alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.51
Termination Agreement
Party A:  Beijing BoheLe Science and Technology Co. Ltd.
Party B:  Yuan Hao, Yue Liu
Party A and Party B has mutually agreed on the termination, and reached the following agreement:
		1.
	The “Loan Agreement”, “Share Pledge Agreement” and “Call Option Agreement” (hereinafter refer to as “Agreements”) was signed by both parties on May 25, 2020. Both parties agreed to terminate the abovementioned Agreements from July 5, 2021, not to execute, and not to pursue all the responsibilities and consequences arising from the Agreements.


		2.
	This agreement takes into effect after being signed and sealed by both parties.


		3.
	The agreement shall be made in three copies with the same legal effect, in which Party A shall hold one copy and Party B shall hold two copies respectively.


​
​
Party A (Seal):
Representative (Signature):
July 5, 2021
​
​
​
Party B (Signature):
July 5, 2021
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simex Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kjell Jagelid, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003                 /s/ Kjell Jagelid
                                        ----------------------------

                                       By: Kjell Jagelid
                                       Its: Chief Financial officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simex Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Simex Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 11.0



                      PULASKI BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Nine Months Ended    Three Months Ended
                                                          September 30, 2001   September 30, 2001
                                                          ------------------   ------------------
<S>                                                         <C>                   <C>
Net income                                                  $   566,739           $   386,478

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted       1,906,873             1,910,973

Basic and diluted earnings per share                        $      0.30           $     0.21
</TABLE>





                                       15
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"New OTI Rules Now in Effect","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AZYvaGF88U\"><a href=\"\/new-oti-rules-now-in-effect\/\">New OTI Rules Now in Effect<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/new-oti-rules-now-in-effect\/embed\/#?secret=AZYvaGF88U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New OTI Rules Now in Effect” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"AZYvaGF88U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2979 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 

with respect to the final maturity date of certain loans, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2021 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself and Mr. NEWHOUSE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation 

Act of 2014 with respect to the final maturity date 

of certain loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MATURITY DATE. 

4 Section 5029(b)(5) of the Water Infrastructure Fi5 nance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3908(b)(5)) 

6 is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2979 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘The final 

2 maturity date’’ and inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding sub3 paragraphs (A) and (B), the final maturity date’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub5 paragraph (C); and 

6 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(B) PROJECTS WITH A USEFUL LIFE OF

9 MORE THAN 35 YEARS.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding 

11 subparagraph (A), for a covered project 

12 with a useful life of more than 35 years 

13 (as determined by the Secretary or the Ad14 ministrator, as applicable), the final matu15 rity date of a secured loan under this sec16 tion shall be not later than the earlier of— 

17 ‘‘(I) the date that is 55 years 

18 after the date of substantial comple19 tion of the relevant project (as deter20 mined by the Secretary or the Admin21 istrator, as applicable); and 

22 ‘‘(II) if the useful life of the 

23 project is less than 55 years, the use24 ful life of the project. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2979 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) COVERED PROJECTS.—In this 

2 subparagraph, the term ‘covered project’ 

3 means a project with respect to which— 

4 ‘‘(I) an application for assistance 

5 under this subtitle has not been sub6 mitted before the date of enactment of 

7 this clause; and 

8 ‘‘(II) an agreement is entered 

9 into under this section on or after 

10 such date of enactment for a project 

11 carried out using funds specifically 

12 provided for such purposes in advance 

13 in subsequent appropriations Acts.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International
Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Pasquale Catizone, President of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
------------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

November 9, 2007

                                       13
#### Misael PERDOMO-MARTINEZ, a.k.a. Misael Perdomo, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70964.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 21, 2011.

Elizabeth Torres, Esquire, Foss and Torres, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Sharon Michele Clay, Esquire, OIL, Brendan Paul Hogan, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Misael Perdomo-Martinez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision de*657nying his application for withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Perdomo-Martinez did not establish a clear probability of persecution because the threats he and his family received, and the death of his cousin, do not amount to persecution on account of a protected ground. *See Nahrvani v. Gonzales,*399 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.2005); *Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1486 (9th Cir.1997). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination Perdomo-Martinez failed to establish a clear probability of persecution in light of his family’s ability to live unharmed in Guatemala City. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001). Perdomo-Martinez does not otherwise contend he has a future fear of persecution. Accordingly, his claim for withholding of removal fails.

We lack jurisdiction to review PerdomoMartinez’s contention that the IJ did not consider evidence of country conditions because he did not exhaust it before the BIA. *See Brezilien v. Holder,*569 F.3d 403, 412 (9th Cir.2009) (no jurisdiction to review due process claim where petitioner failed to exhaust the claim).

Perdomo-Martinez’s counsel is cautioned that her opening brief does not meet this court’s standards. *See generally*Fed.R.App. P.28; 9th Cir. R.28-2.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Carl Savoy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/csavoy\/","title":"Commission Issues Proposed Rule on Service Contract Filing Relief","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8nuXbyuI3r\"><a href=\"\/nprm-on-service-contract-filing-relief\/\">Commission Issues Proposed Rule on Service Contract Filing Relief<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/nprm-on-service-contract-filing-relief\/embed\/#?secret=8nuXbyuI3r\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Issues Proposed Rule on Service Contract Filing Relief” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"8nuXbyuI3r\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following Heart, Lung, & Blood Program Project Review Committee meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2017.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton BWI (Baltimore), 1100 Old Elkridge Landing Road, Baltimore, MD 21090.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey H. Hurst, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7208, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0303,                         *hurstj@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2017.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-24144 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| | /s/DAVIDNATAN          
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Financial Officer





Date:   August 9, 2005







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Elvis Joseph AMARAME, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Robert GATES, in his individual capacity; Joseph Owens, in his individual capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-7820.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 17, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 30, 2010.

Elvis Joseph Amarame, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elvis Joseph Amarame appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
1

Filed 9/25/23 P. v. Lyons CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

WILLIE CARL LYONS,

Defendant and Appellant.

C097768

(Super. Ct. No. 87151)

Defendant Willie Carl Lyons appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for 

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Appellate counsel filed a brief raising no 

arguable issues under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, and requesting we exercise 

our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

1 Defendant petitioned for resentencing under former Penal Code section 1170.95. 

Effective June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered former Penal Code section 1170.95 

as section 1172.6 without substantive changes. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.)
2

On July 5, 2023, this court notified defendant: (1) appellate counsel had filed an 

appellate brief stating counsel’s review of the record did not identify any arguable issues; 

(2) as a case arising from an order denying postconviction relief, defendant was not 

constitutionally entitled to counsel or to an independent review of the record; (3) in 

accordance with the procedures set forth in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, 

defendant had 30 days to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument 

defendant wanted this court to consider; and (4) if this court did not receive a letter or 

brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More than 30 

days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.

We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. 

(People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

/S/

 

RENNER, J.

We concur:

/S/

 

DUARTE, Acting P. J.

/S/

 

WISEMAN, J.*

* Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, assigned by 

the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.