UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


_________________________


FORM 10-Q


_________________________


x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010




 ̈
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the transition period from _________ to _________





Commission File number 000-27163




_________________________


SWK Holdings Corporation


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)




_________________________


Delaware
77-0435679(State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)





5314 North River Run Drive, Suite 350


Provo, Utah 84604


(Address of Principal Executive Offices)





Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (801) 805-1301




_________________________


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  YES   ̈  NO




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     ̈  YES   ̈  NO




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:




Large Accelerated Filer   ̈
Accelerated Filer   ̈
Non-Accelerated Filer   ̈
Smaller Reporting Company x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  x  YES   ̈  NO




As of July 15, 2010, there were 41,237,394 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.







1





SWK Holdings Corporation


Form 10-Q


Quarter Ended June 30, 2010




Table of Contents





PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.
Financial Statements
3Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations—Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
4Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
5Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
17Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
17PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
18Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
18Item 1A.
Risk Factors
18Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
18Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
18Item 4.
Removed and Reserved
18Item 5.
Other Information
18Item 6.
Exhibits
18Signatures
19Certifications  2
 Table of Contents




PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION




ITEM I.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(in thousands, except share data)





June 30,


December 31,2010


2009(unaudited)ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
39,197


$
38,608Prepaid expenses and other current assets


85



1,471Total current assets


39,282



40,079Property and equipment, net


3



-Total assets

$
39,285


$
40,079LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
53


$
-Warrant liability


224



285Total current liabilities


277



285Other long-term liabilities


111



109Total liabilities


388



394Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)Stockholders’ equity:Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding


-



-Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 41,237,394 and 41,215,041  shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively


41



41Additional paid-in capital


4,320,517



4,320,505Accumulated deficit


(4,281,661
)


(4,280,861
)Total stockholders’ equity


38,897



39,685Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$
39,285


$
40,079








See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


3
 Table of Contents


SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


(in thousands, except per share data)





Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009(unaudited)


(unaudited)Revenues:License fees

$
-


$
1,518


$
-


$
2,717Services


-



10,395



-



20,088Total revenues


-



11,913



-



22,805Costs and expenses:Cost of license fees


-



187



-



375Cost of services


-



3,606



-



8,084Amortization of acquired intangible assets


-



125



-



250Sales and marketing


-



2,235



-



5,237Research and development


-



3,386



-



7,049General and administrative


352



2,115



1,016



4,715Restructuring


-



805



-



805Total costs and expenses


352



12,459



1,016



26,515Loss from operations


(352
)


(546
)


(1,016
)


(3,710
)Interest and other income (expense), net


70



(51
)


218



(137
)Loss before provision for income tax


(282
)


(597
)


(798
)


(3,847
)Provision for income tax


(1
)


(10
)


(2
)


(26
)Net loss

$
(283
)

$
(607
)

$
(800
)

$
(3,873
)Basic and diluted net loss per share

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.02
)

$
(0.09
)Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share


41,237



41,215



41,229



41,214








See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


4
 Table of Contents


SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(in thousands)





Six Months EndedJune 30,2010


2009(unaudited)Cash flows from operating activities:Net loss

$
(800
)

$
(3,873
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Depreciation


-



662Amortization of acquired intangible assets


-



250Stock-based compensation


(4
)


814Restructuring expense


-



341Other non-cash charges


(61
)


28Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


-



1,484Prepaid expenses and other assets


(39
)


264Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


53



(715
)Accrued restructuring


-



(554
)Deferred revenue


-



893Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities


(851
)


(406
)Cash flows from investing activities:Proceeds from Asset Sale


1,425



-Purchases of property and equipment


(3
)


(284
)Decrease in restricted cash


-



446Net cash provided by (used in) in investing activities


1,422



162Cash flows from financing activities:Repayments on line of credit, net


-



(2,144
)Borrowings on notes payable


-



227Repayments on notes payable


-



(1,814
)Proceeds from stock option exercises


18



-Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities


18



(3,731
)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents


-



(74
)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


589



(4,049
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


38,608



6,988Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
39,197


$
2,939








See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


5
 Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(Unaudited)








Note 1. SWK Holdings Corporation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies




Nature of Operations




SWK Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries (“the Company,” “SWK,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) were incorporated in July 1996 in California and reincorporated in Delaware in September 1999. Prior to December 23, 2009, the Company developed, marketed and supported customer communications software products. The Company sold its products primarily in North America, Europe and Asia, through its direct sales force and third party integrators. Since the completion of the Asset Sale (see Basis of Presentation below), the Company has been seeking to redeploy its cash to maximize value for its stockholders and is seeking, analyzing and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. The Company’s goal is to redeploy its existing assets to acquire, or invest in, one or more operating businesses with existing or prospective taxable income, or from which it can realize capital gains, that can be offset by use of its net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. The Company is using a value-focused strategy and is focusing its acquisition search on U.S.-based businesses. As of the date hereof, the Company is in the process of indentifying candidates for acquisition or other investment. The Company is unable to assure that it will find suitable candidates or that it will be able to utilize its existing NOL carryforwards.




Basis of Presentation




As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s only material asset was its cash. The Company no longer has any material operating business. Although the notes are given in the present tense and, in some cases, the future tense, some of the information and analysis included in the following notes may not be applicable for 2010. To distinguish the Company’s historical business, which was sold in the Asset Sale, throughout this report, (i) we refer to the Company as “KANA” with respect to historical business activities conducted prior to December 23, 2009, and (ii) we refer to the Company as “SWK” or the “Company” with respect to all other matters.





Following an extensive strategic process, on October 26, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Kay Technology Corp., Inc. ("Kay Technology"), an affiliate of Accel-KKR Capital Partners III, L.P. (“AKKR”). Pursuant to this agreement, on December 23, 2009, the Company sold substantially all of its assets to Kay Technology (the “Asset Sale”).





The consideration in the transaction was $40.6 million, of which $38.6 million in cash was paid to the Company at closing and $1.0 million was paid into escrow to satisfy the Company’s indemnification obligations for certain specified contingencies. An additional $1.0 million was paid into an escrow to satisfy obligations of the Company under any potential downward “true-up” adjustments to the purchase price following the closing (the “Purchase Price Escrow”). The Company received the full $1.0 million from the Purchase Price Escrow on April 28, 2010.





The Asset Purchase Agreement provided for a reduction in the purchase price if certain customer and vendor consents were not received prior to the closing, but allowed the Company to recoup such reduction with respect to any consent received within 30 days of the closing. On February 22, 2010, Kay Technology paid to the Company approximately $0.4 million for customer and vendor consents received after the closing of the Asset Sale.




At the closing of the Asset Sale, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to change its name from Kana Software, Inc. to SWK Holdings Corporation.




Principles of Consolidation




The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SWK and its wholly-owned subsidiaries prior to December 23, 2009. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. As part of the Asset Sale on December 23, 2009, all subsidiaries were transferred to Kay Technology.


6
 Table of Contents


Unaudited Interim Financial Information





The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and reflect all normal, recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 31, 2010. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.





Use of Estimates





The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those related to stock-based compensation, warrant liability valuation, useful lives of property and equipment, income taxes and contingencies and litigation, among others. The Company bases estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.




Cash Equivalents




The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity date of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. There were no such investments at June 30, 2010 and all cash was held in savings or checking accounts with creditworthy financial institutions.




Fair Value of Financial Instruments




The carrying values of the Company’s current financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values due to their relatively short maturities or payment terms.




Certain Risks and Concentrations




Financial instruments subjecting the Company to concentrations of credit risk have consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are deposited with financial institutions that management believes are creditworthy. Deposits in these institutions are in excess of federally insured amounts.




Net Loss per Share





Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock and, when dilutive, shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options and warrants deemed outstanding using the treasury stock method.




For each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock in an aggregate of approximately 2,250,000 and 9,055,000 shares, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share as all such securities were anti-dilutive.




Recent Accounting Pronouncements




On January 21, 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) on improving disclosures about fair value measurements, which amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures to add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. The ASU also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. We are required to comply with the requirements of this ASU commencing the first day of our 2010 fiscal year. This ASU did not have an impact to our financial statements except to require us to provide increased disclosure.


7
 Table of Contents




Note 2. Fair Value Measurement




The Company considers fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based on their own market assumptions. The Company utilizes the following three-level fair value hierarchy to establish the priorities of the inputs used to measure fair value:




Level 1—instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets.




Level 2—instrument valuations are obtained from sources other than quoted market prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.




Level 3—instrument valuations are obtained without observable market values and require a high level of judgment to determine the fair value.




The following table summarizes the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):





Total


Level 1


Level 2


Level 3Liabilities:Warrant liability

$
224


$
-


$
-


$
224




The warrant liability increased by $21,000 and decreased by $61,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, to $0.2 million, and these amounts were recognized as other income. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 7 for Black-Scholes assumptions used to determine fair value.





Note 3. Stockholders’ Equity




(a) Stock Compensation Plans




As part of the Asset Sale, the Company accelerated the vesting of all employee stock options. Any vested but unexercised employee stock options as of March 31, 2010 were cancelled on such date. In addition, Kay Technology withheld from the proceeds of the Asset Sale the amount representing the in-the-money option value of all employee options based on the Asset Sale’s purchase price per share. Kay Technology will pay these amounts with respect to each such former KANA employee either (i) as a bonus to each such KANA employee holding such options promptly following the Company’s notification to Kay Technology of the expiration or termination of such options in accordance with their terms and the option plans under which the options were granted, or (ii) in the event a former KANA employee elects to exercise such options following the closing but prior to their expiration or termination, to the Company following such time the Company notifies Kay Technology of any such exercise (in which case, no such bonus shall be payable to such employee).





The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 Stock Incentive Plan”), as successor to the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Stock Option Plan”), provided for options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to be granted to employees, independent contractors, officers, and directors. The plan expired in July 2009. Options were granted at an exercise price equivalent to the closing fair market value on the date of grant. All options were granted at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and had a term not greater than 10 years from the date of grant. Options are immediately exercisable when vested and generally vest monthly over four years. On December 23, 2009, in connection with the Asset Sale, all stock options, except those held by non-employee Directors, were accelerated to be fully vested and exercisable. As a result of the termination of all employees on December 23, 2009, all unexercised stock options held by employees were cancelled on March 31, 2010 in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement. The only remaining outstanding options as of June 30, 2010 were those held by the Company’s directors.




The following table summarizes activities under the equity incentive plans for the indicated periods:


8
 Table of Contents





Options OutstandingNumber of Shares


Weighted Average Exercise Price


Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)


Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)Balances, December 31, 2009


6,403,048


$
3.50



0.7


$
163Options cancelled and forfeited


(5,882,148
)


3.61Options exercised


(21,733
)


0.71Options granted


-



-Balances, March 31, 2010


499,167


$
2.40



4.4


$
3Options cancelled and forfeited


(164,167
)


2.73Options exercised


-



-Options granted


-



-Balances, June 30, 2010


335,000


$
2.23



6.3


$
6Options vested and exercisable and expected to be vested and exercisable at June 30, 2010


334,525


$
2.24



6.3


$
6Options vested and exercisable at June 30, 2010


332,501


$
2.24



6.3


$
5





At June 30, 2010, there were no options available for grant under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. At June 30, 2010, the Company had no material unrecognized stock-based compensation expense.





