alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         104,906
<SECURITIES>                                   188,819
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,286)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               403,141
<PP&E>                                          84,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,676,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,748,505
<OTHER-SE>                                   (566,238)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,676,753
<SALES>                                         91,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,886
<CGS>                                           32,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  491,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,493)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,875)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (416,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (416,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (416,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.95)


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3086 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number of local wage 

areas allowable within a General Schedule pay locality. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2021 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself and Mr. CARSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number 

of local wage areas allowable within a General Schedule 

pay locality. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Locality Pay Equity 

5 Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITING THE NUMBER OF LOCAL WAGE AREAS DE7 FINED WITHIN A GENERAL SCHEDULE PAY 

8 LOCALITY. 

9 (a) LOCAL WAGE AREA LIMITATION.—Section 

10 5343(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3086 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking ‘‘(but 

2 such’’ and all that follows through ‘‘are employed)’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

4 the semicolon; 

5 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking the period 

6 after ‘‘Islands’’ and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

7 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(6) the Office of Personnel Management shall 

9 define not more than 1 local wage area within a pay 

10 locality, except that this paragraph shall not apply 

11 to the pay locality designated as ‘Rest of United 

12 States’.’’. 

13 (b) GENERAL SCHEDULE PAY LOCALITY DE14 FINED.—Section 5342(a) of title 5, United States Code, 

15 is amended— 

16 (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

17 after the semicolon; 

18 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period 

19 after ‘‘employee’’ and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(4) ‘pay locality’ has the meaning given that 

22 term under section 5302.’’. 

23 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

24 The Director of the Office of Personnel Management 

25 shall prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3086 IH

1 purpose of this Act, including regulations to ensure that 

2 the enactment of this Act shall not have the effect of re3 ducing any rate of basic pay payable to any individual who 

4 is serving as a prevailing rate employee (as defined under 

5 section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code). 

6 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY. 

7 The amendments made by this Act shall apply on and 

8 after the first day of the first full pay period beginning 

9 at least 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.4 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Peter Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ALDA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Peter Chen  Peter Chen Chief Financial Officer December 30, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Bin Liu, Chief Financial Officer of Kingold Jewelry, Inc. certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kingold Jewelry, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kingold Jewelry, Inc. and its subsidiaries.




Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.




Date: May 12, 2010

/s/ Bin LiuBin LiuChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, do each hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                            
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: May 23, 2005
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Paul K. Danner         
|                    |  | Paul K. Danner             
|                    |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Scott L. Vining        
|                    |  | Scott L. Vining            
|                    |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 USC Section 1350 has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3068 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

any interest paid on an overpayment of tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income any interest paid on an overpayment 

of tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freeing Americans 

5 from Interest on Reimbursements Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. INTEREST RECEIVED ON OVERPAYMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

10 by inserting before section 140 the following new section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3068 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 139I. INTEREST RECEIVED ON TAX OVERPAYMENTS. 

2 ‘‘Gross income shall not include any interest allowed 

3 and paid upon an overpayment of tax pursuant to section 

4 6611.’’. 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

6 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after the 

7 date of the enactment of this section. 

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

9 for Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before the 

11 item relating to section 140 the following new item: 

‘‘139I. Interest received on tax overpayments.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – July 30, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CAbdEj9SxG\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-30-2015\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – July 30, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-july-30-2015\/embed\/#?secret=CAbdEj9SxG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – July 30, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"CAbdEj9SxG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Michael David LENDAHL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. PALOSAARI, Warden ASPC Douglas and State of Arizona Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 09-15496.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 2010.

Filed Nov. 9, 2010.

*206Kurt Michael Altman, Kurt M. Altman, P.L.C., Attorney at Law, Scottsdale, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael David Lendahl, pro se.

Sherri Tolar Rollison, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for RespondentsAppellees.

Before: THOMAS and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Although Lendahl exhausted his claim that his sentence was improperly enhanced because a judge, not a jury, found the facts underlying the enhancement, we affirm the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition. The state court’s denial of Lendahl’s claim was not an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law, because no Supreme Court precedent clearly establishes that a prior conviction must be proved to a jury when it is used as a sentencing factor. *See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Further, Lendahl’s claim that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a jury determination of any aggravating factors is unavailing, given that Lendahl’s plea agreement and colloquy reflect that he knew and understood his jury-sentencing rights, consulted his attorney regarding those rights and the consequences of waiving them, and then *207agreed, orally and in writing, to give up those jury-sentencing rights.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Roderick MORRIS, Appellant.

No. 07-1781.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 10, 2008.

Filed April 25, 2008.

*203Christy H. Fawcett, Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellee.

James J. West, West Long, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellant.

Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

Roderick Morris appeals his federal drug-trafficking conviction claiming that the facts underlying his federal conviction are substantially similar to those underlying an offense on which Morris was acquitted in state court. We will affirm.

I.

Because we write exclusively for the parties, who are familiar with the facts and proceedings below, we will not revisit them here. The Supreme Court has squarely held that a federal prosecution is not barred under the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause by a prior state prosecution for the same act. *See Abbate v. United States,*359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959); *see also Bartkus v. Illinois,*359 U.S. 121, 79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684 (1959). Morris does not dispute that *Abbate*and *Baitkus*are fatal to his appeal, but rather argues that the rationale of those precedents was undermined by the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in *Benton v. Maryland,*395 U.S. 784, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969), in which the Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies to the states.

Regardless of the merits of this argument, it is assuredly not our place to overturn Supreme Court precedent. *See Agostini v. Felton,*521 U.S. 203, 237, 117 S.Ct. 1997, 138 L.Ed.2d 391 (1997); *see also United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc.,*431 F.3d 150, 155-156 (3d Cir.2005). And as Morris candidly admits, even the members of this Court who have questioned the continued viability of *Abbate*and *Bartkus*have acknowledged that this is a matter for the Supreme Court. *See United States v. Wilson,*413 F.3d 382, 394 (3d Cir.2005) (Aldisert, J., dissenting) (“The time has come for the Supreme Court to revisit the issue.”); *United States v. Grimes,*641 F.2d 96, 104 (3d Cir.1981) (“[W]e do not believe we are the proper forum to overturn a legal directive from the Supreme Court.”).

For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Federal Maritime Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel to Convene Kickoff Maritime Information Transparency Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HEVJrz4Dm9\"><a href=\"\/federal-maritime-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-to-convene-kickoff-maritime-information-transparency-meeting\/\">Federal Maritime Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel to Convene Kickoff Maritime Information Transparency Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/federal-maritime-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-to-convene-kickoff-maritime-information-transparency-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=HEVJrz4Dm9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Maritime Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel to Convene Kickoff Maritime Information Transparency Meeting” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"HEVJrz4Dm9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,178
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             800
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,105
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,897
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,799
<LOANS>                                        127,715
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,357)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,696
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,053
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,195
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,426
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 155,696
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,874
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  613
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,487
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,013
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,474
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      385
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,183
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,183
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       695
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,777
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   992
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,357
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,357
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      James
      J. Vincenzo, Chief Financial Officer of Theater Xtreme entertainment Group,
      Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended December 31, 2006:





(1)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      that
      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Theater Xtreme
      Entertainment Group, Inc.






Dated:
      February 14, 2007








/s/
                James J. VincenzoJames
                J. Vincenzo, Chief Financial
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.