alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group II,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                               /s/ William Colucci
                               ------------------------------
                               William Colucci, President
                               BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
Order entered December 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00697
- CR
ALLEN MAURICE LITTLE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F
- 0951721
- Y



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES this appeal. On August 25, 2015, this Court abated the above

- referenced appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the proper amount of restitution. On November 19th, 2015 , t he trial court conducted a hearing and determined the proper amount of restitution to be $52,173.95 . This Court received the trial court’s findings of fact from that hearing on December 15, 2015 . We ORDER the trial court report er to file the electronic reporter’s record from that hearing or a written verification that no reporter’s record was made within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order . This Court will proceed to dis pose of this appeal upon obtaining that information./s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JU STICE
#### Javier Sirena SOSA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74613.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 16, 2008.

Javier Sirena Sosa, Anaheim, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., Mona Maria Yousif, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*792Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Petitioner challenges a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l) on the basis that he failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See *United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The record demonstrates that petitioner was the subject of an expedited removal order on October 28, 1998. An expedited removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) interrupts an alien’s continuous physical presence in this country for purposes of cancellation of removal relief. *See Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales,*485 F.3d 509, 511 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.3  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Terrance Owen, President and Chief Executive Officer of ALDA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Terrance Owen  Terrance Owen Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2009                     Exhibit 99.4   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Peter Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ALDA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Peter Chen  Peter Chen Chief Financial Officer March 27, 2009
#### BRADY *v.*BERNARD & KITTINGER.

APPEAL- FROM, ANO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO, THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

No. 501.

Petition for certiorari and motion to dismiss submitted April 26, 1910

Decided May 2, 1910.

An appeal from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under §‘25a of the Bankruptcy Aci oí 1.198 dismissed because taken too late.

Appeal from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under § *25a*of the Bankruptcy Act.

Appellee contended in this case that the appeal came too late as it was taken more than ten days after the order. Appellant contended that as he had filed a petition to set aside the order the time ran from denial of that order. The petition to set aside was not filed until more than ten days after the adjudication.

*596
      *Mr. Norman Farrell, Jr.,*and *Mr. Hill McAlister*for appellants.

*Mr. Edwin C. Brandenburg, Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg, Mr. F. Walter Brandenburg, Mr. A. E. Wilson*and *Mr. James R. Duffin*for appellees.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and petition for writ of certiorari denied.
#### Malkiat SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75730.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*712Submitted April 16, 2008.*

Filed May 7, 2008.

Tsz-Hai Huang, Hardeep Singh Rai, Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Daniel R. Cooper, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, James E. Grimes, Lance L. Jolley, Margaret Perry, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, NOONAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*713MEMORANDUM **

Malkiat Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s and BIA’s factual determinations that Singh did not meet the one-year deadline and did not qualify for an exception to the deadline for filing his asylum application. See *Sillah v. Mukasey,*519 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir.2008). Therefore we dismiss the portion of Singh’s petition challenging the denial of asylum.

*We*conclude that the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence because the IJ’s negative assessment of Singh’s demeanor is entitled to special deference. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1999). In addition, the IJ properly found that Malkiat Singh’s testimony was vague and lacked detail. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). Because Malkiat Singh provided no other evidence to support his claim, he has failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted if returned to India. *See Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995). Because Singh’s CAT claim is based on the same testimonial evidence that the IJ determined to be not credible in connection with his withholding of removal claim, the IJ and BIA also properly denied Singh’s CAT protection claim. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for Cooperative Bank, Wilmington, North Carolina, intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Cooperative Bank on June 19, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated: November 3, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-24279 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee; Change

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of change of meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice that was originally published 
on October 5, 2017, (Volume 82, Number 192, Page 46611), the meeting 
date is now changed. The new date for the meeting is, Tuesday, November 
14, 2017.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 14, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Tuesday, November 
21, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Lisa Billups. For more information please contact Lisa Billups at 
1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP Office 1114 Commerce 
Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to the 
Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

    Dated: October 18, 2017
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2017-23074 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,787,717
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         491,892
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,350,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             2,813,500
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,829,794
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      81,502,174
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        80,663,566
<LOANS>                                    128,353,673
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,108,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             232,964,008
<DEPOSITS>                                 169,714,773
<SHORT-TERM>                                38,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,532,590
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,081
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,695,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             232,964,008
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,592,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,225,537
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               540,624
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,358,984
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,656,842
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,955,333
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,403,651
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   86,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (30,935)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,382,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,472,288
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,472,288
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   898,917
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.93
<LOANS-NON>                                    632,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,022,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,108,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,108,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Karl L. DAHLSTROM, Petitioner-Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-60948

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 14, 2008.

Karl L. Dahlstrom, Pottsboro, TX, pro se.

Robert R. Di Trolio, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Richard Thane Morrison, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division Appellate Section, Laurie Allyn Snyder, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having reviewed Dahlstrom’s contentions, the Commissioner’s response, the tax court’s opinion, and the record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 31.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
            UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
  required  to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
  10-K of Home Loan Trust 2006-HI1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
  do not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
  circumstances  under which such  statements  were made,  not  misleading  with
  respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
  information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
  this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
  based on my knowledge and the  compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
  servicer  compliance  statements  required in this  report  under Item 1123 of
  Regulation  AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
  the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing  agreements
  in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
  asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
  compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required to be
  included  in this report in  accordance  with Item 1122 of  Regulation  AB and
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit to this
  report,  except as otherwise  disclosed in this report. Any material instances
  of noncompliance  described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
  on Form 10-K.

  In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably  relied on information
  provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  JPMorgan  Chase Bank,
  N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ----------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Ofer Segev, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the Company(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date:  May 10, 2007 |   | /s/ OFER SEGEV          |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Ofer Segev              |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – January 15, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UGVGk2VNL0\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-15-2016\/\">Applicants – January 15, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-15-2016\/embed\/#?secret=UGVGk2VNL0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – January 15, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UGVGk2VNL0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}