alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan Gold, President and Chief Executive
Officer of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1)
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S.
  Neurosurgical, Inc.  /s/ Alan
  GoldAlan GoldPresident
  and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          22,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,304,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         18
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     454,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,304,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,874
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,617)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,975)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
hemp_ex1039.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.39
  
  BROKER REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT
  
 This Agreement entered into on the 23th day of November 2021, between Hempacco Co, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and Wizards and Kings LLC. (hereinafter referred to as the "Broker").
  
 1.  The "Company" hereby appoints the "Broker" to handle the sales of its products to accounts to be determined later and agreed upon both parties entering the agreement. Account names will be added to 'Exhibit A".
  
 2.  The "Broker" agrees to use their best effort to promote the sale of the "Company" products with the agreed accounts.
  
 3.  A commission of 10% on the "Net sales" of the products shall be due and payable to "Broker" upon receiving payment from the customer. Copies of all purchase orders and invoices will be emailed to "Broker"@ [redacted email address]. Payment of Commissions will be due 15 days upon delivery considering that the customer has paid due invoice and keeping terms current.
  
 As a bonus for bringing HBI International in as a client, the company shall grant I00,000,000 warrants in Green Globe International, Inc. Warrants will be for 3 years and exercise at $.01 each.
  
 4.  "Company" will furnish "Broker" samples of products and available sales material as "Company" and "Broker" deem sufficient.
  
 5.  "Broker" is an independent contractor and is not an employee of "Company". "Company” is not responsible for withholding FICA or taxes of any kind, unless such withholding is legally required.
  
 6.  Product Liability Indemnification. "Company" agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify "Broker" from any and all losses. damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, incurred by "Broker" from any claim (s) or action (s) made or filed against "Broker" claiming loss or injury of any nature whatsoever, resulting from any defect in the Product (s).
  
 7.  Attorney's Fees. In connection with any dispute by and between the Parties to this agreement, including, but not limited to a dispute over interpretation, claimed breach, failure to pay, or any enforcement of any term of the Agreement, the prevailing party ( if any) shall be entitled to recovery of its attorney fees and costs.
  
 8.  Applicable Law. The laws of the State of Nevada shall govern the application and interpretation of this Agreement.
  
 In Witness Whereof, the parties have signed this agreement on this 23nd day of November 2021.
  
 “Company”
  
 By:      /s/ Sandro Piancone
             Sandro Piancone
             Title:  CEO
             Hempacco Co, Inc.
  
 “Broker”
  
 By:      /s/ Michael John Ostrander
             Wizards and Kings LLC
             Michael John Ostrander
  
  
 	 
	
	

	 

  
 "Exhibit A"
  
 HBI International, Inc.
  
 G-Rollz-Mr. Singh
#### WAHL v. WHITE SEWING MACH. CO.

No. 6119.

Opinion Filed March 16, 1915.

(147 Pac. 301.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Time for Perfecting Appeal — Dismissal. Where no praecipe for summons in error is filed, or summons issued or waiver of issuance and service of summons, or a general appearance made within six months after the rendition of the judgment complained of the proceeding will not be deemed' commenced as required by Sess. Laws 1910-11, c. 18, p. 35, and.on motion the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from, County Court Major County; F. W.*Madison, *Judge.*

Action between G. A. Wahl and the White Sewing Machine Company, a corporation. From the judgment, Wahl brings error.

Dismissed.

*John 7. Roberts*-and Chambers' *& Priest*for plaintiff in error.

*Beeman Eirlcendalt*for defendant in error.

TURNER, J.

The final order appealed from in tliis case *806was made on September 5, 1913. The petition in error was filed in this court on Friday, March 6, 1914. Praecipe was filed, and summons in error was issued on April 21, 1914, and returned, showing service April 24, 1914. Thereafter defendant in error filed his motion to dismiss, alleging as grounds therefor that the proceedings in error were not commenced within the statutory period of six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment complained of. The motion to dismiss was overruled, and on February 3, 1915, defendant in error files his second motion to dismiss. It appears that this court erred in refusing fo dismiss the appeal in the first instance for the reason that the record affirmatively shows that the plaintiff in error was one day late in filing his petition in error, but the appeal should also be dismissed on another ground. The summons in error was not issued or served within the statutory period. The general rule is that summons in error must. be issued and served within the statutory period of six months provided for perfecting appeals. There is a. well-defined exception to this rule, namely, that where summons in error has been issued within the six-month period, but service has not been obtained, the plaintiff in error may have 60 days from the issuance of the first summons in which to faithfully, properly, and diligently follow up- his -attempt to secure service. The ease at bar does not come within this exception, for here no- praecipe was filed or summons issued within the six-month period. *We,*therefore, must conclude that plaintiff in this action did not commence his proceeding within the statutory period. *School Dist. No. 39, etc., v. Fisher, Treas., 23*Okla. 9, 99 Pac. 646; *Durant v. Munford,*38 Okla. 552, 134 Pac. 50; *Watkins v. Barnwell,*35 Okla. 205, 128 Pac. 511; *Campbell v. Ruble,*40 Okla. 48, 135 Pac. 1050.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.
Order filed August 9 , 2012
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

