Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 51389 

10See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

1See Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered Roller 

Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, 

from the People’s Republic of China, 52 FR 22667 

(June 15, 1987), as amended by Tapered Roller 

Bearings from the People’s Republic of China; 

Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order in 

Accordance With Decision Upon Remand, 55 FR 

6669 (February 26, 1990) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 

FR 80844 (July 3, 2017). 

3See Timken’s Letter, ‘‘Fourth Sunset Review of 

the Antidumping Order on Tapered Roller Bearings 

from China (A–570–601): Notice of Intent to 

Participate of the Timken Company,’’ dated July 10, 

2017. 

4See Timken’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review (4th 

Review) pursuant to Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930 of the antidumping duty order on Tapered 

Roller Bearings from China (Case No. A–570–601) 

Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ 

dated August 2, 2017. 

Public Comment 

Case briefs or other written comments 

may be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance no later than seven days 

after the date on which the last 

verification report is issued in this 

investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in case briefs, may be 

submitted no later than five days after 

the deadline date for case briefs.10

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 

(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or 

rebuttal briefs in this investigation are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number, the 

number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. If a 

request for a hearing is made, the 

Department intends to hold the hearing 

at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 

date to be determined. Parties should 

confirm by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 703(f) of 

the Act, the Department will notify the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) of 

its determination. If the final 

determination is affirmative, the ITC 

will determine before the later of 120 

days after the date of this preliminary 

determination or 45 days after the final 

determination. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published pursuant to sections 703(f) 

and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.205(c). 

Dated: October 30, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by this 

investigation is fine denier polyester staple 

fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, 

measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in 

diameter. The scope covers all fine denier 

PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The 

following products are excluded from the 

scope: 

(1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3. decitex 

(more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently 

classifiable under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. 

(2) Low-melt PSF defined as a 

bicomponent fiber with a polyester core and 

anouter, polyester sheath that melts at a 

significantly lower temperature than its inner 

polyester core currently classified under 

HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015. 

Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the 

HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

investigation is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope Comments 

IV. Scope of the Investigation 

V. Injury Test 

VI. Subsidies Valuation 

VII. Benchmarks and Discount Rates 

VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

IX. Analysis of Programs 

X. Calculation of the All-Others Rate 

XI. ITC Notification 

XII. Disclosure and Public Comment 

XIII. Verification 

XIV. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2017–24078 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of the Expedited Fourth 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(the Department) finds that revocation 

of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 

tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished and unfinished (TRBs) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC) would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping. The magnitude 

of the dumping margin likely to prevail 

is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Whitley Herndon; Office II, AD/CVD 

Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6274. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 15, 1987, the Department 

published the AD order on TRBs from 

the PRC.1 On July 3, 2017, the 

Department initiated the fourth sunset 

review of the AD order on TRBs from 

the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(Act).2 On July 10, 2017, the Department 

received a timely notice of intent to 

participate in the sunset review from the 

Timken Company (Timken), a domestic 

producer and the petitioner in the TRBs 

less-than-fair-value investigation, within 

the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On August 2, 2017, 

Timken filed a timely substantive 

response with the Department pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 The 

Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 


Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
51390 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 

5For a full description of the scope of the AD 

Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Fourth Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Tapered 

Roller Bearings from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated concurrently with, and adopted by, 

this notice (Decision Memorandum). 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 

FR 30844 (July 3, 2017). 

3See Letter from the Domestic Interested Party, 

‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Notice 

of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

July 18, 2017. 

4 Id. at 1–2. 

5See Letter from the Domestic Interested Party, 

‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 

Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of 

Sunset Review,’’ dated August 2, 2017. 

6See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube 

From Turkey: Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review of Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 64900 

(October 19, 2011); Certain Pasta from Turkey: 

Final Results of Expedited Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 72 FR 

5269 (February 5, 2007); and Certain Carbon Steel 

Products from Sweden; Final Results of Expedited 

Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty Order, 65 FR 

18304 (April 7, 2000). See also Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty 

the Department conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order includes tapered roller bearings 

and parts thereof. The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 

8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 

8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 

8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. The 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Decision 

Memorandum. The issues discussed in 

the Decision Memorandum include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of dumping and the magnitude of the 

dumping margin likely to prevail if the 

Order were to be revoked. 

The Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of 

the main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Decision Memorandum 

can be accessed at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the 

Department determines that revocation 

of the Order would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

and that the magnitude of the margin of 

dumping likely to prevail if the Order is 

revoked would be up to 60.25 percent. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.281 and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: October 31, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24075 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–844] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Final Results of Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 3, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated a sunset review of 

the countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain lined paper products from India 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The 

Department has conducted an expedited 

sunset review of this order pursuant to 

the Act and 19 CFR 351. As a result of 

this sunset review, the Department finds 

that revocation of the CVD order is 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–1009. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The CVD order on certain lined paper 

products from India was published in 

the Federal Register on September 28, 

2006.1 On July 3, 2017, the Department 

initiated the second sunset review of 

this CVD order pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act.2 On July 18, 2017, we 

received a notice of intent to participate 

on behalf of the Association of 

American School Paper Suppliers and 

each of its individual members (AASPS, 

hereinafter referred to as the domestic 

interested party), an association of 

domestic producers of lined paper 

products.3 The domestic interested 

party claimed interested party status 

under sections 771(9)(F) and (C) of the 

Act, because it is comprised of an 

association of U.S. producers of the 

domestic like product and the 

individual members of the association, 

which are manufacturers, producers, or 

wholesalers in the United States of the 

domestic like product.4 On August 2, 

2017, the domestic interested party 

submitted its substantive response 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 The 

Department did not receive any 

substantive response from the 

Government of India, or Indian 

producers or exporters of the 

merchandise covered by the CVD order. 

As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 

conducted an expedited review of the 

CVD order. This approach is consistent 

with the Department’s practice, 

including the prior sunset review of this 

CVD order.6 The Department did not 


Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES