alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FMCS | 2100 K St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20427 | 202-606-8100 | www.fmcs.gov 

NEWS RELEASE 

Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Contact: Linda Gray-Broughton 

For Immediate Release Grants Program Coordinator 

Website: www.fmcs.gov Phone: 202-606-8181 

FMCS Extends Deadline for Labor-Management Grants;

Applications Now Due June 30, 2016

 

WASHINGTON, DC – The application deadline for a labor-management grant from the Federal 

Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) has been extended to June 30, 2016 to accommodate the 

late expressions of interest among many labor-management parties that still wish to apply. 

The FMCS grants program offers labor-management applicants the opportunity to launch an innovative 

program with FMCS seed money. With new challenges of the 21st century workplace testing the bonds 

of traditional labor-management partnerships, FMCS is looking for proposals that address the 

transitioning workplace, hiring and retaining new generations of workers, and rapidly advancing 

technology-based work structures. 

FMCS Director Allison Beck has explained the special emphasis on such proposals this year: “Dramatic 

shifts in labor market trends, combined with significant labor-management reform activity occurring 

across many industries and at the city, state, and regional level, require broad, creative and 

collaborative approaches to workplace problems.” 

The new deadline for applications offers would-be applicants an additional month to file. FMCS grants 

will be awarded in amounts from $50,000 to $400,000, which is a departure from the previous funding 

cap of $125,000 for geographic or industry-wide committees. 

Parties with well-qualified proposals should not assume that there will be a significantly larger funding 

pool next year! Any future increase in grant funding is entirely dependent on the FY 2017 Congressional 

appropriations process. 

Detailed information and application training videos are available at this link. For additional information, 

contact the FMCS Grants Office at 202-606-8181. 

### 

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government agency whose 

mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. Headquartered in Washington, DC, 

with 10 regional offices and more than 60 field offices, the agency provides mediation and conflict resolution 

services to industry, government agencies and communities.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"The Honorable Michael A. Khouri Remarks at the Annual Meeting of International Association of Movers in Denver, Colorado on September 15, 2011","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fJBeA6TWj9\"><a href=\"\/the-honorable-michael-a-khouri-remarks-at-the-annual-meeting-of-international-association-of-movers-in-denver-colorado-on-september-15-2011\/\">The Honorable Michael A. Khouri Remarks at the Annual Meeting of International Association of Movers in Denver, Colorado on September 15, 2011<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/the-honorable-michael-a-khouri-remarks-at-the-annual-meeting-of-international-association-of-movers-in-denver-colorado-on-september-15-2011\/embed\/#?secret=fJBeA6TWj9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Honorable Michael A. Khouri Remarks at the Annual Meeting of International Association of Movers in Denver, Colorado on September 15, 2011” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"fJBeA6TWj9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 19, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 19, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0469. CORE ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC. v. DLP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CV0993
Denied and Opinion Filed October 8, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01153-CV

IN RE NICHOLAS DYESS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-09867

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to rule 

on relator’s motion for a free appellate record in an appeal pending in this Court under cause 

number 05-18-00825-CV. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus does not comply with the rules 

of appellate procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j), 52.3(k), 52.7(a)(1). Although these 

deficiencies alone constitute sufficient reason to deny mandamus relief, in the interest of judicial 

economy we address the petition.

To establish entitlement to mandamus relief for a trial court’s refusal to act, the relator must 

establish that the trial court had a legal duty to perform a ministerial act, relator made demand for 

performance, and the court refused to perform. Stoner v. Massey, 586 S.W.2d 843, 846 (Tex.

1979). The appellate record is due to be filed in cause number 05-18-00825-CV on October 24, 

2018. Relator’s petition includes no evidence indicating that the record will not be filed when due

or showing that the trial court has refused to rule on or denied relator’s request for a free appellate 
–2–

record. As such, relator’s request for mandamus relief is premature. See, e.g., In re E.M., No. 02-

14-00403-CV, 2015 WL 128739, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 9, 2015, orig. proceeding) 

(citing Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & S.E. Tex., Inc., 971 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. 

1998) (explaining that an action is not ripe for judicial review if it involves “uncertain or contingent 

future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all”)); see also In re 

Elizondo, No. 07-99-0142-CV, 1999 WL 285735, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 5, 1999, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.) (“It is premature to seek mandamus without the trial court first ruling on 

or affirmatively refusing to rule on the very matters upon which relief is sought”).

Accordingly, we deny the petition. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 52.8(a). 

181153F.P05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
#### Francisco ROMERO-NEGRETE, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-74435.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 2016.*

Filed Jan. 27, 2016.

James B. Rudolph, Esquire, Rudolph, Baker *&*Associates, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Karen Y. Stewart, Esquire, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland SEcurity, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Romero-Negrete, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Serrano v. Gonzales,*469 F.3d 1317, 1318 (9th Cir. 2006), and we review de novo claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, *Mo**487*hammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Romero-Negrete’s motion to reopen on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Romero-Negrete did not establish prejudice for the alleged ineffective assistance because he can not show plausible grounds for the relief he seeks. *See Mohammed,*400 F.3d at 793 (to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, petitioner must demonstrate that counsel failed to perform with sufficient competence and that petitioner was prejudiced by that performance); *Serrano,*469 F.3d at 1319 (to show prejudice, an alien must show plausible grounds for relief).

