alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed
                  Certificates Trust 2006-BC1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007


                   /s/ Steve Bailey
                   ----------------
                   Steve Bailey
                   Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24623]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice To Rescind Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement: Taylorsville Mobility Study, Salt Lake County, State 
of Utah

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the Taylorsville Mobility Study.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
Notice of Intent (NOI), issued on March 2, 2010, to prepare an EIS is 
being rescinded for the proposed Taylorsville Mobility Study 
transportation project. The proposed EIS was to analyze and address the 
regional transportation connectivity needs on the west side of the Salt 
Lake Valley in the area bounded by 6200 South, 4700 South; Bangerter 
Highway and Redwood Road in Salt Lake County, State of Utah. For 
Further Information, contact: Edward T. Woolford, Environmental Program 
Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 2520 West 4700 South, Suite 
9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84129, by telephone (801) 955-3524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for 
the area mentioned is being rescinded after an initial planning 
analysis, conducted by FHWA and the Utah Department of Transportation, 
concluded the analysis did not lead to the initiation of an EIS or a 
Federal agency action.

    Authority:  23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.

    Issued on: November 7, 2017.
Edward Woolford,
Environmental Program Manager, Federal Highway Administration, Salt 
Lake City, Utah.
[FR Doc. 2017-24623 Filed 11-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3496 

To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal 

of Honor to Arthur Jibilian for actions behind enemy lines during World 

War II while a member of the United States Navy and the Office 

of Strategic Services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2009 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal of Honor to Arthur Jibilian for actions 

behind enemy lines during World War II while a member 

of the United States Navy and the Office of Strategic 

Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD 

4 OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO ARTHUR JIBILIAN 

5 FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING WORLD WAR II. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time lim7 itations specified in sections 6248 and 6250 of title 10, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3496 IH

1 United States Code, or any other time limitation with re2 spect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who 

3 served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized 

4 and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 

5 6241 of such title to Arthur Jibilian for the acts of valor 

6 described in subsection (b) during World War II while a 

7 member of the United States Navy and the Office of Stra8 tegic Services. 

9 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

10 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Arthur 

11 Jibilian during the successful 1944 operation by the Office 

12 of Strategic Services, code-named ‘‘Operation Halyard’’, 

13 to protect and facilitate in the rescue of over 500 allied 

14 airmen behind enemy lines. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3116 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 

Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 

planning areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2021 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. SIRES, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MALINOWSKI, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. 

MCEACHIN, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. JONES, Mr. VAN

DREW, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. NEWMAN, Mr. CASE, Mr. CRIST, 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Ms. ROSS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning 

areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3116 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Ocean And Safe 

3 Tourism Anti-Drilling Act’’ or the ‘‘COAST Anti-Drilling 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CER6 TAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 

7 SHELF. 

8 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

9 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: 

11 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

12 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

13 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

14 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

15 lease or any other authorization for the exploration, devel16 opment, or production of oil, natural gas, or any other 

17 mineral in— 

18 ‘‘(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area; 

19 ‘‘(2) the South Atlantic planning area; 

20 ‘‘(3) the North Atlantic planning area; or 

21 ‘‘(4) the Straits of Florida planning area,’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL DANIEL CUCUTA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-15-00027-CR

Appeal from the

213th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1371061R)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

December 16, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. David L. Richards, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 16, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00058-CV

Rhett Webster Pease, Appellant

v.

James R. Nickelatti and Brantley Ross Pringle, Jr., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 12527, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this cause was due on March 2, 2004. When notified that the

clerk’s record was late, the district clerk informed this Court that appellant Rhett Webster Pease had

not paid or made payment arrangements for the record and that appellant was not indigent. By letter

of April 23, 2004, this Court informed appellant that he had ten days to make payment arrangements

for the clerk’s record or his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(b) (if appellant fails to pay or make payment arrangements for clerk’s rec ord, court may

dismiss appeal for want of prosecution). To date, appellant has neither made payment arrangements

or responded to our notice in any other way.2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. I d. ; T ex. R. App. P.

42.3(b) (dismissal for want of prosecution).

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 29, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50231

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHNNY TREJO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:94-CR-174-13

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Trejo, federal prisoner # 57448-080, pleaded guilty to conspiracy

to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to launder money. 

The instant notice of appeal was filed on March 4, 2011, more than sixteen years

after the October 1994 final judgment was entered and well beyond the time for

extending the appeal period under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4). 

