alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 01N-0174]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “FDA Recall Regulations” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-827-4659.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 17, 2001 (66 FR 43263), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0249.  The approval expires on October 31, 2004.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                

Dated: December 7, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-30938 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"President Obama Re-Nominates Commissioner Khouri as FMC Commissioner","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vLxNqO5ApY\"><a href=\"\/president-obama-re-nominates-commissioner-khouri-as-fmc-commissioner\/\">President Obama Re-Nominates Commissioner Khouri as FMC Commissioner<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/president-obama-re-nominates-commissioner-khouri-as-fmc-commissioner\/embed\/#?secret=vLxNqO5ApY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“President Obama Re-Nominates Commissioner Khouri as FMC Commissioner” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vLxNqO5ApY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman International LLC (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/PETER. R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 11, 2005                                                   |  | 

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 53532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24764]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): November 16, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 9, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 374 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-23, CP2018-
45.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-24764 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Vilia Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Vilia Valentine     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Vilia Valentine         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"OIG Audits and Reviews - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cN5aUBnBLo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/inspector-general\/oig-audits-and-reviews\/\">OIG Audits and Reviews<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/about\/bureaus-offices\/inspector-general\/oig-audits-and-reviews\/embed\/#?secret=cN5aUBnBLo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“OIG Audits and Reviews” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"cN5aUBnBLo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"To improve FMC management and effectiveness, the OIG conducts audits and reviews of agency programs and activities. In general, these activities involve an examination and analysis of FMC bureaus or offices, programs, or operations. Current Reports Audit and Review Process The auditor may review, analyze, and verify agency records and obtain information by interviews, questionnaires, […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/FMCPIIAFY2023FMCR24-02.pdf"}
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-023
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0565

_________________ DESTINY CARTER n/k/a DESTINY WIEGAND,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ST ATE OF MONTANA, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER,

Defendant and Ap pellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Mike Menahan , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2021

04/28/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0565
#### Anthony Albert JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank CARHUNAGAN and Sandra L. La Fon, substituted for El La Fon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-55420.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 29, 2010.

Anthony Albert Jimenez, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Paul J. Coony, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Jimenez's request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony Albert Jimenez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 *194U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal based on the failure to exhaust and review for clear error its factual findings. *O’Guinn v. Lovelock Carr. Ctr.,*502 F.3d 1056, 1059 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

As a preliminary matter, we reject Ap-pellees’ contention that we lack jurisdiction because Jimenez’s notice of appeal was untimely. *See Solis v. County of Los Angeles,*514 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir.2008) (explaining timeliness of appeal where judgment was not set forth on separate document as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a)); *see also*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(7).

The district court properly dismissed the action because Jimenez did not properly exhaust the prison grievance process prior to filing suit. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d *368 (2006)*(“proper exhaustion” under § 1997e(a) is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); *see also Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 734, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (inmate seeking only money damages must complete any prison administrative process capable of addressing inmate’s complaint and providing some form of relief, even if the process does not provide for the recovery of monetary relief). We construe the dismissal of Jimenez’s claims to be without prejudice. *See Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir.2003) (dismissals for failure to exhaust administrative remedies are without prejudice).

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publi*194cation and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – March 31, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OumJ0VRf1z\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-march-31-2016\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – March 31, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-march-31-2016\/embed\/#?secret=OumJ0VRf1z\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – March 31, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"OumJ0VRf1z\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 10.1
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
BIO-PATH HOLDINGS, INC.
2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
This Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to that certain Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) of Bio-Path Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is adopted as of May 12, 2020.  All capitalized and undefined terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsection 18.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is authorized to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Board unanimously approved this Second Amendment to increase the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted to an Eligible Person during any calendar year under the Plan as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in connection with the foregoing, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
Subsection 4.2(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
1.“4.2 Maximum Award to Eligible Person.
(a)The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted to an Eligible Person during any calendar year shall not exceed 165,000. For purposes of this subsection 4.2(a), an Award that has been granted to an Eligible Person during the calendar year, but which is subsequently forfeited or otherwise cancelled will be counted against the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted to such Eligible Person.”
Except as amended and modified by this Second Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect, and the Plan and this Second Amendment shall be construed as one and the same instrument.
The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being the Second Amendment to the Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Board on May 12, 2020.
​
	 
	BIO-PATH HOLDINGS, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 /s/ Peter H. Nielsen

	​
	Name:
	Peter H. Nielsen

	​
	Title:
	President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	
	 
	


​
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTONIO ESTRADA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-434 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 29, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Christine Greider, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. VILLANTI, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel HOLMES, a/k/a Dan, a/k/a Big Dan, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7077.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 9, 2013.

*360Daniel Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Eric John Klumb; Matthew J. Módica, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Holmes seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. Holmes’ appeal may not proceed unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holmes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*