alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

September 23, 2004

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

The certificationset forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commissionsolely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code.  Thiscertification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange actof 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the“Report”) accompanying this letter.

 

Sherman McKinniss, thePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Rotonics Manufacturing Inc.,and Douglas W. Russell, the Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary andTreasurer of Rotonics Manufacturing Inc., each certifies that:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Rotonics ManufacturingInc.

 

 
| /s/ SHERMAN  McKINNISS                                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Sherman  McKinniss                                          |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman of the Board |
|                                                        |
|                                                        |
| /s/ DOUGLAS  W. RUSSELL                                     |   |
| Douglas W.  Russell                                         |
| Chief Financial  Officer,  Assistant Secretary/Treasurer    |
|                                                             |        |  |

 

----
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00587

- CV Brian K. ALFARO , Pinnacle Partners Financial Corp., & Alfaro Oil & Gas, LLC, Appellants

v. Eugene HER R MANN , Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 12354 Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: Jan uary 1 1 , 2012
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellants Brian K. Alfaro, Pinnacle Partners Financial Corp., and Alfaro Oil & Gas, LLC appeal the trial court’s judgment signed July 14, 2011. On October 31, 2011, we ordered appellants to provide writte n proof to this court on or before November 10, 2011, that either (1) the reporter’s fee had been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the reporter had been made, or (2) they were entitled to the record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. We advised that if appellants did not respond, their brief would be due November 30, 2011, and we would consider04

- 11

- 00587

- CV

- 2

- only those issues or points raised that did not require a reporter’s record for a decision. Appellants did not provide the proof of payment nor establis h they were entitled to appeal without paying the fee. Appellants’ brief was therefore due November 30, 2011, raising only those issues that did not require a reporter’s record for a decision. Neither the brief nor an extension of time to file the brief was filed on or before November 30, 2011. Accordingly, on December 12, 2011, we ordered appellants to file, not later than December 22, 2011, the appellants’ brief and a written response reasonably explaining their failure to timely file the brief. We a dvised appellants that if they failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a). Appellants have not filed a brief or the written response ordered by the
court. We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that appellee, Eugene Herrmann, recover his costs in this appeal from appellants Brian K. Alfaro, Pinnacle Partners Financial Corp., and Alfaro Oil & Gas, LLC.

PER CURIAM
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  FOIA Requests
Home/Resources/Forms & Applications/FOIA Requests FOIA RequestsD2021-03-09T15:42:55-05:00						FOIA RequestsFOIA Requests are now being handled by FOIAExpress.
For more information, please visit our FOIA Information Page.ResourcesFMCS Calendar
Forms & Applications
Arbitration
Notice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)
FOIA Requests
Documents and Data
Multi-Media
FMCS 101 Video Series
Listen to the Conflict Resolutionary Podcast
Learn about the podcast
Episodes
Speeches & Presentations
FAQs Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Diversified Industries, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam Debard, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adam Debard


Adam Debard


Principal Accounting Officer





September 20, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mike JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30778

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2008.

Maurice Landrieu, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mike James, Oakdale, LA, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mike James, federal prisoner #29268-034, moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which challenged his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine hydrochlo*438ride with intent to distribute and possession of 500 grams or more of cocaine hydrochloride with intent to distribute. James contends that his indictment and judgment are flawed and that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. He also argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to file pretrial motions, by failing to investigate, and by failing to pursue a direct appeal. He contends that the district court erred by denying his § 2255 motion without first holding an evidentiary hearing. James also moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. James’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is granted.

James has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right regarding his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); *United States v. Tapp,*491 F.3d 263, 266 (5th Cir.2007). The record does not conclusively indicate whether James asked counsel to file a notice of appeal, making an evidentiary hearing on that issue necessary. *See Tapp,*491 F.3d at 266. A COA is granted solely on the issue whether counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal. The district court’s judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in relation to that claim.

