alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charlie Louis JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7364.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Charlie Louis Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Louis Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demon*226strating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**EXHIBIT      32.****2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (a) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                    |                                    |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Dated:                August 21, 2006 |                               | /s/                Steven D. Hargreaves |
|                                  | By:                Steven D. Hargreaves |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 242 (Monday, December 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 64987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Service Regulations Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service) will 
conduct an open meeting on January 24, 2002, to identify and discuss 
preliminary issues concerning the 2002-03 migratory bird hunting 
regulations.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 24, 2002.

ADDRESSES: The Service Regulations Committee will meet at the Arlington 
Square Building, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax 
Drive, Room 200 A/B, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Andrew, Chief, Division of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department 
of the Interior, ms 634-ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Representatives from the Service, the 
Service's Migratory Bird Regulations Committee, and Flyway Council 
Consultants will meet on January 24, 2002, at 8:30 a.m. to identify 
preliminary issues concerning the 2002-03 migratory bird hunting 
regulations for discussion and review by the Flyway Councils at their 
March meetings.
    In accordance with Departmental policy regarding meetings of the 
Service Regulations Committee attended by any person outside the 
Department, these meetings are open to public observation. Members of 
the public may submit written comments on the matters discussed to the 
Director.

    Dated: November 27, 2001.
Kevin R. Adams,
Acting Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 01-30997 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"February 2021 Revocations and Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9bgBcQ1hFJ\"><a href=\"\/oti\/february-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/\">February 2021 Revocations and Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/february-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=9bgBcQ1hFJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“February 2021 Revocations and Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9bgBcQ1hFJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated April 4, 2003,
appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Find/SVP,  Inc.  for the year
ended  December 31, 2002, in  Registration  Statement No.  333-22445 on Form S-8
(pertaining to the Find/SVP,  Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan);  and  Post-Effective
Amendment  No.  1 to the  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-8  No.  333-68315
(pertaining to the Find/SVP, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan).

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-43940 (pertaining to the Find/SVP, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan) of Find/SVP,
Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 4, 2003, that have been incorporated
by reference from  Registration  Statement No. 333-22445 on Form S-8 (pertaining
to the Find/SVP,  Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan),  and that  originally  appear in
this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Find/SVP,  Inc. for the year ended  December
31, 2002.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
April 4, 2003
Document

Exhibit 4.9


Summary of the 2021 Stock Options Plans
 
Stock options (options de souscription et/ou d’achat d’actions) are granted for free and entitle each holder to subscribe for new shares and/or purchase existing shares of our Company at an exercise price set at the time of grant.
 
Administration. Pursuant to delegations granted at our general meeting of the shareholders, our board of directors determines the exercise price, the aggregate number of stock options granted and the terms and conditions of the stock options, including the number of shares underlying each stock option, their vesting schedule and exercise period and delegates to the Chief Executive Officer the determination of the list of the beneficiaries and the number of stock options granted to each beneficiary, with the exception of the grant to the Chief Executive Officer, which is decided our board of directors.
 
Grants. Our stock options were granted to our Chief Executive Officer, executive officers and employees of our Company. A total of 201,875 stock options have been granted and accepted by the beneficiaries under three (3) plans in 2021, with different terms and conditions as set out below. We have one (1) stock option plan for French beneficiaries (SO 2021 C), one (1) stock option plan for our Chief Executive Officer (SO 2021 D) and one (1) stock option plan for U.S. beneficiaries that was designed to benefit from the “Incentive Stock Options” status (SO US 2021).
 
Underlying shares. The securities to which our stock options give rights are new ordinary shares of our Company. The number of ordinary shares to which each stock option gives right is one (1) new ordinary share.
 
The number of ordinary shares to which each stock option gives right can be adjusted, upwards or downwards, as a result of certain corporate transactions, such as rights issues.
 
