alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pablo Zarrabal GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74635.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 16, 2008.

Pablo Zarrabal Garcia, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying a motion to reopen.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See*
      *791
      *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). The regulations state that a motion to reopen removal proceedings must be filed no later than ninety days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). A review of the administrative record demonstrates that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely. Petitioner’s final administrative order of removal was entered on November 8, 2005. Petitioner’s motion to reopen was filed on September 20, 2007, more than ninety days after the date on which the final order of removal was entered. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

To the extent petitioner challenges the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen for protection under the Convention Against Torture, the BIA did not abuse its discretion. Petitioner has not met his burden of presenting a prima facie case for reopening because the motion to reopen does not present any changes that have occurred in Mexico that are material to him or his circumstances. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(e)(3)(ii); *Kamalthas v. INS,*251 F.3d 1279 (9th Cir.2001).

Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

The motion for reinstatement of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. *See Garcia v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I, Michael D. Devlin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boardwalk Bancorp, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of such disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 20, 2007   /s/Michael D. Devlin  Michael D. DevlinPresident, CEO & Chairman  
Page 64 of 65
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000030 28-DEC-2017 10:28 AM
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

March 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132943(42) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE GABRIELLA JEA NNE VALENTE, Minor.

BARBARA ELLEN VALENTE and ROBERT JOSEPH VALENTE, Petitioners-Appellees,

v SC: 132943 COA: 272058 Kent CC Family Division: 05-021576-AY ROBERT WESLEY ROETMAN, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court's February 2, 2007 order is considered, an d it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

l0306 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2007

Clerk
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

|                                       |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February                9, 2006 |   | /s/                MICHAEL R. HAYNES                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                       |   | Michael                R. Haynes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                       |   | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                       |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                       |   | A                signed original of this written statement required by Section 906                has been                provided to Collectors Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Collectors                Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission                or                its staff upon request. |
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Ferguson certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CoConnect, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  May 19, 2007
**Exhibit 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Realogy    Corporation’s Registration Statement    No. 333-136057    on    Form S-8    of our report dated March 6, 2007, relating to the consolidated    and combined financial statements of Realogy Corporation,    appearing in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Realogy Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006    which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an    explanatory paragraph relating to the fact that, (i) prior    to its separation from Cendant Corporation    (“Cendant”), the Company was comprised of the assets    and liabilities used in managing and operating the real estate    services businesses of Cendant, (ii) included in    Notes 14 and 15 of the consolidated and combined financial    statements is a summary of transactions with related parties,    and (iii) as discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated    and combined financial statements, in connection with its    separation from Cendant, the Company entered into certain    guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded the fair    value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP    Parsippany, New Jersey    March 6, 2007     * * *
Small Claim Form for Informal Adjudication 

and Information Checklist

Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC.

Informal Docket No. _______

_______________________________________________________________________

(Claimant)

 vs.

_______________________________________________________________________

(Respondent)

I. The claimant is [state in this paragraph whether claimant is an association, corporation, 

firm or partnership, and if a firm or partnership, the names of the individuals composing the 

same. State the nature and principal place of business.]

II. The respondent named above is [state in this paragraph whether respondent is an 

association, corporation, firm or partnership, and if a firm or partnership, the names of the 

individuals composing the same. State the nature and principal place of business.]

III. That [state in this and subsequent paragraphs to be lettered A, B, etc., the matters that 

gave rise to the claim. Name specifically each rate, charge, classification, regulation or practice 

which is challenged. Refer to tariffs, tariff items or rules, or agreement numbers, if known. If 

claim is based on the fact that a firm is a common carrier, state where it is engaged in 

transportation by water and which statute(s) it is subject to under the jurisdiction of the Federal 

Maritime Commission].

IV. If claim is for overcharges, state commodity, weight and cube, origin, destination, bill 

of lading description, bill of lading number and date, rate and/or charges assessed, date of 

delivery, date of payment, by whom paid, rate or charge claimed to be correct and amount 

claimed as overcharges. [Specify tariff item for rate or charge claimed to be proper].

V. State section of statute claimed to have been violated. (Not required if claim is for 

overcharges).

VI. State how claimant was injured and amount of damages requested.

VII. The undersigned authorizes the Settlement Officer to determine the above-stated 

claim pursuant to the informal procedure outlined in subpart S (46 CFR 502.301-502.305) of the 

Commission's informal procedure for adjudication of small claims subject to discretionary 

Commission review.
Attach memorandum or brief in support of claim. Also attach bill of lading, copies of 

correspondence or other documents in support of claim.

(Date)

(Claimant's signature)

(Claimant's address)

(Signature of agent or attorney)

(Agent's or attorney's address)

VERIFICATION

State of _______________, County of ___________, ss: _____________________, 

being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he or she is 

The claimant [or if a firm, association, or corporation, state the capacity of the affiant] and is the 

person who signed the foregoing claim, that he or she has read the foregoing and that the facts 

set forth without qualification are true and that the facts stated therein upon information received 

from others, affiant believes to be true.

____________________________

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the State of , County of 

__________, this day of , 20 . (Seal)

(Notary Public)

My Commission expires,________________________
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Pasquale Catizone, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
     International Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
         annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
         of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
         the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls.


Date: November 9, 2007


/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       11
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of NB Telecom, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2007, I, Craig Burton, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.           Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April
15, 2008




NB
Telecom, Inc.




By:  __/s/________________________


Craig
Burton
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International Corporation on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Pasquale Catizone,
President (principal executive officer) and Daniel Generelli, Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                /s/ Pasquale Catizone
                          -------------------------------------------------
                          Pasquale Catizone
                          President (Principal Executive Officer)


                                /s/ Daniel Generelli
                          -------------------------------------------------
                          Daniel Generelli
                          Chief Financial Officer
                          (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Jose Luis MACIAS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Butch JACKSON, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-7237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.

Jose Luis Macias, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Macias seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. *852§ 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Macias has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*