alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, David Stewart, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Telecom, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this quarterly report is being prepared;


         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation; and


         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and;


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):


         (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
         adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
         and report financial information; and


         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: August 13, 2003


/s/ DAVID STEWART
----------------------------------

David Stewart
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA
M UI EEN AD EEN JA M AL AD EEN AB D AL F USAL ABD AL SATT AR, P etitioner , v. Ci vilAc ti on N o. 08 -1 23 6 ( JD B) BARACK

H. OBAMA, et al., Re spo nde nt s.
OR DE R Upon consider ation of the pa rty ' s arguments during the telephonic c onfer ence of September 18, 2009, a

nd the entire rec ord her ein, it is hereby OR DE RE D that responde nts shall take whate ver steps a re ne cessa

ry to ensure that counsel for

petitioner is permitted a f ace -to-fa ce visit with petitioner duringcounsel' s visit t o the Gu anta namo B ay

Na va l B a se the we e k o f S e pte mbe r 2 1, 20 09 . A ny oth e r m e e tin g s w ith petitioner shall be g overne d by the normal proc edure s in place at the Guantana mo Ba y Nava l Ba se. I t is further ORDERED that the meetingorder ed above shall take plac e at a desig nated " meeting pla c e ," a s th a t te rm

is u se d in

pa ra g ra ph6 o f t he de c lara

tio n o f C omm and e r D on

A. Ma rt in (attac hed as Ex. 1 to Resps.' Opp. to Pet' r' s Mot. for Dire ct Contact). It is further OR DE RE D that responde nts shall inform petitioner of the f ollowing: " You have a meetingwith Ms. Cl ear

y and [name of tra

nslator]." I f petitioner a sks the purpose of the meeting or whom it is with, respondents shall decline to pr ovide any information about the nature of the meetingor whom it is with. I n any case , if petitioner re fuses to attend the meetingeither be fore
or a ft e r h e inq

uir e s a bo ut i t, p e tit ion e r w ill no t be fo rc ibl y e xtra c te d f

ro m hi s c e ll, or

oth e rw ise-2-

compelled to attend the meeting . Petitioner instead will be per mitted to foreg o the meetingand
rema in in his cell. Moreover , if responde nts believe that pe titioner may become violent during his face -to-fa ce me eting with counsel, they shall take whatever

steps are nece ssary

to ensure that petitioner' s counsel' s safe ty is not endang ere d during the meetingwith petitioner. I t is further OR DE RE D that petitioner' s counsel shall file a status report - - in writing and by not later than Octobe r 15, 2009 -- advising whether petitioner has a g ree d to repre sentation and to pursue the pre sent habe as petition. I t is further OR DE RE D that this ORDER supercede s this C ourt' s ORDER of September 2, 2009. SO OR DE RE D
. / s / J OHN D. B ATES Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ct J u d ge Date: Septembe r 18, 2009
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2658 

To clarify that aliens who are not lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

in the United States may not be vaccinated until nationals of the United 

States and aliens who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

in the United States are fully vaccinated for COVID–19, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2021 

Mr. KELLER (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, and Ms. MACE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To clarify that aliens who are not lawfully admitted for 

permanent residence in the United States may not be 

vaccinated until nationals of the United States and aliens 

who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in 

the United States are fully vaccinated for COVID–19, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2658 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Hypodermic 

3 Injections and Offering vaccines to Taxpayers Swiftly Act 

4 of 2021’’ or the ‘‘SHOTS Act of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. COVID–19 VACCINE PRIORITY FOR NATIONALS OF 

6 THE UNITED STATES AND ALIENS LAWFULLY 

7 ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—An alien who is not lawfully ad9 mitted for permanent residence in the United States may 

10 not be vaccinated for COVID–19 until the date on which 

11 all nationals of the United States (as such term is defined 

12 in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

13 U.S.C. 1101)) seeking such a vaccine and aliens who are 

14 lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United 

15 States on the date of enactment of this Act seeking such 

16 a vaccine are fully vaccinated for COVID–19. 

17 (b) RULEMAKING; GUIDANCE.— 

18 (1) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 30 days 

19 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec20 retary of Homeland Security, and the Head of any 

21 other applicable Federal agency, shall issue interim 

22 final rules to carry out this Act. 

23 (2) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Homeland 

24 Security, and the head of any other applicable Fed25 eral agency, shall amend applicable guidance to re26 flect the priority described in subsection (a). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2658 IH

1 (c) SUNSET.—This Act shall sunset on the earlier 

2 of— 

3 (1) the date on which the President certifies to 

4 Congress that the requirement under subsection (a) 

5 has been fulfilled; and 

6 (2) December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WorldQuest Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Stephen Polley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                                              | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/ R. Stephen Polley                        | 
|    |  |                                              | 
|    |  | Name: R. Stephen Polley                      | 
|    |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | 

August 8, 2003
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended March 31,
         2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Andrew A. Campbell
                                          Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

May 10, 2004

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 10-17]

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of open meetings as follows:

# Thursday, November 16, 2017:

10:00 a.m.—Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against Iraq.

