alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Paragon  Financial  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Steven
A. Burleson,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Steven A. Burleson
-------------------------
Steven A. Burleson
Chief Executive Officer
May 29, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  accompanied  the Form 10-Q filing  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350. It is being reproduced  herein for information  only. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New
Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### Ivan L. CATHCART, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 5544.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 26, 1957.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 17, 1957.

See 77 S.Ct. 1387.

Leland M. Coulter, Denver, Colo., was on brief for appellant.

_ TTT ,, G. Walton Cheyenne, Wyo. ^ R RaPf ’ Cheyenne, Wyo., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals from a conviction and judgment upon an information alleging that he “did unlawfully and knowingly steal and did aid and abet in stealing from a railroad car * * * *75moving in interstate commerce and from a passenger thereon” a mink cape in violation of Section 659 of Title 18 U.S.C.

The information, says the appellant, fails to allege a cognizable offense since on its face there was no theft from an interstate “shipment”. Such argument is without merit. The statute expressly provides that “Whoever * * * steals, or unlawfully takes * * * from any railroad car * * * operated by any common carrier moving in interstate * * * commerce *or from any passenger thereon*any * * * goods, or chattels, or * * * receives, or has in his possession * * * goods * * * knowing the same to have been * * * stolen” shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned for more than ten years, or both. (Emphasis added.)

Additionally, appellant takes the position that the information is defective for failing to formally plead a felonious intent. We have said that such formalities are no longer necessary or proper under the new rules of pleading. All that is required or permissible is a “plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense.” Rule 7(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.; see Madsen v. United States, 10 Cir., 1948, 165 F.2d 507, 509.

And, the information is likewise challenged as duplicitous, in that it alleges (1) “did unlawfully and knowingly steal”; (2) “and did aid and abet in stealing”; (3) “and did unlawfully and knowingly receive and have in * * * possession” the goods in question. We have stated on numerous occasions that an indictment or information is not fatally duplicitous if couched in the language of the statute, even though it charges more than one offense in the conjunctive. McDonough v. United States, 10 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 402; Troutman v. United States, 10 Cir., 1938, 100 F.2d 628 and cases cited.

The judgment is Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wambold, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-Q of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2004
         (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a) or
         sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

                                          /s/ RICHARD L. WAMBOLD
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard L. Wambold
                                          Chairman, President, and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

May 10, 2004

     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Chairman Attends Panama Canal Expansion Opening Ceremony","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cIDHjMYbZs\"><a href=\"\/fmc-chairman-attends-panama-canal-expansion-opening-ceremony\/\">FMC Chairman Attends Panama Canal Expansion Opening Ceremony<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-chairman-attends-panama-canal-expansion-opening-ceremony\/embed\/#?secret=cIDHjMYbZs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Chairman Attends Panama Canal Expansion Opening Ceremony” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"cIDHjMYbZs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 16-0905

Filed February 8, 2017

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MCCARTHY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

RENEE WERDEL,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Nancy S. Tabor,

Judge.

Christopher McCarthy appeals the paternity decree provision placing the 

parties’ three children in Renee Werdel’s physical care. AFFIRMED.

Andrew B. Howie of Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese, P.C., West 

Des Moines, for appellant.

Michael J. McCarthy of McCarthy, Lammers & Hines, Davenport, for 

appellee.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ. Tabor, J., 

takes no part.
2

DANILSON, Chief Judge.

Christopher (Chris) McCarthy and Renee Werdel have three children 

together, born in 2004, 2005, and 2008. Renee and Chris began their 

relationship in 2002. Renee has been the primary caregiver for the children. 

After living together for several years, Renee took the children to South Dakota 

and sought an emergency protective order. The South Dakota court denied 

emergency relief, noting Iowa had jurisdiction. 

The Iowa district court considered the parties’ requests for joint legal 

custody, each seeking physical care of the children. The district court entered a 

paternity decree placing the parties’ three children in Renee’s physical care. 

Chris appeals.

We review custody actions, which are tried in equity, de novo. Iowa R. 

App. P. 6.907. We give weight to the findings of the trial court—particularly its 

credibility findings—but we are not bound by them. Iowa R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g). 

The trial court’s reasons for placing the children in Renee’s physical 

care—a determination of a history of domestic abuse by Chris, the historical role 

of Renee as primary caregiver of the children, and the children’s strong bond with 

Renee’s oldest child from another relationship—are fully supported by our de 

novo review of the record. We agree with the trial court “Renee is the best 

parent to be awarded primary physical care of the three minor children. Over the 

course of this long-term relationship, Renee has shown the better ability to 

identify the children’s growing and changing needs and provide proper nurturing 

of the same.” Chris testified he and Renee followed “gender role[s]” in their 

relationship, and it was Renee’s responsibility to cook, clean, and care for the 
3

children. The evidence also supports the court’s findings that Chris was abusive; 

the trial court noted several specific findings, which we need not repeat here. 

Contrary to Chris’s contention that Renee had no support for her allegations, her 

mother, sister, and a neighbor all testified about Chris’s controlling and abusive 

nature. The district court specifically observed: “Much of Chris’s testimony, 

demeanor, tone of voice and cavalier attitude, and attitude of he being the victim 

husband gives the Court many ‘tells’ of his true controlling nature.” 

We find no reason to disturb the trial court’s ruling and we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.2

I, Dale E. Gravatt, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Theater Xtreme
Entertainment Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors;

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: March 14, 2005

                                         /s/ Dale E. Gravatt
                                         -------------------
                                         Dale E. Gravatt
                                         Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kendall STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50572.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 6, 2008.

Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Douglas E. Miller, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James H. Locklin, Esq., FPDCA- — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kendall Stewart appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Stewart’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to Long Beach Securities Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of January 1, 2005 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between Long Beach Mortgage Company, as servicer and predecessor in interest to the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-3 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the“Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H. R. 3182 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To provide that inclined sleepers for infants and crib bumpers shall be considered 

banned hazardous products under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety 

Act, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Sleep for Babies Act of 

2021’’. 

SEC. 2. BANNING OF INCLINED SLEEPERS FOR INFANTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act, inclined sleepers for infants, regardless of 

the date of manufacture, shall be considered a banned hazardous 

product under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 

U.S.C. 2057). 

(b) INCLINED SLEEPER FOR INFANTS DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘inclined sleeper for infants’’ means a product with an 

inclined sleep surface greater than ten degrees that is intended, 

marketed, or designed to provide sleeping accommodations for an 

infant up to 1 year old. 

SEC. 3. BANNING OF CRIB BUMPERS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act, crib bumpers, regardless of the date of 

manufacture, shall be considered a banned hazardous product under 

section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2057). 

(b) CRIB BUMPER DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘crib 

bumper’’— 

(1) means any material that is intended to cover the sides 

of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts 

against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete 

access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a 

crib occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped 

in any opening; 

(2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and unsupported vinyl bumper guard, and vertical crib slat covers; and 

(3) does not include a non-padded mesh crib liner. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Mario Cordero","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8vKzPBtLUa\"><a href=\"\/commissioners\/mario-cordero\/\">Mario Cordero<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioners\/mario-cordero\/embed\/#?secret=8vKzPBtLUa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mario Cordero” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8vKzPBtLUa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/CommCordero_Official_071511_large_AE.jpeg","thumbnail_width":160,"thumbnail_height":198}