Standard terms. Our stock options are exercisable during a period of seven (7) years following a three (3) year vesting period at the end of which the beneficiary must be effectively present in our Company or its consolidated subsidiaries (subject to exceptions) and subject to meeting the performance conditions that are assessed by our board of directors.
 
The terms and conditions of our stock options in respect of each of our plans are as follows:
 
																														
	 	 	Performance conditions	 	Assessment date(s)
of presence and
performance
conditions	 	Lock-up period
end date	 	Exercise
price
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SO 2021 C
 
	 	Internal performance (1)
 
	 	October 20, 2024	 	October 21, 2024	 	€2.61
	 	 	Internal performance (1)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SO 2021 D	 	 	October 20, 2024	 	October 21, 2024	 	€3.26
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SO US 2021	 	Internal performance(1)	 	October 20, 2024	 	October 21, 2024	 	€3.22


 

(1)         Based on the achievement of milestones in the development of our Company.
1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the NYSHEX Agreements","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FEewAGoDHt\"><a href=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-the-nyshex-agreements\/\">Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the NYSHEX Agreements<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-from-commissioner-maffei-on-the-nyshex-agreements\/embed\/#?secret=FEewAGoDHt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement from Commissioner Maffei on the NYSHEX Agreements” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"FEewAGoDHt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6599
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM S. GRAVITT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-89-310-A, CA-96-1843-AM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.William S. Gravitt, Appellant Pro Se. Quincy Leon Ollison, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United S tates v. Gravitt , Nos. CR-89-310-A; CA-96-1843-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 12 & 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"id":1045,"date":"2015-02-04T11:55:15","date_gmt":"2015-02-04T15:55:15","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1045"},"modified":"2018-08-14T11:56:00","modified_gmt":"2018-08-14T15:56:00","slug":"commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-11-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-11-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for February 11, 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>February 4, 2015<\/div>\n<h2>Sunshine Act Meeting<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Time and Date<\/strong>:<br \/>\nFebruary 11, 2015; 10:00 AM<\/p>\n<p><strong>Place<\/strong>:<br \/>\n800 North Capitol Street, N.W.<br \/>\nFirst Floor Hearing Room<br \/>\nWashington, D.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Status<\/strong>:<br \/>\nThe first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matters to be Considered<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Open Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Briefing on FMC Continuity of Operations Plan<\/li>\n<li>Briefing on FMC Information Technology Upgrade<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Closed Session<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Briefing on Los Angeles and Long Beach Port Infrastructure and Environmental Programs Cooperative Working Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 201219<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Contact:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Karen V. Gregory<br \/>\nSecretary<br \/>\n202-523-5725<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>February 4, 2015 Sunshine Act Meeting Time and Date: February 11, 2015; 10:00 AM Place: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W. First Floor Hearing Room Washington, D.C. Status: The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session. Matters to be Considered: Open Session... <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-february-11-2015\/\">Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26,4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1045"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1045"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1046,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1045\/revisions\/1046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – December 14, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"L3paojR6Ue\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-2\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – December 14, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-2\/embed\/#?secret=L3paojR6Ue\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – December 14, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"L3paojR6Ue\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### TRAFFIX DEVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKESIDE PLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2007-1482.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 14, 2008.

*973Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

It is ordered that the district court’s judgment is affirmed in all respects.

We note, however, that the district court improperly construed the term “knob” in U.S. Pat. No. 5,749,673 (“the ’673 patent”) to mean “a rounded protuberance capable of being gripped by an entire hand since the width of the rounded protuberance must be greater than the width of a shaft with sufficient length to permit all of the fingers of an average adult hand to be wrapped thereabout.” This construction was error. As the district court noted, “the purpose of the knob is primarily to prevent a user’s hand from slipping off of the end of the shaft.” ’673 patent col. 4, 11. 11-12. This does not mean that the knob must be large enough such that an average adult hand can be wrapped around the knob. All that is required is that the knob be large enough to keep a user’s hand from slipping off the end of the shaft. However, the district court’s erroneous claim construction does not affect its judgment of noninfringement.