James has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right in relation to his remaining issues. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 327, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Consequently, COA is denied as to those issues. *See id.*

COA GRANTED IN PART; COA DENIED IN PART; IFP GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"id":262,"date":"2018-04-23T16:23:57","date_gmt":"2018-04-23T20:23:57","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=262"},"modified":"2018-08-07T09:15:44","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T13:15:44","slug":"commission-to-examine-trucking-delivery-arrangements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-to-examine-trucking-delivery-arrangements\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission To Examine Trucking & Delivery Arrangements"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>April 23, 2018<\/div>\n<p>U.S. cargo owners have forwarded complaints to the Federal Maritime Commission claiming that some ocean carriers are unilaterally changing service contract terms by canceling the port\/container yard to final customer destination leg of the cargo shipment. These cancellations are allegedly due to lack of inland truck availability.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission\u2019s Bureau of Enforcement has initiated an expedited inquiry into these ocean carrier actions. Letters were sent last Friday, April 20th, to those shipping lines whose service contract actions have been called into question. In this inquiry, the Commission is seeking information that will assist in understanding the timing, fairness, and lawfulness of the alleged unilateral changes to ocean carriers\u2019 obligations for inland trucking services.<\/p>\n<p>Shipping lines receiving letters from the FMC are expected to provide their responses within 30 days.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 23, 2018 U.S. cargo owners have forwarded complaints to the Federal Maritime Commission claiming that some ocean carriers are unilaterally changing service contract terms by canceling the port\/container yard to final customer destination leg of the cargo shipment. These cancellations are allegedly due to lack of inland truck availability.... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-to-examine-trucking-delivery-arrangements\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":263,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262\/revisions\/263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
87 A.3d 806

#### Lafaye GASKINS, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 1 EM 2014.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 19, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
**Exhibit
31.1**      **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I,
Phillip Hamilton, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Diversified
      Industries, Inc.; 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report; 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report; 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have: a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared; b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting. 
 
 
 Date:
March 15, 2005
  By: /s/
Phillip Hamilton
 --------------------------------------------------
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
INTERLINQ Software Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-63388, 333-04558 and 333-21099) on Form S-8 of INTERLINQ Software
Corporation of our report dated August 3, 2001, relating to the balance sheets
of INTERLINQ Software Corporation as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2001, and the related schedule,
which report appears in the June 30, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of
INTERLINQ Software Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
September 26, 2001
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Action Fashions, Ltd., a Colorado
Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Susie
Johnson


Susie
Johnson


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer





June 25,
2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBig Cat Energy Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period end ofOctober 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Timothy Barritt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14thday of March, 2008.

TIMOTHY BARRITTTimothy BarrittPresident and Chief Executive Officer










































---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7161

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM R. ABBOTT, a/k/a Rusty Abbott, a/k/a panther_one@yahoo.com, a/k/a 

bigruss912@hotmail.com,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cr-00214-RGD-JEB-1)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William R. Abbott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William R. Abbott appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Abbott, 

No. 2:07-cr-00214-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2020). We deny Abbott’s motion to 

expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NEWS RELEASE

Friday, November 13, 2015 Contact: John Arnold

For Immediate Release Director of Public Affairs

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8100

FMCS Announces Labor-Management Grants

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) today 

announced it has awarded eight grants totaling $751,055 to support cooperative initiatives by 

labor-management groups nationwide to support their innovative approaches to workplace issues 

as well as best practices in labor relations.

“We are pleased to announce this year’s grant program recipients, which represent potentially 

model projects and strong leadership for similar labor-management cooperation and 

collaboration efforts throughout the country. Among the most important grants we award are 

those addressing relationship building and communication between labor and management for 

projects that benefit a facility, a community, or a region in a way that others can emulate,” said 

FMCS Director Allison Beck.

Through the years, the FMCS grants program has helped labor and management

groups nationwide develop creative conflict resolution projects that improve cooperation and 

enhance organizational effectiveness. “This year’s grantees represent a diverse range of projects, 

involving both the public and private sector, including the service, health care, manufacturing 

and construction industries. We are pleased to see the emphasis on innovation in addressing joint 

problems among our applicants, and we look forward to working with these labor-management 

groups in achieving the worthwhile goals they have set for themselves,” the FMCS Director said.

The grants program, which began in 1981 under the authority of the Labor-Management 

Cooperation Act of 1978 (PL 95-524), has funded a broad range of projects designed to address a 

specific workplace, industry or community problem through joint processes. Collaborative 

efforts have enabled the parties to address critical issues, such as, safety, health care costs, skills 

development, training and the resolution of workplace disputes.

Applicants wishing to learn more about the FMCS labor-management grants program may call 

the FMCS Grants Office at 202-606-8181 or visit the agency’s website at www.FMCS.gov, 

where online summaries of the grant recipients’ projects are also available.

###

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government agency whose 

mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. Headquartered in Washington, DC, 

with 10 district offices and 67 field offices, the agency provides mediation and conflict resolution services to 

industry, government agencies and communities.