alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC is Conducting Maintenance on Several Databases This Weekend","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"f2nlY7aRdj\"><a href=\"\/fmc-is-conducting-maintenance-on-several-databases-this-weekend\/\">FMC is Conducting Maintenance on Several Databases This Weekend<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-is-conducting-maintenance-on-several-databases-this-weekend\/embed\/#?secret=f2nlY7aRdj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC is Conducting Maintenance on Several Databases This Weekend” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"f2nlY7aRdj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 52129

- 6

- II Respondent, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

v. JACOB C. EVANS, Appellant.
G LASGOW , J

. — Jacob Evans appeals the sentencing court’s imposition of the criminal filing fee under RCW 36.18.020(2)(h) as a legal financial obligation on his judgment and sentence

. The State concedes that the sentencing court found Evans to be indigent and that the filing fee
should be stricken , as well as any interest on any nonrestitution financial obligations

. We acc ept the State’s concession and remand to the sentencing court to strike the criminal filing fee and interest accrual on any nonrestitution obligations

. In 20 18 , Jacob Evans was convicted of nine counts of second degree identity theft and nine
counts of forgery after cashing a series of stolen and falsified checks . As part of Evans’s sentence, the sentencing court imposed restitution, a crime victim penalty assessment , and a criminal filing
fee. The judgment and sentence also includes an interest accrua l provision. The court also entered an order of indigency. Evans then appealed the imposition of the criminal filing fee. Evans argues, and the State concedes, that the sentencing court erred by ordering Evans to pay the criminal filing fee because he is indigent

. RCW 36.18.030 prohibits courts from imposing the criminal filing fee on indigent defendants. RCW 36.18.020(2)(h); State v. Catling , 19 3 Wn.2d 252, 258, 438 P.3d 1174 (2019)

. This prohibition became effective in June 2018 , befo re Evans Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two December 30, 2019No. 52129

- 6

- II

2

was sentenced in July 2018. State v. Ramirez , 191 Wn.2d 732, 738, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) (noting
that the effective date of relevant amendments to certain legal financial obligation statutes became effective on June 7, 2018)

. The State also concedes that the tr ial court should strike interest accrual on nonrestitution financial obligations. We accept the State’s concession s and remand to the sentencing court to strike the criminal filing fee and interest accrual on any nonrestitution obligations

. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,
it is so ordered.

Glasgow, J. We concur:

Worswick, J.

Maxa, C.J.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  filing  of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  September  30, 2007 (the
"Report") by National Coal Corp. ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:

         1.       to the best of our  knowledge,  the Report fully complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  November 19, 2007            /S/ DANIEL A. ROLING
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Daniel A. Roling
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 19, 2007            /S/ T. MICHAEL LOVE
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    T. Michael Love
                                    Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00690-CV

Jeannette Stevens, Appellant

v.

Riley D. Stevens, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 07-1634-FC3, HONORABLE DONALD HIGGINBOTHAM, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on December 4, 2009, along with an

affidavit of indigence. After several delays, the filing of the appellate record was completed on

November 9, 2010, making appellant’s brief due December 13. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On

January 11, 2011, we sent appellant notice that her brief was overdue, informing her that if a

response was not filed by January 21, the appeal was subject to dismissal. See id. R. 42.3(b). To

date, we have received no response from appellant. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See id. 

____________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 29, 2011
#### Chauncey Antonio HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gregg L. HERSHBERGER; The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 13-7133.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 26, 2013.

Decided: Dec. 5, 2013.

Chauncey Antonio Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chauncey Antonio Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hill has not made *339the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hill’s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000413

06-MAR-2020

09:05 AM
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 51825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-5-000]


Notice of Request for Temporary Waiver; Marathon Pipe Line LLC

    Take notice that on November 1, 2017, pursuant to Rule 204 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.204, Marathon Pipe Line LLC filed a petition 
for temporary waiver of the tariff filing and reporting requirements of 
sections 6 and 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act and parts 341 and 357 
of the Commission's regulations with respect to four pipeline assets, 
as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e080b1c0d01202227202b1d3b3e3e213c3a0e282b3c2d60292138">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on November 17, 2017.

    Dated: November 2, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24272 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### A.H.M. ZUBAIR, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60214

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 23, 2008.

