alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kelvin GOULD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; Artisha K. Todd, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Newport News, VA; Charles E. Haden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-6893.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.

Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gould v. City of Newport News,*No. 2:10-cv-00286-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Gould’s motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), George Deehan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ GEORGE DEEHAN
-----------------------------------------------
George Deehan
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dated: November 14, 2003




                                       43
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leona CRILL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-30042.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 23, 2008.

Kris A. McLean, USMI — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John P. Rhodes, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Leona Crill appeals from the six-month sentence imposed following the revocation of her supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Crill contends that her sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing, and because the district court presumed the Guidelines range was reasonable without taking into account her gambling problems or positive work his*536tory. These contentions are belied by the record. We conclude that there was no procedural error and that Crill’s sentence is substantively reasonable. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-95 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); *see also United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1176 n. 5 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60679

Summary Calendar

 

JUAN JOSE DE JESUS,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 401 876

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Juges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jose De Jesus petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) adopting and affirming the

Immigration Judge’s decision to deny his application for

cancellation of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

His argument that the Immigration and Naturalization Service failed

to follow 8 C.F.R. § 236.3 in obtaining his signatures on the 1998

and 1999 voluntary departure agreements will not be addressed

because it was unexhausted before the BIA. See Wang v. Ashcroft,

260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001).
2

De Jesus argues, without any legal authority, that minors

cannot enter into voluntary departure agreements. We deem this

issue abandoned as it is inadequately briefed. See Cinel v.

Connick, 15 F.3d 1338, 1345 (5th Cir. 1994); Villanueva v. CNA Ins.

Cos., 868 F.2d 684, 687 n. 5 (5th Cir. 1989). Additionally,

De Jesus’s argument that his voluntary departures resulted in a

denial of due process because he was unfairly deprived of the

benefit of applying for cancellation of removal is without merit.

“Eligibility for discretionary relief from a removal order is not

‘a liberty or property interest warranting due process

protection.’” See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 215,

219 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, De Jesus’s petition for review

is DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on Ocean Carriers (II)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TU3X2Rnyjj\"><a href=\"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-focuses-on-ocean-carriers-ii\/\">Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on Ocean Carriers (II)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-focuses-on-ocean-carriers-ii\/embed\/#?secret=TU3X2Rnyjj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on Ocean Carriers (II)” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"TU3X2Rnyjj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – July 7, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GjishEiwa5\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-7-2017\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – July 7, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-7-2017\/embed\/#?secret=GjishEiwa5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – July 7, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GjishEiwa5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,621
<PP&E>                                          23,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,017
<OTHER-SE>                                     639,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,676
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                39,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,898)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,878)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)



</TABLE>
74 A.3d 123

#### Darrell BETHA, Petitioner v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 96 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 5, 2013.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests extraordinary relief, it is DENIED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests mandamus relief, it is GRANTED. The lower court is directed to address Petitioner’s pending PCRA petition within 90 days of this order, including determining whether Petitioner is entitled to court-appointed counsel.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LENY ANDRIANI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70258

Agency No. A088-124-283

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Leny Andriani, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

SEP 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-70258

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for

review.

Andriani testified that her family’s store was looted and burned during the

May 1998 riots, that she was robbed twice, and that her sister was robbed. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Andriani did not suffer

harm rising to the level of past persecution. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971,

975-76 (9th Cir. 2009) (no past persecution where petitioner was stripped naked,

spat on, detained for a couple of days, and beaten by a mob); Wakkary v. Holder,

558 F.3d 1049, 1059-60 (9th Cir. 2009) (no past persecution where petitioner was

“beaten by youths and robbed of his sandals and pocket money” years before

applying for asylum). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that,

even as a member of a disfavored group, Andriani has not established a wellfounded fear of future persecution because she has not demonstrated sufficient

individualized risk. See Halim, 590 F.3d at 979. Accordingly, Andriani’s asylum

claim fails.

