alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KIAN HWA KWEE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75901.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2008.*

Filed May 8, 2008.

Cindy S. Chang, Esq., Law Offices of Cindy S. Chang, Walnut, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Margaret K. Taylor, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Kian Hwa Kwee, a citizen of Indonesia of Chinese descent, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA) final order of removal and denial of eligibility for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), and deny the petition for review.

Because the BIA expressly adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s (IJ) entire decision, we review the IJ’s decision as if it were that of the BIA. *Abebe v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). The IJ’s determinations that a petitioner is not eligible for withholding of removal is reviewed under the substantial evidence standard, and reversal is proper only if the evidence compels a contrary result. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); *Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 966 (9th Cir.1998). Adverse credibility findings are also reviewed for substantial evidence, though a credibility determination must be supported by “specific and cogent” reasons, and any noted inconsistencies in the petitioner’s testimony must “go to the heart of the asylum claim.” *Kaur v. Ashcroft,*379 F.3d 876, 884 (9th Cir.2004) (citation and quotation omitted).

Kwee argues that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding is unsupported by substantial evidence. To the contrary, the IJ gave “specific and cogent” reasons for his adverse credibility finding. *Id.*The IJ cited Kwee’s vague and contradictory testimony with respect to the two alleged incidents of persecution in Indonesia. The inconsistencies in Kwee’s testimony, involving the sole incidents of alleged persecution Kwee experienced, were not minor, but rather went “to the heart” of his claim. *Pal v. INS,*204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000).

Because Kwee’s testimony was properly discredited, and because he does not argue that any other evidence supports his claim, *721we affirm the IJ’s finding that he was ineligible for withholding of removal. *Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254-55 (9th Cir.2003).

REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Hermes MACEDO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76659.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2008.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Stephen Eckdish, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Greg D. Mack, OIL, Edward E. Wiggers, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Hermes Macedo (“Macedo”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) denial of his applications for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) and under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1

The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) correctly found Macedo ineligible for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the INA because he was not persecuted on account of a protected ground. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b). Substantial evidence underlies the IJ’s finding that Macedo never expressed any affirma*560tive political belief, and that Josias de Oliveira Lula Filho (“Oliveira”) never imputed any such belief to Macedo. *See Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*282 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2000). Instead, Oliveira irrationally blames Macedo for his wife’s death, and he appears determined to exact revenge for personal, not political, reasons.

This reality also dooms Macedo’s argument that he has been persecuted as a member of a protected social class: former police officers. Since there is no evidence that any other former officers have been targeted by Oliveira, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Oliveira was motivated by a personal vendetta and not by the characteristics of Macedo’s social group. *See In re C-A-,*23 I. & N. Dec. 951, 958-59 (BIA 2006).

The IJ rejected Macedo’s CAT application on alternative grounds. In this appeal, we are only concerned with the IJ’s finding that Macedo failed to carry his burden to establish that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if he relocated to some part of Brazil other than Goiánia. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(3)(ii). Given that Macedo was attacked only in Goiánia and that he lived without incident for several years in Goiánia’s countryside, we cannot say the record compels a contrary conclusion.

DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Macedo does not appeal the denial of his asylum application.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Realogy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Richard A. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Anthony E. Hull, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ RICHARD A. SMITH   
|RICHARD A. SMITH       
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|March 25, 2011         



|                            
|----------------------------
|/S/ ANTHONY E. HULL         
|ANTHONY E. HULL             
|EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     
|March 25, 2011
OrgNo OrgName Reason for Action License No. Termination Date Comments

029011 ARISEA LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 029011N 5/26/2023

013704 BRIZ FORWARDING, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 004026F 5/5/2023

026042 CARIBBEAN LOGISTICS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 026042NF 5/3/2023

024911 CENTURY MARINE CORPORATION FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 024911NF

5/3/2023 OFF             

5/24/2023 NVOCC

024912 CONTAINER SHIPPING, LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 024912N 4/17/2023

028914 GIANT XPO LOGISTICS, L.L.C. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028914NF 5/14/2023

026511 GT CARRIERS, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026511F 5/18/2023

031588 INT'L IMPEX SERVICE INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 031588NF 5/22/2023

010617 JOEY OH FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 010617N 5/11/2023

027730 JOHNSON WANG FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 027730N 5/10/2023

031587 KASPERSON LOGISTICS LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 031587N 5/15/2023 OFF 031587F REMAINS ACTIVE

