alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Joaquin F.Blaya, Chief Executive Officer of Radio Unica Communications Corp. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dohereby certify as follows:

 

1.     Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I haveexecuted this Certification this 14th day of November, 2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ Joaquin  F. Blaya                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Joaquin F.  Blaya                     |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radio UnicaCommunications Corp. and will be retained by Radio Unica Communications Corp.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"cmoran","title":"Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedure - Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vajwcY0ZMJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/ocean-shipping-reform-act-of-2022-implementation\/guidance-on-charge-complaint-interim-procedure\/\">Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/ocean-shipping-reform-act-of-2022-implementation\/guidance-on-charge-complaint-interim-procedure\/embed\/#?secret=vajwcY0ZMJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedure” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vajwcY0ZMJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On June 16, 2022, the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA) amended the Shipping Act and authorized the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) to promptly investigate \u201cinformation concerning complaints about charges assessed by a common carrier,\u201d 46 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 41310(a)-(b), and order refunds and\/or penalties for charges that do not comply with 46 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 41104(a) and [...]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/seal_final_sm.jpg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":293}
Exhibit 10.14


 


Second Amendment to Unsecured Loan Agreement


 


Signed between the parties on November 23, 2021


 


Whereas on July 1, 2021 a loan
agreement was entered into between Smart Repair Pro, registration number C4094119, a company incorporated in California
(“borrower”), and M.R.M Merchavit Achzakot Ve’nihul Ltd. company number 513142562, pursuant to which lender
loaned to borrower in aggregate of $375,000, as amended for the first time on July 13, 2021 (“Loan Agreement”);


 


Whereas both parties have mutually
agreed to extend the repayment date;


 


Whereas both parties wished to put
the new and updated changes in writing by way of this amendment.


 


Therefore, both parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Extension of the repayment date


 


It is agreed by both parties that Clause
2 to the Loan Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:


 


“The loan amount will be repaid
at the earliest date of either A) March 31, 2023 and B) upon completion of the initial public offering (as defined in Clause 5)”.


 


2.
General


 


The parent company’s undertaking
to issue options shall not be construed in any manner as an undertaking of the parent company to cover or be liable for any of the lender’s
undertakings or liabilities. This amendment will be considered an integral part of the Loan Agreement. Terms used in this amendment, but
not defined herein, shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the
Loan Agreement and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall prevail, even if the conflicting clauses in the Loan Agreement
have not been amended directly under this amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have
executed this Agreement.


 


	Parent Company:	 	Borrower:	 	Lender:
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Jeffs Brands Ltd.	 	/s/ Smart Repair Pro	 	/s/ M.R.M Merchavit Achzakot Ve’nihul Ltd.
	Jeffs’ Brands Lt.	 	Smart Repair Pro	 	M.R.M Merchavit Achzakot Ve’nihul Ltd.
	By:	      	 	By:	    	 	By:	     
	Title:	 	 	Title:	 	 	Title:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER I, David Stewart, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Telecom, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; (b) (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986,
33-8392 and 34-49313); (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by the report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date: August 6, 2004 DAVID STEWART  David Stewart
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Llee Reon TERRY, Jr., a/k/a Llee Devor Terry, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4124.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 16, 2013.

Lisa S. Costner, Lisa S. Costner, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Andrew C. Cochran, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Llee Reon Terry pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2012). The district court sentenced Terry to 180 months’ imprisonment. Terry appeals, challenging his enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012). We affirm.

Terry asserts that the district court erred by relying on his North Carolina convictions for breaking or entering, N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-54(a) (2011), to designate him an armed career criminal. Because Terry raises this claim for the first time on appeal, our review is for plain error. *United States v. Lynn,*592 F.3d 572, 577-78 (4th Cir.2010). To establish plain error, Terry must demonstrate that an error occurred, the error was plain, and the error affected his substantial rights. *Id.*at 577.