Because Andriani failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it

follows that she has not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.
3 12-70258

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Andriani failed to establish it is more likely than not that she will be

tortured if returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Order filed December 13 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00952

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF E .R.G., A CHILD , Appellant

V.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIV E SERVICES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 04728J



### ORDER

This an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case from a decree of
termination signed August 21, 2018. The clerk ’ s record was filed November 5 , 201 8 . The record reflects the notice of appeal was filed October 26, 201 8

. Appellant alleges she did not receive notice of the judgment until October 9, 2018. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a, a ppellant must provide a written order signed by the trial court finding the date when appellant first eitherreceived notice or acquired actual knowledge the judgment was signed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 4.2(c); s ee also LDF Construction, Inc. v. Texas Friends of Chabad Lubavitch, Inc. , 459 S.W.3d 720, 724 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.) (the date must be established by competent proof and included in a written order signed by the trial judge). We have a record of appellant’s motion for new trial wherein appellant explained to the trial court that did she did not re ceive actual notice of the final decree in this case until October 9, 2018. During that hearing the trial court refrained from ruling on whether the motion for new trial was timely ; thus , the trial court did not make the finding necessary for relief under Texas Rule of Civil
Procedure 306a. The trial court, however, did state it would assume the motion was timely for the purpose of denying the motion. Accordingly, we order the trial court to hold a hearing and issue an order finding the date when appellan t first either received notice or acquired actual knowledge that the order was signed. A supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the
trial court ’ s order shall be filed with the clerk of this court by December 31, 2018

. PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan

.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 5 1 4 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

E R V I N S T E R L I N G B R O W N , J R

. , P e t i t i o n e r

– A p p e l l a n t ,

v
. R I C K T H A L E R , D I R E C T O R , T E X A S D E P A R T M E N T O F C R I M I N A L J U S T I C E , C O R R E C T I O N A L I N S T I T U T I O N S D I V I S I O N , R e s p o n d e n t

– A p p e l l e e
.

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 1 0

- C V

- 2 2

B e f o r e W I E N E R , P R A D O , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
E r v i n S t e r l i n g B r o w n , J r
. , f o r m e r l y T e x a s p r i s o n e r # 5 5 9 3 1 4 , m o v e s f o r a

c e r t i f i c a t e o f a p p e a l a b i l i t y ( C O A ) t o a p p e a l f r o m t h e o r d e r o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d e n y i n g h i s a p p l i c a t i o n f o r h a b e a s c o r p u s r e l i e f p u r s u a n t t o 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 2 2 5 4

. B r o w n c h a l l e n g e s a M a y 7 , 2 0 0 9 , p r i s o n d i s c i p l i n a r y h e a r i n g a t w h i c h h e w a s f o u n d g u i l t y o f e x t o r t i n g p r o p e r t y f r o m a n o t h e r p r i s o n e r
. B r o w n a l s o m o v e s f o r

a p p o i n t m e n t o f c o u n s e l ; t h a t m o t i o n i s d e n i e d

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 17, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10514 Document: 00511297164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2010N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 5 1 4

B r o w n w a s r e l e a s e d f r o m p r i s o n a f

t e r t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d e n i e d h i s h a b e a s

a p p l i c a t i o n
. H e h a d s e r v e d h i s 2 0

- y e a r s e n t e n c e a t t h e t i m e o f h i s r e l e a s e
. H i s

c a s e n o l o n g e r p r e s e n t s a c a s e o r c o n t r o v e r s y , a n d w e l a c k j u r i s d i c t i o n t o

c o n s i d e r h i s a p p e a l

. S e e S p e n c e r v
. K

e m n a , 5 2 3 U

. S

. 1 , 7 ( 1 9 9 8 )

. A P P E A L D I S M I S S E D

. C O A D E N I E D

. M O T I O N F O R A P P O I N T M E N T O F C O U N S E L D E N I E D

.

2 Case: 10-10514 Document: 00511297164 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Foundry Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy D. Heffner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      /s/ Timothy D. Heffner
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Timothy D. Heffner
                                      Vice President Finance and Administration,
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      November 9, 2004