alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MIRLAN, dba Vinyard Valley Center, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant—Appellee, and Axis Specialty U.S. Services, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant.

No. 09-55662.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 2010.

Filed Nov. 8, 2010.

John Allen Bunnett, Esquire, Law Office of John A. Bunnett, Downey, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*188Jeffrey N. Gesell, Alan M. Jones, Jones Turner LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendants Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, TALLMAN and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiff-Appellant Mirlan appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Affiliated FM Insurance Company. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our disposition. We affirm.

In an action on an insurance policy, “it is well settled that ‘[t]he burden is on an insured to establish that the [event] forming the basis of its claim is within the basic scope of insurance coverage.’ ” *Dart Inds., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.,*28 Cal.4th 1059, 124 Cal.Rptr.2d 142, 52 P.3d 79, 87 (2002). Here, the insurance policies cover “the actual loss of income sustained by the insured resulting directly from the necessary untenantability, caused by loss, damage or destruction by any of the perils covered herein ... to real or personal property.” Mirlan must therefore show that its losses resulted directly from the necessary untenantability caused by the fire, rather than its own conduct after the fire.

After the fire rendered three tenant spaces untenantable, Mirlan represented to its tenants that they would not have to continue paying rent. However, Mirlan’s tenant leases provided that the tenants were required to continue paying rent even if fire made the spaces untenantable or there were repairs made to the property. The leases also required the tenants to purchase business interruption insurance. Based on these provisions, Mirlan’s tenants would have been required to continue paying rent but for Mirlan’s own representations that they had no obligation to do so. Because there is no evidence in the record that Mirlan would have incurred rental income losses after the fire, Mirlan does not meet its burden to show that its claim falls within the scope of insurance coverage. Because this issue is dispositive, we do not reach the remaining issues.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lynn Powers, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:      May 11, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Lynn Powers                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Lynn Powers                            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and President |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James M. ANDERSON, a/k/a Hollywood, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4064.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 2008.

Decided: May 23, 2008.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, Edward H. Weis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James M. Anderson pled guilty to distributing a quantity of cocaine base (crack), 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000), and was sentenced to a term of 108 months imprisonment. Anderson appealed his sentence, arguing that the district court erred by seeking to impose a “reasonable” sentence rather than a sentence “sufficient, but not greater than necessary” to comply with the purposes of 18 U.S.CA. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2007), and failed to consider adequately the effect of the 100:1 sentencing ratio for cocaine and crack offenses in his case. He also claimed that his sentence was greater than necessary to further the purposes of § 3553(a)(2). We affirmed his sentence; however, the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of *Kimbrough v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). *See United States v. Anderson,*241 Fed.Appx. 912 (4th Cir.2007), *vacated,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 913, 169 L.Ed.2d 719 (2008).

In *Kimbrough,*the Supreme Court held that “it would not be an abuse of discretion for a district court to conclude when sentencing a particular defendant that the crack/powder disparity yields a sentence ‘greater than necessary1 to achieve § 3553(a)’s purposes, even in a mine-run case.” *Kimbrough,*128 S.Ct. at 575. *268*Kimbrough*has thus abrogated *United States v. Eura,*440 F.3d 625 (4th Cir.2006) (holding that sentencing court may not vary from guideline range solely because of 100:1 ratio for crack/cocaine offenses), *vacated,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 853, — L.Ed.2d - (2008). The district court did not have the benefit of *Kimbrough*when it determined Anderson’s sentence. To give the district court the opportunity to reconsider the sentence in light of *Kimbrough,*we conclude that resentencing is necessary.

We therefore vacate the sentence imposed by the district court and remand for resentencing.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*

*

 On remand, Anderson will be resentenced under the revised guidelines for crack offenses that took effect on November 1, 2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          56,236
<SECURITIES>                                    34,348
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,051
<PP&E>                                          10,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,209
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,634)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,940
<SALES>                                         29,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,865
<CGS>                                           12,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,056)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group V,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, William Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 14, 2004

                               /s/ William Colucci
                               -------------------
                           William Colucci, President
                          BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the Port of New York & New Jersey\/OCEMA Discussion Agreement","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"K4jWOs1O5U\"><a href=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-the-port-of-new-york-new-jersey-ocema-discussion-agreement\/\">Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the Port of New York & New Jersey\/OCEMA Discussion Agreement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-the-port-of-new-york-new-jersey-ocema-discussion-agreement\/embed\/#?secret=K4jWOs1O5U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the Port of New York & New Jersey\/OCEMA Discussion Agreement” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"K4jWOs1O5U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 354 

For the relief of Gloria Ayala Cuyuch. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Gloria Ayala Cuyuch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GLORIA 

4 AYALA CUYUCH. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Gloria Ayala Cuyuch shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 354 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Gloria Ayala 

2 Cuyuch enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Gloria Ayala Cuyuch, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 354 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Gloria Ayala Cuyuch shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Supply Chain Innovation Initiative","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Kllf1PdrPu\"><a href=\"\/supply-chain-innovation-initiative\/\">Supply Chain Innovation Initiative<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/supply-chain-innovation-initiative\/embed\/#?secret=Kllf1PdrPu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Supply Chain Innovation Initiative” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Kllf1PdrPu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"January 2021 Revocations and Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wrfPoozrpP\"><a href=\"\/oti\/january-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/\">January 2021 Revocations and Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/january-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=wrfPoozrpP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“January 2021 Revocations and Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"wrfPoozrpP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 10.13

(LOGO)                                                 Dah Sing Financial Centre
Dah Sing Bank                                          108 Gloucester Road,
                                                       Hong Kong

27th June, 2007

Private & Confidential

Concord Camera HK Ltd.
14/F ADP Pentagon Centre
98 Texaco Road
Tsuen Wan
N.T.

For kind attention of
Mr. Wong Kim Fai Paul

Dear Sirs,

Re: Banking Facilities

We have the pleasure to inform you that we will extend your banking facilities
for two months time with expiry date amended to 31st August, 2007. Your existing
facilities will be unchanged for these period. In the meantime, your facilities
is under general review and detailed facility letter will be issued immediately
to you upon approval of our review.

Yours faithfully,
For and on behalf of
Dah Sing Bank, Limited

/s/ Vincent M.T. Tsang
---------------------------
Authority Signature
Commercial Banking Division
VT/(3916)/hh

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>         <C>              <C>                      <C>                       <C>                   <C>
Telephone:  2507 8866        Cable:  Dahsingbank      Telex: 74063 DSB HX       Fax: 2598 5052        Website: www.dahsing.com
</TABLE>
EX-35 (f)
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000


March 21, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-3 Trust


Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 3/30/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(a)   a review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
      year or portion thereof and of performance of such party under this
      Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision and


(b)   to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
      has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill
      any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
      known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Christopher C. Regnier
Christopher C. Regnier, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL JOSEPH GROVE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 250 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
73 A.3d 523

#### David MILLER and I26 Hotel Corporation, Petitioners v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 31, 2013.

*18
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, as stated by petitioners:

> Did the Commonwealth Court’s decision conflict with decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court where it affirmed the lower court’s order granting [respondent] SEPTA’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that Congress intended to preempt state law claims of negligent railroad bridge construction and interference with riparian rights when it enacted the Federal Railroad Safety Act?

Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.