alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PreviousNext

## Deadline Approaching for FMCS Labor-Management Grants Applications Due May 31, 2018

WASHINGTON, DC – The deadline to apply for a labor-management grant from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) is now less than a month away; and time is growing short to earn grant funding for projects such as improving workers’ skills, addressing workplace health and safety issues, or jointly resolving labor-management issues.

FMCS grants totaling approximately $500,000 will be awarded in FY 2018 to promote best practices in labor-management cooperation as a way of improving collective bargaining and proactively mitigating labor-management disputes. The grant program supports the establishment and operation of joint labor-management committees at the company level, on a community or area-wide basis, within a particular industry, and for public sector employees.

FMCS grants are intended to support and promote labor-management cooperation as well as joint, innovative solutions to disruptive workplace issues.

As has been the case in previous years, FMCS is encouraging applications to address the shortage of skilled workers for U.S. manufacturing jobs and in other vital economic sectors. Also of special interest are grant applications that look ahead to training for high-tech jobs that will emerge from an economy where new technologies such as artificial intelligence, self-driving vehicles, and Internet-based transactions are commonplace. John Pinto, FMCS Deputy Director, Field Operations, said, “It is imperative that management and labor begin preparing for the new jobs and workplaces that new technologies will create in the near future.”

FMCS Deputy Director Scot Beckenbaugh added, “We want to encourage labor organizations and employers to think about the jobs of tomorrow and to explore options with the FMCS grants program for developing joint training programs that can teach the skills needed to fill these jobs.”

Detailed information and application training videos are available at https://www.fmcs.gov/resources/forms-applications/labor-management-grants-program/.

Interested parties are urged to contact the FMCS Grants Office at (202) 606-8181 with any questions they might have.

The grants program, which began in 1981 under the authority of the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (PL 95-524), has funded a broad range of projects including outreach, communications, strategic planning, minority recruitment and process development.

John Arnold

#### Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

FacebookTwitterEmail
VACATE and DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 16, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00231-CV
WESCO INSURANCE CO MPANY, Appellant V. WESTWOOD MOTORCARS, LLC; WESTWOOD MOTORS, LLC; IGOR HAJDUCH; AND VERA HAJDUCH, Appellees
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-17267
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III Opinion by Chief Justice Burns By joint motion filed October 19, 2022, th e parties state they have settled their
dispute and ask that we vacate the trial court’s judg ment without reference to the
merits and render judgment dismissing appe llees’ claims against appellant with
prejudice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We gran t the motion and, without
reference to the merits, vacate the tria l court’s judgment a nd render judgment–2– dismissing appellees’ claims agai nst appellant with prejudice. See id.

220231F.P05 /Robert D. Bu r ns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

No. 05-22-00231-CV V.

WESTWOOD MOTORCARS, LLC; WESTWOOD MOTORS, LLC; IGOR HAJDUCH; AND VERA HAJDUCH, Appellees On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-17267. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date and without reference to the merits, we VACATE the trial court’s February 17, 2022 judgment and DISMISS Westwood Motorcars, LLC, Westwood Moto rs, LLC, Igor Hajduch, and Vera Hajduch’s claims against a ppellant with prejudice.

We ORDER that each party bears its own costs of the appeal. The obligations of appellant Wesco Insurance Company, as principal, a nd U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, as surety, on appe llant’s supersedeas bond are RELEASED

.

Judgment entered this 16th day of November 2022.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"David Eng","title":"Passenger Vessel Operators - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pM8JvWdOaQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/passenger-vessel-operators\/\">Passenger Vessel Operators<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/licensing-and-certification\/passenger-vessel-operators\/embed\/#?secret=pM8JvWdOaQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Passenger Vessel Operators” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"pM8JvWdOaQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"About Passenger Vessel Operators (PVOs) subject to FMC regulations are cruise lines that operate vessels having berth or stateroom accommodations for 50 or more passengers that embark passengers at U.S. ports. How to apply for a PVO certificate How to obtain refunds from the PVO in the event of nonperformance Passenger Vessel Operators are required […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
# Time 2014-Present Archives - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

