alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MERLE J. STOKES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-945

[March 6, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 561991CF000970A.

Diamond R. Litty, Public Defender, and Usha Maharajh, Assistant 

Public Defender, Stuart, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinions 

dated January 9, 2019, and February 22, 2017.1

As to appellant’s life sentence for murder with eligibility for parole after 

25 years on Count I, we affirm. See Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 

2018); State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018).

As to appellant’s consecutive life sentences for the non-homicide 

offenses on Counts II and III, we reverse and remand for resentencing 

pursuant to the sentencing provisions enacted in Chapter 2014–220, Laws 

of Florida. Lawton v. State, 181 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 2015).

 

1 Because we are issuing a new opinion, the February 3 and March 27, 2017 

stays of mandate from our prior opinion are now moot.
2

As to appellant’s consecutive 30-year sentence for aggravated battery 

on a person over 65 years of age on Count IV, we affirm based on Hart v. 

State, 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc). As we did in Hart, 

we again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State, 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2018); Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State, 

235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State, 233 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State, 219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

GROSS, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement from Commissioner Maffei on Formal Investigation into Detention and Demurrage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UWKElhfGvT\"><a href=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-formal-investigation-into-detention-and-demurrage-2\/\">Statement from Commissioner Maffei on Formal Investigation into Detention and Demurrage<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-formal-investigation-into-detention-and-demurrage-2\/embed\/#?secret=UWKElhfGvT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement from Commissioner Maffei on Formal Investigation into Detention and Demurrage” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UWKElhfGvT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

                                       OF

                        GREENVILLE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.



         This  Amendment is made to the Bylaws of Greenville  First  Bancshares,
Inc. dated July 9, 1999 (the "Bylaws") this 10th day of April. 2000.

         WHEREAS,  Greenville First  Bancshares,  Inc. (the "Company") wishes to
amend the Bylaws of the Company in order to revise the required  retirement  age
of the initial  directors  as set forth in Article 3, Section 6,  Retirement  of
Directors, and

         WHEREAS, after consideration, the Board of Directors of the Company has
determined that it is in the best interest of the Company to amend the Bylaws in
this regard.

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  the Bylaws are hereby amended by deleting  Article 3,
Section 6, Retirement of Directors, and replacing it with the following:

         "Section 6.  Retirement  of  Directors.  No person  shall be elected or
re-elected  a director of the  Corporation  after  attaining  the age of seventy
(70),  provided that this provision shall not apply to any initial  director who
shall have attained the age of sixty (60) prior to the date hereof."

         As amended herein, the Bylaws shall remain in full force and effect.

                              GREENVILLE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.


                                By: /s/ R. Arthur Seaver
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                        R. Arthur Seaver, Jr., President and CEO
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cleveland KILGORE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-7706.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 27, 2008.

Cleveland Kilgore, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Michele Walls Sartori, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*280PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Kilgore appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Relief Writ of Error Coram Nobis 60(b).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Kilgore,*No. 8:06-cr-00115-RDB (D.Md. Oct. 17, 2007). We deny Kilgore’s motion for release pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
LIGHTLAB
      - LANTIS LASER

    FIRST
      AMENDMENT

     

    THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into and is effective as of the date on
      which the last party has signed below (“Effective Date”), by and between
      LightLab Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal office
      at
      One Technology Park Drive, Westford, Massachusetts, USA, 01886 (“LightLab”), and
      Lantis Laser, Inc., a corporation having its principal office at 3967 Park
      Avenue, Fairfield, Connecticut, 06825 (“Lantis Laser” or
“Licensee”).

     

    WHEREAS,
      on August 8, 2001, LightLab and Licensee made and entered into a Non-Exclusive
      License Agreement in the field of general dentistry, excluding oral surgery
      and
      imaging through a microscope (the “Agreement”);

     

    WHEREAS,
      LightLab and Licensee now wish to amend the Agreement to clarify the definition
      of the Field and adjust the Term;

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained
      herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and
      sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as
      follows:

     

    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              The
                definition of “Field” within SECTION 2 of the Agreement shall now be
                amended to read:

            


    

     

    “Field”
shall
      mean diagnostic applications within general dentistry, excluding oral surgery
      and imaging through a microscope.

