alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daryl LaMonte SAMPLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

*241Daryl Lamonte Sample, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Lamont Sample seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sample has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – January 7, 2016","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l6wJWv2KXD\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-7-2016\/\">Applicants – January 7, 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-january-7-2016\/embed\/#?secret=l6wJWv2KXD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – January 7, 2016” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"l6wJWv2KXD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  filing  of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report")
by National Coal Corp. ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  August 20, 2007                  /S/ DANIEL A. ROLING
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Daniel A. Roling
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 20, 2007                  /S/ T. MICHAEL LOVE
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        T. Michael Love
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hillstream Pharma Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy
      Milby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Randy MilbyRandy
                MilbyPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMarch
                5, 2007
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0659. ALFRED STARLING v. JOE C. BISHOP et al.

Alfred Starling, who is serving a prison sentence following a 2018 conviction

for armed robbery, filed a petition for a writ of error quo warranto against several

individual defendants under OCGA § 9-6-60 et seq. The trial court dismissed

Starling’s petition, and Starling filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”), an appeal in a civil

action filed by a prisoner must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

review. See OCGA § 42-12-8, cross-referencing OCGA § 5-6-35; Jones v. Townsend,

267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals

procedure isjurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257,

257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because Starling wasincarcerated when he filed this civil

action, his failure to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jones, 267 Ga.

at 490-491.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 04, 2019

12/04/2019
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 15, 2008





/s/ William R. Colucci

William R. Colucci, President

BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter Luis TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7314.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.

*796Peter Luis Torres, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Luis Torres appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Torres,*No. 1:04-cr-00471-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

# **Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

# ** **

Wehereby consent to the inclusion of our Independent Auditor’s Report dated January 30,2009 regarding the consolidated balance sheets of Santa Lucia Bancorp andSubsidiary as of    December 31,2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes inshareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended December 31,2008, in the Form    10-K filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/Vavrinek, Trine, Day, & Co., LLP

 

LagunaHills, California

March 27,2009

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for 10510, First National Bank of Crestview, Crestview, Florida, has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership estate of First National Bank of Crestview (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law. The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective November 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

Dated: November 3, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-24288 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2836 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2836

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2021

 Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
   Crist, Mrs. Demings, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Donalds, Ms. Lois Frankel of 
Florida, Mr. C. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. 
  Lawson of Florida, Mr. Mast, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
   Rutherford, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Soto, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Ms. 
Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Florida Coastal Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRELEASING, LEASING, AND 
              RELATED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF 
              FLORIDA.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Prohibition of Oil and Natural Gas Preleasing, Leasing, and 
Related Activities in Certain Areas Off the Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this section or any other law, the Secretary may not offer for 
        oil and gas leasing or preleasing or any related activity, any 
        tract located in--
                    ``(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico that 
                is referred to in section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico 
                Energy Security Act of 2006;
                    ``(B) the portion of the South Atlantic Planning 
                Area south of 30 degrees 43 minutes North Latitude; or
                    ``(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area.
            ``(2) Limitation on effect.--Nothing in this subsection 
        affects any right under any lease issued under this Act before 
        the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-146217) of Volcano Corporation and in the related Prospectus for the registration of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units, the Registration Statement onForm S-8 (No. 333-136655) pertaining to the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan of Volcano Corporation, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-145761) pertaining to the 2005 Equity CompensationPlan and 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Volcano Corporation, and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-149761) pertaining to the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Volcano Corporation of our reports dated March 9, 2009, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Volcano Corporation and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting of Volcano Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Sacramento, California 

March 9, 2009
Abatement Order filed June 23, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00112

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 0011 3

- CR

____________ JOSHUA FESELIER , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1390943 & 1452064



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter ’ s record has not been filed in this appeal. The court reporter has informed the court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter ’ s fee to prepare the reporter ’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(A). This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the payment
of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we enter the following
order. See Tex. R. App. P . 35.3(c).We ORDER the judge of the 232nd District Court to immediately conduct a

hearing at which appellant, appellant ’ s counsel, if any, and counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether appel lant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. The judge may appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a
record of th e hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental
clerk ’ s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court ’ s findings and conclusions, and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference shall be filed with the
clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a close d case, and removed from this court ’ s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court ’ s active docket when the
trial court ’ s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate th e appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court ’ s o rder. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
Maritime Transportation Data 

Infrastructure Overview and Next Steps
Motivation and Goals

Role of FMC

46 U.S.C § 40101, the FMC is tasked with, “provid[ing] an efficient 

and economic transportation system in the ocean commerce of the 

United States that is, insofar as possible, in harmony with, and 

responsive to, international shipping practices.”

46 U.S.C. § 41102, “A common carrier, marine terminal operator, 

or ocean transportation intermediary may not fail to establish, 

observe, and enforce just and reasonable regulations and practices 

relating to or connected with receiving, handling, storing, or 

delivering property.”

Outputs

• Comprehensive and well-documented data dictionary

• Recommended data structures/standards
Data creation, transformation, and 

transmission through the supply 

chain

BoL VOCC CBP MTO LMC/RR BCO

Goals

• Efficient

• Transparent

• Accessible

• Complete
Project Plan

Step 1: Cataloging the Status Quo in Maritime Data, storage, and 

access across the supply chain

• Identify data added at each step 

• Identify data storage and transmission

• Identify critical elements used by each supply chain party

Step 2: Identification of Key Gaps in Data 

Step 3: Definitions/Classification

Inconsistent taxonomy and lexicon

Step 4: Develop Recommendations for Common Data Standards
Stakeholder Engagement

1. Initial meetings with key supply chain participants to catalog data

2. Follow up on initial findings to ensure completeness

3. Maritime Data Summit

Timeline

• Step 1: December 2021-April 2022

• Step 2: April-May 2022

• Maritime Data Summit: June 1, 2022
December 2021-April 2022

• 18 meetings and over 60 presenters

• Many attendees in live sessions and views of YouTube 

recordings: 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwKTAlGGHIA0xcN3b

Dt_Uqg

• Covered the entire maritime supply chain

• Working Closely with Federal Partners:

• CBP

• USDOT

• Commerce Department

• USDA
Summit: Recommendations on a 

Common Maritime Data Lexicon 

• June 1st summit in Washington, DC, will be a 

hybrid in-person and virtual event

• All meeting participants have been invited 

• Breakout sessions on key data elements, 

definitions, standards, and transmission 

• Participants will review and comment on initial 

FMC work products on data definitions and 

data transmission standards
FMC Review and Refinement

• Commissioner Bentzel will present the MTDI 

recommendations at the July Commission 

meeting

• Commission will review final recommendations 

in the Fall