See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). Trejo’s appeal, which is far outside the

time limit, is DISMISSED. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz, 473 F.3d 571, 574

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 24, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50231 Document: 00511581754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2011
No. 11-50231

(5th Cir. 2006). His motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED AS

MOOT.

2

Case: 11-50231 Document: 00511581754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/24/2011
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers
of Security Devices International Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30,
2017, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2018 (the
Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 28, 2018              
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|/s/ Dean Thrasher                  
|Dean Thrasher,                     
|Principal Executive Officer        
|Security Devices International Inc.

|Dated: March 28, 2018              
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|/s/ Rakesh Malhotra                
|Rakesh Malhotra                    
|Chief Financial Officer            
|Security Devices International Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Security Devices International Inc. and will be
retained by Security Devices International Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3034 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3034

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2022

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place 
for holding court for the Western District of Washington, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE FOR HOLDING COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT 
              OF WASHINGTON.

    Section 128(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Mount Vernon,'' after ``Tacoma,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Emery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JOHN R.
EMERYJohn R. EmeryChief Financial Officer




May 15, 2003
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 18
- 00109
- CV JIMMY JOSEPH NEWELL , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017
- 1307
- C2

ORDER
Appellant’s Request for Clerk’s Record

- Reporter’s Record, filed on June 2, 2018 , was not properly served. Every document requesting relief sent to this Court must reflect
that it was served on all parties to the proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5(a). Nevertheless, we use Rule 2 to dispense with this requirement, and proceed to a disposition of appellant’s request. See i d . 2. Future requests not proper ly served will not be acknowledged or acted upon by the Court

. The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed on June 7, 2018 . The reporter’s recordNewell v. State Page 2

has not yet been filed. Becaus e this appeal was only recently reinstated by the Court, the reporter will not be “compelled” to file the reporter’s record or sanctioned per our local
rules at this time. Moreover, there may be no reporter’s record regarding the order being appealed. Th e Court will pursue the filing of the reporter’s record, if any , through the Court’s normal procedures. Appellant will be informed w hen the entire appellate record is filed with the Court or when the Court determines that no reporter’s record exists and the appeal will be submitted on the clerk’s record alone. At that time, appellant may request to check out
the record from the Clerk of this Court. See 10 TH T EX

. A PP

. (W ACO ) L OC

. R . 11(a). Because the Court’s local rules provide a way for appellant to have access to the appellate record, the Court will not order the district clerk or the reporter to provide appellant with a copy of the appellate record. Accordingl y, appellant’s request is denied at this time without prejudice to request to check out the record from the Clerk of this Court at the appropriate time.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion denied Order issue d and filed Ju ly 3 , 2018
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.9
 DARWIN PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS, INC.
STOCK AND UNIT PLAN
FOR NONEMPL0YEE DIRECTORS
(as amended effective January 25, 2007)
 1. Introduction
  2. Definitions




---



##### 



3. Common Stock Subject to the Plan
 (a) Number of Shares
   (b) Adjustments
  4. Administration




---



##### 



5. Restricted Share Awards




---



##### 



6. Crediting of Share Units
 (a) Mandatory Conversions
 ©
 (b) Voluntary Conversions
 ©
 (c) Share Unit Awards
  (d) Dividend Equivalents
  7. Distributions of Share Unit Awards
 (a) Valuation and Payment of Units




---



##### 



(b) Payment of Additional Dividends
  8. Forfeiture of Share Unit Awards
  9. Certain Adjustments
  10. Beneficiaries
  11. Unfunded Status
  12. Transfers Prohibited




---



##### 



13. Limitation of Rights
  14. Termination and Amendment
  15. Choice of Law
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,753

EX PARTE JUAN RAMIREZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-10-M011-0-PR-B IN THE 156TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.

Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of

possession of a prohibited item in a correctional facility and was sentenced to four years’

imprisonment. He did not appeal the conviction.

Applicant contends his plea was involuntary because the plea agreement cannot be

followed. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing, and it has entered findings of fact

indicating Applicant pleaded guilty pursuant to an agreement that this sentence would run
2

concurrently with a federal sentence. The federal judgment, however, requires the federal

sentence to begin when the state sentence expires. Because the plea agreement is not

enforceable, the trial court recommends relief be granted. This Court agrees, and relief is

therefore granted. See Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

The judgment in Cause No. B-10-M011-0-PR-B in the 156th Judicial District Court

of Bee County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Bee

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any

necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 21, 2012

Do Not Publish