alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Testimony of Commissioner Dye before Congress: \u201cExecutive Session and Ocean Shipping Reform Act Hearing\u201d","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IOEklpVOMr\"><a href=\"\/testimony-of-commissioner-dye-before-congress-executive-session-and-ocean-shipping-reform-act-hearing\/\">Testimony of Commissioner Dye before Congress: \u201cExecutive Session and Ocean Shipping Reform Act Hearing\u201d<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/testimony-of-commissioner-dye-before-congress-executive-session-and-ocean-shipping-reform-act-hearing\/embed\/#?secret=IOEklpVOMr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Testimony of Commissioner Dye before Congress: \u201cExecutive Session and Ocean Shipping Reform Act Hearing\u201d” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"IOEklpVOMr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Table Trac, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chad Hoehne, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Chad
      HoehneChad
      HoehneChief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerNovember
      15, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65188-65189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP02-119-000]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 4, 2001, Dominion Transmission Inc. 
(DTI), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an 
effective date of December 5, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 1076
First Revised Sheet No. 1077

    DTI states that the purpose of this filing is to eliminate the 
North of Valley Operational Flow Order. DTI requests a waiver of the 
30-day notice requirement and an effective date of December 5, 2001.
    DTI states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures 
have been served upon DTI's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sec. 385.214 or Sec.  385.211 of the Commission's Rules

[[Page 65189]]

and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31082 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan, Chief Executive Officer of Pruco Life InsuranceCompany, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life Variable Contract RealProperty Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company) and The Prudential VariableContract Real Property Partnership (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract RealProperty Partnership. Date: March 21,    2008          /s/ Scott D. Kaplan    Name: Scott D. Kaplan     Title:     Chief Executive    Officer    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **Darwin    Professional Underwriters, Inc.****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of Darwin Professional    Underwriters, Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission (the    “Report”), I, John L. Sennott, Jr., Senior    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,    hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of    Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United    States Code, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the    periods indicated.     This Certification, which accompanies the Report, has not been,    and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities    and Exchange Commission.      By: /s/  John    L. Sennott, Jr.    John L. Sennott, Jr.    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: February 25, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,146
<SECURITIES>                                       529
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          31,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,135,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         18
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,135,029
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,595
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,956
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,282
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (902)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65187-65188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-389-037]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Co.; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

December 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 5, 2001, Columbia Gulf Transmission

[[Page 65188]]

Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with 
an effective date of December 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 20
First Revised Sheet No. 20A
First Revised Sheet No. 20B

    Columbia Gulf states that it is filing the tariff sheets to comply 
with the Commission's October 24, 2001 orders approving negotiated rate 
agreements in Docket Nos. RP96-389-031, and -032.
    Columbia Gulf states further that it has served copies of the 
filing on all parties identified on the official service list in Docket 
No. RP96-389.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' 
link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31075 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yudhister Bahl, Chief Financial Officer of Gaiam, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/YUDHISTER BAHLYudhister Bahl
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Report of Auto Wholesale Specialists, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Pamela Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 18, 2002
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3123 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the same treatment 

to publicly offered, non-traded Real Estate Investment Trusts as is 

provided to exchange-traded Real Estate Investment Trusts under the 

Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2021 

Mr. SUOZZI (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

the same treatment to publicly offered, non-traded Real 

Estate Investment Trusts as is provided to exchangetraded Real Estate Investment Trusts under the Foreign 

Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parity for Non-Traded 

5 REITs Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3123 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR PUBLICLY OFFERED REAL ESTATE 

2 INVESTMENT TRUSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 897 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ‘‘regularly 

6 traded on an established securities market’’ and in7 serting ‘‘either regularly traded on an established se8 curities market or, solely with respect to real estate 

9 investment trusts, publicly offered (within the mean10 ing of section 562(c)(2)’’, 

11 (2) in subsection (h)(1), by striking ‘‘with re12 spect to any class of stock which is regularly traded 

13 on an established securities market located in the 

14 United States’’ and inserting ‘‘either, with respect to 

15 any class of stock which is regularly traded on an 

16 established securities market located in the United 

17 States or, solely with respect to real estate invest18 ment trusts, publicly offered (within the meaning of 

19 section 562(c)(2))’’, and 

20 (3) in the header of subsection (k)(1), by in21 serting ‘‘OR PUBLICLY OFFERED’’ after ‘‘PUBLICLY

22 TRADED’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

25 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Anthony RANES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30197.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 2010.