Amy Ghosh, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Brooke Marie Maurer, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Kristi Barrows, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Dallas, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Michael B. Mukasey, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

A.H.M. Zubair petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We do not have jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination of the Immigration Judge (IJ) and the BIA that Zubair’s asylum application was untimely. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3). The petition for review in thus dismissed as to the claims concerning asylum.

Additionally, Zubair, who is represented by counsel, does not challenge the IJ’s and BIA’s conclusion that he is not eligible for withholding of removal or relief under CAT. Thus, these issues are deemed abandoned. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993); *Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS,*809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir.1986).

Accordingly, Zubair’s petition for review is DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED *464IN PART. Zubair’s motion to stay removal is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350)

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Ytzhak Edelman,Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Company (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ YTZHAK  EDELMAN      |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Ytzhak  Edelman          |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |   | November 11,  2005       |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Visits Houston for Panel Discussion and Meetings with Local Maritime Leaders","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SBwhBJZ5yU\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-visits-houston-for-panel-discussion-and-meetings-with-local-maritime-leaders\/\">Commissioner Sola Visits Houston for Panel Discussion and Meetings with Local Maritime Leaders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-visits-houston-for-panel-discussion-and-meetings-with-local-maritime-leaders\/embed\/#?secret=SBwhBJZ5yU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Visits Houston for Panel Discussion and Meetings with Local Maritime Leaders” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"SBwhBJZ5yU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 4.50
​
Power of Attorney
We, Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd., the shareholder of Shenzhen Xunlei Networking Technologies Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Xunlei") holding a total of 6.7% equity thereof, agree to authorize Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. ("Giganology Shenzhen") to exercise the shareholder rights that we have corresponding to the 6.7% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei. We hereby irrevocably authorize the Authorized Person to exercise the following rights within the valid period of this Power of Attorney:
The Authorized Person being authorized to fully exercise, on behalf of us and in the name of us as a shareholder holding 6.7% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei, and in accordance with the laws and the articles of association, all the shareholder rights that we are entitled to, including but not limited to: the right to propose convening the shareholders' meetings, to accept any notices of the convening and proceedings of the shareholders' meetings, to attend the shareholders' meeting of Shenzhen Xunlei and exercise all voting rights as a shareholder holding 6.7% equity thereof (including acting as our authorized representative at the shareholders' meetings of Shenzhen Xunlei to designate and appoint the directors, general manager, chief financial officer and other officers of Shenzhen Xunlei and to decide on such matters as dividends), to sell or transfer the 6.7% equity of Shenzhen Xunlei held by us.
The Authorized Person shall have the right to designate any individuals appointed by its Board of Directors (or Executive Director) to exercise the rights granted to it under this Power of Attorney.
Unless the Business Operation Agreement jointly signed by Giganology Shenzhen, Shenzhen Xunlei, Zou Shenglong, Cheng Hao, Shi Jianming, Wang Fang and Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd. is terminated earlier for any reasons, this Power of Attorney shall remain valid for ten years as from the date when it is signed. Upon expiry of this Power of Attorney, if so requested by Giganology Shenzhen, we shall extend the valid period of this Power of Attorney according to the requirements of Giganology Shenzhen.
​
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)
​
​



[This page is the signature page of the Power of Attorney, without text]
​
​
	​
​
​


	

	


	Authorized by:
Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd. 
	 

	 
	 

	Legal Representative/Authorized Representative (Signature under company seal)
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Yang Fei
	 

	​
/s/Seal of Guangzhou Shulian Information Investment Co., Ltd.
​
Date: May 10, 2021
​
​
​
	 

	Authorized Person:
Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
	 

	 
	 

	Legal Representative/Authorized Representative (Signature under company seal)
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Zou Shenglong
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/Seal of Giganology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
	 

	 
	 

	Date:
	 May 10, 2021
	


​

2
Exhibit 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, E.K. Ranjit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
November 14, 2003

|By: |  | /s/E.K. RANJITE.K. Ranjit Chief Financial Officer | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------- | 
|    |  |                                                   | 

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for 10327, Oglethorpe Bank, Brunswick, Georgia, has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the receivership estate of Oglethorpe Bank (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law. The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective November 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

Dated: November 3, 2017.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-24282 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P