alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alan Gold,
certify that: 1.
I have
  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc.;2.
Based on my
  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  quarterly report;3.
Based on my
  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
I am
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-15e) for the
  registrant and I have:a)
designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
  relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
  known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
  in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated
  the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
  (the Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in
  this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
  disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
  Evaluation Date;5.
I have
  disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors
  and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
  performing the equivalent function):a)
all
  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
  which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
  summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
I have
  indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
  changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,
  including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
  material weaknesses.  Date: May
  12, 2006
/s/ Alan
  GoldAlan GoldPresident 12
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX3 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 242 (Monday, December 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65022-65023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, clarification, 
and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held from January 14-17, 2002, from 8 a.m. 
to 4 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the McCarran International 
Airport, Main Terminal (Second Floor), Mezzanine Rooms 2 & 3, 5757 
Wayne Newton Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89111.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eric Harrell, Executive Director, 
ATPAC, Air Traffic Planning and Procedures, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-9155.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held January 14 through 
January 17, 2002, at the McCarran International Airport, Main Terminal 
(Second Floor), Mezzanine Rooms 2 & 3, 5757 Wayne Newton Blvd., Las 
Vegas, NV 89111.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover: a continuation of the 
Committee's review of present air traffic control procedures and 
practices for standardization, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern.
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items.
    4. Report from Executive Director.
    5. Items of Interest.

[[Page 65023]]

    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the 
space available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to 
attend and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify 
the person listed above not later than January 11, 2002. The next 
quarterly meeting of the FAA ATPAC is planned to be held from April 16-
19, 2002, in Washington, DC.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time at the address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 10, 2001.
Eric Harrell,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-31001 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
DONEIL BARRETT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO S

. 1D 1 3

- 5 695, 1D13

- 5697 & 1D13

- 5701

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 2, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge.

Jeffrey Lewis, General Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Crimin al Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel Region One, Tallahassee

, for Appellant

.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attor ney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and R AY

, JJ., CONCUR.
EDWARDS      Certified Public Accountants & Business Advisors
SAUER &      ------------------------------------------------
OWENS        500 Warner Centre, 332 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh PA  1522
             Phone: 412-281-9211  Fax: 412-281-2407   A Professional Corporation
             www.esocpa.com                           Direct Dial:


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
IBT Bancorp, Inc.
309 Main Street
Irwin, PA  15642

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to IBT Bancorp, Inc.'s 2000 Stock Option Plan filed June 30,
2000, of our report dated February 8, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of IBT Bancorp,  Inc. as of December  31, 2004 and 2003,  and the related
consolidated  statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash
flows  for each of the  three  years in the  period  ended  December  31,  2004,
management's  assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial  reporting as of December 31, 2004,  which report is  incorporated  by
reference in the  December  31, 2004 annual  report on Form 10-K of IBT Bancorp,
Inc.


/s/ Edwards Sauer & Owens, P.C.

Edwards Sauer & Owens, P.C.

March 14, 2005

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Extension of deadline for submission of comments via E-mail or Fax on the Draft Environmental Review of the Proposed U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, through the Trade Policy Staff Committee, is extending the deadline for the submission of public comments via fax or E-mail for the draft environmental review of the proposed U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement form November 20, 2001 to January 9, 2002. The draft environmental review is available at                         *http://www.ustr.gov/​environment/​environmental.shtml.*

# DATES:

                        The new deadline for comments is January 9, 2002. Please note the comments at the present time may only be sent by fax to (202) 395-5141 or by E-mail to                         *FR0002@ustr.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Darci Vetter, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Environment and Natural Resources Section, telephone 202-395-7320.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The draft environmental review for the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement was conducted pursuant to Executive Order 13141 on Environmental Review of Trade Agreements (64 FR 63169, Nov. 18, 1999) and its accompanying guidelines (65 FR 79442, Dec. 19, 2000), both of which are available at                     *http://www.ustr.gov/​environment/​environmental.shtml.*                     On November 5 of 2001, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative requested public comments on the draft environmental review. The deadline for comments has been extended to reflect the extension of the U.S.-Chile FTA negotiations into early 2002. A final environmental review will be made publicly available following the conclusion of the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement negotiations.                

Carmen Suro-Bredie,

Chair, Trade Policy Staff Committee.

[FR Doc. 01-30965  Filed 12-12-01; 11:26 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF OREGON,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-17416

D.C. No. 5:14-cv-02444-EJD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Fareed Sepehry-Fard appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims against the State of 

Oregon. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

dismissal of an action as barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. Micomonaco 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 7 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-17416 

v. Washington, 45 F.3d 316, 319 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Sepehry-Fard’s action against the State 

of Oregon on the basis of Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Franceschi v. 

Schwartz, 57 F.3d 828, 831 (9th Cir. 1995) (Eleventh Amendment bars suits in 

federal court for damages or injunctive relief against a state or an arm of the state); 

see also Porter v. Jones, 319 F.3d 483, 491 (9th Cir. 2003) (distinguishing noncognizable claims for retrospective relief, such as damages, from generally 

cognizable claims for prospective relief against state officials). In light of our 

disposition, we do not address the merits of Sepehry-Fard’s claims.