004226 LE MARE TRANSPORT, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 000425F 5/22/2023

028805 MACH 1 AIR SERVICES, LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 004036NF 3/31/2023

031628 MOA GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028337NF 5/20/2023

029107 MUNDO NUEVO USA LOGISTICS, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 029107NF 5/12/2023

022035 OCEAN LINE LOGISTICS INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 022035F 5/28/2023 NVOCC 022035N REMAINS ACTIVE

024291 RAIN LOGISTICS CO.,LTD. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 024291N 5/10/2023

017340 RELIABLE CARGO EXPRESS INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 017340N 5/3/2023

028212 RENOBUILD INTERNATIONAL INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028212NF 4/19/2023

028253 RUMAR IMPORT & EXPORT LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028253NF 5/1/2023

023525 SICOMEX INTERNATIONAL CORP FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 023525F 1/16/2021

030421 SMART VIEWS FINANCIALS, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 030421NF 5/11/2023

027723 UTS CARGO, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 027723NF 5/11/2023

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

May 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1134

DAVID STANLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

LAZARON VENTURES, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

versus

GERALD LEE GRAY; PAUL DARRELL SMITH; J. ROBERT

STUMP; J. JACK KENNEDY, JR.; CAROLINE STEVENS;

COMMUNITY BASED CORRECTIONS; COUNTY OF WISE,

VIRGINIA, a public entity; GREGORY KALLEN;

BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, INCORPORATED;

ANTHONY E. COLLINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief

District Judge. (2:06-cv-00031-jpj)

Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

David Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW

FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Daniel Robert Bieger, COPELAND &

BIEGER, PC, Abingdon, Virginia; George Walerian Chabalewski, James

Van Ingold, James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Tarek F.M. Saad, HOLLAND

& HART, LLP, Denver, Colorado; Michael Edward Anderson, MORRISON &

FOERSTER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Mark B. Wiletsky, HOLLAND & HART,

Boulder, Colorado, for Appellees. Anthony E. Collins, Appellee Pro

Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

David Kim Stanley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying

his motions to amend his complaint and to name defendant John Doe,

and dismissing his state law claims without prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Stanley v. Gray, No. 2:06-cv-00031-jpj

(W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133949 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133949 

 COA: 265417 

Macomb CC: 2004-003514-FC 

EARL HICKERSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"February 2023 Revocations & Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cIoPzlAiH6\"><a href=\"\/oti\/february-2023-revocations-surrenders\/\">February 2023 Revocations & Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/february-2023-revocations-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=cIoPzlAiH6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“February 2023 Revocations & Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"cIoPzlAiH6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/catiemegan\/","title":"Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri – Remarks Association of Transportation Law Professionals Transportation Forum XV","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3upnLHDIFN\"><a href=\"\/acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-remarks-association-of-transportation-law-professionals-transportation-forum-xv\/\">Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri – Remarks Association of Transportation Law Professionals Transportation Forum XV<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-remarks-association-of-transportation-law-professionals-transportation-forum-xv\/embed\/#?secret=3upnLHDIFN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri – Remarks Association of Transportation Law Professionals Transportation Forum XV” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3upnLHDIFN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-169341) of Volcano Corporation and in the related Prospectus for the registration of common stock,preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-165346) of Volcano Corporation and in the related Prospectus for the registration of common stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-172119) of Volcano Corporation pertaining to the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-136655) pertaining to the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan of VolcanoCorporation, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-145761) pertaining to the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan and 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Volcano Corporation, and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-149761)pertaining to the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Volcano Corporation of our report dated March 5, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Volcano Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Sacramento, California 

February 28, 2011
Exhibit 31.1

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Bosso, certify that:

       1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.;

       2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

       3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

       4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

       	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

       	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

       	c)	disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

       5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of our internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or other persons
performing the equivalent functions):

       	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and


<PAGE>

        b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 18, 2005


/S/ WILLIAM BOSSO
--------------------------------------
William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer