alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael John McKAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jerrauld C. JONES, Honorable Judge, Norfolk Circuit Court, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7115.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

*239Michael John McKay, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael John McKay appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. *McKay v. Jones,*No. 1:13-cv-00649-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. July 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KYRON WILLIAM GEANES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00425-LMB-1)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kyron William Geanes, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kyron Geanes appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Geanes, 

1:04-cr-00425-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Eugene SMITH, Appellant, v. EAST ARKANSAS VIDEO, INC., Appellee.

No. 07-1981.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 2008.

Filed: May 8, 2008.

Eugene Smith, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Clayborne S. Stone, Philip S. Anderson, Williams & Anderson, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment on the pleadings on his civil suit brought against defendant in connection with its allegedly unsatisfactory television and internet service to Smith. After careful de novo review, *see Stalley ex rel. United States v. Catholic Health Initiatives,*509 F.3d 517, 521 (8th Cir.2007); *Westcott v. City of Omaha,*901 F.2d 1486, 1488 (8th Cir.1990), we conclude that dismissal of the federal claims was proper. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appointment of counsel, *see Phillips v. Jasper County Jail,*437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review), or preliminary injunctive relief, *see Blue Moon Entm’t, LLC v. City of Bates City, Mo.,*441 F.3d 561, 564 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review). Finally, the court also did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Smith’s state law claims, which the court properly dismissed without prejudice. *See Labickas v. Ark. State Univ.,*78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam).

The judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the Intermodal Association of North America","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0KZgQKbOzy\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyles-prepared-remarks-to-the-intermodal-association-of-north-america\/\">Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the Intermodal Association of North America<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyles-prepared-remarks-to-the-intermodal-association-of-north-america\/embed\/#?secret=0KZgQKbOzy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the Intermodal Association of North America” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"0KZgQKbOzy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the TiVo Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cal Hoagland, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 10, 2007



/s/ CAL HOAGLANDCal HoaglandInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### CUMBRE, INC.; Coachella Valley Insurance Service, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-17190.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 17, 2010.

Kurt W. Melchior, Nossaman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, James Carhart Powers, Nossaman LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Andre Joseph Cronthall, Esquire, Whitney Jones Roy, Alison Nicole Kleaver, Sheppard Mullin Richter *&*Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for DefendantAppellee.

Before: HALL and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

The district court correctly concluded that claim preclusion bars the claims brought by Cumbre, Inc. and Coachella Valley Ins. Co. (collectively, “Cumbre”). Claim preclusion “bars any subsequent suit on claims that were raised or could have been raised in a prior action.” *Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.,*586 F.3d 1204, 1212 (9th Cir.2009).

Cumbre’s present suit alleges the same primary right violation that Cumbre alleged in state court. The final decision by the California Court of Appeals conclusively rejecting that claim is res judicata as to the identical federal claim asserted in this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *Brodheim v. Cry,*584 F.3d 1262, 1268 (9th Cir.2009) (“Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, federal courts are required to give state court judgments the preclusive effects they would be given by another court of that state.”). *273Cumbre argues for application of *Furey v. City of Sacramento,*780 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir.1986), *abrogated on other grounds*as *recognized by Schnuck v. City of Santa Monica,*935 F.2d 171, 173 (9th Cir.1991), but that reliance is misplaced. Under California law, the issuance of a remittitur by the court of appeal indicates that the state appellate process has been concluded. *Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes,*504 F.3d 803, 808 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The following Compromise Agreement is a true copy
 

of the signed agreement.
 

If you require a copy of a signed agreement(s), please 

contact the Commission’s Office of the Secretary, 

202-523-5725.
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPROMISE AGREEMENT 

FMC File No. 17148 

This Agreement is entered into between: 

(1) The Federal Maritime Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, and 

(2) Wilhelmsen Ships Services, Inc., hereafter referred to as Respondent. 

WHEREAS, the Commission is considering the initiation of an assessment proceeding 

against Respondent for the recovery of civil penalties for alleged violation of 46 C.F.R. 

515.18(c). 

WHEREAS, such a proceeding would be based on the Commission’s allegation that 

Respondent engaged in certain practices, to wit: 

Respondent operated without a Qualifying Individual as required 

under 46 C.F.R. 515, for a period in excess of one year. 

