alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Amended Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December                31,                2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB                for the                year ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of HSM Holdings,                Inc. |

| Date:                August 8, 2007    |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| HSM                Holdings, Inc.      |
|                                   |
| By:                /s/ Anthony Hu      |
| Chief                Executive Officer |
Order filed August 9, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

_________________________

NO. 14-12-00246-CV

_________________________

HUNTER BUILDINGS & MANUFACTURING, L.P., HUNTER BUILDINGS, 

L.L.C., AND HUNTER BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.,

&

BBG GROUP, L.L.C., MILO NICKEL AND THOMAS MICHAEL LEBLANC, 

Appellants

V.

MBI, GLOBAL, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-50193

O R D E R

On March 8, 2012, Hunter Buildings & Manufacturing, L.P., Hunter Buildings, 

L.L.C., and Hunter Buildings International, L.L.C. ("Hunter appellants") filed a notice of 

appeal from the final judgment signed December 9, 2011, and the appeal was assigned to 

this court under our appellate number 14-12-00246-CV. Subsequently on March 8, 2012, 

BBG Group, L.L.C., Milo A. Nickel, and Thomas Michael LeBlanc ("BBG appellants") 
2

filed a notice of appeal from the same judgment, which was assigned to this court under our 

appellate number 14-12-00247-CV. 

On July 26, 2012, the Hunter appellants and BBG appellants filed an unopposed 

joint motion to consolidate these appeals. The motion was granted and the court 

consolidated the two above-referenced causes for all purposes into cause number 

14-12-00246-CV. The motion to consolidate also requested the court to order a briefing 

schedule. Accordingly we order the following:

 Hunter appellants' brief is due August 24, 2012;

 BBG appellants' brief is due August 24, 2012; 

 MBI Global's brief(s) is due 30 days after appellants' briefs are filed; and

 Reply briefs are due 30 days after MBI Global's brief(s) is filed.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1


                      CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of SBT Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martin J. Geitz,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:

         (i) The Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

         (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





                                        /s/ Martin J. Geitz
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Martin J. Geitz
                                     Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 30, 2009
       --------------

                                       27
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Big Cat Energy
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end of January 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Timothy Barritt, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 12th day of March,
2009.





TIMOTHY BARRITTTimothy
      BarrittPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                      CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of SBT Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martin J. Geitz, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:

     (i)  The Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc.(1)


                                          /s/ Martin J. Geitz
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Martin J. Geitz
                                          Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 24, 2006




---------------------------
(1) The Simsbury Bank & Trust Company, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. In March 2006, the Company succeeded to the registration of Bank
pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner William P. Doyle Votes to reject joint contracting authority for foreign carriers to negotiate collectively for U.S.-Flag tug services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"thnEe3BSP1\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-reject-joint-contracting-authority-for-foreign-carriers-to-negotiate-collectively-for-u-s-flag-tug-services\/\">Commissioner William P. Doyle Votes to reject joint contracting authority for foreign carriers to negotiate collectively for U.S.-Flag tug services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyle-votes-to-reject-joint-contracting-authority-for-foreign-carriers-to-negotiate-collectively-for-u-s-flag-tug-services\/embed\/#?secret=thnEe3BSP1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner William P. Doyle Votes to reject joint contracting authority for foreign carriers to negotiate collectively for U.S.-Flag tug services” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"thnEe3BSP1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 51969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24465]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 82 , No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 51969]]


                Notice of November 6, 2017

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Iran

                On November 14, 1979, in Executive Order 12170, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
                Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 
                States.

                Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and 
                the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, 
                dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, 
                the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, 
                and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that 
                emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 
                2017. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran 
                declared in Executive Order 12170.

                The emergency declared in Executive Order 12170 is 
                distinct from the emergency declared in Executive Order 
                12957 on March 15, 1995. This renewal, therefore, is 
                distinct from the emergency renewal of January 13, 
                2017.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    November 6, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-24465
Filed 11-7-17; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F8-P
Exhibit 23

                [SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C. LETTERHEAD]


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
           --------------------------------------------------------

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-137514 on Form S-8 of SBT Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 23, 2009
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SBT Bancorp, Inc. and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports
are incorporated by reference in Form 10-K of SBT Bancorp, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2008.



