alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEPHANIE GALE KANTER,

Appellant,

v.

ADAM KANTER,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D2021-2080 & 4D2022-0634

[November 16, 2023]

CORRECTED OPINION

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Linda Alley, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE15-4139.

Doreen Inkeles and Randall Shochet of Shochet Law Group, Trenton,

for appellant.

John J. Shahady of Shahady & Wurtenberger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
2.2 End-of-Term Provisions. Prior to the end of the Term, the Company and theExecutive shall meet to discuss whether the Term should be extended. The Company shall have theright at any time, however, to give written notice of non-renewal of the Term. In the event ofnon-renewal of the Term by the Company and the Executive’s employment is terminated after the endof the Term, other than for Cause (as defined below), or Disability (as defined below) followingsuch notice of non-renewal, then such termination shall be treated as a termination without Causeand the Restricted Period (as defined below) shall be reduced to a period of one year posttermination of employment (the “Reduced Restricted Period”). During such RestrictedPeriod, the Executive shall receive 50% of the payments set forth in Sections 4.4(i) and 4.4(ii),subject to Executive’s signing and not revoking the release of claims as set forth in Section 4.6.For the avoidance of doubt, if the Company is willing to extend the Term and Executive does notagree to extend the Term, then upon such termination of employment at the end of the Term, theExecutive shall be bound by the restrictive covenants set forth in Section 5 below, the RestrictedPeriod shall not be reduced and Executive shall not be entitled to receive any severance benefitswith respect to such termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Section 2.2will not impact any payments or other benefits to which the Executive would then be entitled undernormal Company policies or the LTIP (as defined below) pursuant to the terms thereof.          3. Compensation; Benefits.               3.1 Salary. As compensation for all services to be rendered pursuant to thisAgreement, the Company agrees to pay the Executive a base salary, payable in accordance with theCompany’s normal payroll practices, at the annual rate of not less than $375,000 less suchdeductions or amounts to be withheld as required by applicable law and regulations (the “BaseSalary”). In the event that the Company, in its sole discretion, from time to time determinesto increase the Base Salary, such increased amount shall, from and after the effective date of theincrease, constitute “Base Salary” for purposes of this Agreement.               3.2 Incentive Compensation.               **3.2.1**Annual Bonus. Commencing with the 2008 fiscal year, the Executive will beeligible to receive a bonus with respect to 2008 and each later fiscal year ending during theTerm computed in accordance with the provisions hereafter. If, with respect to any such fiscalyear, the Company achieves “Consolidated EBITDA” (as defined below) of at least the percentageset forth in the table below of its business plan for such fiscal year, such bonus shall be thepercentage set forth in the table below of Base Salary with respect to the fiscal year forwhich the bonus (any such bonus, an “Annual Bonus”) was earned:   **Percentage of Consolidated**
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Visits Alaska as Part of Fact Finding 30","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zHtnMRgu44\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-visits-alaska-as-part-of-fact-finding-30\/\">Commissioner Sola Visits Alaska as Part of Fact Finding 30<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-visits-alaska-as-part-of-fact-finding-30\/embed\/#?secret=zHtnMRgu44\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Visits Alaska as Part of Fact Finding 30” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zHtnMRgu44\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.1


ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Form 10-QSB of AccuImage  Diagnostics  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Aviel Faliks,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 16, 2004


/s/ AVIEL FALIKS
_______________________
Aviel Faliks
Chief Executive Officer




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ACCUIMAGE  DIAGNOSTICS  CORP.  AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ACCUIMAGE  DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### David H. VERDINER, an individual, for himself and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCOTTRADE, INC., an entity of unknown origin, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-56655.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2008.*

Filed May 12, 2008.

Ryan D. Lapidus, Esq., Lapidus & Lapi-dus, Beverly Hills, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew M. White, Esq., White O’Con-nor Curry, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Thomas E. Douglass, Esq., Thompson Coburn, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

*752MEMORANDUM***

The facts of this case are known to the parties.

