alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 17 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q/A of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended September
         30, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         sec.13(a) or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Andrew A. Campbell
                                          Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

Date: January 31, 2005

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John M. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Kana Software, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ John M. Thompson                    
|                        |  | John M. Thompson Chief Financial Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Bishop, Junior, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered December 15, 2016. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground, among others, that the action had been commenced after the statute of limitations had expired. The Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.</p><p>MVAIC's cross-moving papers established, prima facie, that the action had been commenced after the expiration of the three-year statute of limitations (<a href="../2008/2008_28157.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Kings Highway Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 19 Misc 3d 69</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2008]; <a href="../2009/2009_05107.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also 6D Farm Corp. v Carr</i>, 63 AD3d 903</a> [2009]; <a href="../2008/2008_02793.htm" target="_blank"><i>Island ADC, Inc. v Baldassano Architectural Group, P.C.</i>, 49 AD3d 815</a> [2008]; <a href="../2014/2014_51261.htm" target="_blank"><i>Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 44 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51261[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2014]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to the action's timeliness (<a href="../2004/2004_08087.htm" target="_blank"><i>see New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp</i>., 12 AD3d 429</a> [2004]; <a href="../2011/2011_52274.htm" target="_blank"><i>Precision Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 34 Misc 3d 126</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52274[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2011]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: July 12, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Nortia Capital
Partners,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period
ending  July  31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Harrysen
Mittler,   Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 8, 2004

                               /s/Harrysen Mittler
                               -----------------------------------------
                               Harrysen Mittler, Chief Financial Officer
                               Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jirka Rysavy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:         May 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Jirka Rysavy                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jirka Rysavy                                      |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Curtis K. JACKSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherri SCOTT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-17222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Curtis K. Jackson, Sr., Lovelock, NV, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*267MEMORANDUM **

Curtis K. Jackson, Sr., a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We vacate and remand.

After the magistrate judge dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, Jackson filed a motion in which he sought an extension of time to file an amended complaint and requested that the court send him a complete copy of his original complaint. Jackson attached to the motion an incomplete copy of the original complaint that the court had previously sent to him. The district court improperly construed the motion and attachment as Jackson’s proposed amended complaint, and dismissed the action. We vacate the judgment and remand for Jackson to be allowed leave to file an amended complaint.

Jackson’s request in his opening brief for a “recommendation that pro bono counsel be allowed” upon remand is denied.

Jackson shall bear his own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SOKO Fitness & Spa
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Tong Liu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
July 30,
2009                                                                                             
  By:  /s/ Tong
Liu


Name:
Tong Liu


Title:
Chief Executive Officer
















This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 861.

#### Hubert Hopkins, Petitioner, *v.*Heber C. Peters et al.

April 18, 1910.

Petition for a writ of *604certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

*Mr. F. R. Cornwall*and *Mr. L. S. Bacon*for the petitioner.

No appearance for the respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JORDAN FUNK, MICHAEL RESSLER, AND 

BRIAN RESSLER,

Respondents

v.

CHRISTY L. BRADLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 366 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Seeking Comments on Co-Loading Definition and Tariff Access Fees","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sQpgrsDkja\"><a href=\"\/commission-seeking-comments-on-co-loading-definition-and-tariff-access-fees\/\">Commission Seeking Comments on Co-Loading Definition and Tariff Access Fees<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-seeking-comments-on-co-loading-definition-and-tariff-access-fees\/embed\/#?secret=sQpgrsDkja\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Seeking Comments on Co-Loading Definition and Tariff Access Fees” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"sQpgrsDkja\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT
31.1





CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Lloyd
Lane, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Freestone Resources,
Inc.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
June 30, 2008





/s/ Lloyd
Lane


Lloyd
Lane


President
and Chief Executive
Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 65 9 . ALFRED STARLI NG v . J OE C. BI SHOP et a l.

Al fred St arl i n g , wh o i s s erv i n g a p ri s on s en t en ce fo l l o wi n g a 20 1 8 co n v i ct i o n

fo r arm ed ro b b ery , fi l ed a pet i t i o n fo r a wri t o f erro r qu o w a r r a n t o ag ai n s t s ev eral

i n d i v i d u al d efen d an t s u n d er O C G A § 9 -6 -6 0 et s eq

. T h e t ri al co u rt d i s m i s s ed

St arl in g ’ s p et i t i o n , an d St arl i n g fi l ed t h is d i rect ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct io n

. Un d er t h e Pri s o n Li t i g at i o n Refo rm Act o f 19 9 6 (“ PLRA”), an ap p eal i n a ci v i l

act i on fi l ed b y a p ri so n er m u st b e i n i t i at ed b y fi l i n g an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew. See OCGA § 42-1 2 -8

, cro s s -referen ci n g OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 ; Jo n es v. To wn s en d

, 2 6 7 Ga. 4 8 9

, 4 9 0 (4 8 0 SE2 d 2 4 ) (1 99 7 ). “ Co m p l ian ce wi th t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s

p ro ced ure i s ju ri s di ct i o n al

. ” S mo a k v. Dep t. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 21 G a. Ap p

. 2 5 7,

2 5 7 (4 7 1 SE2 d 6 0 ) (1 9 96 ). Becau se St arl i n g was i n carcerat ed wh en h e fi l ed t h i s ci v i l

act i on , h i s fai l ure to co m

p l y wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re d ep ri ves u s o f
ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s d i rect ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Jo n es , 2 6 7 Ga.

at 4 9 0 -4 9 1

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 04, 2019

12/04/2019
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JEFFREY LEE HAZELBAKER, ) DOC #C04914, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1494 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 12, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, Bartow, and Jean Marie Henne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Winter Haven, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, NORTHCUTT, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.