alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                     UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
         required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
         Form 10-K of RAAC Series  2006-SP1  Trust (the  "Exchange  Act periodic
         reports");
      2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic  reports,  taken as a
         whole,  do not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material  fact  necessary to make the  statements  made,  in
         light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
      3. Based on my  knowledge,  all of the  distribution,  servicing and other
         information  required  to be  provided  under  Form 10-D for the period
         covered  by this  report  is  included  in the  Exchange  Act  periodic
         reports;
      4. I  am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed  by  the
         servicers  and  based  on  my  knowledge  and  the  compliance  reviews
         conducted in preparing the servicer  compliance  statements required in
         this report under Item 1123 of  Regulation  AB, and except as disclosed
         in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,  the  servicers  have  fulfilled
         their  obligations  under  the  servicing  agreements  in all  material
         respects; and
      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria
         for asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation  reports on
         assessment  of  compliance  with  servicing  criteria for  asset-backed
         securities  required to be included in this report in  accordance  with
         Item 1122 of  Regulation  AB and  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
         have been  included as an exhibit to this  report,  except as otherwise
         disclosed in this  report.  Any  material  instances  of  noncompliance
         described in such  reports  have been  disclosed in this report on Form
         10-K.

         In  giving  the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied  on
         information  provided  to me by  the  following  unaffiliated  parties:
         JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

      Date:  March 26, 2007

      By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
            --------------------
            Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
            Title: Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,287
<PP&E>                                         162,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,712
<SALES>                                         19,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (395)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.79)


</TABLE>
# CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIONFOR NEVADA PROFIT
CORPORATIONS (Pursuant to NRS
78.385 AND 78.390  After Issuance of Stock)

1.    
          Name of corporation: Findex.com, Inc.

2.    
          The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
          available):

ARTICLE
V: The language of the first sentence of Article V shall be amended so as to read in its
entirety as follows:

| | The
aggregate number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation has
authority to issue is 125,000,000 of which 120,000,000 are to be shares of common stock,
$.001 par value per share, and of which 5,000,000 are to be shares of serial preferred
stock, $.001 par value per share.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.     The vote
by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling           them to
exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater           proportion of
the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by           classes or series,
or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of           incorporation have
voted in favor of the amendment is: A Majority.*

4.     Effective
date of filing (optional): Upon Filing.

5.     Officer
Signature (required): /s/ Steven Malone             
                      
                      
         Steven
Malone, President & Chief Executive Officer

* If any proposed amendment would
alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series
of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the
affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of
the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include
any of the above information and remit the proper fees may cause this filing to be
rejected.

SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
Writ of Mandamus lenied, Opinion issued November 6, 2012

In The

Q.tinrt uf Apiahi

Fiftt itrirtfJixas at 1at1a

No. 05-12-01463-CV

IN RE IIEIIM AMOS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA1O-68776-F

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers

Opinion by Justice Myers

Relator contends the trial court erred by granting a motion to reconsider a motion to recuse,

The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. We conclude

relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See

TEx. R. App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ ofmandamus. The stay ordered by

this Court on October 31, 2012, shall remain in place for two days following the date ofthis order.

LANA YERS

121463F.P05 JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION


     I, Scott W. Hartman, Chief Executive Officer of WQN, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and I have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

Dated:   November 14, 2005


/s/ Scott W. Hartman
---------------------------
Scott W. Hartman
Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Site Policies","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DSTqVmf3Mz\"><a href=\"\/site-policies\/\">Site Policies<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/site-policies\/embed\/#?secret=DSTqVmf3Mz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Site Policies” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DSTqVmf3Mz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          86,801
<SECURITIES>                                    26,715
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,982
<PP&E>                                           5,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,822
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       239,712
<OTHER-SE>                                    (95,816)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,976
<SALES>                                            687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,347
<CGS>                                              893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,112)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,626)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - 5 CFR Part 532

      ( print page 50801)    

### *CFR Correction*

                    In Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 699, revised as of January 1, 2017, in Appendix C to Subpart B of part 532: On page 469, under NEW YORK, the wage area listing for Newburgh is removed; and on page 482, under WASHINGTON, in the Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon wage area listing,                     *Area of application. Survey area plus:,*                     under Washington, Columbia is added.                

[FR Doc. 2017-23913 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maritza Falcon, Appellant.

[665 NYS2d 887]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered on or about August 31, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saun*
      *118
      *ders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andidas, JJ.
#### SIANG PIOW LIU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73831.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 2010.

Filed Nov. 10, 2010.

Siang Piow Liu, San Diego, CA, pro se.

David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Jesse Matthew Bless, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: WARDLAWandW. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and TIMLIN, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Robert J. Timlin, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Liu Siang Piow, a native and citizen of Malaysia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision finding his asylum application time-barred and denying withholding of removal. We deny the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision that an asylum application is untimely and not excused by changed circumstances unless the facts underlying the alleged change in circumstances are undisputed. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)). Liu alleged that the Malaysian government’s monitoring of his internet activism consti*208tuted a changed circumstance. The immigration judge and the BIA did not credit Liu’s testimony that any Malaysian agent monitored his postings. Therefore, the facts underlying the changed circumstances are disputed, and we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

We deny the petition to review the BIA’s decision denying withholding of removal. Substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination that Liu’s testimony was not credible and that he did not establish that the Malaysian government was aware of his postings. Accordingly, Liu has failed to show that it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted based on his online postings.

The petition is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Pamela D. DINKLER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2008-3191.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 15, 2008.

Pamela D. Dinkier, pro se.

*ORDER*

On March 12, 2008, the court issued an order allowing Pamela D. Dinkier (“Dinkier”) 21 days to notify the court if he had dismissed his petition for review before the Board. Dinkier has failed to respond within the time allowed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### Freeman William STANTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sam LAW, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Montana, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 08-35917.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*159Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Freeman William Stanton, Shelby, MT, pro se.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Montana state prisoner Freeman William Stanton appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Stanton’s petition as successive. We take judicial notice of: (1) the 1987 district court order adjudicating the merits of a habeas petition Stanton filed in 1986; and (2) this court’s memorandum disposition affirming the district court’s judgment dismissing the 1986 petition. *See United States ex rel. Robinson Raneheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc.,*971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir.1992) (stating that appellate courts generally “will not consider facts outside the record developed before the district court[, but] may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Because the instant petition challenges the same conviction which was the subject of Stanton’s 1986 petition, and because Stanton did not obtain an order from this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) prior to filing the successive petition, the district court properly dismissed the petition. *See Cooper v. Calderon,*274 F.3d 1270, 1274 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam). The district court committed no error in dismissing the petition rather than transferring it to this court. *See Allen v. Omoski,*435 F.3d 946, 958 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm the district court.

We also construe Stanton’s appeal as a motion for an order authorizing the district court to consider his successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). *See Cooper,*274 F.3d at 1274-75. So construed, we deny the motion because Stanton fails to make “a prima facie showing that the application satisfies the requirements of’ § 2244(b)(2). *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.