alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – May 4, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nuU5SzTrBB\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-4-2018\/\">Applicants – May 4, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-may-4-2018\/embed\/#?secret=nuU5SzTrBB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – May 4, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"nuU5SzTrBB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

800 North Capitol Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20573

Office of the

General Counsel

 June 24, 2022 Tel.: (202) 523-5899

Email: generalcounsel@fmc.gov

TIMING OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE OCEAN SHIPPING 

REFORM ACT OF 2022

This notice contains the opinion of the General Counsel and does not constitute the judgment of 

the Commission or bind the Commission in any subsequent matter.

The Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA 22) became Public Law 117-146 on June 16, 

2022. Certain provisions of OSRA 22 are self-executing and therefore became effective 

immediately, including those in Section 7(a) of the law directed towards common carriers. This 

includes the prohibitions on assessing non-compliant charges1 or issuing non-compliant invoices 

for demurrage or detention charges,

2 as well all of the new requirements related to demurrage and 

detention invoices.3

The provisions above apply to any charge assessed or invoice issued by, or on behalf of or for the 

benefit of, a common carrier. The provisions apply to imports and exports and regardless of 

whether the charge is assessed or invoiced electronically or in paper form. The provisions do not 

apply to charges or invoices issued by non-common carriers solely for their own account.

Finally, these provisions apply to all charges and invoices over which the Commission has 

existing jurisdiction. OSRA 22 neither contracted nor expanded the Commission’s jurisdiction 

related to this issue.

Regulated entities must comply with all relevant statutory requirements of OSRA 22 and should 

consult with their legal counsel for questions related to their respective obligations.

 S. J. Andersen

1 New statutory provision found at 46 U.S.C. 41104(a)(14). 2 New statutory provision found at 46 U.S.C. 41104(a)(15).

3 New statutory provision found at 46 USC 41104(d).
Order entered November 29, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00935
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.K., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 16123

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s written verification he has requested preparation of the reporter’s record

. The requested records are of the hearings held July 30, 2020; September 23, 2020; February 26, 2021; July 26, 2021; and, October 20, 2021.
A ccordingly, we ORDER Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court, to file the record no later than December 20, 2021 . A s the clerk’s record reflects appellant filed a statement of inability to
afford costs on September 4, 2019 and nothing in the record reflects appellant hasbeen ordered to pay costs in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145,

the record shall be filed without payment of costs.
W e DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Duffey and the parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10142

Conference Calendar

 

BILLY WAYNE HORTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN HUDSON; LESLIE

WAGES; MRS. SANDERS;

RALPH HENSLEY, also known

as John Doe,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CV-6-J

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Texas prisoner Billy Wayne Horton, No. 541200, is BARRED

from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) because, while incarcerated,

Horton has brought at least three prior actions in the United

States district courts that were dismissed as frivolous and such

dismissals were affirmed by this court. See Horton v. Wright,

No. 92-1643 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 1993); Horton v. County of Dallas,

No. 92-1580 (5th Cir. Apr. 20, 1993); Horton v. Bowles, No. 95-
No. 97-10142

-2-

10133 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 1995). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Accordingly, Horton’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in

prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED.

 Should he wish to reinstate his appeal, Horton has 15 days

from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing

fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court.

Horton’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at

government expense is DENIED as moot. 

 IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
digaf_ex44.htm

EXHIBIT 4.4
   
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report for Digatrade Financial Corp on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, Chief Financial Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:
  
 	 (1) 
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
	  
	  

	 (2) 
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

   
 	 By:
	 /s/ Brad J. Moynes
	  

	  
	 Brad J. Moynes
 Chief Financial Officer
 April 29, 2022
	  


  
 	 
	
	

	 

  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report for Digatrade Financial Corp on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, Chief Financial Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:
  
 	 (1) 
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
	  
	  

	 (2) 
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

   
 	 By:
	 /s/ Brad J. Moynes
	  

	  
	 Brad J. Moynes
 Chief Financial Officer
 April 29, 2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"License Applicants – October 24, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8dNRaDorJh\"><a href=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-october-24-2014\/\">License Applicants – October 24, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/license-applicants-october-24-2014\/embed\/#?secret=8dNRaDorJh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“License Applicants – October 24, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8dNRaDorJh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Alfredo BARRERA CAMPOS, also known as Jose Alfredo Barrera, also known as Jose Alfredo Barrera-Campos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20439

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*379Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alfredo Barrera Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Barrera Campos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Armagh Group Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darren
Breitkreuz, a Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



                                             /s/ Darren Breitkreuz
                                             --------------------------
                                             Darren Breitkreuz
                                             Director
                                             Armagh Group Inc.
                                             November 12, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group V,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, William Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                             /s/ William Colucci
                                             ------------------------------
                                             William Colucci, President
                                             BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – November 30, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4VxoCv0QSj\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-30-2018\/\">Applicants – November 30, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-30-2018\/embed\/#?secret=4VxoCv0QSj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – November 30, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"4VxoCv0QSj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Activeworlds Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

                                                              /s/ Sean Deson
                                                              --------------
                                                                Sean Deson,
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                                    and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY *v.*SHEEGOG, ADMINISTRATOR.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STÍTES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY.

No. 879.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 16, 1910.

Decided May 31, 1910.

*Held,*without opinion, that the Circuit Court of the United States • had no jurisdiction of this action to enjoin the collection of a judgment entered against appellant in the state court.' .

*600The railroad company removed a suit brought against it and some of its employés for damages for personal injuries from the state court into the Federal court; the state court declined to surrender jurisdiction and the plaintiff in that suit (appellee here) recovered judgment which was affirmed. In the Federal court motions to remand were overruled and judgment entered in favor of the railroad company. Thereupon the railroad company brought this suit in equity in the Circuit Court of the United States to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment entered in the state court in favor of the appellee in this case. The Circuit Court dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction.

*Mr. Pleweti Lee*and *Mr. Edmund F. Trabue*for appellant.

*Mr. John G. Miller*for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment affirmed with costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony NIX, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-15335

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

Robert E. Adler, Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Defenders, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Laura Thomas Rivero, Anne R. Schultz, Kathleen M. Salyer, Harriett R. Galvin, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Nix pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the district court sentenced him as an armed career criminal to prison for 180 months, the minimum sentence permitted by statute, the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).1 He now appeals his sentence, *1342arguing that two of the three convictions the district court used to qualify him an armed career offender do not qualify as violent felonies under the § 924(e): (1) resisting an arresting officer with violence, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 843.01, and (2) fleeing and eluding at high speed, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935(3).

We reject Nix’s challenge to the § 843.01 conviction, holding that a such conviction constitutes a violent felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). This is the same holding we recently reached in *United States v. Hayes,*2010 WL 3489973 (September 8, 2010). Although the *Hayes*decision was not published, we are persuaded by its rationale regarding § 843.01 and therefore adopt its holding. Nix’s challenge to the § 316.1935(3) conviction is foreclosed by *United States v. Harris,*586 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir.2009), which we are bound to follow.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The sentencing range prescribed by the Sentencing Guidelines was 168-210 months' imprisonment.