51392 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 

13Products found to be bearing an invalidly 

licensed or used trademark are not excluded from 

the scope. 

14See Memorandum regarding: ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Expedited Second Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 

17188 (April 10, 2017). 

2The petitioner is SolarWorld Americas, Inc. 

3See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Certain 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Administrative Review Request,’’ dated May 11, 

2017. 

sewn to the front cover face to face 

(outside to outside) so that when the 

book is closed, the stitching is 

concealed from the outside. During 

construction, the polyester cover is 

sewn to the back cover with the outside 

of the polyester spine cover to the inside 

back cover. Both free ends (the ends not 

sewn to the cover and back) are stitched 

with a turned edge construction. Each 

ring within the fixture is comprised of 

a flexible strap portion that snaps into 

a stationary post which forms a closed 

binding ring. The ring fixture is riveted 

with six metal rivets and sewn to the 

back plastic cover and is specifically 

positioned on the outside back cover. 

The product must bear the valid 

trademark FiveStar FlexTM.13

Merchandise subject to this order is 

typically imported under headings 

4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 

4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 

4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 

4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 

4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS 

headings are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes; however, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted 

by, this notice.14 The issues discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of a 

countervailable subsidy and the net 

countervailable subsidy likely to prevail 

if the CVD order were revoked. Parties 

can find a complete discussion of all 

issues raised in this expedited sunset 

review and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via the Enforcement and 

Compliance Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, the 

Department determines that revocation 

of the CVD order would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of a 

countervailable subsidy at the rates 

listed below: 

Producer/exporter 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Aero Exports ......................... 84.98 

Navneet Publications ............ 88.39 

All Others .............................. 87.52 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results of this review in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of 

the Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2017. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24070 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–011] 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic 

products (solar products) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the 

period January 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016. 

DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3586. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 10, 2017, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the initiation of an 

administrative review of the CVD order 

on solar products from the PRC with 

respect to 30 companies for the period 

January 1, 2016, through December 31, 

2016,1 based on a request by the 

petitioner.2 On May 11, 2017, the 

petitioner timely withdrew its request 

for an administrative review of all 30 

companies.3 No other party requested 

an administrative review. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws its request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. In 

this case, the petitioner timely withdrew 

its request for review within the 90-day 

deadline, and no other party requested 

an administrative review of the CVD 

order. Therefore, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding 

the administrative review of the CVD 

order on solar products from the PRC 

covering the period January 1, 2016, 

through December 31, 2016, in its 

entirety. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of solar products 


Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 51393 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 

FR 30844 (July 3, 2017). 

2See Letter to the Department regarding 

‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and 

Spain—Petitioners’ Notice of Intent to Participate.’’ 

(July 18, 2017). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel 

Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain’’ (Issues 

and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently 

with these results and hereby adopted by this 

notice. 

from the PRC at a rate equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated countervailing 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, during the period January 

1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication of this notice. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: October 31, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director performing the duties of the 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–24073 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–825, A–533–810, A–588–833, A–469– 

805] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Spain: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset 

reviews, the Department of Commerce 

(the Department) finds that revocation 

of the antidumping duty orders on 

stainless steel bar (SSB) from Brazil, 

India, Japan, and Spain would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the levels indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian 

Hamilton, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4798. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 3, 2017, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

fourth sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on SSB from 

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain, pursuant 

to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).1 On July 18, 

2017, the Department received a notice 

of intent to participate from Carpenter 

Technology Corporation, Crucible 

Industries LLC, Electroalloy (a Division 

of G.O. Carlson, Inc.), North American 

Stainless, Outokumpu Stainless Bar, 

LLC, Universal Stainless & Alloy 

Products, Inc., Valbruna Slater 

Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the 

petitioners) as domestic interested 

parties, within the deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).2 The 

petitioners claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the 

Act, as manufacturers of a domestic like 

product in the United States. 

On August 2, 2017, we received 

complete substantive responses for each 

review from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We 

received no substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties with 

respect to any of the orders covered by 

these sunset reviews, nor was a hearing 

requested. The Department received no 

comments on the adequacy of responses 

in these sunset reviews. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 

Department is conducting expedited 

(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders. 

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise subject to the orders 

is SSB. For a complete description of 

the scope of these orders, including 

variances in the Japan order, see the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov, and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1), (2) and (3) of the Act, we 

determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on SSB from 

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would 

likely lead to continuation or recurrence 

of dumping up to the following 

weighted-average margin percentages: 

Country 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Brazil ..................................... 19.43 

India ...................................... 21.02 

Japan .................................... 61.47 

Spain ..................................... 62.85 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 


Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES