alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Community Bancorp Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 20, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Perdue                                          
|                    |  |  |  | Michael J. Perdue President and Chief Executive Officer        
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 20, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Bruce Mills, Jr.                                        
|                    |  |  |  | L. Bruce Mills, Jr. Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Community Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Community Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL M. BRISTOL,

Plaintiff

- counter

defendant

- Appellee,

v.

ELIZABETH JOAN HUGHES, Individually and as Trustee of the Scorpio Trust dated January 28, 2015,

Defendant

- counter

- claimant

Appellant. No. 18

- 16385

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 00705

- JCM

CWH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2020 * *

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

E lizabeth Joan Hughes appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for lack of diversity jurisdiction her counterclaims in Gabriel M. Bristol’s action

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 16385

alleging contract claims

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Naffe v. Frey , 789 F.3d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir.

2015). We vacate and remand

.

The district court properly dismissed Hughes’ s counterclaims on the basis of

Hughes’s insufficient allegations to establish complete diversity between the

parties

. However, it is not clear on review that the defective allegations of

jurisdiction in Hughes’ s countercomplaint could not have been cured by

amendment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653 (permitting amendment of defective allegations

of jurisdiction) ; Snell v. Cleveland , Inc. , 316 F.3d 822, 828 n.6 (9th Cir. 2002)

( “ D ismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo

review, that the complaint could not be saved by amendment

. ” (citation omitted) ).

Accordingly, w e vacate the judgment as to Hug hes’s counterc laims

, and

remand for the district court to provide Hughes with an opportunity to amend her

counter complaint

.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
---

Exhibit
23.0





Consent
of ParenteBeard LLC





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 29, 2010, on
the consolidated financial statements of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and for the years then ended, in the Registration
Statement No. 333-135645 on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. with respect to Northeast
Community Bank 401(k) Plan.







/s/ Parente Beard
LLC


Parente
Beard LLC


Clark,
New Jersey


March 29,
2010
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, David Natan, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of SFBC International, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ DAVIDNATAN

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                                       TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Kevin P. Hemenway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 31, 2003                /s/ Kevin P. Hemenway
                                   ---------------------
                                   Kevin P. Hemenway
                                   Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit 10.1


 


CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE, INC.


 


April 25, 2022


 


Raymond Todd Barrett


 


Dear Todd:


 


This letter (this “Letter
Agreement”) memorializes the agreement between you and Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (the “Company”) regarding
certain changes to your compensation in connection with your appointment to serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company. This
Letter Agreement shall be effective as of the effective date of such appointment (the “Effective Date”). In connection
with such appointment, you hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Your annual base salary following the Effective Date, including
during the period in which you serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer and following such period, will be $275,000;



 


		2.	You will be entitled to receive an additional payment of $10,000
per month for as long as you hold the title of Interim Chief Financial Officer (the “Additional Payment”), which Additional
Payment will be prorated for any partial month;



 


		3.	You will be entitled to receive a car allowance of $1,200
per month following the Effective Date, including during the period in which you serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer and following
such period; and



 


		4.	You will also be entitled to receive a one-time cash bonus
of $100,000, payable to you (a) 120 days following the effective date of appointment of a permanent Chief Financial Officer, subject
to your continued employment through the payment date, or (b) if earlier, within 30 days following your termination of employment by
the Company without “Cause” or by you with “Good Reason” (each as defined in that certain Employment Agreement,
dated as of March 9, 2022, between you and the Company (the “Employment Agreement”)), provided that you otherwise
satisfy the conditions to payment of severance benefits under the Employment Agreement (including timely execution and non-revocation
of a release of claims).



 


For the avoidance of doubt,
once you no longer serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer, you will no longer be entitled to receive the Additional Payment. You agree
that such expiration of the Additional Payment shall not constitute Good Reason under the Employment Agreement.


 


All terms and provisions of
the Employment Agreement not described in this Letter Agreement, either expressly or by necessary implication, will remain in full force
and effect. This Letter Agreement and the Employment Agreement represent the entire understanding of the parties hereto and thereto with
respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior arrangements and understandings regarding same.


 


Please sign and date this
Letter Agreement and return it to me to indicate your acceptance of these terms.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE, INC. 
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Fred Ross
	 	Name:	Fred Ross
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	Accepted and Agreed by:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Raymond Todd Barrett	 
	Raymond Todd Barrett
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (32,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    286,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               595,922
<PP&E>                                         311,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                (164,341)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 890,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,104,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       220,923
<OTHER-SE>                                    (686,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   890,868
<SALES>                                         97,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,455
<CGS>                                           51,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (719,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (719,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (719,578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Maximum Penalty Fees Adjusted","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0foFyRmO6k\"><a href=\"\/maximum-penalty-fees-adjusted-2\/\">Maximum Penalty Fees Adjusted<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/maximum-penalty-fees-adjusted-2\/embed\/#?secret=0foFyRmO6k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Maximum Penalty Fees Adjusted” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"0foFyRmO6k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001088771
<NAME>                        Lynch Interactive Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         21,123
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                      330
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,669
<PP&E>                                        150,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                 55,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                245,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          53,633
<BONDS>                                       130,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  245,606
<SALES>                                       155,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              155,762
<CGS>                                         133,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 143,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               15,406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (160)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,447)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.26)



</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Establishes Regulatory Reform Webpage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DEVDliZBP4\"><a href=\"\/fmc-establishes-regulatory-reform-webpage\/\">FMC Establishes Regulatory Reform Webpage<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-establishes-regulatory-reform-webpage\/embed\/#?secret=DEVDliZBP4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Establishes Regulatory Reform Webpage” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DEVDliZBP4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00871-CR

CARLOS ALBERTO BUSTOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1350260

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has been charged with aggravated sexual assault. Appellant’s pretrial bond was revoked by written order signed November 5, 2013. On September 

9, 2014, appellant filed a motion requesting that the trial court reduce the new 

$100,000 bond and reinstate his original bail amount or set a reasonable bail. The 

trial court denied the motion by a written order signed October 7, 2014. On 

October 20, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was filed 

December 3, 2014.
2

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently held that appellate courts lack

jurisdiction to review an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for 

pretrial bail reduction. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014) (holding that there is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the 

courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail 

or the denial of bail). The Ragston court made it clear that Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 31, which provides the procedures for appeals in habeas corpus and bail 

proceedings, does not grant a right of interlocutory appeal from an order denying a 

pretrial motion for bond reduction. Id. 

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Brown.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

William E. MERRITT

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202100341

_________________________

Decided: 28 March 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Stephen F. Keane

Sentence adjudged 3 September 2021 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of 

a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 50 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Captain Thomas P. Belsky, JAGC, USN

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________
United States v. Merritt, NMCCA No. 202100341

Opinion of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.