alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ W.      RUSSELL SMITH, III |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| W.      Russell Smith, III          |   |
| CEO                                 |   |
| January      20, 2009               |   |
#### JI RONG CHEN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-5347-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 23, 2008.

Sheema Chaudhry, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director; Ada E. Bosque, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, Hon. CHESTER J. STRAUB, and Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Petitioner Ji Rong Chen, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the October 31, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. *In re Ji Rong Chen,*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Oct. 31, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See Kaur v. BIA,*413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). “An abuse of discretion may be found ... where the [BIA’s] decision provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” *Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*265 F.3d 83, 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s motion to reopen as barred by time and number limitations. The BIA’s final order was issued in September 2002, but Chen did not file his motion to reopen until July 2006, *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Likewise, as Chen’s July 2006 motion was his second motion to reopen, there can be no dispute that the motion was number-barred. *See id.*As the BIA found, Chen’s motion did not qualify for an exception to the time or number limitation based on changed country conditions in China. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Chen submitted no country condition evidence; his motion to reopen simply provided additional evidence of his wife’s purportedly forced sterilization.1 Accordingly, as the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Chen *51failed to demonstrate changed country conditions, it did not err in denying his motion to reopen as barred by the time and number limitations. *See Wei Guang Wang v. BIA,*437 F.3d 270, 275 (2d Cir.2006); *see also Kaur,*413 F.3d at 234.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, Chen’s pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot.

1

. Where, as here, an alien files a timely petition for review from the denial of a motion, but not from the underlying affirmance of a removal order, we review only the denial of the motion. *Ke Zhen Zhao,*265 F.3d at 90.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, George
J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:
      March 12, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      CarterGeorge
      J. CarterPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 23.0**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

As the independent registered public accountants of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-136002 and No. 333-144420 of our report dated March 15, 2010,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Chicopee Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K ofChicopee Bancorp, Inc. 

/s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker 

Portland, Maine 

March 16, 2010 

 

57
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

LUIS MIGUEL NAVEDO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Although counsel may have 

been negligent in failing to promptly seek nunc pro tunc relief, Petitioner is entitled to a 

counsel-filed Petition for Allowance of Appeal. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122(B). Counsel is 

DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 53511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Submission for OMB Review; 30-Day Comment Request; Generic 
Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service 
Delivery (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development); Correction

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services, National 
Institutes of Health published a Notice in the Federal Register on 
November 9, 2017. That Notice inadvertently contained an error in the 
Supplementary Information section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jennifer Guimond, Project 
Clearance Liaison, Office of Science Policy, Reporting, and Program 
Analysis, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Room 
2A18, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 or call non-toll-free number (301) 496-
1877 or Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#165c7378787f7073643871637f7b79787256787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f4be919a9a9d929186da93819d999b9a90b49a9d9cda939b82">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 9, 2017, the Department of 
Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health published a 
Notice in the Federal Register on page 52067 (82 FR 52067) that 
inadvertently contained an error in the date of expiration. The purpose 
of this notice is to correct the expiration date to read: 10/31/2017.

    Dated: November 9, 2017.
Jennifer Guimond,
Project Clearance Liaison, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2017-24775 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Eugenia M. WOODARD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-20256.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2013.

Eugenia M. Woodard, Houston, TX, pro se.

Michael James Patterson, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eugenia M. Woodard, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. She filed this civil rights action against Texas Southern University (TSU), alleging that the University violated her civil rights by requiring her to repeat a course before receiving her degree. The district court dismissed Woodard’s action with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction under Eleventh Amendment immunity as argued by TSU in its motion to dismiss and as time-barred. Denying Woodard’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal, the district court determined that the appeal was not taken in good faith. In its order, the district court informed Woodard that she could challenge the court’s finding under *Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997).

