Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 217 / Monday, November 13, 2017 / Notices 52275 

2See Letter from Zekelman Industries, regarding 

‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from 

the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

September 29, 2017. 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and 

Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan and 

the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 

2000), and Notice of Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Certain Small Diameter Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe 

from Romania, 65 FR 48963 (August 10, 2000). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 81 

FR 60343 (September 1, 2016). 

3See Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, 

and Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania 

Institution of Five-Year Reviews; Notice of 

Commission Determination to Conduct Full Five 

Year Reviews, 81 FR 91199 (December 16, 2016). 

4See Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy 

Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from 

Japan; Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy 

Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from 

Japan and Romania: Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Five-Year Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 81 FR 93648 (December 21, 2016). 

5See Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, 

and Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania; 

Determinations, 82 FR 48113 (October 16, 2017) 

and USITC Publication 4731 (October 2017), titled 

Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and 

Continued 

CFR 351.213(d)(1), Zekelman timely 

withdrew its request for an 

administrative review of all 20 

companies.2

Rescission of Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws the requests within 

90 days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. Zekelman withdrew its review 

request by the 90-day deadline, and no 

other parties requested an 

administrative review of this order. 

Therefore, we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on circular 

welded carbon quality steel pipe from 

the PRC covering the period July 1, 2016 

to June 30, 2017, in its entirety. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Because the 

Department is rescinding this 

administrative review in its entirety, the 

entries to which this administrative 

review pertains shall be assessed 

antidumping duties that are equal to the 

cash deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP within 15 days after 

the publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of the 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: November 6, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director performing the duties of 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24514 Filed 11–9–17; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–850, A–588–851, A–485–805] 

Certain Large Diameter Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and 

Pressure Pipe From Japan; Certain 

Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy 

Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure 

Pipe From Japan and Romania: 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable November 13, 2017. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

(USITC) that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on certain 

large diameter carbon and alloy 

seamless standard, line and pressure 

pipe (large diameter pipe) from Japan 

and certain small diameter carbon and 

alloy seamless standard, line and 

pressure pipe (small diameter pipe) 

from Japan and Romania would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and material injury to an 

industry in the United States, the 

Department is publishing a notice of 

continuation of the antidumping duty 

orders. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0410. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 26, 2000, and August 10, 

2000, the Department published the AD 

orders on large diameter pipe from 

Japan and small diameter pipe from 

Japan and Romania, respectively.1 On 

September 1, 2016, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the antidumping 

duty orders on large diameter pipe from 

Japan and small diameter pipe from 

Japan and Romania pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).2 On December 16, 

2016, the USITC instituted its review of 

the orders.3

As a result of its review, the 

Department determined that revocation 

of the antidumping duty orders on large 

diameter pipe from Japan and small 

diameter pipe from Japan and Romania 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and, therefore, 

notified the USITC of the magnitude of 

the margins of dumping likely to prevail 

should the orders be revoked.4

On October 16, 2017, the USITC 

published its determination, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(1) of the Act, that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on large diameter pipe from 

Japan and small diameter pipe from 

Japan and Romania would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.5


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
52276 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 217 / Monday, November 13, 2017 / Notices 

Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania, 

Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 (Third 

Review). 

6A full description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Large 

Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, 

Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan (A–588–850), 

Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan (A– 

588–851) and Romania (A–485–805),’’ dated 

December 15, 2016. 7 Id. 

1See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination, 79 FR 76962 

(December 23, 2014) (Final Determination). 

2See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 8592 (February 

18, 2015) (Amended Final Determination). 

3See Final Determination, and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 15. 

4 Id. at Comment 17. 

5See Amended Final Determination, 80 FR at 

8593. 

Scope of the Orders 

Large Diameter Pipe From Japan 

The products covered by this order 

are large diameter seamless carbon and 

alloy (other than stainless) steel 

standard, line, and pressure pipes. The 

seamless pipes subject to this order are 

currently classifiable under the 

subheadings 7304.10.10.30, 

7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 

7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 

7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 

7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 

7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 

7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 

7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 

7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 

7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 

7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 

7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 

7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 

7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 

7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 

7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 

7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 

7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 

7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 

7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes. The written 

product description remains 

dispositive.6

Small Diameter Pipe From Japan and 

Romania 

The products covered by these orders 

include small diameter seamless carbon 

and alloy (other than stainless) steel 

standard, line, and pressure pipes and 

redraw hollows. The seamless pipes 

subject to these orders are currently 

classifiable under the subheadings 

7304.10.10.20, 7304.10.50.20, 

7304.19.10.20, 7304.19.50.20, 

7304.31.30.00, 7304.31.60.50, 

7304.39.00.16, 7304.39.00.20, 

7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 

7304.39.00.32, 7304.51.50.05, 

7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.60.00, 

7304.59.80.10, 7304.59.80.15, 

7304.59.80.20, and 7304.59.80.25 of the 

HTSUS. The HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written product 

description remains dispositive.7

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of these determinations by 

the Department and the USITC that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department 

hereby orders the continuation of the 

antidumping orders on large diameter 

pipe from Japan and small diameter 

pipe from Japan and Romania. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect antidumping duty 

cash deposits at the rates in effect at the 

time of entry for all imports of subject 

merchandise. The effective date of the 

continuation of these orders will be the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of continuation. 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, 

the Department intends to initiate the 

next five-year review of the orders not 

later than 30 days prior to the fifth 

anniversary of the effective date of 

continuation. 

These five-year (sunset) reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

section 751(c) of the Act and published 

pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: November 6, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

Performing the Non-exclusive Functions and 

Duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24515 Filed 11–9–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–011] 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Amended Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 8, 2017, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (CIT) entered final judgment 

sustaining the Department of 

Commerce’s (the Department’s) final 

results of remand redetermination 

pertaining to the countervailing duty 

(CVD) investigation of certain 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic products 

(solar products) from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC). The 

Department is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment in this case is 

not in harmony with the Department’s 

final determination, as amended, in the 

CVD investigation of solar products 

from the PRC. 

DATES: Applicable September 18, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 

(202) 482–3586. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 23, 2014, the 

Department published its final 

determination in the CVD investigation 

of solar products from the PRC.1 On 

February 18, 2015, the Department 

published an amended final 

determination and CVD order.2 In the 

Final Determination, the Department 

found that certain unreported assistance 

discovered during the investigation was 

countervailable using adverse facts 

available (AFA) pursuant to section 776 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).3 Additionally, the Department 

determined not to initiate investigations 

into the mandatory respondents’ 

creditworthinesss in certain years, 

finding that SolarWorld Americas, Inc.’s 

(SolarWorld) creditworthiness 

allegation failed to satisfy the threshold 

initiation requirements of 19 CFR 

351.505(a)(6)(i).4 In the Amended Final 

Determination, the Department found 

that it made a ministerial error in 

countervailing one of the unreported 

programs, and removed that program 

from the net countervailable subsidy 

rate calculated for Changzhou Trina 

Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Trina Solar).5

Trina Solar and SolarWorld appealed 

the Amended Final Determination to the 

CIT, and on December 30, 2016, the CIT 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES