alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into between:

(1) the Federal Maritime Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, and

(2) United Transport Tankcontainers, Inc. (UTT), hereinafter referred to as Respondent.

Whereas the Commission is considering the institution of an assessment proceeding against 

Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violation of the Commission’s regulations at 46 

C.F.R. § 515.18(c);

Whereas this course of action is the result of alleged practices believed by the Commission to have 

been engaged in by Respondent, to wit:

UTT operated without a Qualifying Individual as required pursuant to 46 

C.F.R. Part 515, for a period in excess of one year.

Whereas, the Commission has authority under section 13(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 

§ 41109(a)-(b), and Part 502 of the Commission’s Regulations, 46 C.F.R. Part 502, to compromise and 

collect civil penalties;

Whereas, Respondent has terminated the practices which are the basis of the alleged violations set 

forth herein, and has committed to maintain measures designed to eliminate these practices by Respondent 

in the future.

Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all civil penalties 

arising from the alleged violations set forth and described herein, Respondent and the Commission hereby 

agree upon the following terms of settlement:

1. Respondent shall make monetary payment to the Commission by cashier’s or certified

check in the total amount of $30,000.
−2−

2. This instrument shall forever bar the commencement or institution of any assessment 

proceeding or other claim for recovery of civil penalties from Respondent, its officers, 

directors, or employees arising from the alleged violations set forth above that occurred for 

a period in excess of one year prior to August 23, 2016.

3. It is expressly understood that this Agreement is not, and is not to be construed as, an 

admission by Respondent to the alleged violations set forth above.

4. This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604.

UNITED TRANSPORT TANKCONTAINERS, INC.

 Signature: _____________________________ 

 Printed Name: __________________________ 

 Title: _________________________________ 

 Date: _________________________________ 

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and accepted:

By the Federal Maritime Commission:

_________________________________________

Brian L. Troiano, Deputy Director (Date)

Bureau of Enforcement

_________________________________________________

Peter J. King, Deputy Managing Director (Date)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**

















**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10K-SB of PTM Publications
      Incorporated (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmin Bin Omar Jayaseelan, Principal
      Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      the  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.








**PTM
      PUBLICATIONS INCORPORATED**, a
      Nevada
      corporation




Date:
      May
      19, 2008    /s/ Jasmin Bin Omar Jayaseelan


By:
      Jasmin Bin Omar Jayaseelan, Principal Executive
      Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applications –  October 26, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oPjNeXPppw\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applications-october-26-2018\/\">Applications –  October 26, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applications-october-26-2018\/embed\/#?secret=oPjNeXPppw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applications –  October 26, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"oPjNeXPppw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-8T1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-7


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                           Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### M.D., a minor, by and through his next friends and parents Carlton and Patricia DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd SMITH, Lee County Sheriff Deputy, in his individual capacity, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-14540.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 2008.

Bart Gregory Harmon, Webb & Eley, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Dwayne Lamar Brown, Law Office of Dwayne L. Brown, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Deputy Sheriff Lloyd Smith (“Deputy Smith”), appeals the district court’s summary judgment order denying Smith qualified immunity on M.D.’s claim of excessive force in violation of his Fourth Amendment right. The issue presented on appeal is whether the district court ei’red in denying Deputy Smith’s motion for summary judgment on M.D.’s excessive force claim. We review *de novo*a district *988court’s order on summary judgment. *Skop v. City of Atlanta, GA.,*485 F.3d 1130, 1136 (11th Cir.2007).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s order denying summary judgment based on its well-reasoned memorandum opinion filed on August 27, 2007, 504 F.Supp.2d 1238.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Genius Brand International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/ A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Heyward, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|September 29, 2016 | By: | /s/ Andrew Heyward                                            | 
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                   |     | Andrew Heyward                                                | 
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
#### Jose Garcia BRISENO, Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-70034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Richard H. Burr, III, Burr & Welch, Houston, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kelli L. Weaver, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Div., Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

For essentially the reasons given by the district court in its thorough opinion, we AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group II,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, William Colucci, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                    /s/ William Colucci
                                    -------------------------------
                                    William Colucci, Treasurer
                                    BF Acquisition  Group III, Inc.
EXHIBIT 35.2
                     SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                             HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
                 RAMP SERIES 2006-EFC2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

      The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC,
      as  servicer  (the  "Servicer")   pursuant  to  the  applicable  servicing
      agreement, does hereby certify that:

      1. A review of the Servicer's  activities during the period covered by the
      Issuing  Entity's  report on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
      under  the  applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
      supervision.