# Status:

Open.

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street NW., Suite 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,

Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2017-24361 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

October 18, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60679

Summary Calendar

JUAN JOSE DE JESUS,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 401 876

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Juges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Jose De Jesus petitions f or review of an order of the

Board of Immig ration Appeals (“BIA”) adopting and affirming the

Immigration Judge’s decision to deny his application for

cancellation of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

His argument that the Immigration and Naturalization Service failed

to follow 8 C.F.R. § 236.3 in obtaining his signatures on the 1998

and 1999 voluntary departure agreements will not be addressed

because it was unexhausted before the BIA. See Wang v. Ashcroft

,

260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001).2

De Jesus arg ues, without any legal authority, that minors

cannot enter into voluntary departure agreements. We deem this

issue abandoned as it is inadequately briefed. S ee Cinel v.

Connick

, 15 F.3d 1338, 1345 (5th Cir. 1994); Villanueva v. CNA Ins.

Cos.

, 868 F.2d 684, 687 n. 5 (5th Cir. 1989 ). Additionally,

De Jesus’s argument that his volunt ary departures resulted in a

denial of due process because he was unfairly deprived of the

benefit of applying for cancellation of removal is without merit.

“Eligibility for discretionary relief from a removal order is not

‘a liberty or property inte r est warranting due process

protection.’” See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft , 349 F.3d 213, 215,

219 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, De Jesus’s petition for review

is DENIED.
#### INTERSTATE NAT. BANK v. PUMROY, *Sheriff.*

No. 3425.

Opinion Filed December 22, 1914.

(145 Pac. 416.)

TAXATION — Tax Lien — Priorities—Chattel Mortgages. A lien for taxes upon the property of the tax debtor is inferior to that of a chattel mortgage lien antedating the time the tax lien attaches.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from County Court, Pcrnmee County; G. T. Graves, Judge-.*

Action by the Interstate National Bank, a corporation, against C. I. Pumroy, as sheriff of Pawnee county. Judgment for defendant and. plaintiff brings error.

Reversed and remanded.

*70
      *I~I. B. Martin, Olías. E. Bush,*and *Jno. Y. Murry, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Redmond 8. Cole,*County Atty., for defendant in error.

KANE, C. J.

The only question of any substance involved herein has been récently decided by this court favorable to the contention of plaintiff in error in *Fidelity Trust Co. v. C. I. Pumroy, ante,*145 Pac. 1052, as sheriff of Pawnee county, wherein it was held:

> “A lien for taxes upon the property of the tax debtor is ■inferior to that of a chattel mortgage lien antedating the time the-tax lien attaches.”

Upon the authority of that case the judgment of the court below must be reversed and rendered.

All the Justices concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – June 10, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SuMQsFqU8A\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-june-10-2016\/\">Applicants – June 10, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-june-10-2016\/embed\/#?secret=SuMQsFqU8A\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – June 10, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SuMQsFqU8A\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Moussa NDIAYE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71558.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted: March 8, 2011.*

Filed: March 22, 2011.

Mark Barrett Nerheim, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

*675Drew Brinkman, Tracey McDonald, OIL, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Moussa Ndiaye, a native and citizen of Mauritania, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ndiaye’s motion to reopen where written notice of the hearing was mailed to the most recent address provided by Ndiaye and he admitted to receiving the notice, *see*8 U.S.C. §§ 1229(c), 1229a(b)(5)(A), and where Ndiaye also failed to establish that his failure to appear was because of “exceptional circumstances,” *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1).

In his opening brief, Ndiaye fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s determination that he failed to provide previously unavailable evidence or evidence of changed country conditions relevant to his asylum application. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TONY MOORE HICKMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3235 

[January 23, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF005607-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation raising multiple 

issues on appeal. We affirm all issues. However, we remand with 

instructions for the trial court to correct the written revocation order to 

conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, which found two grounds 

for revocation: felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of 

ammunition. See Walker v. State, 243 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). 

We also remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a corrected 

written order, consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement, finding 

that appellant poses a danger to the community. See Arnone v. State, 204 

So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). 

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *
2

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

t0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142734

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142734 COA: 298015 Macomb CC: 2 009-001929-FH GARY RICHARD MORLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 16, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23.0

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

As the independent registered public
accountants of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-136002 and No. 333-144420 of our report dated March 6, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker
|Portland, Maine                 
|March 6, 2009