alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned officers’ knowledge:





i.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tony Liu


Tony Liu


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


August 7, 2009










/s/ Yanchun Li
 Yanchun Li
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 August 7, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3226 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3226

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure accurate and timely 
 reporting of smoking variants through updating the Federal Health IT 
                            Strategic Plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2021

Mr. Trone (for himself, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, and Mr. Stewart) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure accurate and timely 
 reporting of smoking variants through updating the Federal Health IT 
                            Strategic Plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accurate Reporting of Smoking 
Variants Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has 
        reported 2,807 lung injuries and 68 confirmed deaths from 
        vaping-related injuries.
            (2) According to the 2020 National Youth Tobacco Survey, 
        over 3.6 million kids were reported to be currently using 
        electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), or e-cigarettes.
            (3) Repeated prolonged exposure to aerosols founds in e-
        cigarettes and vaping devices pose considerable potential risk, 
        the long-term health consequences of which also remain to be 
        determined.

SEC. 3. ENSURING ACCURATE AND TIMELY REPORTING OF SMOKING VARIANTS.

    (a) Updating the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan.--Section 
3001(c)(3)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj-
11(c)(3)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ix) Strategies to enable, through the 
                        use of electronic health records, the accurate 
                        and timely collection and use of information on 
                        the use of electronic nicotine delivery 
                        systems, vaping, water pipes, and other 
                        variations of smoking in the same manner as, 
                        through such records, information on smoking is 
                        collected and used.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out the amendment made 
by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose De Jesus CORDOVA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-51251

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western *337District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas L. Wright, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose De Jesus Cordova-Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert, denied,*— U.S.--, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------



                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-7CB
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-7CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Terrin M. JACKSON, Appellant v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 10-2118.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) Nov. 16, 2010.

Filed: Nov. 23, 2010.

*718David M. Linker, Esq., Freedman *&*Lorry, Philadelphia, PA, Stephen B. Potter, Esq., Potter, Carmine & Associates, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Dina W. Griffin, Esq., Lori R. Karimoto, Esq., Patricia A. Stewart, Esq., Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: AMBRO, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Claimant, a 56 year old former longshoreman, tore his right rotator cuff when he fell at his workplace in June 2003. Despite undergoing two surgical procedures and physical therapy, he was not able to return to his previous occupation. He attempted to work as a cargo checker in 2005 but testified that he was unable to perform the job. He further testified that he continues to suffer pain, numbness, and limited range of motion in the right arm and shoulder, and he described his diabetic condition and sleep apnea as additional problems.

After a hearing in April 2007, the ALJ found that claimant was not “disabled” according to the definition set forth in the Social Security Act, because he could perform light exertional work requiring the use of only one arm. The Appeals Council affirmed, and claimant appealed that decision to the United States District Court.

The District Court performed a comprehensive review of the claimant’s record, including the ALJ’s assessment of the testimony and numerous medical reports. Applying the proper standard of review, *see*42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3); *Farg-noli v. Massanari,*247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir.2001) (Commissioner’s decision must be upheld if supported by “substantial evidence”), the District Court found that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, affirmed the agency’s determination, and entered summary judgment in its favor.

While the claimant’s appeal of that ruling was pending in this Court, counsel informed us that in July 2010, claimant had been awarded disability benefits as of December 1, 2009. The issue before us is, therefore, a narrow one: Did the District Court err in upholding the Commissioner’s determination denying benefits until that date?

