alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – September 18, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hBbw0GuTdD\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-september-18-2015\/\">License Applicants – September 18, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-september-18-2015\/embed\/#?secret=hBbw0GuTdD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – September 18, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"hBbw0GuTdD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.**

**t****2667 CAMINO DEL RIO S. PLAZA B t****SAN DIEGO t****CALIFORNIA 92108 t**
**t****TELEPHONE (858)722-5953 t****FAX (858) 761-0341  t****FAX (858) 764-5480**
**t****E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com********t**

** **

 

  
 

 

June 15, 2010

***To Whom It May Concern:***

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form 10-K of PTM Publications Incorporated of our report dated on June 15, 2010, with respect to the audited financial statements of PTM Publications Incorporated, included in Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Chang G. Park

____________________________                                               

Chang G. Park, CPA
 
 

 

 

 

**Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants**

**Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board**
#### Bryon NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GC SERVICES, LP, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-17811.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 1, 2011.

Filed March 24, 2011.

Marshall Meyers, Esquire, Weisberg & Meyers LLC, Phoenix, AZ, Aaron D. Rad-bil, Weisberg & Meyers LLC, Cooper City, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Victoria Orze, Esquire, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Bryon Nichols appeals from the district court’s judgment, following partial summary judgment and a jury trial, in his action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act against GC Services, LP. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *745We review de novo both a grant and a denial of summary judgment. *Padfield v. AIG Life Ins. Co.,*290 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for GC Services on Nichols’s claim that GC Services improperly continued to communicate with him after he sent a cease-and-desist letter, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(c), because Nichols failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether GC Services had received his letter. GC Services had no record of having received the letter, and Nichols testified in his deposition that he mailed the letter by certified mail, return receipt requested, but that he did not receive a return receipt. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1692e(c) (“notification shall be complete upon receipt” if made by mail); *see also Busquets-Ivars v. Ashcroft,*333 F.3d 1008, 1009 (9th Cir.2003) (citing *Mulder v. Comm’r,*855 F.2d 208, 212 (5th Cir.1988) (“While it is presumed that a properly-addressed piece of mail placed in the care of the Postal Service has been delivered, no such presumption of delivery exists for certified mail when the requested return receipt is not received by the sender.”)).

We do not review the district court’s denial of summary judgment regarding Nichols’s claim that GC Services improperly threatened him, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(5), because the denial was “based on a disputed issue of fact, and that issue of fact was decided in a subsequent trial.” *Banuelos v. Constr. Laborers’ Trust Funds for S. Cal.,*382 F.3d 897, 902-03 (9th Cir.2004); *see also Baker v. G.C. Servs. Corp.,*677 F.2d 775, 779 (9th Cir. 1982) (whether creditor’s conduct constitutes a threat under § 1692e is a factual determination).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Consent of Lee P. Gochnour





I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the El Morro Project, Region III, Chile,” dated March 23, 2012, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.








Dated this 28th day of March, 2014








“Lee P. Gochnour”Name:
Lee P. Gochnour, MMSA QPTitle:
Associate Principal Environmental Scientist
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-4CB
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-4CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Arnold Hantman, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of SFBC International, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004



/s/ ARNOLDHANTMAN

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Transition Report of U-Swirl, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ulderico Conte, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 13, 2014
/s/ Ulderico ConteUlderico Conte, Chief Executive Officer and interim 
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and interim Principal 
Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of American Home Mortgage
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


        /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
--------------------------------------
Stephen A. Hozie
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Geoffrey VON KINDER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30356.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 2010.

Filed Nov. 10, 2010.

Edward Eric Zink, Esquire, Special Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of The U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jack E. Sands, Esquire, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: THOMAS and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable David Alan Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Geoffrey Von Kinder appeals his sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Kinder argues on appeal that the district court erred in determining under the modified categorical approach that his prior conviction for burglary of a cabin was a “crime of violence” supporting a base offense level of 20 under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). Specifically, Kinder contests the district court’s conclusion that the cabin burglarized was a dwelling as defined by U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2).

We conclude that the Information and Sentencing Order from Kinder’s prior conviction for burglary were sufficient for a finding under the modified categorical approach that the structure burglarized was a dwelling. *United States v. Bonat,*106 F.3d 1472, 1476 (9th Cir.1997) (“We have previously decided that in determining if a defendant pled guilty to generic burglary, considering the indictment and the judgment of conviction does not constitute a *210factual inquiry forbidden by *Taylor [v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990)].” (citing *United States v. O’Neal,*937 F.2d 1369, 1373 (9th Cir.1991), *superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized in United States v. Huffhines,*967 F.2d 314, 321 (9th Cir.1992))). Accordingly, Kinder’s past conviction qualified as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), and the district court did not err in applying a base offense level of 20 to Kinder’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Consent of Dennis Bergen
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 27th day of March, 2013
 
