alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Industry Advisory\u2014All FMC Statutes & Regulations Remain in Full Effect Following Bridge Collapse","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"R2ZH9rHjqY\"><a href=\"\/industry-advisory-all-fmc-statutes-regulations-remain-in-full-effect-following-bridge-collapse\/\">Industry Advisory\u2014All FMC Statutes & Regulations Remain in Full Effect Following Bridge Collapse<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/industry-advisory-all-fmc-statutes-regulations-remain-in-full-effect-following-bridge-collapse\/embed\/#?secret=R2ZH9rHjqY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Industry Advisory\u2014All FMC Statutes & Regulations Remain in Full Effect Following Bridge Collapse” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"R2ZH9rHjqY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Mohammad \u201cAli\u201d Usman Named Chief Information Officer","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BlrGZzDYDW\"><a href=\"\/mohammad-ali-usman-named-chief-information-officer\/\">Mohammad \u201cAli\u201d Usman Named Chief Information Officer<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/mohammad-ali-usman-named-chief-information-officer\/embed\/#?secret=BlrGZzDYDW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mohammad \u201cAli\u201d Usman Named Chief Information Officer” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"BlrGZzDYDW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24428]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Termination of the Receivership of 10511, Highland 
Community Bank, Chicago, IL

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as 
Receiver for 10511, Highland Community Bank, Chicago, Illinois, has 
been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the 
receivership estate of Highland Community Bank (Receivership Estate); 
the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law. The 
Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-
Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all 
documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which 
FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but 
not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, 
assignments, and deeds. Effective November 1, 2017, the Receivership 
Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the 
Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

    Dated: November 6, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24428 Filed 11-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"CSAV Pays $625,000 Civil Penalty","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wjCsS0jhNu\"><a href=\"\/csav-pays-625000-civil-penalty\/\">CSAV Pays $625,000 Civil Penalty<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/csav-pays-625000-civil-penalty\/embed\/#?secret=wjCsS0jhNu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“CSAV Pays $625,000 Civil Penalty” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"wjCsS0jhNu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"OIG Audits, Evaluations, and Reviews","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"22XHHu2OVo\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-inspector-general\/oig-audits-evaluations-and-reviews\/\">OIG Audits, Evaluations, and Reviews<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/office-of-inspector-general\/oig-audits-evaluations-and-reviews\/embed\/#?secret=22XHHu2OVo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“OIG Audits, Evaluations, and Reviews” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"22XHHu2OVo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyanna Celeste ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 29, 2011.

Decided: April 11, 2011.

Tyanna Celeste Robinson, Appellant pro se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyanna Celeste Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States*
      *229
      *v. Robinson,*No. l:01-cr-00128-NCT-l (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of PharmaNet Development Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John P. Hamill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         |  |  | 
| | ----------------------- |  |  | 
| |                         |  |  | 
| |                         | 
| | /s/ JOHNP. HAMILL*      | 
| | John P. Hamill          | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
|

Date: November 9, 2006

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3011 

To modify the definition of a communist Chinese military company for 

purposes of the imposition of certain sanctions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2021 

Mr. BANKS (for himself, Mr. STEUBE, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of a communist Chinese military 

company for purposes of the imposition of certain sanctions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Holding Chinese Mili5 tary Companies Accountable Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3011 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO APPLICATIONS OF IEEPA AU2 THORITIES TO COMMUNIST CHINESE MILI3 TARY COMPANIES. 

4 Section 1237(b)(4)(B) of the Strom Thurmond Na5 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (50 

6 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking clause (ii); 

8 (2) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik9 ing ‘‘that—’’ and inserting ‘‘that is engaged in pro10 viding commercial services, manufacturing, pro11 ducing, or exporting and—’’; 

12 (3) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘; or’’; and 

14 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

15 clause: 

16 ‘‘(ii)(I) is owned or controlled by, or 

17 affiliated with, the Chinese Communist 

18 Party or any person who has ever been a 

19 delegate of a National People’s Congress of 

20 the Chinese Communist Party; and 

21 ‘‘(II) is engaged in significant invest22 ment in the sectors of fifth-generation 

23 wireless communications, artificial intel24 ligence, advanced computing, ‘big data’ 

25 analytics, autonomy, robotics, directed en26 ergy, hypersonics, or biotechnology.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3011 IH

1 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 Notwithstanding section 1061(i)(6) of the National 

3 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (10 

4 U.S.C. 111 note), the submission required by subsection 

5 (b) of section 1237 of the Strom Thurmond National De6 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999— 

7 (1) shall not terminate on December 31, 2021; 

8 and 

9 (2) shall continue in effect until December 31, 

10 2026. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Agustin TEPEZANO-BEJARANO, also known as Agustin Tepezano-Bejarno, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50147

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 15, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Agustín Tepezano-Bejarano challenges, as substantively unreasonable, his 46-month within-Guidelines sentence for illegal reentry after removal. He maintains Guideline § 2L1.2 (unlawful reentry) lacks an empirical basis and double counts criminal history, his motive for returning to the United States was benign, and illegal reentry is a non-violent offense. “[A] sentence •within a properly calculated Guideline [sentencing] range is presumptively reasonable”. *United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).

Regarding his claim that Guideline § 2L1.2 is not supported by empirical data, Tepezano recognizes this contention is foreclosed, but he raises it to preserve it for possible future review. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir .2009).

Our court previously has rejected the other contentions presented by Tepezano regarding the reasonableness of a sentence. *See id.*at 530-31 (application of unlawful-reentry Guideline causes double-counting of criminal history); *United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, *510565-66 (5th Cir.2008) (benign motive for reentry rendered sentence unreasonable); *United States v. Aguirre-Villa,*460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Cir.2006) (illegal reentry is a mere trespass offense). The district court considered Tepezano’s contentions in mitigation of his sentence and determined a sentence at the bottom of the applicable advisory Guidelines sentencing range was appropriate. There is no basis on which to disturb the presumption of reasonableness in this case. *See United States v. Cooks,*589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 34.4

 

|   | <  **Ernst & Young    LLP**    5 Times Square    New York, New York 10036-6530 | <  Phone: (212)    773-3000     www.ey.com |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Board of DirectorsThe Bank of New York

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanyingManagement's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB ServicingCriteria, that The Bank of New York (the "Company") complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sRegulation AB for the Medallion 2006-1G Series Trust Asset Backed SecuritizationPlatform (the "Platform") as of June 30, 2006 and for the period from March 14,2006 (the date of issuance of the first transaction on the Platform subject tothe requirements of Regulation AB) through June 30, 2006, except for criteria1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i), and1122(d)(4)(i)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to theactivities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included selection of a sample of transactions and complianceactivities related to the Platform during the examination period, anddetermining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed thoseactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selectedtransactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, andactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurredprior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report for theselected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with theaforementioned servicing criteria as of June 30, 2006 and for the period fromMarch 14, 2006 through June 30, 2006 for the Medallion 2006-1G Series TrustAsset Backed Securitization Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

August 30, 2006