alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants May 1, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kg86tFHLhg\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-1-2020\/\">Applicants May 1, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-1-2020\/embed\/#?secret=kg86tFHLhg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants May 1, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"kg86tFHLhg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Karen A. Richardson, hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, that:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this statement is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Epiphany, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                           
|-------------- |  | --------------------------
|August 5, 2005 |  | /s/    KAREN A. RICHARDSON
|               |  | Karen A. Richardson       
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer   



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Kevin J. Yeaman, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, that:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this statement is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Epiphany, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 5, 2005 |  | /s/    KEVIN J. YEAMAN 
|               |  | Kevin J. Yeaman        
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 242 (Monday, December 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64962-64963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31004]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Availability of Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 
(DSEIS) For Proposed Changes to the Chickamauga Lock Project, Hamilton 
County, TN

AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corps of Engineers, Nashville District, and the Tennessee 
Valley Authority (Cooperating Agency) has prepared a Draft Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) to the 1995 Environmental Impact 
Statement titled Chickamauga Dam--Navigation Lock Project Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). This supplement is necessary to 
provide information unknown and not required at the time the FEIS was 
completed.

DATES: Written comments must be received by the Corps of Engineers on 
or before January 29, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on issues to be considered in the SEIS 
shall be mailed to: Wayne Easterling or Patty Coffey, Project Planning 
Branch, Nashville District Corps of Engineers, PO Box 1070 (PM-P), 
Nashville, Tennessee 37202-1070.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information concerning 
the notice, please contact Wayne Easterling, Environmental Team, (615) 
736-7847, or Patty Coffey, Environmental Team, (615) 736-7865.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. The intent of the Supplemental EIS is to 
provide National Environmental Policy Act coverage for the Chickamauga 
Lock project on issues that were unknown or not required when the 
original EIS was prepared. The original EIS for Chickamauga Lock was 
completed in 1995 and a Record of Decision signed in 1996. The original 
EIS considered four alternatives including no action (closing the 
existing lock), constructing a new 110  x  600 foot lock (preferred 
alternative), constructing a new 60  x  360 foot lock (replacement in 
kind) and constructing a new 75  x  400 foot lock. The SEIS now 
proposed will cover cumulative effects and compliance with section 106 
of the Historic Preservation Act. Coordination with the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service will include a Biological Assessment/Opinion for 
Endangered Species Act and a Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report.
    2. This notice serves to solicit comments from the public; federal, 
state and local agencies and officials; Indian

[[Page 64963]]

Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate 
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received by us will 
be considered during the preparation of this Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-31004 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-GF-M
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 10-0838

((((((((((((((((

Robinson & Harrison Poultry Co., Inc. 

v. 

Marcelo Galvan, et al.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The motion to abate, filed on June 30, 2011, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until **August 17, 2011**, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings.

Done at the City of Austin, this 8th day of July, 2011.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Michael Cruz, Deputy Clerk
#### Hana HILSENRATH and Oliver Hilsenrath, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CREDIT SUISSE (CS) and United Bank of Switzerland (UBS), Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-15230.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*302Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Hana Hilsenrath, Washington, DC, pro se.

Oliver Hilsenrath, Washington, DC, pro se.

Yohance Claude Edwards, Esquire, Trial, Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, CA, George Michael Garvey, Esquire, Munger, Tolies *&*Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hana Hilsenrath and Oliver Hilsenrath appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their action against Credit Suisse and the United Bank of Switzerland alleging that the banks failed to warn them through a product-warning label that the banks would not comply with the United States Constitution and its provisions to protect the constitutional right to property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is de novo, *Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.,*356 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order filed on January 10, 2008.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3197 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the 

City of Eunice, Louisiana, certain Federal land in Louisiana, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3197 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save the Liberty The3 atre Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 

7 Eunice, Louisiana. 

8 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en9 titled ‘‘Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and 

10 Preserve, Proposed Boundary Revision and Dis11 posal’’, numbered 467/168813, and dated December 

12 2020. 

13 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

14 the Secretary of the Interior. 

15 SEC. 3. LAND CONVEYANCE. 

16 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall 

17 convey to the City, by quitclaim deed and without consid18 eration, all right, title, and interest of the United States 

19 in and to the parcels of land described in subsection (b). 

20 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of land re21 ferred to in subsection (a) are Lots 5 and 6, less the North 

22 27 feet of Lot 5, Block 22, of the Original Townsite of 

23 Eunice, generally depicted as ‘‘Proposed Disposal Area’’ 

24 on the map. 
3 

•HR 3197 EH

1 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

2 and available for public inspection in the appropriate of3 fices of the National Park Service. 

4 SEC. 4. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS. 

5 Upon the conveyance to the City of the land described 

6 in section 3(b), the boundary of the Jean Lafitte National 

7 Historical Park and Preserve shall be adjusted to ex8 clude— 

9 (1) the conveyed land; and 

10 (2) Lots 7 and 8 of the Original Townsite of 

11 Eunice generally depicted as ‘‘Non-NPS in Current 

12 Boundary’’ on the map. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3197 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to 

land in Louisiana, and for other purposes. the City of Eunice, Louisiana, certain Federal
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         107,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,453
<PP&E>                                           8,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,087
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,727)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,355
<SALES>                                         12,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,750
<CGS>                                            5,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants December 5, 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9f5twefRhs\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-5-2022\/\">Applicants December 5, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-5-2022\/embed\/#?secret=9f5twefRhs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants December 5, 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9f5twefRhs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Jay THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-1911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.

Jay Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against the Department of Education. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’ motion for jurisdiction and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Thomas v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ.,*No. 8:13-cv-01375-DKC (D. Md. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *208materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Adolfo HEREDIA-ARROYO, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-60112

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 2010.

Orlando Mondragon, El Paso, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Thankful Townsend Vanderstar, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC, Luis Garcia, Immigration *&*Customs Enforcement Chief Counsel’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Respondent.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Adolfo Heredia-Arroyo (Heredia), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA found Heredia ineligible for cancellation of removal because his 1997 Texas conviction of possession of marijuana constituted an aggravated felony for purposes of immigration law.

Because none of Heredia’s Texas drug convictions were based upon the fact of a prior conviction, the BIA erred by determining that he had committed an aggravated felony and that, as a result, he was ineligible for cancellation of removal. *See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2577, 2580, 177 L.Ed.2d 68 (2010). Heredia’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order of the BIA is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to allow him to pursue cancellation of removal in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in *Carachuri-Rosendo.*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/   Daniel W. FairfaxDaniel W. FairfaxVice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2008
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, William Threadgill, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of STRATS(SM) Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2006-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.





Dated: March 29, 2013
By:  /s/ William ThreadgillWilliam ThreadgillPresident(senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization)
Order filed December 13, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00952-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF E.R.G., A CHILD, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-04728J

ORDER

This an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case from a decree of 

termination signed August 21, 2018. The clerk’s record was filed November 5, 

2018. The record reflects the notice of appeal was filed October 26, 2018. 

Appellant alleges she did not receive notice of the judgment until October 9, 

2018. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a, appellant must provide a 

written order signed by the trial court finding the date when appellant first either 
received notice or acquired actual knowledge the judgment was signed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 4.2(c); see also LDF Construction, Inc. v. Texas Friends of Chabad 

Lubavitch, Inc., 459 S.W.3d 720, 724 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no 

pet.) (the date must be established by competent proof and included in a written 

order signed by the trial judge). 

We have a record of appellant’s motion for new trial wherein appellant 

explained to the trial court that did she did not receive actual notice of the final 

decree in this case until October 9, 2018. During that hearing the trial court 

refrained from ruling on whether the motion for new trial was timely; thus, the trial 

court did not make the finding necessary for relief under Texas Rule of Civil 

Procedure 306a.The trial court, however, did state it would assume the motion was 

timely for the purpose of denying the motion. 

Accordingly, we order the trial court to hold a hearing and issue an order 

finding the date when appellant first either received notice or acquired actual 

knowledge that the order was signed. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

trial court’s order shall be filed with the clerk of this court by December 31, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan.