alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Juan Alpizar MARTINEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73913.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 15, 2008.

Marc A. Karlin, Esq., Karlin & Karlin, APC, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Se*768curity, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Colette J. Winston, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners challenge a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen and reconsider.

We review the denial of motions to reopen and reconsider for abuse of discretion. *See Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). Regulations provide that a motion to reopen must be filed no later than 90 days after the date the final administrative order of removal was entered. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Regulations further provide that a party may file only one motion to reconsider and it must be filed within 30 days of a BIA decision. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen and reconsider because the BIA entered the final administrative order of removal on May 3, 2007, and the instant motion to reopen and reconsider was not filed until August 16, 2007. In addition, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to reconsider as number-barred because the record demonstrates that petitioners had filed a prior motion to reconsider. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted in part because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied in part.

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenge to the BIA’s decision not to exercise its discretionary authority to reopen sua sponte. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed in part.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65191-65192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-31078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-267-002]


Northern Border Pipeline Co.; Notice of Compliance Filing

December 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on November 28, 2001, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets effective April 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 177
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 250A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 251
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 253
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 266

    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's order dated November 8, 2001 in Docket No. RP01-
267-001 (97 FERC para. 61,162).

[[Page 65192]]

    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been served 
on all parties on the Commission's service list for this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed 
on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select 
``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-31078 Filed 12-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
87 A.3d 805

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Alexander ARTIST, Petitioner.

No. 5 EM 2014.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 19, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal *Nunc Pro Tunc*is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days of this order.
#### Danny E. IRBY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Unknown COLE; Unknown Grimes; Captain Mark Enterkin; Unknown Young; Patrick Thomas; Jimmie Mason; Ray Ruffin; Joseph Fairchild; Sandra Atwood; B. Brashier; K. Harrington; Unknown Carter, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-61083

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

*316Danny E. Irby, Mississippi Department of Corrections East Mississippi Correctional Facility, Meridian, MS, pro se.

Jacqueline H. Ray, Page, Kruger & Holland, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Danny E. Irby, Mississippi prisoner # 44999, appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. He argues that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs and subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment when they: misdiagnosed the underlying cause of his leg complaints; provided inadequate and inappropriate medical care; failed to timely send him for outside medical treatment; delayed treating his injuries; and placed him in administrative segregation in retaliation for requesting outside medical treatment.

The record suggests that the defendants may have been negligent in their diagnosis and treatment of Irby. However, the defendants’s actions do not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. *See Mendoza v. Lynaugh,*989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993); *Varnado v. Lynaugh,*920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir.1991). Irby’s conclusory allegations regarding retaliatory mistreatment are an insufficient basis for § 1983 relief. *See Kinash v. Callahan,*129 F.3d 736, 738 (5th Cir.1997). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under die limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – September 20, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"j6qTYSAq7S\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-20-2019\/\">Applicants – September 20, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-20-2019\/embed\/#?secret=j6qTYSAq7S\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – September 20, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"j6qTYSAq7S\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaiam, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lynn Powers, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2010



/s/ Lynn PowersLynn PowersChief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6190
LORENZO ADKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT C. WRENN, Clerk, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-827-3) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellantfailed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Royal Caribbean International\u2019s GRANDEUR OF THE SEAS","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tjIsYapudL\"><a href=\"\/royal-caribbean-internationals-grandeur-of-the-seas\/\">Royal Caribbean International\u2019s GRANDEUR OF THE SEAS<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/royal-caribbean-internationals-grandeur-of-the-seas\/embed\/#?secret=tjIsYapudL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Royal Caribbean International\u2019s GRANDEUR OF THE SEAS” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tjIsYapudL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Alvin Curry","title":"Databases and Publications - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JzEe2sOdXq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/databases-and-publications\/\">Databases and Publications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/databases-and-publications\/embed\/#?secret=JzEe2sOdXq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Databases and Publications” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"JzEe2sOdXq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Service Contract Filing System (SERVCON) Agreements Summary of Fees Lists Industry Studies and Notices Maritime Transportation Data Initiative Examination of data challenges of the international ocean transportation supply chain Containerized Freight Statistics The Federal Maritime Commission is required to publish a quarterly report describing the total import and export tonnage and total laden and empty […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MERLE J. STOKES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 945

[ March 6, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF000970A

.
Diamond R. Litty, Public Defender, and Usha Maharajh, Assistant Public Defender, Stuart, for appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney,
A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

P ER C URIAM

.
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinions dated January 9, 2019, and February 22, 2017. 1

As to appellant’s life sentence for murder with eligibility for parole after 25 years on Count I, we affirm. See Franklin v. State , 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018) ; State v. Michel , 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018).

As to appellant’s consecutive life sentences for th e non

- homicide offenses on Counts II and III, we reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to the sentencing provisions enacted in Chapter 2014

– 220, Laws of Florida. Lawton v. State , 181 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 2015).

1 Because we are issuing a new opinion, the February 3 and March 27, 2017 stays of mandate from our prior opinion are now moot.2 As to appellant’s consecutive 30

- year se ntence for aggravated battery on a person over 65 years of age on Count IV, we affirm based on Hart v. State , 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc). As we did in Hart, we again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State , 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018 ); Blount v. State , 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State

, 235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State , 233 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State , 219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part

.
G R OSS , M AY and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *
#### Somkhit NASEE; Wisit Kampilo; Bunsri Nametha, Plaintiffs— Appellees, v. GLOBAL HORIZONS MANPOWER, INC.; Platte River Insurance Company; Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.; Valley Fruit Orchards, LLC; Green Acre Farms, Inc., Defendants, and Mordechai Orian, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-35161.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 9, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

Garth L. Jones, Keith Kessler, Stritmat-ter Kessler Whelan Coluccio, Hoquiam, *697WA, Brad J. Moore, Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio, Michael Elwood Withey, Law Offices of Michael E. Withey, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Mordechai Orian, Honolulu, HI, pro se.

Before: McKEOWN, FISHER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *697*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant-Appellant Mordechai Orian appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees. We affirm.

Though the district court unquestionably possessed the power to award Orian fees, *Chambers v. NASCO, Inc.,*501 U.S. 32, 43, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991), Orian has not shown that a fee award was required by any federal statute or precedent. The court’s decision not to award fees was not an abuse of discretion. Similarly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by exercising its inherent power to deny Orian’s motion for fees brought pursuant to Washington Revised Code § 19.30.170(1). *See Chambers,*501 U.S. at 55, 111 S.Ct. 2123 (holding that a district court’s power to fashion a sanction under inherent powers trumps state policy to the contrary); *Willy v. Coastal Corp.,*503 U.S. 131, 139, 112 S.Ct. 1076, 117 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992) (holding that a district court’s power to sanction survives lack of subject-matter jurisdiction).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"v0luh0S4hs\"><a href=\"\/notice-to-passengers-regarding-vantage-travel-services-inc\/\">Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/notice-to-passengers-regarding-vantage-travel-services-inc\/embed\/#?secret=v0luh0S4hs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice to Passengers Regarding Vantage Travel Services, Inc.” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"v0luh0S4hs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}