WHEREAS, the Commission is authorized under section 13(c) of the 1984 Act, 46 

U.S.C. § 41109(c), and Subpart W of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 

C.F.R. § 502.604, et seq. to compromise and collect civil penalties arising for the alleged 

violation set forth and described above; and 

WHEREAS, Respondent has terminated the practice which was the basis of the alleged 

violation set forth herein, and has committed to maintaining measures designed to eliminate such 

practice in the future; and 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHEREAS, Respondent has cooperated and disclosed to the Commission information, 

facts, and documents relevant to its transportation activities and practices; and 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein, and in compromise of all 

civil penalties arising from the alleged violation set forth and described herein, Respondent and 

the Commission hereby agree upon the following terms of settlement: 

1.	 Respondent shall make payment to the Commission by cashier’s check in the total 

amount of $35,000. 

2.	 This instrument shall forever bar the commencement or institution of any 

assessment proceeding or other claim for recovery of civil penalties from 

Respondent, its officers, directors, employees, or agents arising from the alleged 

violation set forth above that occurred for a period in excess of one year prior to 

September 10, 2015. 

3.	 It is expressly understood that this Agreement is not, and is not to be construed as, 

an admission by Respondent to the alleged violation set forth above. 

2
 
 

 

 ____________________________________ 

 

 

 

 ____________________________________ 

 

4.	 This agreement is subject to approval by the Commission’s Managing Director in 

accordance with 46 C.F.R. § 502.604. 

Wilhelmsen Ships Services, Inc. 

Signature: __________________________ 

Printed Name: ______________________ 

Title: ______________________________ 

Date: ______________________________ 

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE 

The above Terms and Conditions and Amount of Consideration are hereby approved and 

accepted: 

By the Federal Maritime Commission: 

Peter J. King, Director (Date) 

Bureau of Enforcement 

Vern W. Hill (Date) 

Managing Director 

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      10,902
<SECURITIES>                             3,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              588,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                (6,770)
<INVENTORY>                                477,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,820,300
<PP&E>                                   4,791,197
<DEPRECIATION>                            (190,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           9,421,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    5,233,724
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                     5,069
<OTHER-SE>                               4,182,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             9,421,387
<SALES>                                    814,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           814,298
<CGS>                                      827,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,580,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,600,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,600,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,600,560)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.330)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.330)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission \u2013 June 6, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qX6wt8ezLi\"><a href=\"\/meeting-summary-june-6-2019\/\">Meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission \u2013 June 6, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/meeting-summary-june-6-2019\/embed\/#?secret=qX6wt8ezLi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission \u2013 June 6, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"qX6wt8ezLi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 05-14-00123-CR OFFENSE: 49.04 The State ofTexas v. Jessica Ruth 

# STYLE: Moore COUNTY: Dallas 

# J5/7-/V

COA DISPOSITION: REVREM 

### TRIAL COURT: County Criminal Court No. 2 DATE: 10/30/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: MB13-50157



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS The State ofTexas v. Jessica Ruth STYLE: Moore 

## APf>3LL££^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: JUDGE: CCA#: 

# IS11.14 CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:
REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Pasquale Catizone, President of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

August 10, 2007


                                       13
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24298]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

Meeting No. 17-04

    The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on November 
9, 2017, at Pickwick Landing State Park Inn, 116 State Park Lane, 
Counce, Tennessee 38326. The public may comment on any agenda item or 
subject at a public listening session which begins at 9:30 a.m. (CT). 
Following the end of the public listening session, the meeting will be 
called to order to consider the agenda items listed below. On-site 
registration will be available until 15 minutes before the public 
listening session begins at 9:30 a.m. (CT). Preregistered speakers will 
address the Board first. TVA management will answer questions from the 
news media following the Board meeting.

Status: Open.

Agenda

Chair's Welcome

Old Business

Approval of minutes of the August 23, 2017, Board Meeting

New Business

1. Report from President and CEO
2. Report of the Finance, Rates, and Portfolio Committee
    A. Financial Performance Update
    B. Long Term Service Agreement for Lagoon Creek
    C. Large and Medium Transformers
3. Report of the People and Performance Committee
    A. Fiscal Year 2017 Performance and Compensation
    B. CEO Compensation for Fiscal Year 2018
4. Report of the Audit, Risk, and Regulation Committee
5. Report of the Nuclear Oversight Committee
6. Report of the External Relations Committee
    A. Direct-served power arrangements


For more information: Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and 
have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to 
comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA 
Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: November 2, 2017.
Sherry A. Quirk,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-24298 Filed 11-3-17; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P