alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – December 21, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8W2fRjUpBH\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-21-2018\/\">Applicants – December 21, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-21-2018\/embed\/#?secret=8W2fRjUpBH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – December 21, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8W2fRjUpBH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6818

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES T. MORRIS, a/k/a Cat,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-96-173, CA-98-5-2)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James T. Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
-2-

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Morris, Nos. CR-96-173; CA-98-5-2 (S.D.W.

Va. May 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

| **Parent**                          |                                                       |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Roma Financial  Corporation         |                                                       |                                  |
|  

 

**Subsidiaries**    | **State or Other**

**Jurisdiction**

**Of Incorporation** |  

**Percentage**

**Ownership** |
| Roma Bank                           | Federal                                                    | 100%                                  |
| RomAsia Bank                        | Federal                                                    | 89.45%                                |
|                                |                                                       |                                  |
| **Subsidiaries of Roma Bank**       |                                                       |                                  |
| Roma Capital Investment Corporation | New Jersey                                                 | 100%                                  |
| General Abstract & Title Agency | New Jersey                                                 | 100%                                  |
| 84 Hopewell, LLC                    | New Jersey                                                 | 50%                                   |
88 A.3d 968

#### Ronald STOCKTON, Appellant v. Francis M. DOUGHERTY, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 26, 2014.

Ronald Stockton, Huntingdon, PA, pro se.

*656Kelly Susan Diffily, City of Philadelphia Law Department, Philadelphia, for Clerk of Courts of Philadelphia County.

Suzanne Noelle Hueston, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for P.A. Davis, Jane Doe, John Doe, Francis M. Dougherty, Marikosa Lamas, Beatrice Rivello, Dorina Varner.

Travis Scott Anderson, PA Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for P.A. Davis, Francis M. Dougherty, Marikosa Lamas, Beatrice Rivello, Dorina Varner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Courts’ “Motion to File Supplemental Brief’ is GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from the
AccuImage Diagnostic Corp. condensed financial statements for the interim period
ended December 31, 2000 included in Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001089799
<NAME>                        AccuImage Diagnostics Corp.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                               511,805
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        437,971
<ALLOWANCES>                         (26,712)
<INVENTORY>                           73,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,077,946
<PP&E>                               137,970
<DEPRECIATION>                      (85,811)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,606,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                386,775
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              10,981
<OTHER-SE>                         1,208,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,606,026
<SALES>                              453,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     453,238
<CGS>                                130,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        537,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      (4,980)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (207,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                           2,191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (209,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (209,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.019)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.019)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50209

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CANDELARIO TRUJEQUE-NOVELO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-361-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Candelario Trujeque-Novelo appeals his 54-month, above-Guidelines 

sentence of imprisonment following his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the 

United States following previous deportation. Trujeque-Novelo argues that 

that the 54-month sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater 

than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

Specifically, Trujeque-Novelo contends that the district court assigned too 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50209 Document: 00513265335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2015
No. 15-50209

2

much weight to his dated criminal history, failed to consider his avoidance of 

non-immigration offenses since 1995, and did not adequately consider his age 

of 65.

We review the district court’s non-Guidelines sentence for abuse of 

discretion under the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 

522 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Gerezano-Rosales, 692 F.3d 393, 400 

(5th Cir. 2012). The record reflects that the district court properly considered 

the § 3553(a) factors. The district court acknowledged Trujeque-Novelo’s 

argument that some of his convictions were dated and noted that his age is a 

factor it usually considers in favor of mitigation. The district court, 

nevertheless, determined that an upward variance was appropriate to address 

Trujeque-Novelo’s underrepresented criminal history category and “pattern of 

recidivism.” Trujeque-Novelo had 15 prior convictions, including two 

convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and seven 

immigration-related convictions. Two lengthy sentences for prior convictions 

of illegal reentry following deportation did not deter Trujeque-Novelo from 

committing the same crime again. Under the totality of the circumstances, the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing this sentence.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-50209 Document: 00513265335 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2015
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-10 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, January 9, 2002. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research Services, Inc. 1745, Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 1745, Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square                               ( print page 64959)                            Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices.

The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.

In accordance with section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. sec. 10(d)), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: December 10, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-30944 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement of Daniel B. Maffei Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission\u202f before\u202f U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"v8ZyLiFtiR\"><a href=\"\/statement-of-daniel-b-maffei-chairman-federal-maritime-commission-before-u-s-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-transportation\/\">Statement of Daniel B. Maffei Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission\u202f before\u202f U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-of-daniel-b-maffei-chairman-federal-maritime-commission-before-u-s-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-transportation\/embed\/#?secret=v8ZyLiFtiR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of Daniel B. Maffei Chairman, Federal Maritime Commission\u202f before\u202f U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation\u00a0” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"v8ZyLiFtiR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 23, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D19-1685 Lower Tribunal No. 18-2810

________________ 

### Richard Rothschild, Appellant,
vs. 

### Charmaine Rothschild, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge. Grigaltchik & Galustov, P.A.,and Adam Rowe, David P. Grigaltchik, and Boris Galustov (Jacksonville), for appellant. Nancy A. Hass, P.A., and Nancy A. Hass (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Industry Advisory \u2014 Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ITohBt1N0l\"><a href=\"\/industry-advisory-applicability-of-provisions-contained-in-pl-117-146\/\">Industry Advisory \u2014 Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/industry-advisory-applicability-of-provisions-contained-in-pl-117-146\/embed\/#?secret=ITohBt1N0l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Industry Advisory \u2014 Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ITohBt1N0l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Raviv Zoller,Chief Executive Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 of the Company (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Raviv  Zoller        |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Raviv Zoller             |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   | November 15,  2004       |

 

----