alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"id":5124,"date":"2020-10-13T14:01:03","date_gmt":"2020-10-13T18:01:03","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=5124"},"modified":"2020-10-13T14:01:03","modified_gmt":"2020-10-13T18:01:03","slug":"anprm-addressing-cruise-line-performance-refunds-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/anprm-addressing-cruise-line-performance-refunds-available\/","title":{"rendered":"ANPRM Addressing Cruise Line Performance & Refunds Available"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.fmc.gov\/readingroom\/proceeding\/20-15\/\">Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)<\/a> addressing possible changes to regulations governing the definition of \u201cnon-performance\u201d by a cruise line and the process for obtaining a refund when a vessel does not sail is now available for review.<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Maritime Commission <a href=\"\/commission-requests-comments-on-possible-changes-to-regulations-governing-cruise-lines\/\">voted in late September to initiate this ANPRM<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The ANPRM contains information about the topics for which the Commission is seeking public input and how interested parties can provide relevant commentary.<\/p>\n<p>The comment period for this ANPRM is open until Friday, November 13, 2020.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) addressing possible changes to regulations governing the definition of \u201cnon-performance\u201d by a cruise line and the process for obtaining a refund when a vessel does not sail is now available for review. The Federal Maritime Commission voted in late September to initiate this... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/anprm-addressing-cruise-line-performance-refunds-available\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[42],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5124"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5124"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5125,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5124\/revisions\/5125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 10(a)

  

  


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-123779 of
FDP Series, Inc. (the “Corporation”) of our report dated July 20, 2007,  relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights as of and for the year ended May 31, 2007
of FDP Series, Inc., including MFS Research International FDP Fund,  Marsico Growth FDP
Fund, Van Kampen Value FDP Fund and Franklin Templeton Total Return FDP Fund, appearing
in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2007. We
also consent to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the
Prospectus and “Financial Statements” in the Statement of Additional Information, which
are parts of such Registration Statement. 



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 



Princeton, New Jersey

  September 26,
2007
Consent of Peter Lloyd
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with,  and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on Peak Gold Mines, New South Wales, Australia,” dated January 1, 2009, as amended and restated on June 12, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2011, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 26th day of March, 2012
 
 
 “Peter Lloyd”
 
 Name:       Peter Lloyd
 Title:         FAusIMM, BESc (Mining), and
 Mining Engineer for New Gold Inc.
**Chang
        G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.**
 **t** **371 E STREET** **t** **CHULA VISTA** **t** **CALIFORNIA 91910-2615** **t**
 **t** **TELEPHONE (858)722-5953** **t** **FAX (858) 408-2695** **t** **FAX (858) 764-5480**
 **t** **E-MAIL** **changgpark@gmail.com** **** **t**
 
    May
          27,
          2008
 
 
 
 
 ***To
          Whom It May Concern:***
 
 
 The
          firm
          of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of our report of May 9,
          2008 on
          the audited consolidated financial statements of PTM Publications
          Incorporated as of February 28, 2008, in any filings that are necessry
          now or in
          the near future with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Very
          truly yours,
 
 **/s/
          Chang G. Park**
 ____________________
 CHANG
          G.
          PARK, CPA
        **Member
          of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants**
 **Registered
          with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
          Board**
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HealthExtras, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.



|                 |  |                                     
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|November 8, 2006 |  | /s/ David T. Blair                  
|                 |  | David T. Blair                      
|                 |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                 | 
|November 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard W. Hunt                 
|                 |  | Richard W. Hunt                     
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3167 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South 

and Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, 

New Jersey, as the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2021 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner 

of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the Township 

of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, as the 

‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, 

7 Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3167 IH

1 in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jer2 sey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George Henry 

3 White Post Office Building’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George Henry White 

8 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Greenville First Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

|1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange         Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities         Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results         of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.     
| |  | Chief Executive Officer   
| |  | August 12, 2003           

| |  | /s/  James M. Austin, III
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | James M. Austin, III     
| |  | Chief Financial Officer  
| |  | August 12, 2003
{"id":1510,"date":"2011-03-01T14:59:52","date_gmt":"2011-03-01T18:59:52","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1510"},"modified":"2018-08-17T15:01:10","modified_gmt":"2018-08-17T19:01:10","slug":"chairman-lidinsky-testifies-to-congress-regarding-fy-2012-fmc-budget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/chairman-lidinsky-testifies-to-congress-regarding-fy-2012-fmc-budget\/","title":{"rendered":"Chairman Lidinsky Testifies to Congress Regarding FY 2012 FMC Budget"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>March 1, 2011<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/assets\/1\/News\/2012_FMC_Authorization_Hearing_Statement.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 1, 2011 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1510"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1510"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1510\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1511,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1510\/revisions\/1511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanchun Li, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/  Yanchun Li
    ------------------------------------
    YANCHUN LI
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATED: APRIL 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         386,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,342,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,070
<INVENTORY>                                    289,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,206,580
<PP&E>                                       3,535,036
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,170,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,830,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,187,048
<BONDS>                                        151,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       11,570,811
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (100,417)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,830,448
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,471,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,755,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (500,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (38,688)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (461,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (461,887)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000736 25-JUN-2018 01:03 PM
74 A.3d 1026

