alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STEVEN ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00265

- CR

Appeal from

426th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

(TC # 75,020 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Steven Curtis Allen attempts to appeal his conviction of forgery by passing, enhanced by

two prior felony convictions

. Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Oli vo v. State

,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of appeal is

due within thirty days after the sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court enters an

appealable order. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a)(1). T he deadline is extended to ninety days after the

date the sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.

See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a)(2). The judgment of conviction reflects that sentence was imposed in

open court on Ap ril 7 , 2016 . Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, his notice

of appeal was due to be filed no later than May 7, 2016, thirty days after the date sentence was- 2

-

imposed in open court. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant did not fil e his notice of appeal

until September 14

, 2016, more than four months after the deadline.

Appellant has filed a document explaining that he informed trial counsel he desired to

appeal, but counsel did not file a notice of appeal on his behalf. Addition ally, Appellant states

that he mistakenly sent his pro se notice of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals. This Court

does not have authority to grant Appellant an out

- of

- time appeal. Because Appellant did not

timely file his notice of appeal, we are r equired to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

October 2 7 , 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between the Servicer and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-HE1 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Community Bancorp Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and
the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|                     |  |  |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Perdue                      
|                     |  |  |  | Michael J. Perdue                          
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 2, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Bruce Mills, Jr.                    
|                     |  |  |  | L. Bruce Mills, Jr.                        
|                     |  |  |  | Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Community Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Community Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bishan DASS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71109.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Garish Sarin, Esquire, Law Offices of Garish Sarin, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Stephen Elliott, Esquire, OIL, Aviva Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Patrick *266James Glen, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., Chief Counsel Ice Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bishan Dass, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that even if Dass’ testimony were credible and he established past persecution, the government established by a preponderance of evidence that Dass could reasonably relocate within India. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(3)(ii); *Melkonian v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 1061, 1069-70 (9th Cir.2003) (presumption of a well-founded fear can be rebutted by showing that under all the circumstances the applicant could reasonably be expected to relocate). Accordingly, Dass’ claims for asylum and withholding of removal fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Dass failed to demonstrate it was more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to India. *See Hasan v. Ashcroft,*380 F.3d 1114, 1122-23 (9th Cir.2004) (denying CAT relief based on the possibility of internal relocation).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CTC Media, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boris Podolsky, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

Date: March 27, 2009

By:

/s/ BORIS PODOLSKY Boris Podolsky Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### Harold GLENN, Appellant, v. Michael BACHAND, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Wynne, Arkansas; Paul Nichols, Individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Wynne, Arkansas; Ervin Dobbins, Individually and in his official capacity as Alderman for the City of Wynne, Arkansas; Charles Hambrick, Individually and in his official capacity as Alderman for the City of Wynne, Arkansas; Monroe Futurall, Individually and in his official capacity as Alderman for the City of Wynne, Arkansas; Glen Hirons, Individually and in his official capacity as Alderman for the City of Wynne, Arkansas; City of Wynne, Appellees.

No. 07-1896.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2008.

Filed: May 15, 2008.

Duiwood W. King, Helena, AR, for Appellant.

Angela R. Echols, Bachelor & Newell, North Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Harold Glenn, a former City of Wynne, Arkansas police officer, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of sum*661mary judgment on his claims against the City and City officials. After reviewing the record de novo and considering Glenn’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the district court’s summary judgment decision. We also conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the court’s order dismissing Glenn’s claims against Arkansas Special Agent Dale Arnold. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 3(c)(1)(B); *Berdella v. Delo,*972 F.2d 204, 207-08 (8th Cir.1992) (appeal of one order does not inherently imply desire to appeal another). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern Dis*661trict of Arkansas.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Lessons from Hanjin Shiping Bankruptcy, Commissioner Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks at 2017 TPM Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qp7bbn5E78\"><a href=\"\/lessons-from-hanjin-shiping-bankruptcy-commissioner-doyles-prepared-remarks-at-2017-tpm-conference\/\">Lessons from Hanjin Shiping Bankruptcy, Commissioner Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks at 2017 TPM Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/lessons-from-hanjin-shiping-bankruptcy-commissioner-doyles-prepared-remarks-at-2017-tpm-conference\/embed\/#?secret=qp7bbn5E78\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lessons from Hanjin Shiping Bankruptcy, Commissioner Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks at 2017 TPM Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"qp7bbn5E78\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Robert Calvin CRAIG, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Herbert JACKSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7248.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 2011.

Decided: April 12, 2011.

Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Appellant pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Craig has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.5 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of TAM Capital Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2009, as amended by this Amendment No.1 (the “Report”), I,David Barioni Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: October 1, 2009 

By: /s/ David Barioni NetoDavid Barioni Neto Chief Executive Officer 

 

----
---

Exhibit 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1650, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Terrance Owen, President and Chief Executive Officer of ALDA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:

|1. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                     

/s/ Terrance Owen

Terrance OwenChief Executive Officer 
February 5, 2010

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certifications**

I, David P. Jones, Executive Chief Financial Officer of Team Finance LLC, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Team Finance LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 10, 2008
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3156 

To reestablish the Commission on Wartime Contracting, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2021 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reestablish the Commission on Wartime Contracting, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wartime Contracting 

5 Commission Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REESTABLISHMENT OF COMMISSION ON WARTIME 

7 CONTRACTING. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby reestablished in 

9 the legislative branch under section 841 of the National 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3156 IH

1 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

2 Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 230) the Commission on War3 time Contracting. 

4 (b) AMENDMENT TO DUTIES.—Section 841(c)(1) of 

5 the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

6 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 231) is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(1) GENERAL DUTIES.—The Commission shall 

9 study the following matters: 

10 ‘‘(A) Federal agency contracting funded by 

11 overseas contingency operations funds. 

12 ‘‘(B) Federal agency contracting for the 

13 logistical support of coalition forces operating 

14 under the authority of the 2001 or 2002 Au15 thorization for the Use of Military Force. 

16 ‘‘(C) Federal agency contracting for the 

17 performance of security functions in countries 

18 where coalition forces operate under the author19 ity of the 2001 or 2002 Authorization for the 

20 Use of Military Force’’. 

21 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 841 of the 

22 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

23 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 230) is amended— 

24 (1) in subsection (b)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3156 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the 

2 Committee on Oversight and Government Re3 form’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘the 

4 Committee on Oversight and Reform’’; 

5 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘of this 

6 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘of the Wartime Con7 tracting Commission Reauthorization Act of 

8 2021’’; and 

9 (C) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘was 

10 first established’’ each place it appears and in11 serting ‘‘was reestablished by the Wartime Con12 tracting Commission Reauthorization Act of 

13 2021’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘On March 

15 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than one year 

16 after the date of enactment of the Wartime Con17 tracting Commission Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS