alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theater Xtreme Entertainment Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 19, 2008





/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Principal Financial Officer
#### Eugene KING, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-8073.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 8, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 22, 2010.

Eugene King, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*844PER CURIAM:

Eugene King appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Reg’l Det. Ctr.,*No. 0:08-cv-04053-TLW (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2009 & entered Oct. 20, 2009; July 21, 2009). We deny King’s motions to appoint counsel, to compel, for an injunction, for summary judgment, and to alter or amend judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael J. Shannahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. SHANNAHAN                    
|                       |  |  |  | Michael J. Shannahan Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 5.1

CONSENT OF AMC CONSULTANTS (PTY.) LTD.

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) of New Gold Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Narrative Description of the Business  Mineral Projects  The New Afton Project in the Companys Annual Information Form
and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.



|                            |  |                           |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | 
|AMC CONSULTANTS (PTY.) LTD.
|                            |  |                          
|By:                         |  | /s/ Michael Jeremy Thomas |  | 
|Name:                       |  | Michael Jeremy Thomas     |  | 
|Title:                      |  | Director                  |  | 

March 25, 2008
Exhibit 4.1

DE VISSER GRAY

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

401 - 905 West Pender Street

Vancouver, BC Canada

V6C 1L6

Tel: (604) 687-5447

Fax: (604) 687-6737

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated March 15, 2006 with respect to the audited financial statements of New
Gold Inc. (formerly DRC Resources Corporation) (the Company) included in this Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/s/ De Visser Gray               
|De Visser Gray                     
|Chartered Accountants              
|Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

September 11, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64902-64903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Notice of Insufficient VA Appropriations To Implement 
Requirements for Notification, Evaluation, and Reduction of Lead Based 
Paint Hazards in VA-Acquired Properties

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of a determination by the 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that it lacks appropriations 
sufficient to cover the costs of implementing certain regulations 
concerning Lead Based Paint hazards in single family properties 
acquired by VA in the operation of the VA guaranteed home loan program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Lutes, Assistant Director for 
Property Management and Strategic Development, (263), Loan Guaranty 
Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans

[[Page 64903]]

Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-7379.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice sets forth a determination by VA 
that it lacks appropriations sufficient to cover the costs of 
implementing certain regulations for notification, evaluation, and 
reduction of Lead Based Paint hazards in VA-acquired properties.
    On September 5, 1999, the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development (HUD) published in the Federal Register (64 FR 50140) a 
final rule to ensure that housing receiving Federal assistance and 
Federally-owned housing that is to be sold does not pose lead-based 
paint hazards to young children. These regulations were designed to 
implement the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 
1992, which is Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1992; 42 U.S.C. 4851 et seq. These HUD rules are codified at 24 CFR 
part 35.
    Requirements for the disposition of residential property owned by a 
Federal agency other than HUD are contained in 24 CFR, part 35, subpart 
C. Such requirements do not apply if appropriations to the agency are 
insufficient to cover the costs of implementing such statute and 
regulations. 42 U.S.C. 4822(a)(3)(C) and 24 CFR part 35.115(b).
    VA hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 24 CFR 35.115(b), it has 
made a determination that it does not have appropriations sufficient to 
cover the costs of implementing 42 U.S.C. 4822(a)(3)(A)-(B) and 24 CFR, 
part 35, subpart C.

    Dated: December 6, 2001.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 01-30936 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
{"id":2097,"date":"2018-09-07T16:10:15","date_gmt":"2018-09-07T20:10:15","guid":{"rendered":"\/?page_id=2097"},"modified":"2021-04-05T10:19:10","modified_gmt":"2021-04-05T14:19:10","slug":"office-of-inspector-general","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-inspector-general\/","title":{"rendered":"Office of Inspector General"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Office of Inspector General (OIG)<\/h1>\n<p>The Federal Maritime Commission’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) is an independent and objective oversight office created within the FMC by the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ignet.gov\/content\/inspector-general-act-1978\">Inspector\u2019s General Act of 1978 (as amended)<\/a>\u00a0to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Conduct and supervise audits, reviews, and investigations relating to FMC programs<\/li>\n<li>Detect and prevent waste, fraud and abuse<\/li>\n<li>Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration and management of FMC programs<\/li>\n<li>Review existing and proposed legislation and regulations and make appropriate recommendations<\/li>\n<li>Maintain effective working relationships with other Federal, State and local governmental agencies, and non-governmental entities, regarding the mandated duties of the Inspector General<\/li>\n<li>Keep the FMC Chairman and Commissioners, and Congress fully informed of serious problems and deficiencies, and recommend, when appropriate, corrective actions and implementation measures<\/li>\n<li>Report violations of law to the U.S. Attorney General<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Office of Inspector General (OIG) The Federal Maritime Commission’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) is an independent and objective oversight office created within the FMC by the\u00a0Inspector\u2019s General Act of 1978 (as amended)\u00a0to: Conduct and supervise audits, reviews, and investigations relating to FMC programs Detect and prevent waste, fraud and... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-inspector-general\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":41,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-OIGsidebar.php","meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2097"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2097"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2097\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5527,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2097\/revisions\/5527"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/41"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### FAY *v.*CROZER.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT O.P THE UNITED STATES FOR THE •SOUTHERN DISTRICT .OP WEST VIRGINIA'.'

No. 165.

Argued April 21, 22, 1910.

Decided May 2, 1910.

A writ of error based on constitutional question will not lie unless the controversy is a substantial one and the question'open to discussion.-

If the identical question has been determined in a suit involving a state statute it is foreclosed although it may subsequently arise .in connection with the provision of the constitution of the State under which the statute was enacted, and the writ of error will be dismissed.

There is no greater objection under the Constitution of the United States to. the forfeiture of land for'five years’ neglect to pay .taxes than there is to a similar forfeiture by the. statute of limitation’s for neglect to assert title against one by whom the former owner has beén disseized.

• The questions involved in this case having been determined in *King*v. Mullin,-171 U. S. 404; *King*v. *West Virginia,*216.TJ. S. 92; the writ of.error is dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*456
      *Mr. George E. Price*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. F. Brown,-Mr. W. W. Hughes*and *Mr. D. J. F. Strother for*defendants in-error.

Per Curiam:

This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the'Southern District of West .Virginia, brought directly to this court, and as such falls within the rule that the. controversy must be substantial and the question open to discussion.. Tested by that rule, we think the writ of error must be dismissed on the authority of *King*v. *Mullins,*171 U. S. 404; *King*v. *West Virginia,*216 U. S. 92. And see *King*v. *Panther Lumber Company,*171 U. S. 437; *Swann*v. *State,*188 U. S. 739, It is contended' that the question of the forfeiture of plaintiffs’ title under the constitution of West Virginia was hot ruled in those, cases, because- théy also involved the statute .of the State, referred to, while this case ' presents the validity of the forfeiture provision of the state constitution alone. But’ it was-pointed out in *King*v. *West Virginia,*216 U. S. 100, that the right *to*redeem given by the statute was. not coextensive with the forfeiture under the state constitution, and yet the constitution was upheld,' as it was in ' *King*v. *Mullins,*171 U. S. 404. I.t follows, therefore, that the státe constitution must be upheld in the present case. The . only hearing that could be necessary would be whether the facts- constitute a forfeiture,- and that question when it arises • between a.former owner and a claimant under the State can be tried in a case between..those parties, as it was here. There is no greater objection under the Constitution off the' United-• States to. the forfeiture of land- for five years’ neglect' to pay . taxes than "there is to a similar'-forfeiture by- the statute of limitations for.neglect to assert title against one. by whom-the ' former owner has been .disseised. We think, that the question, suggested is so plainly covered-by. the preceding cases that the writ of error must be dismissed.

*It is so*ordered,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          67,900                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  661,600                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,200                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    408,200                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,228,600                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,840,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 171,800                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,764,200                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          791,100                       0
<BONDS>                                      2,404,400                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,026,100                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,300                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,764,200                       0
<SALES>                                      1,042,700                  69,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,054,900                  83,400
<CGS>                                          873,600                  61,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  959,500                  64,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,900                   9,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,700                   9,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,900                   3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,300                   5,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,300                   5,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
      (the “Company”) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in that Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Hugh W. Mohler





Hugh
      W.
      Mohler


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


November
      14, 2007




















/s/
      Mark A. Semanie





Mark
      A.
      Semanie


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


November
      14, 2007





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any
      reason other than as specifically required by law.
{"id":39,"count":77,"description":"","link":"\/category\/commissioners\/bentzel\/","name":"Bentzel","slug":"bentzel","taxonomy":"category","parent":7,"meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/39"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/7"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=39"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
---

Exhibit 99.13

Consent of David Rennie

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with mineral
resource estimates for the New Afton Project and to the use of information
derived from the technical report entitled Technical Report on the New Afton
Project, British Columbia, Canada dated December 31, 2009, included in the
Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December
31, 2009 and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in
the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold
Inc.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2010.

|/s/ David Rennie                                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name: David Rennie                                               | 
|Title: P. Eng. of Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle
    Associates Inc.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3565 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3565

  To suspend temporarily the duty on dry adhesive copolyamide pellets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2009

 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on dry adhesive copolyamide pellets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRY ADHESIVE COPOLYAMIDE PELLETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

       ``9902.01.00      Piperazine co-      Free         No change        No change       On or before     ''.
                          polymerized                                                       12/31/2011...
                          copolyamide resin
                          high-temperature
                          melt adhesive
                          pellets (CAS Nos.
                          118106-10-8,
                          1000189-84-3, or
                          1000189-29-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3809.10.00 or
                          3908.90.70)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```