alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2 — RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Adail Ortiz, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.      Date: August 15, 2005     /s/ Adail Ortiz     Name: Adail Ortiz  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon GOBI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50480.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*225Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 29, 2010.

Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Julie Werner-Simon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Eric Vandevelde, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark Eibert, Esquire, Half Moon Bay, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gordon Goei appeals from his jury trial conviction and 41-month sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; evasion of income tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201; and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Goei contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to present a defense, failed to present any witnesses, failed to cross examine two witnesses, and failed to offer any proposed jury instructions. We decline to review these claims on direct appeal as the record is insufficiently developed and the legal representation was not so inadequate that it obviously denied Goei his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. *See United States v. Benford,*574 F.3d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In re: Mohammad Nawaz RAJA, Debtor. Mohammad Nawaz Raja, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-1035.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

*868Mohammad Nawaz Raja, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Patrick Burns, Cunningham *&*Associates, P.L.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Nawaz Raja appeals the district court’s orders: (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for relief from stay and, (2) denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Raja v. IndyMac Fed. Bank,*No. 1:09-cv-00654-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2009; Nov. 24, 2009; December 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         401,268
<SECURITIES>                                    23,452
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               437,475
<PP&E>                                           7,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                     467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 883,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     858,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   883,866
<SALES>                                         14,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,415
<CGS>                                            6,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,968)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.35)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Carlton Parfitt, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Legacy Mining Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 14, 2007



/s/ Carlton Parfitt

-------------------

Carlton Parfitt



Director and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Charles T. Dawson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles T. Dawson
Charles T. Dawson
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 29, 2008

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00163-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1 of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. JP08-22-E00106953

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE MERCION FREEMAN BEY, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Further, any other pending motions are denied

as moot. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 13, 2022
**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**


**OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE**


**(KinderCare
      Portfolio Whole Loan)**




Re:  
GE
      Commercial Mortgage Corporation 2006-C1 (the "Trust"), created pursuant to
      that certain
      pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of March 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement"), among GE Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as depositor, Wachovia
      Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as special servicer
      and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee and REMIC
      administrator.




In
      connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
      behalf of Bank of
      America, N.A. as master servicer (the "Lead Servicer"), with respect to the
      KinderCare Portfolio
      Whole Loan, (as defined in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) a part of which
      is included
      in the Trust, under that certain pooling and servicing agreement (the
      " Lead
      Servicing Agreement ")
      dated
      as of December 1, 2005, among Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.,
      as
      depositor, the Lead Servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as special servicer, and
      LaSalle Bank National
      Association, as trustee and REMIC administrator, hereby certifies that (i)
      with
      respect to
      the
      KinderCare Portfolio Whole Loan, a review of the activities for the period
      ending December
      31, 2006 and of the Lead Servicer's performance under the Lead Servicing Agreement,
      have been made under my supervision; (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based
      on such
      review, the Lead Servicer, with respect to the KinderCare Portfolio Whole Loan,
      has fulfilled
      all of its obligations under the agreements in all material respects throughout
      the aforementioned
      period; and (iii) the Lead Servicer, with respect to the KinderCare Portfolio Whole
      Loan, has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status,
      of any portion
      of the Trust fund as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental
      agency or body.




Bank
      of
      America, National Association




/s/
      Sean
      D. Reilly


Sean
      D.
      Reilly


Principal




/s/
      H.
      Michael Lumadue


H.
      Michael Lumadue


Vice
      President




USActive
      7846785.2
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  March 12, 2010
/s/ Barbara J. FournierBarbara J. FournierChief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2987 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2987

   To increase the amount of loan forgiveness available to teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2021

  Mrs. Luria introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the amount of loan forgiveness available to teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teacher Loan Forgiveness Improvement 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR TEACHERS.

    Section 428J(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1078-10(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$17,500'' and inserting 
        ``$30,000''.

SEC. 3. INCREASED LOAN CANCELLATION FOR TEACHERS.

    Section 460(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087j(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$17,500'' and inserting 
        ``$30,000''.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any 
borrower who completes the fifth complete school year of teaching 
required for loan forgiveness under section 428J(b) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078-10(b)), or for loan cancellation 
under section 460(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1087j(b)), on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sean KYLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel SENKOWSKI, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 09-0357-pr (L), 09-3050-pr (CON).

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 1, 2010.

Susan D. Fitzpatrick, Red Hook, NY, for Appellant.

Malancha Chanda (of counsel), for District Attorney, New York County (Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.), for Appellee.

Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, WALKER, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Sean Kyler appeals from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus by the district court. Following a trial by jury, Kyler was convicted of intentional murder, criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and felony-murder. Kyler argues that the jury verdict must be set aside on the grounds that he was subjected to an unduly suggestive lineup, that the government obtained an indictment on false, misleading and perjured evidence, and that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for felony-murder. We find Kyler’s arguments to be without merit and affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

We have considered all of Kyler’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Luxoft Global Operations GmbH, Zug, SWITZERLAND; Congenica Limited, Hinxton, UNITED KINGDOM; Jeremy G. Frey (individual member), Highfield, UNITED KINGDOM; The HDF Group, Champaign, IL; BioRAFT, Cambridge, MA; Cyclica, Toronto, CANADA; and AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 12, 2017. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 16, 2017 (82 FR 38939).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2017-24544 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION



I, Reed T. Buley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Slopestyle Corporation



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 10, 2007



/s/  Reed T. Buley

Reed T. Buley

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: March 10, 2008       /s/ Barbara J. Fournier
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Barbara J. Fournier
                           Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)