alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Equipment Management Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.18 
 AMENDMENT TO THE FOURTH 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT TO THE FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made on September 12, 2007, by and between LEASED ASSETS POOL COMPANY LIMITED, a Bermuda company whose registered office
is at Century House, 16 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton HM HX, Bermuda (“LAPCO”) and TEXTAINER EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, a Bermuda company whose registered office is at Century House, 16 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM HX, Bermuda
(“Manager”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. LAPCO and Manager are parties to that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Equipment Management Services Agreement, dated June 1, 2002 (“Agreement”). 
 B. LAPCO and Manager desire to amend the Agreement to clarify two definitions. 
 AGREEMENT 
 IT IS HEREBY AGREED that the following two definitions in the Agreement are deleted
in their entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “Long-Term Lease Fleet” means, as of any date of determination, all
LAPCO Containers that are then (a) subject to a Lease having an initial term of twenty-four (24) months or more, other than a Finance Lease, or (b) off-lease if their Leases in effect immediately before they went off-lease were Leases
of the type described in clause (a) of this definition. 
 “Master Lease Fleet” means, as of any date of determination,
all LAPCO Containers that are then (a) subject to a Lease having an initial term of less than twenty-four (24) months, other than a Finance Lease, or (b) off-lease if their Leases in effect immediately before they went off-lease were
Leases of the type described in clause (a) of this definition. 
  

 (1) 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

									
	 TEXTAINER EQUIPMENT
 MANAGEMENT
LIMITED
	 		 	 LEASED ASSETS POOL COMPANY
 LIMITED

					
	By:	 	/s/ Dudley R. Cottingham	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. Harvey
	Title:	 	Director	 		 	Title:	 	Directror
	Date:	 	 	 		 	Date:	 	 

  

 (2)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7862 

CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. JACKSON; RON BELL; MS. DIAL; PAULA SMITH;

ROSEMARY JACKSON; PHILLIP E. STOVER,

Defendants - Appellees,

THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; BRENDA HARDEN;

SHIRLEY GREEN; JUDY FOGG; MS. BOYETTE; MS.

CARTER; GEORGE KENWORTHY; MR. HARRISON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-04-392-BO)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip

Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG,

L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity3 Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Shannon T. Squyres, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

                (1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

                (2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Shannon T. Squyres  |
|-------------------------|
| Shannon T. Squyres      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 12, 2002       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PLANETRX.COM,INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          25,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,240
<PP&E>                                          24,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,141
<BONDS>                                          3,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,013
<SALES>                                          9,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,942
<CGS>                                            8,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (290)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)
<FN>
<F1>Reflects Basic EPS according to SFAS 128
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3188 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish 

a forgivable loan program for remote recreational businesses, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2021 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Mr. EMMER, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish a forgivable loan program for remote 

recreational businesses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assistance Needed for 

5 Great Losses Experienced in Isolated Northern Lakes 

6 Economic Territory Act’’ or the ‘‘ANGLE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3188 IH

1 SEC. 2. FORGIVABLE LOAN PROGRAM FOR REMOTE REC2 REATIONAL BUSINESSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall establish 

4 a program to make forgivable loans available to remote 

5 recreational businesses that experienced a loss in revenue 

6 that is greater than 50 percent during the period between 

7 March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, as compared with 

8 the same period during previous year. 

9 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible for a forgivable 

10 loan, a remote recreational business must— 

11 (1) have been in operation on March 1, 2020; 

12 and 

13 (2) show that the closure of the United States 

14 and Canadian border restricted the ability of Amer15 ican customers to access the location of the remote 

16 recreational business. 

17 (c) LOAN AMOUNT.—The maximum loan amount 

18 shall be equal to 75 percent of the remote recreational 

19 gross annual receipts for fiscal year 2019. 

20 (d) FORGIVENESS.—Not later than 1 calendar year 

21 from the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

22 shall forgive 100 percent of the value of a loan received 

23 less the amount the borrower received from— 

24 (1) any other loan forgiveness program, includ25 ing any program established under the CARES Act 

26 (Public Law 116–136); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3188 IH

1 (2) an advance received under section 1110 of 

2 the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009). 

3 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

4 In this Act: 

5 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis6 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Small Busi7 ness Administration. 