We conclude that it did not. The District Court carefully considered the record as compiled by the ALJ and found that substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s decision. *See Fargnoli,*247 F.3d at 38 (court bound by ALJ’s findings of fact if supported by “substantial evidence” even though court “would have decided the factual inquiry differently”). Standing alone, the fact that the Commissioner subsequently found claimant to be disabled does not warrant remand or reversal in the absence of new and material evidence, which claimant here has failed to provide. *See Allen v. Comm’r of Social Sec.,*561 F.3d 646, 652-53 (6th Cir.2009). We find no reversible error in the entry of summary judgment and, accordingly, we will affirm.
EXHIBIT 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael McConnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

May 2,
2008

|By: | /s/MICHAEL MCCONNELLMichael McConnell Chief Financial Officer | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---



QuickLinks
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"International Moving Checklist","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PMqa38rTpP\"><a href=\"\/resources-services\/international-moving-checklist\/\">International Moving Checklist<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/resources-services\/international-moving-checklist\/embed\/#?secret=PMqa38rTpP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“International Moving Checklist” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"PMqa38rTpP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
CareersFAQsContact UsSite Map

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Search for:
HomeAbout UsMission & ValuesThe Agency helps build better relationships through joint problem-solving and constructive responses to inevitable conflict.Our HistoryAgency DepartmentsOffice of the DirectorOffice of Procurement and Operational SupportOffice of Human ResourcesOffice of BudgetOffice of Information TechnologyOffice of FinanceOffice of the General CounselOffice of Field Operations (Regional)Office of Client ServicesOffice of Field Operations (National)Office of National ProjectsOffice of Conflict Management & Prevention/InternationalCenter for Conflict Resolution EducationOffice of Field AdministrationOffice of Policy and StrategyOffice of Congressional and Public AffairsOffice of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)LocationPhone: (202) 606-8100 
Fax: (202) 606-4251ServicesResolving Labor-Management DisputesCollective Bargaining MediationGrievance MediationAlternative Bargaining ProcessesTechnology Assisted Group Solutions -TAGSBuilding Labor-Management RelationshipsEffective Contract AdministrationEffective  CommunicationsLabor-Management Partnership BuildingOrganizational DevelopmentRepairing Broken RelationshipsAlternative Dispute Resolution for GovernmentWorkplace MediationAdministrative Program DisputesFacilitationDispute Resolution Systems DesignRegulatory NegotiationsPublic Policy DialoguesEducation and OutreachSkills Development TrainingFMCS InstituteFMCS Collaboration with UniversitiesInternational ServicesConferences and WorkshopsArbitrationRequesting a PanelArbitration Policies and ProceduresInformation for FMCS Roster ArbitratorsInformation on Joining the Arbitrator RosterArbitration Contact InformationResourcesFMCS CalendarForms & Applications for FMCS ServicesMediation Agreement FormsArbitrationNotice to FMCS of Upcoming Collective Bargaining (F-7)Labor-Management Grants ProgramFOIA RequestsDocuments and DataMulti-MediaListen to the Conflict Resolutionary PodcastFMCS 101 Video SeriesSpeeches & PresentationsFAQsNLMC InfoVirtual Services
Search for:  With FMCS Assistance, Joffrey Ballet and Dancers Reach Five-Year Agreement
Home/News/With FMCS Assistance, Joffrey Ballet and Dancers Reach Five-Year Agreement Previous			Next
With FMCS Assistance, Joffrey Ballet and Dancers Reach Five-Year Agreement										With assistance from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the New York City-based Joffrey Ballet has reached a new five-year contract for its company of 41 dancers, represented by the American Guild of Musical Artists (AGMA). According to a recent announcement of the contract by the Ballet, the agreement is effective immediately and extends through the 2020-2021 season.
Read news coverage of the agreement and negotiationhere.
John Arnold2016-08-12T15:44:05-04:00													Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
FacebookTwitterEmail Copyright 2020 FMCS | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  EEO/No FEAR Act  |  PAR  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508 |  SORNs
FacebookTwitterYouTubeEmail
#### Douglas GIEBEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Kay BONILLA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-36061.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

*185Douglas Giebel, Big Sandy, MT, pro se.

Norman C. Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, State of Montana, Department of Justice, Helena, MT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument and therefore denies Giebel’s request. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Douglas Giebel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from a sexual harassment complaint filed against him after the expiration of his employment as an adjunct university professor. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals based on Eleventh Amendment immunity and for failure to state a claim. *Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,*382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed under the Eleventh Amendment Giebel’s claims for damages against defendants that are arms of the State of Montana or who are state officials sued in their official capacities. *See Flint v. Dennison,*488 F.3d 816, 824-25 (9th Cir.2007).

The district court properly dismissed Giebel’s due process claim based on his alleged property interest in employment at the university because he admits that he was a former employee whose contract had expired. *See Bd. of Regents v. Roth,*408 U.S. 564, 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) (professor hired for one year and not rehired did not have property interest in continued employment).

To the extent Giebel’s due process claim was based on his liberty interest in his reputation, the district court properly dismissed the claim because Giebel admits that he received notice of the sexual *186harassment allegations and “an opportunity to refute the charge.” *Id.*at 573 & n. 12, 92 S.Ct. 2701 (“The purpose of such notice and hearing is to provide the person an opportunity to clear his name.”).

Giebel has waived claims not argued in his opening brief. *See Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc.,*797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir.1986).

Giebel’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61123

Summary Calendar

PAUL JONATHAN MAGEE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Agency No. A96 637 514

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Paul Jonathan Magee petitions for review of the

Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s order of

deportation. He argues that he is eligible for adjustment of

status and that he was detained and removed in violation of his

due process rights. Magee’s petition for review was not timely

filed, however. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Therefore, we lack

jurisdiction to review the merits of his claims. See KarimianKaklaki v. INS, 997 F.2d 108, 113 (5th Cir. 1993).

PETITION DISMISSED.
84 A.3d 1057

#### Yusef BROWN, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 176 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 29, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. To the *226extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests extraordinary relief, it is DENIED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests mandamus relief, it is GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is directed to dispose of Petitioner’s filings within 90 days of this order.
EXHIBIT 32.3
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Pilgrims Pride Corporation, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:
 
 The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:November 24, 2004
/s/ Richard A. CogdillRichard A. CogdillChief Financial Officer
FMCS | 250 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov 

NEWS RELEASE 

Monday, June 11, 2018 Contact: John Arnold 

For Immediate Release FMCS Director of Public Affairs 

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8100 

Announcement: FMCS Commissioner 

Appointed New Agency Acting Director 

WASHINGTON, DC – FMCS Commissioner Richard Giacolone has been appointed by President Trump to 

serve as the Acting Director for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), effective 

immediately. 

Mr. Giacolone began his mediation career at FMCS in the Chesapeake, Virginia field office in 1995. He 

was the former Director of the FMCS International/ADR Department and Special Assistant to the 

Director of FMCS. Prior to receiving his commission with FMCS, Mr. Giacolone was Labor Relations 

Advisor for the Department of the Navy and has an extensive background in labor relations representing

management. 

During his 23-year FMCS career, Mr. Giacolone mediated thousands of domestic labor and employment 

cases, comprising many cases of national significance, ranging from labor disputes involving multiple 

symphonies and orchestras to bus and transportation disputes and scores of cases involving shipbuilding 

and repair industries with national impact. He has also mediated numerous significant collective 

bargaining agreements covering nationwide bargaining units in the Federal sector. His international 

experience at FMCS includes both mediation and the development and delivery of dispute resolution 

programs in some fourteen countries. 

Among his professional honors, Mr. Giacolone was awarded the Meritorious Civilian Service Medal for 

his contributions to the Department of Navy Labor and Employee Relations program and the Society of 

Federal Labor and Employee Relations Professionals Lifetime Achievement Award. He was elected 

National President of the Society of Federal Labor and Employee Relations Professionals. 

Mr. Giacolone holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Psychology and a Master of Public 

Administration degree from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA. He has served on the faculty and 

regularly lectured at a number of universities on topics such as collective bargaining and arbitration. 

### 

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government 

agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. 

Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 regional offices and more than 60 field offices, the agency 

provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government agencies and communities.