alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Fred J. Griffin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of Simex Technologies,Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];
   c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 23, 2004       /s/ Fred J. Griffin Fred J. Griffin  *Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen J. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



/s/ Stephen J. ThomasStephen J. ThomasChief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3385]
 Shelby County and the contiguous counties of Bartholomew, Decatur, Hancock, Johnson, Marion and Rush in the State of Indiana constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and tornadoes that occurred on November 24, 2001. Applications for loans for physical damage may be filed until the close of business on February 11, 2002 and for economic injury until the close of business on September 11, 2002 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
6.500( print page 65019)Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.250Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.375For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 338511 and for economic injury is 9N8000. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: December 11, 2001. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 01-30976 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection   with  the  Annual   Report  of  Baynon   International
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Generelli,  Treasurer of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ DANIEL GENERELLI
-----------------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### John A. MCALLISTER, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jocelyn HUNTER, Defendant—Appellant, and C. Eric Hunter; Phoenix Colvard Mountain, LLC, Defendants.

No. 10-1011.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 25, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 17, 2010.

Jocelyn Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. David Erik Albright, Jon Berkelhammer, Smith Moore, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jocelyn Hunter appeals the jury verdict in favor of John McAllister, Jr. The record does not contain a transcript of the jury proceedings. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings *746material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant proceeding on appeal in for-ma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at Government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at Government expense, Hunter has waived review of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. See *generally*Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); *Keller v. Prince George’s County,*827 F.2d 952, 954 n. 1 (4th Cir.1987). As no error appears on the record before us, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
  I, Heng Jing LU, certify that:
  1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Dragon Asia Corp.:
  2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
   4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
  (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  (c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  (a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; an
  (b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  
 
 ****Date: November 9, 2004
By:
/s/ *Heng Jing LU*Heng Jing LUChief Executive Officer
   -17-
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3261 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

Against Iraq Resolution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3261 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI2 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION. 

3 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

4 Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) 

5 is hereby repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3261 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force Against Iraq Resolution.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00 647 -CV Se r r e vaP ag e , A ppe lla nt

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF COM AL COUNTY , 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2005 -13 53A , HO NORAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant S err eva Pag e see ks to appea l from a district cour t order te rminatingher pare ntal rights. SeeTex. Family Code Ann. § 263.405 (West 2008). The order ter m i n at i ng appellant’ s pare ntal rights was sign ed an d enter ed by the district court on Nove mber 2, 2006. Pur su ant t o s ub se c tio n 26 3. 40 5( a ) of the fa mil y c od e , a

pp e lla nt’ s a pp e a l is g ov e rn e d b y

the su pr e me court rule s for a cce lerated appe als in civil cases. Id. § 2 63 .4 05 (a). Thus , a pp e lla nt w a s r e qu ir e d to file her notice of a

ppeal within 20 day s after the district court’s or der w as sig ned. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 6 . 1 ( b ) ( ti me to p e r f

e c t a p p e a l) , 2 8 . 1 ( b ) ( p e r f

e c ti o no f a c c e le r ate d

a p p e a l) . O ur

r e v ie wo f

the rec ord shows that appellant did not file her notice of appe al until October 6, 2009, a lmost t hree year s a f t e r th e d i s tr i c t c o urt ’ s o r d e r w a s s i g n e d . W e c o n c l u d e a p p e l l an t ’ s n o t i c e o f

a p p e a l w a s un t i m e l y. Under t h es e circumstance s, we lac k jurisdiction to dis pose of the pur ported a ppeal in any

manner other than dismissal for want of jur isdiction. See I n re K.A.F. , 160 S.W .3d 923, 926-27 (Te x . 2005);2

W ilk ins v . Me tho dis t He alt

h CareSy s. , 160 S.W .3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2005) . We the ref ore dismiss the appea l for wa

nt of jurisdiction.

J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: January

15, 2010
#### Kevin Sean POLK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.L. BEELER; Alberto R. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 07-7540.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 20, 2008.

Decided: May 8, 2008.

Kevin Sean Polk, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Polk v. Beeler,*No. 5:07-hc-02064-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2007). We deny Polk’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"May 2019 Activity Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"I1k2t023Tz\"><a href=\"\/may-2019-activity-report\/\">May 2019 Activity Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/may-2019-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=I1k2t023Tz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“May 2019 Activity Report” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"I1k2t023Tz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report of TAM S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David  Barioni Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 Date: June 25, 2008 

 By: /s/ David Barioni Neto         David Barioni Neto         Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S AUGUST 31, 1999
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001090099
<NAME> REPLACEMENT FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,795
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.27

                        [MED DIVIERSIFIED LETTERHEAD]

November 30, 2001


Mr. Ajay Anand
Interwest Associates
10 Ima Loa Court
Suite 1000
Newport Beach, CA 92663

Dear Ajay:

Further to our recent discussions, the following terms of engagement are
entered into as of November 30, 2001;

     1)  This agreement is made by and between Ajay Anand and Interwest
         Associates (Interwest) and Med Diversified (MED).

     2)  Under this Agreement, MED agrees to engage Interwest as an
         Independent Contractor to provide services to MED in an effort to
         increase MED's exposure to financial community and gain additional
         volume and support of MED's stock.

     3)  Scope of Services: Interwest will provide to MED consulting services
         specifically focused on contacting members of the investment
         community, making presentations to members of the investment
         community on behalf of MED, following up on individuals presented to,
         coordinating with MED to secure support of MED's security and
         otherwise working to maximize MED's exposure to the investment
         community and increase support of MED stock.

     4)  Cash Fees: MED will pay to Interwest a fee of $2,500 per month to be
         paid on the first day of each month.

     5)  Non-Cash Fees: MED will immediately issue to Interwest an option or
         warrant to acquire 150,000 free-trading shares of MED common stock
         at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.

     6)  The date activities will actually commence under this Agreement will
         be December 1, 2001.

     7)  This agreement may be terminated at any time by MED through notifying
         Interwest, in writing, of intention to terminate and date effective.


                                    -Continued-


<PAGE>

                      -Page 2 of 2, Interwest/MED Agreement-

     8)  Interwest agrees to make diligent efforts in performing services
         agreed upon herein.

     9)  In this relationship, Interwest agrees to comply fully with all
         federal and state securities laws and regulations, industry
         guidelines and applicable corporate law. Additionally, Interwest
         shall maintain the confidentiality of all information of MED not
         cleared by MED for public release.


In acknowledgement and acceptance of terms herein:




--------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Magliochetti, CEO, Med Diversified        Date



--------------------------------------------------------------
Ajay Anand, Interwest Associates                Date