                                      /s/SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
                                      SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 30, 2009

           83 PINE STREET o WEST PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960-0635 o
               TELEPHONE (978) 535-0206 o FASCMILE (978) 535-9908
                      smc@shatswell.com www.shatswell.com

                                       24
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reginald Dewayne ELLISON, also known as Reginal Dwayne Ellison, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50643

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Reginald Dwayne Ellison, Federal Correctional Institution Beaumont, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Reginald Dewayne Ellison, federal prisoner # 68841-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion seeking a sentencing reduction based on the retroactive amendment to the crack cocaine guidelines. The district court denied the motion based on its determination that Ellison’s sentence resulted not from the quantity of crack cocaine involved in his offense but from his status as a career offender. Ellison contends that, even though he was sentenced as a career offender, his sentence was nevertheless based on the quantity of crack cocaine attributable to him and that he was therefore entitled to the benefit of the retroactive crack cocaine guidelines amendment.

Ellison is correct that his sentence resulted in part from the amount of crack cocaine involved in his offense. Nevertheless, even had Ellison been awarded the two-level reduction resulting from the retroactive amendment, his offense level would have been reduced from 42 to 40, which, with a criminal history category of VI, would have subjected him to the same guidelines range he originally faced, 360 months to life imprisonment. Thus, the retroactive crack amendment did not have the effect of lowering Ellison’s sentencing *906range, and he was ineligible for § 3582(c)(2) relief. *See*§ 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.lA). Because Ellison was not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) relief, his motion was properly-denied, and any error in the reasons given for the district court’s denial was harmless. *See*Fed.R.CrimP. 52(a); *see also United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas,*105 F.3d 981, 984 (5th Cir.1997). To the extent that Ellison argues that the district court could have further reduced his sentence, considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and his post-sentencing conduct, the argument is without merit. *See United States v. Doublin,*572 F.3d 235, 237-38 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 517, 175 L.Ed.2d 366 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Trustee of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. Liquidating Trust
(the “Liquidating Trust”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Liquidating Trust for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Liquidating Trust.



Date: April 12, 2013





By:        /s/
John G. Demeritt

John G. Demeritt
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
FSP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC
Trustee of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. Liquidating Trust







The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Liquidating
Trust’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Liquidating Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such
filing.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate the 
Receivership of 10247, First National Bank, Rosedale, Mississippi

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for First National Bank, 
Rosedale, Mississippi, intends to terminate its receivership for said 
institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of First National Bank on 
June 4, 2010. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: November 3, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24281 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4733 TERRY GODFREY, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-96-73) Submitted: March 4, 1997 Decided: March 28, 1997 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Philip J. Combs, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Terry Godfrey appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court after he pled guilty to possession of stolen firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C.A § 922(j)(1) (West Supp. 1996). We affirm. Godfrey asserts that the district court erred in determining his base offense level under United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 2K2.1(a)(2) (Nov. 1995), which provides for a base offense level of twenty-four "if the defendant had at least two priorfelony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense." An interpretation of a guideline is reviewed de novo

. United States v. Blake , 81 F.3d 498, 503 (4th Cir. 1996). Under USSG§ 2K2.1(a)(2), the court is instructed to count "any such prior conviction that receives any points under § 4A1.1 (Criminal History Category)." USSG § 2K2.1, comment. (n.5). Prior to this offense, Godfrey was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery. B ecause these counts were considered to be related under USSG§ 4A1.2(2), onlyone of the sentences could be counted under USSG§ 4A1.1(a). However, the second aggravated robbery sentence was correctly counted under USSG § 4A1.1(f). Thus, the district court properly attributed to Godfrey two prior felony convictions under USSG§§ 2K1.2 (a)(2), 4A1.1 (a) & (f).* Accordingly, we affirm Godfrey's sentence.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________*Godfrey's reliance on the definitions in USSG § 4B1.2(3) is misplaced. That section, pertaining to career offenders, is not applicable to a sentence imposed in accordance with USSG § 2K2.1(a). See United States v. Krzeminski , 81 F.3d 681, 682-84 (7th Cir. 1996). 2
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement (No. 333-134152) on Form S-8, Registration Statement (No. 333-145587) on Form S-3, and Registration Statement (No. 333-148138) on Form S-3 of Basin Water Inc. of our reports dated March 17, 2008 relating toour audits of the consolidated financial statements, and the financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Basin Water, Inc for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our report dated March 17, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expressed anopinion that Basin Water, Inc. had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 

/s/  SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP 

Irvine, California 

March 17, 2008