alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants'
auditors and the audit committee of registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
August 6, 2009

/s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN Peter R. Huntsman Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v. PERRY LYNN FLAUGH

Respondent :

: : : : : : : : : No. 2278 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 112 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No. 94493 (Blair County)

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW**  , this 12 th day of August , 2016, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Perry Lynn Flaugh is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E 217

. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g). Justice Mundy dissents and would impose a two-year suspension.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants March 13, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rlcmpp2kC7\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-13-2020\/\">Applicants March 13, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-march-13-2020\/embed\/#?secret=rlcmpp2kC7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants March 13, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"rlcmpp2kC7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Order filed, July 22, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00222

- CV

____________ OMAR VALDES , Appellant

V.

WHATABURGER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. 2015

- 57179



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due June 15, 2016

. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s r ecord has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
#### Jamie L. HUGHES, Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee.

No. 07-1875.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2008.

Filed: May 12, 2008.

Iva Nell Gibbons, Gibbons Law Firm, Clarksville, AR, for Appellant.

Mark W. Webb, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, Tina M. Waddell, Social Security Administration, Dallas, TX, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jamie L. Hughes (Hughes) appeals the district court’s order awarding her attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. After careful review, *see U.S. Dep’t of Labor v. Rapid Robert’s Inc.,*130 F.3d 345, 347 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review), we reverse in part and remand this matter to the district court for further consideration.

Hughes argues the district court abused its discretion in compensating her for only some of the hours listed on her counsel’s itemization of time. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in subtracting 13.9 hours from the total number of hours for which compensation was sought. It is unclear to us, however, why an additional 1.8 hours were subtracted from the 3.8 hours that Hughes’s lawyer spent reviewing the file, communicating with Hughes, preparing the district court complaint, and reviewing district court filings. The court stated that time spent at the administrative level was not compensa-ble, but also stated that the hours were spent preparing to file the district court complaint. Accordingly, we remand to the district court with instructions to clarify the reason for the 1.8 hour deduction.

Hughes also complains that the district court wrongly refused to add a cost-of-living increase to the statutory compensation rate of $125 per hour, given Hughes provided the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as proof of the cost of living in her reply to the Commissioner’s response to her motion for fees. On remand, the court may, if it wishes, consider the CPI as proof of a cost-of-living increase. *Cf. McGhee v. Pot-tawattamie County,*514 F.3d 739, 745 (8th Cir.2008) (deciding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it did not consider an argument raised for the first time in a summary judgment reply brief, where the local rule prohibited new arguments in a reply brief). If the court does consider the CPI, however, the government should be provided with an adequate opportunity to respond. *Cf. Vais Arms, Inc. v. Vais,*383 F.3d 287, 292 (5th Cir. 2004) (rejecting the defendant’s argument that he was denied an opportunity to re*647spond to plaintiffs argument, raised for the first time in plaintiffs reply to defendant’s memorandum opposing summary judgment, where the record established the district court permitted the defendant to file a supplemental memo.).

We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mexus Gold US, a Nevada Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-K (A/1) for the year ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Paul D. Thompson Paul D. Thompson Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer  September 16, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Black 
Tea Oil, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-02030, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the District of Kansas on November 6, 
2017.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Black Tea Oil, LLC and Christopher C. Leiker, 
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from 
and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the 
Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters 
of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these 
allegations by requiring the Defendants to restore the impacted areas 
and to pay a civil penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Phillip R. 
Dupr[eacute], Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense 
Section, Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044, and refer to 
United States v. Black Tea Oil, LLC, et al., DJ #90-5-1-1-20653.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Kansas, 500 State 
Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree 
may be examined electronically at http://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-24461 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants September 11, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m96GEsBbD0\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-11-2023\/\">Applicants September 11, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-11-2023\/embed\/#?secret=m96GEsBbD0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants September 11, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"m96GEsBbD0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Nortia Capital
Partners,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period
ending  July  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William  Bosso,
Chief  Executive Officer  of the  Company, certify,  pursuant  to
18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 8, 2004

                           /s/ William Bosso
                           --------------------------------------
                           William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer
                           Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Ofer Segev, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 of
the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:     November
      6, 2009
                /s/Ofer
      SegevOfer
      SegevChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"National Shipper Advisory Committee Holding Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SuQlxUF0Mg\"><a href=\"\/national-shipper-advisory-committee-holding-meeting\/\">National Shipper Advisory Committee Holding Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/national-shipper-advisory-committee-holding-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=SuQlxUF0Mg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“National Shipper Advisory Committee Holding Meeting” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SuQlxUF0Mg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit      32.1 **

|                              |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                   |
|                         |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Dated:                May 3, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ *Li              Xia              WANG                          * |
|                              | Li              Xia WANG               |
|                              | Chief                Executive Officer |

|                              |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                   |
|                         |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| Dated:                May 3, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ *Peter              MAK                              * |
|                              | Peter              MAK                 |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TAMARA ALYN LANHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 22-35399

D.C. No. 6:20-cv-01601-MC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 20, 2023

Portland, Oregon

Before: RAWLINSON, BEA, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Tamara Lanham appeals the denial of her application for Social Security

benefits. We review the district court’s decision “de novo, and will disturb the

denial of benefits only if the decision contains legal error or is not supported by

FILED

MAY 4 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
substantial evidence.” Terry v. Saul, 998 F.3d 1010, 1012 (9th Cir. 2021) (citation

omitted). 

1. Any error in incorporating the residual functional capacity (RFC)

limitation of “minimal reading and writing skills” into the hypothetical posed to

the Vocational Expert (VE) was harmless. See Carmickle v. Comm’r Soc. Sec.

Admin., 533 F.3d 1155, 1162 (9th Cir. 2008) (explaining that an error is harmless

when it is “inconsequential to the ultimate nondisability determination”) (citations

omitted)). The VE identified two jobs in the national economy, small parts

assembler and electronics worker, which do not require reading or writing. And

Lanham conceded before the district court and at oral argument on appeal that she

could perform these jobs. 

2. The ALJ did not err by declining to address the rebuttal job-numbers

evidence. See White v. Kijakazi, 44 F.4th 828, 836 (9th Cir. 2022) (“[A]n ALJ

need only resolve job-number inconsistencies if the competing job numbers

constitute significant probative evidence . . . .”) (citation, alteration, and internal

quotation marks omitted)). The generic job numbers contained in Lanham’s posthearing filing did not significantly undermine the VE’s expert opinion regarding

the number of available jobs. See Kilpatrick v. Kijakazi, 35 F.4th 1187, 1192–93

(9th Cir. 2022) (recognizing VEs as experts). In addition, Lanham did not cross2
examine the VE regarding the job-numbers estimates. See Shaibi v. Berryhill, 883

F.3d 1102, 1110 (9th Cir. 2017), as amended. “We recognize that a claimant will

rarely, if ever, be in a position to anticipate the particular occupations a VE might

list[,]” but a claimant may “inquir[e] as to the evidentiary basis for a VE’s

estimated job numbers, or inquir[e] as to” the consistency of the numbers. Id.

AFFIRMED.

3