alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Remarks of Commissioner Dye, European Maritime Law Organization, 24th Annual Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s8REPgglHu\"><a href=\"\/remarks-of-commissioner-dye-european-maritime-law-organization-24th-annual-conference\/\">Remarks of Commissioner Dye, European Maritime Law Organization, 24th Annual Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/remarks-of-commissioner-dye-european-maritime-law-organization-24th-annual-conference\/embed\/#?secret=s8REPgglHu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Remarks of Commissioner Dye, European Maritime Law Organization, 24th Annual Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"s8REPgglHu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### DeVinche ALBRITTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; John Doe, Virginia Department of Corrections Health Services Director; David B. Everett, Warden of Sussex II State Prison; Ms. Wanda Rollins, Sussex II State Prison Operations Officer and Law Library Supervisor; Officer Cris, former Sergeant Cris, now Officer Cris; Ms. Massenburg, Grievance Coordinator; Jane Doe, The Office Service Specialist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-6912.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 1, 2010.

DeVinche Albritton, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

DeVinche Albritton appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(2) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Albritton v. Johnson,*No. 2:07-cv-00356-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2010; entered June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *793presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – December 4, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rtz45cTX8Y\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-december-4-2015\/\">License Applicants – December 4, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-december-4-2015\/embed\/#?secret=Rtz45cTX8Y\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – December 4, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Rtz45cTX8Y\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Expanded Flexibility for Ocean Transportation Intermediaries Effective August 22, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4ICYqygAW8\"><a href=\"\/expanded-flexibility-for-ocean-transportation-intermediaries-effective-august-22-2018\/\">Expanded Flexibility for Ocean Transportation Intermediaries Effective August 22, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/expanded-flexibility-for-ocean-transportation-intermediaries-effective-august-22-2018\/embed\/#?secret=4ICYqygAW8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expanded Flexibility for Ocean Transportation Intermediaries Effective August 22, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"4ICYqygAW8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA**  **WESTERN DISTRICT** 
IN RE: MR. JUSTICE SEAMUS P. MCCAFFERY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : No. 430 Judicial Administration Docket

**DISSENTING STA** 

**TEMENT MA** **DA ME JUSTICE TODD**  I strenuously dissent

. It is obvious from recent events that our Court is embroiled in turmoil and needs to act immediately. My disagreement with the majority of the Court is with respect to what action we should take

. The crisis in which we find ourselves is marked by fact
-laden accusations, alleged impropriety, and obvious acrimony. This is precisely the type of conflict

— perhaps the prototypical conflict

— for which the citizens of our Commonwealth , in response to a similar controversy over two decades ago, constitutiona lly created the independent Judicial Conduct Board and the Court of Judicial Discipline. Wh ile the basis for my position is procedural and I express no view on the merits, there is no question in my mind that this matter, including the question of suspension , should be immediately referred to the Judicial Conduct Board for expedited treatment, and , if appropriate, for trial and resolution by the Court of Judicial Discipline. Yet, today, based upon unvetted claims and allegations, a majority of our Court, one of whom is deeply involved in this controversy, has suspended a fellow Justice

. No independent i nvestigative body has made any findings regarding merits or credibility,[No. 430]
- 2

and, u nlike the suspension of Justice Joan Orie Melvin, no formal criminal proceedings have been instituted. Every day, this Court is charged with according due process to litigants , and we faithfully carry out that constitutional obligation

. Even a Justice is entitled to due process.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          75,698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,428,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,526,152
<PP&E>                                      16,480,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             118,003,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,062,720
<BONDS>                                    114,435,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 41,253,908
<COMMON>                                       111,279
<OTHER-SE>                                 (56,816,419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               118,003,421
<SALES>                                     11,081,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,081,249
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,359,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (47,049,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (47,049,735)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (47,049,735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.51)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 5.2



CONSENT OF ROSCOE POSTLE ASSOCIATES INC.

