alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rudy HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank P. ALVARADO, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-16860.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 2010.

Filed Oct. 28, 2010.

Rudy Harris, Coalinga, CA, pro se.

Phillip Arthur, Esquire, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: KLEINFELD and GRABER, *181Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Rudy Harris appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendant Frank Alvarado, the only remaining defendant in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. We review de novo, *Serrano v. Francis,*345 F.3d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir.2003), and affirm for a different reason, *see id.*at 1076-77 (noting that we may affirm on any ground supported by the record).

Even if we assume that Plaintiff can establish that Defendant fired him to accomplish “ethnic balancing” and that doing so was unconstitutional, Defendant is still entitled to qualified immunity. California Code of Regulations title 15, section 3041.1(a), instructs inmate work supervisors to take into account “ethnic balance,” in addition to several other criteria, when assigning inmates to paid positions. Thus, Defendant was following an official regulation duly promulgated by California’s Corrections Standards Authority.

At the time of Plaintiff’s termination, we reviewed race-based prison regulations only to see that they were “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests,” *Armstrong v.*Davis, 275 F.3d 849, 873 (9th Cir.2001) (internal quotation marks omitted), rather than using strict scrutiny as the Supreme Court later instructed in *Johnson v. California,*543 U.S. 499, 504-05, 125 S.Ct. 1141, 160 L.Ed.2d 949 (2005). To date, no court has questioned the legality of California’s inmate hiring regulation or another like it. In these circumstances, any right that Plaintiff had was not “clearly established,” *Pearson v. Callahan,*555 U.S. 223, 129 S.Ct. 808, 815, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009), so Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. *Cf. Grossman v. City of Portland,*33 F.3d 1200, 1209-10 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that a duly enacted city ordinance that explicitly sanctions the conduct in question absolves an officer from knowing that his conduct was unlawful, except when the ordinance so patently violates the Constitution that a reasonable officer could not believe that it was permissible to enforce it).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chuck Bay, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2004	                                                                                                                                                                                                By:/s/ Chuck Bay        Chuck Bay
        Chief Executive Officer



[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kana Software, Inc. and will be retained by Kana Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### Andrew J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2005-7049.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 5, 2008.

Before PROST, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Andrew J. Sanchez, Jr. and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs each respond to the court’s December 5, 2007 order and request that the court summarily affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in *Sanchez v. Principi,*01-1035 (July 23, 2004).

The Board of Veterans’ Appeals determined that the criteria for a schedular rating greater than 50% for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) had not been met prior to July 1, 1997. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims vacated the Board’s decision with respect to the PTSD claim and remanded.*

This case was stayed pending the court’s disposition in *Roan v. Principi,*2004-7093, which was stayed pending the court’s disposition in *Sanders v. Nicholson,*487 F.3d 881 (Fed.Cir.2007), and its companion case *Simmons v. Nicholson,*487 F.3d 892 (Fed. Cir.2007). In *Sanders,*this court held that any 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. *Id.*at 891.

The court agrees that summary affirmance of the judgment vacating in part and remanding to the Board is appropriate in light of our decisions in *Simmons*and *Sanders.*

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The stay of proceedings is lifted.

(2) The judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims noted that the Board decision addressed two other claims that were not at issue in the appeal.
#### James D. WILKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. Inerio ALARCON; United States Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-6967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 9, 2013.

