alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"id":1433,"date":"2012-08-10T12:41:11","date_gmt":"2012-08-10T16:41:11","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1433"},"modified":"2018-08-17T12:42:05","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T16:42:05","slug":"remarks-of-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-sala-de-las-americas-august-1-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/remarks-of-commissioner-mario-cordero-at-sala-de-las-americas-august-1-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Remarks of Commissioner Mario Cordero at Sala de las Americas, August 1, 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>August 10, 2012<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/Cordero_Remarks_08012012_Sala_de_las_Americas.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>August 10, 2012 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1433"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1434,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433\/revisions\/1434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of the 9th day of February, 2001, by and between
NetZero, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), with principal corporate offices at 2555 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, CA 91361, and Charles Hilliard, whose address is 2112
Marshbrook Road, Lake Sherwood, California 91361 ("Employee"). All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in that certain Employment Agreement by
and between the Company and Employee dated April 17, 1999 (the "Agreement" or the "Employment Agreement").

WHEREAS,
the Company and Employee desire to modify certain terms of the Employment Agreement.

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:





---



In
witness whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the first date written above.

| |  |               |  |                                                            
| |  | ------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |  | NETZERO, INC.
| |  |               |  |                                                            
| |  | By:           |  | /s/MARK R. GOLDSTONMark R. Goldston
Chief Executive Officer
| |  |               |  |                                                            
| |  | EMPLOYEE     
| |  |               |  | /s/CHARLES S. HILLIARDCharles S. Hilliard                  

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.4**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of International Stem Cell Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the“Report”), I, Ray Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 25, 2010
#### ROGERS *v.*CLARK IRON COMPANY.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.

No. 244.

Motion to dismiss submitted April 4, 1910.

Decided April 11, 1910.

Where the state-court only decides who is entitled to lands under a patent no Federal question is necessarily involved and this court does not have jurisdiction to review upder §709, Rev. Stat., and in this case no. Federal question was decided directly or by implication.

An attempt to raise a Federal question in this court for the first time is too late.

104 Minnesota, 198, affirmed.

The facts involve the claim of title to property in the State of Minnesota based on a patent of the United States. The state court found the facts as contended by the defendants, and also that the patent itself was not attacked, but that the question was: Who was the person entitled to the lands under the patent?

*Mr. John B. Richards*and *Mr. Daniel G. Cash*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John G. Williams, Mr. Oscar Mitchell, Mr. Joseph B. Cotton, Mr. Frank D. Adams, Mr. William R. Begg*and *Mr. C. O.*Baldwin.for defendants in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The case is reported below in 104 Minnesota, 198, where the facts are set forth at length. We hold that no Federal question was decided either in express terms or by necessary implication, and that the attempt to raise a Federal question was made in this court for the first time, which was too late.
Exhibit 10.3


 


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 


OF


AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF


SPECIALTY RENAL PRODUCTS, INC.


 


It is hereby certified that:


 


FIRST: Specialty Renal
Products, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its Certificate
of Incorporation was initially filed in the office of the Secretary of State on July 2, 2018, and Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) on September 5, 2018.


 


SECOND: This Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted by the directors and the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with
the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


THIRD: The Certificate
of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Article FOURTH in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


“FOURTH: The total number of
shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is (i) 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001
par value per share (“Common Stock”); and (ii) 700,003 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Preferred
Stock”).”


 


The undersigned is signing this certificate on February
4, 2022.


 


	 	SPECIALTY RENAL PRODUCTS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Andrew Astor
	 	Name:	Andrew Astor
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Instructions for Drafting a Shipping Act Complaint","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Hn4TUhSjlc\"><a href=\"\/resources-services\/instructions-for-drafting-a-shipping-act-complaint\/\">Instructions for Drafting a Shipping Act Complaint<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/resources-services\/instructions-for-drafting-a-shipping-act-complaint\/embed\/#?secret=Hn4TUhSjlc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Instructions for Drafting a Shipping Act Complaint” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Hn4TUhSjlc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
JULIE A. MADARANG, Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3199

