alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7414

ONIEL BASIL HARRIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-57-AM) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oniel Basil Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Shelly Renee James, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Oniel Basil Harris appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Angelone , No. CA-01-57-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jul. 31, 2001; entered Aug. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Featured Speaker at the American Maritime Forum","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QXiTgBF35I\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-featured-speaker-at-the-american-maritime-forum\/\">Commissioner Sola Featured Speaker at the American Maritime Forum<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-featured-speaker-at-the-american-maritime-forum\/embed\/#?secret=QXiTgBF35I\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Featured Speaker at the American Maritime Forum” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"QXiTgBF35I\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
23.0
  
 Consent
of Beard Miller Company LLP
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 19, 2008, on
the consolidated financial statements of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for the years then ended, in the Registration
Statement No. 333-132543 on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. with respect to Northeast
Community Bank 401(k) Plan.
  
 /s/  Beard
      Miller Company LLPPine
      Brook, New JerseyMarch
      31, 2008
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Hillstream Pharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Milby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Randy Milby
              -----------------------------------
              Randy
      Milby
              Principal
      Executive Officer
              Principal
      Financial Officer
              January
      12, 2009
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00117-CV

Clinton HABY and Heidi Haby,

Appellants

v.

RIVER TRAIL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-434

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the part of the trial 

court’s judgment ordering Appellee River Trail Property Owners Association to recover the sum 

of $10,000.00 in attorney’s fees from Appellants Clinton Haby and Heidi Haby is REVERSED, 

and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for trial on Appellee River Trail Property Owners 

Association’s claim for attorney’s fees. The remainder of the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs on appeal.

SIGNED February 26, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Realogy Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard A. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Anthony E. Hull, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/    RICHARD A. SMITH                                 
|RICHARD A. SMITH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  March 19, 2008

|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/s/    ANTHONY E. HULL                                                              
|ANTHONY E. HULL EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  March 19, 2008
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41064

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL MEJIA-JAEN,

 DefendantAppellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-01-CR-139-1

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

June 10, 2002

Before JOLLY, DEMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counselfor DanielMejia-Jaen hasmoved for leave to withdraw and hasfiled

a brief asrequired by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mejia was sent a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief and in response has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. 

Our independent review ofthe brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolousissue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
-2-

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Mejia’s motion for the

appointment of counsel is DENIED.
#### David P. VANDAMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark DUNCAN, Commander; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-35973.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 29, 2010.

David P. Vandament, Shelton, WA, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David P. Vandament, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), *Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca,*410 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir.2005), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record, *O’Guinn v. Lo-velock Corr. Ctr.,*502 F.3d 1056, 1059 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed without prejudice Vandament’s claims based on arrests, searches and seizure. *See Harvey v. Waldron,*210 F.3d 1008, 1013 (9th Cir.2000), *overruled on other grounds by Wallace v. Kato,*549 U.S. 384, 127 S.Ct. 1091, 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007) (“a § 1983 action that would call into question the lawfulness of a plaintiffs conviction or confinement is not cognizable” under *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994)). Because amendment would be futile, the district court properly dismissed these claims without leave to amend. *See Cato v. United States,*70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.1995). We are not persuaded that any remaining claims are cognizable or could be cured by amendment. *See id.*

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Ayman Ali MOHAMMAD, a.k.a. Ayman Mohammad, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72249.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Bob Platt, Esquire, Law Office of Bob Platt, Granada Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Shelley Goad, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ayman Ali Mohammad, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his adjustment of status application. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Mohammad’s contentions regarding the denial of his 1-130 visa petition as they pertain to the BIA’s August 27, 2007, order, and this petition for review is not timely as to that order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252; *Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00546-CV

Juanita GONZALES GARCIA, et al.,

Appellants

v.

U.S. BANK, N.A. as Trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. 2006-HE3, Asset-Backed 

U.S. BANK, N.A. as Trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. 2006-HE3, Asset-Backed 

Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-HE3,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01889

Honorable Timothy Johnson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 2, 2015

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellants’ brief was due to be filed by October 23, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

On November 4, 2015, after no brief or motion for extension of time was filed, we ordered 

Appellants Juanita Gonzales Garcia, et al., to show cause in writing not later than November 14, 

2015, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a). To 

date, Appellants have filed no response to our November 4, 2015 order. 

We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section
906 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer




Each
of Thomas J. Mazzarisi, Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen J. Schoepfer, Chief
Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:




(1)
The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008
(“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  
                  CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/
      Thomas J. Mazzarisi
                  
                  /s/
      Stephen J.
  SchoepferName:
      Thomas J. Mazzarisi
                  
                  Name:
      Stephen J. SchoepferDate:
      December 22, 2008
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC Commissioner William Doyle Visits Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on March 10 & 11: Surveys Port and Infrastructure Projects","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lPcJ0mdzZZ\"><a href=\"\/fmc-commissioner-william-doyle-visits-ports-of-los-angeles-and-long-beach-on-march-10-11-surveys-port-and-infrastructure-projects\/\">FMC Commissioner William Doyle Visits Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on March 10 & 11: Surveys Port and Infrastructure Projects<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-commissioner-william-doyle-visits-ports-of-los-angeles-and-long-beach-on-march-10-11-surveys-port-and-infrastructure-projects\/embed\/#?secret=lPcJ0mdzZZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC Commissioner William Doyle Visits Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on March 10 & 11: Surveys Port and Infrastructure Projects” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"lPcJ0mdzZZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51471-51472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Public Availability of the Department of Transportation FY 2016 
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2016 Service Contract 
Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law 111-117, Department of 
Transportation is publishing this notice to advise the public of the 
availability of the FY 2016 Government-wide Service Contact Inventory 
data, the analysis of the FY 2015 Service Contract Inventory data and 
the plan for analyzing the FY 2016 data. This inventory provides 
information on service contract actions over $25,000 awarded in FY 
2016. The information is organized by function to show how contracted 
resources are distributed throughout the agency.
    The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued 
on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default...052010.pdf. Department of 
Transportation has posted its analysis of the FY 2015 Service Contact 
Inventory

[[Page 51472]]

data, the plan for analyzing the FY 2016 data, and the link to the FY 
2016 Government-wide inventory on the Department of Transportation's 
homepage at the following link: https://www.transportation.gov/assistant-secretary-administration/procurement/service-contract-inventory. Questions regarding the Service Contract Inventory should be 
directed to Diane Morrison in the Office of the Senior Procurement 
Executive at 202-366-4960 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abcfc2cac5ce85c6c4d9d9c2d8c4c5ebcfc4df85ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96f2fff7f8f3b8fbf9e4e4ffe5f9f8d6f2f9e2b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 3, 2017.
Gregory Cate,
Deputy Director, Office of Senior Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 2017-24077 Filed 11-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Lamar SNIPE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7448.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *See United States v. Goodwyn,*596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*