alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Forms and Applications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DzDZEn6Sk2\"><a href=\"\/forms-and-applications\/\">Forms and Applications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/forms-and-applications\/embed\/#?secret=DzDZEn6Sk2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Forms and Applications” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DzDZEn6Sk2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
No. 483.

#### S. Davies Warfield et al., Receivers, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, *v.*John B. Gaston.

April 25, 1910.

*Mr. John P. Tillman*and *Mr. Robert*E• *Steiner*for the plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Alexander M. Garber*and *Mr. Samuel D. Weakley*for the defendant in error.

In error to the Supreme Court of. the State of Alabama.

Judgment reversed with costs and cause remanded for further proceedings, per stipulation of 'counsel.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3155 

To allow nonprofit child care providers to participate in the loan programs 

of the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2021 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. STAUBER, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. 

MOOLENAAR, Ms. WILD, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. HAGEDORN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To allow nonprofit child care providers to participate in 

the loan programs of the Small Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Child 

5 Care Investment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOANS FOR NONPROFIT CHILD 

7 CARE PROVIDERS. 

8 Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 632(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3155 IH

1 ‘‘(10) NONPROFIT CHILD CARE PROVIDERS.— 

2 ‘‘(A) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the 

3 term ‘covered nonprofit child care provider’ 

4 means an organization— 

5 ‘‘(i) that— 

6 ‘‘(I) is in compliance with licens7 ing requirements for child care pro8 viders of the State in which the orga9 nization is located; 

10 ‘‘(II) is described in section 

11 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 

12 Code of 1986 and exempt from tax 

13 under section 501(a) of such Code; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(III) is primarily engaged in 

16 providing child care for children from 

17 birth to compulsory school age; 

18 ‘‘(ii) for which each employee and reg19 ular volunteer complies with the criminal 

20 background check requirements under sec21 tion 658H(b) of the Child Care and Devel22 opment Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 

23 U.S.C. 9858f(b)); and 

24 ‘‘(iii) that may— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3155 IH

1 ‘‘(I) provide care for school-age 

2 children outside of school hours or 

3 outside of the school year; or 

4 ‘‘(II) offer preschool or pre5 kindergarten educational programs. 

6 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBILITY FOR LOAN PROGRAMS.— 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

8 subsection, a covered nonprofit child care pro9 vider shall be deemed to be a small business 

10 concern for purposes of any program under this 

11 Act or the Small Business Investment Act of 

12 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) under which— 

13 ‘‘(i) the Administrator may make 

14 loans to small business concerns; 

15 ‘‘(ii) the Administrator may guarantee 

16 timely payment of loans to small business 

17 concerns; or 

18 ‘‘(iii) the recipient of a loan made or 

19 guaranteed by the Administrator may 

20 make loans to small business concerns.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"id":9,"count":112,"description":"","link":"\/category\/commissioners\/dye\/","name":"Dye","slug":"dye","taxonomy":"category","parent":7,"meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/9"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/7"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=9"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 1123

_____________________________
B RIAN L EE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

.

May 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

L EWIS , M.K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Brian Lee, pro se, Appellant.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K

. Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Enrique Alejandro Reyes OTERO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Enrique Alejandro Reyes Otero, Petitioner, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 08-74645, 09-70414.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 1, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 3, 2010.

Carlos Alfredo Cruz, Esquire, Law Offices of Carlos A. Cruz, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

Lance Lomond Jolley, Esquire, OIL, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique Alejandro Reyes Otero petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

The parties are familiar with the facts of the case so we do not repeat them here. The BIA’s factual determination that Reyes Otero was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of a year or more is supported by substantial evidence. *See*§ 1252(b)(4)(B); *see also Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.2006). By its plain terms, the docket record re-*162fleets a cumulative imposed sentence of 457 days.

Because Reyes Otero was sentenced to a year or more of imprisonment for committing a crime of violence, he is statutorily ineligible for relief under section 203(c) of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”). 8 C.F.R. § 1240.65(a) (“To establish eligibility for suspension of deportation under this section, the applicant must ... not have been convicted of an aggravated felony ....”); *see also 8 U.S.C.*1101(a)(43)(F) (defining “aggravated felony” as a crime of violence ... for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year). On this record, Reyes Otero cannot demonstrate that he may have been prejudiced by the claimed failure of his prior counsel to seek relief under NACARA.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**


We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
        333-22445 of Guideline, Inc. on Form S-8 (pertaining to the Guideline, Inc.
        1996
        Stock Option Plan); in Post-Effective Amendment No.1 to the Registration
        No.
        333-68315 on Form S-8 (pertaining to the Guideline, Inc. 1996 Stock Option
        Plan); in Registration Statement No. 333-111081 on Form S-8 (pertaining to
        the
        Guideline, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and 2003 Stock Incentive Plan);
        Registration Statement No. 333-43940 on Form S-8 (pertaining to the Guideline,
        Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan); and in Registration Statement No. 333-135642
        on
        Form S-8 (pertaining to the Guideline, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan) of
        our
        report dated April 16, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion
        and
        includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in method of
        accounting for stock-based compensation on January 1, 2006 to conform with
        SFAS
        No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments”, and the application of SAB No. 108,
“Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
        Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements effective as of December
        31,
        2006.”), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
        statement schedule of Guideline, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this
        Annual
        Report on Form 10-K of Guideline, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
        2006.
 
 /s/
        Deloitte & Touche LLP
 New
        York,
        New York
 April 16,
        2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 13, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Vehicle Safety Communications 8 Consortium (“VSC8 Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: General Motors Holdings LLC, Warren, MI; Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI; Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center Inc., Superior Township, MI; and Nissan Technical Center North America, Farmington Hills, MI.

The general area of VSC8 Consortium's planned activity is collaboration to conduct or facilitate cooperative research, development, testing, and evaluation procedures to gain further knowledge and understanding of connected vehicle interactions and/or applications for vehicles that are intended to transform surface transportation safety, mobility, and environmental performance through a connected vehicle environment. VSC8 Consortium's objectives are to promote the interests of the automotive sector while maintaining impartiality, the independence of its members, and vendor neutrality.

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-24549 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashundria J. BURKES, a/k/a Roe, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7153.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Rashundria J. Burkes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Mark C. Moore, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Andrew Burke Moorman, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rashundria J. Burkes seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion and denying her motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district *240court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burkes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                       |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date:    October 7, 2009 |  | /s/ Kevin M. McMullen
|                         |  | Name:                 |  | Kevin M. McMullen                                
|                         |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President  
|                         | 
|                         |  | /s/ Michael E. Hicks 
|                         |  | Name:                 |  | Michael E. Hicks                                 
|                         |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David S. Montoya, Chief Financial Officer of WQN, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   November 14, 2005


/s/ David S. Montoya
---------------------------
David S. Montoya
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
87 A.3d 805

#### Jean BOLLING, Petitioner v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LICENSE AND INSPECTION, Respondent.

No. 3 EM 2014.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 19, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal *Nunc Pro Tunc*is DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Fact Finding 30 Final Report Released","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"u4nB87uZQs\"><a href=\"\/fact-finding-30-final-report-released\/\">Fact Finding 30 Final Report Released<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fact-finding-30-final-report-released\/embed\/#?secret=u4nB87uZQs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Fact Finding 30 Final Report Released” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"u4nB87uZQs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}