_________________ ________ NO. 14
- 12
- 00 24 6
- CV

_________ ___________ _____ HUNTER BUILDINGS & MANUFACTURING, L.P., HUNTER BUILDINGS, L.L.C., AND HUNTER BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. , & BBG GROUP, L.L.C., MILO NICKEL AND THOMAS MICHAEL LEBLANC, Appellants
V. MBI, GLOBAL, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008
- 50193



### O R D E R
On March 8, 2012, Hunter Buildings & Manufacturing, L.P., Hunter Buildings, L.L.C., and Hunter Buildings International, L.L.C. ("Hunter appellants") filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment signed December 9, 2011, and the appeal was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14

- 12

- 00 246

- CV. Subsequently on March 8, 2012, BBG Group, L.L.C., Milo A. Nickel, and Thomas Michael LeBlanc ("BBG appellants")2

filed a notice of appeal from the same judgment, which was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14

- 12

- 00 247

- CV. On July 26, 2012, the Hunter appellants and BBG appellants filed an unopposed joint motion to consolidate these appeals. The motion was granted and the court consolidate d the two above

- referenced causes for all purposes into cause number 14

- 12

- 00246

- CV. The motion to consolidate also requested the court to order a briefing schedule. Accordingly we order the following:

 Hunter appellants' brief is due August 24, 2012;

 BBG appellants' brief is due August 24, 2012;

 MBI Global's brief(s) is due 30 days after appellants' briefs are filed; and

 R eply briefs are due 30 days after MBI Global's brief(s) is filed.

PER CURIAM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations – June 8, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VbDdPGOlDb\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-june-8-2018\/\">Revocations – June 8, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-june-8-2018\/embed\/#?secret=VbDdPGOlDb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations – June 8, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"VbDdPGOlDb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Thompson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: October 11, 2005 |  | /s/ John Thompson            
|                        |  | John M. Thompson             
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro Javier LAZOS-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50783

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Ramos, Attorney at Law, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alejandro Javier Lazos-Ortiz (Lazos) appeals his convictions for conspiring to harbor and encourage illegal aliens, aiding and abetting the harboring of illegal aliens, and aiding and abetting the encouraging of aliens illegally entering the United States. He asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions because, although there may have been some evidence linking him to some of the alien stash houses discussed at trial, there was no evidence that he had ties to the stash house raided on October 12, 2006, the date alleged in the indictment.

Because Lazos failed to move for a judgment of acquittal, we review his sufficiency argument to determine whether “the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.” *United States v. Delgado,*256 F.3d 264, 274 (5th Cir.2001). “The prosecution is not required to prove the exact date [alleged in the indictment]; it suffices if a date reasonably near is established.” *United States v. Powers,*168 F.3d 741, 746 (5th Cir.1999). We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, and we conclude that the record is not devoid of evidence supporting a conclusion that Lazos engaged in an alien-harboring conspiracy and harbored and encouraged illegal aliens. *See Delgado,*256 F.3d at 274. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7493

GREGORY A. BYRD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-845) Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: January 14, 2004 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory A. Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gregory A. Byrd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Byrd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and HuntsmanInternational LLC (the “Companies”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)                                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| /s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Peter R. Huntsman         |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                  |
| November 14, 2006         |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – Januray 19,2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tn3wSKhAQl\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-januray-192018\/\">Applicants – Januray 19,2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-januray-192018\/embed\/#?secret=tn3wSKhAQl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – Januray 19,2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tn3wSKhAQl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Office of the Secretary - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"98iAuKrAyE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-the-secretary\/\">Office of the Secretary<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-the-secretary\/embed\/#?secret=98iAuKrAyE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of the Secretary” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"98iAuKrAyE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Office of the Secretary serves as the focal point for all matters and documents submitted to and emanating from the Commission.  The Office receives and processes a variety of documents filed by the public including: formal and informal complaints initiating proceedings involving alleged violations of the shipping statutes; special docket applications and applications to [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}