T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. E N R IQ U E G O N Z A L E Z H U E R T A , a. k. a. E nr i que S i e rr aG onz a l e z , a . k. a . G us t a vo G on za l ez , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50182 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 9 5 4 - S VW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S t e phe n V . W i l s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E nri qu e G on za l ez -H uert a app ea l s f rom the 72 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o l l o w i n g h i s c o n v i c t i o n f o rr e - e n trya f

t e rd e p o rt a t i o n , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f irm , b u t r e m a n dto 

# FI LED MA R 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50182 2 c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t. G onz a l e z - H ue rt ac ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by f a i l i ng a de qua t e l yt o di s c us s the 18 U . S . C . 3553( a ) f a c t or s a nd t o e xpl a i n the d e v ia tio n f

r o m th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e . W e d is a g r e e . Se e U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 98 4, 99 3 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). G o n z a le z - H u e rtaa ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e ly un re as on abl e bec ause the 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) fa ct ors w er e noti nd i vi du al l y app l i ed to h is c a s e , a n db e c au s e it is u n du lyh a r s h a n dc r e a te s a n u n w a rr a n te dd is p a r ity w i th s i m i l a r l ys i tua t e d de f e nda nt s . I n l i ghtof

the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f a c to r s , th e s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e G a ll v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). G o n z a le z - H u e rtaa d d itio n a llyc o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto prov i de no t i ce un der F eder alR ul e of C ri m i nal P roce du re 32 (h). T he re cord r e f l e c t s th a tth e d i s tr i c tc o u rtv a r i e df r o m th e G u i d e l i n e s u n d e r1 8 U . S. C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , a n dit h a dn o o b lig a tio n to p r o v id e G o n z a le z - H u e rtan o tic e . See Ir i zarr y v . U ni ted States , 55 3 U . S . 70 8, 71 4 (20 08 ) ( l i m i t i ng the R ul e 32(h) no t i ce re qu i re m entt o d epartures un der 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(b)). C on traryt o G on za l ez -H uert a’ s c on t ent i on , he i s notent i t l ed t o j ud i ci al e s to p p e l.10- 50182 3 I n a c c or da nc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m a n dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e r e f e r e n c e to 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) . See U ni ted States v. H erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m a n d in g s u as p o n te to del et e the re fe re nce t o sec t i on 13 26 (b)) . A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctju d gm en t.