alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cleavon L. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles KING, J. Ford, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-11319

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 28, 2008.

Cleavon L. Allen, Avon Park, FL, pro se.

*848Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Florida prison inmate, brought this action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the appellee police officers for allegedly using excessive force in arresting him on August 26, 1997. The district court, acting *sua sponte,*dismissed his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) on the ground that his claim is barred by Florida’s four-year statute of limitations. He now appeals the court’s ruling.

There is no specific statute of limitations period for actions brought under § 1983. *Owens v. Okure,*488 U.S. 235, 239, 109 S.Ct. 573, 576, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989). Instead, the statute of limitations period for § 1983 claims is determined by the state’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims. *Id.*at 240-41, 109 S.Ct. 573. “Florida’s four-year statute of limitations [period] applies to” § 1983 claims. *Chappell v. Rich,*340 F.3d 1279, 1283 (11th Cir.2003).

Appellant’s § 1983 claim arose on August 26, 1997. He delivered his law suit to prison officials for filing on September 6, 2006, nine years later. His claim is time-barred.

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale Leo GLADUE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30463.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 5, 2008.

Carl E. Rostad, USGF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Evangelo Arvanetes, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dale Leo Gladue appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his *694guilty-plea conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); domestic abuse misdemeanant in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9); and possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Gladue contends that the district court proeedurally erred by failing to adequately consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In particular, he contends that the district court failed to consider his mitigation arguments. Our review of the record discloses that the district court did not explain why it rejected Gladue’s arguments in support of a lower sentence. We therefore conclude that the district court did not sufficiently explain its reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. *See Rita v. United States,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); *United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc) (holding that the district court should normally explain why it rejects a defendant’s specific argument tethered to a relevant § 3553(a) factor).

SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants September 13, 2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cE25GGZJVP\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-13-2021\/\">Applicants September 13, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-13-2021\/embed\/#?secret=cE25GGZJVP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants September 13, 2021” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"cE25GGZJVP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – October 2, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pf2nKWAgo5\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-october-2-2015\/\">License Applicants – October 2, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-october-2-2015\/embed\/#?secret=pf2nKWAgo5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – October 2, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"pf2nKWAgo5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Gregory B. Maffei, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (this “**Report**”) of Liberty Interactive Corporation; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.

 

 
| Date: April 28, 2016                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
| /s/ Gregory B. Maffei                     |   |
| Gregory B. Maffei                         |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer   and President* |   |

 

----
Exhibit 21.1
  SUBSIDIARIES
  DOMESTIC
    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY:
  NAME OF SUBSIDIARY

STATE OF INCORPORATIONHarland Clarke Corp.

DelawareChecks In the Mail, Inc.

DelawareHFS Scantron Holdings Corp.

New YorkScantron Corporation

DelawareHarland Financial Solutions, Inc.

OregonHFS Research & Development, Inc.

DelawareJohn H. Harland Company of Puerto Rico

GeorgiaCentralia Holdings Corporation

GeorgiaTransaction Holdings Inc.

TennesseeTransaction Graphics Inc.

TennesseeCheckboxes Direct Inc.

TennesseeCreate-It!, Inc.

IllinoisSubscriberMail, LLC

Illinois   FOREIGN
    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY:
  NAME OF SUBSIDIARY

JURISDICTIONHarland Financial Solutions Worldwide Limited

IrelandHarland Israel Ltd.

IsraelScantron Canada, Ltd.

Canada
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
ABU KHALID ABDUL

- LATIF, AKA Joseph Anthony Davis,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 30130
D.C. No. 2:11

- cr - 00228

- JLR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2021 * *
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Abu Khalid Abdul

- Latif appeals from the district court’s order denying his
renewed motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 129 1, and we affirm.
Abdul

- Latif contends that the district court erred by conflating the two

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 30130

distinct inquires required by § 3582(c)(1)(A)

— whether there are extraordinary and compelling circumstances supporting compassionate release and whether the 18 U.S.C. § 355 3(a) factors support release

— into a single invented “ totality of extraordinary and compelling reasons ” standard. Abdul

