alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-KS3 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by  the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  U.S.  Bank  National
Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
       Name: Anthony N. Renzi
       Title: Managing Director
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
CTC Media, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Alexander Rodnyansky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: February 28, 2008
  By:
  /s/ Alexander RodnyanskyAlexander Rodnyansky
  Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Carlo Endozo CARINGAL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70041.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 2, 2010.*

Decided Nov. 17, 2010.

Murray David Hilts, Law Offices of Murray D. Hilts, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Sunah Lee, Trial, Oil, Michelle Gorden Latour, Esquire, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, Senior District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Carlo Endozo Caringal (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of the Phil*261ippines, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order finding Petitioner to be removable and statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal.

Petitioner is removable for his convictions for two crimes involving moral turpitude which two crimes did not arise out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii). These two unrelated crimes resulted in separate convictions for petty theft and burglary. Petitioner fails to seek review of the BIA’s findings that his petty theft and burglary offenses are crimes involving moral turpitude.

We have held that “arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.” *Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999). Hence, Petitioner waives these issues. He is thus removable for having committed two crimes involving moral turpitude that did not arise out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct.

Petitioner is further not statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal because he had not accrued the necessary seven years of continuous residence to qualify for relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). Petitioner’s crimes terminated his continuous residence before he accrued seven years of continuous residence. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(l) (“[A]ny period of continuous residence ... in the United States shall be deemed to end ... when the alien has committed an offense referred to in [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2) ].”).

Finally, Petitioner is not entitled to a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) because he was found to be removable, not inadmissible, due to his two convictions for crimes involving moral turpitude. § 1182(h) does not provide a waiver of removability.

We need not reach the issue of whether Petitioner’s drug conviction also renders him removable.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  filing  of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report")
by National Coal Corp. ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

         1.       to the best of our  knowledge,  the Report fully complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  August 14, 2008              /S/ DANIEL A. ROLING
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Daniel A. Roling
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 14, 2008              /S/ MICHAEL R. CASTLE
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Michael R. Castle
                                    Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2856 

To require the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security 

to report on the use of surveillance technology, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2021 

Mr. TORRES of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Inspector General of the Department of 

Homeland Security to report on the use of surveillance 

technology, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oversight of Law En5 forcement Surveillance Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING ON SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. 

7 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, a 

9 law enforcement agency of a major metropolitan area re10 ceiving any Federal funds from the Department of HomeVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:57 Jun 17, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2856.IH H2856

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2856 IH

1 land Security shall report the use of surveillance tech2 nology to: 

3 (1) The Secretary of Homeland Security. 

4 (2) The Inspector General of the Department of 

5 Homeland Security. 

6 (3) The United States Congress. 

7 (b) REPORT BY INSPECTOR GENERAL.—Not later 

8 than one year after the enactment of this Act, and annu9 ally thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department 

10 of Homeland Security shall report to the Committee on 

11 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

12 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

13 Affairs of the Senate on the use of surveillance technology 

14 and the impact the use of such technology has on civil 

15 liberties and privacy. 

16 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY.—The term 

18 ‘‘law enforcement agency’’ means a State, local, In19 dian tribal, or campus public agency engaged in the 

20 prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution, or 

21 adjudication of violations of criminal laws. 

22 (2) MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREA.—The term 

23 ‘‘major metropolitan area’’ means an area including 

24 250,000 residents or more. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2856 IH

1 (3) SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY.—The term 

2 ‘‘surveillance technology’’ means equipment, soft3 ware, or system capable of, or used or designed for, 

4 collecting, retaining, processing, or sharing audio, 

5 video, location, thermal, biometric, or similar infor6 mation, that is operated by or at the direction of the 

7 department. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Mian Taugir AHMED, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-1933.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 14, 2008.

Decided: May 22, 2008.

John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Senior Litigation Counsel, Arthur L. Rabin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mian Taugir Ahmed, a native and citizen of Pakistan, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and Ahmed’s claims and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ahmed’s motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(1) (2008).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Exhibit 10.5


 


 


 


EXHIBIT B-4


 


ALLONGE


 


This Allonge is made to that Senior Secured Incremental
Note, certificate B-3, dated October 15, 2021 (the “Note”), in the original principal sum of five hundred ten thousand six
hundred and fifteen dollars, and fifty-nine cents ($510,615.59) issued by Pareteum Corporation, a Delaware corporation to Channel Ventures
Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to that certain Joinder Agreement dated November 26, 2021 and subject to the
terms of that Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 8, 2020, as amended from time to time.


