alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
            Exhibit
      31.2





I, James
J. Vincenzo, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we
have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors;




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.




Dated:
February 19, 2008





/s/ James J.
Vincenzo


James J.
Vincenzo


Chief
Financial Officer
EX-33(b)




**ASSERTION
      OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA**





The
      Bank
      of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.(collectively, the
      “Company”) provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the
      servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission.





Management
      has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable in regards
      to the following servicing platform for the following period:





Platform :
      Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under
      the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and
      other mortgage-related asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1,
      2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to January 1, 2006) for which
      the
      Company provides trustee, securities administration, paying agent or custodial
      services. The platform includes like kind transactions for which the Company
      provided trustee, securities administrator, paying agent or custodial services
      as a result of the Company’s acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of
      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s corporate trust business, including structured
      finance agency and trust transactions.





Applicable
      Servicing Criteria :
      All
      servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by the
      related transaction agreements as to any transaction, except for the following
      criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii), (iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii),
      (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).





Period :
      Twelve
      months ended December 31, 2006.





With
      respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
      assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria:





• The
      Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
      Servicing Criteria.





• The
      Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria.





•
A s
      of
      December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance
      with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.





Ernst
      & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
      attestation report with respect to the Company’s foregoing assessment of
      compliance.











The
      Bank
      of New York    The Bank
      of New York


The
      Bank
      of New York Trust   The Bank
      of New York Trust


Company,
      N.A.    Company,
      N.A.











By:
      /s/ Robert L. Griffin    By:
/s/ Patrick J. Tadie


Robert
      L.
      Griffin     Patrick
      J. Tadie


Authorized
      Signer Authorized
      Signer








March
      1,
      2007
No. 902.

#### O. M. Carter, Petitioner, *v.*Charles A. Goss.

May 16, 1910.

*Mr. F. Charles Hume*and *Mr. Leigh Robinson*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Maurice E. Locke, Mr. Eugene P. Locke, Mr.. James H. McIntosh, Mr. John Charles Harris*and *Mr. Edward F. Harris*for the respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
84 A.3d 293

#### Dionne HENDERSON, Petitioner v. M. FERRELL, Warden of Curran Fromhold Correctional Facility, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Respondents.

No. 164 EM 2013.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 15, 2014.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. *See Commonwealth v. Reid,*537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.
#### Ronald PAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-400.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 16, 2013.

Ronald Payne, New Rochelle, NY, pro se.

Susan D. Baird, Benjamin H. Torrance, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

*73PRESENT: ROBERTA. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, RALPH K. WINTER and GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Appellant Ronald Payne, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his Social Security action brought pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we review factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions *de novo. Liranzo v. United States,*690 F.3d 78, 84 (2d Cir.2012). Here, an independent review of the record and relevant case law reveals that the district court properly adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Payne’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Payne failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his thorough April 15, 2011 report and recommendation.

We have considered all of Payne’s arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Black Tea Oil, LLC, et al.,*                     Case No. 2:17-cv-02030, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Kansas on November 6, 2017.                

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Black Tea Oil, LLC and Christopher C. Leiker, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to restore the impacted areas and to pay a civil penalty.

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Phillip R. Dupré, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044, and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Black Tea Oil, LL*                    C,                     *et al.,*                     DJ #90-5-1-1-20653.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, 500 State Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at                     *http://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*

Cherie L. Rogers,

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-24461 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Hunziker, certify that:

       1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Nortia Capital Partners, Inc.;

       2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

       3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

       4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

       	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

       	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

       	c)	disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

       5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of our internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or other persons
performing the equivalent functions):

       	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

<PAGE>

        b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 18, 2005


/S/ ROBERT HUNZIKER
----------------------------------------
Robert Hunziker, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: March 10, 2008               /s/ George J. Carter
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   George J. Carter
                                   President (Principal Executive Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – May 5, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8lOfThAl3l\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-5-2017\/\">Applicants – May 5, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-5-2017\/embed\/#?secret=8lOfThAl3l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – May 5, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8lOfThAl3l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EX-10.1




 EXHIBIT 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 28th day of April, 2022, by and between
CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE, a California banking corporation (the “Bank”), and Steven E. Shelton (“Employee”). 

WHEREAS, Employee and the Bank are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 7, 2018 (the “Agreement”); and

 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and representations set forth in this Agreement, Employee and the Bank agree as
follows: 
 1. Amendment. Each reference in paragraph 1 of the Agreement to “President and Chief Executive Officer” is
hereby deleted and replaced with “Chief Executive Officer.” 
 2. Terms of Agreement. Except as expressly modified hereby,
all terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 3. Conflicting Terms. In the event
of any inconsistency or conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms, conditions and provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control. 

4. Entire Agreement. This Amendment and the Agreement constitute the entire and exclusive agreement between the parties with respect to
the subject matter hereof. All previous discussions and agreements with respect to this subject matter are superseded by the Agreement and this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original
and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile counterparts shall be deemed to be originals. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE
		
	By:	 	          

	Name: Stephen A. Cortese
	Title: Chairman of the Board
	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	  
 Steven E.
Shelton
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-139-2017]

On September 12, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Metroplex International Trade Development Corporation, grantee of FTZ 168, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 168, on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, in Dallas, Texas.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 43327, September 15, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.                

Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 168E was approved on November 6, 2017, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 168's 1,909-acre activation limit.

Dated: November 8, 2017.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-24645 Filed 11-14-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Corporation and Huntsman International LLC
(the "Companies") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial
Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial Officer


August
7, 2008

---



QuickLinks