alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE                   Exhibit 10.16

$9,500                                                       Date: May 1, 2000


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,   Archer  Systems  Limited,   Inc.,  the  undersigned
("Payor"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the order of  Richard J.  Margulies,  an
individual,  ("Holder"), the principal amount of $9,500.00,  payable twenty four
(24) months after the date first set forth above.  The  principal  amount hereof
from time to time  outstanding  shall bear  interest  at the rate of six percent
(6%) per annum,  payable on the date set forth  above.  All  payments  hereunder
shall be in lawful  money of the United  States of America at the address of the
Holder  hereof or at such  address as shall be specified by the Holder to Archer
Systems Limited, Inc.

     If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or principal,  then
the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of its legal rights
to collect  the  balance due unless  within  five (5)  business  days after such
notice the default  shall be cured by Payor.  Such notice  shall be deemed given
three (3) days after having been  deposited in the United  States Mail  properly
addressed  and  sent by  registered  mail to the  particular  addressee,  return
receipt requested.

     Prepayments may be made in this note  voluntarily at any time and from time
to time, without penalty.



                                                 Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


                                                 BY:/s/Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                 --------------------------
                                                       Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                       Secretary/Treasurer



                                        3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138002 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138002 

 COA: 286026 

Wayne CC: 06-014503-01 

LEE HANS PACELY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        The comment period for the Availability of a Draft Integrated Feasibility Report (Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement), Aliso Creek Mainstem Ecosystem Restoration Study, Orange County, CA published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, September 29, 2017 and required comments be submitted by November 13, 2017. The comment period has been extended to November 28, 2017.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Deborah Lamb, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, phone number (213) 452-3798.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-23154 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of G/O International, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), I, Jack L. Burns, President, Treasurer and director of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 4/13/05                               /s/Jack L. Burns
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Jack L. Burns
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          37,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,588
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,322
<PP&E>                                          20,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,555
<SALES>                                        254,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,159
<CGS>                                          208,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (179)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (342)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Federal Maritime Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov","author_name":"Catie-Megan Moran","author_url":"https:\/\/www.fmc.gov\/author\/cmoranfmc-gov\/","title":"Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"W7jHgNy83t\"><a href=\"\/commissioner-daniel-b-maffei-statement-on-expanded-supply-chain-investigation\/\">Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"\/commissioner-daniel-b-maffei-statement-on-expanded-supply-chain-investigation\/embed\/#?secret=W7jHgNy83t\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commissioner Daniel B. Maffei Statement on Expanded Supply Chain Investigation” — Federal Maritime Commission\" data-secret=\"W7jHgNy83t\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,l){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=0;o<n.length;o++)n[o].style.display=\"none\";for(o=0;o<i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement(\"a\"),a=l.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7862
CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. JACKSON; RON BELL; MS. DIAL; PAULA SMITH; ROSEMARY JACKSON; PHILLIP E. STOVER, Defendants - Appellees, THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; BRENDA HARDEN; SHIRLEY GREEN; JUDY FOGG; MS. BOYETTE; MS. CARTER; GEORGE KENWORTHY; MR. HARRISON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-04-392-BO) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeHargett v. Jackson , No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15366 and #15367; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number SC-00052]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4346-DR), dated 10/16/2017.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Irma.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/06/2017 through 09/13/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 11/01/2017.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/15/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/16/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration,                               ( print page 52088)                            409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of South Carolina, dated 10/16/2017, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Abbeville, Newberry, Saluda                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2017-24360 Filed 11-8-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
CERTIFICATION

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

     I, Pasquale Catizone, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baynon
     International Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls.


Date: November 1, 2005


/s/ PASQUALE CATIZONE
-------------------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       9
Federal Maritime Commission

Plain Writing Act of 2010 Compliance Report

November 16, 2018

Senior Agency Official for Plain Writing:

Rachel E. Dickon, Secretary, secretary@fmc.gov, 202-523-5725

Plain Language Website address:

http://www.fmc.gov/about/plain_language_guidelines.aspx

Contact us: secretary@fmc.gov

Status of Agency Communications to be Made Available in a Format that is Consistent 

with the OMB Plain Writing Guidelines

Type of Communication, Document 

or Posting, and How it is Made 

Available to the Public

Intended User and Approximate 

Number of Potential Users

Status

Updates to website to improve user 

experience

• Entities regulated by the 

FMC - 6,000 users.

• Members of the public 

impacted by the 

regulatory requirements –

unknown number of 

users.

Metrics and user feedback were 

used to improve and generate 

better organized content based on 

user needs

Frequently used content was 

revised to better meet user 

expectations.

Increased Twitter Use • Entities regulated by the 

FMC - 6,000 users. 

• Members of the public 

impacted by the 

regulatory requirements –

unknown number of 

users.

Actions and activities of the 

Commission are concisely 

announced with links to web 

content.

Rule Revisions • Entities regulated by the 

FMC - 6,000 users. 

• Members of the public 

impacted by the 

regulatory requirements –

unknown number of 

users.

A final rule was issued modernizing, 

updating, and simplifying 

requirements for shipping contracts 

by ocean transportation 

intermediaries .

Ongoing Compliance Activities

• Provide ongoing training on Plain Language principles to document creators. 

• Reorganized web content to make user tasks easier to complete. 

• Provide improved and enhanced media to customers.
#### Gary NUTALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Claude MAYE, Warden, Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution, Bastrop, Texas, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-50883

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 2013.

Gary Patrick Nutall, FCI Bastrop, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gary Nutall, federal prisoner #74016-080, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition for failure to satisfy the requirements of the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He seeks to challenge his conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), on the ground that it cannot be sustained following *Bailey v. United States,*516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995).

The district court correctly determined that Nutall had not made the required *400showing that the *Bailey*decision rendered him actually innocent so as to satisfy the savings clause of § 2255 and qualify for relief under § 2241. *See Christopher v. Miles,*342 F.3d 378, 382 (5th Cir.2003); *Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir.2001). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Nutall’s motion to stay is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-60921

_____________________ GREGORIO R. MACHADO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

__________________________________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, DEMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We reject Petitioner’s argument that this case was improperly transferred to this Court under the Real I.D. Act, because his claim is not independent of his order of removal. We consider this case as a petition for review of a removal order which2

Petitioner has previously assailed in his first petition for review filed in this Court. In 1999 this court dismissed Petitioner’s first petition for review because of lack of jurisdiction. One panel cannot overrule another panel of the court. If we were to consider the claim of the manner of removal to give us jurisdiction, we would conclude that this is for Congress and the Executive and not for the courts. DISMISSED.