- 2020 On Aug. 10, 2020, representatives from Bath Iron Works and International Association of Machinists Local S6 signed an agreement with FMCS' assistance to end the shipyard worker strike in Bath, Maine. The 63-day strike drew national attention against the backdrop of a global pandemic and in an election year.The post 2020 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
- 2019 In April 2019, The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and FMCS officially committed to work together to resolve federal workplace disputes by utilizing ADR as a means of efficiently reducing the backlog of federal sector charges. And, in June, FMCS and the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) announced a new commitment to work [...]The post 2019 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
- 2015 On July 29, 2015, the U.S. Senate votes to confirm FMCS Acting Director Allison Beck as the first woman Director of the Agency. She becomes the 18th Director of the FMCS since it was created by Congress in 1947. Ms. Beck was nominated for the position by President Obama on September 18, 2014.The post 2015 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
- 2018 On June 06, 2018, President Trump appointed Richard Giacolone to serve as the Acting Director for FMCS, for which he was subsequently confirmed by Congress in a unanimous voice-vote as Director.  Mr. Giacolone began his mediation career at FMCS in the Chesapeake, Virginia field office in 1995. He was the former Director of the FMCS [...]The post 2018 appeared first on Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.C. BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-3806.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Dec. 7, 2010.

Richard N. Cox, Office of the United States Attorney, Urbana, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Andrew J. McGowan, Robert A. Alvarado, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge, DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

L.C. Bell pled guilty to possession of more than five grams of cocaine base with intent to distribute and possession of a firearm by a felon. The district court sentenced Bell to 150 months’ imprisonment and eight years of supervised release on the drug count, and 120 months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release on the firearm count, to run concurrently. In *United States v. Bell,*585 F.3d 1045 (7th Cir.2009), we affirmed Bell’s convictions but issued a limited remand to *105allow the district court to determine whether it would have imposed a different sentence in light of *Kimbrough v. United States,*552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). On September 27, 2010, the district court advised us that it would have imposed the same sentence even if it had known that it could take the craek/coeaine powder disparity into account. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21.1

THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.

The following is a list of subsidiaries of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (‘‘Warnaco’’) as of December 29, 2007. Subsidiaries of Warnaco, to the extent not listed below, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

Company


Country or State of Incorporation4278941 Canada Inc.


CanadaA.E.S. Advanced Euro Service S.r.l.


ItalyAuthentic Fitness On-Line Inc.


NevadaCalvin Klein Jeanswear Asia, Ltd.


Hong KongCalvin Klein Jeanswear Company


DelawareCCC Acquisition Corp.


DelawareCK Jeanswear Australia Pty Limited


AustraliaCK Jeanswear Europe S.r.l.


ItalyCKJ Fashion (Shanghai) Ltd.


People’s Republic of ChinaCK Jeanswear Korea Ltd.


KoreaCK Jeanswear NZ Ltd.


New ZealandCKJ Holdings, Inc.


DelawareCKJ UK Ltd.


United KingdomCKU.com Inc.


DelawareDesigner Holdings Ltd.


DelawareDesigner Holdings Overseas Ltd.


Hong KongEratex Gmbh


GermanyEuralis S.A.S.


FranceEuro Retail S.r.l.


ItalyFA France Sarl


FranceGold Lightening Ltd.


Hong KongJeanswear Services Ltd.


United Kingdom


---



THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.

Company


Country or State of IncorporationLejaby S.A.S.


FranceLejaby Taiwan Co., Ltd.


TaiwanLenitex-Warnaco Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H.


AustriaLinda Vista de Veracruz S.A. de C.V.


MexicoLintex-Warnaco S.a.r.l.


SwitzerlandMullion International Limited


British Virgin IslandsOcean Pacific Apparel Corp.


DelawareVista de Puebla S.A. de C.V.


MexicoVista de Yucatan, S.A. de C.V.


MexicoWarnaco (HK) Ltd.


BarbadosWarnaco (Macao) Company Limited


MacaoWarnaco B.V.


NetherlandsWarnaco Denmark A/S


DenmarkWarnaco France S.A.R.L.


FranceWarnaco Germany GmbH


GermanyWarnaco Inc.


DelawareWarnaco International Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.


