alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Information Quality Guidelines - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GUN9GM6kU2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/information-quality-guidelines\/\">Information Quality Guidelines<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/information-quality-guidelines\/embed\/#?secret=GUN9GM6kU2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Information Quality Guidelines” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GUN9GM6kU2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"These Guidelines set forth the Commission\u2019s policies and programs for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of certain information disseminated to the public, pursuant to section 515 of Public Law 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763 and guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).\u00a0 At this time, the Federal Maritime Commission […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE MINOR COURT 

RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 402

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2016, Magisterial District Judge Margaret 

Hunsicker, Montgomery County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Court 

Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing August 28, 2016.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3060 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow first responders 

to continue to exclude service-connected disability pension payments after 

reaching the age of retirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself and Mr. RUPPERSBERGER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow first 

responders to continue to exclude service-connected disability pension payments after reaching the age of retirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Putting Our First Re5 sponders First Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3060 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUED EXCLUSION OF FIRST RESPONDER 

2 SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY PAYMENTS 

3 AFTER AGE OF RETIREMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

6 (d) as subsection (e) and by inserting after subsection (c) 

7 the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR FIRST RESPONDER SERV9 ICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY PAYMENTS AFTER AGE OF

10 RETIREMENT.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual 

12 who receives a service-connected disability excludable 

13 amount, gross income shall not include such amount 

14 of any retirement pension or annuity which— 

15 ‘‘(A) is received by such individual with re16 spect to the service to which the service-con17 nected disability excludable amount relates, 

18 ‘‘(B) is determined by reference to the in19 dividual’s age, length of service, or contribu20 tions, and 

21 ‘‘(C) does not exceed the service-connected 

22 disability excludable amount (determined on an 

23 annualized basis under such regulations or 

24 other guidance as the Secretary may prescribe). 

25 ‘‘(2) SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY EXCLUD26 ABLE AMOUNT.—For purposes of this subsection, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3060 IH

1 the term ‘service-connected disability excludable 

2 amount’ means an amount received by an individual 

3 which ceases upon reaching retirement age and is 

4 not includible in gross income under subsection 

5 (a)(1) by reason of a service-connected disability as 

6 a law enforcement officer (as such term is defined 

7 in section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

8 Safe Streets Act of 1968), an employee in fire pro9 tection activities (as such term is defined in section 

10 3(y) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938), or 

11 an individual who provides out-of-hospital emergency 

12 medical care (including emergency medical techni13 cian, paramedic, or first responder).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2461]


Applications for Review of Action In Rulemaking Proceeding

January 31, 2000.
    Applications for Review have been filed in the Commission's 
rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.115(a). The full text of these documents are 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these applications 
must be filed by February 22, 2001. See section 97.15(b) of the 
Commission's rules (47 CFR 97.15(b)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have 
expired.
    Subject: Modification and Clarification of Policies and Procedures 
Governing Siting and Maintenance of Amateur Radio Antennas and Support 
Structures, and Amendment of Section 97.15 of the Rules Governing the 
Amateur Radio Service (RM-8763).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3116 Filed 2-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             270,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      297,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   698,000
<PP&E>                                           8,307,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,355,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,822,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,355,000
<BONDS>                                          2,438,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            73,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,043,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,822,000
<SALES>                                            588,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   588,000
<CGS>                                              281,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      551,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (35,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (12,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (23,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1** CERTIFICATION     I, Scott D. Kaplan,    certify that:     1.      have reviewed this    annual report on    Form 10-K    of Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account;     2.      Based on my    knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under    which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to    the period covered by this report;     3.      Based on my    knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial    information included in this report, fairly present in all    material respects the financial condition, results of operations    and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods    presented in this report;     4.      The    registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:      a)       Designed such    disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure    controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to    ensure that material information relating to the registrant,    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by    others within those entities, particularly during the period in    which this report is being prepared;      b)       Evaluated the    effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as    of the end of the period covered by this report based on such    evaluation; and      c)       Disclosed in this    report any change in the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s    most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal    quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The    registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):      a)      All significant    deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation    of internal control over financial reporting which are    reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial    information; and      b)      Any fraud, whether    or not material, that involves management or other employees who    have a significant role in the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     Date: March 23,    2007         /s/ Scott D. KaplanScott D. Kaplan    Chief Executive    Officer    Pruco Life Insurance    Company
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11028

Conference Calendar

 

BILLY JOHN ROBERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CV-1055-D

- - - - - - - - - -

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy John Roberson appeals the district court’s remand

order pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The appeal

is DISMISSED for lack of an appealable final judgment. See 28

U.S.C. § 1291; Sullivan v. Finkelstein, 496 U.S. 617, 623-31

(1990); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 99-102 (1991).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert G. Oberosler, Chief
Executive Officer of Theater Xtreme entertainment Group, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31,
2007:





(1) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.