8 (2) REMOTE RECREATIONAL BUSINESS.—The 

9 term ‘‘remote recreational business’’ means a busi10 ness in the contiguous United States that is— 

11 (A) a small business concern (as defined 

12 under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

13 U.S.C. 632)) operating in the recreational in14 dustry; 

15 (B) located within 75 miles of the United 

16 States and Canadian border; and 

17 (C) is only accessible by land via Canada. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E & B GIFTWARE, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Does 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

No. 2010-1213.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 10, 2010.

Henry Tovmassian, Law Offices of Henry Tovmassian, of Sherman Oaks, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee.

Gerard F. Dunne, Law Office of Gerard F. Dunne, PC, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Alexander Vinogradov, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Telecom, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
(b) (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986,33-8392 and 34-49313);
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by the report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
Date: August 5, 2004
ALEXANDER VINOGRADOV
Alexander Vinogradov
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 242 (Monday, December 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65010-65011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Federal Register Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Weeks of December 17, 24, 31, 2001, January 7, 14, 21, 2002.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Week of December 17, 2001

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of December 17, 2001.

Week of December 24, 2001--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of December 24, 2001.

Week of December 31, 2001--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of December 31, 2001.

Week of January 7, 2002--Tentative

Wednesday, January 9, 2002
    9:30 a.m. Meeting with Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) 
(Public Meeting) (Contact: John Larkins, 301-415-7360).
    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--www.nrc.gov.

Week of January 14, 2002--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of Janaury 14, 2002.

Week of January 21, 2002--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of January 21, 2002.
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: David Louis Gamberoni 
(301) 415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: www.nrc.gov
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like

[[Page 65011]]

to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, 
distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is 
available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting 
schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86e2edf1c6e8f4e5a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03676874436d71602d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 12, 2001.
David Louis Gamberoni,
Technical Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31160 Filed 12-13-01; 2:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6861

ELDER PRESCOTT LEACH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 9:19

- cv - 01726

- JMC )

Submitted : October 29, 2020 Decided: November 9, 2020

Before WYNN, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Elder Prescott Leach, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elder Prescott Leach seeks to appeal the district court’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Leach’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A c ertificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reaso nable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both th at the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have indep endently reviewed the record and conclude that Leach has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre sented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3208 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3208

       To amend title 1, United States Code, to define the term 
                infrastructure, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2021

Mr. Murphy of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Green of Tennessee, and 
  Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend title 1, United States Code, to define the term 
                infrastructure, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINED.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 9. Infrastructure defined
    ``In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, except where context 
determines otherwise, the term `infrastructure' means bridges, dams, 
wharfs, roads, highways, ports, buildings, public utilities (including 
broadband), airports, and train stations.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 1 of title 1, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``9. Infrastructure defined.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC
(the "Companies") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of
the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



|                                                          |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ J. KIMO ESPLIN J. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|November 4, 2009                                          |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Mehendra Narayan Chand PEDDY, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71856.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2008.*

Filed May 27, 2008.

Patrick 0. Cantor, Buttar & Cantor, LLP, Tukwila, WA, for Petitioner.

Aliza B. Alyeshmerni, Andrew Oliveira, Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mehendra Narayan Chand Peddy, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 966 (9th Cir.1998), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that the single robbery and minor injuries that Peddy suffered in Fiji did not rise to the level of persecution. *See id.*at 967-69. Further, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Peddy does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution, because he failed to demonstrate the requisite individualized risk of persecution. *See id.*at 970-71. Accordingly, Peddy’s asylum claim fails.

Because Peddy failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it necessarily follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See id.*at 971.

Finally, because Peddy has not shown that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returned to Fiji, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Presidential Documents

64907

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 241

Friday, December 14, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13239 of December 12, 2001

Designation of Afghanistan and the Airspace Above as a

Combat Zone

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution

and the laws of the United States of America, including section 112 of

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 112), I designate, for purposes

of that section, Afghanistan, including the airspace above, as an area in

which Armed Forces of the United States are and have been engaged in

combat.

For purposes of this order, I designate September 19, 2001, as the date

of the commencement of combatant activities in such zone.

[FR Doc. 01–31119

Filed 12–13–01; 11:38 am]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 12, 2001.

W

Billing code 3195–01–P