      2. To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement
      in all material respects  throughout such period.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
     26th day of March 2007.

      By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
          Name: Anthony N. Renzi
          Title: Managing Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas E. SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Anthony Young, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7419.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Thomas E. Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Paulo Custodio Palugod, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas E. Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying Smith’s various motions in his closed criminal case and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Smith,*No. l:03-cr-00245-TSE-l (E.D. Va. Mar. 13 & Aug. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Anita Theresia LUMENTUT; Melkior Lumentut, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72704.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed April 28, 2008.

Robert G. Ryan, Esq., Law Offices of Eugene C. Wong, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Mark C. Walters, Esq., Jennifer Lightbody, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anita Theresia Lumentut and her husband, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we grant the petition for review.

The IJ found that Anita Lumentut had not established past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, and determined that Melkior Lumentut’s testimony that his house was set afire by Muslim extremists was not credible.

Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s determination that Melkior Lumentut’s testimony concerning the reli*559gious motivation for the 1993 burning of his house was not credible, because there is no inconsistency between his testimony and the police report statement that the perpetrators were Muslim proselytizers. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*301 F.3d 1109, 1112 (9th Cir.2002). In addition, the IJ’s demeanor finding regarding how much emotion Melkior Lumentut should have displayed when discussing the event is based on improper speculation. *See Kaur v. Ashcroft,*379 F.3d 876, 887 (9th Cir.2004).

Therefore, we remand for the agency to consider whether, taking petitioners’ testimony as true, they have shown eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Frank ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David KELLY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-15918.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 19, 2010.

Frank Ortiz, Ely, NV, pro se.

William James Geddes, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Edward Louis Oueilhe, III, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, Paul J. Anderson, Esquire, Maupin Cox & Legoy, Reno, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Frank Ortiz appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment, *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and for an abuse of discretion the district court’s or*141der refusing to impose sanctions for alleged spoliation of evidence, *Ingham v. United States,*167 F.3d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir.1999). When a party raises the issue of judicial bias for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error. *United States v. Bosch,*951 F.2d 1546, 1548 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants. Although the district court warned Ortiz that he must set forth specific facts in the form of admissible evidence, Ortiz failed to present evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact as to the sexual assault claim. *See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp.,*475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Ortiz also failed to present evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact as to his access to the courts claim. *See id.; Christopher v. Harbury,*536 U.S. 403, 415, 122 S.Ct. 2179, 153 L.Ed.2d 413 (2002).

Noting that Ortiz made no showing of spoliation of evidence, the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to draw a negative inference and impose sanctions for alleged spoliation of evidence. *See Ingham,*167 F.3d at 1246.

Ortiz’s contention that the district court was biased fails because he does not point to any evidence in the record of judicial bias. *See Commercial Paper Holders v. Hine (Matter of Beverly Hills Bancorp),*752 F.2d 1334, 1341 (9th Cir.1984) (“[Unfavorable rulings alone are legally insufficient to require recusal”).

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal or in a reply brief. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999).

Defendants’ motion to strike from the court’s consideration exhibits that were not part of the record before the district court is granted. *See Kirshner v. Uniden Corp. of Am.,*842 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir.1988) (“Papers not filed with the district court or admitted into evidence by that court are not part of the clerk’s record and cannot be part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner William P. Doyle gives remarks before the World Trade Association of Philadelphia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CDyjhKJxS3\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-gives-remarks-before-the-world-trade-association-of-philadelphia\/\">Commissioner William P. Doyle gives remarks before the World Trade Association of Philadelphia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-gives-remarks-before-the-world-trade-association-of-philadelphia\/embed\/#?secret=CDyjhKJxS3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner William P. Doyle gives remarks before the World Trade Association of Philadelphia” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"CDyjhKJxS3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}