alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3167 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3167

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and 
Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, 
          as the ``George Henry White Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2021

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and 
Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, 
          as the ``George Henry White Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 
South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``George Henry White 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Henry White Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00420

- CR

Samuel Rochell Madison

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

o f Tarrant County (1407727D )

April 5 , 2018

Opinio n by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31179]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[FRL-7119-1]
RIN 2060-AJ79


Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Reformulated Gasoline 
Terminal Receipt Date

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of December 3, 2001, regarding 
establishment of a new compliance date for the reformulated gasoline 
program. This correction clarifies when and where a public hearing 
would be held if a hearing is requested.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this 
correction, contact Chris McKenna, Chemical Engineer, Office of 
Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs 
Division, at (202) 564-9037 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#107d737b757e7e713e7378627963507560713e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e78a848c82898986c9848f958e94a7829786c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In proposed rule FR Doc. 01-29777, beginning on page 60163 in the 
issue of December 3, 2001, make the following correction in the Dates 
section. On page 60163 in the 2nd column, replace the text,

    ``If a hearing is requested within 20 days of the date of 
publication of this document in the Federal Register, a hearing will be 
held on December 24, 2001 at the location indicated in the ADDRESSES 
section below.''

with the following text:

    ``If a hearing is requested no later than December 24, 2001, a 
hearing will be held at a time and place to be published in the Federal 
Register.''

    Dated: December 11, 2001.
Robert D. Brenner,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 01-31179 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Casey STUCKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Warden Lee Correctional Institution, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-6549.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 29, 2010.

Casey Stuckey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Casey Stuckey seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stuckey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Stuckey’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 99.4   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Peter Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ALDA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Peter Chen  Peter Chen Chief Financial Officer November 28


April 25

, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SOKO Fitness & Spa
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xia Yu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
February 3,
2010





By:  /s/ Xia
Yu


Name: Xia
Yu


Title:
Chief Financial Officer










This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Dispute Resolution Systems DesignD2016-11-01T17:33:19-04:00

## Dispute Resolution Systems Design

FMCS can assist your organization to design and develop a new alternative dispute resolution system or to refresh your current system so that it can manage both internal and external conflict sources. Leveraging labor-management organizational expertise with the dispute resolution experience of the FMCS, an effective dispute resolution system will enhance workplace activity and foster improved labor-management relations. For frequently asked questions click here.

- Services
- Resolving Labor-Management Disputes    - Collective Bargaining Mediation
  - Alternative Bargaining Processes
  - Grievance Mediation
  - Technology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGS      - Overview
    - Tags Log-In
    - TAGS Tour
    - Meeting / Conference / Convention Facilitation
    - Online Mediation
    - Online Meetings
    - Online Surveys
    - Strategic Planning & Focus Group Surveys
    - Contact Us 
- Building Labor-Management Relationships    - Initial Contracts
  - LMC-LMF Partnerships
  - Effective Contract Administration
  - Effective  Communications
  - Labor-Management Partnership Building
  - Organizational Development
  - Repairing Broken Relationships
  - Card Check Services 
- Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government    - Workplace Mediation
  - Administrative Program Disputes
  - Facilitation
  - Dispute Resolution Systems Design
  - Regulatory Negotiations
  - Public Policy Dialogues 
- Education and Outreach    - FMCS Collaboration with Universities
  - FMCS Institute      - Arbitration for Advocates
    - Arbitration for Advocates in the Federal Sector
    - Art and Science of Dealing with Difficult People
    - Becoming a Labor Arbitrator
    - Can’t We All Just Get Along?   Bullying Behavior
    - Essential Neutral Skills Series: Consciously Competent Neutral
    - Essential Neutral Skills Series: The Art and Science of Inquiry
    - Evidence and Witness Examination in Arbitration
    - Generational Divide: Myth, Reality, or Should We Go Back to Work
    - Leadership Conflict Resolution Skills: The Six Competencies of Outcome-Based Communication
    - Mediation Skills
    - Meeting Madness: Tools and techniques to make your meetings matter
    - Negotiation Skills 
  - Skills Development Training
  - International Services      - Interactive International Map 
  - Conferences and Workshops 
- Arbitration    - Requesting a Panel
  - Arbitration Policies and Procedures
  - Arbitrator Code of Professional Responsibility
  - Information for FMCS Roster Arbitrators
  - Information on Joining the Arbitrator Roster
  - Arbitration Contact Information
Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
 Suite 388, 1130 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC  V6E 4A4
 T(604) 602-6767F(604) 602-0235
 www.rpacan.com
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF DAVID W. RENNIE
  I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2011, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
  Dated this 26th day of March, 2012
  (Signed)“David W. Rennie”
  Name:
David W. RennieTitle:
P. Eng. and Principal Geologistfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Victor E. Grijalva, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |        |  |                                  | 
|--- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/    |  | Victor E. Grijalva               | 
|    |  |        | 
|    |  | Name:  |  | Victor E. Grijalva               | 
|    |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Chief Financial  | 
|    |  |        |  | Officer, Secretary and Treasurer | 