James D. Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James D. Wilkes appeals the district court’s order adopting as modified the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Wilkes v. Alarcon,*No. 1:11-cv-00131IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 2237861 (N.D.W.Va. May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification**
I, David Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings,Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ David Wilson   David Wilson   Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3022 

To modify the project for flood control, Redbank and Fancher Creeks, California, to allow a non-Federal interest to establish conservation pools, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To modify the project for flood control, Redbank and 

Fancher Creeks, California, to allow a non-Federal interest to establish conservation pools, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CALI4 FORNIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood control, 

6 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, California, authorized by 

7 section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to authorize the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:54 Jun 10, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3022.IH H3022

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3022 IH

1 retary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 

2 to allow a non-Federal interest to establish conservation 

3 pools in the Big Dry Creek Reservoir and Fancher Creek 

4 Reservoir. 

5 (b) STUDY AND PLAN.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—A non-Federal interest that 

7 intends to establish a conservation pool pursuant to 

8 subsection (a) shall— 

9 (A) perform any dam safety study that the 

10 Secretary determines appropriate to determine 

11 whether the establishment of such conservation 

12 pool will affect the flood protections of the 

13 project described in subsection (a) or be inju14 rious to the public; and 

15 (B) submit to the Secretary a plan for the 

16 establishment and engineering of such conserva17 tion pool that will not affect the flood protec18 tions of the project or be injurious to the pub19 lic. 

20 (2) REVIEW.—The Secretary may accept and 

21 expend funds provided by a non-Federal interest to 

22 review any study, engineering, or plan submitted 

23 under this Act to ensure that such study, engineer24 ing, or plan complies with Federal standards. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3022 IH

1 (c) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—The non-Federal share 

2 of the costs to study and modify the project described in 

3 subsection (a) to include conservation pools shall be 90 

4 percent. 

5 (d) AMENDMENT TO WATER CONTROL MANUAL.— 

6 The Secretary is authorized to revise the water control 

7 manual for the project for flood control, Redbank and 

8 Fancher Creeks, California, as necessary to meet the re9 quirements of this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"IPR Center welcomes two new partner agencies","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8UMIxeJ9KA\"><a href=\"\/ipr-center-welcomes-two-new-partner-agencies\/\">IPR Center welcomes two new partner agencies<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/ipr-center-welcomes-two-new-partner-agencies\/embed\/#?secret=8UMIxeJ9KA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“IPR Center welcomes two new partner agencies” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8UMIxeJ9KA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Margarito Lucas RODAS-LOPEZ; Elida Angela Gramajo-Reyes, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72642.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*697Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 6, 2008.

Jorge I. Rodriguez-Choi, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Stephen J. Flynn, Don G. Scroggin, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Margarito Lucas Rodas-Lopez and his wife, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part, grant in part, and remand the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that the untimely filing of Ro-*698das-Lopez’s asylum application should be excused due to extraordinary circumstances. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D); *see also*8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to his asylum claim.

In his opening brief, Rodas-Lopez did not address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the IJ’s denial of CAT protection. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256,1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

We cannot effectively review the IJ’s withholding of removal finding. The IJ did not consider whether Rodas-Lopez suffered past persecution, and therefore it is unclear whether Rodas-Lopez has a presumption of eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Recinos de Leon v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 1185, 1192-94 (9th Cir. 2005); *see also*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(1).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand this case to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. *See id.*at 1194.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0


                       PULASKI BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                        Six Months Ended            Three Months Ended
                                                          June 30, 2002               June 30, 2002
                                                     -------------------------  -------------------------

<S>                                                     <C>                          <C>
Net income                                               $ 792,775                    $ 443,678
                                                         =========                    =========

Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Basic                                               1,915,372                    1,916,192
     Plus:  Common stock equivalents                        31,602                       32,472
                                                            ------                       ------
     Diluted                                             1,946,974                    1,948,664
                                                         =========                    =========

Earnings per share:
     Basic                                                  $ 0.41                       $ 0.23
     Diluted                                                $ 0.41                       $ 0.23
</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – August 13, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"W7sd3r7LM7\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-august-13-2015\/\">License Applicants – August 13, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-august-13-2015\/embed\/#?secret=W7sd3r7LM7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – August 13, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"W7sd3r7LM7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants December 18, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"np0k4fgUw2\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-18-2023\/\">Applicants December 18, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-18-2023\/embed\/#?secret=np0k4fgUw2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants December 18, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"np0k4fgUw2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}