alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0685

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARK WILLIAMS COLLINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including July 2, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2020

05/28/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0685
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"TSA Expansion Update, Statement of Commissioner William P. Doyle: Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) Suspended","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ntPuzC4R1T\"><a href=\"\/tsa-expansion-update-statement-of-commissioner-william-p-doyle-westbound-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-wtsa-suspended\/\">TSA Expansion Update, Statement of Commissioner William P. Doyle: Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) Suspended<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/tsa-expansion-update-statement-of-commissioner-william-p-doyle-westbound-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-wtsa-suspended\/embed\/#?secret=ntPuzC4R1T\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“TSA Expansion Update, Statement of Commissioner William P. Doyle: Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) Suspended” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ntPuzC4R1T\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Joseph COX, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-15425.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 17, 2010.

Anthony F. Shelley, Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Washington, D.C., Wilmer Parker, III, Maloy, Jenkins, Parker, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (“BCBSA”) asks this Court, in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties, to vacate the September 23, 2009 Summary Judgment entered in favor of Appellee William Joseph Cox. Because of the exceptional circumstances of this case,1 we VACATE the Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2106. *See U.S. Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship,*513 U.S. 18, 29, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994). Thus, we DISMISS the appeal as moot, pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement.

1

. Unexpected developments make it unlikely that full counseling would be available to the court if litigation continues in this case. The possible preclusive effect if the case remains is undesirable under these circumstances,
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – December 15, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WrYQTOuRns\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-december-15-2015\/\">License Applicants – December 15, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-december-15-2015\/embed\/#?secret=WrYQTOuRns\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – December 15, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"WrYQTOuRns\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00226

- CR

STEPHEN KENNETH LANE SELLERS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 2242

- C1

ORDER

Stephen Kenneth Lane Sellers was convicted of possession of a controlled

substance with intent to deliver and sentenced to 40 years in prison. See T EX

. H EALTH &

S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 481.112 (West 2011). The State’s brief in this appeal was originally

due o n January 5, 2015. The State has requested and been granted two extensions of

time to file its brief. It has now filed a third motion for extension of time to file its brief.Sellers v. State Page 2

The State’s motion is denied. Its brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than 5:00

p.m. on April 1, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed March 19, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 53552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 09/79-0438 issued to 
Grayhawk Venture Fund I, L.P. said license is hereby declared null and 
void.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: October 18, 2017.
A. Joseph Shepard,
 Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2017-24745 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
EX-10.4


  Exhibit 10.4

   

  Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and replaced with "[***]" pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10). Such identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is (i) not material and (ii) the type of information that the registrant treats as private or confidential.
NO. 07-02-0223-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JUNE 20, 2002

	______________________________

	DONALD MOODY, APPELLANT

	V.

	TDCJ DIRECTOR, GARY L. JOHNSON, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

	NO. 32,545; HONORABLE LEE WATERS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Appellant Donald Moody seeks to appeal from the dismissal of his suit against Gary L. Johnson, Director of the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant is incarcerated in the Neil Unit.  On April 1, 2002, appellant filed a document entitled “Tort Claim Letter” with the District Clerk in Gray County.  The document sought review of appellant’s challenge to disciplinary action taken by officers and the warden of the Neil Unit.  The district court dismissed the suit the same day as frivolous pursuant to Section 14.003 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

	On May 14, 2002, appellant filed a document entitled “Habeas Corpus Writ for 11.07 for notice on appeal.”  The district clerk treated this document as a notice of appeal and filed a clerk’s record in this court.  Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 mandates that, unless extended by a motion for new trial, motion to modify, motion to reinstate, or proper request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the judgment or order appealed from.  It is axiomatic that a notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.  See Denton County v. Huther, 43 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 2001, no pet.).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals is not vested with jurisdiction and, consequently, can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Id.  

	Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed 44 days after the dismissal of his case.  Because it was not filed within the time permitted by Rule 26.1, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EX-33 (e)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on International Standards","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MvzBnBm1j2\"><a href=\"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-focuses-on-international-standards\/\">Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on International Standards<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/next-meeting-of-fmc-data-initiative-focuses-on-international-standards\/embed\/#?secret=MvzBnBm1j2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Next Meeting of FMC Data Initiative Focuses on International Standards” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"MvzBnBm1j2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
No. 629.

#### Fourth Street National Bank, Petitioner, *v.*A. Merritt Taylor et al., Trustees, etc.

May 31, 1910.

*Mr. Samuel Dickson*for the petitioner.

No appearance for the respondents.

On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the petitioner.
Consent of Mark Petersen
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name in connection with, mineral reserve and resource estimates for the Peak Gold Mines, New Afton Project, Mesquite Mine, Cerro San Pedro Mine, El Morro Project and Blackwater Project, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2011, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 26th day of March, 2012
 
 
 "Mark Petersen"Name:
Mark PetersenTitle:
P. Eng., and Vice President, Explorationof New Gold Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders March 8, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RBmH6Xpjez\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-march-8-2016\/\">Revocations and Surrenders March 8, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-march-8-2016\/embed\/#?secret=RBmH6Xpjez\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders March 8, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"RBmH6Xpjez\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theater Xtreme Entertainment
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Scott R. Oglum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005

                                    /s/ Scott R. Oglum
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Scott R. Oglum, Chief Executive Officer
                                    Theater Xtreme Entertainment Group, Inc.



         The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 and shall
not be  deemed  filed by the  Company  for the  purposes  of  Section  18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act") or otherwise  subject to
liability  under  that  Section.  This  certification  shall not be deemed to be
incorporated  by reference  into any filing under the  Securities Act of 1933 or
the  Exchange  Act except to the extent  that this  certification  is  expressly
incorporated by reference into any such filing.

         A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.