alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.3

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION ABSERVICING CRITERIA**

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (the "**Asserting Party**") is responsible for assessing compliance as of June 30, 2006 and for the period from March 14, 2006 (date of issuance of the Medallion 2006-1G Series Trust) through June 30, 2006 (the "**Reporting Period**") with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "**CFR**"), except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) in the CFR, which theAsserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing of the Medallion 2006-1G Series Trust asset-backed securitisation transaction backed by housing loan receivables and serviced by the Asserting Party (the "**Applicable Servicing Criteria**"). The sole asset-backed securitisation transaction covered by this report was the Medallion 2006-1G Series Trust.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Medallion 2006-1G Series Trust asset-backed securitisation transaction backed by housing loan receivables serviced by the Asserting Party.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited

Date:  19 September 2006

By:          /s/ Chris Green               

Name:  Chris Green, Head of Debt Markets, Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      6, 2008                                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                        |
|   |                                                        |
| By:    | /s/      MICHAEL WASHINUSHI                                 |   |
|   |                                                        |
|   | Name:      Michael Washinushi                               |
|   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary |
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the North Atlantic Ports Association","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GEBc2J8UnO\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyles-prepared-remarks-to-the-north-atlantic-ports-association\/\">Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the North Atlantic Ports Association<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-william-p-doyles-prepared-remarks-to-the-north-atlantic-ports-association\/embed\/#?secret=GEBc2J8UnO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner William P. Doyle\u2019s Prepared Remarks to the North Atlantic Ports Association” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GEBc2J8UnO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
FLRA NEWS

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY - WASHINGTON, DC 20424

Contact: Eric Prag FLRA.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 717-444-5859 November 17, 2023

The FLRA Issues a Final Rule Regarding In-Person Filing with the Authority’s

Office of Case Intake and Publication.

Today, the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the FLRA) issued a Federal Register Notice 

adopting a final rule concerning documents filed with the Authority, the FLRA’s three-Member

decisional component, through the Authority’s Office of Case Intake and Publication (CIP).

Specifically, the final rule revises 5 C.F.R. § 2429.24(a) to specify that, if parties wish to file 

documents with CIP in person, then they must schedule an appointment at least one business day 

in advance.

The final rule also makes minor technical and formatting changes to § 2429.24(a), including 

clarifying that documents filed with CIP through the FLRA’s electronic-filing system must be 

filed no later than 11:59 p.m. EST on the date they are due. The final rule does not apply to 

documents filed with the FLRA’s General Counsel, Regional Directors, or Administrative Law 

Judges.

The final rule will take effect on December 18, 2023.

###

The FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non-Postal federal 

employees worldwide, approximately 1.2 million of whom are represented in 2,200 bargaining 

units. It is charged with providing leadership in establishing policies and guidance related to

federal sector labor-management relations and with resolving disputes under, and ensuring 

compliance with, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Office of the Administrative Law Judges","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"saPBQ0yGpw\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/administrative-law-judges\/\">Office of the Administrative Law Judges<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/administrative-law-judges\/embed\/#?secret=saPBQ0yGpw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Office of the Administrative Law Judges” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"saPBQ0yGpw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit
10.19


 


AMENDMENT #1 TO THE EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT ENTERED
INTO ON JANUARY 6, 2021


 


THIS AMENDMENT
#1 (the “Amendment”) to the EPA (as defined below) is made effective as of January 14, 2021, by and between Andina Gold Corp.,
a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Peak One Opportunity Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Holder”)
(collectively the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A. The Company and Holder are the parties
to that certain equity purchase agreement (the “EPA”) originally entered into by the Company and Holder on January 6, 2021.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1. The
reference to “24 months” in the definition of “Commitment Period” in the EPA shall be replaced with
“36 months”.


 


2. This Amendment
shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the EPA. Except as
specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the EPA, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain
in full force and effect.


  


[Signature page to follow]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	ANDINA GOLD CORP.	 	PEAK ONE OPPORTUNITY FUND, L.P.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Christopher Hansen	 	By:	Peak One Investments, LLC, 
	 	Name: 	Christopher Hansen	 	 	General Partner
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 





	 	 	By:	/s/ Jason Goldstein
	 	 	 	Name:   	Jason Goldstein
	 	 	 	Title: 	Managing Member
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Qnective, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”),
      I, Francoise Lanter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      May
      15, 2008





By:
            /s/
              Francoise LanterFrancoise
                LanterChief
                Financial Officer




This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to Qnective, Inc., and will be retained by
      Qnective, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn E. Ubrich, Appellant.

[666 NYS2d 825]

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Rosen, J.), rendered October 31, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

*887Upon pleading guilty to the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of several other charges pending against him, defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of IV2 to 4V2 years. The threshold inquiry on this appeal is the validity of defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal. A review of the relevant facts and circumstances surrounding such waiver *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11) indicates that defendant was not on any drugs or medication at the time of his plea, he discussed the case thoroughly with his attorney, and he was advised in considerable detail by County Court of the rights he would be giving up, including the waiver of his right to appeal. The record further indicates that defendant, who is familiar with the criminal justice system, acknowledged his understanding of the significance of these waivers. In these circumstances, we conclude that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see, People v Moissett,*76 NY2d 909, 911; *People v Hanna,*236 AD2d 742, 744, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1094; *People v Thompson,*234 AD2d 709, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1016).

Furthermore, as defendant failed to move to withdraw or vacate his guilty plea, his further challenge to the knowing, voluntary and intelligent nature of said plea is precluded *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665; *People v Rojas,*238 AD2d 727, 729), and the limited circumstances that would allow such a challenge in the absence of a formal postallocution motion *(see, People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725, 726; *People v Lopez, supra,*at 666) are not present here. In addition, to the extent that defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is preserved for our review *(see, People v Conyers,*227 AD2d 793, *lv denied*88 NY2d 982), we find no indication in the record that defense counsel’s conduct affected the plea bargaining process or that defendant pleaded guilty as a result of counsel’s poor performance *(see, People v McElhiney,*237 AD2d 827, *lv denied*90 NY2d 861).

We finally find no merit to defendant’s contention that he was denied due process by the 22-month delay in the perfection of his appeal *(see, People v Telesco,*189 AD2d 902, *lv denied*81 NY2d 977). Defendant’s remaining contentions either lack merit or are not properly before this Court for review.

Mercure, J. P., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, Steve Rix, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Big Bear Mining Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            the
      annual report on Form 10-K of Big Bear Mining Corp. for the year ended
      December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big Bear
      Mining Corp.




Dated:
March 31, 2010




/s/ Steve
Rix


Steve
Rix


President,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial
Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134112 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134112 

 COA: 273092 

St. Joseph CC: 80-004365 

DONNIE J. DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
#### N. V. & M. Lawrence *vs.*Hix & High.

One of the firm of If. Y. & M. Lawrence made affidavit to foreclose a lien for advances, stating “ that Jno. White, of the 962nd district, G. M., of said county, was and is the tenant for the year 1882 of said If. Y. & M. Lawrence, he having cultivated the lands of said If. Y. *&*M. Lawrence under a contract of rent by which said White pays to said firm one-third of the corn and one-fourth of the cotton ' grown on said lands; that during said year, and while the relation of landlord and tenant, as aforesaid, existed, the said If. Y. & M. Lawrence furnished to said White supplies and articles necessary for, and to enable the making of said crop, to-wit, one mare, for the sum of $85, for which amount said firm claims a landlord’s lien on the portion of said crops, c.orn and cotton belonging to said White; that said amount is due and unpaid; and that since the same became due, the said N. V, & M. Lawrence have demanded payment of the same from said White, which he refused, and still refuses -to make; and that this proceeding, by affidavit to foreclose said lien, is begun within twelve months irom the time the said sum became due

*Held,*that such affidavit was in substantial compliance with the statute upon which it was founded, and was sufficient. Code, §1991.

Judgment reversed.

November 11, 1884.

Blandeord, Justice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5


<S>                              <C>

<CURRENCY>                       CANADIAN
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                  1.50
<CASH>                           844,761
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    141,174
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 985,935
<PP&E>                           139,425
<DEPRECIATION>                   (48,684)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,076,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            708,779
<BONDS>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         2,595,211
<OTHER-SE>                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1,076,676
<SALES>                          364,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 364,238
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,441,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 161,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (916,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (916,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (916,320)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.17)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ("Form 10-KSB") of Qnective, Inc.  (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joe Hicks, Chief

Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Joe Hicks

------------------------------

Joe Hicks

Chief Financial Officer

April 17, 2007