Peoples Republic of ChinaWarnaco Intimo, S.A.


SpainWarnaco Netherlands B.V.


NetherlandsWarnaco of Canada Company


CanadaWarnaco Portugal-Vestuario e Acessorios, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda.


PortugalWarnaco Poland Sp. z.o.o.


PolandWarnaco Puerto Rico, Inc.


Delaware


---



THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.

Company


Country or State of IncorporationWarnaco Retail Inc.


DelawareWarnaco S.r.l.


ItalyWarnaco Shanghai Co. Ltd.


People’s Republic of ChinaWarnaco Singapore Private Ltd.


SingaporeWarnaco Swimwear Inc.


DelawareWarnaco Swimwear Products Inc.


DelawareWarnaco U.S. Inc.


DelawareWarner’s (EIRE) Teoranta


IrelandWarner’s Aiglon, S.A.


FranceWarner’s Company (Belgium) S.p.r.l.


BelgiumWarner’s de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.


MexicoWarner’s (United Kingdom) Ltd.


Northern IrelandWAS Logistics B.V.


NetherlandsWBR Industria e Comercio de Vestuario S.A.


Brazil – Joint VentureWF Overseas Fashion C.V.


Netherlands


---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Plain Language Guidelines, Plan, and Report - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JBfr76DBKN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/plain-language-guidelines-plan-and-report\/\">Plain Language Guidelines, Plan, and Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/plain-language-guidelines-plan-and-report\/embed\/#?secret=JBfr76DBKN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Plain Language Guidelines, Plan, and Report” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"JBfr76DBKN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Plain Writing Act of 2010 [PDF, 125 KB] requires federal agencies to write \u201cclear Government communication that the public can understand and use.\u201d President Obama also emphasized the importance of establishing \u201ca system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration\u201d in his January 21, 2009, Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government [PDF, 269 KB]. The FMC is [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman International LLC (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 11, 2005                                            |  | 

---



QuickLinks
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00060

- CV

I N RE J.R.

, Relator §

§

§

§

§ Original Proceeding

158th District Court of Denton

County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 7168

- 211

April 15, 2021

Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus and holds

that the petition should be conditionally granted. Accordingly, we conditionally grant

the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to dismiss the underlying case. Our

writ will issue only if the trial court f ails to comply.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Mike Wallach

Justice Mike Wallach
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC) - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jQfMAaItR3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/bureau-of-enforcement-investigations-and-compliance-beic\/\">Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/bureau-of-enforcement-investigations-and-compliance-beic\/embed\/#?secret=jQfMAaItR3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC)” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"jQfMAaItR3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Maritime Commission\u2019s Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC) is comprised of three sections: the Office of Enforcement, the Office of Investigations, and the Office of Compliance.   Office of Enforcement The Office of Enforcement is the prosecutorial arm of the Commission. Under the direction and management of the Office Director, attorneys participate as trial [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Archie Fulton MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-5246.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2008.

Decided: May 12, 2008.

*305Anne R. Littlejohn, Law Office of Anne R. Littlejohn, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us after resentencingon remand. We earlier affirmed Archie Moore’s conviction pursuant to his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000), but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing pursuant to *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). *United States v. Moore,*190 Fed.Appx. 319 (4th Cir.2006) (unpublished).

On remand, the district court held a resentencing hearing in accordance with *Booker*and sentenced Moore to 240 months’ imprisonment, the statutory minimum sentence that Moore could have received because he had previously been convicted of a felony drug offense. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Moore filed a timely pro se notice of appeal.

Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which she states that she has found no meritorious issues for appeal because Moore received the statutory mandatory minimum sentence. Because Moore was not eligible for any reduction below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence, we find no error.

In a pro se supplemental brief, Moore asserts that his guilty plea is invalid. The mandate rule “forecloses relitigation of issues expressly or impliedly decided by the appellate court,” as well as “issues decided by the district court but foregone on appeal.” *United States v. Bell,*5 F.3d 64, 66 (4th Cir.1993). Because we affirmed Moore’s conviction in *306his first appeal, this claim is foreclosed by the mandate rule.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Moore’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Moore, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Moore requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Moore.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*