The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2010:





Options Outstanding


Options Vested and ExercisableExercise Prices

Number Outstanding


Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)


Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share


Number Exercisable


Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share$0.70


30,000



9.0


$
0.70



27,501


$
0.70$1.24


30,000



8.1



1.24



30,000



1.24$1.70


100,000



4.6



1.70



100,000



1.70$2.65


15,000



7.4



2.65



15,000



2.65$2.67


30,000



7.1



2.67



30,000



2.67$2.95


100,000



6.2



2.95



100,000



2.95$3.50


30,000



6.7



3.50



30,000



3.50Total


335,000



6.3


$
2.23



332,501


$
2.24





There were no options granted during the three or six months ended June 30, 2010, nor in the three months ended June 30, 2009. Employee stock-based compensation recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2009 uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of options granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans. The weighted average assumptions that were used to calculate the grant date fair value of the Company’s employee stock option grants for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:


9
 Table of Contents





Six Months Ended

June 30,2009Risk-free interest rate


1.34
%Expected volatility


69
%Expected life (in years)


4Dividend yield


0
%





Risk-free interest rates for the options were taken from the Daily Federal Yield Curve Rates on the grant dates for the expected life of the options as published by the Federal Reserve. The expected volatility was based upon historical data and other relevant factors such as the Company’s changes in historical volatility and its capital structure, in addition to mean reversion. The expected forfeiture rate of employee stock options for 2010 and 2009 was calculated using the Company’s historical terminations data.




In calculating the expected life of stock options, the Company determines the amount of time from grant date to exercise date for exercised options and adjusts this number for the expected time to exercise for unexercised options. The expected time to exercise for unexercised options is calculated from grant as the midpoint between the expiration date of the option and the later of the measurement date or the vesting date. In developing the expected life assumption, all amounts of time are weighted by the number of underlying options.





No options were granted in the six months ended June 30, 2010; the weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.41 per share. None of these options were granted with an exercise price below the fair market value.





The intrinsic value of options exercised in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0 and $2,600, respectively.





Note 4. Comprehensive Loss





Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments. The total changes in comprehensive loss during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):




Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009Net loss

$
(283
)

$
(607
)

$
(800
)

$
(3,873
)Foreign currency translation loss


-



(87
)


-



(117
)Comprehensive loss

$
(283
)

$
(694
)

$
(800
)

$
(3,990
)





Note 5. Commitments and Contingencies




(a) Litigation





In July 2001, the Company, its underwriters, and certain officers and directors were named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit. This case is one of several hundred similar cases that have been consolidated into a single action. The complaint alleges misstatements and omissions concerning underwriters’ compensation in connection with the Company’s initial public offering. In February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss that would have disposed of the claims against the Company. A settlement proposal, which did not admit wrongdoing, had been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and preliminarily approved by the Court. While the parties’ request for court approval of the settlement was pending, in December 2006 the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s finding that six focus cases could be certified as class actions. In April 2007, the Court of Appeals denied the plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing, but acknowledged that the District Court might certify a more limited class. At a June 26, 2007 status conference, the Court terminated the proposed settlement as stipulated among the parties. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on August 14, 2007. On September 27, 2007, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification in the six focus cases, which was withdrawn on October 10, 2008. On November 13, 2007, defendants in the six focus cases filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, which the Court denied in March 2008. Plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including the Company), the underwriter defendants, and the insurance carriers for the defendants, engaged in mediation and settlement negotiations. They reached a settlement agreement, which was submitted to the District Court for preliminary approval on April 2, 2009. As part of this settlement, the Company’s insurance carrier agreed to assume the Company’s entire payment obligation under the terms of the settlement. On June 10, 2009, the District Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement agreement. After a September 10, 2009 hearing, the District Court gave final approval to the settlement on October 5, 2009. Several objectors have filed notices of appeal to the United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit from the District Court’s order granting final approval of the settlement. Although the District Court has granted final approval of the settlement agreement, there can be no guarantee that it will not be reversed on appeal. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to these claims. If the settlement is not implemented and the litigation continues against the Company, the Company would continue to defend against this action vigorously.


