. Forty-two (42) 
parties have returned signature pages accepting EPA's settlement offer. 
EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty 
(30) days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement 
should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate 
the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA 
Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, 
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887.
    Written comments may be submitted to Mr. Ray Strickland at the 
above address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: November 28, 2001.
Franklin E. Hill,
Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 01-31242 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAMAR HAYMES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 487 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2021, the Application for Leave to File

Amendment to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Petition for Allowance 

of Appeal is DENIED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3097]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 01-2031) published on page 
7490 of the issue for Tuesday, January 23, 2001.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of New York heading, the entry for 
Financial Institutions, Inc., Warsaw, New York, is revised to read as 
follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York(Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Financial Institutions, Inc., Warsaw, New York; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of and merge with Bath National 
Corporation, Bath, New York, and thereby indirectly acquire Bath 
National Bank, Bath, New York. Applicant also has applied to exercise 
an option to purchase up to 13 percent of the voting shares of Bath 
National Bancorp, Bath, New York.
    Comments on this application must be received by February 16, 2001.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 1, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3097 Filed 2-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Team Finance LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K
(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, H. Lynn Massingale, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)
The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    H. LYNN MASSINGALE,
M.D.H. Lynn Massingale, M.D.Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 12, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Seeks Comments on Interpretative Rule NPRM","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ba1TcqLW7L\"><a href=\"\/fmc-seeks-comments-on-interpretative-rule-nprm\/\">FMC Seeks Comments on Interpretative Rule NPRM<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-seeks-comments-on-interpretative-rule-nprm\/embed\/#?secret=Ba1TcqLW7L\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Seeks Comments on Interpretative Rule NPRM” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Ba1TcqLW7L\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}