alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Regulatory Relief for Service Contracts and NVOCC Service Arrangements, Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to Support","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BKoLvTYw72\"><a href=\"\/regulatory-relief-for-service-contracts-and-nvocc-service-arrangements-commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-support\/\">Regulatory Relief for Service Contracts and NVOCC Service Arrangements, Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to Support<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/regulatory-relief-for-service-contracts-and-nvocc-service-arrangements-commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-support\/embed\/#?secret=BKoLvTYw72\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Regulatory Relief for Service Contracts and NVOCC Service Arrangements, Commissioner William P. Doyle votes to Support” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BKoLvTYw72\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Surrenders December 13, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AREjpDZThM\"><a href=\"\/oti\/surrenders-december-13-2019\/\">Surrenders December 13, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/surrenders-december-13-2019\/embed\/#?secret=AREjpDZThM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Surrenders December 13, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"AREjpDZThM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7937

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERMAN HALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CR-01-353; CA-03-3039)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Herman Hall, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group IV,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                    /s/ William Colucci
                                    -------------------------------
                                    William Colucci, Treasurer
                                    BF Acquisition  Group III, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bertin Oliverez HERNANDEZ, also known as Bertin Olivares, also known as Bertin Oliveres, also known as Bertin Oliverez, also known as Bertin Olivarez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-20191

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 18, 2013.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Bertin Oliverez Hernandez, Houston, TX, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bertin Oliverez Hernandez *536has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Oliverez Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonffivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *536the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Selpa Construction & Rental Equipment Corporation (doing business as Selpa Construction Corporation), Third-Party Defendant.

No. 2010-5083.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 15, 2010.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 3, 2011.

Antonio Borres-Otero, Saldana & Saldana-Egozcure, PSC, of San Juan, PR, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Carlos Lugo-Fiol.

*509Jeffrey A. Regner, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Michael J. Elston, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC.

NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders October 14, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"shWCLMMgLH\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-october-14-2016\/\">Revocations and Surrenders October 14, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-october-14-2016\/embed\/#?secret=shWCLMMgLH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders October 14, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"shWCLMMgLH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jirka Rysavy,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date:       May 12,2008

 
|   | /s/ Jirka Rysavy                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jirka Rysavy                                       |
|   | Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 5.3

CONSENT OF DAVID W. RENNIE

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) of New Gold Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the headings Narrative Description of the Business  Mineral Projects  The New Afton Project and Interests of Experts in the
Companys Annual Information Form and to all other references to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.



|                    |  | 
|------------------- |  | 
|/s/ David W. Rennie |  | 
|David W. Rennie     |  | 

March 28, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2 —    Section 1350 Certification**     I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:      (1)     the    Form 10-Q    of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended September 30,    2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of § 13(a) or § 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and      (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended. /s/  ANDREW    A. CAMPBELL    Andrew A. Campbell    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: November 9, 2007     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall    not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of    Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as    amended. A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


DESCRIPTION OF UNWRITTEN CASH BONUS PLAN ADOPTED
ON JUNE 14, 2021


 


On June 14, 2021, the Compensation Committee of the board of directors
of Medicine Man Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) approved and adopted an unwritten cash bonus plan (the “Bonus Plan”),
effective beginning in the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.


 


Under the Bonus Plan, the Company will pay cash bonuses to manager-level
and above employees as well as the Company’s named executive officers if the Company (i) achieves at least 90% of a specified earnings
before depreciation and amortization target (the “EBITDA Target”) for the applicable fiscal year (the “EBITDA Bonus”),
or (ii) entered into binding agreement for, or consummated, acquisitions of dispensaries, cultivation facilities or other cannabis-related
assets, directly or indirectly, during 2021 (the “M&A Bonus”).


 


The EBITDA Bonus payments will range from 10% to 200% of the applicable
officer’s salary depending on the percentage of the EBITDA Target the Company achieves, as follows:


 


	Target Percentage Achieved	Bonus
    Payment Percentage
	90%	10%
	100%	20%
	105%	30%
	110%	40%
	115%	60%
	120%	80%
	125%	100%
	130%	125%
	135%	150%
	140%	175%
	145%	200%


 


Under the M&A Bonus, officers were eligible to receive up to 25%
of the applicable officer’s salary depending on the proportion of a stated target amount of acquisitions the Company entered into
or consummated during 2021. The Company exceeded the stated target amount of acquisitions for 2021, and, as a result, the Company paid
the full M&A Bonus to the eligible officers.
EX-34 (f)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471-3000
Facsimile (813) 286-6000

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities
transactions backed by residential mortgages and home equity loans, for which
the Company acts as Custodian (the "Platform"), as of September 30, 2006 and for
the period from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 excluding the criteria
1122(d) (1)(i)-(iv), (2)(i)-(vii), (3)(i)-(iv), and (4)(iii)-(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the
individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 1, 2007
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

July 2016

AE Eagle Freight Transportation (China) Limited

Org No.: 025511

Address: Units 13-16, 19/F., Tower A, Regent Centre

63 Wo Yi Hop Road

New Territories, 

Kwai Chung, Hong Kong

Termination: July 19, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

City Network Shipping Limited

Org No.: 016474

Address: Flat B, 22/F., Grandion Plaza

932 Cheung Sha Wan Road

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Termination: July 10, 2016

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

FG International Logistic LTD

Org No.: 023916

Address: 3/F., 11 BLDG., No. 505 Zhongshan S. Road

Shanghai, China 200010

Termination: July 15, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Jus Lordship Logistics Co., LTD.

Org No.: 024591

Address: Room 1812, Poly Central Pivot Plaza

No. 157 Linhexi Road, Tianhe District

Guangzhou, China 510623

Termination: July 15, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Jung Transworld Co., LTD.

Org No.: 025450

Address: #302, Migreen B/D

24, Chungjang-Daero 5 Beon-Gil, Jung-Gu

Busan, South Korea

Termination: July 20, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
Newport Cargo S.A.

Org No.: 022314

Address: Avda Americo Vespucio Oriente

No. 1309, OF501 Pudahuel

Santiago, Chile

Termination: July 01, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

PNL Networks Co., LTD.

Org No.: 022925

Address: 11/F. Samahn Bldg, 520 Teheran-Ro

Gangnam-Gu

Seoul, South Korea

Termination: July 22, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Sony Supply Chain Solutions (China) Limited

Org No.: 025512

Address: Building 11, No. 88, Maji Road

Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone

Shanghai, China

Termination: July 01, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Starline Multi-Trans (H.K.) LTD.

Org No.: 022491

Address: Flat 607, 6/F., Elite Industrial Centre

883 Cheung Sha Wan Road

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Termination: July 10, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Tisco (Shenzhen) Logistics Inc.

Org No.: 025715

Address: Room 1703, Shekou Building, Shekou New Street

Nanshan District, Guangdong Province

Shenzhen, China 518069

Termination: July 27, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Yamato International Logistics (HK) LTD.

Org No.: 023357

Address: Units 1608-1612, 161F, Miramar Tower

132 Nathan Rd, Tsim Shat Sui

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Termination: July 01, 2016 

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond