alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for February 26, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Fxos0PB4nD\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-26-2014\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for February 26, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-26-2014\/embed\/#?secret=Fxos0PB4nD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for February 26, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Fxos0PB4nD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick Abraham McKENZIE, a/k/a Camron Darnell Lewis, a/k/a Jamaican Vince, a/k/a Vince, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7501.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 26, 2013.

*245Frederick Abraham McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.

Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Abraham McKenzie seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKenzie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McKenzie’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Nortia Capital
Partners,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period
ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William  Bosso,
Chief  Executive Officer  of the  Company, certify,  pursuant  to
18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 8, 2004

                           /s/ William Bosso
                           --------------------------------------
                           William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer
                           Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo MIRANDA-GONZALEZ, also known as Alfredo Miranda-Gonzales, also known as Alfredo Miranda, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20056

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 9, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alfredo Miranda-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Miranda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi*959bilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under ble limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Stem Cell Corp.
(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William B.
Adams, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:







(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      March 30, 2009
              
              By:
      /s/ William B. AdamsWilliam
      B. AdamsChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document

Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE MASTEC, INC. 
AMENDED AND RESTATED 
BARGAINING UNITS ESPP





    WHEREAS, MasTec, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the MasTec, Inc. Amended and Restated Bargaining Units ESPP (the “Plan”), established effective as of July 1, 2013, and as most recently amended and restated effective January 1, 2021; and 


WHEREAS, capitalized terms used herein and not herein defined shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan; and


    WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to grant discretion to the Committee to conduct additional Offering Periods under the Plan.     


    NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of December 16, 2021, as follows:


1.A new Section 4(c) of the Plan is hereby added as follows: 


“(c) Additional Offering Periods. 


i.  At the discretion of the Committee, additional Offering Periods (the “Additional Offering Periods”) may be conducted under the Plan as necessary or advisable in the sole discretion of the Committee, permitting grants of options to Participants of certain Designated Subsidiaries.  The Additional Offering Periods may run concurrent to the existing Offering Period. Alternatively, the Committee may determine a different commencement and duration of an Additional Offering Period, and Additional Offering Periods may be consecutive or overlapping. The other terms and conditions of each Additional Offering Period shall be those set forth in this Plan document or in terms and conditions approved by the Committee with respect to such Additional Offering Period, with such changes or additional features as the Committee determines in its discretion.  Unless otherwise superseded by the terms and conditions approved by the Committee with respect to an Additional Offering Period, the provisions of this Plan document shall govern the operation of any offering conducted hereunder.


ii.  Each Offering Period and each Additional Offering Period conducted under this Plan is intended to constitute a separate “offering” for purposes of Section 423 of the Code.


iii.  To the extent an Offering Period, including any Additional Offering Period, is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code, all Participants in such Offering Period or Additional Offering Period shall have the same rights and privileges with respect to their participation in such Offering Period or Additional Offering Period in accordance with Section 423(b)(5) of the Code and the regulations thereunder.”




2.Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, as follows:


“11. Beneficiary.  In the event of a Participant’s death, the individual or the executor/administrator of the deceased Participant’s estate entitled to receive any shares and/or cash from the Participant’s account (the “Participant’s beneficiary”) may submit a request to the Plan’s third party administrator for the required documentation that will authorize the transfer of ownership of any shares and/or cash in the Participant’s account to the Participant’s beneficiary.”


3.Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
August 28, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00643-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – July 21, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QiWp3kC94C\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-july-21-2016\/\">Applicants – July 21, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-july-21-2016\/embed\/#?secret=QiWp3kC94C\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – July 21, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"QiWp3kC94C\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael S. Fields, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.01, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL S. FIELDS  
|                    |  |  |  | Michael S. Fields      
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market  Latin  America,  Inc.) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005,  I, Philip J. Rauch,  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market Latin  America,  Inc.),  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

a)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Paragon Financial  Corporation (kna
     New Market Latin America, Inc.) for the Quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully
     complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

b)   the  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q/A of
     Paragon Financial Corporation (kna New Market Latin America,  Inc.) for the
     quarter ended March 31, 2005,  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,
     the financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Paragon  Financial
     Corporation (kna New Market Latin America, Inc.)





                            /s/ Philip J.Rauch
                                --------------
                                Philip J. Rauch, Chief Financial Officer


Date:    October 10, 2008



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Paragon Financial  Corporation (kna New Market Latin America,  Inc.)
and will be  retained by Paragon  Financial  Corporation  (kna New Market  Latin
America,  Inc.) and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporationand Huntsman International LLC;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrants’other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants, including their consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrants’ internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrants’ othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 9, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN     |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter R. Huntsman         |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian SatelliteHoldings Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 20-F for the yearending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ”Report”), I, John I. Bitove, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 26, 2007                           |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ JOHN I. BITOVE                          |   |
|   |                                        |
|   | Name: John I. Bitove                        |
|   | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

*The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.*

 

1

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Verbena Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Randy Milby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Randy MilbyRandy
              Milby
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                5, 2007