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) of New Gold Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Item 4  Narrative Description of the Business  Mineral Projects
 The Afton Project in the Companys Annual Information Form and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report, and we further consent to the reliance in the Annual Report on the
independent technical report, prepared by us and Gary H. Giroux, P.Eng., dated January 20, 2006 entitled Technical Report on the New Afton Project, Kamloops, British Columbia which the Company used, or directly quoted from, in
preparing summaries concerning the Afton Project, which appear in such Annual Report.



|                              |  |                                  
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /s/    C. Stewart Wallis         
|                              |  | Name:  C. Stewart Wallis P.Geo   
|                              |  | Title:  General Manager Vancouver

March 28, 2006
CERTIFICATION

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

         I, Pasquale Catizone, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
         International Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this annual report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant,
                  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
                  by others within those entities, particularly during the
                  period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
                  and

         c)       presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

         a)       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                  or other employees who have a significant role in the
                  registrant's internal controls.


Date: May 6, 2006



/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       9
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with this Yearly Report of Magnegas Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luisa
Ingargiola, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






1. Such
Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and






2. The
information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Magnegas
Corporation.






Date:
March 26, 2009






/s/
Luisa Ingargiola


Luisa
Ingargiola


Chief
Financial Officer
#### Gustavo ALVAREZ-FRAYIER, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden, RCDC III; Bureau of Prisons; Geo Group, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 12-50991

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 2013.

Gustavo Alvarez-Frayier, Pecos, TX, pro se.

Gary Layton Anderson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

*407PER CURIAM: *

Gustavo Alvarez-Frayier, federal prisoner # 73786-280, an alien against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States upon release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP’s exclusion of him from rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s decision in *Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States,*688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 561, 184 L.Ed.2d 365 (2012).

Accordingly, Alvarez-Frayier’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 4.46
​
Power of Attorney
I, Zou Shenglong, the shareholder of Shenzhen Xunlei Networking Technologies Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Xunlei") holding a total of 76% equity thereof, agree to authorize Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. ("Giganology Shenzhen") to exercise the shareholder rights that I have corresponding to the 76% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei. I hereby irrevocably authorize the Authorized Person to exercise the following rights within the valid period of this Power of Attorney:
The Authorized Person being authorized to fully exercise, on my behalf and in my name as a shareholder holding 76% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei, and in accordance with the laws and the articles of association, all the shareholder rights that I am entitled to, including but not limited to: the right to propose convening the shareholders' meetings, to accept any notices of the convening and proceedings of the shareholders' meetings, to attend the shareholders' meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei and exercise all voting rights as a shareholder holding 76% equity thereof (including acting as my authorized representative at the shareholders' meetings of Shenzhen Xunlei to designate and appoint the directors, general manager, chief financial officer and other officers of Shenzhen Xunlei and to decide on such matters as dividends), to sell or transfer the 76% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei held by me.
The Authorized Person shall have the right to designate any individuals appointed by its Board of Directors (or Executive Director) to exercise the rights granted to it under this Power of Attorney.
Unless the Business Operation Agreement jointly signed by Giganology Shenzhen, Shenzhen Xunlei, Zou Shenglong, Cheng Hao, Wang Fang, Shi Jianming and Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd. is terminated earlier for any reasons, this Power of Attorney shall remain valid for ten years as from the date when it is signed. Upon expiry of this Power of Attorney, if so requested by Giganology Shenzhen, I shall extend the valid period of this Power of Attorney according to the requirements of Giganology Shenzhen.
​
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)
​
​

​



[This page is the signature page of the Power of Attorney, without text]
​
​
	Authorized by: Zou Shenglong
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Zou Shenglong
	 

	​
Date: May 11, 2021
​
​
	 

	Authorized Person: Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
	 

	 
	 

	Legal Representative/Authorized Representative (Signature under company seal)
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Zou Shenglong
	 

	 
	 

	/s/Seal of Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
	 

	 
	 

	Date:
	May 10, 2021
	


​

2