alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Daniel Generelli, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
     International Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
         annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
         of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
         the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls.


Date: July 28, 2006


/s/ DANIEL GENERELLI
-------------------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


                                       10
#### MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert S. TARGAN, DefendantAppellant, and Sheila Targan; Charles Schwab; Sandy Spring Bank, Garnishees.

No. 07-2103.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 10, 2008.

Decided: May 7, 2008.

Robert B. Scarlett, Scarlett *&*Croll, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Harry Martin Rifkin, Cohan, West, Rifkin & Cohen, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

After a consent judgment was entered against Robert Targan and in favor of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc., Merrill Lynch filed a writ of garnishment of funds held by Targan and his wife with Charles Schwab & Co. Targan and his wife filed separate motions to release the property from levy. The district court referred the case to a magistrate judge for discovery. Thereafter, the magistrate judge issued orders denying the Targans’ motions and ordering the release to Merrill Lynch of certain funds in the Charles Schwab accounts. Targan now appeals from the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motion to release property under levy and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We find that the magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction to enter a final order; therefore, we vacate the magistrate judge’s orders and remand for further proceedings.

A magistrate judge may only enter a final appealable judgment if the district court has properly referred the case to the magistrate judge and the parties consent *310to the magistrate judge entering a final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000). Here, the magistrate judge was not directed to conduct any proceedings other than discovery, and the parties did not consent to final disposition by the magistrate judge as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Thus, the magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction to enter a final order. *See United States v. Bryson,*981 F.2d 720, 726 (4th Cir.1992); *see also Gomez v. United States,*490 U.S. 858, 870, 109 S.Ct. 2237, 104 L.Ed.2d 923 (1989). Accordingly, we vacate the orders entered by the magistrate judge and remand this case for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kevin LOVE, also known as Kelvin Love, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-30918

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, Kelly P. Uebinger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kelvin Love, Oakdale, LA, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kevin Love, federal prisoner # 09677-035, appeals following the district court’s grant of relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of sentence. The district court reduced Love’s base offense level by two levels in accordance with the amendments to the Guideline governing cocaine base offenses, and it reduced Love’s sentence to 220 months of imprisonment, which was within the amended guidelines range. We review a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for an abuse of discretion, and its interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines is reviewed de novo. *United States v. Evans,*587 F.3d 667, 671-72 (5th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3462, 177 L.Ed.2d 1064 (2010).

Love argues that the district court should have reduced his sentence to the bottom of the amended guidelines range. He also contends that the district court erred because it failed to address the application of an enhancement for reckless endangerment.

*921The district court was under no obligation to reduce Love’s sentence at all under § 3582(c)(2), and thus, it was under no obligation to reduce it even further within the recalculated range. *See id.*at 673. Because issues relating to the original sentencing are not cognizable under § 3582(c)(2), the district court did not err in failing to address the reckless endangerment enhancement. *See id.*at 674.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Love’s motion to file a supplemental brief, and his motion to supplement and/or clarify the Government’s brief, are denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Blane Walter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date May 10, 2010
By:
/s/ R. BLANE WALTERName R. Blane WalterTitle  Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Legacy Mining, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2008  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2008

/s/Marc Scheive

Marc Scheive

Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1 – RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that:
1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4)  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5)  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Date: May 16, 2005         /s/ Cristina M. Lambert         Name: Cristina M. Lambert    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Approves Final Rule and Receives Briefings","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GcNbrQpscf\"><a href=\"\/commission-approves-final-rule-and-receives-briefings\/\">Commission Approves Final Rule and Receives Briefings<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-approves-final-rule-and-receives-briefings\/embed\/#?secret=GcNbrQpscf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Approves Final Rule and Receives Briefings” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GcNbrQpscf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"November 2019 Activity Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KgHsLB6uKI\"><a href=\"\/november-2019-activity-report\/\">November 2019 Activity Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/november-2019-activity-report\/embed\/#?secret=KgHsLB6uKI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“November 2019 Activity Report” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"KgHsLB6uKI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Meeting Schedule for September 18, 2013","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CbDWBs4cAo\"><a href=\"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-september-18-2013\/\">Commission Meeting Schedule for September 18, 2013<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-meeting-schedule-for-september-18-2013\/embed\/#?secret=CbDWBs4cAo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Meeting Schedule for September 18, 2013” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"CbDWBs4cAo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

818 

KA 14-01735 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RANDOLPH HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 3.) 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW

B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah

A. Haendiges, J.), entered July 2, 2014. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Same memorandum as in People v Harris ([appeal No. 4] ___ AD3d

___ [Feb. 3, 2017]).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BANANA RIVER FINANCE, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

JOHN M. GREENE II, a/k/a JOHN GREEN,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-696

[February 27, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Janet C. Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 31-2017-CA000461.

Mark S. Peters of Eisenmenger, Robinson, Blaue & Peters, P.A., Viera, 

for appellant.

Eric A. Lanigan of Lanigan & Lanigan, PL, Winter Park, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER and FORST, JJ., and GILLESPIE, KENNETH, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.