alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Statement by Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on Commission Vote on Demurrage and Detention and Notice of Proposed Rule Making","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zfjp0vriWV\"><a href=\"\/statement-by-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-commission-vote-on-demurrage-and-detention-and-notice-of-proposed-rule-making\/\">Statement by Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on Commission Vote on Demurrage and Detention and Notice of Proposed Rule Making<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/statement-by-commissioner-carl-w-bentzel-on-commission-vote-on-demurrage-and-detention-and-notice-of-proposed-rule-making\/embed\/#?secret=zfjp0vriWV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement by Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on Commission Vote on Demurrage and Detention and Notice of Proposed Rule Making” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zfjp0vriWV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
### ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# 541 '/5 

# 57/-/r 

# 511 -IS COA # 11-13-00094-CR 

### Victor White v. 

### STYLE: The State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED OFFENSE: 19.03-01
COUNTY: Ector TRIAL COURT: 358th District Court DATE: 3/26/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-38,103



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### Victor White v. 

## style: The State ofTexas PRO S£ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: /*>

# h7{<> '20/S JUDGE: 

## iJL*~ C(M<y^~ 

# SMS $io-/s CCA#: 

### PD-0571-15 CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64803-64804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Grays Harbor Resource Advisory Committee (RAC); Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Grays Harbor Resource Advisory Committee will hold its 
first meeting on January 8, 2002. The meeting will be held at the Grays 
Harbor County Courthouse, Montesano, Washington. The meeting will begin 
at 9:30 AM and end at approximately 3:45 PM. Agenda topics are: (1) 
Introductions; (2) Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) overview; (3) 
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) Roles and Responsibilities; (4) RAC 
Rules and Bylaws; (5) RAC Guidebook review; (6) RAC Communication; (7) 
Future meetings and agendas; (8) Project Process for submission; (9) 
County Update on Title II Projects; (10) Election of RAC Chairperson; 
and (11) Public comments.
    All Grays Harbor Resource Advisory Committee Meetings are open to 
the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Ken Eldredge, RAC Liaison, USDA, Olympic National Forest 
Headquarters, 1835 Black Lake Blvd., Olympia, WA

[[Page 64804]]

98512-5623, (360) 956-2323 or Dale Hom, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Official, at (360) 956-2301.

    Dated: December 7, 2001.
Luis Santoto,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Olympic National Forest.
[FR Doc. 01-30859 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EX-10.2


   

  Exhibit 10.2

   

  THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

  This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made by and between Ceridian HCM, Inc. (“Ceridian HCM”) and Christopher R. Armstrong (“Executive”).

   

  WHEREAS, Ceridian HCM and Executive are parties to an existing Employment Agreement with an effective date of May 1, 2019, and further amendments dated November 5, 2019 and February 1, 2020 (the “Employment Agreement”); and

   

  WHEREAS, Ceridian HCM and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as reflected herein.

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that effective February 23, 2022, the following amendment will be made a part of the Employment Agreement:

   

  1.Section 2.01 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by deleting the position title of “Executive Vice President, Chief Customer Officer” and replacing it with “Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer”.  


   

  2.For the avoidance of doubt, by signing below, the parties acknowledge and agree that the change in the position title as reflected in Section 1 above shall not be deemed a “Good Reason” event as that term is defined in Section 1.13 of the Employment Agreement.


   

  This Amendment will be attached to and be a part of the Employment Agreement between Ceridian HCM and Executive.

   

  Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect without modification.