- Latif acknowledges that a district court need not conduct both inquiries if it finds the defendant’s motion
deficient as to one, see Uni ted States v. Keller , 2 F. 4th 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021),
but he argues that the court may not combine the two inquiries. Assuming Abdul

Latif is correct, we disagree that the district court did so here. Although the court grouped together in a single list all of the factors it had considered, it is evident
which factors were relevant to the extraordinary and compelling reas ons prong and
which related to the § 3553(a) factors

. Moreover, the record makes clear that the court considered all of the relevant aggravating and mitigating circumstances and
found both that extraordinary and compelling circumstances were lacking and t hat the § 3553(a) factors did not support relief. Contrary to Abdul

- Latif’s argument , the court’s explanation is sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review, s ee
Chavez

- Meza v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1959, 196 5

- 67 (2018 ) , and it did not
abuse its discretion in denying the motion , s ee Keller , 2 F. 4th at 1281.
AFFIRMED.
Document

Exhibit 10(a)5
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN


WHEREAS, Southern Company Services, Inc. heretofore established and adopted the Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective June 30, 2016 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, under Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Benefits Administration Committee (“Administrative Committee”) may amend the Plan, provided the amendment either (a) does not involve a substantial increase in cost to any Employing Company (as defined in the Plan), or (b) is necessary, proper, or desirable in order to comply with applicable laws or regulations enacted or promulgated by any federal or state governmental authority; and
WHEREAS, the Administrative Committee, by Resolution on November 8, 2021, has determined it is appropriate to amend the Plan to provide for cessation of active participation for employees of Sequent Energy Management, LP and Sequent Energy Canada Corp. who are no longer Employees due to the divestiture that occurred on July 1, 2021, and to provide for full vesting for the benefits of such employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as specified herein, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.
The Plan is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (g) to Section 4.3, as follows:
(g)    Sequent.
(1)    Cessation of Participation.  Effective as of July 1, 2021, (i) Sequent Energy Management, LP and Sequent Energy Canada Corp. and their direct and indirect subsidiaries will cease to be affiliated companies of Southern Company Gas for purposes of determining Employing Company status under the Plan; and (ii) Participants who cease to be Employees due to the sale of Sequent Energy Management, LP and Sequent Energy Canada Corp., will cease to be eligible to actively participate in the Plan.
(2)    Vesting Acceleration.  Effective as of July 1, 2021, Participants who cease to be Employees due to the sale of Sequent Energy Management, LP and Sequent Energy Canada Corp. will be deemed to be fully vested in their benefits and Accounts for all purposes hereunder.
2.
Except as amended herein by this Eighth Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




SGR/26151365.1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Committee, through its authorized representative, has adopted this Eighth Amendment to the Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended and restated as of June 30, 2016, this 1st day of December, 2021. 


									
		BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
			
		By:	/s/James M. Garvie
			
		Name:	James M. Garvie
			
		Its:	Chairperson




2
SGR/26151365.1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants May 9, 2022","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QQV7MYatuB\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-9-2022\/\">Applicants May 9, 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-9-2022\/embed\/#?secret=QQV7MYatuB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants May 9, 2022” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"QQV7MYatuB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A. (the Company) on Form 20 F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luiz Carlos Siqueira Aguiar, Executive Vice President Corporate and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2010



|    |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Luiz Carlos Siqueira Aguiar                             
|    |  | Luiz Carlos Siqueira Aguiar                                 
|    |  | Executive Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
  LIST OF
    SUBSIDIARIES OF
    DARWIN PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS, INC.
  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF DARWIN
  Darwin Group, Inc. (Delaware) (100)%Darwin National Assurance Company (Delaware) (100)%Darwin Select Insurance Company (Arkansas) (100)%Vantapro Specialty Insurance Company (Illinois) (100)%Evolution Underwriting, Inc. (Delaware) (100)%Agency Marketing Services, Inc. (Florida) (100)%All-South Professional Liability, Inc. (Florida) (100)%Raincross Insurance Company (Florida) (100%)  S-16
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"October 2021 Revocations and Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"D7v2q86HiT\"><a href=\"\/oti\/october-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/\">October 2021 Revocations and Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/october-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=D7v2q86HiT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“October 2021 Revocations and Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"D7v2q86HiT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-3 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Greenpoint MortgageCompany

Date:  March 15, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President