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Alexander C. Ekstrom, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca Louise Pennell, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*124Before: B. FLETCHER, FERNANDEZ and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Steven Anthony Ranes appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with failing to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the conviction but remand to the district court to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence.

At the time of his arrest, Ranes was required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16913, to register and keep his registration current, notwithstanding Washington state’s failure to adopt a registration scheme that complies with SORNA. *United States v. George,*625 F.3d 1124, 1128-30 (9th Cir.2010). Further, *George*squarely rejected each of the constitutional challenges to SORNA that Ranes makes on appeal. *Id.*at 1128-31.

Ranes argues that the facts set forth in the plea agreement do not amount to a violation of SORNA. We conclude that Ranes is bound by his knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. *See United States v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir.2009). In some circumstances, a defendant may appeal a conviction notwithstanding an appeal waiver. *See United States v. Ruelas,*106 F.3d 1416, 1418-19 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that where the indictment failed to charge all elements of a federal offense, the defendant could appeal the district court’s lack of jurisdiction). In this case, however, Ranes’s argument that the facts set forth in the plea agreement do not amount to a violation of SORNA is not exempt from that waiver as a challenge to the court’s jurisdiction. Because of the waiver, we do not reach the merits of Ranes’s argument.

Finally, we hold that the district court erred when it issued a written judgment containing a three year term of supervised release, even though the judge did not orally impose any term of supervised release at the sentencing hearing. The unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence controls. *United States v. Munoz-Dela Rosa,*495 F.2d 253, 256 (9th Cir.1974). The government agrees that we should remand to the district court to correct the written judgment.

Appellant’s conviction is AFFIRMED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. Rule 36-3.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DECEMBER 7, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11292 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00109-MHT-SRW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

llllllllllllllllllll0l Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONEL BRAVO-ZAMORA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Alabama

 ________________________

(December 7, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Schoettker, appointed counsel for Leonel Bravo-Zamora, has filed

a motion to withdraw from further representation pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Because independent review of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and BravoZamora’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
<PAGE>

                             ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2

     The parties to this Engagement Agreement Amendment No. 2 hereby amend the
Engagement Agreement Amendment dated October 30, 2000 between the Board of
Directors of Printware, Inc. ("Printware") and Goldmark Advisors, LLC
("Goldmark"), referred to herein at the "Agreement", to reflect the following
changes:

     - Any and all warrants issued or issuable under the Agreement shall be
       rescinded retroactively to November 1, 2000
     - Services provided by Goldmark to Printware, and any of Printware'
       remaining financial obligations to Goldmark, shall terminate as of
       January 31, 2001

Accordingly, the following changes to each of the applicable captions of the
Agreement shall be made as noted below:

     Caption: "After October 31, 2000"

     Delete in its entirety provision 2. which reads:
         "Warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company's common stock
         exercisable at the market value of such common stock on the warrant
         issuance dates.  The warrants shall be immediately 100% vested.  The
         warrant agreement terms would be five (5) years in duration and their
         provisions would contain all applicable rights and privileges relating
         to dilution. "

     Caption: "Other"

     Add provision 4. which shall read as follows:
         "Services provided by Goldmark to Printware shall terminate as of
         January 31, 2001.  After such date, Printware shall have no remaining
         financial obligations to Goldmark. "

Agreed to by:

Goldmark Advisors, LLC

By: /s/Mark Eisenschenk
Its: Managing Partner
Mark Eisenschenk

Printware, Inc.

By: /s/Gary s. Kohler
Its: Chairman
Gary S. Kohler