alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cherokee International Corporation(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Jeffrey M. Frank, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Van Holland,as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Actof 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Jeffrey  M. Frank                              |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:  Jeffrey M. Frank                       |   |
| Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                      |   |
|                                               |   |
| Date:  May 12, 2004                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ Van  Holland                                   |   |   |
| Name: Van  Holland                                 |   |
| Title:   Chief Financial Officer         |   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer)      |   |
|                                               |   |
| Date:    May 12, 2004               |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Cherokee International Corporation and will be retained byCherokee International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
84 A.3d 700

#### John THOMPSON Jr, Petitioner v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., Respondents.

No. 181 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 28, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITHOUT *217PREJUDICE to Petitioner to file a similar petition in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               7,329,000
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          715,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8,253,000
<PP&E>                                              90,456,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      31,825,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      67,436,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,028,000
<BONDS>                                             42,518,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                          21,590,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        67,436,000
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    24,610,000
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,025,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,350,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        521,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           521,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             8.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BUSINESSES OF PACTIV CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      313
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                        432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   895
<PP&E>                                           1,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                     627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              597
<BONDS>                                          1,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,437
<SALES>                                          2,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,185
<CGS>                                            1,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    185
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                     134
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       240
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47


</TABLE>
{"id":4203,"date":"2019-09-05T09:18:16","date_gmt":"2019-09-05T13:18:16","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=4203"},"modified":"2019-09-05T09:18:17","modified_gmt":"2019-09-05T13:18:17","slug":"dye-addresses-rila-transportation-executives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/dye-addresses-rila-transportation-executives\/","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Dye Addresses RILA Transportation Executives"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Thursday, August 22<sup>nd<\/sup>, Commissioner Rebecca Dye addressed a meeting of the Retail Industry Leaders Association\u2019s transportation and infrastructure committee. In the discussion, she covered a variety of issues with a focus on implementation of the International Maritime Organization\u2019s 2020 low sulfur fuel requirement, and the FMC\u2019s Fact-Finding Investigation No. 28 into the reasonableness of demurrage and detention rules practices. Commissioner Dye explained that, as fact finding officer, she would shortly be recommending that the FMC issue an interpretive rule clarifying its view that such rules (and associated charges) were primarily established to provide a financial incentive for shippers and their agents to pick-up cargo and return empty containers in a timely manner, and that the recommended interpretive rule would reflect that incentive principle.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Thursday, August 22nd, Commissioner Rebecca Dye addressed a meeting of the Retail Industry Leaders Association\u2019s transportation and infrastructure committee. In the discussion, she covered a variety of issues with a focus on implementation of the International Maritime Organization\u2019s 2020 low sulfur fuel requirement, and the FMC\u2019s Fact-Finding Investigation No.... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/dye-addresses-rila-transportation-executives\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,9],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4203"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4203"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4204,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4203\/revisions\/4204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
{"id":8093,"date":"2024-01-04T14:19:29","date_gmt":"2024-01-04T18:19:29","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=8093"},"modified":"2024-02-23T15:17:10","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T19:17:10","slug":"industry-advisory-requiring-no-cost-access-to-tariff-publication-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/industry-advisory-requiring-no-cost-access-to-tariff-publication-systems\/","title":{"rendered":"Industry Advisory \u2013 Requiring No Cost Access to Tariff Publication Systems"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Common Carriers and Conferences must provide public access to their tariff publication systems free of charge effective February 1, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>This requirement is established pursuant to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2024\/01\/02\/2023-27783\/carrier-automated-tariffs\">a Final Rule<\/a>, published on January 2, 2024, amending 46 CFR \u00a7520.<\/p>\n<p>A Common Carrier or Conference that fails to provide the public access to a tariff publication system free of charge in accordance <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-46\/chapter-IV\/subchapter-B\/part-520\/section-520.9\">with 46 CFR \u00a7 520.9(c)(2)<\/a> could be assessed civil penalties. Contact <a href=\"mailto:tradeanalysis@fmc.gov\">tradeanalysis@fmc.gov<\/a> with questions regarding this requirement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Common Carriers and Conferences must provide public access to their tariff publication systems free of charge effective February 1, 2024. This requirement is established pursuant to a Final Rule, published on January 2, 2024, amending 46 CFR \u00a7520. A Common Carrier or Conference that fails to provide the public access... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/industry-advisory-requiring-no-cost-access-to-tariff-publication-systems\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[56,55],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8093"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8093"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8093\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8094,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8093\/revisions\/8094"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### Joselito CASTRO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72652.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Debra Jade Mundel, Marks & Acalin, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffery R. Leist, Trial, Russell John Verby, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joselito Castro, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the *144Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, *Khan v. Holder,*584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

Castro does not challenge the agency’s determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) based on his 1994 conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a).

The BIA correctly determined that Castro is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5). Castro’s legal and constitutional challenges to this determination are foreclosed by *Abebe v. Mukasey,*554 F.3d 1203, 1207, 1208 n. 7 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2739

ROBERT J. MCCARTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army; DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-903-A)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. McCarty, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert J. McCarty appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See McCarty v. West, No. CA-98-903-A (E.D. Va.

Oct. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,659,212
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,447,765
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               2,380,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    6,076,370
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        72,389,376
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          71,313,039
<LOANS>                                      149,495,255
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,153,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               243,119,626
<DEPOSITS>                                   174,312,224
<SHORT-TERM>                                  43,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,090,138
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          21,081
<OTHER-SE>                                    23,696,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               243,119,626
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,689,071
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,639,110
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 210,650
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8,538,831
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,653,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,900,942
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,637,889
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               324,021
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,488,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,543,359
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       967,707
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     967,707
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                      402,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,135,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     32,000
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,153,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,153,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 Form
10-KSB
 Pacific
Alliance Corporation
 File No.
33-08732-D
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Pacific
Alliance Corporation (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.
 
 I, David
Knudson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 1.  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and
 
 2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Alliance
Corporation.
 
 
 Dated:
May 25, 2005
 
 
 
 /s/ David
Knudson
 Principal
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Pacific Alliance Corporation
File No. 000-51777

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Pacific  Alliance  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A.
Scharmann,  President and Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  April 12, 2007


/s/ Mark A. Scharmann
------------------------------------------
Mark A. Scharmann
President/Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis, Panel.
    Date: January 6-8, 2002.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Wales, 1295 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10128.
    Contact Person: Francisco O. Calvo, PhD, Chief, Review Branch, 
DEA, NIDDK, Room 752, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes 
of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-8897.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 5, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-30874 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M