alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Trintiy3 Corporation, (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Steven D. Hargreaves, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  December 21, 2005
              /s/
                Steven D. HargreavesBy:
                  Steven D. HargreavesIts:
                  Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to Trinity3 Corporation and will be retained by Trinity3 Corporation
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Enrique MORENO-CRUZ, also known as Enrique Castillo-Moreno, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50204

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wayne Frost, Esq., Midland, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

*897PER CURIAM: *

Enrique Moreno-Cruz (Moreno) appeals the 46-month sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. He asserts that his sentence, despite being within the applicable guidelines range, was substantively unreasonable because the district court improperly based the sentence on Moreno’s personal factors rather than on the severity of the offense. Additionally, Moreno hypothesizes that such a lengthy sentence could give rise to a due process violation.

Because Moreno did not object to the imposed sentence as unreasonable, we review this claim for plain error. *United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007). Moreno’s disagreement with the within-guidelines sentence imposed does not suffice to rebut the presumption of reasonableness. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *United States v. Campos-Maldonado,*531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.2008); *United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.2008). Under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court is required to consider the factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including “the history and characteristics of the defendant.” § 3553(a)(1). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### BEZA CONSULTING, INC., A Virginia Corporation; Beza Consulting Engineers PLC., an Ethiopian entity, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Muluneh Mhirate YADETA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, and Beza Consulting, Inc., A Maryland Corporation, Defendant.

No. 15-1859.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 12, 2016.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2016.

Muluneh Mhirate Yadeta, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas John McKee, Jr., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Muluneh Mhirate Yadeta appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and entering default judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs in this civil action alleging trademark infringement and other claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Yadeta does not contest the finding that he engaged in discovery violations, which was the basis for the district court’s entry of the default judgment against him, he has forfeited appellate review of that judgment.

Although Yadeta attempts to challenge the amount of the damages awarded to the Plaintiffs, the magistrate judge, in her report and recommendation addressing damages', advised Yadeta that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recom*211mendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Yadeta has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections to the amount of damages after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. *See Beza Consulting, Inc. v. Yadeta,*No. 1:14-cv00881-AJT-TCB (E.D.Va. Mar. 27 & July 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1
 
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         STATE OR JURISDICTION
ENTITY                                                                                     OF INCORPORATION
------                                                                                   ---------------------
 
<S>                                                                                      <C>
Warnaco Inc...........................................................................   Delaware
184 Benton Street Inc.................................................................   Delaware
C.F. Hathaway Company.................................................................   Delaware
Juarmex, S.A. de C.V..................................................................   Mexico
Linda Vista de Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V..................................................   Mexico
Olga de Villanueva, S.A...............................................................   Honduras
Olguita de Mexico, S.A................................................................   Mexicali B.C., Mexico
Warmana Limited.......................................................................   Delaware
Warnaco of Canada Limited.............................................................   Canada
Warnaco Limited.......................................................................   England
Warnaco Sourcing Inc..................................................................   Delaware
Warner's Aiglon, S.A..................................................................   France
Warner's Company (Belgium) S.A........................................................   Belgium
Warner's de Costa Rica Inc............................................................   Delaware
Warner's de Honduras, S.A.............................................................   Honduras
Warner's de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.......................................................   Mexico
Warner's (Eire) Teoranta..............................................................   Ireland
Warner's Lenceria Femenina, S.A.......................................................   Spain
Warner's (United Kingdom) Limited.....................................................   Northern Ireland
Warnaco (Hong Kong) Ltd...............................................................   Barbados
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Exhibit 20


Consent of Richard J. Lambert





I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the El Morro, Region III, Chile” dated March 23, 2012, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on Cerro San Pedro Mine, San Luis Potosí, Mexico” dated February 16, 2010 and amended March 22, 2010, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Peak Gold Mines, New South Wales, Australia” dated March 25, 2013 and the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mesquite Mine, Brawley, California, USA” dated February 26, 2010, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.








Dated this 27th day of March, 2013








“Richard J. Lambert”Name:
Richard J. LambertTitle:
P.E. and Executive Vice-Presidentfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.





RPA (USA) Ltd.143 Union Boulevard Suite 505 lLakewoord, CO, USA 80228 lT+1 (303) 330 0950 www.rpacan.com
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 09, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 09, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A1084. MATTHEW SZYDLOWSKI v. THE STATE.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On March 27, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than April 08, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants September 18, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JeC12k8zMv\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-18-2023\/\">Applicants September 18, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-18-2023\/embed\/#?secret=JeC12k8zMv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants September 18, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"JeC12k8zMv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 99.1**

