alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Registration for First Meeting of National Shipper Advisory Still Available","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ezZaql4Qnn\"><a href=\"\/registration-meeting-nsac-still-available\/\">Registration for First Meeting of National Shipper Advisory Still Available<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/registration-meeting-nsac-still-available\/embed\/#?secret=ezZaql4Qnn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Registration for First Meeting of National Shipper Advisory Still Available” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ezZaql4Qnn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – March 29, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zX3ulxiKs5\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-29-2019\/\">Applicants – March 29, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-29-2019\/embed\/#?secret=zX3ulxiKs5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – March 29, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zX3ulxiKs5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Michael R. PARDUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBILE COUNTY, AL, Saraland, City of, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-14757.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 2008.

James G. Curenton, Jr., James G. Curenton, Jr., P.C., Fairhope, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Thomas O. Gaillard, III, Galloway, Wettermark, Everest, Rutens & Gaillard, LLP, Mobile, AL, Andrew W. Christman, Gidiere, Hinton *&*Herndon, Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Michael Pardue, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pendent state law claims against Mobile County, Baldwin County, the City of Saraland, and various individual defendants employed by those governmental entities. Pardue also challenges an earlier district court order which dismissed several defendants based on ab*790solute prosecutorial immunity. After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

First, concerning the statute of limitations argument, we agree with Judge Vollmer’s original ruling that Pardue could not have filed his § 1983 claims before the charges were *nolle prossed.*Moreover, because we believe that the allegations contained in the complaint against the prosecutors should more appropriately be determined on a motion for summary judgment, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand this case.1

VACATED and REMANDED.

1

. We also vacate the district court's dismissal of the pendent claims.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yudhister Bahl, ChiefFinancial Officer of Gaiam, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Yudhister Bahl      |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
| Yudhister  Bahl          |   |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |   |
| May 9, 2003              |   |   |

 

1

----
#### Chad DuBOIS, Appellant, v. Robert DOOLEY, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison, in his official and individual capacity; Mark Steil, in his official and individual capacity, Ap-pellees.

No. 07-1868.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 2008.

Filed: May 13, 2008.

*652Chad DuBois, Springfield, SD, pro se.

James Ellis Moore, Woods & Fuller, Sioux Falls, SD, for Appellees.

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

South Dakota inmate Chad DuBois appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Deliberate indifference may be exhibited by prison medical personnel in responding to prisoners’ needs or by prison officials in intentionally denying or delaying access to care or interfering with prescribed treatment. *See Meloy v. Bachmeier,*302 F.3d 845, 849 (8th Cir.2002). Here, DuBois did not show that physician assistant Mark Steil provided him inappropriate treatment, or that DuBois suffered any injury from a change in medication against his wishes. *See Gibson v. Weber,*433 F.3d 642, 646 (8th Cir.2006) (deliberate-indifference claim based on inadequate medical treatment requires proof that defendant knew of and disregarded excessive risks to inmate’s health, and that injury in fact resulted); *see also Meuir v. Greene County Jail Employees,*487 F.3d 1115, 1118-19 (8th Cir.2007) (inmate has no constitutional right to particular course of treatment, and his mere disagreement with medical treatment is not basis for § 1983 liability). Warden Robert Dooley undisputedly lacked medical training, and his only involvement was to respond to DuBois’s administrative remedy request. *See Meloy,*302 F.3d at 849 (noting that prison officials cannot substitute their judgment for medical professional’s prescribed treatment); *Tlamka v. Serrell,*244 F.3d 628, 635 (8th Cir.2001) (supervisor liability occurs for Eighth Amendment violation when supervisor is personally involved in violation). We thus conclude that summary judgment was proper. *See Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs.,*512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review); *Bloom v. Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc.,*440 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 (8th Cir.2006) (speculation and conjecture do not create genuine issue of material fact).

We decline to consider arguments and issues DuBois did not raise in his initial brief, and he cannot amend his complaint on appeal. See *Stone v. Harry,*364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004); *Mahaney v. Warren County,*206 F.3d 770, 771 n. 2 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); *Henry v. Dep’t of Hous. & Urban Dev.,*451 F.2d 355, 356 (8th Cir.1971) (per curiam). Rather, he may file another action to pursue any new claims he believes he has.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and deny the pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting tire report and recommendations of the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he panel un ani m ou sl y c on clud es ** th is c a s e is s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). SR / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OR GE AL B E R T O Z AMOR A- L E ON , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 10464 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - C R - 0 0 7 1 6 - NV W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona N e i l V . W a ke , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J o r g e Z a m o r a - L e o n ap p e a ls f r o m h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n an d3 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rille g a l r e - e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( a ) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), Z am ora- L eon’ s c ou nselhas 

# FI LED JAN 07 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSS R/ Res ea r ch 08- 10464 2 fi l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded the appel l antw i th the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e a pro se s up pl em ent albri ef . Z am ora- L eon h as fi l ed a pro se supp l em ent albri ef . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. Z a m o r a - L e o n ’s D e c e m b e r1 4 , 2 0 0 9 m o tio n f o rap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l is de ni e d. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an dth e d istrict co u rt’s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2016

a1212 

# Order

Clerk December 28, 2016

153243

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153243

COA: 322890

Oakland CC: 2013

- 244357

- FC

DONALD LEE JAMES, II,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1


              Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 31, 2006 (the "Report") of Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, William Bosso, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.


/s/ William Bosso
---------------------
Name:  William Bosso
Date:  December 11, 2006
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 30, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-14904

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00001-CR-OC-10-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ANGEL LOPEZ-REBOEOREO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(April 30, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Angela B. Wright, appointed counsel for Angel Lopez-Reboeoreo, has
2

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Lopez-Reboeoreo’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Bentzel Travels to Utah, meets with Inland Port, Intermodal Stakeholders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jvmARyGk4S\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-bentzel-travels-to-utah-meets-with-inland-port-intermodal-stakeholders\/\">Commissioner Bentzel Travels to Utah, meets with Inland Port, Intermodal Stakeholders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-bentzel-travels-to-utah-meets-with-inland-port-intermodal-stakeholders\/embed\/#?secret=jvmARyGk4S\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Bentzel Travels to Utah, meets with Inland Port, Intermodal Stakeholders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"jvmARyGk4S\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group
V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 10, 2005



                             /s/ William Colucci
                             ----------------------------
                             William Colucci, Treasurer
                             BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.



<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James Whang, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of STRATS(SM) Trust For Goldman Sachs Securities, Series 2006-2
      (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement; and

      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
      for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.

Dated: March 28, 2008           By:  /s/ James Whang
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     James Whang
                                     Director
                                     (senior officer of depositor in charge of
                                     securitization)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Sean Deson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                               /s/  Sean Deson
                                               ---------------
                                               Sean Deson,
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 13, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.