alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3179 

To codify Executive Order 13950 (relating to combating race and sex 

stereotyping), and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2021 

Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mrs. GREENE of 

Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. BUDD, Mr. 

GAETZ, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. BUCK, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. ROY, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. HARRIS, 

Mr. WALTZ, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. CLOUD, 

Mr. PERRY, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. BROOKS, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. HUDSON, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. BABIN, Mr. HICE of 

Georgia, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. BANKS, and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Reform, and 

Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To codify Executive Order 13950 (relating to combating 

race and sex stereotyping), and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop CRT Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3179 IH

1 SEC. 2. CODIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER. 

2 Executive Order 13950 (85 Fed. Reg. 60683; relat3 ing to combating race and sex stereotyping) shall have the 

4 force and effect of law. 

5 SEC. 3. FEDERAL FUNDS LIMITATION. 

6 A Federal entity may not grant Federal funds to any 

7 entity that teaches or advances any of the following: 

8 (1) Any race is inherently superior or inferior 

9 to any other race. 

10 (2) The United States is a fundamentally racist 

11 country. 

12 (3) The Declaration of Independence or the 

13 United States Constitution are fundamentally racist 

14 documents. 

15 (4) An individual’s moral worth is determined 

16 by his or her race. 

17 (5) An individual, by virtue of his or her race, 

18 is inherently racist or oppressive, whether con19 sciously or unconsciously. 

20 (6) An individual, because of his or her race, 

21 bears responsibility for the actions committed by 

22 members of his or her race. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Telecom, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Alexander
Vinogradov, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of August 2003.


/s/ ALEXANDER VINOGRADOV
----------------------------------------

Alexander Vinogradov
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24A1084. MATTHEW SZYDLOWSKI v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On March 27, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and

a brief no later than April 08, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe BERNAL-PORTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe Bernal-Portillo, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 07-10344, 07-10345.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 23, 2008.

Robert A. Bork, Esq., Robert L. Ell-man, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brenda Weksler, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated cases, Noe Bernal-Portillo appeals from the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bernal-Portillo contends that his sentence enhancement, based on a prior conviction that was not alleged in the indictment, proved beyond a reasonable doubt, or admitted during plea proceedings, is unconstitutional. He further contends that, under the doctrine of constitutional avoidance, § 1326 should be construed to require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a prior conviction used to enhance a sentence. As Bernal-Portillo concedes, these contentions are foreclosed. *See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 243-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); *United States v. Grisel,*488 F.3d 844, 846-47 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc); *United States v. Zepeda-Martinez,*470 F.3d 909, 912 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Bernal-Portillo does not raise any contentions regarding the 24-month sentence imposed in district court case CR-00-00294-PMP following revocation of supervised release,
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Joaquin F.Blaya, Chief Executive Officer of Radio Unica Communications Corp. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dohereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I haveexecuted this Certification this 14th day of May, 2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ Joaquin  F. Blaya                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joaquin F.  Blaya                     |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radio UnicaCommunications Corp and will be retained by Radio Unica Communications Corp andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"September 2021 Activity Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N73Dwbh7ya\"><a href=\"\/september-2021-activity-report\/\">September 2021 Activity Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/september-2021-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=N73Dwbh7ya\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“September 2021 Activity Report” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"N73Dwbh7ya\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 10.49


 


June 15, 2007


Dr. John Thompson

University of Waterloo

Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1

Canada


Re:          Amendment #5 to Consulting Agreement of July 12, 1999


Dear
Dr. Thompson:


This
will modify paragraph 11 of your Consulting Agreement with Senesco dated July
12, 1999, as modified.  Effective
immediately, the term of the Consulting Agreement will be extended for an
additional 2 year term through June 30, 2009. 
All other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Bruce C. Galton

  	
   

  
	
  Bruce C. Galton

  	
   

  
	
  President

  	
   

  
	
  Senesco, Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Acknowledged and Agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Dr. John Thompson

  	
   

  
	
  Dr. John Thompson
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            118,470
<OTHER-SE>                                         (118,470)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              0
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          91,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,450
<PP&E>                                             806
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,013
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       574,703
<OTHER-SE>                                   (599,316)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,400
<SALES>                                         54,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,387
<CGS>                                            2,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)






</TABLE>
Consent of Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.





We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold, Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to our name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009; the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mesquite Mine, Brawley, California, USA” dated February 26, 2010; the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Cerro San Pedro Mine, San Luis Potosí, Mexico” dated February 16, 2010; and amended March 22, 2010, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Peak Gold Mines, New South Wales, Australia” dated March 25, 2013, and the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the El Morro Project, Region III, Chile” dated March 23, 2012, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.








Dated this 27th day of March, 2013








“Richard Lambert”Name:
Richard J. LambertTitle:
P.E. and Executive Vice-Presidentfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.







RPA (USA) Ltd.143 Union Boulevard Suite 505 lLakewoord, CO, USA 80228 lT+1 (303) 330 0950 www.rpacan.com
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on Maritime Day 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0AjXu0zupP\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-sola-maritime-day-2020\/\">Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on Maritime Day 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-commissioner-sola-maritime-day-2020\/embed\/#?secret=0AjXu0zupP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Commissioner Louis E. Sola on Maritime Day 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"0AjXu0zupP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 21, 2005



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Paul K. Danner     
|    |  | Paul K. Danner         
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining    
|    |  | Scott L. Vining        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00079-CR

SHAQUITA SHAW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15F0365-005

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ShaQuita Shaw has filed an untimely notice of appeal from a judgment revoking her 

community supervision for theft with two or more previous convictions.1 We dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction.

The judgment of conviction in this matter indicates that Shaw’s sentence was imposed on 

February 22, 2019, and that her notice of appeal was filed on April 1, 2019. There is nothing in 

the appellate record to indicate that Shaw filed a motion for new trial. In the absence of a timely 

motion for new trial, Shaw, to perfect her appeal, was required to file her notice of appeal within 

thirty days of the date sentence was imposed, or on or before March 24, 2019. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1). The notice of appeal, therefore, was untimely.

We notified Shaw by letter that her notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the 

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We gave Shaw ten days to respond to our 

letter and demonstrate how we had jurisdiction over the appeal notwithstanding the noted defect. 

Shaw filed a response in which she claims that she mailed her notice of appeal on February 27, 

2019. Our record includes a letter filed by Shaw—which we liberally construed as a notice of 

appeal—on April 1, 2019. There is nothing in the record that reflects an earlier filing by Shaw of 

any document that could reasonably be construed as a notice of appeal. 

 1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03.
3

Because Shaw did not timely file her notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Scott E. Stevens

Justice

Date Submitted: June 3, 2019

Date Decided: June 4, 2019

Do Not Publish