alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.19.1
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.


2020 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
2021 PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED
STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) is made to each Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement granting Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units that was granted by Albertsons Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to its 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on and after May 12, 2021 (each a “2021 PBRSU Award”). 


As of the original date of each 2021 PBRSU Award, each such 2021 PBRSU Award is amended as follows:
1.Section 6(b) of the Appendix is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“(b) If, during a Change in Control Period, the Participant incurs a Termination of Service by the Company without Cause, the Participant shall become fully vested in any portion of the Award that has not yet vested (to the extent not previously forfeited or cancelled) immediately upon such Termination of Service by the Company.”


2.To the extent that the terms of this Amendment are inconsistent with the terms of the 2021 PBRSU Award, this Amendment shall control.


3.Except as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the 2021 PBRSU Award shall continue in full force and effect. 




[Signature page follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth below.
									
		
			
		

ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.

		

By:
	/s/ Juliette Pryor
		Name:	Juliette Pryor
		Title:
	EVP & General Counsel

		Date:
	February 23, 2022

			






[Signature Page to 2021 PBRSU Award Amendment]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo PEREYRA-EQUIHUA, a.k.a. Ruben Rosales Osuna, a.k.a. Ricardo Pereira, a.k.a. Ricardo Pereya-Ehihua, a.k.a. Ricardo Pereyro, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50124.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.*

Filed Dec. 4, 2013.

Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Ami Sheth, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Ricardo Pereyra-Equihua, Lisbon, OH, pro se.

David W. Fermino, Esquire, Law Offices of David W. Fermino, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Pereyra-Equihua appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 132-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pereyra-Equihua’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Pereyra-Equihua the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Pereyra-Equihua waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal five specified issues related to his sentence as long as his sentence did not *854exceed 210 months. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Pereyra-Equihua’s plea or any sentencing issue outside the scope of the sentencing appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waivers. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir.2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, T.J. STINSON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RICHARD E. HUJDA

SONAR TECHNICIAN (SURFACE) THIRD CLASS (E-4), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201500048

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 10 December 2014.

Military Judge: CAPT Bethany Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Northwest, 

Silverdale, WA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR E.K. Westbrook, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: CAPT James Talbert, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

11 June 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted without 

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as 

approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code 

of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of  Legacy Wine & Spirits International, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3364 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3364

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
 participate in the South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2009

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
 participate in the South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``South San Diego County Water 
Reclamation Project of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding after the last section the following:

``SEC. 16__. THE SOUTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Sweetwater Authority, Otay Water District and the City of Chula Vista, 
California, may participate in the design, planning, and construction 
of permanent facilities needed to reclaim, reuse, and treat groundwater 
and wastewater in South San Diego County, California.
    ``(b) Costsharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost of the project.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Funds provided by the Secretary shall not be 
used for the operation and maintenance of the project described in 
subsection (a).
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of 
Public Law 102-575 is amended by adding after the last item the 
following:

``Sec. 16__. The South San Diego County Water Reclamation Project, 
                            California.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 17, 2015","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rxm8OLSbo1\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-17-2015\/\">Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 17, 2015<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-scheduled-for-november-17-2015\/embed\/#?secret=rxm8OLSbo1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Scheduled for November 17, 2015” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"rxm8OLSbo1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,
2005 (the "Report"), I, Liane Pelletier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 2, 2005          /s/ Liane Pelletier
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Liane Pelletier
                                Chief Executive Officer,
                                Chairman of the Board and President
                                Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of FindEx.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Periodic Report), I, Kirk Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
               Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                                                                
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    May 17, 2004 | By:  /s/  Kirk Rowland
          Kirk Rowland
          Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Managers 

DB Commodity Services LLC: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-132484) of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund and Subsidiary of our reports dated March 8, 2010,with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidatedstatements of income and expenses, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund and Subsidiary. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

March 8, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0042

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CLINTON SCOTT KRAUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 14, 2020, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2020

09/11/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0042
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Final Rules to be Published Implementing Shipping Act Amendments and Revising Procedures","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tU0c9ijD99\"><a href=\"\/commission-votes-to-publish-two-final-rules\/\">Final Rules to be Published Implementing Shipping Act Amendments and Revising Procedures<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-votes-to-publish-two-final-rules\/embed\/#?secret=tU0c9ijD99\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Final Rules to be Published Implementing Shipping Act Amendments and Revising Procedures” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tU0c9ijD99\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri Testifies to Congress","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nxSR8cGqtX\"><a href=\"\/acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-testifies-to-congress-2\/\">Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri Testifies to Congress<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/acting-chairman-michael-a-khouri-testifies-to-congress-2\/embed\/#?secret=nxSR8cGqtX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri Testifies to Congress” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"nxSR8cGqtX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### In re: VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Homer Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Merck & Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-30209

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 14, 2011.

Homer Jones, Lexington, OK, pro se.

John A. Kenney, McAfee & Taft, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellee.

*316Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The district court dismissed Appellant Homer Jones’s personal injury claims against Merck *&*Company pursuant to a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice that Jones signed when he submitted his claim to a nonjudicial resolution program established pursuant to a settlement agreement between Merck and a group of plaintiffs’ counsel. After Jones was found by the program administrators to be ineligible to participate in the settlement and he failed properly to complete the process for returning his case to the court system, Merck filed the joint stipulation of dismissal, which was signed by Jones and Merck’s counsel, in the district court. The district court then entered an order dismissing Jones’s complaint.

In his *pro se*brief on appeal, Jones does not contend that his signature on the joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was involuntary or unknowing. Instead, he argues, for the first time on appeal, that the nonjudicial resolution program administrators erred by finding that he was ineligible to participate in the settlement, and that he can prove that Merck’s product, Vioxx, caused his alleged injury.

We generally do not consider issues presented for the first time on appeal. *See Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. v. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela,*575 F.3d 491, 504 (5th Cir. 2009). The joint stipulation of dismissal without prejudice, signed by Jones and Merck’s counsel, was effective upon filing. *See SmallBizPros, Inc. v. MacDonald,*618 F.3d 458, 461 (5th Cir.2010) (“Except in special circumstances ... a voluntary order of dismissal requested by both parties is effective upon filing and does not require the approval of the court.”). Because Jones does not challenge the voluntariness of his stipulation, “the fact that both parties freely consented to the entry of a final judgment precludes an appeal from it.” *Amstar Corp. v. Southern Pacific Transport Co.,*607 F.2d 1100, 1100 (5th Cir.1979). Accordingly, Jones’s appeal is DISMISSED. Jones’s motions for joint designation treated as a motion to supplement the record on appeal and for appointment of counsel are DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.