alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"John A. Moran","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GaoAUg7EeR\"><a href=\"\/commissioners\/john-a-moran\/\">John A. Moran<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioners\/john-a-moran\/embed\/#?secret=GaoAUg7EeR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“John A. Moran” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GaoAUg7EeR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Moran1.jpeg","thumbnail_width":158,"thumbnail_height":200}
#### DING JIN JING, a/k/a Dian Jin Jiang, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-1488.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 3, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 11, 2013.

Nataliya I. Gavlin, Gavlin & Associates, P.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Melissa K. Lott, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department Of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

*363Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ding Jin Jing, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Jing’s merits hearing, the record of Jing’s sworn statement taken after his arrival in the United States, the credible fear interview and Jing’s supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to the Board’s dismissal and that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012); *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
758 S.E.2d 506

#### In the Matter of Samuel Robert DROSE, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001065.

No. 2014-001065.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 20, 2014.

ORDER

By order dated May 19, 2014, the Court placed respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to appoint the Receiver, Peyre T. Lumpkin, pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients.

IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Lumpkin is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust accounts), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Lump-kin shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, *184SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Lumpkin may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment. Respondent shall promptly respond to Mr. Lumpkin’s requests for information and/or documentation and shall fully cooperate with Mr. Lumpkin in all other respects.

Further, this Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow, operating, and/or any other law account(s) of respondent, shall serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Peyre T. Lumpkin has been duly appointed by this Court and that respondent is enjoined from making withdrawals or transfers from or writing any check or other instrument on any of the account(s).

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that the Receiver, Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Lumpkin’s office.

Mr. Lumpkin’s appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"U.S.-Japan Hold Consultations in Tokyo on Maritime Issues","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"otYXyIdnUH\"><a href=\"\/u-s-japan-hold-consultations-in-tokyo-on-maritime-issues\/\">U.S.-Japan Hold Consultations in Tokyo on Maritime Issues<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/u-s-japan-hold-consultations-in-tokyo-on-maritime-issues\/embed\/#?secret=otYXyIdnUH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“U.S.-Japan Hold Consultations in Tokyo on Maritime Issues” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"otYXyIdnUH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/favicon.png","thumbnail_width":512,"thumbnail_height":512}
EXHIBIT 35.3
                     SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                            HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
                 RAAC SERIES 2006-SP1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

      The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC,
      as  servicer  (the  "Servicer")   pursuant  to  the  applicable  servicing
      agreement, does hereby certify that:

      1. A review of the Servicer's  activities during the period covered by the
      Issuing  Entity's  report on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
      under  the  applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
      supervision.

      2. To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement
      in all material respects  throughout such period.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
     26th day of March 2007.

      By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
          Name: Anthony N. Renzi
          Title: Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7225

MICHAEL E. TORY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

K. J. BASSETT, Warden, Keen Mountain

Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-03-746)

Submitted: December 15, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael E. Tory, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to

exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction by a United States

Magistrate Judge.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael E. Tory appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) petition by the district court.*

 An appeal may not

be taken to this court from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of

reason would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Tory has

not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., et al., Intervenors.

Nos. 05-1372, 06-1360.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 6, 2008.

Neil H. Butterklee, Donald Joseph Stauber, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Holly Elizabeth Cafer, Cynthia Ann Marlette, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Glen Scott Bernstein, Kathryn Kavanagh Baran, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Gregory W. Carnet, Entergy Services, Inc., Washington, DC, for Intervenors.

Before: RANDOLPH, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*5
      *JUDGMENT*

This case was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions are denied for the reasons stated in the FERC orders.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C. CIR. R. 41.
Exhibit 10.22


 


AMENDMENT ONE


 


This AMENDMENT ONE (this “Amendment”)
dated February 22, 2022 (the “Effective Date”) to the Collaborative Agreement dated December 29, 2015 (as amended previously
and hereby, the “Agreement”) by and between BioLite, Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of Taiwan and having
its principal place of business at 3rd Floor, 248, Nei-Hu Road, Sec. 1, Taipei, 11493 Taiwan (“BioLite”) and ABVC BioPharma,
Inc. (f/k/a American BriVision Corporation), a Delaware corporation having its principle place of business at 44370 Old Warm Springs Blvd.,
Fremont, CA 94538 (“ABVC”). BioLite and ABVC are thereafter referred to as the “Parties”.
Capitalized words not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Agreement;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties,
in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1. Amendments to the Agreement.
The Agreement is hereby amended to allow ABVC to pay any or all fees due under the Agreement via the consolidation or forgiveness
of debt owed by BioLite to ABVC. Accordingly, ABVC may now make any payments due under the Agreement in cash, in shares of ABVC stock
with equivalent value or via the cancellation of certain debts BioLite owes to ABVC, in equivalent value. For the avoidance of doubt,
payments under the Agreement include, but may not be limited to Milestone Payments due under Section 3 of the Agreement and Royalty Charges
due under Section 4 of the Agreement.


 


2. 
Effectiveness of Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.


 


3. Counterparts. This Amendment
may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all of which
counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. This Amendment shall become effective on the Effective Date.
Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement, any amendments, waivers, consents or supplements, by facsimile
or other electronic transmission (including a .pdf copy sent by e-mail) shall be deemed to constitute an original and fully effective
signature of such party.


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be executed, in duplicate, each Party taking a copy, as of the date first written above.


 


	BIOLITE, INC.	ABVC BIOPHARMA, INC.



 


	By:	/s/ Tsung-Shann Jiang	 	By:	/s/ Howard Doong                  
	Name: 	Tsung-Shann Jiang	 	Name: 	Howard Doong
	Title: 	Chairman & CEO	 	Title: 	CEO
	Date: 	2/22/2022	 	Date: 	2/22/2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Notice to Passengers on Carnival Cruise Line\u2019s CARNIVAL LIBERTY","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5gD049Tn5X\"><a href=\"\/notice-to-passengers-on-carnival-cruise-lines-carnival-liberty\/\">Notice to Passengers on Carnival Cruise Line\u2019s CARNIVAL LIBERTY<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/notice-to-passengers-on-carnival-cruise-lines-carnival-liberty\/embed\/#?secret=5gD049Tn5X\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice to Passengers on Carnival Cruise Line\u2019s CARNIVAL LIBERTY” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"5gD049Tn5X\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3116 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3116

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2021

  Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Sires, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
 Connolly, Mr. Malinowski, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Blumenauer, 
  Mr. Cicilline, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. McEachin, Ms. 
  Bonamici, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Jones, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Smith of New 
Jersey, Ms. Newman, Mr. Case, Mr. Crist, Mr. Scott of Virginia, and Ms. 
    Ross) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean And Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease or any other authorization for the exploration, development, or 
production of oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area;
            ``(2) the South Atlantic planning area;
            ``(3) the North Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(4) the Straits of Florida planning area,''.
                                 <all>
```