alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yodi Shembo Alydor LENGA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-1805.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 12, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 4, 2013.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

*329Yodi Shembo Alydor Lenga, Petitioner Pro Se. Ada Elsie Bosque, Nicole N. Murley, Matthew Allan Spurlock, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yodi Shembo Alydor Lenga, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding him removable and denying his applications for relief. Because the petition for review was not filed within thirty days of the Board’s order, the petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The Board entered the order on May 23, 2013. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2012), Lenga had thirty days, or until June 24, 2013, to timely file a petition for review.* This time period is “jurisdictional in nature and must be construed with strict fidelity to [its] terms.” *Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). It is “not subject to equitable tolling.” *Id.*Because Lenga did not file his petition until June 25, 2013, it is untimely filed. Under Rule 25(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, filings are not timely if not filed with the clerk of the court within the time fixed for such a filing.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*

*

 The thirtieth day was Saturday, June 22, 2013. Therefore, the petition was due no later than Monday, June 24, 2013. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 26(a)(1)(C).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Liane Pelletier,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as created by § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 9, 2005
    /s/ Liane PelletierLiane PelletierChief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and President
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Dana DeBeauvoir Travis County Clerk 

PO Box 149325. Austin TX 78714-9325 Phone: (512) 854-9188 Website: www.traviscountyclerk.org 

March 20,2015 

The Honorable Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Court of Appeals 

Third District of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, TX 78711-2547 

*DELIVERED VIA EMAIL* 

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-15-00090-CR 

Trial Court Case Number: C-1-CR-14-1 00034 

Style: Christopher Hayes Leverson 

v. The State ofTexas 

Dear Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle: 

I am in receipt ofthe request for a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's 

certification ofthe defendant's right to appeal which is to be filed in the Third Court of Appeals 

on or before 02-20-2015. Unfortunately, we are unable to produce the supplemental clerk's 

record containing the trial court's certification of the defendant's right to appeal as no such 

Sincerely, 

Dana DeBeauviour 

Recording, Elections, Computer Resources, Accounting, and Administration Divisions 

5501 Airport Boulevard. Austin. Texas 78751-1410 

Misdemeanor Records, Civil/Probate/Commissioners Court Minutes, and Records Management Divisions 

1000 Guadalupe. Austin. Texas 78701-2328
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2020

CURTIS E. LEYSHON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

– ,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. 

(Tax Ct. No. 020983-13)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Edward Leyshon, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline D. Ciraolo,

Acting Assistant Attorney General, Bridget M. Rowan, Clint A.

Carpenter, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C.; Olivia H. Rembach, Amy Dyar Seals, INTERNAL 

REVENUE SERVICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis E. Leyshon appeals the tax court’s order sustaining

the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency and penalty with 

respect to his 2010 federal income tax liability and imposing a 

penalty pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a)(1) (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Leyshon v. 

Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 020983-13 (U.S. Tax Ct. 

June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Paragon  Financial  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Steven
A. Burleson,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Steven A. Burleson
-------------------------
Steven A. Burleson
Chief Executive Officer
May 27, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  accompanied  the Form 10-Q filing  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350. It is being reproduced  herein for information  only. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New
Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) by New Gold Inc. (the “Company”), I, Robert J. Gallagher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Dated: March 31, 2011
  /s/ Robert J. Gallagher
  Robert J. Gallagher
 Chief Executive Officer
### FILED U.S.COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 09/16/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

------------------------------------------- No. 96-4884

--------------------------------------------

D. C. Docket No. 95-2588-CV-SM WALTER L. STONE, individually, and as Natural Guardian of S.P.S., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus GEORGENE WALL, GINA WALL MASTERSON, BROCK GREEN, Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

---------------------------------------------------------------- (September 16, 1999) Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, WELLF ORD*, Senior Circuit Judge.**

___________________ *Honorable Harry W. Wellford, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by desigantion. **This decision is rendered by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).2 PER CURIAM: In this diversity suit, plaintiffs asse rted a common law action for interference with a parent/child relationship or abducti on. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismisse d the claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6), concluding that Florida rec ognized no claim for which relief could be granted on those grounds. We certified the question to the Supreme Court of Florida, see Stone v. Wall , 135 F.3d 1438, 1443 (11th Cir. 1998), and asked: Whether a cause of action exists fo r interference with the parent/child relationship where a third party (that is, a nonparent who has no custody rights over that child) intentionally abducts a minor child from a parent legally entitled to the child’s custody? The Supreme Court of Florida has answered “Yes.” See Stone v. Wall , 734 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1999). Therefore, we VACATE the district court decision, dismissing this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and REMAND for further proceedings. VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Manuel LOPEZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50211

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Manuel Lopez-Cruz (Lopez) pleaded guilty without a written plea agreement to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

Lopez argues that the district court imposed a sentence greater than necessary to *899meet the goals of sentencing in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a) and that the sentence is, therefore, substantively unreasonable. He contends that (1) his criminal history was overstated due to the double-counting of his prior sexual assault conviction in both his criminal history and his offense level calculations; (2) his short incarceration for 120 days for the sexual assault conviction indicated that his 46-month sentence was greater than necessary to deter future crime or protect the public; and (3) nothing in the record demonstrated that his sentence was necessary to provide him with educational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment.

