alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of FindEx.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, Steven Malone, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
               Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:   August 16, 2004 | By /s/ Steven Malone
       Steven Malone
       President & Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Activeworlds Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul Goodman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 13, 2008





|                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL GOODMAN                                                                                                              
|Paul Goodman
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  January
21, 2010





/s/ Clayton
Carter





Name:
Clayton Carter


Title:  President
and Chief Executive Officer





Dated:  January
21, 2010





/s/ James F. Carroll





James F.
Carroll


Chief
Financial
Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDSEY E. STEWART; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-57199

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00971-MMAWVG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014** 

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Lindsey E. Stewart, Jason P. Stewart, and Caitlin N. Stewart appeal pro se

from the district court’s order granting defendants’ request to waive further

proceedings in connection with their motion for a vexatious litigant determination,

FILED

JUL 3 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
treating the motion as withdrawn, and closing the case. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. M.M. v. Lafayette Sch.

Dist., 681 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion because it reasonably treated

defendants’ request as a motion to withdraw, and its decision resulted in no harm

or prejudice to Lindsey E. Stewart, given that the order declaring her a vexatious

litigant had been vacated. See Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d

1097, 1100 (9th Cir. 2006) (under the abuse of discretion standard, a district court

can be reversed only if it does not apply the correct law, rests its decision on a

clearly erroneous finding of material fact, or applies the correct legal standard in a

manner that results in an abuse of discretion); see also Stewart v. Cal. Dep’t of

Educ., No. 10-55282, 493 F. App’x 889 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2012).

To the extent that appellants challenge the rejection of their brief opposing

defendant’s request, the district court did not abuse its discretion because, as it

explained, the case was closed, and the vexatious litigant order and injunction had

been vacated. See id.

We reject appellants’ contentions that the district court was required to

conduct an evidentiary hearing, and that the district court judge was biased against

them.

2 12-57199
Defendants’ request for judicial notice, filed on May 16, 2013, is granted.

Appellants’ request for judicial notice, filed on November 26, 2013, is

denied.

AFFIRMED.

3 12-57199
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frankie ALICEA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-1259.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 2011.

Decided May 19, 2011.

Dylan Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Frankie Alicea, Pekin, IL, pro se.

Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The District Court, after some false starts, followed the mandate of this court and clarified the sentence. This is all that was requested and the order of the District Court is summarily affirmed.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN**:**

mrranto r0r the prohoe 0s uhitaa stat*0

ror tbm payrmt 0r poeo#io* boar& or Qqmrtmeat of the 3uta b bo &au upon the stat. Truoumr Uao 8ku ‘Oorptrdler ia faror 

### or thellaitoa
s 1. t0a mt0rri00i ~4 th0 f3tm m-~-r l MU
Pl y warrant0 00 ioourd out of an? rw0 l p or aoh puqwoao, Itnopootiw of MO oar 

### E Opde66 

### 1 nubor 0r rie uamutt0 6~43 IrrO~pa~~lrO 0r th8 rioritr 

### of the 

### fmuaoe 0r ticI warmat@ 8~6 l

### w uarrPat0 E shall be **urbrud** by 

### the pootm& or t&hr United
. 8tetw Pwtoiilae to which they 

### we ardepayeble.' The 194Yappro 

### thm mbll8 

### nolrm, UU# 

### or stata 

### Depertmsat 0r l Oq, **~UaUot.8** thEOr 

### 8ooofeJI pagw 991 et Iteas as7 foR j~Oo&o@ laae 

### balw

a91 MC sls of

l ald l 

### Q ro riotloil 

### blli to uoh dririui1.1 appropriation 

### PO ?h* sollalag; ARRwdoa.c --..-



### uaod on the Pi&tin6 

### an6 Probuotion ~ro!itO.’
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 1, 2010
    
    /s/ Liane PelletierLiane PelletierChief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and President
Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Discusses LNG at AAPA Legislative Summit\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Qlvzz4piEK\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-discusses-lng-at-aapa-legislative-summit\/\">Commissioner Sola Discusses LNG at AAPA Legislative Summit\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-discusses-lng-at-aapa-legislative-summit\/embed\/#?secret=Qlvzz4piEK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Discusses LNG at AAPA Legislative Summit\u00a0” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"Qlvzz4piEK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Dye’s Statement on Supply Chain Innovation Team","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DddEYQDhXJ\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-dyes-statement-on-supply-chain-innovation-team\/\">Commissioner Dye’s Statement on Supply Chain Innovation Team<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-dyes-statement-on-supply-chain-innovation-team\/embed\/#?secret=DddEYQDhXJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Dye’s Statement on Supply Chain Innovation Team” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"DddEYQDhXJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Simex Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Kjell I. Jagelid Kjell I. Jagelid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 20, 2007
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Mechael Kanovsky, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                December 20, 2007
            
            /s/
                Mechael KanovskyMechael
                Kanovsky, Ph.D., President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the Quarter Ended  September 30, 2004 (the "Report")
by National Coal Corp. ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.





                                             /s/ Jon Nix
Date:  December 9, 2004                    -------------------------
                                             Jon Nix
                                             President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer





                                             /s/ Robert Chmiel
Date:  December 9, 2004                    -------------------------
                                             Robert Chmiel
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1


            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, William Bosso, Chief Executive Officer of Nortia Capital
Partners, Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nortia
Capital Partners, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;


               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

               (a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

Dated this 16th day of March, 2007.


                                By: /s/  William Bosso
                                    -----------------------
                                    William Bosso
                                    Chief Executive Officer
#### Josue MOISES-BARILLA, aka Josue Moises Barilla Penate, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72521.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2008.*

Filed May 6, 2008.

*701Stephen E. Abrams, Perkins Coie, LLP, Denver, CO, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Director, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Michelle Gor-den Latour, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. *701R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Josué Moises-Barilla, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order1 vacating an immigration judge’s decision granting his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We grant the petition.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal. Moises-Barilla’s exposure of the involvement of local police in drug trafficking and in the murder of his cousin was an expression of political opinion that motivated the police to retaliate against him. *See Fedwunyak v. Gonzales,*477 F.3d 1126, 1129-30 (9th Cir.2007). The fact that the officers retaliated against Moises-Barilla for personal as well as political reasons does not defeat his claim, as the government contends. *See id.*(finding persecution on account of a political opinion where persecutors had mixed motives for them actions). The record compels the conclusion that country conditions have not changed to the extent that Moises-Barilla no longer faces a clear probability of future persecution or *702could safely relocate within El Salvador. *See Ruano v. Ashcroft,*301 F.3d 1155, 1161-62 (9th Cir.2002). Moises-Barilla is therefore entitled to withholding of removal. *See Fedunyak, 477*F.3d at 1129-31.

Moises-Barilla is entitled to relief under CAT because the record compels the conclusion that upon return to El Salvador it is more likely than not that he will be tortured or killed by the police, who are still active in drug trafficking and have shown an ongoing interest in him. *See Muradin v. Gonzales,*494 F.3d 1208, 1211 (9th Cir.2007).

We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. *Fedunyak, 477*F.3d at 1130-31.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.