Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2017 / Notices 52901 

A when it failed to notify the State 

Emergency Response Commission 

(SERC) and/or the Local Emergency 

Planning Committee (LEPC) that these 

facilities are subject to the requirements 

of Section 302(c) of EPCRA. These three 

(3) facilities are located in the following 

states: Kansas and New Hampshire. 

Respondent disclosed that it violated 

EPCRA Section 311(a), 42 U.S.C. 

11021(a), and the implementing 

regulations found at 40 CFR part 370, at 

three (3) facilities listed in Attachment 

A when it failed to submit a Material 

Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for a 

hazardous chemical(s) and/or extremely 

hazardous substance(s) or, in the 

alternative, a list of such chemicals, to 

the LEPCs, SERCs, and the fire 

departments with jurisdiction over these 

facilities. These three (3) facilities are 

located in the following states: Kansas 

and New Hampshire. 

Respondent disclosed that it violated 

EPCRA Section 312(a), 42 U.S.C. 

11022(a), and the implementing 

regulations found at 40 CFR part 370, at 

three (3) facilities listed in Attachment 

A when it failed to prepare and submit 

emergency and chemical inventory 

forms to the LEPCs, SERCs, and the fire 

departments with jurisdiction over these 

facilities. These three (3) facilities are 

located in the following states: Kansas 

and New Hampshire. 

Under EPCRA Section 325, 42 U.S.C. 

11045, the Administrator may issue an 

administrative order assessing a civil 

penalty against any person who has 

violated applicable emergency planning 

or right-to-know requirements, or any 

other requirement of EPCRA. 

Proceedings under EPCRA Section 325, 

42 U.S.C. 11045, are conducted in 

accordance with 40 CFR part 22. The 

EPA, as authorized by EPCRA Section 

325, 42 U.S.C. 11045, has assessed a 

civil penalty for these violations. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection. 

Dated: October 27, 2017. 

Rosemarie Kelley, 

Acting Director, Office of Civil Enforcement, 

Office of Enforcement and Compliance 

Assurance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24722 Filed 11–14–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

FRL–9970–67–OGC; EPA–HQ–OGC– 

2017–0630] 

Proposed Settlement Agreement, 

Clean Air Act Title V Permit Appeal 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement 

Agreement; Request for Public 

Comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby 

given of a proposed settlement 

agreement to resolve a case filed by 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

(‘‘Veolia’’) involving EPA actions under 

the CAA Title V operating permit 

program. On February, 15, 2017, Veolia 

filed a petition with the Environmental 

Appeals Board (‘‘EAB’’) challenging the 

CAA Title V renewal permit issued by 

EPA Region 5 for the Veolia facility in 

Sauget, Illinois (‘‘the Facility’’) on 

January 18, 2017. (In re Veolia ES 

Technical Solutions, L.L.C., CAA 

Appeal No. 17–02). Under the proposed 

settlement agreement, among other 

changes to the permit, Veolia agrees to 

install activated carbon injection 

systems (‘‘ACI systems’’) on two 

incinerators that currently do not have 

controls for vapor phase mercury and 

EPA Region 5 will request a remand of 

the CAA Title V renewal permit. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed settlement agreement must be 

received by December 15, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2017–0630, online at 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method). For comments submitted at 

www.regulations.gov, follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from 

www.regulations.gov. The EPA may 

publish any comment received to its 

public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. The EPA will 

generally not consider comments or 

comment contents located outside of the 

primary submission (i.e. on the web, 

cloud, or other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

T. Krallman, Air and Radiation Law 

Office (2344A), Office of General 

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 

564–0904; email address: 

krallman.john@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Settlement Agreement 

The proposed settlement agreement 

would resolve the case filed by Veolia 

involving EPA Region 5’s actions under 

the CAA title V operating permit 

program. On February 15, 2017, Veolia 

filed a petition with the Environmental 

Appeals Board (‘‘EAB’’) challenging the 

CAA Title V renewal permit issued by 

EPA Region 5 on January 18, 2017 to 

Veolia’s facility in Sauget, Illinois (‘‘the 

Facility’’). 

Under the terms of the proposed 

settlement agreement, among other 

changes to the permit, Veolia agrees to 

install activated carbon injection 

systems (‘‘ACI systems’’) on two of its 

incinerators to control emissions of 

vapor phase mercury and EPA Region 5 

agrees to request a voluntary remand 

from the EAB of the CAA Title V 

renewal permit issued on January 18, 

2017. If this proposed settlement 

agreement is finalized, EPA Region 5 

will put out a draft CAA Title V permit 

for separate public notice and comment 

period. The revised draft CAA Title V 

renewal permit, which is attached to the 

proposed settlement agreement, also 

includes improvements to Veolia’s 

procedures for analyzing hazardous 

wastes burned in the incinerators. If the 

final CAA Title V renewal permit for the 

Facility only contains changes from the 

revised draft that reflect the inclusion of 

any final preconstruction permit that 

has been issued by the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency for 

the ACI systems or clerical changes from 

the draft CAA Title V permit attached to 

the proposed settlement agreement, 

Veolia agrees that it will not file a 

petition for review with the EAB or 

otherwise challenge the final CAA Title 

V renewal permit for the Facility. The 

proposed settlement agreement provides 

that this public notice shall not serve as 

the notice and comment period for any 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
52902 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2017 / Notices 

subsequent draft CAA Title V renewal 

permit for the Facility. The proposed 

settlement agreement also provides that 

nothing in the settlement agreement 

limits the discretion of EPA Region 5 to 

make changes between the draft CAA 

Title V renewal permit and the final 

CAA Title V renewal permit based on 

public notice and comment or 

information contained in the permit 

record; nor does the settlement 

agreement limit or modify any 

discretion afforded EPA by the Act or by 

general principles of administrative law 

in taking those actions. See the 

proposed settlement agreement for 

specific details. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

settlement agreement from persons who 

are not named as parties or intervenors 

to the litigation in question. EPA may 

withdraw or withhold consent to the 

proposed settlement agreement if the 

comments disclose facts or 

considerations that indicate that such 

consent is inappropriate, improper, 

inadequate, or inconsistent with the 

requirements of the Act. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed 

Settlement Agreement 

A. How can I get a copy of the 

settlement agreement? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2017–0630) contains a 

copy of the proposed settlement 

agreement, including the draft CAA 

Title V renewal permit. The official 

public docket is available for public 

viewing at the Office of Environmental 

Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through 

www.regulations.gov. You may use 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search.’’ 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at www.regulations.gov 

without change, unless the comment 

contains copyrighted material, CBI, or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these such comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web 

site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address is automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the official public 

docket, and made available in EPA’s 

electronic public docket. 

Dated: November 1, 2017. 

Gautam Srinivasan, 

Acting Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24723 Filed 11–14–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, November 16, 

2017 at 10:00 a.m. 

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, 

DC (Ninth Floor). 

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the 

public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Assessment of Commission Action on 

Enforcement Matters Awaiting 

Reason-to-Believe Consideration 

Management and Administrative 

Matters 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: 

(202) 694–1220. 

Individuals who plan to attend and 

require special assistance, such as sign 

language interpretation or other 

reasonable accommodations, should 

contact Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and 

Clerk, at (202)694–1040, at least 72 

hours prior to the meeting date. 

Dayna C. Brown, 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24785 Filed 11–13–17; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715–01–P 

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE 

AGENCY 

[No. 2017–N–09] 

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of 

Records 

AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of a new system of 

records. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 

as amended (Privacy Act), the Federal 

Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) gives 

notice of a new proposed Privacy Act 

system of records. The new proposed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES