alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-238-000]


GSP Schiller LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
GSP Schiller LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 24, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="60262532232f0e0c090e05331510100f121420060512034e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 3, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24452 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – February 22, 2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WGo7dmfAIT\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-february-22-2019\/\">Applicants – February 22, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-february-22-2019\/embed\/#?secret=WGo7dmfAIT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – February 22, 2019” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"WGo7dmfAIT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: LEHIGH COUNTY CONSTABLES

PETITION OF: DENNIS C. HUBER AND 

FREDERICK BAINHAUER, III

:

:

:

:

:

No. 43 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Congressional Budget Reports","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tG5lJeQGXu\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/congressional-budget-reports\/\">Congressional Budget Reports<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/congressional-budget-reports\/embed\/#?secret=tG5lJeQGXu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Congressional Budget Reports” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"tG5lJeQGXu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Bennett, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 24, 2004

/s/ Richard E. Bennett, Jr.Richard E. Bennett, Jr.President & Chief Executive Officer(Chief Executive Officer)(Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Pediatric Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Minggang Xiao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: March 31, 2010
By:
/s/ Minggang XiaoMinggang Xiao

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer )
#### David Kent FITCH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mary M. MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 10-7162.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.

David Kent Fitch, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Kent Fitch, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Fitch v. Mitchell,*No. 9:10-cv-00952-HFF, 2010 WL 2696723 (D.S.C. July 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*855terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document

Exhibit 10.1





AMENDMENT TWO
to the
COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC.
LONG TERM RETENTION PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT TWO (this “Amendment”) is executed this 21st day of February, 2022, by Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., a Delaware corporation.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. Long Term Retention Plan, as amended by an Omnibus Amendment dated September 6, 2019 (as amended, the “Plan”), to provide deferred compensation benefits to key Employees;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Committee may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has approved the amendments to the Plan set forth in this Amendment to eliminate the restriction on the timing of Investment Option reallocations under the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, all effective as of the date hereof:
1.Section 3.2(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:
(b)Deemed Investment Elections.  A Participant shall specify how contributions credited to the Participant’s Account pursuant to Section 3.1(b) shall be allocated among the Investment Options and related Investment Subaccounts. In accordance with such procedures and limitations as the Plan Administrator adopts, the Participant may change such specification with respect to contributions not yet credited to an Investment Subaccount.  Any amounts allocated to the Participant’s Account may be reallocated among the Investment Options at the election of the Participant.  Any such request to have one or more Investment Subaccount balances transferred to one or more other Investment Subaccounts shall be made in accordance with and shall be subject to such procedures and limitations as the Plan Administrator adopts. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Subsection, all reallocations among Investment Options are subject to the trading rules, policies and procedures of the underlying mutual fund designated as an Investment Option.














2.Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.  


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf by a duly authorized officer of the Company on the day and year first above written.            


												
		COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC.
				
		By:		/s/ E. Beauregarde Fisher III
		Name:		E. Beauregarde Fisher III
		Title:		Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Raviv Zoller, Chief Executive Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 of the Company(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | August 8, 2006 |   |   |                    | /s/ RAVIV ZOLLER |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|------------------|
|   |           |   |   | Raviv Zoller            |
|   |           |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**POPULAR
      MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.**





Officer's
      Certificate





Annual
      Statement of Servicer





Popular
      ABS, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-B





Pursuant
      to the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above captioned
      series (the “ **Agreement** ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies that he is an officer of Popular Mortgage
      Servicing, Inc. (the “ **Servicer** ”),
      and
      does hereby further certify that:





1.   A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and
      of its performance under the Agreement has been made under his supervision;
      and





2.   To
      the
      best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      its
      obligations under the Agreement throughout such fiscal year.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Officer's Certificate on
      behalf of the Servicer as of this 12th day of March, 2007.











POPULAR
      MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC .






By: 
      /s/ Dennis J. Lauria


Name: Dennis J. Lauria


Title:  Senior
      Vice President
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRISON CO UNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th day of June, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;
and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Marshall Deshun Parker, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00237

- CR

Trial Court No. 13

- 0334X

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no reversible error in the judgment of
the court below

. However, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the asse ssment of attorney fees. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Marshall Deshun Parker, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAN D YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 31st day of July , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24406]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, November 30, 2017.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. The American Coal 
Company, Docket No. LAKE 2011-701 (Issues include whether on remand the 
Judge erred by not adequately explaining the basis for the assessed 
penalty amounts.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

PHONE NUMBER FOR LISTENING TO MEETING: 1 (866) 867-4769, Passcode: 678-
100.

    Dated: November 6, 2017.
Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-24406 Filed 11-6-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edison Schools Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. Christopher
Whittle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.


May 15, 2003                            /s/       H. Christopher Whittle
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                  H. Christopher Whittle
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.21
 AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.
AND CHARLES DAWSON
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 2.1 is hereby modified by deleting the date of December 31, 2010 and
inserting in its place the date December 31, 2013.2.
    
    All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall otherwise
remain in place, except as expressly amended herein.
  HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Peter FeraName:
    Peter FeraTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer/s/ Charles DawsonCharles Dawson Page 1of 1
#### Zoltan LACZY, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74337.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.**

Filed May 2, 2008.

Zoltán Laczy, pro se.

CAS-District Counsel, San Diego, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Stacy S. Paddack, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Zoltán Laczy, a native and citizen of Hungary, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision vacating an immigration judge’s grant of cancellation of removal on the basis that even though Laczy was statutorily eligible for relief, he did not deserve a favorable exercise of discretion. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part.

Laczy contends that he deserved a favorable exercise of discretion because he has not been convicted of any crime. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) deprives us of jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary determination. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir .2005).

Laczy also contends that the Board denied him equal protection and due process. *656He does not explain how he was denied these rights and therefore has not presented a colorable constitutional claim. *See id.*at 930.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.