**AGGREGATE      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO      CERTIFICATEHOLDERS **

| Class                                       |   | Interest |         | Principal |   | Losses        |   | Ending                  Balance |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------|--------------|-----------|--------|---------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                      I-A-1   |   |     | 3,598,206.46 |      |   | 34,952,333.25 |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 64,146,666.75 |   |
|                      I-A-2   |   |     | 757,800.00   |      |   | 0.00          |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 16,840,000.00 |   |
|                      I-A-3   |   |     | 1,440,090.00 |      |   | 0.00          |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 32,002,000.00 |   |
|  I-A-4                                 |   |     | 200,717.43   |      |   | 0.00          |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 64,146,666.75 |   |
|                      I-A-5   |   |     | 4,002,075.00 |      |   | 0.00          |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 88,935,000.00 |   |
| I-A-6                                       |   |     | 2,972,970.00 |      |   | 0.00          |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 66,066,000.00 |   |
|                      I-A-PO  |   |     | 0.00         |      |   | 21,497.75     |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 1,211,398.73 |   |
| I-A-R                                       |   |     | 0.50         |      |   | 100.00        |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 0.00 |   |
|                      II-A-1  |   |     | 553,781.57   |      |   | 2,296,370.36  |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 11,894,629.64 |   |
|                      II-A-PO |   |     | 0.00         |      |   | 18,163.21     |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 61,456.37 |   |
|                      B-1     |   |     | 374,633.15   |      |   | 45,609.55     |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 8,330,390.45 |   |
|                      B-2     |   |     | 119,868.29   |      |   | 14,593.31     |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 2,665,406.69 |   |
| B-3                                         |   |     | 97,415.35    |      |   | 11,859.79     |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 2,166,140.21 |   |
|                      B-4     |   |     | 59,934.15    |      |   | 7,296.66      |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 1,332,703.34 |   |
|                      B-5     |   |     | 44,950.61    |      |   | 5,472.49      |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 999,527.51 |   |
|                      B-6     |   |     | 44,991.48    |      |   | 5,477.47      |   |                            | 0.00   |   |   | 1,000,436.39 |   |

----
{"id":2198,"date":"2018-09-10T13:22:10","date_gmt":"2018-09-10T17:22:10","guid":{"rendered":"\/?page_id=2198"},"modified":"2022-11-17T12:46:12","modified_gmt":"2022-11-17T16:46:12","slug":"hiring-a-reputable-mover","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"\/resources-services\/hiring-a-reputable-mover\/","title":{"rendered":"Hiring a Reputable Mover"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Hiring a Reputable Mover<\/h1>\n<p>Avoid problems when moving overseas. Ensure that your mover is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www2.fmc.gov\/oti\/\">FMC licensed and bonded<\/a>. Federal law requires international movers to be licensed and bonded with the FMC to ensure that companies have sufficient knowledge and experience to handle your shipment and to make sure that companies have a bond in place to compensate consumers in the event that a problem occurs with transportation.<\/p>\n<p>Perform a Google search to ensure that the company does not have a history of unresolved consumer complaints.<\/p>\n<h2>Additional Red Flags<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Mover\u2019s website does not list a physical address<\/li>\n<li>Mover insists on providing quote via telephone or computer based “guestimate”<\/li>\n<li>Mover\u2019s quote is significantly lower than other companies<\/li>\n<li>Mover refuses to take credit card or charges a credit card use fee<\/li>\n<li>Mover charges over 30% cancellation penalty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hiring a Reputable Mover Avoid problems when moving overseas. Ensure that your mover is\u00a0FMC licensed and bonded. Federal law requires international movers to be licensed and bonded with the FMC to ensure that companies have sufficient knowledge and experience to handle your shipment and to make sure that companies have... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/resources-services\/hiring-a-reputable-mover\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":2050,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2198"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2198"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7252,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2198\/revisions\/7252"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PLANETRX.COM, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          64,116
<SECURITIES>                                    12,257
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,828
<PP&E>                                          20,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,670
<BONDS>                                          6,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,834
<SALES>                                          7,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,773
<CGS>                                            7,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,101)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,636)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.05)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS BASIC EPS ACCORDING TO SFAS 128
</FN>


</TABLE>
76 A.3d 536

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Dreama Marie STOTELMYER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 25, 2013.

*191
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

> Did the Superior Court err in holding that a person is statutorily eligible for a county intermediate punishment sentence when a mandatory minimum sentence applies under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508?
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edison Schools Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher J. Scarlata, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



November 14, 2002                           /s/ Christopher J. Scarlata
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Christopher J. Scarlata
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Order entered May 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00343-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-10316-Z

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Glenda E. Finkley’s May 3, 2015 extension request to the 

extent we ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than May 14, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.3(c). Because the record was first due March 16, 2015, no further extensions will be granted 

absent exigent circumstances. See id. 28.4(b)(2). If necessary, the trial court must arrange for a 

substitute reporter. See id. 28.4(b)(1).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable David 

Lopez, Presiding Judge of the 256th Judicial District Court; Ms. Finkley; and the parties.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

PRESIDING JUSTICE