Opinion issued November 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00 52 5
- CV

——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF J.M., B.L.U., B.L.U. , AND K.U . , Child ren

On Appeal from the 3 14 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 20 13
- 05 3 84J



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, S.P.M. , challenges the trial court’s final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child ren . Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that the appeal is without merit and there are no arguable grounds for reversal. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S.2

738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). We affirm the tria l court’s judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The procedures set forth in Anders are applicable to an appeal from a trial court’s order terminating parental rights when, as here, the appellant’s appointed appellate counsel concludes that there are no non - frivolous issues to assert on appeal. In re K.D. , 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.). Counsel has filed an Anders brief in which he concludes that, after a thorough review of the record, appellant’s appeal of the termination of her parental rights is frivolous and without merit. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; In re K.D. , 127 S.W.3d at 67. Counsel’s brief meets the minimum Anders requirements by presenting a professional evaluation of the record an d stating why there are no arguable grounds for reversal on appeal. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400. Counsel has certified that he delivered a copy of the brief to appellant and has informed appel lant of her right to obtain a copy of, and examine, the appellate record and file a response. 1 See In re K.D. , 127 S.W.3d at 67. Additionally, t his Court has notified appellant of her right to review the record and file a pro se response. Appellant has not filed a response.

1 Counsel subsequently notified the Clerk of this Court that, at appellant’s request, he sent her a copy of the appellate record.3

When we receive an Anders brief from an appellant’s appointed attorney who asserts that no arguable grounds for appeal exist, we must determine that issue independently by conducting our own review of the entire record. Johnson v. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs. , No. 01

- 08

- 00749

- CV, 2010 WL 5186806, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 23, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; see In re
K.D. , 127 S.W.3d at 67. We have independently reviewed the entire record and

c ounsel’s Anders brief and agree with counsel’s assessment that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 2 Attorney, William M. Thursland , must immediately send appellant the required no tice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 6.5(c). PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley , Huddle, and Lloyd.

2 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this ap peal and notify appellant that he may, on her own, pursue a petition for review in the Supreme Court of Texas. See In re K.D. , 127 S.W.3d 66, 68 n.3 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).