alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            666 - ITF INDX 2006-AR5



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Revocations and Surrenders – August 28, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Hct37k24Cd\"><a href=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-august-28-2015\/\">Revocations and Surrenders – August 28, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/revocations-and-surrenders-august-28-2015\/embed\/#?secret=Hct37k24Cd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revocations and Surrenders – August 28, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Hct37k24Cd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Lawrence B. LOCKWOOD and Panip, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP, Jonathan Hangartner, and Steve P. Hassid, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2010-1189.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 15, 2010.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan. 28, 2011.

Kathryn L. Boyd, Howarth & Smith, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief was Don Howarth.

Gary A. Clark, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter *&*Hampton, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Darren M. Franklin and Dennis J. Smith.

Andre M. Mura, Center for Constitutional Litigation, P.C., of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae the TPL Group.

David Hricik, Mercer University School Law, of Macon, GA, for amicus curiae Amici Law Professors.

Margaret M. Grignon, Reed Smith LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, for amicus curiae NDP Managed Secui'ity. With her on the brief was Judith E. Posner.

Brian M. Berliner, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, for amicus curiae O’Melveny & Myers LLP. With him on the brief were Joshua Biller; and Mark S. Davies and Meaghan McLaine Vergow, of Washington, DC.

NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Ex.31.2  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mexus Gold US, a Nevada corporation, (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”), I, Paul D. Thompson, Sr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)the Report, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated: July 13, 2018By:/s/ Paul D. Thompson Sr.Paul D. Thompson Sr.
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-1367

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v. Leron L. Morris, also known as Lo Key

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: July 22, 2014 Filed: July 24, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Leron Morris directly appeals after the District Court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him above the Chapte r 7 advisory Guidelines range to the

1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.applicable statutory maximum of 24 months in prison. The revocation occurred after Morris had violated his release conditions seven times—a fact highlighted by the District Court in determining that the advi sory Guidelines range was not sufficient to promote Morris’s respect for the law and deter him from further criminal conduct. Morris’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the District Court abused its discretion by sentencing Morris to the maximum sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude thatthe District Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Morris. See United States v. Thunder , 553 F.3d 605, 609 (8th Cir. 2009) (holding that a revocation sent ence above the advisory range was not substantively unreasonable where the defe ndant repeatedly violated supervised release); United States v. Larison , 432 F.3d 921, 924 (8th Cir. 2006) (affirming a statutory maximum revocation sentence where the district court justified its decision by giving supporting reasons); see also United States v. Growden , 663 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (noting thata revocation sentence is reviewed for substantive reasonableness under a defere ntial abuse-of-discretion standard). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of th e District Court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Morris about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Home Mortgage
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Strauss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


     /s/ Michael Strauss
------------------------------
Michael Strauss
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
mstr-ex101_173.htm



Exhibit 10.1

MicroStrategy Incorporated

 

2021 Cash Bonus Determinations for Certain Executive Officers

 

On February 11, 2022, the Chief Executive Officer of MicroStrategy Incorporated (the “Company”) determined cash bonus awards for the following executive officers of the Company in the amounts set forth opposite their respective names, in each case with respect to the executive’s performance in 2021:

 


					
	
Timothy E. Lang
	
 
	
$
	
575,000
	
 

	
Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Technology Officer
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Phong Q. Le
	
 
	
$
	
1,000,000
	
 

	
President & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
W. Ming Shao
	
 
	
$
	
650,000
	
 

	
Senior Executive Vice President & General Counsel
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 




 

The Chief Executive Officer determined the foregoing awards based on his subjective evaluation of the applicable executive’s performance in the context of general economic and industry conditions and Company performance during 2021.

Salary Determinations for Certain Executive Officers

 

On February 11, 2022, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company approved increases to the annual salaries of the following executive officers of the Company, resulting in the amounts set forth opposite their respective names, effective January 1, 2022:

 


					
	
Timothy E. Lang
	
 
	
$
	
640,000
	
 

	
W. Ming Shao
	
 
	
$
	
640,000
	
 




 

Annual Discretionary Cash Bonus Targets for Certain Executive Officers

 

On February 11, 2022, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company established annual discretionary cash bonus targets for 2022 for the following executive officers of the Company in the amounts set forth opposite their respective names:

 


					
	
Timothy E. Lang
	
 
	
$
	
500,000
	
 

	
Phong Q. Le
	
 
	
$
	
750,000
	
 

	
W. Ming Shao
	
 
	
$
	
500,000
	
 




 

Awards pursuant to the foregoing discretionary cash bonus targets will be determined by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company based on his subjective evaluation of the applicable executive’s performance in the context of general economic and industry conditions and Company performance during the year.
#### Robert F. SPILLMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7367.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 21, 2008.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Robert F. Spillman moves to voluntarily dismiss his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – December 29, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nXnG8e3OEj\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-29-2016\/\">Applicants – December 29, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-december-29-2016\/embed\/#?secret=nXnG8e3OEj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – December 29, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"nXnG8e3OEj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group
III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Justin P. DiNorscia, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: May 23, 2005
                          /s/ Justin P. DiNorscia
                          -------------------------------------
                          Justin P. DiNorscia, President
                          BF Acquisition Group III, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants November 6, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZDes1HP1Qq\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-6-2023\/\">Applicants November 6, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-november-6-2023\/embed\/#?secret=ZDes1HP1Qq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants November 6, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"ZDes1HP1Qq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 99.2

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



     The  undersigned,  Stephen L. Mourlam,  is the Chief  Financial  Officer of
Webster City Federal Bancorp (the "Company").

     This  statement  is being  furnished in  connection  with the filing by the
Company of the Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

     C)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a) or
          78o(d)) and

     D)   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the  Company  as of the dates and for the  periods  covered  by the
          Report.

     This  statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this  statement  will  accompany  the  Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


                                                   /s/ Stephen L. Mourlam
---------------------------                        ----------------------------
Dated                                                     Stephen L. Mourlam
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Jean-Pierre Vandromme, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Telecom, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007   /s/ JEAN-PIERRE VANDROMME   Jean-Pierre Vandromme