alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Doyle: U.S. Merchant Marine and 2017 Hurricane Relief Efforts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BwZHf7Ic5f\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-doyle-u-s-merchant-marine-and-2017-hurricane-relief-efforts\/\">Commissioner Doyle: U.S. Merchant Marine and 2017 Hurricane Relief Efforts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-doyle-u-s-merchant-marine-and-2017-hurricane-relief-efforts\/embed\/#?secret=BwZHf7Ic5f\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Doyle: U.S. Merchant Marine and 2017 Hurricane Relief Efforts” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BwZHf7Ic5f\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Dharmesh Balubhai PATEL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-72230.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.*

Filed Dec. 5, 2013.

Jeffrey O’Brien, Esquire, The Law Office of Jeffrey O’Brien, Berkeley, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Sunah Lee, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dharmesh Balubhai Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“U”) denying Patel’s motion to continue his removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the agency’s denial of a motion to continue, *Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam), and review de novo whether the agency applied a correct legal standard, *Florez-de Solis v. INS,*796 F.2d 330, 333 (9th Cir.1986). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying Patel’s motion to continue in order to wait for an employment-based immigrant visa to become available to him, where he failed to demonstrate good cause for a continuance. *See Sandoval-Luna,*526 F.3d at 1247 (rejecting an abuse-of-discretion challenge to an IJ’s refusal to continue removal proceedings where “no relief was then immediately available”).

The agency also applied the correct legal criteria and provided a reasoned explanation for its decision denying Patel’s motion to continue, where the agency invoked the applicable “good cause” legal standard and cited pertinent legal authorities. *See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,*552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.2009) (concluding that “the IJ ap*856plied the correct legal standard” where “the IJ expressly cited and applied [relevant case law] in rendering its decision, which is all our review requires”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Patel’s unexhausted contention that the IJ failed to redress the harm from the agency’s earlier finding of frivolousness in his asylum application. *See Tijani v. Holder,*628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir.2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In re Thomas Creighton SHRADER, Petitioner.

No. 13-1999.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 26, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 4, 2013.

Thomas Creighton Shrader, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Creighton Shrader petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to arrest judgment. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 34. We conclude that Shrader is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,*503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by Shrader is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7417** 

BERNARD L. STATEN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. ANTHONY W. BATTS, Baltimore City Police Commissioner; CORPORAL MCEVOY, Badge No. 2784; DETECTIVE MICHAEL, Badge No. 2873; DETECTIVE COLLINS, Badge No. 3254; DETECTIVE NACKE, Badge No. 3322; DETECTIVE LEE, Badge No. 3913; DETECTIVE MCCOLLEN, Badge No. 4066 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00599

- CCB )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Bernard L. Staten, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Elissa Hitchner, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bi nding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard L. Staten seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C . § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Staten seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 19 93). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Scott L. Vining, certify that:



1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paragon Financial Corporation;



2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4) The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5) The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board
of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 21, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining    
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Scott L. Vining        
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 65229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04775]


Jonathan Manufacturing d/b/a/ Jonathan Engineered Solutions 
Fullerton, CA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 250(A), subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
May 8, 2001, applicable to workers of Jonathan Engineered Solutions, 
Fullerton, California. The notice was published in the Federal 
Registeron May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28554).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the activities related to the production of aluminum slides 
(assembly and fabrication). The workers are separately identifiable 
from workers producing steel slides at the subject plant.
    New information provided by the State shows that Jonathan 
Manufacturing is the parent firm of Jonathan Engineered Solutions, 
Fullerton, California. Information also shows that some of the 
claimants' wages are reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax 
account for Jonathan Manufacturing, d/b/a Jonathan Engineered 
Solutions, Fullerton California.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Jonathan Engineered Solutions who were adversely affected by 
a shift in the production of aluminum slides to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-04775 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Jonathan Manufacturing, D/B/A Jonathan Engineered 
Solutions, Fullerton, California, engaged in employment related to 
the production of aluminum slides (fabrication and assembly) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 27, 2000, through May 8, 2003, are eligible to apply for 
NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 30th day of November, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-31132 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"User Fees Revised Effective December 19, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"n4Ofb2DkOg\"><a href=\"\/user-fees-revised-effective-december-19-2018\/\">User Fees Revised Effective December 19, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/user-fees-revised-effective-december-19-2018\/embed\/#?secret=n4Ofb2DkOg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“User Fees Revised Effective December 19, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"n4Ofb2DkOg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"id":4263,"date":"2019-09-20T13:01:44","date_gmt":"2019-09-20T17:01:44","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=4263"},"modified":"2019-09-20T13:01:44","modified_gmt":"2019-09-20T17:01:44","slug":"comment-period-extended-nprm-dd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/comment-period-extended-nprm-dd\/","title":{"rendered":"Comment Period Extended for NPRM on Detention & Demurrage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"margin: 0px; font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Federal Maritime Commission has extended the deadline for submitting public comments on a proposed interpretive rule addressing demurrage and detention practices under the Shipping Act.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px; font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Comments to the Commission are now due not later than Thursday, October 31, 2019.\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px; font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Instructions for submitting comments are contained in the proposed rule.\u00a0 While the Commission will provide confidential treatment for identified confidential information to the extent allowed by law, comments are considered to be part of the public record.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Maritime Commission has extended the deadline for submitting public comments on a proposed interpretive rule addressing demurrage and detention practices under the Shipping Act. Comments to the Commission are now due not later than Thursday, October 31, 2019.\u00a0 Instructions for submitting comments are contained in the proposed rule.\u00a0... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/comment-period-extended-nprm-dd\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4263"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4263"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4263\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4264,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4263\/revisions\/4264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – March 20, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ceBEzgJKKv\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-march-20-2015\/\">License Applicants – March 20, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-march-20-2015\/embed\/#?secret=ceBEzgJKKv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – March 20, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ceBEzgJKKv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}