alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

Foreign NVOCC Registration Terminations/Suspensions

January 2019

Famex GLS Co., Ltd. 

Org No.: 026399

Address: Room 808, 551-17, Yangcheon-Ro

Gangseo-Gu

Seoul 07532

South Korea

Termination: December 01, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Highway Logistics Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 020640

Address: #327, Haenam Bldg.

64, Sejong-Daero, Jung-Gu

Seoul

South Korea

Termination: January 05, 2019

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Inter Global Services Ltd.

Org No.: 013701

Address: 9-4 F/L, 500, Sec 4.

Chung-Hsiao East Road

Taipei

Taiwan

Termination: December 01, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Maritime United Operator, SL

Org No.: 026408

Address: Paseo De La Castellana 141-P17 A

28046 Madrid 

Spain

Termination: December 19, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
PDL International PTE LTD

Org No.: 023336

Address: 29 Heather Street, Parnell

Auckland 1052

New Zealand

Termination: December 14, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Raviero SA

Org No.: 026277

Address: Via Landriani 7

Lugano 6900 

Switzerland 

Termination: December 29, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Risingsun Logistics (Dalian) Co., Ltd. 

Org No.: 025874

Address: 1-2, No. 290 Hutan Road

Zhongshan District 

Dalian 

China

Termination: December 27, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

S&W International Chemical Logistics Co., Ltd

Org No.: 024154

Address: 20F, Jinling International Mansion 

No. 85 Ouyang Road 

Shanghai 200081

China

Termination: January 04, 2019

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Shanghai Lion Star International Forwarding Co., Ltd. 

Org No.: 026390

Address: Room 1512, No. 218

Ning Guo Road, Yangpu District 

Shanghai 200090

China

Termination: December 21, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
Sivanit International Forwarding Ltd. dba Sivanit 

International Forwarding Ltd.

Org No.: 019081

Address: 28 Hanamal Street

Haifa 3303128

Israel 

Termination: December 01, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Sunitrans Logistics Private Limited

Org No.: 019698

Address: D-2135/36, Oberoi Garden Estates 

Chandivli Farms Road, Chandivli, Andheri East

Mumbai 400 072

India

Termination: December 01, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

TPO Logistics Co., Ltd.

Org No.: 024350

Address: 6/F., 3-7. 296 Buhn-Gil

Joongangdae-Ro, Donggu

Busan 

South Korea

Termination: January 29, 2019

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond

Willfield Logistics Pvt. Ltd. 

Org No.: 022492

Address: C-406, Swarup Nagar Bldg., OM Nagar

Andheri (East)

Mumbai 400099

India

Termination: December 15, 2018

Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Gertrudez Morales Lopez

, * From the 35th District

Court of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR16889

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00361

- CR * July 3, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered Gertrudez Morales Lopez’s motion to dismiss his

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance

with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye Addresses RILA Transportation Executives","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6llKBTY9SZ\"><a href=\"\/dye-addresses-rila-transportation-executives\/\">Commissioner Dye Addresses RILA Transportation Executives<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/dye-addresses-rila-transportation-executives\/embed\/#?secret=6llKBTY9SZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye Addresses RILA Transportation Executives” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"6llKBTY9SZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 267 

To extend the wildfire and hurricane indemnity program to cover certain 

crop losses in calendar year 2020, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2021 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. NEWHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To extend the wildfire and hurricane indemnity program 

to cover certain crop losses in calendar year 2020, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘2020 WHIP+ Reau5 thorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CROP LOSSES OCCURRING IN CALENDAR YEAR 2020. 

7 Amounts appropriated by section 791(d) of division 

8 B of Public Law 116–94 shall also be made available for 

9 necessary expenses related to losses of crops (including 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 267 IH

1 smoke-tainted wine grapes) as a consequence of wildfires 

2 occurring in calendar year 2020 in the same manner as 

3 other crop losses under the heading ‘‘Department of Agri4 culture—Agricultural Programs—Processing, Research 

5 and Marketing—Office of the Secretary’’ in title I of the 

6 Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Re7 lief Act, 2019 (Public Law 116–20). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Ray PARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7375.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Bobby Ray Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ray Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*244We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REYNOLD GELIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:03-cr-00474-CWH-15; 4:08-cv-70033-CWH)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reynold Gelin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reynold Gelin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Gelin has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Gelin’s motion for certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of New Dragon Asia Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby
      certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25, 2008 of the
      Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                May 8, 2008
            By:
            /s/*Li
                Xia WANG*Li
                Xia WANGChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                May 8, 2008
            By:
            /s/*Peter
                MAK*Peter
                MAKChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Cameron King, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quest Oil Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|By:   | /S/
Cameron King

Cameron King

President and Chief Executive Officer
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 18, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10181]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “The Silver Caesars: A Renaissance Mystery,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 12, 2017, until on or about March 11, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2017-23549 Filed 10-27-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50720

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Miguel Angel Berdeja-Medina, 

Defendant—Appellant,

consolidated with

_____________

No. 20-50726

_____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Angel Verdeja-Medina,

Defendant—Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 19, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2021
No. 20-50720

c/w No. 50726

2

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-666-1

USDC No. 4:20-CR-36-1

Before Clement, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Miguel Angel Berdeja-Medina appeals his sentence of 78 months in 

prison, which the district court imposed following his guilty plea conviction 

for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals from the 

judgment revoking his supervised release, which had been imposed after a 

prior illegal reentry conviction. Berdeja-Medina contends that the recidivism 

enhancement under § 1326(b)(1), which was applied in his case, is 

unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable 

statutory maximum of two years of imprisonment, see § 1326(a), based on 

facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a 

reasonable doubt. He concedes the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres 

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for 

further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary affirmance, asserting that Berdeja-Medina’s argument is 

foreclosed.

The parties are correct that Berdeja-Medina’s assertion is foreclosed 

by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2021
No. 20-50720

c/w No. 50726

3

Cir. 2014); United States v. Rojas-Luna, 522 F.3d 502, 505-06 (5th Cir. 2008). 

Further, Berdeja-Medina has abandoned any challenge to the revocation of 

his supervised release by failing to brief an argument as to the revocation. See 

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the 

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. 

v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion for 

an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgments of the 

district court are AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-50720 Document: 00515750675 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/19/2021
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Consumer Alert \u2013 Tam Tam, Inc. and T-Square Inc.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"S96t1lBiiQ\"><a href=\"\/consumer-alert-tam-tam-inc-and-t-square-inc\/\">Consumer Alert \u2013 Tam Tam, Inc. and T-Square Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/consumer-alert-tam-tam-inc-and-t-square-inc\/embed\/#?secret=S96t1lBiiQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Consumer Alert \u2013 Tam Tam, Inc. and T-Square Inc.” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"S96t1lBiiQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}