 


Pay to the order of Circles MVNE Pte. Ltd., WITHOUT
REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY OR RECOURSE WHATSOEVER, except as expressly set forth in the Note Sale Contract dated as of April 25, 2022,
made and entered into by and between the undersigned, as seller, and Circles MVNE Pte. Ltd., as purchaser and acknowledged and agreed
to by Pareteum Corporation, as issuer.


 


Dated as of April 25, 2022.





 


	 	CHANNEL VENTURES GROUP, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Markwin Maring
	 	Name: Markwin Maring
	 	Title: Statutory Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Comments of FMC Commissioner Michael A. Khouri at the 2010 Global Liner Shipping Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jJKYT5uyuD\"><a href=\"\/comments-of-fmc-commissioner-michael-a-khouri-at-the-2010-global-liner-shipping-conference\/\">Comments of FMC Commissioner Michael A. Khouri at the 2010 Global Liner Shipping Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/comments-of-fmc-commissioner-michael-a-khouri-at-the-2010-global-liner-shipping-conference\/embed\/#?secret=jJKYT5uyuD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Comments of FMC Commissioner Michael A. Khouri at the 2010 Global Liner Shipping Conference” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"jJKYT5uyuD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 35.1

[BNY Mellon Corporate Trust Letterhead]

Statement of
Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

I, James Hall, Vice President
of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the Trustee), states:

(a) A review of the Trustees activities for the period of January
1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) and of the Trustees performance under the Trusts outlined
herein on Schedule I by and between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. (the Depositor) and the Trustee has been
made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for those
certain Trusts listed on Schedule I.

|                     | The Bank of New York Mellon,  
      as Trustee     
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                     
|Date:
March 2,  2015 | /s/ James Hall
      James Hall
      Vice President









Schedule I

PPLUS Trust Certificates Series LTD-1

PPLUS Trust Certificates Series RRD-1



| |  | 
| |  | 

---
#### Mr. Laquan D. COLLIER, a/k/a James Elmore, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, RespondentAppellee, and State of South Carolina, Respondent.

No. 13-7449.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.

Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.

*221Laquan D. Collier, Appellant Pro Se.

Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Laquan D. Collier seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collier has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2683 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase a set-aside for the 

Rural Project Initiative of the TIFIA program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2021 

Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase a setaside for the Rural Project Initiative of the TIFIA program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Communities 

5 Invest in Infrastructure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF SET-ASIDE. 

7 Section 605(f)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘$2,000,000’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘$3,000,000’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2683 IH

1 SEC. 3. NATIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND INNO2 VATIVE FINANCE BUREAU. 

3 (a) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT.—Section 116 of 

4 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(k) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than 

7 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, and 

8 annually thereafter, the Executive Director shall submit 

9 to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

10 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

11 Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report de12 tailing— 

13 ‘‘(1) the use of funds authorized under section 

14 605(f) of title 23; and 

15 ‘‘(2) the progress of the Bureau in carrying out 

16 the purposes described in subsection (b).’’. 

17 (b) OUTREACH.—Section 116(b)(1) of title 49, 

18 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

19 ‘‘(1) to provide assistance and communicate 

20 best practices and financing and funding opportuni21 ties to eligible entities for the programs referred to 

22 in subsection (d)(1), including by— 

23 ‘‘(A) conducting proactive outreach to com24 munities located outside of metropolitan or 

25 micropolitan statistical areas; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2683 IH

1 ‘‘(B) coordinating with the Office of Rural 

2 Development of the Department of Agriculture, 

3 the Office of Community Revitalization of the 

4 Environmental Protection Agency, and any 

5 other agencies that provide technical assistance 

6 for rural communities, as determined by the Di7 rector;’’. 

8 SEC. 4. TIFIA APPLICATION PROCESS REPORT. 

9 Section 609(b)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

10 is amended— 

11 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

12 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

13 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(vi) whether the project is located in 

16 a metropolitan statistical area, 

17 micropolitan statistical area, or neither.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.6


 


AudioCodes Ltd.


 


Amendment No. 5 to 2008 Equity Incentive Plan


 


Effective April 28, 2022,
Section 3(a) of the AudioCodes Ltd. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended
to increase the aggregate maximum number of Ordinary Shares, nominal value NIS 0.01 per share (the “Ordinary Shares”),
which may be issued under the Plan by 2,000,000 Ordinary Shares, such that, subject to Section 16 of the Plan, the aggregate maximum number
of Ordinary Shares which may be issued under the Plan following this amendment shall be 12,009,122 Ordinary Shares.
Exhibit 13.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ending August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Washinushi, certify in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
November 19, 2010By:
/s/ MICHAEL WASHINUSHIName: Michael WashinushiTitle: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.