alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review: Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: December 13, 2001.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: John L. Bowers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4168, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1725.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: December 19, 2001.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ranga V. Srinivas, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Heath, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5108, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1167, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e5e4fff8ffe0f7e4d6f5e5e4b8f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5320213a3d3a253221133020217d3d3a3b7d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 6, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-30876 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE WARNACO GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 4,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                       9,328
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              347,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                32,872
<INVENTORY>                                734,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,197,664
<PP&E>                                     479,298
<DEPRECIATION>                             152,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,762,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      879,519
<BONDS>                                  1,187,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       654
<OTHER-SE>                                 562,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,762,985
<SALES>                                  2,114,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,114,156
<CGS>                                    1,413,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,884,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           206,098
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          80,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            148,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                51,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         97,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                97,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.72)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.15


Loan Agreement


 


Party A: Shenzhen
Qianhai Feishang Environmental Investment Co., Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Party A")


Legal representative: Li Zongyang


Address: Room 201,
Building A, 1 Qianwan Road, Qianhai Shenzhen-Hong Kong Cooperation Zone, Shenzhen city


 


Party B: Shenzhen Chaopeng Investment
Co., Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Party B")


Legal representative: Li Ke


Address: B513-C2,
Rongchao Economic and Trade Center, 4028 Jintian Road, Fuzhong Community, Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen city


 


In accordance with the principle of equality,
fairness and justice, Party A and Party B enter into the following loan agreement after friendly negotiation:


 


Article 1: Amount and Purpose of the
Loan


Party A agrees to provide Party B with
a loan of RMB80 million to meet Party B's working capital requirements.


 


Article 2: Period of the Loan


The loan period is one year. The loan
period shall start from the date when Party B receives the loan from Party A. If Party B needs to extend the loan period, it shall be
agreed by Party A and both parties shall re-negotiate and renew the loan agreement.


 


Article 3: Interest Rate and Interest
of the Loan


The loan bears a fixed interest rate
of 9% per annum. Upon expiration of the loan, Party B shall repay the principal and interest in a lump sum.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


Article 4: Guarantee


The principal and interest of the loan
shall be guaranteed and jointly repaid by Shenzhen Feishang Investment Co., Limited. Please refer to Irrevocable Letter of Guarantee
for Joint and several liability for details.


 


Article 5: Miscellaneous


(1) This loan agreement is made in triplicate,
which shall come into force after being signed and sealed by both parties. Each party holds one copy and the guarantor holds one copy.


(2) For other matters not covered herein,
both parties shall negotiate based on the principle of friendship, equality and fairness.


 


 


Party A: Shenzhen
Qianhai Feishang Environmental Investment Co., Limited (Seal)


Legal representative or authorized representative:
/s/Li Zongyang


Date: June 30, 2021


 


 


 


Party B: Shenzhen Chaopeng Investment
Co., Limited (Seal)


Legal representative or authorized representative:
/s/ Li Ke


Date: June 30, 2021
Exhibit
31.1
 Form
10-KSB
 Pacific
Alliance Corporation
 File No.
33-08732-D
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 I, Mark
A. Scharmann, President/Principal Executive Officer of Pacific Alliance
Corporation, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pacific Alliance
Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 
 5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:  May 25,
2005
 
 
 
 /s/ Mark
A. Scharmann
 President/Principal
Executive Officer
 
  2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3175 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 555
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3175

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 17, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 Main Street in Biloxi, Mississippi, as the ``Robert S. McKeithen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT S. MCKEITHEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 135 Main Street in Biloxi, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert S. McKeithen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert S. 
McKeithen Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 555

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3175

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 Main Street in Biloxi, Mississippi, as the ``Robert S. McKeithen 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 17, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
{"id":2077,"date":"2018-09-07T15:31:52","date_gmt":"2018-09-07T19:31:52","guid":{"rendered":"\/?page_id=2077"},"modified":"2018-10-14T17:53:29","modified_gmt":"2018-10-14T21:53:29","slug":"small-business-regulatory-enforcement-fairness-act-considerations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"\/about-the-fmc\/small-business-regulatory-enforcement-fairness-act-considerations\/","title":{"rendered":"Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Considerations"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Considerations<\/h1>\n<p>The Commission has developed policies and procedures to assist the FMC in appropriately implementing the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). In general, SBREFA establishes certain formal procedural and analytical requirements for rules the Commission may develop which have the potential to impose significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission’s point of contact for small businesses regarding the collection of information and control of paperwork is Ms. Donna Lee, Office of Administration (202) 523-5800.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SBREFA_Guidelines_2003.pdf\">FMC Policies and Procedures on SBREFA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Considerations The Commission has developed policies and procedures to assist the FMC in appropriately implementing the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). In general, SBREFA establishes certain formal procedural and analytical requirements for... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/small-business-regulatory-enforcement-fairness-act-considerations\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":8,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2077"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2077"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2077\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2791,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2077\/revisions\/2791"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafas Gene CAMP, a/k/a Tick, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7740.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2016.

*150Rafas Gene Camp, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Kent, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Daniel Steven Ryan, Kevin Zolot, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafas Gene Camp appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Camp,*No. 3:12-cr00188-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – December 5, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4L9YRhCgSO\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-5-2014\/\">Applicants – December 5, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-5-2014\/embed\/#?secret=4L9YRhCgSO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – December 5, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"4L9YRhCgSO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-39,819]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, and investigation was initiated on August 13, 2001 in response to a worker petition which was filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Engineered Sintered Components, Troutman, North Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and their investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 28th day of November, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-31145  Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Raymond V. BETHEL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7615.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

*248Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bethel has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Bethel’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*