Respondent’s motion to terminate the stay of proceedings is denied as unnecessary.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3,
Monday, September 28, 2015 Contact: John Arnold, Director

For Immediate Release Office of Public Affairs

Web site: www.fmcs.gov Phone: (202) 606-8100

 

FMCS Statement on Agreement 

Between the Chicago Symphony Orchestra 

And the Chicago Federation of Musicians 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Allison Beck, Director of the U.S. Federal Mediation and 

Conciliation Service (FMCS), announced today that representatives of the Chicago Symphony 

Orchestra and the Chicago Federation of Musicians have reached a tentative agreement on a new 

collective bargaining agreement under the auspices of FMCS mediators. 

 

The parties are not commenting regarding details of the agreement until both sides have ratified 

the new contract later this week. 

 

As is Agency practice, the FMCS also is not releasing information about the contract until the 

ratification process has been completed. 

### 

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government 

agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. 

Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 district offices and more than 60 field offices, the agency 

provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government agencies and communities.

NEWS RELEASE

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20427
Exhibit 32.1                                CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Adam DeBard, Chief Operating Officer, of Global Diversified
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
period ended October 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: December 19, 2003                By: /s/  Adam DeBard
                                       Chief Operating Officer (Principal
                                       Accounting and Financial Officer)
PreviousNext

## FMCS Launches Electronic FOIA Processing System

*FOIAXpress allows users to electronically file, monitor and appeal FOIA requests.*

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Oct. 26, 2020) — The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) launched the new FOIAXpress software today to process and track Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and appeals.

FOIA provides individuals the right to access federal government records.  While FMCS posts many agency documents as an information resource in the public online reading room, individuals can submit a FOIA request for other records that may be available. The FOIAXpress tracking and management software replaces the agency’s previous in-house FOIA tracking system.

As part of FMCS’s commitment to transparency, public participation, and accountability, FOIAXpress will speed up the processing of FOIA requests by allowing FMCS staff and FOIA requesters the ability to electronically exchange pertinent documents. FOIAXpress requesters will be able to monitor their requests and appeals online in real-time via the public access link (PAL).

For those unable to file FOIA requests electronically, the FMCS Office of General Counsel will also still receive FOIA requests via mail and fax.

FOIAxpress is available to requesters directly at https://palfmcs.efoia-host.com/ or via the FMCS website at https://www.fmcs.gov/foia/

Greg Raelson

#### Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

FacebookTwitterEmail
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3382 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic of Korea, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Mrs. KIM of California, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, 

Mr. KILMER, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. COOPER, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. 

NUNES, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. GALLEGO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic 

of Korea, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partner with Korea 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3382 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECIPROCAL VISAS FOR NATIONALS OF SOUTH 

2 KOREA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘cap7 ital;’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end ‘‘or (iv) solely to per9 form services in a specialty occupation in the United 

10 States if the alien is a national of the Republic of 

11 Korea and with respect to whom the Secretary of 

12 Labor determines and certifies to the Secretary of 

13 Homeland Security and the Secretary of State that 

14 the intending employer has filed with the Secretary 

15 of Labor an attestation under section 212(t)(1);’’. 

16 (b) NUMERICAL LIMITATION.—Section 214(g) of 

17 such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended by adding at the 

18 end the following: 

19 ‘‘(12)(A) The Secretary of State may not approve a 

20 number of initial applications submitted for aliens de21 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(E)(iv) that is more than the 

22 applicable numerical limitations set out in this paragraph. 

23 ‘‘(B) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

24 in subparagraph (A) is 15,000 for each fiscal year. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3382 IH

1 ‘‘(C) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

2 in subparagraph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens 

3 and not the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

4 (c) SPECIALTY OCCUPATION DEFINED.—Section 

5 214(i)(1) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii),’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘clauses (iii) and (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E),’’. 

8 (d) ATTESTATION.—Section 212(t) of such Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1182(t)), as added by section 402(b)(2) of the 

10 United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementa11 tion Act (Public Law 108–77; 117 Stat. 941), is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘or section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ 

14 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘or clause (iii) 

15 or (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E)’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraphs (3)(C)(i)(II), (3)(C)(ii)(II), 

17 and (3)(C)(iii)(II), by striking ‘‘or 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Occupational Safety and Health Administration

          - 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1926 and 1928
          - [Docket Number H-122A]
          - RIN 1218-AB37

# AGENCY:

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of proposal. 

# SUMMARY:

OSHA is withdrawing its Indoor Air Quality proposal and terminating the rulemaking proceeding. In the years since the proposal was issued, a great many state and local governments and private employers have taken action to curtail smoking in public areas and in workplaces. In addition, the portion of the proposal not related to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) received little attention during the rulemaking proceedings, and much of that consisted of commenters calling into question significant portions of the proposal. As a result, record evidence supporting the non-ETS portion of the proposal is sparse.

Withdrawal of this proposal will also allow the Agency to devote its resources to other projects. The Agency's current regulatory priorities, as set forth in the Regulatory Agenda, include a number of important occupational safety and health standards. This document does not preclude any agency action that OSHA may find to be appropriate in the future.

# DATES: 

The withdrawal is made on December 17, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bonnie Friedman, Director, OSHA Public Affairs Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; Telephone (202) 693-1999; Fax (202) 693-1634.

## Authority and Signature

This document was prepared under the direction of John L. Henshaw, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor. It is issued pursuant to section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1594, 29 U.S.C. 655) and 29 C.F.R. 1911.18.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th of December, 2001.

John L. Henshaw,

Assistant Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 01-31165  Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – June 2, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QrE6IYoaDR\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-june-2-2016\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – June 2, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-june-2-2016\/embed\/#?secret=QrE6IYoaDR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – June 2, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"QrE6IYoaDR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}