alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cuevas Gustavo CORTES; Alma Delia Cortes, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77261.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008 *.

Filed May 1, 2008.

Leon B. Hazany, Esq., Law Offices of Asherson, Klein & Darbinian, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stacey I. Young, Esq., M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*645Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cuevas Gustavo Cortes and his wife Alma Delia Cortes, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to remand and dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, *Movsisian v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005), and review de novo claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, *Lin v. Ashcroft,*377 F.3d 1014, 1024 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

We agree with the BIA that the performance of petitioners’ former counsel did not result in prejudice, and thus them claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, petitioner must show prejudice).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to remand, because the BIA considered the evidence they submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

The record does not support petitioners’ contention that the BIA made an adverse credibility finding.

The record also does not support petitioners’ contention that the IJ exhibited bias.

We deny petitioners’ motion to supplement their briefing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### James D. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony PADULA, Lee CI Warden; Linda Dunlap, SCDC Medical Nurse Director; Gene Noles, SCDC Inmate Grievance Director; Jon Ozmint, SCDC Director; Doctor Davis, SCDC Medical Director; C. James; Geraldine P. Miro, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 10, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 17, 2011.

James D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*311Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James D. Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Scott v. Padula,*No. 0:08-cv-03240-HFF, 2010 WL 2640303 (D.S.C. filed June 30, 2010; entered July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Pursuant to 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we have limited our review to the issues raised in Scott’s informal brief.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Australian Dollar Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 10, 2011



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH ARRUDA            
|Joseph Arruda*               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed
                  Certificates Trust 2006-5 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

      Date: March 26, 2007


                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                  Steve Bailey
                  Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
OrgNo OrgName Reason for Action License No. Termination Date Comments

019248 ALLCARGO NET, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 019248N 6/30/2023

029228 AVAIL LOGISTICS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 029228N 6/29/2023

026981 C & E OPTIMUM LOGISTICS PTY LTD FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026981N 6/1/2023

029223 CNN LOGISTICS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 029223NF 6/4/2023

017656 COLTRANS (USA), INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 017656N 6/22/2023

027844 DNA AUTO GROUP FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 027844NF 6/15/2023

030515 ENDURANCE CARGO MANAGEMENT INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 030515N 6/18/2023

025025 FOYTT INTERNATIONAL LLC VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 025025NF 6/16/2023

019252 GLOBAL PARTNER LOGISTICS, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 019252N 6/15/2023

030610 HILLEBRAND BULK LIQUIDS, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 022389NF 6/29/2023

028376 ONESIMUS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 028376NF 6/16/2023

028361 QUALITY BEST SOLUTIONS INC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 028361N 6/11/2023

015218 SCL ‐ NIELSEN MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT, INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 015218N 6/4/2023

027914 TEMPEST LOGISTICS, LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 027914N 6/1/2023

019088 TRB GROUP, INC. VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 019088NF 6/30/2023

027336 TRIWAYS LOGISTICS (USA) INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 027336N 6/25/2023

016471 UNIVERSAL EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 016471F 6/30/2023 NVOCC 016471N REMAINS ACTIVE

026565 WELLS CARGO EXPRESS LLC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A BOND 026565N 6/1/2023

030008 ZENTRY SOLUTIONS INC. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BONDS 030008NF 6/30/2023

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations & Surrenders

June 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-146719) pertaining to the PGT Savings Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-135616) pertaining to the PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan of ourreports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PGT, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PGT, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 29, 2007. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

Tampa, Florida 

March 7, 2008
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 23-1535, 23-1645

L.M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and 

natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF MIDDLEBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS; MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL 

COMMITTEE; CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough 

Public Schools, in her official capacity; HEATHER TUCKER, Acting 

Principal, Nichols Middle School, in her official capacity,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on June 9, 2024, is 

amended as follows:

On page 16, line 8, change "Middleburgh" to 

"Middleborough."
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Announcing the 3rd Annual Port Environmental Initiatives Forum","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vIEGmH5iJr\"><a href=\"\/announcing-the-3rd-annual-port-environmental-initiatives-forum\/\">Announcing the 3rd Annual Port Environmental Initiatives Forum<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/announcing-the-3rd-annual-port-environmental-initiatives-forum\/embed\/#?secret=vIEGmH5iJr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Announcing the 3rd Annual Port Environmental Initiatives Forum” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"vIEGmH5iJr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Robert Lee NEWBURY, Appellant.

