alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3260 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3260

 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require that certain 
      issuers make disclosures regarding general ledger accounts 
                reconciliation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2021

 Mr. Sherman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require that certain 
      issuers make disclosures regarding general ledger accounts 
                reconciliation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNTS RECONCILIATION.

    Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(s) General Ledger Accounts Reconciliation.--
            ``(1) In general.--Each covered issuer required to file an 
        annual or quarterly report under subsection (a) shall disclose 
        in that report whether such covered issuer has, at the time of 
        such report, completed a general ledger accounts reconciliation 
        for the most recent fiscal quarter and most recent fiscal year, 
        respectively.
            ``(2) Covered issuer defined.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `covered issuer' means an issuer with 
        respect to which a civil or criminal penalty has been imposed 
        under the securities laws by reason of the internal control 
        over financial reporting of such issuer related to the failure 
        of such issuer to reconcile general ledger accounts.''.
                                 <all>
```
# February 2023 F7 Notices
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q/A of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended June 30,
2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a) or
sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pactiv
Corporation for the period then ended.

   /s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
--------------------------------
Andrew A. Campbell
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

January 31, 2005
--------------------------------
Date

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        3
{"id":1447,"date":"2012-06-07T13:31:06","date_gmt":"2012-06-07T17:31:06","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1447"},"modified":"2023-02-03T13:48:56","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03T17:48:56","slug":"comments-of-fmc-commissioner-rebecca-f-dye-at-the-canadian-american-business-council-the-dragon-in-the-room-chinas-impact-on-canada-u-s-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/comments-of-fmc-commissioner-rebecca-f-dye-at-the-canadian-american-business-council-the-dragon-in-the-room-chinas-impact-on-canada-u-s-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Comments of FMC Commissioner Rebecca F. Dye at the Canadian American Business Council, The Dragon in the Room: China\u2019s Impact on Canada\/U.S. Issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>June 7, 2012<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Dye_Speech_Canadian_American_Business_Council6-7-12.pdf\">Click here to download document<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>June 7, 2012 Click here to download document<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,9],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1447"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1447"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7453,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1447\/revisions\/7453"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### Darrell Eugene BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNKNOWN MOSELY, Federal Correctional Institute Yazoo City, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-60231

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2016.

Darrell Eugene Banks, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Darrell Eugene Banks, federal prisoner #23612-058, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief. He also has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Banks argued in the district court that he was actually innocent of the charges listed in the indictment, challenged the validity of his plea, and complained that his trial counsel was ineffective. He also contended that the rulings in *United States v. Simmons,*649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir.2011), and *Miller v. United States,*735 F.3d 141 (4th Cir.2013), provide grounds to reverse his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court denied relief, concluding that Banks failed to meet the requirements of the savings clause under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e), which allows a federal prisoner to challenge his conviction under § 2241 if the remedies provided by § 2255 are “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” When addressing the denial of a § 2241 petition, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. *Jeffers v. Chandler,*253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.2001).

A petitioner seeking to establish that his § 2255 remedy was inadequate or ineffective must make a claim “(i) that is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense and (ii) that was fore*354closed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” Reye*s-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir.2001).

Banks fails to make the required showing. *See id.*He does not cite a retroactively applicable Supreme Court ruling establishing that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense, and he has not established that his claims were foreclosed at the time when they should have been raised.at trial, on appeal, or in an initial § 2255 motion. *See id.*Moreover, the sentencing court rejected the same claims in a § 2255 motion to vacate, correct, or set aside the sentence. A prior unsuccessful § 2255 motion or the inability to meet the second or successive requirement for § 2255 motions does not render § 2255 inadequate or ineffective. *Jeffers,*253 F.3d at 830. Finally, Banks’s actual innocence argument is unavailing. *See McQuiggin v. Perkins,*— U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 1928, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013); *Foster v, Quarterman,*466 F.3d 359, 367-68 (5th Cir.2006).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                       |  |                                  
|------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: June 27, 2006 |  | /s/ Kevin M. McMullen
|                    |  | Name:                 |  | Kevin M. McMullen                
|                    |  | Title:                |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |                       |  | and President                    
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Michael E. Hicks 
|                    |  | Name:                 |  | Michael E. Hicks                 
|                    |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief  
|                    |  |                       |  | Financial Officer; Treasurer     

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3254 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3254

        To terminate Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2021

 Mr. Loudermilk (for himself, Mr. Meuser, Mrs. Greene of Georgia, Mr. 
  Norman, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Latta, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Ms. Van Duyne, 