10
 Table of Contents





In October 2007, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington by Ms. Vanessa Simmonds against certain of the underwriters of the Company’s initial public offering. The plaintiff alleges that the underwriters violated section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by engaging in short-swing trades, and seeks disgorgement of profits from the underwriters in amounts to be proven at trial. On February 28, 2008, Ms. Simmonds filed an amended complaint. The suit names the Company as a nominal defendant, contains no claims against the Company and seeks no relief from the Company. This lawsuit is one of more than fifty similar actions filed in the same court. On July 25, 2008, the underwriter defendants in the various actions filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a claim. In addition, certain issuer defendants in the various actions filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a claim. The Company entered into a stipulation with the plaintiff, entered as an order by the Court, that the Company is not required to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. Accordingly, the Company did not join the motion to dismiss filed by certain issuers. On March 12, 2009, the Court dismissed the complaint in this lawsuit with prejudice. On April 10, 2009, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the District Court’s order, and thereafter the underwriter defendants filed a cross appeal to a portion of the District Court’s order that dismissed thirty of the cases without prejudice following the moving issuers’ motion to dismiss. On May 27, 2009, the Ninth Circuit issued an order stating that the cases were not selected for inclusion in the mediation program, and on May 22, 2009 issued an order granting the parties’ joint motion filed on May 22, 2009 to consolidate the 54 appeals and 30 cross-appeals. Under the current briefing schedule, the briefing was completed on November 17, 2009. No date has been set for oral argument in the Ninth Circuit.





On December 20, 2009, the Company, then known as Kana Software, Inc., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against several defendants: Versata Enterprises, Inc., Gensym Corp., Clear Technology, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., Tenfold Corp., and Versata, Inc. In the litigation, the Company sought a declaratory judgment that it did not infringe several patents. The Company also sought a declaratory judgment of invalidity of all of the patents-in-suit. On December 21, 2009, the Company, then known as Kana Software, Inc., also filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Versata Enterprises, Inc. and Everest Software, Inc. alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,941,304 by defendants' making, selling, offering to sell and/or importing certain email communication software solutions. On December 23, 2009, the Company completed the Asset Sale, pursuant to which (i) the Company sold its operating business, including substantially all of its intellectual property, including all patents, to Kay Technology and (ii) Kay Technology assumed substantially all liabilities relating to the Company’s operating business and agreed to indemnify the Company for losses incurred with respect thereto. On April 14, 2010, the Company was dismissed as a party to these lawsuits.




The ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and either unfavorable or favorable outcomes could have a material negative impact on the Company’s results of operations, balance sheets and cash flows due to defense costs, and divert management resources.




(b)  Escrow




Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company delivered to Kay Technology prior to closing an estimated purchase price certificate setting forth the Company’s good faith estimates of the Company’s net working capital, net debt and transaction expenses as of the closing date. The gross purchase price was adjusted for certain items, based on changes in financial condition and certain other matters occurring between the signing of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the closing of the Asset Sale. The adjustments included (i) a downward adjustment for transaction expenses, as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement, which included certain other charges not included in transaction expenses on our statement of operations, (ii) a downward adjustment in the case that any required vendor and customer consents were not obtained, (iii) an excess net debt adjustment, as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement, for net debt in excess of certain preset levels and (iv) a working capital adjustment for any deficiency of adjusted working capital, as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement, as compared to certain preset levels. At the closing, $1.0 million of consideration was paid into the Purchase Price Escrow to satisfy any obligations of the Company under any potential downward “true-up” adjustments to the purchase price following the closing. On April 28, 2010, the Company received the full $1.0 million from the Purchase Price Escrow.




Note 6. Information About Geographic Areas




KANA considered itself to be in a single industry segment, specifically the licensing and support of its software applications, and SWK currently considers itself to be in a single industry segment. KANA’s revenue classification was based upon customer location. There were no sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Geographic information on revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):


11
 Table of Contents





Three

Months Ended

June 30,


Six

Months Ended

June 30,2009


2009North America

$
9,620


$
17,306Europe


2,058



5,036Asia Pacific


235



463Total

$
11,913


$
22,805





The Company had no long-lived assets as of December 31, 2009 as all such assets were sold in the Asset Sale. All long-lived assets as of June 30, 2010 were based in the United States.