In accordance with *SEC v. Zandford,*535 U.S. 813,122 S.Ct. 1899, 153 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002), and *Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit,*547 U.S. 71, 126 S.Ct. 1503, 164 L.Ed.2d 179 (2006), as well as this Court’s recent ruling in *U.S. Mortgage, Inc. v. Saxton,*494 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2007), we conclude the commissions charged by Scottrade, which necessarily “coincided” with the purchase and sale of securities, fall squarely within the range that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act was intended to cover.

AFFIRMED.

***

 disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John Sadowski, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2006-A1 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Chase Home Finance LLC as Sub-Servicer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as
     Named Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Washington Mutual
     Bank as Named Servicer and Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.
     as Sub-Servicer.

     Dated:    June 5, 2008

     /s/ John Sadowski
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 10-50340, 10-50350

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mark Randolph Stelmach, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public *882Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jorge Delgado appeals the 18-month sentence he received following the revocation of his supervised release. Delgado argues that the revocation sentence was unreasonable because the district court ordered that 9 months of this sentence run consecutively to a 30-month sentence imposed for a separate illegal reentry conviction.

We have yet to determine whether sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release are to be reviewed under the “unreasonableness” standard of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Prior to *Booker,*we applied a “plainly unreasonable” standard. *See United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir.2005). However, we need not decide the correct standard today because Delgado’s sentence is appropriate under any standard. *See id.*at 120.

“The district court has the discretion to order that a sentence imposed upon the revocation of supervised release run concurrently with or consecutively to other sentences.” *United States v. Whitelaw,*580 F.3d 256, 260 (5th Cir.2009). The district court’s decision to run the revocation sentence partially consecutive to the sentence on the underlying charge was authorized by statute and is preferred under the guidelines policy statements. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3584; U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) & comment, (n.4.). Additionally, the sentencing transcript reflects that the district court at least implicitly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and when imposing Delgado’s revocation sentence. *See United States v. Gonzalez,*250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3157 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3157

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
 Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ``Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans 
                      Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              ALEXANDRIA, MINNESOTA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Alexandria, 
Minnesota, expected to open in September 2009, shall after the date of 
the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Max J. 
Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. Any 
reference to such outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Max J. Beilke Department of 
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 3, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3049 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to prohibit a former Member 

of Congress from making a lobbying contact under such Act on behalf 

of a client which is a Communist country, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. ROY, and Mrs. HINSON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to prohibit 

a former Member of Congress from making a lobbying 

contact under such Act on behalf of a client which is 

a Communist country, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Communist Coun5 tries Participating in Lobbying Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3049 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING LOBBYING CONTACTS BY FORMER 

2 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON BEHALF OF 

3 COMMUNIST COUNTRIES. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 

5 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) is amended by inserting 

6 after section 5 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 5A. PROHIBITING LOBBYING CONTACTS BY FORMER 

8 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON BEHALF OF 

9 COMMUNIST COUNTRIES. 

10 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other pro11 vision of this Act, a former Member of Congress may not 

12 make a lobbying contact under this Act, or any commu13 nication which would be a lobbying contact under this Act 

14 if it were not disclosed under the Foreign Agents Registra15 tion Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611 et seq.), 

16 on behalf of a client which, at the time of the lobbying 

17 contact or communication, is a Communist country or an 

18 entity owned or controlled by a Communist country. 

19 ‘‘(b) PENALTY.—In addition to any other penalty 

20 under this Act, any person who violates subsection (a) 

21 shall be subject to a fine of not more than $25,000 for 

22 each such violation. 

23 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, a ‘Communist 

24 country’ means a country which is treated as a Communist 

25 country under section 620(f) of the Foreign Assistance 

26 Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2370(f)).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3049 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to lobbying contacts 

3 under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 which are 

4 made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Considering CMA CGM Petition","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"13E8crmSVP\"><a href=\"\/fmc-considering-cma-cgm-petition\/\">FMC Considering CMA CGM Petition<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-considering-cma-cgm-petition\/embed\/#?secret=13E8crmSVP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Considering CMA CGM Petition” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"13E8crmSVP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants May 8, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vHeHGmbrdC\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-may-8-2020\/\">License Applicants May 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-may-8-2020\/embed\/#?secret=vHeHGmbrdC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants May 8, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vHeHGmbrdC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}