alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 298 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exempt certain noncontiguous 

trade from the coastwise laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2021 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exempt certain 

noncontiguous trade from the coastwise laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Noncontiguous Ship5 ping Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHIPPING: EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN NONCONTIG7 UOUS TRADE FROM THE COASTWISE LAWS. 

8 Section 55101(b) of title 46, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 298 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ after the 

2 semicolon; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

4 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) carriage on a route in noncontiguous trade 

7 (as that term is defined in section 53501), unless— 

8 ‘‘(A) at least three owners or operators of 

9 coastwise qualified vessels (as that term is de10 fined in section 55108(a)) regularly operate 

11 such a vessel on such route; 

12 ‘‘(B) each of such owners or operators 

13 transports at least 20 percent of the volume of 

14 goods on that route; and 

15 ‘‘(C) none of such owners or operators are 

16 under common ownership.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of BF Acquisition Group
V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R.
Colucci, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 17, 2007

                                  /s/ William R. Colucci
                                  --------------------------------
                                  William R. Colucci, President
                                  BF Acquisition Group V, Inc.
Exhibit 31.01



Section 302 Certification



I, Richard M. Rosenblatt, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intermix Media, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |  |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard M. Rosenblatt    
|                      |  |  |  | Richard M. Rosenblatt        
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Legacy Wine & Spirits International, Ltd. (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2010  (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 17, 2010

/s/Jaclyn Cruz

Jaclyn Cruz

Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"FMC is Conducting Server Maintenance","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uyu0mC5WlV\"><a href=\"\/fmc-is-conducting-server-maintenance-2\/\">FMC is Conducting Server Maintenance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/fmc-is-conducting-server-maintenance-2\/embed\/#?secret=uyu0mC5WlV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FMC is Conducting Server Maintenance” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"uyu0mC5WlV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Doyle Votes in Favor to Move Forward on an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Service Contracts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LLgyI0WP6s\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-doyle-votes-in-favor-to-move-forward-on-an-advanced-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-for-service-contracts\/\">Commissioner Doyle Votes in Favor to Move Forward on an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Service Contracts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-doyle-votes-in-favor-to-move-forward-on-an-advanced-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-for-service-contracts\/embed\/#?secret=LLgyI0WP6s\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Doyle Votes in Favor to Move Forward on an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Service Contracts” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"LLgyI0WP6s\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51328-51329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15320 and #15321; U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Disaster 
Number VI-00011]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
U.S. Virgin Islands

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4340-DR), dated 09/20/
2017.
    Incident: Hurricane Maria.
    Incident Period: 09/16/2017 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/20/2017.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/18/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/20/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

[[Page 51329]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the U.S. Virgin Islands, dated 09/20/2017, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 12/18/2017.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-23919 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Office of the Secretary
800 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20573-0001

Phone: (202) 523-5725
Fax: (202) 523-0014

E-mail: Secretary@fmc.gov
March 27, 2009

The Honorable Russell D. Feingold
United States Senate

506 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Feingold:

Section 641 of The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 requires the head of each
Federal agency to report to Congress on the amount of acquisitions made by the agency from
entities that manufacture articles, materials, or supplies outside of the United States, and on
whether any waivers of the requirements contained in the Buy American Act had been granted
with respect to such articles, materials or supplies, and to provide a summary of the total
procurement funds spent on goods manufactured in the United States versus funds spent on
goods manufactured outside of the United States. This letter serves as the report of the Federal
Maritime Commission (“Commission”) for fiscal year 2008.

As reported to the Federal Procurement Data Center, the Commission obligated
$149,168 between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2008 on goods under the different
manufacturing categories. Most goods were acquired using General Services Administration
(“GSA”) Federal Supply Schedule vendors. GSA requires compliance with the Buy American
Act requirements in its contracting process. A limited number of publication and information
technology product purchases were made subject to the Buy American Act exceptions (i.e.,
non-availability in the United States or information technology that is a commercial item).

The Commission made no purchases of articles, materials, or supplies that were
manufactured outside of the United States within the meaning of the Buy American Act.

No waivers have been granted with respect to such articles, materials or supplies under
the Buy American Act (41 USC 10(a) et seq.).

Copies of this report are being distributed to the Senate Transportation, Housing and
Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee, and to the House
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations
Subcommittee.


Section 641 requires that each Federal agency submitting a report shall make the report
publicly available to the maximum extent practicable. In compliance with this provision, the
Commission will place the report on its website at www.fme.gov.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Anthony Haywood, the
Commission’s Deputy Director of Administration, at (202), A22-ARN0.

Sincerely,

Karen V. ni) Meera,

Secretary

cc: Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee

House Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee
#### Karen MARGARYAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74989.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2008.*

Filed May 16, 2008.

Margarita Mkrtehyan, for Petitioner.

Carol Federighi, Yamileth G. Handuber, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen.

*786Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The regulations provide that “a party may file only one motion to reopen,” and that the motion “must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened.” *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen, filed more than three years after the final administrative decision was rendered. In this regard, the BIA correctly determined that petitioner failed to show that he had been the victim of ineffective assistance of counsel such that the time limits for filing his motion should be equitably tolled. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). Nor did the BIA err in concluding that petitioner failed to show that reopening was warranted based on changed circumstances in Armenia. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. *See Garcia v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*786ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATIONS I, Kjell I. Jagelid, hereby certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the report) of Simex Technologies, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Omitted] (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: November 20, 2007/s/ Kjell I. JagelidKjell I. Jagelid
Exhibit
10.1





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENTis
made as of the 5th of
August, 2010





BETWEEN:





Ness
AT Ltd.


With
offices at Kiryat Atidim,


Tel Aviv,
Israel (the “Company”)





Mr.
Effi Kotek


(the
“Executive”)





WHEREAS,
the Parties have previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as
of  March 11, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”),
setting forth the terms and conditions of the employment relationship of the
Executive with the Company;





WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend the provisions of the Employment Agreement in the
manner hereinafter appearing;




NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises, and intending to be legally bound, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:





The
Employment Agreement shall hereby be amended as follows:





In
section 6 (b) the term specified in section )ii) (termination by the Company)
and (iii) (resignation by the Executive) shall be extended to nine
months.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above
written.





Ness
      A.T. Ltd.
              BY:
              /s/Sachi
      GerlitzSachi
      GerlitzTitle:
      President & CEOBY:
              /s/Ofer
      SegevOfer
      SegevTitle:
      EVP & CFOThe
      Executive
              BY:
              /s/Effi
      KotekEffi
      Kotek