alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E S T HE R P OR T I L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70334 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 512- 287 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E s the rP ort i l l o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s or de rpr e t e rm i tt i ng he rappl i c a t i on f orc a nc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo 

# FI LED MA Y10 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70334 2 q u e s tio n s o f

la w , Mer cado -Zazueta v. H older , 58 0 F . 3d 11 02 , 11 04 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dwe g r a n tth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A de c i de d thi s c a s e w i thoutthe be ne f i tof ourde c i s i on i n Me r c adoZazueta v. H

older , i n w hi ch w e hel d thatfor purpo se s of s at i sf yi ng the fi ve ye ar s o f law fu l p er m an en t res id en ce re q u ired u n d er8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b (a )( 1 ), a p ar en t’ s s t a tus a s al a w f

ul pe rm a ne ntr e s i de nti s i m put e d t o the une m a nc i pa t e d m i nor c hi l dr e n r e s i di ng w i th tha tpa r e nt . 580 F . 3d a t1113- 16. A c c or di ngl y , w e gr a ntthe p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew an drem an dt o th e B IA fo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. See I N S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 (200 2) (percuri am ). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW G R A N TED ; R EM A N D ED .
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of PharmaNet Development Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Hamill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         |  |  | 
| | ----------------------- |  |  | 
| |                         |  |  | 
| |                         | 
| | /s/ John P. Hamill*     | 
| | John P. Hamill          | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
|

Date: August 6, 2008



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













1
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: For-Hire Telephone Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0709.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 33,923.
    Average Hours per Response: 3 minutes, 30 seconds.
    Burden Hours: 1,283.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved information collection. The For-Hire Telephone Survey (FHTS) 
is conducted for the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to 
estimate fishing effort and catch on for-hire vessels (i.e., charter 
boats and head boats). These data are required to carry out provisions 
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended, regarding conservation and management 
of fishery resources.
    NOAA Fisheries designed and implemented the FHTS to collect fishing 
effort information from for-hire vessel representatives through log 
sheet submission, the internet, or by telephone interview. For-hire 
vessels are randomly selected for the FHTS from a comprehensive sample 
frame developed and maintained by NMFS. A sample of 10% of the vessels 
on the FHTS frame are selected for reporting each week. Each interview 
collects information about the vessel, the number and type of trips the 
vessel made during the reporting week, the number of anglers on each 
trip, and other trip-level information.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1beb8a3b0aea284939c988282989e9fb19e9c93df949e81df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7e8eef5e6f8f4d2c5caced4d4cec8c9e7c8cac589c2c8d789c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: October 31, 2017.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-23949 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofTelecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ Cristina M. Lambert
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-BC1
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-BC1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                       Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
​

Exhibit 4.55
1st Amendment to the
Consultancy Agreement
between
CureVac AG
Friedrich-Miescher-Str. 15, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- hereinafter referred to as “CureVac” -
and
Clarentis SRL
Route de Renipont 25c, 1380 Ohain, Belgium; registered under number BE 0740.928.560, and duly represented by its Managing Director, Antony Blanc 
- hereinafter referred to as “Consultant” -
WHEREAS, CureVac and Consultant entered into a Consultancy Agreement effective July 9th, 2020 (the “Agreement”).
WHEREAS, following the August 20th announcement by the European Commission that it had concluded exploratory talks with CureVac to purchase 225 million doses of CureVac’s potential vaccine against COVID-19 on behalf of the Member States, the Parties have agreed to include a success fee to the Agreement terms.
THEREFORE, both Parties mutually agree to amend § 2 (1) (“Remuneration”) by addition of the following wording:
“The parties agree that for the successful final execution of the EU-Tender for COVID-19 (SANTE/ 2020/C3/047) agreement for delivery of 225 million doses of vaccine, Consultant will receive a success fee of EUR 250.000,- (two-hundred­fifty-thousand).
The EUR 250.000,- will be paid in two tranches, a first component of EUR 150.000,- upon signature of the EU-tender agreement. The second payment of EUR 100.000,- shall be paid within 20 calendar days after the date that the interim package has been submitted to EMA for purposes of obtaining the (conditional)  marketing authorization.”
This amendment shall enter into force upon signature. The remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in force unamended. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Agreement, unless expressly stated otherwise.
Signatures on following page
​

