Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2001 / Notices 65511

Date City Location Time

February 4, 2002 ....................... Athens, Texas ........................... Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center, 5550 Flat Creek Road

(Farm Road 2495).

7:00 PM

February 11, 2001 ..................... South Burlington, Vermont ....... Clarion Hotel, 1117 Williston Road ............................................. 7:00 PM

February 12, 2002 ..................... Watertown, New York ............... Dulles State Office Building, 317 Washington Street .................. 7:00 PM

February 13, 2002 ..................... Syracuse, New York ................. Sheraton University Hotel, 801 University Avenue ..................... 7:00 PM

February 19, 2002 ..................... Portland, Oregon ...................... Doubletree Hotel-Lloyd Center, 1000 NE Multnomah ................. 7:00 PM

Dated: December 13, 2001.

Marshall Jones,

Acting Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 01–31272 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–459]

In the Matter of Certain Garage Door

Operators Including Components

Thereof; Notice of Commission

Decision Not To Review an Initial

Determination Granting Complainant’s

Motion To Add a Respondent

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined not to

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)

issued by the presiding administrative

law judge (ALJ) in the above-captioned

investigation granting a motion to add

Martec Access Products, Inc. as a

respondent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)

205–3115. Copies of the ALJ’s ID and all

other nonconfidential documents filed

in connection with this investigation are

or will be available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)

205–2000. Hearing-impaired persons are

advised that information on this matter

can be obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)

205–1810. General information

concerning the Commission may also be

obtained by accessing its Internet server

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public

record for this investigation may be

viewed on the Commission’s electronic

docket (EDIS–ON–LINE) at http://

dockets.usitc.gov/eol/public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission instituted this investigation

on July 16, 2001, based on a complaint

filed by The Chamberlain Group, Inc.

against six entities: Linear Corporation,

Napoleon Spring Works, Inc., Lynx

Industries, Inc., Innovative Home

Products, Inc., Wayne-Dalton

Corporation, and Guardian Access

Corporation. 66 FR 37704 (2001).

Computime Limited was later added as

a respondent. The complaint alleges

violations of section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and/or the sale within the United States

after importation of certain garage door

operators by reason of infringement of

certain claims of complainant’s U.S.

Letters Patents Nos. Re. 35,364 and Re.

36,703.

On September 21, 2001, complainant

filed a motion for leave to amend the

complaint and notice of investigation to

add Martec Access Products, Inc. as a

respondent. On October 2, 2001, the

Commission investigative attorney filed

a response in support of complainant’s

motion to amend. On October 15, 2001,

respondent Wayne-Dalton Corporation

(‘‘Wayne-Dalton’’) filed a motion to

strike complainant’s motion to amend.

On October 25, 2001, complainant filed

a response to Wayne-Dalton’s motion to

strike complainant’s motion to amend.

On October 31, 2001, Wayne-Dalton

filed a motion for leave to reply to

complainant’s response to WayneDalton’s motion.

On November 26, 2001, the ALJ

granted complainant’s motion to amend

in the subject ID. On the same day the

ALJ denied respondent’s motion to

strike.

The authority for the Commission’s

determination is contained in section

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in

§ 210.42 of the Commission’s rules of

practice and procedure (19 CFR 210.42).

Issued: December 13, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31254 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337–TA–454]

In the Matter of Certain Set-Top Boxes

and Components Thereof: Notice of a

Commission Determination Not To

Review an Initial Determination

Allowing an Amendment to the

Complaint

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

the U.S. International Trade

Commission has determined not to

review the presiding administrative law

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination

(‘‘ID’’) granting a motion to amend the

complaint in the above-captioned

investigation to add license agreements

and licensees.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Elizabeth Jones, Esq., Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone (202)

205–3106. Copies of the subject ID and

all other nonconfidential documents

filed in connection with this

investigation are or will be available for

inspection during official business

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the

Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that

information on this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TTD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information

concerning the Commission may also be

obtained by accessing its Internet server

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public

record for this investigation may be

viewed on the Commission’s electronic

docket (EDIS–ON–LINE) at http://

dockets.usitc.gov/eol/public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission instituted this investigation

on March 16, 2001, based on a

complaint by Gemstar-TV Guide

International, Inc. of Pasadena,

California, and StarSight Telecast, Inc.

of Fremont, California, alleging

violations of section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930 in the importation into the

65512 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2001 / Notices

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain set-top boxes

and components thereof by reason of

infringement of claims 18–24, 26–28,

31–33, 36, 42–43, 48–51, 54, 57–61, and

66 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,253,066;

claims 1, 3, 8, and 10 of U.S. Letters

Patent 5,479,268; and claims 14–17, 19,

and 31–35 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,809,204.

On August 7, 2001, complainants

Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.

and StarSight Telecast, Inc. moved to

amend the complaint to add license

agreements and licensees. No party

opposed the motion to amend.

On August 23, 2001, the presiding

ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 24) granting

the motion. No petitions for review of

the ID were filed.

This action is taken under the

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,

and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR

210.42.

Issued: December 14, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–31253 Filed 12–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden,

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and the impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Employment Standards Administration

is soliciting comments concerning the

following information collections: (1)

Pre-Hearing Statement (LS–18); (2)

Overpayment Recovery Questionnaire

(OWCP–20); (3) Claim for Continuance

of Compensation (CA–12).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted to the office listed in the

addressee section below by February 19,

2002.

ADDRESSES: Ms. Patricia A. Forkel, U.S.

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution

Ave., NW., Room S–3201, Washington,

DC 20210, telephone (202) 693–0339

(this is not a toll-free number), fax (202)

693–1451, E-mail: pforkel@fenix2.dolesa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pre-Hearing Statement (LS–18)

I. Background

The Office of Workers’ Compensation

Programs administers the Longshore

and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act.

The Act provides benefits to workers

injured in maritime employment on the

navigable waters of the United States or

in an adjoining area customarily used by

an employer in loading, unloading,

repairing, or building a vessel. Title 20,

CFR 702.217 provides for the referral of

claims under the Longshore Act for

formal hearings. This section provides

that, before a case is transferred to the

Office of Administrative Law Judges, the

district director shall furnish each of the

parties or their representatives with a

copy of a pre-hearing statement form.

Each party shall, within 21 days of

receipt, complete it and return it to the

district director. Upon receipt, the

district director shall transmit the form

to the Office of the Chief Administrative

Law Judge.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submissions

of responses.

III. Current Actions

The Department of Labor seeks the

approval of the extension of this

information collection in order to carry

out its responsibility to prepare cases for

formal hearings under the Act.

Type of Review: Extension.

Agency: Employment Standards

Administration.

Title: Pre-Hearing Statement.

OMB Number: 1215–0085.

Agency Number: LS–18.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; Businesses or other forprofit.

Frequency: On occasion.

Total Annual Respondents/

Responses: 6,800.

Time Per Response: 10 minutes.

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,088.

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):

$0.

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintenance): $2,595.50.

Overpayment Recovery Questionnaire

(OWCP–20)

Background

Both the Federal Coal Mine Health

and Safety Act (30 U.S.C. 923(b) and 20

CFR 725.544(c) and the Federal

Employees’ Compensation Act (5 U.S.C.

8129(b) and 20 CFR 10.320–10.324)

provide for the recovery, waiver,

compromise, or termination of

overpayment of benefits to beneficiaries.

The OWCP–20 collects information

used to ascertain the financial condition

of the beneficiary who has been

overpaid to determine if the

concealment or improper transfer of

assets, and to identify and consider

present and potential income and

current assets for enforced collection

proceedings. The form also provides a

means for the beneficiary to explain

why he/she is not at fault for the

overpayment.

II. Review Focus

The Department of Labor is

particularly interested in comments

which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who