     

    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              SECTION
                9.1 shall now be amended to read:

            


    

     

    9.1
      Term.
      This
      Agreement, unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, shall remain in
      effect for three (3) years following whichever of the following events occurs
      first:

     

    (a)
      Licensee’s Release of a Licensed Product; (b) Licensee’s First Commercial Sale
      of a Licensed Product; or (c) July 1, 2007.

     

    
      	 	
              3.

            	
              The
                terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in effect, subject
                to
                the terms and conditions described
                herein.

            


    

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be executed
      under seal by their duly authorized representatives.

     

    
      	
              LIGHTLAB
                IMAGING, INC.

            	
              LANTIS
                LASER, INC.

            
	 	 
	 	 
	
              By

            	
              By

            
	
              
                

              

              Name:
                Akira Masuda

            	
              
                

              

              Name:
                Stanley Baron

            
	
              Title:
                Chairman & CEO

            	
              Title:
                Chairman, President & CEO
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and Affiliate Pay $1.275 Million Penalty","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"T6MD3VgcA6\"><a href=\"\/mitsui-o-s-k-lines-and-affiliate-pay-1-275-million-penalty\/\">Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and Affiliate Pay $1.275 Million Penalty<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/mitsui-o-s-k-lines-and-affiliate-pay-1-275-million-penalty\/embed\/#?secret=T6MD3VgcA6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and Affiliate Pay $1.275 Million Penalty” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"T6MD3VgcA6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00239-CV

Otis Roofing, LLC and Forest James, Appellants

v.

Joel Juarez, Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-21-007466, THE HONORABLE MADELEINE CONNOR, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Otis Roofing, LLC, and Forest James have filed Appellants’ Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal. They assert that the trial court has granted their motion for new trial

regarding the dismissal of their suit that they challenged by this appeal. We grant their motion 

and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: June 15, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          23,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,517,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         18
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,517,977
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-41415) and
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51193, 33-60093, 33-60091,
33-59091, 33-58148, and 33-58146) of The Warnaco Group, Inc. of our report dated
March 2, 1999 appearing on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
New York, New York
April 1, 1999

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-41415) and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51193, 33-60093, 33-60091, 33-59091, 33-58148 and 33-58146)
of The Warnaco Group, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 1999 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the two
fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 1999 which appears in this
Form 10-K/A.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 2000
#### Clarence Jay FAULKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheri POTEET, Associate Superintendent and Shane Maitland, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-35875.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 23, 2010.

Clarence Jay Faulkner, Connell, WA, pro se.

James Brooks Clemmons, Jr., Attorney General of Washington, Spokane, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Clarence Jay Faulkner, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment as to certain claims and dismissing with prejudice the remaining claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and due process claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment and dismissal for failure to state a claim, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and may affirm on any grounds supported by the record, *Atel Fin. Corp. v. Quaker Coal Co.,*321 F.3d 924, 926 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). We affirm.

Defendants Poteet and Maitland were entitled to summary judgment on Faulkner’s due process claim. Faulkner failed to establish a triable issue as to whether he was deprived of a protected interest due to the erroneous information in the mail restriction notices. *See Wright v. Riveland,*219 F.3d 905, 913 (9th Cir.2000) (to state a procedural due process claim, a plaintiff must allege “(1) a liberty of property interest protected by the Constitution; (2) a deprivation of the interest by the government; [and] (3) lack of process.”) (internal citation and quotation omitted). Faulkner received a meaningful, due process hearing on the infraction. *See Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 563-72, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (setting forth the notice, hearing, and appeal requirements that a prisoner must receive as part of a disciplinary action).

Summary judgment on Faulkner’s retaliation claim was appropriate because Faulkner did not establish a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Maitland acted with a retaliatory motive. *See Rhodes v. Robinson,*408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir.2005) (stating elements of a retaliation claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Faulkner’s complaint with prejudice, because amendment would *238be futile. *See Gardner v. Martino,*563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3817505
<SECURITIES>                                    584322
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9741028
<ALLOWANCES>                                    158656
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              18073838
<PP&E>                                        96500054
<DEPRECIATION>                                37193306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                80886478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         27515226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         32530
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  80886478
<SALES>                                      109244998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             109244998
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                102819173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3257990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2488587
<INCOME-TAX>                                    674000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1814587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Eyal Waldman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.; and

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 17, 2018



By:

/s/ EYAL WALDMANName:

Eyal WaldmanTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)