Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 21, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01202-CR 

No. 05-15-01203-CR 

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183-J, F10-01184-J 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Senrick Wilkerson was convicted of sexual performance by a child and sexual assault of 

a child. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, as were the appeals from the denial of 

his motion for post-conviction DNA testing related to the convictions. Wilkerson v. State, Nos. 

05-11-00061–00062-CR, 2012 WL 2877623 (Tex. App.––Dallas July 16, 2012, pet. ref’d) 

(convictions); Wilkerson v. State, Nos. 05-14-00007–00008-CR, 2015 WL 139387 2015 WL 

139387 (Tex. App.––Dallas Jan. 12, 2015, no pet.) (DNA). The Court now has before it 

appellant’s “motion for appeal” to which is attached a copy of a “motion to enter nunc pro tunc 

order” to correct inaccuracies in the judgments. Appellant asserts he filed the motion on 

September 21, 2015. Appellant complains in the letter accompanying his notice of appeal that 

the trial court does not respond to the motions he files. 
 –2– 

We note that the notice of appeal and the motion for nunc pro tunc judgment do not 

contain the file-stamp of the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office. We received correspondence 

from the Dallas County District Clerk stating that appellant did not file the documents with that 

office. If a notice of appeal is filed with this Court, the date on which it is received will be 

recorded and the notice will be sent to the trial court clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). Rule 

25.2(c)(1), however, does not apply to appellant’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. That 

motion must be filed with the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 23.1. Appellant may not file a 

motion to correct the trial court’s judgment in this Court, nor may he use this Court as an 

alternative filing office for documents directed to the trial court. 

Because appellant’s notice of appeal attacks no judgment or order over which we have 

jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeals. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

151202F.U05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant 

No. 05-15-01202-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F10-01183-J. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Myers and Brown participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered October 21, 2015. 

 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant 

No. 05-15-01203-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F10-01184-J. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Myers and Brown participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered October 21, 2015.