alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.63

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                 E-MEDSOFT.COM
              2000 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AND STOCK BONUS PLAN

         The following provisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby
made a part of, that certain e-MedSoft.com 2000 Stock Option and Stock Bonus
Plan (the "Plan") of e-MedSoft.com, a Nevada corporation d/b/a Med Diversified,
Inc. ("MED"), adopted by the Board of Directors on October ____, 2001. All
capitalized terms in this Amendment, to the extent not otherwise defined
herein, shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.

                             CHANGE OF NAME OF PLAN

         The name of the Plan is hereby changed to "Med Diversified, Inc. 2000
Nonqualified Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan".

                     INCREASE IN NUMBER OF AVAILABLE SHARES

         Section 3 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Section
3 is hereby substituted in place thereof to provide as follows:

         "3.    SHARES RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE. The cumulative total number of
         shares which may be subject to options issued and outstanding under
         this Plan and for issuance as stock bonuses is limited to 17,000,000
         Shares. This amount automatically will be adjusted in accordance with
         Article 22 of this Plan. If an option is terminated, in whole or in
         part, for any reason other than its exercise, the Board may
         reallocate the shares subject to that option (or to the part thereof
         so terminated) to one or more other options or stock bonuses to be
         granted under this Plan."

         Except as expressly modified hereby, all other terms and provisions of
the Plan shall remain in full force and effect, are incorporated herein by this
reference, and shall govern the conduct of the Board; provided, however, to the
extent of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Plan and this
Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.

                                                     APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF
                                                     DIRECTORS OF E-MEDSOFT.COM
                                                     D/B/A MED DIVERSIFIED, INC.
                                                     EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 24, 2001
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (“the Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eran Broshy, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


**inVentiv
              Health Inc.**Date: November
              9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ ERANBROSHY**Eran
                Broshy****Chief
                Executive Officer**







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit
31.2


CERTIFICATION





I, James
J. Vincenzo, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we
have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors;




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.




Dated:
June 5, 2008





/s/ James J.
Vincenzo


James J. Vincenzo


Chief Financial Officer
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00604-CV Shelia M. Bazemo re, App ellant v. Curtis Car

ter, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126T H JUDICIAL DIST RICT NO. FM102420, HONORAB LE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESI DING The clerk ’s r eco rd was fil

ed o n Dec ember 2 0, 200 1, making Shel ia Bazem ore’s bri ef due on January

22, 20 02 . S he fa iled t o file a b rie f. On Fe bruary 12, 2002, t hi s Court’s clerk n ot if ie d Baz em ore that her bri

ef wa s overdue; the n

ot ic e wa rn ed tha t the Cou rt cou l d di sm i ss he r ap pe al f or want of prosecu tion if

sh e fai l ed to f i l e a br i ef by Fe br ua ry 22, 200 2. S he

ha s n ot f i l ed a b ri ef or otherwi se re spon ded. W e di sm i ss h er app eal f or wan t of pros ecuti

on. Tex . R. A

pp. P. 42 .3(b ).

Bea An n Sm ith, Justice Bef ore Chi ef J

ustice A boussie, Justices

B. A. Sm ith an d Yeakel Di sm i ss ed f or W an t of Pros ec ution File d: March 28, 20022

Do No t Publis

h
{"id":1449,"date":"2012-05-10T13:33:57","date_gmt":"2012-05-10T17:33:57","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1449"},"modified":"2018-08-17T13:36:04","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T17:36:04","slug":"statement-of-william-p-doyle-nominee-for-federal-maritime-commissioner-before-the-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation-united-states-senate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/statement-of-william-p-doyle-nominee-for-federal-maritime-commissioner-before-the-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation-united-states-senate\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement of William P. Doyle, Nominee for Federal Maritime Commissioner Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>May 10, 2012<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/Statement_of_FMC_Nominee_Doyle_5_10_12.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>May 10, 2012 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,25],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1449"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1449"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1450,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1449\/revisions\/1450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: David Berry v. Faith Temple Ministry International

Appellate case number: 01-19-00290-CV

Trial court case number: 1128507

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Appellant has filed two motions for emergency relief, one on May 15, 2019, and the second 

on May 28, 2019. The Court requested a response to the first motion.\

On May 20, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing an amended order 

reducing the supersedeas bond amount from $700,000.00 to $7,000.00. Both of appellant’s 

motions challenge the original order setting the supersedeas bond amount of $700,000.00. 

Because the bond is no longer set at that amount, appellant’s motions are denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __June 4, 2019______
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------


          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o     The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o     The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.

o     As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                       1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                       2
#### Rafael Garnica MARTINEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74052.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 15, 2008.

Deniz S. Arik, Stender & Pope, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Julie Pfluger, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*767Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioners’ appeal of an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioners’ applications for cancellation of removal.

As to lead petitioners (Garniea-Martinez, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] and Mendez-Antonio, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ]), a review of the administrative record and the response to the October 31, 2007 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision on hardship with respect to their cancellation of removal applications. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); *Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002); *Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir.2001); *Mamanee v. INS,*566 F.2d 1103 (9th Cir.1977). Accordingly, the court dismisses this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction as to the two lead petitioners.

As to the lead petitioners’ son ([ AXX-XXXXXX ]), a review of the administrative record and the response to the order to show cause demonstrates that there is substantial evidence to support the BIA’s decision that petitioner failed to establish that he has a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D); *Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, his petition for review is summarily denied because the questions raised by the petition are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FILED

March 6, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

VAN ADRIAN BARKER, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Sumner Chancery

VS. ) No. 96D-72

)

PATSY LOU (RANDOLPH) ) Appeal No.

SLEDD BARKER, ) 01A01-9704-CH-00192

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the court’s opinion for two reasons. First, the expenses

associated with the upkeep of the Gail Drive house were more than off-set by the

rental income from the house. Second, the increase in the value of the house was due,

not to Mr. Barker’s contributions to the maintenance of the house which were de

minimis, but to the appreciation in the value of real property in general.

_______________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-6
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-6


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2960 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2960

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an exception for 
certain qualified retired law enforcement officers to carry a concealed 
                    firearm, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2021

  Mr. Bacon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an exception for 
certain qualified retired law enforcement officers to carry a concealed 
                    firearm, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officers Safety 
COVID Extension Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CARRYING OF CONCEALED FIREARMS BY QUALIFIED RETIRED LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

    Section 926C of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State 
or any political subdivision thereof, an individual shall be a 
`qualified retired law enforcement officer' under subsection (c), for 
the calendar years 2021 and 2022, if such retired law enforcement 
officer meets the standards for qualification in firearms training for 
an active duty law enforcement officer to carry a firearm, as 
determined by the former agency of the individual, the State in which 
the individual resides, or if the State has not established such 
standards either a law enforcement agency within the State in which the 
individual resides or the standards used by a certified firearms 
instructor that is qualified to conduct a firearms qualification test 
for active duty officers in that State, at the expense of such 
individual, during the calendar year 2019.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jirka Rysavy,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:      August 11, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Jirka Rysavy                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jirka  Rysavy                                      |
|   | Chairman  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----