alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                     5,631,970
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7,075,595
<PP&E>                                        47,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             7,487,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        531,365
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         674
<OTHER-SE>                                 6,955,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               7,487,388
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19,445
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             467,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (447,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (447,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               (447,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.046)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.046)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations – March 23, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mW5NQ0t0zw\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-march-23-2018\/\">Revocations – March 23, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-march-23-2018\/embed\/#?secret=mW5NQ0t0zw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations – March 23, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"mW5NQ0t0zw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under provisions of law agencies are required to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of the appointment of Performance Review Board (PRB) members. This notice announces the appointment of individuals to serve on the PRB of the Department of Veterans Affairs.                    

# DATES:

This notice is applicable October 31, 2017.

# ADDRESSES:

Corporate Senior Executive Management Office, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Tia N. Butler, Executive Director, Corporate Senior Executive Management Office (052), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7865.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The membership of the Department of Veterans Affairs Performance Review Board is as follows:

Wright Simpson, Vivieca (Chair)

Breyfogle, Cynthia

Hyduke, Barbara

Rivera, Fernando

Frueh, Michael

Rawls, Cheryl

Hipolit, Richard

Johnson, Harvey

Sullivan, Matthew

Hanson, Anita

Chandler, Richard

Skelly, Jonathan (Alternate)

MacDonald, Edna (Alternate)

Hogan, Michael (Alternate)

Powers, Glenn (Alternate)

                    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. David J. Schulkin, Secretary of Veterans                           ( print page 51672)                        Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on October 31, 2017, for publication.                

Authority:5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4)

Dated:October 31, 2017.

Jeffrey Martin,

Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2017-24139 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
---

EXHIBIT 32.1








Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Gold, President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U.S. Neurosurgical, Inc.








/s/ Alan Gold


Alan Gold


President and Chief Executive Officer


November 15, 2010
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 304 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity between the costof-living adjustment with respect to an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2021 

Mr. CONNOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity 

between the cost-of-living adjustment with respect to an 

annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System 

and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal COLA Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 304 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN COLA FOR FERS ANNUITIES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) 

3 of section 8462 of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

4 to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), effective 

6 December 1 of each year, each annuity payable from the 

7 Fund having a commencing date not later than such De8 cember 1 shall be increased by the percent change in the 

9 price index for the base quarter of such year over the price 

10 index for the base quarter of the preceding year in which 

11 an adjustment under this subsection was made, adjusted 

to the nearest 1 12 ⁄10 of 1 percent.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub14 section (a) shall apply to— 

15 (1) any cost-of-living adjustment under section 

16 8462 of title 5, United States Code, made after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act; and 

18 (2) any annuity covered by such section com19 mencing before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                               LABRANCHE & CO INC.
                              EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

     WHEREAS, LaBranche & Co Inc., a Delaware corporation (the  "Company"),
maintains the LaBranche & Co Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the
right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT:

     RESOLVED that, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company,
the first sentence  of Section 4 of the Plan be, and it hereby is,  amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

     "Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 13 below, the maximum
     number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the
     Plan is 7,687,500."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as
of the 31st day of July, 2001.


                                LaBRANCHE & CO INC.



                                By: /s/ George M.L. Labranche, IV
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name:  George M. L. LaBranche, IV
                                    Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and President

                                       -1-
#### Glenn WM. GREEN-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roderick SOWERS; The Attorney General of the State of Maryland; J. Philip Morgan, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-6791.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.

Glenn Wm. Green-El, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

*717Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Wm. Green-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green-El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 13, 2014","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RScMg20yau\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-13-2014\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 13, 2014<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-13-2014\/embed\/#?secret=RScMg20yau\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 13, 2014” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"RScMg20yau\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Speaks at NY\/NJFFF&BA Annual Dinner & Person of the Year","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9Sa9XxLyka\"><a href=\"\/maffei-ny-njfff-ba-annual-dinner\/\">Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Speaks at NY\/NJFFF&BA Annual Dinner & Person of the Year<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/maffei-ny-njfff-ba-annual-dinner\/embed\/#?secret=9Sa9XxLyka\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Speaks at NY\/NJFFF&BA Annual Dinner & Person of the Year” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9Sa9XxLyka\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Ralph E. KROLIK, M.D., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 06-16478.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 15, 2008.

Filed April 30, 2008.

Pete V. Domenici, Jr., Esq., Domenici Law Firm, PC, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ronda R. Fisk, Esq., Thomas L. Hudson, Esq., Osborn Maledon, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, Defendant-Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Ralph E. Krolik appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the National Board of Medical Examiners on his claim under the Americans With Disabilities Act. We affirm.

On appeal, Krolik abandoned any argument that he is actually disabled under the ADA and contends only that he is disabled under 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(C), which defines “disability” to include “being regarded as” having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities. *See also Thornton v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.,*261 F.3d 789, 798 (9th Cir.2001). Krolik maintains that there exists a genuine issue of fact as to whether the NBME “regarded” him as having Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and/or learning disabilities.

At oral argument, Krolik’s counsel conceded that the NBME did not “regard” Krolik as disabled. Indeed, the record establishes that the reason that the NBME denied Krolik’s request for accommodations was precisely because it concluded that he did not have any such impairment. In its denial, the NBME explained to Krolik that “the documentation submitted with your request for accommodation does not adequately support an ADHD diagnosis or the existence of a disability.” Moreover, although Krolik points to evidence showing that the NBME accommodated some (but not all) test takers who requested accommodation based on their ADHD, the evidence did *595not show that the NBME regarded Krolik as having any impairments. Because the court must conduct an “individualized inquiry” into whether a person is disabled under the ADA, evidence regarding the disabilities of other test takers did not create a genuine issue of fact as to whether Krolik was disabled. *See Thornton,*261 F.3d at 794. Without more, Krolik failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he was disabled under 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(C), and the district court’s summary judgment was therefore proper.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.