alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,417
<SECURITIES>                                    31,536
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (258)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,064
<PP&E>                                           5,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,431
<SALES>                                          5,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,318
<CGS>                                            1,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,212)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.31)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OC2
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OC2


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HDkQebSNdO\"><a href=\"\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter\/\">Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-publishes-update-of-its-official-case-law-reporter\/embed\/#?secret=HDkQebSNdO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Publishes Update of its Official Case Law Reporter” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"HDkQebSNdO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Patrick J. POWERS, Appellant, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 07-2365.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 2008.

Filed: May 14, 2008.

*656Kenneth R. Shemin, Shemin & Hendren, argued, Fayetteville, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Staci Dumas Carson, David Michael Donovan, Watts *&*Donovan, argued, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit. Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Patrick J. Powers appeals the district court’s1 order denying his summary judgment motion and dismissing his Employee Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (UNUM) arising from the denial of continued short-term-disability benefits. Under the abuse-of-discretion standard, which the parties agree applied below, UNUM’s decision needed only to be reasonable, that is, supported by substantial evidence. *See Dillard’s Inc. v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston,*456 F.3d 894, 899 (8th Cir.2006) (plan administrator’s decision will be reversed only if it was arbitrary and capricious); *Norris v. Citibank, N.A. Disability Plan (501),*308 F.3d 880, 883-84 (8th Cir.2002) (reviewing de novo district court’s application of abuse-of-discretion standard).

We agree with the district court that the decision to deny Powers benefits as of January 11, 2004, was supported by substantial evidence. As of that date Powers did not meet the second prong of the plan’s definition of disabled, i.e., that he was “not working in any occupation.” Given the plan’s plain and unambiguous definition of disability, it is irrelevant why Powers returned to work at a lower-paying position for another employer. We also agree with the district court that the term “gainful occupation” is not relevant because it does not appear in the section of the plan addressing short-term disability, and that the recurrent-disability provision does not apply in these circumstances. Finally, Powers’s remaining arguments (raised for the first time on appeal) are unavailing.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Rule Change Will Provide More Rights to Refunds for Cancelled or Delayed Cruises","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"n21cTtqBYi\"><a href=\"\/fmc-rule-change-will-provide-more-rights-to-refunds-for-cancelled-or-delayed-cruises\/\">FMC Rule Change Will Provide More Rights to Refunds for Cancelled or Delayed Cruises<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-rule-change-will-provide-more-rights-to-refunds-for-cancelled-or-delayed-cruises\/embed\/#?secret=n21cTtqBYi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Rule Change Will Provide More Rights to Refunds for Cancelled or Delayed Cruises” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"n21cTtqBYi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
 
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
        undersigned, Ofer Segev, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc.,
        a
        Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
        that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
        2007 of
        the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
        in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.


Date:November
              8, 2007
            
            /s/ OFER
              SEGEVOfer
              SegevChief
              Financial Officer
NO. 28686

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

STEVEN B. JOHNSON, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 08-053-8696)

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board’s Report

and Recommendation for the Disbarment of Respondent Steven B.

Johnson and Respondent Johnson’s lack of objection thereto as

exhibited by his failure to request briefing as permitted by Rule

2.7(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

(RSCH), it appears that Respondent Johnson failed to disclose

Oregon disciplinary matters in his 2004 bar application and

failed to update the application before he was admitted to the

Bar of the State of Hawai#i in violation of rules governing

admission to the Bar and Rules 3.3(a) (A lawyer shall not

knowingly: (1) make a false statement of material fact or law to

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

28686

08-DEC-2010

10:15 AM
a tribunal); 8.1(a) (An applicant for admission to the bar, or a

lawyer in connection with a bar admission application or in

connection with a disciplinary matter, shall not: (a) knowingly

make a false statement of material fact); 8.1(b) (An applicant

for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar

admission application or in connection with a disciplinary

matter, shall not: . . . (b) fail to disclose a fact necessary

to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen

in the matter); 8.4(a) (It is professional misconduct for a

lawyer to: (a) violate or attempt to violate the rules of

professional conduct); and 8.4(c) (It is professional misconduct

for a lawyer to: . . . (c) engage in conduct involving

dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation). Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Steven B. Johnson

is disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction,

effective immediately, notwithstanding RSCH Rule 2.16(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.2(d),

that in addition to the requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16,

Respondent must apply for, take, and pass the Hawai#i Bar

Examination before a reinstatement petition will be considered.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 8, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Craig H. Nakamura

2
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Michael R. Haynes, Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
 made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:
  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
 registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
 over financial reporting.
 
 
 
 Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ MICHAEL R. HAYNESMichael R. HaynesChief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Containerized Freight Statistics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VMO5bIOotB\"><a href=\"\/containerized-freight-statistics\/\">Containerized Freight Statistics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/containerized-freight-statistics\/embed\/#?secret=VMO5bIOotB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Containerized Freight Statistics” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"VMO5bIOotB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President