alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Opening Statement of Commissioner Max Vekich at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VXf6AvcTKl\"><a href=\"\/hearing-threats-to-shipping-vekich\/\">Opening Statement of Commissioner Max Vekich at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/hearing-threats-to-shipping-vekich\/embed\/#?secret=VXf6AvcTKl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Opening Statement of Commissioner Max Vekich at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"VXf6AvcTKl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------


<PAGE>



          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
#### Adilso Ismael JOVEL, a.k.a. Jose Carlos, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71919.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 2, 2010.

Adilso Ismael Jovel, Napa, CA, pro se.

Jennifer Parker Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristin A. Moresi, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*274MEMORANDUM **

Adilso Ismael Jovel, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854 (9th Cir.2009), and we grant the petition for review.

The BIA erred in determining that Jovel was ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 209(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1159(c), because he previously adjusted his status, where Jovel was not requesting to readjust his status but to apply for the waiver *nunc pro tunc. Cf. Robleto-Pastora v. Holder,*591 F.3d 1051, 1059-60 (9th Cir.2010) (no readjustment of status with a section 209(c) waiver where he became inadmissible subsequent to his initial adjustment). At the time United States Citizenship and Immigration Services approved Jovel’s adjustment of status application, he was already inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) and therefore needed a section 209(c) waiver to adjust. Because it is unclear whether he was ever afforded an opportunity to apply for the waiver, the IJ should have informed him of his potential eligibility for such a waiver *nunc pro tunc*and explored the issue with him. *See United States v. Arrieta,*224 F.3d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir.2000). Because neither the BIA nor the IJ addressed the availability of this type of *nunc pro tunc*relief, we remand for the a determination of whether the agency may retroactively grant Jovel a section 209(c) waiver *nunc pro tunc.*

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Jovel’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 26, 2008 | By:      /s/ Scott      Hughes                                  |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Scott      Hughes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                         | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132583 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROBERT A. WOODS, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Christal Woods, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132583 

 COA: 270600 

Oakland CC: 2004-062745-NH 

FARMINGTON FAMILY
 PHYSICIANS, P.C., MEDICAL

ARTS X-RAY, P.C., and 

SHELDON STERN, D.O., 

 Defendants, 

and 

WON CHAE, M.D., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

Braverman v Garden City Hosp (Docket Nos. 134445-134446) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 1132** 

ROSA DEL CARMEN AREVALO DE ARRIOLA ,
Petitioner ,

v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : September 20, 2016 Decided: December 2, 2016

Before TRAXLER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia , for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Paul Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jenny C. Lee , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washingto n, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rosa del Carmen Arevalo de Arriola, a native and citizen of

El Salvador , petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) d ismissing her appeal from the
immigration judge’s denial of her requests for withholding of
removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We
have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of

Arevalo de Arriola’s merits hearin g and all supporting evidence.
We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision. See Gom is v. Holder , 571 F.3d 353,
359 (4th Cir. 2009)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. In re Arevalo de Arriola (B.I.A. Jan. 11,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIE D
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Kremenstein, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Martin Kremenstein 
|                      |  |  |  | Martin Kremenstein     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Document

                                            Exhibit 10.2
Griffon Corporation Director Compensation Program
(adopted as of March 3, 2022)



Each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Griffon Corporation (the “Company”) who is not an employee of the Company (each a “Non-employee Director”) shall receive compensation for such person’s services as a member of the Board as outlined in this Director Compensation Program.


Cash Compensation


Annual Retainer Fees


•Annual retainer fee in the amount of $70,000
•Additional annual retainer fee for the Chairmen of the following Committees:
◦Audit – $20,000
◦Compensation – $17,500
◦Finance – $15,000
◦Nominating and Corporate Governance – $15,000
•Additional annual retainer fee in the amount of $25,000 for the Lead Independent Director


Meeting Fees


•Fee in the amount of $1,500 for attending any meeting of the Board
•Fee in the amount of $2,500 for attending any meeting of the Audit Committee
•Fee in the amount of $1,500 for attending any meeting of any committee other than the Audit Committee


Equity Compensation


Following election to the Board each year at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“AGM”), each Non-employee Director shall be awarded a grant of restricted shares with a value of $100,000 (the “RS Dollar Amount”).  If a Non-employee Director becomes a member of the Board other than as a result of being elected at the AGM, such Non-employee Director shall be awarded a grant of restricted shares with a value based on the pro-rata portion of the RS Dollar Amount equal to the difference between 365 and the number of days elapsed since the last AGM as of the date such Non-employee Director becomes a member of the Board, divided by 365. All restricted shares granted to a Non-employee Director shall vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.  If service as a director terminates as a result of (i) death, (ii) disability, (iii) the failure of the Company to nominate such director for re-election to the Board, (iv) the failure of such director to be re-elected to the Board after being nominated for re-election, or (v) the occurrence of a change in control, all restricted shares shall immediately vest.


The number of restricted shares to be granted annually shall be determined by dividing the RS Dollar Amount (or a pro rata portion of such amount, as appropriate) by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (or, if not the New York Stock Exchange, the principal exchange on which the Company’s common stock is traded) on the date of grant. The RS Dollar Amount shall be subject to the review of the Board from time to time.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Joseph Wallen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quest Oil Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|By:   | /s/
Joseph Wallen

Joseph Wallen

Chief Financial Officer
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 18, 2005
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MICHAEL MAGER, As parent of Victoria Mager

, Petitioner

- Appellee

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES,

Respondent

- Appellant

______________________

2023

- 2382

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims

in No. 1:14

- vv

- 00820

- RTH, Judge Ryan T. Holte.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to voluntarily

dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal

Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties’ joint response to the court’s October 16, 2023 , order, Case: 23-2382 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2023MAGER v. HHS 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

November 7

, 2023

Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 7, 2023 Case: 23-2382 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2023
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of EconoShare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hyman Schwartz,
      Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
                September 25, 2007
            /s/
                Hyman SchwartzPrincipal
                Accounting OfficerPrincipal
                Executive Officer