A defendant convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm who has three pri- or convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses is subject to sentencing *368as an armed career criminal.*18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1); *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 4B1.4 (2011). Terry contends that his prior North Carolina convictions for breaking or entering are not qualifying convictions for purposes of the ACCA. We have held to the contrary on several occasions. *United States v. Thompson,*588 F.3d 197, 202 (4th Cir.2009); *United States v. Thompson,*421 F.3d 278, 284 (4th Cir.2005); *United States v. Bowden,*975 F.2d 1080, 1084-85 (4th Cir.1992). The Supreme Court’s recent decision in *Descamps v. United States,*— U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013), does not affect our conclusion. Terry’s North Carolina conviction for second-degree burglary also qualifies as an ACCA predicate. The elements of second-degree burglary in North Carolina clearly track the definition of “generic burglary.” *Descamps,*133 S.Ct. at 2283; *State v. Rick,*342 N.C. 91, 463 S.E.2d 182, 188 (1995).

We therefore discern no error, plain or otherwise, in Terry’s armed career criminal designation. Accordingly, we affirm his sentence. Terry’s pro se motion to file a supplemental brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Terry does not dispute that his two North Carolina armed robbery convictions qualify as predicate offenses.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Puerto Nuevo Terminals Agreement Amendment to Take Effect","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IrfMlCSMhH\"><a href=\"\/puerto-nuevo-terminals-agreement-amendment-to-take-effect\/\">Puerto Nuevo Terminals Agreement Amendment to Take Effect<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/puerto-nuevo-terminals-agreement-amendment-to-take-effect\/embed\/#?secret=IrfMlCSMhH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Puerto Nuevo Terminals Agreement Amendment to Take Effect” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"IrfMlCSMhH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     Notice published November 15, 2001 (66 FR 57467-57468), Notice of Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations, incorrectly noticed revocation of license number 2581F, issued to Unitrans International Corporation of Inglewood, CA 90301. The notice is corrected to read:                

*License Number:*                     2581F.                 

*Name:*                     Unitrans International Corporation (S.F.).                 

*Address:*                     461 Littlefield Ave., South San Francisco, CA 94080.                 

*Date Revoked:*                     July 30, 2001.                 

*Reason:*                     Surrendered License Voluntarily.                

Licensee Unitrans International Corporation, License Number 1989F, address 709 S. Hindry Avenue, Inglewood, CA 90301 remains duly licensed by the Federal Maritime Commission with a branch office located at 461 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080. 

Dated: December 11, 2001. 

Sandra L. Kusumoto, 

Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing. 

[FR Doc. 01-30942 Filed 12-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kana Software, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael J. Shannahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.02, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                         |  |  |  |                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. SHANNAHAN
|                         |  |  |  | Michael J. Shannahan    
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

January 2017

DO CA.SRL

Org No.: 018549

Address: Via Trieste 1

CAP 57124 Livorno, Toscana

Italy

Termination: January 21, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

GS Global Logistics Co., Limited

Org No.: 024832

Address: Flat/RM 702, 7/Fl., Tins Enterprises Centre

No. 777 Lai Chi Kok Road, Cheung Sha Wan

Kowloon

Hong Kong

Termination: January 5, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Qingdao Flyingcolors Logistics Co.

Org No.: 025938

Address: 20-I, Tower B

No. 22 Shandong Road

Qingdao 266071

China

Termination: January 1, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

S.H.E. Maritime Services Ltd. dba Trinity Line

Org No.: 009698

Address: No. 2 Town Quay Wharf

Abbey Road

Barking Essex 1G11 7BZ

United Kingdom

Termination: January 7, 2017

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
EXHIBIT 32.1






Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)






Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Cellceutix
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:






The
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cellceutix Corporation and will be retained by Cellceutix Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.






Dated: 
October 8, 2009




/s/ George W. EvansGeorge
      W. Evans(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Leo EhrlichLeo
      Ehrlich(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darrell Keith CRITTENDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-40913

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

*937James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Darrell Keith Crittenden, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Darrell Keith Crittenden, federal prisoner # 98731-079, seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. He also moves for the appointment of counsel. Crittenden pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 77 grams of cocaine base (crack cocaine) and was sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 to 210 months of imprisonment. By moving to proceed IFP, Crittenden is challenging the district court’s certification decision that his appeal was not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997). Crittenden argues that he was entitled to a sentence reduction despite the fact that he was sentenced as a career offender.

Crittenden’s guidelines imprisonment range was not derived from the quantity of crack cocaine involved in the offense but rather from his status as a career offender. Therefore, the district court was correct in concluding that a sentencing reduction was not permitted. *See*§ 3582(c)(2); *United States v. Anderson,*591 F.3d 789, 790-91 (5th Cir.2009).

Crittenden has failed to show that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, his IFP motion is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Crittenden’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.