No. 06-1736.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 9, 2008.

Filed: May 13, 2008.

George S. Leone, Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for United States of America.

Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., Ridgewood, NJ, for Appellant.

BEFORE: BARRY and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 Hon. Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

*OPINION OF THE COURT*

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Robert Newbury pled guilty to filing a false claim with the September 11 Victims’ Compensation Fund. At sentencing, he sought a downward departure or, in the alternative, a variance. The government opposed this application. The District Court sentenced Newbury to 30 months of imprisonment, which was as the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range. Before us in this appeal, he insists that this sentence was unreasonable because he presented a “unique prospect of rehabilitation” and because the District Court placed “undue emphasis on the generic need for deterrence and retribution.” We will affirm.

The sentencing judge conducted New-bury’s sentencing hearing and reached her ultimate conclusion in strict and sensitive accord with the governing law articulated in *Rita v. United States,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007), and our decision in *United States v. Cooper,*437 F.3d 324 (3d Cir.2006). She explained the reasoning behind her decision at some length. That explanation (1) expressly recognized that the Guideline range was advisory only and that she was authorized to grant Newbury’s probation request, (2) discussed the relevant § 3553(a) factors, including express reference to, and evaluation of, each of his arguments based on his “history and characteristics,” (3) advised the parties that she was confident that specific deterrence was not necessary, and (4) after weighing the relevant § 3553(a) factors, indicated that a sentence at the bottom of the Guideline range would reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment and adequate general deterrence. The sentencing judge also expressly assured Newbury that she believed his sentence was no greater than necessary to serve those objectives.

“[W]e must decide ... whether the district judge imposed the sentence ... she did for reasons that are logical and consistent with the factors set forth in section 3553(a).” *Cooper,*437 F.3d at 330 (quoting *United States v. Williams,*425 F.3d 478, 481 (7th Cir.2005)).1 We conclude that she *209did. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

1

. While we lack jurisdiction to review the District Court’s denial of a departure, we do have jurisdiction to review the reasonableness *209of the sentence imposed. *Cooper,*437 F.3d at 332-33.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 287 

To prohibit the removal of Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism 

until Cuba satisfies certain conditions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2021 

Ms. SALAZAR (for herself, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. 

GIMENEZ, Mr. DUNN, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. WALTZ, Mrs. BICE of Oklahoma, and Mrs. CAMMACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the removal of Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism until Cuba satisfies certain conditions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fighting Oppression 

5 until the Reign of Castro Ends Act’’ or the ‘‘FORCE 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REMOVAL. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, neither the President nor the Secretary of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 287 IH

1 State may remove Cuba from the list of state sponsors 

2 of terrorism until the President makes the determination 

3 described in section 205 of the Cuban Liberty and Demo4 cratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 

5 6065). 

6 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘state 

7 sponsor of terrorism’’ means a country the government of 

8 which the Secretary of State determines has repeatedly 

9 provided support for international terrorism pursuant 

10 to— 

11 (1) section 1754(c)(1)(A) of the Export Control 

12 Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4318(c)(1)(A)); 

13 (2) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act 

14 of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371); 

15 (3) section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act 

16 (22 U.S.C. 2780); or 

17 (4) any other provision of law. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of 4301,                Inc. |

| Date:                March 30, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| 4301,                Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| By:                /s/                *Yusuke                Matsuo                        * |
| Yusuke                Matsuo Chief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer                                                                                                          |
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Cordero Says Facilitating Exports a Key Goal of FMC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IxFGzHMm12\"><a href=\"\/cordero-says-facilitating-exports-a-key-goal-of-fmc\/\">Cordero Says Facilitating Exports a Key Goal of FMC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/cordero-says-facilitating-exports-a-key-goal-of-fmc\/embed\/#?secret=IxFGzHMm12\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cordero Says Facilitating Exports a Key Goal of FMC” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"IxFGzHMm12\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}