alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Activeworlds Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Sean
Deson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                        /s/  Sean Deson
                                                        ------------------------
                                                              Sean Deson,
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                                 and
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 15, 2005









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Mary Thien Hoang Appointed to SES","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"I64NJjoFVO\"><a href=\"\/mary-thien-hoang-appointed-to-ses\/\">Mary Thien Hoang Appointed to SES<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/mary-thien-hoang-appointed-to-ses\/embed\/#?secret=I64NJjoFVO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mary Thien Hoang Appointed to SES” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"I64NJjoFVO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Growth
      Consultants, LLC**


**33
      North Pine Circle**


**Belleair,
      Florida 33756**




July
      7,
      2006




Ms.
      Tracy
      Culver Caswell, General Counsel


Smart
      Video Technologies, Inc.


3505
      Koger Boulevard, Suite 400


Duluth,
      Georgia 30096




Re:
            *Extension
                of January 27, 2006 Consulting Agreement*Dear
                Tracy:




This
      letter is to confirm that SmartVideoTM Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and I
      have agreed to extend the term of my January 27, 2006 Consulting
      Agreement through and including September 30, 2006. Furthermore,
      this letter will confirm that I have agreed to forego the previously
      agreed upon option grant to me in the third quarter of 2006. All other
      terms and conditions of the January 27, 2006 Consulting Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect until September 30 th ,
      2006,
      at which time
      the
      Agreement will expire or be renewed for an additional quarter.




Please
      call me with any questions.




Sincerely,









N.
      John
      Simmons, Jr., President


Growth
      Consultants, LLC




Cc:
            Glenn
                Singer


David
      Ross


William
      Loughman
No. 152.

#### Thomas D. Wilcoxon, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*Mitchell H. Wilcoxon. Martha E. Lemon and Mary D. Proctor.

April 11, 1910.

*Mr. H. T. Wilcoxon*for the plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. A. Crain*for the defendants in error.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.

Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.
Federal Maritime Commission 

Plain Writing Act of 2010 Compliance Report 

September 29, 2017 

Senior Agency Official for Plain Writing: 

Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary, secretary@fmc.gov, 202-523-5725 

Plain Language Website address: 

http://www.fmc.gov/about/plain_language_guidelines.aspx 

Contact us: secretary@fmc.gov 

Status of Agency Communications to be Made Available in a Format that is Consistent 

with the OMB Plain Writing Guidelines 

Type	of Communication, Document

or Posting, and	How it is Made	

Available to the Public

Intended	User	and	Approximate

Number of Potential Users

Status

Regulatory Reform Initiative • Entities regulated by the

FMC - 6,000	users.

• Members of the public

impacted	by	the

regulatory requirements –

unknown	number of

users.

A	task force was created, and	a

Notice of Inquiry was issued and

public comment received	to	assist

the Commission	to	identify and	

address outdated, burdensome, or

ineffective	regulations.

Increased	Twitter	Use • Entities regulated by the

FMC - 6,000	users.

• Members of the public

impacted	by	the

regulatory requirements –

unknown	number of

users.

Actions and	activities of the	

Commission	are concisely

announced with links to web

content.

Rule Revisions • Entities regulated by the

FMC - 6,000	users.

• Members of the public

impacted	by	the

regulatory requirements –

unknown	number of

users.

Regulations concerning shipping

contracts,	ocean	transportation

licenses,	and	presentation	of

evidence	were	revised this year to

modernize and clarify language.

Three final rules were issued.

Ongoing Compliance Activities 

• Update forms in use for modern English and clarity

• Provide ongoing training on Plain Language principles to document	creators

• Reorganized	web	content to	make user tasks easier to	complete.

.

.
• Provide	improved	 	 	 	 and enhanced media	to customers.

• Translate high-impact	content	for	Low	English	Proficiency	users.
Exhibit 10.27





inVentiv Health, Inc.


500 Atrium Drive


Somerset, New Jersey  08873


August 6, 2009





Mr. Eran Broshy


88 Central Park West, Apartment 1W


New York, NY 10023





Dear Eran:





This will confirm the understandings reached with the Board of Directors of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the "Company") regarding your reconfirmation as Chairman of the Board of Directors as of August 1, 2009, and your acceptance of
such position:





1.  You will be entitled to a retainer at a rate of $100,000 per annum for so long as you serve as Chairman and per meeting fees at the rates paid to other members of the Board of Directors.





2.  For so long as you serve as Chairman, you will be entitled to participate in any health care or dental care plans, policies or arrangements which the Company maintains in accordance with the written terms of such plans, policies or arrangements.





3.  You will be eligible to receive equity grants on the same terms as other non-employee members of the Board of Directors.  Accordingly, you shall be awarded a grant on or about August 12, 2009 having a value determined in accordance with FAS 123R of $360,000 vesting in
equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date, which grant shall be subject to the terms of the Company's 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Company's standard grant documentation.





4.  Vesting of your previously awarded equity grants will no longer be subject to acceleration based on any acceleration events specified in the Employment Agreement dated as of June 11, 2009 between the Company and you (the "Employment
Agreement") other than, for so long as you continue to serve as a director, a Change in Control (as defined therein), death or Disability (as defined therein).  In addition, however, to the extent the stock options and restricted awards granted to you prior to the date hereof would have vested had you remained a director of the Company on June 14, 2011, such vesting shall be accelerated if (a) you are not renominated to the Board of Directors, other than for Cause or by reason of your refusal
to be renominated, and (b) as a result your service as a director terminates prior to June 14, 2011.  For purposes hereof, "Cause" shall have the meaning, and shall be determined, as set forth in the Consulting Agreement dated as of the date hereof between the Company and you.





Please execute this letter where indicated below to confirm your agreement with the foregoing.





Very truly yours,


INVENTIV HEALTH, INC.








by           /s/ Per G.H. Lofberg


Name:  Per G.H. Lofberg


Title:  Member, Compensation Committee of theBoard of Directors





by           /s/ Mark Jennings


Name:  Mark Jennings


Title:  Member, Compensation Committee of theBoard of Directors





AGREED:








/s/ Eran Broshy


Name:  Eran Broshy
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn ELIELY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-7368.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2008.

Decided: May 2, 2008.

Shawn Eliely, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Eliely appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for release on recognizance or bail pending the court’s consideration of Eliely’s post-conviction motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).1 Before a prisoner may be released on bail pending a collateral attack on his conviction, he must show substantial constitutional claims on which he has a high probability of success, and exceptional circumstances making a grant of bail necessary for the habeas remedy to be effective. *See Lee v. Jabe,*989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir.1993); *Calley v. Callaway,*496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir.1974). Eliely fails *271to meet this standard. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under the collateral order doctrine. *See Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-57, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).

2

. We also deny Eliely's motion to expedite as moot and deny his motion for summary relief.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
AccuImage Diagnostic Corp. condensed financial statements for the interim period
ended December 31, 1999 included in Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001089799
<NAME>                        Accu-Image

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         170,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,572
<PP&E>                                          56,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 960,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          360,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       559,478
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   960,168
<SALES>                                        875,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               875,461
<CGS>                                          486,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1367

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Leron L. Morris, also known as Lo Key

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: July 22, 2014

Filed: July 24, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Leron Morris directly appeals after the District Court1

 revoked his supervised

release and sentenced him above the Chapter 7 advisory Guidelines range to the

1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
applicable statutory maximum of 24 months in prison. The revocation occurred after

Morris had violated his release conditions seven times—a fact highlighted by the

District Court in determining that the advisory Guidelines range was not sufficient to

promote Morris’s respect for the law and deter him from further criminal conduct. 

Morris’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the District

Court abused its discretion by sentencing Morris to the maximum sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its

discretion in sentencing Morris. See United States v. Thunder, 553 F.3d 605, 609 (8th

Cir. 2009) (holding that a revocation sentence above the advisory range was not

substantively unreasonable where the defendant repeatedly violated supervised

release); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 924 (8th Cir. 2006) (affirming a

statutory maximum revocation sentence where the district court justified its decision

by giving supporting reasons); see also United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984

(8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (noting that a revocation sentence is reviewed for

substantive reasonableness under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court, and we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Morris about procedures for seeking

rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

______________________________

-2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6986

MAURICE RICHBURG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD HUTCHINSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99-

1162-MJG)

Submitted: November 16, 1999 Decided: November 30, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Richburg, Appellant Pro Se. Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Richburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing

as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994

& Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Richburg’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Richburg v.

Hutchinson, No. CA-99-1162-MJG (D. Md. June 29, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition
Group  V,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period
ending  July  31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  William  R.
Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 18, 2006

                                   /s/ William R. Colucci
                                   -----------------------------
                                   William R. Colucci, President
                                   BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

    <S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      51,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       109,387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  880,276
<PP&E>                                             37,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,789,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,288,447
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           23,208
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        401,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,789,112
<SALES>                                           173,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  173,454
<CGS>                                             112,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      61,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,369,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                788,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,713,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,713,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,713,560)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.28)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 302 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing a Patronage System Act of 
2021'' or the ``PPSA Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON EXCEPTION OF COMPETITIVE SERVICE POSITIONS.

    (a) In General.--No position in the competitive service (as defined 
under section 2102 of title 5, United States Code) may be excepted from 
the competitive service unless such position is placed--
            (1) in any of the schedules A through E as described in 
        section 6.2 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, as in 
        effect on September 30, 2020; and
            (2) under the terms and conditions under part 6 of such 
        title as in effect on such date.
    (b) Subsequent Transfers.--No position in the excepted service (as 
defined under section 2103 of title 5, United States Code) may be 
placed in any schedule other than a schedule described in subsection 
(a)(1).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.
```