alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Sola Meets with Florida\u2019s Governor & Attorney General on Cruise Ship Matters","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dDsMHLtUh4\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-sola-meets-with-floridas-governor-attorney-general-on-cruise-ship-matters\/\">Commissioner Sola Meets with Florida\u2019s Governor & Attorney General on Cruise Ship Matters<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-sola-meets-with-floridas-governor-attorney-general-on-cruise-ship-matters\/embed\/#?secret=dDsMHLtUh4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Sola Meets with Florida\u2019s Governor & Attorney General on Cruise Ship Matters” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"dDsMHLtUh4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David Natan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| | /s/DAVIDNATAN          
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Financial Officer





Date:   May 10, 2005







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants August 7, 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2qPoJ25jyk\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-7-2023\/\">Applicants August 7, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-7-2023\/embed\/#?secret=2qPoJ25jyk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants August 7, 2023” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"2qPoJ25jyk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# FILED
May 18, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

NOT FOR PUBLICA

TION STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Filed: May 18, 1998 Appellee, )

) ) Knox Criminal VS. ) ) No. 03-S-01-9610-CR-00096 ) THOMAS DEE HUSKE Y, ) ) Appellant. )

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING The appellant, Thomas Dee Huskey, has filed a pe tition requesting this Co ur t to g ra nt a r eh ea ri ngin th is

ma tt er pu rs ua nt

to Te nn . R . A pp . P . 3 9. We have considered all of the ar guments raised in the petiti on, and we have found them to be without merit. The pet ition for rehearing is, therefore, denied.

PER CURIAM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Applicants – August 25, 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jcnvOes7uc\"><a href=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-25-2017\/\">Applicants – August 25, 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/oti\/applicants-august-25-2017\/embed\/#?secret=jcnvOes7uc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Applicants – August 25, 2017” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"jcnvOes7uc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
# 756-/* ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 04-12-00430-CR CHARLES ARRINGTON v 

### STYLE: the state oftexas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

### AGGRAVATED OFFENSE: SEXUAL ASSAULT COUNTY: BEXAR TRIAL COURT: 187TH DATE:08/04/2015 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 2011CR1663



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD STYLE: «Style1» v. «Style2» CCA#: 

## APP£LLAMr*£> Petition CCADisposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWIN CCA IS: DATE: 

# Pse~&?ec/ JUDGE: 

# 156-/5 DATE: /I/Oy. V. 20/<T JUDGE: Po SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rayon Anthony COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-5226.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 31, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 23, 2011.

*308Jeffrey M. Brandt, Robinson & Brandt, P.S.C., Covington, Kentucky, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rayon Anthony Coleman was found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine (Count 1) and possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine (Count 2). He was sentenced to ninety-seven months of imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. On appeal, Coleman raises two sentencing issues: (1) whether the district court erred by failing to grant him a two-level downward adjustment because he was a “minor participant” under *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”) § 3B1.2(b) (2009); and (2) whether his sentence was unreasonable and greater than necessary under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2010). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

First, we review the denial of a downward adjustment pursuant to USSG § 3B1.2 for clear error. *United States v. Pratt,*239 F.3d 640, 646 (4th Cir.2001) (providing standard). A defendant seeking a mitigating adjustment under § 3B1.2 bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the adjustment, *United States v. Akinhoye,*185 F.3d 192, 202 (4th Cir.1999); *United States v. Palinkas,*938 F.2d 456, 460 (4th Cir.1991), *judgment vacated on other grounds*by, *Kochekian v. United States,*503 U.S. 931, 112 S.Ct. 1464, 117 L.Ed.2d 610 (1992), *op. reinstated by, United States v. Kochekian,*977 F.2d 905 (4th Cir.1992), and we find no clear error in the district court’s determination that Coleman failed to show he was a minor participant.

Second, Coleman alleges that his sentence was greater than necessary and therefore unreasonable. After *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), we review a sentence for reasonableness using a “deferential abuse-of-diseretion standard.” *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 49, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). We find that Coleman’s sentence was reasonable. The court correctly calculated Coleman’s advisory sentencing range, reviewed the § 3553(a) factors, and sentenced him within that range. We apply a presumption of reasonableness on appeal to a within-Guidelines sentence. *Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 347, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); *United States v. Allen,*491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir.2007).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *309in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Justice Department and Federal Maritime Commission Reaffirm and Strengthen Partnership to Promote Fair Competition in the Shipping Industry","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G6DuxeWpEb\"><a href=\"\/justice-department-and-federal-maritime-commission-reaffirm-and-strengthen-partnership-to-promote-fair-competition-in-the-shipping-industry\/\">Justice Department and Federal Maritime Commission Reaffirm and Strengthen Partnership to Promote Fair Competition in the Shipping Industry<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/justice-department-and-federal-maritime-commission-reaffirm-and-strengthen-partnership-to-promote-fair-competition-in-the-shipping-industry\/embed\/#?secret=G6DuxeWpEb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Justice Department and Federal Maritime Commission Reaffirm and Strengthen Partnership to Promote Fair Competition in the Shipping Industry” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"G6DuxeWpEb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Bennett, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 ****DateNovember 22, 2004

/s/ Richard E. Bennett, Jr.Richard E. Bennett, Jr.
President & Chief Executive Officer
*(Chief Executive Officer)**(Chief Financial Officer and**Principal Accounting Officer)*
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
  26
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Compliance Programs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5uB5ySb77J\"><a href=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/compliance-programs\/\">Compliance Programs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/about-the-fmc\/bureaus-offices\/compliance-programs\/embed\/#?secret=5uB5ySb77J\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Compliance Programs” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"5uB5ySb77J\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of AccuImage Diagnostics Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chris
Weimann , Assistant Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 22, 2003


/s/ CHRIS WEIMANN
____________________________________________
Chris Weimann
Assistant Treasurer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Barton *vs.*Barton.

Where a resident of Fulton county was convicted of perjury, sentenced to the penitentiary, and confined in Gilmer county, this was not a voluntary change of domicile; and if thereafter his wife brought a libel for divorce against him, based on his conviction, Fulton county was the proper venue of the case.

March 30, 1885.

Venue. Jurisdiction. Penitentiary. Before Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1884.

Reported in the decision.

Walter A. Way, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant.

Blandeord, Justice.

Plaintiff brought her action against defendant, whom ■ she alleged was in the penitentiary in Gilmer county, Georgia; that he was convicted of perjury by the superior court of Fulton county; that at that time he was a citizen and resident of Fulton county; that he was carried to Gilmer county for punishment in the penitentiary.

The court below held that Fulton superior court had no jurisdiction of defendant; but that the jurisdiction was .in superior court of Gilmer couty, and dismissed plaintiff’s libel for divorce.

We think the facts show that the court below committed manifest error. The defendant did not voluntarily change his domicile, and, under the facts, he still had a domicile in Fulton county.

Judgment reversed.