alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Chairman Cordero Applauds USCG Statement on Container Weights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BvjbfWRc3f\"><a href=\"\/chairman-cordero-applauds-uscg-statement-on-container-weights\/\">Chairman Cordero Applauds USCG Statement on Container Weights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/chairman-cordero-applauds-uscg-statement-on-container-weights\/embed\/#?secret=BvjbfWRc3f\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Chairman Cordero Applauds USCG Statement on Container Weights” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BvjbfWRc3f\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

GIANE K. SANTOS, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-5566 

 ) 

FELIPE DOS SANTOS, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed May 6, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Christine Greider, Judge. 

Justin C. Carlin of Golden & La Neve, Fort 

Lauderdale, for Appellant. 

James W. Chandler of Law Office of James 

W. Chandler, P.A., Naples, for Appellee. 

KHOUZAM, Judge. 

 Giane K. Santos, the former wife, appeals the final judgment modifying the 

parenting and child support plans. We reverse the final judgment's modification of the 

child support plan because the trial court used outdated financial information from both 

the former wife and the former husband, Felipe Santos, in calculating the amount of 

child support. We affirm the remaining issue on appeal without comment. 
- 2 -

 The parties filed petitions to modify or clarify the child support plan. In 

support of their petitions, both parties filed updated financial affidavits. However, in 

ruling on the petitions and calculating the amount of child support, it appears that the 

trial court used the affidavits filed in connection with the original dissolution instead of 

the updated affidavits filed with the modification petitions. 

 The use of outdated financial information in calculating a child support 

award can constitute reversible error. See Mitchell v. Mitchell, 841 So. 2d 564, 570 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ("Notwithstanding that Ms. Mitchell's income was rising at the time 

of the final hearing in 2000, the circuit court used her outdated 1999 gross income 

figure. This was error."); Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) 

("In the final judgment, the trial court erroneously relied on the first outdated report and 

found that the wife earns approximately $3,012 per month instead of the updated figure 

$4,118, arrived at in the supplemental report."). Here, the court erroneously used the 

affidavits filed in connection with the initial dissolution proceedings as opposed to the 

updated affidavits filed with the petitions. 

 Therefore, we reverse the final judgment with respect to the child support 

modification and remand for the trial court to reconsider the support award in light of the 

parties' updated financial information. 

 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. 

NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2671 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to specify certain effects of 

guidelines, general statements of policy, and similar guidance issued 

by the Federal Trade Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2021 

Mr. ARMSTRONG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to specify 

certain effects of guidelines, general statements of policy, 

and similar guidance issued by the Federal Trade Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Solidifying Habitual 

5 and Institutional Explanations of Liability and Defenses 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘SHIELD Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2671 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTS OF GUIDELINES, GENERAL STATEMENTS 

2 OF POLICY, AND SIMILAR GUIDANCE. 

3 Section 18(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act 

4 (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(3)(A) No guidelines, general statements of policy, 

7 or similar guidance issued by the Commission shall confer 

8 any rights upon any person, State, or locality, nor shall 

9 operate to bind the Commission or any person, State, or 

10 locality to the approach recommended in such guidelines, 

11 general statements of policy, or similar guidance. In any 

12 enforcement action, the Commission shall prove a violation 

13 of a provision of law enforced by the Commission. The 

14 Commission may not base an enforcement action on, or 

15 execute a consent order based on, acts or practices that 

16 are alleged to be inconsistent with any such guidelines, 

17 general statements of policy, or similar guidance, unless 

18 the acts or practices violate a provision of law enforced 

19 by the Commission. 

20 ‘‘(B) In any enforcement action, a defendant may 

21 offer as evidence of compliance with a provision of law en22 forced by the Commission, any guidelines, general state23 ments of policy, or similar guidance issued by the Commis24 sion pursuant to that law.’’ 

25 ‘‘(C) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to 

26 confer any authority upon or negate any authority of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2671 IH

1 Commission to issue guidelines, general statements of pol2 icy, or similar guidance.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 8.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF TAM S.A. Name

   Business name

   Jurisdiction of incorporationTAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.

   TAM Linhas Aéreas

   BrazilFidelidade Viagens e Turismo Limited

   TAM Viagens

   BrazilMultiplus S.A.

   Multiplus

   BrazilPantanal Linhas Aéreas S.A.

   Pantanal

   BrazilTransportes Aéreos del Mercosur S.A.

   TAM Mercosur

   ParaguayTAM Capital Inc.

   TAM Capital

   Cayman IslandsTAM Capital 2 Inc.

   TAM Capital 2

   Cayman IslandsTAM Financial Services 1 Limited

   TAM Financial 1

   Cayman IslandsTAM Financial Services 2 Limited

   TAM Financial 2

   Cayman IslandsTP Franchising Limited

   TP Franchising

   Brazil


---
CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Asensia, Inc.,
for the year ending December 31, 2007 I, Marlena Cervantes, Chief Financial
Officer of Asensia, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:






1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and






2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Asensia, Inc.






Date:
April 14, 2008




/s/ Marlena
Cervantes


Marlena
Cervantes


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DAVIDNATAN         
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date:   November 14, 2005







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the use ofour reports dated March 11, 2008, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Cowen Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Cowen Group, Inc. andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cowen Group, Inc.,incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 of Form 10-K.

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

1.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135795)dated July 14, 2006,

 

2.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145728)dated August 27, 2007, and

 

3.  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-147844)dated December 5, 2007;

 

of our reports dated March 11,2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cowen Group, Inc.and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CowenGroup, Inc., included herein by reference.

 

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

New York, New York

April 1, 2008

 

 

E-3

----
Exhibit 13.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Satellite Holdings Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ”Report”), I, Michael Moskowitz, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
November 12, 2009By:
/s/ MICHAEL MOSKOWITZName: Michael MoskowitzTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Gurjeet BHULLAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-4416 NAC.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2013.

Sandro S. Paterno, Michael Kimmelman, PC, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General; Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director; Joseph A. O’Connell, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: ROBERTA. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, GERARD E. LYNCH, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Petitioner Gurjeet Bhullar, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a September 28, 2012 decision of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. *In re Gurjeet Bhullar,*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Sept. 28, 2012). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

Our review is limited to the BIA’s September 2012 order from which Bhullar has filed a timely petition for review. We review the BIA’s decision for abuse of discretion. *See All v. Gonzales,*448 F.3d 515, 517 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). An alien seeking to reopen proceedings may file one motion to reopen no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). There is no dispute that Bhullar’s motion to reopen, filed in August 2012, was untimely because the BIA issued a final order of removal in April 2010, and was number-barred because it was Bhullar’s second motion seeking reopening.

Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as Bhullar’s marriage and the filing of the 1-130 petition constituted changed personal circumstances, not changed country conditions, as is required to excuse the time and number limitations. *See Wei Guang Wang v. BIA,*437 F.3d 270, 273-74 (2d Cir.2006) (making clear that time and numerical limitations on motions to reopen may not be suspended because of a “self-induced change in personal circumstances” that is “entirely of [the applicant’s] own making after being ordered to leave the United States”); *see also Yuen Jin v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 143, 155 (2d Cir.2008).

Although Bhullar contends that the BIA failed to state why his evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening, the only evi*64dence Bhullar submitted with his second motion was evidence of his marriage and the 1-130 petition. Given the BIA’s discussion of Bhullar’s evidentiary submissions in its denial of his first motion to reopen, the BIA’s treatment of the new evidence was not an abuse of discretion, as proof that Bhullar had married his cousin did not remedy the deficiencies in his evidence the BIA had previously identified, and did not establish “changed conditions arising in” India. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii).

Bhullar has not separately challenged the denial of reconsideration.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Annual Performance Plans By Fiscal Year","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EmXlUzNrVv\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/annual-performance-plans-by-fiscal-year\/\">Annual Performance Plans By Fiscal Year<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/annual-performance-plans-by-fiscal-year\/embed\/#?secret=EmXlUzNrVv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Annual Performance Plans By Fiscal Year” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"EmXlUzNrVv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 200TH DISTRIC T COURT OF TRAVIS CO UNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 7th day of April, A.D. 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;
and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Office of Inspector General, Appellants

v. Antoine Dental Center, Appellee No. 06

- 15

- 00076

- CV

Trial Court No. D

- 1

- GN

- 14

- 002229

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant s , Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Office of Inspector General, pay all costs of this appeal. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the H on. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 23rd day of June , A.D. 2016

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2896 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2896

  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
 certain institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of 
                 certain foods, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2021

Ms. Pingree (for herself, Mr. Fortenberry, Ms. Adams, and Mr. Harder of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
 certain institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of 
                 certain foods, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kids Eat Local Act''.

SEC. 2. GEOGRAPHIC PREFERENCE AND IDENTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL FOOD.

    Paragraph (3) of section 9(j) of the Richard B. Russell National 
School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(j)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) allow institutions receiving funds under this Act and 
        the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), 
        including the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable 
        Program--
                    ``(A) to use a geographic preference for the 
                procurement of unprocessed agricultural products, both 
                locally grown and locally raised; or
                    ``(B) to use locally grown, locally raised, or 
                locally caught as a product specification.''.
                                 <all>
```
OrgNo Organization Name Reason for Action Terminated Date

029026 ASTRO PACIFIC PTE LTD Failure to maintain a bond 3/31/2022

026879 I.V.T. INNOVATION VALLEY TRANSPORT S.R.L. Failure to maintain a bond 3/16/2022

029004 INLAND ROUND PTE. LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 3/17/2022

028938 SHENZHEN MIRAGE LOGISTICS LIMITED Failure to maintain a bond 3/16/2022

019484 SLOMAN NEPTUN SHIPPING & TRANSPORT GMBH Voluntary Surrender 3/18/2022

029018 SUN TRACK EXPRESS (CHINA) CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 3/31/2022

024986 SUNJIN LOGISTICS CO., LTD. Failure to maintain a bond 3/30/2022

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Foreign Registered NVOCC Terminations & Surrenders

March 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10135 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Guillermo Zarco Villasenor,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19

- CR

- 373

- 2

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The attorney appointed to represent Guillermo Zarco Villasenor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zarco Villasenor has file d a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 12, 2022

Lyle W. Ca yce Clerk Case: 21-10135 Document: 00516164379 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2022No. 21

- 10135

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Villasenor ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accord ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

**.** 42. 2. Zarco Villasenor ’s motion to appoint counsel and for an extension of time is **DENIED**

. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901,
902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998). Case: 21-10135 Document: 00516164379 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/12/2022