   

  				
	CERIDIAN HCM, INC. 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date: February 28, 2022
	 
	By:
	 /s/ Leagh Turner

	 
	Leagh Turner

	 
	Its:
	 
	Co-Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	EXECUTIVE:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date: February 28, 2022
	 
	/s/ Christopher R. Armstrong

	 
	Christopher R. Armstrong



   

  - 1 -
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2890

To reduce, from 21 years of age to 18 years of age, the minimum age at 
 which a person may obtain a handgun from a Federal firearms licensee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2021

Mr. Massie (for himself, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Hice of Georgia, 
Mr. Gosar, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Clyde, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Norman, and Mr. 
   Brooks) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce, from 21 years of age to 18 years of age, the minimum age at 
 which a person may obtain a handgun from a Federal firearms licensee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment For Every 
Registrable Voter Act'' or the ``SAFER Voter Act''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM AGE FOR OBTAINING A HANDGUN FROM A FEDERAL FIREARMS 
              LICENSEE.

    (a) In General.--Section 922(b)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``, and, if the firearm, or ammunition is other 
than a shotgun or rifle, or ammunition for a shotgun or rifle, to any 
individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is 
less than twenty-one years of age''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 922(c)(1) of such title is 
amended by striking ``, in the case of any firearm other than a shotgun 
or a rifle, I am twenty-one years or more of age, or that, in the case 
of a shotgun or a rifle,''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7684
DAVID S. COUSINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LIEUTENANT MURRAY; SERGEANT TUCK; SERGEANT BASKET; OFFICER WILDER; OFFICER DUKE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-761-5-H) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.David S. Cousins, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cousins v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections , No. CA-93-761-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Mexus Gold US, a Nevada Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Paul D. Thompson


Paul D. Thompson


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer





June 29, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LANIER WORLDWIDE FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  307,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    163,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560,941
<PP&E>                                         469,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          353,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           879
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,104,088
<SALES>                                        958,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               990,532
<CGS>                                          619,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  291,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,553
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                     UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
      1. I have  reviewed  this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
         required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
         Form 10-K of RAMP Series  2006-EFC2  Trust (the  "Exchange Act periodic
         reports");
      2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic  reports,  taken as a
         whole,  do not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material  fact  necessary to make the  statements  made,  in
         light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
      3. Based on my  knowledge,  all of the  distribution,  servicing and other
         information  required  to be  provided  under  Form 10-D for the period
         covered  by this  report  is  included  in the  Exchange  Act  periodic
         reports;
      4. I  am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed  by  the
         servicers  and  based  on  my  knowledge  and  the  compliance  reviews
         conducted in preparing the servicer  compliance  statements required in
         this report under Item 1123 of  Regulation  AB, and except as disclosed
         in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,  the  servicers  have  fulfilled
         their  obligations  under  the  servicing  agreements  in all  material
         respects; and
      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria
         for asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation  reports on
         assessment  of  compliance  with  servicing  criteria for  asset-backed
         securities  required to be included in this report in  accordance  with
         Item 1122 of  Regulation  AB and  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
         have been  included as an exhibit to this  report,  except as otherwise
         disclosed in this  report.  Any  material  instances  of  noncompliance
         described in such  reports  have been  disclosed in this report on Form
         10-K.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
         information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
         U.S. Bank National Association.

      Date:  March 26, 2007

      By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
            --------------------
            Name: Anthony N. Renzi
            Title: Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SOKO Fitness & Spa
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xia Yu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
July 30,
2009                                                                                              
By:  /s/ Xia
Yu


Name: Xia
Yu


Title:
Chief Financial Officer











This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Larry Keith EASTER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Correc-tions, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-6131.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2008.

Decided: May 1, 2008.

Larry Keith Easter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*348Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Keith Easter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Because the motion directly attacked his parole revocation, the district court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion, which was, in essence, a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. *See United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 206 (4th Cir.2003).

The district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Easter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Easter’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) (2000). Easter’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bay National Corporation
      (the “Company”) each certifies, pursuant to his knowledge, that the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in that Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.








/s/Hugh
      W. Mohler





Hugh
      W.
      Mohler


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2006




















/s/
      Mark
      A. Semanie





Mark
      A.
      Semanie


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


May
      12,
      2006





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any
      reason other than as specifically required by law.