alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT MARCH 27, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [PUBLIS H]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ N o. 06- 1298 4

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ D. C. Docket N o. 98-00063 -CV -6 SHERNIKA HOLTON , SPENCER WILSON, SANDRA MCI NTYRE, MARY HILL, W IL LI E M AE LE W IS, SHARON BOSTICK, TH E T HO MAS CO UN TYBRA NCH OF TH E N AA CP, GLADYS SHOTW ELL, AU DRE Y L IN DE R, LI SAW EB B, JEN NI FE R H IG HT OW ER , EVELYNW ILKERSON, Pl ai nti ff s- Appe llants , ve rs us CITY OF THOMASVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, De fendant-Appellee.Plaintiffs have filed only a Petition for Rehea

ringEn Ba

nc. A pe tition for rehe aringen banc , * howeve r, “will also be treated as a pe tition for rehe aringbefor e the or igina l panel.” 11th Cir. R. 35- 5. Honora

ble J ohn R. Gibson, United States Circuit J udg e for t h e E i ghth Circuit, sit ting by ** desig nation. 2

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ ON PETI TI ON(S) FOR REHEARI NG *

Be fo re E D MO N D SO N , Ch ie f Judg e, T JO FL A T a nd G IB SO N , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. **

PE R CU RIA M: Brief ly stated, w e, in our m ore re cent opinio n (490 F.3d 1257 ) in this case, af fi rmedth e D i s t ri ct Co u rt ’s d ec i s i o n d ea l i n g wi t h wh et h ert h e s ch o o l d i s t ri ct ’s use of ability

groupin g either presently discrim inates intentio nally against black stu de nts or

r ef le ct s–pe r the Mc N ea l de ci sio n–the pr es en t r es ult of pa st unlaw fu l
se gr eg at ionin the dis tr ic t. Pl ai nti ff s say , in part , that w e w er e w ro ng t o r ep re se nt tha t, if pr es en t int en tio na l r ac ia l di sc ri m inatio n by the sc hool dis tr ic t ha s be enam oti va tin g f ac tor3

in the pr es en t r ac ia l i m

ba lanc e in c la sse s, the f

ed er al c ourts c oul d do nothin g if oth er c au se s a lso c ontri but ed

sub stanti al ly
. W e did

not int en d to say

that. T he opi nio n w ri te r w as shi ft ing be tw ee n tw o id ea s: p re se nt d isc ri m inator y int en tio n
an d pr es en t r es ult s of

pa st d isc ri m inatio n. St ill , it is hard to be a lw ay s c le ar . A nd w e do n ot w ishto be c onf usi ng. S o, if the opinio n–taken as a whole–can be re ad to say som ething li ke what plaintiffs sugg est, w e w rite today

to say that the opin ion sh ouldnot be read to have decided such a thing
. W e did not n eed to be or m ean to be innov ative. Fo r the abil ity

gr oupi ng, the dis tr ic t c ourt, a s am atte r of f ac t, ha s r ep eate dly fo und no p re se nt i nte nt t o di sc ri m inate on a cc ount of r ac e. G ive n th e w hol e
ev ide nc e, that f

ind ing is not

c le ar ly e rr one ous. E ve ry

thi ng w e w ro te la st July

m ust be take n inthat c ont ex t. W e stand b y our de ci sio n. Pe tit ionf or Re he ar ing DENIE D.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT: /s/ J. L
. E dm onds on

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ CHIEF J UDGE
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants'
auditors and the audit committee of registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 4, 2009

/s/ PETER R. HUNTSMAN Peter R. Huntsman Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-022
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George PERRY, a/k/a Fuzz, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7191.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

George Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Perry appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal case so that he may challenge alleged sentencing amendments by the court. We have reviewed the record and found no qualifying order for which he sought a motion to reopen the appeal period. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Adonis Berle WHITBY, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2011-3009.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 30, 2010.