By moving to proceed IFP, Woodard is challenging the district court’s certification that her appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202. Our inquiry into an appellant’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We may dismiss the appeal under 5th Circuit Rule 42.2 if it is frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Woodard does not challenge the district court’s reasons for dismissing her complaint or denying her leave to proceed IFP on appeal. Pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction. *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that issue. *Brinkmann v. Dall. Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). Because Woodard has failed to challenge any legal aspect of the district court’s disposition of the claims raised in her complaint or the certification that her appeal is not taken in good faith, she has abandoned the critical issues of *493her appeal. *Id.*Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. *See Howard,*707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, Woodard’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and her appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-029
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Exhibit 32.1



                      CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of SBT Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Martin J. Geitz, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  hereby
certify that:

     (i) The Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as
amended; and

     (ii) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/ Martin J. Geitz
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin J. Geitz
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 28, 2008


                                       69
Unassociated Document


    
      


      [LETTERHEAD
        OF STAF*TEK]

      


      


      PROMISSORY
        NOTE

      TO

      MRS.
        PHYLLIS L. BELL

      


      


      
        	
                $40,000.00

              	
                May
                  19, 2005

              


      

      


      


      For
        value
        received, STAF*TEK SERVICES, INC., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, (herein referred to
        as
‘maker’) promises to pay to the order of PHYLLIS L. BELL, (herein referred to as
        ‘payee’) on or before May 31, 2005 the principal sum of Forty Thousand and
        No/100 Dollars ($40,000.00) plus $100.00.

      


      Payment
        of this note shall be as follows: One lump sum payment of $40,000.00 plus
        $100.00 interest.

      


      Maker
        may
        prepay this note in whole or in part without penalty or surcharge at any
        time
        prior to the maturity date.

      


      The
        maker
        hereby severally waives presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest
        and notice to protest, and aggress that extensions of the time for payment
        may
        be granted without notice. In case of legal proceedings to collect this note,
        maker agrees to pay all court costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees to
        payee as prevailing parties in the suit.

      


      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is signed the 19th
        day of
        May, 2005.

      


      


      
        	
                /s/
                  Shelia Hobens

              	 	
                /s/
                  John H. Simmons

              
	
                Shelia
                  Hobens

              	 	
                John
                  H. Simmons, President, C.E.O.

              
	 	 	
                Staf*Tek
                  Services, Inc.

              
	 	 	
                4870
                  S. Lewis St., Ste. 250

              
	 	 	
                Tulsa,
                  Oklahoma 74105
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KEVIN LONELL SQUAIR,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D 1 8
- 87 4 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 6 , 2018 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Michael A. Graves, Public Defender, Brooksville, and Eric R. Tippin, Assistant Public Def ender, Brooksville, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the June 21, 2017 judgment and sentence rendered in Case N o. 15
- CF -001809, in the Circuit Court in and for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.
SAWAYA, EVANDER and BERGER , JJ., concur.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of G+G Retail, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 2, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael Kaplan
--------------------------------------
Michael Kaplan
Chief Financial Officer
September 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Downingtown Area School District : CASES CONSOLIDATED

:

v. : No. 92 C.D. 2022

:

Chester County Board :

of Assessment Appeals :

:

Tax Parcel No.: 33

- 5

- 43.3 :

:

Appeal of: Marchwood Apartments :

Owners LLC :

Downingtown Area School District :

:

v. : No. 93 C.D. 2022

:

Chester County Board :

of Assessment Appeals :

:

Tax Parcel No.: 33

- 5

- 43.2 :

:

Appeal of: Marchwood Apartments :

Owners LLC :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, Novem ber 27 , 2023

, having considered Appellee’s application

for reargument and Marchwood Owner Apartments’ and Chester County Board of

Assessment Appeals’ answer s in response thereto

, the application is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3050 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3050

 To increase the period of time a claimant under the Federal Employees 
 Compensation Act may supply supporting documentation to the Office of 
             Worker's Compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2021

Mr. Joyce of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Carson, and Mr. Stauber) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the period of time a claimant under the Federal Employees 
 Compensation Act may supply supporting documentation to the Office of 
             Worker's Compensation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kenneth Meisel Public Servants' 
Claimant Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN TIME-PERIOD FOR FECA CLAIMANT TO SUPPLY SUPPORTING 
              DOCUMENTATION TO OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Labor shall--
            (1) amend section 10.121 of title 20, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, by striking ``30 days'' and inserting ``60 days''; 
        and
            (2) modify the Federal Employees Compensation Act manual to 
        reflect the changes to such section made by the Secretary 
        pursuant to paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert G. Oberosler, Chief
Executive Officer of Theater Xtreme entertainment Group, Inc., hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2008:





(1) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.




Dated:
June 5, 2008





By: /s/ Robert
G. Oberosler


Robert G.
Oberosler


Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that
Section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
except to the extent that this certification is expressly incorporated by
reference into any such filing.