 
 “Dennis Bergen”Name:
Dennis BergenTitle:
P. Eng. and Principal Geologistfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
 
 RPA Inc.1130 Pender Street Suite 388 | Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 4A4| T+1 (604) 602 6767 www.rpacan.com
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 6440** 

EUGENE DOUGLAS, JR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; MAJOR DOUGLAS CLOMAN; INTERNAL INVESTIGATION UNIT; WARDEN KATHLEEN S. GREEN; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; ASS. WARDEN VICTORIA BURKHARD; MICHAEL KING, Chief of Security; CAPTAIN WALTER S. HOLMES; LT. D. BARNES; LT. SHEILA BROWN

KING; CAPTAIN C. TYLER; J. CHATHAM, Mailroom; SGT. PAUL ZIOLKOWSKI; OFFICER CHARLES WESTBROOK; LT. B. POLK; SGT. COPELAND; OFFICER D. CULLOTTA; SGT. GREGORY WARD; OFFICER COPE; OFFICER M. PARKER; OFFICER JONES; OFFICER CHRISTINA CARTER; SGT. BALDERSON; OFFICER BROMLEY; CORRECTIO NAL MEDICAL SERVICE; DR. BAHANNA; CMS MEDICAL CONTRACTOR; MARYAM MESSAFORTH; OFFICER MCGEE; OFFICER STERLING; OFFICER MERRIT; OFFICER DAVIS; OFFICER GUNTER; OFFICER ASHBY; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER WOOTEN; OFFICER TURNER; OFFICER WHITTINGTON; OFFICER BYRD; NU RSE KATHY KILLMAN; NURSE KENYA; NURSE NIXEN; MARY COOPER; BRIAN BOZEMAN; OFFICER MISTER; OFFICER PERSINGER; OFFICER HARMON; OFFICER AHALT; OFFICER BAILY ,
Defendants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryl and , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv
- 00255

- DKC )

Submitted : July 19, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eugene Douglas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland ; Philip Melton Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Eugene Douglas, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s

order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by th e district

court. Douglas v. Maynard , No. 8:11

- cv
- 00255

- DKC (D. Md. Feb.

9, Feb. 21, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the

d ecisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document

                                    [Date], 2022


Dear [Crewleader],


JetBlue is successful because of Crewleaders like you who demonstrate passion, dedication, and a commitment to balancing the interests of our Company, Customers and Shareholders.


As you likely appreciate, the impact of COVID-19 has created an incredibly challenging period for our Company, our industry, and all of us as individuals. That said, we want to recognize your significant efforts and contributions with an Executive Retention Award (“Award”) and encourage your continued service to JetBlue.


Executive Retention Award: You will be eligible to receive a one-time bonus in the amount of [$___ ] on the later of (1) May 1, 2023, OR (2) 30 days following the lapse of CARES Act compensation restrictions, or subsequent legislation establishing similar limitations (such date, the “Payment Date”). This Executive Retention Award may be paid in the form of cash or fully vested equity at the sole discretion of the Board, or Compensation Committee if delegated by the Board, at the time of payment. Any payment in the form of fully vested equity shall be made from the Company’s 2020 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan with arrangements for tax withholding, including through reducing the number of shares deliverable in settlement of the award, to be consistent with the terms of such plan.


You must remain employed with or performing services for JetBlue through the Payment Date to receive payment of the Award. However, you will receive the Award on the Payment Date should JetBlue terminate your employment or services without Cause or if you terminate your employment or services with JetBlue for Good Reason, as defined in the Amended and Restated JetBlue Airways Corporation Severance Plan. Under any other circumstances where you do not remain employed with or performing services for JetBlue through the Payment Date, the Board, or Compensation Committee if delegated by the Board, may determine in its sole discretion whether you shall still be eligible to receive any payment of your Award.


If this Executive Retention Award is deemed to violate requirements of the Government Support1 compensation restrictions, either (1) payment of any Award shall be deferred until the company reasonably believes that any payment will not be prohibited under the Government Support restrictions, or (2) if deferral is infeasible, this Award shall be void to the extent necessary to comply with such requirements.  This Executive Retention Award is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code with respect to amounts subject thereto and shall be interpreted, construed and performed consistent with such intent.


Thank you again for your continued extraordinary efforts during this unprecedented time. We look forward to your future contributions and continued success here at JetBlue.   


Best regards,


Chief People Officer












1  “Government Support” means compensation limitations established under the CARES Act, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, the American Rescue Plan, or any subsequent legislation establishing similar limitations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         968,453
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,034,114
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             65,641
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     967,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,034,114
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,728
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,728
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,728
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                161,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (156,527)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (156,527)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (156,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.39)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>