Sepehry-Fard’s contentions that the district court violated his right to due 

process are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
## NO. 12-08-00206-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTRICT

TYLER, TEX AS
BEN JAM IN RO WL AN D B EALL, II, § APP EAL FRO

M T HE APPELLANT V . § COUNTY COURT A T LAW OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Appellant plea ded guilty to rec kles s d ri v i ng , and the tria l court asse ssed punishment on J anuar y 24, 2 0 0 7 . The re cord inc ludes the trial cour t’s cer tification showing that this is a plea barg ain case and A

ppellant has no rig ht to appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2 (d). Ac cording ly , the a pp e a l is dism issed for want of ju risdiction
. Opinion delivere d May

21, 2008. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBL I SH)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3103

    To direct the Secretary of Defense to permit a veterans service 
   organization to use the parking lot at the Pentagon for an annual 
                veteran-led remembrance motorcycle ride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2021

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Defense to permit a veterans service 
   organization to use the parking lot at the Pentagon for an annual 
                veteran-led remembrance motorcycle ride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let Veterans Honor the Fallen Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL PERMIT FOR A VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATION TO USE 
              PENTAGON PARKING LOT FOR VETERAN-LED REMEMBRANCE 
              MOTORCYCLE RIDE.

    (a) Permit Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall permit a VSO 
to use the parking lot at the Pentagon as a staging area for the event.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held each year on a date 
determined by such VSO on condition that the VSO submits a notification 
of use to the Secretary not later than January 31 of each year the 
event takes place.
    (c) Length of Access.--The Secretary shall permit the VSO to use 
the parking lot for the period of the event indicated in the 
notification under subsection (b) and the two hours preceding such 
period.
    (d) Expenses and Liabilities.--The VSO shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities arising from any 
activities relating to the event.
    (e) Additional Arrangements.--The Secretary may make additional 
arrangements that may be required to carry out this Act.
    (f) Definitions.--In this Act--
            (1) The term ``event'' means the ``Rolling to Remember'' 
        Memorial Day Remembrance Ride.
            (2) The term ``VSO'' means a veterans service organization 
        recognized under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3302 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the seller of 

an electric vehicle from being treated as the taxpayer that placed such 

vehicle in service and taking the electric vehicle tax credit if such vehicle 

is sold to the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Mr. ESTES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the seller of an electric vehicle from being treated as 

the taxpayer that placed such vehicle in service and 

taking the electric vehicle tax credit if such vehicle is 

sold to the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Subsidies for Gov5 ernment Purchases of Electric Vehicles Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3302 IH

1 SEC. 2. SELLER OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROHIBITED FROM 

2 BEING TREATED AS TAXPAYER PLACING 

3 SUCH VEHICLE IN SERVICE IF VEHICLE SOLD 

4 TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30D(f)(3) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘but only 

7 if’’ and all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘but 

8 only if— 

9 ‘‘(A) such person clearly discloses to such 

10 person or entity in a document the amount of 

11 any credit allowable under subsection (a) with 

12 respect to such vehicle (determined without re13 gard to subsection (c)), 

14 ‘‘(B) such person or entity is not the Fed15 eral Government or an agency or representative 

16 thereof, and 

17 ‘‘(C) such person or entity is not a State 

18 government or a locality, agency, or representa19 tive thereof. 

20 For purposes of subsection (c), property to which 

21 this paragraph applies shall be treated as of a char22 acter subject to an allowance for depreciation.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

25 the date of the enactment of this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
HEMACARE CORPORATION
                    EXHIBIT 11

      BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Year ended December 31,
                               2002          2001
                            -----------   -----------
<S>                         <C>           <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common
 shares used to compute
 basic earnings per share    7,673,220     7,533,970
                            ===========   ===========

     Net income (loss)      $ (591,000)   $  323,000
                            ===========   ===========
Basic net income (loss)
 per share                  $    (0.08)   $     0.04
                            ===========   ===========

       DILUTED

Weighted average common
 shares used to compute
 basic earnings per
 share                      7,673,220     7,533,970
Dilutive common
 equivalent shares
 attributable to
 stock options (based
 on average market
 price)                             -       723,887
Dilutive common
 equivalent shares
 attributable to
 warrants (based on
 average market
 price)                             -        39,697

Weighted average
 common shares
 and equivalents
 used to compute
 diluted earnings
 per share                  7,673,220      8,297,554
                           ===========    ===========

     Net income (loss)     $ (591,000)    $  323,000
                           ===========    ===========

Diluted net income
 (loss) per share          $    (0.08)    $     0.04
                           ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
#### Stanley Monroe MEADORS, etc., Appellant, v. Walker M. SMELSER, Administrator, et al., Appellees.

No. 12970.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 22, 1957.

Jerome Templeton, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

C. Howard Bozeman, Clyde W. Key, Knoxville, Tenn., Tyree B. Harris III, Nashville, Tenn., for appellees.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the brief of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

*720Now therefore, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying appellant’s motion to reopen the judgment in the case of Walker M'. Smelzer, Administrator of the Estate of William C. Smel-zer, Jr., Deceased, in the district court, be and is hereby affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Robert L. Taylor, 148 F.Supp. 891.