AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed December 28, 2022

In the 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00094
- CR No. 05
- 22
- 00095
- CR JESSICA NICOLE SHERE N , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 2020
- 1
- 0623, 2021
- 1
- 0630
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle Jessica Nicole Sheren app eals her convictions of two counts of misdemeanor family violence assault

. 1 After a bench trial, the trial court sentenced her to two hundred days’ confinement on each count, to run concurrently

. Ms. Sheren ’s attorney has filed a brief in which he conclud es Ms. Sheren ’s appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 2 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S.

1 S ee T EX

. P ENAL C ODE § 22.01(a).

2 Although counsel’s brief complied with Anders , it is unclear whether counsel complied with the requirements imposed by Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Regardless, the– 2

–

738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record and shows why there are no arguable grounds for an appeal. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders ). We advised Ms. Sheren of her right to file a pro se

response , and she has not filed a response

. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (T ex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to
Anders brief filed by counsel).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s d uty in
Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit, finding nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment.

220094f.u05 220095f.u05 Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)

Clerk of Court sent Ms. Sheren a letter, attaching copies of counsel’s brief and motion to withdraw, infor ming Ms. Sheren of her rights and addressing any deficiencies in counsel’s correspondence. Under these circumstances, any failure by counsel to comply with Kelly ’s requirements is harmless. /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
JESSICA NICOLE SHEREN, Appellant
No. 05

- 22

- 00094

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 1

- 0623. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Molberg and Partida

- Kipness participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.
Judgment entered this 28 th day of December , 2022

.– 4

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
JESSICA NICOLE SHEREN, Appellant
No. 05

- 22

- 00095

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 1

- 0630. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Molberg and Partida

- Kipness participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.
Judgment entered this 28 th day of December , 2022

.