alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 9 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00871

- CR

CARLOS ALBERTO BUSTOS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 1350260



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant has been charged with aggravated sexual assault. Appellant’s pre

trial bond was revoked by written order signed November 5, 2013. On September 9, 2014, appellant filed a motion requesting that the trial cou rt reduce the new $100,000 bond and reinstate his original bail amount or set a reasonable bail . The

t rial court denied the motion by a written order signed October 7, 2014

. On October 20, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was fi led December 3, 2014.2

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recen tly held that appellate court s lack jurisdiction to review an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for pretrial bail reduction

. See Rags t on v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim . App. 2014) (holding that there is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or the denial of bail). The Ragston court made it clear that Texas Rule of Appel late
Procedure 31 , which provides the procedures for appeals in habeas corpus and bail proceedings, does not grant a right of interlocutory appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for bond reduction. Id.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed f or want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Brown. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Digital Strategy Initiative at Federal Maritime Commission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9GJ6u9cBuF\"><a href=\"\/digitalstrategy\/\">Digital Strategy Initiative at Federal Maritime Commission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/digitalstrategy\/embed\/#?secret=9GJ6u9cBuF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Digital Strategy Initiative at Federal Maritime Commission” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"9GJ6u9cBuF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### In re S.V. BABU, Sharath Hegde, and Sunil Chandra Jha.

No. 2008-1025.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 15, 2008.

ORDER

Appellant having submitted the required brief, and it appearing that the appeal was dismissed in error, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Armando Eugene MINES, a/k/a Robert Edward Mines, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-6809.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 30, 2010.

Armando Eugene Mines, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Armando Eugene Mines appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and denying his subsequent motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Mines v. United States,*No. 1:10-cv00520-WMN, 2010 WL 917059 (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2010); 2010 WL 1741375 (Apr. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Industry Advisory \u2014 Interim Procedures for Submitting \u201cCharge Complaints\u201d Under 46 U.S.C. \u00a7 41310","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zFV4Ggk1fW\"><a href=\"\/industry-advisory-interim-procedures-for-submitting-charge-complaints\/\">Industry Advisory \u2014 Interim Procedures for Submitting \u201cCharge Complaints\u201d Under 46 U.S.C. \u00a7 41310<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/industry-advisory-interim-procedures-for-submitting-charge-complaints\/embed\/#?secret=zFV4Ggk1fW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Industry Advisory \u2014 Interim Procedures for Submitting \u201cCharge Complaints\u201d Under 46 U.S.C. \u00a7 41310” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"zFV4Ggk1fW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
|                                  | (1)                                                       |   | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and                 |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                      |
|                                  | (2)                                                       |   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |
|                                  |                                                      |   |                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                                  |                                                      |   |
| Dated:      March 18, 2009  |                                                      |   |
|                                  |                                                      |   |
|                                  | /s/ RODNEY      HERSHBERGER                               |   |
|                                  | Rodney      Hershberger                                   |   |
|                                  | President      and Chief Executive Officer           |   |
|                                  |                                                      |   |
|                                  | /s/ JEFFERY      T. JACKSON                               |   |
|                                  | Jeffery      T. Jackson                                   |   |
|                                  | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                  |
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David S. Bassin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




inVentiv Health,
      Inc.November
      7, 2008
              By:
              /s/ DAVID
      S. BASSINName 
      David S. BassinTitle   
      Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Wilshire Credit Corporation
Payments
P.O. Box 30040; Los Angeles, CA  90030-0040
or   P.O. Box 650314; Dallas, TX  75265-0314
Correspondence

P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR  97207-8517
Phone

(503) 952-7947
(888) 502-0100
Fax

(503) 952-7476
Web Site

www.wfsg.com
Exhibit 35 [Wilshire logo]
Exhibit T CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER March 1, 2007
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. 250 Vesey Street 4 World Financial Center, 10
th
Floor
New York, New York  10080
U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingston Avenue Mail Code EP-MN-WS3D
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107-2292 Attn: Structured Finance/SURF 2006-AB1
Re:
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as February 1, 2006 among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as Depositor, Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Special Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-AB1, Pool 1406
I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing of Wilshire Credit Corporation (the "Servicer"), hereby
certify that:
i.

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and
ii.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof, or if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof.
Wilshire Credit Corporation,
as Servicer
By: _/s/: Ken Frye_____ Name: Ken Frye Title: Senior Vice President Loan Servicing
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses the 44th Annual Conference of the National Custom Brokers and Forwarders Association of American (NCBFAA)in New Orleans","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pMrlcJAbuC\"><a href=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-addresses-the-44th-annual-conference-of-the-national-custom-brokers-and-forwarders-association-of-american-ncbfaain-new-orleans\/\">Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses the 44th Annual Conference of the National Custom Brokers and Forwarders Association of American (NCBFAA)in New Orleans<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/acting-chairman-khouri-addresses-the-44th-annual-conference-of-the-national-custom-brokers-and-forwarders-association-of-american-ncbfaain-new-orleans\/embed\/#?secret=pMrlcJAbuC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Acting Chairman Khouri Addresses the 44th Annual Conference of the National Custom Brokers and Forwarders Association of American (NCBFAA)in New Orleans” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"pMrlcJAbuC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Dontay D. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.S. WOODFORD, Director of Corrections; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-56176.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed April 30, 2008.

Dontay D. Hayes, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Phillip Lindsay, Esq., Office of the Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Dontay D. Hayes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his constitutional right of access to the courts by denying him adequate access to the law library during prison lock-down periods. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, *Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,*382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hayes’ action because the allegations in Hayes’ amended complaint demonstrate that, even if his access to the law library was deficient, he did not sustain an actual injury as a result of defendants’ conduct. *See Letvis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 351-53, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (holding that there is no abstract freestanding right to a law library, and a prisoner must demonstrate that his efforts to pursue a non-frivolous legal claim were hindered); *see also Sands v. Lewis,*886 F.2d 1166, 1171 (9th Cir.1989) (holding *577that an “actual injury consists of some specific instance in which an inmate was actually denied access to the courts”). Even accepting Hayes’ contentions of denial of law library access during lockdown, the record supports the district court’s conclusion that Hayes’ federal habeas petition was untimely.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Hayes leave to file a second amended complaint. *See Chappel v. Lab. Corp. of Am.,*232 F.3d 719, 725-26 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that district court has discretion to deny leave to amend when amendment would be futile).

Hayes’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Hayes’ December 14, 2006 motion to receive a copy of the motions he submitted on November 27, 2006 is denied.

Hayes’ request for judicial notice is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Duane ROSENGREN; Thomas Bullard; Jeff Miller; City of Rohnert Park, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-15184.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed April 30, 2008.

Ali T. Agha, Santa Rosa, CA, pro se.

Raymond J. Fullerton, Jr., Esq., Geary Shea O’Donnell & Grattan, Steven Mitchell, Esq., Leo Bartolotta, Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*580MEMORANDUM **

Ali T. Agha appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment for defendants after a bench trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights by using excessive force when arresting him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error factual conclusions and review de novo legal conclusions. *Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton,*348 F.3d 789, 793 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err when it concluded that the officer did not use excessive force when arresting Agha. *See Saman v. Robbins,*173 F.3d 1150, 1155-56 (9th Cir.1999). Further, because Agha failed to prove his excessive force claim, his related state and federal claims fail. *See id.*at 1157 n. 6 (“A prima facie case for battery is not established under California law unless the plaintiff proves that an officer used unreasonable force against him to make a lawful arrest or detention.”); *id.*at 1157 (stating that the question of whether the City had a policy authorizing or condoning the use of excessive force is moot if plaintiff cannot show a constitutional deprivation). Similarly, the district court properly granted summary judgment on Agha’s false arrest claim because it is undisputed that Agha refused to sign the notice to appear. *See*Cal.Penal Code § 853.5(a) (stating that the failure to sign the notice to appear permits arrest and detention); *Henry v. County of Shasta,*132 F.3d 512, 522 n. 17 (9th Cir.1997).

Agha contends that he did not receive a fair trial. The district court did not abuse its discretion in conducting Agha’s bench trial. *See Navellier v. Sletten,*262 F.3d 923, 941 (9th Cir.2001) (stating trial courts have broad authority to impose reasonable time limits). Agha’s claim of judicial bias, raised for the first time on appeal, is not supported by the record. *See King v. U.S. Dist. Court,*16 F.3d 992, 993 (9th Cir. 1994).

Agha’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, Dwayne Skellern, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the annual report on Form 10-K of Big Bear Mining Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big Bear Mining Corp.




Dated: August 31, 2009





/s/ Dwayne Skellern


Dwayne Skellern


President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Home > News Articles > West Coast Port Forum Alert

## West Coast Port Forum Alert

Posted on: 

September 12, 2014