alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jorge Antonio DELGADO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70977.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 22, 2011.

Reza Athari, Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC, a Multi-Jurisdictional Firm, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel I. Smulow, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Antonio Delgado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *717(“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Delgado’s motion to reopen because the motion was filed more than six years after the BIA’s final order of removal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Delgado did not establish that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the time limitation, *see Iturri-barria,*321 F.3d at 897.

Delgado’s remaining contention is not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – December 16, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jiYggDbMbs\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-december-16-2016\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – December 16, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-december-16-2016\/embed\/#?secret=jiYggDbMbs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – December 16, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"jiYggDbMbs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 22, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"szjdtZhj9S\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-22-2021\/\">Applicants November 22, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-22-2021\/embed\/#?secret=szjdtZhj9S\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 22, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"szjdtZhj9S\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
2014 Year-End Information Quality Report 

Section I

I. Cover Sheet: Requests for Correction Received FY 2014 (Oct 1, 2013 to Sept 30, 2014)

Department Name:

Web page location of department information quality correspondence: http://www.fmc.gov/about/information_quality_guidelines.aspx

Agency Name Number of Requests Received

Federal Maritime Commission 0

TOTAL 0
SECTION II

II. If you have received correction requests or appeals and did not provide a final response in FY03-FY12

or FY13 please list those correction requests below and provide a detailed summary in secton IV of this

template.

Agency Name

Complete Still Incomplete Complete

Still 

Incomplete

Federal Maritime Commission

TOTAL 0 0 0

Number of Outstanding 

Requests from FY03-FY13

that were completed in 

FY14 or are still incomplete 

Number of Appeals 

Received in FY03-FY13

that were completed in 

FY14 or are still incomplete
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50666 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARMANDO RODOLFO DAVILA-VELASCO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-244-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Armando Rodolfo Davila-Velasco appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Davila-Velasco complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Davila-Velasco thus contends that his sentenceNo. 03-50666 -2- should not exceed the maximum terms of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Davila-Velasco acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     118,552,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,912,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   625,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           149,206,000
<PP&E>                                      32,088,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,649,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,531,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,502,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,072,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               199,531,000
<SALES>                                     16,858,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,858,000
<CGS>                                       18,459,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,459,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,023,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               175,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             364,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (24,860,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (24,860,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,860,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 53527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Node.Js Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 26, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Node.js Foundation 
(``Node.js Foundation'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, HackerOne, San Francisco, CA; Chef Software, Inc., 
Seattle, WA; Profound Logic, Dayton, OH; and Keymetrics, Inc., Paris, 
FRANCE, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Node.js Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 17, 2015, Node.js Foundation filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on September 28, 2015 (80 FR 58297).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 14, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 7, 2017 (82 FR 42363).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-24771 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
#### Margarita VIZCARRA DE BASILIO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74362.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 22, 2011.

Brenda Carolina Diaz, Esquire, Phung Miyamoto & Diaz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Samia Naseem, John Clifford Cunningham, I, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAS-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*709Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Margarita Vizcarra de Basilio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo questions of law. *Ha-mazaspyan v. Holder,*590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Vizcarra de Basilio’s motion to reopen because the evidence Vizcarra de Basilio submitted with her motion does not compel the conclusion that she suffered from a serious illness sufficient to establish an exceptional circumstance that would excuse her failure to appear. *See Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft,*298 F.3d 888, 891-92 (9th Cir.2002).

The BIA did not err by declining to consider the new evidence Vizcarra de Basilio submitted on appeal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(iv); *see also Matter of Gri-jalva,*21 I. & N. Dec. 27, 36 (BIA 1995) (the BIA will not remand to the IJ for consideration of evidence submitted on appeal that was available and could have been presented along with a motion to reopen filed with the IJ).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.3

Certifications

I, H. Lynn Massingale, Chief Executive Officer of Health Finance Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Finance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/s/    H. LYNN MASSINGALE,
M.D.H. Lynn Massingale Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 10, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Irwin Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Evolve One, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Evolve One, Inc.

September 15, 2005
                                        By: /s/ Irwin Horowitz
                                        Irwin Horowitz,
                                        President, Principal Executive Officer,
                                        and Principal Accounting and
                                        Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Evolve One, Inc. and will be retained by Evolve One, Inc. and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.
Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WF1

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

Al       19,496,527.32       61,621,276.87           0.00       363,584,723.13
A2A       4,535,473.05       77,223,984.74           0.00        60,833,015.26
A2B       1,681,601.49                0.00           0.00        40,501,000.00
A2C       2,457,256.14                0.00           0.00        58,527,000.00
A2D       2,587,655.07                0.00           0.00        58,251,000.00
A2E       1,688,712.93                0.00           0.00        37,021,000.00
A2F       1,566,805.14                0.00           0.00        36,929,000.00
CE                0.00                0.00           0.00         6,858,438.78
M1        1,279,181.34                0.00           0.00        28,313,000.00
M2          760,732.83                0.00           0.00        16,302,000.00
M3          489,478.23                0.00           0.00         9,438,000.00
M4          225,225.00                0.00           0.00         4,290,000.00
M5          225,225.00                0.00           0.00         4,290,000.00
P           896,429.90                0.00           0.00               100.00
R                 0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00
RX                0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00