alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2934 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2934

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove from the list 
 of drugs excluded from coverage under the Medicare prescription drug 
 program prescription oral vitamins and mineral products indicated for 
  the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with chronic 
                            kidney disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2021

  Mr. O'Halleran (for himself, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Butterfield, and Mr. 
   Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove from the list 
 of drugs excluded from coverage under the Medicare prescription drug 
 program prescription oral vitamins and mineral products indicated for 
  the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with chronic 
                            kidney disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renal Anemia Innovation Support and 
Expansion Act'' or the ``RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING CERTAIN PRESCRIPTION VITAMINS AND MINERAL PRODUCTS 
              FROM THE LIST OF DRUGS EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM.

    Section 1860D-2(e)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w-102(e)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting ``other than subparagraph 
(F) of such section (relating to prescription vitamin and mineral 
products, except prenatal vitamins and fluoride preparations) if the 
prescription vitamin or mineral product is orally administered and is 
indicated for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with 
chronic kidney disease,'' after ``other than subparagraph (E) of such 
section (relating to smoking cessation agents),''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIGIMARC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          86,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,335
<PP&E>                                           2,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                     673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,610
<SALES>                                          2,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,570
<CGS>                                            1,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,211)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"DECEMBER 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gVum2RpEzw\"><a href=\"\/december-2021-activity-report\/\">DECEMBER 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/december-2021-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=gVum2RpEzw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“DECEMBER 2021 ACTIVITY REPORT” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"gVum2RpEzw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants  – April 27, 2018","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1tn8PnfcCM\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-april-27-2018\/\">Applicants  – April 27, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-april-27-2018\/embed\/#?secret=1tn8PnfcCM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants  – April 27, 2018” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"1tn8PnfcCM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 31.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer of Nortia Capital Partners,
Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nortia
Capital Partners, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;


               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

               (a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 11th day of December, 2006.

                                 By: /s/  William Bosso
                                    -----------------------
                                    William Bosso
                                    Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Larry Dean FRY, Appellant.

No. 07-3404.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 22, 2008.

Filed: April 25, 2008.

Matthew Jeremy Cole I, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellee.

*548John P. Messina, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellant.

Larry Dean Fry, Cedar Rapids, IA, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dean Fry (Fry) appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. On appeal, Fry argues the revocation-hearing evidence was insufficient to support the district court’s finding that Fry had committed an assault. After carefully reviewing the record, we affirm.

We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Fry had violated the conditions of his supervised release. *See United States v. Carothers,*337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir.2003) (stating the government’s burden of proof and the clear-error review standard). Although the district court did not engage in the balancing required by this court’s precedent before admitting hearsay evidence of the alleged assault at the revocation hearing, *see United States v. Reynolds,*49 F.3d 423, 426 (8th Cir.1995) (explaining, before admitting hearsay evidence at revocation hearing, the court must balance defendant’s constitutional right to confront a witness against the government’s explanation for why confrontation is undesirable or impractical), the evidence appears to be admissible under that test, *see United States v. Martin,*371 F.3d 446, 448 (8th Cir.2004) (concluding the hearsay evidence offered by the government is admissible if the evidence is sufficiently reliable and the government has a reasonably satisfactory explanation for not producing the witness). Even if the evidence were not properly admitted, we conclude any error was harmless, given the evidence of other supervised release violations. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a) (“Any error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.”).

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
#### Shone FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tammy POWELL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-2070.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 23, 2010.*

Decided Dec. 1, 2010.

Shone Foster, Ina, IL, pro se.

William P. Hardy, Attorney, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Springfield, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

*

 After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, tire appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

*143ORDER

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Shone Foster claims that Tammy Powell, a shift commander at the Sangamon County Detention Facility, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments by threatening him while he was in pretrial detention. Foster had asked why the jail was on lockdown, and Powell scoffed, “Top Secret, if I told you, I’d have to kill you.” Foster says this expression was not jest and that he feared for his life. And he grew more anxious, he continues, after filing a grievance and being confronted by Powell, who accused him of trying to ruin her career and warned that she could make his stay “very uncomfortable” if he did not “back off.” Foster did not relent but instead named Powell in a second grievance. After that he had no further contact with her and suffered no adverse action at the jail.

At screening, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the district court allowed Foster’s retaliation theory to proceed, but later the court dismissed the suit because Foster had not updated his mailing address upon being released from jail. At Foster’s urging, however, the court reconsidered that ruling and reinstated the suit. The court then granted summary judgment for Powell on the ground that her isolated comments, uncoupled from any adverse action, could not have deterred a reasonable person from exercising his First Amendment rights.

On appeal Foster primarily challenges the rescinded procedural dismissal, but we construe his pro se filings to contest also the grant of summary judgment for Powell. *See Anderson v. Hardman,*241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir.2001). Even so, the district court properly decided that, as a matter of law, Powell’s remarks could not have deterred a reasonable person from exercising his First Amendment rights. *See Bridges v. Gilbert,*557 F.3d 541, 552 (7th Cir.2009); *Bart v. Telford,*677 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir.1982); *Thaddeus-X v. Blatter,*175 F.3d 378, 398 (6th Cir.1999). Indeed Foster’s own conduct makes this point evident, since his immediate reaction to both conversations with Powell was to file a grievance. And there is no evidence that he suffered an adverse action while confined, i.e., discipline, altered conditions of confinement, loss of privileges, reassignment, or otherwise.

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Terrie Rae TURBIVILLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-30030.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 2, 2008.

Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brad L. Arndorfer, Esq., Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terrie Rae Turbiville appeals from the district court’s decision, following a limited remand under *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), that it would not have imposed a different sentence had it known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*652Turbiville contends that her due process rights were violated when the district court did not allow her to present new evidence during the *Ameline*remand. This contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Combs,*470 F.3d 1294, 1296-97 (9th Cir.2006). Turbiville also contends that the district court failed to comply with this court’s re-sentencing order. Her contention is belied by the record. During the initial appeal this court did not ultimately remand for a full re-sentencing.

We also conclude that the district court did not clearly err in making its drug quantity approximation. *See United States v. Kilby,*443 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir.2006). The district court was entitled to rely on the admissions of Turbiville’s coconspirator regarding the amount of methamphetamine he produced. *See id.*(“[T]he information which supports an approximation must possess sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.”). Based on the record on a whole, Turbiville could reasonably foresee the manufacture of at least 50 grams of methamphetamine. *See United States v. Ortiz,*362 F.3d 1274, 1275 (9th Cir.2004).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
      undersigned, Ofer Segev, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008
      of
      the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 6, 2008
            /s/
                Ofer SegevOfer
                SegevChief
                Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Extends Temporary Exemption of Certain Service Contract Filing Requirements","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"n1DcMiZH99\"><a href=\"\/commission-extends-temporary-exemption-of-certain-service-contract-filing-requirements\/\">Commission Extends Temporary Exemption of Certain Service Contract Filing Requirements<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-extends-temporary-exemption-of-certain-service-contract-filing-requirements\/embed\/#?secret=n1DcMiZH99\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Extends Temporary Exemption of Certain Service Contract Filing Requirements” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"n1DcMiZH99\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}