alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commission Moves Forward with Regulatory Reform Efforts as Part of November Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1SoyPTMd35\"><a href=\"\/commission-moves-forward-with-regulatory-reform-efforts-as-part-of-november-meeting\/\">Commission Moves Forward with Regulatory Reform Efforts as Part of November Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commission-moves-forward-with-regulatory-reform-efforts-as-part-of-november-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=1SoyPTMd35\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commission Moves Forward with Regulatory Reform Efforts as Part of November Meeting” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"1SoyPTMd35\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wesley Devon FOOTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4139.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 2008.

Decided: May 7, 2008.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, David P. Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wesley Devon Foote pled guilty to three counts of distribution of cocaine base (crack) after a prior conviction for a drug offense, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a), (b)(1)(B) (West 1999 & Supp.2007). He was sentenced as a career offender to a term of 262 months imprisonment. *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 4B1.1 (2005). Foote appealed his sentence, arguing that *308he was improperly sentenced as a career offender, that this court’s standard of review for criminal sentences is an unconstitutional return to mandatory guideline sentencing, and that the district court erroneously believed that it lacked authority to impose a sentence below the guideline range based in part on the disparity in sentences for crack and cocaine offenses. We affirmed his sentence; however, the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of *Kimbrough v. United States,*— U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). *See United States v. Foote,*249 Fed.Appx. 967 (4th Cir.2007), vacated, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 1133, 169 L.Ed.2d 946 (2008).

In *Kimbrough,*the Supreme Court held that “it would not be an abuse of discretion for a district court to conclude when sentencing a particular defendant that the crack/powder disparity yields a sentence ‘greater than necessary1 to achieve § 3553(a)’s purposes, even in a mine-run case.” *Kimbrough,*128 S.Ct. at 575. *Kimbrough*has thus abrogated *United States v. Eura,*440 F.3d 625 (4th Cir.2006) (holding that sentencing court may not vary from guideline range solely because of 100:1 ratio for crack/coeaine offenses), *vacated*, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 853, — L.Ed.2d --- (2008). The district court did not have the benefit of *Kimbrough*when it determined Foote’s sentence. To give the district court the opportunity to reconsider the sentence in light of *Kimbrough,*we conclude that resentencing is necessary.

We therefore vacate the sentence imposed by the district court and remand for resentencing.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*

*

 On remand, Foote will be resentenced under the revised guidelines for crack offenses that took effect on November 1, 2007.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB/A for the quarter  ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report") by
National Coal Corp.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies
that:

1.   to  the  best  of  our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   to the best of our  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in the  Report
     fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
     results of operations of Registrant.





                                     /s/ Jon Nix
Date:  December 15, 2004             -------------------------
                                     Jon Nix
                                     President and
                                     Chief Executive Officer





                                     /s/ Robert Chmiel
Date:  December 15, 2004             -------------------------
                                     Robert Chmiel
                                     Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baynon International Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Pasquale Catizone, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Pasquale Catizone
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

May 2, 2011

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Baynon International
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

May 2, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51826-51827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-4-000]


Marathon Pipe Line LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on November 1, 2017, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2016), Marathon Pipe Line 
LLC (MPL), filed a petition for a declaratory order seeking approval of 
the overall rate structure and terms of service for a redesign and 
expansion project for two interstate crude oil pipelines that MPL 
operates, namely the

[[Page 51827]]

Woodpat and Roxpat pipelines, which will be combined and expanded to 
create a single pipeline system that can ship Cushing, Rockies, and 
Canadian crude oil to multiple Patoka, Illinois destinations, as more 
fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#480e0d1a0b07262421262d1b3d3838273a3c082e2d3a2b662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51171403121e3f3d383f34022421213e232511373423327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on November 30, 2017.

    Dated: November 2, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24271 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Organic Sales and Marketing,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Samuel F.H.  Jeffries,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 12, 2009

                                                        /s/ Samuel F.H. Jeffries
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Samuel F.H. Jeffries
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATIONS I, Kjell I. Jagelid, hereby certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the report) of Simex Technologies, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Omitted] (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: November 20, 2007/s/ Kjell I. JagelidKjell I. Jagelid
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Meghan Leanne Garza, * From the 161st District Court

o f Ector County, Texas

Trial Court No. B

- 16

- 0 294

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00146

- CR * December 15 , 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-20572 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Jonathan Keith Senteno, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:21-CR-271-1 

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathan Keith 

Senteno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Senteno has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

June 22, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-20572 Document: 00516365385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2022
No. 21-20572 

2 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-20572 Document: 00516365385 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2022
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Armagh Group Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adrian
Towning, a Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


                                             /s/ Adrian Towning
                                             --------------------------
                                             Adrian Towning
                                             Director
                                             Armagh Group Inc.
                                             November 12, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7943
In Re: CHAUNCEY MARSHBURN,

Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:06-hc-02176-BO) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 1, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey Marshburn, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Chauncey Marshburn petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reconsider its order dismissing Marshburn’s petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). Marshburn seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the court denied the motion for reconsideration on November 27, 2006. See Marshburn v. Jackson , No. 5:06-hc-02176-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2006). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RFMSI SERIES 2006-S3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Executive Vice President