Note 7. Warrant Liability




Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted authoritative guidance issued by the FASB eliminating an exemption to derivative treatment for certain financial instruments. As a result of adopting this guidance, warrants to purchase 1,914,586 shares of the Company’s common stock previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment. These warrants have exercise prices ranging from $1.97 to $2.45 and expire in September or October 2012. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants to purchase common stock from equity to a liability, as if these warrants were a derivative liability since their date of issue. On January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the effects of prior accounting for the warrants in the amount of $1.8 million from additional paid-in capital to accumulated deficit, and $0.1 million from additional paid-in capital to warrant liability. The fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions that were used to calculate fair value as of June 30, 2010 were as follows:





Expiration DateSeptember 2012


October 2012Risk-free interest rate


0.71
%


0.74
%Expected volatility


63
%


62
%Expected life (in years)


2.3



2.3Dividend yield


0
%


0
%




Note 8. Income Taxes





The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, which is included in other long-term liabilities in the balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):





Beginning balance at January 1, 2010

$
109Additions for tax positions related to the current period


2Ending balance at June 30, 2010

$
111




Note 9. Restructuring Costs




The following table provides a summary of restructuring activity during the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):




12
 Table of Contents




Facilities


Severance and Related


TotalRestructuring accruals:Accrual as of December 31, 2008

$
1,180


$
-


$
1,180Restructuring expense


273



532



805Payments made


(784
)


(417
)


(1,201
)Sublease payments received


183



-



183Accrual as of June 30, 2009

$
852


$
115


$
967





In April 2009, Kana signed a Settlement and Release Agreement with RMJM Group, Inc. (“RMJM”), the sub landlord for one of the properties included in the restructuring accrual that provided for RMJM to draw down a letter of credit held by RMJM as security for RMJM’s lease. The proceeds of the draw down and current cash deposit held by RMJM will be applied to all remaining lease payments and estimated additional operating costs for the remainder of the lease that expires in January 2010.





In April 2009, the Company implemented various cost reduction activities to reduce operating costs. The expense related to reduction in workforce was approximately $532,000 and the expense related to the Settlement and Release Agreement with RMJM was approximately $167,000. Additionally, in June 2009, the Company had another facility settlement for one of its European offices and the related expense was approximately $106,000.





Upon closing of the Asset Sale on December 23, 2009, all restructuring obligations were assumed by Kay Technology.





Note 10. Subsequent Event





On July 30, 2010, the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders. At the meeting, the stockholders elected William T. Clifford and Michael A. Margolis as Class II and Class III directors, respectively, and approved a proposal for the Company to retain all of its cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of investing in or acquiring control of one or more operating businesses.




13
 Table of Contents


ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS





In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and industry, and our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “plan,” “will” and variations of these words and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Forward-looking statements that were believed to be true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false.




The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010, and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.





Overview





SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “SWK”), was known until December 23, 2009 as KANA Software, Inc. (“KANA”) and was headquartered in Menlo Park, California. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and words of similar meaning refer to SWK Holdings Corporation.





From 1996 to December 23, 2009, the Company engaged in the development, marketing and support of customer communications software products.





Following an extensive strategic process, on October 26, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Kay Technology Corp., Inc. (“Kay Technology”), an affiliate of Accel-KKR Capital Partners III, L.P. (“AKKR”). Pursuant to this agreement, on December 23, 2009, the Company sold substantially all of its assets to Kay Technology (the “Asset Sale”) in exchange for cash consideration of $40.6 million. In addition, Kay Technology assumed certain of KANA’s liabilities in the transaction. Of the $40.6 million in consideration, $38.6 million was paid in cash to the Company at closing and $1.0 million was paid into escrow to satisfy SWK’s indemnification obligations for certain specified contingencies. An additional $1.0 million was paid into escrow to satisfy our obligations under any potential downward “true-up” adjustments to the purchase price following the closing (the “Purchase Price Escrow”). On February 22, 2010, Kay Technology paid the Company approximately $0.4 million for customer and vendor consents received after the closing of the Asset Sale. On April 28, 2010, we received the full $1.0 million from the Purchase Price Escrow. On May 18, 2010, the Company was paid approximately $83,000 for additional post-closing adjustments to the Asset Sale consideration.




At the closing of the Asset Sale, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to change its name from Kana Software, Inc. to SWK Holdings Corporation and relocated its headquarters to Provo, Utah. To distinguish the historical business, which is no longer conducted by the Company, throughout this report (i) we refer to the Company as KANA with respect to historical business activities conducted prior to December 23, 2009, and (ii) we refer to the Company as SWK or the Company with respect to all other matters.





Since the completion of the Asset Sale, we have been seeking to redeploy our cash to maximize value for our stockholders and are seeking, analyzing and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. Our goal is to redeploy our existing assets to acquire or invest in one or more operating businesses with existing or prospective taxable income, or from which we can realize capital gains, that can be offset by use of our NOL carryforwards. We are using a value-focused strategy and are focusing our acquisition search on U.S.-based businesses. As of the date hereof, we are in the process of identifying and reviewing candidates for acquisition or other investment. We are unable to assure that we will find suitable candidates or that we will be able to utilize our existing NOL carryforwards.





Since the Company did not enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions requiring 50% or more of its cash by June 23, 2010, the Company has called a meeting of stockholders (as part of its annual meeting of stockholders) on July 30, 2010 to vote on a proposal to retain all of such cash for the purpose of investing in or acquiring control of one or more operating businesses. We are not under any obligation, contractually or otherwise, to call this meeting to vote on the return of cash to our stockholders.


14
 Table of Contents




Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010. We believe there have been no new critical accounting policies or material changes to our existing critical accounting policies and estimates during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





Information with respect to Recent Accounting Pronouncements may be found in Note 1 to the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part I. Financial Information — Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.





Revenues





Total revenues decreased from $11.9 million and $22.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, to $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of the Asset Sale.





License revenues included licensing fees only, and exclude associated support and consulting revenue. The majority of KANA’s licenses to customers were perpetual and associated revenues were recognized upon delivery provided that all revenue recognition criteria were met. License revenues were $1.5 million and $2.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. KANA’s services revenues consisted of support revenues and professional services fees. Services revenues were $10.4 million and $20.1 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 respectively.




Costs and Expenses





Total cost of revenues was $3.9 million and $8.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Due to the Asset Sale, no cost of revenues was incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010.





License Fees. Cost of license fees consisted of KANA’s third-party software royalties, referral fees, and costs of documentation. Cost of license fees as a percentage of license fees was 12% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 14% for the six months ended June 30, 2009.





Services. Cost of services consisted primarily of compensation and related expenses for KANA’s customer support, consulting and training and enterprise on-demand services organizations, and allocation of facility costs and system costs incurred in providing customer support. Cost of services was $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.





Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets.Amortization of acquired intangible assets recorded in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 related to $2.5 million of identifiable intangibles purchased in connection with the eVergance acquisition in June 2007. Acquired intangible assets were carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization was computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets (five years). Intangible assets were written off in 2009 as a result of the Asset Sale and as such there was no amortization of acquired intangible assets in the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2010.





Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consisted primarily of compensation and related costs for sales and marketing personnel and promotional expenditures, including public relations, advertising, trade shows and marketing materials. Sales and marketing expenses was $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $5.2 million for the six months in the prior year. Due to the Asset Sale, no sales and marketing expenses were incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Research and Development. Research and development expenses consisted primarily of compensation and related costs for research and development employees and contractors and enhancement of existing products and quality assurance activities. Research and development expenses were $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Due to the Asset Sale, no research and development expenses were incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010.





General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for finance, legal, human resources, and corporate governance. Information technology and facilities costs were allocated among all operating departments in 2009. General and administrative expenses decreased by 81% to $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 due to the Asset Sale. General and administrative expenses decreased by 79% to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, we had 3 general and administrative employees compared to 31 such employees as of June 30, 2009, a 91% decrease.


15
 Table of Contents




Restructuring Expense. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded $805,000 of restructuring expense related to a reduction in workforce of 27 employees and the adjustment of rent related to two facilities included in our restructuring accrual. There was no restructuring activity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.





Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net





Interest and other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income, interest expense and the change in fair value of warrant liability. Expense from the increase in the fair value of our warrants was approximately $21,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to other income of $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Income from the decrease in the fair value of our warrants was approximately $61,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an expense of $4,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net interest income (expense) and other income (expense) consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents, net of interest expense from KANA’s former line of credit and notes payable, and was approximately $71,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and $(51,000) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net interest income (expense) was approximately $136,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $(137,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net interest income related to higher cash and cash equivalents balances in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, as well as the elimination of debt obligations prior to 2010.





Provision for Income Taxes





We have a history of net operating losses on a consolidated basis from inception through June 30, 2010. Accordingly, we have recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of our gross deferred tax assets, as the future realization of the tax benefit for accounting purposes is not currently more likely than not. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, certain of KANA’s foreign subsidiaries were profitable, based upon application of intercompany transfer pricing agreements. The Company thus reported income tax expense totaling approximately $10,000 and $26,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 in those foreign jurisdictions.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





As of June 30, 2010, we had $39.2 million in cash, compared to $38.6 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, we had working capital of $39.0 million, compared to working capital of $39.8 million as of December 31, 2009.





Primary Driver of Cash Flow





Our ability to generate cash in the future depends primarily upon our success in acquiring one or more businesses. Since the timing of any acquisition is difficult to predict, we may not be able to generate positive cash flow in any particular future period. In addition, the interest rate that we receive on our cash will affect our ability to cover our administrative expenses. Given low current interest rates, we do not anticipate that our interest income will be sufficient to cover our administrative expenses for the foreseeable future.





Operating Cash Flow





We had negative cash flow from operating activities of $0.9 million for the first six months of 2010, which included a $0.8 million net loss and an increase in prepaids and a decrease in non-cash charges, which was partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in accrued liabilities. KANA’s operating activities used $0.4 million of cash for the first six months of 2009, which included a $3.9 million net loss, net payments of $0.6 million against accrued restructuring, a reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $0.7 million, partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $0.9 million increase in deferred revenue, non-cash charges of $0.8 million for stock-based compensation expense, and $0.7 million of depreciation.





Investing Cash Flow





The Company’s investing activities provided $1.4 million and $0.2 million of cash for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively, which consisted of collections on Asset Sale receivables and purchases of property and equipment in 2010, and the release of restricted cash in 2009 partially offset by purchases of property and equipment.





Financing Cash Flow





Our financing activities generated $18,000 for the first six months of 2010 and KANA used $3.7 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Financing activities consisted of proceeds from stock option exercises in 2010 and payments on the line of credit and notes payable in 2009.


16
 Table of Contents




Existence and Timing of Contractual Obligations





As of June 30, 2010, the Company had no outstanding debt commitments.





The Company subleases approximately 2,300 square feet on a month-to-month basis for our executive offices under an agreement with Nightwatch Capital Advisors, LLC, a company of which John Nemelka, our Interim Chief Executive Officer is the Managing Principal, and Paul Burgon, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, is a Principal and the Chief Financial Officer. The rent under this sublease is approximately $4,000 per month.




Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements





As of June 30, 2010, the Company did not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.





Outlook





As of June 30, 2010, the Company had no operating business. The Company does not expect to generate any income other than interest income until it consummates a business combination or develops other sources of income. The Company estimates that its capital resources are adequate to fund its limited operating activities for twelve months from the balance sheet date.





ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.





Not applicable.





ITEM 4T.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.





Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.





In connection with the preparation of this report, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.





Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


17
 Table of Contents


PART II: OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





None.





ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.





Information regarding the Company’s risk factors appears in “Part I. – Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.





ITEM2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.





None.





ITEM 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.





None.





ITEM4.





REMOVED AND RESERVED.





ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION.





None.





ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS




Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing

Date

Provided

Herewith31.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.









X31.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.









X32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*









X32.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*









X





*
These certifications accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. They are not deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of SWK Holdings Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.


18
 Table of Contents


SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


August 6, 2010





SWK Holdings Corporation/s/ JOHN F. NEMELKAJohn F. NemelkaInterim Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ PAUL BURGONPaul BurgonInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)






19