#### UNITED POLICE SOCIETY OF MT. LEBANON; Retired Police Officers; Mark Kubit, Mary Eichinger, John Michalec, David White, Les Palombine, Mary Sue Joyce, William Laurence, Kevin Macken, Tom Gianni, Robert Gehrmann, Pat O’Donnell, and Blaise Larotonda v. MT. LEBANON COMMISSION; Stephen M. Feller; Mt. Lebanon Pension Plan Administrator; Municipality of Mt. Lebanon. Petition of United Police Society of Mt. Lebanon.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 10, 2013.

*130
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, with an additional issue required to be addressed by this Court, is as follows:

> Whether a municipality that collectively bargains to provide a particular pension benefit improvement, and confirms its bargain by legislatively adopting the benefit in its Pension Ordinance (and numerous subsequent amendments), may subsequently refuse to provide the benefit because one of its managers directed the Plan Actuary to perform an Act 205 cost estimate on the effect of adding a different and lesser benefit?

Additionally, the parties are directed to address the issue of the possible remedy or range of remedies appropriate under the Municipal Pension Plan Funding Standard and Recovery Act (“Act 205”), 53 P.S. §§ 895.101-895.803, and case law interpreting Act 205, under the factual scenario posed by this case.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Keith ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50624

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Keith Adams, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Keith Adams, federal prisoner # 78734-080 moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in an appeal of the district court’s dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of his motion to enforce plea agreement and correct clerical error in the judgment. He argues that the Government breached the plea agreement by allowing restitution in an amount greater than the amount to which Adams agreed in the plea agreement. Further, he asserts that the district court retains jurisdiction to enforce a plea agreement at any time; therefore, the court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction was erroneous.

A movant for IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that the appeal is taken in good faith. *Carson v. Polley,*689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.1982). This court’s inquiry into Adams’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).”’ *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (citation omitted).

To the extent that Adams sought modification of the restitution order, the district court lacked jurisdiction to address the issue. *See United States v. Hatten,*167 F.3d 884, 887 n. 5 (5th Cir.1999); *see United States v. Segler,*37 F.3d 1131, 1135 (5th Cir.1994). Further, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 is the appropriate vehicle for changes that do not substantively alter the orally announced sentence but instead correct errors in the written judgment. *United States v. Spencer,*513 F.3d 490, 491-92 (5th Cir.2008). The amount of restitution announced at sentencing is consistent with the amount stated in the judgment of conviction and sentence.

Adams has not established that he will raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue. *See Carson,*689 F.2d at 586. Accordingly, we DENY the motion to proceed IFP on appeal, and we DISMISS Adams’s appeal as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"id":2437,"date":"2018-09-11T14:40:39","date_gmt":"2018-09-11T18:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/?page_id=2437"},"modified":"2022-11-17T12:31:08","modified_gmt":"2022-11-17T16:31:08","slug":"cadrs-resources","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"\/resources-services\/cadrs-resources\/","title":{"rendered":"CADRS Resources"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>CADRS Resources<\/h1>\n<h2>CADRS Publications<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/iyba.yachts\/docs\/newsletters\/2015_02.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Avoid Complications When Hiring Yacht Shipping Service Providers<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.iamovers.org\/ResourcesPublications\/IndustryIssues.aspx?ItemNumber=3827\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">International Association of Movers Social Cafe Blog Re: OTI Licensing Requirements<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Webinars<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>NCBFAA Webinar – <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=yY1AO8vuPBw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Federal Maritime Commission Programs, Initiatives, and Dispute Resolution<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Working Group<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.adr.gov\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ADR.gov<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CADRS Resources CADRS Publications Avoid Complications When Hiring Yacht Shipping Service Providers International Association of Movers Social Cafe Blog Re: OTI Licensing Requirements Webinars NCBFAA Webinar – Federal Maritime Commission Programs, Initiatives, and Dispute Resolution Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Working Group ADR.gov<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":2050,"menu_order":36,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2437"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2437"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7247,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2437\/revisions\/7247"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.’s333-70569, 33-62721, and 33-70526) and in the Prospectus constituting part ofthe Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.’s 33-88410 and 333-116497) ofRotonics Manufacturing Inc. of our report dated August 12, 2004 appearing onpage F-1 of this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ Windes  & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |
|                                                 |
| Long Beach,  California                              |
| September  22, 2004                                  |

 

----