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0831

- 14

- 0267 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Julie A. Madarang moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 14-3199 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2014MADARANG v. MSPB 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-3199 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2014
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (“the Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eran Broshy, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            
            /S/    ERANBROSHY**Eran
                Broshy**
              **Chief
                Executive Officer**




August
      9 ,
      2005








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF SPINNAKER EXPLORATION COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Spinnaker Exploration Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger L. Jarvis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ROGER L. JARVIS                                                       
|Name: Roger L. Jarvis Title: Chief Executive Officer Date: August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spinnaker Exploration Company and will be retained by Spinnaker Exploration Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with
the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) by National Coal Corp. (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/ Daniel A. Roling                 
|                      |  | Daniel A. Roling                     
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael R. Castle                
|                      |  | Michael R. Castle                    
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group V,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William R. Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008

                                  /s/ William R. Colucci
                                  ----------------------
                                  William R. Colucci, President
                                  BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
#### Richard E. BLACKBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; South Carolina Department of Corrections: Jon Ozmint, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Robert Ward, Regional Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Robin Chavis, ECI Associate Warden; Ms. Sprattling, ECI Grievance Clerk; Sandra Bowie, Chief, Branch Grievance; J. Glenn Alewine; Pravin R. Patel, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-6677.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 17, 2010.

Richard E. Blackburn, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott & Tyler, PA, Florence, South Carolina; Benjamin Albert Baroody, Bellamy, Rutenburg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely *&*Bowers, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard E. Blackburn appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blackburn’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Blackburn v. South Carolina,*No. 9:06-cv-02011-PMD, 2009 WL 632542 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11351 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v. IRVING ALEXANDER FLORES

- FUENTES , Defendant

– Appellant

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CR

- 64

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Irving Alexander Flores

- Fuentes appeals the 24

- month prison sentence he received upon the revocation of his supervised release , contending that it is substantively unreasonable

. He argues that the district court improperly considered as an aggravating fac tor the leniency of the sentence he received for a new conviction that was based on the same conduct underlying his supervised release violation . The court, however, made no finding as to the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 3, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11351 Document: 00514585555 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2018No. 17

- 11351

2 propriety of that sentence. Instead, it explained that it base d the revocation sentence on the need to address the conduct underlying the supervised release violation, to deter Flores

- Fuentes from commit ting additional crimes, and to account for Flores

- Fuentes’s “extensive” criminal history, all of which were
proper factors for the court to consider. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (2)(B); s ee also United States v. Rivera , 79 7 F.3d 307, 309 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (explaining that, in imposing a revocation sentence, the court is “punishing the defendant’s breach of the court’s trust,” and that ‘“the nature of the conduct leading to the revocation [may] be considered in measuring the ex tent of the breach of trust ”’ (quoti ng U.S.S.G. ch. 7, pt. A, introductory cmt .) ). Flores

- Fuentes has not demonstrated that the distri ct court gave substantial weight to an irrelevan t or improper factor or that it made a clear error in judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. See United States v. Winding , 817 F.3d 910, 914 (5th Cir. 2016). He has not overcome the presumption that his revocation sentence , which was within the range recommended by the guidelines policy statements, is reasonable , s ee United States v. Lopez

- Velasquez , 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) , and thus has not shown that the revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable, see United States v. Miller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011)

. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-11351 Document: 00514585555 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2018
<PAGE>



                                                                 EXHIBIT 24.1(b)
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
and related Reoffer Prospectus (Form S-8 No. 33-58146) pertaining to the Amended
and Restated 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of The Warnaco Group, Inc. of our
report  dated  February 23,  1995, with  respect  to the  consolidated financial
statements and schedule of The Warnaco Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 6, 1996.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
March 18, 1996




<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Scott
      R. Oglum, Chief Executive Officer of Theater Xtreme entertainment Group, Inc.,
      hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2005:





(1)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      that
      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Theater Xtreme
      Entertainment Group, Inc.




Dated:
      November 14, 2005





/s/
                Scott R. OglumScott
                R. Oglum, Chief Executive Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.