Adonis Berle Whitby, Macon, GA, pro se.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Adonis Berle Whitby moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

*512It Is Ordered That:

The motion is granted.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3074 

To prohibit certain funding made available to the United States Agency 

for Global Media relating to provision of an open platform for China, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain funding made available to the United 

States Agency for Global Media relating to provision 

of an open platform for China, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 The short title shall be the ‘‘No Taxpayer Funded 

5 Platform for Chinese Communists Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3074 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FUNDING RELATING TO 

2 PROVISION OF AN OPEN PLATFORM FOR 

3 CHINA. 

4 (a) FUNDING PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any 

5 other provision of law, no funding made available to the 

6 United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) may 

7 be used to provide an open platform for representatives 

8 of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), members of the 

9 Chinese Communist Party (CCP), or any entity owned or 

10 controlled by the PRC or CCP. 

11 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

12 of the enactment of this Act, the USAGM shall submit 

13 to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

15 the Senate a report describing whether or not any of its 

16 broadcast entities, including its grantee organizations, has 

17 provided at any time during the five year period imme18 diately preceding such report an open platform for rep19 resentatives of the PRC, members of the CCP, or any enti20 ty owned or controlled by the PRC or CCP. Such report 

21 shall be made available on a publicly available website by 

22 the Federal Government. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Rahdi Njoto WAHJUDI, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70353.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed Decided May 15, 2008.

Sarah J.M. Jones, Law Offices of Sarah J.M. Jones, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a second motion to reopen a previous denial of an application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We review this decision for an abuse of discretion. *See Ray v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 582 (9th Cir.2006) (citing *Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.2004)).

We conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen because petitioner’s motion was untimely, as well as number-barred, and the petitioner has not provided additional evidence to support an exception to the numerical or time limits for motions to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) and (3). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary affirmance is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Doyle Observes Maritime Day 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3dh7xNFvMU\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-doyle-observes-maritime-day-2015\/\">Commissioner Doyle Observes Maritime Day 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-doyle-observes-maritime-day-2015\/embed\/#?secret=3dh7xNFvMU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Doyle Observes Maritime Day 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"3dh7xNFvMU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 





	Certificate
    of Amendment	Certificat
    de modification
	Canada
    Business Corporations Act	Loi
    canadienne sur les sociétés par actions


 





	 	Electra
    Battery Materials Corporation	 
	 	Corporate name / Dénomination
    sociale	 


 





	 	1095406-3	 
	 	Corporation number / Numéro
    de société	 


 


	I HEREBY CERTIFY that the articles of the above-named corporation are amended under section 178 of the Canada Business Corporations Act as set out in the attached articles of amendment.	 	JE CERTIFIE que les statuts de la société susmentionnée sont modifiés aux termes de l'article 178 de la Loi canadienne sur les sociétés par actions, tel qu'il est indiqué dans les clauses modificatrices ci-jointes.



 


 


 





	 	Isabelle Foley	 
	 	Deputy Director / Directeur adjoint	 
	 	 	 
	 	2021-12-06	 
	 	Date of amendment (YYYY-MM-DD)	 
	 	Date de modification (AAAA-MM-JJ)	 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 





 


 


 






     


     


    

 


 


 








	Form 4	Formulaire 4
	Articles of Amendment	Clauses modificatrices
	Canada Business Corporations Act	Loi canadienne sur les sociétés par
	(CBCA) (s. 27 or 177)	actions (LCSA) (art. 27 ou 177)


 





			Corporate
                                            name 

Dénomination sociale

First
Cobalt Corp.


 





			Corporation
                                            number

 Numéro de la société

1095406-3


 





			The
                                            articles are amended as follows

Les
statuts sont modifiés de la façon suivante
	 	 	 
	 	 	The
corporation changes its name to:


La
dénomination sociale est modifiée pour :


Electra
Battery Materials Corporation




 


 


 


 


 


 


 





			Declaration:
                                            I certify that I am a director or an officer of the corporation.

 Déclaration : J’atteste
                                            que je suis un administrateur ou un dirigeant de la société.


 





	 	Original signed by / Original signé
    par
	 	Ryan Snyder
	 	Ryan Snyder
	 	905-334-2827


 





Misrepresentation
constitutes an offence and, on summary conviction, a person is liable to a fine not exceeding $5000 or to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding six months or both (subsection 250 (1) of the CBCA).


 


Faire une fausse déclaration constitue une infraction
et son auteur, sur déclaration de culpabilité par procédure sommaire, est passible d’une amende maximale de
5 000 $ et d’un emprisonnement maximal de six mois, ou l’une de ces peines (paragraphe 250(1) de la LCSA).


 


You are providing information required by the CBCA. Note
that both the CBCA and the Privacy Act allow this information to be disclosed to the public. It will be stored in personal information
bank number IC/PPU-049.


 


Vous fournissez des renseignements exigés par la
LCSA. Il est à noter que la LCSA et la Loi sur les renseignements personnels permettent que de tels renseignements soient
divulgués au public. Ils seront stockés dans la banque de renseignements personnels numéro IC/PPU-049.


 





	 	IC 3069 (2008/04)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group V,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                 /s/ William Colucci
                                 ------------------------------
                                 William Colucci, President
                                 BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 7, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00341-CV
MESQUITE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant V. MARIA R. SALAZAR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-12678



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Nowe ll Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss appeal based on settlement. We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

190341F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

MESQUITE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant

No. 05-19-00341-CV V.

MARIA R. SALAZAR, Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-12678. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and N owell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER each party bear its own costs of this appeal as agreed.

Judgment entered May 7, 2019.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-21-00161-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2021-07817

Style: Six Brothers Concrete Pumping, LLC and Joseph Lowry

v. Martin Tomczak

Date motion filed*: 9/2/2021

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time

Party filing motion: Appellants Six Brothers Concrete Pumping, LLC and Joseph Lowry

Document to be filed: Appellants’ Supplemental Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 2, 2021

Number of previous extensions granted: None

Date Requested: 7 days

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 9, 2021

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

1. The supplemental brief of appellants, Six Brothers Concrete Pumping, LLC and Joseph Lowry, 

regarding the order denying the TCPA motion to dismiss is due September 9, 2021.

2. The response brief of appellee, Martin Tomczak, regarding the order denying the TCPA motion to 

dismiss is due September 30, 2021.

3. The reply brief of appellants, Six Brothers Concrete Pumping, LLC and Joseph Lowry, regarding both 

the temporary injunction and the TCPA motion to dismiss is due October 14, 2021.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 3, 2021
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 39 6 . CARLOS A. RAMI REZ v . THE STATE.

Th i s ap p eal was d o ck et ed i n t h i s Co u rt o n M ay 4

, 2 0 22

. Ap pel l an t ’ s b ri ef was

t h ereaft er d u e t o b e fi l ed o n or b efo re May 2 4, 2 0 22

. S ee C T

. O F A P P

. R. 2 3 ( a )
(“ Ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef s h al l b e fi l ed wi t hi n 20 d ay s aft er t h e ap p eal i s d o ck et ed

. ”). Each

n o t i ce o f d ock et in g i n fo rm s an ap p el l an t “ t h at fai l ure t o fi l e t h e en u m erat i o n o f erro rs

an d ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef wi t h i n t h e t i m e req u i red m ay res ul t i n t h e d i s m i s s al o f t h e ap p eal

an d /o r ap p ro p ri at e san ct i o n s .” C T

. O F A P P

. R. 1 3 ; s ee C T

. O F A P P

. R. 2 3 (a) (“ Fai l u re

t o f i l e wi t h i n [2 0 d ay s o f d o ck et i n g ]

, u n les s ex t en ded u p on m ot i o n fo r g o od cau s e

s h o wn , m ay res ul t i n th e d is m i ss al o f t he ap p eal

, an d m ay s ub ject t h e offen di n g p art y

an d /o r co u n s el t o s an ct i o n s, i ncl u d i n g c o n tem pt .”). Becau s e ap p el l an t h as n ei t h er

t i m el y fi l ed i t s i ni t i al b ri ef n o r t i m el y req u es t ed an ex t en s i o n o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o

s o , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DI SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. June 07, 2022

06/07/2022