alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ancy A. MATHIRAMPUZHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-308-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 3, 2011.

Ancy A. Mathirampuzha, pro se, West Hartford, CT, for Appellant.

David Christopher Nelson, Assistant U.S. Attorney (Elizabeth A. Latif, on brief) for David B. Fine, United States Attorney, District of Connecticut, New Haven, CT, for Appellees.

PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge, JED S. RAKOFF,* District Judge.

*

 Jed S. Rakoff, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Ancy Mathirampuzha, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her complaint brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, *et seq.*(“Title VII”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

Mathirampuzha’s appeal challenges only the district court’s dismissal of her Title VII claim, and thus all of her other claims — including any due process claim— are abandoned. *See Cruz v. Gomez,*202 F.3d 593, 596 n. 8 (2d Cir.2000) (“When a litigant — including a *pro se*litigant-raises an issue before the district court but does not raise it on appeal, the issue is abandoned.”).

With respect to her Title VII claim, we review orders granting summary judgment *de novo,*focusing on whether the district court properly concluded that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact. *See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.,*321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). Having conducted a *de novo*review of the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.4CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (the "Company") on Form 20‐F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Líbano Miranda Barroso, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 13, 2011 By:/s/ Líbano Miranda BarrosoLíbano Miranda BarrosoChief Executive Officer


---
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  K ARLG. B YRD , S R .,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. T HE B ALTIMORE S UN C OMPANY ; B ALTIMORE G RAPHIC C OMMUNICATIONS U NION #31, No. 01-2054



#  Defendants-Appellees, and R OBERT S TALLINGS , President, Baltimore Graphic Communications Union #31, Defendant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-00-2677-JFM) Submitted: August 14, 2002 Decided: August 30, 2002 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Ralph T. Byrd, Laytonsville, Maryland, for Appellant. CharlesLamasa, Baltimore, Maryland; Howard K. Kurman, OFFIT, KURMAN & ALMS, P.A., Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Karl G. Byrd, Sr., appeals from the dismissal of his employment discrimination complaint, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure12(b)(6). The district court found that Byrd failed to set forth sufficient facts to establish a prima facie discrimination claim in his complaint. On appeal, Byrd argues he is not required to plead a prima facie case in his complaint, and instead must merely comply with the liberal pleading standards found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). He relies on a recent case, Swierkiewicz v. Sorema , ___ U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 992 (2002), which stands for that proposition. The district court did not have the benefit of Swierkiewicz ’s reasoning. Therefore, we vacate and remand for further proceedings consistent with that decision. Our decision renders moot Byrd’s motion for summary disposition, so we deny that motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED 2 B YRD v. T HE B ALTIMORE S UN C O
.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Rejects New York\/New Jersey Equipment Optimization Discussion Agreement","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lfiq6ePLHP\"><a href=\"\/fmc-rejects-new-york-new-jersey-equipment-optimization-discussion-agreement\/\">FMC Rejects New York\/New Jersey Equipment Optimization Discussion Agreement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-rejects-new-york-new-jersey-equipment-optimization-discussion-agreement\/embed\/#?secret=lfiq6ePLHP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Rejects New York\/New Jersey Equipment Optimization Discussion Agreement” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"lfiq6ePLHP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
exv10w25



 





EXHIBIT 10.25




AMENDMENT

TO THE MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.

2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN




     3. Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 12of this Plan, the
maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock which may be optioned and sold under the Plan is
1,000,000 shares. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Stock. If an Option
expires or becomes unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full,
theunpurchased Shares which were subject thereto shall, unless the Plan has beenterminated,
become available for future grant under the Plan.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF CTC MEDIA, INC.

Subsidiary

Percentage OwnershipAdvertising and Marketing LLP (Kazakhstan)

60%Channary, Ltd. (Cyprus)

74%OAO Teleexpress (Moscow)

99.9%OAO VnC Permprades (Perm)

80.02%OOO AC Region (Bratsk)

49%OOO Costafilm

100%OOO CTC Balakovo (Balakovo)

50%OOO CTC Communications

100%OOO Independent Broadcasting Co. (Chelyabinsk)

100%OOO CTC Investments

100%OOO CTC Irkutsk (Irkutsk)

51%OOO CTC Karelia (Petrozavodsk)

51%OOO CTC-Saratov (Saratov)

100%OOO CTC Ufa (Ufa)

100%OOO CTC Volgograd (Volgograd)

100%OOO CTC Voskhod (Vladivostok)

74%OOO Irkutsk TV (Irkutsk)

51%OOO Kompania Region (Tula)

100%OOO Kontinent-50 (Vladivostok)

100%OOO Marathon TV (Moscow)

100%OOO Media Region (Bratsk)

51%OOO "MRG"

100%OOO Muzic-Ramil (Moldova)

51%OOO "Nomad"

100%OOO Novy Radioproject (Ekaterinburg)

100%OOO NTK (N. Novgorod)

100%OOO ORT (Moscow)

100%OOO PKF Radiosvyaz (Voronezh)

100%OOO Premi (Moscow)

100%OOO Programma,Servis, Montazh (Rostov)

100%OOO Region-25 (Vladivostok)

100%OOO Region TV (Irkutsk)

51%OOO RT (Moscow)

100%OOO Samara Business Club

21%OOO Sixth Channel (Ulyanovsk)

51.06%OOO Sof Tele Media (Uzbekistan)

51.06%OOO Soho Media

100%OOO Stav. Vesh. Corp. (Stavropol)

100%OOO TC g.Kemerovo Tom' (Kemerovo)

100%OOO TC Vecher (Barnaul)

51%OOO Telekompania MIG TV (Ekaterinburg)

100%OOO TV Company T8 (Perm)

100%OOO TV-Domashny (Moscow)

100%OOO TV Station Mir (Novosibirsk)

50%OOO Vega-TV (Barnaul)

51%OOO Vertical (Kirov)

100%OOO VTK (Voronezh)

90%Prim LLP (Kazakhstan)

70%


---



Subsidiary

Percentage OwnershipSablock, Ltd (Cyprus)

100%SRL TeleDixi (Moldova)

51%Teleradiokompaniya 31st Kanal LLP (Kazakhstan)

20%ZAO Baltiyskaya TV Co. (Kaliningrad)

75%ZAO Telecompany 6 Channel (St. Petersburg)

80%ZAO CTC (Moscow)

100%ZAO CTC Region

100%ZAO CTC Saratov (Saratov)

74%ZAO Kanal 6 (Kazan)

100%ZAO Nevsky Kanal (St. Petersburg)

100%ZAO Novy Kanal (Moscow)

100%ZAO Orion TV (Samara)

100%ZAO Radio-Volga-TV (Samara)

100%ZAO RTK (Ekaterinburg)

51.44%ZAO "TV Darial"

100%ZAO TV Maxima (Perm)

85%ZAO TV&Radio Co. Gubernia (Tver)

100%ZAO Variant (Kazan)

52%ZAO Yuzhny Region Holding (Rostov)

51.05%ZAO Region TV (Rostov)

15.93%ZAO Zodiak (Omsk)

84.18%ZAO "Zollen" (Moscow)

100%


All
subsidiaries listed above are organized under the laws of the Russian Federation, other than as indicated above.

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 31.2 — RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, Héctor Houssay, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Héctor Houssay    Name: Héctor HoussayTitle: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EX-35 (e)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH

4001 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054


March 7, 2007

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
Servicer Oversight Group, Yvonne Williams
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Re: Servicer Compliance Statement

Deal Name: JPALT 2006-A1

Dear Sir and/or Madame:

This statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of
Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:

1.   I am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer");

2.   A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from 02/01/2006
     (the "Reporting Period") and its performance under the Agreement has been
     made under my supervision; and

3.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as described in
     section 3(a) hereto, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
     under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
     Period.

a.   The Servicer did not maintain or provide one of the required monthly
     reports, specifically the S5L2 Fidelity report, as stated in the
     transaction agreement(s) for the Reporting period shown in section 2 of
     this statement.

By: /s/ Deborah A. Rocchi
Name:  Deborah A. Rocchi
Title: Assistant Vice President
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-3F

Per Section 3.02a of the Standard Terms to Master Servicing & Trust Agreement,
dated as of 3/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
(Master Servicer), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:

(i)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(ii)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 4.17


 


Loan Agreement


 


Lender:GLOBAL INTERNET OF PEOPLE,INC


 


Borrower:WAICHUN LOGISTICS TECHNOLOGY LIMITED


 


The Lender and the Borrower,
through friendly negotiation, have reached this loan agreement of USD [825,000]. Both parties abide by this agreement


 


1. Loan Amount


 


The loan amount is USD [825,000].


 


2. Term of the Loan


 


The term of the loan is [12]
months, from the date the loan reaches the borrower's account. The Borrower has the right to repay part or all of the loan principal in
advance. The term of the loan can be extended if agreed and signed by both parties.


 


3. Loan interest


 


The loan interest under this
agreement is [8]% per year, and the daily interest rate = annual interest rate / 365 days. The loan interest is calculated on a daily
basis based on the actual loan period of the loaned principal. If the loaned funds arrive in the account in installments, the loan interest
shall be calculated on a daily basis for each installment of the loaned principal based on its actual loan period.


 


When the Borrower repays part
or all of the loan principal, the interest corresponding to the repayment principal shall be paid at the same time.


 


4. Use of Loan


 


The loan under this agreement
is used for the borrower's daily business and investment, abide by law.


 


5. Liability for Breach of
Contract


 


(1) If the borrower fails to
repay the entire loan principal of the lender on time, the loan interest shall be calculated according to the bank loan interest rate
of the same period from the overdue date until the day when the loan principal is fully repaid.


 


(2) If the borrower changes
the use of the loan, it shall pay the lender a penalty according to the bank loan interest rate of the same period from the date of the
change of the use until the date when the default situation is corrected.


 


(3) If the breaches of the
above paragraphs (1) and (2) simultaneously, the liquidated damages shall be paid accumulatively.


 


6. Any disputes arising from
the signing and performance of this agreement shall be resolved through friendly negotiation. If the negotiation cannot be resolved, either
party may apply to Shenzhen Arbitration Commission for arbitration in Shenzhen.


 


7. This agreement is in duplicate,
which will take effect immediately after both parties sign it. Each party holds one copy, which has the same legal effect.


 


(No text below)


 


Lender: (signature)


 


Borrower: (signature)


 


Date: May 10, 2021
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Proposes Changes to FMC Regulations on Cruise Line Performance & Refunds","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"k5yOnI0ptU\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-proposes-changes-to-fmc-regulations-on-cruise-line-performance-refunds\/\">Commissioner Sola Proposes Changes to FMC Regulations on Cruise Line Performance & Refunds<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-proposes-changes-to-fmc-regulations-on-cruise-line-performance-refunds\/embed\/#?secret=k5yOnI0ptU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Proposes Changes to FMC Regulations on Cruise Line Performance & Refunds” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"k5yOnI0ptU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



      In connection with the Annual Report of Security Devices International
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Sheldon Kales,
the Chief Executive Officer, and Rakesh Malhotra, the Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of the
               Company.


February 26, 2008                    By:   /s/ Sheldon Kales
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Sheldon Kales, President



February 26, 2008                    By:  /s/ Rakesh Malhotra
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Rakesh Malhotra, Principal Financial
                                             Officer