alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATIONS I, Kjell I. Jagelid, hereby certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the report) of Simex Technologies, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Omitted] (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: November 27, 2007/s/ Kjell I. JagelidKjell I. Jagelid
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40969 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GENE ALLEN LOCKABY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-235

- - - - - - - - - - June 12, 1996 Before KING, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gene Lockaby, #4294-078, appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Mr. Lockaby contends that double jeopardy barred his prosecution for drug-related offenses following civil forfeiture proceedings stemming from the same criminal activity. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noNo. 95-40969 - 2 - reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the same reasons given by the district court. Lockaby v. United States , No. 4:95- CV-235 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 1995). AFFIRMED.
#### Valaria MOLINA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76512.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 4, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 8, 2010.

John M. Levant, Esq., Ask Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Anthony Cardozo Payne, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and MILLS,** Senior District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Valaria Molina, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence, *Zheng v. Ashcroft,*332 F.3d 1186, 1193 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief. Although Molina suffered an armed robbery and rape by suspected gang members in El Salvador, the IJ permissibly found that she did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the El Salvadoran government. *See id.*at 1194 (acquiescence requires “both actual knowledge and willful blindness” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

We lack jurisdiction to review Molina’s contention that the IJ abused her discretion by failing to consider documents supporting Molina’s CAT claim because Molina did not raise the issue in her brief to the BIA. *Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

Finally, we reject Molina’s contention that the BIA failed to consider the additional evidence that she submitted on appeal. *See Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 *199F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring alien to overcome presumption that BIA considered all the relevant evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:      March 3, 2010           |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                     |   |   |   |   |
| /s/      Benjamin Mayer                  |   |   |   |   |
| Benjamin      Mayer                      |   |   |   |   |
| President      and Chairman of the Board |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harley L. Rollins, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of eLandia International Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of eLandia International, Inc.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 2, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Harley L. Rollins  
|                    |  |     |  | Harley L. Rollins      
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-03-00388- CV Jim m ie Lue c ke Chi ldr e n P ar tn e r ship , Lt d., App e lla nt v. Elain e P runcutz, John Pr uncutz, and Am y P ete rs, Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF LEE COUNTY , 21ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 11, 936, H ONO RAB LE DON B . MO RGAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Ji mmie Luecke Children Partnership, Ltd. has notified this Court that a pp e lle e El a ine Pr

un c utz h a s f

ile d f or ba nk ru ptc y un de r T i t l e 7 , Un ite d St ate s B ank ru ptc y Cod e (c a se number 04-16266- frm, Un it e d St a te s B a nk r u p tc y Co u r t, We s te rn District of Te x as, Austin Division). SeeTex. R. App. P . 8.1. In acc ordanc e with the automatic stay under f eder al law a

nd the state rule s of appe llate proc edure , this appeal is suspended until an event occ urs that would allow the a ppeal to be re instated. 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex . R. App. P. 8.2. Any party may move for reinstatement whe n and if a pp ro p ri ate. SeeTex. R. App. P . 8.3. Fa ilure to notify the Court of an e vent allowing reinstateme nt will result in dis missal for want of prosec ution.

David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pury ear Filed: January

27, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         419,244
<SECURITIES>                                    20,306
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               464,130
<PP&E>                                          13,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,554,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                6
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,483,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,554,828
<SALES>                                         24,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,519
<CGS>                                            9,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               168,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (147,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (147,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (147,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.31)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Launches Export Phase of Supply Chain System Information Initiative","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UFwx9qReWa\"><a href=\"\/fmc-launches-export-phase-of-supply-chain-system-information-initiative\/\">FMC Launches Export Phase of Supply Chain System Information Initiative<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-launches-export-phase-of-supply-chain-system-information-initiative\/embed\/#?secret=UFwx9qReWa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Launches Export Phase of Supply Chain System Information Initiative” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"UFwx9qReWa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian SatelliteHoldings Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 20-F for the yearending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ”Report”), I, Michael Washinushi, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

3.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

4.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 26, 2007                                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ MICHAEL WASHINUSHI                                  |   |
|   |                                                    |
|   | Name: Michael Washinushi                                |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

*The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.*

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel Generelli, certify that:

1.    I  have  reviewed  this   quarterly   report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Baynon
      International Corporation;

2.    Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material  fact  necessary to make the  statements  made, in
      light of the  circumstances  under which such  statements  were made,  not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this  annual
      report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are  responsible  for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:

      a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
            material  information  relating  to the  registrant,  including  its
            consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within
            those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual
            report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    presented  in  this  annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  base on
      our most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit
      committee of  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing the
      equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have
            identified for the registrant's  auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal controls.


Date: May 7, 2007


/s/ DANIEL GENERELLI
-----------------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.43(a)AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT     Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) dated as of December 22, 2006,by and between Realogy Corporation (the “Company”) and Anthony E. Hull (the “Executive”).     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain EmploymentAgreement, dated as of the separation of the Company from Cendant Corporation on July 31,2006, governing the terms of the Executive’s employment with the Company (the “EmploymentAgreement”); and     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company hasapproved the amendment of the Employment Agreement in certain respects.     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the partieshereby agree as follows:1. The second and third sentences of Section VII(a) of the Employment Agreement (suchsection entitled “Without Cause Termination and Constructive Discharge”) are herebyamended and restated to read, in their entirety, as follows:     **“In addition, upon such event, all Long Term Incentive Awards granted on or after theEffective Date will become vested upon the Executive’s termination of employment, and anysuch awards that are stock options or stock appreciation rights will remain outstanding fora period of two years (but not beyond the original expiration date) following theExecutive’s termination of employment. In addition, upon such event, the Executive will beentitled to elect to continue to participate in the Company’s medical and dental plans atthe rate applicable to active employees for a period ending upon the earlier of the secondanniversary of Executive’s termination of employment and the date he becomes eligible toparticipate in another employer’s medical plan.”**2. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shallremain in full force and effect.3. This Amendment has been executed and delivered in the State of New Jersey and itsvalidity, interpretation, performance and enforcement shall be governed by the lawsof such state.4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, of each which will be deemed anoriginal, but both of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
 

 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date firstabove written.       REALOGY CORPORATION       By: /s/ Richard A. Smith         Richard A. Smith    Vice Chairman and President/s/ Anthony E. Hull         Anthony E. Hull
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

ROBERT CAPTAIN LEITE

- YOUNG,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2784 D isciplinary Docket No. 3

No s . 18 & 35 DB 2021

Attorney Registration No. 312616

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 5th day of April , 2021, the Joint Petition for Emergency Temporary

Suspension Under Pa.R.D.E. 208(f) is granted , and Robert Captain Leite

- Young is placed

on immediate temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court. See

Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(1). It is further provided that:

1. Respondent shall comply with a ll provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

2. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients

or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and

3. All financial insti tutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall

freeze such accounts pending further action.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this Order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.

208(f)(6) are specifically preserved.This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of

Pa.R.D.E

. 402 pertaining to confidentiality

.