alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1 — RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.      Date: August 15, 2005     /s/ Cristina M. Lambert     Name: Cristina M. Lambert
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24518]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-66-2015]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Hitchcock, Texas; Amendment of 
Application

    A request has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 
(the Board) by the Port of Houston Authority (PHA), grantee of FTZ 84, 
at the request of the City of Hitchcock, to amend the City's pending 
application requesting authority to establish a new foreign-trade zone 
in Hitchcock, Texas. The pending application was docketed on October 6, 
2015 (FTZ Board Docket B-66-2015, 80 FR 61358, October 13, 2015).
    PHA is requesting authority to include the site originally proposed 
for FTZ designation as part of a new zone in Hitchcock, Texas as an 
additional magnet site of FTZ 84, adjacent to the Houston Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry. The proposed site is as follows: 
Proposed Site 1 (280.54 acres)--Blimp Base, 7529 Blimp Base Road, 
Hitchcock. If approved, the proposed site would be assigned a new site 
number under FTZ 84. The amended application is limited to FTZ 
designation for the proposed Blimp Base site (i.e., it does not request 
authority for the ASF service area originally proposed in the 
application).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 21013, 1401 Constitution 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    The closing period for their receipt is December 13, 2017. Rebuttal 
comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period 
may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period (to December 28, 
2017).
    For further information, contact Camille Evans at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffbc9e929693939ad1ba899e918cbf8b8d9e9b9ad1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adeeccc0c4c1c1c883e8dbccc3deedd9dfccc9c883cac2db">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-2350.

    Dated: November 6, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24518 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"No Fear Act Statistics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GZ9qgtQbEO\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/no-fear-act-statistics\/\">No Fear Act Statistics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/no-fear-act-statistics\/embed\/#?secret=GZ9qgtQbEO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“No Fear Act Statistics” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"GZ9qgtQbEO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of  Legacy Wine & Spirits International, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1801

___________ Daniel C. Coyle, Sr., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Aquila, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 28, 2010 Filed: February 3, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daniel Coyle appeals the order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment to Aquila, Inc., in his employmen t-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing it in the light mo st favorable to Coyl e, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. SeeDidier v. Schwan Food Co. , 465 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). We-2- decline to consider Coyle' s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry , 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 2, 2012 

jam 

Order 

 

August 2, 2012 

145529 (16) 

RICKY LEE MCCLINTON, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 145529 

 COA: 308741 

CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $55.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$320.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification**
I, Liane Pelletier, Chief Executive Officer of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.,certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings,Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ Liane Pelletier   Liane Pelletier   Chief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board and PresidentAlaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulaski Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John T. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


                            By:      /S/ John T. Robertson
                               -------------------------------------------
                               John T. Robertson
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)


August 14, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel,

                    November 8, 2017, 2:00 p.m. to November 8, 2017, 4:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 18, 2017, 82 FR 48522-48523.                

The meeting will be held on November 7, 2017. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: November 2, 2017.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-24264 Filed 11-7-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the amended annual report of AGR Tools, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:   April 29, 2011





By:       /s/ John Kuykendall
 John Kuykendall
 Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
#### In re: K. CLARK, K. Clark, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Respondent, Time Warner Cable, a corporation, Real Party in Interest.

No. 07-72899.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2008.*

Filed April 30, 2008.

Stephen Yagman, Esq., Yagman & Yagman *&*Reichmann, Venice Beach, CA, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

Travers D. Wood, Esq., White & Case, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Other Party Time Warner Cable, A Corporation Real Party In Interest.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

K. Clark petitions for a writ of mandamus arising from the district court’s decision to dismiss her complaint against Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) on the grounds that her claim against TWC under 47 U.S.C. § 258(a) warranted a referral to the Federal Communications Commission in the first instance.1

Clark’s mandamus petition seeks precisely the same relief as her appeal — a reversal of the district court’s decision, and a remand that requires the district court to consider the merits of her § 258(a) claim. This court will not “engage in extraordinary review by mandamus ... when it can exercise the same review by a contemporaneous ordinary appeal.” *Calderon v. U.S. Dist. Court,*137 F.3d 1420, 1421 (9th Cir.1998) (quoting *Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.,*460 U.S. 1, 8 n. 6, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983)).

Accordingly, Clark’s petition for mandamus is

DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. In a concurrently filed opinion, we address Clark's direct appeal from the district court’s decision. *See Clark v. Time Warner Cable,*523 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir.2008).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, who is the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Trustee of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. Liquidating Trust, (the “Liquidating Trust”)
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Liquidating Trust for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Liquidating Trust.



Date: March
31, 2015





|By: | /s/ John G. Demeritt                                
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|    | John G. Demeritt                                    
|    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    | FSP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC                         
|    | Trustee of FSP Phoenix Tower Corp. Liquidating Trust



The foregoing certification is being furnished
with the Liquidating Trust’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Liquidating Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information
language in such filing.