alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3046 

To prohibit Federal service academies from providing training and education 

based on critical race theory. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. ROY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

MOORE of Alabama, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GALLAGHER, and Mrs. 

LESKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal service academies from providing 

training and education based on critical race theory. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

4 IN CRITICAL RACE THEORY. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds may be obli6 gated or expended to provide training or education based 

7 on critical race theory at a Federal service academy. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3046 IH

1 (b) FEDERAL SERVICE ACADEMY DEFINED.—In this 

2 section, the term ‘‘Federal service academy’’ means the 

3 following: 

4 (1) The United States Military Academy. 

5 (2) The United States Naval Academy. 

6 (3) The United States Air Force Academy. 

7 (4) The United States Coast Guard Academy. 

8 (5) The United States Merchant Marine Acad9 emy. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Simeon SADOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20508

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stanley G. Schneider, Schneider & McKinney, P.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Simeon Sadowski appeals as substantively unreasonable his 97-month sentence for possession of child pornography; he does not contest that the sentence falls within the applicable guidelines range. We review the substantive reasonableness of the sentence for an abuse of discretion. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). This court has rejected Sadowski’s argument that district courts err by giving credence to non-empirical Guidelines during sentencing. *See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir.2009) (holding that a sentence within the applicable guidelines range is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness even if the Guideline applied is not empirically grounded). By arguing that the district court erred in its 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) analysis, Sadowski invites this court to engage in impermissible “substantive second-guessing of the sentencing court.” *United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.2008). He fails to overcome the presumption of reasonableness afforded his sentence. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.5


 


ClimateRock


 


50 Sloane Avenue


London, SW3 3DD, United Kingdom 


 


April 27, 2022


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing
on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of ClimateRock (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), U.N. SDG Support LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services
as may be required by the Company from time to time, at 50 Sloane Avenue, London, SW3 3DD, United Kingdom. In exchange therefore, the
Company shall pay U.N. SDG Support LLC $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
Date.


 


U.N. SDG Support LLC hereby agrees that it does
not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account
for any reason whatsoever.


 


This agreement may not be amended, modified or
waived as to any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto.


 


No party hereto may assign this agreement or any
rights, interests or contracted obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party. Any purported assignment
in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the
purported assignee.


 


This agreement shall be governed by, construed
in accordance with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its choice of law principles.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	ClimateRock
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
Per Regnarsson
	 	 	Name:	Per Regnarsson
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and

Director


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	U.N. SDG SUPPORT LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
Charles Ratelband	 
	 	Name:	Charles Ratelband	 
	 	Title:	Managing Member	 


  


[Signature page to Administrative Services Agreement]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 299 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 299

 To provide a definition of reasonable rate for noncontiguous domestic 
                  ocean trade, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2021

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a definition of reasonable rate for noncontiguous domestic 
                  ocean trade, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Noncontiguous Shipping Reasonable 
Rate Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. NONCONTIGUOUS DOMESTIC OCEAN TRADE.

    Section 13701(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph:
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this section, a rate is 
        reasonable if such rate is within 10 percent of a rate set by a 
        comparable international ocean rate index recognized by the 
        Federal Maritime Commission.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Igor SEDRAKYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71436.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Areg Kazaryan, Law Offices of Areg Kazaryan, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Colette Jabes Winston, Esquire, Monica Antoun, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*309Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Igor Sedrakyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

With respect to Sedrakyan’s asylum claim, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen because he was removable for having committed an aggravated felony. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(a)(2)(C), 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).

With respect to Sedrakyan’s withholding of removal and CAT claims, we lack jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2676 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2676

     To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to require that any 
     legislative recommendation of the Federal Trade Commission be 
 accompanied by an economic analysis and include a description of the 
               rationale for the recommended legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2021

 Mr. Bucshon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to require that any 
     legislative recommendation of the Federal Trade Commission be 
 accompanied by an economic analysis and include a description of the 
               rationale for the recommended legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Revealing Economic Conclusions for 
Suggestions Act'' or the ``RECS Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF ANALYSIS AND RATIONALE FOR LEGISLATIVE 
              RECOMMENDATIONS.

    Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 46(f)) 
is amended by inserting after ``That the Commission'' the following: 
``shall not submit any recommendations for legislation (including any 
legislation to provide the Commission with additional regulatory or 
enforcement powers) without an economic analysis by the Bureau of 
Economics of the Commission sufficient to demonstrate that the 
Commission has identified a problem it determines should be addressed, 
including the rationale for the Commission's determination that private 
markets or public institutions could not adequately address the issue, 
and that its recommended legislation is based on a reasoned 
determination that the benefits of the recommended legislation outweigh 
its costs: Provided further, That the Commission''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3


   

  Exhibit 10.3

   

  FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

  This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made by and between Ceridian HCM, Inc. (“Ceridian HCM”) and Stephen Holdridge (“Executive”).

   

  WHEREAS, Ceridian HCM and Executive are parties to an existing agreement dated December 8, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”); and

   

  WHEREAS, Ceridian HCM and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as reflected herein.

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that effective February 23, 2022, the following amendment will be made a part of the Employment Agreement:

   

  
   1.
   
    Sections 2.01 and 2.02 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by deleting “Global Head of Services” and replacing it with “Executive Vice President, Chief Customer Officer” and replacing Appendix A with the appendix attached hereto.
   

  

   

  
   2.
   
    Base Salary in Section 3.01 of the Employment Agreement is increased to Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand dollars ($650,000) USD.
   

  

   

  This Amendment will be attached to and be a part of the Employment Agreement between Ceridian HCM and Executive.

   

  Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect without modification.

   

  CERIDIAN HCM, INC. 

   

  			
	Date: February 28, 2022
	By:
	/s/ Leagh Turner

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Leagh Turner

	 
	Its:
	Co-Chief Executive Officer



   

  EXECUTIVE:

   

  		
	Date: February 28, 2022
	/s/ Stephen Holdridge

	 
	Stephen Holdridge



   

  APPENDIX A

  Chief Customer Officer: Job Description

  Redefine GCO as a ‘revenue machine’ responsible for generating or supporting the generation of all non-ACV revenue across the global organization. Accelerate the commercial orientation of the business overall. Further advance the full commercial customer lifecycle, working closely with the Chief Revenue Officer on the bookings/sales side, as well as the Chief Operating Officer, to ensure the full customer 

   

  

   

  lifecycle is designed and operating fit for purpose to drive (a) optimal revenue, (b) optimal efficiency, and (c) high customer satisfaction.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------






                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of PalWeb
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the Period Ended February 28, 2003 (the "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 19, 2003                        /s/ William W. Rahhal
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           William W. Rahhal
                                           Chief Financial Officer





                 The foregoing certification is being furnished
                      solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Yaron Garmazi,Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 of the Company (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Yaron  Garmazi       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Yaron  Garmazi           |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |   | November 15,  2004       |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TONY MOORE HICKMAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3235

[January 23, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF

005607

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant Publ ic Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pau l Patti III, Assis tant Attor ney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant appeal s the revocation of his probation raising multiple issues on appeal. We affirm all issues. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the writte n revocation order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, which found two grounds for revocation: felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of ammunition. See Walker v. State , 243 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We also remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a corrected written order, consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement , finding that appellant poses a danger to the community. See Arnone v. State , 204 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions

.

G ROSS , L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *2 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350)

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Raviv Zoller,Chief Executive Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Company (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ RAVIV  ZOLLER        |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Raviv Zoller             |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   | November 11,  2005       |

 

----
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 268 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Battlefield 

National Historic Park to be adjusted, to authorize the 

donation of land to the United States for addition to 

that historic park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 268 RFS

1 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY; LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 

2 (a) BOUNDARY.—Section 3(b)(2) of the Palo Alto 

3 Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 (16 U.S.C. 

4 410nnn–1(b)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 

6 follows: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.— 

8 ‘‘(i) In addition to the land described 

9 in paragraph (1), the historical park shall 

10 consist of— 

11 ‘‘(I) the approximately 34 acres 

12 of land, as generally depicted on the 

13 map entitled ‘Palo Alto Battlefield 

14 NHS Proposed Boundary Expansion’, 

15 numbered 469/80,012, and dated May 

16 21, 2008; and 

17 ‘‘(II) on the date that such land 

18 is donated to the United States, the 

19 approximately 166.44 acres of land 

20 generally depicted on the map entitled 

21 ‘PALO ALTO BATTLEFIELD NA22 TIONAL HISTORICAL PARK Pro23 posed Boundary Addition, Fort 

24 Brown Unit’, numbered 469/143,589, 

25 and dated April 2018. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 268 RFS

1 ‘‘(ii) Before accepting any donated 

2 land described in this subparagraph, the 

3 Secretary shall complete a boundary study 

4 analyzing the feasibility of adding the land 

5 to the national historical park. 

6 ‘‘(iii) If a boundary study completed 

7 under clause (ii) finds that acceptance of 

8 the donated land is feasible and appro9 priate, the Secretary may accept such land 

10 and administer the land as part of the his11 torical park after providing notice of such 

12 finding to Congress.’’; and 

13 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

14 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘MAP’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘MAPS’’; and 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘map’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘maps’’. 

18 (b) LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—Section 3(b)(3) of the 

19 Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 

20 (16 U.S.C. 410nnn–1(b)(3)) is amended by striking 

21 ‘‘after’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Secretary of the InVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:14 Mar 17, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H268.RFS H268

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 268 RFS

1 terior’’ and inserting ‘‘after the addition of lands to the 

2 historic park boundary, the Secretary of the Interior’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 15, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2788 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the 

cap on full-time employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs who provide equal employment opportunity 

counseling. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2788 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Equal Employment 

3 Opportunity Counselor Modernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CAP ON FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES 

5 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF6 FAIRS WHO PROVIDE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

7 OPPORTUNITY COUNSELING. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 516 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking subsection (g); and 

11 (2) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub12 section (g). 

13 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

14 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

15 Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Af16 fairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a report 

17 regarding the effect of the amendment under subsection 

18 (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS