alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan OLIBAS-VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50175.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

*214Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sean Coyle, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Daniel Earl Zipp, Assistant U.S. Office of the U.S. Attorney Erick L. Guzman, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Olibas-Valenzuela appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

Olibas-Valenzuela contends that the supervised release revocation procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) violate *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). As Olibas-Valenzuela concedes, this contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Santana,*526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir.2008), and *United States v. Huerta-Pimental,*445 F.3d 1220, 1225 (9th Cir.2006).

Olibas-Valenzuela further argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to calculate and consider the applicable advisory Guidelines range. The record reveals that the district court committed a significant procedural error because it did not calculate the advisory Guidelines range, and neither the parties nor the probation office identified the applicable range. *See Gall v. United States, 552*U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *United States v. Denton,*611 F.3d 646, 651 (9th Cir.2010). The Government has not met its burden of showing that the error was harmless; therefore, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. *United States v. Grissom, 525*F.3d 691, 696 (9th Cir.2008) (stating that this court “will remand non-harmless procedural errors”).

Because the district court’s failure to calculate the advisory Guidelines range requires remand for resentencing, it is unnecessary to address Olibas-Valenzuela’s remaining claims of procedural error at sentencing.

VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-2783; MM Docket No. 01-113; RM-9655] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule, dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commission dismisses a petition for rule making filed by Mount Rushmore Broadcasting, Inc., requesting the allotment of Channel 259A at Big Piney, Wyoming, and Channel 261A at La Barge, Wyoming. Petitioner filed no comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. No other party filed comments. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media Bureau, and (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-113 adopted November 21, 2001 and released November 30, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail                     *qualexint@aol.com.*

      ( print page 64793)    
Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01-30865 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Bond Program Information for OTIs - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tnLP7L7yqu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/bond-program-information-for-otis\/\">Bond Program Information for OTIs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/bond-program-information-for-otis\/embed\/#?secret=tnLP7L7yqu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Bond Program Information for OTIs” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tnLP7L7yqu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) ocean freight forwarders and non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVOCCs) are required to submit acceptable proof of financial responsibility to the Commission. Although OTIs may submit surety bonds, guaranties or insurance as proof of financial responsibility, to date all such proof has been in the form of surety bonds. Ocean freight forwarders […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Seeks Public Comments on its FY 2022-2026 Strategic Planning","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9AJLcSZYuu\"><a href=\"\/fmc-seeks-public-comments-on-its-fy-2022-2026-strategic-planning\/\">FMC Seeks Public Comments on its FY 2022-2026 Strategic Planning<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-seeks-public-comments-on-its-fy-2022-2026-strategic-planning\/embed\/#?secret=9AJLcSZYuu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Seeks Public Comments on its FY 2022-2026 Strategic Planning” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9AJLcSZYuu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
1

The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1980

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Arden J. Messersmith, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 5, 2002

 Filed: September 11, 2002 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, MURPHY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arden J. Messersmith pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to possess with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was

sentenced to 262 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Messersmith

did not appeal. Within one year, the government moved to reduce his sentence under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), and the district court1

 reduced the sentence to 131 months

imprisonment to be followed by 5 years supervised release. Messersmith now

appeals the reduced sentence. His counsel has moved to withdraw, filing a brief
-2-

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For reversal, counsel argues

that Messersmith’s sentence should have been reduced more based on his assistance

to the government. 

This court lacks jurisdiction to review the extent of a departure made by a

district court under Rule 35(b). See United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599

(8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (dismissing challenge to extent of Rule 35(b) reduction

because appeal is not based on any criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jirka Rysavy, Chief Executive Officer of Gaiam, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/JIRKA RYSAVYJirka Rysavy
Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



QuickLinks
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 16, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bQtEACLgAg\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-16-2020\/\">Applicants November 16, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-16-2020\/embed\/#?secret=bQtEACLgAg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 16, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"bQtEACLgAg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No, 333-47516) pertaining to the ADVO, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-71679) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-81365) pertaining tothe MailCoups, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-38237) pertaining to the ADVO, Inc.’s President’s Club Stock Award Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-11323) pertaining to the ADVO, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan No. 001, (Form S-8No. 333-115387) pertaining to ADVO, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan No. 004 as of our reports dated December 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ADVO, Inc., management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ADVO, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Hartford,Connecticut 

December 4, 2006
Exhibit 99.1
Pacific Alliance Corporation
Form 10-KSB



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Pacific  Alliance  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark A.  Scharmann,  President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Dated:  April 9, 2003                         /s/ Mark A. Scharmann
                                              President
                                              Principal Executive Officer



                                       39
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 2, 2011 

0126 

Order 

 

February 2, 2011 

141858 

TORME C. FINDLEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141858 

 COA: 291402 

WCAC: 08-000112 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, n/k/a 

CHRYSLER GROUP L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of 

this order addressing whether the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission is 

required to render a majority opinion in order to provide a final decision that is 

reviewable by the appellate courts.
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nortia Capital
Partners, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Bosso, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

       i.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      ii.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results
           of operations of the Company.


/S/ WILLIAM BOSSO
--------------------------------------
William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer


Date:	November 18, 2005
#### Michael COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Tim WILKINSON, individually and in his official capacity; Nurse Angie Wood, individually and in her official capacity; Sheryl Wiley, individually and in her official capacity; Pat Thomas, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-31240

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 19, 2013.

Michael Cooper, Winnfield, LA, pro se.

*559Ronald E. Corkern, Jr., Corkern, Crews *&*Guillet, L.L.C., Natchitoches, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Cooper appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. His brief contains no citations to the record in support of either his statement of the facts or his legal argument. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(7) and (9), the appellant’s brief must include “a statement of facts relevant to the issues submitted for review with appropriate references to the record” and an argument section that contains the “appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.” Because Cooper has not provided any record support for his appellate arguments, he has abandoned them by failing to adequately brief them. *See United States v. Cothran,*302 F.3d 279, 286 n. 7 (5th Cir.2002); *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); *Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987).

Accordingly, Cooper’s motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.Michael Adler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.     By: /s/ B. Michael Adler      Name: B. Michael Adler   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  
May 14, 2004
-20-