Lopez argues that although he did not object to the reasonableness of his sentence in the district court, no such objection was necessary to preserve the issue for review. He also argues that an appellate presumption of reasonableness should not apply to his sentence because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not supported by empirical data. Lopez correctly acknowledges, however, that these arguments are foreclosed by this court’s precedent, and he asserts that he is raising them only to preserve them for future review. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 378, 175 L.Ed.2d 231 (2009); *United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007).

The record demonstrates that the district court considered the § 3553(a) factors and Lopez’s arguments at sentencing before determining that Lopez’s within-guidelines sentence was fair and reasonable, and thus Lopez has failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that this court applies to his within-guidelines sentence. *See United States v. Campos-Maldonado,*531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir. 2008). As a result, Lopez has not shown that the district court committed plain error by imposing an unreasonable sentence. *See Peltier,*505 F.3d at 391-92.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06

- 15

- 00022

- CR

IN THE

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

at TEXARKANA

_____________________________ SONYA KAY HARGETT , Appellant,

v. STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee.

_____________________________ Appealed from the 71 st District Court
for Harrison County, Texas

Jason D. Cassel Texas State Bar No. 24006970 jdc@emafirm.com ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2 649 Longview, Texas 75606 Telephone ( 903 ) 75 7- 8449

Facsimile (903) 758

- 7397

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Sonya Kay Hargett ACCEPTED 06-15-00022-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/8/2015 1:40:16 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

1. This brief complies with the type

- volume limitation of F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 9. 4(i)(3) because this brief contains 1585 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted by F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 9. 4(i)(1) ; and

2. This brief complies with the typeface requirements of F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 9.4(e) and the type style requirements of F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 9.4(e)
because this brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft® Word 2010 version 14.0.7 in 14 point
Times New Roman.

_____________________ Jason D. Cassel Attorney for Defendant

- Appellant June 8, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing C ertificate of Compliance has been forwarded to the Harrison County District Attorney’s Office o n this 8th day of June , 20 15

.

_____________________ Jason D. Cassel Attorney for Defendant

- Appellant June 8, 2015
Consent of Holger Krutzelmann
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Cerro San Pedro Mine, San Luis Potosí, Mexico” dated February 16, 2010 and amended March 22, 2010, and the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mesquite Mine, Brawley, California, USA” dated February 26, 2010, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 27th day of March, 2013
 
 
 “Holger Krutzelmann”Name:
Holger KrutzelmannTitle:
P. Eng and former Principal Metallurgistfor Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
 
 RPA Inc.55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T+1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran

On November 14, 1979, in Executive Order 12170, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.

Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2017. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12170.

The emergency declared in Executive Order 12170 is distinct from the emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 on March 15, 1995. This renewal, therefore, is distinct from the emergency renewal of January 13, 2017.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2017-24465

Billing code 3295-F8-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants September 4, 2020","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rfCI4cJxbC\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-4-2020\/\">Applicants September 4, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-september-4-2020\/embed\/#?secret=rfCI4cJxbC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants September 4, 2020” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"rfCI4cJxbC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert D. O'Donnell and Marie P. Mueller hereby jointly
certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as follows:

      (a)   They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
            Officer, respectively, of Community Bancorp of New Jersey (the
            "Company");

      (b)   To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on
            Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report")
            complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section
            13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (c)   To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report,
            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                      Robert D. O'Donnell
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert D. O'Donnell

                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Title

                                      May 13, 2003
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Date


                                      Marie P. Mueller
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Marie P. Mueller

                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Title

                                      May 13, 2003
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Date

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Community Bancorp of New
      Jersey and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       26
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed November 29, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D2022-1800

Lower Tribunal No. 18-8002 CC 

________________

Mercantil Bank, N.A.,

Appellant,

vs.

Doctor Battery, Inc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana 

Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge.

Law Offices of Victor K. Rones, P.A., Victor K. Rones and Jeremy

S. Rones, for appellant.

Law Office of Ray Garcia, P.A., Ray Garcia and Nataline Garcia, for 

appellees.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
March 1, 2006, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated
as of March 1, 2006 (as  amended  from  time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential  Accredit Loans, Inc., as company,  Residential Funding Company, LLC
(formerly  Residential Funding  Corporation),  as master servicer,  and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director