alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3562 

To designate the Federal building under construction at 1220 Echelon Parkway in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Chaney, Goodman, Schwerner Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building under construction at 

1220 Echelon Parkway in Jackson, Mississippi, as the 

‘‘Chaney, Goodman, Schwerner Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building under construction at 1220 

5 Echelon Parkway in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘Chaney, Goodman, Schwerner 

7 Federal Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3562 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Chaney, Goodman, Schwerner Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Max Vekich","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fvdVuOHuTP\"><a href=\"\/commissioners\/max-vekich\/\">Max Vekich<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioners\/max-vekich\/embed\/#?secret=fvdVuOHuTP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Max Vekich” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"fvdVuOHuTP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CommissionerVekichWeb.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":375}
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                  of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          |                                                                                                                        |                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |                                                                                                                        |
|                                                     |                                                                                                                   |                                     |
| Date: May              12,              2006   | By:                                                                                                               | /s/ Richard              E. Bennett, Jr. |
|                                                          | Richard E. Bennett, Jr.Chief Executive Officer*( Chief Financial Officer and**Principal Accounting                Officer)* |
|                                                          |                                                                                                                        |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jermaine R. WOODBURY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-7359.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

Michael Wein, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, As*814sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine R. Woodbury seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel, 529*U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack, 529*U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Woodbury has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Woodbury’s pending motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We deny Woodbury’s motion to schedule oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Document

Exhibit 10.2
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Metrics for 2022


On February 9, 2022, the Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future performance-based restricted stock unit final awards for the 2022-2024 performance-period for participants, including executive officers, under the Company's shareholder-approved 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-226348).


The performance based restricted stock unit grant is a target opportunity; however, participants will have the opportunity to earn a maximum of up to 200% of the target.  The performance based restricted stock unit grant has a three-year performance period (2022-2024), after which the Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee will determine the final award based on corporate performance-to-objectives. The maximum performance level that can be achieved for any single metric for the 2022 Performance Unit grants is 200%. 100% of the final award will be based on financial metrics and can be modified by up to +/-25% based on relative Total Shareholder Return of Ford’s common stock compared to a peer group of companies over the three-year performance period.  The metrics and weightings are summarized below:






						
	Financial Metrics – 100%
Company Adjusted Free Cash Flow
Company Adjusted EBIT Margin
External Annual ROIC
	Weighting
50%
30%
20%

	

Total Shareholder Return
	

Modifier

	Total Shareholder Return (TSR)	+/- 25%
EXHIBIT 99.14

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Southern Group  International,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"). I, Jon Nix, President and CEO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Jon Nix
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Jon Nix, President & CEO

Dated:  5/16/03
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Now Accepts Online Payments","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WLq6cmL2Eo\"><a href=\"\/fmc-now-accepts-online-payments\/\">FMC Now Accepts Online Payments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-now-accepts-online-payments\/embed\/#?secret=WLq6cmL2Eo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Now Accepts Online Payments” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"WLq6cmL2Eo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of AudioStocks, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis J. Leung,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following
      pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Luis J. Leung


Luis
      J.
      Leung


President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





July
      9,
      2007
EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



                            MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                           Mattson International, Inc.

                           Mattson Wet Products, Inc.

                         Steag Electronic Systems, Inc.

                                Steag Cutek, Inc.

                         Mattson Thermal Products, Inc.

                                RF Services, Inc.

                             Steag CVD Systems, Ltd.

                      Mattson Technology Center KK (Japan)

                         Mattson International Korea Co.

                    Mattson Technology of Singapore Pte. Ltd.

                        Mattson International Inc. Taiwan

                Steag Electronic Systems SE Asia Pte. Ltd. Taiwan

                         Mattson Technology Holding GmbH

                           Mattson International GmbH

                         Mattson Thermal Products, GmbH

                           Mattson Semiconductor GmbH

                        Mattson International France SARL

                         Mattson Technology UK Ltd. (UK)

                          Mattson Technology srl Italy

             Steag Electronic Systems SE Asia Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)

                        Steag Electronic Systems UK Ltd.

                      Mattson Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

                    Mattson Technology Cayman Holdings, Ltd.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants August 22, 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BcgzZdbSj7\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-22-2022\/\">Applicants August 22, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-22-2022\/embed\/#?secret=BcgzZdbSj7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants August 22, 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BcgzZdbSj7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 35.1**




**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**













RE: **First
      Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-AA2**




We
      the
      undersigned authorized officers, of First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, and
      its
      wholly owned subsidiary, First Tennessee Mortgage Services Inc. (collectively,
      the “Servicer”) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, do hereby
      certify that:




1.  A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the period from March 1, 2006 and through
      December 31, 2006 and of the Servicer’s performance under applicable servicing
      agreement has been made under my supervision.




2.  To
      the
      best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      of
      its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period.







First
                Horizon Home Loan CorporationBy:
            /s/Kim
                YowellDate:
                03/01/07Name:
                Kim YowellTitle:
                SVP, Servicing ManagerFirst
                Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.By:
            /s/Terry
                L. McCoyDate:
                03/01/07Name:
                Terry L. McCoyTitle:
                Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group III,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                    /s/ William Colucci
                                    -------------------------------
                                    William Colucci, Treasurer
                                    BF Acquisition  Group III, Inc.
#### William L. CHAPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 06-56493.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 1, 2008.

William L. Chapin, Huntington Beach, CA, pro se.

Evan J. Davis, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Kenneth L. Greene, Esq., Kathleen E. Lyon, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendant Appellee.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

William L. Chapin appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) violated his due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), *Arrington v. Wong,*237 F.3d 1066, 1069 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action against the IRS because Chapin failed to establish any statutory waiver of sovereign immunity, and, thus, his constitutional claims are barred. *See Gilbert v. DaGrossa,*756 F.2d 1455, 1457-58 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that a suit alleging civil and constitutional claims against IRS employees in them official capacity is a suit against the United States and is barred by sovereign immunity absent statutory waiver); *Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States,*492 F.3d 1084, 1088 (9th Cir.2007) (stating that dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is proper where plaintiff fails to establish an “unequivocally expressed waiver of sovereign immunity”).

Contrary to Chapin’s contentions, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 “cannot by itself be construed as constituting a waiver of the government’s defense of sovereign immunity.” *Gilbert,*756 F.2d at 1458. Similarly, 5 U.S.C. § 702 “does not provide an independent jurisdictional basis; it only prescribes the standards for reviewing agency action once jurisdiction is established.” *Staacke v. United States Sec’y of Labor,*841 F.2d 278, 282 (9th Cir.1988).

Because amendment would be futile, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Chapin’s complaint without leave to amend. *See Albrecht v. Lund,*845 F.2d 193, 196 (9th Cir.1988).

Because we affirm dismissal based on lack of jurisdiction, we do not reach the other issues raised on appeal. *See Come**639*v. Caterpillar, Inc.,*503 F.3d 974, 984 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.