November 11, 2003

-20-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Source One Mortgage Services Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Source One Mortgage Services Corporation of our report dated February 12, 1999,
except, for note 23, as to which the date is March 29, 1999, relating to the
consolidated statements of condition of Source One Mortgage Services Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
Annual Report to Shareholders of Source One Mortgage Services Corporation.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-47025) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No. 33-71924) on Form S-3 and
the registration statement (No. 33-62765) on Form S-4 of Source One Mortgage
Services Corporation, and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated
February 12, 1999, except for note 23, as to which the date is March 29, 1999,
relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Source One Mortgage
Services Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, which report is
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998, Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Source One Mortgage Services Corporation.



                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 29, 1999
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and

NINA RINGGOLD,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

MYER J. SANKARY; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-56175

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-09215-R-RC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

This interlocutory appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-

3 as a preliminary injunction appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(a)(1). We dismiss.

FILED

DEC 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-56175

The district court denied appellants’ request for a preliminary injunction

seeking to stay state court proceedings. After appellants filed this appeal, the

district court dismissed the underlying federal action. We determine questions of

mootness in light of the present circumstances. Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517,

528 (9th Cir. 1996). Because the facts and circumstances supporting the

preliminary injunction application have materially changed, we cannot grant the

requested relief. Doe and Associates Law Offices v. Napolitano, 252 F.3d 1026,

1029 (9th Cir. 2001) (holding that dismissal of underlying action renders moot the

district court’s denial of preliminary injunctive relief). Accordingly, this appeal is

moot.

All pending motions are DENIED.

DISMISSED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 30 , 2015 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 30 , 2015

151520 (51)

SHANNON BITTERMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 151520

v COA: 319663

Saginaw CC: 13

- 019397

- CZ

CHERYL D. BOLF,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellee to extend the time

to file her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted for

filing if submitted on or before January 13, 2016.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 24th day of March 2022 (the “Amendment Date”) by and among Lodging Fund REIT III OP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), and RLC V RIFC, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the “Contributor”).
WHEREAS, Contributor and Operating Partnership entered into that certain Contribution Agreement dated February 1, 2022 (the “Agreement”) for the contribution of a 113-room hotel business known as the Residence by Marriott Fort Collins located at 1127 Oakridge Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (the “Property”);
WHEREAS, during the course of Operating Partnership’s due diligence studies, the Operating Partnership has realized that it will need an extension to the Due Diligence Period (as defined in the Agreement); 
NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1.Reinstatement. The Agreement is hereby reinstated and remains in full force and effect. 
​
2.Capitalization.  All capitalized terms used herein will have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Agreement, unless otherwise specified herein. 
​
3.Due Diligence Period. Section 2.17.1 shall remain in full force and effect except that the Due Diligence Period shall now extend until the thirtieth (30th) after the Operating Partnerships receipt of the change of ownership PIP.  
​
4.Conflict; Counterparts.  In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall control. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts via facsimile or email in .PDF format, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but such counterparts when taken together shall constitute but one Amendment. 
​
5.Successors and Assigns.  This Amendment shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors, administrators, and assigns.
​
6.Ratification.  Except as set forth above, the terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in their entirety.
​
​
​
[Signature Page to Follow]
​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written.
SELLER:
RLC V RIFC, LLC 
a Colorado limited liability company
​
​
​
​
By: _/s/ Stephen Mills______
      Stephen Mills, Manager
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
[OPERATING PARTNERSHIP’S SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
​



OPERATING PARTNERSHIP:
LODGING FUND REIT III OP, LP
A Delaware limited partnership
​
By: Lodging Fund REIT III, Inc. 
Its: General Partner
​
​
​
By:    /s/ David R. Durell         
Name:  David R. Durell
Title:  Chief Investment Officer
#### STATE ex rel. SPRAGUE, Co. Atty., v. ONE PIN BALL MACHINE STYLED “KILROY” et al.

No. 34210.

Dec. 12, 1950.

*225 P. 2d 372.*

I. C. Sprague, Co. Atty., McCurtain County, of Idabel, for plaintiff in error.

Ed Shipp, of Idabel, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The issues involved in the case at bar are controlled by State of Oklahoma ex rel, I. C. Sprague, County Attorney, v. One Pin Ball Machine, Styled “Nevada”, No. 34205, 203 Okla. 652, 225 P. 2d 369, this day decided, and the opinion therein disposes of the issues herein.

The cause is reversed and remanded in accordance with the directions in said cause No. 34205.

DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.