1



​

​
	​


	​


	​



	AGREED:
	    
	​

	​
	​
	​

	Tübingen, September 3, 2020
	​
	Ohain, September 3, 2020

	​
	​
	​

	/s/ Dr. Franz-Werner Haas
	​
	/s/ Antony Blanc

	CureVac AG
	​
	Clarentis SRL

	​
	​
	​

	By: Dr. Franz-Werner Haas
	​
	By: Antony Blanc

	​
	​
	​

	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	​
	Title: Managing Director.



​

2
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-NC3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
#### Patrick BASS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCC Coleman-USP II, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-14411

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 14, 2011.

Patrick Bass, Coleman, FL, pro se.

Linda Julin McNamara, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Zachary James Kelton, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Coleman, FL, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lemuel Bass, a *pro se*federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Following Bass’s federal conviction, the Federal Bureau of Prisons temporarily transferred him to the custody of Georgia to face state charges for which he was ultimately convicted. In his § 2241 petition, Bass attacked the validity of that state conviction on the ground that he had been improperly transferred to state custody. Specifically, he argued that the writ of habeas corpus *ad prosequendum*authorizing the transfer did not contain an official seal and did not address the correct federal correctional facility and warden. The district court denied Bass’s petition, finding that even if the transfer was improper, that would not invalidate the state conviction.1

*887We agree with the district court that, even if Bass’s transfer to state custody was improper, that would not invalidate his state conviction. As the government explains, a defendant forcibly abducted by the government for purposes of bringing him in the court’s presence will not impair that court’s power to try him. *See United States v. Alvarez-Machain,*504 U.S. 655, 660-62, 112 S.Ct. 2188, 119 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992). It stands to reason, as the district court did here, that because even a forcible abduction would not entitle Bass to relief, neither do the technical form defects about which he complains. To the extent Bass seeks to collaterally attack his federal conviction, he has failed to satisfy the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). *See Darby v. Hawk-Sawyer,*405 F.3d 942, 945 (11th Cir.2005). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Bass’s § 2241 petition.

AFFIRMED.

1

. “The availability of habeas relief under § 2241 presents a question of law we review de novo.” *Darby v. Hawk-Sawyer,*405 F.3d 942, 944(11th Cir.2005).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dean DRUMMOND, a.k.a. Rayon Antonio Smith, a.k.a. Blacks, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-13165.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 13, 2008.

Lisa A. Hirsch, Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ira N. Loewy, Bierman, Shohat & Lo-ewy, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WILSON, COX and BOWMAN,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Pasco M. Bowman II, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Dean Drummond appeals his convictions for (1) conspiracy to import 5 kilograms or more of a mixture containing cocaine and 100 kilograms or more of a mixture con*907taining marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968; (2) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; and (3) possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court erred by (1) admitting translated transcripts of conversations that did not contain a verbatim text of the conversations; (2) permitting a case agent to testify about coded words in the conspirators’ recorded conversations; (3) finding that recordings of phone conversations obtained by wiretaps should not be suppressed; (4) denying his amended motion to suppress the wiretap evidence without conducting an evidentiary hearing; and (5) not granting a new trial despite a sleeping juror.

After a careful consideration of the briefs, review of the record on appeal, and having heard oral argument in the matter, we conclude that Drummond’s arguments have no merit. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye Updates FMC on Supply Chain Innovation Initiative","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oWM9bWXjFT\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-dye-updates-fmc-on-supply-chain-innovation-initiative\/\">Commissioner Dye Updates FMC on Supply Chain Innovation Initiative<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-dye-updates-fmc-on-supply-chain-innovation-initiative\/embed\/#?secret=oWM9bWXjFT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye Updates FMC on Supply Chain Innovation Initiative” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"oWM9bWXjFT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eknali Nick SENGSATHEUANE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-20856

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eknali Nick Sengsatheuane presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.