Dated:
May 16, 2008








By:/s/ Robert G.
      OberoslerRobert
      G. OberoslerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that
Section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
except to the extent that this certification is expressly incorporated by
reference into any such filing.
Presidential Documents

64735

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 241

Friday, December 14, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of December 7, 2001

Certification Related to Northern Ireland Under Section 405

of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign

Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 405 of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan

Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001, as enacted

in Public Law 106–113, I hereby certify that: (i) training or exchange programs

conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation or other Federal law enforcement agencies for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) or

PSNI members are necessary to improve the professionalism of policing

in Northern Ireland and advance the peace process in Northern Ireland;

(ii) such programs will include in the curriculum a significant human rights

component; (iii) vetting procedures have been established in the Departments

of State and Justice, and any other appropriate Federal agency, to ensure

that training or exchange programs do not include PSNI members who

there are substantial grounds for believing have committed or condoned

violations of internationally recognized human rights, including any role

in the murder of Patrick Finucane or Rosemary Nelson or other violence

or serious threat of violence against defense attorneys in Northern Ireland;

and (iv) the Governments of the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland

are committed to assisting in the full implementation of the recommendations

contained in the Patten Commission report issued September 9, 1999.

You are authorized and directed to transmit this certification to the appropriate congressional committees and to publish it in the Federal Register.

[FR Doc. 01–31023

Filed 12–13–01; 8:45 am]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 7, 2001.

W

Billing code 4710–10–M
#### Temidayo AJAKA, Fehintola Ajaka, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, Brooksamerica Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant.

No. 07-12836

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 19, 2008.

Charles McLeod Baird, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants.

*917Mark F. Dehler, Michael E. Perez, Mark F. Dehler, LLC, Decatur, GA, Greg M. Taube, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and VINSON,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable C. Roger Vinson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us for the second time. The question presented is whether plaintiffs’ claim for rescission and damages under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601*et seq.,*and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1639, is barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel — because plaintiff Temidayo Ajaka failed to reveal the claims to the bankruptcy court in his Chapter 13 wage earner case with the intent to conceal them from the court in order to gain an unfair advantage over his creditors. In *Ajaka v. Brooksamerica Mortgage Corporation et al.,*453 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir.2006), the plaintiffs challenged the district court invocation of the doctrine to bar their claims on summary judgment. We vacated the summary judgment, and remanded the case for trial, because a material issue of fact that needed to be resolved: “whether Ajaka had the motivation and intent to manipulate the judicial system under the circumstances presented.” *Id.*at 1346.

On remand, the district court, following a bench trial, once again held that the doctrine barred plaintiffs’ claims. As indicated in its dispositive order, the court found, on the basis of the testimony adduced, that Ajaka intended to manipulate the judicial system: “Mr. Ajaka had both the knowledge of the claim early enough, as well as motivation sufficient enough, to make a mockery of the judicial system circumstances here.... Mr. Ajaka knew of his TILA claims well before when he finally revealed them to the bankruptcy court, and ... affirmatively intended to conceal those claims in his bankruptcy proceeding, in order to gain an unfair advantage over his lenders.” Order at 36. The evidence fully supported these findings. The district court’s judgment is, accordingly,

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF BHA GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.


BHA Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation; PrecipTech, Ltd., a Canadian
corporation; BHA Group, Ltd., a Canadian corporation; BHA International, Inc., a
U.S. Virgin Islands corporation; BHA Group GmbH, a German corporation; BHA Group
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and BHA Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation; BHA Purfilter S.L., a Spanish corporation; BHA Group
International Holdings B.V., a Dutch corporation; and The 63rd Street and Blue
Ridge Redevelopment Corporation, a Missouri Corporation, are the only
subsidiaries of the Company, each of which are wholly-owned. Tool Rental and
Supply Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Midwest Precipitator Corporation,
an Illinois corporation (DBA Midwest Power Corporation); BHA Group AG, a Swiss
corporation; BHA Environmental Technology Company, Ltd., a China corporation;
and BHA Group Philippines, Inc., a Philippine corporation, are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of BHA Group, Inc. BHA Group International Pvt. Ltd., an India
corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHA Group International, Inc.; BHA
Technologies AG, a Swiss corporation; and BHA Technologies K.K., a Japan
corporation, are wholly-owned subsidiaries of BHA Technologies, Inc.; BHA do
Brazil Ltda, a Brazilian corporation; and BHA U.K. Ltd., a United Kingdom
corporation, are wholly-owned subsidiaries of BHA Group International Holdings
B.V. BHA Group de Mexico S.A. de C.V. is 99% owned by BHA Group International
Holdings B.V. and 1% owned by BHA Group Holdings. Inc.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-108744 of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 18, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to 1) the Company's plan of reorganization and
emergence from bankruptcy as a new entity on February 4, 2003, 2) the
restatement of the February 4, 2003 consolidated balance sheet, 3) a change in
method of accounting for defined benefit pension plans, and 4) a change in
method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective January
5, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Warnaco Group,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York

March 18, 2004
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dameon JOHNICE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30185

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Jennifer McDaniel Kleinpeter, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Harvey Craft, Esq., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Dameon Johnice, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Dameon Johnice has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Johnice has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Johnice’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Johnice’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir..R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.