alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the
Managing Owner of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund (the Fund), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                    |  |  |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                    |  |  |  | Principal Financial Officer
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2006-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








|Dated: March 30, 2016 | By: | /s/ Barbara Garafalo                                      | 
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     | Barbara Garafalo                                          | 
|                      |     | Vice President                                            | 
|                      |     | (senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization) |
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 24, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00195

- CR

IN RE Elwin Roberto ORTIZ LAGOS

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On March 6, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay. Because relator has obtained the requested relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The stay imposed on Ma rch 8, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on May 24, 2023

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of May, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This pro ceeding arises out of Cause No. 11126CR , styled State of Texas v. Elwin Roberto Ortiz Lagos , pending in the County Court
, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth and the Honorable Susan D. Reed presiding.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Temporary Adjustments in FMC Operations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3EYKYk1Siv\"><a href=\"\/temporary-adjustments-in-fmc-operations\/\">Temporary Adjustments in FMC Operations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/temporary-adjustments-in-fmc-operations\/embed\/#?secret=3EYKYk1Siv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Temporary Adjustments in FMC Operations” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3EYKYk1Siv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Action Fashions, Ltd., a Colorado
Corporation, nka Mexus Gold US (the “Company”) on Form 10-K A-1 for the year
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant
to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Paul D.
Thompson


Paul D.
Thompson


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


Principal
Accounting Officer





January
6, 2010
---

Exhibit 99.12

Consent of Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates
Inc.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of references to our name in connection with mineral
resource estimates for the New Afton Project, Mesquite Mine and Cerro San Pedro
Mine and to the use of information derived from the technical report entitled
Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada dated
December 31, 2009, the technical report entitled Technical Report on the
Mesquite Mine, Brawley, California dated February 26, 2010, and the technical
report entitled Technical Report on the Cerro San Pedro Mine, San Luis Potosí,
Mexico dated February 16, 2010, included in the Annual Information Form of New
Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2009 and we consent to the
incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2010.

SCOTT WILSON ROSCOE POSTLE ASSOCIATES INC.

|/s/ Richard J. Lambert                                                                        | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Richard J. Lambert                                                                     | 
|Title:    P.E. and Executive
    Vice-President of Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Guidance on License Renewals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mawPLW1hDu\"><a href=\"\/resources-services\/guidance-on-license-renewals\/\">Guidance on License Renewals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/resources-services\/guidance-on-license-renewals\/embed\/#?secret=mawPLW1hDu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Guidance on License Renewals” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"mawPLW1hDu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**PLS CPA, A Professional Corp.**

**t****4725 MERCURY STREET SUITE 210 t****SAN DIEGO t****CALIFORNIA 92111 t**
**t****TELEPHONE (858)722-5953 t****FAX (858) 761-0341  t****FAX (858) 764-5480**
**t****E-MAIL****changgpark@gmail.com********t**

June 15, 2011

***To Whom It May Concern:***

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form 10-K of Magnum Oil, Inc. (formerly PTM Publications Incorporated) of our report dated on June 15, 2011, with respect to the audited financial statements of Magnum Oil, Inc., included in Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2011.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PLS CPA

____________________________                                               

PLS CPA, A Professional Corp.

 

**Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants**

**Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board**
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – February 22, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kR1nwwjQTq\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-february-22-2019\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – February 22, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-february-22-2019\/embed\/#?secret=kR1nwwjQTq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – February 22, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"kR1nwwjQTq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Alfonso CHAVEZ-PLACENCIA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70726.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 21, 2008.

*483Victor D. Nieblas Pradis, City of Industry, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alfonso Chavez-Placencia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision ordering him removed and denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. *Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales,*468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006). We dismiss the petition for review in part and deny it in part.

We lack jurisdiction to review Chavez-Placencia’s contentions that his charging document provided inadequate notice, and that he is eligible for adjustment of status despite his conviction, as these contentions were not exhausted before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional).

We reject Chavez-Plaeencia’s contention that his conviction is not an aggravated felony barring him from cancellation of removal. *See Rendon v. Mukasey,*520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”). Chavez-Placencia’s plea agreement establishes that he pled guilty to felony “sale of marijuana.” *See Parrilla v. Gonzales,*414 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2005) (a plea colloquy transcript is a judicially noticeable document under the modified categorical approach described in *Shepard v. United States,*544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### German Exequiel SEGOVIA-ARANA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72576.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

Sarah J. Jones, Esquire, Law Office of Sarah J.M. Jones, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Linda Y. Cheng, Trial, Craig William Kuhn, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Elizabeth J. Stevens, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

German Exequiel Segovia-Arana, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Segovia-Arana’s fear of harm based on personal retribution did not demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future harm on account of a protected ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zaearias,*502 U.S. 478, 481-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

Because Segovia-Arana did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Segovia-Arana failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to El Salvador. *See Santos-Lemus,*542 F.3d at 748.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group
I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31,
2001 as  filed with  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, William Bosso,  President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  as  adopted  pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: January 22, 2004

                           /s/ William Bosso
                           -----------------------------
                           William Bosso, President
                           BF Acquisition Group I, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-065]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Negotiated Rate

December 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 4, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing a notice of change in the rates 
for the October 18, 2001 Negotiated Rate Agreement between Tennessee 
and NJR Energy Services which was accepted by the Commission in 
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 97 FERC para. 61,248 (2001). As agreed 
to in the November 30 Order, Tennessee states that it is providing 
notice of substitution of a fixed price effective December 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sec. 385.214 or Sec. 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31072 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P