alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clarke American Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the period ended December  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Charles T. Dawson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles T. Dawson                                        Charles T. DawsonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 9, 2007

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 906 Certification by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Each of Yahia Gawad, Chief Executive Officer,
and James Essex, Chief Financial Officer, of CardioGenics Holdings Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:

(1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended April 30, 2013 (“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|/s/ Yahia Gawad                                          |  | /s/ James Essex                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         |  |                                                         
|Name: Yahia Gawad
        Title: Chief Executive Officer |  | Name: James Essex
        Title: Chief Financial Officer
|                                                         |  |                                                         
|Date: June 19, 2013                                      |  |
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harvey
S. Traison, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

|                      |  |        |  |                                 | 
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 12, 2003 |  |        |  |                                
|                      |  |        |  |                                
|                      |  |        |  | /s/ Harvey S. Traison          
|                      |  |        |  |                                
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Harvey S. Traison              
|                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief
|                      |  |        |  | Financial Officer              

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and
will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.5**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report of TAM Capital Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  David Barioni Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 Date: June 25, 2008 

 By: /s/ David Barioni Neto         David Barioni Neto        Chief Executive Officer
#### Samuel WOLDESEMAIT, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71434.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 24, 2011.

. Saad Ahmad, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

James A. Hurley, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Samuel Woldesemait, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Woldesemait’s motion to reopen because the motion was filed more than 15 years after the BIA’s February 7, 1994, order dismissing the underlying appeal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Woldese-mait failed to demonstrate that he acted with the due diligence required to warrant equitable tolling of the filing deadline, *see Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1


           Section 1350 Certification by Principal Executive Officer


The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a
knowing or willful misrepresentation.

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.


Dated:  December 16, 2008          By:  /s/   ZACHARY R. SUCHIN
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name:   Zachary R. Suchin
                                        Title:  Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jason FOXWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-4581-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 22, 2010.

Neil B. Checkman, Law Office of Neil B. Checkman, Esq., New York, NY, for Appellant.

Avi Weitzman, Wai Shun Wilson Leung, Daniel A. Braun, U.S. Attorney’s Office, SDNY, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, JOSÉ A. CABRANES and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Jason Foxworth challenges his 68-month prison sentence, which was imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after Fox-worth was convicted of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

Appellate review of a district court’s sentence has two components: procedural review and substantive review. *United States v. Cavera,*550 F.3d 180, 189 (2d Cir.2008) (in banc). If the appellate court finds no procedural error, the substantive review is done under an abuse-of-discretion standard. *Id.*at 187 (citing *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 46, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007)). Under the abuse-of-discretion standard, an appellate court will vacate the district court’s sentence only in “exceptional cases where the trial court’s decision ‘cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions.’ ” *Cavera,*550 F.3d at 189 (quoting *572
      *United States v. Rigas,*490 F.Sd 208, 238 (2d Cir.2007)).

Concluding that the district court committed no procedural error and that the 68-month sentence it imposed was reasonable and well within “the range of permissible decisions,” we hereby AFFIRM the sentence.
# Sheet1

mailto:vhill@fmc.govmailto:vhill@fmc.govmailto:vhill@fmc.gov
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares
DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 27, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin Rich         
|                     |  |  |  | Kevin Rich             
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2942 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the catch-up 

contribution limit for retirement plans of participants age 62 through 64. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2021 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the catch-up contribution limit for retirement plans of 

participants age 62 through 64. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HIGHER CATCH-UP LIMIT TO APPLY AT AGE 62, 

4 63, AND 64. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 (1) PLANS OTHER THAN SIMPLE PLANS.—Sec7 tion 414(v)(2)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by inserting the following before 

9 the period: ‘‘($10,000, in the case of an eligible parVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:10 Jun 09, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2942.IH H2942

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2942 IH

1 ticipant who has attained age 62, but not age 65, 

2 before the close of the taxable year)’’. 

3 (2) SIMPLE PLANS.—Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) of 

4 such Code is amended by inserting the following be5 fore the period: ‘‘($5,000, in the case of an eligible 

6 participant who has attained age 62, but not age 65, 

7 before the close of the taxable year)’’. 

8 (b) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.—Subparagraph 

9 (C) of section 414(v)(2) of such Code is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: ‘‘In the case of a year begin11 ning after December 31, 2022, the Secretary shall adjust 

12 annually the $10,000 amount in subparagraph (B)(i) and 

13 the $5,000 amount in subparagraph (B)(ii) for increases 

14 in the cost-of-living at the same time and in the same 

15 manner as adjustments under the preceding sentence; ex16 cept that the base period taken into account shall be the 

17 calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2021.’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to years beginning after December 

20 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Seda MARGARYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 07-71247, 08-70665.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.*

Filed March 17, 2011.

Vadim Yuzefpolsky, Esq., Law Offices of Vadim Yuzefpolsky, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated petitions for review, Seda Margaryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) (No. 07-71247), and denying her motion to reopen (No. 08-70665). We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, *see Iturribarria v. INS, 321*F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petitions for review.

In her opening brief, Margaryan does not challenge the denial of her asylum claim as untimely, the dispositive adverse credibility determination based on testimonial inconsistencies with her original declaration, or the denial of her CAT claim. Accordingly, Margaryan does not challenge the BIA’s March 22, 2007, order dismissing her underlying appeal. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

*609The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Margaryan’s motion to reopen because she filed it over eight months after the BIA’s March 22, 2007, dismissal of her underlying appeal, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Margaryan failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling due to her lack of diligence, *see Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897 (noting that equitable tolling is available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud, or error”).

No. 07-71247: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

No. 08-70665: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)OR**
**RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.§1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002** 
In connection with the annual report of Verbena Pharmaceuticals,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A  for the year ended December 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Robert Schneiderman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief FinancialOfficer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal ExecutiveOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer)of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:
 
(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
 
(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Date: June 26, 2009

By:

/s/ *Robert Schneiderman*

  

  

  

Name: Robert Schneiderman 

  

  

  

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President,Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer)of Verbena Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of PGT, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Rodney Hershberger, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffery T. Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 25, 2008



/s/ RODNEY HERSHBERGERRodney HershbergerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ JEFFERY T. JACKSONJeffery T. JacksonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Volcano Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, R. Scott Huennekens, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                    
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    R. SCOTT
HUENNEKENS         
|                    |  |  |  | R. Scott Huennekens                
|                    |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)