alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3119 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3119

  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2021

 Mr. Rush (for himself and Mr. Walberg) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Emergency Leadership Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRETARIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of 
Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) upon request of a State, local, or tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the 
functions of the Secretary described in section 203(a)(12) of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (as added by this Act) are 
performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants October 10, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pY5bFCoyBw\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-october-10-2023\/\">Applicants October 10, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-october-10-2023\/embed\/#?secret=pY5bFCoyBw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants October 10, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"pY5bFCoyBw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### In re: Clarence HICKS, Petitioner.

No. 07-7614.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 2008.

Decided: May 29, 2008.

Clarence Hicks, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition granted by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of delay in the district court. Finding substantial delay below, we grant the mandamus petition.

Following the district court’s ruling in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion filed by Clarence Hicks, Hicks filed a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). The district court entered an order in April 2006 addressing Hicks’s motion, dismissing some of the claims therein and ordering the Government to respond to the remaining claims. The Government responded in July 2006. Hicks sought leave of the court to reply to that response, which was granted on August 2, 2006. No further action has been taken in the district court regarding the Rule 60(b).

As we conclude that Hicks has established a clear and indisputable right to expeditious treatment of his Rule 60(b) motion, and no other adequate remedy is available, we find that he has shown his entitlement to the writ of mandamus. *See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is granted. The district court is ordered to act on the Rule 60(b) *237motion pending in case No. l:98-cr-00259-BEL-9; l:02-cv-02076-BEL within sixty days of the date of this opinion. We grant Hicks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION GRANTED.*
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Ytzhak Edelman, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 of theCompany (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   November 8, 2006 | /s/ Ytzhak  Edelman     |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                               | Ytzhak Edelman          |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LANIER WORLDWIDE FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  301,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    178,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               584,006
<PP&E>                                         481,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                 307,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,160,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          421,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           879
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,160,073
<SALES>                                        649,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670,633
<CGS>                                          412,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,179
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,501
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Assessment of Commission Action on Enforcement Matters Awaiting Reason-
to-Believe Consideration
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, 
at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Dayna C. Brown,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-24785 Filed 11-13-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – November 3, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FuO66uFSqi\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-3-2017\/\">Applicants – November 3, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-3-2017\/embed\/#?secret=FuO66uFSqi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – November 3, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"FuO66uFSqi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32

| | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Greenville First Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.     
| |  | Chief Executive Officer   
| |  | November 13, 2003         

| |  | /s/  James M. Austin, III
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | James M. Austin, III     
| |  | Chief Financial Officer  
| |  | November 13, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Nova Mu d, Inc

. , Appellant,

v.

Sandra H. Staley, Individually as Independent Executrix of the Estate of George G. Staley, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra H. Staley

, Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 14 7

- C V

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Winkler C ounty, Texas

(TC# 15,68 3

- B )

O R D E R

The Court has considered the Appellants’ joint motion to consolidate cases on appeal, and
concludes the motion should be GRANTED. The above styled and numbered cause shall be

consolidated with cause numbers 08

- 17

- 0014 5

- CV, styled Acme Energy Services, Inc. d/b/a Big
Dog Drilling v. Sandra H. Staley, Individually as Independent Executrix of the Estate of George G. Staley, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra H. Staley , 08

- 17

- 0014 6

- CV, styled Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. v. Sandra H. Staley, Individually as Independent Executrix of the Estate of George G. Staley, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for
Sandra H. Staley , and 08

- 17

- 00148

- CV, styled Acme Energ y Services, Inc. d/b/a Rig Movers
Express v. Sandra H. Staley, Individually as Independent Executrix of the Estate of George G.
Staley, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra H. Staley , for purposes of briefing and oral argument only.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd day of August , 20 1 7

. PER CURIAM

B efore McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.
​
​

Exhibit 4.9
​
AMENDMENT
This is to confirm the amendment to EMPLOYEE SECONDMENT AGREEMENT (TEP) executed on March 29, 2018 (the “Agreement”) between Toppan Electronics Products Co., Ltd. (“TEP”) and VTS-TOUCHSENSOR Co., LTD (“VTS”).
	1.
	The parties agree that the term of the Agreement shall be extended for additional two (2) years, ending March 25, 2023.


	2.
	Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge and agree that the Agreement will be terminated prior to the expiration date of the Agreement set forth in Article 1, if the parties reach an agreement in writing with respect to the transfer of TEP employees to VTS as employees of VTS.


	3.
	The parties agree to change the Schedule 1 as attached hereto. The Schedule 1 may be changed when having request from TEP and shall be discussed by both parties.


4.This amendment shall have the effect on March 26, 2021.
	5.
	Except as specifically provided hereinabove, both parties shall comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument as of the dated indicated below.
​
	​


	​


	​


	​


	​



	Toppan Electronics Products Co., Ltd.
	    
	VTS-TOUCHSENSOR Co., LTD.

	​
	​
	​

	Date:
	March 25, 2021
	​
	Date: 
	March 25, 2021

	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​

	By:
	/s/ Kazuhiro Takada
	​
	By:
	/s/ Mario Bernardo N.Santos

	Name: Kazuhiro Takada
	​
	Name: Mario Bernardo N.Santos

	Title: Representative Director
	​
	Title: Managing Director

	​
	​
	​



​
​

​



CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.
​
​

Schedule 1
[***]

​
*Order Entered March 1, 2011:*

#### *In re*Smith,

Docket No. 299300.

The Court, on its own motion, orders that the February 15, 2011, opinion is hereby amended. The opinion released as an unpublished opinion per curiam is amended to be an opinion per curiam for publication.

The Clerk’s Office is directed to provide a copy of this order to the Reporter’s Office along with a copy of the opinion per curiam.

In all other respects, the February 15, 2011, opinion remains unchanged, and the filing deadline for any additional relief shall run from that date. Reported at 291 Mich App 621.
#### Maria Socorro Gallegos MATIAS; Jose Jimenez Mendoza, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74120.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*242Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Stephen Shaiken, Law Office of Stephen Shaiken, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Kiley L. Kane, Esquire, Trial, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Socorro Gallegos Matías and Jose Jimenez Mendoza, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their request for a continuance and their application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance, and review de novo claims of due process violations. *Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ oral request for a second continuance because petitioners did not demonstrate good cause. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.2009) (considering, among other factors, the nature of the evidence excluded as a result of the denial of a continuance and the number of continuances previously granted). It follows that petitioners’ due process challenge fails. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring agency error for a petitioner to establish a due process violation).

We lack jurisdiction to the extent petitioners challenge the agency’s discretionary determination that they failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,*552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.