alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of SantaLucia Bancorp (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of suchperiod and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

 

 
| Date:  | March 30, 2009 |   | /s/ John C. Hansen                                   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   | John C. Hansen                                       |
|   |                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|   |                |   |                                                 |
|   |                |   |                                                 |
| Date:  | March 30, 2009 |   | /s/ James M. Cowan                                   |
|   |                |   | James M. Cowan                                       |
|   |                |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of MODERNRENEWABLETECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, RANDYWHITE, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Randy White


Randy White


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Financial Officer


December 8, 2010
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMETNS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                             644
<SECURITIES>
<RECEIVABLES>
<ALLOWANCES>
<INVENTORY>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   644
<PP&E>
<DEPRECIATION>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              952
<BONDS>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                    50,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (308)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     (308)
<SALES>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>
<CGS>
<TOTAL-COSTS>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   745
<LOSS-PROVISION>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (745)
<INCOME-TAX>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (745)
<DISCONTINUED>
<EXTRAORDINARY>
<CHANGES>
<NET-INCOME>                                     (745)
<EPS-BASIC>
<EPS-DILUTED>


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"June 2021 Revocations and Surrenders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5OQDguaGwV\"><a href=\"\/oti\/june-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/\">June 2021 Revocations and Surrenders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/june-2021-revocations-and-surrenders\/embed\/#?secret=5OQDguaGwV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“June 2021 Revocations and Surrenders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"5OQDguaGwV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Creighton SHRADER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6960.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 26, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 4, 2013.

Thomas Creighton Shrader, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Betty Adkins Pullin, Thomas Charles Ryan, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

*322Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Creighton Shrader appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for new trials. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.**United States v. Shrader*(S.D.W.Va. June 3, 2013 & entered June 4, 2013; June 5, 2013 & entered June 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Shrader argues on appeal that the district court did not address all of his arguments in its order denying his motion for a new trial on the stalking charges. Although the district court did not address all of Shrader’s arguments, we conclude that his arguments were not based on new evidence but were simply new arguments based on previously known facts.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                                       TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
(the "Report"), I, David Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: August 6, 2004           /s/ David Wilson
                               ----------------
                               David Wilson
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                               Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit
32.1





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of New Dragon Asia Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25, 2009 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      May 8, 2009
                By:
                /s/ 
      Li Xia
      WANGLi
      Xia WANGChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Dated:
      May 8, 2009
                By:
                /s/ 
      Ling
      WangLing
      WangChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)
#### Elizabeth Pineda ZIALCITA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72986.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Alison Dixon, Esquire, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

OIL, M. Lee Quinn, Esquire, Emily Anne Radford, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elizabeth Pineda Zialcita, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Rivera v. Mukasey,*508 F.3d 1271, 1274 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Zialcita testified inconsistently concerning her level of political involvement and whether she was a member of a political party, and because Zialcita admitted she told the asylum officer she was not personally threatened with harm in the Philippines. *See Chebchoub v. INS, 257*F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001) (inconsistencies related to basis for alleged fear of persecution go to the heart of the claim). The IJ reasonably found Zialcita’s explanations for the inconsistencies unconvincing. *See Rivera,*508 F.3d at 1275. In the *257absence of credible testimony, Zialcita failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Zialcita’s CAT claim is based on testimony the agency found not credible, and no other evidence in the record compels a finding that it is more likely than not she would be tortured if she returned to the Philippines, her CAT claim also fails. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 3.1



                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT             [FILING STAMP]
                                                                    FILED
                                       TO                    00 MAY -5 PM: 3:31

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION        SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                            TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
                                       OF

                             SHOPPING SHERLOCK, INC.


     Pursuant to the  provisions  of Section  607.1006  of the Florida  Business
Corporation  Act,   Shopping   Sherlock,   Inc.,  a  Florida   corporation  (the
"Corporation"),  hereby  adopts  the  following  amendment  to its  Articles  of
Incorporation as follows:

     1.   Article  I of the  Articles  of  Incorporation  is hereby  amended  as
          follows:

                                    ARTICLE I

                                Name and Address

          The name of the  Corporation is "ASPi Europe,  Inc." and its principal
          place of business is Two Union Square,  Suite 4200,  601 Union Street,
          Seattle, Washington 98101.

     The  amendment  was  adopted  at  the  Corporation's   special  meeting  of
shareholders on May 2, 2000 by a number of votes  sufficient for approval of the
amendment.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has  executed  these  Articles  of
Amendment this 2nd of May, 2000.



                                         /s/ Patrick McGrath, Secretary
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Patrick McGrath, Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10900

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 19, 2013.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Charles M. Bleil, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 *546U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2017 WY 41

 April Term, A.D. 2017

April 19, 2017

TONYA OEDEKOVEN,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-16-0292

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification 

that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant 

to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional “no contest” plea to one count of 

felony theft. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-402. The district court imposed an 18 to 36 month 

sentence, which was suspended in favor of three years of supervised probation. 

Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s December 6, 2016, “Judgment, 

Sentence and Probation Order.”

[¶2] On February 13, 2017, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a 

“Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The next day, this Court entered an “Order 

Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that, on 

or before March 30, 2017, Appellant would be permitted to file a pro se brief specifying 

the issues she would like the Court to consider. This Court also provided notice that, 

after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on 

counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal.” 

Appellant did not file a pro se brief or any other pleading in the time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by 

appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be 

granted and the district court’s December 6, 2016, “Judgment, Sentence and Probation 

Order” should be affirmed. It is, therefore, 

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant, Tonya Oedekoven, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the district court’s December 6, 2016, “Judgment, Sentence and 

Probation Order” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 19th day of April, 2017.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. JAMES BURKE

Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2982 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2982

   To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize cybersecurity 
 operations and missions to protect critical infrastructure by members 
    of the National Guard in connection with training or other duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2021

 Mr. Kim of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Ms. 
    Kuster, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, and Mr. Ryan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize cybersecurity 
 operations and missions to protect critical infrastructure by members 
    of the National Guard in connection with training or other duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Cybersecurity Support 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS TO PROTECT CRITICAL 
              INFRASTRUCTURE BY MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN 
              CONNECTION WITH TRAINING OR OTHER DUTY.

    Section 502(f)(1) of title 32, United States Code, is amended by 
adding after the flush matter at the end the following new sentence: 
``Such training or other duty may include cybersecurity operations or 
missions undertaken by the member's unit at the request of the Governor 
of the State concerned to protect critical infrastructure (as that term 
is defined in the Critical Infrastructures Protection Act of 2001 (42 
U.S.C. 5195c)).''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Louis E. Sola Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EX3GwWZU6m\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-louis-e-sola-statement-on-expanded-supply-chain-investigation\/\">Commissioner Louis E. Sola Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-louis-e-sola-statement-on-expanded-supply-chain-investigation\/embed\/#?secret=EX3GwWZU6m\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Louis E. Sola Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"EX3GwWZU6m\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}