 Mrs. Cammack, Mr. DesJarlais, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Wenstrup, 
  Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Cawthorn, and Mr. Johnson of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To terminate Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF FEDERAL PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 2104(e)(2) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 
9023(e)(2)) is amended by striking ``September 6, 2021'' and inserting 
``May 31, 2021''.
    (b) Amount.--Section 2104(b)(3)(A)(ii) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
9023(b)(3)(A)(ii)) is amended by striking ``September 6, 2021'' and 
inserting ``May 31, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE REGISTRANT'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      33,359,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,279)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,453,633
<PP&E>                                       1,976,222
<DEPRECIATION>                               (836,539)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,336,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,813,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,720
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,121,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,336,992
<SALES>                                      1,980,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,980,419
<CGS>                                        1,616,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,564,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,912,212)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,222,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,222,909)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity3 Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Shannon T.
Squyres and Steven D. Hargreaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

               /s/ Shannon T. Squyres
               ------------------------------------------
               Shannon T. Squyres,
               Chief Executive Officer
               August 13, 2003

               /s/ Steven D. Hargreaves
               -------------------------------------------
               Steven D. Hargreaves,
               Chief Financial Officer
               August 13, 2003

                                       12
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:24 a.m. on Monday, December 10, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory, and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, a motion of Director John M. Reich (Appointive), seconded by Director James E. Gilleran (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Donald E. Powell, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: December 11, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James D. LaPierre,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-30909  Filed 12-11-01; 12:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3106]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Document Availability; Draft Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement, Cal Black Memorial Airport, Halls Crossing, Utah

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration has released, for public 
review and comment, the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (DSEIS) to address issues arising from the 1993 10th Circuit 
U.S. Court of Appeals Decision concerning the closure of Halls Crossing 
Airport and the development and operation of Cal Black Memorial 
Airport, Halls Crossing, Utah. The DSEIS identifies the noise impacts 
associated with operation of Cal Black Memorial Airport, the probable 
impacts if Halls Crossing Airport had not been closed, and includes a 
survey of visitors to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and their 
reaction to aircraft overflight noise.

DATE AND ADDRESS FOR COMMENTS: Comments concerning the DSEIS may be 
submitted by March 30, 2001, to Mr. Dennis Ossenkop, ANM-611, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98055-4056.
    A public hearing may be requested by contacting Mr. Dennis Ossenkop 
at the address above. Persons desiring to review the DSEIS may do so 
during normal business hours at the following locations:

Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division Office, Suite 315, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office, Suite 224, 
26805 East 68th Ave, Denver, Colorado
San Juan County Courthouse, County Executive Office, 117 S. Main, 
Monticello, Utah

    If you desire additional information related to this project, 
please contact Mr. Dennis Ossenkop at the above address.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on January 29, 2001.
Lowell H. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division, Northwest Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. 01-3106 Filed 2-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Mr. Mike Dunham
c/o WorkWise, Inc.
12000 W. Park Place
Milwaukee WI 53224-3026
USA

                                                                 August 21, 2007

Dear Mike,

It is my pleasure to offer you a seat on the Board of Directors for BioForce
Nanosciences Holdings, Inc. The Board meets four times per year, with at least
one (preferably two) meetings being held in person. I believe we can accommodate
your annual travel schedule and living arrangements by having physical meetings
of the board at the appropriate times and places.

Board members are currently compensated with options to purchase BioForce stock
at pricing that is determined by the market price at the time of issuance. You
will receive 200,000 options to purchase BioForce stock, vesting over a
three-year period as follows.

66,666 after the first year of service
66,666 after the second year of service
66,667 after the third year of service

All options would vest immediately upon a change in control.

BioForce does not currently provide cash compensation to our Directors. However
I would like to change that policy and will bring the matter forward in an
upcoming Board meeting. I will propose a reasonable level of additional cash
compensation for service as a board committee chair. Such committees have not
yet been established, but I believe that that deficit must be rectified quickly.
In particular, we need to establish an audit committee, and I consider you to be
the best candidate for chair of that committee if that service can be melded
with your other activities.

Thank you for your kind consideration. Please feel free to contact Greg, Kerry
or me if you have any questions or comments.

Best wishes,


/s/ Eric Henderson
---------------------------
Eric Henderson, CEO
BioForce Nanosciences, Inc.
Ames, IA 50014

515 233 8333 x101
ehenderson@bioforcenano.com
*Order Entered September 15, 2011:*

#### Florence Cement Company v Vettraino,

Docket No. 295090.

Reported at 292 Mich 461.

The Court orders that the May 3, 2011, opinion is hereby amended. The opinion contained the following clerical errors:

The defendant’s last name was misspelled. The correct spelling is “Vettraino.”

On page 3, the slip opinion states, “It is undisputed that Comerica provided the remaining $142,000 requested, and that this amount, but only this amount, was paid to Florence, leaving a shortfall of $142,557.27.” The shortfall amount should correctly be $114,557.27.

In all other respects, the May 3, 2011, opinion remains unchanged.